Commit Graph

93 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Claude
a0231e7692 Complete Mission 3 Stage 0 technical challenges specification
Added comprehensive technical challenges breakdown (600+ lines):

Break Escape In-Game Challenges:

1. RFID Keycard Cloning (NEW MECHANIC)
   - Proximity-based (2 GU range, 10-second window)
   - Visual feedback: Progress bar, particle effects, audio cues
   - Success: Cloned keycard added to inventory
   - Alternative: Social engineering (victoria_trust >= 40)
   - Tutorial: Agent 0x99 pre-mission briefing
   - Educational: RFID vulnerabilities, proximity attacks
   - Implementation: Proximity detection, progress tracking, inventory integration

2. Lockpicking (Reinforced from M1-M2)
   - 4 locks: IT cabinet (easy), executive office (medium), security room (medium), safe (PIN)
   - Safe combo: 2010 (WhiteHat founding year)
   - Clues: Reception plaque, computer file
   - Skill reinforcement, no tutorial needed
   - Contains: LORE Fragment 2 (Exploit Catalog)

3. Guard Patrol Stealth (Reinforced from M2)
   - Night security guard, 4-waypoint patrol (60s loop)
   - LOS: 150px range, 120° cone
   - Detection states: Unaware → Alert → Suspicious → Hostile
   - Strategies: Timing-based stealth, social engineering, distraction
   - Educational: Operational security, pattern recognition

4. Social Engineering (Advanced)
   - Victoria Sterling: Influence system (50 start, 40+ for bypasses)
   - Trust unlocks: Office info (30+), server access (40+), double agent (80+)
   - James Park: Information extraction (office layout, schedules, security)
   - Night Guard: Cover story validation
   - Educational: Trust exploitation, corporate infiltration

5. Multi-Encoding Puzzle
   - Message 1: ROT13 whiteboard ("MEET WITH THE ARCHITECT...")
   - Message 2: Hex client list (Ransomware Inc, Critical Mass, Social Fabric)
   - Message 3: Base64 email (ProFTPD exploit pricing)
   - Message 4: Double-encoded USB (ROT13 + Base64 nested - Architect's directives)
   - Discovery: Conference room, Victoria's computer, email, desk drawer
   - Educational: Pattern recognition, multi-stage decoding, persistence
   - CAMPAIGN REVEAL: First direct Architect communication!

VM/SecGen Challenges (Information Gathering: Scanning):

1. Network Port Scanning
   - Tool: nmap
   - Target: 192.168.100.50
   - Output: Ports 21 (FTP), 22 (SSH), 80 (HTTP), 3632 (distcc)
   - Flag: flag{network_scan_complete}
   - Educational: Port scanning, service enumeration
   - Difficulty: Easy

2. Banner Grabbing (FTP)
   - Tool: netcat, ftp
   - Banner reveals: Client codename "GHOST" (M2 connection!)
   - Flag: flag{ftp_intel_gathered}
   - Educational: Intelligence from banners, netcat fundamentals
   - Difficulty: Easy

3. HTTP Service Analysis
   - HTML contains Base64 in comment
   - Encoded: ZmxhZ3twcmljaW5nX2ludGVsX2RlY29kZWR9
   - Decoded: flag{pricing_intel_decoded}
   - Educational: Web reconnaissance, Base64 (reinforced)
   - Connects: Victoria's pricing email
   - Difficulty: Medium

4. distcc Exploitation (CVE-2004-2687)
   - Vulnerability: distcc daemon RCE
   - Tools: Metasploit or manual exploitation
   - Shell access → operational logs
   - CRITICAL REVEAL: ProFTPD sold to Ghost for $12,500 (M2 hospital!)
   - Flag: flag{distcc_legacy_compromised}
   - Educational: Legacy exploitation, CVE research, RCE
   - Difficulty: Advanced

Challenge Integration Matrix:
- 9 challenges total (5 in-game, 4 VM)
- Difficulty: Easy → Advanced scaling
- Educational: NSS, SS, ACS, SOC, HF, AB knowledge areas
- Unlocks: Server access, intel, LORE, M2 connection, Architect reveal

Difficulty Scaling:
- Easy: 5s RFID, slower guard, tutorial VM
- Normal: 10s RFID, standard guard, all encoding types
- Hard: 15s RFID, fast guard, additional obfuscation

Educational Assessment Rubric:
 Network reconnaissance (port scanning, service enumeration)
 Service exploitation (distcc CVE-2004-2687, Metasploit)
 Encoding analysis (ROT13, Hex, Base64, nested decoding)
 Intelligence correlation (physical + digital evidence)
 Physical security (RFID, lockpicking, stealth, social engineering)

Implementation Priority:
- Phase 1: RFID, guard, VM challenges, drop-site integration
- Phase 2: Social engineering, encoding puzzle, LORE, safe
- Phase 3: Tutorials, scaling, alternative paths, feedback

Status: Stage 0 technical challenges COMPLETE 
Next: narrative_themes.md, hybrid_architecture_plan.md
2025-12-24 15:27:57 +00:00
Claude
5a1b8d9542 Begin Mission 3 'Ghost in the Machine' - Stage 0 Initialization
Created comprehensive Stage 0 scenario initialization for Mission 3:

Mission Overview:
- Title: "Ghost in the Machine"
- Tier: Intermediate (Mission 3 of Season 1)
- ENTROPY Cell: Zero Day Syndicate
- SecGen Scenario: "Information Gathering: Scanning"
- Playtime: 60-75 minutes
- New Mechanic: RFID keycard cloning

Key Features:
 Undercover operation at WhiteHat Security Services (Zero Day front company)
 RFID cloning mechanics (proximity-based, 10-second window)
 Network reconnaissance integration (nmap, netcat, distcc exploitation)
 Multi-encoding puzzle (ROT13, Hex, Base64, double-encoded)
 Major revelation: Zero Day sold M2 hospital ransomware exploit
 First direct mention of "The Architect" (campaign arc progression)
 Double agent vs. arrest moral choice

Technical Challenges:
- VM: Network scanning (nmap), banner grabbing (netcat), distcc CVE-2004-2687
- In-Game: RFID cloning, lockpicking, guard patrol, social engineering, multi-encoding
- Hybrid: Dead drop system integrates VM flags with ERB narrative content

CyBOK Areas:
- NSS: Port scanning, service enumeration, banner grabbing
- SS: distcc exploitation, legacy service targeting
- ACS: ROT13, Hex, Base64 encoding, multi-stage decoding
- SOC: Intelligence correlation, systematic investigation
- HF: Undercover operations, social engineering
- AB: Exploit marketplace economics, threat actor coordination

3-Act Structure:
- Act 1 (20-30%): Undercover infiltration, daytime recon, clone RFID card
- Act 2 (50-55%): Nighttime infiltration, network scan, evidence collection
- Act 3 (20-25%): M2 connection reveal, Architect discovery, moral choice

Key NPCs:
- Victoria Sterling (Zero Day sales lead) - Professional, ideological, arrest/double agent target
- James Park (Innocent pen tester) - Moral complexity, optional protection choice
- "Cipher" (Cell leader) - Referenced but not seen, future villain setup
- Agent 0x99 (Handler) - Briefing, tutorials, debrief

LORE Fragments:
1. Zero Day Client List (Hex-encoded) - Shows all ENTROPY cells coordinating
2. Exploit Catalog (Safe, PIN 2010) - ProFTPD sale to Ghost for $12,500
3. The Architect's Requirements (Double-encoded) - First direct communication
4. Victoria's Manifesto (Whiteboard) - Free market ideology

Campaign Connections:
- M1: Social Fabric appears in client list
- M2: ProFTPD exploit sold to Ghost revealed (MAJOR "aha moment")
- M4: Critical Mass client, SCADA exploits referenced
- M6: Crypto Anarchists mentioned in Architect's requirements
- M7-9: The Architect introduction, coordination revealed

Educational Objectives:
- Network reconnaissance (port scanning, service enumeration)
- Banner grabbing for intelligence gathering
- Multi-stage encoding/decoding
- Intelligence correlation (physical + digital evidence)
- RFID security vulnerabilities

Victory Conditions:
- Full (100%): 4 VM flags, 4 encoded messages, 3 LORE, moral choices, stealth
- Standard (80%): 3 VM flags, 3 encoded messages, 2 LORE, moral choices
- Minimal (60%): 2 VM flags, 2 encoded messages, moral choice

Moral Choices:
1. Victoria Sterling: Arrest (disrupt cell) vs. Double Agent (long-term intel)
2. James Park: Protect innocent vs. Focus on mission
3. Consequences tracked in global variables, reflected in debrief

Critical Decisions Made:
 RFID cloning: Proximity (10s) + social engineering alternative
 Network scanning: Automated flags + educational tutorial
 Double agent: Long-term intelligence vs. immediate disruption
 Architect reveal: Name only (identity reserved for M7-9)
 Setting: WhiteHat Security corporate office
 Structure: Daytime recon → nighttime infiltration

Next Steps:
Stage 1 - Narrative Structure Development (scene-by-scene breakdown)

Status: Stage 0 COMPLETE 
2025-12-24 15:21:04 +00:00
Claude
237d606d6a Add Mission 3 'Ghost in the Machine' preparation document
Mission 3: Intelligence Gathering & Network Reconnaissance
- ENTROPY Cell: Zero Day Syndicate
- SecGen Scenario: Information Gathering: Scanning
- New Mechanics: RFID keycard cloning, network reconnaissance
- Difficulty: Intermediate (Mission 3 of Season 1)
- Playtime: 60-75 minutes

Key Features:
- Undercover operation at WhiteHat Security Services (Zero Day front)
- RFID cloning mechanics introduction
- Network scanning integration (nmap, netcat, distcc exploitation)
- Multi-encoding puzzle (ROT13, Hex, Base64)
- Major revelation: Zero Day sold M2 hospital ransomware exploit
- First direct mention of "The Architect" (campaign arc progression)
- Double agent vs. arrest moral choice

Campaign Connections:
- Reveals cross-cell coordination (M2 hospital attack traced to Zero Day)
- Sets up Zero Day as recurring antagonist
- Introduces The Architect as mysterious coordinator
- Client list connects M1 (Social Fabric), M2 (Ransomware Inc), M4 (Critical Mass)

CyBOK Areas:
- Network Security (port scanning, service enumeration, banner grabbing)
- Systems Security (distcc exploitation CVE-2004-2687)
- Applied Cryptography (multiple encoding types, pattern recognition)
- Security Operations (intelligence correlation, systematic investigation)

README includes:
- Executive summary and mission overview
- 9-stage development workflow (same as M1, M2)
- Technical challenges breakdown (RFID, network recon, encoding)
- Narrative arc (3 acts: undercover → infiltration → revelation)
- Key NPCs (Victoria Sterling, James Park, Cipher references)
- LORE opportunities (client lists, exploit catalog, Architect requirements)
- Good practices from M1 & M2
- Critical decisions needed before Stage 0
- Risk assessment
- Development timeline estimate (70-97 hours design)

Status: Ready for Stage 0 initialization
2025-12-22 18:29:21 +00:00
Claude
d2bbbb83fa Complete Mission 2 'Ransomed Trust' Stages 8-9: Validation and Assembly
Stage 8: Scenario Review and Validation
- Comprehensive validation report (08_validation_report.md)
- Validated completeness across all 8 stages (0-7)
- Technical validation: room dimensions, Ink syntax, item placement
- Educational quality: CyBOK alignment, technical accuracy
- Narrative quality: character consistency, choice impact
- Player experience: no soft locks, clear objectives
- Overall assessment: PASS WITH MINOR RECOMMENDATIONS
- No critical fixes required, scenario ready for assembly

Stage 9: Scenario Assembly
- Logical flow validation (09_logical_flow_validation.md)
  - All objectives completable with multiple valid paths
  - Progressive unlocking validated (no soft locks)
  - Resource access validated (items, keycards, NPCs)
  - Spatial logic validated (all coordinates within bounds)
  - Hybrid integration validated (VM flags, terminal interfaces)
  - Complete 12-step walkthrough (50-70 minutes)
  - VALIDATION PASSED

- Assembly guidance (09_assembly_guidance.md)
  - Phase-by-phase implementation roadmap (6 phases)
  - Complete JSON templates and ERB structure
  - All 9 room definitions with connections
  - NPC configurations with Ink script references
  - Complete items list (12 items)
  - LORE fragments JSON (3 fragments)
  - VM integration configuration
  - Validation checklists
  - Estimated implementation time: 12-18 hours

Mission 2 planning (Stages 0-9) now complete and ready for developer implementation.
2025-12-22 12:57:48 +00:00
Claude
0fcb879f6d Add Mission 2 Stage 7: Complete Ink Script Suite
Created 8 comprehensive Ink scripts for Mission 2 "Ransomed Trust":

1. m02_opening_briefing.ink
   - Act 1 emergency briefing with Agent 0x99
   - Player choice tracking (cautious/aggressive/adaptable approach)
   - Mission objectives and stakes establishment (47 patients, 12-hour window)
   - 3-line dialogue rule adherence throughout

2. m02_npc_sarah_kim.ink
   - Dr. Kim (Hospital CTO) NPC with hub dialogue pattern
   - Guilt revelation about budget cuts ($85K security vs $3.2M MRI)
   - Trust/influence system (0-100 scale)
   - Ransom decision input and scapegoating protection options

3. m02_npc_marcus_webb.ink
   - Marcus Webb (IT Admin) social engineering target
   - Trust-based access (keycard vs lockpicking paths)
   - Password hints and server room access progression
   - Vindication storyline (protect from scapegoating)

4. m02_terminal_dropsite.ink
   - VM flag submission interface (4 flags)
   - Hybrid architecture integration (VM → in-game unlocks)
   - Progressive intel unlocking system
   - Ghost manifesto horror reveal integration

5. m02_terminal_ransom_interface.ink
   - Critical moral choice interface (pay ransom vs manual recovery)
   - Ghost's persuasion vs Agent 0x99's analysis
   - Consequence visualization (1-2 vs 4-6 patient deaths)
   - Secondary decision: hospital exposure
   - Global variable tracking for debrief callbacks

6. m02_phone_agent0x99.ink
   - Handler support and tutorial guidance
   - Contextual hints (guard patrols, lockpicking, passwords, PIN safe)
   - Encoding tutorial (Base64, ROT13)
   - Ransom decision counseling (neutral presentation)
   - Event-triggered knots for game events

7. m02_phone_ghost.ink
   - Antagonist communication (cold, calculated ideology)
   - ENTROPY philosophy explanation
   - Patient death calculation justification
   - Unrepentant true believer characterization
   - Post-decision responses (paid vs refused ransom)

8. m02_closing_debrief.ink
   - Comprehensive outcome acknowledgment
   - Patient death statistics (2 vs 6 fatalities)
   - NPC fate tracking (Dr. Kim, Marcus protected/unprotected paths)
   - Ransom choice validation (utilitarian vs consequentialist ethics)
   - Hospital exposure consequences
   - Mission 3 setup (Zero Day Syndicate)
   - The Architect tease

Key Features:
- All scripts follow 3-line dialogue rule for pacing
- Hub patterns for replayable conversations
- Trust/influence systems for NPCs
- Proper #exit_conversation tags
- Variable tracking for choice callbacks
- External variable integration
- Event-triggered knot support
- Moral complexity without "right" answers

Stage 7 Complete: All narrative content ready for implementation.
2025-12-21 01:44:14 +00:00
Claude
3d65114fa5 Add Mission 2 Stages 5-6: Room Layout and LORE Fragments
Stage 5 - Room Layout and Spatial Design:
- Hospital floor plan with 7 rooms (hub-and-spoke layout)
- 3 locked doors with progressive difficulty (easy → medium → medium-hard)
- 60-second guard patrol with predictable waypoints
- Detailed container placement (11 total containers)
- PIN puzzle design with multiple clues and fallback device
- Server Room as central hub for VM/encoding challenges
- Multiple solution paths for player agency

Stage 6 - LORE Fragments:
- Fragment 1: Ghost's Manifesto (VM discovery, patient death calculations)
- Fragment 2: CryptoSecure Services (filing cabinet, front company operations)
- Fragment 3: ZDS Invoice (safe puzzle, exploit procurement and cross-cell coordination)
- Campaign connections to M3 (Zero Day Syndicate) and M6 (Crypto Anarchists)
- The Architect coordination role revealed

These planning documents complete the foundational design for Mission 2
"Ransomed Trust" room layout, spatial design, and narrative LORE integration.
2025-12-21 01:32:55 +00:00
Claude
7c175d6b2f Complete Mission 2 'Ransomed Trust' Stages 0-4 development
Stage 0: Scenario Initialization
- Complete mission overview with hospital ransomware crisis
- Ransomware Incorporated cell integration
- Hybrid architecture plan (VM ProFTPD exploitation + ERB narrative)
- Concrete stakes: 47 patients, 12-hour deadline, $87K ransom
- Ghost as true believer antagonist (calculated patient deaths)
- 3 LORE fragments planned (manifesto, CryptoSecure, ZDS invoice)

Stage 1: Narrative Structure
- Complete 3-act structure (18 scenes)
- Act 1: Infiltration (Dr. Kim, Marcus, guard tutorial)
- Act 2: Exploitation (VM challenges, safe puzzle, LORE discoveries)
- Act 3: Impossible choices (ransom dilemma, hospital exposure)
- Emotional beat timeline with intensity mapping
- Tutorial integration for new mechanics (guards, PIN safe, ROT13)

Stage 2: Character Development
- Dr. Sarah Kim: Desperate CTO with guilt over budget cuts
- Marcus Webb: Defensive IT admin, scapegoat victim
- Ghost: Unrepentant ENTROPY operative, true believer
- Agent 0x99: Supportive handler, growing ENTROPY concern
- Voice examples with 3-line dialogue rule
- Character arcs defined (Marcus varies by player choice)

Stage 3: Moral Choices and Consequences
- Choice 1: Marcus trust building (sympathize/professional/blame)
- Choice 2: Marcus protection (warn/plant evidence/ignore)
- Choice 3: Ransom payment (pay/independent recovery) - NO RIGHT ANSWER
- Choice 4: Hospital exposure (public/quiet) - transparency vs pragmatism
- Optional: Ghost confrontation (argue/acknowledge/silent)
- All choices have meaningful campaign consequences (M6 financial trail)
- Utilitarian vs Consequentialist ethical frameworks
- Debrief variations reflect all choices (4 ransom+exposure combos)

Stage 4: Player Objectives and Tasks
- 5 required aims, 3 optional aims
- 23 required tasks, 4 optional tasks (27 total)
- Hybrid objectives: VM flag submissions + in-game tasks
- Success tiers: 60% minimal, 80% standard, 100% perfect
- Progressive unlocking validated (no soft locks)
- Ink tag integration (#complete_task, #unlock_aim, #give_item)
- Optional achievements: Ghost Hunter, Code Breaker, Ethical Hacker

Technical Challenges (Detailed Breakdown):
- New mechanics: Patrolling guards (60s predictable), PIN safe puzzle
- Reinforced mechanics: Lockpicking (4 doors), social engineering, Base64
- New encoding: ROT13 (Caesar cipher introduction)
- VM: ProFTPD CVE-2010-4652 exploitation, SSH brute force, Linux nav
- CyBOK coverage: Malware, Incident Response, Cryptography, Human Factors

Key Design Decisions:
- Ransom dilemma has no 'right' answer (both ethically valid)
- Ghost remains unrepentant (true believer, no redemption arc)
- Marcus's fate controllable by player (justice possible)
- Guard patrols beginner-friendly (forgiving, predictable, alternate paths)
- PIN puzzle accessible (multiple clues, hint system, fallback device)
- Campaign integration: M3 ZDS connection, M6 financial trail

Ready for Stage 5: Room Layout Design
2025-12-20 17:42:27 +00:00
Claude
7254234a88 Add Mission 2 'Ransomed Trust' development preparation document
- Created comprehensive preparation doc for M02 development
- Extracted mission details from Season 1 arc plan
- Documented 9-stage development workflow
- Applied Mission 1 good practices and lessons learned
- Identified new mechanics: patrolling guards, PIN cracking
- Outlined moral choices: ransom payment, hospital exposure
- Documented campaign connections to M1 and M6
- Included risk assessment and success criteria
- Ready for Stage 0: Scenario Initialization
2025-12-20 17:14:59 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
adbd7a64b0 Revise Mission 1: First Contact to enhance narrative depth and urgency
- Updated the story premise to introduce "Operation Shatter," detailing the coordinated mass panic attack targeting vulnerable populations.
- Expanded the room layout to include additional rooms and NPC interactions, enhancing player exploration and engagement.
- Added critical LORE fragments revealing casualty projections and targeting demographics, emphasizing the stakes of the mission.
- Revised dialogue and choices to reflect player actions and moral implications, ensuring a more impactful closing debrief.
- Improved scenario structure and flow, aligning with best practices for narrative clarity and player agency.
2025-12-08 00:20:50 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
d327380fac Enhance scenario validation and improve timed conversation structure
- Updated `validate_scenario.rb` to enforce correct usage of `targetKnot` in timed conversations, ensuring compliance with new requirements.
- Added checks for missing properties in timed conversations, including `delay` and `targetKnot`, to improve scenario integrity.
- Enhanced logging for validation issues, providing clearer feedback on scenario configuration errors.
- Updated relevant scenarios to align with the new validation rules, ensuring consistency across gameplay elements.
2025-12-04 23:15:03 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
996a4ab6ce Add lab conversion prompt documentation for Break Escape scenarios
- Introduced a comprehensive guide for converting existing lab Ink files into Break Escape scenarios, detailing each step of the process.
- Included instructions for determining lab configuration, creating new scenario directories, and editing Ink files to align with gameplay requirements.
- Provided guidelines for updating scenario JSON, managing objectives, and ensuring compliance with best practices for dialogue and influence tracking.
- Emphasized the importance of validating scenarios and maintaining consistency with SecGen XML metadata for CyBOK entries.
2025-12-04 23:13:50 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
47eaffa4c3 Scenario development WiP 2025-12-01 08:48:43 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
2b766c6000 Add SecGen Scenario Summaries for BreakEscape mission design
- Created a comprehensive document detailing various SecGen lab scenarios, including setup, user accounts, vulnerabilities, and CTF steps.
- Each scenario provides insights into player experiences and objectives, aiding mission designers in understanding gameplay dynamics.
- Scenarios cover a range of topics, including Linux and Windows security labs, malware exploitation, information gathering, and post-exploitation techniques.
2025-11-30 02:26:28 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
92330b04dc Enhance flag handling and XML integration for standalone mode
- Updated `GamesController` to support XML flag hints for standalone mode, improving backward compatibility with legacy flag input.
- Introduced `parse_flag_hints_xml` method in `Mission` model to extract flags from XML content.
- Enhanced `Game` model to incorporate `flags_by_vm` from player state for better flag management.
- Modified `new.html.erb` to update UI for flag hints input, replacing the previous comma-separated flags format.
- Improved `FlagStationMinigame` to display accepted VM flags and handle flag submissions more effectively.
- Adjusted scenario JSON to include flag stations with VM-specific flag handling.
2025-11-29 20:57:39 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
3a64ffe8f1 Finalize implementation plan for VM and CTF Flag Integration following Review 4
- Updated last modified date and added new review document reference.
- Added policy methods for `GamePolicy#submit_flag?` and `MissionPolicy#create_game?`.
- Fixed authorization in `games#create` to use `:create_game?` and removed redundant `VmSet` authorization.
- Clarified loading of `hacktivity-cable.js` with CSP nonce.
- Included fallback for non-Hacktivity mode in VM set validation.
- Documented minor amendments and verification checklist for implementation readiness.
2025-11-28 15:00:13 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
0c25124967 feat: Update VM console integration to use ActionCable for async file delivery 2025-11-28 14:23:39 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
752fb2c4f9 Implement Review 3 updates for VM and CTF Flag Integration
- Added detailed review documentation for Hacktivity compatibility.
- Addressed critical issue: implemented missing `games#create` action in GamesController.
- Updated `MissionsController#show` to handle VM-required missions differently.
- Clarified deployment order for migration to remove unique index.
- Added recommendations for strong parameters in `games#create`.
- Documented necessary changes for flag submission and VM set display.
- Verified compatibility of model structures and updated flag submission logic.
2025-11-28 14:00:27 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
dd720130c7 update plans 2025-11-27 23:44:51 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
a3690b6a68 Implementation plan for VMs 2025-11-27 23:28:44 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
9d6d7709c3 feat: Implement Objectives System with UI and Server Sync
- Added ObjectivesManager to track mission objectives and tasks.
- Created ObjectivesPanel for displaying objectives in a collapsible HUD.
- Integrated objectives state restoration from the server during game initialization.
- Implemented task completion and unlocking mechanisms via game actions.
- Added CSS styles for the objectives panel with a pixel-art aesthetic.
- Developed a test scenario to validate the objectives system functionality.
- Updated database schema to include fields for tracking completed objectives and tasks.
2025-11-26 00:50:32 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
150518b4c4 feat: Include objectives state in server response and implement event emissions for door unlocks and key pickups 2025-11-25 23:19:11 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
575dc9aad0 Add updated TODO checklist and corrected code snippets for objectives system
- Created an updated TODO checklist outlining phases and tasks for the objectives system implementation.
- Added corrected code snippets for critical fixes, including door unlock event emission and key pickup event handling.
- Documented necessary changes to ensure proper event emissions for objectives tracking.
- Reviewed and approved the implementation plan with minor corrections regarding door unlock events.
2025-11-25 23:13:58 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
3cc9fafcec feat: Enhance mission management with CyBOK integration and collection filtering
- Added `Cybok` model to manage CyBOK entries associated with missions.
- Implemented `by_collection` scope in `Mission` model for filtering missions by collection.
- Updated `missions_controller` to filter missions based on the selected collection.
- Introduced `CybokSyncService` for syncing CyBOK data from mission metadata to the database.
- Created new views and partials for displaying CyBOK information with tooltips using Tippy.js.
- Added metadata fields to `break_escape_missions` for `secgen_scenario` and `collection`.
- Enhanced mission seeding logic to support new metadata and CyBOK entries.
- Added multiple new mission scenarios with associated metadata.
2025-11-25 15:20:05 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
797b075cbe feat: Add mission metadata and CyBOK integration with JSON schema and example files 2025-11-25 14:59:57 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
2c8757de3e Add character registry and NPC management features
- Implemented a global character registry to manage player and NPC data.
- Added methods for setting the player, registering NPCs, and retrieving character information.
- Integrated character registry updates into the NPC manager for seamless NPC registration.
- Created test scenarios for line prefix speaker format, including narrator modes and background changes.
- Developed comprehensive NPC sprite test scenario with various NPC interactions and items.
2025-11-24 02:21:31 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
48e7860e0f Add comprehensive review and implementation plan for line prefix speaker format
- Created COMPREHENSIVE_REVIEW.md detailing architecture, risk assessment, and recommendations for the line prefix speaker format implementation.
- Developed README.md summarizing the implementation plan assessment, key findings, and integration of the Background[] feature.
- Included detailed risk assessment, updated timeline estimates, and success criteria for the implementation.
- Recommended enhancements for security, performance, reliability, and deployment strategies.
- Established a phased approach for implementation with clear priorities and next steps for the team and content creators.
2025-11-24 00:07:38 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
843879cd62 feat: Enhance NPC chat system with narrator character support, default speaker behavior, and improved NPC behavior tags
- Implemented narrator syntax to display character portraits during narration.
- Changed default speaker behavior to default to the main NPC for unprefixed lines.
- Enhanced NPC behavior tags to support no parameters, comma-separated lists, wildcard patterns, and an "all" keyword.
- Added comprehensive testing requirements for narrator, default speaker, and NPC behavior tags.
- Updated documentation to reflect new features and usage examples.
- Addressed critical and high-priority issues from REVIEW1, including function naming conflicts, regex security, and empty dialogue validation.
- Improved code organization and backward compatibility.
2025-11-23 22:52:20 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
fbb69f9c53 Implement comprehensive server-side validation and client integration for inventory and container management
- Added server-side validation for inventory actions, ensuring items are validated before being added to the player's inventory.
- Updated client-side `addToInventory()` function to include server validation and error handling for inventory actions.
- Implemented container loading logic to fetch contents from the server, handling locked containers appropriately.
- Enhanced player state initialization to ensure starting items are correctly added to the inventory.
- Clarified NPC `itemsHeld` structure and updated validation logic to match the expected item format.
- Improved error handling for room access and container interactions, including transaction safety for state mutations.
- Introduced new endpoints for scenario mapping and bulk inventory synchronization.
- Added performance optimizations, including caching filtered room data and implementing JSON schema validation for item structures.
- Established a detailed implementation plan with phased priorities and testing gaps identified for future work.
2025-11-21 15:27:54 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
87fae7cb07 refactor: Simplify unlock loading UI dramatically
User correctly pointed out the loading UI was over-engineered.

## Simplifications:

### Before (over-complicated):
- Complex timeline management
- Success/failure flash effects (green/red)
- Spinner alternatives
- Stored references on sprites
- Timeline cleanup logic
- ~150 lines of code

### After (simple):
- startThrob(sprite) - Blue tint + pulsing alpha
- stopThrob(sprite) - Kill tweens, reset
- ~20 lines of code

## Why This Works:

1. **Door sprites get removed anyway** when they open
2. **Container items transition** to next state automatically
3. **Game already shows alerts** for success/error
4. **Only need feedback** during the ~100-300ms API call

## API Changes:

- showUnlockLoading() → startThrob()
- clearUnlockLoading() → stopThrob()
- No success/failure parameter needed
- No stored references to clean up

## Result:

From 150+ lines down to ~30 lines total.
Same UX, much simpler implementation.

User feedback: "Just set the door or item to throb, and remove when
the loading finishes (the door sprite is removed anyway), and if it's
a container, just follow the unlock with a removal of the animation."
2025-11-20 15:37:38 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
266bc7a7ca docs: Clarify CSRF token handling for Hacktivity integration
User correctly noted that Hacktivity's application layout already includes
csrf_meta_tags, so we don't need to add them again.

## Changes:

### Section 9.3.1: Layout Strategy
- Split into Option A (Hacktivity layout - recommended) and Option B (standalone)
- **Option A (Recommended):** Read from existing meta tag
  - Uses Hacktivity's csrf_meta_tags (already present in layout)
  - No duplicate meta tags needed
  - Reads via: document.querySelector('meta[name="csrf-token"]')?.content
- **Option B:** Standalone layout
  - For when engine needs separate layout
  - Must add <%= csrf_meta_tags %> to engine layout
  - Can use <%= form_authenticity_token %> directly

### Section 9.3.3: Token Reading Logic
- Updated config.js to try multiple sources:
  1. window.breakEscapeConfig.csrfToken (if explicitly set)
  2. meta[name="csrf-token"] tag (from Hacktivity layout)
- Better error messages showing all sources checked
- Logs which source provided the token

### Section 9.3.5: Issue #2 Solution
- Updated to reference the fallback logic in 9.3.3
- Added debugging console commands
- Shows how to check all meta tags

## Key Points:

-  Hacktivity layout csrf_meta_tags are reused (don't duplicate)
-  Fallback chain ensures token found from either source
-  Clear guidance for both integration scenarios
-  Better debugging when token is missing

This aligns with Rails best practices and Hacktivity's existing setup.
2025-11-20 15:37:38 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
cece95cd7f feat: Add critical implementation details based on review
Based on comprehensive codebase review, enhanced implementation plans with:

## Phase 3 Updates (Scenario Conversion):
- Complete bash script to convert all 26 scenarios to ERB structure
- Explicit list of 3 main scenarios (ceo_exfil, cybok_heist, biometric_breach)
- List of 23 test/demo scenarios for development
- Instructions to rename .json to .erb (actual ERB code added later in Phase 4)
- Preserves git history with mv commands
- Both automated script and manual alternatives provided

## Phase 9 Updates (CSRF Token Handling):
NEW Section 9.3: "Setup CSRF Token Injection"
- Critical security implementation for Rails CSRF protection
- Complete view template with <%= form_authenticity_token %>
- JavaScript config injection via window.breakEscapeConfig
- CSRF token validation and error handling
- Browser console testing procedures
- 5 common CSRF issues with solutions
- Fallback to meta tag if config missing
- Development vs production considerations

## Phase 9 Updates (Async Unlock with Loading UI):
ENHANCED Section 9.5: "Update Unlock Validation with Loading UI"
- New file: unlock-loading-ui.js with Phaser.js throbbing tint effect
- showUnlockLoading(): Blue pulsing animation during server validation
- clearUnlockLoading(): Green flash on success, red flash on failure
- Alternative spinner implementation provided
- Complete unlockTarget() rewrite with async/await server validation
- Loading UI shows during API call (~100-300ms)
- Graceful error handling with user feedback
- Updates for ALL lock types: pin, password, key, lockpick, biometric, bluetooth, RFID
- Minigame callback updates to pass attempt and method to server
- Testing mode fallback (DISABLE_SERVER_VALIDATION)
- Preserves all existing unlock logic after server validation

## Key Features:
- Addresses 2 critical risks from review (CSRF tokens, async validation)
- Solves scenario conversion gap (26 files → ERB structure)
- Maintains backward compatibility during migration
- Comprehensive troubleshooting guidance
- Production-ready security implementation

Total additions: ~600 lines of detailed implementation guidance
2025-11-20 15:37:38 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
d2e3524b6b docs: Add comprehensive migration review (review1)
Complete codebase review against Rails Engine migration plans:

EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.md (7KB, 243 lines):
- Overall assessment: READY FOR MIGRATION (95% confidence)
- Timeline: 10-12 weeks, ~64 hours total effort
- Zero blocking issues identified
- Key metrics and risk assessment
- Go/No-Go checklist

COMPREHENSIVE_REVIEW.md (47KB, 1,676 lines):
- Detailed current state analysis (95+ JS files, 800MB assets)
- Gap analysis with specific file references
- Risk matrix: 2 critical, 4 high, 3 medium (all mitigatable)
- Phase-by-phase recommendations with code examples
- Complete testing strategy
- Implementation checklists

Key Findings:
- Minimal client changes needed (~100 lines across 4 files)
- No architectural conflicts with current code
- All existing code well-organized and modular
- Clear path forward with realistic timeline

Recommendation: PROCEED WITH MIGRATION
2025-11-20 15:37:38 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
5d22db5f69 docs: Add API reference and testing guide
Complete documentation for:
- 04_API_REFERENCE.md: All 9 API endpoints with examples
- 05_TESTING_GUIDE.md: Minitest strategy with fixtures and tests

These complete the documentation set along with the Hacktivity integration guide.
2025-11-20 15:37:38 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
6e912eecec docs: Add Hacktivity integration guide (Phase 12)
Complete step-by-step guide for mounting BreakEscape engine in Hacktivity:
- Gemfile and bundle installation
- Route mounting at /break_escape
- Database migration installation
- User model compatibility verification
- Static asset configuration
- Session and CSRF setup
- Content Security Policy (CSP) configuration
- Testing integration
- Deployment to staging
- Troubleshooting guide
- Verification checklist
- Performance monitoring
- Rollback plan

This completes the full documentation set (7 files, ~140KB total)
2025-11-20 15:37:37 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
48c9669925 docs: Add comprehensive README with navigation and quick start
- Complete documentation structure guide
- Quick start instructions
- Phase checklist for progress tracking
- Architecture summary with diagrams
- Troubleshooting section
- Philosophy and success criteria
- Technology stack overview
- Before/after comparison

Documentation set complete: 5 core files, fully self-contained
2025-11-20 15:37:37 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
95ef8c654d docs: Add complete implementation plan (Phases 1-12)
Part 1 (Phases 1-6):
- Rails Engine setup with explicit commands
- Move files with mv (preserve git history)
- Create ERB scenario templates
- Database migrations and models
- Seed data (metadata only)
- Controllers with JIT Ink compilation

Part 2 (Phases 7-12):
- Pundit authorization policies
- Mission and game views
- Client API integration
- Comprehensive test suite
- Standalone mode support
- Final integration and deployment

Total: 78 hours, 12 phases, completely actionable with explicit bash/rails commands
2025-11-20 15:37:37 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
27bd4e9760 docs: Add simplified 2-table schema (missions + games)
Added comprehensive planning docs:
- 00_OVERVIEW.md: Project aims, philosophy, all decisions
- 01_ARCHITECTURE.md: Complete technical design
- 02_DATABASE_SCHEMA.md: Full schema reference with examples

Key simplifications:
- 2 tables instead of 3-4
- Files on filesystem, metadata in database
- JIT Ink compilation
- Per-instance scenario generation via ERB
- Polymorphic player (User/DemoUser)
- Session-based auth
- Minimal client changes (<5%)

Next: Implementation plan with step-by-step TODO list
2025-11-20 15:37:37 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
0eca2fac4c docs: Add JIT Ink compilation approach (Issue #3 eliminated)
Benchmarked bin/inklecate compilation speed:
- Small files: ~300ms
- Large files: ~400ms
- Average: 330ms (fast enough for JIT!)

Controller now:
- Compiles .ink files on-demand when requested
- Only compiles if .json missing or .ink file is newer
- Caches compiled .json files on filesystem
- No build step, Rake tasks, or CI/CD setup needed
- Development-friendly: edit .ink, refresh browser
- Production-safe: optional pre-compilation

Issue #3 (Ink Compilation) eliminated entirely - 0 hours P0 work!
2025-11-20 15:37:37 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
6da63c650d docs: Add simplified 2-table schema (missions + games)
Major simplification to migration plan:
- Remove NpcScript model entirely
- Reduce to 2 tables: missions (metadata) + games (state + scenario snapshot)
- Serve ink files directly from filesystem via game endpoints
- Move scenario_data to game instances (enables per-instance randomization)
- Eliminates Issue #2 (NPC schema complexity)
- Reduces P0 fixes from 10 hours to 2-3 hours
- Much simpler seed process (metadata only)
2025-11-20 15:37:37 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
e871d6df84 docs: Add comprehensive review of Rails Engine migration plan
- Identify 5 critical issues requiring fixes before implementation
- Validate architecture decisions (mostly solid)
- Provide corrected database schema for shared NPCs
- Document P0 fixes needed: Ink compilation, file structure, NPC schema
- Recommend 1.5 days of prep work to save 3-5 days of rework
- Total review: 6 documents covering issues, architecture, and solutions
2025-11-20 15:37:37 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
50eba12238 docs: Add Hacktivity integration validation and setup guide 2025-11-20 15:37:37 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
15fbadecb2 docs: Add complete Rails Engine migration plan (JSON-centric approach)
Comprehensive implementation plan for converting BreakEscape to a Rails Engine.

DOCUMENTATION CREATED:
- 00_OVERVIEW.md: Project aims, philosophy, decisions summary
- 01_ARCHITECTURE.md: Technical design, models, controllers, API
- 02_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md: Phases 1-6 with bash/rails commands
- 02_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN_PART2.md: Phases 7-12 with client integration
- 03_DATABASE_SCHEMA.md: 3-table JSONB schema reference
- 04_TESTING_GUIDE.md: Fixtures, tests, CI setup
- README.md: Quick start and navigation guide

KEY APPROACH:
- Simplified JSON-centric storage (3 tables vs 10+)
- JSONB for player state (one column, all game data)
- Minimal client changes (move files, add API client)
- Dual mode: Standalone + Hacktivity integration
- Session-based auth with polymorphic player
- Pundit policies for authorization
- ERB templates for scenario randomization

TIMELINE: 12-14 weeks (vs 22 weeks complex approach)

ARCHITECTURE DECISIONS:
- Static assets in public/break_escape/
- Scenarios in app/assets/scenarios/ with ERB
- .ink and .ink.json files organized by scenario
- Lazy-load NPC scripts on encounter
- Server validates unlocks, client runs dialogue
- 6 API endpoints (not 15+)

Each phase includes:
- Specific bash mv commands
- Rails generate and migrate commands
- Code examples with manual edits
- Testing steps
- Git commit points

Ready for implementation.
2025-11-20 15:37:37 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
b1356c1157 docs: Add simplified Rails Engine migration approach
RECOMMENDED APPROACH: 12-14 weeks instead of 22 weeks

KEY SIMPLIFICATIONS:
- Use JSON storage for game state (already in that format)
- 3 database tables instead of 10+
  - game_instances (with player_state JSONB)
  - scenarios (with scenario_data JSONB)
  - npc_scripts (Ink JSON)

- 6 API endpoints instead of 15+
  - Bootstrap game
  - Load room (when unlocked)
  - Attempt unlock
  - Update inventory
  - Load NPC script (on encounter)
  - Sync state (periodic)

VALIDATION STRATEGY:
- Validate unlock attempts (server has solutions)
- Validate room/object access (check unlocked state)
- Validate inventory changes (check item in unlocked location)
- NPCs: Load Ink scripts on encounter, run conversations 100% client-side
- NPC door unlocks: Simple check (encountered NPC + scenario permission)

WHAT WE DON'T TRACK:
- Every event (client-side only)
- Every conversation turn (no sync needed)
- Every minigame action (only result matters)
- Complex NPC permissions (simple rule: encountered = trusted)

BENEFITS:
- Faster development (12-14 weeks vs 22 weeks)
- Easier maintenance (JSON matches existing format)
- Better performance (fewer queries, JSONB indexing)
- More flexible (easy to modify game state structure)
- Simpler logic (clear validation rules)

Updated README_UPDATED.md to recommend simplified approach first.
Complex approach documentation retained for reference.
2025-11-20 15:37:37 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
1e775ef89c docs: Update Rails Engine migration plans for current codebase
Updated migration plans to reflect significant codebase evolution:

NEW SYSTEMS DOCUMENTED:
- NPC system (fully implemented with NPCManager, conversation state, events)
- Event system (80+ events across codebase)
- Global game state management (window.gameState.globalVariables)
- Multiple scenarios (24 total, up from 1 originally planned)

KEY UPDATES:
- UPDATED_MIGRATION_STATUS.md: Comprehensive status of what's changed
  - What's implemented vs what still needs server-side integration
  - Updated timeline: 22 weeks (was 18 weeks)
  - New database schema requirements
  - Updated risk assessment

- CLIENT_SERVER_SEPARATION_PLAN.md: Added 3 new systems
  - System 5: NPC System (hybrid approach confirmed)
  - System 6: Event System (selective logging)
  - System 7: Global Game State (server as source of truth)
  - Updated migration checklist: 9 phases (was 7)
  - Updated timeline: 18-22 weeks

- README_UPDATED.md: New master index document
  - Quick start guide
  - Document index
  - What's changed summary
  - Timeline breakdown
  - Architecture decisions
  - Success metrics

MIGRATION APPROACH:
- Hybrid NPC approach: Scripts client-side, validation server-side
- Selective event logging: Critical events only
- State sync: Server as source of truth, client cache for performance
- Incremental rollout with dual-mode support

TIMELINE: 22 weeks (~5.5 months)
- Added 4 weeks for NPC, Event, State integration
- Original: 18 weeks → Updated: 22 weeks (+22%)

All plans are complete, self-contained, actionable, and feature-focused.
Ready for team review and implementation.
2025-11-20 15:37:37 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
57d9b8f5d8 docs: Remove critical action required for room dimension audit from implementation plan -- these are older rooms replaced by 2.0 rooms 2025-11-16 02:17:39 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
128727536e docs: Complete comprehensive review2 of room layout plans with critical bug fixes
Performed detailed validation of room layout implementation plans against
ceo_exfil.json scenario, identifying and fixing 3 critical bugs that would
have caused implementation failure.

## Critical Bugs Fixed

1. **Negative Modulo Bug** (CRITICAL)
   - JavaScript modulo with negatives: -5 % 2 = -1 (not 1)
   - Affected all rooms with negative grid coordinates
   - Fixed: Use ((sum % 2) + 2) % 2 for deterministic placement
   - Applied to all door placement functions (N/S/E/W)

2. **Asymmetric Door Alignment Bug** (CRITICAL)
   - Single-door rooms connecting to multi-door rooms misaligned
   - Example: office1 (2 doors) ↔ office2 (1 door) = 64px misalignment
   - Fixed: Check connected room's connection array and align precisely
   - Applied to all 4 directions with index-based alignment

3. **Grid Rounding Ambiguity** (CRITICAL)
   - Math.round(-0.5) has implementation-dependent behavior
   - Fixed: Use Math.floor() consistently for grid alignment
   - Applied to all positioning functions

## Scenario Validation

- Traced ceo_exfil.json step-by-step through positioning algorithm
- Simulated door placements for all rooms
- Verified office1↔office2/office3 connections (key test case)
- Result: Would fail without fixes, will succeed with fixes

## Documents Updated

- DOOR_PLACEMENT.md: Added asymmetric alignment + negative modulo fix
- POSITIONING_ALGORITHM.md: Changed Math.round() to Math.floor()
- GRID_SYSTEM.md: Added grid alignment rounding clarification
- README.md: Updated critical fixes status, added Phase 0

## Review Documents Created

- review2/COMPREHENSIVE_REVIEW.md: Full analysis (400+ lines)
- review2/SUMMARY.md: Executive summary and status

## Confidence Assessment

- Before fixes: 40% success probability
- After fixes: 90% success probability

## Status

 Plans are self-contained and actionable
 All critical bugs fixed in specifications
 Validated against real scenario
 Ready for implementation (after Phase 0 audit)

Remaining risk: Room dimension validation (must audit before coding)
2025-11-16 02:13:21 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
019986ceef docs: Add comprehensive room layout system redesign plan
Created detailed implementation plan for redesigning the room layout system
to support variable room sizes and four-direction connections.

Core Concepts:
- Grid unit system (5×4 tiles base, excluding 2-tile visual top)
- Valid room heights: 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26... (formula: 2 + 4N)
- Breadth-first room positioning from starting room
- Deterministic door placement with alignment for asymmetric connections
- Comprehensive scenario validation

Documents Created:
- OVERVIEW.md: High-level goals and changes
- TERMINOLOGY.md: Definitions and concepts
- GRID_SYSTEM.md: Grid unit system specification
- POSITIONING_ALGORITHM.md: Room positioning logic
- DOOR_PLACEMENT.md: Door placement rules and algorithms
- WALL_SYSTEM.md: Wall collision system updates
- VALIDATION.md: Scenario validation system
- IMPLEMENTATION_STEPS.md: Step-by-step implementation guide
- TODO_LIST.md: Detailed task checklist
- README.md: Quick start and overview

Review & Critical Fixes:
- review1/CRITICAL_REVIEW.md: Identified 4 critical issues
- review1/RECOMMENDATIONS.md: Solutions for all issues
- UPDATED_FILES_SUMMARY.md: Integration of review feedback

Critical Issues Identified & Resolved:
1. Grid height calculation (now: 6, 10, 14, 18...)
2. Door alignment for asymmetric connections (solution documented)
3. Code duplication (shared module approach specified)
4. Disconnected rooms (validation added)

Implementation Strategy:
- Incremental approach with feature flag
- Phase 1: Constants and helpers
- Phase 2a: North/South positioning
- Phase 2b: East/West support
- Phase 3: Door placement with critical fixes
- Phase 4: Validation
- Phase 5-6: Testing and documentation

Estimated time: 18-26 hours
Confidence: 9/10 (all critical issues addressed)

Ready for implementation.
2025-11-15 23:58:19 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
7ecda9d39d feat(rfid): Implement multi-protocol RFID system with 4 protocols
Implement comprehensive multi-protocol RFID system with deterministic
card_id-based generation, MIFARE key attacks, and protocol-specific UI.

## New Protocol System (4 protocols):
- EM4100 (low security) - Instant clone, already implemented
- MIFARE_Classic_Weak_Defaults (low) - Dictionary attack succeeds (95%)
- MIFARE_Classic_Custom_Keys (medium) - Requires Darkside attack (30s)
- MIFARE_DESFire (high) - UID only, forces physical theft

## Key Features:

### 1. Protocol Foundation
- Created rfid-protocols.js with protocol definitions
- Added protocol detection, capabilities, security levels
- Defined attack durations and common MIFARE keys

### 2. Deterministic Card Generation
- Updated rfid-data.js with card_id-based generation
- Same card_id always produces same hex/UID (deterministic)
- Simplified scenario format - no manual hex/UID needed
- getCardDisplayData() supports all protocols

### 3. MIFARE Attack System
- Created rfid-attacks.js with MIFAREAttackManager
- Dictionary Attack: Instant, 95% success on weak defaults
- Darkside Attack: 30 sec (10s on weak), cracks all keys
- Nested Attack: 10 sec, uses known key to crack rest
- Protocol-aware attack behavior

### 4. UI Enhancements
- Updated rfid-ui.js with protocol-specific displays
- showProtocolInfo() with color-coded security badges
- showAttackProgress() and updateAttackProgress()
- Protocol headers with icons and frequency info
- Updated showCardDataScreen() and showEmulationScreen()

### 5. Unlock System Integration
- Updated unlock-system.js for card_id matching
- Support multiple valid cards per door (array)
- Added acceptsUIDOnly flag for DESFire UID emulation
- Backward compatible with legacy key_id format

### 6. Minigame Integration
- Updated rfid-minigame.js with attack methods
- startKeyAttack() triggers dictionary/darkside/nested
- handleCardTap() and handleEmulate() use card_id arrays
- UID-only emulation validation for DESFire
- Attack manager cleanup on minigame exit

### 7. Styling
- Added CSS for protocol headers and security badges
- Color-coded security levels (red=low, teal=medium, green=high)
- Attack progress styling with smooth transitions
- Dimmed menu items for unlikely attack options

## Scenario Format Changes:

Before (manual technical data):
```json
{
  "type": "keycard",
  "rfid_hex": "01AB34CD56",
  "rfid_facility": 1,
  "key_id": "employee_badge"
}
```

After (simplified with card_id):
```json
{
  "type": "keycard",
  "card_id": "employee_badge",
  "rfid_protocol": "MIFARE_Classic_Weak_Defaults",
  "name": "Employee Badge"
}
```

Technical data (hex/UID) generated automatically from card_id.

## Door Configuration:

Multiple valid cards per door:
```json
{
  "lockType": "rfid",
  "requires": ["employee_badge", "contractor_badge", "master_card"],
  "acceptsUIDOnly": false
}
```

## Files Modified:
- js/minigames/rfid/rfid-protocols.js (NEW)
- js/minigames/rfid/rfid-attacks.js (NEW)
- js/minigames/rfid/rfid-data.js
- js/minigames/rfid/rfid-ui.js
- js/minigames/rfid/rfid-minigame.js
- js/systems/unlock-system.js
- css/rfid-minigame.css
- planning_notes/rfid_keycard/protocols_and_interactions/03_UPDATES_SUMMARY.md (NEW)

## Next Steps:
- Phase 5: Ink integration (syncCardProtocolsToInk)
- Test with scenarios for each protocol
- Add Ink variable documentation

Estimated implementation time: ~12 hours (Phases 1-4 complete)
2025-11-15 23:48:15 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
d697eef3ca docs(rfid): Add multi-protocol RFID system planning & review
Created comprehensive planning for adding multiple RFID protocols with
different security levels and attack capabilities.

Planning Documents:
- 00_IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md: Complete implementation guide (14h estimate)
- 01_TECHNICAL_DESIGN.md: Protocol specs, data models, UI design
- 02_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md: Detailed file-by-file implementation plan
- CRITICAL_REVIEW.md: Pre-implementation review with 12 improvements

Protocol System (Simplified from Original):
 EM4100 (low security) - Instant clone, already implemented
 MIFARE Classic (medium) - Requires key attacks (Darkside/Nested/Dictionary)
 MIFARE DESFire (high) - UID only, forces physical theft
 HID Prox - Removed (too similar to EM4100, saves 2h)

Key Features:
- Protocol detection with color-coded security levels
- MIFARE key cracking minigames (30s Darkside, 10s Nested, instant Dictionary)
- Ink integration for conditional interactions based on card protocol
- Dual format support (no migration needed)
- UID-only emulation for DESFire with acceptsUIDOnly door property

Review Improvements Applied:
- Merged "attack mode" into clone mode (simpler state machine)
- Removed firmware upgrade system (can add later)
- Dual format card data support instead of migration (safer)
- Added error handling for unsupported protocols
- Added cleanup for background attacks
- Documented required Ink variables

Time Estimate: 14 hours (down from 19h)
- Phase 1: Protocol Foundation (3h)
- Phase 2: Protocol Detection & UI (3h)
- Phase 3: MIFARE Attack System (5h)
- Phase 4: Ink Integration (2h)
- Phase 5: Door Integration & Testing (1h)

Next Steps: Begin implementation starting with Phase 1
2025-11-15 23:48:15 +00:00
Z. Cliffe Schreuders
0210a12c64 docs(rfid): Add comprehensive post-implementation review
Added three review documents analyzing the completed RFID system:

- POST_IMPLEMENTATION_REVIEW.md: Full technical analysis of implementation
  - Reviewed 4 core files, 6 integration points, CSS, and test scenario
  - Found 0 critical issues, 2 medium priority improvements (optional)
  - Confirmed production-ready status
  - Verified correct conversation return pattern
  - Validated EM4100 protocol implementation

- ISSUES_SUMMARY.md: Quick reference for identified issues
  - 7 total issues (all minor/optional)
  - Action items with code examples
  - Testing checklist

- README.md: Review overview and quick status

Key findings:
 Clean modular architecture following established patterns
 Authentic Flipper Zero UI with smooth animations
 Robust error handling and validation
 Seamless integration with all game systems
 Comprehensive test scenario created

Recommended improvements (optional):
- Use hex ID for key_id to prevent collisions
- Add cardToClone validation in clone mode
- Extract timing constants for maintainability

Overall assessment: Production ready with minor improvements recommended
2025-11-15 23:48:15 +00:00