# Emails

DocNumber: C05771388
MetadataSubject: (AP) SERBIAN LEADER TO VISIT MASS GRAVE OF 200 CROATS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-03T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0106/DOC_0C05771388/C05771388.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (AP) Serbian leader to visit mass grave of 200 Croats
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_OS
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, November 3, 2010 3:17 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771388
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771388 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, November 3, 2010 3:17 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (AP) Serbian leader to visit mass grave of 200 Croats
  From: Simmons, Krista M
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-O_OS
  Sent: Tue Nov 02 11:40:13 2010
  Subject: (AP) Serbian leader to visit mass grave of 200 Croats
  ZAGREB (AP) - Serbia's president will lay wreaths at the mass grave of Croats slain by Serbs during the 1991 war,
  becoming the first Serbian leader to pay his respects to the victims of a massacre that remains a potent symbol of
  wartime brutality.
  Boris Tadic and his Croatian counterpart, Ivo Josipovic, on November 4 will also honor 18 Serbs killed by Croats in a
  nearby village.
  The visit to Ovcara, a pig farm near the eastern city of Vukovar where more than 200 Croat prisoners of war and
  civilians were executed, is a "profoundly symbolic act," said Josko Paro, Josipovic's foreign policy adviser.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771388 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771389
MetadataSubject: (AP) TOP HAMAS OFFICIAL ARRESTED IN EGYPT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-19T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0098/DOC_0C05771389/C05771389.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (AP) Top Hamas official arrested in Egypt
ExtractedFrom: Abed in, Huma <AbedinH©state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-II
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 8:41 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771389
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771389 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abed in, Huma <AbedinH©state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 8:41 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (AP) Top Hamas official arrested in Egypt
  From: Moore, Anna W
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-II
  Sent: Sun Sep 19 07:55:51 2010
  Subject: (AP) Top Hamas official arrested in Egypt
  GAZA CITY (AP) — Relatives of a top Hamas security official in the Gaza Strip say he was arrested at Cairo airport while
  returning from a pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia. Egyptian officials confirmed a member of Hamas' military wing had been
  arrested before the weekend at Cairo's airport because his name was on a wanted list for using falsified travel
  documents. Mohammed Dababish is a top official in Hamas' internal security unit, which oversees intelligence matters
  in Gaza. Hamas officials declined comment.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771389 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771390
MetadataSubject: MASHABANE CALL UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0093/DOC_0C05771390/C05771390.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Mashabane call update
ExtractedTo: H; laurenjilotY
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 7:52 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771390
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Re-sending with a cc to my personal acct just to be sure I didn't miss an email. In the mean time, I'm working to
  determine if there are any other windows of availability

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771390 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 7:52 AM
  To: H; laurenjilotY
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Re-sending with a cc to my personal acct just to be sure I didn't miss an email. In the mean time, I'm working to
  determine if there are any other windows of availability
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: ihdr22@clintonemailcom' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 05:59:20 2010
  Subject: Mashabane call update
  Mashabane has offered a call time of 8:00 this morning. If that is amenable to you, I can set it up.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771390 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771391
MetadataSubject: MESSAGE FROM VJOSA
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Verveer, Melanne S
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-14T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0103/DOC_0C05771391/C05771391.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: message from Vjosa
ExtractedFrom: Verveer, Melanne S <VerveerMS@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 5:24 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771391
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: I thought you'd like to see Vjosa's reaction tp your visit to Kosovo.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771391 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  PART B6
  From: Verveer, Melanne S <VerveerMS@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 5:24 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: message from Vjosa
  I thought you'd like to see Vjosa's reaction tp your visit to Kosovo.
  From: vjosa dobruna
  To: Verveer, Melanne 5
  Sent: Wed Oct 13 17:11:26 2010
  Subject: Re: message from Vjosa
  Dear Melanne,
  Thank you; We, group of women leaders met with Secretary Clinton. It was a short meeting,
  introduction and photo opportunity. But, I hope the event send a message to our
  government that women should be supported. I also think that the Embassy will consider more
  vision of women of Kosova.
  Secretary Clinton was just remarkable. Her message for our, also Belgrade leadership was clear
  and strait forward; dialogue, dialogue, dialogue as two independent states!
  The admiration expressed by the population in the streets as motorcade was passing, meeting
  with PM and acting President, open meeting with students and media was impressive. She is
  really inspiration for all.
  Maybe was not a right time, but I only wish she has pressed the PM on corruption practices.
  Thank you once again for facilitating this meeting.
  Best regards,
  Vjosa
  From: "Verveer, Melanne S" <V7rveerMS©state.gov>
  To: vjosadobruna
  Sent: Sat, October 9, 2010 6:38:34 PM
  Subject: Re: message from Vjosa
  She is eager to see you. The embassy told me that they talked to you and you're able to see her.
  From: vjosa dobruna
  To: Verveer, Melanne S
  Sent: Sat Oct 09 12:51:03 2010
  Subject: Re: message from Vjosa
  Thanks for replying to the message.
  My phone number is
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771391 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771391 Date: 08/31/2015
  Today someone called me from the US Embassy to invite me to meet Secretary on Wednesday.
  It is going to be a close 15 min meeting with several women leaders.
  Thank you.
  Vjosa
  Sent: Fri, October 8, 2010 3:26:51 PM
  Subject: RE: message from Vjosa
  Vjosa, do you have a phone number? We're hoping that the Secretary will get to see you.
  Melanne S. Verveer
  Ambassador at Large for Global Women's Issues
  U.S. Department of State
  2201 C Street NW, Room 6805
  Washington, DC 20520
  Tel: (202) 647-7283
  Fax: (202) 647-7288
  VerveerMS@state.gov
  From: vjosa dobruna [mailto:
  Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 3:59 PM
  To: Verveer, Melanne S
  Subject: message from Vjosa
  Dear Melanne,
  Hope this message finds you well.
  I am trying to follow your work and every time I run into information that involves you as a
  speaker or presenter, I know that strong advocacy for the benefit of women is coming for the
  future.
  I am starting a foundation, with a objective to advocate policies on health, environment and
  human rights. Women in the region have serious obstacles to access health care and services,
  and are suffering from a luck of information. Many preventable diseases are taking its toll
  because of the lack of information and facilities, especially regarding breast cancer and cervical
  cancer. Also, laws on health care do not require for preventive services such as mammography,
  pap smear and other preventive services. I am planning to work on different level, not excluding
  other target groups but starting with women.
  Today, media have announce the visit of Secretary Hillary Clinton in the region, including
  Kosovo. Is there any chance to meet with her during short visit in Prishtina? I know she is
  coming to assist the dialogue between Prishtina and Belgrade, but she would be even more
  helpful if she meets me and other women.
  New early elections are coming in few months and she would bust our confidence and would
  support better participation of women and better election result.
  I am afraid that our government officials are going to meet alone and/or be very selective who
  can meet her because is going to have impact on the election.
  I am not with any political party but would be wonderful and extremely helpful for the support
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771391 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771391 Date: 08/31/2015
  of woman's agenda
  Is any chance that you will be coming with Secretary Clinton?
  Best regards,
  Vjosa
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771391 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771393
MetadataSubject: MASHABANE CALL UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771393/C05771393.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Mashabane call update
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 8:19 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771393
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  I think we've lost our availability for today but ill double check. If she is free, ill have ops connect her over. If not, she is
  avail btw 6-8 am tmw am.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771393 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 8:19 AM
  To:
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  I think we've lost our availability for today but ill double check. If she is free, ill have ops connect her over. If not, she is
  avail btw 6-8 am tmw am.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:17:25 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Can we still do it?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H; laurenjilot
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 07:51:45 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Re-sending with a cc to my personal acct just to be sure I didn't miss an email. In the mean time, I'm working to
  determine if there are any other windows of availability
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: thdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 05:59:20 2010
  Subject: Mashabane call update
  Mashabane has offered a call time of 8:00 this morning. If that is amenable to you, I can set it up.
  #$##
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771393 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771394
MetadataSubject: MASHABANE CALL UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771394/C05771394.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Mashabane call update
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 8:20 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771394
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: No problem! I'm on it
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771394 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 8:20 AM
  To:
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  No problem! I'm on it
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:19:02 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Sorry--I'm just seeing this.
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 05:59:20 2010
  Subject: Mashabane call update
  Mashabane has offered a call time of 8:00 this morning. If that is amenable to you, I can set it up.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771394 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771396
MetadataSubject: (AP) NATO TO TURN AFGHAN SECURITY CONTROL OVER BY 2014
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-19T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0108/DOC_0C05771396/C05771396.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (AP) NATO to turn Afghan security control over by 2014
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shift-II
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, November 19, 2010 10:01 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771396
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771396 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 10:01 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (AP) NATO to turn Afghan security control over by 2014
  From: Moore, Anna W
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shift-II
  Sent: Fri Nov 19 09:59:02 2010
  Subject: (AP) NATO to turn Afghan security control over by 2014
  LISBON (AP) - NATO will start drawing down its troops in Afghanistan next July and its combat role in the war-torn nation
  will end by 2014 or earlier so security can be turned over to the Afghans, a top alliance official said November 19. "We
  think that goal is realistic, and we have made plans to achieve it, but of course if circumstances agree, it could be sooner,
  absolutely," said Mark Sedwill, NATO's top civilian representative in Afghanistan. Sedwill said the troop withdrawal
  starting next year will be "shallow" and eventually accelerate but did not elaborate. NATO spokesman James Appathurai
  also said the alliance's 28 leaders, including President Barack Obama, were set to approve the withdrawal plan. He said
  NATO is "quite confident of the end of 2014 timeline for handing responsibility to Afghan security forces" as requested
  by Afghan President Hamid Karzai. Appathurai and Sedwill did not say how many NATO troops would stay in
  Afghanistan after 2014 serving as military advisers and trainers.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771396 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771400
MetadataSubject: MAX FROM AMSTERDAM ON RISE OF FAR RIGHT IN EUROPE
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-18T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0108/DOC_0C05771400/C05771400.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Max from Amsterdam on rise of far right in Europe
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 1:28 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771400
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  http://maxblumenthal.com/2010/11/the-return-of-ghosts-debating-the-rise-of-geert-wilders-and-the-far-right/
  The Return of Ghosts: Debating the rise of Geert Wilders and
  the far-right at the Nexus Symposium
  On 11.18.10, By Max
  The Nexus Institute's Return of Ghosts conference was inspired by the rise of far-right politician Geert Wilders in the
  Netherlands
  I spent last week in Amsterdam, where I participated in the "Return of Ghosts" symposium of the Nexus Institute, a
  discussion/debate about the resurgence of neo-fascism in Europe and anti-democratic trends in the West. Besides
  providing a forum for debating European politics, the symposium was the occasion for the first public appearance in
  Europe by Peruvian writer Mario Vargas Llosa since he was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature last month. The arrival
  of Vargas Llosa, one of the world's foremost intellectuals, resulted in an overflow crowd filled with members of the Dutch
  media, the country's political class, and the royal family.
  Even with Vargas Llosa in the spotlight, the participants' attention was focused on Geert Wilders, the leader of the far-right
  Dutch People's Party for Freedom and Democracy, which is now the third leading party in the Netherlands. With his
  gathering influence, Wilders has essentially placed the Dutch coalition government in a stranglehold; the government
  meets with him every Wednesday to gauge his opinions and ask for his instructions. While Wilders dictates at will to the
  government, he remains independent of it, comfortably avoiding the consequences of policies he has helped to shape. It
  is the perfect position for a politician whose agenda is comprised exclusively of xenophobic populism, and typical strategy
  of the far-right in countries across the continent.
  Wilders' base lies in the mostly Catholic south, where ironically few people have ever encountered a Muslim. He has also
  generated support in the city of Groeningen, once a citadel of the communists. Seeking to expand his base, Wilders
  promised to hire scores of "animal cops" to investigate and prosecute the abuse of animals, a clever wedge strategy in the
  only country I know of that has a party dedicated exclusively to animal rights. Of course, Wilders could care less about our
  furry friends. His stated goal is to end immigration not just to Holland but to all of Europe; ban the Quran (free speech is
  only for the "Judeo-Christian" community), and severely limit the rights of Muslim citizens of Europe by, for instance,
  instituting what he called a "head rag tax" on Muslim women. Wilders' international allies include the goosestepping neo-
  Nazis of the English Defense League, the far-right pogromist Pam Geller, the Belgian neo-fascist party Vlaams Belang,
  and a substantial portion of the US neocon elite. Over the course of just a few years, he has become perhaps the most
  influential Islamophobe in the world.
  But does this make Wilders a fascist? Rob Riemen, the director of the Nexus Institute, thinks so. Riemen has just
  published a book entitled "De Eeuwige Terugkeer Van Het Fascisme," or "The Eternal Return of Fascism" (I eagerly await
  its English translation), dedicated to highlighting the danger of Wilders' eerily familiar brand of right-wing populism. In the
  book, Riemen urges readers to compare Wilders' politics to the early incarnations of European fascism, not to the
  genocidal terminal stage fascism of late World War II. He calls the parallels between Wilders and the early fascists "one-
  and-one." In an economic and civilizational crisis like the kind the Netherlands is facing, Riemen warns that reactionary
  figures like Wilders can easily seize power while centrist elements stand by politely and passively, refusing to call a spade
  a spade. Where Wilders' ascendancy will lead is unknown, but if he is not stopped in his tracks, Riemen is certain the
  B6
  story will not end well. In the week after its publication, Riemen's book flew off the shelves, selling 5000 copies while
  generating heated reactions from across the spectrum of debate.
  Riemen told me that despite the public enthusiasm for his book, his characterization of Wilders has been attacked as "un-
  Dutch." In Dutch culture, as in so many others, open confrontation is avoided at all cost. Political disagreement is
  welcomed only if it is expressed in a collegial manner, as though nothing more than reputations were at stake. So the
  Dutch cultural elite generally goes along to get along. The resistance Riemen has met since he called Wilders out seemed
  to have alarmed and frustrated him. Why was it so difficult for liberal elements in the Netherlands to recognize the clear
  resonances of fascism in Wilders' political style? he wondered. And why did they seem more concerned with regulating
  the terms of debate than with forming a united front against the far-right? Once the symposium opened and I was able to
  see the Dutch elite in action, I began to understand Riemen's indignation.
  The symposium began with a speech by Vargas Llosa, a complex personality who has allied himself with center-right
  parties in Spain and elsewhere but whose politics remain fundamentally rooted in cultural liberalism. Vargas Llosa's
  differences with leaders of the left, which he used to belong to, exploded over the issue of free trade. He is an ardent neo-
  liberal and reviles Latin populists like Hugo Chavez and 011anta Humala who advocate protectionism and industrial
  nationalization.
  Vargas Llosa decorated his speech with literary metaphors and natural imagery to describe the challenges of democracy,
  particularly in Europe. But the body of the address was devoted to the supposed threat Islamic extremism posed to
  Western civilization. Vargas Llosa singled out suicide bombing as the most dangerous phenomenon, pointing to the
  Madrid and London bombings by al-Qaida inspired operatives, while curiously not mentioning suicide attacks by secular
  groups like the Tamil Tigers and the Kurdish PKK, or the nationalistic suicide terror by Palestinian militants (Vargas Llosa
  declared in his speech that "Israel deserves to be treated like any other nation," and has been harshly critical of the state
  in the past).
  During the first panel, which I participated in, Fania Oz-Salzberger, an Israeli professor of history and the daughter of
  famed author Amos Oz, boasted to crowd of Israel's "vibrant democracy." She was enthusiastically seconded by Mitchell
  Cohen, a former editor of Dissent who has devoted considerable energy to assailing anti-Zionist Jews, writing that "the
  dominant species of anti-Semitism encourages anti-Zionism." I found it odd that neither expressed any concern over the
  almost endless stream of anti-democratic laws passing through the Knesset, or by the general authoritarian, anti-liberal
  trend in Israeli society. Oz-Salzberger went on to announce to a smattering of applause that "Geert Wilders and politicians
  like him are not welcomed by Israelis."
  Yet Wilders is one of Israel's most frequent guests, having visited the country over 40 times in 20 years. In fact, he claims
  that his views on Islam and Arabs were forged while living on an Israeli moshav. "Nowhere did I have the special feeling of
  solidarity that I get when I land at Ben Gurion airport," he once said. Wilders reportedly receives heavy support from Dutch
  financial backers of Israel, and has met with a range of Israeli officials. His closest allies lie within the extremist settler
  movement, prompting him to call for the forced transfer of Palestinians to Jordan. Members of the liberal Zionist
  intelligensia like Oz-Salzberger may not not want Wilders around, but who in Israel is listening to them? Israel's
  mainstream leadership echoes Wilders' crudest talking points on a regular basis, while the Zionist left clings to a dwindling
  handful of Knesset seats and watches passively — even resentfully — as a rag-tag band of leftist radicals fights for
  equality for all. Consider a recent statement by former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, who is seen as a centrist within the
  Israeli political spectrum: "The origin of terrorism is within Islam," Olmert declared this month.
  The pro-Israel position of the new breed of European far-rightists has to be recognized as much more than a convenient
  political tactic. Of course, saying you "stand with Israel," as Wilders so often does, is an easy way to insulate yourself from
  charges of anti-Semitism. But the extreme right is also attracted to Israel because the country represents its highest
  ideals. While some critics see Israel as a racist apartheid state, people like Wilders see Israel as a racist apartheid state
  — and they like it. They richly enjoy when Israel mows down Arab Muslims by the dozens and tells the world to go to hell;
  they admire Israel's settler culture; and most of all, they yearn to live in a land like Israel that privileges its ethnic majority
  above all others to the point that it systematically humiliates and dispossesses the swarthy racial outclass. The endgame
  of the far-right is to make Europe less tolerant and more Israeli.
  After the Italian philosopher Paolo Flores D'Arcais proclaimed that Italy was no longer a democratic country, citing PM
  Silvio Berlusconi's control over 90 percent of the country's media, the government's deep seated corruption and the Prime
  Minister's repeated attempts to impose onerous restrictions on journalistic freedom, Riemen asked me if the United States
  was a democracy given the the rapidly rising influence of corporations over the media and elections. After two panelists
  had described Israel as a vibrant democracy while another labeled Italy a non-democratic quasi-dictatorship, I decided
  that our definition of democracy was subjective at best. So I sidestepped the question and outlined a few of the greatest
  blows to American democracy, from the elimination of the Fairness Doctrine to the Telecommunications Deregulation Act
  to the Citizens United SCOTUS decision. Later in the evening, D'Arcais would remark to me with amazement that he
  never knew American media was ever regulated in the first place.
  During the 20 minutes or so when students of Tilburg University were able to question the panel, one student asked
  whether suicide terror was a uniquely Islamic phenomenon, apparently referring to Vargas Llosa's address. I responded
  that it of course was not, citing the example of secular groups like the Tamil Tigers which brought the tactic into practice
  the second suicide. I recommended the audience review the research of Robert Pape, the University of Chicago political
  scientist who demonstrated a clear connection between the American and Israeli occupation of Middle Eastern countries
  and the motivations of suicide bombers. Oz-Salzberger jumped in, proclaiming that occupation has little or nothing to do
  with the motives of suicide bombers. She did not marshal any evidence to support her point, possibly because our time
  was so limited. It would have been hard to do so, however, without supporting the fundamental argument of Wilders about
  Islam's inherent violence — or the even sillier theory by the Israeli filmmaker/professional hasbarist Pierre Rehov that
  suicide bombers are motivated by sexual repression.
  Next, the Dutch panel took the stage. The main attraction was Frits Bolkstein, the longtime leader of the People's Party for
  Freedom and Democracy who employed Wilders as his parliamentary aide, providing him a stepping stone to his political
  career. He was a silver haired curmudgeon from aristocratic stock who reminded me instantly of the "paleocon" characters
  I've met while covering white nationalist conventions like American Renaissance.
  "Everything went wrong when the government became impressed in the 90's with the idea of the 'good stranger,"
  Bolkstein declared. "If the previous governments had tightened their immigration laws, there would not have been a Mr.
  Wilders."
  The only member of the panel to mount a significant challenge to Bolkstein was the Tilburg University professor Paul
  Frissen, who argued that the rule of law and basic standards of democracy protects "the right to be fundamentalist." The
  other panelists either gave Bolkstein's xenophobia a pass or attempted to surpass his resentment of Muslims. After
  Bolkstein lightly criticized Wilders' call for banning the Quran, remarking that "what he says about Islam is nonsense"
  because it contradicts the freedom of religion, AB Klink, a former Dutch senator and ex-Minister of Health, chimed in."It's
  not nonsense because Islam is so different in its cultural values than ours," Klink claimed.
  Then, when Bolkstein called for shutting down Islamic schools, Frissen reminded him that state-supported Christian
  schools in the Dutch Bible belt teach theocratic concepts as well. Meindert Fennema, the political biographer of Wilders,
  entered the debate to demand that all religious schools be closed. "I'm against all forms of religious teaching!" he proudly
  exclaimed, sending gales of applause through the audience. "How can you call yourself a liberal?" Frissen asked with a
  tone of exasperation. Fennema ignored him.
  During question time, a young freelance writer from India named Natasha Ginwala asked Bolkstein to answer for the
  "ghost of neo-colonialism," which "the African people never voted for." She mentioned the exploitative deals forced on
  developing countries by transnational oil companies, possibly alluding to Bolkstein's role as a manager at Royal Dutch
  Shell in authoritarian countries like El Salvador, Indonesia, and Honduras during the 1970's (I'm sure nothing unseemly
  happened during Bo!stein's tenure in these places). Bolkstein's responded bluntly, "If these countries try to be self-
  sufficient it just doesn't work!"
  After the symposium, I talked to Ginwala and a group of her friends, who were mostly immigrant students. They were
  appalled by the ignorance of the Dutch panelists. "None of them knew the first thing about Islam," an Arab student
  remarked. "They couldn't even pretend to understand what Muslims actually believe." Ginwala added, "How can Bolkstein
  tell me my country can't be self-sufficient? I come from India. It's one of the most diversified economies on the planet."
  I was not in Amsterdam long enough to do any formal reporting. However, I did notice that all of the immigrants I spoke to
  were closely and nervously following the rise of the right. At the airport, while waiting to board my flight, I talked to a 20-
  something security guard named Muhammad who seemed almost as bored as I was. Muhammad had spent his whole life
  in Amsterdam, but his parents were from Cairo, Egypt. He told me he wanted to take his girlfriend on a trip to New York
  City and Miami someday. When I brought up the topic of Wilders, he scoffed at his perception of Muslims. "Most of us
  aren't even religious," Muhammad said. "When I hear him talking about Muslims wanting to take over, I just laugh. I'm like,
  is this guy serious?"
  But he did not underestimate Wilders' appeal. "Everything he does and everything he says, it seems like it's carefully
  planned. He obviously knows what he's doing. And they let him get away with it," Muhammad remarked. "Look, I'm just a
  citizen, I'm nobody, but if I say something about Christians or Jews that the government doesn't like, I'll be punished. But
  when Wilders, who is a public official, says all the things he says about Muslims, nothing happens to him. Instead, more
  and more people are voting for him."

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771400 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 1:28 PM
  Subject: Max from Amsterdam on rise of far right in Europe
  http://maxblumenthal.com/2010/11/the-return-of-ghosts-debating-the-rise-of-geert-wilders-and-the-far-right/
  The Return of Ghosts: Debating the rise of Geert Wilders and
  the far-right at the Nexus Symposium
  On 11.18.10, By Max
  The Nexus Institute's Return of Ghosts conference was inspired by the rise of far-right politician Geert Wilders in the
  Netherlands
  I spent last week in Amsterdam, where I participated in the "Return of Ghosts" symposium of the Nexus Institute, a
  discussion/debate about the resurgence of neo-fascism in Europe and anti-democratic trends in the West. Besides
  providing a forum for debating European politics, the symposium was the occasion for the first public appearance in
  Europe by Peruvian writer Mario Vargas Llosa since he was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature last month. The arrival
  of Vargas Llosa, one of the world's foremost intellectuals, resulted in an overflow crowd filled with members of the Dutch
  media, the country's political class, and the royal family.
  Even with Vargas Llosa in the spotlight, the participants' attention was focused on Geert Wilders, the leader of the far-right
  Dutch People's Party for Freedom and Democracy, which is now the third leading party in the Netherlands. With his
  gathering influence, Wilders has essentially placed the Dutch coalition government in a stranglehold; the government
  meets with him every Wednesday to gauge his opinions and ask for his instructions. While Wilders dictates at will to the
  government, he remains independent of it, comfortably avoiding the consequences of policies he has helped to shape. It
  is the perfect position for a politician whose agenda is comprised exclusively of xenophobic populism, and typical strategy
  of the far-right in countries across the continent.
  Wilders' base lies in the mostly Catholic south, where ironically few people have ever encountered a Muslim. He has also
  generated support in the city of Groeningen, once a citadel of the communists. Seeking to expand his base, Wilders
  promised to hire scores of "animal cops" to investigate and prosecute the abuse of animals, a clever wedge strategy in the
  only country I know of that has a party dedicated exclusively to animal rights. Of course, Wilders could care less about our
  furry friends. His stated goal is to end immigration not just to Holland but to all of Europe; ban the Quran (free speech is
  only for the "Judeo-Christian" community), and severely limit the rights of Muslim citizens of Europe by, for instance,
  instituting what he called a "head rag tax" on Muslim women. Wilders' international allies include the goosestepping neo-
  Nazis of the English Defense League, the far-right pogromist Pam Geller, the Belgian neo-fascist party Vlaams Belang,
  and a substantial portion of the US neocon elite. Over the course of just a few years, he has become perhaps the most
  influential Islamophobe in the world.
  But does this make Wilders a fascist? Rob Riemen, the director of the Nexus Institute, thinks so. Riemen has just
  published a book entitled "De Eeuwige Terugkeer Van Het Fascisme," or "The Eternal Return of Fascism" (I eagerly await
  its English translation), dedicated to highlighting the danger of Wilders' eerily familiar brand of right-wing populism. In the
  book, Riemen urges readers to compare Wilders' politics to the early incarnations of European fascism, not to the
  genocidal terminal stage fascism of late World War II. He calls the parallels between Wilders and the early fascists "one-
  and-one." In an economic and civilizational crisis like the kind the Netherlands is facing, Riemen warns that reactionary
  figures like Wilders can easily seize power while centrist elements stand by politely and passively, refusing to call a spade
  a spade. Where Wilders' ascendancy will lead is unknown, but if he is not stopped in his tracks, Riemen is certain the
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771400 Date: 08/31/2015
  B6

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771400 Date: 08/31/2015
  story will not end well. In the week after its publication, Riemen's book flew off the shelves, selling 5000 copies while
  generating heated reactions from across the spectrum of debate.
  Riemen told me that despite the public enthusiasm for his book, his characterization of Wilders has been attacked as "un-
  Dutch." In Dutch culture, as in so many others, open confrontation is avoided at all cost. Political disagreement is
  welcomed only if it is expressed in a collegial manner, as though nothing more than reputations were at stake. So the
  Dutch cultural elite generally goes along to get along. The resistance Riemen has met since he called Wilders out seemed
  to have alarmed and frustrated him. Why was it so difficult for liberal elements in the Netherlands to recognize the clear
  resonances of fascism in Wilders' political style? he wondered. And why did they seem more concerned with regulating
  the terms of debate than with forming a united front against the far-right? Once the symposium opened and I was able to
  see the Dutch elite in action, I began to understand Riemen's indignation.
  The symposium began with a speech by Vargas Llosa, a complex personality who has allied himself with center-right
  parties in Spain and elsewhere but whose politics remain fundamentally rooted in cultural liberalism. Vargas Llosa's
  differences with leaders of the left, which he used to belong to, exploded over the issue of free trade. He is an ardent neo-
  liberal and reviles Latin populists like Hugo Chavez and 011anta Humala who advocate protectionism and industrial
  nationalization.
  Vargas Llosa decorated his speech with literary metaphors and natural imagery to describe the challenges of democracy,
  particularly in Europe. But the body of the address was devoted to the supposed threat Islamic extremism posed to
  Western civilization. Vargas Llosa singled out suicide bombing as the most dangerous phenomenon, pointing to the
  Madrid and London bombings by al-Qaida inspired operatives, while curiously not mentioning suicide attacks by secular
  groups like the Tamil Tigers and the Kurdish PKK, or the nationalistic suicide terror by Palestinian militants (Vargas Llosa
  declared in his speech that "Israel deserves to be treated like any other nation," and has been harshly critical of the state
  in the past).
  During the first panel, which I participated in, Fania Oz-Salzberger, an Israeli professor of history and the daughter of
  famed author Amos Oz, boasted to crowd of Israel's "vibrant democracy." She was enthusiastically seconded by Mitchell
  Cohen, a former editor of Dissent who has devoted considerable energy to assailing anti-Zionist Jews, writing that "the
  dominant species of anti-Semitism encourages anti-Zionism." I found it odd that neither expressed any concern over the
  almost endless stream of anti-democratic laws passing through the Knesset, or by the general authoritarian, anti-liberal
  trend in Israeli society. Oz-Salzberger went on to announce to a smattering of applause that "Geert Wilders and politicians
  like him are not welcomed by Israelis."
  Yet Wilders is one of Israel's most frequent guests, having visited the country over 40 times in 20 years. In fact, he claims
  that his views on Islam and Arabs were forged while living on an Israeli moshav. "Nowhere did I have the special feeling of
  solidarity that I get when I land at Ben Gurion airport," he once said. Wilders reportedly receives heavy support from Dutch
  financial backers of Israel, and has met with a range of Israeli officials. His closest allies lie within the extremist settler
  movement, prompting him to call for the forced transfer of Palestinians to Jordan. Members of the liberal Zionist
  intelligensia like Oz-Salzberger may not not want Wilders around, but who in Israel is listening to them? Israel's
  mainstream leadership echoes Wilders' crudest talking points on a regular basis, while the Zionist left clings to a dwindling
  handful of Knesset seats and watches passively — even resentfully — as a rag-tag band of leftist radicals fights for
  equality for all. Consider a recent statement by former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, who is seen as a centrist within the
  Israeli political spectrum: "The origin of terrorism is within Islam," Olmert declared this month.
  The pro-Israel position of the new breed of European far-rightists has to be recognized as much more than a convenient
  political tactic. Of course, saying you "stand with Israel," as Wilders so often does, is an easy way to insulate yourself from
  charges of anti-Semitism. But the extreme right is also attracted to Israel because the country represents its highest
  ideals. While some critics see Israel as a racist apartheid state, people like Wilders see Israel as a racist apartheid state
  — and they like it. They richly enjoy when Israel mows down Arab Muslims by the dozens and tells the world to go to hell;
  they admire Israel's settler culture; and most of all, they yearn to live in a land like Israel that privileges its ethnic majority
  above all others to the point that it systematically humiliates and dispossesses the swarthy racial outclass. The endgame
  of the far-right is to make Europe less tolerant and more Israeli.
  After the Italian philosopher Paolo Flores D'Arcais proclaimed that Italy was no longer a democratic country, citing PM
  Silvio Berlusconi's control over 90 percent of the country's media, the government's deep seated corruption and the Prime
  Minister's repeated attempts to impose onerous restrictions on journalistic freedom, Riemen asked me if the United States
  was a democracy given the the rapidly rising influence of corporations over the media and elections. After two panelists
  had described Israel as a vibrant democracy while another labeled Italy a non-democratic quasi-dictatorship, I decided
  that our definition of democracy was subjective at best. So I sidestepped the question and outlined a few of the greatest
  blows to American democracy, from the elimination of the Fairness Doctrine to the Telecommunications Deregulation Act
  to the Citizens United SCOTUS decision. Later in the evening, D'Arcais would remark to me with amazement that he
  never knew American media was ever regulated in the first place.
  During the 20 minutes or so when students of Tilburg University were able to question the panel, one student asked
  whether suicide terror was a uniquely Islamic phenomenon, apparently referring to Vargas Llosa's address. I responded
  that it of course was not, citing the example of secular groups like the Tamil Tigers which brought the tactic into practice
  the second suicide. I recommended the audience review the research of Robert Pape, the University of Chicago political
  scientist who demonstrated a clear connection between the American and Israeli occupation of Middle Eastern countries
  and the motivations of suicide bombers. Oz-Salzberger jumped in, proclaiming that occupation has little or nothing to do
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771400 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771400 Date: 08/31/2015
  with the motives of suicide bombers. She did not marshal any evidence to support her point, possibly because our time
  was so limited. It would have been hard to do so, however, without supporting the fundamental argument of Wilders about
  Islam's inherent violence — or the even sillier theory by the Israeli filmmaker/professional hasbarist Pierre Rehov that
  suicide bombers are motivated by sexual repression.
  Next, the Dutch panel took the stage. The main attraction was Frits Bolkstein, the longtime leader of the People's Party for
  Freedom and Democracy who employed Wilders as his parliamentary aide, providing him a stepping stone to his political
  career. He was a silver haired curmudgeon from aristocratic stock who reminded me instantly of the "paleocon" characters
  I've met while covering white nationalist conventions like American Renaissance.
  "Everything went wrong when the government became impressed in the 90's with the idea of the 'good stranger,"
  Bolkstein declared. "If the previous governments had tightened their immigration laws, there would not have been a Mr.
  Wilders."
  The only member of the panel to mount a significant challenge to Bolkstein was the Tilburg University professor Paul
  Frissen, who argued that the rule of law and basic standards of democracy protects "the right to be fundamentalist." The
  other panelists either gave Bolkstein's xenophobia a pass or attempted to surpass his resentment of Muslims. After
  Bolkstein lightly criticized Wilders' call for banning the Quran, remarking that "what he says about Islam is nonsense"
  because it contradicts the freedom of religion, AB Klink, a former Dutch senator and ex-Minister of Health, chimed in."It's
  not nonsense because Islam is so different in its cultural values than ours," Klink claimed.
  Then, when Bolkstein called for shutting down Islamic schools, Frissen reminded him that state-supported Christian
  schools in the Dutch Bible belt teach theocratic concepts as well. Meindert Fennema, the political biographer of Wilders,
  entered the debate to demand that all religious schools be closed. "I'm against all forms of religious teaching!" he proudly
  exclaimed, sending gales of applause through the audience. "How can you call yourself a liberal?" Frissen asked with a
  tone of exasperation. Fennema ignored him.
  During question time, a young freelance writer from India named Natasha Ginwala asked Bolkstein to answer for the
  "ghost of neo-colonialism," which "the African people never voted for." She mentioned the exploitative deals forced on
  developing countries by transnational oil companies, possibly alluding to Bolkstein's role as a manager at Royal Dutch
  Shell in authoritarian countries like El Salvador, Indonesia, and Honduras during the 1970's (I'm sure nothing unseemly
  happened during Bo!stein's tenure in these places). Bolkstein's responded bluntly, "If these countries try to be self-
  sufficient it just doesn't work!"
  After the symposium, I talked to Ginwala and a group of her friends, who were mostly immigrant students. They were
  appalled by the ignorance of the Dutch panelists. "None of them knew the first thing about Islam," an Arab student
  remarked. "They couldn't even pretend to understand what Muslims actually believe." Ginwala added, "How can Bolkstein
  tell me my country can't be self-sufficient? I come from India. It's one of the most diversified economies on the planet."
  I was not in Amsterdam long enough to do any formal reporting. However, I did notice that all of the immigrants I spoke to
  were closely and nervously following the rise of the right. At the airport, while waiting to board my flight, I talked to a 20-
  something security guard named Muhammad who seemed almost as bored as I was. Muhammad had spent his whole life
  in Amsterdam, but his parents were from Cairo, Egypt. He told me he wanted to take his girlfriend on a trip to New York
  City and Miami someday. When I brought up the topic of Wilders, he scoffed at his perception of Muslims. "Most of us
  aren't even religious," Muhammad said. "When I hear him talking about Muslims wanting to take over, I just laugh. I'm like,
  is this guy serious?"
  But he did not underestimate Wilders' appeal. "Everything he does and everything he says, it seems like it's carefully
  planned. He obviously knows what he's doing. And they let him get away with it," Muhammad remarked. "Look, I'm just a
  citizen, I'm nobody, but if I say something about Christians or Jews that the government doesn't like, I'll be punished. But
  when Wilders, who is a public official, says all the things he says about Muslims, nothing happens to him. Instead, more
  and more people are voting for him."
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771400 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771401
MetadataSubject: (REUTERS) FRANCE SAYS IRANIAN WOMAN WILL NOT BE HANGED NOVEMBER 3
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: AbedinH@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-03T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0106/DOC_0C05771401/C05771401.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (Reuters) France says Iranian woman will not be hanged November 3
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH©state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-II; SES-0_05
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, November 3, 2010 8:01 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771401
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771401 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH©state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, November 3, 2010 8:01 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (Reuters) France says Iranian woman will not be hanged November 3
  From: Casteel, Ezra A
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-II; SES-0_05
  Sent: Wed Nov 03 07:58:35 2010
  Subject: (Reuters) France says Iranian woman will not be hanged November 3
  PARIS (Reuters) - An Iranian woman accused of adultery will not be executed November 3, France's foreign minister said,
  citing a telephone conversation with his Iranian counterpart. "Manouchehr Mottaki assured me that Iranian legal
  authorities had not yet reached a verdict in the affair relating to (Ashtiani) and that the information regarding her
  alleged execution did not correspond to reality," Bernard Kouchner said in a statement.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771401 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771402
MetadataSubject: MASHABANE CALL UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771402/C05771402.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Mashabane call update
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.goy>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 8:31 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771402
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Ms,
  Mashabane is no longer available this morning, but can do anytime btw 6-8 am tomorrow morning. Let me know if you'd
  like us to lock in a time.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771402 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.goy>
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 8:31 AM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Ms,
  Mashabane is no longer available this morning, but can do anytime btw 6-8 am tomorrow morning. Let me know if you'd
  like us to lock in a time.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemailcom>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:17:25 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Can we still do it?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H; laurenjilot
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 07:51:45 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Re-sending with a cc to my personal acct just to be sure I didn't miss an email. In the mean time, I'm working to
  determine if there are any other windows of availability
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: 'hdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abed in, Huma
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 05:59:20 2010
  Subject: Mashabane call update
  Mashabane has offered a call time of 8:00 this morning. If that is amenable to you, I can set it up.
  #1t#
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771402 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771403
MetadataSubject: MASHABANE CALL UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771403/C05771403.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Mashabane call update
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 8:33 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771403
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Yes, will work on setting that up and let you know.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771403 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 8:33 AM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Yes, will work on setting that up and let you know.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemailcom>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:31:45 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Ok--can we try for 8 tomorrow?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:30:56 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Ms,
  Mashabane is no longer available this morning, but can do anytime btw 6-8 am tomorrow morning. Let me know if you'd
  like us to lock in a time.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:17:25 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Can we still do it?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H; laurenjilotY
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 07:51:45 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Re-sending with a cc to my personal acct just to be sure I didn't miss an email. In the mean time, I'm working to
  determine if there are any other windows of availability
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: 'hdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 05:59:20 2010
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771403 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771403 Date: 08/31/2015
  Subject: Mashabane call update
  Masha bane has offered a call time of 8:00 this morning. If that is amenable to you, I can set it up.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771403 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771404
MetadataSubject: ARE YOU UP
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-03T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0106/DOC_0C05771404/C05771404.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: are you up
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov> _
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, November 3, 2010 10:38 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771404
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771404 Date: 08/31/2015
  -
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov> _
  Sent: Wednesday, November 3, 2010 10:38 AM
  To: H
  Subject: are you up
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771404 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771405
MetadataSubject: WE JUST HEARD KARZAI IS NOT COMING TO NY.
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-19T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0098/DOC_0C05771405/C05771405.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: We just heard karzai is not coming to ny.
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 8:42 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771405
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771405 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 8:42 AM
  To:
  Subject: We just heard karzai is not coming to ny.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771405 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771408
MetadataSubject: 2012 NATO SUMMIT IN US
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Gordon, Philip H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-18T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0108/DOC_0C05771408/C05771408.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: 2012 NATO summit in US
ExtractedTo: H; Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma
ExtractedFrom: Gordon, Philip H <GordonPH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 3:35 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771408
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Just got word POTUS has agreed to host NATO summit in US in spring 2012. Alliance expected to agree and
  announce this in Lisbon.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771408 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Gordon, Philip H <GordonPH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 3:35 PM
  To: H; Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma
  Subject: 2012 NATO summit in US
  Just got word POTUS has agreed to host NATO summit in US in spring 2012. Alliance expected to agree and
  announce this in Lisbon.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771408 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771409
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-19T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0098/DOC_0C05771409/C05771409.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 8:52 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771409
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: You want me to come to chappaqua to help u leave today? Or meet u in nyc?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771409 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2010 8:52 AM
  To: H
  You want me to come to chappaqua to help u leave today? Or meet u in nyc?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771409 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771410
MetadataSubject: 11/3 0845 MEETING READOUT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-03T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0106/DOC_0C05771410/C05771410.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCc: Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771410
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Wednesday, November 3, 2010 10:58 AM
  FW: 11/3 0845 Meeting Readout

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771410 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Wednesday, November 3, 2010 10:58 AM
  FW: 11/3 0845 Meeting Readout
  From: Mull, Stephen D
  Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 9:54 AM
  To: Abedin, Hume; Sullivan, Jacob); Moy, Kin W; Macmanus, Joseph E
  Cc: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: 11/3 0845 Meeting Readout
  Elections
  With some 20 seats still undecided, Republicans have already picked up 61 seats in House; Democrats likely to
  keep 51-53 seats in Senate. Spratt and Skelton losses are among more significant; H will prepare an analysis of
  election's impact on our oversight committees. Murkowski appears to be headed for historic write-in win; her
  support of Law of Sea and likely sympathy for New START will be good for us. Reid will likely return to
  Washington energized by win to pursue consequential lame duck session. Manchin and Kirk will take up their
  seats in the Senate this month; Rich suggests S calls to each to help lock in support for New START.
  Other Congressional issues
  Tom Nides' prep going well, and he'll see SFRC members and Sem Gilibrand this week. Rich expects
  committee will vote him out during lame duck; still unclear if we'll get floor vote. An inter-agency team Will
  brief the Hill this week on the President's Asia trip. Kerry will leave for the Middle East, including Syria, on
  Sunday.
  Guantanamo Closure
  DOJ is considering Harold's latest paper on the way forward.
  Iran
  Kouchner announced after conversation with Iranian FM Mottaki that adultery convict Ashtiani will not be
  imminently executed, as earlier reported. Jundullah designation being announced this morning.
  India
  Roemer and Blake making good progress on nuclear liability issue, but we are not yet ready to raise public
  expectations.
  Iraq
  Press reports about Inspector General's report on mil-civ transition mistakenly suggest that State had been
  unaware of associated challenges.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771410 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771410 Date: 08/31/2015
  Middle East
  Saeb Erekat here today, and will be delivering public remarks. He'll meet George Mitchell tomorrow.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771410 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771411
MetadataSubject: SHE'S STILL OUR PARK RIDGE GIRL!!
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Ebeling, Betsy
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771411/C05771411.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: She's still our Park Ridge Girl!!
ExtractedTo: H; Huma Abedin
ExtractedFrom: Ebeling, Betsy
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 8:41 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771411
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Marking a landmark moment for all
  Daily Herald Editorial Board
  Published: 8/26/2010 12:05 AM
  Today marks a watershed moment in our nation's history.
  Know what it is? Any plans to celebrate the occasion? Ninety years ago this day, the United States
  secretary of state signed into law the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution giving women the right
  to vote.
  That significant moment in history securing that basic civil right for one of the two genders in
  existence came after a more than 70-year struggle that saw pioneering "radical" women jailed and
  physically abused as they fought for justice.
  Ninety years ago today. Not all that long ago, really. We still have women among us who lived during
  a time when this basic but powerful activity was prohibited. Denied to their mothers and
  grandmothers, older sisters and aunts.
  Illinois played a pivotal role in the struggle, and Illinois and suburban women continue to mark our
  history, politics and policy. And they should continue to by exercising their right, speaking out and
  working to change policies that affect us all.
  Illinois did not allow women to vote in presidential and local elections until 1913 and, according to
  votingwomen.org, Illinois, Michigan and Wisconsin were the first three states to ratify the 19th
  Amendment on June 10, 1919.
  From the start, Illinois and its suburbs have been home to pioneering women. Libertyville's Clara
  Colby is listed as the first woman to vote, having cast a ballot for a new town hall while, papers at the
  time reported, her husband stayed home to "scrub clothes in the laundry."
  There is Jane Addams, the Cedarville, III., native social worker and suffragist who founded Chicago's
  Hull House and was one of the first women to win a Nobel Peace Prize.
  And Illinois has elected 14 female members of Congress. The first was Chicago Republican Winnifred
  S. Huck, only the third woman elected to Congress, just two years after the 19th Amendment
  ratification. Huck was the first wife and mother elected to Congress. Republican Ruth Hanna
  McCormick worked as a Springfield lobbyist who helped pass the law allowing Illinois women to vote
  in some elections in 1913 before she moved on to Congress. Democrat Emily Taft Douglas, an early
  leader of the League of Women Voters and an internationalist who was the wife of former U.S. Sen.
  Paul Douglas and a cousin to President William H. Taft, beat isolationist Republican Stephen Day in
  1945, according to the Women in Congress website.
  In more recent times, Rockford Republican Lynn Martin moved from Congress to Labor Secretary
  and Chicago Democrat Carol Moseley Braun became the first black woman in the U.S. Senate. Now,
  of course, we also have Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who hails from Park Ridge. In the suburban
  trenches all along the way, women have been leading and agitating for change. Former Democratic
  state Rep. Eugenia Chapman of Arlington Heights is credited with helping start community colleges in
  Illinois. Republican Giddy Dyer of Hinsdale joined her in supporting the Equal Rights Amendment and
  also passed DuPage County's first clean air ordinance. Chapman worked with Republican Virginia B.
  Macdonald of Arlington Heights to establish a women's center at Harper College. And omit goes.
  Nice, you say, but big deal? Indeed, they were a big deal and, indeed, women shaping our lives still
  are a big deal. Men, can you imagine your life without women? Women, can you imagine your life
  without other women? American women have come a long way in 90 years and society is the better
  for it. Women vote in greater numbers than men and have for years, nationally and in Illinois. They
  very well can and should vote, write laws, lead and play even more influential roles in what the next
  90 years, and beyond, may bring us all.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771411 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Ebeling, Betsy
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 8:41 AM
  To: H; Huma Abedin
  Subject: She's still our Park Ridge Girl!!
  Marking a landmark moment for all
  Daily Herald Editorial Board
  Published: 8/26/2010 12:05 AM
  Today marks a watershed moment in our nation's history.
  Know what it is? Any plans to celebrate the occasion? Ninety years ago this day, the United States
  secretary of state signed into law the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution giving women the right
  to vote.
  That significant moment in history securing that basic civil right for one of the two genders in
  existence came after a more than 70-year struggle that saw pioneering "radical" women jailed and
  physically abused as they fought for justice.
  Ninety years ago today. Not all that long ago, really. We still have women among us who lived during
  a time when this basic but powerful activity was prohibited. Denied to their mothers and
  grandmothers, older sisters and aunts.
  Illinois played a pivotal role in the struggle, and Illinois and suburban women continue to mark our
  history, politics and policy. And they should continue to by exercising their right, speaking out and
  working to change policies that affect us all.
  Illinois did not allow women to vote in presidential and local elections until 1913 and, according to
  votingwomen.org, Illinois, Michigan and Wisconsin were the first three states to ratify the 19th
  Amendment on June 10, 1919.
  From the start, Illinois and its suburbs have been home to pioneering women. Libertyville's Clara
  Colby is listed as the first woman to vote, having cast a ballot for a new town hall while, papers at the
  time reported, her husband stayed home to "scrub clothes in the laundry."
  There is Jane Addams, the Cedarville, III., native social worker and suffragist who founded Chicago's
  Hull House and was one of the first women to win a Nobel Peace Prize.
  And Illinois has elected 14 female members of Congress. The first was Chicago Republican Winnifred
  S. Huck, only the third woman elected to Congress, just two years after the 19th Amendment
  ratification. Huck was the first wife and mother elected to Congress. Republican Ruth Hanna
  McCormick worked as a Springfield lobbyist who helped pass the law allowing Illinois women to vote
  in some elections in 1913 before she moved on to Congress. Democrat Emily Taft Douglas, an early
  leader of the League of Women Voters and an internationalist who was the wife of former U.S. Sen.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771411 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771411 Date: 08/31/2015
  Paul Douglas and a cousin to President William H. Taft, beat isolationist Republican Stephen Day in
  1945, according to the Women in Congress website.
  In more recent times, Rockford Republican Lynn Martin moved from Congress to Labor Secretary
  and Chicago Democrat Carol Moseley Braun became the first black woman in the U.S. Senate. Now,
  of course, we also have Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who hails from Park Ridge. In the suburban
  trenches all along the way, women have been leading and agitating for change. Former Democratic
  state Rep. Eugenia Chapman of Arlington Heights is credited with helping start community colleges in
  Illinois. Republican Giddy Dyer of Hinsdale joined her in supporting the Equal Rights Amendment and
  also passed DuPage County's first clean air ordinance. Chapman worked with Republican Virginia B.
  Macdonald of Arlington Heights to establish a women's center at Harper College. And omit goes.
  Nice, you say, but big deal? Indeed, they were a big deal and, indeed, women shaping our lives still
  are a big deal. Men, can you imagine your life without women? Women, can you imagine your life
  without other women? American women have come a long way in 90 years and society is the better
  for it. Women vote in greater numbers than men and have for years, nationally and in Illinois. They
  very well can and should vote, write laws, lead and play even more influential roles in what the next
  90 years, and beyond, may bring us all.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771411 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771412
MetadataSubject: SENATE JUST VOTED TO CONFRIM
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Lew, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-18T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0108/DOC_0C05771412/C05771412.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Senate just voted to confirm
ExtractedTo: H; Mills, Cheryl D; Sullivan, Jacob J
ExtractedFrom: Lew, Jacob J <LewJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 8:28 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771412
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  After a cloture petition was prepared there was a negotiation and Landrieu released her hold. Voice vote in the end.
  More words of thanks and farewell to follow, but wanted to share the news.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771412 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Lew, Jacob J <LewJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 8:28 PM
  To: H; Mills, Cheryl D; Sullivan, Jacob J
  Subject: Senate just voted to confirm
  After a cloture petition was prepared there was a negotiation and Landrieu released her hold. Voice vote in the end.
  More words of thanks and farewell to follow, but wanted to share the news.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771412 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771413
MetadataSubject: FINANCIAL TIMES EDITORIAL ON FOOD SECURITY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-14T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0103/DOC_0C05771413/C05771413.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: Financial Times Editorial on Food Security
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Klevorick, Caitlin B
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 7:14 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771413
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: See highlighted area of editorial
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771413 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 7:14 AM
  To:
  Subject: FW: Financial Times Editorial on Food Security
  See highlighted area of editorial
  From: Huang, Cindy Y
  Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 5:21 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Cc: Klevorick, Caitlin B
  Subject: Fw: Financial Times Editorial on Food Security
  So exciting that S was singled out for praise! Thanks to Caitlin who did the background heavy lifting on this (related to the
  earlier piece on Haiti and food security)!
  From: Clark, Jeanne L
  To: Huang, Cindy Y; Nagy, Eleanor
  Sent: Wed Oct 13 23:34:49 2010
  Subject: FW: Financial Times Editorial on Food Security
  I wanted to make sure you both saw this Financial Times editorial. This is the most resounding endorsement of Feed the
  Future I've seen in a major paper.
  Regards,
  Jeanne
  Food security
  Published: October 13 2010 22:22 I Last updated: October 13 2010 22:22
  The spectre of a global food crisis has reared its head again. Soaring corn prices, which on Monday recorded their biggest
  one-day rise since 1973, have triggered fears of a return to the turmoil of 2007-2008. Far-reaching measures are needed
  to prevent a recurrence.
  Rising prices over the last decade are in part the result of burgeoning demand from emerging markets such as China and
  India. The emergence of commodities as a distinct asset class has also put upward pressure on prices. Commodity index-
  fund investment has soared over the last decade. Non-food commodities, in particular metals, have been equally affected.
  Copper and tin prices hit record highs last week.
  Shocks on the supply side, in particular adverse weather events, have also contributed. Droughts in eastern Europe and
  heavy rains in North America this summer sent grain and oilseed prices soaring.
  In the long run the market is likely to respond to higher prices by boosting production. Increases in productivity and
  innovations such as genetically modified crops will help supply to catch up with demand, bringing food prices down to
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771413 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771413 Date: 08/31/2015
  more affordable levels.
  But governments need to do a better job of managing shocks when they occur — and in doing so must not suppress the
  price mechanism. Actions taken to alleviate shortages have often undermined production when it is most needed. Export
  bans, such as that introduced by Russia in August, discourage productive investment by denying producers the windfall of
  selling to international markets. Direct food aid does the same by undercutting farmers in developing countries.
  A mechanism is needed to keep markets open during volatile periods, however politically difficult this is. Rich countries
  should also continue to replace food aid with development assistance that boosts agricultural productivity. Initiatives such
  as Hillary Clinton's Feed the Future programme, which aims to give small-scale farmers access to new technologies, are
  much needed.
  Poor countries are not without remedy. Larger food reserves will help to relieve shortages. Investing in irrigation and
  other measures to improve land quality will accelerate productivity growth. Rich countries should help to finance such
  Investments.
  We are beginning to realise that the era of food surpluses has come to an end. How policymakers respond will determine
  whether the turbulence of recent months becomes a regular occurrence.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771413 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771414
MetadataSubject: MASHABANE CALL UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771414/C05771414.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Mashabane call update
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 8:52 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771414
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Confirmed for 8am tomorrow morning
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771414 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 8:52 AM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Confirmed for 8am tomorrow morning
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: Ihdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:33:17 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Yes, will work on setting that up and let you know.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:31:45 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Ok--can we try for 8 tomorrow?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:30:56 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Ms,
  Mashabane is no longer available this morning, but can do anytime btw 6-8 am tomorrow morning. Let me know if you'd
  like us to lock in a time.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:17:25 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Can we still do it?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H; laurenjiloty
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 07:51:45 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771414 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771414 Date: 08/31/2015
  Re-sending with a cc to my personal acct just to be sure I didn't miss an email. In the mean time, I'm working to
  determine if there are any other windows of availability
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: ihdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 05:59:20 2010
  Subject: Mashabane call update
  Mashabane has offered a call time of 8:00 this morning. If that is amenable to you, I can set it up.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771414 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771415
MetadataSubject: SENATE JUST VOTED TO CONFRIM
MetadataTo: Lew, Jacob J
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-18T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0108/DOC_0C05771415/C05771415.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Senate just voted to confirm
ExtractedTo: Lew, Jacob J; H; Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 8:29 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771415
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: CONGRATSIIIIII
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771415 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 8:29 PM
  To: Lew, Jacob J; H; Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Re: Senate just voted to confirm
  CONGRATSIIIIII
  Original Message
  From: Lew, Jacob
  To: 'hdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>; Mills, Cheryl D; Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Thu Nov 18 20:27:53 2010
  Subject: Senate just voted to confirm
  After a cloture petition was prepared there was a negotiation and Landrieu released her hold. Voice vote in the end.
  More words of thanks and farewell to follow, but wanted to share the news.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771415 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771416
MetadataSubject: JACK LEW WAS JUST CONFIRMED!!
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-18T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0108/DOC_0C05771416/C05771416.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Jack lew was just confirmed!!
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abed in, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Reines, Philippe I; Sullivan, Jacob 1
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 8:45 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771416
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771416 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abed in, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 8:45 PM
  To: H
  Cc: Reines, Philippe I; Sullivan, Jacob 1
  Subject: Jack lew was just confirmed!!
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771416 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771417
MetadataSubject: IN CASE YOU MISSED, AND SEE LAST GRAPH. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771417/C05771417.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771417
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  sbwhoeop
  Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:05 AM
  In case you missed, and see last graph. Sid
  H: In Case you missed this, by the FT international affairs editor, esp the last graph. Sid
  Financial Times FT.corn
  A poisoned process holds little hope
  By David Gardner
  Published: August 25 2010 22:46 1 Last updated: August 25 2010 22:46
  „
  As the caravans of Middle East peace negotiators rumble into Washington next week for the umpteenth time, the
  pervasive cynicism and sense of deja vu all over again is overwhelming — and with good reason.
  The Middle East peace process long ago turned into a tortured charade of pure process while events on the ground — in
  particular the relentless and strategic Israeli colonisation of occupied Palestinian land — pull in the opposite direction to
  peace. "We have all been colluding in a gigantic confidence trick," is how one Arab minister puts it, "and here we go
  again."
  While many factors had combined to hand veto powers to rejectionists on both sides, the heart of the question remains
  the continuing Israeli occupation. It is essential to remember that the biggest single increase of Jewish settlers on Arab
  and — a 50 per cent rise — took place in 1992-96 under the governments of peace-makers Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon
  Peres at.the high-water mark of the Oslo peace accords. Many Israelis will point to the perfidy of the late Yassir Arafat,
  who wanted to talk peace but keep the option of armed resistance dangerously in play. But what killed Oslo was the
  occupation. The second intifada that erupted a decade ago was essentially the Oslo war.
  A decade on, the Israeli settlement enterprise has turned the occupied West Bank into a discontiguous scattering of
  cantons, walled in by a security barrier built on yet more annexed Arab land and criss-crossed by segregated Israeli roads
  linking the settlements. Last month, B'Tselem, the Israeli human rights group, published a study showing Israel has now
  taken 42 per cent of the West Bank, with 300,000 settlers there and another 200,000 in East Jerusalem. The siege of
  Gaza has turned that sliver of land into a vast, open-air prison.
  The main feature of the present situationi is the disconnect between the high politics of the utterly discredited peace
  process and these — in Israeli parlance — "facts on the ground".
  At last month's White House summit, where Barack Obama and Benjamin Netanyahu massaged their long estrangement
  into a political armistice, the US president praised the Israeli prime minister as a leader "willing to take risks for peace".
  But there is no evidence for this whatsoever. True, in June last year, in response to Mr Obama's Cairo speech denying
  any legitimacy to Israel's settlements, Mr Netanyahu forced himself to utter the words "Palestinian state" — but he
  surrounded them with barbed-wire caveats that voided them of meaning.
  Indeed, the words all sides use — peace, resolution, security, and so on — may be the same; but what each side means by
  them is different.
  The mainstream Palestinian leaders, President Mahmoud Abbas and Salem Fayyad, the prime minister, and the Quartet
  made up of the US, the European Union, the UN and Russia, talk of a negotiated resolution. This means two states living
  in peace and security, and a Palestinian homeland on the 22 per cent of Mandate Palestine taken by Israel in the 1967
  Arab-Israeli war. East Jerusalem would serve as the capital of the West Bank and Gaza, with marginal land swaps to
  preserve some Israeli settlements near Jerusalem. But what does Mr Netanyahu mean?
  He has been most clear on what he does not mean. For a start, he has set his face against any concessions on
  Jerusalem. He wants to keep most settlements except for the far-flung "ideological" ones and the 100-plus "outposts"
  established as pawns to be traded once the chess game began. His idea of a demilitarised Palestinian state is more like a
  sort of supra-municipal administration than a self-determined, independent government.
  Will he surprise us, on the hackneyed Nixon and China principle that holds it is politicians of the right who most easily
  close difficult deals? There is little to suggest that:
  The thinking of Mr Netanyahu, son of a celebrated promoter of Greater Israel, has always been profoundly irredentist.
  While his nationalist Likud faces the constraints of being in coalition with an assortment of ultra-rightist and ultra-orthodox
  parties as well as Labour, that was plainly his choice; the centrist Kadima party was (and remains) an alternative. To be
  fair, Israel's electoral system — with a low threshold for entry into the Knesset that makes multi-party coalitions inevitable —
  means lobbies such as the settlers can take the national interest hostage. But Mr Netanyahu magnifies this by his choice
  of partners and by diligently firing up the ultra-hawks in the pro-Israel lobby in the US.
  As risks he. has taken for peace, Exhibit A is the much-hyped moratorium on settlement-building, which expires next
  month and has, in any case, been speciously interpreted. While the bulldozers to build settlements have been idling,
  moreover, the bulldozers demolishing Palestinian homes have been roaring: the rate of demolition in and around
  Jerusalem has doubled this year, while the army has just razed the village of al-Farisiye in the Jordan Valley, in line with
  Mr Netanyahu's strategically obsolete obsession with keeping the valley as Israel's eastern border.
  As diplomacy struggles to keep alive the viability of a two-state solution, three rival systems of control have crystallised in
  the occupied territories that would make up a future Palestinian homeland: the settlements; the crimped Palestinian
  Authority of Mr Abbas and Mr Fayyad; and then Hamas, which Israel and its Arab and western allies have tried and failed
  to marginalise. Time is short for a negotiated outcome; it may even have run out.
  The outlines of a deal are clear, in the (Bill) Clinton parameters of 2000 and Arab Peace initiative of 2002, endorsed by 22
  Arab and 57 Muslim countries (as well as Hamas, as part of the 2007 Mecca accord). There has to be an end to the
  occupation, and the US and Quartet cannot just allude to this; they must demand it.
  The writer is international affairs editor
  "FT" and "Financial Times" are trademarks of the Financial Times. Prjyacy pplicyI Terris
  © Copyright The Financial Times, Ltd 2010.

RawText:
  -
  4E'
  /s7 t"
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771417 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  -11111111111119=111MINSIMMOI9 4911111101111
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  sbwhoeop
  Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:05 AM
  In case you missed, and see last graph. Sid
  H: In Case you missed this, by the FT international affairs editor, esp the last graph. Sid
  Financial Times FT.corn
  A poisoned process holds little hope
  By David Gardner
  Published: August 25 2010 22:46 1 Last updated: August 25 2010 22:46
  „
  As the caravans of Middle East peace negotiators rumble into Washington next week for the umpteenth time, the
  pervasive cynicism and sense of deja vu all over again is overwhelming — and with good reason.
  The Middle East peace process long ago turned into a tortured charade of pure process while events on the ground — in
  particular the relentless and strategic Israeli colonisation of occupied Palestinian land — pull in the opposite direction to
  peace. "We have all been colluding in a gigantic confidence trick," is how one Arab minister puts it, "and here we go
  again."
  While many factors had combined to hand veto powers to rejectionists on both sides, the heart of the question remains
  the continuing Israeli occupation. It is essential to remember that the biggest single increase of Jewish settlers on Arab
  and — a 50 per cent rise — took place in 1992-96 under the governments of peace-makers Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon
  Peres at.the high-water mark of the Oslo peace accords. Many Israelis will point to the perfidy of the late Yassir Arafat,
  who wanted to talk peace but keep the option of armed resistance dangerously in play. But what killed Oslo was the
  occupation. The second intifada that erupted a decade ago was essentially the Oslo war.
  A decade on, the Israeli settlement enterprise has turned the occupied West Bank into a discontiguous scattering of
  cantons, walled in by a security barrier built on yet more annexed Arab land and criss-crossed by segregated Israeli roads
  linking the settlements. Last month, B'Tselem, the Israeli human rights group, published a study showing Israel has now
  taken 42 per cent of the West Bank, with 300,000 settlers there and another 200,000 in East Jerusalem. The siege of
  Gaza has turned that sliver of land into a vast, open-air prison.
  The main feature of the present situationi is the disconnect between the high politics of the utterly discredited peace
  process and these — in Israeli parlance — "facts on the ground".
  At last month's White House summit, where Barack Obama and Benjamin Netanyahu massaged their long estrangement
  into a political armistice, the US president praised the Israeli prime minister as a leader "willing to take risks for peace".
  But there is no evidence for this whatsoever. True, in June last year, in response to Mr Obama's Cairo speech denying
  any legitimacy to Israel's settlements, Mr Netanyahu forced himself to utter the words "Palestinian state" — but he
  surrounded them with barbed-wire caveats that voided them of meaning.
  Indeed, the words all sides use — peace, resolution, security, and so on — may be the same; but what each side means by
  them is different.
  The mainstream Palestinian leaders, President Mahmoud Abbas and Salem Fayyad, the prime minister, and the Quartet
  made up of the US, the European Union, the UN and Russia, talk of a negotiated resolution. This means two states living
  in peace and security, and a Palestinian homeland on the 22 per cent of Mandate Palestine taken by Israel in the 1967
  Arab-Israeli war. East Jerusalem would serve as the capital of the West Bank and Gaza, with marginal land swaps to
  preserve some Israeli settlements near Jerusalem. But what does Mr Netanyahu mean?
  He has been most clear on what he does not mean. For a start, he has set his face against any concessions on
  Jerusalem. He wants to keep most settlements except for the far-flung "ideological" ones and the 100-plus "outposts"
  established as pawns to be traded once the chess game began. His idea of a demilitarised Palestinian state is more like a
  sort of supra-municipal administration than a self-determined, independent government.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771417 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771417 Date: 08/31/2015
  Will he surprise us, on the hackneyed Nixon and China principle that holds it is politicians of the right who most easily
  close difficult deals? There is little to suggest that:
  The thinking of Mr Netanyahu, son of a celebrated promoter of Greater Israel, has always been profoundly irredentist.
  While his nationalist Likud faces the constraints of being in coalition with an assortment of ultra-rightist and ultra-orthodox
  parties as well as Labour, that was plainly his choice; the centrist Kadima party was (and remains) an alternative. To be
  fair, Israel's electoral system — with a low threshold for entry into the Knesset that makes multi-party coalitions inevitable —
  means lobbies such as the settlers can take the national interest hostage. But Mr Netanyahu magnifies this by his choice
  of partners and by diligently firing up the ultra-hawks in the pro-Israel lobby in the US.
  As risks he. has taken for peace, Exhibit A is the much-hyped moratorium on settlement-building, which expires next
  month and has, in any case, been speciously interpreted. While the bulldozers to build settlements have been idling,
  moreover, the bulldozers demolishing Palestinian homes have been roaring: the rate of demolition in and around
  Jerusalem has doubled this year, while the army has just razed the village of al-Farisiye in the Jordan Valley, in line with
  Mr Netanyahu's strategically obsolete obsession with keeping the valley as Israel's eastern border.
  As diplomacy struggles to keep alive the viability of a two-state solution, three rival systems of control have crystallised in
  the occupied territories that would make up a future Palestinian homeland: the settlements; the crimped Palestinian
  Authority of Mr Abbas and Mr Fayyad; and then Hamas, which Israel and its Arab and western allies have tried and failed
  to marginalise. Time is short for a negotiated outcome; it may even have run out.
  The outlines of a deal are clear, in the (Bill) Clinton parameters of 2000 and Arab Peace initiative of 2002, endorsed by 22
  Arab and 57 Muslim countries (as well as Hamas, as part of the 2007 Mecca accord). There has to be an end to the
  occupation, and the US and Quartet cannot just allude to this; they must demand it.
  The writer is international affairs editor
  "FT" and "Financial Times" are trademarks of the Financial Times. Prjyacy pplicyI Terris
  © Copyright The Financial Times, Ltd 2010.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771417 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771418
MetadataSubject: SENATE JUST VOTED TO CONFIRM
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Lew, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-18T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0108/DOC_0C05771418/C05771418.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Senate just voted to confirm
ExtractedFrom: Lew, Jacob J <Lewn@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 8:54 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771418
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Thanks so much -- for your leadership and friendship and for the opportunity to be part of this great team.
  All best.
  Jack

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771418 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Lew, Jacob J <Lewn@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 8:54 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: Senate just voted to confirm
  Thanks so much -- for your leadership and friendship and for the opportunity to be part of this great team.
  All best.
  Jack
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Lew, Jacob J
  Sent: Thu Nov 18 20:48:20 2010
  Subject: Re: Senate just voted to confirm
  Congratulations and good luck-
  All the best, H
  Original Message
  From: Lew, Jacob J <Lewil@state.gov>
  To: H; Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>; Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivan.1.1@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Nov 18 20:27:53 2010
  Subject: Senate just voted to confirm
  After a cloture petition was prepared there was a negotiation and Landrieu released her hold. Voice vote in the end.
  More words of thanks and farewell to follow, but wanted to share the news.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771418 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771419
MetadataSubject: FOR HILLARY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Huma, Abedin
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-18T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0108/DOC_0C05771419/C05771419.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: for Hillary
ExtractedTo: H; 'woodardew@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: Huma Abedin
ExtractedCc: H
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 9:05 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771419
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Ok
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771419 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Huma Abedin
  Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 9:05 PM
  To: H; 'woodardew@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: for Hillary
  Ok
  Original Message
  From: H
  To: Huma Abedin; 'WoodardEW@state.gov' <WoodardEW@state.gov>
  Cc: H
  Sent: Thu Nov 18 21:03:28 2010
  Subject: Fw: for Hillary
  Let's discuss for schedule.
  Original Message
  From: PVerveer
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Nov 13 21:59:08 2010
  Subject: Re: for Hillary
  It's a very New York crowd and very Diane style event (i.e. unconventional) Last year, it was held in one of the big
  delegates' lounges at the UN and she redid all the chairs, etc in her patterns. The awards are all serious and DVF is the
  moderator. Each awardee receives 50K for her ongoing work. The event bears no resemblance to a typical foreign policy
  event, but if you were in NY, you could arrive for the awards and leave. I have no doubt you would be very warmly
  embraced and DVF and Barry are so fond of you. I would only do it if could be easily done.
  In a message dated 11/13/2010 8:51:10 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, HDR22@clintonemail.com writes:
  Do you think I should do this?
  Original Message
  From: pverveer
  To: H
  Sent: Fri Nov 12 11:32:48 2010
  Subject: Fwd: for Hillary
  from your friend, DVF
  Original Message
  From: DVF <dvf
  To: pverveer
  Sent: Fri, Nov 12, 2010 1:29 am
  Subject: for Hillary
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771419 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771419 Date: 08/31/2015
  Dearest Madame Secretary,
  I am in Abu Dhabi, watching you on television with Prime Minister Natanyaou. You are looking so well ! You are
  more and more impressive...I am so proud of you !
  We are planning our Women of the World Conference again for next March. On Saturday night, March 12th, I
  will be having the 2nd DVF Award at a dinner at the UN. 2 of the recipients will be women from Vital Voices, one will be
  voted by people on line and the fourth one is the special one give to formidable example of courage and leadership. Last
  year it was given to Ingrid Betancourt by Meryll Streep.
  More than anything, I would love if you would be willing to accept that award. YOU are such an example of
  strength. leadership and spirit to all of us women.
  Am I dreaming or would you be willing to accept it ?
  Lots of love
  Diane von Furstenberg
  DVF Studio L.P.
  440 West 14th Street
  New York, NY 10014
  Tel: 212-741-6607
  01:29:41 Fri 12 Nov 2010 Diane von Furstenberg L.P.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771419 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771420
MetadataSubject: MASHABANE CALL UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771420/C05771420.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Mashabane call update
ExtractedTo: H; 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: Huma Abedin <Huma@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Huma Abedin
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:50 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771420
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  III let lauren handle
  Ops can schedule menendez to lock in

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771420 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Huma Abedin <Huma@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:50 AM
  To: H; 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  III let lauren handle
  Ops can schedule menendez to lock in
  Original Message
  From: H
  To: 'JilotyLC@state.gove <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 09:49:01 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Also, I'd like to set up calls w Martin Indyk and Rob Wexler for this morning if possible.
  Am I set to talk w Menendez at noon?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:51:35 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Confirmed for 8am tomorrow morning
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: 'hdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:33:17 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Yes, will work on setting that up and let you know.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:31:45 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Ok--can we try for 8 tomorrow?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771420 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771420 Date: 08/31/2015
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:30:56 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Ms,
  Mashabane is no longer available this morning, but can do anytime btw 6-8 am tomorrow morning. Let me know if you'd
  like us to lock in a time.
  Original Message
  •From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:17:25 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Can we still do it?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H; laurenjilot
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 07:51:45 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Re-sending with a cc to my personal acct just to be sure I didn't miss an email. In the mean time, I'm working to
  determine if there are any other windows of availability
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: 'hdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 05:59:20 2010
  Subject: Mashabane call update
  Mashabane has offered a call time of 8:00 this morning. If that is amenable to you, I can set it up.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771420 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771421
MetadataSubject: THE BEAT GOES ON.....
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Ebeling, Betsy
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-03T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0106/DOC_0C05771421/C05771421.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: The beat goes on
ExtractedFrom: Ebeling, Betsy
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, November 3, 2010 11:32 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771421
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  With 97 percent of the precincts counted, Quinn and Bill Brady Were separated by three-tenths of a percentage point —
  roughly 11,100 votes out of 3.57 million cast.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771421 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Ebeling, Betsy
  Sent: Wednesday, November 3, 2010 11:32 AM
  To:
  Subject: The beat goes on
  With 97 percent of the precincts counted, Quinn and Bill Brady Were separated by three-tenths of a percentage point —
  roughly 11,100 votes out of 3.57 million cast.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771421 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771422
MetadataSubject: (AP) LEW CONFIRMED AS BUDGET DIRECTOR
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Huma, Abedin
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-18T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0108/DOC_0C05771422/C05771422.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (AP) Lew confirmed as budget director
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-0_05; SES-O_Shift-III
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 9:05 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771422
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771422 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 9:05 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (AP) Lew confirmed as budget director
  From: Deyo, Justin A
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-0_05; SES-O_Shift-III
  Sent: Thu Nov 18 20:51:56 2010
  Subject: (AP) Lew confirmed as budget director
  WASHINGTON (AP) - The Senate confirmed Jacob Lew as director of the Office of Management and Budget after a
  Louisiana senator lifted a hold on his nomination. Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu had held up Lew's confirmation to
  protest the administration's six-month moratorium on deepwater oil and gas drilling in the Gulf. She said that "notable
  progress has been made" in her talks with the Interior Department and noted some permits have been issued in recent
  weeks. The nomination was confirmed by voice vote.
  Justin Deyo
  U.S. Department of State
  Operations Center (S/ES-0)
  202-647-1512
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771422 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771423
MetadataSubject: IN CASE YOU MISSED, AND SEE LAST GRAPH. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771423/C05771423.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: In case you missed, and see last graph. Sid
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:02 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771423
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Maybe. And, of course, worth the effort. Without an effort, the two state solution is dead; if failed, on the other hand, also
  dead. Another idea, don't know if it can be made to work: How to introduce Israel entering the NPT and ending its nuclear
  ambiguity, which is its state policy, but which itself is the model for Iran now. Can this issue be used profitably in
  negotiations, a wild card, as it were? Can options be developed on whether it can, how it might work, potential effect on
  peace process? Israel's nuclear ambiguity policy is certainly a big issue coming given Iran. See below from Haaretz today:
  • Home
  • Print Edition
  • Nt-
  -
  3ws
  • Published 00:56 26.08.10
  • Latest update 00:56 26.08.10
  Interview / Why Israel should end its policy of
  nuclear ambiguity
  An interview with Avner Cohen, expert on nonproliferation
  issues and author of the forthcoming book "The Worst-Kept
  Secret: Israel's Bargain with the Bomb."
  By Nia.
  tasha Mozwvava Tags: Israel news
  Avner Cohen is a senior fellow of the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of
  International Studies. He is the author of "Israel and the Bomb" and the forthcoming "The Worst-Kept Secret: Israel's
  Bargain with the Bomb."
  Avner Cohen, you claim that the time has come for Israel to abandon its policy of nuclear ambiguity. Why now,
  and why would that be good for Israel?
  "Nuclear ambiguity is a cornerstone of Israeli strategic thinking. It was born many years ago, and sealed as part of a
  comprehensive deal with the United States in 1969. It was appropriate at the time, but today. in my opinion, it is not just
  anachronistic, but foolish and anti-democratic. Even in realpolitik terms, it is an 'own goal' for Israel. In my view, it
  undermines genuine Israeli interests, including the need to gain recognition and legitimacy and to be counted among the
  responsible states in this strategic field."
  Are you sure the pressure on Israel is so severe? If Israel is criticized over its nuclear program, its usually
  marginal. The brunt of the criticism is over its treatment of the Palestinians. •
  "Israel received tacit consent for its nuclear program from the Western world because it appeared to be a small, just state'
  surrounded by enemies, and the memory of the Holocaust was still fresh. Israel's image was different then.
  "In the long term, the more Israel appears to reject peace and to be the one that opposes a two-state solution, the more it
  will be perceived as a regional bully that possesses nuclear weapons. So the world will be a lot less forgiving on the
  nuclear issue. The situation of ambiguity, in which you don't have real legitimacy, is not a good place to be."
  The United States has called on Israel to join the nonproliferation treaty, but during Prime Minister Benjamin
  Netanyahu's visit to Washington, U.S. President Barack Obama said he recognizes the special nature of the
  threats Israel faces, and these threats warrant special security measures.
  The Americans want to appear just and fair because the issue is seen in Israel as completely sacred. They want to look
  as though they respect that. This agreement [with the U.S.] has been passed along from president to president, but I don't
  believe this issue is as sacred to Americans as it is to Israelis."
  Do you give credence to the slippery slope theory, under which abandoning ambiguity would lead to demands
  that Israel disarm?
  "Those are cliches used by the defense establishment. Nobody 'demands that Israel make such an announcement without
  first doing the preparatory work among its allies and the Arab states. This great fear of a slippery slope is ridiculous. Israel
  has its own interests; nobody can coerce it to do things."
  What about the claim that ambiguity is what keeps the Arab states from feeling a need to launch an arms race
  against Israel?
  "I don't dismiss that claim out of hand, and if, after study and thought, this fear turns out to be warranted, I would be
  prepared to wait. But in some ways, ambiguity is insulting to the Arabs. The claim you mention treats Arabs as though
  they were children: If they are told that Israel doesn't admit to it, that frees them of the need to deal with the reality. I
  believe the Arab countries don't want to play a game of make-believe, but rather want to discuss the topic directly and
  realistically."
  You say, basically, that Iran is imitating Israel's nuclear behavior. That comparison would certainly rankle Israel
  supporters.
  "But the way Iran has advanced toward nuclear capability is not via announcements and tests, but rather by rumors. It can
  even remain within the bounds of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. If that rankles anybody, let it rankle.
  "If Iran is not attacked, it will want to achieve a status of ambiguity; I see this as nearly certain. The international
  community thus has another reason not to accept the idea of ambiguity as legitimate. The norm that a state with a nuclear
  weapon must say so clearly is part of the nonproliferation regime. The longer Iran continues down this path, the less
  patience the world will have for Israel."
  How do you envision the scenario of 'coming out of the nuclear closet?'
  "Censorship plays a very central role in the enforcement of nuclear ambiguity. So long as there is a [military] censor, it is
  very hard to alter ambiguity. If censorship didn't exist, israeli newspapers would be able to write about the subject more
  openly.
  "Another issue is the need for a law that addresses the nuclear topic. There is a Shin Bet [security service] law, but there
  is no law for the Mossad and no law for the Israel Atomic Energy Commission. This is a very problematic situation.
  "On the international level, it's a sensitive subject that demands preparatory work. Ultimately, I see a political statement by
  Israel's government in which the prime minister would find the right way to put this subject on the table. He would talk
  about the historical background and the responsible way Israel has dealt with this topic. With a few rare exceptions, these
  weapons have no military use; Israel views them as a means of deterrence. I don't think Israel would need to go into detail
  regarding how many [bombs] it has or exactly what it has.
  "Israel has a right to the bomb no less than New Delhi, or even the United States. Ambiguity creates a sense that we are
  sinners, as though we had done something so terrible that we can't tell the awful truth - and I don't think it is so awful. This
  is a country that the world has viewed as a nuclear state for a long time, and the time has come for it to say something
  positive on this huge, complicated and awe-inspiring topic...
  "All these states are ultimately committed under the treaty they signed to achieve a world without nuclear weapons.
  Whether that will happen in our lifetimes I can't say."
  You say ambiguity undermines Israeli democracy and prevents debate on matters of life and death, such as the
  question of whose finger will be on the button. Do you think the Israeli public is ready for such a discussion?
  "There has been very little creative thinking in this area, and ambiguity is one of the stifling factors that have produced an
  unacceptable, closed culture incapable of creative thinking. Ambiguity's power derives from the fact that Israeli society
  accepts it, and it seems to the public that any attempt to deviate from it would cause serious damage to Israeli security.
  "Ambiguity has created a public incapable of dealing with the topic, one that is afraid of it and prefers the issue to be
  handled by 'trustworthy hands' so that it does not have to take responsibility itself.
  Ambiguity has created an ignorant, craven public.which, in a certain sense, has betrayed its civic, democratic duties on
  this subject."
  What's it like researching a topic nobody discusses?
  "When I started studying this subject 25 years ago, I had the feeling I was entering a palace where nothing could be
  touched. It took me years to find the right way to handle the topic responsibly - from a researcher's perspective, not from
  the standpoint of someone who is directly involved in the matter.
  Today I think it is possible to initiate a meaningful dialogue about concrete, real issues."
  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend.
  • Comments
  • Share
  • Text Size -1-1:
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Become a Haaretz.com Faceboolr friend
  This story is by:
  • atasha Mozoovaya

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771423 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:02 AM
  To:
  Subject: Re: In case you missed, and see last graph. Sid
  Maybe. And, of course, worth the effort. Without an effort, the two state solution is dead; if failed, on the other hand, also
  dead. Another idea, don't know if it can be made to work: How to introduce Israel entering the NPT and ending its nuclear
  ambiguity, which is its state policy, but which itself is the model for Iran now. Can this issue be used profitably in
  negotiations, a wild card, as it were? Can options be developed on whether it can, how it might work, potential effect on
  peace process? Israel's nuclear ambiguity policy is certainly a big issue coming given Iran. See below from Haaretz today:
  • Home
  • Print Edition
  • Nt-
  -
  3ws
  • Published 00:56 26.08.10
  • Latest update 00:56 26.08.10
  Interview / Why Israel should end its policy of
  nuclear ambiguity
  An interview with Avner Cohen, expert on nonproliferation
  issues and author of the forthcoming book "The Worst-Kept
  Secret: Israel's Bargain with the Bomb."
  By Nia.
  tasha Mozwvava Tags: Israel news
  Avner Cohen is a senior fellow of the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of
  International Studies. He is the author of "Israel and the Bomb" and the forthcoming "The Worst-Kept Secret: Israel's
  Bargain with the Bomb."
  Avner Cohen, you claim that the time has come for Israel to abandon its policy of nuclear ambiguity. Why now,
  and why would that be good for Israel?
  "Nuclear ambiguity is a cornerstone of Israeli strategic thinking. It was born many years ago, and sealed as part of a
  comprehensive deal with the United States in 1969. It was appropriate at the time, but today. in my opinion, it is not just
  anachronistic, but foolish and anti-democratic. Even in realpolitik terms, it is an 'own goal' for Israel. In my view, it
  undermines genuine Israeli interests, including the need to gain recognition and legitimacy and to be counted among the
  responsible states in this strategic field."
  Are you sure the pressure on Israel is so severe? If Israel is criticized over its nuclear program, its usually
  marginal. The brunt of the criticism is over its treatment of the Palestinians. •
  "Israel received tacit consent for its nuclear program from the Western world because it appeared to be a small, just state'
  surrounded by enemies, and the memory of the Holocaust was still fresh. Israel's image was different then.
  "In the long term, the more Israel appears to reject peace and to be the one that opposes a two-state solution, the more it
  will be perceived as a regional bully that possesses nuclear weapons. So the world will be a lot less forgiving on the
  nuclear issue. The situation of ambiguity, in which you don't have real legitimacy, is not a good place to be."
  The United States has called on Israel to join the nonproliferation treaty, but during Prime Minister Benjamin
  Netanyahu's visit to Washington, U.S. President Barack Obama said he recognizes the special nature of the
  threats Israel faces, and these threats warrant special security measures.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771423 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771423 Date: 08/31/2015
  The Americans want to appear just and fair because the issue is seen in Israel as completely sacred. They want to look
  as though they respect that. This agreement [with the U.S.] has been passed along from president to president, but I don't
  believe this issue is as sacred to Americans as it is to Israelis."
  Do you give credence to the slippery slope theory, under which abandoning ambiguity would lead to demands
  that Israel disarm?
  "Those are cliches used by the defense establishment. Nobody 'demands that Israel make such an announcement without
  first doing the preparatory work among its allies and the Arab states. This great fear of a slippery slope is ridiculous. Israel
  has its own interests; nobody can coerce it to do things."
  What about the claim that ambiguity is what keeps the Arab states from feeling a need to launch an arms race
  against Israel?
  "I don't dismiss that claim out of hand, and if, after study and thought, this fear turns out to be warranted, I would be
  prepared to wait. But in some ways, ambiguity is insulting to the Arabs. The claim you mention treats Arabs as though
  they were children: If they are told that Israel doesn't admit to it, that frees them of the need to deal with the reality. I
  believe the Arab countries don't want to play a game of make-believe, but rather want to discuss the topic directly and
  realistically."
  You say, basically, that Iran is imitating Israel's nuclear behavior. That comparison would certainly rankle Israel
  supporters.
  "But the way Iran has advanced toward nuclear capability is not via announcements and tests, but rather by rumors. It can
  even remain within the bounds of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. If that rankles anybody, let it rankle.
  "If Iran is not attacked, it will want to achieve a status of ambiguity; I see this as nearly certain. The international
  community thus has another reason not to accept the idea of ambiguity as legitimate. The norm that a state with a nuclear
  weapon must say so clearly is part of the nonproliferation regime. The longer Iran continues down this path, the less
  patience the world will have for Israel."
  How do you envision the scenario of 'coming out of the nuclear closet?'
  "Censorship plays a very central role in the enforcement of nuclear ambiguity. So long as there is a [military] censor, it is
  very hard to alter ambiguity. If censorship didn't exist, israeli newspapers would be able to write about the subject more
  openly.
  "Another issue is the need for a law that addresses the nuclear topic. There is a Shin Bet [security service] law, but there
  is no law for the Mossad and no law for the Israel Atomic Energy Commission. This is a very problematic situation.
  "On the international level, it's a sensitive subject that demands preparatory work. Ultimately, I see a political statement by
  Israel's government in which the prime minister would find the right way to put this subject on the table. He would talk
  about the historical background and the responsible way Israel has dealt with this topic. With a few rare exceptions, these
  weapons have no military use; Israel views them as a means of deterrence. I don't think Israel would need to go into detail
  regarding how many [bombs] it has or exactly what it has.
  "Israel has a right to the bomb no less than New Delhi, or even the United States. Ambiguity creates a sense that we are
  sinners, as though we had done something so terrible that we can't tell the awful truth - and I don't think it is so awful. This
  is a country that the world has viewed as a nuclear state for a long time, and the time has come for it to say something
  positive on this huge, complicated and awe-inspiring topic...
  "All these states are ultimately committed under the treaty they signed to achieve a world without nuclear weapons.
  Whether that will happen in our lifetimes I can't say."
  You say ambiguity undermines Israeli democracy and prevents debate on matters of life and death, such as the
  question of whose finger will be on the button. Do you think the Israeli public is ready for such a discussion?
  "There has been very little creative thinking in this area, and ambiguity is one of the stifling factors that have produced an
  unacceptable, closed culture incapable of creative thinking. Ambiguity's power derives from the fact that Israeli society
  accepts it, and it seems to the public that any attempt to deviate from it would cause serious damage to Israeli security.
  "Ambiguity has created a public incapable of dealing with the topic, one that is afraid of it and prefers the issue to be
  handled by 'trustworthy hands' so that it does not have to take responsibility itself.
  Ambiguity has created an ignorant, craven public.which, in a certain sense, has betrayed its civic, democratic duties on
  this subject."
  What's it like researching a topic nobody discusses?
  "When I started studying this subject 25 years ago, I had the feeling I was entering a palace where nothing could be
  touched. It took me years to find the right way to handle the topic responsibly - from a researcher's perspective, not from
  the standpoint of someone who is directly involved in the matter.
  Today I think it is possible to initiate a meaningful dialogue about concrete, real issues."
  • Print Page
  • Send to a friend.
  • Comments
  • Share
  • Text Size -1-1:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771423 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771423 Date: 08/31/2015
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Become a Haaretz.com Faceboolr friend
  This story is by:
  • atasha Mozoovaya
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To:
  Sent: Thu, Aug 26, 2010 9:45 am
  Subject: Re: In case you missed, and see last graph.
  Well, this may be a case of no good options, but I still believe it is better to
  be caught trying. Stay tuned...
  Original Message
  From:
  To: H
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 09:04:36 2010
  Subject: In case you missed, and see last graph. Sid.
  H: In case you missed this, by the FT international affairs editor, esp the last
  graph. Sid
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771423 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771423 Date: 08/31/2015
  Financial Times FT.com <httpl/iFT.com/>
  A poisoned process holds little hope
  By David Gardner
  Published: August 25 2010 22:46 1 Last updated: August 25 2010 22:46
  As the caravans of Middle East peace negotiators rumble into Washington next
  week for the umpteenth time, the pervasive cynicism and sense of deja vu all
  over again is overwhelming -.and with good reason.
  The Middle East peace process long ago turned into a tortured charade of pure
  process while events on the ground - in particular the relentless and strategic
  Israeli colonisation of occupied Palestinian land. - pull in the opposite
  direction to peace. "We have all been colluding in a gigantic confidence trick,"
  is how one Arab minister puts it, "and here we go again."
  While many factors had combined to hand veto powers to rejectionists on both
  sides, the heart of the question remains the continuing Israeli occupation. ‘7"
  is essential to remember that the biggest single increase of Jewish settlers on
  Arab land - a 50 per cent rise - took place in 1992-96 under the governments of
  peace-makers Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres at the high-water mark of the Oslo
  peace accords. Many Israelis will point to the perfidy of the late Yassir
  Arafat, who wanted to talk peace but keep the option of armed resistance
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771423 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771423 Date: 08/31/2015
  dangerously in play. But what killed Oslo was the occupation. The second
  intifada that erupted a decade ago was essentially the Oslo war.
  A decade on, the Israeli settlement enterprise has turned the occupied West Bank
  into a discontiguous scattering of cantons, walled in by a security barrier
  built on yet more annexed Arab land and criss-crossed by segregated Israeli
  roads linking the settlements. Last month, B'Tselem, the Israeli human rights
  group, published a study showing Israel has now taken 42 per cent of the West
  Bank, with 300,000 settlers there and another 200,000 in East Jerusalem. The
  siege of Gaza has turned that sliver of land into a vast, open-air prison.
  The main feature of the present situation is the disconnect between the high
  politics of the utterly discredited peace process and these - in Israeli
  parlance - "facts on the ground".
  At last month's White House summit, where Barack Obama and Benjamin Netanyahu .
  massaged their long estrangement into a political armistice, the US president
  praised the Israeli prime minister as a leader "willing to take risks for
  peace".
  But there is no evidence for this whatsoever. True, in June last year, in
  response to Mr Obama's Cairo speech denying any legitimacy to Israel's
  settlements, Mr Netanyahu forced himself to utter the words "Palestinian state"
  - but he surrounded them with barbed-wire caveats that voided them of meaning.
  Indeed, the words all sides use - peace, resolution, security, and so on - may
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771423 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771423 Date: 08/31/2015
  be the same; but what each side means by them is different.
  The mainstream Palestinian leaders, President Mahmoud Abbas and Salam Fayyad,
  the prime minister, and the Quartet made up of the US, the European Union, the
  UN and Russia, talk of a negotiated resolution. This means two states living in
  peace and security, and a Palestinian homeland on the 22 per cent of Mandate
  Palestine taken by Israel in the 1967 Arab-Israeli war. East Jerusalem would
  serve as the capital of the West Bank and Gaza, with marginal land swaps to
  preserve some Israeli settlements near Jerusalem. But what does Mr Netanyahu
  mean?
  He has been most clear on what he does not mean. For a start, he has set his
  face—against any concessions on Jerusalem. He wants to .keep most settlements
  except for the far-flung "ideological" ones and the 100-plus "outposts"
  established as pawns to be traded once the chess game began. His idea of a
  demilitarised Palestinian state is more like a sort of supra-municipal
  administration than a self-determined, independent government.
  Will he surprise us, on the hackneyed Nixon and China principle that holds it is
  politicians of the right who most easily close difficult deals? There is little
  to suggest that.
  The thinking of Mr Netanyahu, son of a celebrated promoter of Greater Israel,
  has always been profoundly irredentist. While his nationalist Likud faces the
  constraints of being in coalition with an assortment of ultra-rightist and
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771423 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771423 Date: 08/31/2015
  ultra-orthodox parties as well as Labour, that was plainly his choice; the
  centrist Kadima party was (and remains) an alternative. To be fair, Israel's
  electoral system - with a low threshold for entry into the Knesset that makes
  multi-party coalitions inevitable - means lObbies such as the settlers can take
  the national interest hostage. But Mr Netanyahu magnifies this by his choice of
  partners and by diligently firing up the ultra-hawks in the pro-Israel lobby in
  the US.
  As risks he has taken for peace, Exhibit A is the much-hyped moratorium on
  settlement-building, which expires next month and has, in any case, been
  speciously interpreted. While the bulldozers to build settlements have been
  idling, moreover, the bulldozers demolishing Palestinian homes have been
  roaring: the rate of demolition in and around Jerusalem has doubled this year,
  while the army has lust razed the village of al-Farisiye in the Jordan Valley,
  in line with Mr Netanyahu's strategically obsolete obsession with keeping the
  valley as Israel's eastern border.
  As diplomacy struggles to keep alive the viability of a two-state solution,
  three rival systems of control have crystallised in the occupied territories
  that would make up a future Palestinian homeland: the settlements; the crimped.
  Palestinian Authority of Mr Abbas and Mr Fayyad; and then Hamas, which Israel
  and its Arab and western allies have tried and failed to marginalise. Time is
  short for a negotiated outcome; it may even have run out.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771423 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771423 Date: 08/31/2015
  The outlines of a deal are clear, in the (Bill) Clinton parameters of 2000 and
  'Arab Peace Initiative of 2002, endorsed by 22 Arab and 57 Muslim countries (as
  well as Hamas, as part of the 2007 Mecca accord). There has to be an end to the
  occupation, and the US and Quartet cannot just allude to this; they must demand
  it.
  The writer is international affairs editor
  "FT" and "Financial Times" are trademarks of the Financial Times. Privacy policy
  <btto: /www.ft.com/servicE oois/help/Drivacv> I Terms
  <http://www.ft...ccm/s
  .ervices•ocis/heip/terms>
  (s.D Copyright The Financial Times <htt_:
  ./_/ e• >
  Ltd 2010.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771423 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771424
MetadataSubject: JAKE AND HUMA ON TIME'S 40 UNDER 40
MetadataTo: Abedin, Huma
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-14T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0103/DOC_0C05771424/C05771424.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771424
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Thursday, October 14, 2010 7:37 AM
  Abedin, Huma; Sullivan, Jacob J; H
  FW: Jake and Huma on Time's 40 under 40

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771424 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Thursday, October 14, 2010 7:37 AM
  Abedin, Huma; Sullivan, Jacob J; H
  FW: Jake and Huma on Time's 40 under 40
  Original Message
  From: Caitlin Klevorick [mailto
  Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 7:35 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Toiv, Nora F; Laszczych, Joanne
  Subject: Jake and Huma on Time's 40 under 40
  http://www.time.comitime/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2023831_20238
  29_2025209,00.html
  http://www.time.comitime/specials/packages/article/0,28804,2023831_20238
  29_2025219,00.html
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771424 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771427
MetadataSubject: (AP) HARIRI COURT PRESIDENT APPEALS FOR ACCEPTANCE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-03T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0106/DOC_0C05771427/C05771427.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (AP) Hariri court president appeals for acceptance
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Hume <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-II; SES-O_OS
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, November 3, 2010 1:32 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771427
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771427 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Hume <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, November 3, 2010 1:32 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (AP) Hariri court president appeals for acceptance
  From: Casteel, Ezra A
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-II; SES-O_OS
  Sent: Wed Nov 03 13:18:01 2010
  Subject: (AP) Hariri court president appeals for acceptance
  LEIDSCHENDAM (AP) - The president of a UN-backed tribunal set up to prosecute the assassins of former Lebanese
  Prime Minister Ran Hariri made an impassioned plea for Lebanese to give the court a chance to show it can dispense
  impartial justice. Italian Judge Antonio Cassese also told Lebanese journalists visiting the Special Tribunal for Lebanon
  he hopes prosecutors will issue an indictment by December in the 2005 truck bombing that killed Hariri and 22 others on
  Beirut's Mediterranean waterfront.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771427 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771430
MetadataSubject: MASHABANE CALL UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771430/C05771430.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: Mashabane call update
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Huma Abedin
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:03 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771430
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Ok will work on those and get back to you asap
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771430 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:03 AM
  To:
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  Ok will work on those and get back to you asap
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:49 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Also, I'd like to set up calls w Martin Indyk and Rob Wexler for this morning if possible.
  Am I set to talk w Menendez at noon?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:51:35 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Confirmed for 8am tomorrow morning
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: 'hdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:33:17 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Yes, will work on setting that up and let you know.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:31:45 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Ok--can we try for 8 tomorrow?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771430 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771430 Date: 08/31/2015
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:30:56 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Ms,
  Mashabane is no longer available this morning, but can do anytime btw 6-8 am tomorrow morning. Let me know if you'd
  like us to lock in a time.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:17:25 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Can we still do it?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H; laurenjiloty
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 07:51:45 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Re-sending with a cc to my personal acct just to be sure I didn't miss an email. In the mean time, I'm working to
  determine if there are any other windows of availability
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: 'hdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 05:59:20 2010
  Subject: Mashabane call update
  Mashabane has offered a call time of 8:00 this morning. If that is amenable to you, I can set it up.
  #4#
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771430 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771431
MetadataSubject: 11/3 0845 MEETING READOUT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-03T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0106/DOC_0C05771431/C05771431.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: 11/3 0845 Meeting Readout
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, November 3, 2010 1:43 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771431
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771431 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, November 3, 2010 1:43 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: 11/3 0845 Meeting Readout
  From: Mull, Stephen D
  To: Abedin, Huma; Sullivan, Jacob 3; Moy, Kin W; Macmanus, Joseph E
  Cc: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Wed Nov 03 09:53:56 2010
  Subject: 11/3 0845 Meeting Readout
  Elections
  With some 20 seats still undecided, Republicans have already picked up 61 seats in House; Democrats likely to
  keep 51-53 seats in Senate. Spratt and Skelton losses are among more significant; H will prepare an analysis of
  election's impact on our oversight committees. Murkowski appears to be headed for historic write-in win; her
  support of Law of Sea and likely sympathy for New START will be good for us. Reid will likely return to
  Washington energized by win to pursue consequential lame duck session. Manchin and Kirk will take up their
  seats in the Senate this month; Rich suggests S calls to each to help lock in support for New START.
  Other Congressional Issues
  Tom Nides' prep going well, and he'll see SFRC members and Sem Gilibrand this week. Rich expects
  committee will vote him out during lame duck; still unclear if we'll get floor vote. An inter-agency team will
  brief the Hill this week on the President's Asia trip. Kerry will leave for the Middle East, including Syria, on
  Sunday.
  Guantanamo Closure
  Dal is considering Harold's latest paper on the way forward.
  Iran
  Kouchner announced after conversation with Iranian FM Mottaki that adultery convict Ashtiani will not be
  imminently executed, as earlier reported. Jundullah designation being announced this morning.
  India
  Roemer and Blake making good progress on nuclear liability issue, but we are not yet ready to raise public
  expectations.
  Iraq
  Press reports about Inspector General's report on mil-civ transition mistakenly suggest that State had been
  unaware of associated challenges.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771431 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771431 Date: 08/31/2015
  Middle East
  Saeb Erekat here today, and will be delivering public remarks. He'll meet George Mitchell tomorrow.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771431 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771433
MetadataSubject: IN KOSOVO, CRAZY FOR THE CLINTONS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-14T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0103/DOC_0C05771433/C05771433.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: In Kosovo, crazy for the Clintons
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 8:01 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771433
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771433 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 8:01 AM
  To:
  Subject: FW: In Kosovo, crazy for the Clintons
  From: williamsbarrett
  Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 5:32 PM
  To: Toiv, Nora F; Mills, Cheryl 0; MMoore
  Subject: Re: In Kosovo, crazy for the Clintons
  "Boutique Hillary" -- this could be hillary's future. m
  Original Message
  From: Toiv, Nora F <ToivNF@state.gov>
  To: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>; Minyon Moore <
  Sent: Wed, Oct 13, 2010 4:01 pm
  Subject: In Kosovo, crazy for the Clintons
  >; williamsbarrett
  betOcishingtein Post
  In Kosovo crazy for the Clintons
  By Mary Beth Sheridan
  Washington Post Staff Writer
  Wednesday, October 13, 2010; 9:41 AM
  PRISTINA, KOSOVO- This poor, tiny corner of Europe turned into the Land of Clinton on Wednesday, with thousands of
  Kosovo residents turning out to greet Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and pay homage to her husband.
  Former president Bill Clinton is revered here for his role in ending the Yugoslav "ethnic cleansing" campaign of the late
  1990s.
  Arriving in Pristina, Clinton's motorcade slowed to a halt on the central Bill Clinton Boulevard, and she hopped out of her
  car to personally inspect an 11-foot gold statue of the former president. She waved and smiled as a crowd brandished
  American flags, applauded and chanted "Hill-a-REE!! Hill-a-REE!"
  Above the little plaza, an image of Clinton grinned from a giant billboard. Hillary Clinton's face beamed from another
  billboard nearby, bearing the word "Welcome."
  After posing for photos with the Bill Clinton statue, the secretary of state ducked into the Hillary boutique next door.
  As she emerged, a local reporter approached. "Do you like it?" the reporter asked, gesturing to the statue. "Your
  husband."
  "Yes! And look, a store with my name," said the secretary of state, holding a shopping bag inscribed "Boutique Hillary."
  Asked what she thought of Kosovo, Hillary Clinton replied, "I'm so glad to be back after 10 years. It's wonderful."
  The chief U.S. diplomat was concluding a three-day Balkan tour that also took her to Bosnia and Serbia.
  During her husband's administration, NATO bombed Yugoslavia to force it to end an "ethnic cleansing" campaign in
  Kosovo, a breakaway province largely populated by ethnic Albanians.
  Kosovo declared independence in 2008.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771433 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771434
MetadataSubject: ARE YOU UP
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-03T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0106/DOC_0C05771434/C05771434.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: are you up
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Toiv, Nora F
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, November 3, 2010 2:13 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771434
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Calling now
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771434 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, November 3, 2010 2:13 PM
  To:
  Cc: Toiv, Nora F
  Subject: RE: are you up
  Calling now
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 212 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Cc: Toiv, Nora F
  Subject: Re: are you up
  I just landed in New Zealand and am trying to call you.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Wed Nov 03 10:37:30 2010
  Subject: are you up
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771434 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771438
MetadataSubject: FW:
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-14T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0103/DOC_0C05771438/C05771438.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw:
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Blake, Robert 0
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 12:27 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771438
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Fyi
  10/13/2035

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771438 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  PART
  B1,1.4(D),B6
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 12:27 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw:
  Fyi
  Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 08/27/2015 — Class:
  CONFIDENTIAL — Reason: 1.4(D) — Declassify on:
  10/13/2035
  From: Morningstar, Richard L
  To: Sullivan, Jacob
  Cc: Blake, Robert 0
  Sent: Thu Oct 14 11:51:03 2010
  Subject: FW:
  Jake- Attached is an e-mail to Holbrooke on TAPI. S is interested in the project and may want to see this. I will also
  forward a similar e-mail to Gen. Petraeus...Dick
  From: Morningstar, Richard L
  Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 11:48 AM
  To: iholbrooker@state.govi
  Cc: Stein, Daniel D; Goodman, Mary Beth
  Subject: FW:
  Dear Richard:
  B1
  1.4(D)
  In the past two months, the TAPI project has been resuscitated, largely due to Turkmen President
  Berdimukhamedov's personal outreach to his counterparts in Kabul, Islamabad and New Delhi. A "Heads of
  Agreement" for the project was recently signed, and there is a possibility that the heads of state of the four
  participant countries will meet in Ashgabat in December to give further political impetus to the project. As a
  result, the Asian Development Bank, has now
  reengaged on the project, and has just agreed to fund technical assistance to the Afghan Ministry of Mines to
  assist in negotiations with the other TAPI partners.
  I have met twice with Turkmen President Berdimukhamedov since August, and TAPI is at the top of his
  agenda.
  We all recognize the significant hurdles that TAPI faces, both from a security and commercial standpoint,
  but we believe we should do what we can to encourage forward movement on the project:
  I have also made General
  Petraeus aware of the above.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771438 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771438 Date: 08/31/2015
  We'll let you know how this develops, and in the meantime, would be grateful for any thoughts or advice you
  might have on the project.
  With best regards,
  Dick
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771438 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771440
MetadataSubject: WASHPOST HEADS UP
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jake
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-19T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0109/DOC_0C05771440/C05771440.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: WashPost Heads up
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Burns, William
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, November 19, 2010 12:31 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771440
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Just as I put those guys back on the front foot - this came in.
  Look forward to discussing.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771440 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 12:31 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: WashPost Heads up
  Just as I put those guys back on the front foot - this came in.
  Look forward to discussing.
  From: Feltman, Jeffrey D
  To: Sullivan, Jacob
  Cc: Burns, William
  Sent: Fri Nov 19 12:19:19 2010
  Subject: FIN: WashPost Heads up
  Jake, Bill Burns and I got an advance copy of Dan Kurtzer's op-ed piece for Sunday's Washington Post. (I assure you that
  we have not been in touch with Dan on this, should someone wonder.) I am forwarding it to you in the same spirit in
  which Dan forwarded it to us -- the need to avoid surprises. As S will have taped her talk shows on Saturday, the
  questioners won't be asking things from this.
  Jeffrey Feltman
  Assistant Secretary
  Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs
  Department of State
  202-647-7209
  It was only a little over a year and a half ago that the Obama administration demanded a freeze on Israeli
  settlements in the occupied territories, including even the "natural growth" of existing settlements. At the time,
  the administration called settlement activity "illegitimate" and appeared ready to go to the mat with Israel to
  show just how strongly the United States believed that settlements impede peace.
  But now, the administration says it is prepared to pay off Israel to freeze only some of its settlement activity,
  and only temporarily. For the first time in memory, the United States is poised to reward Israel for its bad
  behavior.
  Here's the offer that Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is reported to have put on the table recently: The
  United States will provide a package of advanced weaponry and military assistance to Israel totaling several
  billion dollars, all in return for an Israeli commitment to freeze settlement construction for just three months,
  excluding construction in Jerusalem. During this period, the United States hopes Israel and the Palestinian
  Authority will negotiate an agreement on the final borders of a future Palestinian state. The Israeli cabinet is
  weighing the offer, having demanded a letter from Washington confirming the terms.
  This is a very bad idea. And while Washington will almost certainly come to regret bribing Israel, Israel may
  regret receiving such a bribe even more.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771440 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771440 Date: 08/31/2015
  Previously, U.S. opposition to settlements resulted in penalties, not rewards, for continued construction.
  Washington deducted from its loan guarantees to Israel an amount equivalent, dollar for dollar, to the money
  that Israel spent in the occupied territories. While it's true that the United States has turned a blind eye to
  indirect U.S. subsidies for Israeli activities in the territories - such as tax deductions for American organizations
  that fund settlements - the deal now being offered to Israel is of a totally different magnitude. If it goes forward,
  it will be the first direct benefit that the United States has provided Israel for settlement activities that we have
  opposed for more than 40 years.
  It is not clear that Washington has thought through the implications. Will the United States similarly reward
  Palestinians for stopping their own bad behavior? Will Washington pay them to, say, halt the incitement against
  Israel and Jews in their public media and some educational materials - something that shouldn't have been going
  on in the first place? Will the rewards for Israel be automatically renewable? Meaning, if Israel is willing to
  continue the settlement freeze after three months, will another set of rewards be the price for that? And what
  about enforcement? Will the United States demand its money back if it learns about construction during the
  freeze, even if that construction was not authorized by the Israeli government?
  The list of problems is so long that it would not be surprising if the administration were already experiencing
  buyer's remorse.
  But the arrangement has an even more serious long-term implication, one that should worry Israel profoundly.
  If it goes through, this deal will shake the foundation of the U.S.-Israeli strategic partnership. Since the early
  1980s, the two countries have cooperated closely on assessing Israeli security, and Washington has promised to
  ensure Israel's "qualitative military edge" over any combination of potential Arab adversaries.
  This commitment has been insulated from the vicissitudes of politics and diplomacy. Whatever the state of
  U.S.-Israeli relations or the peace process, America's commitment to Israel's security has been manifest. Not so,
  if this deal materializes. By subjecting Israel's defense needs to the political demands of an American
  administration, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has done something quite dangerous for Israel - he has
  made those needs contingent, negotiable, optional. Israel's security requirements are now merely a bargaining
  chip with which to negotiate what Jerusalem will or will not do to advance the peace process.
  Today, the United States has "purchased" a short-term settlements freeze; what will be for sale tomorrow?
  Conversely, how seriously should our defense planners and congressional budget watchers take Israel's
  arguments about its security needs when it is prepared to market different elements of its policy for another
  squadron of advanced aircraft? Does anyone really believe that there is a substantive connection between a
  three-month settlement freeze and Israel's professed need for more airplanes?
  These short-sighted tactics will lead both the United States and Israel into a long-term bind. Washington will be
  left fending off a landslide of demands from others who hope to be rewarded for their bad behavior, to be paid
  for stopping what they should never have been doing. Israel, meanwhile, will be left struggling to explain how
  precious its settlements really are if a payoff - albeit a high one - is enough to see them frozen. And both
  countries will need a new rationale for the exceedingly high price of what Israel calls its security requirements,
  but which will now look more like poker chips used to secure American aid.
  This bargaining exercise has been unseemly all along; if it proceeds, both sides will probably regret it. But the
  deal has not yet been sealed. And it is not too late to start over.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771440 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771441
MetadataSubject: MASHABANE CALL UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771441/C05771441.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: Mashabane call update
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Huma Abedin
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:23 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771441
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Martin Indyk is free for the next 40 minutes. I can connect him to your blackberry whenever you're ready. I'm still
  working on Menendez and Wexler.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771441 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:23 AM
  To:
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  Martin Indyk is free for the next 40 minutes. I can connect him to your blackberry whenever you're ready. I'm still
  working on Menendez and Wexler.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemailcom]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:49 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Also, I'd like to set up calls w Martin Indyk and Rob Wexler for this morning if possible.
  Am I set to talk w Menendez at noon?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:51:35 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Confirmed for Sam tomorrow morning
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: 'hdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:33:17 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Yes, will work on setting that up and let you know.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:31:45 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Ok--can we try for 8 tomorrow?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771441 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771441 Date: 08/31/2015
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:30:56 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Ms,
  Mashabane is no longer available this morning, but can do anytime btw 6-8 am tomorrow morning. Let me know if you'd
  like us to lock in a time.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 2608:17:25 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Can we still do it?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H; laurenjilotV
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 07:51:45 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Re-sending with a cc to my personal acct just to be sure I didn't miss an email. In the mean time, I'm working to
  determine if there are any other windows of availability
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: ihdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 05:59:20 2010
  Subject: Mashabane call update
  Mashabane has offered a call time of 8:00 this morning. If that is amenable to you, I can set it up.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771441 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771445
MetadataSubject: (REUTERS) IRELAND'S FOUR-YEAR PLAN TO BE PUBLISHED NOVEMBER 23
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-20T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0109/DOC_0C05771445/C05771445.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (Reuters) Ireland's four-year plan to be published November 23
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shift-I
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 3:20 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771445
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771445 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 3:20 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (Reuters) Ireland's four-year plan to be published November 23
  From: Vu, Anny T
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shift-I
  Sent: Sat Nov 20 02:39:43 2010
  Subject: (Reuters) Ireland's four-year plan to be published November 23
  DUBLIN (Reuters) — Ireland's four-year plan to reduce its deficit will be published on November 23, ahead of any
  international financial aid package, the Irish Times reported, citing unnamed senior Irish officials. "The cabinet will meet
  November 21 to sign off on the 160-page document which charts how the state will reduce its outgoings," the Irish Times
  said, adding the publication date had been brought forward so it could be identified as a government-originated plan
  rather than one driven by Europe or the IMF. The Irish Times said a separate plan for restructuring the banking sector
  was also expected to be finalized November 20-21.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771445 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771446
MetadataSubject: ASHTON
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-20T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0109/DOC_0C05771446/C05771446.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Ashton
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ©state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Wells, Alice G; Sullivan, Jacob J
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 3:58 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771446
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: FYI - you probably know this, but...
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771446 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  1.4(B),B1,1.4(D)
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ©state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 3:58 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Ashton
  FYI - you probably know this, but...
  Original Message ---
  From: Burns, William
  To: Gordon, Philip H
  Cc: Wells, Alice G; Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Fri Nov 19 18:16:19 2010
  Subject: RE: Ashton
  1.4(B)
  1.4(D)
  B1
  Cooper called also with same message.
  Original Message
  From: Gordon, Philip H
  Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 1:49 PM
  To: Burns, William J
  Cc: Wells, Alice G; Sullivan, Jacob J
  Subject: Ashton
  We will see her again at us-eu summit tomorrow if anything you want to convey. (We'll also see davut
  tomorrow).
  Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 08/27/2015 — Class: CONFIDENTIAL — Reason: 1.4(B), 1.4(D) — Declassify
  on: 11/19/2025
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771446 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771447
MetadataSubject: SECSTATE WITH SPANISH FOMIN
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-20T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0109/DOC_0C05771447/C05771447.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Secstate with Spanish FoMin
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 5:08 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771447
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedCc:
  Sanchez, Mauricio X; Ortiz, Katherine I; Dressel, Abigail L.; Mattern, Daniel S; Martin, Elizabeth K; Pease, Leah M;

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771447 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 5:08 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Secstate with Spanish FoMin
  From: Stroh, Mark E
  To: Sullivan, Jacob 3; Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Sat Nov 20 05:03:27 2010
  Subject: Fw: Secstate with Spanish FoMin
  Jake,
  Fyi for the spanish
  From: Genton, Thomas R
  To: Stroh, Mark E; Galvin, Jeffrey E; Johnson, Andrew C; Harrison, Paul Q; Wohlers, Paul; Lussenhop, Matthew R; Ensor,
  David B
  Cc: Sanchez, Mauricio X; Ortiz, Katherine I; Dressel, Abigail L.; Mattern, Daniel S; Martin, Elizabeth K; Pease, Leah M;
  McKay, Maria E; Feldmann, David S
  Sent: Sat Nov 20 05:01:09 2010
  Subject: Re: Secstate with Spanish FoMin
  Mark,
  You've probably heard that a bomb went off thisd morning in Laghman province, Aghanistan. The Governor of the
  province is in Madrid at the end of a one-week visit to Poland, Germany, and Spain.
  His message has been of support for ISAF and international development, which is helping Afghanistan defeat the enemy,
  confront radical terrorists, and rebuild.
  The Governor is considering release of a a statement from Madrid to news outlets this afternoon. We have offered
  assistance in reaching media. Will keep you posted.
  Please share this info, as appropriate, with those who should know in the Dept.
  FOR KABUL:
  While it appears that Insurgents hoped to capitalize on the NATO summit to send a message, and likely chose Laghman
  because of it has been relatively peaceful and secure, this incident underscores the Governor's talking points that, while
  Laghman has been peaceful and made great progress on all fronts in the past 9 years, Afghanstan still needs security and
  development assistance to defeat the terrorists, who only bring destruction, fear, and oppression.
  Tom Genton,
  PAO Madrid
  -Tom
  From: Stroh, Mark E
  To: Genton, Thomas R; Galvin, Jeffrey E; Johnson, Andrew C; Harrison, Paul Q; Wohlers, Paul
  Cc: Sanchez, Mauricio X; Ortiz, Katherine I; Dressel, Abigail L.
  Sent: Fri Nov 19 14:33:42 2010
  Subject: Re: Secstate with Spanish FoMin
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771447 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771447 Date: 08/31/2015
  Absolutely torn.
  Thanks for doing all the long-distance legwork for us today and yesterday!
  Regards,
  Mark
  From: Genton, Thomas R
  To: Stroh, Mark E; Galvin, Jeffrey E; Johnson, Andrew C; Harrison, Paul Q; Wohlers, Paul
  Cc: Sanchez, Mauricio X; Ortiz, Katherine I; Dressel, Abigail L.
  Sent: Fri Nov 19 14:30:34 2010
  Subject: Secstate with Spanish FoMin
  Mark,
  I agree. All the key Spanish MFA and GOS officials are on the ground in Lisbon, so go ahead and handle it. Just keep us
  in the loop on what comes out of it.
  -Tom
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  From: Stroh, Mark E
  Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 8:29 PM
  To: Genton, Thomas R; Galvin, Jeffrey E; Johnson, Andrew C; Harrison, Paul Q; Wohlers, Paul
  Cc: Sanchez, Mauricio X; Ortiz, Katherine I
  Subject: Re: Urgent - Contact for Press Lead, S Bilat with Spain FonMin
  Tom,
  We have confirmed a 10.30 bilat with the spanish. At this point it might be easier for us to handle the bilat arrangements
  here on the ground but feel free to check in with us and we'll tell you what we know!
  Thanks for your assistance and best regards,
  Mark
  From: Genton, Thomas R
  To: Stroh, Mark E; Galvin, Jeffrey E; Johnson, Andrew C; Harrison, Paul Q; Wohlers, Paul
  Cc: Sanchez, Mauricio X; Ortiz, Katherine I
  Sent: Fri Nov 19 14:24:56 2010
  Subject: RE: Urgent - Contact for Press Lead, S Bilat with Spain FonMin
  Mark,
  After several unsuccessful attempts to reach contacts at MFA or Moncloa (Spanish Presidency), at 8:15 pm today I
  reached the Moncloa Director of International Communication, Juan Cierco, on the ground in Lisbon, who indicated to
  me that he had just received official word from you (albeit through a third party) that a 15-min Clinton-Trinidad meeting
  had been confirmed for 10:30 am Saturday morning, and that the Secretary had agreed to a photo spray (no remarks or
  Q&A).
  True or False?
  --Tom
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771447 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771447 Date: 08/31/2015
  Thomas R. Genton
  Counselor for Public Affairs, U.S. Embassy Madrid, Spain
  Calle de Serrano, 75 28006 Madrid, Spain
  Tel: [34] 91-587-2523 Cell: Fax: 91-576-8464
  E-mail: gentontr@state.gov
  This e-mail is UNCLASSIFIED in accordance with E.O. 12958
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  From: Stroh, Mark E
  Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 2:20 PM
  To: Galvin, Jeffrey E; Johnson, Andrew C; Harrison, Paul Q; Wohlers, Paul
  Cc: Sanchez, Mauricio X; Genton, Thomas R; Ortiz, Katherine I
  Subject: Re: Urgent - Contact for Press Lead, S Bilat with Spain FonMin
  They are SERIOUSLY jumping the gun!
  We have not/NOT confirmed.
  From: Galvin, Jeffrey E
  To: Stroh, Mark E; Johnson, Andrew C; Harrison, Paul Q
  Cc: Sanchez, Mauricio X; Genton, Thomas R; Ortiz, Katherine I
  Sent: Fri Nov 19 08:14:51 2010
  Subject: Re: Urgent - Contact for Press Lead, S Bilat with Spain FonMin
  Mark/Andrew-
  The Ministry of Foreign Affairs just sent out a press advisory pegging the bilat at 10:30 Saturday, pending confirmation. I
  will send you a scan. Are they jumping the gun or is this on?
  -Jeff
  From: Stroh, Mark E
  To: Galvin, Jeffrey E; Johnson, Andrew C; Harrison, Paul Q
  Cc: Sanchez, Mauricio X; Genton, Thomas R; Ortiz, Katherine I
  Sent: Thu Nov 18 17:02:17 2010
  Subject: Re: Urgent - Contact for Press Lead, S Bilat with Spain FonMin
  Ok. Who is mauricio and how do I reach him? Is he here in lisbon?
  From: Galvin, Jeffrey E
  To: Stroh, Mark E; Johnson, Andrew C; Harrison, Paul Q
  Cc: Sanchez, Mauricio X; Genton, Thomas R; Ortiz, Katherine I
  Sent: Thu Nov 18 10:49:22 2010
  Subject: Re: Urgent - Contact for Press Lead, S Bilat with Spain FonMin
  Thanks Mark- Mauricio will help make the link up on our side. I hope it is a successful summit. -Jeff
  From: Stroh, Mark E
  To: Galvin, Jeffrey E; Johnson, Andrew C; Harrison, Paul Q
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771447 Date: 08/31/2015
  Web: http://madrid.usembassy.gov

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771447 Date: 08/31/2015
  Cc: Sanchez, Mauricio X; Genton, Thomas R; Ortiz, Katherine I
  Sent: Thu Nov 18 15:38:21 2010
  Subject: Re: Urgent - Contact for Press Lead, S Bilat with Spain FonMin
  Jeff,
  Thanks. First a point of clarification - we are reaching out to the spanish team here for a bilat but no meeting is confirmed.
  We are checking their availability here. That is all.
  That said, its highly likely it will happen, so please feel free to have the spanish reach out to me here on the ground. If its
  via email please also cc paul harrison from usnato and andrew johnson, s staff. We are happy to discuss ground rules and
  such with the spanish team at their convenience.
  My local cell here in portugal is
  Regards,
  Mark
  From: Galvin, Jeffrey E
  To: Stroh, Mark E
  Cc: Sanchez, Mauricio X; Genton, Thomas R; Ortiz, Katherine I
  Sent: Thu Nov 18 08:55:31 2010
  Subject: Urgent - Contact for Press Lead, S Bilat with Spain FonMin
  Mark—
  S has apparently scheduled a bilat with the Spanish Foreign Minister on the margins of the Lisbon summits. The MFA
  press staff wants to coordinate with you on press availability and ground rules. If you agree, I would like to put you
  directly in contact with them to work out the details. If you prefer, we can operate as a filter for you, but with the event
  on top of us direct contact is probably going to work better.
  Yours, Jeff
  Jeffrey Galvin
  Information Officer
  Public Affairs Section
  US Embassy Madrid
  +34-91-587-2510
  (direct)
  E-mail: galvinje@state gov
  ® You Tube m0.0
  SBU
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  From: McKnight, Alexandra K
  Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 2:48 PM
  To: Galvin, Jeffrey E; Quick, Delia D; Feldmann, David S; Boland, Matthew H
  Cc: Ortiz, Katherine I; Genton, Thomas R; Sanchez, Mauricio X
  Subject: RE: Contact for Press Lead, S trip to NATO Summit
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771447 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771447 Date: 08/31/2015
  Mark Stroh is the S Advance who's on the ground; I'd reach out to him in Lisbon. He's in constant coordination with
  Huma, Jake and Phillipe.
  Best,
  Alex
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  From: Galvin, Jeffrey E
  Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 8:28 AM
  To: McKnight, Alexandra K; Quick, Delia D; Feldmann, David S
  Cc: Ortiz, Katherine I; Genton, Thomas R; Sanchez, Mauricio X
  Subject: Contact for Press Lead, S trip to NATO Summit
  S is having a one-on-one with Spanish Foreign Minister Trinidad Jimenez at the NATO Summit. We just got a call from
  the MFA here asking what the press rules for the meeting are. I would like to contact the advance lead and see how
  they want to proceed. Who should I reach out to?
  Jeffrey Galvin
  Information Officer
  Public Affairs Section
  US Embassy Madrid
  +34-91-587-2510
  (direct)
  E-mail: galvinje@state gov
  ® You Tube mo
  SBU
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771447 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771448
MetadataSubject: (AP) BIN LADEN: RELIEF BODY NEED FOR MUSLIM COUNTRIES
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-01T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0101/DOC_0C05771448/C05771448.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (AP) Bin Laden: Relief body needed for Muslim countries
ExtractedFrom: Abed in, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-I; SES-O_Shift-II; SES-O_OS
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, October 1, 2010 7:07 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771448
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771448 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abed in, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, October 1, 2010 7:07 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (AP) Bin Laden: Relief body needed for Muslim countries
  From: Withers, Anne M
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-I; SES-O_Shift-II; SES-O_OS
  Sent: Fri Oct 01 06:37:03 2010
  Subject: (AP) Bin Laden: Relief body needed for Muslim countries
  CAIRO (AP) - Al-Qaida has released a new audio tape of Osama bin Laden in which the leader of the terror network calls
  for the creation of a relief body to aid Muslims harmed in natural disasters and wars. In a copy of the message, bin
  Laden also criticizes governments in Muslim countries for spending more money on armies than on their citizens. The
  bin Laden tape comes after similar messages from al-Qaida figures that accused the Pakistani government of failing to
  provide for its people after massive floods in the country killed hundreds and left some 8 million people homeless. The
  authenticity of the tape could not be immediately verified.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771448 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771451
MetadataSubject: FROM ARTURO - CORREA RESCUED IN ECUADOR
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Valenzuela, Arturo A
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-01T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0101/DOC_0C05771451/C05771451.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771451
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Valenzuela, Arturo A <ValenzuelaAA@state.gov>
  Friday, October 1, 2010 7:34 AM
  Gonzalez, Juan S; Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma; Steinberg, James B; Burns, William J
  From Arturo - Correa Rescued in Ecuador
  Madame Secretary: After a tense day in which President Correa was slightly injured at noon by rioting and
  striking police, and later was barred from leaving the hospital by the same, the army finally rescued him at
  9pm last night. Some military units, including the Navy unit in Guayaquil appeared to support the police. The
  police also occupied the national congress. As the rescue took place, the head of the Ecuadoran Joints Chiefs
  of Staff issued a statement supporting the president, and noting that the armed forces respect the rule of law
  "in which the President [Rafael Correa] is the maximum authority of the three branches." Things are now
  calm.
  Reaction in the hemisphere was one of deep concern. The OAS adopted a resolution; South American
  presidents at the call of UNASUR travelled to Buenos Aires and are likely to go on to Quito to support
  Correa. Several, including Garcia and Santos, called Correa. Zapatero also spoke with him. Moratinos tried to
  reach you at around 6pm last evening to convey that news, I took the call.
  As you know, we issued a statement of support for Correa. I also gave an interview to CNN in Spanish, which
  was re-played frequently. I strongly recommend that you call Correa today to reiterate U.S. support for his
  government and to wish him well.
  He will appreciate it but, more broadly, it sends a signal that the United States supports the constitutional
  order and rejects any attempt to undermine it. Chavez in Buenos Aires predictably declared that we were
  behind the unrest. We have prepared a call sheet for you.
  Regards,
  Arturo

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771451 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Cc:
  Subject:
  Valenzuela, Arturo A <ValenzuelaAA@state.gov>
  Friday, October 1, 2010 7:34 AM
  Gonzalez, Juan S; Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma; Steinberg, James B; Burns, William J
  From Arturo - Correa Rescued in Ecuador
  Madame Secretary: After a tense day in which President Correa was slightly injured at noon by rioting and
  striking police, and later was barred from leaving the hospital by the same, the army finally rescued him at
  9pm last night. Some military units, including the Navy unit in Guayaquil appeared to support the police. The
  police also occupied the national congress. As the rescue took place, the head of the Ecuadoran Joints Chiefs
  of Staff issued a statement supporting the president, and noting that the armed forces respect the rule of law
  "in which the President [Rafael Correa] is the maximum authority of the three branches." Things are now
  calm.
  Reaction in the hemisphere was one of deep concern. The OAS adopted a resolution; South American
  presidents at the call of UNASUR travelled to Buenos Aires and are likely to go on to Quito to support
  Correa. Several, including Garcia and Santos, called Correa. Zapatero also spoke with him. Moratinos tried to
  reach you at around 6pm last evening to convey that news, I took the call.
  As you know, we issued a statement of support for Correa. I also gave an interview to CNN in Spanish, which
  was re-played frequently. I strongly recommend that you call Correa today to reiterate U.S. support for his
  government and to wish him well.
  He will appreciate it but, more broadly, it sends a signal that the United States supports the constitutional
  order and rejects any attempt to undermine it. Chavez in Buenos Aires predictably declared that we were
  behind the unrest. We have prepared a call sheet for you.
  Regards,
  Arturo
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771451 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771459
MetadataSubject: (AP) NATO: THREE CIVILIANS KILLED BY COALITION FORCES
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-20T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0109/DOC_0C05771459/C05771459.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (AP) NATO: Three civilians killed by coalition forces
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shift-II
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 10:16 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771459
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771459 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 10:16 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (AP) NATO: Three civilians killed by coalition forces
  From: Rudnitski, lennine R
  To: NEWS-Mahogany; NEWS-Afghanistan
  Cc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shift-II
  Sent: Sat Nov 20 10:12:45 2010
  Subject: (AP) NATO: Three civilians killed by coalition forces
  KABUL (AP) - NATO said coalition forces accidentally killed three Afghan civilians and wounded four others in Kunar
  province in eastern Afghanistan. NATO said in a statement issued the incident occurred after coalition troops came
  under fire near the village of Tantil in Pech district. When coalition forces returned fire, three or four rounds landed
  short of the target area, near a village, killing and wounding the civilians November 19. NATO spokesman U.S. Army Col.
  Rafael Torres said the coalition does everything within its power to prevent civilian casualties in the course of
  operations, but in this case it failed. The coalition expressed condolences to the families.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771459 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771461
MetadataSubject: UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jake
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-20T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0109/DOC_0C05771461/C05771461.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: update
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Jake Sullivan <
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 8:41 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771461
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  they update as of 840 pm is that the ball is in their court as they weigh the deal with shas and our concerns. dan
  will talk to molho and/or dermer very late tonight our time/first thing sunday there. i'll send you an update early
  in the morning.
  >

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771461 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jake Sullivan <
  Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 8:41 PM
  To: H
  Subject: update
  they update as of 840 pm is that the ball is in their court as they weigh the deal with shas and our concerns. dan
  will talk to molho and/or dermer very late tonight our time/first thing sunday there. i'll send you an update early
  in the morning.
  >
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771461 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771463
MetadataSubject: UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jake
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-20T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0109/DOC_0C05771463/C05771463.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: update
ExtractedFrom: Jake Sullivan <
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 9:17 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771463
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  another wrinkle -- uzi arad gave an interview saying we have now given them written assurances, possibly
  laying the groundwork for a vote tomorrow BEFORE we have worked through the remaining issues. they may
  have decided to just go for it. dan will follow up.
  On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Jake Sullivan < > Wrote:
  they update as of 840 pm is that the ball is in their court as they weigh the deal with shas and our
  concerns. dan will talk to molho and/or dermer very late tonight our time/first thing sunday there. i'll send you
  an update early in the morning.
  >

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771463 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jake Sullivan <
  Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 9:17 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: update
  another wrinkle -- uzi arad gave an interview saying we have now given them written assurances, possibly
  laying the groundwork for a vote tomorrow BEFORE we have worked through the remaining issues. they may
  have decided to just go for it. dan will follow up.
  On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Jake Sullivan < > Wrote:
  they update as of 840 pm is that the ball is in their court as they weigh the deal with shas and our
  concerns. dan will talk to molho and/or dermer very late tonight our time/first thing sunday there. i'll send you
  an update early in the morning.
  >
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771463 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771465
MetadataSubject: LEADING TUROUGH CIVILIAN POWER
MetadataFrom: Clinton, Hillary Rodham
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0096/DOC_0C05771465/C05771465.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771465
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771465 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  August 30, 2010
  LEADING THROUGH CIVILIAN POWER
  B5
  HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON
  1
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771465 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771465 Date: 08/31/2015 B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771465 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771465 Date: 08/31/2015 B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771465 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771465 Date: 08/31/2015 B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771465 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771465 Date: 08/31/2015 B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771465 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771465 Date: 08/31/2015 B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771465 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771465 Date: 08/31/2015 B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771465 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771465 Date: 08/31/2015 B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771465 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771465 Date: 08/31/2015 B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771465 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771465 Date: 08/31/2015 B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771465 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771465 Date: 08/31/2015 B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771465 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771465 Date: 08/31/2015 B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771465 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771470
MetadataSubject: (AP) AGED SAUDI RULER TO FLY TO THE UNITED STATES OVER BLOOD CLOT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-21T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0109/DOC_0C05771470/C05771470.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (AP) Aged Saudi ruler to fly to the United States over blood clot
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shift-I
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 21, 2010 6:59 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771470
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771470 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2010 6:59 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (AP) Aged Saudi ruler to fly to the United States over blood clot
  From: Withers, Anne M
  To: NEWS-Mahogany; NEWS-NEA; NEWS-CA; SCPR-Leadership-DL; DS Command Center
  Cc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shift-I
  Sent: Sun Nov 21 01:33:03 2010
  Subject: (AP) Aged Saudi ruler to fly to the United States over blood clot
  RIYADH (AP) - A senior Saudi official says the kingdom's aged ruler will fly to the United States for "medical tests." The
  official says King Abdullah will leave the kingdom on November 22, three days after he was admitted to the hospital
  suffering from back pain due to a blood clot. The 86-year-old Crown Prince Sultan, who himself spent over a year in the
  U.S. and Morocco for medical treatment and recuperation, will arrive at Riyadh on November 21 to oversee the
  kingdom, the official said. The official spoke late November 20 on condition of anonymity because he was not
  authorized to speak to the press. The palace said November 19 that King Abdullah was hospitalized after a blood clot
  had created pressure on the nerves surrounding a ruptured disc.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771470 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771471
MetadataSubject: (AP) AGED SAUDI RULER TO FLY TO THE UNITED STATES OVER BLOOD CLOT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-21T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0109/DOC_0C05771471/C05771471.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: (AP) Aged Saudi ruler to fly to the United States over blood clot
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shift-I
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 21, 2010 6:59 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771471
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Jeff mentioned we are helping expedite visas for delegation.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771471 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2010 6:59 AM
  To:
  Subject: Re: (AP) Aged Saudi ruler to fly to the United States over blood clot
  Jeff mentioned we are helping expedite visas for delegation.
  From: Abedin, Huma
  To: 'hdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemall.com>
  Sent: Sun Nov 21 06:58:46 2010
  Subject: Fw: (AP) Aged Saudi ruler to fly to the United States over blood clot
  From: Withers, Anne M
  To: NEWS-Mahogany; NEWS-NEA; NEWS-CA; SCPR-Leadership-DL; DSCommand Center
  Cc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shift-I
  Sent: Sun Nov 21 01:33:03 2010
  Subject: (AP) Aged Saudi ruler to fly to the United States over blood clot
  RIYADH (AP) - A senior Saudi official says the kingdom's aged ruler will fly to the United States for "medical tests." The
  official says King Abdullah will leave the kingdom on November 22, three days after he was admitted to the hospital
  suffering from back pain due to a blood clot. The 86-year-old Crown Prince Sultan, who himself spent over a year in the
  U.S. and Morocco for medical treatment and recuperation, will arrive at Riyadh on November 21 to oversee the
  kingdom, the official said. The official spoke late November 20 on condition of anonymity because he was not
  authorized to speak to the press. The palace said November 19 that King Abdullah was hospitalized after a blood clot
  had created pressure on the nerves surrounding a ruptured disc.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771471 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771477
MetadataSubject: (JERUSALEM POST) PM: CABINET TO REVIEW US FREEZE DEAL WHEN WE GET LETTER
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-21T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0109/DOC_0C05771477/C05771477.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (Jerusalem Post) PM: Cabinet to review US freeze deal when we get letter
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shift-11
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 21, 2010 12:10 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771477
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771477 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2010 12:10 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (Jerusalem Post) PM: Cabinet to review US freeze deal when we get letter
  From: RudnItski, Jennine R
  To: NEWS-Mahogany; NEWS-NEA
  Cc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shift-11
  Sent: Sun Nov 2112:03:58 2010
  Subject: (Jerusalem Post) PM: Cabinet to review US freeze deal when we get letter
  (Jerusalem Post) Prime Minister Netanyahu met with Likud MKs and deputy ministers to discuss the U.S.
  proposal for a 90-day construction freeze, November 21. In the meeting, Netanyahu told the Likud officials: "I
  have a responsibility that includes making the best decision for the state of Israel and its national interests,
  foremost, its security." He continued, 'We still haven't received the written agreement from the Americans on
  the basic understandings." The prime minister assured those attending the meeting, "If we receive a written
  agreement, I will bring it to the cabinet and I am sure that the ministers will approve it because it is what's best
  for the state of Israel." He added, "If we don't receive such a document, I won't bring the issue [of a freeze] to
  the cabinet."
  Earlier in the day thousands of settlers protested outside the Prime Minister's Office in Jerusalem against the
  potential freeze. National Infrastructures Minister Uzi Landau, an opponent of an additional freeze, addressed
  the demonstrators. Dozens of youngsters also blocked the entrance to Jerusalem. Police dispersed the
  protesters and arrested two people. Over the weekend, Kadima MK Avi Dichter told The Jerusalem Post, "The
  total freeze for 10 months was a serious mistake," said Dichter. "It was clear that it would come to an end, and
  that in those 10 months nothing dramatic could happen between Israel and the Palestinians — leaving us in the
  same situation as at the beginning."
  "Netanyahu made a second mistake when he didn't agree to the American request to extend a two-month
  freeze immediately on September 26, and insist that it was the last freeze. If he had, we'd be one week away
  from the end, rather than in our current state," he said. Dichter said the "main problem is that the topic of the
  freeze has become the central topic of discussion, rather than talks between us and the Palestinians.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771477 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771478
MetadataSubject: KURZNER WASHINGTON POST "OUTLOOK" ARTICLE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-21T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0109/DOC_0C05771478/C05771478.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Kurzer Washington Post "Outlook" article
ExtractedFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma; Sullivan, Jacob J
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 21, 2010 12:13 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771478
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  behavior.Washington Post.doc
  You almost certainly have seen this, but just in case. AM

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771478 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2010 12:13 PM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma; Sullivan, Jacob J
  Subject: Kurzer Washington Post "Outlook" article
  Attachments: 2010.11.21.With settlement deal, U.S. will be rewarding Israel's bad
  behavior.Washington Post.doc
  You almost certainly have seen this, but just in case. AM
  From: Daniel C. Kurtzer <
  To: Daniel Kurtzer <
  Sent: Sat Nov 20 21:24:29 2010
  Subject: Washington Post "Outlook" article
  The attached article will appear in the November 21edition of the Washington Post in
  the "Outlook" section. As usual, I would value your comments. And, as usual, please
  accept my apologies if you receive more than one copy of this. All the best. Dan
  Kurtzer
  PRINCETON
  UNIVERSITY
  Daniel C. Kurtzer
  S. Daniel Abraham Chair in
  Middle East Policy Studies
  Woodrow Wilson School of
  Public and International Affairs
  1230 Bendheim Hall
  Princeton University
  Princeton, N.J. 08544
  Office: +1 (609) 258-9859
  Cell:
  Fax: +1 (609) 258-2601
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771478 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771480
MetadataSubject: (AP) MEXICAN LAKE VICTIM HARTLEY POSSIBLY MISTAKEN FOR DRUG RUNNER
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-14T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0103/DOC_0C05771480/C05771480.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (AP) Mexican lake victim Hartley possibly mistaken for drug runner
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-III
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 10:37 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771480
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771480 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 10:37 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (AP) Mexican lake victim Hartley possibly mistaken for drug runner
  From: Abdalla, Alyce N
  To: NEWS-Mahogany; NEWS-CA; NEWS-WHA; NEWS-H
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-III
  Sent: Thu Oct 14 17:25:48 2010
  Subject: (AP) Mexican lake victim Hartley possibly mistaken for drug runner
  MEXICO CITY (AP) - The American tourist who reportedly was shot and killed by Mexican pirates on a border lake may
  have been a victim of mistaken identity, a U.S. consulate official said October 14. "I think what you had is two innocent
  American tourists who mistakenly stumbled into a bad area and were pursued and the shooting occurred," said Brian
  Quigley, spokesman for the U.S. consulate in Matamoros, across the Rio Grande from Brownsville, Texas. Quigley was
  responding to a report by Stratfor, an Austin, Texas-based public policy research group that analyzes the Mexican drug
  war. The report suggested David and Tiffany Hartley might have been mistaken for drug runners and attacked.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771480 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771481
MetadataSubject: MASHABANE CALL UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771481/C05771481.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: Mashabane call update
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:31 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771481
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  He is getting on a short flight this morning, and can do anytime between 1:30-5:30 PM this afternoon. Let me know if
  you'd like me to set a time.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771481 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:31 AM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  He is getting on a short flight this morning, and can do anytime between 1:30-5:30 PM this afternoon. Let me know if
  you'd like me to set a time.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemall.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:28 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  I can't do now--need another time.
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 10:22:52 2010
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  Martin Indyk is free for the next 40 minutes. I can connect him to your blackberry whenever you're ready. I'm still
  working on Menendez and Wexler.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:49 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Also, I'd like to set up calls w Martin Indyk and Rob Wexler for this morning if possible.
  Am I set to talk w Menendez at noon?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:51:35 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Confirmed for 8am tomorrow morning
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771481 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771481 Date: 08/31/2015
  To: ihdr22@clintonemail.coml <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:33:17 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Yes, will work on setting that up and let you know.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:31:45 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Ok--can we try for 8 tomorrow?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotylC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:30:56 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Ms,
  Mashabane is no longer available this morning, but can do anytime btw 6-8 am tomorrow morning. Let me know if you'd
  like us to lock in a time.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:17:25 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Can we still do it?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H; laurenjiloty
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 07:51:45 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Re-sending with a cc to my personal acct just to be sure I didn't miss an email. In the mean time, I'm working to
  determine if there are any other windows of availability
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: 'hdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 05:59:20 2010
  Subject: Mashabane call update
  Mashabane has offered a call time of 8:00 this morning. If that is amenable to you, I can set it up.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771481 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771482
MetadataSubject: MASHABANE CALL UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771482/C05771482.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: Mashabane call update
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:36 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771482
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  He prefers 2:00 PM. I have locked it in and will connect to you at that time.
  Will report back to you soon on the other two.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771482 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:36 AM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  He prefers 2:00 PM. I have locked it in and will connect to you at that time.
  Will report back to you soon on the other two.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:32 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Yes--btw1:30and 2:30 works for me.
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 10:31:11 2010
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  He is getting on a short flight this morning, and can do anytime between 1:30-5:30 PM this afternoon. Let me know if
  you'd like Me to set a time.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:28 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  I can't do now--need another time.
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 10:22:52 2010
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  Martin Indyk is free for the next 40 minutes. I can connect him to your blackberry whenever you're ready. I'm still
  working on Menendez and Wexler.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:49 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771482 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771482 Date: 08/31/2015
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Also, I'd like to set up calls w Martin Indyk and Rob Wexler for this morning if possible.
  Am I set to talk w Menendez at noon?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotylC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:51:35 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Confirmed for 8am tomorrow morning
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: 'hdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:33:17 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Yes, will work on setting that up and let you know.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:31:45 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Ok--can we try for 8 tomorrow?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:30:56 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Ms,
  Mashabane is no longer available this morning, but can do anytime btw.6-8 am tomorrow morning. Let me know if you'd
  like us to lock in a time.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:17:25 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Can we still do it?
  Original Message
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771482 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771482 Date: 08/31/2015
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H; laurenjiloty
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 07:51:45 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Re-sending with a cc to my personal acct just to be sure I didn't miss an email. In the mean time, I'm working to
  determine if there are any other windows of availability
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: ihdr22@clintonemailcom' <hdr22@clintonemailcom>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 05:59:20 2010
  Subject: Mashabane call update
  Mashabane has offered a call time of 8:00 this morning. If that is amenable to you, I can set it up.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771482 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771483
MetadataSubject: FW:
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-14T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0103/DOC_0C05771483/C05771483.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw:
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 10:39 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771483
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: What should I tell him?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771483 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  PART B6
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 10:39 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw:
  What should I tell him?
  Original Message
  From: Declan Kelly
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Oct 14 17:42:04 2010
  Subject:
  Shaun Woodward just called to say that he had received a communication through Sidney that the Secretary wants him
  to come to the conference next week. Before I put that in motion, given the reaction it will get from Owen Paterson and
  the folks in Northern Ireland I wanted to ask you to check whether or not it's accurate. Let me know as soon as you can
  please. Thanks
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771483 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771484
MetadataSubject: MASHABANE CALL UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771484/C05771484.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: Mashabane call update
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <filotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 11:31 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771484
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Robert Wexler can do 1:30 PM ET. (He is currently on the west coast).
  Good for you? Then lndyk at 2PM.
  Still no word back from Menendez, but we are still trying.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771484 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <filotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 11:31 AM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  Robert Wexler can do 1:30 PM ET. (He is currently on the west coast).
  Good for you? Then lndyk at 2PM.
  Still no word back from Menendez, but we are still trying.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:32 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Yes--btw1:30and 2:30 works for me.
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C KlilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 10:31:11 2010
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  He is getting on a short flight this morning, and can do anytime between 1:30-5:30 PM this afternoon. Let me know if
  you'd like me to set a time.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:28 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  I can't do now--need another time.
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 10:22:52 2010
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  Martin lndyk is free for the next 40 minutes. I can connect him to your blackberry whenever you're ready. I'm still
  working on Menendez and Wexler.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:49 AM
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771484 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771484 Date: 08/31/2015
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Also, I'd like to set up calls w Martin lndyk and Rob Wexler for this morning if possible.
  Am I set to talk w Menendez at noon?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:51:35 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Confirmed for 8am tomorrow morning
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: ihdr22@clintonemail.comi <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:33:17 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Yes, will work on setting that up and let you know.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:31:45 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Ok--can we try for 8 tomorrow?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:30:56 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Ms,
  Mashabane is no longer available this morning, but can do anytime btw 6-8 am tomorrow morning. Let me know if you'd
  like us to lock in a time.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:17:25 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Can we still do it?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771484 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771484 Date: 08/31/2015
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H; laurenjiloty
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 07:51:45 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Re-sending with a cc to my personal acct just to be sure I didn't miss an email. In the mean time, I'm working to
  determine if there are any other windows of availability
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: 'hdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 05:59:20 2010
  Subject: Mashabane call update
  Mashabane has offered a call time of 8:00 this morning. If that is amenable to you, I can set it up.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771484 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771485
MetadataSubject: MASHABANE CALL UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771485/C05771485.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: Mashabane call update
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 11:35 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771485
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Great, I will connect them to your blackberry at those times.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771485 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 11:35 AM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  Great, I will connect them to your blackberry at those times.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 11:34 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Yes to both.
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 2611:30:43 2010
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  Robert Wexler can do 1:30 PM ET. (He is currently on the west coast).
  Good for you? Then lndyk at 2PM.
  Still no word back from Menendez, but we are still trying.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:32 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  . Yes--btw1:30and 2:30 works for me.
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 10:31:11 2010
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  He is getting on a short flight this morning, and can do anytime between 1:30-5:30 PM this afternoon. Let me know if
  you'd like me to set a time.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:28 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771485 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771485 Date: 08/31/2015
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  I can't do now--need another time.
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 10:22:52 2010
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  Martin Indyk is free for the next 40 minutes. I can connect him to your blackberry whenever you're ready. I'm still
  working on Menendez and Wexler.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:49 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Also, I'd like to set up calls w Martin Indyk and Rob Wexler for this morning if possible.
  Am I set to talk w Menendez at noon?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:51:35 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Confirmed for 8am tomorrow morning
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: 'hdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:33:17 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Yes, will work on setting that up and let you know.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:31:45 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Ok--can we try for 8 tomorrow?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771485 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771485 Date: 08/31/2015
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:30:56 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Ms,
  Mashabane is no longer available this morning, but can do anytime btw 6-8 am tomorrow morning. Let me know if you'd
  like us to lock in a time.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:17:25 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Can we still do it?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H; laurenjilotV
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 07:51:45 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Re-sending with a cc to my personal acct just to be sure I didn't miss an email. In the mean time, I'm working to
  determine if there are any other windows of availability
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: ihdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abed in, Huma
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 05:59:20 2010
  Subject: Mashabane call update
  Mashabane has offered a call time of 8:00 this morning. If that is amenable to you, I can set it up.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771485 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771486
MetadataSubject: MASHABANE CALL UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771486/C05771486.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: Mashabane call update
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 11:44 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771486
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Okay, in that same 1:30-2:30 window? Or now?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771486 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 11:44 AM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  Okay, in that same 1:30-2:30 window? Or now?
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 11:44 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  I'd also like to speak w Steinberg and Cheryl in whichever order you can get them.
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 11:35:22 2010
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  Great, I will connect them to your blackberry at those times.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 11:34 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Yes to both.
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 11:30:43 2010
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  Robert Wexler can do 1:30 PM ET. (He is currently on the west coast).
  Good for you? Then Indyk at 2PM.
  Still no word back from Menendez, but we are still trying.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:32 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771486 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771486 Date: 08/31/2015
  Yes--btw1:30and 2:30 works for me.
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 10:31:11 2010
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  He is getting on a short flight this morning, and can do anytime between 1:30-5:30 PM this afternoon. Let me know if
  you'd like me to set a time.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:28 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  I can't do now--need another time.
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 10:22:52 2010
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  Martin Indyk is free for the next 40 minutes. I can connect him to your blackberry whenever you're ready. I'm still
  working on Menendez and Wexler.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:49 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Also, I'd like to set up calls w Martin Indyk and Rob Wexler for this morning if possible.
  Am I set to talk w Menendez at noon?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:51:35 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Confirmed for 8am tomorrow morning
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771486 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771486 Date: 08/31/2015
  To: ihdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:33:17 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Yes, will work on setting that up and let you know.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:31:45 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Ok--can we try for 8 tomorrow?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:30:56 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Ms,
  Mashabane is no longer available this morning, but can do anytime btw 6-8 am tomorrow morning. Let me know if you'd
  like us to lock in a time.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:17:25 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Can we still do it?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H; laurenjiloty
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 07:51:45 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Re-sending with a cc to my personal acct just to be sure I didn't miss an email. In the mean time, I'm working to
  determine if there are any other windows of availability
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: ihdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 05:59:20 2010
  Subject: Mashabane call update
  Mashabane has offered a call time of 8:00 this morning. If that is amenable to you, I can set it up.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771486 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771487
MetadataSubject: MASHABANE CALL UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771487/C05771487.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: Mashabane call update
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 11:45 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771487
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Will do.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771487 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 11:45 AM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  Will do.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 11:45 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Now.
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.goy>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 11:44:10 2010
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  Okay, in that same 1:30-2:30 window? Or now?
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 11:44 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  I'd also like to speak w Steinberg and Cheryl in whichever order you can get them.
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 11:35:22 2010
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  Great, I will connect them to your blackberry at those times.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 201011:34 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Yes to both.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771487 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771487 Date: 08/31/2015
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 11:30:43 2010
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  Robert Wexler can do 1:30 PM ET. (He is currently on the west coast).
  Good for you? Then lndyk at 2PM.
  Still no word back from Menendez, but we are still trying.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:32 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Yes--btw1:30and 2:30 works for me.
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 10:31:112010
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  He is getting on a short flight this morning, and can do anytime between 1:30-5:30 PM this afternoon. Let me know if
  you'd like me to set a time.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemailcom]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:28 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  I can't do now--need another time.
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 10:22:52 2010
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  Martin Indyk is free for the next 40 minutes. I can connect him to your blackberry whenever you're ready. I'm still
  working on Menendez and Wexler.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:49 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771487 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771487 Date: 08/31/2015
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Also, I'd like to set up calls w Martin Indyk and Rob Wexler for this morning if possible.
  Am I set to talk w Menendez at noon?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 2608:51:35 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Confirmed for 8am tomorrow morning
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: 'hdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:33:17 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Yes, will work on setting that up and let you know.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:31:45 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Ok--can we try for 8 tomorrow?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:30:56 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Ms,
  Mashabane is no longer available this morning, but can do anytime btw 6-8 am tomorrow morning. Let me know if you'd
  like us to lock in a time.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>.
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:17:25 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Can we still do it?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771487 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771487 Date: 08/31/2015
  To: H; laurenjilotY
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 07:51:45 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Re-sending with a cc to my personal acct just to be sure I didn't miss an email. In the mean time, I'm working to
  determine if there are any other windows of availability
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: 'hdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  •Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 05:59:20 2010
  Subject: Mashabane call update
  Mashabane has offered a call time of 8:00 this morning. If that is amenable to you, I can set it up.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771487 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771488
MetadataSubject: MASHABANE CALL UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771488/C05771488.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: Mashabane call update
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 1:01 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771488
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Will do
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771488 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 1:01 PM
  To:
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  Will do
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 1:00 PM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Pis try to get Armitage for me.
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 11:44:56 2010
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  Will do.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 11:45 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Now.
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 11:44:10 2010
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  Okay, in that same 1:30-2:30 window? Or now?
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 11:44 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  I'd also like to speak w Steinberg and Cheryl in whichever order you can get them.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771488 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771488 Date: 08/31/2015
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 11:35:22 2010
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  Great, I will connect them to your blackberry at those times.
  Original Message
  From: H (mailto:HDR22@clintonemailcoml
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 11:34 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Yes to both.
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 11:30:43 2010
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  Robert Wexler can do 1:30 PM ET. (He is currently on the west coast).
  Good for you? Then Indyk at 2PM.
  Still no word back from Menendez, but we are still trying.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:32 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Yes--btw1:30and 2:30 works for me.
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 10:31:11 2010
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  He is getting on a short flight this morning, and can do anytime between 1:30-5:30 PM this afternoon. Let me know if
  you'd like me to set a time.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 10:28 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  I can't do now--need another time.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771488 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771488 Date: 08/31/2015
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 10:22:52 2010
  Subject: RE: Mashabane call update
  Martin Indyk is free for the next 40 minutes. I can connect him to your blackberry whenever you're ready. I'm still
  working on Menendez and Wexler.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:49 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Also, I'd like to set up calls w Martin lndyk and Rob Wexler for this morning if possible.
  Am I set to talk w Menendez at noon?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:51:35 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Confirmed for 8am tomorrow morning
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: Ihdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:33:17 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Yes, will work on setting that up and let you know.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:31:45 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Ok--can we try for 8 tomorrow?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:30:56 2010
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771488 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771488 Date: 08/31/2015
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Ms,
  Mashabane is no longer available this morning, but can do anytime btw 6-8 am tomorrow morning. Let me know if you'd
  like us to lock in a time.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 08:17:25 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Can we still do it?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H; laurenjiloty
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 07:51:45 2010
  Subject: Re: Mashabane call update
  Re-sending with a cc to my personal acct just to be sure I didn't miss an email. In the mean time, I'm working to
  determine if there are any other windows of availability
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: ihdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 05:59:20 2010
  Subject: Mashabane call update
  Mashabane has offered a call time of 8:00 this morning. If that is amenable to you, I can set it up.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771488 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771501
MetadataSubject: CALLS REMINDER: WEXLER AND INDYK
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771501/C05771501.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Calls Reminder: Wexler and lndyk
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.goy>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 1:21 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771501
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Coming up in 10 minutes:
  Wexler at 1:30 PM
  Indyk at 2:00 PM
  ###

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771501 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.goy>
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 1:21 PM
  To:
  Subject: Calls Reminder: Wexler and lndyk
  Coming up in 10 minutes:
  Wexler at 1:30 PM
  Indyk at 2:00 PM
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771501 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771504
MetadataSubject: H: FYI, TO DISCUSS WHEN YOU CAME UP FOR AIR... SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-05T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0096/DOC_0C05771504/C05771504.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: H: fyi, to discuss when you come up for air... Sid
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, September 5, 2010 11:48 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771504
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  . Subject: H: fyi, to discuss when you come up for air... Sid
  http://www.newsweek.com/2010/04/15/europe-s-new-politics-of-fear.print.html
  Europe's New Politics of Fear
  by Denis MacShaneApril 16, 2010
  There is a new divide in Europe. Not an iron curtain, but an iron intolerance as politicians revert to blaming minorities for
  their nations' woes. In Western Europe it is Muslims. In Eastern Europe they are Jews, Roma, and gays. In the
  Netherlands, Geert Wilders surged to an election victory in March on the back of anti-Muslim, anti-Quran populism. In
  Hungary the Fidesz Party won big in recent elections with attacks on "Jewish capital... which wants to devour the entire
  world." To the right of Fidesz is the openly anti-Jewish Jobbik Party, which won just two seats fewer than the Socialists. Its
  leaders want to wear the neo-Nazi uniform of the pre-1939 Hungarian Guard when they take their seats in Budapest's
  Parliament.
  Contemporary political scientists do not like to highlight anti-Semitism. They prefer the term "radical populism," but to
  anyone with half a sense of European history, the parallels with an older, Jew-baiting politics can no longer be dismissed.
  Economic dislocation and a rapid loss of confidence in traditional politics gave rise to ultranationalist movements in the
  first half of the last century. Now a global recession and the hunt for someone to blame as jobs and incomes disappear is
  producing the same toxic politics.
  The Fidesz leader, Viktor Orban, was a youthful evangelist for liberalized open markets after 1990. Now he strikes a much
  more nationalist tone. His Socialist opponents had to accept an austerity IMF package. Unlike Greece—which is being
  helped, so far, by its euro-zone partners—Hungary was alone as boom-time euro loans to buy houses and cars had to be
  paid back in an ever-devaluing forint. Blaming the Socialist government, globalization, and international capital was easy.
  But Fidesz went further. In a bid for votes on the far right, a Fidesz parliamentarian, Oszkar Molnar, says it's time to give
  "primacy to Hungarian interests over those of global capital, Jewish capital."
  Like Jean-Marie Le Pen's National Front in France, Jobbik has the support of about 15 percent of Hungarian voters. The
  Czech right-wing ODS Party has had to dismiss its leader, former premier Mirek Topolanek, after he attacked the Jewish
  origins of the current Czech prime minister and castigated the gay transport minister. In a new book, The Populist Radical
  Right in Poland, the Oxford-educated Warsaw political professor Rafal Pankowski writes: "Antisemitism is crucial to the
  Polish populist right. The number of Jews in Poland today is minimal, but the anti-Jewish prejudice serves as a code for a
  general hostility to diversity and to Polish [liberal] democracy." For the time being, criticism of nationalist politics is
  suspended as Poles mourn President Lech Kaczynski and other national leaders killed in the air-crash tragedy this month.
  But the record of his party activists—including Michal Kaminski, Poland's best-known M.E.P. and leader of a small right-
  wing group in the Strasbourg Parliament—is disturbing. An admirer of the late Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet,
  Kaminski uses ugly language about gays, and says he will apologize for the killing of Jews on Polish soil in World War II
  when "Jews apologize for killing Poles."
  Mainstream political parties have sought to play down the rise of minority bashing. But Fidesz is affiliated with the center-
  right European People's Party, which groups Angela Merkel's ruling Christian Democratic Union Party in Germany,
  Nicolas Sarkozy's Union for a Popular Movement government in France, and ruling conservative parties in Sweden, Italy,
  and Belgium. When Austrian rightist Jorg Haider entered a coalition in Austria a decade ago, the European Union held
  Vienna in a political quarantine until Haider was removed. But Fidesz has a massive majority built on attacking "Jewish
  capital" in language even Haider didn't dare utter.
  So radical populism—anti-Muslim in Western Europe, anti-Jewish in Eastern Europe, and anti-foreigner and anti-
  immigrant rhetoric everywhere—is no longer fringe politics. In Britain's general election, all the main parties are seeking to
  appease anti-foreigner feeling with language on immigrants that they would not tolerate if applied to British citizens living
  and working abroad. Comparisons with prewar Europe should not be overdrawn. Fascism is dead and not coming back.
  But a new politics of intolerance is afoot in Europe, and no one knows how to deal with it.
  http://www.newsweek.com/2010/09/05/how-marine-le-pen-is-changing-french-politics.print.html
  B6
  Eit
  What a Tea Party Looks Like in Europe
  Marine Le Pen is moving her father's rabble-rousing, far-right
  party away from the fringe, and redefining French politics in
  the process.
  by Tracy McNicoll and Christopher DickeySeptember 05, 2010
  amuel Bollendorff / The New York Times-Redux
  Marine Le Pen is the heir apparent to the leadership of the National Front, the right-wing party her father Jean-Marie (left)
  leads today
  Jean-Marie Le Pen, the 82-year-old firebrand of France's far right—the man who for decades has played on the inchoate
  fears, xenophobia, knee-jerk racism, and ill-disguised anti-Semitism of many of his supporters—had just finished speaking
  to the faithful on a farm not far from the English Channel. As members of the youth wing of his National Front party
  feasted on barbecue and apple pie, they were thrilled to see the grand old man hold forth, still the "provocateur" taunting
  the establishment, the "toreador" who hides the sword in his cape and lets the press run at him like a bull. Even these
  youngsters knew, however, that Jean-Marie's time in the ring is nearing an end. The old man himself made it clear he's.
  determined to step down. All eyes this day were on his daughter Marine. "She has the will, the courage, the temperament
  necessary, and the competence," Le Pen told reporters at the farmhouse. "It seems to me indisputable that she is our
  camp's best candidate for 2012."
  Tall, blonde, plain-spoken, and thick-skinned, Le Pen's youngest child, at 42, is the heir apparent to his party. She's
  expected to win the contest for its leadership in January, and she's a passionate advocate of its core message: strong
  French nationalism, relentless Euro-skepticism, and a lot of hard-nosed talk about fighting crime and immigration. She's a
  fresh face, a new look, and, with rising poll numbers placing her third in a crowded field of possible 2012 candidates, a
  new threat in French politics. In the eyes of many, she's more effective—and thus more dangerous—than her father.
  It's a measure of the Le Pens' enhanced power that they've managed to push President Nicolas Sarkozy to the right and
  cast their own party as mainstream. Over the summer, Sarkozy essentially gave up his flirtation with the left, which began
  after his election in 2007. He had cherry-picked popular Socialists for his centrist government, dividing their party. But in
  elections this past March, Sarkozy's UMP party managed to keep control of only one out of 22 regional governments. So
  he decided to swing back to the right by playing on fears about public safety and immigration. He proposed taking
  citizenship away from some criminals of immigrant background and launched a campaign against Roma (or "Gypsies"),
  booting hundreds out of the country. While the measures proved popular in opinion polls, Sarkozy, ironically, did not. His
  abysmal approval ratings remain in the low 30s.
  The younger Le Pen takes great pleasure in watching Sarkozy squirm. "I think I get on [his] nerves quite a bit," she says.
  "My profile is much more complicated for him to deal with than that of my father." The old man could be painted as a
  creature of the past, a purveyor of old prejudices with a "sulfurous" reputation, says Marine. Today, however, the Front
  wants to bill itself as "neither left nor right." If that means losing some fringe elements (many of whom support Marine's
  rival, Bruno Gollnisch), well, "tent pis," she says.
  Other right-wing movements in Europe are also pushing into the political mainstream. The government of Prime Minister
  Silvio Berlusconi in Italy has long relied on its alliance with two groups that used to be considered extreme—one of them
  the former Fascist Party under Gianfranco Fini, the other the secessionist Northern League of Umberto Bossi. A falling-out
  between Berlusconi and Fini has left Bossi as the current kingmaker in Italian politics. In the Netherlands, the militantly
  Islamophobic Geert Wilders won enough seats in the last elections to become a pivotal figure in the drawn-out process of
  trying to build a new coalition government.
  Yet these movements often differ in significant ways from the right wing that's made in the U.S.A. Put aside the usual
  caricature of "people in pointy hoods and the Ku Klux Klan," Marine Le Pen says, and she still believes "the American right
  is much more to the right than the National Front." She might agree with those who want to manage American frontiers
  more effectively and prevent massive illegal immigration, but she's also a big believer in the state's ability and obligation
  to help its people. "We feel the state should have the means to intervene," she says. "We are very attached to public
  services A la frangaise as a way to limit the inequalities among regions and among the French," including "access for all to
  the same level of health care."
  Le Pen grew up in a household that was all politics all the time, with her father the object of sometimes violent attacks by
  competing factions on the right, as well as by the left. When Marine was just 8, someone set off a 20-kilo bomb in the
  family's Paris apartment building. Miraculously, no one was killed or seriously injured, but the front of the building was
  brought down. The crime has never been solved. "The worst part wasn't just the attack, it was that not a single politician
  sent a word of condolence," she says. "It was difficult, but it builds character, it hardens you."
  That's a real asset in political life anywhere. If Sarkozy finds himself facing off against Marine Le Pen in the presidential
  race a year and a half from now, he may find himself wishing her old man had stayed around a little longer.
  With Barbie Nadeau in Rome

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771504 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Sunday, September 5, 2010 11:48 AM
  To:
  . Subject: H: fyi, to discuss when you come up for air... Sid
  http://www.newsweek.com/2010/04/15/europe-s-new-politics-of-fear.print.html
  Europe's New Politics of Fear
  by Denis MacShaneApril 16, 2010
  There is a new divide in Europe. Not an iron curtain, but an iron intolerance as politicians revert to blaming minorities for
  their nations' woes. In Western Europe it is Muslims. In Eastern Europe they are Jews, Roma, and gays. In the
  Netherlands, Geert Wilders surged to an election victory in March on the back of anti-Muslim, anti-Quran populism. In
  Hungary the Fidesz Party won big in recent elections with attacks on "Jewish capital... which wants to devour the entire
  world." To the right of Fidesz is the openly anti-Jewish Jobbik Party, which won just two seats fewer than the Socialists. Its
  leaders want to wear the neo-Nazi uniform of the pre-1939 Hungarian Guard when they take their seats in Budapest's
  Parliament.
  Contemporary political scientists do not like to highlight anti-Semitism. They prefer the term "radical populism," but to
  anyone with half a sense of European history, the parallels with an older, Jew-baiting politics can no longer be dismissed.
  Economic dislocation and a rapid loss of confidence in traditional politics gave rise to ultranationalist movements in the
  first half of the last century. Now a global recession and the hunt for someone to blame as jobs and incomes disappear is
  producing the same toxic politics.
  The Fidesz leader, Viktor Orban, was a youthful evangelist for liberalized open markets after 1990. Now he strikes a much
  more nationalist tone. His Socialist opponents had to accept an austerity IMF package. Unlike Greece—which is being
  helped, so far, by its euro-zone partners—Hungary was alone as boom-time euro loans to buy houses and cars had to be
  paid back in an ever-devaluing forint. Blaming the Socialist government, globalization, and international capital was easy.
  But Fidesz went further. In a bid for votes on the far right, a Fidesz parliamentarian, Oszkar Molnar, says it's time to give
  "primacy to Hungarian interests over those of global capital, Jewish capital."
  Like Jean-Marie Le Pen's National Front in France, Jobbik has the support of about 15 percent of Hungarian voters. The
  Czech right-wing ODS Party has had to dismiss its leader, former premier Mirek Topolanek, after he attacked the Jewish
  origins of the current Czech prime minister and castigated the gay transport minister. In a new book, The Populist Radical
  Right in Poland, the Oxford-educated Warsaw political professor Rafal Pankowski writes: "Antisemitism is crucial to the
  Polish populist right. The number of Jews in Poland today is minimal, but the anti-Jewish prejudice serves as a code for a
  general hostility to diversity and to Polish [liberal] democracy." For the time being, criticism of nationalist politics is
  suspended as Poles mourn President Lech Kaczynski and other national leaders killed in the air-crash tragedy this month.
  But the record of his party activists—including Michal Kaminski, Poland's best-known M.E.P. and leader of a small right-
  wing group in the Strasbourg Parliament—is disturbing. An admirer of the late Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet,
  Kaminski uses ugly language about gays, and says he will apologize for the killing of Jews on Polish soil in World War II
  when "Jews apologize for killing Poles."
  Mainstream political parties have sought to play down the rise of minority bashing. But Fidesz is affiliated with the center-
  right European People's Party, which groups Angela Merkel's ruling Christian Democratic Union Party in Germany,
  Nicolas Sarkozy's Union for a Popular Movement government in France, and ruling conservative parties in Sweden, Italy,
  and Belgium. When Austrian rightist Jorg Haider entered a coalition in Austria a decade ago, the European Union held
  Vienna in a political quarantine until Haider was removed. But Fidesz has a massive majority built on attacking "Jewish
  capital" in language even Haider didn't dare utter.
  So radical populism—anti-Muslim in Western Europe, anti-Jewish in Eastern Europe, and anti-foreigner and anti-
  immigrant rhetoric everywhere—is no longer fringe politics. In Britain's general election, all the main parties are seeking to
  appease anti-foreigner feeling with language on immigrants that they would not tolerate if applied to British citizens living
  and working abroad. Comparisons with prewar Europe should not be overdrawn. Fascism is dead and not coming back.
  But a new politics of intolerance is afoot in Europe, and no one knows how to deal with it.
  http://www.newsweek.com/2010/09/05/how-marine-le-pen-is-changing-french-politics.print.html
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771504 Date: 08/31/2015
  B6

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771504 Date: 08/31/2015
  Eit
  What a Tea Party Looks Like in Europe
  Marine Le Pen is moving her father's rabble-rousing, far-right
  party away from the fringe, and redefining French politics in
  the process.
  by Tracy McNicoll and Christopher DickeySeptember 05, 2010
  amuel Bollendorff / The New York Times-Redux
  Marine Le Pen is the heir apparent to the leadership of the National Front, the right-wing party her father Jean-Marie (left)
  leads today
  Jean-Marie Le Pen, the 82-year-old firebrand of France's far right—the man who for decades has played on the inchoate
  fears, xenophobia, knee-jerk racism, and ill-disguised anti-Semitism of many of his supporters—had just finished speaking
  to the faithful on a farm not far from the English Channel. As members of the youth wing of his National Front party
  feasted on barbecue and apple pie, they were thrilled to see the grand old man hold forth, still the "provocateur" taunting
  the establishment, the "toreador" who hides the sword in his cape and lets the press run at him like a bull. Even these
  youngsters knew, however, that Jean-Marie's time in the ring is nearing an end. The old man himself made it clear he's.
  determined to step down. All eyes this day were on his daughter Marine. "She has the will, the courage, the temperament
  necessary, and the competence," Le Pen told reporters at the farmhouse. "It seems to me indisputable that she is our
  camp's best candidate for 2012."
  Tall, blonde, plain-spoken, and thick-skinned, Le Pen's youngest child, at 42, is the heir apparent to his party. She's
  expected to win the contest for its leadership in January, and she's a passionate advocate of its core message: strong
  French nationalism, relentless Euro-skepticism, and a lot of hard-nosed talk about fighting crime and immigration. She's a
  fresh face, a new look, and, with rising poll numbers placing her third in a crowded field of possible 2012 candidates, a
  new threat in French politics. In the eyes of many, she's more effective—and thus more dangerous—than her father.
  It's a measure of the Le Pens' enhanced power that they've managed to push President Nicolas Sarkozy to the right and
  cast their own party as mainstream. Over the summer, Sarkozy essentially gave up his flirtation with the left, which began
  after his election in 2007. He had cherry-picked popular Socialists for his centrist government, dividing their party. But in
  elections this past March, Sarkozy's UMP party managed to keep control of only one out of 22 regional governments. So
  he decided to swing back to the right by playing on fears about public safety and immigration. He proposed taking
  citizenship away from some criminals of immigrant background and launched a campaign against Roma (or "Gypsies"),
  booting hundreds out of the country. While the measures proved popular in opinion polls, Sarkozy, ironically, did not. His
  abysmal approval ratings remain in the low 30s.
  The younger Le Pen takes great pleasure in watching Sarkozy squirm. "I think I get on [his] nerves quite a bit," she says.
  "My profile is much more complicated for him to deal with than that of my father." The old man could be painted as a
  creature of the past, a purveyor of old prejudices with a "sulfurous" reputation, says Marine. Today, however, the Front
  wants to bill itself as "neither left nor right." If that means losing some fringe elements (many of whom support Marine's
  rival, Bruno Gollnisch), well, "tent pis," she says.
  Other right-wing movements in Europe are also pushing into the political mainstream. The government of Prime Minister
  Silvio Berlusconi in Italy has long relied on its alliance with two groups that used to be considered extreme—one of them
  the former Fascist Party under Gianfranco Fini, the other the secessionist Northern League of Umberto Bossi. A falling-out
  between Berlusconi and Fini has left Bossi as the current kingmaker in Italian politics. In the Netherlands, the militantly
  Islamophobic Geert Wilders won enough seats in the last elections to become a pivotal figure in the drawn-out process of
  trying to build a new coalition government.
  Yet these movements often differ in significant ways from the right wing that's made in the U.S.A. Put aside the usual
  caricature of "people in pointy hoods and the Ku Klux Klan," Marine Le Pen says, and she still believes "the American right
  is much more to the right than the National Front." She might agree with those who want to manage American frontiers
  more effectively and prevent massive illegal immigration, but she's also a big believer in the state's ability and obligation
  to help its people. "We feel the state should have the means to intervene," she says. "We are very attached to public
  services A la frangaise as a way to limit the inequalities among regions and among the French," including "access for all to
  the same level of health care."
  Le Pen grew up in a household that was all politics all the time, with her father the object of sometimes violent attacks by
  competing factions on the right, as well as by the left. When Marine was just 8, someone set off a 20-kilo bomb in the
  family's Paris apartment building. Miraculously, no one was killed or seriously injured, but the front of the building was
  brought down. The crime has never been solved. "The worst part wasn't just the attack, it was that not a single politician
  sent a word of condolence," she says. "It was difficult, but it builds character, it hardens you."
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771504 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771504 Date: 08/31/2015
  That's a real asset in political life anywhere. If Sarkozy finds himself facing off against Marine Le Pen in the presidential
  race a year and a half from now, he may find himself wishing her old man had stayed around a little longer.
  With Barbie Nadeau in Rome
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771504 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771506
MetadataSubject: FW:
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: McHale, Judith A
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-15T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0103/DOC_0C05771506/C05771506.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW:
ExtractedFrom: McHale, Judith A <McHaleJA@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, October 15, 2010 5:36 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771506
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  FYI
  The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com
  War on terror: Obama softened the language, but
  hardened Muslim hearts
  The Obama administration's shift in counterterrorism language sought to bridge the divide with the Muslim world and soften Americans' fear of
  Islam. But the new rhetoric hasn't matched policy, and the unintended costs at home and abroad have been high.
  By Stuart Gottlieb
  posted October 14, 2010 at 9:58 am EDT
  New Haven, Conn. —
  One of the most defining aspects of the Obama administration's counterterrorism strategy has been its effort to change America's rhetorical approach
  to the threat of terrorism, particularly Islamic terrorism. "The language we use matters," President Obama told the Arabic satellite television station
  Al Arabiya in an interview during his first week in office. Scrubbed were George W. Bush-era terms like "war on terrorism," "radical Islam," and
  "jihadist."The White House's 2010 National Security Strategy formally replaced the term "Islamic terrorism" with "violent extremism."
  The purpose of the shift in semantics was two-fold.
  First, it aimed to repackage the fight against terrorism as a specific fight against Al Qaeda, not against Islamic extremism, which Mr. Obama believes
  contributed to a post-9/11 perception that America was "at war with Islam." Indeed, the new rhetoric has gone hand in hand with Obama's outreach to
  the Muslim world to build "a new partnership based on mutual respect and mutual interest."
  Second, it was part of a broader effort to soften Americans' fear of Islamic terrorism, which Obama officials believe plays directly into the hands of
  extremists.
  Language change ineffective
  Now it is fair to ask whether Obama's use of language regarding terrorism has proven effective. Startling new polls suggest it hasn't. The first, by the
  Brookings Institution in Washington, shows that between May 2009 and May 2010 the number of Middle Eastern Arabs expressing optimism in
  Obama's approach toward their region dropped from 51 percent to just 16 percent, with those describing themselves as "discouraged" by the Obama
  presidency rising from 15 percent to 63 percent.
  The second, by the Pew Research Center, shows that in August 2010 fewer Americans held a favorable view of Islam (30 percent) than five years
  earlier during the Bush administration (41 percent), with more Americans (35 percent) saying Islam encourages violence more than other religions
  (in 2002, it was 25 percent).
  These starkly negative trend lines suggest the limited utility of language in fighting terrorism. Yes, terrorism is a propaganda-fueled activity – an
  ongoing battle to win hearts and minds and attract new recruits to fight for the cause. And of course the language used in combating terrorism is vital
  – the counterproductive "smoke 'em out" rhetoric of the Bush administration is a case in point.
  But if rhetoric does not match policy, or appears to discount or play down threats, the credibility – and thus effectiveness – of the overall
  counterterrorism strategy may be undermined. It appears the Obama administration has dug itself into just such a hole.
  Rhetoric doesn't match policy
  When looking beyond the nuanced language and appealing promises, what Muslims around the world see is an administration that has ramped up the
  war in Afghanistan; is killing scores of Muslim civilians with drone strikes; continues to hold more than 1,000 Muslim detainees in Guantanamo,
  Bagram, and other prisons; and maintains seemingly unconditional support of Israel.
  This is not to critique these policies, but to point out that they do not match the raised expectations of the Muslim world and have only muddled
  Obama's oft-stated goal of turning Muslims toward America and away from extremist movements.
  The price of downplaying the threat
  A large price is also being paid domestically for disconnected rhetoric. Despite maintaining nearly all of Bush's hard-line tactics — the USA Patriot
  Act, warrantless surveillance, indefinite detentions the White House has consistently played down the threat, even in the face of a clear uptick in
  terrorism activity.
  For example, following the failed 2009 Christmas Day airline bombing, Obama described the suspect as an "isolated extremist," despite his ties to Al
  Qaeda. And the administration's initial response to the failed May 2010 Times Square bombing by an American Muslim trained in Pakistan was to
  call it a "one-off' event. Attorney General Eric Holder stated in congressional testimony that he believed these and other recent Islamic terror plots
  were unconnected, and unrelated to radical Islam.
  There is little doubt that the administration's unwillingness to speak candidly about Islamic terrorism has taken a toll on the public's trust. A Gallup
  poll released last month shows Americans favoring Republicans over Democrats on the issue of terrorism 55 percent to 31 percent — up from 49
  percent to 42 percent last fall.
  Time to reverse the trend
  Obama entered office promising to fight a smarter and more effective war on terrorism, and in many ways he has. His instincts to maintain aggressive
  tactics while toning down inflammatory rhetoric were sound. Yet his administration seems to have overlearned a key lesson of the Bush years — that
  overstating the threat of terrorism has costs attached. So, too, does rhetoric that understates the threat, especially when detached from policy.
  It is not too late to reverse this troubling trend. The White House can begin by focusing less on overly reassuring rhetoric — which has not paid
  dividends at home or abroad — and more on a candid accounting of the threats faced and the policies employed to confront them.
  Stuart Gottlieb, a former foreign-policy adviser and speechwriter in the US Senate (1999-2003), is now director of policy studies at the Jackson Insti
  tute for Global Affairs at Yale. He's the editor of "Debating Terrorism and Counterterrorism: Con filo ting Perspectives on Causes, Contexts, and Re
  sponses." The original version of this piece appeared in the online edition of The National Interest.
  © The Christian Science Monitor. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Privacy Policy.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771506 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: McHale, Judith A <McHaleJA@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 5:36 AM
  To:
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: FW:
  FYI
  The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com
  War on terror: Obama softened the language, but
  hardened Muslim hearts
  The Obama administration's shift in counterterrorism language sought to bridge the divide with the Muslim world and soften Americans' fear of
  Islam. But the new rhetoric hasn't matched policy, and the unintended costs at home and abroad have been high.
  By Stuart Gottlieb
  posted October 14, 2010 at 9:58 am EDT
  New Haven, Conn. —
  One of the most defining aspects of the Obama administration's counterterrorism strategy has been its effort to change America's rhetorical approach
  to the threat of terrorism, particularly Islamic terrorism. "The language we use matters," President Obama told the Arabic satellite television station
  Al Arabiya in an interview during his first week in office. Scrubbed were George W. Bush-era terms like "war on terrorism," "radical Islam," and
  "jihadist."The White House's 2010 National Security Strategy formally replaced the term "Islamic terrorism" with "violent extremism."
  The purpose of the shift in semantics was two-fold.
  First, it aimed to repackage the fight against terrorism as a specific fight against Al Qaeda, not against Islamic extremism, which Mr. Obama believes
  contributed to a post-9/11 perception that America was "at war with Islam." Indeed, the new rhetoric has gone hand in hand with Obama's outreach to
  the Muslim world to build "a new partnership based on mutual respect and mutual interest."
  Second, it was part of a broader effort to soften Americans' fear of Islamic terrorism, which Obama officials believe plays directly into the hands of
  extremists.
  Language change ineffective
  Now it is fair to ask whether Obama's use of language regarding terrorism has proven effective. Startling new polls suggest it hasn't. The first, by the
  Brookings Institution in Washington, shows that between May 2009 and May 2010 the number of Middle Eastern Arabs expressing optimism in
  Obama's approach toward their region dropped from 51 percent to just 16 percent, with those describing themselves as "discouraged" by the Obama
  presidency rising from 15 percent to 63 percent.
  The second, by the Pew Research Center, shows that in August 2010 fewer Americans held a favorable view of Islam (30 percent) than five years
  earlier during the Bush administration (41 percent), with more Americans (35 percent) saying Islam encourages violence more than other religions
  (in 2002, it was 25 percent).
  These starkly negative trend lines suggest the limited utility of language in fighting terrorism. Yes, terrorism is a propaganda-fueled activity – an
  ongoing battle to win hearts and minds and attract new recruits to fight for the cause. And of course the language used in combating terrorism is vital
  – the counterproductive "smoke 'em out" rhetoric of the Bush administration is a case in point.
  But if rhetoric does not match policy, or appears to discount or play down threats, the credibility – and thus effectiveness – of the overall
  counterterrorism strategy may be undermined. It appears the Obama administration has dug itself into just such a hole.
  Rhetoric doesn't match policy
  When looking beyond the nuanced language and appealing promises, what Muslims around the world see is an administration that has ramped up the
  war in Afghanistan; is killing scores of Muslim civilians with drone strikes; continues to hold more than 1,000 Muslim detainees in Guantanamo,
  Bagram, and other prisons; and maintains seemingly unconditional support of Israel.
  This is not to critique these policies, but to point out that they do not match the raised expectations of the Muslim world and have only muddled
  Obama's oft-stated goal of turning Muslims toward America and away from extremist movements.
  The price of downplaying the threat
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771506 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771506 Date: 08/31/2015
  A large price is also being paid domestically for disconnected rhetoric. Despite maintaining nearly all of Bush's hard-line tactics — the USA Patriot
  Act, warrantless surveillance, indefinite detentions the White House has consistently played down the threat, even in the face of a clear uptick in
  terrorism activity.
  For example, following the failed 2009 Christmas Day airline bombing, Obama described the suspect as an "isolated extremist," despite his ties to Al
  Qaeda. And the administration's initial response to the failed May 2010 Times Square bombing by an American Muslim trained in Pakistan was to
  call it a "one-off' event. Attorney General Eric Holder stated in congressional testimony that he believed these and other recent Islamic terror plots
  were unconnected, and unrelated to radical Islam.
  There is little doubt that the administration's unwillingness to speak candidly about Islamic terrorism has taken a toll on the public's trust. A Gallup
  poll released last month shows Americans favoring Republicans over Democrats on the issue of terrorism 55 percent to 31 percent — up from 49
  percent to 42 percent last fall.
  Time to reverse the trend
  Obama entered office promising to fight a smarter and more effective war on terrorism, and in many ways he has. His instincts to maintain aggressive
  tactics while toning down inflammatory rhetoric were sound. Yet his administration seems to have overlearned a key lesson of the Bush years — that
  overstating the threat of terrorism has costs attached. So, too, does rhetoric that understates the threat, especially when detached from policy.
  It is not too late to reverse this troubling trend. The White House can begin by focusing less on overly reassuring rhetoric — which has not paid
  dividends at home or abroad — and more on a candid accounting of the threats faced and the policies employed to confront them.
  Stuart Gottlieb, a former foreign-policy adviser and speechwriter in the US Senate (1999-2003), is now director of policy studies at the Jackson Insti
  tute for Global Affairs at Yale. He's the editor of "Debating Terrorism and Counterterrorism: Con filo ting Perspectives on Causes, Contexts, and Re
  sponses." The original version of this piece appeared in the online edition of The National Interest.
  © The Christian Science Monitor. All Rights Reserved. Terms under which this service is provided to you. Privacy Policy.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771506 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771510
MetadataSubject: MENENDEZ CALL WINDOWS TODAY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771510/C05771510.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Menendez Call Windows today
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC©state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 1:58 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771510
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Menendez's staff has finally gotten back to us. They cay he can do a call between 5:00 — 5:30 PM today or after 7:00 PM
  today.
  Lauren

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771510 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC©state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 1:58 PM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Menendez Call Windows today
  Menendez's staff has finally gotten back to us. They cay he can do a call between 5:00 — 5:30 PM today or after 7:00 PM
  today.
  Lauren
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771510 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771511
MetadataSubject: TONY BLAIR REQUESTS TO SPEAK WITH YOU
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771511/C05771511.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Tony Blair requests to speak with you
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 2:30 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771511
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  MS:
  Blair is available tmw (Friday, 8/27) between 11AM and 12 Noon, or Saturday morning.
  Lauren

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771511 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 2:30 PM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Tony Blair requests to speak with you
  MS:
  Blair is available tmw (Friday, 8/27) between 11AM and 12 Noon, or Saturday morning.
  Lauren
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771511 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771512
MetadataSubject: COMPREHENSIVE CALLS UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771512/C05771512.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Comprehensive Calls update
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 2:42 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771512
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  MS — I've heard back from Armitage and Wexler offices. Here are all of your pending calls in one e-mail:
  -Tony Blair: asking to speak with you btw 11AM-12 Noon tomorrow (Friday), or sometime Saturday morning.
  - Fmr. Dep. Sec Armitage: Available at 3:15 PM today or 12 noon tomorrow (Friday).
  - Menenedez: Available between 5-5:30 PM today, or after 7:00 PM today.
  - Robert Wexler: Available anytime after 4:30 PM today, or anytime tomorrow.
  Just let me know if you would like for me to lock anything in.
  ###

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771512 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 2:42 PM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Comprehensive Calls update
  MS — I've heard back from Armitage and Wexler offices. Here are all of your pending calls in one e-mail:
  -Tony Blair: asking to speak with you btw 11AM-12 Noon tomorrow (Friday), or sometime Saturday morning.
  - Fmr. Dep. Sec Armitage: Available at 3:15 PM today or 12 noon tomorrow (Friday).
  - Menenedez: Available between 5-5:30 PM today, or after 7:00 PM today.
  - Robert Wexler: Available anytime after 4:30 PM today, or anytime tomorrow.
  Just let me know if you would like for me to lock anything in.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771512 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771514
MetadataSubject: WITH SETTLEMENT DEAL US WILL BE REWARDING ISRAEL'S BAD BEHAVIOR
MetadataFrom: Washington Post
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-21T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0109/DOC_0C05771514/C05771514.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771514
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771514 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  tbe post
  With settlement deal, U.S. will be rewarding Israel's bad
  behavior
  By Daniel Kurtzer
  Sunday, November 21, 2010;
  It was only a little over a year and a half ago that the °barna administration demanded a freeze
  on Israeli settlements in the occupied territories, including even the "natural growth" of existing
  settlements. At the time, the administration called settlement activity "illegitimate" and appeared
  ready to go to the mat with Israel to show just how strongly the United States believed that
  settlements impede peace.
  But now, the administration says it is prepared to pay off Israel to freeze only some of its
  settlement activity, and only temporarily. For the first time in memory, the United States is
  poised to reward Israel for its bad behavior.
  Here's the offer that Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is reported to have put on the
  table recently: The United States will provide a package of advanced weaponry and military
  assistance to Israel totaling several billion dollars, all in return for an Israeli commitment to
  freeze settlement construction for just three months, excluding construction in Jerusalem. During
  this period, the United States hopes Israel and the Palestinian Authority will negotiate an
  agreement on the final borders of a future Palestinian state. The Israeli cabinet is weighing the
  offer, having demanded a letter from Washington confirming the terms.
  This is a very bad idea. And while Washington will almost certainly come to regret bribing
  Israel, Israel may regret receiving such a bribe even more.
  Previously, U.S. opposition to settlements resulted in penalties, not rewards, for continued
  construction. Washington deducted from its loan guarantees to Israel an amount equivalent,
  dollar for dollar, to the money that Israel spent in the occupied territories. While it's true that the
  United States has turned a blind eye to indirect U.S. subsidies for Israeli activities in the
  territories - such as tax deductions for American organizations that fund settlements - the deal
  now being offered to Israel is of a totally different magnitude. If it goes forward, it will be the
  first direct benefit that the United States has provided Israel for settlement activities that we have
  opposed for more than 40 years.
  It is not clear that Washington has thought through the implications. Will the United States
  similarly reward Palestinians for stopping their own bad behavior? Will Washington pay them to,
  say, halt the incitement against Israel and Jews in their public media and some educational
  materials - something that shouldn't have been going on in the first place?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771514 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771514 Date: 08/31/2015
  Will the rewards for Israel be automatically renewable? Meaning, if Israel is willing to continue
  the settlement freeze after three months, will another set of rewards be the price for that?
  And what about enforcement? Will the United States demand its money back if it learns about
  construction during the freeze, even if that construction was not authorized by the Israeli
  government?
  The list of problems is so long that it would not be surprising if the administration were already
  experiencing buyer's remorse. But the arrangement has an even more serious long-term
  implication, one that should.worry Israel profoundly.
  If it goes through, this deal will shake the foundation of the U.S.-Israeli strategic partnership.
  Since the early 1980s, the two countries have cooperated closely on assessing Israeli security,
  and Washington has promised to ensure Israel's "qualitative military edge" over any combination
  of potential Arab adversaries.
  This commitment has been insulated from the vicissitudes of politics and diplomacy. Whatever
  the state of U.S.-Israeli relations or the peace process, America's commitment to Israel's security
  has been manifest. Not so, if this deal materializes. By subjecting Israel's defense needs to the
  political demands of an American administration, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has done
  something quite dangerous for Israel - he has made those needs contingent, negotiable, optional.
  Israel's security requirements are now merely a bargaining chip with which to negotiate what
  Jerusalem will or will not do to advance the peace process.
  Today, the United States has "purchased" a short-term settlements freeze; what will be for sale
  tomorrow? For that matter, how seriously should our defense planners and congressional budget
  watchers take Israel's arguments about its security needs when it is prepared to market different
  elements of its policy for another squadron of advanced aircraft? Does anyone really believe that
  there is a substantive connection between a three-month settlement freeze and Israel's professed
  need for more airplanes?
  These short-sighted tactics will lead both the United States and Israel into a long-term bind.
  Washington will be left fending off a landslide of demands from others who hope to be rewarded
  for their bad behavior, to be paid for stopping what they should never have been doing. Israel,
  meanwhile, will be left struggling to explain how precious its settlements really are if a payoff -
  albeit a high one - is enough to see them frozen.
  And both countries will need a new rationale for the exceedingly steep price of what Israel calls
  its security requirements, but which will now look more like poker chips used to secure
  American aid.
  This bargaining exercise has been unseemly all along. If it proceeds, both sides will probably
  regret it. But the deal has not yet been sealed. And it is not too late to start over.
  Daniel Kurtzer, a former U.S. ambassador to Israel and Egypt, teaches Middle East politics at
  Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771514 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771515
MetadataSubject: MINI SCHEDULE 10/15/10 FRIDAY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-15T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0103/DOC_0C05771515/C05771515.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Mini Schedule 10/15/10 Friday
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC©state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, October 15, 2010 8:12 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771515
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  8:15 am DEPART Private Residence
  En route State Department
  8:25 am ARRIVE State Department
  8:25 am PRESIDENTIAL DAILY BRIEFING
  8:30 am Secretary's Office
  8:45 am DAILY SENIOR STAFF MEETING
  9:15 am Secretary's Conference Room
  9:30 am WEEKLY MEETING w/UN AMBASSADOR SUSAN RICE
  10:00 am Secretary's Office
  10:00 am YITZHAK MOLCHO PRE-BRIEF*
  11:00 am Secretary's Outer Office
  11:00 am MEETING w/ISRAELI CHIEF NEGOTIATOR YITZHAK MOLCHO
  11:45 am Secretary's Outer Office
  12:00 pm CALL w/FRENCH PRESIDENT NICOLAS SARKOZY
  12:15 pm Secretary's Office
  12:30 pm OFFICE TIME
  1:30 pm Secretary's Office
  1:55 pm (t) DEPART State Department
  En route Andrews Air Force Base
  2:20 pm (t) ARRIVE Andrews Air Force Base (AAB)
  2:30 pm (t) WHEELS UP Andrews Air Force Base via Mil Air Tail#60500
  En route San Francisco, California
  5:00 pm (t) ARRIVE San Francisco International Airport (SFO)
  5:10 pm (t) DEPART San Francisco International Airport
  En route San Francisco Marriott
  5:40 pm (t) ARRIVE San Francisco Marriott
  6:30 pm OPTIONAL: DROP BY COMMONWEALTH CLUB MEET AND GREET
  7:00 pm Salon 14, San Francisco Marriott
  7:00 pm COMMONWEALTH CLUB FORUM
  8:00 pm Ballroom, San Francisco Marriott
  8:00 pm DEPART San Francisco Marriott
  En route Private Residence
  9:15 pm ARRIVE Private Residence
  ###

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771515 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC©state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 8:12 AM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Mini Schedule 10/15/10 Friday
  8:15 am DEPART Private Residence
  En route State Department
  8:25 am ARRIVE State Department
  8:25 am PRESIDENTIAL DAILY BRIEFING
  8:30 am Secretary's Office
  8:45 am DAILY SENIOR STAFF MEETING
  9:15 am Secretary's Conference Room
  9:30 am WEEKLY MEETING w/UN AMBASSADOR SUSAN RICE
  10:00 am Secretary's Office
  10:00 am YITZHAK MOLCHO PRE-BRIEF*
  11:00 am Secretary's Outer Office
  11:00 am MEETING w/ISRAELI CHIEF NEGOTIATOR YITZHAK MOLCHO
  11:45 am Secretary's Outer Office
  12:00 pm CALL w/FRENCH PRESIDENT NICOLAS SARKOZY
  12:15 pm Secretary's Office
  12:30 pm OFFICE TIME
  1:30 pm Secretary's Office
  1:55 pm (t) DEPART State Department
  En route Andrews Air Force Base
  2:20 pm (t) ARRIVE Andrews Air Force Base (AAB)
  2:30 pm (t) WHEELS UP Andrews Air Force Base via Mil Air Tail#60500
  En route San Francisco, California
  5:00 pm (t) ARRIVE San Francisco International Airport (SFO)
  5:10 pm (t) DEPART San Francisco International Airport
  En route San Francisco Marriott
  5:40 pm (t) ARRIVE San Francisco Marriott
  6:30 pm OPTIONAL: DROP BY COMMONWEALTH CLUB MEET AND GREET
  7:00 pm Salon 14, San Francisco Marriott
  7:00 pm COMMONWEALTH CLUB FORUM
  8:00 pm Ballroom, San Francisco Marriott
  8:00 pm DEPART San Francisco Marriott
  En route Private Residence
  9:15 pm ARRIVE Private Residence
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771515 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771516
MetadataSubject: (JERUSALEM POST) PM: CABINET TO REVIEW US FREEZE DEAL WHEN WE GET LETTER
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-21T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0109/DOC_0C05771516/C05771516.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (Jerusalem Post) PM: Cabinet to review US freeze deal when we get letter
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob .1 <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shlft-II
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 21, 2010 2:34 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771516
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Fyi - Prince is working with Dermer to get a common line.
  Meanwhile, I just watched my first ever women's field hockey game - Maryland beat UNC to win the national
  championship.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771516 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob .1 <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2010 2:34 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (Jerusalem Post) PM: Cabinet to review US freeze deal when we get letter
  Fyi - Prince is working with Dermer to get a common line.
  Meanwhile, I just watched my first ever women's field hockey game - Maryland beat UNC to win the national
  championship.
  From: Rudnitski, Jennine R
  To: NEWS-Mahogany; NEWS-NEA
  Cc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shlft-II
  Sent: Sun Nov 21 12:03:58 2010
  Subject: (Jerusalem Post) PM: Cabinet to review US freeze deal when we get letter
  (Jerusalem Post) Prime Minister Netanyahu met with Likud MKs and deputy ministers to discuss the U.S.
  proposal for a 90-day construction freeze, November 21. In the meeting, Netanyahu told the Likud officials: "I
  have a responsibility that includes making the best decision for the state of Israel and its national interests,
  foremost, its security." He continued, 'We still haven't received the written agreement from the Americans on
  the basic understandings." The prime minister assured those attending the meeting, "If we receive a written
  agreement, I will bring it to the cabinet and I am sure that the ministers will approve it because it is what's best
  for the state of Israel." He added, "If we don't receive such a document, I won't bring the issue [of a freeze] to
  the cabinet."
  Earlier in the day thousands of settlers protested outside the Prime Minister's Office in Jerusalem against the
  potential freeze. National Infrastructures Minister Uzi Landau, an opponent of an additional freeze, addressed
  the demonstrators. Dozens of youngsters also blocked the entrance to Jerusalem. Police dispersed the
  protesters and arrested two people. Over the weekend, Kadima MK Avi Dichter told The Jerusalem Post, "The
  total freeze for 10 months was a serious mistake," said Dichter. "It was clear that it would come to an end, and
  that in those 10 months nothing dramatic could happen between Israel and the Palestinians — leaving us in the
  same situation as at the beginning."
  "Netanyahu made a second mistake when he didn't agree to the American request to extend a two-month
  freeze immediately on September 26, and insist that it was the last freeze. If he had, we'd be one week away
  from the end, rather than in our current state," he said. Dichter said the "main problem is that the topic of the
  freeze has become the central topic of discussion, rather than talks between us and the Palestinians.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771516 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771518
MetadataSubject: (AP) IRAN SETS FEBRUARY TRAIL DATE FOR THREE AMERICANS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-21T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0109/DOC_0C05771518/C05771518.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (AP) Iran sets February trial date for three Americans
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shift-II; SES-O_Shift-III
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 21, 2010 2:56 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771518
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771518 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2010 2:56 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (AP) Iran sets February trial date for three Americans
  From: Rudnitski, Jennine R
  To: NEWS-Iran; NEWS-CA; NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shift-II; SES-O_Shift-III
  Sent: Sun Nov 2114:41:30 2010
  Subject: (AP) Iran sets February trial date for three Americans
  TEHRAN (AP) - Iran set a February 6 trial date for three Americans arrested more than a year ago along the Iraqi border
  and charged with spying, their lawyer said. The trial was to have started on Nov. 6, but authorities said they delayed it
  because one of the Americans, who was freed on bail, had not been summoned to return to the country to appear in
  court. Their lawyer said he received an official notification of the new trial date November 21. Iran warned that it will
  seize the $500,000 bail posted by released hiker Sarah Shourd if she does not return for trial. Shourd has not disclosed
  any plans to return to Iran. She said in an interview published Oct. 31 in The New York Times that the three stepped off
  an unmarked dirt road and inadvertently crossed from Iraq only because a border guard of unknown nationality
  gestured for them to approach.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771518 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771519
MetadataSubject: RE:
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-15T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0103/DOC_0C05771519/C05771519.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE:
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob 1 <Sullivan11@state.gov>; Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, October 15, 2010 9:25 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771519
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: ok
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771519 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 9:25 AM
  To: H
  Subject: RE:
  ok
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 9:22 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Fw:
  Pls print.
  Original Message
  From: McHale, Judith A <McHaleJA@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob 1 <Sullivan11@state.gov>; Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Oct 15 05:35:42 2010
  Subject: FW:
  FYI
  The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com
  War on terror: Obama softened the language, but hardened Muslim hearts
  The Obama administration's shift in counterterrorism language sought to bridge the divide with the Muslim world and
  soften Americans' fear of Islam. But the new rhetoric hasn't matched policy, and the unintended costs at home and
  abroad have been high.
  By Stuart Gottlieb <http://www.csmonitor.com/layout/set/print/About/Contact-Us-Feedback>
  posted October 14, 2010 at 9:58 am EDT
  New Haven, Conn. —
  One of the most defining aspects of the Obama administration's counterterrorism strategy has been its effort to change
  America's rhetorical approach to the threat of terrorism <http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2009/0129/obama-
  redefines-war-on-terror> , particularly Islamic terrorism. "The language we use matters," President Obama told the
  Arabic satellite television station Al Arabiya in an interview during his first week in office. Scrubbed were George W.
  Bush-era terms like "war on terrorism," "radical Islam," and "jihadist." <http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0901/p03s03-
  uspo.html> The White House's 2010 National Security Strategy formally replaced the term "Islamic terrorism" with
  "violent extremism."
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771519 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771519 Date: 08/31/2015
  The purpose of the shift in semantics was two-fold.
  First, it aimed to repackage the fight against terrorism as a specific fight against Al Qaeda, not against Islamic extremism,
  which Mr. Obama believes contributed to a post-9/11 perception that America was "at war with Islam." Indeed, the new
  rhetoric <http://www.csmonitor.com/World/G lobal-News/2009/0604/in-fra nce-oba ma-erases-the-us-vs-them-
  rhetoric> has gone hand in hand with Obama's outreach to the Muslim world
  <http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2009/0605/p06s01-wome.html> to build "a new partnership based on
  mutual respect and mutual interest."
  Second, it was part of a broader effort to soften Americans' fear of Islamic terrorism, which Obama officials believe plays
  directly into the hands of extremists.
  Language change ineffective
  Now it is fair to ask whether Obama's use of language regarding terrorism has proven effective. Startling new polls
  suggest it hasn't. The first, by the Brookings Institution in Washington, shows that between May 2009 and May 2010 the
  number of Middle Eastern Arabs expressing optimism in Obama's approach toward their region dropped
  <http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2010/0806/0bama-s-popularity-may-be-down-in-US-but-he-s-even-
  less-popular-among-Arabs> from 51 percent to just 16 percent, with those describing themselves as "discouraged" by
  the Obama presidency rising from 15 percent to 63 percent.
  The second, by the Pew Research Center, shows that in August 2010 fewer Americans held a favorable view of Islam (30
  percent) than five years earlier during the Bush administration (41 percent), with more Americans (35 percent) saying
  Islam encourages violence more than other religions (in 2002, it was 25 percent).
  These starkly negative trend lines suggest the limited utility of language in fighting terrorism. Yes, terrorism is a
  propaganda-fueled activity — an ongoing battle to win hearts and minds <http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-
  East/2009/0603/p06s16-wome.html> and attract new recruits to fight for the cause. And of course the language used in
  combating terrorism <http://www.csmonitorcom/USA/Foreign-Policy/2008/0801/p02s01-usfp.html> is vital — the
  counterproductive "smoke 'em out" rhetoric of the Bush administration <http://www.csmonitor.com/2001/0919/p12s2-
  woeu.html> is a case in point.
  But if rhetoric does not match policy, or appears to discount or play down threats, the credibility — and thus
  effectiveness — of the overall counterterrorism strategy may be undermined. It appears the Obama administration has
  dug itself into just such a hole.
  Rhetoric doesn't match policy
  When looking beyond the nuanced language and appealing promises, what Muslims around the world see is an
  administration that has ramped up the war in Afghanistan
  <http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2010/0609/0bama-wants-more-money-for-Afghanistan-war.-Will-Congress-
  grant-it> ; is killing scores of Muslim civilians with drone strikes <http://www.csmonitor.com/World/terrorism-
  security/2010/0915/US-drone-attacks-bombard-Haqqani-network-in-Pakistan> ; continues to hold more than 1,000
  Muslim detainees in Guantanamo <http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Topics/Guantanamo>, Bagram, and other prisons;
  and maintains seemingly unconditional support of Israel.
  This is not to critique these policies, but to point out that they do not match the raised expectations of the Muslim world
  and have only muddled Obama's oft-stated goal of turning Muslims toward America and away from extremist
  movements.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771519 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771519 Date: 08/31/2015
  The price of downplaying the threat
  A large price is also being paid domestically for disconnected rhetoric. Despite maintaining nearly all of Bush's hard-line
  tactics — the USA Patriot Act <http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2010/0301/0bama-signs-Patriot-Act-extension-
  without-reforms> , warrantless surveillance, indefinite detentions — the White House has consistently played down the
  threat, even in the face of a clear uptick in terrorism activity.
  For example, following the failed 2009 Christmas Day airline bombing
  <http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2010/0102/Calling-it-war-Obama-pegs-Christmas-Day-attack-to-Al-Qaeda> ,
  Obama described the suspect as an "isolated extremist," despite his ties to Al Qaeda. And the administration's initial
  response to the failed May 2010 Times Square bombing <http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2010/0509/Times-Square-
  bombing-Sign-of-desperation-from-Pakistan-Taliban> by an American Muslim trained in Pakistan was to call it a "one-
  off" event. Attorney General Eric Holder stated <http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2010/0203/Holder-letter-why-
  we-read-Christmas-Day-bomber-his-rights> in congressional testimony that he believed these and other recent Islamic
  terror plots were unconnected, and unrelated to radical Islam.
  There is little doubt that the administration's unwillingness to speak candidly about Islamic terrorism has taken a toll on
  the public's trust. A Gallup poll released last month shows Americans favoring Republicans over Democrats on the issue
  of terrorism 55 percent to 31 percent — up from 49 percent to 42 percent last fall.
  Time to reverse the trend
  Obama entered office promising to fight a smarter and more effective war on terrorism, and in many ways he has. His
  instincts to maintain aggressive tactics while toning down inflammatory rhetoric
  <http://www.csmonitorcom/2006/0517/p09s01-cojh.html> were sound. Yet his administration seems to have
  overlearned a key lesson of the Bush years — that overstating the threat of terrorism
  <http://www.csmonitorcom/2007/0418/p04s01-woeu.html> has costs attached. So, too, does rhetoric that
  understates the threat, especially when detached from policy.
  It is not too late to reverse this troubling trend. The White House can begin by focusing less on overly reassuring rhetoric
  — which has not paid dividends at home or abroad — and more on a candid accounting of the threats faced
  <http://www.csmonitorcom/2006/0905/p14s02-bogn.html> and the policies employed to confront them.
  Stuart Gottlieb, a former foreign-policy adviser and speechwriter in the US Senate (1999-2003), is now director of policy
  studies at the Jackson Insti tute for Global Affairs at Yale. He's the editor of "Debating Terrorism and Counterterrorism:
  Con flic ting Perspectives on Causes, Contexts, and Re sponses." The original version of this piece appeared in the online
  edition of The National Interest.
  © The Christian Science Monitor. All Rights Reserved. Terms <http://www.csmonitor.com/About/Terms> under which
  this service is provided to you. Privacy Policy <http://www.csmonitor.com/About/Privacy-Policy>.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771519 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771522
MetadataSubject: FROM ARTURO - CORREA RESCUED IN ECUADOR
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-01T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0101/DOC_0C05771522/C05771522.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCc: Gonzalez, Juan S <GonzalezJS©state.gov>:
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771522
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Lauren Jiloty <
  Friday, October 1, 2010 8:22 AM
  H; valenzuelaaa@state.gov; Huma Abedin
  RE: From Arturo - Correa Rescued in Ecuador
  yes will do
  >

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771522 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  6.7
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Lauren Jiloty <
  Friday, October 1, 2010 8:22 AM
  H; valenzuelaaa@state.gov; Huma Abedin
  RE: From Arturo - Correa Rescued in Ecuador
  yes will do
  > From: HDR22@clintonemail.com
  > To: valenzuelaaa©state.gov
  > CC: Laurenjilot
  > Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 08:09:48 -0400
  > Subject: Re: From Arturo - Correa Rescued in Ecuador
  > I will call--I'm copying Lauren to work to set up call.
  •
  Original Message
  > From: Valenzuela, Arturo A <ValenzuelaAAAstate.gov>
  > To. H
  > Cc: Gonzalez, Juan S <GonzalezJS©state.gov>:
  , Sullivan, Jacob 3 <Sullivan33(6
  .3state.gov>; Abedin, Hurna
  <Abedin1-1(astate.gov>: Steinberg, James B <Steinberg36@state.gov>; Burns, William 3 <BurnsW3©state.gov>
  > Sent: Fri Oct 01 07:33:50 2010
  > Subject: From Arturo - Correa Rescued in Ecuador
  > Madame Secretary: After a tense day in which President Correa was slightly injured at noon by rioting and striking
  police, and later was barred from leaving the hospital by the same, the army finally rescued him at 9pm last night. Some
  military units, including the Navy unit in Guayaquil appeared to support the police. The police also occupied the national
  congress. As the rescue took place, the head of the Ecuadoran Joints Chiefs of Staff issued a statement supporting the
  president, and noting that the armed forces respect the rule of law "in which the President [Rafael Correa] is the
  maximum authority of the three branches." Things are now calm.
  > Reaction in the hemisphere was one of deep concern. The OAS adopted a resolution; South American presidents at the
  call of UNASUR travelled to Buenos Aires and are likely to go on to Quito to support Correa. Several, including Garcia and
  Santos, called Correa. Zapatero also spoke with him. ivioratinos tried to reach you at around 6prn last evening to convey
  that news, I took the call.
  > As you know, we issued a statement of support for Correa. I also gave an interview to CNN in Spanish, which was re-
  played frequently. I strongly recommend that you call Correa today to reiterate U.S. support for his government and to
  wish him well.
  > He will appreciate it but, more broadly, it sends a signal that the United States supports the constitutional order and
  rejects any attempt to undermine it. Chavez in Buenos Aires predictably declared that we were behind the unrest. We
  have prepared a call sheet for you.
  > Regards,
  > Arturo
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771522 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771526
MetadataSubject: FYI, STATE OF PLAY/POLL NOW. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-22T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0109/DOC_0C05771526/C05771526.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: h: fyi, state of play/poll now. Sid
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, November 22, 2010 10:25 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771526
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  MyQ
  Map & Directions
  Directory
  Contact Us
  Search
  INFORMATION:
  For Alumni
  For Parents
  For News Media
  01:
  ,?rint this page
  Home> Institutes and Centers> Quinnipiac University Polling Institute> National (US)> Release Detail
  November 22, 2010 - American Voters Could Deny Obama Reelection, Quinnipiac University National
  Poll Finds; President Tied With Romney, Huckabee But Leads Palin
  Word format
  President Barack Obama does not deserve a second term, American voters say 49 - 43 percent, and he is in a
  statistical dead heat with possible Republican challengers Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee, according to a
  Quinnipiac University poll released today. President Obama leads Sarah Palin 48 - 40 percent.
  Romney, Huckabee, Palin and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich are bunched together when Republican
  voters are asked who they prefer for the GOP's 2012 presidential nomination, the independent Quinnipiac
  (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University survey finds.
  Democratic voters say 64 - 27 percent they do not want anyone to challenge President Obama for their party's
  nomination in 2012.
  "The Democratic base remains squarely behind President Barack Obama when it comes to his re-election, but
  his weakness among independent voters at this point makes his 2012 election prospects uncertain," said Peter
  A. Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute.
  "The demographic splits in the electorate when voters are asked whether the president deserves a second term is
  a roadmap for his re-election strategists on how they need to focus their appeal. Only 39 percent of men, 34
  percent of whites, 35 percent of political independents and 38 percent of those over age 35 think he deserves
  four more years in the Oval Office."
  In trial heats for 2012, former Massachusetts Gov. Romney receives 45 percent to 44 percent for Obama, while
  the president gets 46 percent to 44 percent for Mr. Huckabee. Matched against Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, a
  virtual unknown to most voters, the president leads 45 - 36 percent.
  "At this point, former Alaska Gov. Palin runs the worst against President Obama. Daniels is essentially a
  generic Republican because of his anonymity to most voters. Obama only gets 45 percent against him while he
  gets 48 percent against Ms. Palin," said Brown. "She is very unpopular among independents and although she
  recently said she thought she could defeat Obama, the data does not now necessarily support that assertion."
  "Unlike Daniels, who is a political unknown to most Americans, virtually all voters have formed an opinion
  about Palin and that opinion is not encouraging for her candidacy."
  Ms. Palin is viewed the most negatively by the American people of the possible Republican candidates in 2012.
  She is viewed unfavorable by 51 percent of voters and favorably by 36 percent. Among independents, the key
  swing voting bloc, she has a negative 54 - 33 percent favorability rating.
  Huckabee gets a 41 - 25 percent favorability rating and Romney gets a 38 - 26 percent score. Former U.S.
  House Speaker Newt Gingrich gets a negative 30 - 43 percent score.
  Obama gets a 48 - 48 percent split overall, with a negative 43 - 52 percent among independent voters.
  In a mythical Republican primary Ms. Palin gets 19 percent, including 25 percent of GOP women, followed by
  Romney with 18 percent, Huckabee at 17 percent, Gingrich at 15 percent, Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty at 6
  percent and Daniels, Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour and Sen. John Thune of South Dakota at 2 percent each.
  "The best thing Obama has going for him when it comes to his re-election may be that at this point the
  Republicans don't have a candidate who is both nationally well-known and well- liked by a majority of voters,"
  said Brown.
  From November 8 - 15, Quinnipiac University surveyed 2,424 registered voters nationwide, live by telephone,
  with a margin of error of +/- 2 percentage points.
  The Quinnipiac University Poll, directed by Douglas Schwartz, Ph.D., conducts public opinion surveys in
  Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Florida, Ohio and the nation as a public service and for
  research. For more data or RSS feed- http://www.quinnipiac.edu/polling.xml, call (203) 582-5201
  begin_of the_skype_highlighting (203) 582-5201 end_of the_skype_highlighting, or follow us on
  Twitter.
  1. (Republicans and Republican Leaners) It is a long way off but I would like to ask you some questions about
  the 2012 Presidential election. If the 2012 Republican primary for President were being held today, and the
  candidates were: Sarah Palin, Mike Huckabee, Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney, Mitch Daniels, Tim Pawlenty,
  Haley Barbour, and John Thune for whom would you vote?
  REPUBLICANS
  WHITE
  NoColl Coll BrnAgn
  Tot Men Worn Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath
  Palin 19% 14% 25% 22% 10% 20% 16% 20%
  Huckabee 17 17 18 17 18 26 22 13
  Gingrich 15 18 11 15 15 13 16 16
  Romney 18 20 15 14 26 13 14 22
  Daniels 2 3 2 2 3 2 1 3
  Pawlenty 6 6 5 6 6 6 7 6
  Barbour 2 3 1 1 4 2 2 1
  Thune 2 2 1 1 3 1 1 2
  SMONE ELSE(VOL) 1 1 1 1 2 - - 3
  WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
  DK/NA 17 15 19 19 13 14 20 14
  2. (Democrats and Democrat Leaners) It is a long way off but I would like to ask you some questions about the
  2012 Presidential election. Would you like to see a candidate other than Barack Obama run for the Democratic
  nomination for President in 2012 or not?
  DEMOCRATS
  NoColl Coll
  Tot Men Worn Wht Blk Degree Degree
  Yes 27% 30% 25% 32% 13% 32% 16%
  No 64 62 65 59 83 58 76
  OK/NA 9 8 10 10 4 10 9
  3. Turning to the November 2012 general election for President, if the 2012 election for President were being
  held today, and the candidates were, Barack Obama the Democrat and Sarah Palin the Republican for whom
  would you vote?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Blk His
  Obama 48% 6% 89% 44% 44% 52% 41% 91% 60%
  Palin 40 85 6 37 44 36 47 1 31
  SMONE ELSE(VOL) 4 3 2 8 5 3 5 2 -
  WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 3 3 1 6 4 3 3 1 6
  OK/NA 4 3 2 6 3 6 4 4 3
  AGE IN YRS INCOME POL PHIL
  18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con
  Obama 62% 44% 45% 54% 48% 44% 86% 63% 17%
  Palin 30 43 42 35 42 46 9 22 72
  SMONE ELSE(VOL) 4 4 3 3 4 5 2 5 4
  WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 2 4 4 3 3 3 2 4 3
  DR/NA 2 5 4 5 3 2 1 5 4
  WHITE
  NoColl Coll BrnAgn
  Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath
  Obama 46% 56% 23% 31% 39%
  Palin 42 33 67 58 48
  SMONE ELSE(VOL) 4 4 4 5 5
  WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 4 3 2 2 4
  DR/NA 5 3 4 4 4
  4, If the 2012 election for President were being held today, and the candidates were, Barack Obama the
  Democrat and Mitt Romney the Republican for whom would you vote?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Blk His
  Obama 44% 3% 86% 35% 40% 48% 37% 87% 60%
  Romney 45 91 8 46 51 39 53 3 32
  SMONE ELSE(VOL) 2 2 1 3 2 1 2 - -
  WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 2 1 1 4 2 2 2 3 2
  DK/NA 7 3 5 12 5 9 7 7 7
  AGE IN YRS INCOME POL PHIL
  18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con
  Obama 59% 40% 41% 50% 44% 38% 81% 56% 15%
  Romney 34 48 48 37 49 54 11 32 75
  SMONE ELSE(VOL) 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2
  WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 1 3 2 2 - 3 1 1 3
  DK/NA 6 7 7 8 6 4 5 9 5
  WHITE
  NoColl Coll BrnAgn
  Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath
  Obama 42% 51% 19% 26% 34%
  Romney 46 42 69 64 53
  SMONE ELSE(VOL) 2 1 3 2 2
  WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 2 1 2 2 2
  DK/NA 8 4 7 6 9
  5. If the 2012 election for President were being held today, and the candidates were, Barack Obama the
  Democrat and Mike Huckabee the Republican for whom would you vote?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Bik His
  Obama 46% 4% 85% 40% 42% 49% 38% 90% 64%
  Huckabee 44 88 9 47 49 40 52 5 26
  SMONE ELSE(VOL) 2 2 1 4 3 1 2 - 1
  WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 2 1 - 3 2 1 2 1 2
  DK/NA 6 4 5 7 4 8 6 4 7
  AGE IN YRS INCOME POL PHIL
  18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con
  Obama 60% 41% 43% 51% 44% 42% 84% 59% 16%
  Huckabee 34 48 46 38 48 52 10 29 76
  SMONE ELSE(VOL) 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 3 2
  WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) - 2 2 2 1 2 - 2 2
  OK/NA 4 6 7 7 5 2 4 8 5
  1
  1
  I
  WHITE
  NoColl Coll BrnAgn
  Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath
  Obama 43% 52% 21% 27% 36%
  Huckabee 46 40 72 66 52
  SMONE ELSE(VOL) 2 2 2 2 2
  WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 2 1 1 1 3
  DK/NA 7 5 5 5 7
  6. If the 2012 election for President were being held today, and the candidates were, Barack Obama the
  Democrat and Mitch Daniels the Republican for whom would you vote?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Blk His
  Obama 45% 6% 85% 37% 42% 49% 38% 84% 66%
  Daniels 36 78 5 34 39 32 42 3 22
  SMONE ELSE(VOL) 2 2 1 4 3 2 3 1 1
  WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 3 2 1 4 3 2 3 1 2
  DK/NA 14 12 8 21 13 15 15 10 9
  AGE IN YRS INCOME POL PHIL
  18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con
  Obama 58% 42% 42% 51% 44% 41% 83% 60% 15%
  Daniels 30 37 38 30 40 43 8 20 65
  SMONE ELSE(VOL) 1 3 2 2 2 2 1 3 3
  WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 1 2 3 3 1 3 1 3 3
  DK/NA 10 15 15 13 13 12 7 15 15
  WHITE
  NoColl Coll BrnAgn
  Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath
  Obama 43% 51% 23% 28% 37%
  Daniels 37 32 56 52 42
  SMONE ELSE(VOL) 2 2 3 3 3
  WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 3 2 3 3 3
  DK/NA 15 13 15 15 16
  7. Is your opinion of - Barack Obama favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about him?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Elk His
  Favorable 48% 6% 86% 43% 44% 51% 40% 91% 66%
  Unfavorable 48 91 12 52 53 44 56 9 31
  Hvn't hrd enough 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 - 3
  REFUSED 2 1 1 3 2 3 3 -
  AGE IN YRS INCOME POL PHIL
  18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con
  Favorable 61% 45% 42% 55% 47% 41% 83% 62% 17%
  Unfavorable 35 51 54 42 49 56 14 32 81
  Hvn't hrd enough 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 3 1
  REFUSED 2 2 3 2 3 2 1 3 2
  WHITE
  NoColl Coll BrnAgn
  Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath
  Favorable 45% 53% 23% 28% 39%
  Unfavorable 50 43 75 68 58
  Hvn't hrd enough 2 1 1 2 1
  REFUSED 2 3 1 2 3
  TREND: Is your opinion of - Barack Obama favorable, unfavorable, or haven't you heard enough about him?
  Nov 18 Sep 09 Jul 21 Mar 25 Nov
  FAVORABLE
  High Low
  19 Nov 12 Feb 21
  2010 2010 2010 2010 2009 2008 2007
  Favorable 48 47 49 47 50 67 44
  Unfavorable 48 45 45 47 38 19 14
  Hvn't hrd enough 2 5 4 4 9 11 40
  REFUSED 2 3 2 1 2 3 1
  8. Is your opinion of - Sarah Palin favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about her?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Blk His
  Favorable 36% 74% 8% 33% 40% 32% 41% 8% 31%
  Unfavorable 51 17 78 54 49 53 47 74 56
  Hvn't hrd enough 10 7 12 10 8 12 9 16 12
  REFUSED 3 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 -
  TREND: Is your opinion of - Sarah Palin favorable, unfavorable, or haven't you heard enough about her?
  Nov 18 Sep 09 Jul 21 Mar 24 Sep 18
  2010 2010 2010 2010 2008
  Favorable 36 31 35 33 37
  Unfavorable 51 50 49 51 30
  Hvn't hrd enough 10 15 14 14 31
  REFUSED 3 3 2 2 2
  9. Is your opinion of - Mike Huckabee favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about him?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Elk His
  Favorable 41% 69% 15% 45% 47% 35% 46% 17% 28%
  Unfavorable 25 7 42 21 27 23 23 30 36
  Hvn't hrd enough 33 23 41 33 26 40 30 52 35
  REFUSED 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1
  TREND: Is your opinion of Mike Huckabee favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about him?
  Nov 18 Oct 31
  2010 2007
  Favorable 41 15
  Unfavorable 25 13
  Hvn ' t hrd enough 33 70
  REFUSED 2 2
  10. Is your opinion of - Mitt Romney favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about him?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Elk His
  Favorable 38% 64% 16% 43% 44% 32% 43% 14% 34%
  Unfavorable 26 9 44 22 27 25 25 34 29
  Him ' t hrd enough 35 26 40 33 27 41 31 51 37
  REFUSED 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1
  TREND: Is your opinion of Mitt Romney favorable, unfavorable, or haven't you heard enough about him?
  Nov 18 Mar 25 Nov 12 Oct 31 Aug 15 Jun 13 May 3
  2010 2010 2008 2007 2007 2007 2007
  Favorable 38 28 34 28 20 18 17
  Unfavorable 26 25 20 25 22 20 16
  Hvn ' t hrd enough 35 45 43 45 55 60 65
  REFUSED 2 2 3 2 2 2 2
  11. Is your opinion of - Newt Gingrich favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about him?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Blk His
  Favorable 30% 60% 9% 26% 36% 25% 34% 6% 24%
  Unfavorable 43 18 62 45 44 43 43 53 34
  Hvn ' t hrd enough 25 20 28 26 19 30 21 39 40
  REFUSED 2 2 1 • 2 2 2 2 2 2
  TREND: Is your opinion of Newt Gingrich favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about him?
  Nov 18 Feb 21
  2010 2007
  Favorable 30 22
  Unfavorable 43 47
  Hvn ' t hrd - enough 25 30
  REFUSED 2 2
  12. Is your opinion of - Tim Pawlenty favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about him?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Blk His
  Favorable 13% 25% 4% 14% 18% 9% 14% 4% 11%
  Unfavorable 10 3 18 9 11 10 9 14 16
  Hvn ' t hrd enough 76 72 77 76 70 81 76 82 72
  REFUSED 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 - 1
  13. Is your opinion of - John Thune favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about him?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Blk His
  Favorable 7% 12% 2% 8% 10% 5% 7% 3% 12%
  Unfavorable 5 2 9 3 5 5 4 8 9
  Hvn't hrd enough 87 85 89 88 85 90 88 88 79
  REFUSED 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
  14. Is your opinion of - Mitch Daniels favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about him?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Blk His
  Favorable 10% 18% 5% 10% 12% 8% 11% 5% 7%
  Unfavorable 8 2 14 7 9 8 7 21 9
  Hvn't hrd enough 81 79 81 83 78 83 82 73 83
  REFUSED 1 1 1 - - 1 1 1 1
  15. Is your opinion of - Haley Barbour favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about him?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Blk His
  Favorable 12% 22% 4% 13% 16% 9% 13% 5% 19%
  Unfavorable 12 4 19 13 14 10 11 19 13
  Hvn't hrd enough 75 73 76 74 69 81 75 75 67
  REFUSED 1 1 1 - 1 - 1 1 -
  20. Looking ahead to the 2012 election for President, do you feel that Barack Obama deserves to be reelected,
  or do you feel that he does not deserve to be reelected?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Blk His
  Deserves reelection 43% 4% 81% 35% 39% 46% 34% 86% 65%
  Does not 49 92 13 51 53 45 57 4 29
  DK/NA 9 4 6 14 8 9 9 9 5
  AGE IN YRS INCOME POL PHIL
  18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con
  Deserves reelection 58% 38% 38% 49% 40% 37% 76% 54% 14%
  Does not 34 53 54 42 51 56 15 34 80
  DK/NA 8 9 8 9 9 7 9 11 5
  WHITE
  NoColl Coll BrnAgn
  Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath
  Deserves reelection 41% 47% 19% 23% 32%
  Does not 51 44 75 69 60
  DK/NA 9 9 7 8 9
  TREND: Looking ahead to the 2012 election for President, do you feel that Barack Obama deserves to be
  reelected, or do you feel that he does not deserve to be reelected?
  Nov 18 Jul 21 Mar 25
  2010 2010 2010
  Yes/deserves 43 40 40
  No/does not 49 48 48
  DK/NA 9 12 11
  31. Is your opinion of the Republican Party favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about it?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Elk His
  Favorable 40% 85% 9% 33% 42% 37% 46% 5% 29%
  Unfavorable 45 8 75 48 45 45 40 73 57
  Hvn't hrd enough 13 5 14 15 10 15 11 20 13
  REFUSED 3 2 1 4 3 3 2 2 2
  AGE IN YRS INCOME POL PHIL
  18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con
  Favorable 29% 45% 41% 33% 45% 49% 10% 30% 64%
  Unfavorable 55 42 42 45 49 45 79 53 21
  Hvn't hrd enough 15 10 13 19 3 4 9 14 12
  REFUSED 1 2 4 2 3 2 2 3 2
  I
  I
  WHITE
  NoColl Coll BrnAgn
  Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath
  Favorable 40% 39% 60% 57% 50%
  Unfavorable 41 55 28 31 35
  Hvn't hrd enough 16 4 10 10 12
  REFUSED 3 3 2 2 2
  TREND: Is your opinion of the Republican Party favorable, unfavorable, or haven't you heard enough about it?
  (*Low also 25% Jul 2009)
  Nov 18 Sep 09 Jul 21 Apr 21 Mar
  FAVORABLE....
  High Low
  24 Nov 18 Oct 8
  2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2009*
  Favorable 40 35 33 33 33 40 25
  Unfavorable 45 43 42 47 42 45 53
  Hvn't hrd enough 13 19 21 15 21 13 18
  REFUSED 3 3 4 4 4 3 4
  32. Is your opinion of the Democratic Party favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about it?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Blk His
  Favorable 38% 5% 76% 28% 31% 44% 33% 69% 52%
  Unfavorable 50 86 14 56 59 41 55 20 39
  Hvn't hrd enough 10 7 8 11 7 12 10 10 8
  REFUSED 3 2 1 4 3 3 3 1 1
  AGE IN YRS INCOME POL PHIL
  18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con
  Favorable 48% 35% 35% 43% 41% 30% 71% 48% 13%
  Unfavorable 40 53 53 41 52 64 21 37 76
  Hvn't hrd enough 10 9 9 13 4 5 5 12 10
  REFUSED 2 2 3 2 4 1 3 3 1
  WHITE
  NoColl Coll BrnAgn
  Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath
  Favorable 37% 41% 20% 25% 31%
  Unfavorable 49 53 69 65 54
  Hvn't hrd enough 12 4 9 8 13
  REFUSED 3 2 2 2 2
  TREND: Is your opinion of the Democratic Party favorable, unfavorable, or haven't you heard enough about it?
  Nov 18 Sep 09 Jul 21 Apr 21 Mar
  FAVORABLE
  High Low
  24 Nov 12 Mar 24
  2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2008 2010
  Favorable 38 34 34 32 33 55 33
  Unfavorable 50 47 49 52 48 35 48
  Hvn't hrd enough 10 15 14 12 17 6 17
  REFUSED 3 3 3 3 2 4 2
  33. Is your opinion of the the Tea Party Movement favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about
  it?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Blk His
  Favorable 34% 65% 7% 35% 41% 28% 39% 10% 24%
  Unfavorable 38 11 63 37 38 38 35 57 45
  Hvn ' t hrd enough 26 22 28 26 20 32 25 32 30
  REFUSED 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1
  TREND: Is your opinion of the Tea Party movement favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about
  it?
  Nov 17 Sep 09 Jul 21 Apr 21 Mar 24
  2010 2010 2010 2010 2010
  Favorable 34 30 33 32 28
  Unfavorable 38 31 31 31 23
  Him ' t hrd enough 26 37 35 34 49
  REFUSED 1 2 1 2 1
  38. Do you consider yourself part of the Tea party movement or not?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Blk His
  Yes 13% 25% 2% 14% 14% 11% 14% 2% 12%
  No 83 71 94 84 82 84 82 93 87
  DK/NA 4 4 4 2 3 5 4 5 1
  AGE IN YRS INCOME POL PHIL
  18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con
  Yes 8% 15% 14% 13% 12% 13% 2% 4% 26%
  No 88 83 81 82 86 85 95 91 71
  DK/NA 4 . 2 5 5 1 2 3 5 3
  WHITE
  NoColl Coll BrnAgn
  Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath
  Yes 14% 11% 23% 17% 15%
  No 81 88 71 78 81
  DK/NA 5 2 6 5 4
  TREND: Do you consider yourself part of the Tea Party movement or not?
  Nov 18 Sep 09 Jul 21 Apr 21 Mar 24
  2010 2010 2010 2010 2010
  Yes 13 12 - 12 15 13
  No 83 80 81 79 80
  DK/NA 4 9 7 6 6
  Quinnipiac University • 275 Mount Carmel Ave. • Hamden, CT 06518-1908 • 203-582-8200
  begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 203-582-8200 end_of_the_skype_highlighting • Admissions and Financial
  Aid: 800-462-1944 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 800-462-1944 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
  Contact us with your questions and comments. Copyright 1999-2010Script for writing out current year for copyright
  Quinnipiac University. Statement of liability and copyrights.
  Script for Google Analytics

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 10:25 AM
  To:
  Subject: h: fyi, state of play/poll now. Sid
  MyQ
  Map & Directions
  Directory
  Contact Us
  Search
  INFORMATION:
  For Alumni
  For Parents
  For News Media
  01:
  ,?rint this page
  Home> Institutes and Centers> Quinnipiac University Polling Institute> National (US)> Release Detail
  November 22, 2010 - American Voters Could Deny Obama Reelection, Quinnipiac University National
  Poll Finds; President Tied With Romney, Huckabee But Leads Palin
  Word format
  President Barack Obama does not deserve a second term, American voters say 49 - 43 percent, and he is in a
  statistical dead heat with possible Republican challengers Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee, according to a
  Quinnipiac University poll released today. President Obama leads Sarah Palin 48 - 40 percent.
  Romney, Huckabee, Palin and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich are bunched together when Republican
  voters are asked who they prefer for the GOP's 2012 presidential nomination, the independent Quinnipiac
  (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University survey finds.
  Democratic voters say 64 - 27 percent they do not want anyone to challenge President Obama for their party's
  nomination in 2012.
  "The Democratic base remains squarely behind President Barack Obama when it comes to his re-election, but
  his weakness among independent voters at this point makes his 2012 election prospects uncertain," said Peter
  A. Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015
  "The demographic splits in the electorate when voters are asked whether the president deserves a second term is
  a roadmap for his re-election strategists on how they need to focus their appeal. Only 39 percent of men, 34
  percent of whites, 35 percent of political independents and 38 percent of those over age 35 think he deserves
  four more years in the Oval Office."
  In trial heats for 2012, former Massachusetts Gov. Romney receives 45 percent to 44 percent for Obama, while
  the president gets 46 percent to 44 percent for Mr. Huckabee. Matched against Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, a
  virtual unknown to most voters, the president leads 45 - 36 percent.
  "At this point, former Alaska Gov. Palin runs the worst against President Obama. Daniels is essentially a
  generic Republican because of his anonymity to most voters. Obama only gets 45 percent against him while he
  gets 48 percent against Ms. Palin," said Brown. "She is very unpopular among independents and although she
  recently said she thought she could defeat Obama, the data does not now necessarily support that assertion."
  "Unlike Daniels, who is a political unknown to most Americans, virtually all voters have formed an opinion
  about Palin and that opinion is not encouraging for her candidacy."
  Ms. Palin is viewed the most negatively by the American people of the possible Republican candidates in 2012.
  She is viewed unfavorable by 51 percent of voters and favorably by 36 percent. Among independents, the key
  swing voting bloc, she has a negative 54 - 33 percent favorability rating.
  Huckabee gets a 41 - 25 percent favorability rating and Romney gets a 38 - 26 percent score. Former U.S.
  House Speaker Newt Gingrich gets a negative 30 - 43 percent score.
  Obama gets a 48 - 48 percent split overall, with a negative 43 - 52 percent among independent voters.
  In a mythical Republican primary Ms. Palin gets 19 percent, including 25 percent of GOP women, followed by
  Romney with 18 percent, Huckabee at 17 percent, Gingrich at 15 percent, Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty at 6
  percent and Daniels, Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour and Sen. John Thune of South Dakota at 2 percent each.
  "The best thing Obama has going for him when it comes to his re-election may be that at this point the
  Republicans don't have a candidate who is both nationally well-known and well- liked by a majority of voters,"
  said Brown.
  From November 8 - 15, Quinnipiac University surveyed 2,424 registered voters nationwide, live by telephone,
  with a margin of error of +/- 2 percentage points.
  The Quinnipiac University Poll, directed by Douglas Schwartz, Ph.D., conducts public opinion surveys in
  Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Florida, Ohio and the nation as a public service and for
  research. For more data or RSS feed- http://www.quinnipiac.edu/polling.xml, call (203) 582-5201
  begin_of the_skype_highlighting (203) 582-5201 end_of the_skype_highlighting, or follow us on
  Twitter.
  1. (Republicans and Republican Leaners) It is a long way off but I would like to ask you some questions about
  the 2012 Presidential election. If the 2012 Republican primary for President were being held today, and the
  candidates were: Sarah Palin, Mike Huckabee, Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney, Mitch Daniels, Tim Pawlenty,
  Haley Barbour, and John Thune for whom would you vote?
  REPUBLICANS
  WHITE
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015
  NoColl Coll BrnAgn
  Tot Men Worn Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath
  Palin 19% 14% 25% 22% 10% 20% 16% 20%
  Huckabee 17 17 18 17 18 26 22 13
  Gingrich 15 18 11 15 15 13 16 16
  Romney 18 20 15 14 26 13 14 22
  Daniels 2 3 2 2 3 2 1 3
  Pawlenty 6 6 5 6 6 6 7 6
  Barbour 2 3 1 1 4 2 2 1
  Thune 2 2 1 1 3 1 1 2
  SMONE ELSE(VOL) 1 1 1 1 2 - - 3
  WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
  DK/NA 17 15 19 19 13 14 20 14
  2. (Democrats and Democrat Leaners) It is a long way off but I would like to ask you some questions about the
  2012 Presidential election. Would you like to see a candidate other than Barack Obama run for the Democratic
  nomination for President in 2012 or not?
  DEMOCRATS
  NoColl Coll
  Tot Men Worn Wht Blk Degree Degree
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015
  Yes 27% 30% 25% 32% 13% 32% 16%
  No 64 62 65 59 83 58 76
  OK/NA 9 8 10 10 4 10 9
  3. Turning to the November 2012 general election for President, if the 2012 election for President were being
  held today, and the candidates were, Barack Obama the Democrat and Sarah Palin the Republican for whom
  would you vote?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Blk His
  Obama 48% 6% 89% 44% 44% 52% 41% 91% 60%
  Palin 40 85 6 37 44 36 47 1 31
  SMONE ELSE(VOL) 4 3 2 8 5 3 5 2 -
  WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 3 3 1 6 4 3 3 1 6
  OK/NA 4 3 2 6 3 6 4 4 3
  AGE IN YRS INCOME POL PHIL
  18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con
  Obama 62% 44% 45% 54% 48% 44% 86% 63% 17%
  Palin 30 43 42 35 42 46 9 22 72
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015
  SMONE ELSE(VOL) 4 4 3 3 4 5 2 5 4
  WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 2 4 4 3 3 3 2 4 3
  DR/NA 2 5 4 5 3 2 1 5 4
  WHITE
  NoColl Coll BrnAgn
  Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath
  Obama 46% 56% 23% 31% 39%
  Palin 42 33 67 58 48
  SMONE ELSE(VOL) 4 4 4 5 5
  WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 4 3 2 2 4
  DR/NA 5 3 4 4 4
  4, If the 2012 election for President were being held today, and the candidates were, Barack Obama the
  Democrat and Mitt Romney the Republican for whom would you vote?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Blk His
  Obama 44% 3% 86% 35% 40% 48% 37% 87% 60%
  Romney 45 91 8 46 51 39 53 3 32
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015
  SMONE ELSE(VOL) 2 2 1 3 2 1 2 - -
  WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 2 1 1 4 2 2 2 3 2
  DK/NA 7 3 5 12 5 9 7 7 7
  AGE IN YRS INCOME POL PHIL
  18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con
  Obama 59% 40% 41% 50% 44% 38% 81% 56% 15%
  Romney 34 48 48 37 49 54 11 32 75
  SMONE ELSE(VOL) 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2
  WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 1 3 2 2 - 3 1 1 3
  DK/NA 6 7 7 8 6 4 5 9 5
  WHITE
  NoColl Coll BrnAgn
  Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath
  Obama 42% 51% 19% 26% 34%
  Romney 46 42 69 64 53
  SMONE ELSE(VOL) 2 1 3 2 2
  WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 2 1 2 2 2
  DK/NA 8 4 7 6 9
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015
  5. If the 2012 election for President were being held today, and the candidates were, Barack Obama the
  Democrat and Mike Huckabee the Republican for whom would you vote?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Bik His
  Obama 46% 4% 85% 40% 42% 49% 38% 90% 64%
  Huckabee 44 88 9 47 49 40 52 5 26
  SMONE ELSE(VOL) 2 2 1 4 3 1 2 - 1
  WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 2 1 - 3 2 1 2 1 2
  DK/NA 6 4 5 7 4 8 6 4 7
  AGE IN YRS INCOME POL PHIL
  18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con
  Obama 60% 41% 43% 51% 44% 42% 84% 59% 16%
  Huckabee 34 48 46 38 48 52 10 29 76
  SMONE ELSE(VOL) 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 3 2
  WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) - 2 2 2 1 2 - 2 2
  OK/NA 4 6 7 7 5 2 4 8 5
  1
  1
  I
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015
  WHITE
  NoColl Coll BrnAgn
  Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath
  Obama 43% 52% 21% 27% 36%
  Huckabee 46 40 72 66 52
  SMONE ELSE(VOL) 2 2 2 2 2
  WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 2 1 1 1 3
  DK/NA 7 5 5 5 7
  6. If the 2012 election for President were being held today, and the candidates were, Barack Obama the
  Democrat and Mitch Daniels the Republican for whom would you vote?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Blk His
  Obama 45% 6% 85% 37% 42% 49% 38% 84% 66%
  Daniels 36 78 5 34 39 32 42 3 22
  SMONE ELSE(VOL) 2 2 1 4 3 2 3 1 1
  WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 3 2 1 4 3 2 3 1 2
  DK/NA 14 12 8 21 13 15 15 10 9
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015
  AGE IN YRS INCOME POL PHIL
  18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con
  Obama 58% 42% 42% 51% 44% 41% 83% 60% 15%
  Daniels 30 37 38 30 40 43 8 20 65
  SMONE ELSE(VOL) 1 3 2 2 2 2 1 3 3
  WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 1 2 3 3 1 3 1 3 3
  DK/NA 10 15 15 13 13 12 7 15 15
  WHITE
  NoColl Coll BrnAgn
  Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath
  Obama 43% 51% 23% 28% 37%
  Daniels 37 32 56 52 42
  SMONE ELSE(VOL) 2 2 3 3 3
  WLDN'T VOTE(VOL) 3 2 3 3 3
  DK/NA 15 13 15 15 16
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015
  7. Is your opinion of - Barack Obama favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about him?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Elk His
  Favorable 48% 6% 86% 43% 44% 51% 40% 91% 66%
  Unfavorable 48 91 12 52 53 44 56 9 31
  Hvn't hrd enough 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 - 3
  REFUSED 2 1 1 3 2 3 3 -
  AGE IN YRS INCOME POL PHIL
  18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con
  Favorable 61% 45% 42% 55% 47% 41% 83% 62% 17%
  Unfavorable 35 51 54 42 49 56 14 32 81
  Hvn't hrd enough 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 3 1
  REFUSED 2 2 3 2 3 2 1 3 2
  WHITE
  NoColl Coll BrnAgn
  Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath
  Favorable 45% 53% 23% 28% 39%
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015
  Unfavorable 50 43 75 68 58
  Hvn't hrd enough 2 1 1 2 1
  REFUSED 2 3 1 2 3
  TREND: Is your opinion of - Barack Obama favorable, unfavorable, or haven't you heard enough about him?
  Nov 18 Sep 09 Jul 21 Mar 25 Nov
  FAVORABLE
  High Low
  19 Nov 12 Feb 21
  2010 2010 2010 2010 2009 2008 2007
  Favorable 48 47 49 47 50 67 44
  Unfavorable 48 45 45 47 38 19 14
  Hvn't hrd enough 2 5 4 4 9 11 40
  REFUSED 2 3 2 1 2 3 1
  8. Is your opinion of - Sarah Palin favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about her?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Blk His
  Favorable 36% 74% 8% 33% 40% 32% 41% 8% 31%
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015
  Unfavorable 51 17 78 54 49 53 47 74 56
  Hvn't hrd enough 10 7 12 10 8 12 9 16 12
  REFUSED 3 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 -
  TREND: Is your opinion of - Sarah Palin favorable, unfavorable, or haven't you heard enough about her?
  Nov 18 Sep 09 Jul 21 Mar 24 Sep 18
  2010 2010 2010 2010 2008
  Favorable 36 31 35 33 37
  Unfavorable 51 50 49 51 30
  Hvn't hrd enough 10 15 14 14 31
  REFUSED 3 3 2 2 2
  9. Is your opinion of - Mike Huckabee favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about him?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Elk His
  Favorable 41% 69% 15% 45% 47% 35% 46% 17% 28%
  Unfavorable 25 7 42 21 27 23 23 30 36
  Hvn't hrd enough 33 23 41 33 26 40 30 52 35
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015
  REFUSED 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1
  TREND: Is your opinion of Mike Huckabee favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about him?
  Nov 18 Oct 31
  2010 2007
  Favorable 41 15
  Unfavorable 25 13
  Hvn ' t hrd enough 33 70
  REFUSED 2 2
  10. Is your opinion of - Mitt Romney favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about him?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Elk His
  Favorable 38% 64% 16% 43% 44% 32% 43% 14% 34%
  Unfavorable 26 9 44 22 27 25 25 34 29
  Him ' t hrd enough 35 26 40 33 27 41 31 51 37
  REFUSED 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015
  TREND: Is your opinion of Mitt Romney favorable, unfavorable, or haven't you heard enough about him?
  Nov 18 Mar 25 Nov 12 Oct 31 Aug 15 Jun 13 May 3
  2010 2010 2008 2007 2007 2007 2007
  Favorable 38 28 34 28 20 18 17
  Unfavorable 26 25 20 25 22 20 16
  Hvn ' t hrd enough 35 45 43 45 55 60 65
  REFUSED 2 2 3 2 2 2 2
  11. Is your opinion of - Newt Gingrich favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about him?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Blk His
  Favorable 30% 60% 9% 26% 36% 25% 34% 6% 24%
  Unfavorable 43 18 62 45 44 43 43 53 34
  Hvn ' t hrd enough 25 20 28 26 19 30 21 39 40
  REFUSED 2 2 1 • 2 2 2 2 2 2
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015
  TREND: Is your opinion of Newt Gingrich favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about him?
  Nov 18 Feb 21
  2010 2007
  Favorable 30 22
  Unfavorable 43 47
  Hvn ' t hrd - enough 25 30
  REFUSED 2 2
  12. Is your opinion of - Tim Pawlenty favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about him?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Blk His
  Favorable 13% 25% 4% 14% 18% 9% 14% 4% 11%
  Unfavorable 10 3 18 9 11 10 9 14 16
  Hvn ' t hrd enough 76 72 77 76 70 81 76 82 72
  REFUSED 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 - 1
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015
  13. Is your opinion of - John Thune favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about him?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Blk His
  Favorable 7% 12% 2% 8% 10% 5% 7% 3% 12%
  Unfavorable 5 2 9 3 5 5 4 8 9
  Hvn't hrd enough 87 85 89 88 85 90 88 88 79
  REFUSED 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
  14. Is your opinion of - Mitch Daniels favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about him?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Blk His
  Favorable 10% 18% 5% 10% 12% 8% 11% 5% 7%
  Unfavorable 8 2 14 7 9 8 7 21 9
  Hvn't hrd enough 81 79 81 83 78 83 82 73 83
  REFUSED 1 1 1 - - 1 1 1 1
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015
  15. Is your opinion of - Haley Barbour favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about him?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Blk His
  Favorable 12% 22% 4% 13% 16% 9% 13% 5% 19%
  Unfavorable 12 4 19 13 14 10 11 19 13
  Hvn't hrd enough 75 73 76 74 69 81 75 75 67
  REFUSED 1 1 1 - 1 - 1 1 -
  20. Looking ahead to the 2012 election for President, do you feel that Barack Obama deserves to be reelected,
  or do you feel that he does not deserve to be reelected?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Blk His
  Deserves reelection 43% 4% 81% 35% 39% 46% 34% 86% 65%
  Does not 49 92 13 51 53 45 57 4 29
  DK/NA 9 4 6 14 8 9 9 9 5
  AGE IN YRS INCOME POL PHIL
  18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015
  Deserves reelection 58% 38% 38% 49% 40% 37% 76% 54% 14%
  Does not 34 53 54 42 51 56 15 34 80
  DK/NA 8 9 8 9 9 7 9 11 5
  WHITE
  NoColl Coll BrnAgn
  Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath
  Deserves reelection 41% 47% 19% 23% 32%
  Does not 51 44 75 69 60
  DK/NA 9 9 7 8 9
  TREND: Looking ahead to the 2012 election for President, do you feel that Barack Obama deserves to be
  reelected, or do you feel that he does not deserve to be reelected?
  Nov 18 Jul 21 Mar 25
  2010 2010 2010
  Yes/deserves 43 40 40
  No/does not 49 48 48
  DK/NA 9 12 11
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015
  31. Is your opinion of the Republican Party favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about it?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Elk His
  Favorable 40% 85% 9% 33% 42% 37% 46% 5% 29%
  Unfavorable 45 8 75 48 45 45 40 73 57
  Hvn't hrd enough 13 5 14 15 10 15 11 20 13
  REFUSED 3 2 1 4 3 3 2 2 2
  AGE IN YRS INCOME POL PHIL
  18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con
  Favorable 29% 45% 41% 33% 45% 49% 10% 30% 64%
  Unfavorable 55 42 42 45 49 45 79 53 21
  Hvn't hrd enough 15 10 13 19 3 4 9 14 12
  REFUSED 1 2 4 2 3 2 2 3 2
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015

  I
  I
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015
  WHITE
  NoColl Coll BrnAgn
  Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath
  Favorable 40% 39% 60% 57% 50%
  Unfavorable 41 55 28 31 35
  Hvn't hrd enough 16 4 10 10 12
  REFUSED 3 3 2 2 2
  TREND: Is your opinion of the Republican Party favorable, unfavorable, or haven't you heard enough about it?
  (*Low also 25% Jul 2009)
  Nov 18 Sep 09 Jul 21 Apr 21 Mar
  FAVORABLE....
  High Low
  24 Nov 18 Oct 8
  2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2009*
  Favorable 40 35 33 33 33 40 25
  Unfavorable 45 43 42 47 42 45 53
  Hvn't hrd enough 13 19 21 15 21 13 18
  REFUSED 3 3 4 4 4 3 4
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015
  32. Is your opinion of the Democratic Party favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about it?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Blk His
  Favorable 38% 5% 76% 28% 31% 44% 33% 69% 52%
  Unfavorable 50 86 14 56 59 41 55 20 39
  Hvn't hrd enough 10 7 8 11 7 12 10 10 8
  REFUSED 3 2 1 4 3 3 3 1 1
  AGE IN YRS INCOME POL PHIL
  18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con
  Favorable 48% 35% 35% 43% 41% 30% 71% 48% 13%
  Unfavorable 40 53 53 41 52 64 21 37 76
  Hvn't hrd enough 10 9 9 13 4 5 5 12 10
  REFUSED 2 2 3 2 4 1 3 3 1
  WHITE
  NoColl Coll BrnAgn
  Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015
  Favorable 37% 41% 20% 25% 31%
  Unfavorable 49 53 69 65 54
  Hvn't hrd enough 12 4 9 8 13
  REFUSED 3 2 2 2 2
  TREND: Is your opinion of the Democratic Party favorable, unfavorable, or haven't you heard enough about it?
  Nov 18 Sep 09 Jul 21 Apr 21 Mar
  FAVORABLE
  High Low
  24 Nov 12 Mar 24
  2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 2008 2010
  Favorable 38 34 34 32 33 55 33
  Unfavorable 50 47 49 52 48 35 48
  Hvn't hrd enough 10 15 14 12 17 6 17
  REFUSED 3 3 3 3 2 4 2
  33. Is your opinion of the the Tea Party Movement favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about
  it?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Blk His
  Favorable 34% 65% 7% 35% 41% 28% 39% 10% 24%
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015
  Unfavorable 38 11 63 37 38 38 35 57 45
  Hvn ' t hrd enough 26 22 28 26 20 32 25 32 30
  REFUSED 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1
  TREND: Is your opinion of the Tea Party movement favorable, unfavorable or haven't you heard enough about
  it?
  Nov 17 Sep 09 Jul 21 Apr 21 Mar 24
  2010 2010 2010 2010 2010
  Favorable 34 30 33 32 28
  Unfavorable 38 31 31 31 23
  Him ' t hrd enough 26 37 35 34 49
  REFUSED 1 2 1 2 1
  38. Do you consider yourself part of the Tea party movement or not?
  Tot Rep Dem Ind Men Worn Wht Blk His
  Yes 13% 25% 2% 14% 14% 11% 14% 2% 12%
  No 83 71 94 84 82 84 82 93 87
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015
  DK/NA 4 4 4 2 3 5 4 5 1
  AGE IN YRS INCOME POL PHIL
  18-34 35-54 55+ <50 50-100 >100K Lib Mod Con
  Yes 8% 15% 14% 13% 12% 13% 2% 4% 26%
  No 88 83 81 82 86 85 95 91 71
  DK/NA 4 . 2 5 5 1 2 3 5 3
  WHITE
  NoColl Coll BrnAgn
  Degree Degree Evngl Prot Cath
  Yes 14% 11% 23% 17% 15%
  No 81 88 71 78 81
  DK/NA 5 2 6 5 4
  TREND: Do you consider yourself part of the Tea Party movement or not?
  Nov 18 Sep 09 Jul 21 Apr 21 Mar 24
  2010 2010 2010 2010 2010
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015
  Yes 13 12 - 12 15 13
  No 83 80 81 79 80
  DK/NA 4 9 7 6 6
  Quinnipiac University • 275 Mount Carmel Ave. • Hamden, CT 06518-1908 • 203-582-8200
  begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 203-582-8200 end_of_the_skype_highlighting • Admissions and Financial
  Aid: 800-462-1944 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 800-462-1944 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
  Contact us with your questions and comments. Copyright 1999-2010Script for writing out current year for copyright
  Quinnipiac University. Statement of liability and copyrights.
  Script for Google Analytics
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771526 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771529
MetadataSubject: FROM ARTURO - CORREA RESCUED IN ECUADOR
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Valenzuela, Arturo A
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-01T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0101/DOC_0C05771529/C05771529.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: From Arturo - Correa Rescued in Ecuador
ExtractedFrom: Valenzuela, Arturo A <ValenzuelaAA@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Laurenjilot
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, October 1, 2010 10:06 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771529
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Thanks so much for doing this. I will follow up w a call to FM Patifio who I now understand was also injured after I spoke
  to him yesterday.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771529 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Valenzuela, Arturo A <ValenzuelaAA@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, October 1, 2010 10:06 AM
  To:
  Cc: Laurenjilot
  Subject: Re: From Arturo - Correa Rescued in Ecuador
  Thanks so much for doing this. I will follow up w a call to FM Patifio who I now understand was also injured after I spoke
  to him yesterday.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Valenzuela, Arturo A
  Cc: 'Laurenjiloty
  Sent: Fri Oct 01 08:09:48 2010
  Subject: Re: From Arturo - Correa Rescued in Ecuador
  I will call--I'm copying Lauren to work to set up call.
  Original Message
  From: Valenzuela, Arturo A <ValenzuelaAA@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Gonzalez, Juan S <GonzalezJS@state.gov>; Sullivan, Jacobi <Sullivanil@state.gov>; Abedin, Huma
  <AbedinH@state.gov>; Steinberg, James B <Steinbergi13@state.gov>; Burns, William J<BurnsWi@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Oct 01 07:33:50 2010
  Subject: From Arturo - Correa Rescued in Ecuador
  Madame Secretary: After a tense day in which President Correa was slightly injured at noon by rioting and striking
  police, and later was barred from leaving the hospital by the same, the army finally rescued him at 9pm last night. Some
  military units, including the Navy unit in Guayaquil appeared to support the police. The police also occupied the national
  congress. As the rescue took place, the head of the Ecuadoran Joints Chiefs of Staff issued a statement supporting the
  president, and noting that the armed forces respect the rule of law "in which the President [Rafael Correa] is the
  maximum authority of the three branches." Things are now calm.
  Reaction in the hemisphere was one of deep concern. The OAS adopted a resolution; South American presidents at the
  call of UNASUR travelled to Buenos Aires and are likely to go on to Quito to support Correa. Several, including Garcia
  and Santos, called Correa. Zapatero also spoke with him. Moratinos tried to reach you at around 6pm last evening to
  convey that news, I took the call.
  As you know, we issued a statement of support for Correa. I also gave an interview to CNN in Spanish, which was re-
  played frequently. I strongly recommend that you call Correa today to reiterate U.S. support for his government and to
  wish him well.
  He will appreciate it but, more broadly, it sends a signal that the United States supports the constitutional order and
  rejects any attempt to undermine it. Chavez in Buenos Aires predictably declared that we were behind the unrest. We
  have prepared a call sheet for you.
  Regards,
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771529 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771529 Date: 08/31/2015
  Arturo
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771529 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771530
MetadataSubject: DOCUMENTS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771530/C05771530.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Documents
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 3:17 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771530
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Some more classified papers coming to house at 6pm:
  - one re karzai
  Update about an AmCit in Somalia
  David Hale readout of a meeting
  Barak/Abbas on Sunday

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771530 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 3:17 PM
  To:
  Subject: Documents
  Some more classified papers coming to house at 6pm:
  - one re karzai
  Update about an AmCit in Somalia
  David Hale readout of a meeting
  Barak/Abbas on Sunday
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771530 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771534
MetadataSubject: DEEP DIVES
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771534/C05771534.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Deep dives
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 4:19 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771534
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Here's the list of deep dives we were thinking of doing in the next few months:
  Sept: Indonesia (pre-Comprehensive Ptshp Dialogue), Russia (pre-NRC)
  October: India (pre-POTUS trip), Balkans (pre-your potential trip to the Balkans)
  November: Central Asia (pre-your trip)
  And then other deep dives for the future (or whenever it might be timely):
  Iran (pre-P5+1?)
  Egypt
  Turkey/Cyprus
  Mexico
  Brazil

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771534 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 4:19 PM
  To:
  Subject: Deep dives
  Here's the list of deep dives we were thinking of doing in the next few months:
  Sept: Indonesia (pre-Comprehensive Ptshp Dialogue), Russia (pre-NRC)
  October: India (pre-POTUS trip), Balkans (pre-your potential trip to the Balkans)
  November: Central Asia (pre-your trip)
  And then other deep dives for the future (or whenever it might be timely):
  Iran (pre-P5+1?)
  Egypt
  Turkey/Cyprus
  Mexico
  Brazil
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771534 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771535
MetadataSubject: (REUTERS) - IRAQ'S SHI'ITE-LED ALLIANCE CHOSE PRIME MINISTER NURI AL-MALIKI
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-01T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0101/DOC_0C05771535/C05771535.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (Reuters) - Iraq's Shi'ite-led alliance chose Prime Minister Nun al-Maliki
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_OS
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, October 1, 2010 11:15 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771535
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771535 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, October 1, 2010 11:15 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (Reuters) - Iraq's Shi'ite-led alliance chose Prime Minister Nun al-Maliki
  From: Abdalla, Alyce N
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-O_OS
  Sent: Fri Oct 0111:11:20 2010
  Subject: (Reuters) - Iraq's Shrite-lecl alliance chose Prime Minister Nuni al-Maliki
  BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraq's Shi'ite-led alliance chose Prime Minister Nuni al-Maliki as its candidate to head the next
  government, a step towards ending a political impasse that left Iraq without a new government since a March election.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771535 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771537
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Quam, Lois
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771537/C05771537.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771537
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Lois Quam
  Thursday, August 26, 2010 4:45 PM
  Great to talk with you today and will follow up right after Labor Day.
  Yours, Lois

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771537 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Lois Quam
  Thursday, August 26, 2010 4:45 PM
  Great to talk with you today and will follow up right after Labor Day.
  Yours, Lois
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771537 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771540
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-15T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0103/DOC_0C05771540/C05771540.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Update: (Reuters) LONDON: US GEN PETRAEUS SAYS ISAF FACILITATED PASSAGE
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-II; SES-0_0S; SES-O_CMS
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, October 15, 2010 9:26 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771540
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: OF SENIOR TALIBAN COMMANDER TO KABUL FOR TALKS
MetadataSubject:
  UPDATE: (REUTERS) LONDON: US GEN PETRAEUS SAYS ISAF FACILITATED PASSAGE OF SENIOR TALIBAN COMMANDER TO KABUL FOR TALKS

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771540 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 9:26 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Update: (Reuters) LONDON: US GEN PETRAEUS SAYS ISAF FACILITATED PASSAGE
  OF SENIOR TALIBAN COMMANDER TO KABUL FOR TALKS
  From: Moore, Anna W
  To: NEWS-Afghanistan; NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-II; SES-0_0S; SES-O_CMS
  Sent: Fri Oct 15 07:42:13 2010
  Subject: Update: (Reuters) LONDON: US GEN PETRAEUS SAYS ISAF FACILITATED PASSAGE OF SENIOR TALIBAN
  COMMANDER TO KABUL FOR TALKS
  LONDON (Reuters) — U.S. General David Petraeus, the commander of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, said NATO-
  led forces had facilitated the passage of a senior Taliban commander to Kabul to hold talks with the Afghan
  government. Speaking to an audience in London, Petraeus said the move was part of U.S. and NATO support for Afghan
  President Hamid Karzai's reconciliation discussions with the Taliban. "In certain respect we do facilitate that, given that,
  needless to say it would not be the easiest of tasks for a senior Taliban commander to enter Afghanistan and make his
  way to Kabul if ISAF (International Security Assistance Force) were not....aware of it and therefore allows it to take
  place," he said. "That's about as far as I can go on that at this point."
  From: Moore, Anna W
  Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 7:31 AM
  To: NEWS-Mahogany; NEWS-Afghanistan
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-II; SES-0_0S; SES-O_CMS
  Subject: (Reuters) LONDON: US GEN PETRAEUS SAYS ISAF FACILITATED PASSAGE OF SENIOR TALIBAN COMMANDER
  TO KABUL FOR TALKS
  (Headline only.)
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771540 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771542
MetadataSubject: 8/26 PAKSTAN FLOOD RELIEF DONATIONS REPORT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771542/C05771542.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: 8/26 Pakistan Flood Relief donations report
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 5:01 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771542
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedCc:
  Davisson, Brandon; Anderson, Roger W; Bordley, Donna; Klevorick, Caitlin B; Shah, Khushali P; Thessin, James H

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771542 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 5:01 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW: 8/26 Pakistan Flood Relief donations report
  From: Klevorick, Caitlin B
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 4:21 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Fw: 8/26 Pakistan Flood Relief donations report
  Given there hasn't been been a lot of coverage—this seems decent...
  From: Millette, James L
  To: Kennedy, Patrick F
  Cc: Davisson, Brandon; Anderson, Roger W; Bordley, Donna; Klevorick, Caitlin B; Shah, Khushali P; Thessin, James H
  Sent: Thu Aug 26 16:14:58 2010
  Subject: 8/26 Pakistan Flood Relief donations report
  Pat, through 8/25 for the Pakistan Flood Relief:
  1. Have received $30,590 in pledge funds from texting all at $10 each so 3,059 pledges
  2. Have received $178,922 in credit card donations from 2,050 donors
  3. Have received $ 6,105 in ACH donations from 85 donors
  4. Have received $19,565 in mailed in checks from 119 donors
  So in total we have received $235,182 in pledges and donations from 5,313 donors
  On average this is about $44 per donation/pledge. If you excluded the ten dollar pledges/donations the
  average donation was $163 dollars.
  Jim Millette
  Deputy Assistant Secretary
  Global Financial Services
  US Department of State
  (843) 308-5578
  Millettejl@state.gov
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771542 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771547
MetadataSubject: ECONOMIST
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: PIR
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-01T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0101/DOC_0C05771547/C05771547.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Economist
ExtractedFrom: PIR <preines
ExtractedCc: CEA
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, October 1, 2010 6:41 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771547
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  The Economist has invited you to submit an 800 word piece for their 2011 outlook issue. You'd be the only USG official,
  and would be featured with David Cameron and other heads of state. We all agree we should definitely do. It's a bit of a
  short fuse, so if you agree Josh Daniel would work on boiling down your CFR speech.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771547 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: PIR <preines
  Sent: Friday, October 1, 2010 6:41 PM
  To:
  Cc: CEA
  Subject: Economist
  The Economist has invited you to submit an 800 word piece for their 2011 outlook issue. You'd be the only USG official,
  and would be featured with David Cameron and other heads of state. We all agree we should definitely do. It's a bit of a
  short fuse, so if you agree Josh Daniel would work on boiling down your CFR speech.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771547 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771548
MetadataSubject: QDDR MARKS BOLD STEP FORWARD IN STRENGTHENING AMERICA'S CIVILIAN POWER
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-22T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0109/DOC_0C05771548/C05771548.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: QDDR Marks Bold Step Forward in Strengthening America's Civilian Power
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, November 22, 2010 4:05 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771548
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771548 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 4:05 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW: QDDR Marks Bold Step Forward in Strengthening America's Civilian Power
  From: Laszczych, Joanne
  Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 2:33 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: FW: QDDR Marks Bold Step Forward in Strengthening America's Civilian Power
  From: John K. Glenn [mailto
  Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 2:25 PM
  To: Laszczych, Joanne
  Subject: QDDR Marks Bold Step Forward in Strengthening America's Civilian Power
  Dear Cheryl,
  This morning we released a statement on the QDDR preview draft, and I thought you would be interested in it.
  Please feel free to drop me a note if you have any questions.
  John K. Glenn
  Policy Director
  FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASK MEDIA CONTACT
  November 22, 2010 Richard Parker
  Tel: (202) 730-4163
  E-mail: rparker@usglc.org
  USGLC Looks Forward to Working with the 112th Congress to Protect
  National Security
  Washington, DC— The U.S. Global Leadership Coalition today released the following statement from Executive
  Director Liz Schrayer on the preview of the Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review:
  "As part of the USGLC's Impact '08 initiative, a bipartisan working group of foreign policy experts called on the next
  administration to conduct a Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review. We believed such a review was a vital
  step in modernizing our civilian-led tools of global engagement, and we congratulate Secretary Clinton and
  Administrator Shah for tackling this monumental and necessary task.
  "The preview of the QDDR released last week represents a bold step towards implementing a smart power foreign policy
  by elevating our civilian power and ensuring effective, results-driven programs. While we have not seen the full report
  and expect varying views on some of the recommendations, the initial outline includes several significant highlights that
  are essential for America to meet today's global challenges: Increasing the resources and human capacity for State and
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771548 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771548 Date: 08/31/2015
  USAID; reinstituting budget and planning authority for USAID; and putting in place monitoring and evaluation efforts
  with clear metrics and a guarantee of program transparency.
  "Today's global threats require the use of a wide range of tools, and the QDDR can help ensure our international affairs
  programs continue to make a critical impact in advancing our national security and economic intersts."
  The U.S. Global Leadership Coalition (www.usglc.org) is a broad-based influential network of 400 businesses and
  NG0s; national security and foreign policy experts; and business, faith-based, academic and community leaders in all 50
  states who support a smart power approach of elevating diplomacy and development alongside defense in order to build a
  better, safer world.
  ###
  0
  Click here to forward this message.
  Click here to unsubscribe.
  nonp ofit sollware
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771548 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771550
MetadataSubject: ECONOMIST
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: PIR
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-01T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0101/DOC_0C05771550/C05771550.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Economist
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: PIR <preines >
ExtractedCc: CEA <AdlerCE@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, October 1, 2010 7:20 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771550
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: I imagine early next week
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771550 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: PIR <preines >
  Sent: Friday, October 1, 2010 7:20 PM
  To: H
  Subject: Re: Economist
  I imagine early next week
  Original Message
  From: Evergreen
  To: PIR
  Subject: Re: Economist
  Sent: Oct 1, 2010 7:19 PM
  Agreed. When can I see a draft?
  Original Message
  From: PIR <preines
  To: H
  Cc: CEA <AdlerCE@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Oct 01 18:40:39 2010
  Subject: Economist
  The Economist has invited you to submit an 800 word piece for their 2011 outlook issue. You'd be the only USG official,
  and would be featured with David Cameron and other heads of state. We all agree we should definitely do. It's a bit of a
  short fuse, so if you agree Josh Daniel would work on boiling down your CFR speech.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771550 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771552
MetadataSubject: MEETING WITH NK TEAM
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-22T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0109/DOC_0C05771552/C05771552.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Meeting with NK team
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivann@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, November 22, 2010 10:57 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771552
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Fyi - cryptic to me.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771552 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivann@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 10:57 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Meeting with NK team
  Fyi - cryptic to me.
  Original Message
  From: Campbell, Kurt M
  To: Sullivan, Jacob .1
  Sent: Mon Nov 22 21:31:07 2010
  Subject: Meeting with NK team
  Jake -- please encourage the Secretary to keep her cards close
  Kurt
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771552 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771553
MetadataSubject: ANWAR IBRAHIM
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: SullivanJJ@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-22T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0109/DOC_0C05771553/C05771553.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Anwar Ibrahim
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, November 22, 2010 11:17 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771553
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Also fyi. Not sure what to make of Kim's inquiry.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771553 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 11:17 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Anwar Ibrahim
  Also fyi. Not sure what to make of Kim's inquiry.
  From: Campbell, Kurt M
  To: Sullivan, Jacob); Steinberg, James B
  Sent: Mon Nov 22 21:27:40 2010
  Subject: Re: Anwar Ibrahim
  Very interesting. First I've heard.
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J
  To: Campbell, Kurt M; Steinberg, James B
  Sent: Mon Nov 22 20:04:27 2010
  Subject: FW: Anwar Ibrahim
  FYI from BBC reporter.
  From: Kim Ghattas [mailto
  Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 8:02 PM
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Subject: Anwar Ibrahim
  Hearing from some sources that Anwar Ibrahim has linked to AQ financiers. Apparently the Saudis are onto this and
  showed the US a dossier about this. Do you know anything about it? Is this the real reason why her meeting with him was
  cancelled?
  Kim Ghattas
  BBC Washington
  State department correspondent
  www.twitter.ccm/bbckimghattas
  Direct line - BBC Bureau
  Direct line - State dpt bureau
  BBC news
  Suite 800, 2000 M Street NW,
  Washington DC 20036, USA
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771553 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771553 Date: 08/31/2015
  •http://www.bbc.co.uk
  This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the
  BBC unless specifically stated.
  If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
  Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
  immediately.
  Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
  Further communication will signify your consent to this.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771553 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771555
MetadataSubject: USGLC QDDR STATEMENT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-11-23T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0109/DOC_0C05771555/C05771555.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: USGLC QDDR Statement
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 3:39 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771555
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771555 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 3:39 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: USGLC QDDR Statement
  From: Liz Schrayer <
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Mon Nov 22 21:21:10 2010
  Subject: USGLC QDDR Statement
  U.S. GLOBAL
  LEADERSHIP
  COALITION
  FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
  November 22, 2010
  MEDIA CONTACT
  Richard Parker
  Tel: (202) 730-4163
  E-mail: rparker@usglc.org
  QDDR Marks Bold Step Forward in Strengthening America's
  Civilian Power
  Washington, DC— The U.S. Global Leadership Coalition today released the following
  statement from Executive Director Liz Schrayer on the preview of the Quadrennial Diplomacy
  and Development Review:
  "As part of the USGLC's Impact '08 initiative, a bipartisan working group of foreign policy
  experts called on the next administration to conduct a Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development
  Review. We believed such a review was a vital step in modernizing our civilian-led tools of
  global engagement, and we congratulate Secretary Clinton and Administrator Shah for tackling
  this monumental and necessary task.
  "The preview of the QDDR released last week represents a bold step towards implementing a
  smart power foreign policy by elevating our civilian power and ensuring effective, results-driven
  programs. While we have not seen the full report and expect varying views on some of the
  recommendations, the initial outline includes several significant highlights that are essential for
  America to meet today's global challenges: Increasing the resources and human capacity for
  State and USAID; reinstituting budget and planning authority for USAID; and putting in place
  monitoring and evaluation efforts with clear metrics and a guarantee of program transparency.
  "Today's global threats require the use of a wide range of tools, and the QDDR can help ensure
  our international affairs programs continue to make a critical impact in advancing our national
  security and economic intersts."
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771555 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771555 Date: 08/31/2015
  The U.S. Global Leadership Coalition (www.usglc.org) is a broad-based influential network of
  400 businesses and NG0s; national security and foreign policy experts; and business, faith-
  based, academic and community leaders in all 50 states who support a smart power approach
  of elevating diplomacy and development alongside defense in order to build a better, safer
  world.
  ###
  Liz Schrayer I President
  202-689-8900 I
  Schrayer & Associates, Inc.
  1129 20th Street NW, Suite 600
  Washington, DC 20036
  www.schrayer.com
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771555 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771562
MetadataSubject: (AP) OFFICIALS THINK BIN LADEN INVOLVED IN EUROPE PLOT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-01T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0101/DOC_0C05771562/C05771562.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (AP) Officials think bin Laden involved in Europe plot
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shift-HI
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, October 1, 2010 9:17 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771562
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771562 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, October 1, 2010 9:17 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (AP) Officials think bin Laden involved in Europe plot
  From: Moore, Anna W
  To: NEWS-Mahogany; NEWS-SCT; NEWS-EUR
  Cc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shift-HI
  Sent: Fri Oct 0119:27:11 2010
  Subject: (AP) Officials think bin Laden involved in Europe plot
  WASHINGTON (AP) — Osama bin Laden emerged October 1 as possibly a key figure in the European terror plot, and
  officials said he may be flexing his muscles in a move to show a besieged al-Qaida remains strong and able to launch
  major attacks on western targets. U.S. counterterrorism officials said they believe that senior al-Qaida leaders, including
  bin Laden, were involved in the plan to strike several European cities in a coordinated assault. If bin Laden had a direct
  hand in the planning, it would be the most active role he has played in a terror plot since the 9/11 attacks, according to
  U.S. officials and analysts.
  Counterterrorism officials said that they are now working under the assumption that bin Laden played a role in the
  plotting, but they would not detail what indications they've seen that led them in that direction.
  Still, some also believe that bin Laden's orders may have been delivered by one of his top commanders, since the al-
  Qaida leader is known to avoid close contact with anyone except his closet confidants.
  While bin Laden's name is still a powerful reminder of the World Trade Center's twin towers and the Pentagon
  engulfed in flames, U.S. officials have for months asserted both in private and in hearings on Capitol Hill that his core al-
  Qaida group is weakened, struggling to raise money and attract recruits.
  "Clearly there is a great deal of pressure on al-Qaida to do something to show that it is still alive and kicking," said
  Richard Barrett, the head of a U.N. group that monitors the threat posed by al-Qaida and the Taliban. "They need to
  show they're strong, they're a force multiplier, that they've still got some beef, that they've got operators abroad, that
  they can do things."
  Barrett said al-Qaida's Pakistan-based network has not launched a successful attack since the London subway
  bombing in 2005. "In order to attract the younger new recruits, I think they have to do a bit better than that," he said.
  The multi-pronged scope of the emerging terror plan _ which aimed to launch coordinated shooting rampages or
  attacks in Britain, France and Germany _ is an al-Qaida hallmark.
  U.S. officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters, declined to reveal what evidence
  they have that bin Laden took a more prominent role in this plan. And one U.S. intelligence official cautioned that the
  details of how the plan was directed or coordinated by the group's core leaders is not yet clear.
  The involvement of bin Laden and his devoted leaders, believed to be in hiding in Pakistan, underscores continuing
  U.S. concerns about that country's role as a safe haven for al-Qaida and other Islamic extremists.
  And it reflects al-Qaida's persistent effort _ through video and online messages _ to inspire its followers to wage
  attacks against the West. The threat to Europe was highlighted when bin Laden issued a call to arms in March 2008 after
  a Danish newspaper printed controversial cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad.
  He warned Europeans in an audio message that there would be a "severe" reaction to come.
  Rep. Pete Hoekstra, R-Mich., the senior Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, said that bin Laden may
  simply be trying to re-exert himself. And his role in the European plot could suggest a lack of confidence by al-Qaida
  central in the ability of other affiliated groups in Yemen or Africa to carry out a successful attack on their own, Hoekstra
  said.
  Over the past year, several terror attacks in the U.S. have either failed or been foiled, including the botched attempts
  to bring down a Detroit-bound airliner on Christmas Day and to set off a bomb in New York's Time Square.
  "They've let other people take the lead on attacking the West," said Hoekstra, adding that bin Laden may now be
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771562 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771562 Date: 08/31/2015
  thinking, "these guys can't do it, we've got to become more involved again."
  Bin Laden's presumed role in the European plot was first reported by NPR.
  One senior U.S. official, meanwhile, discounted any involvement in the Europe terror plot by al-Qaida's North African
  affiliate. While al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb is dangerous in its region and may want to export its terror operations to
  Europe, there are no indications that it is able to do that at this time, said the official.
  A Pakistani intelligence official said Thursday that eight Germans and two British brothers are at the heart of the
  European terror plot, which is still in its early stages. One of the Britons was killed in a recent CIA missile strike, he said.
  Pakistan, Britain and Germany are tracking the suspects and intercepting their phone calls, the official told The
  Associated Press on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to release the information to the media.
  U.S. officials have pressed Pakistan to increase its efforts to root out the militants hiding in the mountainous border
  region.
  The U.S. has dramatically stepped up its missile attacks in North Waziristan, and is believed to have launched at least
  21 this month. The covert campaign is largely carried out by CIA drones and has led to the deaths of a number of top
  militant leaders.
  Pakistan has complained vocally about the program but is believed to provide intelligence assistance for at least some
  of the strikes.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771562 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05771566
MetadataSubject: REMINDER ON WEXLER/MENENDEZ
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0094/DOC_0C05771566/C05771566.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Reminder on wexler/menendez
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 6:02 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05771566
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Wexler coming up at 630 pm, menendez at 7pm. Ops will connect them to you.
  ###

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771566 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 6:02 PM
  To:
  Subject: Reminder on wexler/menendez
  Wexler coming up at 630 pm, menendez at 7pm. Ops will connect them to you.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05771566 Date: 08/31/2015



