# Emails

DocNumber: C05762668
MetadataSubject: MINI SCHEDULE WEDNESDAY 7/7/09
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-08T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762668/C05762668.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedDateSent: Tue Jul 07 17:20:57 2009
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762668
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Wednesday, July 08, 2009 7:35 AM
  Abedin, Huma
  Mini Schedule Wednesday 7/7/09

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762668 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From:
  Sent
  To:
  Cc:
  Subject:
  Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Wednesday, July 08, 2009 7:35 AM
  Abedin, Huma
  Mini Schedule Wednesday 7/7/09
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Tue Jul 07 17:20:57 2009
  Subject: Mini Schedule Wednesday 7/7/09
  8:00 am BREAKFAST FOR CONGRESSIONAL LEADERS REGARDING
  9:15 am INDIA STRATEGY James Monroe Room, 8th Floor
  10:00 am PHONE CALL w/HENRY KISSINGER
  10:15 am Secretary's Office
  10:45 am PHOTO OP w/AMBASSADORIAL SEMINAR THREE
  11:05 am Treaty Room
  11:15 am PRIVATE MEETING w/DAVE STONE
  11:30 am Secretary's Office
  12:00 pm POLICY LUNCHEON
  2:00 pm James Monroe Room, 8" Floor
  2:15 pm MEETING ONUS/CHINA STRATEGIC DIALOGUE
  3:15 pm Secretary's Office *Kurt Campbell, P.J. Crowley, Cheryl Mills, Anne-Marie Slaughter,
  Hums Abedin, Jake Sullivan and Derek Chollet
  3:15 pm PRIVATE MTG w/ MARK HYMAN
  3:45 pm Secretary's Office
  Tbd DEPART State Department *En route Private Residence
  Tbd ARRIVE Private Residence
  7:00 pm PHONE CALL w/JAPANESE FOREIGN MINISTER NAKASONE
  Secretary's Residence
  ###
  103
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762668 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762669
MetadataSubject: KYRGYZSTAN REJECTS OBAMA "COOPERATION" OFFER
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2009-06-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/23_24_25_26/DOC_0C05762669/C05762669.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Kyrgyzstan rejects Obama "cooperation" offer
ExtractedTo: Mills, Cheryl D; H
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-I
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:25 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762669
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Soon as I saw it I emailed Bob Blake.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762669 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:25 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; H
  Subject: Re: Kyrgyzstan rejects Obama "cooperation" offer
  Soon as I saw it I emailed Bob Blake.
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J; 'H' <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Thu Jun 11 07:56:55 2009
  Subject: FW: Kyrgyzstan rejects Obama "cooperation" offer
  !?
  From: Gorog, Andrea
  Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 6:21 AM
  To: NEWS-Mahogany; NEWS-L; NEWS-SCA; NEWS-PM
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-I
  Subject: Kyrgyzstan rejects Obama "cooperation" offer
  Kyrgyzstan rejects Obama "cooperation" offer
  U.S. President Obama has sent a personal appeal to Kyrgyzstan proposing ways to discuss "expanding cooperation".
  Kyrgyzstan will not reverse its decision to close a U.S. military air base which is used to supply American troops for
  Afghanistan occupation, Kyrgyz Foreign Minister Kadyrbek Sarbayev said on Thursday. U.S. President Barack Obama
  has sent a personal appeal to Kyrgyzstan proposing ways to discuss "expanding cooperation".
  But Bakiyev's office said in a statement it had received a letter from Obama praising bilateral relations. "Moreover,
  Barack Obama expressed hope to further strengthen various forms of cooperation between the United States and
  Kyrgyzstan," the statement said without mentioning the air base issue. "The decision to annul all agreements on the
  Manes military air base has been taken and there is no turning back on this," he told the 24.kg news agency.
  Andrea Gordy,
  Watch Officer
  Department of State Operations Center
  202-647-1512
  Lt.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762669 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762670
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-06-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_18-20M/DOC_0C05762670/C05762670.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: RE:
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:00 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762670
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: We have - you said it was you - this was an fyi
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762670 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:00 AM
  To:
  Subject: RE:
  We have - you said it was you - this was an fyi
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 8:00 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Re:
  We have to resolve this today!
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Jun 06 16:15:01 2009
  Subject: FW:
  Just FYI given where you are leaning — I put her resume at the bottom in text in case you want to see on your bb.
  cdm
  From:
  Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 11:11 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject:
  Cheryl,
  Great meeting you yesterday. I enjoyed the conversation and am looking forward very much to working with you. The
  security interview went fine, I believe. I owe them some more information which they will get over the weekend.
  Separately I have attached a bio for as promised.
  66
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762670 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762670 Date: 07/31/2015
  Talk to you soon. Thanks again,
  Best wishes,
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762670 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762670 Date: 07/31/2015
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. r2014-20439 Doc No. C05762670 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05762672
MetadataSubject: WE HAVE INFORMED OUR CLOAKROOM THAT WE LIFT THE HOLD ON SHANNON NOMINATION
MetadataTo: vermarr@state.gov
MetadataFrom: hrod17@clintonemail.com
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-16T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/10_11_15_16/DOC_0C05762672/C05762672.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedCc: Moncrief, Benjamin (LeMieux) <Benjamin_Moncrief@LeMieux.senate.gov>
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762672
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Wednesday, December 16, 2009 10:01 PM
  'vermarr@state.gov'
  Re: We have informed our cloakroom that we lift the hold on Shannon nomination
  What took them so long? Did you promise your first born?

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762672 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Wednesday, December 16, 2009 10:01 PM
  'vermarr@state.gov'
  Re: We have informed our cloakroom that we lift the hold on Shannon nomination
  What took them so long? Did you promise your first born?
  Original Message
  From: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Wed Dec 16 21:48:05 2009
  Subject: Fw: We have informed our cloakroom that we lift the hold on Shannon nomination
  Hold on Tom was lifted. Thanks for making the calls. Trying to get him thru as quickly as possible before another hold
  emerges.
  From: Feehery, Kerry (LeMieux) <Kerry_Feehery@LeMieux.senate.gov>
  To: Verma, Richard R
  Cc: Moncrief, Benjamin (LeMieux) <Benjamin_Moncrief@LeMieux.senate.gov>
  Sent: Wed Dec 16 18:45:49 2009
  Subject: We have informed our cloakroom that we lift the hold on Shannon nomination
  Kerry Feehery
  Chief of Staff
  Senator George LeMieux (R-FL)
  356 Russell Office Building
  (202)228-4945
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762672 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762675
MetadataSubject: SPOKE WITH CLAIRE
MetadataTo: Abedin, Huma
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-08T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762675/C05762675.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Spoke with Claire
ExtractedTo: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 10:02 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762675
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  She was flattered that her presence is missed in the building on long trips. Committed to make the building work for S
  while she is traveling.
  I asked if there are any long trips she's passionate about we would work it out — she said only two — if HRC ever goes to
  Antarctica and Africa. I said we would work those out (her cousin is Amb to Angola so that is her real interest).
  She was pleased she was impactful.
  cdm
  104

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762675 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 10:02 AM
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Cc:
  Subject: Spoke with Claire
  She was flattered that her presence is missed in the building on long trips. Committed to make the building work for S
  while she is traveling.
  I asked if there are any long trips she's passionate about we would work it out — she said only two — if HRC ever goes to
  Antarctica and Africa. I said we would work those out (her cousin is Amb to Angola so that is her real interest).
  She was pleased she was impactful.
  cdm
  104
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762675 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762676
MetadataSubject: WE HAVE TO BE PROACTIVE
MetadataTo: sullivanjj@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-16T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/10_11_15_16/DOC_0C05762676/C05762676.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: We have to be proactive
ExtractedTo: esullivanjj@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 10:02 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762676
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Kerry is right that no one else can do this. We should get Ban to convene or do it ourselves. How can we? What do you
  think?

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762676 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 10:02 PM
  To: esullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: We have to be proactive
  Kerry is right that no one else can do this. We should get Ban to convene or do it ourselves. How can we? What do you
  think?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762676 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762678
MetadataSubject: WE HAVE INFORMED OUR CLOAKROOM THAT WE LIFT THE HOLD ON SHANNON NOMINATION
MetadataTo: vermarr@state.gov
MetadataFrom: hrod17@clintonemail.com
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-16T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/10_11_15_16/DOC_0C05762678/C05762678.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: We have informed our cloakroom that we lift the hold on Shannon nomination
ExtractedTo: 'vermarr@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Moncrief, Benjamin (LeMieux) <Benjamin_Moncrief@LeMieux.senate.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 10:13 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762678
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Does this mean you have to go to Cuba and arrest Castro or just shovel more $ into Little Havana?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762678 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 10:13 PM
  To: 'vermarr@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: We have informed our cloakroom that we lift the hold on Shannon nomination
  Does this mean you have to go to Cuba and arrest Castro or just shovel more $ into Little Havana?
  Original Message
  From: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Wed Dec 16 22:05:46 2009
  Subject: Re: We have informed our cloakroom that we lift the hold on Shannon nomination
  Yes, I sold my soul to George Lemieux today. I am not proud of it.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Verma, Richard R
  Sent: Wed Dec 16 22:00:49 2009
  Subject: Re: We have informed our cloakroom that we lift the hold on Shannon nomination
  What took them so long? Did you promise your first born?
  Original Message
  From: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Wed Dec 16 21:48:05 2009
  Subject: Fw: We have informed our cloakroom that we lift the hold on Shannon nomination
  Hold on Tom was lifted. Thanks for making the calls. Trying to get him thru as quickly as possible before another hold
  emerges.
  From: Feehery, Kerry (LeMieux) <Kerry_Feehery@LeMieux.senate.gov>
  To: Verma, Richard R
  Cc: Moncrief, Benjamin (LeMieux) <Benjamin_Moncrief@LeMieux.senate.gov>
  Sent: Wed Dec 16 18:45:49 2009
  Subject: We have informed our cloakroom that we lift the hold on Shannon nomination
  Kerry Feehery
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762678 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762678 Date: 06/30/2015
  Chief of Staff
  Senator George LeMieux (R-FL)
  356 Russell Office Building
  (202)228-4945
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762678 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762679
MetadataSubject: FYI
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-06-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/AddBacks/DOC_0C05762679/C05762679.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: FW: fyi
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Toiv, Nora F
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:17 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762679
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: See traffic below — read down to first email
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762679 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:17 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW: fyi
  See traffic below — read down to first email
  From: Stremlau, Matthew H
  Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 4:50 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Cc: Toiv, Nora F
  Subject: RE: fyi
  Libya is hosting the AU summit at the end of June and the theme for the summit is agriculture. Gaddafi is most likely
  trying to build up international support for the summit. Jeff has been in contact w/ AU and NEPAD reps and encouraged
  them to write a letter.
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 12:18 PM
  To: Stremlau, Matthew H
  Cc: Toiv, Nora F
  Subject: RE: fyi
  Interesting. Why?
  From: Stremlau, Matthew H
  Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 11:13 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Cc: Toiv, Nora F
  Subject: fyi
  • Gaddafi is sending a letter to President Obama tomorrow about food security and asking U.S. to increase its
  support
  • The head of NEPAD and AU are sending a letter to S Clinton tomorrow also about food security
  Matthew Stremlau, Ph.D.
  Policy Planning Staff
  Office of the Secretary of State
  U.S. Department of State
  Phone: 202-736-7308
  Cell:
  Blackberry:
  Email: StremlauMH@state.gov
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762679 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762680
MetadataSubject: WE HAVE INFORMED OUR CLOAKROOM THAT WE LIFT THE HOLD ON SHANNON NOMINATION
MetadataTo: vermarr@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-16T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/10_11_15_16/DOC_0C05762680/C05762680.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedCc: Moncrief, Benjamin (LeMieux) <Benjamin_Moncrief@LeMieux.senate.gov>
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762680
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
  Wednesday, December 16, 2009 10:37 PM
  'vermarr@state.gov'
  Re: We have informed our cloakroom that we lift the hold on Shannon nomination
  Can we get him confirmed tonight?

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762680 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
  Wednesday, December 16, 2009 10:37 PM
  'vermarr@state.gov'
  Re: We have informed our cloakroom that we lift the hold on Shannon nomination
  Can we get him confirmed tonight?
  Original Message
  From: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Wed Dec 16 22:26:42 2009
  Subject: Re: We have informed our cloakroom that we lift the hold on Shannon nomination
  I suspect they would prefer more $ for Little Havana.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Verma, Richard R
  Sent: Wed Dec 16 22:12:55 2009
  Subject: Re: We have informed our cloakroom that we lift the hold on Shannon nomination
  Does this mean you have to go to Cuba and arrest Castro or just shovel more $ into Little Havana?
  Original Message
  From: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Wed Dec 16 22:05:46 2009
  Subject: Re: We have informed our cloakroom that we lift the hold on Shannon nomination
  Yes, I sold my soul to George Lemieux today. I am not proud of it.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Verma, Richard R
  Sent: Wed Dec 16 22:00:49 2009
  Subject: Re: We have informed our cloakroom that we lift the hold on Shannon nomination
  What took them so long? Did you promise your first born?
  Original Message
  From: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Wed Dec 16 21:48:05 2009
  Subject: Fw: We have informed our cloakroom that we lift the hold on Shannon nomination
  Hold on Tom was lifted. Thanks for making the calls. Trying to get him thru as quickly as possible before another hold
  emerges.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762680 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762680 Date: 06/30/2015
  From: Feehery, Kerry (LeMieux) <Kerry_Feehery@LeMieux.senate.gov>
  To: Verma, Richard R
  Cc: Moncrief, Benjamin (LeMieux) <Benjamin_Moncrief@LeMieux.senate.gov>
  Sent: Wed Dec 16 18:45:49 2009
  Subject: We have informed our cloakroom that we lift the hold on Shannon nomination
  Kerry Feehery
  Chief of Staff
  Senator George LeMieux (R-FL)
  356 Russell Office Building
  (202)228-4945
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762680 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762682
MetadataSubject: ARGENTINA
MetadataTo: sullivanjj@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-17T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/10_11_15_16/DOC_0C05762682/C05762682.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Argentina
ExtractedTo: 'sullivanjj@state.gov.
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 5:30 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762682
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  The FM just told me that Arturo had been there yesterday and had insulted their country. He was very upset and said I
  needed to do damage control. Can you figure out what he's talking about? Thx.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762682 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 5:30 PM
  To: 'sullivanjj@state.gov.
  Subject: Argentina
  The FM just told me that Arturo had been there yesterday and had insulted their country. He was very upset and said I
  needed to do damage control. Can you figure out what he's talking about? Thx.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762682 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762683
MetadataSubject: ARGENTINA
MetadataTo: sullivanjj@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-17T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/10_11_15_16/DOC_0C05762683/C05762683.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Argentina
ExtractedTo: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 5:34 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762683
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: He's standing right inside the door here.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762683 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 5:34 PM
  To: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Argentina
  He's standing right inside the door here.
  Original Message
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivankl@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Thu Dec 17 17:31:102009
  Subject: Re: Argentina
  On it.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Sullivan, Jacob
  Sent: Thu Dec 17 17:29:30 2009
  Subject: Argentina
  The FM just told me that Arturo had been there yesterday and had insulted their country. He was very upset and said I
  needed to do damage control. Can you figure out what he's talking about? Thx.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762683 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762686
MetadataSubject: SECRETARY SEBELIUS
MetadataTo: mark
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762686/C05762686.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Secretary Sebelius
ExtractedTo: mark
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 6:56 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762686
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Happy to call. Will check in with hrc.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762686 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 6:56 AM
  To: mark
  Cc:
  Subject: Re: Secretary Sebelius
  Happy to call. Will check in with hrc.
  From: Mark Hyman, MD
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Cc: Hillary Clinton <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Thu Jul 09 00:34:39 2009
  Subject: Secretary Sebelius
  Dear Huma,
  It was great to see you today however briefly
  Tim Collins just called me after his meeting with Secretary Sebelius tonight and she was interested in what we are trying
  to do. Tim suggested it would be helpful if you or the Secretary called to introduce me to her. Then I could set up a
  meeting tomorrow while I am still here. I am leaving at 630 pm.. I would really appreciate it — I think it could help
  move things along!
  Be well,
  Mark
  PS I am on my cell
  Mark Hyman, MD
  Vice Chair, Institute for Functional Medicine
  Founder and Medical Director
  The UltraWellness Center
  45 Walker Street
  Lenox MA 012 0
  108
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762686 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762690
MetadataSubject: CAMBODIA RETURNS 20 UIGHURS TO CHINA
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-19T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/10_11_15_16/DOC_0C05762690/C05762690.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762690
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Saturday, December 19, 2009 2:01 PM
  'millscd@state.gov'
  Re: Cambodia Returns 20 Uighurs to China

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762690 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Saturday, December 19, 2009 2:01 PM
  'millscd@state.gov'
  Re: Cambodia Returns 20 Uighurs to China
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Dec 19 13:59:53 2009
  Subject: Fw: Cambodia Returns 20 Uighurs to China
  Fyi
  From: OpsAlert
  Sent: Sat Dec 19 10:21:00 2009
  Subject: Cambodia Returns 20 Uighurs to China
  (SBU) The Cambodian Ministry of Interior confirmed 20 Uighurs departed on a charter flight to China at 0915 EST / 2115
  local, according to Embassy Phnom Penh. The whereabouts of two other Uighurs who had previously fled are unknown.
  Post adds the two are carrying letters of protection from the UNHCR.
  Automatic electronic distribution to: S, D(S), D(L), P, E, C, M, DG, T, R, PA, G, AF, EAP, EUR, NEA, SCA, WHA,I0, S/CRS,
  S/CT, H, DS, CA, PMAT, INR, IIP, CMS, S/ES, S/ES-0, NSOC, and WHSR.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762690 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762692
MetadataSubject: CALL WITH SEN. LAUTENBERG
MetadataTo: hormatsrd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-19T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/10_11_15_16/DOC_0C05762692/C05762692.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Call with Sen. Lautenberg
ExtractedTo: 'hormatsrd@state.gov'; 'KellyC@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 3:53 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762692
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  I spoke w the Senator who is not ready to lift his hold yet. He spoke w the Charge in the Brazilian Embassy who told him
  there was a procedure in the Brazilian courts that could be used to give Mr. Goldman custody now and during the
  remaining time of the court proceedings.
  Craig, can you find out what the Brazilians meant by that and if their govt is pursuing it?
  Bob, can you and USTR contact your Brazilian counterparts to explain how important the Goldman case is to the Senator
  who can't understand how the father wins every case but never gets his son back and he has run out of patience and is
  willing to hold this critical bill.
  Let me know what you find out. Thanks.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762692 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 3:53 PM
  To: 'hormatsrd@state.gov'; 'KellyC@state.gov'
  Cc: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: Call with Sen. Lautenberg
  I spoke w the Senator who is not ready to lift his hold yet. He spoke w the Charge in the Brazilian Embassy who told him
  there was a procedure in the Brazilian courts that could be used to give Mr. Goldman custody now and during the
  remaining time of the court proceedings.
  Craig, can you find out what the Brazilians meant by that and if their govt is pursuing it?
  Bob, can you and USTR contact your Brazilian counterparts to explain how important the Goldman case is to the Senator
  who can't understand how the father wins every case but never gets his son back and he has run out of patience and is
  willing to hold this critical bill.
  Let me know what you find out. Thanks.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762692 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762693
MetadataSubject: PUBLIC AFFAIRS RESUME OF
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_18-20M/DOC_0C05762693/C05762693.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762693
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762693 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  PUBLIC AFFAIRS RESUME OF
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762693 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762693 Date: 07/31/2015
  City Government:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762693 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05762694
MetadataSubject: TRAVEL
MetadataTo: abedinh@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-19T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/AddBacks/DOC_0C05762694/C05762694.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Travel
ExtractedTo: 'abedinh@state.gov'; 'ValmoroU@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 6:52 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762694
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  I'd like to stick w the 8 if we think it will go; if not, should we try the train at 6 or 7 if they're going; if not, I'd like to try
  the 7am Monday shuttle as a last resort. How will we decide?

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762694 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 6:52 PM
  To: 'abedinh@state.gov'; 'ValmoroU@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Travel
  I'd like to stick w the 8 if we think it will go; if not, should we try the train at 6 or 7 if they're going; if not, I'd like to try
  the 7am Monday shuttle as a last resort. How will we decide?
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
  Sent: Sat Dec 19 16:54:52 2009
  Subject: Travel
  Lona and I wanted to check in with you on travel. All the news is reporting (Mario confirming) that travel tomorrow will
  be messy. All flights to dc till 6pm tomorrow are basically canceled (though the 8pm is still scheduled to go). Mario has
  asked us to check in tomorrow but as of now, he thinks a monday morning flight might be more reliable. There are trains
  running but they expect delays, maybe cancellations. Below is lonas draft for monday. Do you want to hold off on
  making a decision till we know more tomorrow?
  PREV RON Washingon, DC
  8:15 amDEPART Private Residence
  En route State Department
  [drive time: 10 minutes]
  8:25 amARRIVE State Department
  8:25 amPRESIDENTIAL DAILY BRIEFING
  8:30 amSecretary's Office
  8:30 am DAILY SMALL STAFF MEETING
  8:45 amSecretary's Office
  Participants: Cheryl, Huma, Jake, Joe, and Lona
  8:45 amDAILY SENIOR STAFF MEETING
  9:15 amSecretary's Conference Room
  Participants: Jim Steinberg, Jack Lew, Bill Burns, Pat Kennedy, P.J. Crowley, Dan Smith, Harold Koh, Anne-Marie
  Slaughter, Ian Kelly, Rich Verma and Joe Macmanus
  9:15 amMONDAY MEETING w/ASSISTANT SECRETARIES
  10:00 amPrincipals Conference Room 7516
  10:00 amPRE-BRIEF FOR WEEKLY POTUS MEETING
  10:15 amSecretary's Office
  Participants: Jim, Jack, Cheryl, Jake and Huma
  10:15 amOFFICE TIME
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762694 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762694 Date: 06/30/2015
  11:15 amSecretary's Office
  11:15 amTOYS FOR TOTS CEREMONIAL PRESENTATION TO
  11:30 amU.S. MARINE CORPS RESERVE
  C Street Lobby
  Contact: DS x33699 B6
  Staff: Dan
  OPEN PRESS
  -HRC escorted to C Street Lobby by Major General John F. Kelly and Lt. General Osman.
  -Welcome Remarks by DS Assistant Secretary Eric Boswell.
  -HRC make brief remarks (2-3 minutes) at podium.
  -Major General John F. Kelly, Director of Toys for Tots makes brief remarks.
  -DS Assistant Secretary Eric Boswell concludes ceremony.
  -HRC poses for photos with Marines and Uniformed Protective Officers.
  11:30 amOFFICE TIME
  12:45 pmSecretary's Office
  12:45 pm (t)BRIEFING ON IRAN
  1:45 pm (t)Secretary's Conference Room
  Participants: Bill Burns and Others TBD
  1:45 pmMEETING w/UNDER SECRETARY JUDITH McHALE
  2:45 pmSecretary's Office
  Contact: R x79199
  Staff: Cheryl
  2:45 pm0FFICE TIME
  3:15 pmSecretary's Office
  3:15 pmREMARKS ON THE 15TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE INTERNATIONAL
  4:00 pmCONFERENCE ON POPULATION
  Benjamin Franklin Room, 8th Floor
  Contact: Jen Klein
  Call Time: 3:00pm
  OPEN PRESS
  Note: Approximately 200 guests attending.
  -HRC has pull-aside with10-12 VIPs upon arrival in Monroe Room.
  -U/S Otero to Melanne to HRC
  -HRC gives remarks (15-18 minutes in length) and departs.
  4:25 pmDEPART State Department
  En route White House
  [drive time: 5 minutes]
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762694 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762694 Date: 06/30/2015
  4:30 pmARRIVE White House
  4:30 pmWEEKLY MEETING w/PRESIDENT OBAMA AND VP BIDEN
  5:00 pmOval Office
  Contact: Jessica Wright Office 202-456-3321
  5:05 pmDEPART White House
  En route State Department
  [drive time: 5 minutes]
  5:10 pmARRIVE State Department
  5:15 pm0FFICE TIME
  6:55 pmSecretary's Office
  6:55 pmDEPART State Department
  En route White House
  [drive time: 5 minutes]
  7:00 pmARRIVE White House
  7:00 pmHOLIDAY DINNER HOSTED BY THE PRESIDENT AND FIRST LADY
  9:00 pm (t)State Floor Rooms
  Call Time: 7:00pm
  CLOSED PRESS
  Note: Business attire, 150 guests attending. POTUS expected to arrive at 7:10 pm
  9:05 pm (t)DEPART White House
  En route Private Residence
  [drive time: 10 minutes]
  9:15 pm (t)ARRIVE Private Residence
  HRC RONWashington, DC
  WJC RONChappaqua, NY
  Weather:
  Washington, DC: Partly sunny, 40/25.
  FYI:
  2:00 pmCeremonial Swearing-in for Jeffrey Bleich, U.S. Ambassador to Australia
  Location: South Court Auditorium of the Eisenhower Executive Office Building
  Note: Chief Justice Roberts to perform the ceremony.
  7:00 pmClinton Senate Alumni Holiday Party
  9:30 pmLocation: Luzzatto/Lieter Home, 3014 32nd Street NW
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762694 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762695
MetadataSubject: NOMINEES UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills. Cherl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762695/C05762695.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: FW: nominees update
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Rodriguez, Miguel E
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 7:24 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762695
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762695 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 7:24 AM
  To:
  Subject: FW: nominees update
  From: Verma, Richard R
  Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 6:08 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Sullivan, Jacob 3; Abedin, Huma; Reines, Philippe I
  Cc: Rodriguez, Miguel E
  Subject: nominees update
  The SFRC reported out all of the following nominees
  yesterday. We will try to push as many of these through the
  Senate today, if at all possible.
  NOMINATIONS:
  1. Christopher William Dell to be Ambassador to the
  Republic of Kosovo,
  2. Nancy J. Powell to be Director General of the Foreign
  Service
  3. Capricia Penavic Marshall to be Chief of Protocol, and to
  have the rank of Ambassador during her tenure of service
  4. Maria Otero to be Under Secretary of State for Democracy
  and Global Affairs
  5. Philip L. Verveer for the rank of Ambassador during his
  tenure of service as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for
  International Communications and Information Policy in the
  Bureau of Economic, Energy, and Business Affairs and U.S.
  Coordinator for International Communications and Information
  Policy
  6. The Honorable Laurie Susan Fulton to be Ambassador to
  Denmark
  1nq
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762695 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762695 Date: 06/30/2015
  7. Louis B. Susman to be Ambassador to the United
  Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
  8. Charles H. Rivkin to be Ambassador to France, and to
  serve concurrently and without additional compensation as
  Ambassador to Monaco
  9. Mark Henry Gitenstein to be Ambassador to Romania
  10. The Honorable Timothy J. Roemer to be Ambassador
  to India
  11. Richard J. Schmierer to be Ambassador to the Sultanate
  of Oman
  12. Gordon Gray to be Ambassador to the Republic of
  Tunisia
  110
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762695 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762696
MetadataSubject: CONCEPT PAPER: REMARKS TO THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/23_24_25_26/DOC_0C05762696/C05762696.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762696
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762696 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B5
  6.23.09
  CONCEPT PAPER:
  REMARKS TO THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS
  This concept paper offers a _framework for your "big speech." We propose five parts to
  the speech:
  1
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762696 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762696 Date: 06/30/2015
  PART ONE: INTRODUCTION
  PART TWO: THE ENDS
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762696 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762696 Date: 06/30/2015
  Our foreign policy must have clear_priorities:
  'I
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762696 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762696 Date: 06/30/2015
  PART THREE: THE WAYS
  PART FOUR: THE MEANS
  a
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762696 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762696 Date: 06/30/2015
  Several approaches will serve as hallmarks of our foreign policy:
  5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762696 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762696 Date: 06/30/2015
  PART FIVE: CONCLUSION
  [Still working on concluding thoughts/ideas for ending]
  6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762696 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762697
MetadataSubject: CHECKING IN
MetadataTo: cheryl.mills
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-19T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/10_11_15_16/DOC_0C05762697/C05762697.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Checking in
ExtractedTo: 'cheryl.miIls@ 'millscd@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 8:59 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762697
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: I can talk tonight or tomorrow am. What works for you?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762697 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 8:59 PM
  To: 'cheryl.miIls@ 'millscd@state.gov'
  Subject: Checking in
  I can talk tonight or tomorrow am. What works for you?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762697 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762698
MetadataSubject: FYI
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills. Cherl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_18-20M/DOC_0C05762698/C05762698.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762698
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  See below
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Thursday, July 09, 2009 7:29 AM
  H
  FYI

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762698 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5,B6
  ilW'
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  See below
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Thursday, July 09, 2009 7:29 AM
  H
  FYI
  From: Mills, Cheryl D [mailto:MillsCD@state.gov]
  Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 5:29 AM
  To: Strobe Talbott; Lew, Jacob J
  Subject: Re: I should have proofed the below...
  Thanks strobe - look forward to discussing on friday
  From: Strobe Talbott
  Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 4:59 AM
  To: 'Mills, Cheryl D'; Jack Lew
  Subject: RE: QDDR Draft Document
  Jack & Cheryl: two thoughts came to mind as to head what I gather, from TOR, will be the
  Steering Committee:
  There is are considerations—one for each—that I'd prefer to comment on in person Friday,
  in neither case negative but in both cases just to complete my thoughts on them.
  Strobe
  From: Mills, Cheryl D [mailto:MillsCD@state.gov]
  Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 2:22 PM
  To: Strobe Talbott; Berger, Samuel R.
  Subject: QDDR Draft Document
  Strobe:
  Attached and below is a draft "terms of reference" for the QDDR per our discussion — copying Sandy so he has it as well
  for discussion when you all talk. I will follow-up with you about Friday.
  111
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762698 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762698 Date: 07/31/2015
  Thanks for coming today.
  cdm
  2010-2011 QDDR Terms of Reference
  I. Introduction and Scope
  112
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762698 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762698 Date: 07/31/2015
  113
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762698 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762698 Date: 07/31/2015
  114
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762698 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762698 Date: 07/31/2015
  115
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762698 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762698 Date: 07/31/2015
  116
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762698 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05762699
MetadataSubject: MINI SCHEDULE 7/9/09
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762699/C05762699.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Mini Schedule 7/9/09
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 8:05 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762699
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  8:25 am PRESIDENTIAL DAILY BRIEFING
  8:30 am Secretary's Office
  8:30 am DAILY SMALL STAFF MEETING
  8:45 am Secretary's Office
  8:45 am DAILY SENIOR STAFF MEETING
  9:15 am Secretary's Conference Room
  9:15 am WEEKLY MEETING w/REGIONAL BUREAU SECRETARIES
  10:00 am Deputy Secretary's Conference Room
  10:00 am HOLD FOR HUMA
  11:00 am Secretary's Office
  11:00 am OFFICE TIME
  12:20 pm Secretary's Office
  12:20 pm DEPART State Department *En route River Entrance, Pentagon
  12:30 pm ARRIVE The Pentagon
  12:30 pm ONE-ON-ONE LUNCH w/DEFENSE SECRETARY ROBERT GATES
  1:30 pm Secretary Gates' Private Office, Pentagon
  1:35 pm DEPART The Pentagon *En route State Department
  1:45 pm ARRIVE State Department
  2:00 pm MEETING w/SE RICHARD HOLBROOICE
  3:00 pm Secretary's Office
  3:00 pm PRIVATE MEETING w/MAUREEN WHITE
  3:30 pm Secretary's Office
  3:30 pm OFF-THE-RECORD MEETING w/FRED HIATT AND JACKSON DIEHL,
  4:00 pm WASHINGTON POST Secretary's Office
  4:00 pm SCHEDULING MEETING w/LONA AND HUMA
  4:30 pm Secretary's Office
  4:30 pm
  6:00 pm
  OFFICE TIME
  Secretary's Office
  6:00 pm RECEPTION FOR NEW MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF
  7:30 pm REPRESENTATIVES Thomas Jefferson Room, 8th Floor *Approx. 55 ppl expected.
  7:30 pm (t) DEPART State Department *En route Private Residence
  7:40 pm (t) ARRIVE Private Residence
  ###
  117

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762699 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  war
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 8:05 AM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Mini Schedule 7/9/09
  8:25 am PRESIDENTIAL DAILY BRIEFING
  8:30 am Secretary's Office
  8:30 am DAILY SMALL STAFF MEETING
  8:45 am Secretary's Office
  8:45 am DAILY SENIOR STAFF MEETING
  9:15 am Secretary's Conference Room
  9:15 am WEEKLY MEETING w/REGIONAL BUREAU SECRETARIES
  10:00 am Deputy Secretary's Conference Room
  10:00 am HOLD FOR HUMA
  11:00 am Secretary's Office
  11:00 am OFFICE TIME
  12:20 pm Secretary's Office
  12:20 pm DEPART State Department *En route River Entrance, Pentagon
  12:30 pm ARRIVE The Pentagon
  12:30 pm ONE-ON-ONE LUNCH w/DEFENSE SECRETARY ROBERT GATES
  1:30 pm Secretary Gates' Private Office, Pentagon
  1:35 pm DEPART The Pentagon *En route State Department
  1:45 pm ARRIVE State Department
  2:00 pm MEETING w/SE RICHARD HOLBROOICE
  3:00 pm Secretary's Office
  3:00 pm PRIVATE MEETING w/MAUREEN WHITE
  3:30 pm Secretary's Office
  3:30 pm OFF-THE-RECORD MEETING w/FRED HIATT AND JACKSON DIEHL,
  4:00 pm WASHINGTON POST Secretary's Office
  4:00 pm SCHEDULING MEETING w/LONA AND HUMA
  4:30 pm Secretary's Office
  4:30 pm
  6:00 pm
  OFFICE TIME
  Secretary's Office
  6:00 pm RECEPTION FOR NEW MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF
  7:30 pm REPRESENTATIVES Thomas Jefferson Room, 8th Floor *Approx. 55 ppl expected.
  7:30 pm (t) DEPART State Department *En route Private Residence
  7:40 pm (t) ARRIVE Private Residence
  ###
  117
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762699 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762700
MetadataSubject: I'M UP IF YOU CAN CALL. LET ME KNOW.
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-20T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/10_11_15_16/DOC_0C05762700/C05762700.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: I'm up if you can call. Let me know.
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov'; 'cheryl.mills@
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 5:25 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762700
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762700 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 5:25 AM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov'; 'cheryl.mills@
  Subject: I'm up if you can call. Let me know.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762700 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762702
MetadataSubject: FRIDAY POLICY REVIEW ON AFRICA
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-06-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/23_24_25_26/DOC_0C05762702/C05762702.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: FW: Friday Policy Review on Africa
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Toiv, Nora F
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, June 12, 2009 7:38 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762702
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Interesting take on China below.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762702 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 7:38 AM
  To:
  Subject: FW: Friday Policy Review on Africa
  Interesting take on China below.
  From: Stremlau, Matthew H
  Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 7:21 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Cc: Toiv, Nora F
  Subject: RE: Friday Policy Review
  No — I wasn't invited to this. I can't anyway — I need to go over to USAID for an event we're hosting w/
  IFPRI. S/P recently drafted a policy paper on Africa and I worked contributed a lot to that paper. I see one big
  issue missing from those questions —the issue of China in Africa. China is transforming the continent in a way
  not seen since the days of colonialism.
  We should also think about China in the context of food security. There are one million Chinese
  farmers currently working in Africa! That's remarkable if you think about it. China has also bought nearly 3
  million hectares of land in Africa and could become one of the largest sources of commercial farming on the
  continent. They are also building many of the roads that will transform transportation and the movement of
  agriculture products.
  --Matt
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 10:19 PM
  To: Stremlau, Matthew H
  Subject: FW: Friday Policy Review
  Are you coming?
  From: Smith, Daniel B
  Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 4:28 PM
  To: SES_DepSecysMeeting
  Cc: Mills, Cheryl D; Slaughter, Anne-Marie; Crocker, Bathsheba N; Hembry, Marcella G; Chollet, Derek H; Carson,
  Johnnie; Carter, Phillip X; Smith, Pamela (AID/ES)
  Subject: RE: Friday Policy Review
  70
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762702 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762702 Date: 06/30/2015
  Attached please find the questions for tomorrow's policy review.
  << File: Questions for Africa Seminar.doc >>
  From: Smith, Daniel B
  Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 3:22 PM
  To: SES_DepSecysMeeting
  Cc: Mills, Cheryl D; Slaughter, Anne-Marie; Crocker, Bathsheba N; Hembry, Marcella G; Chollet, Derek H; Carson,
  Johnnie; Carter, Phillip X
  Subject: Friday Policy Review
  This Friday's policy review meeting will focus on sub-Saharan Africa. It will be held from 9:15-10:15 in the
  Deputy's Conference Room. S/P will circulate questions for discussion in advance of the meeting. Those
  bureaus that have relevant issues/concerns should send an appropriate representative to the
  meeting. Please do not send more than one representative without prior approval.
  71
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762702 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762704
MetadataSubject: PER CALL LAST NIGHT
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-20T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/AddBacks/DOC_0C05762704/C05762704.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762704
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sunday, December 20, 2009 9:41 AM
  B6
  Per call last night
  Let me know when and if I should make call. Thx.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762704 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sunday, December 20, 2009 9:41 AM
  B6
  Per call last night
  Let me know when and if I should make call. Thx.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762704 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762705
MetadataSubject: MEMO ON SPEECH ATTACHED AND IN TEXT. FOR YOU AND CHERYL ONLY; NO CIRCULATION. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762705/C05762705.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Memo on speech attached and in text. For you and Cheryl only; no circulation. Sid
ExtractedTo: H; MillsCD©state.gov; cheryl.mills
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, July 9, 2009 8:59 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762705
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  July 9, 2009
  For: Hillary

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762705 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2009 8:59 AM
  To: H; MillsCD©state.gov; cheryl.mills
  Subject: Memo on speech attached and in text. For you and Cheryl only; no circulation. Sid
  Attachments: hrc memo cfr speech 070809.docx
  CONFIDENTIAL
  July 9, 2009
  For: Hillary
  From: Sid
  Re: Your CFR speech
  The draft, sent by separate email, is intended to give you options and ideas. Use as you wish. Several ideas
  are at the core of this version: in particular, the concept of the US as a modern global nation and how
  that serves our capacity for leadership.
  For most policy speeches a generic tone and workmanlike prose are acceptable. But for this one, it is not.
  This speech can't afford to be lackluster. It will then be held up in invidious comparison to Obama's
  glittering best efforts. Your speech must have, amid the policies, a distinctive and authoritative voice.
  Your early draft makes no distinctions between allies or partners; indeed, it barely mentions allies. The early
  draft also features a strong malaise theme. Even if rebutted after being raised, the focus is on obstacles
  and hindrances, not on achievements, opportunities and what can be achieved. There's no accounting of
  progress so far. The effect is downbeat in tone. At the same time, the draft contains passages of vague
  and gauzy liberal universalism, while in one line assailing it, an unconvincing juggling act. The notion
  that all nations and peoples want the same things as Americans will not fly and is open to derision. It
  reflects blithe liberal cultural imperialism, among other things. (See Graham Greene. And, on the
  contrary, some nations—and peoples—seek nuclear weapons, like Iran; some don't want to curb global
  warming, like China; some don't care about human rights, like most Arab nations; some have contempt
  for democracy, including de facto allies like Egypt, not to mention Myanmar; and some are indifferent
  to poverty, any number of African kleptocracies.) Also there is some confusion of definitions, for
  example, asserting dialogue with adversaries is "strategic engagement," when that is a concept usually
  applied to allies and partners.
  The speech must be crafted with a sense of real time and cannot be delivered out of sync with it. Slogans
  can become shopworn, especially those that lack analytical, historical and descriptive power. What
  served you once, at your confirmation, may not serve again in the same way. The most cogent foreign
  policy columnists from Clive Crook of the Financial Times to David Rothkopf of Foreign Policy have
  already written columns in the last week on the limits of "soft power" (i.e., "smart power") and others I
  understand are preparing to make similar criticisms. I would use sparingly or not at all. You do not need
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762705 Date: 06/30/2015
  B6

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762705 Date: 06/30/2015
  to have a complex foreign policy agenda reduced to two words that the administration's adversaries will
  undoubtedly use against you.
  Stay cool with this summers hottest movies. Moviefone brings you trailers, celebrities, movie showtimes and tickets!
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762705 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762706
MetadataSubject: KASIT CAN TALK RIGHT NOW. OSCAR SHOULD BE PRINTING CALL SHEET RIGHT NOW. OK?
MetadataTo: abedinh@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-20T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/10_11_15_16/DOC_0C05762706/C05762706.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: kasit can talk right now. oscar should be printing call sheet right now. ok?
ExtractedTo: 'abedinh@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 10:22 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762706
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Ok
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762706 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 10:22 AM
  To: 'abedinh@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: kasit can talk right now. oscar should be printing call sheet right now. ok?
  Ok
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Dec 20 10:13:09 2009
  Subject: kasit can talk right now. oscar should be printing call sheet right now. ok?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762706 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762707
MetadataSubject: FYI: JONES' ENEMIES WITHIN... SID
MetadataTo: cheryl.mills ;H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2009-06-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/23_24_25_26/DOC_0C05762707/C05762707.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: FYI: Jones' enemies within... Sid
ExtractedTo: cheryl.mills
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, June 12, 2009 8:54 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762707
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Your request is being processed...
  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-clemons/can-national-security-adv b 214672.html
  Steve Clemons
  Director of the American Strategy Program at the New America Foundation
  Posted: June 12, 2009 07:12 AM
  Can National Security Adviser James Jones Survive
  a Second Round of Attacks and "Longer Knives"?
  I am here in London where I'm participating in an interesting forum sponsored by the Princeton Project on
  National Security and the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) Transatlantic Program, I've received not just
  one email -- but three -- from prominent insider journalists and policy hands that Jim Jones' tenure as National
  Security Adviser is highly fragile.
  One of these emails reports starkly:
  Knives getting longer
  That's all my contact said. But other emails have intimated to me a serious tone-deafness by Jones about his role
  and responsibilities, his relationship with the President, and his relationship with younger, dedicated,
  hardworking and late-working staff. Jones recently said that National Security Council staff members that
  stayed longer than 7:30 pm must be disorganized in their work.
  I speak to various NSC officials -- often at 10:00 or 11:00 pm at night. They are hardworking, racing as fast as
  they can to manage the many, many, many major initiatives that Barack Obama has decided to simultaneously
  pursue.
  James Jones is considered by his admirers to be a genius when thinking about management structures and
  decision-making processes. On the other hand, his critics see him as a plodding, slow-moving, out of touch
  retired general who was better prepared to think about the last era rather than the one we are moving into. His
  °critics think that he's just too unable to animate nimble, high flex policy decision making products for a White
  House on a manic dash to get a lot of top tier issues dealt with.
  Friends at the National Security Council respect a great deal the way in which NSC Deputy Tom Donilon is
  managing his brief Many see him picking up the load that Jones seems unable or unwilling to carry. Donilon is
  deeply engaged in the broad Middle East and Iran portfolio, the non-proliferation/WMD/arms control portfolio,
  the China economic and security portfolio, and he has -- according to reports -- supported and helped cultivate
  relationship building between State, DoD, the NSC, and other parts of the national security bureaucracy.
  Some tell me that James Jones decided to try and remove himself from the "whack-a-mole" crisis reaction style
  of decision-making that could rob the Obama administration of the chance to define a new course in national
  security affairs. Tom Donilon, according to reports, wields far more the hand of power when it comes to day to
  day management and responding to crises that require presidential attention and response.
  Jones, in contrast, has been obsessed with the structure of decisions -- who is involved in those decisions, what
  the structure of decision-making should be, and what legal modifications to this process need to be made. He
  looks at that as the big nut that needs to be cracked -- and that would improve, according to Jim Jones, the
  President's effectiveness and chances of success at a macro level.
  Jones' self-determined task is not high profile, mostly structural, and has not won him many admirers for
  leadership -- but what he is doing is necessary. If he departs his role, this challenge of dealing with the growing
  complexity of national security threats and the vital need to recalibrate the policy making and decision-making
  process will require the attention of someone serious.
  So, whether Jones stays or goes -- his portfolio will remain vital.
  But what is clear is that Jones has enemies and that they are trying to undermine his place in the Obama orbit.
  Their motives may not be earnest concern about the tempo or pace of Jones' management style -- but they very
  well could be his unwillingness to allow the liberal interventionists inside the Obama administration to have
  more than their fair share of power in the Obama decision-making process.
  Jones has structured an all views on the table approach to decision making -- quite evident when it comes to
  Middle East policy -- and the hawkish/neocon-friendly/Likudist-hugging part of the Obama administration's
  foreign policy operation may be engaged in a coup attempt against Jones.
  I don't know if he'll survive this latest effort to oust him -- but folks need to know that those "longer knives", on
  the whole, do not have pure motives.
  -- Steve Clemons directs the foreign policy programs at the New America Foundation and publishes the popular
  political blog, The Washington Note
  Shop Dell's full line of Laptops now starting at $349!

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762707 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 8:54 AM
  To: cheryl.mills
  Subject: FYI: Jones' enemies within... Sid
  Your request is being processed...
  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steve-clemons/can-national-security-adv b 214672.html
  Steve Clemons
  Director of the American Strategy Program at the New America Foundation
  Posted: June 12, 2009 07:12 AM
  Can National Security Adviser James Jones Survive
  a Second Round of Attacks and "Longer Knives"?
  I am here in London where I'm participating in an interesting forum sponsored by the Princeton Project on
  National Security and the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) Transatlantic Program, I've received not just
  one email -- but three -- from prominent insider journalists and policy hands that Jim Jones' tenure as National
  Security Adviser is highly fragile.
  One of these emails reports starkly:
  Knives getting longer
  That's all my contact said. But other emails have intimated to me a serious tone-deafness by Jones about his role
  and responsibilities, his relationship with the President, and his relationship with younger, dedicated,
  hardworking and late-working staff. Jones recently said that National Security Council staff members that
  stayed longer than 7:30 pm must be disorganized in their work.
  I speak to various NSC officials -- often at 10:00 or 11:00 pm at night. They are hardworking, racing as fast as
  they can to manage the many, many, many major initiatives that Barack Obama has decided to simultaneously
  pursue.
  James Jones is considered by his admirers to be a genius when thinking about management structures and
  decision-making processes. On the other hand, his critics see him as a plodding, slow-moving, out of touch
  retired general who was better prepared to think about the last era rather than the one we are moving into. His
  °critics think that he's just too unable to animate nimble, high flex policy decision making products for a White
  House on a manic dash to get a lot of top tier issues dealt with.
  Friends at the National Security Council respect a great deal the way in which NSC Deputy Tom Donilon is
  managing his brief Many see him picking up the load that Jones seems unable or unwilling to carry. Donilon is
  deeply engaged in the broad Middle East and Iran portfolio, the non-proliferation/WMD/arms control portfolio,
  the China economic and security portfolio, and he has -- according to reports -- supported and helped cultivate
  relationship building between State, DoD, the NSC, and other parts of the national security bureaucracy.
  Some tell me that James Jones decided to try and remove himself from the "whack-a-mole" crisis reaction style
  of decision-making that could rob the Obama administration of the chance to define a new course in national
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762707 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762707 Date: 06/30/2015
  security affairs. Tom Donilon, according to reports, wields far more the hand of power when it comes to day to
  day management and responding to crises that require presidential attention and response.
  Jones, in contrast, has been obsessed with the structure of decisions -- who is involved in those decisions, what
  the structure of decision-making should be, and what legal modifications to this process need to be made. He
  looks at that as the big nut that needs to be cracked -- and that would improve, according to Jim Jones, the
  President's effectiveness and chances of success at a macro level.
  Jones' self-determined task is not high profile, mostly structural, and has not won him many admirers for
  leadership -- but what he is doing is necessary. If he departs his role, this challenge of dealing with the growing
  complexity of national security threats and the vital need to recalibrate the policy making and decision-making
  process will require the attention of someone serious.
  So, whether Jones stays or goes -- his portfolio will remain vital.
  But what is clear is that Jones has enemies and that they are trying to undermine his place in the Obama orbit.
  Their motives may not be earnest concern about the tempo or pace of Jones' management style -- but they very
  well could be his unwillingness to allow the liberal interventionists inside the Obama administration to have
  more than their fair share of power in the Obama decision-making process.
  Jones has structured an all views on the table approach to decision making -- quite evident when it comes to
  Middle East policy -- and the hawkish/neocon-friendly/Likudist-hugging part of the Obama administration's
  foreign policy operation may be engaged in a coup attempt against Jones.
  I don't know if he'll survive this latest effort to oust him -- but folks need to know that those "longer knives", on
  the whole, do not have pure motives.
  -- Steve Clemons directs the foreign policy programs at the New America Foundation and publishes the popular
  political blog, The Washington Note
  Shop Dell's full line of Laptops now starting at $349!
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762707 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762708
MetadataSubject: KASIT CALL IS COMING THROUGH SHORTLY, OSCAR HAS CALL SHEET
MetadataTo: abedinh@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-20T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/10_11_15_16/DOC_0C05762708/C05762708.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: kasit call is coming through shortly, oscar has call sheet
ExtractedTo: 'abedinh@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 10:23 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762708
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Ok
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762708 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 10:23 AM
  To: 'abedinh@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: kasit call is coming through shortly, oscar has call sheet
  Ok
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.goy>
  To: H; Oscar Flores
  Sent: Sun Dec 20 10:21:32 2009
  Subject: kasit call is coming through shortly, oscar has call sheet
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762708 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762711
MetadataSubject: YOUR CFR SPEECH
MetadataTo: Hillary
MetadataFrom: Sid
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762711/C05762711.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedFrom: Sid
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762711
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762711 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  CONFIDENTIAL
  July 9, 2009
  For: Hillary
  From: Sid
  Re: Your CFR speech
  1. This draft, sent by separate email, is intended to give you options and ideas. Use as you
  wish. Several ideas are at the core of this version: in particular, the concept of the US as a
  modern global nation and how that serves our capacity for leadership.
  2. For most policy speeches a generic tone and workmanlike prose are acceptable. But for
  this one, it is not. This speech can't afford to be lackluster. It will then be held up in
  invidious comparison to Obama's glittering best efforts. Your speech must have, amid the
  policies, a distinctive and authoritative voice.
  3. Your early draft makes no distinctions between allies or partners; indeed, it barely
  mentions allies. The early draft also features a strong malaise theme. Even if rebutted
  after being raised, the focus is on obstacles and hindrances, not on achievements,
  opportunities and what can be achieved. There's no accounting of progress so far. The
  effect is downbeat in tone. At the same time, the draft contains passages of vague and
  gauzy liberal universalism, while in one line assailing it, an unconvincing juggling act.
  The notion that all nations and peoples want the same things as Americans will not fly
  and is open to derision. It reflects blithe liberal cultural imperialism, among other things.
  (See Graham Greene. And, on the contrary, some nations—and peoples—seek nuclear
  weapons, like Iran; some don't want to curb global warming, like China; some don't care
  about human rights, like most Arab nations; some have contempt for democracy,
  including de facto allies like Egypt, not to mention Myanmar; and some are indifferent to
  poverty, any number of African kleptocracies.) Also there is some confusion of
  definitions, for example, asserting dialogue with adversaries is "strategic engagement,"
  when that is a concept usually applied to allies and partners.
  4. The speech must be crafted with a sense of real time and cannot be delivered out of sync
  with it. Slogans can become shopworn, especially those that lack analytical, historical
  and descriptive power. What served you once, at your confirmation, may not serve again
  in the same way. The most cogent foreign policy columnists from Clive Crook of the
  Financial Times to David Rothkopf of Foreign Policy have already written columns in
  the last week on the limits of "soft power" (i.e., "smart power") and others I understand
  are preparing to make similar criticisms. I would use sparingly or not at all. You do not
  1
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762711 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762711 Date: 06/30/2015
  need to have a complex foreign policy agenda reduced to two words that the
  administration's adversaries will undoubtedly use against you.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762711 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762713
MetadataSubject: YOUR CFR SPEECH
MetadataTo: Hillary
MetadataFrom: Sid
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762713/C05762713.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedFrom: Sid
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762713
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  RELEASE IN FULL
  CONFIDENTIAL
  July 9, 2009
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762713 Date: 06/30/2015
  For: Hillary
  From: Sid
  Re: Your CFR speech
  1. The draft, sent by separate email, is intended to give you options and ideas. Use as you
  wish. Several ideas are at the core of this version: in particular, the concept of the US as a
  modern global nation and how that serves our capacity for leadership.
  2. For most policy speeches a generic tone and workmanlike prose are acceptable. But for
  this one, it is not. This speech can't afford to be lackluster. It will then be held up in
  invidious comparison to Obama's glittering best efforts. Your speech must have, amid the
  policies, a distinctive and authoritative voice.
  3. Your early draft makes no distinctions between allies or partners; indeed, it barely
  mentions allies. The early draft also features a strong malaise theme. Even if rebutted
  after being raised, the focus is on obstacles and hindrances, not on achievements,
  opportunities and what can be achieved. There's no accounting of progress so far. The
  effect is downbeat in tone. At the same time, the draft contains passages of vague and
  gauzy liberal universalism, while in one line assailing it, an unconvincing juggling act.
  The notion that all nations and peoples want the same things as Americans will not fly
  and is open to derision. It reflects blithe liberal cultural imperialism, among other things.
  (See Graham Greene. And, on the contrary, some nations—and peoples—seek nuclear
  weapons, like Iran; some don't want to curb global warming, like China; some don't care
  about human rights, like most Arab nations; some have contempt for democracy,
  including de facto allies like Egypt, not to mention Myanmar; and some are indifferent to
  poverty, any number of African kleptocracies.) Also there is some confusion of
  definitions, for example, asserting dialogue with adversaries is "strategic engagement,"
  when that is a concept usually applied to allies and partners.
  4. The speech must be crafted with a sense of real time and cannot be delivered out of sync
  with it. Slogans can become shopworn, especially those that lack analytical, historical
  and descriptive power. What served you once, at your confirmation, may not serve again
  in the same way. The most cogent foreign policy columnists from Clive Crook of the
  Financial Times to David Rothkopf of Foreign Policy have already written columns in
  the last week on the limits of "soft power" (i.e., "smart power") and others I understand
  are preparing to make similar criticisms. I would use sparingly or not at all. You do not
  1
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762713 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762713 Date: 06/30/2015
  need to have a complex foreign policy agenda reduced to two words that the
  administration's adversaries will undoubtedly use against you.
  2
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762713 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762715
MetadataSubject: FYI...SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762715/C05762715.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: fyi... Sid
ExtractedTo: H; MillsCD@state.gov; cheryl.mill
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, July 9, 2009 9:10 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762715
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  July 9, 2009
  For: Hillary, Cheryl

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762715 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2009 9:10 AM
  To: H; MillsCD@state.gov; cheryl.mill
  Subject: fyi... Sid
  Attachments: hrc memo rothkopf piece 070909.docx
  CONFIDENTIAL
  July 9, 2009
  For: Hillary, Cheryl
  From: Sid
  Re: The drift
  FYI: This is the first of what will likely soon be other analyses in the same vein as I am led to understand.
  http://rothkopf.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/07/08/the_problem_whenthe_president_isthe_policy
  Foreign Policy
  The problem when the president is the policy...
  By David J. Rothkopf
  Wed, 07/08/2009 - 11:25arn
  You could tell it wasn't going well. The conversations with Medvedev and Putin were tense, the body language
  awkward. The speech at the New Economic School laid an egg. The press seemed bored with the visit of
  America's rock star president. And as for real results, well, there weren't any.
  Looking for explanations in an article Clifford Levy and Ellen Barry in today's New York Times called "In
  Russia, Obama's Star Power Does Not Translate," a range of possible answers were rolled out: Russians are
  jaded, Russians don't go for U.S. political posturing, Obama's speeches don't translate well, and, according to
  one person who ought to understand politics, a Russian circus designer, "Russians are the smartest people in the
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762715 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762715 Date: 06/30/2015
  world." (A fact they have carefully hidden behind a veil of hundreds of years of economic and political
  catastrophe.)
  Somehow, the formula that has been working for Barack Obama since early in 2007 suddenly seems to have
  gone cold. It is not enough simply to be him or to roll out Michelle and the girls (all of whom joined him in
  Moscow...unlike say, his top two State Department officials). What's more, it's not just Russia. Oh sure, the
  press still swoon in most corners of the world and crowds and political leaders still get all fluttery when first
  exposed to America's charming, thoughtful, intelligent, young president. But we are now starting to see what
  happens when being Barack Obama is not enough. We are now starting to see the shortcomings of the new
  administration's approach wherein the president has actually been the policy.
  He has said we had changed and offered himself as evidence. He has been what we have offered to friends in
  terms of visits, access and calls. He has been the headline grabber, the spokesperson, the new voice of America.
  He has enabled the administration to take inherited policies and wrap them in Obama-paper with Obama-glitter
  all over it and all of a sudden, the old was repackaged into appearing new. Where there have been differences,
  as with the concept of engagement, the change has been sold as a difference between him and his predecessor,
  with his speeches describing what was new and the possibility of interacting with him being the potential pay-
  off.
  This played big during his early trips overseas, the novelty value was high and the eagerness to move on from
  the painful prior era was great. At the G20 meeting, at the Summit of the Americas, in Cairo, the concept of
  "president as policy" seemed to be working. But now we see where it is not. Not in Russia. Not with the
  Iranians who are happy to accept engagement and anything else that will be given to them but no strings, please
  Not with Hugo Chavez, who hammed it up with Obama in Trinidad but led his misfit chorus in reflexively
  hammering the United States after the coup in Honduras. Certainly not in North Korea.
  It seems that having the president as policy works best with the people who are pre-disposed to like us and to
  some extent with the young and the disenfranchised. But with the hard cases, with our enemies, it falls painfully
  and dangerously flat.
  In these instances, the new president is discovering that something much more than personal diplomacy and
  smile from the genuinely appealing Obama clan is needed. In these instances, we are going to need to go back
  to the drawing board and do the grunt work of foreign policy, the tough negotiations, the nuanced position
  changes, the threats, the cajoling. It's a very different game from American politics and, in fact, is often
  completely unconnected to it. What works here, very often does not play at all overseas.
  There is a problem with this new reality. It requires a coordinated, multi-tiered, high-functioning foreign policy
  establishment. It needs the State Department to be in a central role. It needs the NSC to work both as a policy
  development and policy implementation mechanism and the National Security Advisor to be seen and
  respected.. .like the Secretary of State.. .as key advisors. It requires that the foreign policy of the United States is
  not centered too heavily either the president or the executive office of the president -- although the president
  will always remain the ultimate key. It is perfectly appropriate for the president to be part of the product, part
  of the rewards offered, and the mastermind...but he needs to move beyond campaign mode to something new. It
  is much akin to the entrepreneur of a successful company recognizing that for the company to grow further, to
  become a mature organization, he is going to need a mature structure that depends less on him and more on
  delegation of power to effective lieutenants and their teams.
  We're not there yet. The secretary of state and the State Department have been visibly marginalized. She has
  become a kind of behind the scenes player. She's not on the Sunday morning shows. The president or the vice
  president handles the big media assignments (often not sounding exactly like they were on the same page). The
  National Security Advisor, for all his personal strengths, is viewed as a bit of a lost cause five months into the
  presidency. One of his predecessors in the job said to me when asked whether he viewed General Jones as
  failing in the job, "to me, on that issue, where there is smoke, there is fire." Tom Donilon, Jones's deputy, is
  seen to be managing the NSC process. Denis McDonough and Mark Lippert, Obama confidantes, are seen to be
  working closely with him and his inner office team (Rahm Emanuel, the VP, David Axelrod, Greg Craig and
  others) to play the leading role in shaping policy.
  Clearly neither Hillary Clinton nor Jim Jones is a weak person. But all power in the U.S. national security
  apparatus flows from the president. And there is no denying that, despite the fact that they show up at work
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762715 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762715 Date: 06/30/2015
  every day and go through the motions, that their roles don't measure up to many of their predecessors and the
  structure that is emerging suggests problems to come.
  It's time to move out of campaign mode and into governing mode. It's time recognize that it really does take a
  big team of empowered leaders to make the complex foreign policy of the U.S. work and evolve in the right
  directions. It's time to recognize that it does not reflect badly on the president if we all agree he cannot
  transform the world single handedly, that however different he may be from his predecessors, that alone is not
  enough.
  ALEXEY DRUZHININ/AFP/Getty Images
  David Rothkopf I Permalink I I Comments? Login or register
  ( filed under:
  • Obama Administration I Russia I U.S. Foreign Policy
  Stay cool with this summer's hottest movies. Moviefone brings you trailers, celebrities, movie showtimes and tickets!
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762715 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762716
MetadataSubject: NO WH MTG
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-06-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/AddBacks/DOC_0C05762716/C05762716.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: RE: No WH mtg
ExtractedTo: H; Valmoro, Lona J; Sullivan, Jacob J
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: cheryl.mills
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, June 12, 2009 10:31 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762716
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  I addressed this with Lippert when we last had an issue.
  Our identified point of contact is Sarah Farnsworth and we talk to her regularly. I will call and find out what happened
  but this meeting was confirmed. They are not telling us when things get canceled and I think we need another contact
  there if sarah is too overwhelmed.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762716 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN
  PART B6
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 10:31 AM
  To: H; Valmoro, Lona J; Sullivan, Jacob J
  Cc: cheryl.mills
  Subject: RE: No WH mtg
  I addressed this with Lippert when we last had an issue.
  Our identified point of contact is Sarah Farnsworth and we talk to her regularly. I will call and find out what happened
  but this meeting was confirmed. They are not telling us when things get canceled and I think we need another contact
  there if sarah is too overwhelmed.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 10:22 AM
  To: Valmoro, Lona J; Abedin, Huma; Sullivan, Jacob J
  Cc: 'cheryl.mills B6
  Subject: No WH mtg
  I arrived for the 10:15 mtg and was told there was no mtg. Matt said they had "released" the time. This is the second
  time this has happened. What's up???
  B6
  72
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762716 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762717
MetadataSubject: JAPANESE AMBASSADOR
MetadataTo: abedinh@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-20T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/10_11_15_16/DOC_0C05762717/C05762717.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Japanese ambassador
ExtractedTo: 'abedinh@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 3:04 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762717
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Ok
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762717 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
  Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 3:04 PM
  To: 'abedinh@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Japanese ambassador
  Ok
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Dec 20 15:02:18 2009
  Subject: Japanese ambassador.
  Kurt campbell is asking if you would do a quick pull aside with Japanese Ambassador Fujisaki tomorrow. Kurt would do
  meeting, and would bring him by for a few minutes. Pls let me know what you think.
  Points he sent:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762717 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762718
MetadataSubject: THE DIRFT
MetadataTo: Hillary
MetadataFrom: Sid
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762718/C05762718.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedFrom: Sid
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762718
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762718 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  CONFIDENTIAL
  July 9, 2009
  For: Hillary, Cheryl
  From: Sid
  Re: The drift
  FYI: This is the first of what will likely soon be other analyses in the same vein as I am led to
  understand.
  http://rothkopf.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/07/08/the_problem_whenthe_president_is
  _the_policy
  Foreign Policy
  The problem when the president is the
  policy...
  By David J. Rothkopf
  Wed, 07/08/2009 - 11:25am
  1
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762718 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762718 Date: 06/30/2015
  You could tell it wasn't going well. The conversations with Medvedev and Putin were tense, the
  body language awkward. The speech at the New Economic School laid an egg. The press seemed
  bored with the visit of America's rock star president. And as for real results, well, there weren't
  any.
  Looking for explanations in an article Clifford Levy and Ellen Barry in today's New York Times
  called "In Russia, Obama's Star Power Does Not Translate," a range of possible answers were
  rolled out: Russians are jaded, Russians don't go for U.S. political posturing, Obama's speeches
  don't translate well, and, according to one person who ought to understand politics, a Russian
  circus designer, "Russians are the smartest people in the world." (A fact they have carefully
  hidden behind a veil of hundreds of years of economic and political catastrophe.)
  Somehow, the formula that has been working for Barack Obama since early in 2007 suddenly
  seems to have gone cold. It is not enough simply to be him or to roll out Michelle and the girls
  (all of whom joined him in Moscow...unlike say, his top two State Department officials). What's
  more, it's not just Russia. Oh sure, the press still swoon in most corners of the world and crowds
  and political leaders still get all fluttery when first exposed to America's charming, thoughtful,
  intelligent, young president. But we are now starting to see what happens when being Barack
  Obama is not enough. We are now starting to see the shortcomings of the new administration's
  approach wherein the president has actually been the policy.
  He has said we had changed and offered himself as evidence. He has been what we have offered
  to friends in terms of visits, access and calls. He has been the headline grabber, the spokesperson,
  the new voice of America. He has enabled the administration to take inherited policies and wrap
  them in Obama-paper with Obama-glitter all over it and all of a sudden, the old was repackaged
  into appearing new. Where there have been differences, as with the concept of engagement, the
  2
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762718 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762718 Date: 06/30/2015
  change has been sold as a difference between him and his predecessor, with his speeches
  describing what was new and the possibility of interacting with him being the potential pay-off.
  This played big during his early trips overseas, the novelty value was high and the eagerness to
  move on from the painful prior era was great. At the G20 meeting, at the Summit of the
  Americas, in Cairo, the concept of "president as policy" seemed to be working. But now we see
  where it is not. Not in Russia. Not with the Iranians who are happy to accept engagement and
  anything else that will be given to them but no strings, please Not with Hugo Chavez, who
  hammed it up with Obama in Trinidad but led his misfit chorus in reflexively hammering the
  United States after the coup in Honduras. Certainly not in North Korea.
  It seems that having the president as policy works best with the people who are pre-disposed to
  like us and to some extent with the young and the disenfranchised. But with the hard cases, with
  our enemies, it falls painfully and dangerously flat.
  In these instances, the new president is discovering that something much more than personal
  diplomacy and smile from the genuinely appealing Obama clan is needed. In these instances, we
  are going to need to go back to the drawing board and do the grunt work of foreign policy, the
  tough negotiations, the nuanced position changes, the threats, the cajoling. It's a very different
  game from American politics and, in fact, is often completely unconnected to it. What works
  here, very often does not play at all overseas.
  There is a problem with this new reality. It requires a coordinated, multi-tiered, high-functioning
  foreign policy establishment. It needs the State Department to be in a central role. It needs the
  NSC to work both as a policy development and policy implementation mechanism and the
  National Security Advisor to be seen and respected.. .like the Secretary of State. ..as key advisors.
  It requires that the foreign policy of the United States is not centered too heavily either the
  president or the executive office of the president -- although the president will always remain the
  ultimate key. It is perfectly appropriate for the president to be part of the product, part of the
  rewards offered, and the mastermind.. .but he needs to move beyond campaign mode to
  something new. It is much akin to the entrepreneur of a successful company recognizing that for
  the company to grow further, to become a mature organization, he is going to need a mature
  structure that depends less on him and more on delegation of power to effective lieutenants and
  their teams.
  We're not there yet. The secretary of state and the State Department have been visibly
  marginalized. She has become a kind of behind the scenes player. She's not on the Sunday
  morning shows. The president or the vice president handles the big media assignments (often not
  sounding exactly like they were on the same page). The National Security Advisor, for all his
  personal strengths, is viewed as a bit of a lost cause five months into the presidency. One of his
  predecessors in the job said to me when asked whether he viewed General Jones as failing in the
  job, "to me, on that issue, where there is smoke, there is fire." Tom Donilon, Jones's deputy, is
  seen to be managing the NSC process. Denis McDonough.and Mark Lippert, Obama
  confidantes, are seen to be working closely with him and his inner office team (Rahm Emanuel,
  the VP, David Axelrod, Greg Craig and others) to play the leading role in shaping policy.
  3
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762718 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762718 Date: 06/30/2015
  Clearly neither Hillary Clinton nor Jim Jones is a weak person. But all power in the U.S. national
  security apparatus flows from the president. And there is no denying that, despite the fact that
  they show up at work every day and go through the motions, that their roles don't measure up to
  many of their predecessors and the structure that is emerging suggests problems to come.
  It's time to move out of campaign mode and into governing mode. It's time recognize that it
  really does take a big team of empowered leaders to make the complex foreign policy of the U.S.
  work and evolve in the right directions. It's time to recognize that it does not reflect badly on the
  president if we all agree he cannot transform the world single handedly, that however different
  he may be from his predecessors, that alone is not enough.
  ALEXEY DRUZHININ/AFP/Getty Images
  David Rothkopf I Permalink ??,,icri01 Comments? Login or register
  ( filed under:
  • Obama Administration I Russia I U.S. Foreign Policy
  4
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762718 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762720
MetadataSubject: FEDERAL AGENCIES IN WASHINGTON, DC WILL BE CLOSED MONDAY, DECEMBER 21
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-20T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/10_11_15_16/DOC_0C05762720/C05762720.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21(U)
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 5:08 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762720
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: What does that mean for our schedules?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762720 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 5:08 PM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21(U)
  What does that mean for our schedules?
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Dec 20 17:05:29 2009
  Subject: Fw: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21 (U)
  Fyi
  From: OpsAlert
  Sent: Sun Dec 20 16:52:37 2009
  Subject: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21 (U)
  (U) Non-emergency employees (including employees on pre-approved leave) will be granted excused absence for the
  number of hours they were scheduled to work. Emergency employees are expected to report for work on time.
  Automatic electronic distribution to: S, D(S), D(L), P, E, C, M, DG, T, R, PA, G, AF, EAP, EUR, NEA, SCA, WHA, 10, S/CRS,
  S/CT, H, DS, CA, PMAT, INR, IIP, CMS, S/ES, S/ES-0, NSOC, and WHSR.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762720 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762721
MetadataSubject: CALL TOM SHANNON FIRST THING FRIDAY MORNING. HE HAS AN UPDATE FOR YOU ON COSTA RICA.
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762721/C05762721.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Call torn shannon first thing friday morning. He has an update for you on costa rica.
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 11:50 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762721
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: 130
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762721 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 11:50 PM
  To:
  Subject: Call torn shannon first thing friday morning. He has an update for you on costa rica.
  130
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762721 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762722
MetadataSubject: FEDERAL AGENCIES IN WASHINGTON, DC WILL BE CLOSED MONDAY, DECEMBER 21
MetadataTo: abedinh@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-20T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/AddBacks/DOC_0C05762722/C05762722.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21(U)
ExtractedTo: 'abedinh@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 5:14 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762722
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  I have to go back and there will be some meetings I will still have and I have a lot of work to drop off. I also am supposed
  to meet w the POTUS and go to the WH dinner, both of which I believe will happen.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762722 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 5:14 PM
  To: 'abedinh@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21(U)
  I have to go back and there will be some meetings I will still have and I have a lot of work to drop off. I also am supposed
  to meet w the POTUS and go to the WH dinner, both of which I believe will happen.
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Dec 20 17:12:18 2009
  Subject: Fw: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21 (U)
  Do you still want to go back?
  Many building people will stay home.
  From: OpsAlert
  Sent: Sun Dec 20 16:52:37 2009
  Subject: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21 (U)
  (U) Non-emergency employees (including employees on pre-approved leave) will be granted excused absence for the
  number of hours they were scheduled to work. Emergency employees are expected to report for work on time.
  Automatic electronic distribution to: S, D(S), D(L), P, E, C, M, DG, T, R, PA, G, AF, EAP, EUR, NEA, SCA, WHA,I0, S/CRS,
  S/CT, H, DS, CA, PMAT, INR, IIP, CMS, S/ES, S/ES-0, NSOC, and WHSR.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762722 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762723
MetadataSubject: FEDERAL AGENCIES IN WASHINGTON, DC WILL BE CLOSED MONDAY, DECEMBER 21
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-20T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/10_11_15_16/DOC_0C05762723/C05762723.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21(U)
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 6:29 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762723
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: What about Judith McHale and Kurt and everyone who asked to see me? I have to come anyway.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762723 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 6:29 PM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21(U)
  What about Judith McHale and Kurt and everyone who asked to see me? I have to come anyway.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Dec 20 17:46:49 2009
  Subject: Re: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21 (U)
  Folks won't be in
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Sun Dec 20 17:07:34 2009
  Subject: Re: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21 (U)
  What does that mean for our schedules?
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Dec 20 17:05:29 2009
  Subject: Fw: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21 (U)
  Fyi
  From: OpsAlert
  Sent: Sun Dec 20 16:52:37 2009
  Subject: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21 (U)
  (U) Non-emergency employees (including employees on pre-approved leave) will be granted excused absence for the
  number of hours they were scheduled to work. Emergency employees are expected to report for work on time.
  Automatic electronic distribution to: S, D(S), D(L), P, E, C, M, DG, T, R, PA, G, AF, EAP, EUR, NEA, SCA, WHA,I0, S/CRS,
  S/CT, H, DS, CA, PMAT, INR, 11P, CMS, S/ES, S/ES-0, NSOC, and WHSR.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762723 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762724
MetadataSubject: FEDERAL AGENCIES IN WASHINGTON, DC WILL BE CLOSED MONDAY, DECEMBER 21
MetadataTo: abedinh@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-20T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/AddBacks/DOC_0C05762724/C05762724.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21(U)
ExtractedTo: 'abedinh@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 6:34 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762724
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Will the WH dinner still happen?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762724 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 6:34 PM
  To: 'abedinh@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21(U)
  Will the WH dinner still happen?
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Dec 20 17:16:31 2009
  Subject: Re: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21 (U)
  Ok great
  I agree
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Sun Dec 20 17:14:23 2009
  Subject: Re: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21 (U)
  I have to go back and there will be some meetings I will still have and I have a lot of work to drop off. I also am supposed
  to meet w the POTUS and go to the WH dinner, both of which I believe will happen.
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Dec 20 17:12:18 2009
  Subject: Fw: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21 (U)
  Do you still want to go back?
  Many building people will stay home.
  From: OpsAlert
  Sent: Sun Dec 20 16:52:37 2009
  Subject: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21 (U)
  (U) Non-emergency employees (including employees on pre-approved leave) will be granted excused absence for the
  number of hours they were scheduled to work. Emergency employees are expected to report for work on time.
  Automatic electronic distribution to: S, D(S), D(L), P, E, C, M, DG, T, R, PA, G, AF, EAP, EUR, NEA, SCA, WHA,I0, S/CRS,
  S/CT, H, DS, CA, PMAT, INR, 11P, CMS, WES, S/ES-0, NSOC, and WHSR.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762724 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762726
MetadataSubject: CALL FELL OFF; MORE TO DISCUSS RE: UK GOVT INFO
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2009-06-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/23_24_25_26/DOC_0C05762726/C05762726.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: call fell off; more to discuss re: UK govt info
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, June 12, 2009 10:35 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762726
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Shop Dell's full line of Laptops now starting at $349!
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762726 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 10:35 AM
  To:
  Subject: call fell off; more to discuss re: UK govt info
  Shop Dell's full line of Laptops now starting at $349!
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762726 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762727
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-10T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_18-20M/DOC_0C05762727/C05762727.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fw:
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: West, Thomas; Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, July 10, 2009 5:57 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762727
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Confidential fyi on traffic VI - didn't know you asked him to stay and want to know why ...
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762727 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5,B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 5:57 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw:
  Confidential fyi on traffic VI - didn't know you asked him to stay and want to know why ...
  Original Message
  From: Kennedy, Patrick F
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Thu Jul 09 15:59:08 2009
  Subject: RE:
  Cheryl
  Regards
  pat
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 2:39 PM
  To: Kennedy, Patrick F
  Subject: FW:
  I agree with this - do you?
  Original Message
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 12:05 PM
  To: Blake, Robert 0; Wells, Alice G; Smith, Daniel B
  Cc: West, Thomas; Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: RE:
  Adding Cheryl.
  Original Message
  From: Blake, Robert 0
  Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 12:00 PM
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J; Wells, Alice G; Smith, Daniel B
  Cc: West, Thomas
  111
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762727 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762727 Date: 07/31/2015
  Subject:
  132
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762727 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05762728
MetadataSubject: FEDERAL AGENCIES IN WASHINGTON, DC WILL BE CLOSED MONDAY, DECEMBER 21
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-20T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/AddBacks/DOC_0C05762728/C05762728.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21 M
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov.
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 8:57 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762728
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Also I have meeting w POTUS and WH dinner and need to work w Jake on our year end summary report and much else.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762728 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 8:57 PM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov.
  Subject: Re: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21 M
  Also I have meeting w POTUS and WH dinner and need to work w Jake on our year end summary report and much else.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Dec 20 20:55:43 2009
  Subject: Re: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21 (U)
  Will check with each
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Sun Dec 20 18:28:48 2009
  Subject: Re: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21 (U)
  What about Judith McHale and Kurt and everyone who asked to see me? I have to come anyway.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Dec 20 17:46:49 2009
  Subject: Re: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21 (U)
  Folks won't be in
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Sun Dec 20 17:07:34 2009
  Subject: Re: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21 (U)
  What does that mean for our schedules?
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Dec 20 17:05:29 2009
  Subject: Fw: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21 (U)
  Fyi
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762728 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762728 Date: 06/30/2015
  From: OpsAlert
  Sent: Sun Dec 20 16:52:37 2009
  Subject: Federal agencies in Washington, DC will be closed Monday, December 21 (U)
  (U) Non-emergency employees (including employees on pre-approved leave) will be granted excused absence for the
  number of hours they were scheduled to work. Emergency employees are expected to report for work on time.
  Automatic electronic distribution to: S, D(S), D(L), P, E, C, M, DG, T, R, PA, G, AF, EAP, EUR, NEA, SCA, WHA,I0, S/CRS,
  S/CT, H, DS, CA, PMAT, INR, IIP, CMS, S/ES, S/ES-0, NSOC, and WHSR.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762728 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762729
MetadataSubject: SPEECH FOR TOMORROW'S MEETING
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-10T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762729/C05762729.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: FW: Speech for Tomorrow's Meeting
ExtractedTo: Justin Cooper
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, July 10, 2009 7:00 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762729
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Justin:
  Strobe's edits for WJC to see.
  cd m
  B6

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762729 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 7:00 AM
  To: Justin Cooper
  Cc:
  Subject: FW: Speech for Tomorrow's Meeting
  Attachments: ST comments on HRC July 09 speech to CFR draft July 9.doc
  Justin:
  Strobe's edits for WJC to see.
  cd m
  B6
  From: Strobe Talbott
  Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 6:52 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; John Podesta; Berger, Samuel R.
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Subject: RE: Speech for Tomorrow's Meeting
  Here are my suggestions — in Track Changes — on what I think is a very strong speech.
  From: Mills, Cheryl D [mailto:MillsCD@state.gov]
  Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 6:13 PM
  To: John Podesta; Berger, Samuel R.; Strobe Talbott
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Subject: Speech for Tomorrow's Meeting
  John/Sandy/Strobe:
  In addition to the QDDR which Nora sent to you earlier today, this is the other agenda item HRC would like to discuss
  tomorrow morning. She will be working from this version though we are continuing our editing.
  See you early and many thanks for your help.
  Best.
  cdm
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 5:49 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: AS speech master
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762729 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762730
MetadataSubject: 5635
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-21T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/10_11_15_16/DOC_0C05762730/C05762730.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Fwd: 5635
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov.
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, December 21, 2009 5:01 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762730
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  I caught some of the interview and wondered whether it would cause problems. We have to watch this closely.
  Would John get that written somewhere?
  I'm in the car on my berry if you need me. Thx.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762730 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 5:01 AM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov.
  Subject: Re: Fwd: 5635
  I caught some of the interview and wondered whether it would cause problems. We have to watch this closely.
  Would John get that written somewhere?
  I'm in the car on my berry if you need me. Thx.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Mon Dec 21 04:52:28 2009
  Subject: Fw: Fwd: 5635
  Fyi compliment to you.
  Phil g and liz are following up on the first matter.
  Cdm
  B6
  From: John Podesta
  To:
  Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Sun Dec 20 12:24:13 2009
  Subject: Fw: Fwd: 5635
  Sorry to bother on the Sunday before Christmas but the Echumenical Patriarch's crowd are extremely worried that he
  may get arrested or otherwise harassed/attacked as a result of the 60 Minutes interview he gave which airs tonight.
  Thought it was worth passing along and that you might want to get someone to pulse the Emabassy in Turkey.
  Hope you are getting a little rest after one hell of a week. Notwithstanding some press whining, I thought BHO and HRC
  did a fabulous job in Copenhagen and that the schedule structure has a much better chance of success than sticking with
  Kyoto architecture. Congrats to all..
  From: Fr. Alex Karloutsos
  To: John Podesta
  Sent: Sun Dec 20 00:33:57 2009
  Subject: Fwd: 5635
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762730 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762730 Date: 06/30/2015
  Dear John,
  Thank you for responding to me re:the safety of the EP. Unfortunately, the 60 minutes interview has been raising
  jingoistic fervor in Turkey. As I told you, the Foreign Ministry called HAH on Friday to express their dismay and concern
  that He was disparaging Turkey in such a public manner. Of course, HAH expressed His love for His country, Turkey, but
  reiterated the painful, laundry list of issues faced by the Greek Orthodox Christian minority. Today, many of the news
  outlets in Turkey are attacking HAH saying that He has condemned Turkey's good name. One of the nationalist papers
  called HAH crazy and pictured Him hanging from a cross. (see attachment) The Foreign Ministries said, acourse, that
  he was sure the EP made "a slip of the tongue."
  Our concern is that some nationalists will attempt to do damage to the Patriarchate or, ever worse some nut from the
  Grey wolves will be let loose to hurt/kill HAH. Of course, the Government may over react once they see the full
  interview. It is an honest piece of journalism - but very very tough "to face the country in the mirror". Sadly, some
  Greek Nationalists fan the flames from their side as well.
  I am also sending you a blog<http://www.cbsnews.com/8618-18560_162-
  5990771.html?assetTypeld=58&messageld=8825797>which shows some of the the lunacy out there on this issue.
  Fortunately, we have good friends like you and an Administration that believes in human rights, religious freedom, civil
  rights and dignity of every individual. Above all, we believe in, and glorify, the manager-born Messiah whose message of
  good will amongst women and men is best expressed in social/divine justice for everyone.
  Thank you
  Father Alex •
  Forwarded Message B6
  From: "nikolaos manginas"
  To: "nikolaos manginas"
  Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 4:33:57 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
  Subject: 5635
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762730 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762731
MetadataSubject: ST comments on HRC July 09 speech to CFR draft July 9
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762731/C05762731.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762731
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  I
  ST suggestions
  I. INTRODUCTION
  1.
  Comment (Sill: separate bullet, since it goes
  beyond Iran/N. Korea
  1
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015
  Comment ($721: I think this trio works better—
  and it avoids yet another "challenges."
  '
  Comment [513]: The earlier part of the pare
  refers to Americans as well; this point relates to
  those abroad.
  [
  -. Comment [574]: Suggest deleting. "Unique"
  makes the point. Don't push the exceptionalist/
  , "indispensable nation" line too bard....
  fFormatted: Strikethrough
  .....,---------,4.,..................,N
  ( Formatted: Strikethrough ._..1
  2
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015
  Comment [STS]: Point here being that those
  dumb-power things weren't good or effective in the
  20th century either.
  untstmuussunnuns..M..1111111Mnt■ntimtnwiptue:.111■101,1101.1.4temenutintls.u...11
  " Comment [S79]: I'd suggest this line because it
  sets up "smart power" below.
  {
  Comment [ST7]; They haven't JUST become
  that....
  Comment [ST9]: simpler, easier for listener to
  absorb.
  Comment [S19]: Whenever possible,
  assert/remind what are the common themes, the core,
  guiding principals
  Comment [S7101: Point here is that a number of
  his predecessors were willing to do all of those
  thing—and indeed DID all of those things. It's the
  "new level" point that sets him apart.
  3
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015
  Comment [5711]:Again, it's not yet established
  as "nee framework — it's really an updating of the
  pre-Bush43 framework
  Comment[5112]: Seems to me you've got to
  mention this here, othenvise it's conspicuous by its
  absence
  c-Comment [5113]: COMMENT: I'm not sure
  these are always opposites; sometimes the arrogance
  of power has been rootedin naiveté of a particularly
  pernicious sort.
  •
  Comment (5M): I'm suggesting avoiding echo
  of "the ends justifies the means."
  4
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015
  -I
  Comment [MS]: "recovery" is a solution, not a
  problem or crisis.
  Comment [5116]: Again, the word
  "challenge"—justifiablyl—is in danger of overuse.
  Comment [5117]: Here I'm suggesting making
  clearer the point that just because climate change is a
  "long-term threat" doesn't mean urgent action can be
  put off.
  ..wx-
  -eleautmesovera.auonuauts.....ontsusewecr,euveaxema
  .uumsaanummwe
  Comment [ST181: I really don't think this
  cliche—a throwback to Gerry Fordl—adds anything.
  Formatted: Strikethrough
  , 1 Formafted: Strikethrough
  ...,immsurstrunmum.m.anu.......ann.rnit.n.rmattadatuanmanuts...nninnal
  Comment [STU]: A direct quote from HRC at
  the Wednesday lunch—and a very good line if put in
  the right context, which is what's happening here.
  ‘ Comment [S120]: cut cuz defensive-sounding )
  id 01912 010.11.131.9111111.10 9
  Fonnatted: Strikethrough
  ' .1111111..0.1
  ■110.11.11.4.7.1.411
  111.MIlt174.1111■■■....11■1112=31.13iIMMIIIIMIC.1111: .
  1
  . Comment [Mt]: Unfortunately, the "actors" 1
  don't—yet—demand it. They need to be persuaded.
  - 1 Comment [ST22]: everyone'si not just "ours"
  Comment [S123]: point "support" by itself
  suggests only the case where such governments
  exist—adding "encourage" suggests promoting
  where they don't yet exist, or aren't yet established.
  [
  Comment [S124]: not sure they're "at the
  essence" 1
  5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015

  6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015
  Comment EST25]: This is an important change:
  alas, America has emphatically and all too often
  NOT been all those good things. We were too often
  acting on the priniple that the enemy of our enemy
  was our friend, even if that friend was dictatorial—
  "our son of a bitch." So this needs to be put in terms
  of a promise end of more principled application of a
  principle that was honored in the breach in the past.
  Comment (51261:1 suspect there will be a 1
  question about whether to be this blunt but I'd argue
  for it. Bush43 made this concept his own, put his
  own brand on it.
  C'
  [
  Comment E5127]: point being, al Qaeda is, in
  fact an NGOI
  4.11.4=ra-
  -etaCtl.
  omment (S128]: The media doesn't wield the I
  pen, the censors do.
  -( Formatted: Highlight
  Comment [5129]: This is one of the very few
  awkward and not very clear phrases in the speech.
  All those "c" words sound like "peter piper picked a
  • peck..." —and I'm not sure what it means.
  Formatted: Highlight
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015
  Comment[5130]:I would plea for avoiding
  "multi-polar." It's a Euro-cliche now gone
  universal, but it's not really valid analytically, nor is
  it smart to use it, precisely because it does echo the
  rhetoric of those who want to see America be "just
  another country." Sorry this costs the speech the
  "multi-polar"/ "multi-partner" line, but I really think
  it's important to remove multipolar from the
  vocabulary of the adminisfration. Happy to
  elaborate.
  7
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015
  Formatted: Strikethrough
  Comment [S1311: I find this gratuitous, gilding
  the lily, etc. Also, the Santayana quote as become
  one of the hoariest clichds around. Whereas, what
  follows is a key point—and will get more attention
  without the what I'm suggesting be cut
  Formatted: Strikethrough
  Comment (S732]: I'm not sure what "resources"
  means, so suggest cutting
  ---1Comment [S133]:"harnessing"? That doesn't .
  sound good! Or wouldn't to them.
  [Comment [ST34]: again, I'm looking to tint 1
  back the use of "challenge"
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015
  8

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015
  9
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015
  Formatted: Font: Italic
  Formatted: Highlight
  • Comment [ST3 5]: this is inutilat jaron that I
  should be avoided
  • al=rattavelatumrc-,a-em.rasn=turememanuressurmart•tautuvanur......,
  .F
  rOi
  r
  natbni: Strikethrough
  10
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015
  B5
  11
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015 I

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015
  Formatted: Highlight
  —1Comment [S136]: I think this passage needs
  more work.
  LFormatted: Highlight
  12
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015
  13
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015
  •
  [
  Comment [S1373: rd like to discuss how this
  passage—which I totally support—will be read in
  India. ,
  14
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015
  15
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015
  Comment [S138]: Urge you cut! I assume it's a
  dig at )(agan's book and its title. But it misses the
  irony in the tide and ICagan's point That's another
  lunch. lust take it out.
  ennrtnommamment runmmantmtranitmrtuntmta
  Formatted: Strikethrough, Highlight
  1111$119 I.P.MIIIMICRIMS.VIIIM$11
  .12■31$1.10.U111■110111..131111111131.11,11■1111:1
  1
  Comment [ST39]:"Sovereignty"is a more
  c
  complicated point
  Formatted: Strikethrough
  16
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015
  17
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762731 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762732
MetadataSubject: SPEECH FOR TOMORROW'S MEETING
MetadataTo: Cooper, Justin
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-10T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762732/C05762732.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: FW: Speech for Tomorrow's Meeting
ExtractedTo: Justin Cooper
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, July 10, 2009 7:00 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762732
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Justin:
  Strobe's edits for WJC to see.
  cdm B6

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762732 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 7:00 AM
  To: Justin Cooper
  Cc:
  Subject: FW: Speech for Tomorrow's Meeting
  Attachments: ST comments on HRC July 09 speech to CFR draft July 9.doc
  Justin:
  Strobe's edits for WJC to see.
  cdm B6
  From: Strobe Talbott
  Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 6:52 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; John Podesta; Berger, Samuel R.
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob)
  Subject: RE: Speech for Tomorrow's Meeting
  Here are my suggestions — in Track Changes — on what I think is a very strong speech.
  From: Mills, Cheryl D [mailto:MillsCD@state.gov]
  Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 6:13 PM
  To: John Podesta; Berger, Samuel R.; Strobe Talbott
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Subject: Speech for Tomorrow's Meeting
  John/Sandy/Strobe:
  In addition to the QDDR which Nora sent to you earlier today, this is the other agenda item HRC would like to discuss
  tomorrow morning. She will be working from this version though we are continuing our editing.
  See you early and many thanks for your help.
  Best.
  cdm
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 5:49 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: JJS speech master
  133
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762732 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762735
MetadataTo: capriciamarshall@
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-21T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/10_11_15_16/DOC_0C05762735/C05762735.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762735
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Monday, December 21, 2009 7:26 AM
  'ca • nciamarshall@
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6

RawText:
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Monday, December 21, 2009 7:26 AM
  'ca • nciamarshall@
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762735 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762735 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762736
MetadataSubject: CHECKING IN
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-05-28T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/23_24_25_26/DOC_0C05762736/C05762736.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: RE: Checking in
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 7:43 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762736
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Isabelle 7:30
  Still working througn trip planning, Saudi still ott and Honduras still on tnougn tne discussions are still aismai.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762736 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE
  IN PART B6
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 7:43 PM
  To:
  Subject: RE: Checking in
  Isabelle 7:30
  Still working througn trip planning, Saudi still ott and Honduras still on tnougn tne discussions are still aismai.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 7:40 PM
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Checking in
  Anything I need to know?
  56
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762736 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762737
MetadataSubject: MINI SCHEDULE 7/10/09
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-10T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762737/C05762737.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Mini Schedule 7/10/09
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, July 10, 2009 8:20 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762737
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  7:30 am PHONE CALL w/SWISS FEDERAL COUNCILLOR MICHELINE
  7:45 am CALMY-REY Secretary's Residence
  8:15 am DEPART Private Residence *En route State Department
  8:25 am ARRIVE State Department
  8:25 am PRESIDENTIAL DAILY BRIEFING
  8:30 am Secretary's Office
  8:30 am PRIVATE BREAKFAST
  9:30 am James Madison Room, 84' floor
  9:30 am OFFICE TIME
  10:00 am Secretary's Office
  10:00 am TOWN HALL MEETING
  11:00 am Dean Acheson Auditorium, First Floor *Approx. 700 employees attending.
  11:30 am PHOTO OPS
  11:35 am Secretary's Outer Office
  12:00 pm SWEARING-IN CEREMONY FOR DANIEL BENJAMIN,
  12:20 pm COORDINATOR FOR COUNTERTERRORISM Benjamin Franldin Room, 8th Floor
  *Approx. 170 guests attending.
  12:30 pm OFFICE TIME
  1:15 pm Secretary's Office
  1:15 pm MEETING w/TIM SOLSO, CEO OF CUMMINS AND CO-CHAIR US-
  1:30 pm BRAZIL CEO FORUM Secretary's Office
  1:30 pm BILATERAL w/EUROPEAN UNION COMMISSIONER BENITA
  2:00 pm FERRERO-WALDNER Secy's Conf. Room *Camera Spray in Treaty Room preceding.
  2:00 pm WEEKLY MEETING w/UN AMBASSADOR SUSAN RICE
  2:30 pm Secretary's Office
  2:30 pm MEETING w/DENNIS ROSS
  3:00 pm Secretary's Office
  3:20 pm DEPART State Department *En route Reagan National Airport
  3:35 pm ARRIVE Reagan National Airport
  4:00 pm DEPART Reagan National Airport via US Air Shuttle #2187
  En route New York, New York-LaGuardia Airport
  5:13 pm ARRIVE New York, New York
  5:30 pm DEPART LaGuardia Airport
  En route Private Residence
  6:30 pm ARRIVE Private Residence
  ###
  134

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762737 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 8:20 AM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Mini Schedule 7/10/09
  7:30 am PHONE CALL w/SWISS FEDERAL COUNCILLOR MICHELINE
  7:45 am CALMY-REY Secretary's Residence
  8:15 am DEPART Private Residence *En route State Department
  8:25 am ARRIVE State Department
  8:25 am PRESIDENTIAL DAILY BRIEFING
  8:30 am Secretary's Office
  8:30 am PRIVATE BREAKFAST
  9:30 am James Madison Room, 84' floor
  9:30 am OFFICE TIME
  10:00 am Secretary's Office
  10:00 am TOWN HALL MEETING
  11:00 am Dean Acheson Auditorium, First Floor *Approx. 700 employees attending.
  11:30 am PHOTO OPS
  11:35 am Secretary's Outer Office
  12:00 pm SWEARING-IN CEREMONY FOR DANIEL BENJAMIN,
  12:20 pm COORDINATOR FOR COUNTERTERRORISM Benjamin Franldin Room, 8th Floor
  *Approx. 170 guests attending.
  12:30 pm OFFICE TIME
  1:15 pm Secretary's Office
  1:15 pm MEETING w/TIM SOLSO, CEO OF CUMMINS AND CO-CHAIR US-
  1:30 pm BRAZIL CEO FORUM Secretary's Office
  1:30 pm BILATERAL w/EUROPEAN UNION COMMISSIONER BENITA
  2:00 pm FERRERO-WALDNER Secy's Conf. Room *Camera Spray in Treaty Room preceding.
  2:00 pm WEEKLY MEETING w/UN AMBASSADOR SUSAN RICE
  2:30 pm Secretary's Office
  2:30 pm MEETING w/DENNIS ROSS
  3:00 pm Secretary's Office
  3:20 pm DEPART State Department *En route Reagan National Airport
  3:35 pm ARRIVE Reagan National Airport
  4:00 pm DEPART Reagan National Airport via US Air Shuttle #2187
  En route New York, New York-LaGuardia Airport
  5:13 pm ARRIVE New York, New York
  5:30 pm DEPART LaGuardia Airport
  En route Private Residence
  6:30 pm ARRIVE Private Residence
  ###
  134
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762737 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762738
MetadataSubject: VOANEWS.COM:AFRICA'S ANTI-GAY LAWS SPARK ACCUSATIONS AND DENIALS IN US
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-22T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/10_11_15_16/DOC_0C05762738/C05762738.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762738
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Tuesday, December 22, 2009 7:54 AM
  'millscd@state.gov'
  Re: voanews.com: Africa's Anti-Gay Laws Spark Accusations and Denials in US B6
  Mira patel in sp told me she is already starting to do this. Do you want someone in drl.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762738 Date: 06/30/2015_
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Tuesday, December 22, 2009 7:54 AM
  'millscd@state.gov'
  Re: voanews.com: Africa's Anti-Gay Laws Spark Accusations and Denials in US B6
  Mira patel in sp told me she is already starting to do this. Do you want someone in drl.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Tue Dec 22 07:50:48 2009
  Subject: FW: voanews.com: Africa's Anti-Gay Laws Spark Accusations and Denials in US
  I think this is a good idea — what do you think?
  cdm
  From: Richard Socarides
  Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 7:50 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: voanews.com: Africa's Anti-Gay Laws Spark Accusations and Denials in US
  There is a lot of appreciation for everything the Dept has done around this so far and I think you could really build on it
  by putting someone there in charge of international LGBT human rights issues.
  Africa's Anti-Gay Laws Spark Accusations and Denials in US
  Nico Colombant I Washington 21 December 2009
  Photo: AP
  Evangelical pastor Rick Warren, 23 Jun 2009
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762738 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762738 Date: 06/30/2015
  Anti-gay laws sweeping through East Africa have sparked a debate in the United States about the possible influence of
  American evangelical leaders and lawmakers with strong ties in that region. U.S. activists are also shedding new light on
  the risks that gays face in East Africa.
  In his book called The Family, American journalist Jeff Sharlet criticizes a group of influential American Christian leaders
  and conservative lawmakers with close ties to politicians in East Africa.
  He accuses them of treating some of the countries they deal with as social and political experiments.
  "It has become sort of a Frankenstein's monster and is the family going to take responsibility for the empowerment they
  have given to some of these politicians?," asked Jeff Sharlet.
  In his book, Sharlet specifically refers to politicians in Uganda proposing an anti-gay law that would criminalize
  homosexuality. The law, which could be passed within weeks despite international condemnation, includes possible
  punishment by death.
  Anti-gay laws were recently passed in Burundi, are being discussed in Rwanda, and could soon be expanded in Kenya
  and Tanzania.
  The American group Sharlet calls The Family is also known as The Fellowship. It organizes an annual National Prayer
  Breakfast with the U.S. president and foreign guests, but besides that activity shuns publicity and does not openly list its
  members.
  But Sharlet says more American reporters are looking into the group and its alleged ties to Africa. These include helping
  African politicians with money so they can push socially conservative agendas.
  "We see reporters in Iowa, in Pennsylvania, and in Oklahoma, going to their elected representatives who have a link to
  this whole thing and saying 'tell us about the link'," he said. "They are not accusing them of anything, they are saying,
  'You have a relationship with the Ugandan government, what is the nature of that relationship? And, are you going to
  use that influence to oppose this legislation that seems to be supported by some of your allies?"
  Religious leaders like Rick Warren have also been under the microscope. He is the senior pastor of the California-based
  Saddleback church, which is active in both Uganda and Rwanda.
  After being questioned about his role by U.S. media, Warren issued a video message on the Internet, denying his
  support for the law in Uganda.
  "As an American pastor, it is not my role to interfere with the politics of other nations, but it is my role to speak out on
  moral issues and it is my role to shepherd other pastors who look to me for guidance, and it is my role to correct lies and
  errors and false reports when others associate my name with a law that I had nothing to do with, [and which] I
  completely oppose and I vigorously condemn," said Rick Warren. "I am referring to the pending law under consideration
  by the Ugandan parliament, known as the Anti-Homosexuality Bill."
  Rwanda's parliament is also working to pass a law which would criminalize homosexuality but Warren has yet to address
  his church's role in that matter. In 2005, he called Rwanda a "purpose driven nation." Warren went with dozens of
  American evangelicals to hold meetings with government ministers, lawmakers and donate materials to churches across
  Rwanda.
  Several American lawmakers who have been linked to the Fellowship, like Nevada Senator John Ensign have called the
  Ugandan law proposal "outrageous". But others like Kansas Senator Sam Brownback, who went to Uganda in 2004,
  have said they do not know enough about the bill to comment.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762738 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762738 Date: 06/30/2015
  The executive director of the U.S.-based International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission, Cary Alan Johnson,
  welcomes some of the questions now being asked.
  "It is a debate that has to happen and we are glad it is happening," said Cary Alan Johnson. "Rwanda and Uganda are
  both countries with deeply spiritual people and as of late we have understood that some of the more conservative
  elements in the United States have been funding the most violent and homophobic discourses about homosexuality."
  Johnson says those seeking to push an agenda should understand the consequences of their actions. He warns anti-gay
  laws could worsen already high HIV levels in east Africa.
  "The impact of these laws on HIV prevention is extremely worrisome to us," he said. "Laws we are talking about in
  Uganda, Rwanda, will make it impossible for groups to do HIV education that targets men who have sex with men or
  that targets bisexual people and we know that there is a strong impact of HIV on this community and on society in
  general."
  Lisa Laurel Weinberg, from the Massachusetts Lutheran Social Services Human Rights Protection Project, says the
  situation is already very difficult. In her other job as an asylum attorney, she recently helped a young Ugandan woman
  win asylum to the United States. The woman's apartment had been raided by police while she was inside with her
  girlfriend.
  "The police broke in and brought them to the police station and raped them in what is called a corrective rape," said Lisa
  Laurel Weinberg. "It is when males of authority try and correct lesbianism through rape."
  But Weinberg warns trying to fight the new laws from the outside is very complicated.
  "I got an e-mail yesterday that said be really careful and check with Ugandans before you do any advocacy from the
  West, because us imposing our values, they are really sensitive to the whole colonialism history, so that the email
  cautioned be careful what you do and let it come from them," she said.
  Some prominent politicians and journalists in East Africa have called homosexuality the "white man's disease." Pro-gay
  groups in the region, which are mostly underground, say they are becoming increasingly afraid to ask for help, and
  believe outside interference could worsen the persecution they face.
  Find this article at:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762738 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762738 Date: 06/30/2015
  http://www1.voanews.comienglishinews/human-rights/Africas-Anti-Gay-Laws-Spark-Accusations-and-Denials-in-US-
  79853182.html
  Richard Socarides, Esq.
  Brady Klein Weissman LLP B6
  501 Fifth Avenue, 19th Floor, New York, NY 10017
  w: 212.949.5800
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762738 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762739
MetadataSubject: ANY NEWS TO REPORT?
MetadataTo: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-05-28T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/23_24_25_26/DOC_0C05762739/C05762739.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Any news to report?
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 8:36 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762739
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Nothing to report - how did mtg go?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762739 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN
  PART B6
  From:
  Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 8:36 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: Any news to report?
  Nothing to report - how did mtg go?
  Original Message
  From: Hrc New
  To: Cheryl Mills
  Sent: May 28, 2009 7:40 PM
  Subject: Any news to report?
  Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762739 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762743
MetadataSubject: VOANEWS.COM:AFRICA'S ANTI-GAY LAWS SPARK ACCUSATIONS AND DENIALS IN US
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-22T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/10_11_15_16/DOC_0C05762743/C05762743.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: voanews.com: Africa's Anti-Gay Laws Spark Accusations and Denials in US
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov.
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 8:04 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762743
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Let's discuss.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762743 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
  Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 8:04 AM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov.
  Subject: Re: voanews.com: Africa's Anti-Gay Laws Spark Accusations and Denials in US
  Let's discuss.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Tue Dec 22 07:56:10 2009
  Subject: RE: voanews.com: Africa's Anti-Gay Laws Spark Accusations and Denials in US
  I think I would want someone higher profile.
  If she is doing this, it's likely as a response to incoming rather than as an affirmative agenda.
  Not sure how I got to be the person pushing all things in this area -- think from the earlier efforts on family benefits but
  as general matter - we have a reactive mechanism right now (to others, to me sending emails re Uganda (and now
  Rwanda is doing same kind of anti-gay law)) etc.
  This would be someone who's portfolio would be an affirmative agenda.
  cdm
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 7:54 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Re: voanews.com: Africa's Anti-Gay Laws Spark Accusations and Denials in US B6
  Mira patel in sp told me she is already starting to do this. Do you want someone in drl.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Tue Dec 22 07:50:48 2009
  Subject: FW: voanews.com: Africa's Anti-Gay Laws Spark Accusations and Denials in US
  I think this is a good idea — what do you think?
  cdm
  From: Richard Socarides
  Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 7:50 AM
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762743 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762743 Date: 06/30/2015
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: voanews.com: Africa's Anti-Gay Laws Spark Accusations and Denials in US
  There is a lot of appreciation for everything the Dept has done around this so far and I think you could really build on it
  by putting someone there in charge of international LGBT human rights issues.
  Africa's Anti-Gay Laws Spark Accusations and Denials in US
  Nico Colombant I Washington 21 December 2009
  Photo: AP
  Evangelical pastor Rick Warren, 23 Jun 2009
  Anti-gay laws sweeping through East Africa have sparked a debate in the United States about the possible influence of
  American evangelical leaders and lawmakers with strong ties in that region. U.S. activists are also shedding new light on
  the risks that gays face in East Africa.
  In his book called The Family, American journalist Jeff Sharlet criticizes a group of influential American Christian leaders
  and conservative lawmakers with close ties to politicians in East Africa.
  He accuses them of treating some of the countries they deal with as social and political experiments.
  "It has become sort of a Frankenstein's monster and is the family going to take responsibility for the empowerment they
  have given to some of these politicians?," asked Jeff Sharlet.
  In his book, Sharlet specifically refers to politicians in Uganda proposing an anti-gay law that would criminalize
  homosexuality. The law, which could be passed within weeks despite international condemnation, includes possible
  punishment by death.
  Anti-gay laws were recently passed in Burundi, are being discussed in Rwanda, and could soon be expanded in Kenya
  and Tanzania.
  The American group Sharlet calls The Family is also known as The Fellowship. It organizes an annual National Prayer
  Breakfast with the U.S. president and foreign guests, but besides that activity shuns publicity and does not openly list its
  members.
  But Sharlet says more American reporters are looking into the group and its alleged ties to Africa. These include helping
  African politicians with money so they can push socially conservative agendas.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762743 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762743 Date: 06/30/2015
  "We see reporters in Iowa, in Pennsylvania, and in Oklahoma, going to their elected representatives who have a link to
  this whole thing and saying 'tell us about the link'," he said. "They are not accusing them of anything, they are saying,
  'You have a relationship with the Ugandan government, what is the nature of that relationship? And, are you going to
  use that influence to oppose this legislation that seems to be supported by some of your allies?"
  Religious leaders like Rick Warren have also been under the microscope. He is the senior pastor of the California-based
  Saddleback church, which is active in both Uganda and Rwanda.
  After being questioned about his role by U.S. media, Warren issued a video message on the Internet, denying his
  support for the law in Uganda.
  "As an American pastor, it is not my role to interfere with the politics of other nations, but it is my role to speak out on
  moral issues and it is my role to shepherd other pastors who look to me for guidance, and it is my role to correct lies and
  errors and false reports when others associate my name with a law that I had nothing to do with, [and which] I
  completely oppose and I vigorously condemn," said Rick Warren. "I am referring to the pending law under consideration
  by the Ugandan parliament, known as the Anti-Homosexuality Bill."
  Rwanda's parliament is also working to pass a law which would criminalize homosexuality but Warren has yet to address
  his church's role in that matter. In 2005, he called Rwanda a "purpose driven nation." Warren went with dozens of
  American evangelicals to hold meetings with government ministers, lawmakers and donate materials to churches across
  Rwanda.
  Several American lawmakers who have been linked to the Fellowship, like Nevada Senator John Ensign have called the
  Ugandan law proposal "outrageous". But others like Kansas Senator Sam Brownback, who went to Uganda in 2004,
  have said they do not know enough about the bill to comment.
  The executive director of the U.S.-based International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission, Cary Alan Johnson,
  welcomes some of the questions now being asked.
  "It is a debate that has to happen and we are glad it is happening," said Cary Alan Johnson. "Rwanda and Uganda are
  both countries with deeply spiritual people and as of late we have understood that some of the more conservative
  elements in the United States have been funding the most violent and homophobic discourses about homosexuality."
  Johnson says those seeking to push an agenda should understand the consequences of their actions. He warns anti-gay
  laws could worsen already high HIV levels in east Africa.
  "The impact of these laws on HIV prevention is extremely worrisome to us," he said. "Laws we are talking about in
  Uganda, Rwanda, will make it impossible for groups to do HIV education that targets men who have sex with men or
  that targets bisexual people and we know that there is a strong impact of HIV on this community and on society in
  general."
  Lisa Laurel Weinberg, from the Massachusetts Lutheran Social Services Human Rights Protection Project, says the
  situation is already very difficult. In her other job as an asylum attorney, she recently helped a young Ugandan woman'
  win asylum to the United States. The woman's apartment had been raided by police while she was inside with her
  girlfriend.
  "The police broke in and brought them to the police station and raped them in what is called a corrective rape," said Lisa
  Laurel Weinberg. "It is when males of authority try and correct lesbianism through rape."
  But Weinberg warns trying to fight the new laws from the outside is very complicated.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762743 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762743 Date: 06/30/2015
  "I got an e-mail yesterday that said be really careful and check with Ugandans before you do any advocacy from the
  West, because us imposing our values, they are really sensitive to the whole colonialism history, so that the email
  cautioned be careful what you do and let it come from them," she said.
  Some prominent politicians and journalists in East Africa have called homosexuality the "white man's disease." Pro-gay
  groups in the region, which are mostly underground, say they are becoming increasingly afraid to ask for help, and
  believe outside interference could worsen the persecution they face.
  Find this article at:
  http://www1.voa news.com/englishinews/huma n-rights/Africas-Anti-Gay-Laws-Spa rk-Accusations-a nd-Denia Is-in-US-
  79853182.html
  Richard Soca rides, Esq.
  Brady Klein Weissman LLP
  501 Fifth Avenue, 19th Floor, New York, NY 10017
  w: 212.949.5800
  B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762743 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762745
MetadataSubject: UPDATE: WORKSHOP KEY FINDINGS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: newmyer
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-10T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762745/C05762745.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: update: workshop key findings
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: newmyer on behalf of Jackie Newmyer
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, July 10, 2009 3:58 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762745
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Dear Secretary Clinton,
  I hope that your elbow is healing quickly. I mentioned that we were doing some work on maritime developments in the
  region from the Persian Gulf to the East China Sea and Sea of Japan. Below are key findings from the report, but the
  main takeaway is that the political impact of Chinese military modernization may be greater than a narrow technical
  analysis of China's capabilities would suggest, and for a range of reasons, technical and political, prospects for regional
  cooperation are limited, but pathways to conflict are numerous and increasing.
  All best, Jackie
  Key findings from the workshop include:
  • Chinese naval modernization has proceeded at rates higher than
  forecast 10 years ago and has created the capability to complicate operation of US carrier battle groups within 1,000
  kilometers of the Chinese coastline.
  • The Indian Ocean may in the coming decades be the operating area of
  SSBNs from countries with limited experience in sustained SSBN patrols, including India, China, and possibly Pakistan.
  • Chinese maritime relations with countries along the littoral area
  have continued to develop, with a new friendly relationship emerging with Sri Lanka, to complement the existing
  relations with Myanmar and Pakistan. This may lead to a new form of "blue-brown water" naval operations, in which
  Chinese naval forces operate far from Chinese bases, but close to the coasts of client states.
  The workshop tended to the conclusion that the trends in the region were not such as to make maritime cooperation
  easy. These trends
  include:
  Japanese concern that Chinese dominance in the waters within 1,000
  miles of Chinese territory has immediate consequences for Japan's maritime autonomy.
  • Indian suspicion of Chinese naval developments in Hainan Island,
  Chinese development of port infrastructure in Pakistan and Myanmar, and the possibility of Chinese ballistic missile
  submarines operating close to India.
  • Indian interest in SSBNs, plus Chinese SSBN ports in Hainan and
  even, possibly, Pakistani SSBNs, all of which creates the possibility of multiple SSBN patrols in the Indian Ocean, along
  with the potential for naval nuclear accidents at sea.
  • Asymmetries in levels of operational competence, and technology, in
  submarines and maritime aviation, which, for example, make functional multi-national naval cooperation harder for
  states that are afraid of revealing technologies or weaknesses.
  • The major role of land-based maritime warfare strike complexes in
  this region, which means that war at sea always carries with it the risk of escalation to strikes on ground targets in
  homeland areas.
  The report also offers two scenarios under which the United States may consider engaging militarily in the region.
  The first scenario, which concerns a clash between Japan and China in waters claimed by both, compels us to consider:
  • The circumstances under which the Chinese may seek to demonstrate
  that their new maritime capabilities must be taken seriously and respected, and
  • What the United States would lose if it did not support the
  Japanese, and then faced a world in which Japan became either a subordinate power to China or a nuclear armed state,
  capable of pursuing its national interest independent of the United States.
  The second scenario concerns an American naval blockade of an Iran that has tested a nuclear weapon, potentially
  giving rise to an interaction between the United States and China far from the operating bases of each but close to
  territory of a client of China, a "blue-brown water" clash. In this scenario, China is using its navy to show presence, and
  to force the United States to ask itself whether it wants to go to war with China over a political conflict that is less than
  black and white. Thinking about the options that would be left to the United States under these circumstances
  underscores how Chinese naval forces may have more political impact by 2025 than a narrow assessment of their
  military capabilities would suggest.
  On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:45 AM, <newmyer wrote:
  > Secretary Clinton, The Australian is the newspaper in which I read
  > your remarks on Asia-Pacific. Thank you again, Jackie
  > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
  >

RawText:
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: newmyer on behalf of Jackie Newmyer
  Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 3:58 PM
  To: H
  Subject: update: workshop key findings
  Dear Secretary Clinton,
  I hope that your elbow is healing quickly. I mentioned that we were doing some work on maritime developments in the
  region from the Persian Gulf to the East China Sea and Sea of Japan. Below are key findings from the report, but the
  main takeaway is that the political impact of Chinese military modernization may be greater than a narrow technical
  analysis of China's capabilities would suggest, and for a range of reasons, technical and political, prospects for regional
  cooperation are limited, but pathways to conflict are numerous and increasing.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762745 Date: 06/30/2015
  All best, Jackie
  Key findings from the workshop include:
  • Chinese naval modernization has proceeded at rates higher than
  forecast 10 years ago and has created the capability to complicate operation of US carrier battle groups within 1,000
  kilometers of the Chinese coastline.
  • The Indian Ocean may in the coming decades be the operating area of
  SSBNs from countries with limited experience in sustained SSBN patrols, including India, China, and possibly Pakistan.
  • Chinese maritime relations with countries along the littoral area
  have continued to develop, with a new friendly relationship emerging with Sri Lanka, to complement the existing
  relations with Myanmar and Pakistan. This may lead to a new form of "blue-brown water" naval operations, in which
  Chinese naval forces operate far from Chinese bases, but close to the coasts of client states.
  The workshop tended to the conclusion that the trends in the region were not such as to make maritime cooperation
  easy. These trends
  include:
  Japanese concern that Chinese dominance in the waters within 1,000
  miles of Chinese territory has immediate consequences for Japan's maritime autonomy.
  • Indian suspicion of Chinese naval developments in Hainan Island,
  Chinese development of port infrastructure in Pakistan and Myanmar, and the possibility of Chinese ballistic missile
  submarines operating close to India.
  • Indian interest in SSBNs, plus Chinese SSBN ports in Hainan and
  even, possibly, Pakistani SSBNs, all of which creates the possibility of multiple SSBN patrols in the Indian Ocean, along
  with the potential for naval nuclear accidents at sea.
  • Asymmetries in levels of operational competence, and technology, in
  submarines and maritime aviation, which, for example, make functional multi-national naval cooperation harder for
  states that are afraid of revealing technologies or weaknesses.
  • The major role of land-based maritime warfare strike complexes in
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762745 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762745 Date: 06/30/2015
  this region, which means that war at sea always carries with it the risk of escalation to strikes on ground targets in
  homeland areas.
  The report also offers two scenarios under which the United States may consider engaging militarily in the region.
  The first scenario, which concerns a clash between Japan and China in waters claimed by both, compels us to consider:
  • The circumstances under which the Chinese may seek to demonstrate
  that their new maritime capabilities must be taken seriously and respected, and
  • What the United States would lose if it did not support the
  Japanese, and then faced a world in which Japan became either a subordinate power to China or a nuclear armed state,
  capable of pursuing its national interest independent of the United States.
  The second scenario concerns an American naval blockade of an Iran that has tested a nuclear weapon, potentially
  giving rise to an interaction between the United States and China far from the operating bases of each but close to
  territory of a client of China, a "blue-brown water" clash. In this scenario, China is using its navy to show presence, and
  to force the United States to ask itself whether it wants to go to war with China over a political conflict that is less than
  black and white. Thinking about the options that would be left to the United States under these circumstances
  underscores how Chinese naval forces may have more political impact by 2025 than a narrow assessment of their
  military capabilities would suggest.
  On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:45 AM, <newmyer wrote:
  > Secretary Clinton, The Australian is the newspaper in which I read
  > your remarks on Asia-Pacific. Thank you again, Jackie
  > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
  > Original Message
  > From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  > Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 07:40:19
  > To: 'newmye
  > Subject: Re: Australian! and update
  > P.S. What's the reference to "Australian" mean?? H
  > Original Message
  > From: newmyer
  > To: H
  > Sent: Thu May 21 10:22:48 2009
  > Subject: Australian! and update
  > Dear Secretary Clinton,
  > I was heartened to read your forceful remarks about the US commitment to the Asia-Pacific region this morning. On
  Monday, our office held a workshop for the NIC that highlighted the downsides associated with an American withdrawal
  from the region. I will be providing you with our report from that event. Also, in early June, we are holding two
  workshops with US policy makers (one for Democrats and one for Republicans) to illuminate how contingencies in
  Pakistan might affect US-China relations. I will give you a read out on those events as well.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762745 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762745 Date: 06/30/2015
  > Anne-Marie was in touch last evening to tell me that she had looked into the possibility of working with LTSG and
  found that unfortunately her office would not be able to do so. Happily, Michele Flournoy's office is reaching out and
  has asked me to participate in a wargame next week for the QDR, which I hope will help build the foundation for a
  contract between her office and LTSG.
  > I am extremely grateful to you for helping me find opportunities to
  > serve our government. As ever, I will keep you posted. Thank you
  > again, and yrs, Jackie
  > --
  > Jacqueline Newmyer
  > President, Long Term Strategy Group
  > 12 Eliot St., Cambridge, MA 02138
  > www.ltstrategy.com
  Jacqueline Newmyer
  President, Long Term Strategy Group
  12 Eliot St., Cambridge, MA 02138
  www.ltstrategy.com
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762745 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762747
MetadataSubject: PALAU OFFENDED BY US POSITIONS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Farrow, Jeffrey L
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-10T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762747/C05762747.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Palau offended by US positions
ExtractedFrom: Jeffrey L Farrow
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, July 10, 2009 6:37 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762747
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Below is the statement of very impressive Palau reps at the end of a session of required meetings on the next
  phase of free association aid. FYI only, the Palauans were insulted by the nature and depth of the response to
  their proposal as well as the content and the overall approach. They are even privately questioning the
  relationship. (This hasn't affected their intent to take the Uighurs.) I will send a few further thoughts.
  At the conclusion of yesterday's meeting, the Palau delegation caucused to discuss its reaction to the response of the United
  States delegation to the proposals that it made in June in Washington D.C., and expanded upon in subsequent communications.
  While the Palau delegation has agreed to respond to certain additional questions raised by the United States delegation on specific
  elements of the Palau proposal, and further has agreed to participate in certain working groups on specific issues, the Palau
  delegation was deeply disappointed with the response of the United States delegation. The United States delegation did not
  seriously respond, as required by the Compact, to the operational requirements of the Government of Palau or to Palau's
  comprehensive and considered plans to achieve economic advancement and self-sufficiency.
  In light of the foregoing, the Palau delegation has determined that it must now return to Palau to discuss with President Toribiong
  the next steps that Palau needs to take regarding the Compact. Thank you.
  Jeff
  Jeffrey L. Farrow
  202-343-2905 o

RawText:
  B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762747 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jeffrey L Farrow
  Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 6:37 PM
  To:
  Subject: Palau offended by US positions
  Below is the statement of very impressive Palau reps at the end of a session of required meetings on the next
  phase of free association aid. FYI only, the Palauans were insulted by the nature and depth of the response to
  their proposal as well as the content and the overall approach. They are even privately questioning the
  relationship. (This hasn't affected their intent to take the Uighurs.) I will send a few further thoughts.
  At the conclusion of yesterday's meeting, the Palau delegation caucused to discuss its reaction to the response of the United
  States delegation to the proposals that it made in June in Washington D.C., and expanded upon in subsequent communications.
  While the Palau delegation has agreed to respond to certain additional questions raised by the United States delegation on specific
  elements of the Palau proposal, and further has agreed to participate in certain working groups on specific issues, the Palau
  delegation was deeply disappointed with the response of the United States delegation. The United States delegation did not
  seriously respond, as required by the Compact, to the operational requirements of the Government of Palau or to Palau's
  comprehensive and considered plans to achieve economic advancement and self-sufficiency.
  In light of the foregoing, the Palau delegation has determined that it must now return to Palau to discuss with President Toribiong
  the next steps that Palau needs to take regarding the Compact. Thank you.
  Jeff
  Jeffrey L. Farrow
  202-343-2905 o
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762747 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762748
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-05-28T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/23_24_25_26/DOC_0C05762748/C05762748.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 10:15 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762748
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Not sure if u r still up but I left the tomorrows bfg binder outside your door.
  57

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762748 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 10:15 PM
  To:
  Not sure if u r still up but I left the tomorrows bfg binder outside your door.
  57
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762748 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762749
MetadataSubject: RE:
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-05-28T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/23_24_25_26/DOC_0C05762749/C05762749.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re:
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 10:16 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762749
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Have not heard from carl. Left him 2 messages and emailed.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762749 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 10:16 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re:
  Have not heard from carl. Left him 2 messages and emailed.
  Original Message ---
  From: Abedin, Huma
  To: Ihdr22@clintonemail.comi <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Thu May 28 22:14:42 2009
  Not sure if u r still up but I left the tomorrows bfg binder outside your door.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762749 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762750
MetadataSubject: IS ISABELLE COMING
MetadataTo: hanleymr@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-22T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/10_11_15_16/DOC_0C05762750/C05762750.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Is isabelle coming
ExtractedTo: 'hanleymr@state.gov'; Huma Abedin
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 8:06 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762750
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762750 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 8:06 AM
  To: 'hanleymr@state.gov'; Huma Abedin
  Subject: Is isabelle coming
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762750 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762753
MetadataSubject: ANTI-GAY LAWS
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-22T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/10_11_15_16/DOC_0C05762753/C05762753.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Anti-Gay Laws
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov.
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 9:17 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762753
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: I will call you later.
ExtractedCc:
  Posner, Michael H; Patel, Mira D; Baer, Daniel B; Hyde, Dana; Goosby, Eric; Smith, Daniel B; Moy, Kin W

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762753 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 9:17 AM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov.
  Subject: Re: Anti-Gay Laws
  I will call you later.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Tue Dec 22 08:44:48 2009
  Subject: FW: Anti-Gay Laws
  FYI
  From: Goosby, Eric
  Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 8:32 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Re: Anti-Gay Laws
  Cheryl
  It may be worth putting together a small group to think through the issue in some depth to decide whether there is a
  more proactive strategy that may be possible and/or worth engaging in one or more countries :
  1. Define human rights challenges around gay communities in many of our partner countries
  2. Define the social political context (ie: how does civil society and the political/legislative activity converge or not
  converge)
  3. Potential role of Judicial response (eg: Adult Disability Act in US)
  4. Role of multilateral and normative bodies
  We are quietly doing this in PEPFAR over the next two months to assess whether we can work behind the politics to
  increase the "safe space" for our populations seeking and/or in care (increase identification, entry and retention).
  Cheryl, I hope you have a wonderful holiday, heading back to SF now, back in Monday (28th)
  Eric
  This email was sent from a wireless Blackberry device.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762753 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762753 Date: 06/30/2015
  This e-mail is unclassified based on the definitions provided in E.O. 12958
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  To: Carson, Johnnie
  Cc: Posner, Michael H; Patel, Mira D; Baer, Daniel B; Hyde, Dana; Goosby, Eric; Smith, Daniel B; Moy, Kin W
  Sent: Tue Dec 22 08:18:24 2009
  Subject: Anti-Gay Laws
  Johnnie
  What is the best way to have a systematic assessment of what countries in Africa have laws proceeding or on the books
  re: anti-gay measures similar to the Uganda bill?
  I am particularly concerned as we begin to make determinations in budget process for significant investments in several
  countries for GHFSI, Pepfar, GHI, etc., that we not be surprised.
  Can you advise how we can proceed or if we should do a call or seek a tasking for this information?
  Thanks.
  cdm
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762753 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762754
MetadataSubject: LATEST ITERATION
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-05-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/23_24_25_26/DOC_0C05762754/C05762754.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Latest Iteration
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, May 29, 2009 5:38 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762754
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Confidential fyi
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762754 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 5:38 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Latest Iteration
  Confidential fyi
  Original Message
  From: Slaughter, Anne-Marie
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob
  Sent: Thu May 28 17:24:41 2009
  Subject: RE: Latest Iteration
  Cheryl, Jake,
  I owe you both an apology. I had a very productive flight (8-10 hours in a darkened quiet cabin is just what I needed) and
  finished Les Gelb's book -- it is astonishing how close our analyses are -- he says that foundation of US power is to
  catalyze others to get problems solved. HRC wanted me to make the speech harder and I see some very good ways to do
  that -- talking about assembling power coalitions to deal w/ troublesome states, a term Les uses.
  But I also had a chance to reread the frame that you put together, much more carefully. There are a number of very
  good things in it that I am going to try to work into a revision, or at least flag for how we can build off of this speech in
  subsequent speeches. I am sorry that I didn't see that in the press of trying to get to this point.
  I will have a revision by Sunday afternoon China time, which would allow her and you to see it Sunday morning.
  AM
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 11:05 AM
  To: Slaughter, Anne-Marie
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob „I
  Subject: Latest Iteration
  AMS:
  This document is the latest iteration I understand from Justin (who works at Chappaqua). I also understand that last
  night she was making changes to it but Justin did not get them so they may not be reflected in this draft.
  cdm
  59
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762754 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762755
MetadataSubject: FRAME
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-05-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/23_24_25_26/DOC_0C05762755/C05762755.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762755
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Friday, May 29, 2009 5:43 AM
  Fw: FW: Frame
  Fyi •
  Jim's thoughts on
  Cdm

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762755 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE
  IN PART
  B5,B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Friday, May 29, 2009 5:43 AM
  Fw: FW: Frame
  Fyi •
  Jim's thoughts on
  Cdm
  From: Jim Kennedy
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Cc:
  Sent: I-n may 19 U1:35:4/ 1009
  Subject: Re: FW: Frame
  I think this is very good. I really like the emphasis on security, which is part of her brand, and very relevant (I
  always have in the back of my mind the possibility that great tragedy will strike again, so we need to prepared
  to deal with that reality, should it come about some day).
  I like combining that with the notion of prosperity and humanity, which together covers so much ground - from
  economic development to human rights.
  A couple miscl thoughts --
  - in terms of promoting prosperity/economic development, might there be a reason to technological
  advancement (giving people access to education and technological tools that can help them in terms of both
  education and access to social networks and other avenues for advancement). You do reference education in the
  development arena, and in prosperity, so that's good).
  - there isn't much here mentioning democratization, freedom, etc. I know that is probably dicey given the
  multitude of governments we want to partner with that aren't ready to talk that talk, but still think it needs to be
  incorporated in some aspect of a mission statement.
  - really like strong reference to women as a key to economic and social stabilization. That ties into her "brand"
  and into a reality. I know when the First Ladies of Africa came out here to LA, one of the desires was to try to
  draw them into an alliance that might transcend their own national differences and create cross-border force for
  positive change. A friend of mine is one of the executives with the Hunger Project, whose CEO is a woman
  who focuses, too, on the way targeting women can help alleviate hunger in ways that just dealing with men or
  generally cannot.
  - really like that 'variable geometry' reference. This is kind of like 3 dimensional chess - strange and
  complicated alliances need to be made to grapple with a multitude of cross-cutting challenges. This is calculus,
  not arithmetic.
  - would like to be sure religions are involved here, vis a vis the various partnerships. It can be either a
  powerful force of positive change, or it can get in the way of progress, depending on how it's used or abused,
  60
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762755 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762755 Date: 06/30/2015
  but to the extent allowed Constitutionally, the power of religion should be encouraged in the direction of
  alliances and partnerships of progress.
  - as I think about Kennan's "containment" doctrine a little further - in some ways it can be reapplied to
  extremism, meaning that our goal should be to contain not Communism this time, but extremist ideology
  whereever it exists, and just as Kerman supported, development is one of the ways to build those walls of
  containment around a dangerous ideology. We want to contain extremist, nihilistic, violent ideologies and
  movements whereever they might take root, and a good way to do that is to focus on development, on women,
  on technology, on education.
  The power of diplomacy rests on two foundations. On the one hand, there is the reality and potentiality of
  military force. Without having the capacity to defend, and to project force, diplomacy is inherently weak and
  ineffectual.
  On the other hand, development is the other foundation upon which successful diplomacy can be built. It's the
  carrot to the military's stick. And the State Department has an integral role to play in both the diplomatic and
  developmental parts of that tripod (while also being understanding of, and when necessary supportive of,
  implementing the military part).
  The connective tissue of security, prosperity and humanity is, as you suggest, "purpose," or more prosaically -
  "morality." Morals. It is immoral for people to live in fear, to be unprotected, to be subject to harm and
  death. It is immoral for people's human rights to be violated, to not have access to education and heatlh. And it
  is immoral to be denied the opportunity to grow, to create a better future for children, etc. To let, as Roy has
  said, every child to live up to his or her God-given potential.
  one last point - on shared humanity, perhaps protecting the natural resources of the Earth - environmentalism -
  should be referenced along with health and human rights. It's part of the underpinning of our international
  morality and the kind of partnership we need to solve global warming, etc.
  On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov> wrote:
  Can you both take a look at this — if this implementing agenda works, we will use language of purpose to
  surround it.
  cdm
  61
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762755 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762756
MetadataSubject: AND, IT WAS AS PLEASURE WORKING W YOU TOO!
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-22T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/AddBacks/DOC_0C05762756/C05762756.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762756
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Tuesday, December 22, 2009 10:04 AM
  B6
  And, it was a pleasure working w you too!
  Mike--
  Thanks for your kind comments last night. And, now, all we have to do is deliver on what we wrought. I look forward
  to following up w you on next steps. Until then, happiest of holidays and here's to a new year w lower emissions, higher
  transparency and more sleep! Best, Hillary

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762756 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Tuesday, December 22, 2009 10:04 AM
  B6
  And, it was a pleasure working w you too!
  Mike--
  Thanks for your kind comments last night. And, now, all we have to do is deliver on what we wrought. I look forward
  to following up w you on next steps. Until then, happiest of holidays and here's to a new year w lower emissions, higher
  transparency and more sleep! Best, Hillary
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762756 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762757
MetadataSubject: SPANISH LANGUAGE DOCUMENT - DECLARACION A LA PRENSA 10 DE JULIO.DOC
MetadataFrom: Sanchez, Oscar Arias
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762757/C05762757.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762757
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762757 Date: 06/30/2015
  1
  RELEASE IN FULL
  DeclaraciOn a la prensa
  Oscar Arias Sanchez
  Presidertte de la RepUblica de Costa Rica
  10 de julio de 2009
  Estimables miembros de la prensa nacional e internacional, amigas y amigos:
  Antes que nada, quiero agradecerles su presencia aqui durante las Ultimas horas, y
  la fidelidad con que han seguido nuestros esfuerzos por alcanzar una soluci6n pacffica al
  conflicto hondurerio. Una prensa que aguarda paciente los productos del dialog°, en lugar
  de los productos del odio, del enfrentamiento o de la guerra, es en sí misma un simbolo
  democratic°. A traves de ustedes, el mundo ha hecho una vigilia por la paz en Honduras.
  Como es de su conocimiento, el martes 7 de julio los dos sectores involucrados en
  este conflict° solicitaron mi mediaciOn para dialogar sobre sus dfferencias. Acepte sin
  dudarlo, porque estoy convencido de que ningtin costarricense debe negarse jamas a
  permitir que prevalezca el dialog° sobre la intransigencia, el perdOn sobre el rencor o el
  acuerdo sobre la fuerza. El mandato de nuestra historia es darle la 'nano a quien quiera
  transitar las sendas de la democracia, porque sabemos que eso no disminuye sino que
  dignifica a nuestro pueblo. For eso, desde el dia de ayer abri las puertas de :mi propio
  hogar para recibir a los representantes hondurerios. Ambos sectores expusieron dos
  versiones muy distintas de los hechos ocurridos en su pals, antes y despues del 28 de jtmio
  pasado. Asi se empiezan a sanar las heridas de un conflicto: hablando de frente con la
  verdad.
  Ayer les dije que esto tomaria tiempo. Pero insistire hasta el cansancio que en la
  larga epopeya de la humanidad, el paso dedsivo es siempre el pr-imero. Los hermanos
  hondurerios han dado aqui ese paso, se han visto a los ojos y han hablado con franqueza.
  Eso es, por su cuenta, un logro capital para su pals. Ambos sectores han afirmado su
  convicciOn de que es con el verbo, y no con la polvora, con que se escribiran los trazos de
  su reconciliacion. En ningtin momento hemos escuchado insultos ni amenazas en las
  conversaciones sostenidas. En ningtin momento los sectores se han dejado de escuchar.
  Ambos han acordado continuar con las conversaciones a la mayor brevedad posible, y no
  descansar hasta akanzar un acuerdo que resuelva esta crisis.
  Costa Rica continuara mediartdo mientras se lo sigan pidiendo los sectores
  involucradas. Si algo en nuestra historia o en nuestra cultura puede servir para traer
  trartquilidad a nuestros hermanos, no dudaremos en prestar nuestro servicio. Porque
  sabemos que en ausencia de dialog°, una visi6n debe necesariamente aniquilar a la otra.
  Solo en el dialog°, dos versiones clistintas de una misma realidad pueden convivir. Para
  quienes no creen en lo que estamos haciendo aqui, para quienes fustigan nuestras
  intenciones, les digo que no sere yo, ni los delegados que tan arduamente han trabaj ado,
  quienes desmentiremos sus acusaciones. Seran los acuerdos que los sectores alcancen. Sera
  la paz que regresara a Honduras. Sera la estabilidad que solo surgira de las voluntades
  conjuntas de ambos sectores. Estas puertas son a prueba de balas retoricas, y asi como hace
  veintidos arios no nos desalentaron los oscuros presagios de quienes veian el dialog° como
  un obstaculo, y no como un fin, esta vez tampoco nos van a desalentar. No mandare a
  callar a nadie. Nunca ha sido mi estilo. Yo lucho por principios y no contra personas. For
  eso seguire defendiendo esos principios, que son los de la paz, el entendimiento y la
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762757 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762757 Date: 06/30/2015
  2
  voluntad para alcanzar acuerdos. Y la mejor forma de defenderlos es estar aqui, donde me
  llamen.
  En los prOximos dias anunciaremos la fecha de nuesto siguiente encuentro. Sepan,
  desde ahora, que sera de nuevo un encuentro respetuoso y franco, con el fin Ultimo de
  robustecer la democracia en Honduras y permitir la gobernabilidad. Una vez mas pido
  que nos dejen a los centroamericanos resolver los problemas de los centroamericanos, tal y
  como lo hicimos veintidOs atios eras. Porque hemos madurado mas y lo podemos
  demostrar.
  Al pueblo de Honduras, le pido que conserve sus anhelos, que continue con sus
  oraciones, que no quite la mirada del horizonte donde despuntara el sol de un nuevo dia.
  No destruyan, con violencia, lo que hemos constTuido aqui con esperanza. Porque en la
  democracia, mas que en ningan otro sistema, siempre hay una segunda oportunidad.
  Siempre hay razon para esperar con ilusiOn. Sus lideres han demostrado que estan
  dispuestos a escribir de nuevo la historia. Y aqui en Costa Rica tenemos papel y lapiz de
  sobra. Seran bienvenidos cualquier dia, a cualquier hora.
  Muchas gracias.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762757 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762759
MetadataSubject: ONWARD!
MetadataTo: sterntd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-22T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/10_11_15_16/DOC_0C05762759/C05762759.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Onward!
ExtractedTo: 'sterntd@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 10:06 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762759
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Todd--
  I look forward to our next steps to deliver on our accord after we both get some sleep and a few days off. Thanks for all
  your great work, and my very best to you, Jen and the boys for the new year. Hillary

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762759 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
  Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 10:06 AM
  To: 'sterntd@state.gov'
  Subject: Onward!
  Todd--
  I look forward to our next steps to deliver on our accord after we both get some sleep and a few days off. Thanks for all
  your great work, and my very best to you, Jen and the boys for the new year. Hillary
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762759 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762760
MetadataSubject: 2009-07-10 JJS SPEECH 2
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-10T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762760/C05762760.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: 2009-07-10 JJS speech 2
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, July 10, 2009 7:04 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762760
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Attached is the latest version of the speech, incorporating comments from Sandy and Strobe, as well as edits from
  Cheryl and Anne-Marie and Lissa.
  While it has improved, it has also grown in length. It is now just a bit shorter than your Senate confirmation
  testimony. There are places to cut, but I want you to see it in full so you can make your own assessments.
  John Podesta will send a few additional thoughts later today or tomorrow — the rest of his comments are captured in
  this revised text.
  Dennis is going to sharpen and hone the sections on the Middle East and Iran, and I will ask Holbrooke to work on the
  Af-Pak piece.
  I am available any time to discuss.
  142

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762760 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 7:04 PM
  To:
  Cc: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: 2009-07-10 JJS speech 2
  Attachments: 2009-07-10 JJS speech 2.doc
  Attached is the latest version of the speech, incorporating comments from Sandy and Strobe, as well as edits from
  Cheryl and Anne-Marie and Lissa.
  While it has improved, it has also grown in length. It is now just a bit shorter than your Senate confirmation
  testimony. There are places to cut, but I want you to see it in full so you can make your own assessments.
  John Podesta will send a few additional thoughts later today or tomorrow — the rest of his comments are captured in
  this revised text.
  Dennis is going to sharpen and hone the sections on the Middle East and Iran, and I will ask Holbrooke to work on the
  Af-Pak piece.
  I am available any time to discuss.
  142
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762760 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762761
MetadataSubject: HOLBROOKE JUST CALLED FOR U
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-05-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/23_24_25_26/DOC_0C05762761/C05762761.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Holbrooke just called for u
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, May 29, 2009 7:33 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762761
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: 62
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762761 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE
  IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 7:33 AM
  To: H
  Subject: Holbrooke just called for u
  62
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762761 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762762
MetadataSubject: 2009-07-10 JJS SPEECH 2.DOCX
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762762/C05762762.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762762
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  I. INTRODUCTION
  1
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015
  2
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015
  3
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015
  4
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015
  5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015
  6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015
  7
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015
  R
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015
  Q
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015
  10
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015
  11
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015
  12
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015
  13
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015
  14
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015
  15
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015
  V. THE CONCLUSION
  16
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015
  Thank you.
  17
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762762 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762764
MetadataSubject: FROM ADAM MINTER'S SHANGHAI SCRAP BLOG
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762764/C05762764.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fw: From Adam Minter's Shanghai Scrap blog
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 7:10 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762764
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Read through - nice complement to jose's induction to the process
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762764 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 7:10 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: From Adam Minter's Shanghai Scrap blog
  Read through - nice complement to jose's induction to the process
  From: Villarreal, Jose
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 05:40:58 2009
  Subject: Fw: From Adam Minter's Shanghai Scrap blog
  Fyi - Lots of catch up to do, but Secretary's team is being viewed as bringing order to process...xo jose
  Ps this guy is widely read among Chinese and expats...
  From: Cooney, Thomas E (Shanghai)
  To: Shanghai Expo Working Group ; Villarreal, Jose
  Sent: Fri Jul 10 23:36:03 2009
  Subject: Fw: From Adam Minter's Shanghai Scrap blog
  Just fyi
  From: talpeitom
  To: Cooney, Thomas E (Shanghai)
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 11:32:05 2009
  Subject: From Adam Minter's Shanghai Scrap blog
  A US Expo 2010 pavilion, after all.
  http://shanghaiscrap.com/?p=3350
  Filed under:Expo 2010, Expo 2010 - US Pavilion, US Politics — posted by Adam on July 11, 2009 @ 7:00 am
  Coming at the end of a tumultuous week in China marked by earthquakes, riots, and continued economic
  uncertainty, the news that the US had finally confirmed that its participation in Expo 2010 (a/k/a, next year's
  world fair) didn't seem particularly significant. And, with much of Shanghai's foreign correspondent corps
  preoccupied with more pressing news elsewhere in China, it didn't receive much coverage. Fair enough, I think.
  However, insofar as the US pavilion – or lack thereof– had become an increasingly thorny diplomatic issue
  between China and the United States, the signing ceremony was an important signal that some kind of
  resolution was at hand.
  I've been following the mostly sad saga of the US pavilion for several months now, both on Shanghai Scrap,
  and elsewhere. And, until two weeks ago, there was absolutely no reason to believe that a participation
  agreement would ever be signed. Shanghai Expo, Inc., a non-profit authorized by the US State Department to
  fund-raise, design, build, and operate a US pavilion, had failed to raise sufficient funds to break ground. At
  yesterday's signing ceremony, Beatrice Camp, the US Consul General in Shanghai blamed the underwhelming
  fundraising on the global economic crisis – a point that was picked up by the Chinese media. No doubt, the
  141
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762764 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762764 Date: 06/30/2015
  economic crisis played a role, but as Camp and others close to the US effort surely know, the other important
  factor was the inexperienced and increasingly erratic trio running the non-profit Shanghai Expo, Inc. As
  recently as last month, one of its members — Frank Lavin, a former US ambassador to Singapore and
  Undersecretary of Commerce — issued a press release falsely claiming that the US Congress had "adopted" a
  resolution in support of the US pavilion. This incident; and others like it, succeeded in alienating potential
  donors (including major US corporations with operations in China), vast swaths of the US expatriate business
  community in Shanghai, and — most crucially — members of the Shanghai government. For those of us
  following the events, the question was no longer "How badly will the US damage its relationship with China if
  it doesn't participate?" but instead became "What's worse for US-China relations? Turning down Shanghai's
  Expo invite or continuing the current, incompetent effort?"
  The July 1 appointment of Jose Villarreal as Commissioner General to the US pavilion effort seems to have
  changed the equation. A lawyer with ties to the Clintons, Secretary of State Clinton empowered him to oversee
  the US effort. He didn't waste any time, either, arriving in Shanghai on Monday, and managing to pull of the
  signing on Friday. One person familiar with Villarreal's role described it as the arrival of an "adult" to a chaotic
  situation that badly needed one. Indeed, if there's one telling detail to the handful of official and press accounts
  of yesterday's signing, it's the total absence of the Shanghai Expo, Inc. members from the official comments
  and photos (US Consulate coverage here; Shanghai government account here), none of whom live or work in
  Shanghai, anyway. If that was a conscious decision, it was a wise one.
  A final point. As Villarreal conceded, the US effort must still raise roughly half of its $61 million budget. I
  suspect that — with Villarreal in charge of the effort — reluctant wallets will become less so. Regardless, though,
  this raises a still unresolved question: namely, what are the actual fundraising rules for the US pavilion effort?
  Back in 2007, the State Department indicated that it would not sign a participation agreement with Expo 2010,
  Inc until all funds were raised for a pavilion. Apparently, that ill-conceived policy has changed. I say apparently
  because, up until now, the State Department has refused to release the "action plan" that governs fundraising
  and other rules related to the US pavilion in Shanghai. As a result of this official intransigence, a Freedom of
  Information Act request has been filed to obtain this document(s?). Why the secrecy? It's anybody's guess, and
  according to the State Department's FOIA office, we can keep guessing until Thanksgiving — it's around then
  that they'll get around to releasing the documents.
  [UPDATE: Just received notice that groundbreaking for the US pavilion will be on July 17 at 10:30 AM.
  Secretary of Commerce Gary Locke will be present.]
  IRS Circular 230 Notice Requirement: This communication is not given in the form of a
  covered opinion, within the meaning of Circular 230 issued by the United States Secretary
  of the Treasury. Thus, we are required to inform you that you cannot rely upon any tax
  advice contained in this communication for the purpose of avoiding United States federal
  tax penalties. In addition, any tax advice contained in this communication may not be
  used to promote, market or recommend a transaction to another party.
  The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and
  confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you have received this communication
  in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.
  144
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762764 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762766
MetadataSubject: MINI SCHEDULE 5/29/09
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2009-05-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/AddBacks/DOC_0C05762766/C05762766.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762766
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Friday, May 29, 2009 7:36 AM
  H
  Abedin, Huma
  Mini Schedule 5/29/09

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762766 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE
  IN FULL
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Cc:
  Subject:
  Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Friday, May 29, 2009 7:36 AM
  H
  Abedin, Huma
  Mini Schedule 5/29/09
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Thu May 28 23:57:13 2009
  Subject: Mini Schedule 5/29/09
  8:25 am ARRIVE State Department
  8:25 am PRESIDENTIAL DAILY BRIEFING
  8:30 am Secretary's Office
  8:30 am DAILY SMALL STAFF MEETING
  8:45 am Secretary's Office
  8:45 am DAILY SENIOR STAFF MEETING
  9:15 am Secretary's Conference Room
  9:30 am PHONE CALL w/INDIAN FOREIGN MINISTER KRISHNA
  9:40 am Secretary's Office
  9:45 am PHONE CALL w/INDIAN CONGRESS PARTY PRESIDENT
  9:55 am GANDHI Secretary's Office
  10:40 am DEPART State Department *En route White House
  10:45 am ARRIVE White House
  11:00 am POTUS ANNOUNCEMENT ON CYBER SECURITY
  11:30 am East Room
  11:30 am DEPART White House *En route State Department
  63
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762766 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762766 Date: 06/30/2015
  11:35 am ARRIVE. State Department
  11:45 am OFFICE TIME
  12:45 pm Secretary's Office
  12:45 pm MEETING w/PAT KENNEDY, DAN SMITH AND KERRY O'CONNOR
  1:30 pm Secretary's Office
  1:30 pm PHONE CALL w/DANISIFI FOREIGN MINISTER MOLLER
  1:45 pm Secretary's Office
  2:30 pm MEETING w/CHERYL AND MARGARET CARPENTER
  3:15 pm Secretary's Office
  4:00 pm (t) DEPART State Department *En route Private Residence
  64
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762766 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762767
MetadataSubject: FROM ADAM MINTER'S SHANGHAI SCRAP BLOG
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762767/C05762767.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: From Adam Minter's Shanghai Scrap blog
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 7:30 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762767
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  We can leave then for now - we can work around as nee be and they have a few connections to companies we don't.
  Asked philippe for a plan - he may want to sole source it to get the coverage but if not, yes.
  Cdm

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762767 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN
  PART B5, B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 7:30 AM
  To:
  Cc: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Re: From Adam Minter's Shanghai Scrap blog
  We can leave then for now - we can work around as nee be and they have a few connections to companies we don't.
  Asked philippe for a plan - he may want to sole source it to get the coverage but if not, yes.
  Cdm
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 07:17:35 2009
  Subject: Re: From Adam Minter's Shanghai Scrap blog
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 07:09:55 2009
  Subject: Fw: From Adam Minter's Shanghai Scrap blog
  Read through - nice complement to jose's induction to the process
  B6
  From: Villarreal, Jose
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 05:40:58 2009
  Subject: Fw: From Adam Minter's Shanghai Scrap blog
  Fyi - Lots of catch up to do, but Secretary's team is being viewed as bringing order to process...xo jose
  Ps this guy is widely read among Chinese and expats...
  From: Cooney, Thomas E (Shanghai)
  To: Shanghai Expo Working Group ; Villarreal, Jose
  Sent: Fri Jul 10 23:36:03 2009
  Subject: Fw: From Adam Minter's Shanghai Scrap blog
  145
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762767 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762767 Date: 06/30/2015
  Just fyi
  From: taipeitoH
  To: Cooney, Thomas E (Shanghai)
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 11:32:05 2009
  Subject: From Adam Minter's Shanghai Scrap blog
  A US Expo 2010 pavilion, after all. <http://shanghaiscrap.com/?p=3350>
  http://shanghaiscrap.com/?p=3350
  Filed under:Expo 2010 <http://shanghaiscrap.com/?cat=33>, Expo 2010 - US Pavilion
  <http://shanghaiscrap.com/?cat=38>, US Politics <http://shanghaiscrap.com/?cat=28> — posted by Adam on July 11,
  2009 @ 7:00 am
  Coming at the end of a tumultuous week in China marked by earthquakes, riots, and continued economic uncertainty,
  the news that the US had finally confirmed that its participation in Expo 2010
  <http://en.expo2010.cn/a/20090710/000011.htm> (a/k/a, next year's world fair) didn't seem particularly significant.
  And, with much of Shanghai's foreign correspondent corps preoccupied with more pressing news elsewhere in China, it
  didn't receive much coverage. Fair enough, I think. However, insofar as the US pavilion – or lack thereof– had become
  an increasingly thorny diplomatic issue between China and the United States, the signing ceremony was an important
  signal that some kind of resolution was at hand.
  I've been following the mostly sad saga of the US pavilion for several months now, both on Shanghai Scrap
  <http://shanghaiscrap.com/?cat=38> , and elsewhere <http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200904u/shanghai-expo-2010>
  . And, until two weeks ago, there was absolutely no reason to believe that a participation agreement would ever be
  signed. Shanghai Expo, Inc. <http://usapavilion2olo.com/>, a non-profit authorized by the US State Department to
  fund-raise, design, build, and operate a US pavilion, had failed to raise sufficient funds to break ground. At yesterday's
  signing ceremony, Beatrice Camp, the US Consul General in Shanghai blamed the underwhelming fundraising on the
  global economic crisis <http://shanghalusembassy-china.org.cn/071009.html> – a point that was picked up by the
  Chinese media <http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2009-07/10/content_11685418.htm> . No doubt, the economic
  crisis played a role, but as Camp and others close to the US effort surely know, the other important factor was the
  inexperienced and increasingly erratic trio running the non-profit Shanghai Expo, Inc. As recently as last month, one of
  its members – Frank Lavin, a former US ambassador to Singapore and Undersecretary of Commerce – issued a press
  release falsely claiming that the US Congress had "adopted" a resolution in support of the US pavilion
  <http://shanghaiscrap.com/?p=3106> . This incident, and others like it, succeeded in alienating potential donors
  (including major US corporations with operations in China), vast swaths of the US expatriate business community in
  Shanghai, and – most crucially – members of the Shanghai government. For those of us following the events, the
  question was no longer "How badly will the US damage its relationship with China if it doesn't participate?" but instead
  became "What's worse for US-China relations? Turning down Shanghai's Expo invite or continuing the current,
  incompetent effort?"
  The July 1 appointment of Jose Villarreal as Commissioner General to the US pavilion effort seems to have changed the
  equation. A lawyer with ties to the Clintons, Secretary of State Clinton empowered him to oversee the US effort. He
  didn't waste any time, either, arriving in Shanghai on Monday, and managing to pull of the signing on Friday. One person
  146
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762767 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762767 Date: 06/30/2015
  familiar with Villarreal's role described it as the arrival of an "adult" to a chaotic situation that badly needed one. Indeed,
  if there's one telling detail to the handful of official and press accounts of yesterday's signing, it's the total absence of
  the Shanghai Expo, Inc. members from the official comments and photos (US Consulate coverage here
  <http://en.expo2010.cn/a/20090710/000011.htm>; Shanghai government account here
  <http://en.expo2010.cn/a/20090710/000011.htm> ), none of whom live or work in Shanghai, anyway. If that was a
  conscious decision, it was a wise one.
  A final point. As Villarreal conceded, the US effort must still raise roughly half of its $61 million budget. I suspect that —
  with Villarreal in charge of the effort — reluctant wallets will become less so. Regardless, though, this raises a still
  unresolved question: namely, what are the actual fundraising rules for the US pavilion effort? Back in 2007, the State
  Department indicated that it would not sign a participation agreement with Expo 2010, Inc until all funds were raised for
  a pavilion. Apparently, that ill-conceived policy has changed. I say apparently because, up until now, the State
  Department has refused to release the "action plan" that governs fundraising and other rules related to the US pavilion
  in Shanghai. As a result of this official intransigence, a Freedom of Information Act request has been filed to obtain this
  document(s?) <http://shanghaiscrap.com/?p=3103> . Why the secrecy? It's anybody's guess, and according to the State
  Department's FOIA office, we can keep guessing until Thanksgiving — it's around then that they'll get around to releasing
  the documents.
  [UPDATE: Just received notice that groundbreaking for the US pavilion will be on July 17 at 10:30 AM. Secretary of
  Commerce Gary Locke will be present.]
  IRS Circular 230 Notice Requirement: This communication is not given in the form of a covered opinion, within the
  meaning of Circular 230 issued by the United States Secretary of the Treasury. Thus, we are required to inform you that
  you cannot rely upon any tax advice contained in this communication for the purpose of avoiding United States federal
  tax penalties. In addition, any tax advice contained in this communication may not be used to promote, market or
  recommend a transaction to another party.
  The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
  recipient(s) named above. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and
  delete the original message.
  147
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762767 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762768
MetadataSubject: CONGRATULATIONS!
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762768/C05762768.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762768
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Fyi
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Saturday, July 11, 2009 7:48 AM
  Fw: Congratulations!

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762768 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Fyi
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Saturday, July 11, 2009 7:48 AM
  Fw: Congratulations!
  From: Toiv, Nora F
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Fri Jul 10 21:29:39 2009
  Subject: Fw: Congratulations!
  From: Jeff Sachs
  To: Toiv, Nora F
  Sent: Fri Jul 10 20:52:06 2009
  Subject: Congratulations!
  Dear Nora,
  Please pass along the following message to Cheryl.
  Thanks,
  Jeff Sachs
  Dear Cheryl,
  Congratulations on the launch of the $20b G8 initiative. This will stand as a historic success of President Obama and
  Secretary Clinton. Please do convey my personal congratulations and gratitude to Secretary Clinton if you have a
  moment to do so. I know what a key role you personally played in bringing this to fruition.
  I would like to suggest one overarching strategy for success.
  Please do push hard on the donors (USAID included!) to pool the donor resources into one, at most two, multilateral
  funding streams. Certainly the World Bank should be the main spigot, and IFAD possibly a second. By pooling the
  resources, we'll cut down BY YEARS on the delays, donor negotiations, further talk, report writing, expert trips, etc., etc.,
  which are now the biggest single threat to success of the initiative.
  I look forward to a few minutes by phone or in person to offer some tips coming from long years of experience in this
  sphere. This can be a real historic path-breaker, if it's not swallowed in the agencies!
  Warm regards and kudos!
  Jeff Sachs
  1 AO
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762768 Date: 06/30/2015
  B6



DocNumber: C05762769
MetadataSubject: FROM ADAM MINTER'S SHANGHAI SCRAP BLOG
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762769/C05762769.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fw: From Adam Minter's Shanghai Scrap blog
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 8:49 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762769
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: See b/I
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762769 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN
  PART B5, B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 8:49 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: From Adam Minter's Shanghai Scrap blog
  See b/I
  From: Balderston, Kris M
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Reines, Philippe I; 'AmbEFBagley
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 08:42:06 2009
  Subject: Re: From Adam Minter's Shanghai Scrap blog
  We spoke to PIR yesterday and we are going to talk to the WP on monday. PIR has the details.
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  To: Reines, Philippe I; 'AmbEFBag10
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 07:11:01 2009
  Subject: Fw: From Adam Minter's Shanghai Scrap blog
  See b/I - article next week need philipe (see the ps)
  •Balderston, Kris M
  From: Villarreal, Jose
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 05:40:58 2009
  Subject: Fw: From Adam Minter's Shanghai Scrap blog
  Fyi - Lots of catch up to do, but Secretary's team is being viewed as bringing order to process...xo Jose
  Ps this guy is widely read among Chinese and expats...
  From: Cooney, Thomas E (Shanghai)
  To: Shanghai Expo Working Group ; Villarreal, Jose
  149
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762769 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762769 Date: 06/30/2015
  Sent: Fri Jul 10 23:36:03 2009
  Subject: Fw: From Adam Minter's Shanghai Scrap blog
  Just fyi
  From: taipeitom
  To: Cooney, Thomas E (Shanghai)
  Sent: Sat Jul 1111:32:05 2009
  Subject: From Adam Minter's Shanghai Scrap blog
  A US Expo 2010 pavilion, after all.
  http://sharighaiscrap.com/?p=3350
  Filed under:Expo 2010, Expo 2010 - US Pavilion, US Politics — posted by Adam on July 11, 2009 @ 7:00 am
  Coming at the end of a tumultuous week in China marked by earthquakes, riots, and continued economic
  uncertainty, the news that the US had finally confirmed that its participation in Expo 2010 (a/k/a, next year's
  world fair) didn't seem particularly significant. And, with much of Shanghai's foreign correspondent corps
  preoccupied with more pressing news elsewhere in China, it didn't receive much coverage. Fair enough, I think.
  However, insofar as the US pavilion – or lack thereof– had become an increasingly thorny diplomatic issue
  between China and the United States, the signing ceremony was an important signal that some kind of
  resolution was at hand.
  I've been following the mostly sad saga of the US pavilion for several months now, both on Shanghai Scrap,
  and elsewhere. And, until two weeks ago, there was absolutely no reason to believe that a participation
  agreement would ever be signed. Shanghai Expo, Inc., a non-profit authorized by the US State Department to
  fund-raise, design, build, and operate a US pavilion, had failed to raise sufficient funds to break ground. At
  yesterday's signing ceremony, Beatrice Camp, the US Consul General in Shanghai blamed the underwhelming
  fundraising on the global economic crisis – a point that was picked up by the Chinese media. No doubt, the
  economic crisis played a role, but as Camp and others close to the US effort surely know, the other important
  factor was the inexperienced and increasingly erratic trio running the non-profit Shanghai Expo, Inc. As
  recently as last month, one of its members – Frank Lavin, a former US ambassador to Singapore and
  Undersecretary of Commerce – issued a press release falsely claiming that the US Congress had "adopted" a
  resolution in support of the US pavilion. This incident, and others like it, succeeded in alienating potential
  donors (including major US corporations with operations in China), vast swaths of the US expatriate business
  community in Shanghai, and – most crucially – members of the Shanghai government. For those of us
  following the events, the question was no longer "How badly will the US damage its relationship with China if
  it doesn't participate?" but instead became "What's worse for US-China relations? Turning down Shanghai's
  Expo invite or continuing the current, incompetent effort?"
  The July 1 appointment of Jose Villarreal as Commissioner General to the US pavilion effort seems to have
  changed the equation. A lawyer with ties to the Clintons, Secretary of State Clinton empowered him to oversee
  the US effort. He didn't waste any time, either, arriving in Shanghai on Monday, and managing to pull of the
  signing on Friday. One person familiar with Villarreal's role described it as the arrival of an "adult" to a chaotic
  situation that badly needed one. Indeed, if there's one telling detail to the handful of official and press accounts
  of yesterday's signing, it's the total absence of the Shanghai Expo, Inc. members from the official comments
  and photos (US Consulate coverage here; Shanghai government account here), none of whom live or work in
  Shanghai, anyway. If that was a conscious decision, it was a wise one.
  A final point. As Villarreal conceded, the US effort must still raise roughly half of its $61 million budget. I
  suspect that – with Villarreal in charge of the effort – reluctant wallets will become less so. Regardless, though,
  150
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762769 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762769 Date: 06/30/2015
  this raises a still unresolved question: namely, what are the actual fundraising rules for the US pavilion effort?
  Back in 2007, the State Department indicated that it would not sign a participation agreement with Expo 2010,
  Inc until all funds were raised for a pavilion. Apparently, that ill-conceived policy has changed. I say apparently
  because, up until now, the State Department has refused to release the "action plan" that governs fundraising
  and other rules related to the US pavilion in Shanghai. As a result of this official intransigence, a Freedom of
  Information Act request has been filed to obtain this document(s?). Why the secrecy? It's anybody's guess, and
  according to the State Department's FOIA office, we can keep guessing until Thanksgiving — it's around then
  that they'll get around to releasing the documents.
  [UPDATE: Just received notice that groundbreaking for the US pavilion will be on July 17 at 10:30 AM.
  Secretary of Commerce Gary Locke will be present.]
  IRS Circular 230 Notice Requirement: This communication is not given in the form of a
  covered opinion, within the meaning of Circular 230 issued by the United States Secretary
  of the Treasury. Thus, we are required to inform you that you cannot rely upon any tax
  advice contained in this communication for the purpose of avoiding United States federal
  tax penalties. In addition, any tax advice contained in this communication may not be
  used to promote, market or recommend a transaction to another party.
  The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and
  confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you have received this communication
  in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.
  151
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762769 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762770
MetadataSubject: CLARITY ON MY TENURE IN INDIA
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_18-20M/DOC_0C05762770/C05762770.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Clarity on my tenure in India
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Wells, Alice G; Blake, Robert 0; Smith, Daniel B
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 8:50 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762770
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762770 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 8:50 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Clarity on my tenure in India
  From: Smith, Daniel B
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 08:42:32 2009
  Subject: Fw: Clarity on my tenure in India
  From: Burleigh, Peter A
  To: Burns, William J; Kennedy, Patrick F
  Cc: Wells, Alice G; Blake, Robert 0; Smith, Daniel B
  Sent: Fri Jul 10 23:51:59 2009
  Subject: Clarity on my tenure in India
  B6
  Hi Bill and Pat:
  Warm regards, Peter
  1S7
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762770 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05762771
MetadataSubject: JOE DIMENTO
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762771/C05762771.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Joe DiMento
ExtractedTo: H; Valmoro, Lona J
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 1:03 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762771
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  I have his email B6
  May have his cell too- ill check my files

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762771 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 1:03 PM
  To: H; Valmoro, Lona J
  Subject: Re: Joe DiMento
  I have his email B6
  May have his cell too- ill check my files
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C; Valmoro, Lona J
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 12:45:09 2009
  Subject: Joe DiMento
  Do either of you have his email or cell info?
  153
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762771 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762772
MetadataSubject: IF YOU JUST TRIED CALLING ME, CALL AGAIN ON ...I'M BOYCOTTING CALLS FROM "UNKNOWN" NUMBERS
MetadataTo: H2
MetadataFrom: Talbott, Strobe
MetadataDateSent: 2009-05-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/23_24_25_26/DOC_0C05762772/C05762772.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: if you just tried calling me, call again on .. I'm boycotting calls from "unknown B6
ExtractedTo: H2; H
ExtractedFrom: Strobe Talbott B6
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, May 29, 2009 7:49 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762772
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  numbers" -- but will take a callback as signal that it's you
  Strobe Talbott
  President, The Brookings Institution
  1775 Massachusetts Avenue NW
  Washington, DC 20036
  B6

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762772 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN
  PART B6
  From: Strobe Talbott B6
  Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 7:49 AM
  To: H2; H
  Subject: if you just tried calling me, call again on .. I'm boycotting calls from "unknown B6
  numbers" -- but will take a callback as signal that it's you
  Strobe Talbott
  President, The Brookings Institution
  1775 Massachusetts Avenue NW
  Washington, DC 20036
  B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762772 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762773
MetadataSubject: JOE DIMENTO
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Valmoro, Lona J
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762773/C05762773.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Joe DiMento
ExtractedTo: H; Jiloty, Lauren C
ExtractedFrom: Valmoro, Lona 1 <ValmoroU@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 1:08 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762773
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  His cell is
  B6

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762773 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Valmoro, Lona 1 <ValmoroU@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 1:08 PM
  To: H; Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Re: Joe DiMento
  His cell is
  B6
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C; Valmoro, Lona 1
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 12:45:09 2009
  Subject: Joe DiMento
  Do either of you have his email or cell info?
  1z4.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762773 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762774
MetadataSubject: GOT YOUR MESSAGE...
MetadataTo: H2
MetadataFrom: Talbott, Strobe
MetadataDateSent: 2009-05-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/23_24_25_26/DOC_0C05762774/C05762774.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: got your message....
ExtractedTo: H2; H
ExtractedFrom: Strobe Talbott
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, May 29, 2009 7:58 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762774
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  much appreciated.... sounds like the right plan... no need to call back unless there's more to
  discuss re tomorrow.... you can go back to saving the world! cheers, s

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762774 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN
  PART B6
  From: Strobe Talbott
  Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 7:58 AM
  To: H2; H
  Subject: got your message....
  much appreciated.... sounds like the right plan... no need to call back unless there's more to
  discuss re tomorrow.... you can go back to saving the world! cheers, s
  From: Strobe Talbott
  Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 7:49 AM
  To: HRC; HRC Blackberry
  Subject: if you just tried calling me, call again on .. I'm boycotting calls from "unknown numbers" -- but will
  take a callback as signal that it's you
  Strobe Talbott
  President, The Brookings Institution
  1775 Massachusetts Avenue NW
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762774 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762775
MetadataSubject: JONES
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/AddBacks/DOC_0C05762775/C05762775.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Jones
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 1:27 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762775
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Jones wants to talk to you
  He's wheels up from ghana at 2:30.
  Wants to follow up post carter call.
  1 SS

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762775 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 1:27 PM
  To:
  Subject: Jones
  Jones wants to talk to you
  He's wheels up from ghana at 2:30.
  Wants to follow up post carter call.
  1 SS
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762775 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762776
MetadataSubject: MESSAGE FROM KURT CAMPBELL AND KURT TONG
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762776/C05762776.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Message from kurt campbell and kurt tong
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 2:29 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762776
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  They said:"Our side has been dialing on Friday evening and Saturday morning our time (Saturday morning and Saturday
  evening over there), with no answer. Our side will keep trying, starting again this evening (Sunday morning over there).
  1s6

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762776 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 2:29 PM
  To:
  Subject: Message from kurt campbell and kurt tong
  They said:"Our side has been dialing on Friday evening and Saturday morning our time (Saturday morning and Saturday
  evening over there), with no answer. Our side will keep trying, starting again this evening (Sunday morning over there).
  1s6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762776 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762780
MetadataSubject: N KOREA
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/AddBacks/DOC_0C05762780/C05762780.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: N. Korea
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 4:24 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762780
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Kurt is CampbelIKM@state.gov
  I'm working on donilon

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762780 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 4:24 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: N. Korea
  Kurt is CampbelIKM@state.gov
  I'm working on donilon
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 15:13:27 2009
  Subject: Re: N. Korea
  What are emails for Kurt Campbell and Tom Donilon?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 15:02:19 2009
  Subject: Fw: N. Korea
  From: Jimmy
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 14:06:23 2009
  Subject: N. Korea
  Hillary: As I explained to you on the phone, I don't think it is appropriate to tell them that I will come only if they agree in
  advance to release the women. Your response was, in effect, "They have already agreed." Is this correct? If not, I will go,
  by commercial airline if necessary, representing The Carter Center, and try to induce them to approve the release. JC
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F - 2 0 1 4 - 2 0 4 3 9 Doc No. C05762780 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762781
MetadataSubject: 21ST CENTURY STATECRAFT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-05-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/23_24_25_26/DOC_0C05762781/C05762781.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: FW: 21st Century Statecraft
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Caroline.Adler Mills, Cheryl D;
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, May 29, 2009 2:41 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762781
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: FYI
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762781 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE
  IN PART B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 2:41 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW: 21st Century Statecraft
  FYI
  Original Message
  From: Katie Dowd [mailto
  Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 2:05 PM
  To: Ross, Alec J
  Cc: Caroline.Adler Mills, Cheryl D;
  Subject: Re: 21st Century Statecraft
  85,000 views on the US Government Channel channel alone already. This is wonderful. Great work!
  On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Ross, Alec J<RossAl@state.gov> wrote:
  > Even Craig from Craig's list getting in on the HRC 21st century
  statecraft
  > video ... http://cnewmark.com/
  > Alec Ross
  > Senior Advisor for Innovation
  > Office of the Secretary of State
  >(202) 647-6315
  > RossAJ@State.gov
  67
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762781 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762782
MetadataSubject: N KOREA
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/AddBacks/DOC_0C05762782/C05762782.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762782
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Saturday, July 11, 2009 6:28 PM
  Re: N. Korea
  Tom donilon

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762782 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Saturday, July 11, 2009 6:28 PM
  Re: N. Korea
  Tom donilon
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 17:07:58 2009
  Subject: Re: N. Korea
  Thx.
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 16:23:43 2009
  Subject: Re: N. Korea
  Kurt is CampbelIKM@state.gov
  I'm working on donilon
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 15:13:27 2009
  Subject: Re: N. Korea
  What are emails for Kurt Campbell and Tom Donilon?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 15:02:19 2009
  Subject: Fw: N. Korea
  From: Jimmy
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 14:06:23 2009
  Subject: N. Korea
  1Kci
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762782 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762782 Date: 06/30/2015
  Hillary: As I explained to you on the phone, I don't think it is appropriate to tell them that I will come only if they agree in
  advance to release the women. Your response was, in effect, "They have already agreed." Is this correct? If not, I will go,
  by commercial airline if necessary, representing The Carter Center, and try to induce them to approve the release. JC
  )
  160
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762782 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762783
MetadataSubject: BOOK DEAL
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-05-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/23_24_25_26/DOC_0C05762783/C05762783.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762783
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Friday, May 29, 2009 2:45 PM
  williamsbarreti
  FW: book deal
  B6
  FYI:

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762783 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE
  IN PART B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Cc:
  Subject:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Friday, May 29, 2009 2:45 PM
  williamsbarreti
  FW: book deal
  B6
  FYI:
  From: MangoMuse
  To: mango_muse(
  Sent: Fri May 29 14:28:17 2009
  Subject: book deal
  Washington Post's "Reliable Source" is reporting that Patti Solis Doyle has signed a book deal with Hyperion,
  with an anticipated publish date of 2011.
  This Just In . . .
  • Patti Solis Doyle: You've managed Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign, been sacked via e-mail, then
  resurfaced in the transition office of then-President-elect Obama. What's your next act? Book deal! She's inked it
  with Hyperion for an undisclosed amount. Scheduled for 2011, the nonfiction book will trace her political journey --
  and, we can only hope, reveal some juicy campaign gossip.
  http://voices. washingtonpost. com/reliable- source/2009/ 05/this just in 60.html
  68
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762783 Date: 06/30/2015
  B6



DocNumber: C05762784
MetadataSubject: N KOREA
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Campbell, Kurt M
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762784/C05762784.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762784
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Campbell, Kurt M <CampbelIKM@state.gov>
  Saturday, July 11, 2009 9:43 PM
  Re: N. Korea
  Secretary Clinton -

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762784 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5,B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Campbell, Kurt M <CampbelIKM@state.gov>
  Saturday, July 11, 2009 9:43 PM
  Re: N. Korea
  Secretary Clinton -
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemailcom>
  To: Campbell, Kurt M
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 16:36:04 2009
  Subject: Fw: N. Korea
  Kurt--I just rec'd the email below from Carter reiterating one of the points he made to me yesterday. If you want to
  discuss, pis call me thru ops. HRC
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 15:02:19 2009
  Subject: Fw: N. Korea
  From: Jimmy
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 14:06:23 2009
  Subject: N. Korea
  Hillary: As I explained to you on the phone, I don't think it is appropriate to tell them that I will come only if they agree in
  advance to release the women. Your response was, in effect, "They have already agreed." Is this correct? If not, I will go,
  by commercial airline if necessary, representing The Carter Center, and try to induce them to approve the release. JC
  11
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762784 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762786
MetadataSubject: OPED : A DOSE OF REALISM IN HONSURAS BY EDWARD SCHUMACHER-MATOS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762786/C05762786.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fw: OpEd I A Dose of Realism in Honsuras By Edward Schumacher-Matos
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 6:19 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762786
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762786 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 6:19 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: OpEd I A Dose of Realism in Honsuras By Edward Schumacher-Matos
  From: Sullivan, Jacob 3
  To: Shannon, Thomas A; Abedin, Huma; Llorens, Hugo; Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Sat Jul 1114:54:29 2009
  Subject: RE: OpEd I A Dose of Realism in Honsuras By Edward Schumacher-Matos
  Very interesting.
  From: Shannon, Thomas A
  Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2009 2:46 PM
  To: Sullivan, Jacob 3; Abedin, Huma; Llorens, Hugo; Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Fw: OpEd I A Dose of Realism in Honsuras By Edward Schumacher-Matos
  This will appear in tomorrow's Post.
  From: pburellii
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 08:05:33 2009
  Subject: OpEd I A Dose of Realism in Honsuras By Edward Schumacher-Matos
  Washington Post I A Dose of Realism in Honduras
  By Edward Schumacher-Matos
  Sunday, July 12, 2009
  Sometimes you have to give political leaders credit.
  President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton are on the verge of achieving their own coup in
  Honduras and advancing American interests with a deftness not seen from Washington in many years.
  The president's reference to Honduras during his trip to Moscow reflects how the small Central American
  country is but a pawn as the administration pushes the reset button globally and in the hemisphere.
  Justice may not be totally served in Honduras, but the country is likely to end up better off anyway.
  "America cannot and should not seek to impose any system of government on any other country," Obama said
  in Russia, "nor would we presume to choose which party or individual should run a country. . . . Even as we
  meet here today, America supports now the restoration of the democratically elected president of Honduras,
  even though he has strongly opposed American policies. We do so not because we agree with him. We do so
  because we respect the universal principle that people should choose their own leaders."
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case NOTF-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762786 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762786 Date: 06/30/2015
  The immediate lesson was to teach Russia to stay out of Georgia and Ukraine. The message, however, also
  resonated throughout Latin America, undercutting the polarization efforts of Venezuelan President Hugo
  Chavez.
  That the administration has joined with the Organization of American States in condemning the ouster of
  Honduran President Manuel Zelaya has left Chavez puffing a lot of hot air with no one to fight against.
  When three Chavez allies -- the presidents of Argentina, Ecuador and Paraguay -- sought unsuccessfully to
  escort Zelaya back to Honduras on Venezuelan planes, they looked irresponsible for setting off violence that
  resulted in one death. Clinton, meanwhile, working quietly with Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, Chile and other
  moderate countries, has brought the two opposing Honduran camps together in a mediation with one of the
  grand old men of Latin America, Costa Rican Oscar Arias, a Nobel Peace laureate.
  There is now genuine movement toward a peaceful resolution of the crisis.
  The United States, long seen as a bully in the region, is suddenly being seen as respectful and wise. The
  flummoxed Chavez could only come up with a patently hilarious formula in which the "Yankee empire" was
  still the villain in Honduras but Obama may not be responsible because he is more like a prisoner of the
  empire."
  More fundamentally, Obama and Clinton, perhaps because neither is particularly experienced in Latin America,
  have approached the region with fresh eyes and wonder what all the fuss is about. The Moscow speech and their
  actions in Honduras underline that the Cold War really is over.
  Chavez is a nuisance, but Washington has no enemies in Latin America. Our major interests are immigration,
  crime and trade, not ideologies, as much as the extremists on the right and the left there and here might want to
  make it so.
  So, are we sacrificing Honduras? No. Zelaya is the main culprit in this crisis, but what counts is the rule of law.
  His hand has been slapped very hard. Allowing him to serve out the last six months of his term while not
  holding the referendum that would have opened the way to succession has a better chance of bringing peace and
  stability to the country than the current standoff.
  The bigger question will be: What have the rest of us learned? We have all been pushing Latin Americans to
  uphold the rule of law, but beyond simply insisting that Zelaya was elected, few in the OAS, the European
  Union or other critics have been willing to give much credence to Hondurans for trying to do just that.
  The Honduran Supreme Court, as it is empowered to do under the constitution, ordered the army to arrest
  Zelaya after he began to carry out a referendum for a constitutional convention that the court, Congress and his
  own attorney general said was illegal. Yet, many Latin American and European governments still call it a
  "military coup" or, as the Associated Press called it several days afterward, a "military power grab." Clinton and
  Obama dropped calling it a coup.
  There are gray areas having to do with presidential powers and the fact that the Honduran constitution prohibits
  extradition of citizens. The army exiled Zelaya in consultation with civilian leaders to avoid precisely the sort of
  violence seen when Zelaya tried to return. He forced the country and its institutions against the wall, and for
  that he should take his medicine.
  Edward Schumacher-Matos is syndicated by the Washington Post Writers Group. His e-mail address
  is edwardschumachermalosgvahoo.com.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762786 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762786 Date: 06/30/2015
  [-
  Post a Comment
  ILA
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762786 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762787
MetadataSubject: AID DIR
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mikulski, BAM
MetadataDateSent: 2009-05-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_18-20M/DOC_0C05762787/C05762787.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762787
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Mikulski, BAM (Mikulski) <BAM@Mikulski.senate.gov>
  Friday, May 29, 2009 5:31 PM
  H
  Aid dir
  Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
  69

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762787 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5,B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Mikulski, BAM (Mikulski) <BAM@Mikulski.senate.gov>
  Friday, May 29, 2009 5:31 PM
  H
  Aid dir
  Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
  69
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762787 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05762788
MetadataSubject: VET: ARTURO VALENZUELA
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-04-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_18-20M/DOC_0C05762788/C05762788.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedCc: Patel, Shraddha; Samuelson, Heather F
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762788
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sunday, April 26, 2009 9:55 PM
  H
  FW: VET: Arturo Valenzuela
  cdm

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762788 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B5,B6
  WW
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sunday, April 26, 2009 9:55 PM
  H
  FW: VET: Arturo Valenzuela
  cdm
  From: Perla, Laura
  Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 12:56 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Cc: Patel, Shraddha; Samuelson, Heather F
  Subject: VET: Arturo Valenzuela
  Cheryl,
  3
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762788 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05762789
MetadataSubject: KURT CAMPBELL WANTS TO TALK WHEN U CAN
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762789/C05762789.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Kurt campbell wants to talk when u can.
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH©state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 9:11 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762789
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Had a good call yesterday with our team, reaching out to treasury on change and should know more today.
  4cr

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762789 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH©state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 9:11 AM
  To:
  Subject: Kurt campbell wants to talk when u can.
  Had a good call yesterday with our team, reaching out to treasury on change and should know more today.
  4cr
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762789 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762791
MetadataSubject: FROM IVO DAALDER
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-05-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_18-20M/DOC_0C05762791/C05762791.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: From ivo daalder
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, May 29, 2009 5:42 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762791
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: 70
RawText:
  PLEASE PASS TO SECRETARY CLINTON:
  B6
  B6
  B6
  There are three major reasons why is not the right person for
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762791 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  PART B6
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 5:42 PM
  To:
  Subject: From ivo daalder
  70
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762791 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05762792
MetadataSubject: SPEECH
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762792/C05762792.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Speech
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 9:21 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762792
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Where are you on it - will you have a revised version today to give direction of your desires?
  At moment we have addl comments in from a derek, sandy, george (on mep), dennis r, ams and we are holding off
  doing a new draft until we get a sense from you about your edits.
  Cdm

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762792 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 9:21 AM
  To:
  Subject: Speech
  Where are you on it - will you have a revised version today to give direction of your desires?
  At moment we have addl comments in from a derek, sandy, george (on mep), dennis r, ams and we are holding off
  doing a new draft until we get a sense from you about your edits.
  Cdm
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762792 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762793
MetadataSubject: 2010-2011 QDDR TERMS OF REFERENCE
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762793/C05762793.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762793
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762793 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B5
  2010-2011 QDDR Terms of Reference
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762793 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762793 Date: 06/30/2015
  B
  2
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762793 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762793 Date: 06/30/2015
  3
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762793 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762793 Date: 06/30/2015
  B
  4
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762793 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762793 Date: 06/30/2015
  B
  5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762793 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762793 Date: 06/30/2015
  6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762793 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762794
MetadataSubject: AID DIR
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-05-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_18-20M/DOC_0C05762794/C05762794.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Aid dir
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, May 29, 2009 5:46 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762794
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Assume u got this directly
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762794 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5,B6
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 5:46 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Aid dir
  Assume u got this directly
  Original Message
  From: Mikulski, BAM (Mikuiski) <BAM@Mikulski.senate.gov>
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Fri May 29 17:34:07 2009
  Subject: Fw: Aid dir
  Could you see that the. Boss gets this email. Thanks
  Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
  Original Message
  From: Mikuiski, BAM (Mikulski)
  To: 'hdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Fri May 29 17:31:03 2009
  Subject: Aid dir
  Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
  71
  5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762794 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05762795
MetadataSubject: 2010-2011 QDDR TERMS OF REFERENCE
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762795/C05762795.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762795
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762795 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B5
  2010-2011 QDDR Terms of Reference
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762795 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762795 Date: 06/30/2015
  2
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762795 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762795 Date: 06/30/2015
  B
  3
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762795 Date: 06/30/2015

  4
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762795 Date: 06/30/2015
  -
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F:2014-20439 Doc No. C05762795 Date: 06/30/2015

  5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762795 Date: 06/30/2015
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762795 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762795 Date: 06/30/2015
  6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762795 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762797
MetadataSubject: HANDOVER IN SCA - MAY 15
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-04-27T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_18-20M/DOC_0C05762797/C05762797.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedCc: Russell, Daniel A; Thomas, Harry K (Director General); Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762797
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Monday, April 27, 2009 11:24 AM
  H
  FW: Handover in SCA - May 15

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762797 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5,B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Monday, April 27, 2009 11:24 AM
  H
  FW: Handover in SCA - May 15
  From: Boucher, Richard .A
  Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 10:09 AM
  To: Burns, William 3
  Cc: Russell, Daniel A; Thomas, Harry K (Director General); Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Handover in SCA - May 15
  Bill:
  If it's OK with you, I'm planning on leaving this job on May 15,
  Richard
  7
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762797 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05762798
MetadataSubject: FW:
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-04-27T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_18-20M/DOC_0C05762798/C05762798.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762798
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Monday, April 27, 2009 2:19 PM
  H
  FW.
  CV Apr09.doc

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762798 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Attachments:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Monday, April 27, 2009 2:19 PM
  H
  FW.
  CV Apr09.doc
  From: Jan Piercy [mailto:
  Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 11:06 AM
  To: Carpenter, Margaret V.W.; Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject:
  In a call last Tuesday, Hillary asked me to get her resume. It is attached.
  Hope you're both doing well — this most recent trip certainly has played well. Great job, but I know how unrelentingly
  demanding it is for everyone on the team. HRC did mention ongoing challenges in staffing. Good luck and let me know
  anything I can do from the outside.
  Jan
  Jan Piercy
  Executive Vice President
  Shor- Bank Corporation
  mobile
  210 G treet NW Suite 401
  Washington, D.C. 20005
  From:
  Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2009 2:11 PM
  To: Jan Pie
  Subject: s CV
  Hi Jan,
  Here's my CV. I'm honored that HRC wanted it!
  PRIVACY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain business confidential and
  privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If this e-mail was not intended for you, please notify the sender by
  reply e-mail that you received this in error. Destroy all copies of the original message and attachments.
  8
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762798 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05762800
MetadataSubject: HOLBROOKE ASKING TO SPEAKK AS SOON AS U R AVAILABLE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762800/C05762800.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Holbrooke asking to speak as soon as u r available.
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 10:45 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762800
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: 167
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762800 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 10:45 AM
  To: H
  Subject: Holbrooke asking to speak as soon as u r available.
  167
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762800 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762802
MetadataSubject: RESUME
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_18-20M/DOC_0C05762802/C05762802.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762802
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762802 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  EDUCATION:
  PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762802 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762802 Date: 07/31/2015 B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762802 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762802 Date: 07/31/2015 B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762802 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762802 Date: 07/31/2015 B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762802 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762802 Date: 07/31/2015 B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762802 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762802 Date: 07/31/2015 B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762802 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762802 Date: 07/31/2015 B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762802 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762802 Date: 07/31/2015 B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762802 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762802 Date: 07/31/2015 B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762802 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762802 Date: 07/31/2015 B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762802 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762802 Date: 07/31/2015 B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762802 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762802 Date: 07/31/2015 B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762802 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762802 Date: 07/31/2015 B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762802 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05762804
MetadataSubject: FAILED IED NEAT AMB HILL CONVOY IN TALLIL
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762804/C05762804.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (SBU) Failed IED near Amb. Hill convoy in Tallil
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH©state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sun Jul 12 11:19:21 2009
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762804
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Fyi
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762804 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH©state.gov>
  Sent Sunday, July 12, 2009 11:39 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (SBU) Failed IED near Amb. Hill convoy in Tallil
  Fyi
  From: Banks, Dana
  To: Abedin, Huma; S_SpecialAssistants; D(L); D(S); P; NEA-FO-DL; DS Command Center; SES-0
  Sent: Sun Jul 12 11:19:21 2009
  Subject: (SBU) Failed IED near Amb. Hill convoy in Tallil
  Ambassador Hill's Chief of Staff Chris Klein reports at 1715 Iraq time (1015 EDT), a failed IED exploded 50 meters in front
  of Amb. Hill's convoy in Tallil. No reported injuries. Amb. Hill was en route to a meeting with provincial council chairs in
  Dhiciar Province at the time.
  Dana L. Banks
  Senior Watch Officer
  State Department Operations Center (S/ES-0)
  202-647-1512
  1LO
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762804 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762805
MetadataSubject: NOTE TO S
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-06-25T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762805/C05762805.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762805
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Thursday, June 25, 2009 4:41 PM
  Fw: note to S
  Fyi - a clas version will come in hard copy in your pouch tonight

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762805 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Thursday, June 25, 2009 4:41 PM
  Fw: note to S
  Fyi - a clas version will come in hard copy in your pouch tonight
  From: Goldberg, Philip S
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Thu Jun 25 16:31:19 2009
  Subject: note to S
  Cheryl, Here is a cleaned up version of what I will send to S. I removed
  some language and changed some. But the thrust is the same.
  Note to the Secretary
  From Phil Goldberg
  June 25, 2009
  Madam Secretary,
  First, thanks for your confidence in asking me to take on the North Korea
  sanctions mission. I know the importance of the issue to you and the
  President.
  65
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762805 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762805 Date: 06/30/2015
  -
  66
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762805 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762805 Date: 06/30/2015
  67
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762805 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762806
MetadataSubject: BRAZIL AND MEXICO
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jake
MetadataDateSent: 2009-05-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/23_24_25_26/DOC_0C05762806/C05762806.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762806
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Jake Sullivan
  Friday, May 29, 2009 8:59 PM
  Reines, Philippe I (Special Use Only)
  Brazil and Mexico

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762806 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN
  PART B5,B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Cc:
  Subject:
  Jake Sullivan
  Friday, May 29, 2009 8:59 PM
  Reines, Philippe I (Special Use Only)
  Brazil and Mexico
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762806 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762807
MetadataSubject: KURT HAS UPDATE ON NORTH KOREA SITUATION. PLS CALL WHEN U CAN
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762807/C05762807.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Kurt has update on north korea situation. Pls call when u can.
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH©state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 2:39 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762807
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: 169
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762807 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH©state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 2:39 PM
  To:
  Subject: Kurt has update on north korea situation. Pls call when u can.
  169
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762807 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762808
MetadataSubject: UNDELIVERABLE: THANKS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2009-04-27T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/17_18_19/DOC_0C05762808/C05762808.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: RE: Undeliverable: Thanks
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, April 27, 2009 6:26 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762808
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Correct address is:
  You had just inverted the "o" and the "u" in her last name.
  Lauren

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762808 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 6:26 PM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: RE: Undeliverable: Thanks
  Correct address is:
  You had just inverted the "o" and the "u" in her last name.
  Lauren
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 6:08 PM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Fw: Undeliverable: Thanks
  Pls call Fluornoy's office at DOD and check this address which she sent me this am and send me the correct one asap.
  Thx.
  Original Message
  From: postmaster@Local <postmaster@Local>
  To:
  Sent: Mon Apr 27 17:57:56 2009
  Subject: Undeliverable: Thanks
  Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:
  The recipient's e-mail address was not found in the recipient's e-mail system. Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver
  this message for you. Please check the e-mail address and try resending this message, or provide the following
  diagnostic text to your system administrator.
  Diagnostic information for administrators:
  Generating server:
  9
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762808 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762808 Date: 06/30/2015
  St< #5.1.1> #SMTP#
  Original message headers:
  Received: from OSDNSGO1R2.0SD.MIL ([130.16.205.111]) by
  with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 27 Apr
  unknown [130.16.210.73])
  BorderWare MXtreme Mail Firewall) with ESMTP id EEEDAB587L
  Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:57:53 -0400 (EDT)
  X-AuditID: 8210d249-a4b48bb0000007bd-ec-49f62a61e8cd
  Received: from mail.clintonemail.com (ool-18bbeabb.static.optonline.net [24.187.234.1871)
  by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id D9C0518678E
  for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:57:53 -0400 (EDT)
  Received: from CLNTINET08.clinton.local ([fe80::dObb:23d3:175e:4993]) by CLNTINET08.clinton.local
  ([fe80::dObb:23d3175e:4993%10]) with mapi; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:57:50 -0400
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: '
  CC: "'newmyer
  Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:57:48 -0400
  Subject: Thanks
  Thread-Topic: Thanks
  Thread-Index: AcnHgzQ9CXPTB9LmTC2AwUsPbh5yjw==
  Message-ID: <786762D781A7FF4FAC906089284044880332BC6E7BPCLNTINET08.clinton.local>
  Accept-Language: en-US
  Content-Language: en-US
  X-MS-Has-Attach:
  X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
  acceptlanguage: en-US
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
  Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
  MIME-Version: 1.0
  X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQ6CR+E=
  X-STA-Metric: 39 (engine=024)
  X-STA-NotSpam: cc:2**0 michele hillary thanks issues
  X-STA-Spam: subject:Thanks best, header:Message-ID:1 her best
  X-BTI-AntiSpam:
  score:0,sta:39/024,dcc:off,dnsbl:off,sw:off,bsn:none,spf:off,dk:off,pbmf:trust/9,ipr:1/2,trusted:yes,ts:no,bs:no,ubl:off
  Received-SPF: none
  Return-Path: HDR22@clintonemail.com
  X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Apr 2009 21:57:48.0286 (UTC) FILETIME=[33F139E0:01C9C783]
  2009 17:57:48 -0400
  Received: from
  by
  for
  <newmver
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762808 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762810
MetadataSubject: SPEECH
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762810/C05762810.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Speech
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 3:27 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762810
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Sending now - their will be a series of emails
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762810 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 3:27 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: Speech
  Sending now - their will be a series of emails
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Sun Jul 12 11:08:05 2009
  Subject: Re: Speech
  I am nearly done w my editing (along w Bill's). Pis send me all the commerts you just listed so I can review.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jul 12 09:20:35 2009
  Subject: Speech
  Where are you on it - will you have a revised version today to give direction of your desires?
  At moment we have addil comments in from a derek, sandy, george (on mep), dennis r, ams and we are holding off
  doing a new draft until we get a sense from you about your edits.
  Cdm
  170
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762810 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762811
MetadataSubject: SO SORRY!
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Axelrod, David M
MetadataDateSent: 2009-06-25T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/AddBacks/DOC_0C05762811/C05762811.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: So sorryl
ExtractedFrom: Axelrod, David M.
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 4:44 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762811
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Love to. I look forward to it!
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762811 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Axelrod, David M.
  Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 4:44 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: So sorryl
  Love to. I look forward to it!
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Axelrod, David M.
  Sent: Thu Jun 25 15:52:49 2009
  Subject: Re: So sorry!
  David--
  Thank you for your too kind words which were a greatly welcome addition to my healing and rehab. My word of advice
  is to watch where you step and stay grounded!
  It's an honor to serve the President w you and I'd enjoy spending some one-on-one time just comparing notes and
  catching up in the next weeks. All the best, Hillary
  Original Message
  From: Axelrod, David M
  To: H
  Sent: Tue Jun 23,23:18:50 2009
  Subject: So sorry!
  Hillary:
  I have hesitated to email because I'm sure you are being inundated with good wishes. But I just wanted to tell you how
  sorry I was to hear about your injury. It sounded horribly painful.
  I hope you will allow yourself to rest and recover. You are an all-star player, and we need you for the long run!
  David
  68
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762811 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762812
MetadataSubject: 2009-07-10 JJS SPEECH 2 - AMS EDITS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762812/C05762812.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: FW: 2009-07-10 JJS speech 2 - AMS edits
ExtractedFrom: Cheryl Mills
ExtractedCc: Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 3:33 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762812
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Per your request — here are AMS' comments in text and general below.
  Oscar should print for you so you can see the red-line as it will not show up on your bb.
  cdm

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762812 Date: 06/30/2015
  From: Cheryl Mills
  Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 3:33 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW: 2009-07-10 JJS speech 2 - AMS edits
  Attachments: 2009-07-10 JJS speech 2amscom.docx RELEASE IN PART B5,B6
  Per your request — here are AMS' comments in text and general below.
  Oscar should print for you so you can see the red-line as it will not show up on your bb.
  cdm
  From: Anne-Marie Slaughter
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J;
  Cc: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 10:43:32 2009
  Subject: RE: 2009-07-10 AS speech 2
  Muscatine, Lissa
  AM
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762812 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762813
MetadataSubject: BRAZIL AND MEXICO
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Reines, Philippe I
MetadataDateSent: 2009-05-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/23_24_25_26/DOC_0C05762813/C05762813.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedDateSent: Fri May 29 20:59:26 2009
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762813
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Reines, Philippe I <reinesp@state.gov>
  Friday, May 29, 2009 9:48 PM
  Sullivan, Jacob J
  Re: Brazil and Mexico
  If we set the expectation now that the outcome is likely to not go our way, ANY alternative - even one kicking the can
  down the road as Jake outlines below - would be seen as a significant victory.
  And as an added bonus, it would be an opportunity to highlight your personal dedication to and prioritization of human
  rights/democracy, which we've been criticized for since China.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762813 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN
  PART B5,B6
  From:
  Sent
  To:
  Cc:
  Subject:
  Reines, Philippe I <reinesp@state.gov>
  Friday, May 29, 2009 9:48 PM
  Sullivan, Jacob J
  Re: Brazil and Mexico
  If we set the expectation now that the outcome is likely to not go our way, ANY alternative - even one kicking the can
  down the road as Jake outlines below - would be seen as a significant victory.
  And as an added bonus, it would be an opportunity to highlight your personal dedication to and prioritization of human
  rights/democracy, which we've been criticized for since China.
  From: Jake Sullivan B6
  To: H <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Reines, Philippe I
  Sent: Fri May 29 20:59:26 2009
  Subject: Brazil and Mexico
  B5
  a
  73
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762813 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762814
MetadataSubject: THANKS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Newmyer, Jackie
MetadataDateSent: 2009-04-27T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/17_18_19/DOC_0C05762814/C05762814.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Thanks
ExtractedFrom: Jackie Newmyer
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, April 27, 2009 6:51 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762814
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Secretary Clinton,
  Thank you! Will update you when I hear from her, and if there is anything else I should do, let me know. All
  best, Jackie
  ps Saw that Foreign Minister Yeo was on your schedule today. Fyi, he is one of my favorite Singaporeans
  because of this 2007 speech on China, which he posted to his blog (!):
  April 12, 2007
  Foreign Minister George Yeo's speech at a dinner organised by the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy on 5
  February 2007, which he gave off-the-cuff.
  Thank you Kishore for your kind words. Dear friends, ladies and gentlemen. I was in India two weeks ago, had
  a good trip, spent nine days there. While in Calcutta after calling on the Chief Minister, I had a bit of time to
  look around so I attended a mass at Mother Theresa's house. Very interesting gathering; there was a Singapore
  nun there, she had been there for over ten years; Sister Maria Tony. I wondered why someone from Singapore
  would want to dedicate her life to picking up the dead and the dying in the back alleys of Calcutta and living
  that life. There were many nuns there who were in their ninth year. They take their first vow in the fifth year,
  renewable every year. In the tenth year they have to decide - final vows for eternity. So if you are not sure,
  please, there's a way out; if you are sure, then you're in the room. So the priest gave a very tough sermon and
  while he was talking, I could hear the din of traffic noise outside, in the streets of Calcutta. Then suddenly, I
  heard the call of the muezzin. Now this is a Hindu city. I told myself, I thought wow, what diversity in this
  country, India, and its ability to internalise this diversity and to find it unremarkable that the tiny woman from
  Albania should come into their midst, become one of them and then when she was beatified, was celebrated as
  an Indian, on the way to canonization.
  China and India in that comparison- China is not India. China has a very different sense of itself; its deep
  internal construction is very different. Superficially there are similarities, as there is between China and the US
  and China and Europe. But if you look into it's deep construction, it is very different. When we talk about
  China's future and China in the 21st century, how China will behave in a world community, China's attitudes
  towards democracy, towards law, towards social justice. It is important first to look into this deep construction
  because that is their nature. Naturally we should not be deterministic, there is nothing inevitable in human
  history, but when we understand its nature, it becomes easier to anticipate its moves and you'll be less suprised
  by its actions.
  A few years ago, the Chinese government embarked on a major project which is its dynastic duty- to write the
  history of the Qing dynasty, the Manchus, from 1368 to 1644. Ever since the Han dynasty, roughly
  contemporaneous with the Roman Empire, they developed a historiographic tradition of each dynasty writing
  the history of the previous period. So Sima Qian of the Later Han wrote of the earlier Han and the entire period
  before that; then later on they wrote about the Later Han, Jin wrote up the Three Kingdoms; Ming wrote up the
  Yuan: The Yuan, which was Mongol in its origins wrote up the Sung. Sung wrote up the Tang dynasty which
  was the Classical Period. The last dynasty, the Qing, collapsed in the Republican Revolution of 1911; this is
  now 2007. I think in 2003, they embarked on this project, 'The Official History of the Qing dynasty'. When the
  former Vice Premier Li Lanqing was in Singapore recently, I asked him about it. He said "we told the scholars
  not to rush this project". I asked him how long it would take to write this history. He said it would take many
  years, easily 10 years. I said, "have you collected the material?" He said yes. I asked, "external sources?" He
  said yes, external sources too. All the countries, the Vatican, European countries, the whole lot; all assembled -
  24 official histories, this would be the 26th. And Li's instruction to them was not to be too quick to draw
  conclusions!
  Now Mao Tze Tung was a revolutionary, he was a great revolutionary. He overturned everything before but he
  knew his history, he read the 24 histories, and not only did he read them, he annotated them. But he wrote with
  a terrible, illegible scrawl, so scholars had to decipher those scrawls. Then they wrote commentaries on his
  commentaries and now it's all published. It is very difficult for the Chinese to depart from their own history
  because it's the same great plains, the same mountains more or less, the same neighbours more or less and they
  have seen the same patterns recur. So a long time ago during the Ming dynasty they wrote up the romantic
  period of the Three Kingdoms. The first line said: "Below heaven, great movements, great currents, long
  disunity leads to unity and long unity leads to disunity." So they accept as a part of their own deep nature that
  there are cycles in their civilisation; that they have ups and downs. In recent years, when you visit them, you
  could sense them feeling their own re-emergence, it's a bit scary. In the initial years, they were lacking in
  confidence, they asked many questions, but now they know that there is an organic vitality. It is like an
  adolescent who watches his own development, and conscious of it. I say scary because for those of us who live
  on the periphery of that empire, what happens there will radiate its influence on us and eventually, to a greater
  or lesser degree envelope us.
  How do we see China? I think to begin with, it's important not to try and, from an intellectual viewpoint,
  transpose our own experiences on to China, because I believe it will develop according to its own logic,
  according to its own DNA. It is growing now, it will continue to grow, it will develop its own contradictions
  and one day those contradictions, many years from now, will lead to its own decline. So they say at the
  beginning of a dynasty the taxes are light but the treasury is full, and at the end of a dynasty, the taxes are
  crushing but the treasury is empty. The important thing to realise about China is that some things are deeply
  resistant to change. Take Confucius. Every time they had to overturn a dynasty, they had to overturn Confucius,
  because Confucius justified the status quo. So throughout the 19th century, whether it was the Taiping
  Revolution, the Communist movement or Sun Yat Sen; they spent their lives debunking Confucius. It reached
  its final moment when they criticised Zhou Enlai together with Confucius- no- Lin Biao together with
  Confucius. That was the last paroxysm. Today, Hu Jingtao said [in Mandarin He Xie She Hui ], "harmonious
  society". Suddenly you hear the resonance of Confucius coming back. And everywhere in the world on the
  pattern of Alliance Francaise, the Goethe Institute, the USIA, they establish Confucius Institutes and the
  learning of the Confucianist classics are coming back with remarkable force in China, not yet in the state
  curriculum but just parents wanting to teach their children the Confucianist ditties. Now why is this important?
  From Mao to Deng to Jiang Zemin, at every stage, they re-interpreted Marx. They are comfortable with the
  young Marx, the idea of the superstructure on the economic base, the idea that politics is concentrated
  economics- that they like. But the class struggle, they downplay. They talk about the Three Represents, the
  progressive forces, the progressive elements, they nurture those. Now Hu Jingtao says "harmonious society",
  "peaceful re-emergence". This mindset has a certain attitude towards law, has a certain attitude towards religion,
  towards democracy and towards foreign policy and I would like, to deal with each in turn.
  Joseph Needham many years ago, I think in the 60's, the man who wrote The Science and Civilisation of China,
  that great encyclopedic work; he said its not that the Chinese have no legal tradition. In fact, by his estimation,
  the Chinese had a greater corpus of legal codification than the West. A greater corpus of legal codification than
  the West! Surprise, surprise. But the idea that the Emperor is below the law, that is completely alien to their
  thinking. Where did that idea come from? Well in the West, you may trace it back to Hammurabi, you may
  trace it back to Moses, to Greece, to Rome. But if you trace the evolution of that DNA, it goes back, way back,
  into its early beginnings. The Chinese had a very different evolutionary starting point. It was not in law, it was
  in an idea they call '1i' which is proper conduct among human beings. They believe, deep in their instincts, that
  law is only a means towards justice, and that when the outcome of law is perverse, then that law must be
  overridden, because justice, proper conduct, the proper relationship among human beings must take
  precedence. And to suddenly say that all that had happened in the previous dynasties, all that the earlier
  histories have summarised, are all wrong and that they should instead adopt something with its origins in
  Western Europe, which had as its crowning moment the crowning of Charlemagne by the Pope in the year 800;
  to them, what are you talking about? For the Chinese, laws are more like regulations, means towards a larger
  end. Their attitude towards democracy follows a parallel pattern.
  Democracy is not an end in itself, democracy is a means and they are quite happy to consider democracy as a
  useful means towards government and that at appropriate places and appropriate levels, democracy is good. So
  at the village and the township level they have democracy, it is a universal franchise. They approve a slate of
  candidates, and they have fierce elections, fierce campaigning, and those who are incompetent or arrogant or
  despotic, they get chucked out. But once you reach the level of the cities and the provinces, they say no. No
  direct democracy. Why not? Because they do not believe, with their view of the universe, that that is the way to
  produce good government. Any more than the Catholic Church believes that the way to elect the Pope is
  through universal franchise. That the parishioners should decide who should be the parish priest. The Parish
  Council, maybe, that's ok. But the parish priest? Bishops? Universal franchise? That's against God's laws. They
  have that kind of instinct embedded in them, it is not Communist, it is just Chinese. And they know that too
  much democracy, invariably leads to 'localitis'; of favouritism towards friends, relatives, people who are from
  the same villages whom we have a relationship with.
  We have the same problem in Singapore, in fact this problem exists throughout East Asia. Till today, apart from
  Singapore, among Chinese communities and among many East Asian communities, the idea that ultimate
  control of the business should go outside the family is unpersuasive. You talk to Li Ka-shing, you talk to Robert
  Kwok, you talk to Lim Soe Liong, you talk to any of them; they will go back to the family. Why? Because they
  believe that in the end, what matters at the deepest level, is trust. And the family guarantees you that trust.
  This is also the Indian wisdom. So you have the Marwaris controlling the economy of Calcutta, you have the
  Parsees, you have Sindhis, of which Kishore is a member, you have the Chettiars. They operate on the basis of
  deep trust and at a completely different level from that of contract law. And because they distrust local
  affiliations, in two dynasties, Ming and Qing, no senior official could serve within 400 miles of where he was
  born. No local official to serve within 400 miles, so in other words, in Singapore, no Singaporean can govern
  Singapore. They go beyond that, today there's almost no province in China where the provincial leader is from
  that province. Now you consider this, you transpose this onto Europe, it's as if routinely, the President of France
  is not French. And if you are a German, you are disqualified as a Chancellor of the Republic. And an Italian
  cannot be trusted to serve in Rome. Ancient wisdom! What is remarkable is this is accepted as legitimate. If you
  are Cantonese and you have a Northener squatting over you, you do not consider it perverse or an abomination.
  This is part of life and in fact, you are more likely to have impartial governor than if a local boy were to be
  there, because he is more likely to favour those who are related to him or those who are his friends.
  So when you talk democracy to the Chinese, it is against this cultural backdrop. So what applied to the Qing
  dynasty, the Ming dynasty, they have taken a step further recently in China. They introduced even more rules,
  governing the circumstances under which you are disqualified from serving in the area near where you were
  born. You can't stay in a ministry for too long, you can't stay in a department for too long beacuse if you stay
  too long, you develop affiliations and those affiliations will result in sidedoors and guanxi and corruption. Of
  course, many of these rules will still be breached, and there will be scandals from time to time and they will act
  on those scandals. For as long as the central leadership is pristine, the system can be maintained. But one day
  they will become corrupt, as in so many previous dynasties, and a downward spiral begins. And it is very
  difficult in that situation to reverse it.
  So I mentioned at the table that for India, it's not a country that can sustain a revolution, because its deep
  structure would not allow for it. I think China is a country which can only be renewed through periodic
  revolutions. Kishore asked me when- I said well maybe in 200 years time because these are long cycles and
  they expect as a matter of course that the history of the People's Republic would not be written by the People's
  Republic. It will be written by the next dynasty. Except that right now they say we shouldn't call it a dynasty,
  we are now democrats, we are a republic, there is no Emperor...Well, whatever term you call it, it will be done
  much later.
  Let me now talk about their attitude towards religion. Being a Roman Catholic I follow quite closely the ups
  and downs in their relationship with the Vatican and I find it quite fascinating. The Jesuits, when they went to
  China in the Ming dynasty, hoped that they could convert the Emperor, and all of China would become Catholic
  and a great mission would have been achieved. They never succeeded. Some of the brightest minds from
  Europe went there. Matteo Ricci, he corrected the Chinese calendar, he repaired the clocks in the palace, he saw
  the throne, but he never got to meet the Emperor and he died in China. And his tomb, it's in the compound of
  the Beijing Party School today. And the church which he founded is still there today. 'Li Matou', that's what he
  called himself, he applied for permission to be buried in China and he was given that permission. Then when
  the Manchus swept southwards, in 1644, the missionaries thought now they had a chance, "the Manchus will be
  a bit more accomodating towards us, we will yet Christianise China". So if you read the despatches of the
  missionaries during that period, the Tartar Wars they described it, they were full of hope. But not a chance.
  They appealed to the Second Emperor, Kangxi.
  "Can we send more missionaries?" "No problem". "Can we have them all report to a papal legate in Beijing"
  "No such thing". The Emperor imposed one condition: "you can send as many priests as you want to China but
  they must die in China, they cannot leave after that". You see, instinctively, the Chinese, when they see the
  Catholic Church, they see someone like themselves, someone whose claim to its members is total. And for
  whom that loyalty is a jealous one.
  Mind you they do not try to control everything; they just control the big things, dogma, doctrine. After that you
  are left on your own and you are financially independent, but on the big issue of who appoints ministers and
  provincial secretaries, it's the same as the Pope appointing Bishops and Bishops ordaining Priests and governing
  this vast empire, whether we're talking about the Chinese empire or the Catholic empire. They have about the
  same number of members in the world which is why their interaction is a complex and difficult one. And over
  the appointment of Bishops, both seek ultimate authority. In the end they have got to find a way to resolve it. I
  can anticipate the Vatican's argument that "we are not of this realm, we are of the other realm, so please we are
  not in conflict". As for the Chinese leaders, their attitude towards religion from the earliest days is to keep
  religion at arm's length. Those who govern the empire, they are areligious, they can have private religions, but
  in matters of their public conduct, they are Confucianist. In public, you are not a Catholic, you are not a
  Muslim, you are not a Buddhist. When the Jesuits went to China, they were very impressed by this - that it was
  possible to create a moral order based not on religion but on ethics. So impressed, that they wrote about it, and
  influenced people like Voltaire and the other Encyclopedists. It helped inspire the Frence revolution- that you
  could get rid of the Church, and still maintain a moral order in society.
  I've talked about China and law, China and democracy, China and religion, now let me talk about China and
  foreign policy which is perhaps your greatest interest; about which I can only talk about generally because you
  are the experts in this field. I think it's very difficult for the Chinese to break from their old mindset that they are
  [Zhong Guo], the Middle Kingdom, they are at the center of the Universe, then there are the other 'chopsticks
  peoples' who are semi-Sinic. I think they consider Singapore to be semi-Sinic. Then there are those who are
  beyond that realm, who are what the Greeks would have called Barbarians. The Mongols, the Manchus, the
  Europeans, the Americans, the Indians and so on.
  Now all that jargon of course is not in use today. They are very civilised, they will welcome you with great
  hospitality - lavish dinners, very courteous words, offering you the best of everything in the house. It reminded
  me of the way my mother used to teach us at home, we were a big family and the stranger has got to be treated
  well, the visitor has to be treated well, because you are afraid of the visitor. So you always treat visitors better
  than your own family members because the visitor is capricious, he can harm you so make sure you fit him in.
  Those who are within your authority, you can always maintain order anyway. This is the way, in their minds,
  the universe is ordered. So I can understand why the Koreans, the Japanese, the Vietnamese, to some extent, the
  Singaporeans, they feel uncomfortable about what they see as a repetition of a pattern they have seen many
  times before in the past. Will the Chinese change this principle of foreign policy, I think they have, because,
  never in their history have they met, have they existed in close contact with competing centers of power, with
  the US, with Europe, India, and you are no longer separated by oceans which cannot be crossed, mountains
  which cannot be crossed, now they are connected. So they are making adjustments.
  It will be interesting to watch how they handle their Olympics; if the Olympics become an exercise of pure
  Chinese nationalism, I think the international reaction against China will be very severe. But I think the Chinese
  will be sophisticated. I expect they will organise cheer teams for the Americans, for the Japanese, so that there
  is an appearance of courtesy and common humanity. They are very careful to ensure that their words fit
  conditions today.
  But let me say in their defence that many of these methods they use arise out of fear, not out of a desire to
  dominate. If you analyse the old tributary system, those who sent tributes got more than they gave in return. It
  became a racket. So the Japanese merchants competed to get tokens from [Ryukyu] in order to be able to do the
  China trade because it meant a lot of money. The Chinese are fearful of foreigners. They are fearful of the
  Russians to the north, the Muslims to the West, the Indians across the Himalayas, but mostly the Americans
  across the Pacific. Their strategy is to keep the temperature low, low profile, hide the shine of your armour, the
  shine of your sword, just play the game and concentrate on economic development. Internally will they make
  preparations? I have no doubt, because they have a deep fear. Is their intention to dominate, to conquer, the way
  the European powers did in the past? I don't think so. I don't think there is a great desire to turn non-Chinese
  into Chinese. Maybe Korea, maybe Vietnam, maybe Mongolia, who at various points in time were part of their
  greater empire, they might consider worth civilising. But beyond that, Sinicising Indians, Russians? No, I don't
  think they will want to do that. So as they now become stronger and more powerful, I believe that while their
  old nature will re-assert itself, they will also be reacting to us. If they find the world a threatening place, they
  will develop their own responses to those threats.
  Quite early in the day, they wanted to neutralise Southeast Asia, Asean. It had never been an area which
  threatened them, historically. So they didn't worry about Southeast Asia as a threat. But resources, sea lanes,
  they go through Southeast Asia. And they made a dramatic move a few years ago. Zhu Rongji was here for the
  ASEAN-China summit. He said, "free trade agreement". At that time when he announced it, the leaders of
  ASEAN almost fell off their chairs. We thought of China an economic threat to us. Not as a partner. Took us
  almost a year to digest the implications and to say yes, let's negotiate. Step by step. And all the time China was
  assuring us that we would benefit more than they would benefit. When the Framework Agreement was signed
  by Zhu Rongji in 2002 in Phonm Penh, he made two remarkable statements. He said if after 10 years, the
  agreement benefits China more than it benefits Southeast Asia, let us renegotiate it. I can never imagine the
  American USTR, or the European Trade Commissioner, talking like that. I mean in a contract, a deal is a deal,
  it's settled for eternity. Then he said: "China does not seek for itself an exclusive position in Southeast Asia", so
  he acknowledged that we were not just going to date one girl, we intended to be promiscuous from the
  beginning. Towards Northeast Asia, I think it is very complicated, because there is so much history and legacy.
  Towards Central Asia, towards Russia, they have deep fears. Towards America, it has become a relationship
  bound together at so many points, a rupture would become more and more unthinkable. But it is going to be a
  very difficult relationship, it will be the most important and most difficult relationship to manage in this
  century. If it's badly managed there will be war, if it's properly managed there will be another generation of
  peace and hundreds of millions of people in the world would be raised out of the depths of poverty. In this area,
  you are the experts, but whenever I see China and watch its moves, I go back to its deep nature because it's not
  easy for a country so vast, with such a sense of itself, to depart too much from its deep nature. Thank you.
  George Yeo
  On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 5:57 PM, H <HDR22@clintonemai1.com> wrote:
  Michele,
  I look forward to getting together to discuss a number of issues. Thanks for following up w Jackie Newmyer.
  Her email:
  All the best, Hillary
  Jacqueline Newmyer
  President, Long Term Strategy Group
  12 Eliot St., Cambridge, MA 02138
  617-661-1626 (fax)
  www.ltstrategy.com

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762814 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jackie Newmyer
  Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 6:51 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: Thanks
  Secretary Clinton,
  Thank you! Will update you when I hear from her, and if there is anything else I should do, let me know. All
  best, Jackie
  ps Saw that Foreign Minister Yeo was on your schedule today. Fyi, he is one of my favorite Singaporeans
  because of this 2007 speech on China, which he posted to his blog (!):
  April 12, 2007
  Foreign Minister George Yeo's speech at a dinner organised by the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy on 5
  February 2007, which he gave off-the-cuff.
  Thank you Kishore for your kind words. Dear friends, ladies and gentlemen. I was in India two weeks ago, had
  a good trip, spent nine days there. While in Calcutta after calling on the Chief Minister, I had a bit of time to
  look around so I attended a mass at Mother Theresa's house. Very interesting gathering; there was a Singapore
  nun there, she had been there for over ten years; Sister Maria Tony. I wondered why someone from Singapore
  would want to dedicate her life to picking up the dead and the dying in the back alleys of Calcutta and living
  that life. There were many nuns there who were in their ninth year. They take their first vow in the fifth year,
  renewable every year. In the tenth year they have to decide - final vows for eternity. So if you are not sure,
  please, there's a way out; if you are sure, then you're in the room. So the priest gave a very tough sermon and
  while he was talking, I could hear the din of traffic noise outside, in the streets of Calcutta. Then suddenly, I
  heard the call of the muezzin. Now this is a Hindu city. I told myself, I thought wow, what diversity in this
  country, India, and its ability to internalise this diversity and to find it unremarkable that the tiny woman from
  Albania should come into their midst, become one of them and then when she was beatified, was celebrated as
  an Indian, on the way to canonization.
  China and India in that comparison- China is not India. China has a very different sense of itself; its deep
  internal construction is very different. Superficially there are similarities, as there is between China and the US
  and China and Europe. But if you look into it's deep construction, it is very different. When we talk about
  China's future and China in the 21st century, how China will behave in a world community, China's attitudes
  towards democracy, towards law, towards social justice. It is important first to look into this deep construction
  because that is their nature. Naturally we should not be deterministic, there is nothing inevitable in human
  history, but when we understand its nature, it becomes easier to anticipate its moves and you'll be less suprised
  by its actions.
  A few years ago, the Chinese government embarked on a major project which is its dynastic duty- to write the
  history of the Qing dynasty, the Manchus, from 1368 to 1644. Ever since the Han dynasty, roughly
  contemporaneous with the Roman Empire, they developed a historiographic tradition of each dynasty writing
  the history of the previous period. So Sima Qian of the Later Han wrote of the earlier Han and the entire period
  before that; then later on they wrote about the Later Han, Jin wrote up the Three Kingdoms; Ming wrote up the
  Yuan: The Yuan, which was Mongol in its origins wrote up the Sung. Sung wrote up the Tang dynasty which
  was the Classical Period. The last dynasty, the Qing, collapsed in the Republican Revolution of 1911; this is
  now 2007. I think in 2003, they embarked on this project, 'The Official History of the Qing dynasty'. When the
  former Vice Premier Li Lanqing was in Singapore recently, I asked him about it. He said "we told the scholars
  not to rush this project". I asked him how long it would take to write this history. He said it would take many
  years, easily 10 years. I said, "have you collected the material?" He said yes. I asked, "external sources?" He
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762814 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762814 Date: 06/30/2015
  said yes, external sources too. All the countries, the Vatican, European countries, the whole lot; all assembled -
  24 official histories, this would be the 26th. And Li's instruction to them was not to be too quick to draw
  conclusions!
  Now Mao Tze Tung was a revolutionary, he was a great revolutionary. He overturned everything before but he
  knew his history, he read the 24 histories, and not only did he read them, he annotated them. But he wrote with
  a terrible, illegible scrawl, so scholars had to decipher those scrawls. Then they wrote commentaries on his
  commentaries and now it's all published. It is very difficult for the Chinese to depart from their own history
  because it's the same great plains, the same mountains more or less, the same neighbours more or less and they
  have seen the same patterns recur. So a long time ago during the Ming dynasty they wrote up the romantic
  period of the Three Kingdoms. The first line said: "Below heaven, great movements, great currents, long
  disunity leads to unity and long unity leads to disunity." So they accept as a part of their own deep nature that
  there are cycles in their civilisation; that they have ups and downs. In recent years, when you visit them, you
  could sense them feeling their own re-emergence, it's a bit scary. In the initial years, they were lacking in
  confidence, they asked many questions, but now they know that there is an organic vitality. It is like an
  adolescent who watches his own development, and conscious of it. I say scary because for those of us who live
  on the periphery of that empire, what happens there will radiate its influence on us and eventually, to a greater
  or lesser degree envelope us.
  How do we see China? I think to begin with, it's important not to try and, from an intellectual viewpoint,
  transpose our own experiences on to China, because I believe it will develop according to its own logic,
  according to its own DNA. It is growing now, it will continue to grow, it will develop its own contradictions
  and one day those contradictions, many years from now, will lead to its own decline. So they say at the
  beginning of a dynasty the taxes are light but the treasury is full, and at the end of a dynasty, the taxes are
  crushing but the treasury is empty. The important thing to realise about China is that some things are deeply
  resistant to change. Take Confucius. Every time they had to overturn a dynasty, they had to overturn Confucius,
  because Confucius justified the status quo. So throughout the 19th century, whether it was the Taiping
  Revolution, the Communist movement or Sun Yat Sen; they spent their lives debunking Confucius. It reached
  its final moment when they criticised Zhou Enlai together with Confucius- no- Lin Biao together with
  Confucius. That was the last paroxysm. Today, Hu Jingtao said [in Mandarin He Xie She Hui ], "harmonious
  society". Suddenly you hear the resonance of Confucius coming back. And everywhere in the world on the
  pattern of Alliance Francaise, the Goethe Institute, the USIA, they establish Confucius Institutes and the
  learning of the Confucianist classics are coming back with remarkable force in China, not yet in the state
  curriculum but just parents wanting to teach their children the Confucianist ditties. Now why is this important?
  From Mao to Deng to Jiang Zemin, at every stage, they re-interpreted Marx. They are comfortable with the
  young Marx, the idea of the superstructure on the economic base, the idea that politics is concentrated
  economics- that they like. But the class struggle, they downplay. They talk about the Three Represents, the
  progressive forces, the progressive elements, they nurture those. Now Hu Jingtao says "harmonious society",
  "peaceful re-emergence". This mindset has a certain attitude towards law, has a certain attitude towards religion,
  towards democracy and towards foreign policy and I would like, to deal with each in turn.
  Joseph Needham many years ago, I think in the 60's, the man who wrote The Science and Civilisation of China,
  that great encyclopedic work; he said its not that the Chinese have no legal tradition. In fact, by his estimation,
  the Chinese had a greater corpus of legal codification than the West. A greater corpus of legal codification than
  the West! Surprise, surprise. But the idea that the Emperor is below the law, that is completely alien to their
  thinking. Where did that idea come from? Well in the West, you may trace it back to Hammurabi, you may
  trace it back to Moses, to Greece, to Rome. But if you trace the evolution of that DNA, it goes back, way back,
  into its early beginnings. The Chinese had a very different evolutionary starting point. It was not in law, it was
  in an idea they call '1i' which is proper conduct among human beings. They believe, deep in their instincts, that
  law is only a means towards justice, and that when the outcome of law is perverse, then that law must be
  overridden, because justice, proper conduct, the proper relationship among human beings must take
  precedence. And to suddenly say that all that had happened in the previous dynasties, all that the earlier
  histories have summarised, are all wrong and that they should instead adopt something with its origins in
  Western Europe, which had as its crowning moment the crowning of Charlemagne by the Pope in the year 800;
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762814 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762814 Date: 06/30/2015
  to them, what are you talking about? For the Chinese, laws are more like regulations, means towards a larger
  end. Their attitude towards democracy follows a parallel pattern.
  Democracy is not an end in itself, democracy is a means and they are quite happy to consider democracy as a
  useful means towards government and that at appropriate places and appropriate levels, democracy is good. So
  at the village and the township level they have democracy, it is a universal franchise. They approve a slate of
  candidates, and they have fierce elections, fierce campaigning, and those who are incompetent or arrogant or
  despotic, they get chucked out. But once you reach the level of the cities and the provinces, they say no. No
  direct democracy. Why not? Because they do not believe, with their view of the universe, that that is the way to
  produce good government. Any more than the Catholic Church believes that the way to elect the Pope is
  through universal franchise. That the parishioners should decide who should be the parish priest. The Parish
  Council, maybe, that's ok. But the parish priest? Bishops? Universal franchise? That's against God's laws. They
  have that kind of instinct embedded in them, it is not Communist, it is just Chinese. And they know that too
  much democracy, invariably leads to 'localitis'; of favouritism towards friends, relatives, people who are from
  the same villages whom we have a relationship with.
  We have the same problem in Singapore, in fact this problem exists throughout East Asia. Till today, apart from
  Singapore, among Chinese communities and among many East Asian communities, the idea that ultimate
  control of the business should go outside the family is unpersuasive. You talk to Li Ka-shing, you talk to Robert
  Kwok, you talk to Lim Soe Liong, you talk to any of them; they will go back to the family. Why? Because they
  believe that in the end, what matters at the deepest level, is trust. And the family guarantees you that trust.
  This is also the Indian wisdom. So you have the Marwaris controlling the economy of Calcutta, you have the
  Parsees, you have Sindhis, of which Kishore is a member, you have the Chettiars. They operate on the basis of
  deep trust and at a completely different level from that of contract law. And because they distrust local
  affiliations, in two dynasties, Ming and Qing, no senior official could serve within 400 miles of where he was
  born. No local official to serve within 400 miles, so in other words, in Singapore, no Singaporean can govern
  Singapore. They go beyond that, today there's almost no province in China where the provincial leader is from
  that province. Now you consider this, you transpose this onto Europe, it's as if routinely, the President of France
  is not French. And if you are a German, you are disqualified as a Chancellor of the Republic. And an Italian
  cannot be trusted to serve in Rome. Ancient wisdom! What is remarkable is this is accepted as legitimate. If you
  are Cantonese and you have a Northener squatting over you, you do not consider it perverse or an abomination.
  This is part of life and in fact, you are more likely to have impartial governor than if a local boy were to be
  there, because he is more likely to favour those who are related to him or those who are his friends.
  So when you talk democracy to the Chinese, it is against this cultural backdrop. So what applied to the Qing
  dynasty, the Ming dynasty, they have taken a step further recently in China. They introduced even more rules,
  governing the circumstances under which you are disqualified from serving in the area near where you were
  born. You can't stay in a ministry for too long, you can't stay in a department for too long beacuse if you stay
  too long, you develop affiliations and those affiliations will result in sidedoors and guanxi and corruption. Of
  course, many of these rules will still be breached, and there will be scandals from time to time and they will act
  on those scandals. For as long as the central leadership is pristine, the system can be maintained. But one day
  they will become corrupt, as in so many previous dynasties, and a downward spiral begins. And it is very
  difficult in that situation to reverse it.
  So I mentioned at the table that for India, it's not a country that can sustain a revolution, because its deep
  structure would not allow for it. I think China is a country which can only be renewed through periodic
  revolutions. Kishore asked me when- I said well maybe in 200 years time because these are long cycles and
  they expect as a matter of course that the history of the People's Republic would not be written by the People's
  Republic. It will be written by the next dynasty. Except that right now they say we shouldn't call it a dynasty,
  we are now democrats, we are a republic, there is no Emperor...Well, whatever term you call it, it will be done
  much later.
  Let me now talk about their attitude towards religion. Being a Roman Catholic I follow quite closely the ups
  and downs in their relationship with the Vatican and I find it quite fascinating. The Jesuits, when they went to
  China in the Ming dynasty, hoped that they could convert the Emperor, and all of China would become Catholic
  and a great mission would have been achieved. They never succeeded. Some of the brightest minds from
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762814 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762814 Date: 06/30/2015
  Europe went there. Matteo Ricci, he corrected the Chinese calendar, he repaired the clocks in the palace, he saw
  the throne, but he never got to meet the Emperor and he died in China. And his tomb, it's in the compound of
  the Beijing Party School today. And the church which he founded is still there today. 'Li Matou', that's what he
  called himself, he applied for permission to be buried in China and he was given that permission. Then when
  the Manchus swept southwards, in 1644, the missionaries thought now they had a chance, "the Manchus will be
  a bit more accomodating towards us, we will yet Christianise China". So if you read the despatches of the
  missionaries during that period, the Tartar Wars they described it, they were full of hope. But not a chance.
  They appealed to the Second Emperor, Kangxi.
  "Can we send more missionaries?" "No problem". "Can we have them all report to a papal legate in Beijing"
  "No such thing". The Emperor imposed one condition: "you can send as many priests as you want to China but
  they must die in China, they cannot leave after that". You see, instinctively, the Chinese, when they see the
  Catholic Church, they see someone like themselves, someone whose claim to its members is total. And for
  whom that loyalty is a jealous one.
  Mind you they do not try to control everything; they just control the big things, dogma, doctrine. After that you
  are left on your own and you are financially independent, but on the big issue of who appoints ministers and
  provincial secretaries, it's the same as the Pope appointing Bishops and Bishops ordaining Priests and governing
  this vast empire, whether we're talking about the Chinese empire or the Catholic empire. They have about the
  same number of members in the world which is why their interaction is a complex and difficult one. And over
  the appointment of Bishops, both seek ultimate authority. In the end they have got to find a way to resolve it. I
  can anticipate the Vatican's argument that "we are not of this realm, we are of the other realm, so please we are
  not in conflict". As for the Chinese leaders, their attitude towards religion from the earliest days is to keep
  religion at arm's length. Those who govern the empire, they are areligious, they can have private religions, but
  in matters of their public conduct, they are Confucianist. In public, you are not a Catholic, you are not a
  Muslim, you are not a Buddhist. When the Jesuits went to China, they were very impressed by this - that it was
  possible to create a moral order based not on religion but on ethics. So impressed, that they wrote about it, and
  influenced people like Voltaire and the other Encyclopedists. It helped inspire the Frence revolution- that you
  could get rid of the Church, and still maintain a moral order in society.
  I've talked about China and law, China and democracy, China and religion, now let me talk about China and
  foreign policy which is perhaps your greatest interest; about which I can only talk about generally because you
  are the experts in this field. I think it's very difficult for the Chinese to break from their old mindset that they are
  [Zhong Guo], the Middle Kingdom, they are at the center of the Universe, then there are the other 'chopsticks
  peoples' who are semi-Sinic. I think they consider Singapore to be semi-Sinic. Then there are those who are
  beyond that realm, who are what the Greeks would have called Barbarians. The Mongols, the Manchus, the
  Europeans, the Americans, the Indians and so on.
  Now all that jargon of course is not in use today. They are very civilised, they will welcome you with great
  hospitality - lavish dinners, very courteous words, offering you the best of everything in the house. It reminded
  me of the way my mother used to teach us at home, we were a big family and the stranger has got to be treated
  well, the visitor has to be treated well, because you are afraid of the visitor. So you always treat visitors better
  than your own family members because the visitor is capricious, he can harm you so make sure you fit him in.
  Those who are within your authority, you can always maintain order anyway. This is the way, in their minds,
  the universe is ordered. So I can understand why the Koreans, the Japanese, the Vietnamese, to some extent, the
  Singaporeans, they feel uncomfortable about what they see as a repetition of a pattern they have seen many
  times before in the past. Will the Chinese change this principle of foreign policy, I think they have, because,
  never in their history have they met, have they existed in close contact with competing centers of power, with
  the US, with Europe, India, and you are no longer separated by oceans which cannot be crossed, mountains
  which cannot be crossed, now they are connected. So they are making adjustments.
  It will be interesting to watch how they handle their Olympics; if the Olympics become an exercise of pure
  Chinese nationalism, I think the international reaction against China will be very severe. But I think the Chinese
  will be sophisticated. I expect they will organise cheer teams for the Americans, for the Japanese, so that there
  is an appearance of courtesy and common humanity. They are very careful to ensure that their words fit
  conditions today.
  But let me say in their defence that many of these methods they use arise out of fear, not out of a desire to
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762814 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762814 Date: 06/30/2015
  dominate. If you analyse the old tributary system, those who sent tributes got more than they gave in return. It
  became a racket. So the Japanese merchants competed to get tokens from [Ryukyu] in order to be able to do the
  China trade because it meant a lot of money. The Chinese are fearful of foreigners. They are fearful of the
  Russians to the north, the Muslims to the West, the Indians across the Himalayas, but mostly the Americans
  across the Pacific. Their strategy is to keep the temperature low, low profile, hide the shine of your armour, the
  shine of your sword, just play the game and concentrate on economic development. Internally will they make
  preparations? I have no doubt, because they have a deep fear. Is their intention to dominate, to conquer, the way
  the European powers did in the past? I don't think so. I don't think there is a great desire to turn non-Chinese
  into Chinese. Maybe Korea, maybe Vietnam, maybe Mongolia, who at various points in time were part of their
  greater empire, they might consider worth civilising. But beyond that, Sinicising Indians, Russians? No, I don't
  think they will want to do that. So as they now become stronger and more powerful, I believe that while their
  old nature will re-assert itself, they will also be reacting to us. If they find the world a threatening place, they
  will develop their own responses to those threats.
  Quite early in the day, they wanted to neutralise Southeast Asia, Asean. It had never been an area which
  threatened them, historically. So they didn't worry about Southeast Asia as a threat. But resources, sea lanes,
  they go through Southeast Asia. And they made a dramatic move a few years ago. Zhu Rongji was here for the
  ASEAN-China summit. He said, "free trade agreement". At that time when he announced it, the leaders of
  ASEAN almost fell off their chairs. We thought of China an economic threat to us. Not as a partner. Took us
  almost a year to digest the implications and to say yes, let's negotiate. Step by step. And all the time China was
  assuring us that we would benefit more than they would benefit. When the Framework Agreement was signed
  by Zhu Rongji in 2002 in Phonm Penh, he made two remarkable statements. He said if after 10 years, the
  agreement benefits China more than it benefits Southeast Asia, let us renegotiate it. I can never imagine the
  American USTR, or the European Trade Commissioner, talking like that. I mean in a contract, a deal is a deal,
  it's settled for eternity. Then he said: "China does not seek for itself an exclusive position in Southeast Asia", so
  he acknowledged that we were not just going to date one girl, we intended to be promiscuous from the
  beginning. Towards Northeast Asia, I think it is very complicated, because there is so much history and legacy.
  Towards Central Asia, towards Russia, they have deep fears. Towards America, it has become a relationship
  bound together at so many points, a rupture would become more and more unthinkable. But it is going to be a
  very difficult relationship, it will be the most important and most difficult relationship to manage in this
  century. If it's badly managed there will be war, if it's properly managed there will be another generation of
  peace and hundreds of millions of people in the world would be raised out of the depths of poverty. In this area,
  you are the experts, but whenever I see China and watch its moves, I go back to its deep nature because it's not
  easy for a country so vast, with such a sense of itself, to depart too much from its deep nature. Thank you.
  George Yeo
  On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 5:57 PM, H <HDR22@clintonemai1.com> wrote:
  Michele,
  I look forward to getting together to discuss a number of issues. Thanks for following up w Jackie Newmyer.
  Her email:
  All the best, Hillary
  Jacqueline Newmyer
  President, Long Term Strategy Group
  12 Eliot St., Cambridge, MA 02138
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762814 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762814 Date: 06/30/2015
  617-661-1626 (fax)
  www.ltstrategy.com
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762814 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762815
MetadataSubject: LETTER TO LAUTENBERG
MetadataTo: abedin@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-22T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/10_11_15_16/DOC_0C05762815/C05762815.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Letter to Lautenberg
ExtractedTo: 'abedinh@state.gov'; 'vermarr@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Verma, Richard R; Rodriguez, Miguel E
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 4:01 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762815
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: The letter is good to go w me. HRC.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762815 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 4:01 PM
  To: 'abedinh@state.gov'; 'vermarr@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Letter to Lautenberg
  The letter is good to go w me. HRC.
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Tue Dec 22 15:42:21 2009
  Subject: Fw: Letter to Lautenberg
  From: Verma, Richard R
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Cc: Verma, Richard R; Rodriguez, Miguel E
  Sent: Tue Dec 22 15:33:57 2009
  Subject: Letter to Lautenberg
  Hi Huma.— could you please show this to the Secretary? Senator Reid's staff and Senator Lautenberg would like the
  letter below sent to his office today. Upon receipt of the letter, we are told Senator Lautenberg will lift his hold on the
  GSP and ATPDA trade legislation. I know the Secretary would prefer to wait until there is a final decision in Brazil, but it
  is still unclear when that decision will come (may not even be today) and we have drafted the letter so that it still makes
  sense regardless of how and when the court rules. Thanks, and I'm at my desk if she wants to discuss it further. Rich
  Dear Senator Lautenberg,
  I appreciated the opportunity to speak with you this past weekend regarding the custody case of Sean Goldman, the
  young American boy wrongfully detained in Brazil for more than five years. As we discussed, the Administration has
  long maintained that Sean should be reunited with his father David in New Jersey. I have made a point of emphasizing
  this position with Brazilian Foreign Minister Celso Amorim during our many conversations, as have other U.S. Officials
  with their Brazilian counterparts.
  We have worked closely with the Government of Brazil to ensure it upholds its obligations under the Hague Convention
  on International Child Abduction. We were quite concerned by last week's decision suspending the order reuniting Sean
  with his father. We were encouraged, however, by the appeal filed last Friday by the Brazilian Solicitor General which
  challenges this suspension. Like you, we are eager to learn of the outcome of this appeal. We understand a decision
  could be announced shortly.
  You can be assured that we will continue advocating for the reunification of Sean and his father and pressing the
  Government of Brazil to ensure swift consideration of the Goldman case so that this long legal process may reach a final
  conclusion without further delay. In the meantime, please be assured that the State Department as well as the U.S.
  Embassy in Brasilia has been and will continue to be a resource to the Goldman family during this trying time.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762815 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762815 Date: 06/30/2015
  Sincerely,
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762815 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762816
MetadataSubject: LETTER TO LAUTENBERG
MetadataTo: vermarr@state.gov
MetadataFrom: hrod17@clintonemail.com
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-22T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/10_11_15_16/DOC_0C05762816/C05762816.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Letter to Lautenberg
ExtractedTo: 'vermarr@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Verma, Richard R; Rodriguez, Miguel E
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 7:25 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762816
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Based on the Brazilian decision he should release the hold. Do I need to call him?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762816 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 7:25 PM
  To: 'vermarr@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Letter to Lautenberg
  Based on the Brazilian decision he should release the hold. Do I need to call him?
  Original Message
  From: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
  To: H; Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Tue Dec 22 18:38:59 2009
  Subject: RE: Letter to Lautenberg
  FYI -- we ended up not sending the letter this afternoon because Lautenberg's staff was being difficult and hedging.
  Now, we can update and send tomorrow (if it is still required) based on latest information from tonight's ruling, as you
  had intended from the start.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 4:01 PM
  To: Abedin, Huma; Verma, Richard R
  Subject: Re: Letter to Lautenberg
  The letter is good to go w me. HRC.
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Tue Dec 22 15:42:21 2009
  Subject: Fw: Letter to Lautenberg
  From: Verma, Richard R
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Cc: Verma, Richard R; Rodriguez, Miguel E
  Sent: Tue Dec 22 15:33:57 2009
  Subject: Letter to Lautenberg
  Hi Huma — could you please show this to the Secretary? Senator Reid's staff and Senator Lautenberg would like the
  letter below sent to his office today. Upon receipt of the letter, we are told Senator Lautenberg will lift his hold on the
  GSP and ATPDA trade legislation. I know the Secretary would prefer to wait until there is a final decision in Brazil, but it
  is still unclear when that decision will come (may not even be today) and we have drafted the letter so that it still makes
  sense regardless of how and when the court rules. Thanks, and I'm at my desk if she wants to discuss it further. Rich
  Dear Senator Lautenberg,
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762816 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762816 Date: 06/30/2015
  I appreciated the opportunity to speak with you this past weekend regarding the custody case of Sean Goldman, the
  young American boy wrongfully detained in Brazil for more than five years. As we discussed, the Administration has
  long maintained that Sean should be reunited with his father David in New Jersey. I have made a point of emphasizing
  this position with Brazilian Foreign Minister Celso Amorim during our many conversations, as have other U.S. Officials
  with their Brazilian counterparts.
  We have worked closely with the Government of Brazil to ensure it upholds its obligations under the Hague Convention
  on International Child Abduction. We were quite concerned by last week's decision suspending the order reuniting Sean
  with his father. We were encouraged, however, by the appeal filed last Friday by the Brazilian Solicitor General which
  challenges this suspension. Like you, we are eager to learn of the outcome of this appeal. We understand a decision
  could be announced shortly.
  You can be assured that we will continue advocating for the reunification of Sean and his father and pressing the
  Government of Brazil to ensure swift consideration of the Goldman case so that this long legal process may reach a final
  conclusion without further delay. In the meantime, please be assured that the State Department as well as the U.S.
  Embassy in Brasilia has been and will continue to be a resource to the Goldman family during this trying time.
  Sincerely,
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762816 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762817
MetadataSubject: PERSONAL
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2009-06-25T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762817/C05762817.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Personal
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob I <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 10:20 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762817
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Yes. We had Jim raise this with the Greek ambassador yesterday, who told him that they were aware of the situation
  and would come back with a report when Jim got to Corfu.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762817 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Sullivan, Jacob I <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 10:20 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: Personal
  Yes. We had Jim raise this with the Greek ambassador yesterday, who told him that they were aware of the situation
  and would come back with a report when Jim got to Corfu.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Thu Jun 25 22:11:03 2009
  Subject: Fw: Personal
  Do you know anything about this?
  Original Message
  From: Davis, Lanny J.
  To: H
  Sent: Tue Jun 23 20:32:06 2009
  Subject: Personal
  Dear Hillary,
  John Solomon, Exec Editor of Washington Times and a close personal friend (and always fair to us as AP reporter and
  later Wash Post reporter), has called about a Wash Times reporter who is being held by Iranians. He says Greeks have
  good relations and he believes they are trying to help. He believes you are meeting with Greek Foreign Minister
  tomorrow and hopes you can raise the issue with him - he may already know something about it. Any information he
  knows would help family.
  Hope you can do this -
  And hope your elbow is better -
  Best wishes,
  Lanny
  IRS Circular 230 disclosure:
  To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this
  communication, unless expressly stated otherwise, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the
  purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or
  recommending to another party any tax-related matter(s) addressed herein.
  NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: THIS E-MAIL IS MEANT FOR ONLY THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OF THE TRANSMISSION, AND MAY
  BE A COMMUNICATION PRIVILEGED BY LAW. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS E- MAIL IN ERROR, ANY REVIEW, USE,
  DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS E-MAIL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US
  69
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762817 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762817 Date: 06/30/2015
  IMMEDIATELY OF THE ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND PLEASE DELETE THIS MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU
  IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR COOPERATION.
  For more information about Orrick, please visit http://www.orrick.com/
  70
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762817 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762822
MetadataSubject: 2-PAGER
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-04-28T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/17_18_19/DOC_0C05762822/C05762822.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fw: 2-pager
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 5:28 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762822
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  See comments on AMS document I left on you chair today.
  Jim and torn F comments in email below.
  Cdm

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762822 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 5:28 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: 2-pager
  See comments on AMS document I left on you chair today.
  Jim and torn F comments in email below.
  Cdm
  From: Jim Kennedy
  To: Tom Freedman
  Cc: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Mon Apr 27 21:38:56 2009
  Subject: Re: 2-pager
  i like virtually everything in the two-pager, and I do agree with Tom on the notion of elevating the "national
  interest" and security elements of this, both because those have become part of her "brand," and also to help
  flesh it out in a way that both gives it the widest reach, and also protects it from attack.
  some ways to consider doing that might be to just ensure that the overarching description of it "call out" the
  national interest/security reasoning at work - something like "America has the opportunity and the responsibility
  to lead in the creation of a network of principled partnerships that will serve our national interest, enhance our
  security and build the capacity of people and nations to solve global problems and give everyone more power to
  reach their potential."
  (i inserted "network" of principled partnerships because i think it kind of alludes to both the diversity of the
  kinds of partnerships as well as to the influence of technology on building them...not a "must have" but just a
  thought... .in the same vein, i don't know whether there might be an advantage in alluding to a network of
  "pragmatic and principled partnerships" or "practical and principled partnerships" just to ensure it's got that
  pragmatism aspect of it sharply inserted).
  On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Tom Freedman < wrote:
  I like the substance and I might consider if there are ways to communicate, or more strongly affirm, some elements that
  would be important for audiences to hear, including that this is an approach of leadership, self-interest, and values. The
  values I mean are things like security, stability and building opportunity. Those pieces are in here, but the notion should be
  clear that we are not ceding leadership, we are leading by building alliances and partnerships. And we will always stand
  for what is right and the right to defend ourselves and our allies, but we are fighting as we always have for shared values.
  Make sense? Tom
  From: Mills, Cheryl D [mailto:MillsCDAstate.gov]
  Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 1:37 PM
  To: Jim Kennedy; Tom Freedman
  Subject: FW: 2-pager
  See attached
  11
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762822 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762822 Date: 06/30/2015
  From: Slaughter, Anne-Marie
  Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 12:14 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Sullivan, Jacob J
  Subject: 2-pager
  I tried out "principled partnership" on her this morning and she likes it — I really think we're almost there. Pse
  let me know whether I can distribute this more widely for tomorrow's mtg.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762822 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762823
MetadataSubject: GOOD NEW
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-06-25T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762823/C05762823.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Good news
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 7:53 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762823
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Rich reports that Kurt, Ellen Tauscher and Dan Rooney were confirmed tonight!
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762823 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 7:53 PM
  To:
  Subject: Good news
  Rich reports that Kurt, Ellen Tauscher and Dan Rooney were confirmed tonight!
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762823 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762824
MetadataSubject: COUPLE EDITS - DEREK CHOLLET'S EDITS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762824/C05762824.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: FW: couple edits - DEREK CHOLLET's EDITS
ExtractedFrom: Cheryl Mills
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 3:37 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762824
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Derek's comments — again in redline in text so Oscar should print so you can see them.
  cdm

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762824 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5,B6
  From: Cheryl Mills
  Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 3:37 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW: couple edits - DEREK CHOLLET's EDITS
  Attachments: 2009-07-10 JJS_speech_2[1].doc
  Derek's comments — again in redline in text so Oscar should print so you can see them.
  cdm
  From: Derek Chollet
  To: Jake Sullivan
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 1t38:44 2009
  Subject: couple edits
  ; Sullivan, Jacob J; Cheryl Mills < ; Mills, Cheryl D
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762824 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762825
MetadataSubject: NOMINATIONS TODAY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-04-28T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_18-20M/DOC_0C05762825/C05762825.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Nominations Today
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 6:06 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762825
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Fyi
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762825 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 6:06 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Nominations Today
  Fyi
  From: Coleman, Claire L
  To: S
  Sent: Mon Apr 27 17:57:35 2009
  Subject: FW: Nominations Today
  FYI
  From: Ruffini, Julio
  Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 5:45 PM
  To: Verma, Richard R; Polt, Michael C; O'Donnell, Edward B; Rodriguez, Miguel E; Bulgrin, Julie K; Nolan, Sarah E
  Subject: Nominations Today
  The following were nominated today:
  Daniel Benjamin, Coordinator for Counterterrorism, with rank of Ambassador at Large
  Robert Blake, Assistant Secretary for South Asian Affairs
  Kurt Campbell, Assistant Secretary for East Asian and Pacific Affairs
  13
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762825 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05762827
MetadataSubject: ANY WORD YET - SHE'S HEADING OVER SHORTLY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-04-28T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/17_18_19/DOC_0C05762827/C05762827.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: FW: any word yet - she's heading over shortly
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 7:56 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762827
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: FYI
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762827 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 7:56 AM
  To:
  Subject: FW: any word yet - she's heading over shortly
  FYI
  From: McDonough, Denis R. [mailto
  Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 7:46 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Re: any word yet - she's heading over shortly
  Let you a vm on cell phone from my bike. Cannot get clear.
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  To: McDonough, Denis R.
  Sent: Tue Apr 28 07:40:44 2009
  Subject: any word yet - she's heading over shortly
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762827 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762828
MetadataSubject: NORTH KOREA TO MOVE INTERCONTINENTAL MISSILE: REPORT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-05-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/23_24_25_26/DOC_0C05762828/C05762828.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fw: North Korea to move intercontinental missile: report
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH©state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-0 Shift-III
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, May 29, 2009 10:24 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762828
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762828 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH©state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 10:24 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: North Korea to move intercontinental missile: report
  From: Gorog, Andrea
  To: NEWS-Mahogany; NEWS-EAP; NEWS-Korea
  Cc: SES-0 Shift-III
  Sent: Fri 1;1
  -ay 29 21:47:25 2009
  Subject: North Korea to move intercontinental missile: report
  North Korea to move [Inter contktenta[l mOssillle: report
  Fri May 29, 2009 9:40pm EDT
  SEOUL (Reuters) - North Korea is preparing to move an intercontinental ballistic missile from a factory near Pyongyang to
  a launch site on the east coast, a South Korean newspaper quoted a source in Washington as saying on Saturday.
  The factory north of Pyongyang is the same place where the North manufactured the long-range rocket it fired on April 5
  before moving it to the east-coast Musudan-ri missile range for assembly and launch, the Dong-a Ilbo newspaper said.
  Regional powers are waiting to see what the North might do next after it conducted a nuclear test on Monday. South
  Korea is on alert on the assessment Pyongyang may make provocative moves using conventional weapons at their
  heavily armed border.
  North Korea has warned of an intercontinental ballistic missile test in anger over U.N. Security Council punishment of
  what Pyongyang said was a satellite launch on April 5.
  "Preparations to move an ICBM from the Saneum Weapons Research Center near Pyongyang by train have been
  captured by U.S. spy satellites," Dong-a Ilbo quoted a source in Washington knowledgeable about the issue as saying.
  The research lab is the North's main center of research and manufacture of long-range missiles, the newspaper said.
  South Korea's defense ministry could not immediately comment on the report.
  North Korea fired a short-range missile on Friday from the Musudan-ri missile base, South Korea's Yonhap news agency
  quoted an unnamed government source as saying. The missile appeared to be a modified surface-to-air missile with a
  range of up to 160 km (99 miles), Dong-a Ilbo said.
  The two Koreas have fought two deadly naval clashes on their disputed maritime border in the past 10 years and the
  North has warned another could happen.
  U.S. Defense Department spokesman Geoff Morrell said on Friday there had been no sign of stepped-up North Korean
  military activity.
  But a U.S. defense official said the United States had observed "above average activity" in the past 24 hours at a site in
  North Korea that has previously been used to test fire long-range missiles.
  South Korea's Defense Ministry said it had seen the number of Chinese fishing boats near the peninsula in the Yellow
  Sea drop sharply in recent days and is watching the North's activities for indications of aggression.
  74
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762828 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762828 Date: 06/30/2015
  In Singapore, defense ministers of South Korea, Japan and the United States will meet to discuss responses to North
  Korea's further provocations, South Korea's defense ministry said.
  Andrea Gorog
  Watch Officer
  Department of State Operations Center
  202-647-1512
  75
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762828 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762829
MetadataSubject: PERSONAL
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2009-06-25T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762829/C05762829.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Personal
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivanil@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 10:27 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762829
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  I will. Philippe is keeping Solomon informed -- he passed along a readout of Jim's conversation yesterday.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762829 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivanil@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 10:27 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: Personal
  I will. Philippe is keeping Solomon informed -- he passed along a readout of Jim's conversation yesterday.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Sullivan, Jacob
  Sent: Thu Jun 25 22:22:47 2009
  Subject: Re: Personal
  Would you pis give Lanny a report and do you know who is keeping Solomon informed?
  Original Message
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivann@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Thu Jun 25 22:19:57 2009
  Subject: Re: Personal
  Yes. We had Jim raise this with the Greek ambassador yesterday, who told him that they were aware of the situation
  and would come back with a report when Jim got to Corfu.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Sullivan, Jacob
  Sent: Thu Jun 25 22:11:03 2009
  Subject: Fw: Personal
  Do you know anything about this?
  Original Message
  From: Davis, Lanny J.
  To: H
  Sent: Tue Jun 23 20:32:06 2009
  Subject: Personal
  Dear Hillary,
  John Solomon, Exec Editor of Washington Times and a close personal friend (and always fair to us as AP reporter and
  later Wash Post reporter), has called about a Wash Times reporter who is being held by Iranians. He says Greeks have
  good relations and he believes they are trying to help. He believes you are meeting with Greek Foreign Minister
  tomorrow and hopes you can raise the issue with him - he may already know something about it. Any information he
  knows would help family.
  Hope you can do this -
  And hope your elbow is better -
  Best wishes,
  71
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762829 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762829 Date: 06/30/2015
  Lanny
  IRS Circular 230 disclosure:
  To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this
  communication, unless expressly stated otherwise, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the
  purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or
  recommending to another party any tax-related matter(s) addressed herein.
  NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: THIS E-MAIL IS MEANT FOR ONLY THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OF THE TRANSMISSION, AND MAY
  BE A COMMUNICATION PRIVILEGED BY LAW. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS E- MAIL IN ERROR, ANY REVIEW, USE,
  DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS E-MAIL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US
  IMMEDIATELY OF THE ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND PLEASE DELETE THIS MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU
  IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR COOPERATION.
  For more information about Orrick, please visit http://www.orrick.com/
  72
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762829 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762836
MetadataSubject: BRAZIL AND MEXICO
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Reines, Philippe I
MetadataDateSent: 2009-05-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/23_24_25_26/DOC_0C05762836/C05762836.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Brazil and Mexico
ExtractedFrom: Reines, Philippe I <reinesp@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 7:31 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762836
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Tom backgrounded them yesterday in the briefing room, not certain but don't think he put down any groundwork on
  this specifically.
  But in terms of setting expectations it would be a combo of a few overt and not overt things:
  - Seeing what Admin/For Pol Members of Congress are on TV today and the shows tomorrow, all we need is one person
  to float it.
  - We have flight time tomorrow when Tom & Jake can do it on background or OTR.
  - There's one blogger that folks loosely follow, I know how to get her something through a 3rd party.
  - I have to talk to a few of our guys today like Matt Lee on misc stuff, and I'm sure he'll ask me something about the OAS
  where I can easily say the folks in WHA are real pessimistic. And our travelers traffic info among themselves. The best
  thing to put out there would be the notion that there are those who don't think you should go. If you don't, you don't.
  But if you do, you chose to be direct, to make a principled stand.
  Shouldn't be too tough, because the notion of Cuba being voted in is something they will WANT to believe, it'll make
  good copy. And it makes it easier to explain any decision/outcome

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762836 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN
  PART B5,B6
  From: Reines, Philippe I <reinesp@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 7:31 AM
  To:
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob
  Subject: Re: Brazil and Mexico
  Tom backgrounded them yesterday in the briefing room, not certain but don't think he put down any groundwork on
  this specifically.
  But in terms of setting expectations it would be a combo of a few overt and not overt things:
  - Seeing what Admin/For Pol Members of Congress are on TV today and the shows tomorrow, all we need is one person
  to float it.
  - We have flight time tomorrow when Tom & Jake can do it on background or OTR.
  - There's one blogger that folks loosely follow, I know how to get her something through a 3rd party.
  - I have to talk to a few of our guys today like Matt Lee on misc stuff, and I'm sure he'll ask me something about the OAS
  where I can easily say the folks in WHA are real pessimistic. And our travelers traffic info among themselves. The best
  thing to put out there would be the notion that there are those who don't think you should go. If you don't, you don't.
  But if you do, you chose to be direct, to make a principled stand.
  Shouldn't be too tough, because the notion of Cuba being voted in is something they will WANT to believe, it'll make
  good copy. And it makes it easier to explain any decision/outcome
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Reines, Philippe I
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Sat May 30 06:42:27 2009
  Subject: Re: Brazil and Mexico
  How will we set any expectations? Did anyone background the press yet?
  Original Message
  From: Reines, Philippe I <reinesp@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivanil@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri May 29 21:47:49 2009
  Subject: Re: Brazil and Mexico
  76
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762836 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762836 Date: 06/30/2015
  If we set the expectation now that the outcome is likely to not go our way, ANY alternative - even one kicking the can
  down the road as Jake outlines below - would be seen as a significant victory.
  And as an added bonus, it would be an opportunity to highlight your personal dedication to and prioritization of human
  rights/democracy, which we've been criticized for since China.
  From: Jake Sullivan
  To: H <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Reines, Philippe I
  Sent: Fri May 29 20:59:26 2009
  Subject: Brazil and Mexico
  77
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762836 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762838
MetadataSubject: FATHER BEIRNE
MetadataTo: balderstonkm@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2009-12-23T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/10_11_15_16/DOC_0C05762838/C05762838.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Father Beirne
ExtractedTo: 'balderstonkm@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: 'ValmoroU@state.gov'; Huma Abedin
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 10:53 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762838
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: When he comes in January let's have him for lunch w a small group including Mark Landler.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762838 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 10:53 AM
  To: 'balderstonkm@state.gov'
  Cc: 'ValmoroU@state.gov'; Huma Abedin
  Subject: Father Beirne
  When he comes in January let's have him for lunch w a small group including Mark Landler.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762838 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762839
MetadataSubject: 2009-07-10 JJS SPEECH 2 - DENNIS ROSS COMMENTS FOR IRAN
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762839/C05762839.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: FW: 2009-07-10 JJS speech 2 - DENNIS ROSS COMMENTS FOR IRAN
ExtractedFrom: Cheryl Mills
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 3:39 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762839
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Dennis comments below and but primarily in text in track changes.
  cdm

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762839 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5,B6
  From: Cheryl Mills
  Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 3:39 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW: 2009-07-10 JJS speech 2 - DENNIS ROSS COMMENTS FOR IRAN
  Attachments: 2009-07-10 JJS speech 2.docx
  Dennis comments below and but primarily in text in track changes.
  cdm
  From: Ross, Dennis B
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Sat Jul 11 13:02:26 2009
  Subject: 2009-07-10 335 speech 2
  Jake,
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762839 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762840
MetadataSubject: DOES THS MEAN YOUR CAREER AS A MAJOR LEAGUE PITCHER IS OVER?
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Podesta, John
MetadataDateSent: 2009-06-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762840/C05762840.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: RE: Does this mean your career as a major league pitcher is over?
ExtractedFrom: John Podesta
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, June 2, 2009 8:22 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762840
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: We'll meet you in Arizona. Sounds like you are doing OK.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762840 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: John Podesta
  Sent: Friday, June 2, 2009 8:22 AM
  To:
  Subject: RE: Does this mean your career as a major league pitcher is over?
  We'll meet you in Arizona. Sounds like you are doing OK.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 10:35 PM
  To: John Podesta
  Subject: Re: Does this mean your career as a major league pitcher is over?
  Probably for this season, but I'll be ready next spring! Until then, I'll keep my day job.
  Original Message
  From: John Podesta
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jun 21 15:07:06 2009
  Subject: Does this mean your career as a major league pitcher is over?
  Tried you a couple days ago, but email bounced back Neera says this is the right one. How are you doing? Hope it's not
  too excruciating, but suspect that it is. Hope you're better soon. We need you in the real majors.
  John and Mary
  PS No matter what anybody says, we refuse to believe that Holbrooke tripped you.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762840 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762842
MetadataSubject: 2009-07-10 JJS SPEECH 2 - JIM KENNEDY'S EDITS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762842/C05762842.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: FW: Fw: 2009-07-10 JJS speech 2 - JIM KENNEDY'S EDITS
ExtractedFrom: Cheryl Mills
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 3:43 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762842
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Jim's comments on the same draft — also in track changes in text.
  cdm

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762842 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Cheryl Mills
  Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 3:43 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW: Fw: 2009-07-10 JJS speech 2 - JIM KENNEDY'S EDITS
  Attachments: 2009-07-10 JJS speech 2a.doc
  Jim's comments on the same draft — also in track changes in text.
  cdm
  From: Jim Kennedy
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Sun Jul 12 03:55:08 2009
  Subject: Re: Fw: 2009-07-10 AS speech 2
  hi jake - here's a tracked changes version as well as a clean one...
  On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov> wrote:
  I think you'll find this draft much better. But it can still use you!
  From: Jim Kennedy [mailto
  Sent: Saturday, July 11,2009 12:46 AM
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Subject: Re: Fw: 2009-07-10 JJS speech 2
  I will try to give it a "polish" (as they say out here in hollywood). I haven't looked at this latest draft yet, but i
  did think the earlier version lacked a kind of "narrative" flow (and hadn't had time to fully engage over the 4th)
  . don't know if it will help but wil try.
  On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 8:28 PM, Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov> wrote:
  Hi Jim. Here is where things stand. It's now in hrc's hands. Would love it if you could go thru and sleeken/sharpen it. Needs a lot of it.
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J
  To: 'Berger, Samuel R.'
  Sent: Fri Jul 10 19:06:42 2009
  Subject: 2009-07-10 JJS speech 2
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762842 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762842 Date: 06/30/2015
  Here is the latest and greatest.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762842 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762843
MetadataSubject: SPEECH - PJ CROWLEY SANDY SUMMARY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Cheryl Mills
MetadataDateSent: 2009-07-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/27_28_29/DOC_0C05762843/C05762843.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: FW: Speech - PJ Crowley, Sandy, Summary
ExtractedFrom: Cheryl Mills
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 3:47 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762843
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Below are PJ's comments/edits in this email (i.e., no attachment).
  All of Sandy's were incorporated in the draft you have except his point
  that: "Finally, there needs to be a key para that sets forth the lens through which through which you want the speech to
  be seen."
  We actually are still awaiting George's comments on ME para.
  cdm

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762843 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5,B6
  From: Cheryl Mills
  Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 3:47 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW: Speech - PJ Crowley, Sandy, Summary
  Below are PJ's comments/edits in this email (i.e., no attachment).
  All of Sandy's were incorporated in the draft you have except his point
  that: "Finally, there needs to be a key para that sets forth the lens through which through which you want the speech to
  be seen."
  We actually are still awaiting George's comments on ME para.
  cdm
  Original Message
  From: Crowley, Philip J
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J; Chollet, Derek H; Slaughter, Anne-Marie; Muscatine, Lissa; Mills, Cheryl;
  Sent: Sun Jul 12 09:44:29 2009
  Subject: Speech
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762843 Date: 06/30/2015



DocNumber: C05762845
MetadataSubject: BRAZIL AND MEXICO
MetadataTo: Reines, Philippe I
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2009-05-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCAll_1_1-29_JuneWEB/23_24_25_26/DOC_0C05762845/C05762845.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JuneWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Brazil and Mexico
ExtractedTo: Reines, Philippe I; H
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 7:57 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05762845
ExtractedDateReleased: 06/30/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Tom's backgrounder definitely played down expectations.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762845 Date: 06/30/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5,B6
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 7:57 AM
  To: Reines, Philippe I; H
  Subject: Re: Brazil and Mexico
  Tom's backgrounder definitely played down expectations.
  Original Message
  From: Reines, Philippe I
  To: 'Hdr22@clintonemail.coml <Hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob
  Sent: Sat May 30 07:31:10 2009
  Subject: Re: Brazil and Mexico
  Tom backgrounded them yesterday in the briefing room, not certain but don't think he put down any groundwork on
  this specifically.
  But in terms of setting expectations it would be a combo of a few overt and not overt things:
  - Seeing what Admin/For Pol Members of Congress are on TV today and the shows tomorrow, all we need is one person
  to float it.
  - We have flight time tomorrow when Tom & Jake can do it on background or OTR.
  - There's one blogger that folks loosely follow, I know how to get her something through a 3rd party.
  - I have to talk to a few of our guys today like Matt Lee on misc stuff, and I'm sure he'll ask me something about the OAS
  where I can easily say the folks in WHA are real pessimistic. And our travelers traffic info among themselves. The best
  thing to put out there would be the notion that there are those who don't think you should go. If you don't, you don't.
  But if you do, you chose to be direct, to make a principled stand.
  Shouldn't be too tough, because the notion of Cuba being voted in is something they will WANT to believe, it'll make
  good copy. And it makes it easier to explain any decision/outcome
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Reines, Philippe I
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacobi
  Sent: Sat May 30 06:42:27 2009
  Subject: Re: Brazil and Mexico
  How will we set any expectations? Did anyone background the press yet?
  78
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762845 Date: 06/30/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762845 Date: 06/30/2015
  Original Message
  From: Reines, Philippe I <reinesp@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivanil@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri May 29 21:47:49 2009
  Subject: Re: Brazil and Mexico
  If we set the expectation now that the outcome is likely to not go our way, ANY alternative - even one kicking the can
  down the road as Jake outlines below - would be seen as a significant victory.
  And as an added bonus, it would be an opportunity to highlight your personal dedication to and prioritization of human
  rights/democracy, which we've been criticized for since China.
  From: Jake Sullivan
  To: H <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Reines, Philippe I
  Sent: Fri May 29 20:59:26 2009
  Subject: Brazil and Mexico
  79
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05762845 Date: 06/30/2015



