# Emails

DocNumber: C05772567
MetadataSubject: GLOBAL HUNGER AND FOOD SECURITY INITIATIVE - AWARD TO SECRETARY CLINTON
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-11T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772567/C05772567.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Global Hunger and Food Security Initiative - Award to Secretary Clinton
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
ExtractedCc: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, January 11, 2010 11:03 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772567
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: That's very nice but you should get it! But, of course, I would accept on behalf of all of us.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772567 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
  Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 11:03 PM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Global Hunger and Food Security Initiative - Award to Secretary Clinton
  That's very nice but you should get it! But, of course, I would accept on behalf of all of us.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
  Sent: Mon Jan 11 22:40:35 2010
  Subject: FW: Global Hunger and Food Security Initiative - Award to Secretary Clinton
  FYI
  From: Rick Leach [mailto
  Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 11:28 AM
  To: Thompson, James F
  Subject: Global Hunger and Food Security Initiative - Award to Secretary Clinton
  Importance: High
  Hello and Happy New Year Jim,
  Friends of WFP has decided to provide its annual "Leadership in the Fight Against Hunger" Award to Secretary Clinton
  this year. The award is presented at a ceremony on Capitol Hill (within one of the House/Senate caucus rooms).
  Approximately 200 people attend the event including Members of Congress, NGO representatives, business leaders,
  administration officials and other leaders in the fight against hunger.
  As you know, Friends of WFP is a non-profit organization dedicated to addressing global hunger. Its board members
  include former agriculture secretary Dan Glickman, former Senators George McGovern and Bob Dole, YUM Brands CEO
  David Novak, former NSC Advisor Sandy Berger and others. I established the organization in 1997.
  Before officially announcing Secretary Clinton as this year's award recipient, we hoped to confirm that Secretary Clinton
  will be available to personally accept the award. We plan to schedule the award ceremony in September on either a
  Tuesday or Wednesday evening (at approximately 6:30/7pm). We would select the specific date based on Secretary
  Clinton's schedule.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772567 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772567 Date: 08/31/2015
  I think the ceremony would provide another good opportunity to shine a spotlight on the unprecedented commitment
  of Secretary Clinton and President Obama to addressing global hunger. Thank you for your help in engaging the
  appropriate officials in the State Department.
  All the Best,
  Rick Leach
  From: Thompson, James F [ThompsonJF2@state.gov]
  Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 4:16 PM
  To: Global Partnership Initiative
  Subject: Global Hunger and Food Security Initiative Update
  Friends,
  As 2009 comes to a close, we wanted to provide you with an update on the U.S. Global Hunger and Food Security
  Initiative and share with you what is to come in the new year.
  First, a word of thanks for the input that many of you provided on our Global Hunger and Food Security Initiative
  consultation document. We received a large amount of interest and excellent suggestions on the document, and we will
  soon release a new version that reflects this input.
  We are also drafting an implementation plan that will describe in greater detail how we intend to implement the
  initiative. We look forward to sharing both documents with you.
  In recent months, we have continued to garner international support for the five core principles for global food security
  that form the basis of our strategy. In November, all UN member states endorsed these principles at the World Summit
  on Food Security in Rome.
  1) Invest in country-owned plans
  2) Foster strategic coordination
  3) Strive for a comprehensive approach to food security
  4) Ensure a strong role for the multilateral system
  5) Ensure sustained and substantial commitment by all partners to investment in agriculture and food security and
  nutrition
  In establishing the Rome Principles, the international community declared a new business model for coordinated action
  to increase global food security.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772567 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772567 Date: 08/31/2015
  Translating these principles into action, on December 6-8, the Government of Rwanda, together with the
  Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Program, hosted a technical review of its Agriculture Sector Investment
  Plan and convened a high-level stakeholders meeting. At the meeting, development partners and the African
  Union/NEPAD endorsed Rwanda's plan and agreed to mobilize support for scaled-up financing. The African
  Union/NEPAD and representatives from the World Bank, UN, donor countries, the private sector, civil society
  organizations, and NGOs attended the meeting.
  The United States was represented by a whole-of-government team led by Special Assistant to the President Gayle
  Smith that included representatives from the Departments of State, Treasury, and Agriculture, USAID, and MCC. Our
  team committed to improve the quality of our aid; to provide robust financial commitments and technical support; and
  to work to mobilize additional financing of the Investment Plan.
  In the new year, we will continue to engage all stakeholders, work with the international community, and build on our
  experience in Rwanda as we move forward with plans to implement our initiative.
  Please continue to visit our website: www.state.gov/s/globalfoodsecurity to stay informed of planning for the initiative
  and to provide input.
  We wish you a happy new year and look forward to continuing to work closely with you.
  The Global Hunger and Food Security Team
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772567 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772569
MetadataSubject: JOHN GILL
MetadataTo: Abedin, Huma
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-12T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772569/C05772569.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: John Gill
ExtractedTo: Hume Abedin; 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 12:49 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772569
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: When can I call him?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772569 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 12:49 AM
  To: Hume Abedin; 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
  Subject: John Gill
  When can I call him?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772569 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772570
MetadataSubject: UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jake J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-08T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772570/C05772570.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Update
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivan.1.1@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, October 8, 2010 6:51 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772570
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Some cats and dogs:
  1. Talked to Denis about EU summit issue and Saakashvili. He said he would work both of them.
  2. Hikers meeting was interesting and will fill you in Monday. Bottom line — we are actively working a number of
  the options, including the British option.
  3. Saw Kurt this evening to discuss a potential Asia speech in Hawaii and he was focused on Jim again. I know you
  spoke with him and assume he gave you the same analysis.
  4. Sent you updates on Libya — it played as we expected...a demand for a complete settlement freeze including
  •Jerusalem. Our press line will be to gloss over that and focus on the top line: We have Arab support for efforts
  to create conditions to continue the negotiations .... i.e., no collapse. You will receive tomorrow morning two
  Plan B documents, one from the Mitchell team and one from Dennis Ross.
  Will continue to report this weekend.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772570 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivan.1.1@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, October 8, 2010 6:51 PM
  To:
  Subject: Update
  Some cats and dogs:
  1. Talked to Denis about EU summit issue and Saakashvili. He said he would work both of them.
  2. Hikers meeting was interesting and will fill you in Monday. Bottom line — we are actively working a number of
  the options, including the British option.
  3. Saw Kurt this evening to discuss a potential Asia speech in Hawaii and he was focused on Jim again. I know you
  spoke with him and assume he gave you the same analysis.
  4. Sent you updates on Libya — it played as we expected...a demand for a complete settlement freeze including
  •Jerusalem. Our press line will be to gloss over that and focus on the top line: We have Arab support for efforts
  to create conditions to continue the negotiations .... i.e., no collapse. You will receive tomorrow morning two
  Plan B documents, one from the Mitchell team and one from Dennis Ross.
  Will continue to report this weekend.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772570 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772571
MetadataSubject: YOUR TECHNOLOGY DINNER THIS EVENING
MetadataTo: balderstonkm@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-12T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772571/C05772571.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Your technology dinner this evening
ExtractedTo: 'balderstonkm@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 10:45 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772571
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Can you send me a call sheet for Bloomberg?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772571 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B4,B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
  Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 10:45 AM
  To: 'balderstonkm@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Your technology dinner this evening
  Can you send me a call sheet for Bloomberg?
  Original Message
  From: Balderston, Kris M <BalderstonKM@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jan 10 20:56:15 2010
  Subject: Re: Your technology dinner this evening
  Its not like a traditional trade show/expo with specific booths. It is more subtle and the pavilion folks would negotiate
  creatively on what they want..
  Depdg on amount, they get on the big wall of contributors, we show multiple scenes of NYC in the shows and displays,
  they can use the wonderful VIP lounge/auditorium to have NYC day or week at the Expo - the rockettes, Broadway goes
  to China, commercial diplomacy, mtgs betwn NYC and Chinese officials, .getting SME's access to China etc. We could
  really be creative.
  LA, San Fran, San Antonio already in, chicago on way...
  As you know the general theme is "Better Cities, Better Lives". How can NYC not be repped? They cam brag about their
  innovations.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Balderston, Kris M
  Sent: Sun Jan 10 20:41:04 2010
  Subject: Re: Your technology dinner this evening
  If a city gives $ do they put up display/exhibits?
  Original Message
  From: Balderston, Kris M <BalderstonKM@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jan 10 20:37:29 2010
  Subject: Re: Your technology dinner this evening
  This will be an important two weeks to nail down these big companies. We are negotiating with them now about
  possible options. I'll keep you posted.
  May be good to mention this to Mayor Bloomberg if you run into him or see him. Doctoroff gave us
  Bloomberg, LLC but he thght the Mayor may be interested for the city.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Balderston, Kris M
  from B4
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772571 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772571 Date: 08/31/2015
  Sent: Sun Jan 10 20:13:04 2010
  Subject: Re: Your technology dinner this evening
  What else can I do to help?
  Original Message
  From: Balderston, Kris M <BalderstonKM@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jan 10 19:03:24 2010
  Subject: Re: Your technology dinner this evening
  Google has been wierd about this whole deal but this whole Espo experience has been fascinating. Some companies will
  say absolutely no for months (Qualcomm, Bloomberg, J&J) and then pop out of nowhere and say yes. Others like All are
  in for and then decide not to give us a penny. Therefore we have to keep bugging these guys.
  We WILL raise the money. We are at $54M+ (this wk Hawaii came in for $500k and Bloomberg LLC and need $7M
  more. Ideally we would like to raise $10 to 11M to cover any overruns (it's getting more expensive because the US was
  so late we are paying more now to build it quicker).
  Where it will come from?
  A- Right now we have three big companies talking to us in the range of
  Haier may go from If two or three come thru big we are done.
  each - Monsanto, Disney, and Oracle.
  B- We also have a number of other companies like Invitrogen, Hormel, Mattel and Major League Baseball in the
  range.
  C- Interestingly the cities and states are going to their private funders and trying to raise money on their own to
  promote their jurisdictions - Chicago, Houston, Georgia, Montana, TN. (In the past, over 20 states participated with
  public funds but current budgets are tough). Maybe a chat w Mayor Bloomberg would be worthwhile. For example, I
  spoke to the University of WA and they will probably get benefactors to cosponsor at $250k making them the only
  university represented.
  D- We have approached groups like Pharma and the fashion industry thru Diane von Furstenburg to get them to bundle
  smaller companies and both have agreed to do it. I met w DVL and she wants you to know that she is very excited about
  helping (they are in the range).
  E-We have talked to the elusive Chamber of Commerce again about getting SME's to raise $2-3M in smaller increments.
  They are contemplating it.
  Finally the two obvious industries that are not involved are the banks (and we know why) and the insurance companies
  who are starting to look into the market over there.
  Anyway, I did not mean to go on and on but that's where we stand and these are the potential areas to tap. We'll get
  there.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Balderston, Kris M
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772571 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772571 Date: 08/31/2015
  Sent: Sun Jan 10 17:47:22 2010
  Subject: Re: Your technology dinner this evening
  I don't think I made any progress. What will it mean if we can't raise the remaining $? Where else can we try?
  Do you know how
  Original Message
  From: Balderston, Kris M <BalderstonKM@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Thu Jan 07 18:33:26 2010
  Subject: Your technology dinner this evening
  I noticed on your schedule that you are meeting with a number of tech CEO's this evening. Google should be an obvious
  co-sponsor of the USA Pavilion and they have consistently pushed us off. Although they bring up IP issues as a reason
  not to participate, the Chinese frequently note that they do a lot of business in China. We are now at $54 million. If the
  opportunity arises, it would be helpful to note the importance of a USA standing in Shanghai.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772571 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772572
MetadataSubject: CALL REQUEST STEINBERG
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-08T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772572/C05772572.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Call request: Steinberg
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, October 8, 2010 6:52 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772572
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Ms: dep. Sec steinberg has asked, via ops, for a secure call with you.
  ###

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772572 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, October 8, 2010 6:52 PM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Call request: Steinberg
  Ms: dep. Sec steinberg has asked, via ops, for a secure call with you.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772572 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772573
MetadataSubject: CALL REQUEST STEINBERG
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-08T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772573/C05772573.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Call request: Steinberg
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, October 8, 2010 7:08 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772573
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Ok- ill find out and get back to you.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772573 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, October 8, 2010 7:08 PM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Re: Call request: Steinberg
  Ok- ill find out and get back to you.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Fri Oct 08 19:06:56 2010
  Subject: Re: Call request: Steinberg
  Pis let him know I won't be at secure phone for at least two hours. How late can I call?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Oct 08 18:51:39 2010
  Subject: Call request: Steinberg
  Ms: dep. Sec steinberg has asked, via ops, for a secure call with you.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772573 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772575
MetadataSubject: CALL REQUEST STEINBERG
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-08T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772575/C05772575.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Call request: Steinberg
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, October 8, 2010 7:19 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772575
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  We let steinberg know that you won't be at a secure phone for at least two hours. He is unsure of how late he will be
  available this evening, so his preference is to check back in with ops later on in the evening. When he does that I will let
  you know.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772575 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, October 8, 2010 7:19 PM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Re: Call request: Steinberg
  We let steinberg know that you won't be at a secure phone for at least two hours. He is unsure of how late he will be
  available this evening, so his preference is to check back in with ops later on in the evening. When he does that I will let
  you know.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemailcom>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Fri Oct 08 19:06:56 2010
  Subject: Re: Call request: Steinberg
  Pls let him know I won't be at secure phone for at least two hours. How late can I call?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Oct 08 18:51:39 2010
  Subject: Call request: Steinberg
  Ms: dep. Sec steinberg has asked, via ops, for a secure call with you.
  ##1*
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772575 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772576
MetadataSubject: CALL REQUEST STEINBERG
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-08T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772576/C05772576.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Call request: Steinberg
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, October 8, 2010 7:50 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772576
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  D steinberg informed ops that he has resolved the issue and has rescinded his request to speak with you this evening.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772576 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, October 8, 2010 7:50 PM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Re: Call request: Steinberg
  D steinberg informed ops that he has resolved the issue and has rescinded his request to speak with you this evening.
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: thdr22@clintonemallcom' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Fri Oct 08 19:19:23 2010
  Subject: Re: Call request: Steinberg
  We let steinberg know that you won't be at a secure phone for at least two hours. He is unsure of how late he will be
  available this evening, so his preference is to check back in with ops later on in the evening. When he does that I will let
  you know.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Fri Oct 08 19:06:56 2010
  Subject: Re: Call request: Steinberg
  Pls let him know I won't be at secure phone for at least two hours. How late can I call?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Oct 08 18:51:39 2010
  Subject: Call request: Steinberg
  Ms: dep. Sec steinberg has asked, via ops, for a secure call with you.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772576 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772577
MetadataSubject: STATEMENT
MetadataTo: sullivanjj@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-12T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772577/C05772577.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Statement
ExtractedTo: 'sullivanij@state.gov.
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 11:15 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772577
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772577 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 11:15 PM
  To: 'sullivanij@state.gov.
  Subject: Re: Statement
  Original Message
  From: Sullivan, Jacob1 <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Tue Jan 12 23:12:29 2010
  Subject: Statement
  Here you go:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772577 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772578
MetadataSubject: CALL TMW WITH SOUTH KOREAN MINISTER KIM SUNG-HWAN
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-08T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772578/C05772578.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Call tmw with South Korean Foreign Minister Kim Sung-hwan
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC©state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, October 8, 2010 9:40 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772578
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Ops has confirmed this call for tomorrow at 9:30 am EDT.
  Ops informs us that the call with the thai fm will not be confirmed until closer to midnight tonight.
  ###

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772578 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC©state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, October 8, 2010 9:40 PM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Call tmw with South Korean Foreign Minister Kim Sung-hwan
  Ops has confirmed this call for tomorrow at 9:30 am EDT.
  Ops informs us that the call with the thai fm will not be confirmed until closer to midnight tonight.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772578 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772579
MetadataSubject: FOR HRC: ECONOMIST OP-ED
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772579/C05772579.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: For HRC: Economist op-ed
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Daniel, Joshua J; Fuchs, Michael H; Sullivan, Jacob
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, October 9, 2010 12:04 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772579
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Do you want me to have faxed to you as well?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772579 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B5
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, October 9, 2010 12:04 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: For HRC: Economist op-ed
  Do you want me to have faxed to you as well?
  Original Message
  From: Schwerin, Daniel B
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Cc: Daniel, Joshua J; Fuchs, Michael H; Sullivan, Jacob
  Sent: Fri Oct 08 21:02:59 2010
  Subject: For HRC: Economist op-ed
  Huma, here's a revised draft of the Economist op-ed that reflects the Secretary's suggestions:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772579 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772579 Date: 08/31/2015
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772579 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772581
MetadataSubject: CALLS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772581/C05772581.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Calls
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, October 9, 2010 8:27 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772581
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  9:30 korean fm confirmed
  10am thai fm confirmed
  And kouchner called asking to speak to you today.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772581 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, October 9, 2010 8:27 AM
  To: H
  Subject: Calls
  9:30 korean fm confirmed
  10am thai fm confirmed
  And kouchner called asking to speak to you today.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772581 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772582
MetadataSubject: CALL ME OR EMAIL
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-14T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772582/C05772582.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: FW: Call Me or Email
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.goV
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Loraine Mangones
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 4:39 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772582
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: I'm back on the ground, on the way to the house.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772582 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 4:39 AM
  To: 'millscd@state.goV
  Subject: Re: FW: Call Me or Email
  I'm back on the ground, on the way to the house.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Wed Jan 13 21:44:33 2010
  Subject: FW: FW: Call Me or Email
  FYI - see Michele message
  Forwarded message
  From: Stewart Paperin
  Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:33:30 -0500
  Subject: FW: Call Me or Email
  To: raj.shah rajivshah
  Raj,
  In organizing efforts for Haiti you may want to reach out to Michele Pierre Louis, the former Prime Minister, who is on
  the ground. I have attaached below a short email describing the situation. She is a superb executive and has one of the
  best insights into what is needed.
  Stewart
  From: Michele Duvivier [mailto
  Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 2:13 PM
  To: Stewart Paperin
  Subject: Re: Call Me or Email
  Stewart,
  We are safe but Port-au-Prince is destroyed. My appartment is gone.
  FOKAL is safe fortunately but a few employees had their homes destroyed, like mine. The phones don't work so it is
  easier to stay in touch by internet.
  The situation is dramatic. the governement is owerless. The Palace, the Parliament, the Ministries, the Minustah are
  non operational. We cannot count the dead. is dead and Minustah's headquarters collapsed. We ran out of
  medical supplies, water, food for the first reliefs, and then we have to think about reconstruction.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772582 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772582 Date: 08/31/2015
  As soon as we can talk I'll call you to talk about specifics.
  The hard part is that there have been over 40 repeats after the first tough seism and we don't know if it is over yet.
  We keep in touch.
  Michele
  From: Stewart Paperin
  To: micheleduvivier
  Cc: Loraine Mangones
  Sent: Wed, January 13, 2010 12:09:15 PM
  Subject: Call Me or Email
  Michele,
  I heard you, Loraine and the family are ok.. Please call me if you have a chance or ask Loraine to. I talked with
  and want to discuss how we can be helpful.
  Sip
  Sent from my mobile device
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772582 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772586
MetadataSubject: FOR HRC: ECONOMIST OP-ED
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Schwerin, Daniel B
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772586/C05772586.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: For HRC: Economist op-ed
ExtractedTo: H; Fuchs, Michael H
ExtractedFrom: Schwerin, Daniel B <SchwerinDB@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Daniel, Joshua 1; Fuchs, Michael H; Sullivan, Jacob J
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, October 9, 2010 8:32 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772586
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Thank you, we'll make that change.
  Dan

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772586 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B5
  From: Schwerin, Daniel B <SchwerinDB@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, October 9, 2010 8:32 AM
  To: H; Fuchs, Michael H
  Subject: Re: For HRC: Economist op-ed
  Thank you, we'll make that change.
  Dan
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Schwerin, Daniel B; Fuchs, Michael H
  Sent: Sat Oct 09 05:59:29 2010
  Subject: Fw: For HRC: Economist op-ed
  This is fine but needs to mention the G-20 and the way we used it to address economic crisis.
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Oct 09 00:03:36 2010
  Subject: Fw: For HRC: Economist op-ed
  Do you want me to have faxed to you as well?
  Original Message
  From: Schwerin, Daniel B
  To: Abed in, Huma
  Cc: Daniel, Joshua 1; Fuchs, Michael H; Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Fri Oct 08 21:02:59 2010
  Subject: For HRC: Economist op-ed
  Huma, here's a revised draft of the Economist op-ed that reflects the Secretary's suggestions:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772586 Date: 08/31/2015

  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772586 Date: 08/31/2015
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772586 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772593
MetadataSubject: LAW OF THE SEAS
MetadataTo: brimmere@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-14T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772593/C05772593.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Law of the Seas
ExtractedTo: 'brimmere@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 4:06 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772593
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Esther--Can you tell me if China has signed this treaty?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772593 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 4:06 PM
  To: 'brimmere@state.gov'
  Subject: Law of the Seas
  Esther--Can you tell me if China has signed this treaty?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772593 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772596
MetadataSubject: LAW OF THE SEAS
MetadataTo: brimmere@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-14T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772596/C05772596.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Law of the Seas
ExtractedTo: 'brimmere@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 5:19 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772596
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Thx.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772596 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 5:19 PM
  To: 'brimmere@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Law of the Seas
  Thx.
  Original Message
  From: Brimmer, Esther D <BrimmerE@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Thu Jan 14 17:17:47 2010
  Subject: RE: Law of the Seas
  Yes, Ma'am, China ratified in 1996.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 4:06 PM
  To: Brim mer, Esther D
  Subject: Law of the Seas
  Esther--Can you tell me if China has signed this treaty?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772596 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772599
MetadataSubject: RAJ SHAH
MetadataTo: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-14T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772599/C05772599.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Raj Shah
ExtractedTo: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 5:52 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772599
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Can you send me his email address?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772599 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 5:52 PM
  To: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
  Subject: Raj Shah
  Can you send me his email address?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772599 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772600
MetadataSubject: FEED THE FUTURE INITIATIVE
MetadataTo: Clinton, Hillary
MetadataFrom: American Beverage Association
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-18T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0103/DOC_0C05772600/C05772600.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772600
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772600 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  FOOD INDUSTRY CODEX COALITION
  Advancing Sound International Policy Through Science
  October 18, 2010
  Secretary Hilary Clinton
  US Department of State
  2201 C Street NW
  Washington, DC 20520
  Secretary Tom Vilsack
  US Department of Agriculture
  Whitten Building .
  1400 Independence Avenue NW
  Washington, DC 20250
  Dear Secretary Clinton and Secretary Vilsack:
  On behalf of the members of the Food Industry Codex Coalition (FICC)1 we applaud the
  Administration's global commitment to food security, through its Feed the Future
  initiative, and urge your strong and continuing support for the US government's role in
  Codex2 to further this objective. We address this appeal to both of you, as it relates both
  to your individual and joint responsibilities on Codex Alimentarius. We are much
  encouraged by the Administration's view that "the private sector is particularly important
  for combating food insecurity and increasing the sustainability of our efforts," and we
  enthusiastically welcome this partnership with the Administration.
  We draw your attention especially to the critical relationship between Codex and Feed
  the Future. A vibrant science-based global food safety regulatory system which Codex
  fosters is among the most tangible and valuable components in the strategy to further our
  shared goal to achieve global food security. Safe food is a prerequisite for a sufficient
  The FICC represents the interests of over 70 food companies and trade associations keenly interested in
  the international standard setting activities of the Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC). FICC
  recognizes the critical role Codex serves to facilitate trade and protect consumer health. The coalition,
  which represents the entire food chain from production to retail, works to influence international food
  policy based on science. FICC members actively engage with U.S. delegates and Codex staff in an effort to
  support and strengthen U.S. leadership in Codex.
  2 The Codex Alimentarius was created in 1963 under the joint umbrellas of the United Nations' World
  Health Organization (WHO) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) with a dual mandate:
  protection of the health of consumers and the facilitation of fair practices in food trade.
  FICC Letter
  October 19, 2010
  Page 1 of 3
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772600 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772600 Date: 08/31/2015
  supply. For our developing country partners, Codex standards serve a vital role in
  protecting the health of their people, and in facilitating market opportunities for their
  agricultural commodities. For the US food and agriculture industry, these science-based
  Codex rules help protect our $100 billion agricultural export market by setting global
  standards for safe and fair food trade. Moreover, they lay the foundation for achieving
  the President's National Export Initiative goal of doubling exports in the next five years.
  For all these reasons the US should increase its presence and influence in Codex.
  Specifically, we urge your close attention, high priority, and full funding support in these
  areas:
  • US Codex Office, USDA, and international outreach programs;
  • Office of the Codex Chairperson, currently held by an American at USDA;
  • Codex-related positions at both FAO and WHO, the two Codex UN oversight
  institutions:
  • Committed and focused senior policy level participation in the US Codex
  Policy Committee;
  • High-level participation in US delegations to Codex Commission and
  committee meetings;
  • Consistent policy positions for Codex meetings; and
  • Enhanced collaboration between the US Mission and the Codex Secretariat at
  FAO in Rome.
  FICC acknowledges with appreciation our government's responsiveness to previous
  petitions to the Administration to give strong support to Codex issues, and notes
  particularly USDA's earlier action to strengthen the leadership of the US Codex Office.
  At this time we respectfully urge your renewed attention to these other critical areas of
  Codex activity. Ensuring the full potential of Codex is an essential component to
  improve global food safety and achieving America's priority goal of global food
  security.
  Thank you for your consideration of these views.
  Sincerely,
  American Beverage Association
  American Frozen Food Institute
  Animal Health Institute
  Association of Dressings and Sauces
  Biotechnology Industry Organization
  Calorie Control Council
  Campbell Soup Company
  Corn Refiners Association
  CropLife America
  FICC Letter
  October 19, 2010
  Page 2 of 3
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772600 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772600 Date: 08/31/2015
  Enzyme Technical Association
  Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association of the United States
  Global Agritrends
  Grocery Manufacturers Association
  Institute of Shortening and Edible Oils
  International Association of Color Manufacturers
  International Dairy Foods Association
  International Food Additives Council
  International Formula Council
  Juice Products Association
  National Cattleman's Beef Association
  National Confectioners Association
  National Fisheries Institute
  National Oilseed Processors Association
  National Pork Producers Council
  National Renderers Association
  Nestle USA
  Pet Food Institute
  US Meat Export Federation
  ViaGen, Inc.
  Vinegar Institute
  cc:
  Ron Kirk, USTR
  Islam Siddiqui, USTR Agriculture Negotiator
  Margaret Hamberg, Commissioner FDA
  Ertharin Cousin, Ambassador to the US Mission to UN Agencies Rome
  Jim Miller, Undersecretary of State USDA FFAS
  Elizabeth Hagen, Undersecretary of Food Safety USDA
  Catherine Woteki, Undersecretary of State USDA REE
  Robert Hormats, Undersecretary of State Economic, Energy and Agriculture
  Francisco Sanchez, Undersecretary for International Trade, DOC
  Rajiv Shah, Administrator USAID
  Jose Fernandez, Assistant Secretary of State, Economic Energy and Business
  Ester Brimmer, Assistant Secretary of State, International Organizations
  Cheryl Mills, Chief of Staff to Secretary of State
  Ann Tutwiler, Global Food Security Coordinator USDA
  Michael Taylor, Deputy Commissioner for Foods, FDA
  Gayle Smith, White House National Security Council
  Karen Hulebak, Codex Chairperson
  Karen Stuck, US Codex Manager
  FICC Letter
  October 19, 2010
  Pace 3 of 3
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772600 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772602
MetadataSubject: GOOD JOB!
MetadataTo: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-14T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772602/C05772602.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Good Job!
ExtractedTo: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 5:54 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772602
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Pis print.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772602 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 5:54 PM
  To: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
  Subject: Fw: Good Job!
  Pis print.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Wed Jan 13 16:09:53 2010
  Subject: FW: Good Job!
  fyi
  From: hugh parmer [mailto
  Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 3:58 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Good Job!
  Ms Mills,
  I got your email address in a message from my good friend, Kathleen Townsend, several months ago but have never
  wanted to bother you directly. However, as the former head of humanitarian operations at USAID under Pres. Clinton, I
  thought it appropriate to commend you and your colleagues on the excellent job that is being done in the early days of
  the USG response to the tragedy in Haiti. The deployment of Coast Guard and SouthComm resources, the immediate
  organization of an interdepartmental group to coordinate USG efforts, the deployment of multiple USAID urban search
  and rescue units as well as a DART, and the ability to make these decisions without delay is impressive. Managing
  information flow with early statements by the Pres. and Sec. followed by your press conference on relief plans
  effectively focused attention on the US leadership role. Please pass on my "good job" to whomever has been leading
  this effort. It's as good as I have seen from the USG. Let me know if there is anyway I can be of help.
  Hugh
  tih Parmer
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772602 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772604
MetadataSubject: GOOD TO SEE YOU
MetadataTo: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-14T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772604/C05772604.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCc: Golden, Jennifer R <GoldenJR@state.gov>
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772604
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Pls print.
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
  Thursday, January 14, 2010 5:54 PM
  'JilotyLC@state.gov'
  Fw: Good to see you

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772604 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Pls print.
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
  Thursday, January 14, 2010 5:54 PM
  'JilotyLC@state.gov'
  Fw: Good to see you
  Original Message
  From: McHa le, Judith A <McHaleJA@state.gov>
  To: Doug Hattaway
  Cc: Golden, Jennifer R <GoldenJR@state.gov>
  Sent: Wed Jan 13 12:56:19 2010
  Subject: RE: Good to see you
  Thanks for the note. Would love to follow up on Pakistan and also have another idea I'd like to talk to you about. By copy
  of this email I am asking Jenn Golden from my office to find-a time tb meet. Hope to see you soon.
  JM
  Original Message
  From: Doug Hattaway [mailto:
  Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 10:01 AM
  To: McHale, Judith A
  Subject: RE: Good to see you
  Judith:
  I hope you've been well. Following up on the Secretary's request, when would you like to regroup about
  communications support in Pakistan?
  As food for thought, I've been talking with She's a great source of insight and
  information on the ground, with a valuable independent perspective. She is very tuned into the government's
  communications challenges and opportunities.
  In her view, while the need is more urgent than ever, the government does have positive programs and policies that
  would generate good will if people knew about them. Communications seems to suffer both from a lack of perspective -
  politicians are obsessed with politics in the capital, rather than the needs of people at the grassroots - and a lack of both
  practical expertise and proactive strategy. They need a plan for publicizing initiatives that benefit people, as well as
  hands-on training and support to execute effectively.
  This sounds very similar to the situation my team dealt with in Lebanon, where we worked with the government,
  political parties and NG0s. We learned not to let a state of crisis be an obstacle to moving forward with a
  communications program - they're always in crisis and, as you know, effective communications is part of the long-term
  solution.
  I know there may be concern about working with US consultants. One approach would be to work through NDI, which
  has great contacts and credibility on the ground. That's how we did it in Lebanon.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772604 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772604 Date: 08/31/2015
  I hope some of this is useful food for thought. You may recall that, when we met before the holidays, I showed you the
  program we did in Lebanon. Would you like me to put together ideas for a program in Pakistan?
  Best, Doug
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2010 5:45 PM
  To: 'doug
  Cc: 'mchaleja@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Good to see you
  Raj is off to a brilliant start and thank you for the help_you provided him.
  We share your assessment of Pakistan's need for a public narrative and better capacity to communicate effectively.
  Judith has been working on how we improve our comm work there, and I know you were talking to the Pakistani
  Ambassador about helping them. I'm copying Judith and asking that the two of you discuss what we could do given the
  very difficult political landscape.
  Thx for all your good counsel. We need to follow thru on the campaign for women we discussed some months back. Are
  you still assisting Melanne? Let me know what I can do to hurry it along. H
  Original Message
  From: doug
  To: H
  Sent: Thu Jan 07 16:36:51 2010
  Subject: Good to see you
  Mme Secretary:
  I'm glad I got to see you at Raj's swearing-in. Hope you liked the speech. Alonzo said we hit the right notes and Raj is off
  to a strong start.
  Of course I was kidding about "running away" from your "long list" of things you wanted to talk about with me. I'm
  happy to talk anytime.
  In fact, it would be good to touch base on the women's initiative and Pakistan. I've been talking with NDI's highly
  regarded country director in Pakistan, who says communications is a desperate need and will definitely do some good
  for the government.
  Look forward to seeing you again soon. All the best, Doug
  Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772604 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772605
MetadataSubject: HOW TO ADDRESS GLOBAL BURDEN OF CHRONIC DISEASE
MetadataTo: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-14T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772605/C05772605.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: How to Address Global Burden of Chronic Disease
ExtractedTo: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 5:56 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772605
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Pls print.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772605 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 5:56 PM
  To: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
  Subject: Fw: How to Address Global Burden of Chronic Disease
  Attachments: Global Burden Chronic Disease.pdf; Global Burden Chronic Disease.pdf
  Pls print.
  Original Message
  From: Dr. Mark Hyman
  To: H
  Sent: Tue Jan 12 16:16:38 2010
  Subject: How to Address Global Burden of Chronic Disease
  Dear Hillary,
  I wanted to pass on some thoughts we are formulating on how to address the global burden of chronic disease and get
  your input We could have a short call about this if you have time..
  I have been thinking about how Paul Farmer created a whole movement around infectious disease globally and how we
  can apply that to chronic disease -- and yes - I would love to meet him and talk with him about this problem.
  So here's the problem.
  1. By 2020 global mortality from chronic disease will claim 50 million lives compared to 20 million for communicable or
  infectious disease and currently mortality in DEVELOPING WORLD is 29 million people a year from chronic disease.
  2. As you know in the US, chronic disease care (usually at end stage in acute settings) accounts for almost 80% of health
  care expenditures. This is likely to increase globally and in developing countries because countries like India have
  diabetes rates of 25%. Mortality from heart disease in China in 35 to 44 year olds has increased 300% in the last few
  decades.
  3. Global Funding for prevention and treatment of the causes of chronic disease doesn't match the disease burden by
  an unacceptable margin.
  4. Less than 5% of funding from governments, NGO's, private foundations is for chronic disease (i.e. World Bank - $4.5
  billion to health sector work, 2.5% for non-communicable disease and Global Fund focuses only on HIV/AIDS, malaria
  and TB and the WHO spends $7.50 for infectious disease and $0.50 for chronic disease, Gates Foundation: no funding
  for chronic disease).
  So here's what I see as the solution
  We need a movement to create awareness, build the messaging, fund comparative research on innovative methods for
  preventing and treating chronic disease, develop changes in medical education to scale training for providers in effective
  prevention and treatment of chronic disease, build partnerships and support for demonstration projects and other
  initiatives, and develop health information technology platforms to support chronic disease prevention and care as an
  integrated system and other disruptive technologies.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772605 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772605 Date: 08/31/2015
  There are a lot of potential partners for this -- but I was thinking that a strategic alliance could be made between the
  Institute for Functional Medicine and the Clinton Foundation (and potentially other key partners) to build and scale this
  movement -- then it would be much easier to raise awareness and raise money. I have a lot of donors who would fund
  something like this but it has to have organization and clout and staying power.
  I also wonder if Chelsea would be interested in being part of/leading this initiative - it seems right up her alley and I
  know she is looking for a job in June!
  And I also realized that the State Department plays a large role in global health issues and there are ways the State Dept
  can help address the chronic disease epidemic globally.
  Many of pieces of this are already in place and happening - for example the VA of New England wants to bring the
  Functional Medicine model into the care of their patients. The health system in Colombia is implementing a model
  based on Functional medicine because they cannot cope with their chronic disease burden. CIGNA wants to bring this
  into their 11 million subscribers. We are building a research institute at Harvard and clinical programs. But it all needs
  organization and strategy and coordination and funding in an integrated way.
  Would you have a few minute to talk about this in the next week or so?
  Hope you are staying warm Thanks again for all your help and support
  Fondly,
  Mark
  On 1/4/10 9:56 PM, "Hillary Clinton" <hdr22@clintonemail.com> wrote:
  > Dear Mark--
  > Thank you for your good wishes, and Happy New Year to you and Pier.
  > I hope
  > 2010 is filled to the brim w blessings and opportunities for you both.
  > Have you ever met Paul Farmer? He's a good friend and is now
  > working w Bill in Haiti and Rwanda while continuing to teach at
  > Harvard and run Partners in Health. Would you like to spend time w him? Even work in one of his programs?
  >Just let me know and I could call him for you.
  > I hope to see you again soon. There's always much to discuss! All
  > the best always---H
  > Original Message
  > From: Dr. Mark Hyman
  > To: H
  > Sent: Sun Jan 03 15:09:38 2010
  Subject: Happy New Year
  > Dear Hillary,
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772605 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772605 Date: 08/31/2015
  > I just wanted to wish you a happy new year and let you know how
  > grateful I am for your help and friendship. Although health reform
  > as it ended up still leaves a lot to be done I think their are other
  > ways to create change.
  > I just finished the book about Paul Farmer mountains beyond mountains
  > and it made me think about how we can create a movement to address the
  > global burden of chronic disease which affects hundreds of millions
  > more than infectious disease.
  > Once I get the strategy more formed I would love to get your thoughts.
  > Hope you got some rest over the holidays.
  > Be well. Fondly.
  > Mark Hyman, MD
  > Sent from my iPhone
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772605 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772606
MetadataSubject: (AP) EXTREMIST JEWS DAMAGE PALESTINIAN OLIVE TREES
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772606/C05772606.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (AP) Extremist Jews damage Palestinian olive trees
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Shaker, Joan P
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, October 9, 2010 9:27 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772606
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772606 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, October 9, 2010 9:27 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (AP) Extremist Jews damage Palestinian olive trees
  From: Deyo, Justin A
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: Shaker, Joan P
  Sent: Sat Oct 09 08:54:26 2010
  Subject: (AP) Extremist Jews damage Palestinian olive trees
  IRAQ BURIN (AP) - Palestinians say extremist Jews damaged their olive trees close to a West Bank village as the yearly
  harvest of the important crop begins. Resident Bilal Eid said that two dozen men from a nearby Jewish settlement tore
  at about a dozen trees after trying to attack Palestinians bulldozing an access road to their fields. The attack came at the
  beginning of the 40-day Palestinian olive harvest. It's traditionally a time of heightened violence, as a minority of
  extremist Jews try to provoke Palestinians. Eid said the damage could kill the trees, which were meant to be harvested
  this week, near the village of Burin. A military spokeswoman said Israeli forces ordered the Jewish intruders to leave.
  Justin Deyo
  U.S. Department of State
  Operations Center (S/ES-0)
  202-647-1512
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772606 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772607
MetadataSubject: ABHISIT CANCELED CALL.
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772607/C05772607.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Abhisit canceled call.
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, October 9, 2010 9:32 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772607
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772607 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, October 9, 2010 9:32 AM
  To:
  Subject: Abhisit canceled call.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772607 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772608
MetadataSubject: GLOBAL BURDEN OF CHRONIC DISEASES: OVERCOMING IMPEDIMENTS TO PREVENTION AND CONTROL
MetadataFrom: JAMA
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-08T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772608/C05772608.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772608
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772608 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  The Global Burden of Chronic Diseases: Overcoming
  Impediments to Prevention and Control
  Derek Yach; Corinna Hawkes; C. Linn Gould; et al.
  JAMA. 2004;291(21):2616-2622 (doi:10.1001/jama.291.21.2616)
  http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/ful1/291/21/2616
  Online article and related content
  current as of January 8, 2010.
  Correction
  Citations
  Topic collections
  Contact me if this article is corrected.
  This article has been cited 161 times.
  Contact me when this article is cited.
  Medical Practice; Health Policy; Public Health; World Health; Pulmonary Diseases;
  Asthma; Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
  Contact me when new articles are published in these topic areas.
  Subscribe
  http://jama.com/subscribe
  Permissions
  permissions@ama-assn.org
  http://pubs.ama-assn.org/misc/permissions.dt1
  Email Alerts
  http://jamaarchives.com/alerts
  Reprints/E-prints
  reprints@ama-assn.org
  Downloaded from www.jama.com by Mark Hyman on January 8, 2010
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772608 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772609
MetadataSubject: HOLBROOKE WANTS TO TALK
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772609/C05772609.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Holbrooke wants to talk.
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, October 9, 2010 10:06 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772609
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772609 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, October 9, 2010 10:06 AM
  To:
  Subject: Holbrooke wants to talk.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772609 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772611
MetadataSubject: GLOBAL BURDEN OF CHRONIC DISEASES: OVERCOMING IMPEDIMENTS TO PREVENTION AND CONTROL
MetadataFrom: JAMA
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772611/C05772611.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772611
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772611 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  I= SPECIAL COMMUNICATION
  The Global Burden of Chronic Diseases
  Overcoming Impediments to Prevention and Control
  Derek Yach, MBChB, MPH
  Corinna Hawkes, PhD
  C. Linn Gould, MS, MPH
  Karen J. Haman, MD
  C
  HRON1C DISEASES ARE THE
  largest cause of death in the
  world (FIGURE 1), led by car-
  diovascular disease (17 mil-
  lion deaths in 2002, mainly from is-
  chemic heart disease and stroke) and
  followed by cancer (7 million deaths),
  chronic lung diseases (4 million), and
  diabetes mellitus (almost 1 million).'
  These leading diseases share key risk
  factors: tobacco use, unhealthful di-
  ets, lack of physical activity, and alco-
  hol use (TABLE)." The current burden
  of chronic diseases reflects past expo-
  sure to these risk factors, and the fu-
  ture burden will be largely deter-
  mined by current exposures.
  The global prevalence of all the lead-
  ing chronic diseases is increasing, with
  the majority occurring in developing
  countries and projected to increase sub-
  stantially over the next 2 decades (Fig-
  ure 1).3 Cardiovascular disease is al-
  ready the leading cause of mortality in
  developing countries (FIGURE 2).1 Be-
  tween 1990 and 2020, mortality from is-
  chemic heart disease in developing coun-
  tries is expected to increase by 120% for
  women and 137% for men.' Predic-
  tions for the next 2 decades include a
  . near tripling of ischemic heart disease
  and stroke mortality in Latin America,
  the Middle East, and sub-Saharan Africa.
  The global number of individuals with
  diabetes in 2000 was estimated to be 171
  million (2.8% of the world's population),
  a figure projected to increase in 2030 to
  366 million (6.5%), 298 million of whom
  Chronic diseases are the largest cause of death in the world. In 2002, the
  leading chronic diseases—cardiovascular disease, cancer, chronic respira-
  tory disease, and diabetes—caused 29 million deaths worldwide. Despite
  growing evidence of epidemiological and economic impact, the global re-
  sponse to the problem remains inadequate. Stakeholders include govern-
  ments, the World Health Organization and other United Nations bodies, aca-
  demic and research groups, nongovernmental organizations, and the private
  sector. Lack of financial support retards capacity development for preven-
  tion, treatment, and research in most developing countries. Reasons for this
  include that up-to-date evidence related to the nature of the burden of chronic
  diseases is not in the hands of decision makers and strong beliefs persist
  that chronic diseases afflict only the affluent and the elderly, that they arise
  solely from freely acquired risks, and that their control is ineffective and too
  expensive and should wait until infectious diseases are addressed. The in-
  fluence of global economic factors on chronic disease risks impedes progress,
  as does the orientation of health systems toward acute care. We identify 3
  policy levers to address these impediments: elevating chronic diseases on
  the health agenda of key policymakers, providing them with better evi-
  dence about risk factor control, and persuading them of the need for health
  systems change. A more concerted, strategic, and multisectoral policy ap-
  proach, underpinned by solid research, is essential to help reverse the nega-
  tive trends in the global incidence of chronic disease.
  JAMA. 2004;291:2616-2622 www jama com
  will live in developing countries.' Can- the world's most populous country,
  cer incidence increased 19% between China, age-specific death Fates from cir-
  1990 and 2000, mainly in developing culatory disease increased between
  countries.6 Death and disability due to 200% and 300% in those aged 35
  chronic obstructive pulmonary disease through 44 years between 1986 and
  are increasing across most regions.' Risks 1999, and by more than 100% in those
  for chronic disease are also escalating. aged 45 through 54 years.' During the
  Smoking prevalence and obesity levels same period, cancer death rates in-
  among adolescents in developing coun-
  portend rapid increases in chronic dis-
  tries have risen over the past decade and
  Author Affiliations: World Health Organization,
  Geneva, Switzerland (Drs Yach, Hawkes, and Gould)
  eases.'" and Fogarty International Center/US National Insti-
  tutes of Health, Washington, DC (Dr Hofman). Linn
  Numerous developing countries and Gould is now at Erda Environmental Services, Inc, Se-
  countries in transition have witnessed attle, Wash.
  Correspondence: Derek Yach, MBChB, MPH, World
  a rapid deterioration of their chronic Health Organization, 20, Avenue Appia, CH-1211
  disease risk and mortality profiles.' In Geneva 27 Switzerland (yachd@who.int).
  2616 JAMA, June 2, 2004—Vol 291, No. 21 (Reprinted) ©2.004 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
  Downloaded from www.iama.com by Mark Hyman on January 8.2010
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772611 Date: 08/31/2015

  0 Diabetes Mellitus
  oChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
  and Asthma
  0 Other Noncommunicable Diseases
  liiNeoplasms
  IN Cardiovascular Diseases
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772611 Date: 08/31/2015
  GLOBAL BURDEN OF CHRONIC DISEASES
  No.
  of
  Deaths,
  Millions
  Figure 1. Global Mortality From Chronic Diseases
  creased between 100% and 200% in
  those aged 35 through 44 years and be-
  tween 100% and 160% in those aged 45
  through 54 years.
  Chronic diseases have not simply dis-
  placed acute infectious ones in devel-
  oping countries. Rather, such coun-
  tries now experience a polarized and
  protracted double burden of disease."
  India, the second most populous coun-
  try, has the highest number of diabet-
  ics in the world and annual coronary
  deaths are expected to reach 2 million
  by 2010.12 At the same time, around 2.5
  million children in India die from in-
  fections such as pneumonia, diarrhea,
  and malaria every year. In South Africa,
  infectious diseases account for 28% of
  years of lives lost while chronic dis-
  eases account for 25%."
  The increased burden of chronic dis-
  eases in countries that also have a high
  infectious disease burden is straining
  their health services. In all countries,
  it is also leading to growing economic
  costs, best documented with respect to
  tobacco-related diseases,8 with increas-
  ing evidence emerging for cardiovas-
  cular disease,' diabetes," and obe-
  sity." Many developed nations have
  focused considerable efforts on address-
  ing the burden of chronic diseases. In
  contrast, the rising burden of chronic
  diseases on developing countries has re-
  ceived inadequate attention."
  The rates and potential risks of
  chronic disease, vis-a-vis policy deci-
  sions, can be described conceptually.
  For example, as economic develop-
  ment occurs, tobacco use and obesity
  (and presumably other risk behav-
  iors) increase.9." Eventually uptake of
  risk factors leads to onset of disease.
  Mortality and morbidity from chronic
  disease subsequently decline along with
  continued economic development.
  Thus far, only the Organisation for Eco-
  n o mic Co-operation and Develop-
  ment countries have achieved these de-
  clines,' which have been associated with
  consumption behavior, while declin-
  ing mortality from chronic diseases is
  associated with very high levels of so-
  cial and economic development. Thus,
  in the absence of policy actions, con-
  sumption of tobacco, alcohol, and foods
  high in fat and sugar increases along
  with gross national product, followed
  by associated increases in chronic dis-
  Chronic Illness
  50
  40
  30
  20
  10
  0
  1990 2002 2020,
  Predicted`
  eases decades later. This contrasts with
  infectious diseases, which generally de-
  cline with economic growth." Chronic
  disease risk rates do not begin to fall un-
  Injuries and Communicable Disease
  Dinjuries
  III Communicable Diseases
  50
  40
  5 30
  O 20
  10
  1990 2002 2020,
  Predicted*
  Source derived from data in the World Health Report 2003' and Murray and Lopez.'
  *The 2020 projections were estimated by Murray and Lopez.'
  Table. Contribution of 10 Selected Risk Factors to Burden of Disease by Level of
  Development and Mortality*
  Risk Factor
  Percentage of Mortality Attributable to Risk Factors
  Developing Countriest
  High Mortality Low Mortality Developed Countries
  (Population: 2.3 Billion) (Population: 2.4 Billion) (Population: 1.4 Billion)t
  Underweight 14.9 3.1 .
  Unsafe sex 10.2 0.8
  Unsafe water, sanitation
  and hygiene
  5.5 1.7
  Indoor smoke from
  solid fuels
  3.7 1.9
  Zinc deficiency 3.2
  Iron deficiency 3.1 1.8 0.7
  Vitamin A deficiency 3.0
  Blood pressure 2.5 5.0 10.9
  Tobacco 2.0 4.0 12.2
  Cholesterol 1.9 2.1 7.6
  Alcohol 6.2 9.2
  Overweight 2.7 7.4
  Low fruit and
  vegetable intake
  1.9 3.9
  Physical inactivity 3.3
  Illicit drugs
  Ellipses indicates that it is not a top-10 mortality risk factor.
  *Based on TheWofici Health Report 2003.2
  tDeveloped countries include the United States, Japan, and Australia; low-mortality developing countries include China.
  Brazil, and Thailand; and high-mortality developing countries include India, Mali, and Nigeria.
  ©2004 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. (Reprinted) JAMA, June 2, 2004-
  Vol 291, No. 21 2617
  Downloaded from www.jama.com by Mark Hyman on January 8, 2010
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772611 Date: 08/31/2015

  0 Low-Mortality Developing Countries
  niHigh-Mortality Developing Countries
  0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000
  Deaths, Thousands
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772611 Date: 08/31/2015
  GLOBAL BURDEN OF CHRONIC DISEASES
  til high levels of wealth and literacy are
  reached, whereupon governments are
  more likely to respond to public health
  concerns and use a broad range of
  policy instruments to influence con-
  sumption trends. The global chal-
  lenge policymakers face is how to
  implement policies now that support
  continued economic development while
  simultaneously reducing the rates of in-
  crease of chronic diseases.
  KEY PLAYERS' POLICY
  RESPONSES TO
  THE GLOBAL BURDEN
  OF CHRONIC DISEASES
  Although many key groups have re-
  sponded to the infectious disease bur-
  dens of developing nations, they have
  not responded to the expanded chronic
  disease burden.
  Heads of State
  Heads of state of the G8 countries rec-
  ognized health as a global challenge at
  their Summit in 2000, acknowledging
  that health is the "key to prosperity"
  and that "poor health drives pov-
  erty."" The G8 leaders agreed to
  Cardiovascular Diseases
  Malignant Neoplasms
  Injuries
  Respiratory Infections
  Chronic Respiratory Diseases
  Human Immunodeficiency Virus/AIDS
  Perinatal Conditions
  Diarrhea! Diseases
  Tuberculosis
  Digestive Diseases
  Childhood Diseases
  Malaria
  Diabetes Mellitus
  Genitourinary Diseases
  Neuropsychiatic Disorders
  Maternal Conditions
  mobilize resources, ultimately leading
  to the establishment of the Global
  Fund for HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and
  Malaria.20 No subsequent commitment
  has yet been made for chronic dis-
  eases.
  Similarly, the G77, representing heads
  of state from approximately 130 devel-
  oping countries, recently discussed global
  health issues.2' Their focus was commu-
  nicable diseases although they did sup-
  port the Framework Convention on To-
  bacco Control—a reversal for manyG77
  members, who previously feared re-
  duced tobacco consumption would nega-
  tively affect their farmers."The G77have
  also expressed concerns that efforts to re-
  duce sugar consumption might harm
  their economies!'
  Health Ministries
  The capacity of 185 countries to pre-
  vent and treat chronic diseases was re-
  cently assessed by the World Health Or-
  ganization (WHO)." Although there was
  a high level of awareness about chronic
  diseases among health ministry offi-
  cials, this was not supported by compre-
  hensive policies and budgets to develop
  integrated approaches to their preven-
  tion, surveillance, and control. Thirty-
  nine percent of countries reviewed had
  budget lines for chronic diseases. Only
  a few developing countries have com-
  mitted significant resources to chronic
  disease control."
  World Health Organization
  Many of WHO's functions are directly
  related to chronic disease control. WHO
  member states first requested action on
  chronic diseases in 1956 when India pro-
  posed a resolution on cardiovascular dis-
  ease and hypertension at the Ninth World
  Health Assembly." Subsequently, mem-
  ber states from both developed and devel-
  oping countries have demanded action
  on chronic diseases, including the global
  strategy on "Prevention and Control of
  Non-communicable Diseases" in 2000°5
  and a resolution and subsequent strat-
  egy on "Diet, Physical Activity and
  Health" in 2002-2004.2' The landmark
  resolution on the Framework Conven-
  tion on Tobacco Control in 20032' was
  the first time WFIO used its constitu-
  tional treaty-making right to address a
  global public health threat.
  With the important exception of to-
  bacco control, WHO's financial re-
  sources for chronic disease control are
  small. WHO Headquarters spends only
  $0.50 on chronic diseases (all noncom-
  municable diseases except for mental
  health) per death per person com-
  pared with $7.50 for leading commu-
  nicable diseases.28
  Academic Health Centers
  and Research Institutions
  Schools of public health in the United
  States train thousands of health profes-
  sionals from developing countries who
  return home as potential future public
  health leaders. A survey of the core re-
  quirements of the curricula of mem-
  bers of the Association of Schools of Pub-
  lic Health indicates that international
  health course work does not yet reflect
  the current global burden of chronic dis-
  eases.29 Although Johns Hopkins, Uni-
  versity of North Carolina, and Yale now
  address obesity in their nutrition courses
  and Yale teaches chronic diseases and has
  Figure 2. Deaths Attributable to 16 Leading Causes in Developing Countries, 2001
  2618 JANA, June 2, 2004—Vol 291, No. 21 (Reprinted) ©2004 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
  Downloaded from www.jama.com by Mark Hyman on January 8,2010
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772611 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772611 Date: 08/31/2015
  GLOBAL BURDEN OF CHRONIC DISEASES
  a international tobacco seminar in its in-
  troductory global health course, the pri-
  mary focus remains on infectious dis-
  eases and primary health care.
  International committees convened by
  the Global Forum on Health Research
  recommend that greater support be given
  to chronic disease research specific to
  developing countries." Yet the exponen-
  tial growth of funding over the past
  decades has not been proportionally allo-
  cated to the growing burden of chronic
  disease.31 Most research support focuses
  on infectious diseases.3='" A recent review
  showed that total health research funds
  spent on chronic diseases was only 7.4%
  in Cuba, 2.3% in Kazakhstan, and 14.4%
  in the Philippines?'
  Nevertheless, there are efforts to fo-
  cus more research on chronic dis-
  eases. The Fogarty International Cen-
  ter has begun to allocate one third of
  its resources to chronic disease re-
  search and training programs in the de-
  veloping world." Research funding
  agencies in India, Mexico, and South
  Africa are devoting increasing budget-
  ary resources to chronic diseases."-"
  Important insights into policies needed
  to strengthen research capability for
  chronic diseases in developing na-
  tions can be gained from experiences
  in tropical disease research and train-
  ing over the past 3 decades."
  Donors
  Although official development assis-
  tance for health has increased in the past
  5 years, these trends have been almost
  entirely absorbed by human immuno-
  deficiency virus (HIV)/AIDS in sub-
  Saharan Africa (Catherine M. Michaud,
  MD, PhD, written communication,
  October 2003). Bilateral aid agencies
  rarely prioritize chronic disease or
  related risk factors.'" Official Overseas
  Development Aid to the health sector
  in 2002 reached $2.9 billion, of which
  0.1% was officially allocated to chronic
  diseases (including mental health;
  Catherine M. Michaud, MD, PhD, writ-
  ten communication, March 2004). The
  true figure may be higher since about
  30% of Overseas Development Aid to
  health goes to basic health services, of
  which a proportion would benefit
  chronic disease control.
  Private investment in global health far
  exceeds government assistance, but most
  target infectious diseases and humani-
  tarian needs. There has been modest sup-
  port for tobacco control from the UN
  Foundation, the Rockefeller Founda-
  tion, and the Soros Foundations,41.42 but
  this is now declining. The Bill and
  Melinda Gates Foundation does not in-
  clude chronic diseases in its portfolio."
  Although several US foundations sup-
  port innovative domestic chronic dis-
  ease research and training programs, they
  provide little support for such pro-
  grams internationally.
  World Bank and Regional
  Development Banks
  Although the World Bank recognizes
  the increasing burden of chronic dis-
  eases on the poor, it has no compre-
  hensive chronic disease policy. Over the
  last 5 years, it provided $4.25 billion
  in loans to countries for health sector
  work, about 2.5% of which was allo-
  cated to "noncommunicable disease
  prevention and control" programs, all
  in eastern Europe (Catherine M. Mi-
  chaud, MD, PhD, written communica-
  tion, March 2004).
  The lack of an integrated approach to
  chronic diseases is reflected by the Bank's
  Poverty Strategy Reduction Papers, which
  are intended to guide investment priori-
  ties to reduce poverty in the poorest
  countries in the world. However, the Pov-
  erty Strategy Reduction Papers present
  no strategies to address chronic dis-
  eases, and in particular smoking."
  The Regional Development Banks
  have policies on health, but only the
  Asian Development Bank includes
  chronic diseases."' This policy has been
  met by minimal spending commit-
  ments. A review carried out for the Asian
  Development Bank in 1999 recom-
  mends that subsidies for chronic dis-
  eases would be better spent on the pre-
  vention and treatment of communicable
  diseases."' The rationale was that the cost
  of treating chronic disease is most likely
  to accrue to individuals and, as such,
  should be left to the private market.
  Global Nongovernmental
  Organizations
  Nationally, nongovernmental organi-
  zations (NG0s) are reported to play a
  variety of roles in chronic disease con-
  trol, but their precise roles and effec-
  tiveness are not well known.23 Inter-
  nationally, NGOs proved critical in
  the development of the Framework
  Convention on Tobacco Control."
  Nongovernmental organizations have
  a wide geographic spread and have
  the ability to build capacity. Yet over-
  all, there has been no concerted effort
  on chronic diseases by NG0s. Non-
  governmental organizations con-
  cerned with diet and nutrition in
  developed countries have not built
  capacity in developing countries.
  International consumer group input is
  inadequate. Initiatives such as "sus-
  tainable development" and "corporate
  social responsibility" have not been
  applied to Chronic diseases.
  Health and Development
  Initiatives
  United Nations health and develop-
  ment reports play a major role in
  setting priorities for global health. Per-
  sistent problems that hinder develop-
  ment, such as infant and maternal mor-
  tality, malnutrition, and HIV/AIDS have
  received priority in the poorest coun-
  tries. But the emphasis on communi-
  cable diseases has excluded consider-
  ation of chronic diseases in low-
  middle and middle income countries.
  The Millennium Development Goals are
  illustrative in this respect. Millen-
  nium Development Goal 6 is to "Com-
  bat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other dis-
  eases."4 Although the other diseases
  category theoretically includes chronic
  diseases, in practice, they are ignored.
  The UN Population Fund does not
  mention chronic diseases in its strat-
  egy on population and development"'
  and UN Children's Fund's recent goal-
  setting program, "A World Fit for Chil-
  dren" does not include risk factors for
  chronic conditions among the 25 ac-
  tion points proposed to "promote
  healthy lives" despite strong evidence
  to the contrary."
  ©2004 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. (Reprinted) JAMA, June 2, 2004—Vol 291, No. 21 2619
  Downloaded from wWw.jama.com by Mark Hyman on January 8, 2010
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772611 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772611 Date: 08/31/2015
  GLOBAL BURDEN OF CHRONIC DISEASES
  Reasons for Neglect: Impediments
  to Control Global Chronic Diseases
  In most developing countries inad-
  equate financing and lack of man-
  power to address chronic diseases have
  been major impediments to chronic dis-
  ease control. Other impediments are the
  failure to provide key decision makers
  with up-to-date evidence on the bur-
  den of chronic diseases: a lack of un-
  derstanding of the economic factors that
  influence chronic disease risks; and the
  current orientation of health systems to-
  ward acute care.
  Up-to-Date Evidence Is Not in the
  Hands of Key Decision Makers
  Many key decision makers still be-
  lieve that chronic diseases afflict only
  the affluent and the elderly and arise
  only from freely acquired risks and that
  their control is ineffective and too ex-
  pensive and should wait until infec-
  tious diseases are addressed.
  These beliefs are based on a misun-
  derstanding of the chronic disease bur-
  den. In developed countries, the rela-
  tionship between socioeconomic
  inequalities and many chronic dis-
  eases and their risk factors are well de-
  scribed." Although the disease bur-
  den is more variable in developing
  countries, the poorest populations, par-
  ticularly in rapidly growing cities, in
  many cases already exhibit the high-
  est risks for tobacco use, alcohol use,
  and physical activity, with evidence
  emerging for obesity.5254 This will lead
  to a higher burden of chronic diseases
  over the long-term. Poverty also leads
  to greater comorbidity and decreased
  access to quality medical care.
  Chronic diseases in developing coun-
  tries are not just diseases of the el-
  derly, since cardiovascular disease ac-
  counts for as many deaths in young and
  middle-agerfadults as HIWAIDS.' Also,
  in developing countries chronic dis-
  eases affect a much higher proportion
  of people during their prime working
  years than in developed countries. Male
  deaths during middle age could create
  a significant cohort of widows, which
  increases the likelihood that women will
  live out their final years in poverty.'
  Many decision makers mistakenly be-
  lieve that chronic diseases arise only as
  a result of the irresponsibility of the in-
  dividuals who contract them, with the
  perception that "smoking is a free choice
  with health consequences."" Yet age and
  uptake of smoking in developing coun-
  tries are showing a trend toward early
  teenage years,' the stage of life when the
  addictiveness of tobacco belies free-
  dom of choice. Tobacco marketing is of-
  ten targeted specifically at children," al-
  cohol advertisements shape young
  peoples' perceptions and encourage pro-
  drink attitudes," and food marketing
  works its way "into the skin" of chil-
  dren and adolescents." There will al-
  ways be a tension between the role of in-
  dividuals vs the role of government, but
  it is clear that governments (and indus-
  try) must take some responsibility."
  Chronic disease control is not neces-
  sarily expensive or ineffective. For ex-
  ample, a recent review of tobacco con-
  trol in Brazil, South Africa, Thailand,
  Poland, Bangladesh, and Canada showed
  that tobacco prevalence can be re-
  duced cost-effectively in high-, middle-,
  and low-income countries.' Several
  clinical and public health interven-
  tions have the potential to reduce the
  burden of disease from cardiovascular
  disease, diabetes, and hypertension sig-
  nificantly and at low cost.' There is, how-
  ever, an urgent need to develop best
  practices for obesity control.
  The belief that scarce resources should
  not be used for chronic diseases until in-
  fectious diseases are addressed is also fal-
  lacious. Several infectious agents cause
  cancer?; tobacco increases deaths from
  tuberculosis in already infected popu-
  lations,' and antiretroviral regimens in
  HIV-infected patients increase the risk
  of heart disease.' Better tobacco con-
  trol would reduce tuberculosis mortal-
  ity, and new vaccines could reduce the
  prevalence of cervical cancer and per-
  haps other cancers.
  Economic Factors Influence
  Chronic Disease Risks
  At a macroeconomic level, it is often as-
  sumed that global economic develop-
  ment increases income and subse-
  quently improves all aspects of health
  in developing countries. Yet, although
  greater economic investment and higher
  incomes among some groups have
  eased some of the health challenges in
  developing countries, chronic dis-
  eases have been exacerbated.'
  Important drivers here are urbaniza-
  tion, trade, foreign investment, and pro-
  motional marketing. More open con-
  ditions for trade and foreign investment
  can bring economic benefits, but also
  encourage unhealthful behavior risks."
  Several of the world's top 100 nonfi-
  nancial transnational corporations
  ranked by foreign assets in 2000 are as-
  sociated with chronic disease risk fac-
  tors, including tobacco, food, and au-
  tomobile companies.64 These companies
  all invest heavily in marketing their
  products,"'" which, if unregulated, en-
  courages acquisition of the risk fac-
  tors for chronic diseases.
  Lobbyists for tobacco, sugar, and other
  food interests have diverted attention
  from the need to address consumption
  patterns that drive chronic diseases, and
  their views have become the accepted
  position of many policytnakers." Some
  companies and their trade associations
  have actively tried to thwart introduc-
  tion of regulations and effective advo-
  cacy in advancing tobacco control."
  Sugar lobbyists have been effective in
  having their messages that "sugar doesn't
  harm health—but less sugar consump-
  tion harms their economies" accepted by
  some governments despite evidence to
  the contrary.67
  Health Systems Are Not Oriented
  Toward Managing Chronic
  Diseases
  Acute problems, such as certain infec-
  tious diseases and maternal and child
  care, have been the principal focus of
  health care systems." Although infec-
  tious diseases continue to be a threat
  in many developing :countries, their
  health systems now must address a
  double burden of chronic and acute
  conditions.
  The chronic disease management
  model is more complex than that re-
  quired for acute problems, such as
  2620 JANIA, June 2, 2004—Vol 291, No. 21 (Reprinted) ©2004 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
  Downloaded from www.iama.com by Mark Hyman on January 8. 2010
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772611 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772611 Date: 08/31/2015
  GLOBAL BURDEN OF CHRONIC DISEASES
  many infectious diseases." It entails
  multiple causes over a lifetime and a
  more horizontal and integrated ap-
  proach, with patient, family, and the
  community being active participants.
  Chronic care has tended to screen
  high-risk individuals with a high prob-
  ability of contracting chronic dis-
  eases. Yet for chronic diseases, most risk
  factors are widely distributed in the
  population, with all individuals at risk
  but differing in the extent of their risk.69
  Prevention and treatment therefore re-
  quires a sustained, multisectoral com-
  mitment well beyond the traditional
  health sector. This model is also re-
  quired for communicable diseases such
  as HIV/AIDS, since antiretroviral
  therapy must be taken for life."
  TOWARD THE
  FUTURE-LEVERING
  LONG-TERM CHANGE
  The rising global burden of chronic dis-
  eases needs stronger leadership by
  policy makers, advocates, and health
  professionals.
  Placing Chronic Diseases Higher on
  the Political and Health Agenda
  Decision makers need to be fully in-
  formed with the up-to-date evidence
  about the burden and impacts of
  chronic diseases. Clearer messages on
  chronic diseases are needed and the ad-
  vocacy base expanded. Gaps in our
  knowledge about chronic disease con-
  trol should be tackled using a "grand
  challenges in i tiative."71
  Controlling Risk Factors
  for Chronic Diseases
  The negative impacts of global eco-
  nomic development can be amelio-
  rated through multisectoral action to
  tackle chronic diseases upstream. Policy
  leaders need to encourage transna-
  tional corporations to improve health
  while also making a profit by putting
  in place new business models, such as
  those being developed by Unilever
  (Paulus Verschuen and Harry jonge-
  neelan, written communication, May
  13,2004) and Novo Nordisk SA.7' They
  should also encourage the creation of
  codes and incentives for healthy for-
  eign investment in developing coun-
  tries and incorporating chronic dis-
  eases into accountability initiatives such
  as the UN Global Compact."
  The role of government is critical to
  the development and implementation
  of well grounded risk-factor control
  programs such as the WHO's Frame-
  work Convention on Tobacco Con-
  trol, which also has implications for
  food policies." Age-specific death rates
  from the leading chronic diseases in Or-
  ganization for Economic Co-opera-
  tion and Development countries have
  declined as a result of governmental and
  civil society action against tobacco use,
  emphasis on maintaining healthful life
  styles, and access to treatments.4 Over
  the last decade, increased longevity has
  been accompanied by a compression of
  morbidity: in the United States, disabil-
  ity rates in people older than 65 years
  have decreased 2% a year while mor-
  tality rates have declined by 1%."
  Governments can play a role by alter-
  ing economic incentives for business and
  individuals. Expanding markets for fruit
  and vegetables will allow developing
  countries to gain from increased ex-
  port earnings and consumption. Rais-
  ing the tobacco excise tax to levels that
  will reduce consumption effectively"
  will increase government revenue and
  reduce the burden of disease.
  Health System Realignment
  Health systems should be realigned to ac-
  commodate diagnosis, secondary pre-
  vention, and primary prevention of
  chronic diseases. Governments need to
  support this transformation if they are
  to realize significant health gains. In an
  approach that has international applica-
  tions, the United Kingdom Govern-
  ment Treasury has recommended a set
  of clear health targets and objectives for
  the nation based on scenarios." The new
  financing opportunities for chronic in-
  fectious diseases like H1V/AIDS and tu-
  berculosis create a chance to build inte-
  grated systems in the poorest countries.
  The potential for secondary prevention
  of cardiovascular disease and diabetes in
  developing countries has been high-
  lighted by several academics4.'668 but
  needs to be translated into action.
  We are now at a critical juncture with
  respect to the global health agenda. Co-
  ordinated and focused emphasis on
  chronic disease is essential to address
  the enormity of the burden of those who
  now survive beyond childhood around
  the world.
  Disclaimer: The views in this article represent the opin-
  ions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the
  views or position of either the World Health Organi-
  zation or the views or position of the US National In-
  stitutes of Health.
  Acknowledgment: The authors would like to thank
  Dr Catherine Michaud for her analysis of Overseas De-
  velopment Assistance for chronic diseases Thanks also
  to Ian Neil from WHO and the anonymous reviewer
  for comments that helped strengthen the article.
  REFERENCES
  1. World Health Organization.The World Health Re-
  port 2003-Shaping the Future. Geneva, Switzer-
  land: World Health Organization; 2003.
  2. World Health Organization.The World Health Re-
  port 2002-Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Life.
  Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization;
  2002.
  3. Murray CL, Lopez AD.The Global Burden of Dis-
  ease. Boston, Mass: Harvard School of Public Health;
  1996.
  4. Leeder S, Raymond S, Greenberg H, Liu H, Esson
  K. A Race Against Time: The Challenge of Cardio-
  vascular Disease in Developing Economies, New York,
  NY: Columbia University; 2004.
  5. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global'
  prevalence of diabetes: estimates for 2000 and projec-
  tions for 2030.Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1047-1053.
  6. Stewart BW, Kleihaus P, eds. World Cancer Re-
  port. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2003.
  7. World Health Organization.WHO Strategy for Pre-
  vention and Control of Chronic Respiratory Dis-
  eases. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organiza-
  tion; 2002.
  B. Jha P, Chaloupka FJ. Curbing the Epidemic Gov-
  ernments and the Economics of Tobacco Control.
  Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruc-
  tion and Development/World Bank; 1999.
  9. Popkin BM, Doak CM. The obesity epidemic is a
  worldwide phenomenon. Nutr Rev. 1998:56:106-
  134.
  10. Bumgarner R. China: non-communicable dis-
  ease issues and options revisited. Soc Prey Med. In
  press.
  11. Frenk 1, Bobadilla IL, Sepulveda J, Cervantes LM,
  Health Transition in middle-income countries: new chal-
  lenges for health care. Policy Plann. 1989;4:29-39.
  12. Basnayar B, Rajapasha LC. Cardiovascular and in-
  fectious diseases in South Asia: the double whammy,
  BM/. 2004;328:781.
  13. Steyn K, Bradshaw D, Norman R. Laubscher R.
  Determinants and Treatment of Hypertension in South
  Africa/Determinants of Hypertension and Its Treat-
  ment in South Africa During 1998: The First Demo-
  graphic and Health Survey (draft). Tygerburg, South
  Africa: South Africa Medical Research Council; 2003.
  14. International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes At-
  las. 2nd ed. Brussels, Belgium: Internal Diabetes Fed-
  eration; 2003.
  15. Thompson D, Wolf AM. The medical-care cost
  burden of obesity. Obes Rev. 2001;2:189-197.
  16. Beaglehole R, Yach D. Globalization and the pre-
  vention and control of non-communicable diseases:
  ©2004 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. (Reprinted) JAMA, June 2, 2004-Vol 291, No. 21 2621
  Downloaded from www.iama.com by Mark Hyman on January 8. 2010
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772611 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772611 Date: 08/31/2015
  GLOBAL BURDEN OF CHRONIC DISEASES
  the neglected chronic diseases of adults.Lancet. 2003;
  362:903-908.
  17. Yach D. Tobacco-induced diseases in South Africa.
  mi Epiderniol. 1990;19:1122-1123.
  18. McKeown T.The Origins ofHuman Disease. Ox-
  ford, England: Basil Blackwell; 1988.
  19. 08 Communique. Okinawa 2000. Available at:
  http://www.g8.utoronto.ca/summit/20000kinawa
  /finalcom.htm. Accessed January 12, 2004.
  20. Sommet D'Evian 2003. 2003 G8 Summit. Avail-
  able at: http://www.g8.fr/evian/english/navigation
  /200348_summit/summit_documents/health_-_a
  _g8_action_plan.html. Accessed January 12, 2004.
  21. Group of seventy-seven, final communique:
  adopted by the thirty-fourth meeting of chairment/
  coordinators of the chapters of the Group of 77.
  Geneva, 26-27 June 2003 [press release]. Available
  at: http://www.877.org/news/pr062703.htm. Ac-
  cessed January 13, 2004.
  22. Fleck F. Rich and poor to clash over sugar in
  WHO's healthy diet plan. BM.1. 2004;328:730.
  23. Alwan A, MacLean D, Mandil A. Assessment of
  National Capacity for Noncommunicable Disease Pre-
  vention and Control. Geneva, Switzerland: World
  Health Organization; 2001.
  24. World Health Organization. Cardiovascular dis-
  eases and hypertension. In: Program of the 9th World
  Health Assembly. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health
  Organization; 1956. WHA9.3121.
  25. World Health Organization. Prevention and con-
  trol of non-communicable diseases. Fifty-third World
  Health Assembly; May 20, 2000; Geneva, Switzer-
  land. WHA53/17. Available at: http://www.who.int
  /gb/EB_WHA/PDF/VVHA53/ResWHA53/17.pdf. Ac-
  cessed January 13, 2004.
  26, World Health Organization. Integrated preven-
  tion of noncommunicable diseases: draft global strat-
  egy on diet, physical activity and health. World Health
  Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; 2003. Available
  at: http://www.whoint/gb/EB_WHA/PDF/EB113
  /eeb11344a1.pdf. Accessed January 13, 2004.
  27. Resolution: WHO Framework Convention on To-
  bacco Control. Fifty-sixth World Health Assembly; May
  2003. WHA56.1. Available at: http://www.who.int
  /gb/EB_WHA/PDF/WHA56/ea56r1.pdf. Accessed
  January 13, 2004.
  28. Financial management report: expenditure on
  implementation of objectives in programme budget
  2002-2003-all sources of funds, covering the pe-
  riod 1 January 2002-31 December 2002. Geneva, Swit-
  zerland: World Heath Organization; 2003.
  29. Association of Schools of Public Health Web site.
  Available at: http://www.asph.org/document.cfm
  ?page=200. Accessed March 28, 2004.
  30. The 10/90 Report on Health Research 2001-
  2002. Geneva, Switzerland: Global Forum for Health
  Research; 2002:89-94.
  31. Monitoring Financial Flows for Health Re-
  search. Geneva, Switzerland: Global Forum for Health
  Research; 2002.
  32. Wellcome Trust Web site. Available at: http:
  //www.wellcome.ac.uk/en/1/biosfgintpopsuprem
  .html. Accessed January 12, 2004.
  33. United Kingdom Medical Research Council Web
  site. Available at: http://www.mrc.ac.uk. Accessed
  January 12, 2004.
  34. Alano BP, Almario ES. Tracking funds flow for
  health R & D. Presented at: The Global Forum for
  Health Research Forum 7; December 2003; Geneva,
  Switzerland.
  35. Fogarty International Center Web site. Available at:
  http://www.fic.nih.gov/. Accessed January 12, 2004.
  36. Indian Council of Medical Research. Non-
  ; communicable diseases Web page. Available at: http:
  //www.icmr.nic.in/thrust/thrustncd.htm. Accessed
  January 12, 2004.
  37. Instituto Nacionale de Salud de Mexico Web site.
  Available at: http://www.insp.mx. Accessed January
  12, 2004.
  38. South Africa Medical Research Council Web site.
  Available at: http://www.mrc.ac.za. Accessed Janu-
  ary 12,2004.
  39. Nchinda T. Research capacity strengthening in the
  South. Soc Sci Med. 2002;54:1699-1711.
  40. Bilateral Aid Guide. Geneva, Switzerland: World
  Health Organization, Dept of Government and Pri-
  vate Sector Relations; 2003. •
  41. United Nations Foundation Project: building al-
  liances and taking action to create a generation of to-
  bacco-free children and youth-a WHO/UNICEF
  project supported by the United Nations Founda-
  tion. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 1999. Available at:
  http://www.who.int/tobacco/areas/training
  /un_foundation/en. Accessed March 30, 2004.
  42. Rockefeller Foundation launches a new program
  to support reducing the health burden of tobacco on
  the poor in developing countries. Press release (May
  30, 2000). New York, Rockefeller Foundation, 2000.
  Available at: http://www.rockfound.org/display.asp
  ?context= l&Collection =46,DocID=54&Preview =0
  &ARCurrent= 1. Accessed March 30, 2004.
  43. Global Health Program fact sheet. Seattle, Wash:
  Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle; 2004. Avail-
  able at: http://www.gatesfoundation.org/MediaCenter
  /Publications/GlobalHealthFactSheet-021201.htm. Ac-
  cessed March 30, 2004.
  44. World Bank. Health, nutrition, and population sec-
  tor strategy paper. Washington, DC: World Bank:
  Health Nutrition and Population Division; 1997.
  45. Dodd R, Hinshelwood E.Poverty Reduction Strat-
  egy Papers-Their Significance for Health. Geneva,
  Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2002.
  46. Policy for the health sector. Manila, Phillipines:
  Asian Development Bank; 1999. Available at: http:
  //www.adb.org/Documents/Policies/Health
  /health100.asp. Accessed January 13, 2004.
  47. Ramesh A, Gertler P, Lagman A.Economic Analy-
  sis of Health Sector Proiects-A Review of Issues,
  Methods, and Approaches. Manila, Philippines: Asian
  Development Bank; 1999:8.
  48. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
  Implementing the Millennium Declaration: Goal
  6-Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases.
  Available at: http://www.undp.org/mdg/goa16.pdf.
  Accessed January 13, 2004.
  49. United Nations Population Fund.Summary of the
  (CPO Programmed of Action. Available at: http://www
  .unfpa.org/icpd/summary.htm. Accessed January 13,
  2004.
  50. United Nations General Assembly. Resolution
  S-27/2: a world fit for children. Adopted by the Gen-
  eral Assembly October 11, 2002.
  51. Wilkinson RG, Marmot M. Social Determinants
  of Health: The Solid Facts. 2nd ed. Copenhagen: Den-
  mark: World Health Organization Regional Office for
  Europe; 2003.
  52. Yach D. Chronic disorders: cardiovascular dis-
  ease, cancer, and diabetes. In: Levy BS, Sidel VW, eds.
  Social Justice and Public Health. Oxford, England: Ox-
  ford University Press; in press.
  53. Pena M, Bacallao I, eds. Obesity among the
  poor: an emerging problem in Latin America and the
  Caribbean. In: Obesity and Poverty: A New Public
  Health Challenge. Washington, DC: Pan American
  Health Organization, 2000:3-10. Scientific publica-
  tion 576.
  54. Jha P, Chaloupka FJ, eds. Tobacco Control in De-
  veloping Countries. New York, NY. Oxford Univer-
  sity Press; 2000.
  55. A manipulated dichotomy in global health policy
  [editorial]. Lancet. 2000;355:1923.
  56. Wakefield M, Flay B, Nichter M, Giovino G. Role
  of the media in influencing trajectories of youth smok-
  ing. Addiction. 2003;98:79-103.
  57. Babor T, Caetano R, Casswell S, at al. Alcohol:
  No Ordinary Commodity.New York, NY. Oxford Uni-
  versity Press; 2003.
  58. Hawkes C. Marketing activities of global soft drink
  and fast food companies in emerging markets: a re-
  view. In: Globalization, Diets and Noncommuni-
  cable Diseases. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Or-
  ganization; 2002.
  59. Marmot M. Evidence based policy or policy based
  evidence? 8M1. 2004;328:906-907.
  60. de Beyer J, Waverley Brigden L. Tobacco Con-
  trol Policy: Strategies, Successes and Setbacks. Wash-
  ington, DC: World Bank/Research for International To-
  bacco Control; 2003.
  61. Gajalakshmi V, Peto R, Kanaka TS, Jha P. Smok-
  ing and mortality from tuberculosis and other dis-
  eases in India. Lancet. 2003;362:507-515.
  62. Sklar P, Henry M. HIV Infection and cardiovas-
  cular disease-is there really a link?N Eng11 Med. 2003;
  349:2065-2067.
  63. Bettcher DW, Yach D, Guindon GE. Global trade
  and health: key linkages and future challenges. Bull
  World Health Organ. 2000;78:521-534.
  64. United Nations Conference on Trade and Devel-
  opment (UNCTAD).World Investment Report 2003.
  New York, NY: UNCTAD; 2003.
  65. Brownell KD, Hagen KB. Food Fight: The Inside
  Story of the Food Industry: America's Obesity Crisis,
  and What We Can Do About It. Chicago, Ill: Con-
  temporary Books; 2004.
  66. World Health Organization. Tobacco Company
  Strategies to Undermine Tobacco Control Activities
  at the World Health Organization. Report of the Com-
  mittee of Experts on Tobacco Industry Documents.
  Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization;
  2000:46;116.
  67. Mann J. Free sugars and human health: suffi-
  cient evidence for action? Lancet. 2004;363:1068-
  1070.
  68. World Health Organization. Innovative Care for
  Chronic Conditions: Building Blocks for Action. Geneva,
  Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2002.
  69. Rose G. Sick individuals and sick populations. Int
  1 Epidemic,'. 1985:14(1).
  70. World Health Organization/Joint United Na-
  tions Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). Treating
  3 million by 2005: making it happen: the WHO Strat-
  egy. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organiza-
  tion; 2003. Available at http://www.who.int/3by5
  /publications/documents/isbn9241591129/en/.
  Accessed January 13,2004.
  71. Varmus H, Klausner R, Zerhouni E, Acharya T, Dear
  AS, Singer PA. Grand Challenges in Global Health.Sci-
  ence. 2003302:398-399. Available at http://www
  .grandchallengesgh.org/ArDisplay.aspx?ID=
  788rSecID=302. Accessed January 13, 2004.
  72. Novo Nordisk's New Strategy: from fighting dis-
  ease to improving health [translation]. Mandag Mor-
  gen. February 9, 2004.
  73. Guide to the Global Compact: A Practical Un-
  derstanding of the Vision and Nine Principles. New
  York, NY: UN Global Compact; 2001.
  74. Yach D, Hawkes C, Epping-Jordan JE, Galbraith
  S. The World Health Organization's Framework Con-
  vention on Tobacco Control: implications for global
  epidemics of food-related deaths and disease.1 Pub-
  lic Health Policy. 2003;24:274-290.
  75. Fries J. Measuring and monitoring success in com-
  pressing morbidity. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(5 pt
  2):455-459.
  76. Guindon GE, Tobin S. Yach D. Trends and afford-
  ability of cigarette prices: ample room for tax in-
  creases and related health gains. Tob Control. 2002;
  11:35-43.
  77. Wanless D. Securing Our Future Health: Taking
  a Long-term View. London, England: HM Treasury;
  2002.
  2622 JAMA, June 2, 2004-Vol 291, No. 21 (Reprinted) ©2004 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
  Downloaded from www.jama.com by Mark Hyman on January 8, 2010
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772611 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772614
MetadataSubject: ISSUES I COVER
MetadataTo: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-14T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772614/C05772614.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Issues I cover
ExtractedTo: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>; Sullivan, Jacobi <Sullivamil@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 5:58 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772614
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Pls print.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772614 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 5:58 PM
  To: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
  Subject: Fw: Issues I cover
  Attachments: Note on current projects.docx; Note on current projects.docx
  Pls print.
  Original Message
  From: Fuchs, Michael H <FuchsMH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>; Sullivan, Jacobi <Sullivamil@state.gov>
  Sent: Sun Jan 10 11:17:32 2010
  Subject: Issues I cover
  Madam Secretary,
  Attached and below, please find a list of the issues I cover.
  Thanks,
  Mike
  MEMORANDUM
  TO: Secretary Clinton
  FROM: Mike
  CC: Cheryl, Jake
  SUBJECT: Issues I Cover
  In addition to the day-to-day projects and follow-up items I work on with Jake, I cover the following issues:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772614 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772614 Date: 08/31/2015
  Long-Range Policy
  Helping Cheryl and Jake plan for, and follow-up on, the bi-monthly policy meetings
  Working with bureaus on end-of-year reports follow-up
  Keeping up to speed on issues discussed at Deputies meetings for weekly memos
  Helping shepherd speech ideas and providing feedback on drafts
  Substantive Issue Areas
  Human rights/democracy
  Sudan
  Mexico
  Cookstoves
  Yemen-related issues
  Export controls
  Cybersecurity
  Terrorist finance issues
  •
  Military families issues
  Climate change
  Dialogues and partnerships with Nigeria, South Africa, Angola, Indonesia, Brazil
  State Department Reform
  Report reform: Working with Rich Verma and his team on reforming state's system for producing annual reports to
  Congress
  QDDR-related assistance
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772614 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772615
MetadataSubject: ISSUES I COVER
MetadataTo: Clinton
MetadataFrom: Mike
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772615/C05772615.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772615
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772615 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  MEMORANDUM
  TO: Secretary Clinton
  FROM: Mike
  CC: Cheryl, Jake
  SUBJECT: Issues I Cover
  In addition to the day-to-day projects and follow-up items I work on with
  Jake, I cover the following issues:
  Long-Range Policy
  • Helping Cheryl and Jake plan for, and follow-up on, the bi-monthly policy
  meetings
  • Working with bureaus on end-of-year reports follow-up
  • Keeping up to speed on issues discussed at Deputies meetings for weekly
  memos
  • Helping shepherd speech ideas and providing feedback on drafts
  Substantive Issue Areas
  • Human rights/democracy
  • Sudan
  • Mexico
  • Cookstoves
  • Yemen-related issues
  • Export controls
  • Cybersecurity
  • Terrorist fmance issues
  • Military families issues
  • Climate change
  • Dialogues and partnerships with Nigeria, South Africa, Angola, Indonesia,
  Brazil
  State Department Reform
  • Report reform: Working with Rich Verma and his team on reforming state's•
  system for producing annual reports to Congress
  • QDDR-related assistance
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772615 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772616
MetadataSubject: H: DEMS SHOULD DEMAND BOEHNER REMOVE THIS GOP NAZI REENACTOR. PUT BOEHNER IN THIS BLITZKRIEG. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772616/C05772616.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772616
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  sbwhoeop
  Saturday, October 9, 2010 10:50 AM
  H: Dems should demand Boehner remove this GOP Nazi reenactor. Put Boehner in this
  blitzkrieg. Sid
  Why is This GOP House Candidate Dressed as
  a Nazi?
  By Joshua Green
  An election year already notable for its menagerie of extreme and unusual candidates can add another one: Rich lott, the
  Republican nominee for Congress from Ohio's 9th District, and a Tea Party favorite, who for years donned a German
  Waffen SS uniform and participated in Nazi re-enactments.
  Rich lott, second from right, in a Nazi SS Waffen uniform.
  lott, whose district lies in Northwest Ohio, was involved with a group that calls itself Wiking, whose members are devoted
  to re-enacting the exploits of an actual Nazi division, the 5th SS Panzer Division Wiking, which fought mainly on the
  Eastern Front during World War 11. lott's participation in the Wiking group is not mentioned on his campaign's website, and
  his name and photographs were removed from the Wiking website.When contacted by The Atlantic, lott confirmed his
  involvement with the group over a number of years, but said his interest in Nazi Germany was historical and he does not
  subscribe to the tenets of Nazism. "No, absolutely not," he said. "In fact, there's a disclaimer on the [Wiking] website. And
  you'll find that on almost any reenactment website. it's purely historical interest in World War II."
  Rich lott and his wife, as shown on his campaign website.
  lott, a member of the Ohio Military Reserve, added, "I've always been fascinated by the fact that here was a relatively
  small country that from a strictly military point of view accomplished incredible things. I mean, they took over most of
  Europe and Russia, and it really took the combined effort of the free world to defeat them. From a purely historical military
  point of view, that's incredible."
  lott says the group chose the Wiking division in part because it fought on the Eastern Front, mainly against the Russian
  Army, and not U.S. or British soldiers. The group's website includes a lengthy history of the Wiking unit, a recruitment
  video, and footage of goose-stepping German soldiers marching in the Warsaw victory parade after Poland fell in 1939.
  The website makes scant mention of the atrocities committed by the Waffen SS, and includes only a glancing reference to
  the "twisted" nature of Nazism. Instead, it emphasizes how the Wiking unit fought Bolshevist Communism:
  Nazi Germany had no problem in recruiting the multitudes of volunteers willing to lay down their lives to
  ensure a "New and Free Europe", free of the threat of Communism. National Socialism was seen by -
  many in Holland, Denmark, Norway, Finland, and other eastern European and Balkan countries as the
  protector of personal freedom and their very way of life, despite the true underlying totalitarian (and quite
  twisted, in most cases) nature of the movement. Regardless, thousands upon thousands of valiant men
  died defending their respective countries in the name of a better tomorrow. We salute these idealists; no
  matter how unsavory the Nazi government was, the front-line soldiers of the Waffen-SS (in particular the
  foreign volunteers) gave their lives for their loved ones and a basic desire to be free.
  Historians of Nazi Germany vehemently dispute this characterization. "These guys don't know their history," said Charles
  W. Sydnor, Jr., a retired history professor and author of "Soldiers of Destruction: The SS Death's Head Division, 1933-45,"
  which chronicles an SS division. "They have a sanitized, romanticized view of what occurred." Sydnor added that re-
  enactments like the Wiking group's are illegal in Germany and Austria. "If you were to put on an SS uniform in Germany
  today, you'd be arrested."
  See web-only content:
  http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/10/why-is-this-gop-house-candidate-dressed-as-a-nazi/64319/
  Christopher Browning, a professor of history at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, said, "It is so unhistorical and
  so apologetic that you don't know to what degree they've simply caught up innocent war memorabilia enthusiasts who
  love putting on uniforms."
  loft says he does not recall exactly when he joined the Wiking group (his name appears on a unit roster as far back as
  2003), but did so with his son "as a father-son bonding thing." He says his name and pictures were removed from the
  Wiking website not out of concern that they would harm his political career, but because he quit the group three years
  ago, after his son lost interest.
  loft participated in the group under his own name, and also under the alias "Reinhard Pferdmann," which has also been
  removed, and which lott described as being his German alter ego. "Part of the reenactor's [experience]," lott said, "is the
  living-history part, of really trying to get into the persona of the time period. In many, not just in our unit, but in many units
  what individuals do is create this person largely based on a Germanized version of their name, and a history kind of based
  around your own real experiences. 'Reinhard' of course is 'Richard' in German. And 'Pferdmann,"pferd' is a horse. So it's
  literally 'horse man."
  Asked whether his participation in a Nazi re-enactor's group might not upset voters, particularly Jewish voters, loft said he
  hoped it would not: "They have to take it in context. There's reenactors out there who do everything. You couldn't do Civil
  War re-enacting if somebody didn't play the role of the Confederates. [This] is something that's definitely way in the past.
  ... [I hope voters] take it in context and see it for what it is, an interest in World War II history. And that's strictly all."
  0
  lott at Nazi re-enactment.
  Rabbi Moshe Saks, of the Congregation B'nai Israel in Sylvania, Ohio, a suburb of Toledo that sits in the 9th district,
  disagreed. "Any kind of reenactment or glorification of Nazi Germany, to us, would be something unacceptable and
  certainly in poor taste, if not offensive," he said. "I think the reaction here will be very negative. And not just among the
  Jewish community, but the broader community."
  In a follow-up email today, loft seemed at pains to address concerns that his conduct may have alienated veterans groups
  but made no specific mention of possible offense to Jews or human rights groups: "Never, in any of my reenacting of
  military history, have I meant any disrespect to anyone who served in our military or anyone who has been affected by the
  tragedy of war. In fact, I have immense respect for veterans who served our country valiantly, and my respect of the
  military and our veterans is one of the reasons I have actively studied military history throughout my life." He added that
  he has participated in re-enactments as a Civil War Union infantryman, a World War I dough boy and World War II
  American infantryman and paratrooper.
  The actual Wiking unit has a history as grisly as that of other Nazi divisions. In her book "The Death Marches of
  Hungarian Jews Through Austria in the Spring of 1945," Eleonore Lappin, the noted Austrian historian, writes that soldiers
  from the Wiking division were involved in the killing of Hungarian Jews in March and April 1945, before surrendering to
  American forces in Austria.
  "What you often hear is that the [Wiking] division was never formally accused of anything, but that's kind of a dodge," says
  Prof. Rob Citino, of the Military History Center at the University of North Texas, who examined the Wiking website. "The
  entire German war effort in the East was a racial crusade to rid the world of 'subhumans,' Slays were going to be enslaved
  in numbers of tens of millions. And of course the multimillion Jewish population of Eastern Europe was going to be
  exterminated altogether. That's what all these folks were doing in the East. It sends a shiver up my spine to think that
  people want to dress up and play SS on the weekend."
  This article available online at:
  http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/10/why-is-this-gop-house-candidate-dressed-as-a-nazi/64319/
  Copyright © 2010 by The Atlantic Monthly Group. All Rights Reserved.
  <img src="http://b.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&c2=6463921&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c15=&cj=1" alt="

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772616 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  sbwhoeop
  Saturday, October 9, 2010 10:50 AM
  H: Dems should demand Boehner remove this GOP Nazi reenactor. Put Boehner in this
  blitzkrieg. Sid
  Why is This GOP House Candidate Dressed as
  a Nazi?
  By Joshua Green
  An election year already notable for its menagerie of extreme and unusual candidates can add another one: Rich lott, the
  Republican nominee for Congress from Ohio's 9th District, and a Tea Party favorite, who for years donned a German
  Waffen SS uniform and participated in Nazi re-enactments.
  Rich lott, second from right, in a Nazi SS Waffen uniform.
  lott, whose district lies in Northwest Ohio, was involved with a group that calls itself Wiking, whose members are devoted
  to re-enacting the exploits of an actual Nazi division, the 5th SS Panzer Division Wiking, which fought mainly on the
  Eastern Front during World War 11. lott's participation in the Wiking group is not mentioned on his campaign's website, and
  his name and photographs were removed from the Wiking website.When contacted by The Atlantic, lott confirmed his
  involvement with the group over a number of years, but said his interest in Nazi Germany was historical and he does not
  subscribe to the tenets of Nazism. "No, absolutely not," he said. "In fact, there's a disclaimer on the [Wiking] website. And
  you'll find that on almost any reenactment website. it's purely historical interest in World War II."
  Rich lott and his wife, as shown on his campaign website.
  lott, a member of the Ohio Military Reserve, added, "I've always been fascinated by the fact that here was a relatively
  small country that from a strictly military point of view accomplished incredible things. I mean, they took over most of
  Europe and Russia, and it really took the combined effort of the free world to defeat them. From a purely historical military
  point of view, that's incredible."
  lott says the group chose the Wiking division in part because it fought on the Eastern Front, mainly against the Russian
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772616 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772616 Date: 08/31/2015
  Army, and not U.S. or British soldiers. The group's website includes a lengthy history of the Wiking unit, a recruitment
  video, and footage of goose-stepping German soldiers marching in the Warsaw victory parade after Poland fell in 1939.
  The website makes scant mention of the atrocities committed by the Waffen SS, and includes only a glancing reference to
  the "twisted" nature of Nazism. Instead, it emphasizes how the Wiking unit fought Bolshevist Communism:
  Nazi Germany had no problem in recruiting the multitudes of volunteers willing to lay down their lives to
  ensure a "New and Free Europe", free of the threat of Communism. National Socialism was seen by -
  many in Holland, Denmark, Norway, Finland, and other eastern European and Balkan countries as the
  protector of personal freedom and their very way of life, despite the true underlying totalitarian (and quite
  twisted, in most cases) nature of the movement. Regardless, thousands upon thousands of valiant men
  died defending their respective countries in the name of a better tomorrow. We salute these idealists; no
  matter how unsavory the Nazi government was, the front-line soldiers of the Waffen-SS (in particular the
  foreign volunteers) gave their lives for their loved ones and a basic desire to be free.
  Historians of Nazi Germany vehemently dispute this characterization. "These guys don't know their history," said Charles
  W. Sydnor, Jr., a retired history professor and author of "Soldiers of Destruction: The SS Death's Head Division, 1933-45,"
  which chronicles an SS division. "They have a sanitized, romanticized view of what occurred." Sydnor added that re-
  enactments like the Wiking group's are illegal in Germany and Austria. "If you were to put on an SS uniform in Germany
  today, you'd be arrested."
  See web-only content:
  http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/10/why-is-this-gop-house-candidate-dressed-as-a-nazi/64319/
  Christopher Browning, a professor of history at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, said, "It is so unhistorical and
  so apologetic that you don't know to what degree they've simply caught up innocent war memorabilia enthusiasts who
  love putting on uniforms."
  loft says he does not recall exactly when he joined the Wiking group (his name appears on a unit roster as far back as
  2003), but did so with his son "as a father-son bonding thing." He says his name and pictures were removed from the
  Wiking website not out of concern that they would harm his political career, but because he quit the group three years
  ago, after his son lost interest.
  loft participated in the group under his own name, and also under the alias "Reinhard Pferdmann," which has also been
  removed, and which lott described as being his German alter ego. "Part of the reenactor's [experience]," lott said, "is the
  living-history part, of really trying to get into the persona of the time period. In many, not just in our unit, but in many units
  what individuals do is create this person largely based on a Germanized version of their name, and a history kind of based
  around your own real experiences. 'Reinhard' of course is 'Richard' in German. And 'Pferdmann,"pferd' is a horse. So it's
  literally 'horse man."
  Asked whether his participation in a Nazi re-enactor's group might not upset voters, particularly Jewish voters, loft said he
  hoped it would not: "They have to take it in context. There's reenactors out there who do everything. You couldn't do Civil
  War re-enacting if somebody didn't play the role of the Confederates. [This] is something that's definitely way in the past.
  ... [I hope voters] take it in context and see it for what it is, an interest in World War II history. And that's strictly all."
  0
  lott at Nazi re-enactment.
  Rabbi Moshe Saks, of the Congregation B'nai Israel in Sylvania, Ohio, a suburb of Toledo that sits in the 9th district,
  disagreed. "Any kind of reenactment or glorification of Nazi Germany, to us, would be something unacceptable and
  certainly in poor taste, if not offensive," he said. "I think the reaction here will be very negative. And not just among the
  Jewish community, but the broader community."
  In a follow-up email today, loft seemed at pains to address concerns that his conduct may have alienated veterans groups
  but made no specific mention of possible offense to Jews or human rights groups: "Never, in any of my reenacting of
  military history, have I meant any disrespect to anyone who served in our military or anyone who has been affected by the
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772616 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772616 Date: 08/31/2015
  tragedy of war. In fact, I have immense respect for veterans who served our country valiantly, and my respect of the
  military and our veterans is one of the reasons I have actively studied military history throughout my life." He added that
  he has participated in re-enactments as a Civil War Union infantryman, a World War I dough boy and World War II
  American infantryman and paratrooper.
  The actual Wiking unit has a history as grisly as that of other Nazi divisions. In her book "The Death Marches of
  Hungarian Jews Through Austria in the Spring of 1945," Eleonore Lappin, the noted Austrian historian, writes that soldiers
  from the Wiking division were involved in the killing of Hungarian Jews in March and April 1945, before surrendering to
  American forces in Austria.
  "What you often hear is that the [Wiking] division was never formally accused of anything, but that's kind of a dodge," says
  Prof. Rob Citino, of the Military History Center at the University of North Texas, who examined the Wiking website. "The
  entire German war effort in the East was a racial crusade to rid the world of 'subhumans,' Slays were going to be enslaved
  in numbers of tens of millions. And of course the multimillion Jewish population of Eastern Europe was going to be
  exterminated altogether. That's what all these folks were doing in the East. It sends a shiver up my spine to think that
  people want to dress up and play SS on the weekend."
  This article available online at:
  http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/10/why-is-this-gop-house-candidate-dressed-as-a-nazi/64319/
  Copyright © 2010 by The Atlantic Monthly Group. All Rights Reserved.
  <img src="http://b.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&c2=6463921&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c15=&cj=1" alt="
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772616 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772617
MetadataSubject: YOUR SPEECH ON THE MIDEAST
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Daniel, Joshua J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-18T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0103/DOC_0C05772617/C05772617.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Your speech on the Mideast
ExtractedFrom: Daniel, Joshua J <Danielil@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>; Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>; Schwerin, Daniel B
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, October 18, 2010 9:06 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772617
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Of course. We're working on the deliverables now per your request.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772617 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: Daniel, Joshua J <Danielil@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 9:06 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: Your speech on the Mideast
  Of course. We're working on the deliverables now per your request.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Daniel, Joshua J
  Sent: Mon Oct 18 20:59:36 2010
  Subject: Re: Your speech on the Mideast
  Thx, Josh. May I see a draft tomorrow?
  Original Message
  From: Daniel, Joshua J <Danielil@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>; Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>; Schwerin, Daniel B
  <SchwerinDB@state.gov>
  Sent: Sun Oct 17 18:57:42 2010
  Subject: Your speech on the Mideast
  Madame Secretary,
  On Wednesday, you're scheduled to give a 15-minute talk at a gala hosted by the American Task Force on Palestine, a
  moderate, pro-peace Palestinian-American organization. Here's a quick overview of our plans for the speech, which we
  developed with NEA. Please let us know if you have any reactions.
  The audience in the room will include Palestinian-Americans who are influential in their communities: lawyers, doctors,
  business leaders, etc. Of course, a much larger audience beyond the room will read this speech as well. This is your first
  opportunity to address this issue in a serious way since the end of the moratorium.
  Key points:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772617 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772617 Date: 08/31/2015
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772617 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772618
MetadataSubject: HOLBROOKE CALLED AGAIN. WANTS TO TALK BEFORE HIS 4PM FLIGHT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772618/C05772618.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Holbrooke called again. Wants to talk before his 4pm flight
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, October 9, 2010 2:26 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772618
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772618 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, October 9, 2010 2:26 PM
  To: H
  Subject: Holbrooke called again. Wants to talk before his 4pm flight
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772618 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772619
MetadataSubject: UNDELIVERABLE: SCHEDULE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: postmaster@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772619/C05772619.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Undeliverable: Schedule
ExtractedFrom: postmaster@state.gov
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, October 9, 2010 2:51 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772619
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:
  woodardew2Ostate.gov
  The recipient's e-mail address was not found in the recipient's e-mail system. Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver
  this message for you. Please check the e-mail address and try resending this message, or provide the following diagnostic
  text to your system administrator.
  Diagnostic information for administrators:
  Generating server: MSWASHDCIB03.washdc.state.sbu
  woodardew2@state.gov
  #< #5.1.1> #SMTP#
  Original message headers:
  Received: from vance2.state.gov ([10.4.16.238]) by
  MSWASHDCIB03.washdc.state.sbu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 9
  Oct 2010 14:50:50 -0400
  Received: from mail.clintonemail.com (ool-18bbeabb.static.optonline.net [24.187.234.187])
  by vance2.state.gov with ESMTP id o99IRX3G009077
  (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=CAFAIL)
  for <woodardEW2@state.gov›; Sat, 9 Oct 2010 14:27:34 -0400
  Received: from CLNTINET08.clinton.local ([fe80::d0bb:23d3:f75e:4993]) by
  CLNTINET08.clinton.local ([fe80::d0bb:23d3:f75e:4993%101) with mapi; Sat, 9
  Oct 2010 14:48:40 -0400

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772619 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: postmaster@state.gov
  Sent: Saturday, October 9, 2010 2:51 PM
  To:
  Subject: Undeliverable: Schedule
  Attachments: details.txt; Schedule (1.98 KB)
  Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:
  woodardew2Ostate.gov
  The recipient's e-mail address was not found in the recipient's e-mail system. Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver
  this message for you. Please check the e-mail address and try resending this message, or provide the following diagnostic
  text to your system administrator.
  Diagnostic information for administrators:
  Generating server: MSWASHDCIB03.washdc.state.sbu
  woodardew2@state.gov
  #< #5.1.1> #SMTP#
  Original message headers:
  Received: from vance2.state.gov ([10.4.16.238]) by
  MSWASHDCIB03.washdc.state.sbu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 9
  Oct 2010 14:50:50 -0400
  Received: from mail.clintonemail.com (ool-18bbeabb.static.optonline.net [24.187.234.187])
  by vance2.state.gov with ESMTP id o99IRX3G009077
  (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=CAFAIL)
  for <woodardEW2@state.gov›; Sat, 9 Oct 2010 14:27:34 -0400
  Received: from CLNTINET08.clinton.local ([fe80::d0bb:23d3:f75e:4993]) by
  CLNTINET08.clinton.local ([fe80::d0bb:23d3:f75e:4993%101) with mapi; Sat, 9
  Oct 2010 14:48:40 -0400
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: "'woodardEW2@state.gov'" <woodardEW2@state.gov>, Huma Abedin
  Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 14:48:39 -0400
  Subject: Schedule
  Thread-Topic: Schedule
  Thread-Index: Actn4paKaQgL7soQQ5WOUtKlrs/T1g==
  Message-ID: <786762D781A7FF4FAC906089234044881607D4E774@CLNTINET08.clinton.local>
  Accept-Language: en-US
  Content-Language: en-US
  X-MS-Has-Attach:
  X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
  acceptlanguage: en-US
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
  Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
  MIME-Version: 1.0
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772619 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772619 Date: 08/31/2015
  Return-Path: HDR22@clintonemail.com
  X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Oct 2010 18:50:50.0911 (UTC) FILETIME=[E4CD22F0:01CB67E2]
  X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.0.0.4160-6.500.1024-17690.006
  X-TM-AS-Result: No--12.519900-5.000000-31
  X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No
  X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772619 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772622
MetadataSubject: FAXES
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: jake.sullivan
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772622/C05772622.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Faxes
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: jake.sullivan
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, October 9, 2010 5:01 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772622
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Odd - the specials say they sent to NY and got confirmation. Working to get them out again.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772622 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: jake.sullivan
  Sent: Saturday, October 9, 2010 5:01 PM
  To: H
  Subject: Re: Faxes
  Odd - the specials say they sent to NY and got confirmation. Working to get them out again.
  Original Message
  From: H
  To: lake.sullivan
  To: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: Faxes
  Sent: Oct 9, 2010 2:51 PM
  They did not arrive in NY so were they sent to DC instead? If they were, I will get them tomorrow by noon when I return.
  Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772622 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772623
MetadataSubject: UNDELIVERABLE: SCHEDULE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772623/C05772623.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772623
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Lauren Jiloty
  Saturday, October 9, 2010 7:40 PM
  woodardew@state.gov
  RE: Undeliverable: Schedule
  MS,
  It's WoodardEW©state.gov
  I apologize for not seeing this sooner I don't get my hotmail to my blackberry.
  I'm copying Eric here.
  -Lauren

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772623 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Cc:
  Subject:
  Lauren Jiloty
  Saturday, October 9, 2010 7:40 PM
  woodardew@state.gov
  RE: Undeliverable: Schedule
  MS,
  It's WoodardEW©state.gov
  I apologize for not seeing this sooner I don't get my hotmail to my blackberry.
  I'm copying Eric here.
  -Lauren
  From: HDR22©clintonemail.com
  To: Laurenjiloty
  Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 14:52:40 -0400
  Subject: Fw: Undeliverable: Schedule
  What is Eric W's address? The one below didn't work.
  Original Message
  From: postmaster@state.gov <postmaster@state.gov>
  To: woodardew2@state.00v <woodardew2@state.gov>
  Sent: Sat Oct 09 14:31:11 2010
  Subject: Undeliverable: Schedule
  Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:
  woodardew2Cestate.gov
  The recipient's e-mail address was not found in the recipient's system. Microsoft
  Exchange will not try to redeliver this message for you. Please check the e-mail address
  and try resending this message, or provide the following diagnostic text to your system
  administrator.
  Diagnostic information for administrators:
  Generating server: MSWASHDCIP,03.wasndc.state..stu
  woodardew26state.gov
  #< #3.1.1> #SMTP#
  Original message headers:
  Received: from vance2.state.gov ([10.4.16.230]) by
  MSWASHDCT03.washOc.state.sbu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.790.3959); Sat, 9
  Oct 2010 14:50:50 -0400
  Received: from mail.clintbnemail.com cpor-18bbeabb.static.optchline.net [24.187.234.187])
  by v;
  ,
  nce2.state.u.cv with ESMTP -;c1 0991RX3009077
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772623 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772623 Date: 08/31/2015
  (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=CAFAIL)
  for <woodardEW2@state.gov›; Sat, 9 Oct 2010 14:27:34 -0400
  Received: from CLNTINET08.clinton.local ([fe80::dObb:23d3:f75e:4993]) by
  CLNTINET08.clinton.local ([fe80::dObb:23d3:f75e:4993%10]) with mapi; Sat, 9
  Oct 2010 14:48:40 -0400
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: "woodardEW2@state.govr" <woodardEW2@state.gov>, Huma Abedin
  Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 14:48:39 -0400
  Subject: Schedule
  Thread-Topic: Schedule
  Thread-Index: Actn4paKaQgL7soQQ5WOUtKlrs/T1g==
  Message-ID: <786762D781A7FF4FAC9060892B4044881607D4E774@CLNTINET08.clinton.local>
  Accept-Language: en-US
  Content-Language: en-US
  X-MS-Has-Attach:
  X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
  accept language: en-US
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
  Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
  MIME-Version: 1.0
  Return-Path: HDR22@ciintonemail.com
  X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Oct 2010 18:50:50.0911 (UTC) FILETIME=[E4CD22F0:010E67E2]
  X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.0.0.4160-6.500.1024-17690.006
  X-TM-AS-Result: No--12.519900-5.000000-31
  X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No
  X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No
  --Forwarded Message Attachment--
  From: HDR226-
  1clintonemail.com
  To: woodardEW2©state.gov; Hurna
  Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 14:48:39 -0400
  Subject: Schedule
  Line block questions:
  Whv is the Julia Roberts interview during the time I have weekly depoartmental meeting?
  Also, I don't see a mtg w POTUS on the 15th--can we get that scheduled?
  T want to have my own pre-brief before the Kissinger event.
  And. I notice that the HBO event conflicts w a PC mtg at NH. Now w/Doniion in charge can
  we get a set time for all the regular mtgs so we don't schedule conflicting events?
  When is Adm Mullen having his small Pakistan dinner? if it's the 21st, can I get back in
  time from Paris?
  If La Raze can pay for a reception for Raul, why is his swearing in ceremony in the
  Treaty Room instead of the Franklin? Can't we find a time for them? Also, I won't be able
  to go to his reception at a hotel since I have to go to the screening for the Nat Geo
  special so that day doesn't work so well. What about on the 26th after T get back from NY
  since gill will be in Haiti and could come back to DC?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772623 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772624
MetadataSubject: IRWIN REDLENER
MetadataTo: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-14T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772624/C05772624.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Irwin redlener
ExtractedTo: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 6:40 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772624
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Ok
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772624 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 6:40 PM
  To: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Irwin redlener
  Ok
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Thu Jan 14 18:35:16 2010
  Subject: Fw: Irwin redlener
  III add him to your grid
  c.
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: Abed in, Huma
  Sent: Thu Jan 14 18:34:22 2010
  Subject: Irwin redlener
  Just called me for her. Wants to talk to her about pediatric casualties in haiti
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772624 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772629
MetadataSubject: INTERACTION OP-ED ON BRANDING IN PAKISTAN
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: McHale, Judith A
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-10T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772629/C05772629.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: InterAction op-ed on branding in Pakistan
ExtractedTo: H; Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D; Reines, Philippe I
ExtractedFrom: McHale, Judith A <McHaleJA@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 5:51 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772629
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Fyi
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772629 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: McHale, Judith A <McHaleJA@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 5:51 AM
  To: H; Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D; Reines, Philippe I
  Subject: Fw: InterAction op-ed on branding in Pakistan
  Fyi
  From: Schwartz, Larry
  To: McHale, Judith A; Douglas, Walter T; Davidson, Mark 3
  Sent: Sun Oct 10 01:35:11 2010
  Subject: FW: InterAction op-ed on branding in Pakistan
  Interaction op-ed that Raj Shah was told will appear in the Washington Post also appeared in Sunday Daily
  Times in Pakistan.
  by Samuel A. Worthington
  The work that relief and humanitarian organizations carry out in Pakistan is far from easy or safe. We go to
  difficult areas and are targets for militants seeking to destroy our lifesaving mission through a campaign of
  killing, kidnapping and intimidation.
  Overtly branding our efforts as sponsored by the U.S. government — as the Obama administration wants us
  to do — only makes our jobs harder and more dangerous.
  I have the privilege of leading InterAction, an alliance of U.S.-based nongovernmental organizations
  conducting relief work around the world; nearly a quarter of our 200 members are responding to the recent
  floods in Pakistan, and many of them have been in Pakistan for decades.
  Though our efforts are supported by public donations, much of the assistance we deliver — whether food,
  water, essential health care or education — comes via funding from the U.S. government. And in recent
  weeks, the Obama administration has pressured us to make that link as clear and public as possible. Secretary
  of State Hillary Rodham Clinton questioned our courage, suggesting last month that some NGOs are too
  "afraid to have association with the U.S. government" while distributing aid in Pakistan.
  None of the NGO workers in Pakistan — living under a daily threat of kidnappings or targeted killings — are
  cowards. The dangers they face are immense, and their bravery must be commended as they help people
  whose lives have been devastated by terrorism or the epic floods.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772629 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772629 Date: 08/31/2015
  Of course, I understand where the administration is coming from. The U.S.-funded assistance we provide saves
  lives and helps struggling communities rebuild. In the battle for hearts and minds in Pakistan, U.S. officials
  argue, the failure to clearly advertise that the American government is behind this help — with, for instance,
  logos on medicines or signs on food-distribution centers — is a missed opportunity. In 2009 the United States
  approved $7.5 billion in assistance to Pakistan over the next five years; however, as Washington Post
  columnist David Ignatius noted recently, Pakistanis read more about American drone attacks than about these
  aid dollars.
  In countries such as Liberia or Democratic Republic of Congo, U.S. NGOs that get funding from the U.S.
  government routinely promote the fact that they are delivering help "from the American people." But in
  Pakistan, where aid workers' lives are more often at stake, an enforced branding campaign could undermine
  our ability to deliver assistance as fast as possible without being a lightning rod for protests or attacks. It
  would also put the lives of Americans and their Pakistani colleagues at risk. (It is usually Pakistani nationals
  who do the bulk of the work on the ground.)
  In an environment where we are often soft targets for militants, drawing attention to our connection to the
  U.S. government makes us even more vulnerable.
  In March, one of InterAction's most active members in Pakistan, World Vision — which works on issues from
  health care to farming to literacy — was attacked in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (formerly called the North-West
  Frontier Province), and seven of its employees were killed. And a year ago, the office of the World Food
  Program in Islamabad was attacked, and five employees were killed.
  There must be a balance among mitigating the risks NGOs face, communicating U.S. goodwill and delivering
  assistance effectively. NGOs must be allowed to strike that balance on their own every day — even if the
  upshot is that we don't include U.S. signs on new health clinics.
  In some cases, particularly in less-volatile regions of Pakistan, conspicuously identifying aid as American may
  not pose a threat to our work. But in areas where militants are particularly active, the risks to those delivering
  the aid may be great. These judgments must be made by the NGOs on the ground, depending on local
  circumstances, and not directed by the State Department's branding concerns.
  In Pakistani tribal areas along the Afghan border, for instance, the U.S. Agency for International Development
  has granted our members waivers allowing us not to brand U.S. assistance, but there is growing pressure by
  the government for these waivers to be phased out. While I agree that U.S. aid to the Pakistani people and
  government needs to be more visible, this could put humanitarian workers' lives in jeopardy.
  The American people are enormously generous, as shown after Haiti's devastating earthquake in January and
  in the aftermath of the December 2004 tsunami in Asia. In Pakistan, the United States — through military and
  civilian assistance, as well as through NGOs — is playing a major role in response to the recent floods, which
  forced at least 15 million people from their homes. The humanitarian groups I represent are providing basics,
  including clean water, medicine and shelter.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772629 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772629 Date: 08/31/2015
  The debate over branding our efforts is not simply another technical policy decision; for us, it can be a matter
  of life and death. NGOs and the Obama administration must work together to find a solution that allows
  humanitarian workers in the field flexibility to brand or not, according to security conditions on the ground.
  We are ready and eager to have that dialogue. The lives of our front-line workers depend on it.
  Samuel A. Worthington is president of InterAction, an alliance of U.S.-based nongovernmental organizations
  carrying out international humanitarian and development work.
  END
  SBU
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772629 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772630
MetadataSubject: BLANK
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-10T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772630/C05772630.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 7:40 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772630
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Jon davidson will print your press clips today.
  Was going to have monica help marina tomorrow morning unless you don't need it.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772630 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 7:40 AM
  To:
  Jon davidson will print your press clips today.
  Was going to have monica help marina tomorrow morning unless you don't need it.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772630 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772632
MetadataSubject: INTERACTION OP-ED ON BRANDING IN PAKISTAN
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: McHale, Judith A
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-10T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772632/C05772632.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: InterAction op-ed on branding in Pakistan
ExtractedFrom: McHale, Judith A <McHaleJA@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 9:08 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772632
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  I agree. As you know I believe passionately that it is not in our national interests to continue to provide billions of dollars
  in aid and assistance without the very people we are helping knowing we are the ones providing the assistance. Some of
  our research in Pakistan indicates that many people believe the assistancee is coming from China and of course the
  Chinese do nothing to correct the record.
  I asked INR to provide me with an assessment of the current situation after the floods to determine the impact of our
  assistance. I have also asked them to work with the IC to give us an accurate and unbiased assessment of the security
  risks involved. I aksed for it a couple of weeks ago so hopefully they will have something we can use now which might be
  helpful in drafting a response.
  In terms of the security arguments he makes, it is worth noting that the incidents he references are situations where the
  attacks occured in places where there was NO USG branding. The reality is that the terrorists attack any group or
  institution which might impede their ability to prevail.
  I had already planned a USAID/State meeting to address this issue this week. I'll try to get everyone together today or
  tomorrow and will report back to you.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772632 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: McHale, Judith A <McHaleJA@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 9:08 AM
  To:
  Subject: Re: InterAction op-ed on branding in Pakistan
  I agree. As you know I believe passionately that it is not in our national interests to continue to provide billions of dollars
  in aid and assistance without the very people we are helping knowing we are the ones providing the assistance. Some of
  our research in Pakistan indicates that many people believe the assistancee is coming from China and of course the
  Chinese do nothing to correct the record.
  I asked INR to provide me with an assessment of the current situation after the floods to determine the impact of our
  assistance. I have also asked them to work with the IC to give us an accurate and unbiased assessment of the security
  risks involved. I aksed for it a couple of weeks ago so hopefully they will have something we can use now which might be
  helpful in drafting a response.
  In terms of the security arguments he makes, it is worth noting that the incidents he references are situations where the
  attacks occured in places where there was NO USG branding. The reality is that the terrorists attack any group or
  institution which might impede their ability to prevail.
  I had already planned a USAID/State meeting to address this issue this week. I'll try to get everyone together today or
  tomorrow and will report back to you.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: McHale, Judith A
  Sent: Sun Oct 10 08:08:19 2010
  Subject: Re: InterAction op-ed on branding in Pakistan
  JM-
  HRC
  Original Message
  From: McHale, Judith A <McHaleJA@state.gov>
  To: H; Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivann@state.gov>; Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>; Reines, Philippe I
  <reinesp@state.gov>
  Sent: Sun Oct 10 05:50:43 2010
  Subject: Fw: InterAction op-ed on branding in Pakistan
  Fyi
  From: Schwartz, Larry
  To: McHale, Judith A; Douglas, Walter T; Davidson, Mark
  Sent: Sun Oct 10 01:35:11 2010
  Subject: FW: InterAction op-ed on branding in Pakistan
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772632 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772632 Date: 08/31/2015
  Interaction op-ed that Raj Shah was told will appear in the Washington Post also appeared in Sunday Daily Times in
  Pakistan.
  by Samuel A. Worthington
  The work that relief and humanitarian organizations carry out in Pakistan is far from easy or safe. We go to difficult areas
  and are targets for militants seeking to destroy our lifesaving mission through a campaign of killing, kidnapping and
  intimidation.
  Overtly branding our efforts as sponsored by the U.S. government — as the Obama administration wants us to do —
  only makes our jobs harder and more dangerous.
  I have the privilege of leading InterAction, an alliance of U.S.-based nongovernmental organizations conducting relief
  work around the world; nearly a quarter of our 200 members are responding to the recent floods in Pakistan, and many
  of them have been in Pakistan for decades.
  Though our efforts are supported by public donations, much of the assistance we deliver — whether food, water,
  essential health care or education — comes via funding from the U.S. government. And in recent weeks, the Obama
  administration has pressured us to make that link as clear and public as possible. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham
  Clinton questioned our courage, suggesting last month that some NGOs are too "afraid to have association with the U.S.
  government" while distributing aid in Pakistan.
  None of the NGO workers in Pakistan — living under a daily threat of kidnappings or targeted killings — are cowards.
  The dangers they face are immense, and their bravery must be commended as they help people whose lives have been
  devastated by terrorism or the epic floods.
  Of course, I understand where the administration is coming from. The U.S.-funded assistance we provide saves lives and
  helps struggling communities rebuild. In the battle for hearts and minds in Pakistan, U.S. officials argue, the failure to
  clearly advertise that the American government is behind this help — with, for instance, logos on medicines or signs on
  food-distribution centers — is a missed opportunity. In 2009 the United States approved $7.5 billion in assistance to
  Pakistan over the next five years; however, as Washington Post columnist David Ignatius noted recently, Pakistanis read
  more about American drone attacks than about these aid dollars.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772632 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772632 Date: 08/31/2015
  In countries such as Liberia or Democratic Republic of Congo, U.S. NGOs that get funding from the U.S. government
  routinely promote the fact that they are delivering help "from the American people." But in Pakistan, where aid workers'
  lives are more often at stake, an enforced branding campaign could undermine our ability to deliver assistance as fast as
  possible without being a lightning rod for protests or attacks. It would also put the lives of Americans and their Pakistani
  colleagues at risk. (It is usually Pakistani nationals who do the bulk of the work on the ground.)
  In an environment where we are often soft targets for militants, drawing attention to our connection to the U.S.
  government makes us even more vulnerable.
  In March, one of InterAction's most active members in Pakistan, World Vision — which works on issues from health care
  to farming to literacy — was attacked in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (formerly called the North-West Frontier Province), and
  seven of its employees were killed. And a year ago, the office of the World Food Program in Islamabad was attacked,
  and five employees were killed.
  There must be a balance among mitigating the risks NGOs face, communicating U.S. goodwill and delivering assistance
  effectively. NGOs must be allowed to strike that balance on their own every day — even if the upshot is that we don't
  include U.S. signs on new health clinics.
  In some cases, particularly in less-volatile regions of Pakistan, conspicuously identifying aid as American may not pose a
  threat to our work. But in areas where militants are particularly active, the risks to those delivering the aid may be great.
  These judgments must be made by the NGOs on the ground, depending on local circumstances, and not directed by the
  State Department's branding concerns.
  In Pakistani tribal areas along the Afghan border, for instance, the U.S. Agency for International Development has
  granted our members waivers allowing us not to brand U.S. assistance, but there is growing pressure by the government
  for these waivers to be phased out. While I agree that U.S. aid to the Pakistani people and government needs to be more
  visible, this could put humanitarian workers' lives in jeopardy.
  The American people are enormously generous, as shown after Haiti's devastating earthquake in January and in the
  aftermath of the December 2004 tsunami in Asia. In Pakistan, the United States — through military and civilian
  assistance, as well as through NGOs — is playing a major role in response to the recent floods, which forced at least 15
  million people from their homes. The humanitarian groups I represent are providing basics, including clean water,
  medicine and shelter.
  The debate over branding our efforts is not simply another technical policy decision; for us, it can be a matter of life and
  death. NGOs and the Obama administration must work together to find a solution that allows humanitarian workers in
  the field flexibility to brand or not, according to security conditions on the ground.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772632 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772632 Date: 08/31/2015
  We are ready and eager to have that dialogue. The lives of our front-line workers depend on it.
  Samuel A. Worthington is president of InterAction, an alliance of U.S.-based nongovernmental organizations carrying out
  international humanitarian and development work.
  END
  SBU
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772632 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772633
MetadataSubject: INTERACTION OP-ED ON BRANDING IN PAKISTAN
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: McHale, Judith A
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-10T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772633/C05772633.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: InterAction op-ed on branding in Pakistan
ExtractedFrom: McHale, Judith A <McHaleJA@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 11:12 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772633
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Thx. I feel the same way! Just got off a call with usaid, srap and my team. We are drafting a response. I think we need
  something firm, accurate and rapid. Still deciding who will sign and whether it will be an op ed or letter to the editor. I
  want to be sure we avoid a public battle with the ngo community on this issue. UsAID is recommending that Raj meet
  with Worthington and read him the riot act for the op ed.
  Will forward the draft before we send.
  8TW, USAID confirmed that there was no USG branding in the attacks Worthington references.
  Jm

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772633 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: McHale, Judith A <McHaleJA@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 11:12 AM
  To:
  Subject: Re: InterAction op-ed on branding in Pakistan
  Thx. I feel the same way! Just got off a call with usaid, srap and my team. We are drafting a response. I think we need
  something firm, accurate and rapid. Still deciding who will sign and whether it will be an op ed or letter to the editor. I
  want to be sure we avoid a public battle with the ngo community on this issue. UsAID is recommending that Raj meet
  with Worthington and read him the riot act for the op ed.
  Will forward the draft before we send.
  8TW, USAID confirmed that there was no USG branding in the attacks Worthington references.
  Jm
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: McHale, Judith A
  Sent: Sun Oct 10 10:48:22 2010
  Subject: Re: InterAction op-ed on branding in Pakistan
  Thx--I love working w you--I feel sometimes we were separated at birth! Onward!
  Original Message
  From: McHale, Judith A <McHaleJA@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Oct 10 09:07:53 2010
  Subject: Re: InterAction op-ed on branding in Pakistan
  I agree. As you know I believe passionately that it is not in our national interests to continue to provide billions of dollars
  in aid and assistance without the very people we are helping knowing we are the ones providing the assistance. Some of
  our research in Pakistan indicates that many people believe the assistancee is coming from China and of course the
  Chinese do nothing to correct the record.
  I asked INR to provide me with an assessment of the current situation after the floods to determine the impact of our
  assistance. I have also asked them to work with the IC to give us an accurate and unbiased assessment of the security
  risks involved. I aksed for it a couple of weeks ago so hopefully they will have something we can use now which might be
  helpful in drafting a response.
  In terms of the security arguments he makes, it is worth noting that the incidents he references are situations where the
  attacks occured in places where there was NO USG branding. The reality is that the terrorists attack any group or
  institution which might impede their ability to prevail.
  I had already planned a USAID/State meeting to address this issue this week. I'll try to get everyone together today or
  tomorrow and will report back to you.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772633 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772633 Date: 08/31/2015
  To: McHale, Judith A
  Sent: Sun Oct 10 08:08:19 2010
  Subject: Re: InterAction op-ed on branding in Pakistan
  JM-
  HRC
  Original Message
  From: McHale, Judith A <McHaleJA@state.gov>
  To: H; Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>; Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>; Reines, Philippe I
  <reinesp@state.gov>
  Sent: Sun Oct 10 05:50:43 2010
  Subject: Fw: InterAction op-ed on branding in Pakistan
  Fyi
  From: Schwartz, Larry
  To: McHale, Judith A; Douglas, Walter T; Davidson, Mark .1
  Sent: Sun Oct 10 01:35:11 2010
  Subject: FW: InterAction op-ed on branding in Pakistan
  Interaction op-ed that Raj Shah was told will appear in the Washington Post also appeared in Sunday Daily Times in
  Pakistan.
  by Samuel A. Worthington
  The work that relief and humanitarian organizations carry out in Pakistan is far from easy or safe. We go to difficult areas
  and are targets for militants seeking to destroy our lifesaving mission through a campaign of killing, kidnapping and
  intimidation.
  Overtly branding our efforts as sponsored by the U.S. government — as the Obama administration wants us to do —
  only makes our jobs harder and more dangerous.
  I have the privilege of leading InterAction, an alliance of U.S.-based nongovernmental organizations conducting relief
  work around the world; nearly a quarter of our 200 members are responding to the recent floods in Pakistan, and many
  of them have been in Pakistan for decades.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772633 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772633 Date: 08/31/2015
  Though our efforts are supported by public donations, much of the assistance we deliver — whether food, water,
  essential health care or education — comes via funding from the U.S. government. And in recent weeks, the Obama
  administration has pressured us to make that link as clear and public as possible. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham
  Clinton questioned our courage, suggesting last month that some NGOs are too "afraid to have association with the U.S.
  government" while distributing aid in Pakistan.
  None of the NGO workers in Pakistan — living under a daily threat of kidnappings or targeted killings — are cowards.
  The dangers they face are immense, and their bravery must be commended as they help people whose lives have been
  devastated by terrorism or the epic floods.
  Of course, I understand where the administration is coming from. The U.S.-funded assistance we provide saves lives and
  helps struggling communities rebuild. In the battle for hearts and minds in Pakistan, U.S. officials argue, the failure to
  clearly advertise that the American government is behind this help — with, for instance, logos on medicines or signs on
  food-distribution centers — is a missed opportunity. In 2009 the United States approved $7.5 billion in assistance to
  Pakistan over the next five years; however, as Washington Post columnist David Ignatius noted recently, Pakistanis read
  more about American drone attacks than about these aid dollars.
  In countries such as Liberia or Democratic Republic of Congo, U.S. NGOs that get funding from the U.S. government
  routinely promote the fact that they are delivering help "from the American people." But in Pakistan, where aid workers'
  lives are more often at stake, an enforced branding campaign could undermine our ability to deliver assistance as fast as
  possible without being a lightning rod for protests or attacks. It would also put the lives of Americans and their Pakistani
  colleagues at risk. (It is usually Pakistani nationals who do the bulk of the work on the ground.)
  In an environment where we are often soft targets for militants, drawing attention to our connection to the U.S.
  government makes us even more vulnerable.
  In March, one of InterAction's most active members in Pakistan, World Vision — which works on issues from health care
  to farming to literacy — was attacked in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (formerly called the North-West Frontier Province), and
  seven of its employees were killed. And a year ago, the office of the World Food Program in Islamabad was attacked,
  and five employees were killed.
  There must be a balance among mitigating the risks NGOs face, communicating U.S. goodwill and delivering assistance
  effectively. NGOs must be allowed to strike that balance on their own every day — even if the upshot is that we don't
  include U.S. signs on new health clinics.
  In some cases, particularly in less-volatile regions of Pakistan, conspicuously identifying aid as American may not pose a
  threat to our work. But in areas where militants are particularly active, the risks to those delivering the aid may be great.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772633 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772633 Date: 08/31/2015
  These judgments must be made by the NGOs on the ground, depending on local circumstances, and not directed by the
  State Department's branding concerns.
  In Pakistani tribal areas along the Afghan border, for instance, the U.S. Agency for International Development has
  granted our members waivers allowing us not to brand U.S. assistance, but there is growing pressure by the government
  for these waivers to be phased out. While I agree that U.S. aid to the Pakistani people and government needs to be more
  visible, this could put humanitarian workers' lives in jeopardy.
  The American people are enormously generous, as shown after Haiti's devastating earthquake in January and in the
  aftermath of the December 2004 tsunami in Asia. In Pakistan, the United States — through military and civilian
  assistance, as well as through NGOs — is playing a major role in response to the recent floods, which forced at least 15
  million people from their homes. The humanitarian groups I represent are providing basics, including clean water,
  medicine and shelter.
  The debate over branding our efforts is not simply another technical policy decision; for us, it can be a matter of life and
  death. NGOs and the Obama administration must work together to find a solution that allows humanitarian workers in
  the field flexibility to brand or not, according to security conditions on the ground.
  We are ready and eager to have that dialogue. The lives of our front-line workers depend on it.
  Samuel A. Worthington is president of InterAction, an alliance of U.S.-based nongovernmental organizations carrying out
  international humanitarian and development work.
  END
  SBU
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772633 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772634
MetadataSubject: IS THERE STILL A BOTTLENECK AT THE AIRPORT?
MetadataTo: rshah
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-14T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772634/C05772634.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Is there still a bottleneck at the airport? I'm listening to a doctor (Bob Hoff w Salvation
ExtractedTo: 'rshal" ; 'cheryl.mills
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
ExtractedCc: 'FuchsMH@state.gov'; 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 8:38 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772634
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Army)on NPR saying he is upset because they are running out of supplies and he keeps
  being told they are in the air.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772634 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
  Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 8:38 PM
  To: 'rshal" ; 'cheryl.mills
  Cc: 'FuchsMH@state.gov'; 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: Is there still a bottleneck at the airport? I'm listening to a doctor (Bob Hoff w Salvation
  Army)on NPR saying he is upset because they are running out of supplies and he keeps
  being told they are in the air.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772634 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772636
MetadataSubject: GATES SAYS HE NEEDS TO TALK TO U TONIGHT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-18T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0103/DOC_0C05772636/C05772636.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Gates says he needs to talk to u tonight
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, October 18, 2010 10:18 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772636
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772636 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 10:18 PM
  To:
  Subject: Gates says he needs to talk to u tonight
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772636 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772637
MetadataSubject: HAVE TALKED A FEW TIMES WITH TOM
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Campbell, Kurt M
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-10T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772637/C05772637.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Have talked a few times with Tom
ExtractedFrom: Campbell, Kurt M <CampbelIKM@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 11:13 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772637
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Can debrief or discuss at your convenience Madame Secretary. Ops can find me at any time. Will be out of pocket 1 to 4.
  Thanks Kurt

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772637 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Campbell, Kurt M <CampbelIKM@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 11:13 AM
  To:
  Subject: Have talked a few times with Tom
  Can debrief or discuss at your convenience Madame Secretary. Ops can find me at any time. Will be out of pocket 1 to 4.
  Thanks Kurt
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772637 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772639
MetadataSubject: FYI - COLOMBIAN PRESIDENT URIBE INTENDS TO TRAVEL TO HAITI JANUARY 17,
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-14T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772639/C05772639.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: FYI - Colombian President Uribe intends to travel to Haiti January 17,
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivann@state.gov>; Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 9:21 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772639
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: When can you talk?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772639 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 9:21 PM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: FYI - Colombian President Uribe intends to travel to Haiti January 17,
  When can you talk?
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivann@state.gov>; Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Jan 14 20:54:25 2010
  Subject: FYI - Colombian President Uribe intends to travel to Haiti January 17,
  INTERNATIONAL COORDINATION
  (U) Colombian President Uribe intends to travel to Haiti January 17, according to press. His government will also
  send a naval hospital ship. (Rendon News Alerts)
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772639 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772640
MetadataSubject: LETTER TO SECTY CLINTON FROM TONY LAKE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-18T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0103/DOC_0C05772640/C05772640.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Letter to Secty Clinton from Tony Lake
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Jiloty, Lauren C
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, October 18, 2010 10:25 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772640
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772640 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 10:25 PM
  To:
  Cc: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Fw: Letter to Secty Clinton from Tony Lake
  Attachments: [Untitled].pdf; [Untitleapdf
  Original Message
  From: Huang, Cindy Y
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Cc: Haslach, Patricia M
  Sent: Mon Oct 18 18:39:51 2010
  Subject: FW: Letter to Secty Clinton from Tony Lake
  Handwritten note of thanks from Tony Lake to S. Glad that he notes the meeting was "useful" -- maybe a sign that we
  managed to make it more than just talking heads? Thx!
  Original Message
  From: Sabar, Aisha (USUN)
  Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 6:38 PM
  To: Nagy, Eleanor; Huang, Cindy Y
  Subject: FW: Letter to Secty Clinton from Tony Lake
  Nice note from Tony Lake to the Secretary regarding the nutrition event in case you didn't already see it..
  Aisha I. Sabar
  Economic and Social Affairs Adviser
  U.S. Mission to the United Nations
  799 United Nations Plaza
  New York, NY 10017
  Tel: 212-415-4229
  Email: sabara2@state.gov
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED Original Message
  From: Sammis, John F (USUN)
  Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 12:39 PM
  To: Nemroff, Courtney R (USUN); Glucksman, Tobias H (USUN)
  Subject: FW: Letter to Secty Clinton from Tony Lake
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772640 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772640 Date: 08/31/2015
  Who had the lead on the nutrition event for us?
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED
  Original Message
  From: Myers, Honora L (USUN)
  Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 12:38 PM
  To: DiCarlo, Rosemary A (USUN); Anderson, Brooke D (USUN); Barton, Rick (USUN); Ahmed, Salman (USUN); Sammis,
  John F (USUN); Nemroff, Courtney R (USUN)
  Subject: FW: Letter to Secty Clinton from Tony Lake
  Original Message
  From: EXECUTIVE [mailto:EXECGRP@STATE.GOV]
  Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 12:35 PM
  To: Myers, Honora L (USUN)
  Subject: Letter to Secty Clinton from Tony Lake
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772640 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772642
MetadataSubject: FAXES
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: jake.sullivan
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772642/C05772642.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Faxes
ExtractedTo: H; 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: jake.sullivan
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, October 9, 2010 4:38 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772642
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Sorry - just seeing. I was told they were sent and received. Will check.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772642 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: jake.sullivan
  Sent: Saturday, October 9, 2010 4:38 PM
  To: H; 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Faxes
  Sorry - just seeing. I was told they were sent and received. Will check.
  Original Message
  From: H
  To: lake.sullivar
  To: Isullivanjj@state.govi
  Subject: Faxes
  Sent: Oct 9, 2010 2:51 PM
  They did not arrive in NY so were they sent to DC instead? If they were, I will get them tomorrow by noon when I return.
  Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772642 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772645
MetadataSubject: SCHEDULE
MetadataTo: ValmoroLJ@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-15T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772645/C05772645.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Schedule
ExtractedTo: 'ValmoroU@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, January 15, 2010 7:28 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772645
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Yes.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772645 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 7:28 AM
  To: 'ValmoroU@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Schedule
  Yes.
  Original Message
  From: Valmoro, Lona J<ValmoroU@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Jan 15 05:57:10 2010
  Subject: Schedule
  MS -- Rich Verma would like to add a conference call this afternoon with the House Republicans to give them an update
  on the Haiti relief efforts. It would be an ideal way to cover many of these people instead of doing individual calls down
  the road. The time that works best for folks on the Hill is 3:30pm -- okay to add to your schedule?
  Lona Valmoro
  Special Assistant to the Secretary of State
  (direct) B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772645 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772646
MetadataSubject: REPRESENTATION
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-10T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772646/C05772646.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Representation
ExtractedTo: Sullivan, Jacob J
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: H
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 5:42 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772646
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Jake -
  Re the matter we discussed - no on-going representation since 2001.
  Cdm

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772646 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 5:42 PM
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Cc: H
  Subject: Representation
  Jake -
  Re the matter we discussed - no on-going representation since 2001.
  Cdm
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772646 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772647
MetadataSubject: FRAMEWORK FOR SARAJEVO TOWN HALL
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Rooney, Megan
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772647/C05772647.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: framework for Sarajevo town hall
ExtractedFrom: Megan Rooney
ExtractedCc: Daniel, Joshua J; Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, October 9, 2010 7:54 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772647
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Madam Secretary,
  I'm writing remarks for your town hall in Sarajevo on Tuesday. Jake and Josh discussed having the
  speechwriters send you bullets summarizing significant remarks ahead of time, so you can know the direction
  we're taking and let us know if we're on the right or wrong track.
  Below are the main points for Sarajevo; the draft I'm writing is covering this ground. It will follow the flow of
  many of your previous town hall appearances.
  If there is anything you'd like me to emphasize, add, or subject, let me know and I'll go for it.
  Thanks very much,
  Megan
  •
  •
  •
  •

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772647 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5,B6
  From: Megan Rooney
  Sent: Saturday, October 9, 2010 7:54 PM
  To:
  Cc: Daniel, Joshua J; Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma
  Subject: framework for Sarajevo town hall
  Madam Secretary,
  I'm writing remarks for your town hall in Sarajevo on Tuesday. Jake and Josh discussed having the
  speechwriters send you bullets summarizing significant remarks ahead of time, so you can know the direction
  we're taking and let us know if we're on the right or wrong track.
  Below are the main points for Sarajevo; the draft I'm writing is covering this ground. It will follow the flow of
  many of your previous town hall appearances.
  If there is anything you'd like me to emphasize, add, or subject, let me know and I'll go for it.
  Thanks very much,
  Megan
  •
  •
  •
  •
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772647 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772649
MetadataSubject: SCHEDULE
MetadataTo: ValmoroLJ@state.gov
MetadataFrom: hrod17@clintonemail.com
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-15T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772649/C05772649.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Schedule
ExtractedTo: 'ValmoroU@state.goV; Huma Abedin
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, January 15, 2010 7:53 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772649
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: I also want to call the head of the Red Cross.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772649 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
  Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 7:53 AM
  To: 'ValmoroU@state.goV; Huma Abedin
  Subject: Re: Schedule
  I also want to call the head of the Red Cross.
  Original Message
  From: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Jan 15 05:57:10 2010
  Subject: Schedule
  MS -- Rich Verma would like to add a conference call this afternoon with the House Republicans to give them an update
  on the Haiti relief efforts. It would be an ideal way to cover many of these people instead of doing individual calls down
  the road. The time that works best for folks on the Hill is 3:30pm -- okay to add to your schedule?
  Lona Valmoro
  Special Assistant to the Secretary of State
  direct)
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772649 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772650
MetadataSubject: LETTER DRAFT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: jake.sullivan
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-10T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772650/C05772650.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Letter draft
ExtractedFrom: jake.sullivan
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 7:38 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772650
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: I flagged same thing - Dan S said he would revert first thing tomorrow.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772650 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: jake.sullivan
  Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 7:38 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: Letter draft
  I flagged same thing - Dan S said he would revert first thing tomorrow.
  Original Message
  From: H
  To: isullivanjj@state.govl
  To: ijake.sullivan
  Subject: Letter draft
  Sent: Oct 10, 2010 7:26 PM
  In the copy delivered to me, words appear missing at the end of para beginning w "Fifth." Pls check your copy and
  advise. Thx.
  Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772650 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772653
MetadataSubject: H: THE BOEHNER POLL. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-10T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772653/C05772653.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772653
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  sbwhoeop
  Sunday, October 10, 2010 8:46 PM
  Re: H: The Boehner poll. Sid
  Good and I will tell shaun
  Sent via DROID on Verizon Wireless
  Original message

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772653 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  sbwhoeop
  Sunday, October 10, 2010 8:46 PM
  Re: H: The Boehner poll. Sid
  Good and I will tell shaun
  Sent via DROID on Verizon Wireless
  Original message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: sbwhoeop <sbwhoeor
  Sent: Mon, Oct 11, 2010 00:24:56 GMT+00:00
  Subject: Re: H: The Boehner poll. Sid
  I gave to Bill who is trying to influence strategy.
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Fri Oct 08 16:08:27 2010
  Subject: H: The Boehner poll. Sid
  The Huffington Post <http://vvww.huffingtonpost.com/> <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/>
  Drew Westen <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/drew-westen>
  Psychologist and neuroscientist; Emory University Professor
  Posted: October 8, 2010 09:23 AM
  Bringing Up Boehner <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/drew-
  westen/post 1034 b 755497.html>
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772653 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772653 Date: 08/31/2015
  According to news reports, today Republican minority leader and Coppertone model John
  Boehner will give his "closing argument" to the American people on why they should throw out
  the Democrats and kill the Obama-Pelosi-Reid "job-killing agenda." He will be returning to his
  working class roots, speaking at a piping manufacturing plant, an unusual venue these days for a
  man who is seen much more frequently at gatherings of Wall Street executives with open
  checkbooks and the males-only country club where he works on his tan when not making the
  rounds at other clubs with industry lobbyists.
  Either the Speaker-to-be is following the model of Michael Steele and free-lancing, or Karl Rove
  and the Republicans believe it is safe or even advantageous to bring him out in public after the
  White House made an effort to put Boehner's face on what a Republican majority might look
  like, with the president invoking his name eight times in one speech.
  I have to admit that at the time I was agnostic as to whether it made sense to try to brand him at
  this late date, as Boehner has minimal name recognition among voters. But the White House was
  no doubt responding to three realities.
  First, Boehner is an unknown to most Americans, which means that, unlike most Republicans in
  the news, he has not been well branded by the GOP -- which means for once Democrats might
  actually brand someone or something first rather than playing catch-up. Second, Boehner would
  indeed be the highest-ranking Republican were the GOP to assume control over the House (other
  than of course Karl Rove, who is now directing traffic on the right side of the street in
  Washington again). And third, a concrete face is always better than an abstraction when telling a
  story, and other than perhaps Sarah PalM, who Republicans could alternately accept and decline
  as the leader of their party, Boehner's tanned visage and history as errand-boy for virtually every
  major corporate special interest in his two decades in Washington (including his stint as the
  Marlboro Man, handing out tobacco lobby campaign checks to his fellow Republicans on the
  floor of the House) made him a potential counter-villain to the Republican's bogeywoman,
  Nancy Pelosi.
  I remained agnostic until this week, when colleagues at Media Matters Action Network and I
  conducted a national messaging survey
  <http://cloudfront.mediamattersaction.orgistatic/images/pdf/BrandingBoehner.pdf with 1,000
  registered voters, selected to match the demographics of the voting and likely voting populations.
  The goal was to see how effectively we could speak with voters about Boehner as not only the
  symbol and standard-bearer for the GOP but also the water-boy for corporate America. (The
  results were surprisingly similar whether we looked at registered voters or likely voters, although
  as others have described, precisely how to determine who is a "likely voter" in this election is as
  much art as science, and the point of good messaging at this point is actually to change the
  dynamics of likely voting, not just to reflect them.)
  As detailed in a memo published in Politico, what we found was clear: Boehner is a target well
  worth defining, who readily stands for precisely what Americans perceive to be the reasons they
  would have to hold their noses to vote for Congressional Republicans (perhaps the only group
  left who poll worse than Congressional Democrats with swing voters). We tested both
  paragraph-length narratives and single-sentence language designed to capture the essence of
  those narratives, and in each case, we tested them against the toughest opposition language we
  could test them against: the words of Boehner, Cantor, Limbaugh and others combined in
  defining the "Obama-Pelosi-Reid" agenda.
  What we found, in brief, is that we could beat a tough GOP narrative about the "job-killing"
  socialists in the White House and Congress by 15 to 20 points with two narratives starring
  Boehner in the leading role (with best supporting bad actor going in one of the narratives to Karl
  Rove and his corporate allies), and we could win with over 15 different sentence-long
  descriptions of "what's the matter with Boehner" with margins ranging from 10 to 60 points
  against a tough conservative attack on the Obama-Pelosi-Reid axis of conservative evil.
  The narratives that most moved likely voters -- including swing voters, who preferred them by
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772653 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772653 Date: 08/31/2015
  double-digits over tough Republican rhetoric -- made clear whose voices Boehner would be
  speaking for as Speaker (e.g., the Wall Street executives he convened to try to block Wall Street
  reform). They harnessed the same populist anger at the hijacking of Washington by corporate
  special interests that has enlivened the tea partiers and is palpable across the political spectrum,
  and they focused on the extremism of the party Boehner would Speak for. A narrative that
  brought Karl Rove into the picture was slightly more polarizing with swing voters but slightly
  more powerful with likely Democratic voters.
  In some ways what was most surprising was the success of the single-line statements of what we
  need in a Speaker and who John Boehner really speaks for (although these single-line statements
  came after the narratives, and likely reflect the power of branding, even over the course of a brief
  online encounter with voters). They ranged from relatively lofty and aspirational (e.g., "We need
  a Speaker who is also a listener, who can hear the voices of ordinary Americans" -- a theme
  colleagues and I found highly resonant across the political spectrum in message testing on the
  role of money in politics) -- to the harder-edged (e.g., "The Speaker of the House is a heartbeat
  away from the Presidency. Unfortunately, we know where John Boehner's heart is, and it isn't
  with the middle class," or "John Boehner understands deficits. He's spent nearly 20 years in
  Washington creating them.")
  If there's a message in this message research, it is at once short-term and long-term. In the short
  run, if Democrats want to hang onto their seats in November, they would do well to define this
  election in terms of the middle class and small business versus the billionaires and big
  corporations that are hijacking our democracy; to use Boehner as a poster child for the party
  whose primary commitment is to the latter and whose tan is a testament to that commitment; and
  to avoid giving voters reason to regret their vote if they give it to Democrats again this time, by
  supporting the things they say they stand for and avoiding that golden mean between the public
  interest and the special interests that finance campaigns on both sides of the aisle.
  In the longer run, branding matters. One of the biggest strategic and messaging mistakes of the
  last two years was the failure of Democrats to brand their opponents while their opponents were
  busy branding them -- and in particular the failure to brand the Bush Recession as the natural
  consequence of failed Republican economic principles. Two years ago, that was a virtually
  uncontested political proposition, as the voters made clear in handing Democrats the White
  House and supermajorities in both the House and Senate. Today, the public is split down the
  middle as to who caused the recession.
  Reality doesn't brand itself. Hopefully it won't take a debacle in November and another 10
  million jobs lost for reality to unveil itself again for a brief political moment and for progressives
  to have a second bite at the apple.
  <http://getglue.com/?s,--
  -w>
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772653 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772654
MetadataSubject: CONFERENCE CALL OF FRIENDS OF HAITI; LADY ASHTON
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: hrod17@clintonemail.com
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-15T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772654/C05772654.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Conference Call of Friends of Haiti; Lady Ashton
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov'; Huma Abedin; 'ValmoroU@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Valmoro, Lona J<ValmoroU@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, January 15, 2010 9:11 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772654
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Ok to do conf call 1300 Sunday and call w Lady Ashton before that.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772654 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 9:11 PM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov'; Huma Abedin; 'ValmoroU@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Conference Call of Friends of Haiti; Lady Ashton
  Ok to do conf call 1300 Sunday and call w Lady Ashton before that.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.goy>
  To: H
  Cc: Valmoro, Lona J<ValmoroU@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Jan 15 20:58:51 2010
  Subject: FW: Conference Call of Friends of Haiti; Lady Ashton
  FYI Below.
  FYI — I spoke to Lady Catherine Ashton who called to 1) wish you well on this trip and express her gratefulness that you
  are traveling; and 2) ask if you might be willing to call her Sunday morning to give her a read out of your trip bic she has
  a briefing in Brussels and having a first hand report from you will allow her to forestall a trip to Haiti in the next week.
  cdm
  From: Jacobson, Roberta S
  Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 7:52 PM
  To: Abedin, Huma; Sullivan, Jacobi; Valmoro, Lona J; Mills, Cheryl D; Reynoso, Julissa; Jacobson, David
  Cc: De Pirro, Velia M; Sheaffer, Gary L; Breese, Terry A; Kelly, Craig A; Gonzalez, Juan S
  Subject: FW: Conference Call of Friends of Haiti
  Importance: High
  7th floor colleagues: Please advise whether Sunday at 1300 would work for S; Canadian-led conference call with Friends
  of Haiti. Many thanks. Roberta
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  From: Alex.Bugailiskis B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772654 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772654 Date: 08/31/2015
  Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 7:48 PM
  To: Jacobson, Roberta S
  Subject: Conference Call of Friends of Haiti
  Roberta,
  with regard to the conference call of FMs of the Friends of Haiti, can we agree on Sunday, January 17th at 1300h?
  We will be sending you a proposed agenda for the call and a list of participating Ministers.
  Cheers
  Alex Bugailiskis
  Assistant Deputy Minister
  Latin America and the Caribbean
  Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada
  125 Sussex Drive
  Ottawa, ON K1A 0G2
  Tel Fax 613-944-1910 B6
  Sous-ministre adjointe
  Amerique latine et Caraibes
  Affaires etrangeres et Commerce international Canada
  125, promenade Sussex
  Ottawa (ON) K1A 0G2
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772654 Date: 08/31/2015

  Tel.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772654 Date: 08/31/2015
  Fax 613-944-1910 B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772654 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772655
MetadataSubject: CONFERENCE CALL OF FRIENDS OF HAITI; LADY ASHTON
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: hrod17@clintonemail.com
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-15T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772655/C05772655.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Conference Call of Friends of Haiti; Lady Ashton
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov'; Huma Abedin; 'ValmoroU@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, January 15, 2010 9:17 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772655
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  W/whom? I thought she wanted to speak w me Sunday morning. I just want to do it as late as possible.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772655 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 9:17 PM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov'; Huma Abedin; 'ValmoroU@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Conference Call of Friends of Haiti; Lady Ashton
  W/whom? I thought she wanted to speak w me Sunday morning. I just want to do it as late as possible.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H; Huma Abedin; Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Jan 15 21:11:07 2010
  Subject: RE: Conference Call of Friends of Haiti; Lady Ashton
  I think she may do an earlier call
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 9:11 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Huma Abedin; Valmoro, Lona J
  Subject: Re: Conference Call of Friends of Haiti; Lady Ashton
  Ok to do conf call 1300 Sunday and call w Lady Ashton before that.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Jan 15 20:58:51 2010
  Subject: FW: Conference Call of Friends of Haiti; Lady Ashton
  FYI Below.
  FYI — I spoke to Lady Catherine Ashton who called to 1) wish you well on this trip and express her gratefulness that you
  are traveling; and 2) ask if you might be willing to call her Sunday morning to give her a read out of your trip b/c she has
  a briefing in Brussels and having a first hand report from you will allow her to forestall a trip to Haiti in the next week.
  cdm
  From: Jacobson, Roberta S
  Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 7:52 PM
  To: Abedin, Huma; Sullivan, Jacob J; Valmoro, Lona J; Mills, Cheryl D; Reynoso, Julissa; Jacobson, David
  Cc: De Pirro, Velia M; Sheaffer, Gary L; Breese, Terry A; Kelly, Craig A; Gonzalez, Juan S
  Subject: FW: Conference Call of Friends of Haiti
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772655 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772655 Date: 08/31/2015
  Importance: High
  7th floor colleagues: Please advise whether Sunday at 1300 would work for 5; Canadian-led conference call with Friends
  of Haiti. Many thanks. Roberta
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  From: Alex.Bugailiskis
  Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 7:48 PM
  To: Jacobson, Roberta S
  Subject: Conference Call of Friends of Haiti
  Roberta,
  with regard to the conference call of FMs of the Friends of Haiti, can we agree on Sunday, January 17th at 1300h?
  We will be sending you a proposed agenda for the call and a list of participating Ministers.
  Cheers
  Alex Bugailiskis
  Assistant Deputy Minister
  Latin America and the Caribbean
  Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada
  125 Sussex Drive
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772655 Date: 08/31/2015

  Tel. Fax 613-944-1910
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772655 Date: 08/31/2015
  Ottawa, ON K1A 062
  Tel. ; Fax 613-944-1910 B6
  Sous-ministre adjOinte
  Amerique latine et Caraibes
  Affaires etrangeres et Commerce international Canada
  125, promenade Sussex
  Ottawa (ON) K1A 0G2
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772655 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772656
MetadataSubject: HAPPY ANNIVERSARY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mikulski, BAM
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-10T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772656/C05772656.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Happy Anniversary
ExtractedFrom: Mikulski, BAM (Mikulski) <BAM@Mikuiski.senate.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 10:05 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772656
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Pres Bill Ift a $$$$ raiser 4 me and is on his way home to ufifi he was a big draw and hit. Am doing well. My opponent is
  a doc who is a self funder who's media person is the guy who did that cruel campaign. Against max clealand. This
  $$event is agreat insurane policy. Hope all is going great with u. You are doing such. Good. Work. Take care. And. Big.
  Thanks 4Iending. Bill 4 part of eve.
  Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772656 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mikulski, BAM (Mikulski) <BAM@Mikuiski.senate.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 10:05 PM
  To:
  Subject: Happy Anniversary
  Pres Bill Ift a $$$$ raiser 4 me and is on his way home to ufifi he was a big draw and hit. Am doing well. My opponent is
  a doc who is a self funder who's media person is the guy who did that cruel campaign. Against max clealand. This
  $$event is agreat insurane policy. Hope all is going great with u. You are doing such. Good. Work. Take care. And. Big.
  Thanks 4Iending. Bill 4 part of eve.
  Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772656 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772657
MetadataSubject: RESPONSE TO S CALL
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: hrod17@clintonemail.com
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-15T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772657/C05772657.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: response to S call
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state. ov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Leach, Kirk A
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, January 15, 2010 9:20 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772657
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Very touching.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772657 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 9:20 PM
  To: 'millscd@state. ov'
  Subject: Re: response to S call
  Very touching.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Fri Jan 15 21:17:49 2010
  Subject: FW: response to S call
  From: Kennedy, Patrick F
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Fri Jan 15 19:21:18 2010
  Subject: FW. response to S call
  Cheryl
  E-mail from the Department's Casualty Assistance Office, who is in contact with the sister [principle living relative] of the
  Regards
  pat
  From: Boncy, Virginia W
  Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 11:26 AM
  To: Powell, Nancy 1; Browning, Steve A; Manzanares, .1 Robert (Bob); Taglialatela, Linda S
  Cc: Leach, Kirk A
  Subject response to S call
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772657 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772657 Date: 08/31/2015
  When I spoke to this morning she said that the Secretary had called, and she said, "I can't tell
  you how much it meant to us." She went on to say that she and her husband were very moved by the Secretary's words
  and by how much everyone cares.
  Ginny
  Virginia Boncy
  Deputy Director
  Office of Casualty Assistance
  Tel: 202-736-4302
  Fax: 202-647-5313
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772657 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772658
MetadataSubject: CONFERENCE CALL OF FRIENDS OF HAITI; LADY ASHTON
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: hrod17@clintonemail.com
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-15T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772658/C05772658.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Conference Call of Friends of Haiti; Lady Ashton
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, January 15, 2010 9:33 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772658
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Bill wants me to speak to/meet w Eduard Mulette who will replace head of UN Mission. Do you know him?

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772658 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 9:33 PM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Conference Call of Friends of Haiti; Lady Ashton
  Bill wants me to speak to/meet w Eduard Mulette who will replace head of UN Mission. Do you know him?
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H; Huma Abedin; Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Jan 15 21:20:53 2010
  Subject: RE: Conference Call of Friends of Haiti; Lady Ashton
  Not sure who they were but fine to do lpm - I'll make sure it works.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 9:17 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Huma Abedin; Valmoro, Lona J
  Subject: Re: Conference Call of Friends of Haiti; Lady Ashton
  W/whom? I thought she wanted to speak w me Sunday morning. I just want to do it as late as possible.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H; Huma Abedin; Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Jan 15 21:11:07 2010
  Subject: RE: Conference Call of Friends of Haiti; Lady Ashton
  I think she may do an earlier call
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 9:11 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Huma Abedin; Valmoro, Lona 1
  Subject: Re: Conference Call of Friends of Haiti; Lady Ashton
  Ok to do conf call 1300 Sunday and call w Lady Ashton before that.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Jan 15 20:58:51 2010
  Subject: FW: Conference Call of Friends of Haiti; Lady Ashton
  FYI Below.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772658 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772658 Date: 08/31/2015
  FYI — I spoke to Lady Catherine Ashton who called to 1) wish you well on this trip and express her gratefulness that you
  are traveling; and 2) ask if you might be willing to call her Sunday morning to give her a read out of your trip b/c she has
  a briefing in Brussels and having a first hand report from you will allow her to forestall a trip to Haiti in the next week.
  cdm
  From: Jacobson, Roberta S
  Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 7:52 PM
  To: Abedin, Huma; Sullivan, Jacob J; Valmoro, Lona J; Mills, Cheryl D; Reynoso, Julissa; Jacobson, David
  Cc: De Pirro, Velia M; Sheaffer, Gary L; Breese, Terry A; Kelly, Craig A; Gonzalez, Juan S
  Subject: FW: Conference Call of Friends of Haiti
  Importance: High
  7th floor colleagues: Please advise whether Sunday at 1300 would work for 5; Canadian-led conference call with Friends
  of Haiti. Many thanks. Roberta
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  From: Alex.Bugailiski!
  Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 7:48 PM
  To: Jacobson, Roberta S
  Subject: Conference Call of Friends of Haiti
  Roberta,
  with regard to the conference call of FMs of the Friends of Haiti, can we agree on Sunday, January 17th at 1300h?
  We will be sending you a proposed agenda for the call and a list of participating Ministers.
  Cheers
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772658 Date: 08/31/2015

  Tel. Fax 613-944-1910
  Tel. Fax 613-944-1910
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772658 Date: 08/31/2015
  Alex Bugailiskis
  Assistant Deputy Minister
  Latin America and the Caribbean
  Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada
  125 Sussex Drive
  Ottawa, ON K1A 0G2
  Sous-ministre adjointe
  Amerique latine et Caraibes
  Affaires etrangeres et Commerce international Canada
  125, promenade Sussex
  Ottawa (ON) K1A 0G2
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772658 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772660
MetadataSubject: DAVID (LINDWALL)'S HOUSE IN POP...
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: hrod17@clintonemail.com
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-15T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772660/C05772660.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: David (Lindwall)'s house in PoP....
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>; Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivan.1.1@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, January 15, 2010 9:41 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772660
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: What a reminder and tribute to our team.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772660 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 9:41 PM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: David (Lindwall)'s house in PoP....
  What a reminder and tribute to our team.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>; Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivan.1.1@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Jan 15 21:36:12 2010
  Subject: FW: David (Lindwall)'s house in PoP....
  Take a look — a reminder of the trauma our workers have confronted.
  From: Kennedy, Patrick F
  Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 4:06 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: FW: David (Lindwall)'s house in PoP....
  Cheryl
  Photo of Port au Prince DCM David Lindwall's house post-earthquake
  Regards
  pat
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772660 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772661
MetadataSubject: HELP FOR DYING PATIENTS
MetadataTo: cheryl.mills
MetadataFrom: hrod17@clintonemail.com
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-17T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772661/C05772661.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Help for dying patients
ExtractedTo: 'cheryl.mills ; 'rshah
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>; cheryl.mill
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 12:43 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772661
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  ; Huma Abedin B6
  Mark, emergency room doc, is w Paul Farmer; Pier is his orthopedic surgeon wife. Is there any way to help asap? This
  should be the highest priority. Coulc one of the medical teams alreay there move over to help? Could Gen Keen or UN
  get the supplies and generators they need to them at first light?

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772661 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 12:43 AM
  To: 'cheryl.mills ; 'rshah
  Subject: Fw: Help for dying patients
  ; Huma Abedin B6
  Mark, emergency room doc, is w Paul Farmer; Pier is his orthopedic surgeon wife. Is there any way to help asap? This
  should be the highest priority. Coulc one of the medical teams alreay there move over to help? Could Gen Keen or UN
  get the supplies and generators they need to them at first light?
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: mark
  Cc: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>; cheryl.mill
  <MillsCD@state.goy>
  Sent: Sun Jan 17 00:33:23 2010
  Subject: Re: Help for dying patients
  H; Shah, Rajiv (AID/A)
  ; Mills, Cheryl D
  Adding raj as well.
  Original Message
  From: Dr. Mark Hyman
  To: Hillary Clinton <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma; Jiloty, Lauren C; cheryl.mill
  Sent: Sat Jan 16 22:00:42 2010
  Subject: Help for dying patients
  Dear Hillary and all.
  We arrived at the general hospital last night with 1500 people sick or dying with 40 percent needing surgery. It has no
  water electricity or food and very limited surgical suites or supplies It the largest and most well known public hospital in
  the city and according to NH and paul farmer needs to be supported and it's infrastucture needs to be rebuilt.
  Right now we have surgeons but not enough operating rooms set up. We
  desperately need to get a generator and fuel and surgical lights and surgery supplies not just first aid. There are
  hundreds including children with festering wounds needing amputation and emergency
  surgical care. The doctors nurses and patients have no food or water.
  Can you help get the infrastructure of electricity water and a medical hospital tent for post op patients. We are
  operating with headlamps and hacksaws rinsed with alcohol.
  If we have the electricity and water we can open 11 operating rooms tomorrow if we get what we need. Can the
  military help ASAP and for security of equipment and medication.
  Until this morning when did the first amuptation there was almost no surgery happening at all here in the city and B6
  none at the General.
  Five days after the quake with no acute surgical care wounds are
  festering patients are getting septic and dying. If we had a little
  help with basic servcices we could stop this.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772661 Date: 08/31/2015
  Mills, Cheryl D

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772661 Date: 08/31/2015
  I don't have cell or email at the hospital. Please coordinate with Claire Pierre or Nancy from PIH.
  Thank you thank you thank you.
  Mark Hyman, MD
  Sent from my iPhone
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772661 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772662
MetadataSubject: HELP FOR DYING PATIENTS
MetadataTo: cheryl.mills
MetadataFrom: hrod17@clintonemail.com
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-17T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772662/C05772662.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Help for dying patients
ExtractedTo: 'cheryl.mill ; 'rshah
ExtractedFrom: H < hrod17@clintonemail.com >
ExtractedCc: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>; cheryl.mills
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 12:44 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772662
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Huma Abedin
  Also food and water?

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772662 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H < hrod17@clintonemail.com >
  Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 12:44 AM
  To: 'cheryl.mill ; 'rshah
  Subject: Re: Help for dying patients
  Huma Abedin
  Also food and water?
  Original Message
  From: H
  To: icheryl.mill,
  Sent: Sun Jan 17 00:42:53 2010
  Subject: Fw: Help for dying patients
  'rshah ; Huma Abedin
  Mark, emergency room doc, is w Paul Farmer; Pier is his orthopedic surgeon wife. Is there any way to help asap? This
  should be the highest priority. Coulc one of the medical teams alreay there move over to help? Could Gen Keen or UN
  get the supplies and generators they need to them at first light?
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: marl
  Cc: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>; cheryl.mills
  <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Sun Jan 17 00:33:23 2010
  Subject: Re: Help for dying patients
  >; H; Shah, Rajiv (AID/A)
  Mills, Cheryl D
  Adding raj as well.
  Mills, Cheryl D
  Original Message
  From: Dr. Mark Hyman
  To: Hillary Clinton <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma; Jiloty, Lauren C; cheryl.mill
  Sent: Sat Jan 1622:00:42 2010
  Subject: Help for dying patients
  Dear Hillary and all.
  We arrived at the general hospital last night with 1500 people sick or dying with 40 percent needing surgery. It has no
  water electricity or food and very limited surgical suites or supplies It the largest and most well known public hospital in
  the city and according to PIH and paul farmer needs to be supported and it's infrastucture needs to be rebuilt.
  Right now we have surgeons but not enough operating rooms set up. We
  desperately need to get a generator and fuel and surgical lights and surgery supplies not just first aid. There are
  hundreds including children with festering wounds needing amputation and emergency
  surgical care. The doctors nurses and patients have no food or water.
  Can you help get the infrastructure of electricity water and a medical hospital tent for post op patients. We are
  operating with headlamps and hacksaws rinsed with alcohol.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772662 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772662 Date: 08/31/2015
  If we have the electricity and water we can open 11 operating rooms tomorrow if we get what we need. Can the
  military help ASAP and for security of equipment and medication.
  Until this morning when
  none at the General.
  did the first amuptation there was almost no surgery happening at all here in the city and
  Five days after the quake with no acute surgical care wounds are
  festering patients are getting septic and dying. If we had a little
  help with basic servcices we could stop this.
  I don't have cell or email at the hospital. Please coordinate with Claire Pierre or Nancy from PIH.
  Thank you thank you thank you.
  Mark Hyman, MD
  Sent from my iPhone
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772662 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772663
MetadataSubject: MONDAY
MetadataTo: jacobjlew
MetadataFrom: hrod17@clintonemail.com
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-17T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0116/DOC_0C05772663/C05772663.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Monday
ExtractedTo: 'jacobjle 'Iewjj@state.gov B6
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 12:54 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772663
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Jack--
  In looking at my schedule, I could talk w you by phone Sunday or Monday, rather than meeting, which would give you
  back your Monday and service event. I learned the office will be closed Monday, so I will be working from home. Does
  that make sense?
  What times would be good to talk tomorrow or Monday?
  Thx, Hillary

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772663 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 12:54 AM
  To: 'jacobjle 'Iewjj@state.gov B6
  Subject: Monday
  Jack--
  In looking at my schedule, I could talk w you by phone Sunday or Monday, rather than meeting, which would give you
  back your Monday and service event. I learned the office will be closed Monday, so I will be working from home. Does
  that make sense?
  What times would be good to talk tomorrow or Monday?
  Thx, Hillary
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772663 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772674
MetadataSubject: URGENT: FRIENDS OF HAITI TELECONFERENCE
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-17T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0116/DOC_0C05772674/C05772674.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: URGENT: Friends of Haiti Teleconference
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Reynoso, Julissa; Kelly, Craig A; Valenzuela, Arturo A; Gonzalez, Juan S
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 10:13 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772674
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: I cannot do either time. We could send Raj or Jack.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772674 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5,B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 10:13 AM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: URGENT: Friends of Haiti Teleconference
  I cannot do either time. We could send Raj or Jack.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gbv>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jan 17 10:08:43 2010
  Subject: FW: URGENT: Friends of Haiti Teleconference
  Copying you as heads up for your 1pm call only —not for decision.
  cdm
  From: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 10:00 AM
  To: Jacobson, Roberta 5; S_SpecialAssistants; Valmoro, Lona 1; Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D
  Cc: Reynoso, Julissa; Kelly, Craig A; Valenzuela, Arturo A; Gonzalez, Juan S
  Subject: Re: URGENT: Friends of Haiti Teleconference
  Cheryl needs to address
  From: Jacobson, Roberta S
  To: S_SpecialAssistants; Abedin, Huma; Valmoro, Lona J; Sullivan, Jacob 1; Mills, Cheryl D
  Cc: Reynoso, Julissa; Kelly, Craig A; Valenzuela, Arturo A; Gonzalez, Juan S
  Sent: Sun Jan 1709:58:11 2010
  Subject: FW: URGENT: Friends of Haiti Teleconference
  Please see attached additional information and question from Canadian government prior to this afternoon's 1300
  phone call. Specifically, the Canadian government is asking whether the Secretary could come to Montreal for the GOC's
  "prep" donors meeting the evening of 1/23 or morning of 1/24? [Note: Montreal has world's second largest Haitian
  diaspora, hence location.]
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772674 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772674 Date: 08/31/2015
  WHA would recommend participation if at all possible. Thank you, Roberta
  From: Alex.Bugailiskis
  Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 8:41 AM
  To: Jacobson, Roberta S
  Subject: URGENT: Friends of Haiti Teleconference
  Good morning Roberta! Congratulations on a successful visit by the Secretary of State. We are looking forward to this
  afternoon's teleconference. After opening remarks, Minister Cannon will ask ?rime Minister Bellerive to speak and the
  UN (we may only have DPKO LeRoy on line due to visit of Sec Gen to Haiti). He will then ask FM Amorim and Sec State
  Clinton to provide their views on the situation and then open the floor to Kouchner and others. Response has been good
  and most will be represented at FM level (Mexico/Espinosa may still be in flight from Japan, and Argentina and Costa
  Rica will be Vice-Ministers).
  There is as well agreement in principle to begin laying the groundwork for a broader Donors Conference on
  Reconstruction and our offer to host a preparatory meeting on January 25th has been well received. However, early
  indications are that the EU has a conflict as they have their General Relations and Foreign Relations meetings scheduled
  for that day. As the EU would be essential for such a meeting we are scrambling to look for alternative dates. Given the
  momentum we would rather go earlier than later. Minister Cannon would be available to host this on the weekend of
  the 23-24th of January (dinner on the 23rd, meeting on the morning of the 24th). However, I believe that Ambassador
  Jacobsen had indicated that Mrs. Clinton has another engagement on the 23rd. Could you please let me know, before
  this afternoon's teleconference, if in principle, Mrs.Clinton might be available to attend a meeting in Montreal on the
  evening of the 23rd or the morning of the 24th?
  Many thanks Roberta.
  Alex
  B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772674 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772675
MetadataSubject: URGENT: FRIENDS OF HAITI TELECONFERENCE
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-17T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0116/DOC_0C05772675/C05772675.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: URGENT: Friends of Haiti Teleconference
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov.
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Reynoso, Julissa; Kelly, Craig A; Valenzuela, Arturo A; Gonzalez, Juan S
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 10:16 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772675
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Also, if they're holding a mtg, I would think they'd want the UN/Bill and he can't go either (it's a CVC thing).

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772675 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5,B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 10:16 AM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov.
  Subject: Re: URGENT: Friends of Haiti Teleconference
  Also, if they're holding a mtg, I would think they'd want the UN/Bill and he can't go either (it's a CVC thing).
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jan 17 10:08:43 2010
  Subject: FW: URGENT: Friends of Haiti Teleconference
  Copying you as heads up for your 1pm call only —not for decision.
  cdm
  From: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 10:00 AM .
  To: Jacobson, Roberta 5; S_SpecialAssistants; Valmoro, Lona J; Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D
  Cc: Reynoso, Julissa; Kelly, Craig A; Valenzuela, Arturo A; Gonzalez, Juan S
  Subject: Re: URGENT: Friends of Haiti Teleconference
  Cheryl needs to address
  From: Jacobson, Roberta S
  To: S_SpecialAssistants; Abedin, Huma; Valmoro, Lona 1; Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D
  Cc: Reynoso, Julissa; Kelly, Craig A; Valenzuela, Arturo A; Gonzalez, Juan S
  Sent: Sun Jan 17 09:58:11 2010
  Subject: FW: URGENT: Friends of Haiti Teleconference
  Please see attached additional information and question from Canadian government prior to this afternoon's 1300
  phone call. Specifically, the Canadian government is asking whether the Secretary could come to Montreal for the GOC's
  "prep" donors meeting the evening of 1/23 or morning of 1/24? [Note: Montreal has world's second largest Haitian
  diaspora, hence location.]
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772675 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772675 Date: 08/31/2015
  WHA would recommend participation if at all possible. Thank you, Roberta
  From: Alex.Bugailiskis
  Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 8:41 AM
  To: Jacobson, Roberta S
  Subject: URGENT: Friends of Haiti Teleconference
  Good morning Roberta! Congratulations on a successful visit by the Secretary of State. We are looking forward to this
  afternoon's teleconference. After opening remarks, Minister Cannon will ask Prime Minister Bellerive to speak and the
  UN (we may only have DPKO LeRoy on line due to visit of Sec Gen to Haiti). He will then ask FM Amorim and Sec State
  Clinton to provide their views on the situation and then open the floor to Kouchner and others. Response has been good
  and most will be represented at FM level (Mexico/Espinosa may still be in flight from Japan, and Argentina and Costa
  Rica will be Vice-Ministers).
  There is as well agreement in principle to begin laying the groundwork for a broader Donors Conference on
  Reconstruction and our offer to host a preparatory meeting on January 25th has been well received. However, early
  indications are that the EU has a conflict as they have their General Relations and Foreign Relations meetings scheduled
  for that day. As the EU would be essential for such a meeting we are scrambling to look for alternative dates. Given the
  momentum we would rather go earlier than later. Minister Cannon would be available to host this on the weekend of
  the 23-24th of January (dinner on the 23rd, meeting on the morning of the 24th). However, I believe that Ambassador
  Jacobsen had indicated that Mrs. Clinton has another engagement on the 23rd. Could you please let me know, before
  this afternoon's teleconference, if in principle, Mrs.Clinton might be available to attend a meeting in Montreal on the
  evening of the 23rd or the morning of the 24th?
  Many thanks Roberta.
  Alex
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772675 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772676
MetadataSubject: 1 PM CALL SHEET
MetadataTo: abedinh@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-17T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0116/DOC_0C05772676/C05772676.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: lpm call sheet.
ExtractedTo: 'abedinh@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 1:43 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772676
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: He did. Thx.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772676 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 1:43 PM
  To: 'abedinh@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: lpm call sheet.
  He did. Thx.
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jan 17 12:51:07 2010
  Subject: Re: 1pm call sheet.
  Marina told me she left. I'm faxing to secret service. Dan will make sure u get it
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma
  To: ehdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sun Jan 17 12:48:20 2010
  Subject: 1pm call sheet.
  This is what you should have just gotten.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772676 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772676 Date: 08/31/2015
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772676 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772677
MetadataSubject: 1 PM CALL MANIFEST
MetadataTo: abedinh@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-17T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0116/DOC_0C05772677/C05772677.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: 1pm call manifest
ExtractedTo: 'abedinh@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 1:44 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772677
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: The Canadians said they would do transcript of call so pls ask WHA to obtain one for me.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772677 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
  Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 1:44 PM
  To: 'abedinh@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: 1pm call manifest
  The Canadians said they would do transcript of call so pls ask WHA to obtain one for me.
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.goy>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jan 17 12:52:09 2010
  Subject: 1pm call manifest
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772677 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772678
MetadataSubject: 1 PM CALL MANIFEST
MetadataTo: abedinh@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-17T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0116/DOC_0C05772678/C05772678.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: 1pm call manifest
ExtractedTo: 'abedinh@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 1:48 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772678
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Can you ask WHA to work for times so I can fly up mid morning and return late afternoon. Could I see Frattini next day?
  What seems best?

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772678 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
  Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 1:48 PM
  To: 'abedinh@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: 1pm call manifest
  Can you ask WHA to work for times so I can fly up mid morning and return late afternoon. Could I see Frattini next day?
  What seems best?
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jan 17 12:52:51 2010
  Subject: 1pm call manifest
  We now have confirmed participation by Brazil/Amorim; France/Kouchner; Haiti/PM; Chile, Uruguay, Peru at ministerial
  level; Argentina, Mexico, and Costa Rica at Vice Min level. UN has committed to high-level participation as well,
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772678 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772680
MetadataSubject: 1 PM CALL MANIFEST
MetadataTo: abedinh@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-17T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0116/DOC_0C05772680/C05772680.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: 1pm call manifest
ExtractedTo: 'abedinh@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 2:28 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772680
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: If he's coming to London, could I see him there? Also what's status of France?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772680 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 2:28 PM
  To: 'abedinh@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: 1pm call manifest
  If he's coming to London, could I see him there? Also what's status of France?
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jan 17 14:14:07 2010
  Subject: Re: 1pm call manifest
  Contacting with wha now. Frattini would have to cancel his trip so we would have to re-schedule for another date or just
  do in context of one of these multilateral meetings. He has a big speech in italy on the 26th.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Sun Jan 17 13:48:18 2010
  Subject: Re: 1pm call manifest
  Can you ask WHA to work for times so I can fly up mid morning and return late afternoon. Could I see Frattini next day?
  What seems best?
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jan 17 12:52:51 2010
  Subject: 1pm call manifest
  We now have confirmed participation by Brazil/Amorim; France/Kouchner; Haiti/PM; Chile, Uruguay, Peru at ministerial
  level; Argentina, Mexico, and Costa Rica at Vice Min level. UN has committed to high-level participation as well,
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772680 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772682
MetadataSubject: CAN YOU DO UPDATE CALL?
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-17T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0116/DOC_0C05772682/C05772682.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Can you do update call?
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov.
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 2:28 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772682
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Of course.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772682 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 2:28 PM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov.
  Subject: Re: Can you do update call?
  Of course.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H; cheryl.mills <cheryl.mills
  Sent: Sun Jan 17 14:25:28 2010
  Subject: RE: Can you do update call?
  Give me a few minutes
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 2:03 PM
  To: 'cheryl.mills
  Subject: Can you do update call?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772682 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772683
MetadataSubject: (AP) SERBIAN ANTI-GAY RIOTS WRONG MESSAGE TO EU
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772683/C05772683.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (AP) Serbian anti-gay riots send wrong message to EU
ExtractedTo: Sullivan, Jacob J
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, October 11, 2010 7:35 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772683
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: You should discuss Dan's email w/ S on plane
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772683 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 7:35 AM
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Cc:
  Subject: Fw: (AP) Serbian anti-gay riots send wrong message to EU
  You should discuss Dan's email w/ S on plane
  From: Vu, Anny T
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-0_05; SES-O_Shift-I
  Sent: Mon Oct 11 05:47:15 2010
  Subject: (AP) Serbian anti-gay riots send wrong message to EU
  BELGRADE (AP) — Serbia's failure to prevent anti-gay riots could hurt its bid to join the European Union, a EU official
  said. Jelko Kacin, in charge of the European Parliament's evaluation reports on Serbia, said in a statement the anti-gay
  riots "show an elementary lack" of tolerance for minority rights in Serbia and the "inefficiency" of the state in preventing
  such a trend. "A very bad message was sent from Belgrade" that could hurt its bid to join the EU, the Slovenian official
  said. The gay pride march, was viewed as a major test for Serbia's government, which has pledged to protect human
  rights as it seeks EU membership.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772683 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772684
MetadataSubject: 1 PM CALL MANIFEST
MetadataTo: abedinh@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-17T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0116/DOC_0C05772684/C05772684.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: 1pm call manifest
ExtractedTo: 'abedinh@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 2:36 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772684
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Since Davos is now about Haiti, do I need to go? Bill is going.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772684 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 2:36 PM
  To: 'abedinh@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: 1pm call manifest
  Since Davos is now about Haiti, do I need to go? Bill is going.
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jan 17 14:32:08 2010
  Subject: Re: 1pm call manifest
  III confirm if he'll be there for london.
  As for paris, looks like sarkozy will be there but we won't know for sure till tomorrow. So it would mean sarkozy meeting,
  speech and kouchner around 6pm when he's back from davos.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Sun Jan 17 14:27:44 2010
  Subject: Re: 1pm call manifest
  If he's coming to London, could I see him there? Also what's status of France?
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jan 17 14:14:07 2010
  Subject: Re: 1pm call manifest
  Contacting with wha now. Frattini would have to cancel his trip so we would have to re-schedule for another date or just
  do in context of one of these multilateral meetings. He has a big speech in italy on the 26th.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Sun Jan 17 13:48:18 2010
  Subject: Re: 1pm call manifest
  Can you ask WHA to work for times so I can fly up mid morning and return late afternoon. Could I see Frattini next day?
  What seems best?
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jan 17 12:52:51 2010
  Subject: 1pm call manifest
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772684 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772684 Date: 08/31/2015
  We now have confirmed participation by Brazil/Amorim; France/Kouchner; Haiti/PM; Chile, Uruguay, Peru at ministerial
  level; Argentina, Mexico, and Costa Rica at Vice Min level. UN has committed to high-level participation as well,
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772684 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772685
MetadataSubject: (AP) SERBIAN ANTI-GAY RIOTS WRONG MESSAGE TO EU
MetadataTo: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jake J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772685/C05772685.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: (AP) Serbian anti-gay riots send wrong message to EU
ExtractedTo: Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, October 11, 2010 7:38 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772685
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Will do.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772685 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 7:38 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Cc:
  Subject: Re: (AP) Serbian anti-gay riots send wrong message to EU
  Will do.
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  To: Sullivan, Jacob)
  Cc: 'hdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Mon Oct 11 07:35:04 2010
  Subject: Fw: (AP) Serbian anti-gay riots send wrong message to EU
  You should discuss Dan's email w/ S on plane
  From: Vu, Anny T
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shift-I
  Sent: Mon Oct 11 05:47:15 2010
  Subject: (AP) Serbian anti-gay riots send wrong message to EU
  BELGRADE (AP) — Serbia's failure to prevent anti-gay riots could hurt its bid to join the European Union, a EU official
  said. Jelko Kacin, in charge of the European Parliament's evaluation reports on Serbia, said in a statement the anti-gay
  riots "show an elementary lack" of tolerance for minority rights in Serbia and the "inefficiency" of the state in preventing
  such a trend. "A very bad message was sent from Belgrade" that could hurt its bid to join the EU, the Slovenian official
  said. The gay pride march, was viewed as a major test for Serbia's government, which has pledged to protect human
  rights as it seeks EU membership.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772685 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772689
MetadataSubject: MONDAY
MetadataTo: lewjj@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-17T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0116/DOC_0C05772689/C05772689.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Monday
ExtractedTo: lewjj@state.gov.
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 5:29 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772689
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Let's talk tomorrow. I'll call you in the morning about two subjects: Haiti and Af-Pak. Is there anything else you want to
  raise?

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772689 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 5:29 PM
  To: lewjj@state.gov.
  Subject: Re: Monday
  Let's talk tomorrow. I'll call you in the morning about two subjects: Haiti and Af-Pak. Is there anything else you want to
  raise?
  Original Message
  From: Lew, Jacob J <LewJJ@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jan 17 06:08:52 2010
  Subject: Re: Monday
  Welcome back. I changed my plans and will be back in DC this morning. I have meetings between 9 and noon but will
  be available any time in the afternoon today or tomorrow and can work around your schedule. After spending several
  hours on the phone last night I wanted to come back and attend to some of the logistical coordination issues.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: 'jacobjlew <jacobjlew
  Sent: Sun Jan 17 00:54:07 2010
  Subject: Monday
  ;Lew,Jacobi B6
  Jack--
  In looking at my schedule, I could talk w you by phone Sunday or Monday, rather than meeting, which would give you
  back your Monday and service event. I learned the office will be closed Monday, so I will be working from home. Does
  that make sense?
  What times would be good to talk tomorrow or Monday?
  Thx, Hillary
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772689 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772690
MetadataSubject: (REUTERS) U.S. COMMANDER ORDERS PROBE INTO UK AFGHAN AID WORKER'S DEATH
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772690/C05772690.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (Reuters) U.S. commander orders probe into UK Afghan aid worker's death
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: NEWS-Mahogany; NEWS-Afghanistan
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, October 11, 2010 8:31 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772690
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772690 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 8:31 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (Reuters) U.S. commander orders probe into UK Afghan aid worker's death
  From: Deyo, Justin A
  To: SES-O_Shift-II; SES-O_OS
  Cc: NEWS-Mahogany; NEWS-Afghanistan
  Sent: Mon Oct 11 08:15:44 2010
  Subject: (Reuters) U.S. commander orders probe into UK Afghan aid worker's death
  KABUL (Reuters) - The commander of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, General David Petraeus, has ordered a probe
  into the death of a British aid worker killed during a rescue bid by U.S. forces, the U.S. military said. "Initial reports
  indicated the explosion was caused by a detonation triggered by one of the captors who was in close proximity to Linda
  Norgrove. Subsequent review of surveillance footage and discussions with members of the rescue team do not
  conclusively determine the cause of her death," it said. The statement comes shortly after British Prime Minister David
  Cameron told a news conference Norgrove may have been killed by a grenade from foreign forces during the rescue
  operation.
  Justin Deyo
  U.S. Department of State
  Operations Center (S/ES-0)
  202-647-1512
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772690 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772691
MetadataSubject: H: THE BOEHNER POLL. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772691/C05772691.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: H: The Boehner poll. Sid
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, October 11, 2010 10:05 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772691
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Did this with Sean. Sid
  The Political Scene
  Confounding Fathers
  The Tea Party's Cold War roots.
  by Sean Wilentz October 18, 2010
  ann Beck's view of American history stems from the paranoid politics of the fifties.
  A few months ago, the cable-television and radio host Glenn Beck began his Fox News show with one of his favorite
  props: a pipe clenched between his teeth. "I've got my pipe," he told his audience, his speech slightly muddled by the
  stem, "because we're going to speak about schoolish kind of things." The theme of the day was "Restoring History," and
  Beck, looking professorial in a neat dark blazer and a pink button-down shirt, began the lesson by peering at a stack of
  history textbooks and pronouncing them full of falsehoods, produced by "malicious progressive intent." Progressives, he
  explained—liberals, socialists, Communists, the entire spectrum of the left—"knew they had to separate us from our
  history to be able to separate us from our Constitution and God." For the next hour, Beck earnestly explained some of the
  history that "is being stolen from us": the depression of 1920, for example, or how conservative economics saved the
  nation from the "near-depression" of 1946—crises that progressives don't want you to know about. "You've been taught
  one lie, I think, your whole life," he said.
  For the fractious Tea Party movement, Beck—a former drive-time radio jockey, a recovering alcoholic, and a Mormon
  convert—has emerged as both a unifying figure and an intellectual guide. One opinion poll, released in July by
  Democracy Corps, showed that he is "the most highly regarded individual among Tea Party supporters," seen not merely
  as an entertainer, like Rush Limbaugh, but as an "educator." And in the past few months Beck has established his own
  institute of learning: the online, for-profit Beck University. Enrollees can take courses like Faith 102, which contends with
  "revisionists and secular progressives" about the separation of church and state; Hope 102, an attack on the activist
  federal government; and the combined Charity 101/102/103, a highly restrictive interpretation of rights, federalism, and the
  division of powers.
  During the "Restoring History" episode, Beck twice encouraged viewers to join his Web seminars, where they can hear
  "lessons from the best and brightest historians and scholars that we could find." The B.U. faculty consists of three
  members, including one bona-fide academic, James R. Stoner, Jr., the chair of the political-science department at
  Louisiana State University; the other two are the head of a management consulting firm and the founder of WallBuilders,
  which the Web site calls "a national pro-family organization." Beck himself often acts as a professor, a slightly jocular one,
  on his Fox News program. Surrounded by charts and figures, he offers explanations of current politics and history lessons
  about the country's long march to Obama-era totalitarianism. The decline, he says, began with the Progressive era of the
  early twentieth century, in particular with the Presidency of Woodrow Wilson, when both the Federal Reserve System and
  the graduated federal income tax came into existence. "Wilson," Beck told his radio audience in August, "just despised
  what America was."
  Beck's claims have found an audience among Tea Party spokesmen and sympathizers. At the movement's Freedom
  Summit in Washington last September, one activist told a reporter, "The election between Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow
  Wilson in 1912 was when it started going downhill." And in April an angry member of the Tea Party Patriots group from
  Cape Fear, North Carolina, claimed on the group's Web site that "the very things you see happening in this country today
  started with the Wilson Administration."
  At a Tax Day rally this past spring, the veteran conservative organizer Richard Viguerie described the Tea Party as "an
  unfettered new force of the middle class." And, indeed, calling Obama a socialist in the tradition of Woodrow Wilson is
  audacious enough to seem like the marker of a new movement—or, at least, a new twist in the nation's long history of
  conspiracy-mongering. In fact, it marks a revival of ideas that circulated on the extremist right half a century ago,
  especially in the John Birch Society and among its admirers.
  Beck's version of American history relies on lessons from his own acknowledged inspiration, the late right-wing writer W.
  Cleon Skousen, and also restates charges made by the Birch Society's founder, Robert Welch. The political universe is,
  of course, very different today from what it was during the Cold War. Yet the Birchers' politics and their view of American
  history—which focussed more on totalitarian threats at home than on those posed by the Soviet Union and Communist
  China—has proved remarkably persistent. The pressing historical question is how extremist ideas held at bay for decades
  inside the Republican Party have exploded anew—and why, this time, Party leaders have done virtually nothing to
  challenge those ideas, and a great deal to abet them.
  The early nineteen-sixties were a turbulent time in American politics, for the right wing in particular. In the South, racist
  violence against civil-rights workers was constant, deepening sectional splits in the Democratic Party that would in time
  deliver the once solidly Democratic South to the Republicans. Southern elected officials, in support of what they called
  "massive resistance" to civil-rights laws and judicial rulings, resurrected the ideas of nullification and interposition, which
  claimed that individual states could void federal laws within their own borders. Others focussed on what they considered a
  fearsome Communist menace inside the United States. General Edwin A. Walker caused an enormous stir when he
  resigned from the Army in 1961, after President John F. Kennedy's Pentagon reprimanded him for spreading right-wing
  propaganda among his troops and accusing prominent American officials of Communist sympathies. Senator Strom
  Thurmond, the Dixiecrat from South Carolina, spoke for many on the far right when he declared that various modestly
  liberal domestic programs "fall clearly within the category of socialism."
  The John Birch Society was one of the decade's most controversial right-wing organizations. Founded in 1958 by Robert
  Welch, a candy manufacturer from Massachusetts, the society took its name from a Baptist missionary and military-
  intelligence officer killed by Communist Chinese forces in 1945, whom Welch called the first American casualty of the
  Cold War. The group was founded at a propitious time. After Senator Joseph McCarthy's fall, in 1954, many of McCarthy's
  followers felt bereft of a voice, and Welch seemed to speak for them; by the mid-sixties, his society's membership was
  estimated to be as high as a hundred thousand. Welch, exploiting fears of what McCarthy had called an "immense"
  domestic conspiracy, declared that the federal government had already fallen into the Communists' clutches. In a tract
  titled "The Politician," he attacked President Dwight D. Eisenhower as "a dedicated, conscious agent of the Communist
  conspiracy" who had been serving the plot "all of his adult life." Late in 1961, after the disastrous Bay of Pigs invasion, he
  accused the Kennedy Administration of "helping the Communists everywhere in the world while pretending to do the
  opposite."
  Wherever he looked, Welch saw Communist forces manipulating American economic and foreign policy on behalf of
  totalitarianism. But within the United States, he believed, the subversion had actually begun years before the Bolshevik
  Revolution. Conflating modern liberalism and totalitarianism, Welch described government as "always and inevitably an
  enemy of individual freedom." Consequently, he charged, the Progressive era, which expanded the federal government's
  role in curbing social and economic ills, was a dire period in our history, and Woodrow Wilson "more than any other one
  man started this nation on its present road to totalitarianism."
  In the nineteen-sixties, Welch became convinced that even the Communist movement was but "a tool of the total
  conspiracy." This master conspiracy, he said, had forerunners in ancient Sparta, and sprang fully to life in the eighteenth
  century, in the "uniformly Satanic creed and program" of the Bavarian Illuminati. Run by those he called "the Insiders," the
  conspiracy resided chiefly in international families of financiers, such as the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, government
  agencies like the Federal Reserve System and the Internal Revenue Service, and nongovernmental organizations like the
  Bilderberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Trilateral Commission. Since the early twentieth century, they
  had done a good deal of their evil work under the guise of humanitarian uplift. "One broad avenue down which these
  conspiratorial forces advance was known as progressive legislation," Welch declared in 1966. "The very same collectivist
  theories and demagogic pretenses which had destroyed earlier civilizations were now paraded forth in the disguise of new
  and modern concepts."
  In the worst case, Welch believed, military action might be necessary to dislodge the totalitarians. But for the moment a
  nonviolent political revolution would suffice. Accordingly, he designed the Birch Society roughly, if not explicitly, on the
  Marxist-Leninist model of a vanguard revolutionary party: a series of small cells that would work in secret to agitate the
  populace and elect right-thinking candidates to office. "It isn't numbers we have to worry about," Welch wrote, "but the
  courage on the part of our followers to stick their necks out and play rough—the same as the Communists do."
  The "Founder" himself would dictate the society's policies, advised by a council of about two dozen businessmen and
  professionals, and the local cells would be overseen by unyielding commanders. "It is the leadership that is most
  demanding, most exacting of its followers," Welch observed, "that achieves really dedicated support." Welch's group
  became synonymous with right-wing extremism, earning satirical blasts from critics ranging from the cartoonist Walt Kelly
  to the musicians Bob Dylan and Dizzy Gillespie. The trumpeter, whose actual name was John Birks Gillespie, made a
  humorous run for the Presidency in 1964, organizing John Birks Societies in twenty-five states.
  Still, the most outlandish of the era's right-wing anti-Communists was not Welch but Willard Cleon Skousen. A
  transplanted Canadian who served as a Mormon missionary in his teens, Skousen was considered so radical in the early
  nineteen-sixties that even J. Edgar Hoover's F.B.I. watched him closely; one 1962 memo in his extensive F.B.I. file noted
  that "during the past year or so, Skousen has affiliated himself with the extreme right-wing 'professional communists' who
  are promoting their own anticommunism for obvious financial purposes." Skousen was himself employed by the F.B.I.,
  from 1935 until 1951, much of that time as a special agent working chiefly in administration. These desk jobs, he claimed
  implausibly, gave him access to confidential domestic intelligence about Communism. Skousen also maintained that he
  had served as Hoover's administrative assistant; Hoover informed inquirers that there was no such position.
  Skousen taught for years in the speech and religion departments at Brigham Young University, interrupted by a stint, from
  1956 to 1960, as the police chief of Salt Lake City. His time in office was contentious, and after he raided a friendly card
  game attended by the city's right-wing mayor, J. Bracken Lee, he was promptly fired. Lee called Skousen "a master of half
  truths" and said that he ran the police department "like a Gestapo"; Skousen's supporters placed burning crosses on the
  Mayor's lawn.
  After losing his police job, Skousen founded a group called the All-American Society, which Time described in 1961 as an
  exemplar of the far-right "ultras." Although he did not join the Birch Society, Skousen worked with its American Opinion
  Speakers' Bureau, and, in 1963, wrote a rousing tract titled "The Communist Attack on the John Birch Society," which
  condemned the society's critics for "promoting the official Communist Party line." (This was a tic of Skousen's; he later
  defended the Mormon policy of denying the priesthood to blacks with a pamphlet called "The Communist Attack on the
  Mormons.")
  All along, Skousen's evolving thoughts ran in tandem with Welch's. In "The Naked Communist," a lengthy primer
  published in 1958, he enlivened a survey of the worldwide leftist threat with outlandish claims, writing that F.D.R.'s adviser
  Harry Hopkins had treasonously delivered to the Soviets a large supply of uranium, and that the Russians built the first
  Sputnik with plans stolen from the United States. A year before Richard Condon's novel "The Manchurian Candidate"
  appeared, Skousen announced that the Communists were creating "a regimented breed of Pavlovian men whose minds
  could be triggered into immediate action by signals from their masters." A later book, "The Naked Capitalist," decried the
  Ivy League Establishment, who, through the Federal Reserve, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Rockefeller
  Foundation, formed "the world's secret power structure." The conspiracy had begun, Skousen wrote, when reformers like
  the wealthy banker Edward M. (Colonel) House, a close adviser to President Woodrow Wilson, helped put into place the
  Federal Reserve and the graduated income tax.
  In 1971, Skousen organized another group, the Freemen Institute, which he later renamed the National Center for
  Constitutional Studies. According to an article published in the Review of Religious Research, the center's targets
  included "the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Federal
  Communication Commission's fairness doctrine in editorial broadcasting, the federal government's change of the gold
  standard in currency, all subsidies to farmers, all federal aid to education, all federal social welfare, foreign aid, social
  security, elimination of public school prayer and Bible reading, and (that familiar right-wing nemesis) the United Nations."
  Skousen's pronouncements made him a pariah among most conservative activists, including some on the right-wing
  fringe. In 1962, the ultraconservative American Security Council threw him out, because members felt that he had "gone
  off the deep end." In 1971, a review in the Mormon journal Dialogue accused Skousen of "inventing fantastic ideas and
  making inferences that go far beyond the bounds of honest commentary," and advancing doctrines that came "perilously
  close" to Nazism. And in 1979, after Skousen called President.Jimmy Carter a puppet of the Council on Foreign Relations
  and the Rockefeller family, the president of the Mormon church issued a national order banning announcements about his
  organizations.
  Skousen was undeterred. In 1981, he produced "The 5,000 Year Leap," a treatise that assembles selective quotations
  and groundless assertions to claim that the U.S. Constitution is rooted not in the Enlightenment but in the Bible, and that
  the framers believed in minimal central government. Either proposition would have astounded James Madison, often
  described as the guiding spirit behind the Constitution, who rejected state-established religions and, like Alexander
  Hamilton, proposed a central government so strong that it could veto state laws. "The 5,000 Year Leap" is not a fervid
  book. Instead, it is calmly, ingratiatingly misleading. Skousen quotes various eighteenth-century patriots on the evils of
  what Samuel Adams, in 1768, called "the Utopian schemes of leveling," which Skousen equates with redistribution of
  wealth. But he does not mention the Founders' endorsement of taxing the rich to support the general welfare. Thomas
  Jefferson, for example, wrote approvingly in 1811 of having federal taxes (then limited to tariffs) fall solely on the wealthy,
  which meant that "the farmer will see his government supported, his children educated, and the face of his country made
  a paradise by the contributions of the rich alone, without his being called on to spend a cent from his earnings."
  Skousen also challenges the separation of church and state, asserting that "the Founders were not indulging in any idle
  gesture when they adopted the motto 'In God We Trust.' "In reality, the motto that came out of the Constitutional
  Convention was "E Pluribus Unum": out of many, one. "In God We Trust" came much later; its use on coins was first
  permitted in 1864, and only in 1955, at the height of the Cold War, did Congress mandate that it appear on all currency.
  The following year, President Eisenhower—who Welch charged was a Communist agent—approved "In God We Trust" as
  the national motto.
  In 1982, Skousen published a follow-up work, an ancestor-worshipping history text titled The Making of America," and
  prepared a study guide for nationwide seminars based on its contents. As Alexander Zaitchik reports in his informative
  study of Beck, "Common Nonsense," the new book became an object of controversy in 1987, after the California
  Bicentennial Commission sold it as part of a fund-raising drive. Among its offenses was an account of slavery drawn from
  long-disgraced work by the historian Fred A. Shannon, which characterized slave children as "pickaninnies" and
  suggested that the worst victims of slavery were the slaveholders themselves. The constitutional scholar Jack Rakove, of
  Stanford, inspected Skousen's book and seminars and pronounced them "a joke that no self-respecting scholar would
  think is worth a warm pitcher of spit."
  By the time Skousen died, in 2006, he was little remembered outside the ranks of the furthest-right Mormons. Then, in
  2009, Glenn Beck began touting his work: "The Naked Communist," "The Naked Capitalist," and, especially, "The 5,000
  Year Leap," which he called "essential to understanding why our Founders built this Republic the way they did." After
  Beck put the book in the first spot on his required-reading list—and wrote an enthusiastic new introduction for its reissue—
  it shot to the top of the Amazon best-seller list. In the first half of 2009, it sold more than two hundred and fifty thousand
  copies. Local branches of the Tea Party Patriots, the United American Tea Party, and other groups across the country
  have since organized study groups around it. "It is time we learn and follow the FREEDOM principles of our Founding
  Fathers," a United American Tea Party video declares, referring to the principles expounded by Skousen's book. If Beck is
  the movement's teacher, "The 5,000 Year Leap" has become its primer, with "The Making of America" as a kind of 102-
  level text.
  The popularity of Beck's broadcasts, which now reach two million viewers each day, has brought neo-Birchite ideas to an
  audience beyond any that Welch or Skousen might have dreamed of. Several times a week, Beck informs his audience
  that socialists (whom he also sometimes calls Fascists or Communists) led by Obama have seized power, and that
  patriotic Americans must take their country back. His TV show for some time featured "Comrade Updates," in which Beck
  described perfidy while the Soviet anthem played in the background. He attacks all the familiar bogeymen: the Federal
  Reserve System (which he asserts is a private conglomerate, unaccountable to the public); the Council on Foreign
  Relations (born of a "progressive idea" to manipulate the media in order to "let the masses know what should be done");
  and a historical procession of evildoers, including Skousen's old target Colonel House and Welch's old target Woodrow
  Wilson. His sources on these matters, quite apart from Skousen's books, can be unreliable. On September 22nd, amid a
  diatribe about House, Beck cited a passage from "Secrets of the Federal Reserve," by Eustace Mullins. The book,
  commissioned in 1948 by Ezra Pound, is a startlingly anti-Semitic fantasy of how a Jewish-led conspiracy of all-powerful
  bankers established the Federal Reserve in service of their plot to dominate the world.
  Part of Beck's allure is the promise that he will reveal secret information. In one segment last year, he produced a drawing
  of fasces—which he described, anachronistically, as "the Roman symbol of Fascism"—and then a picture of an old
  Mercury dime, with fasces on the reverse side. "Who brought this dime in? It happened in 1916—Woodrow Wilson was
  the President," he said. "We've been on the road to Fascism for a while." Benito Mussolini, of course, didn't adopt the
  ancient symbol of authority as the Fascist emblem until the nineteen-twenties; the designer of the coin, the sculptor
  Adolph A. Weinman, intended it to signify the nation's military preparedness, and paired it with an olive branch to illustrate
  the desire for peace.
  Beck's readings of Progressive-era politics are nearly as bizarre. Whatever can be said about Theodore Roosevelt, he
  was not a crypto-radical. It was Roosevelt who coined the term "lunatic fringe" to describe the extreme leftists of his day,
  and his concept of New Nationalism—in which an activist government built a vibrant capitalism, partly by regulating big
  business—looked back to Alexander Hamilton, not Karl Marx. Nor was Wilson a Bolshevik; in fact, in 1917 he sent
  American troops to Russia to support the anti-Bolshevik White Army. At home, his reforms sought to break up monopolies
  in order to restore competition among small companies. "If America is not to have free enterprise," Wilson declared, "then
  she can have no freedom of any sort whatever."
  In 2007, Beck, then the host of "Glenn Beck," on CNN's Headline News, brought to his show a John Birch Society
  spokesman named Sam Antonio, who warned of a government plot to abolish U.S. borders with Mexico and Canada,
  "and eventually all throughout the Americas." Beck told Antonio, "When I was growing up, the John Birch Society—I
  thought they were a bunch of nuts." But now, he said, "you guys are starting to make more and more sense to me." His
  guest beamed. "Yes, we at the John Birch Society are not nuts," Antonio said. "We are just exposing the truth that's been
  out there for many, many years." Since then, the Birch Society's Web site has run clips from Beck's Fox broadcasts,
  proudly pointing out similarities with their own ideas. Last June, an essay on the site described a presentation by Beck on
  Communism in America as "the ultimate in complete agreement between the Beck and JBS presentations of American
  history."
  Beck has also praised Ezra Taft Benson, one of Skousen's close associates. Benson, the Secretary of Agriculture under
  President Eisenhower and the thirteenth president of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, gained notoriety for
  a speech in 1966 in which he denounced Democratic officeholders and intellectuals (including the historian Arthur M.
  Schlesinger, Jr.) as socialists and Communist sympathizers, warned that "the Constitution will be endangered and hang,
  as it were, by a single thread," and praised the John Birch Society as "the most effective non-church organization in our
  fight against creeping socialism and Godless Communism." Last June, Beck aired a clip from another Benson speech,
  intoning, "Ezra Taft Benson warned about what was coming." The Birch Society's Web site subsequently praised Beck for
  "getting progressively (sorry for the bad word choice) closer to presenting American history in the way that The John Birch
  Society has been doing it for over 50 years."
  Beck is no more the sole representative of today's multifaceted Tea Party than Welch or Skousen was of the nineteen-
  sixties far right; he recently told the Times, a bit disingenuously, that he was "not involved with the Tea Party." Why, then,
  have the politics of Skousen, Benson, and the John Birch Society had such a resurgence among conservative
  Republicans—not just through Beck but through Tea Party heroes like the Nevada Republican Senate candidate Sharron
  Angle? (Last month, Angle gave a warm address to a "freedom conference" in Salt Lake City, co-sponsored by the John
  Birch Society and Skousen's old group, the National Center for Constitutional Studies, praising her audience as
  "mainstream America" and patriots who had "heard the call.") The columnist Frank Rich, among others, has suggested
  that the election of a black President sowed "fears of disenfranchisement among a dwindling and threatened minority in
  the country." There are signs that this is so: Republicans' singling out of Thurgood Marshall as an "activist Justice" during
  Elena Kagan's Supreme Court confirmation hearings, the warnings on Fox News about the terrible dangers posed by the
  minuscule New Black Panther Party. But "socialist" is not a racial slur. Jim Crow was not built out of fears of the Federal
  Reserve and the I.R.S. The Tea Party's fulminations against cap-and-trade, federal-government bailouts, and big
  government generally play on very old themes that have nothing to do with the color of President Obama's skin.
  The current right-wing resurgence has more to do with the inner dynamics of American conservatism in the past half
  century. In the nineteen-fifties and nineteen-sixties, the far right was condemned by liberals, as might be expected; in
  November, 1961, President Kennedy devoted part of a speech in Los Angeles to denouncing those "discordant voices of
  extremism" that "equate the Democratic Party with the welfare state, the welfare state with socialism, and socialism with
  Communism." But the Bircher right also provoked deep anxiety among conservatives, who feared being perceived as
  paranoids and conspiracy-mongers.
  The leading intellectual spokesman and organizer of the anti-Bircher conservatives was William F. Buckley, Jr., the editor
  of National Review. Buckley was by no means moderate in his conservatism. He was a lifelong defender of Joseph
  McCarthy and a foe of New Deal liberalism. But he drew the line at claiming that the course of American government was
  set by a socialist conspiracy, and he feared that the ravings of the extreme right would cost more balanced, practical
  conservatives their chance at national power. "By 1961," his biographer John B. Judis writes, "Buckley was beginning to
  worry that with the John Birch Society growing so rapidly, the right-wing upsurge in the country would take an ugly, even
  Fascist turn rather than leading toward the kind of conservatism National Review had promoted." In the next two decades,
  with Buckley's support and counsel, Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan completed a conservative revolution that
  succeeded by keeping extremist elements far from the centers of power.
  As confidant and adviser to leading conservative politicians, Buckley had far more political influence than might be
  expected from the editor of a weekly journal. Yet in the early nineteen-sixties he found fighting the Birchers and their
  fellow-travellers extremely difficult. Even though some of Buckley's colleagues at National Review thought that the Birch
  Society went too far, they would not attack the society publicly, for fear of alienating both the Birchers and the
  conservatives who sympathized with their views. When Buckley wrote an editorial in 1962 that accused Welch of
  "distorting reality" and failing to make "the crucial moral and political distinction" between Communists and liberals, the
  magazine immediately lost subscriptions and financial support.
  By 1960, Senator Barry Goldwater, of Arizona, was emerging as the great political hope of conservative Republicans, and
  he consulted closely with Buckley. At a meeting at the Breakers hotel, in Palm Beach, in January, 1962, Buckley urged
  Goldwater to repudiate the Birch Society. Goldwater demurred; though he conceded that some embarrassing "kooks"
  lurked among the Birchers, he insisted to Buckley that there were also some "nice guys," and that it would be injudicious
  to attack the group in public. The Birchers' support helped gain Goldwater the Republican Presidential nomination in
  1964, and he winked at them in his acceptance speech with his famous line: "Extremism in the defense of liberty is no
  vice. . . . Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue."
  In the general election, though, Goldwater suffered a crushing loss to Lyndon Johnson, partly because Democrats
  succeeded in making him look like a captive of the loony right. (To the Goldwater slogan "In Your Heart, You Know He's
  Right," the Democrats shot back, "In Your Guts, You Know He's Nuts.") Buckley's fears had been confirmed. But he was
  undeterred in his efforts to build a respectable and viable conservative movement. In 1967, he favored Richard Nixon
  among a field of Republican aspirants. He liked Ronald Reagan's politics, but considered Reagan, who had only recently
  been elected the governor of California, too new to national politics. George Romney, the governor of Michigan, a wishy-
  washy moderate, was obviously unsuitable, to say nothing of the Republican archliberal Nelson Rockefeller, of New York.
  Nixon was a hard-nosed Republican with strong conservative views, especially on Communism and the Cold War; he had
  established himself as a Communist-hunter in the nineteen-forties by pressing the charge that Alger Hiss, a former official
  at the State Department, had spied for the Soviets. And, promisingly, Nixon was the front-runner. "It seems to me that we
  ought to have a real chance of winning this year," Buckley wrote to Goldwater around the time of the Republican National
  Convention. He served the campaign as an adviser, and by aiding his friend Frank Shakespeare, who had taken charge
  of Nixon's media operations.
  But Buckley's candidate had a reputation for shiftiness that made him unpopular across the political spectrum. Some of
  the editors of National Review, recalling that Nixon had cut a deal with Rockefeller in order to secure the G.O.P.
  nomination in 1960, didn't sufficiently trust him. And the Birch Society had nothing but contempt for the figure whom
  Welch had called one of "the slipperiest politicians that ever showed up on the American scene." As President, in 1969,
  Nixon began to open diplomatic relations with Communist China, and the right wing placed him on its list of perfidious
  appeasers. When he visited Beijing in 1972, even Buckley was deeply offended. But when the general election took place
  later that year, with the antiwar Democratic candidate, George McGovern, voicing the country's anxieties over Vietnam,
  Buckley and the mainstream of what he called "responsible conservatism" returned to Nixon. The purist conservatives
  were left to back the third-party candidacy of John Schmitz, a Republican congressman and a member of the John Birch
  Society.
  Nixon won in a landslide, and the next year he appointed Buckley the American delegate to the United Nations. The
  conservative pragmatists had found the way to real power. And, despite the embarrassment of Watergate, in Nixon's
  second term, their strategy proved effective over time. Nixon's campaign against McGovern sharpened the Democrats'
  internal divisions over civil rights and Vietnam, and, Buckley wrote, revealed that the Democrats had "an indifference
  toward national independence and a hostility toward national freedom." Meanwhile, the Buckley mainstream, having read
  the Birchers out of the conservative movement, established itself as a permanent and growing force in the Republican
  Party and in national politics.
  In 1976, Buckley and National Review supported Ronald Reagan's primary challenge to Nixon's successor, Gerald Ford.
  After two terms as governor, Reagan had matured into what Buckley considered a nearly ideal conservative politician: a
  shrewd leader as well as a man of principle. Reagan nearly succeeded in wresting the nomination from Ford,
  demonstrating how formidable a national figure he had become. The Bircher right had flourished in his political bastion of
  Orange County, and Reagan was adept at winning extremists' allegiance while he pursued realistic strategies. His
  pragmatic side showed immediately after he finally secured the Republican nomination in 1980, when he chose the
  relatively moderate George H. W. Bush, his bitter foe during the primaries, as his running mate. Though the decision
  dismayed right-wing ideologues, it had two practical benefits: it instantly healed the divisions between Republican
  moderates and conservatives, and it helped dampen charges from the Democrats that Reagan was a reckless right-
  winger. Nobody was more pleased by Bush's selection than his fellow Skull and Bones man William F. Buckley, who
  understood the political logic as clearly as Reagan had.
  As President, Reagan flattered the extremists—he even delivered some admiring words about Skousen's Freemen
  Institute—but he saved his political capital for his real goals: undoing the fiscal underpinnings of New Deal-style
  government, and redirecting U.S. foreign policy by battling the Soviet Union and its proxies around the world. He
  appointed moderates to positions of importance, as when he made James Baker III, Bush's close associate, his first chief
  of staff, rather than the far more ideological Edwin Meese III, his former chief of staff from California. (As a top policy
  adviser, Meese helped Reagan stack the federal bench with conservatives, but he was otherwise eclipsed by Baker and
  Baker's deputy, the pragmatic Reaganite Michael Deaver, and his crusade, as Attorney General, to roll back civil-rights
  legislation largely failed.) When zealots in the Administration were exposed, as in the Iran-Contra scandal, Reagan
  skillfully evaded responsibility and replaced them with more centrist Republicans. And, when he recognized in Mikhail
  Gorbachev a Soviet leader with whom he could undertake genuine efforts to reduce the nuclear threat, Reagan pushed
  forward, ignoring the complaints that he had become, in the hard-liner Howard Phillips's phrase, "a useful idiot for Soviet
  propaganda."
  Whatever misgivings may have arisen about him on the right, Reagan achieved a dramatic conservative overhaul of the
  federal tax code, a profound reconfiguring of the judiciary, and a near-victory for the West in the Cold War. From the
  standpoint of the mainstream right, the only problem with his legacy was that no other Republican could come close to
  matching his public appeal and political savvy. For the party of Reagan, his departure was the beginning of a long decline,
  and it is the absence of a similarly totemic figure, during the past twenty years, that has allowed the current resurgence of
  extremism. George H. W. Bush repelled right-wingers with his moderate tendencies—not least when, in the face of fiscal
  calamity, he broke his campaign pledge not to raise taxes. Bill Clinton inspired them to an almost ecstatic series of
  attacks, and though there remained enough of an older conservative establishment, personified by Senator Bob Dole, to
  check some of the wildest charges, the new Republican House majority after 1994, pushed by such ideologues as Tom
  DeLay and Dick Armey, had little interest in maintaining the center. They harassed Clinton, forcing an impeachment even
  though polls showed that more than sixty per cent of the American people disapproved. George W. Bush seemed at first
  to have a bit of Reagan's conservative charisma, but the right wing turned against him for failing to win the war in Iraq, for
  his moderate position on immigration, and for spending hundreds of millions of federal dollars to combat the financial
  collapse in 2008. When William F. Buckley died, during the 2008 primary season, it seemed to symbolize the end of a
  conservative era. David Klinghoffer, a former literary editor at National Review, lamented that "urbane visionaries and
  builders of institutions" such as Buckley have been replaced by media figures "who make their money by stirring fears and
  resentments." Conservatism, Klinghoffer added, "has undergone a shift toward demagoguery and hucksterism," and is
  now ruled by those he called "the crazy-cons."
  Some Republicans have tried to extend the Buckley tradition, but to little effect. The commentator David Frum, a former
  speechwriter for George W. Bush, lost his job at the American Enterprise Institute after he complained about the
  Republicans' obstruction of health-care reform and called the right-wing surge a threat to conservatism. In June, the
  congressman Bob Inglis, of South Carolina, a tough conservative who nonetheless backed Bush's financial bailout, lost a
  vicious primary fight with a right-wing insurgent named Trey Gowdy. To his amazement, Inglis was confronted on the
  campaign trail by voters who were convinced that numbers on their Social Security cards indicated that a secret bank had
  bought them at birth. "And then, of course," he recalls, "it turned into something about the Federal Reserve and the
  Bilderbergers and all that stuff." Not even Karl Rove can afford open dissent with the Tea Partiers. Appearing on Fox
  News the night of the recent primaries, he described the Tea Party-backed Senate candidate in Delaware, Christine
  O'Donnell, as probably unelectable and said that some of her statements were "nutty." Instantly, criticism came from
  Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh, and other right-wing Republicans. Within days, he was back on Fox, proclaiming himself "a
  huge Tea Party fan," endorsing O'Donnell, and affirming that the National Republican Senatorial Committee would give
  her its full backing.
  So far, Rove, an unlikely dissident, is the only prominent Republican leader to so much as gesture at stepping forward, as
  Buckley and his allies did. Even strong conservatives like Inglis have been pushed aside, as have such former G.O.P.
  stalwarts as Charlie Crist, in Florida, and Mike Castle, in Delaware, both beaten in the primaries by Tea Party candidates;
  Grist is now running a long-shot campaign as an Independent. Desperate for gains in the midterm elections, the
  Republicans are neglecting the struggle it took to make politics safe for Reagan.
  Fifty years ago, President Kennedy deplored the far right's "counsels of fear and suspicion." Today, Obama's White
  House is still struggling to make sense of its enemies. In the absence of forthright leadership, on both the right and the
  left, the job of standing up to extremists appears to have been left to the electorate. Candidates like O'Donnell may prove
  too eccentric to prevail, or voters may simply become disillusioned by politicians who campaign on their hatred of
  government. After the election, mainstream conservatives may well engage in what Richard Viguerie has forecast as "a
  massive, almost historic battle for the heart and soul of the Republican Party." (Already, Rove and some leading Bush
  political operatives, including the former Republican National Committee chairman Ed Gillespie, have been quietly
  supplanting the battered G.O.P. establishment in the effort to raise funds for this year's candidates.) But, according to a
  recent poll, more than seventy per cent of Republicans support the Tea Party, and it seems almost certain that a
  Republican Party that has unstintingly appeased the far right will enjoy a strong and perhaps smashing victory in the
  coming midterm elections.
  In 1906, early in the Progressive era, the humorist Finley Peter Dunne's fictional barroom sage, Mr. Dooley, put the social
  and political tumult of the day into perspective. "Th' noise ye hear is not th' first gun iv a revolution," Dooley remarked. "It's
  on'y th' people iv th' United States batin' a carpet." A century from now, or even a year from now, Americans may say the
  same about the Tea Party. For the moment, though, it appears that the extreme right wing is on the verge of securing a
  degree of power over Congress and the Republican Party that is unprecedented in modern American history. For
  defenders of national cohesion and tempered adversity in our politics, it is an alarming state of affairs. •
  Read more http://www.newyorker.com/reportinq/2010/10/18/101018fa fact wilentz?printable=true#ixzz123hWc5bz

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772691 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 10:05 AM
  To:
  Subject: Re: H: The Boehner poll. Sid
  Did this with Sean. Sid
  The Political Scene
  Confounding Fathers
  The Tea Party's Cold War roots.
  by Sean Wilentz October 18, 2010
  ann Beck's view of American history stems from the paranoid politics of the fifties.
  A few months ago, the cable-television and radio host Glenn Beck began his Fox News show with one of his favorite
  props: a pipe clenched between his teeth. "I've got my pipe," he told his audience, his speech slightly muddled by the
  stem, "because we're going to speak about schoolish kind of things." The theme of the day was "Restoring History," and
  Beck, looking professorial in a neat dark blazer and a pink button-down shirt, began the lesson by peering at a stack of
  history textbooks and pronouncing them full of falsehoods, produced by "malicious progressive intent." Progressives, he
  explained—liberals, socialists, Communists, the entire spectrum of the left—"knew they had to separate us from our
  history to be able to separate us from our Constitution and God." For the next hour, Beck earnestly explained some of the
  history that "is being stolen from us": the depression of 1920, for example, or how conservative economics saved the
  nation from the "near-depression" of 1946—crises that progressives don't want you to know about. "You've been taught
  one lie, I think, your whole life," he said.
  For the fractious Tea Party movement, Beck—a former drive-time radio jockey, a recovering alcoholic, and a Mormon
  convert—has emerged as both a unifying figure and an intellectual guide. One opinion poll, released in July by
  Democracy Corps, showed that he is "the most highly regarded individual among Tea Party supporters," seen not merely
  as an entertainer, like Rush Limbaugh, but as an "educator." And in the past few months Beck has established his own
  institute of learning: the online, for-profit Beck University. Enrollees can take courses like Faith 102, which contends with
  "revisionists and secular progressives" about the separation of church and state; Hope 102, an attack on the activist
  federal government; and the combined Charity 101/102/103, a highly restrictive interpretation of rights, federalism, and the
  division of powers.
  During the "Restoring History" episode, Beck twice encouraged viewers to join his Web seminars, where they can hear
  "lessons from the best and brightest historians and scholars that we could find." The B.U. faculty consists of three
  members, including one bona-fide academic, James R. Stoner, Jr., the chair of the political-science department at
  Louisiana State University; the other two are the head of a management consulting firm and the founder of WallBuilders,
  which the Web site calls "a national pro-family organization." Beck himself often acts as a professor, a slightly jocular one,
  on his Fox News program. Surrounded by charts and figures, he offers explanations of current politics and history lessons
  about the country's long march to Obama-era totalitarianism. The decline, he says, began with the Progressive era of the
  early twentieth century, in particular with the Presidency of Woodrow Wilson, when both the Federal Reserve System and
  the graduated federal income tax came into existence. "Wilson," Beck told his radio audience in August, "just despised
  what America was."
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772691 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772691 Date: 08/31/2015
  Beck's claims have found an audience among Tea Party spokesmen and sympathizers. At the movement's Freedom
  Summit in Washington last September, one activist told a reporter, "The election between Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow
  Wilson in 1912 was when it started going downhill." And in April an angry member of the Tea Party Patriots group from
  Cape Fear, North Carolina, claimed on the group's Web site that "the very things you see happening in this country today
  started with the Wilson Administration."
  At a Tax Day rally this past spring, the veteran conservative organizer Richard Viguerie described the Tea Party as "an
  unfettered new force of the middle class." And, indeed, calling Obama a socialist in the tradition of Woodrow Wilson is
  audacious enough to seem like the marker of a new movement—or, at least, a new twist in the nation's long history of
  conspiracy-mongering. In fact, it marks a revival of ideas that circulated on the extremist right half a century ago,
  especially in the John Birch Society and among its admirers.
  Beck's version of American history relies on lessons from his own acknowledged inspiration, the late right-wing writer W.
  Cleon Skousen, and also restates charges made by the Birch Society's founder, Robert Welch. The political universe is,
  of course, very different today from what it was during the Cold War. Yet the Birchers' politics and their view of American
  history—which focussed more on totalitarian threats at home than on those posed by the Soviet Union and Communist
  China—has proved remarkably persistent. The pressing historical question is how extremist ideas held at bay for decades
  inside the Republican Party have exploded anew—and why, this time, Party leaders have done virtually nothing to
  challenge those ideas, and a great deal to abet them.
  The early nineteen-sixties were a turbulent time in American politics, for the right wing in particular. In the South, racist
  violence against civil-rights workers was constant, deepening sectional splits in the Democratic Party that would in time
  deliver the once solidly Democratic South to the Republicans. Southern elected officials, in support of what they called
  "massive resistance" to civil-rights laws and judicial rulings, resurrected the ideas of nullification and interposition, which
  claimed that individual states could void federal laws within their own borders. Others focussed on what they considered a
  fearsome Communist menace inside the United States. General Edwin A. Walker caused an enormous stir when he
  resigned from the Army in 1961, after President John F. Kennedy's Pentagon reprimanded him for spreading right-wing
  propaganda among his troops and accusing prominent American officials of Communist sympathies. Senator Strom
  Thurmond, the Dixiecrat from South Carolina, spoke for many on the far right when he declared that various modestly
  liberal domestic programs "fall clearly within the category of socialism."
  The John Birch Society was one of the decade's most controversial right-wing organizations. Founded in 1958 by Robert
  Welch, a candy manufacturer from Massachusetts, the society took its name from a Baptist missionary and military-
  intelligence officer killed by Communist Chinese forces in 1945, whom Welch called the first American casualty of the
  Cold War. The group was founded at a propitious time. After Senator Joseph McCarthy's fall, in 1954, many of McCarthy's
  followers felt bereft of a voice, and Welch seemed to speak for them; by the mid-sixties, his society's membership was
  estimated to be as high as a hundred thousand. Welch, exploiting fears of what McCarthy had called an "immense"
  domestic conspiracy, declared that the federal government had already fallen into the Communists' clutches. In a tract
  titled "The Politician," he attacked President Dwight D. Eisenhower as "a dedicated, conscious agent of the Communist
  conspiracy" who had been serving the plot "all of his adult life." Late in 1961, after the disastrous Bay of Pigs invasion, he
  accused the Kennedy Administration of "helping the Communists everywhere in the world while pretending to do the
  opposite."
  Wherever he looked, Welch saw Communist forces manipulating American economic and foreign policy on behalf of
  totalitarianism. But within the United States, he believed, the subversion had actually begun years before the Bolshevik
  Revolution. Conflating modern liberalism and totalitarianism, Welch described government as "always and inevitably an
  enemy of individual freedom." Consequently, he charged, the Progressive era, which expanded the federal government's
  role in curbing social and economic ills, was a dire period in our history, and Woodrow Wilson "more than any other one
  man started this nation on its present road to totalitarianism."
  In the nineteen-sixties, Welch became convinced that even the Communist movement was but "a tool of the total
  conspiracy." This master conspiracy, he said, had forerunners in ancient Sparta, and sprang fully to life in the eighteenth
  century, in the "uniformly Satanic creed and program" of the Bavarian Illuminati. Run by those he called "the Insiders," the
  conspiracy resided chiefly in international families of financiers, such as the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, government
  agencies like the Federal Reserve System and the Internal Revenue Service, and nongovernmental organizations like the
  Bilderberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Trilateral Commission. Since the early twentieth century, they
  had done a good deal of their evil work under the guise of humanitarian uplift. "One broad avenue down which these
  conspiratorial forces advance was known as progressive legislation," Welch declared in 1966. "The very same collectivist
  theories and demagogic pretenses which had destroyed earlier civilizations were now paraded forth in the disguise of new
  and modern concepts."
  In the worst case, Welch believed, military action might be necessary to dislodge the totalitarians. But for the moment a
  nonviolent political revolution would suffice. Accordingly, he designed the Birch Society roughly, if not explicitly, on the
  Marxist-Leninist model of a vanguard revolutionary party: a series of small cells that would work in secret to agitate the
  populace and elect right-thinking candidates to office. "It isn't numbers we have to worry about," Welch wrote, "but the
  courage on the part of our followers to stick their necks out and play rough—the same as the Communists do."
  The "Founder" himself would dictate the society's policies, advised by a council of about two dozen businessmen and
  professionals, and the local cells would be overseen by unyielding commanders. "It is the leadership that is most
  demanding, most exacting of its followers," Welch observed, "that achieves really dedicated support." Welch's group
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772691 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772691 Date: 08/31/2015
  became synonymous with right-wing extremism, earning satirical blasts from critics ranging from the cartoonist Walt Kelly
  to the musicians Bob Dylan and Dizzy Gillespie. The trumpeter, whose actual name was John Birks Gillespie, made a
  humorous run for the Presidency in 1964, organizing John Birks Societies in twenty-five states.
  Still, the most outlandish of the era's right-wing anti-Communists was not Welch but Willard Cleon Skousen. A
  transplanted Canadian who served as a Mormon missionary in his teens, Skousen was considered so radical in the early
  nineteen-sixties that even J. Edgar Hoover's F.B.I. watched him closely; one 1962 memo in his extensive F.B.I. file noted
  that "during the past year or so, Skousen has affiliated himself with the extreme right-wing 'professional communists' who
  are promoting their own anticommunism for obvious financial purposes." Skousen was himself employed by the F.B.I.,
  from 1935 until 1951, much of that time as a special agent working chiefly in administration. These desk jobs, he claimed
  implausibly, gave him access to confidential domestic intelligence about Communism. Skousen also maintained that he
  had served as Hoover's administrative assistant; Hoover informed inquirers that there was no such position.
  Skousen taught for years in the speech and religion departments at Brigham Young University, interrupted by a stint, from
  1956 to 1960, as the police chief of Salt Lake City. His time in office was contentious, and after he raided a friendly card
  game attended by the city's right-wing mayor, J. Bracken Lee, he was promptly fired. Lee called Skousen "a master of half
  truths" and said that he ran the police department "like a Gestapo"; Skousen's supporters placed burning crosses on the
  Mayor's lawn.
  After losing his police job, Skousen founded a group called the All-American Society, which Time described in 1961 as an
  exemplar of the far-right "ultras." Although he did not join the Birch Society, Skousen worked with its American Opinion
  Speakers' Bureau, and, in 1963, wrote a rousing tract titled "The Communist Attack on the John Birch Society," which
  condemned the society's critics for "promoting the official Communist Party line." (This was a tic of Skousen's; he later
  defended the Mormon policy of denying the priesthood to blacks with a pamphlet called "The Communist Attack on the
  Mormons.")
  All along, Skousen's evolving thoughts ran in tandem with Welch's. In "The Naked Communist," a lengthy primer
  published in 1958, he enlivened a survey of the worldwide leftist threat with outlandish claims, writing that F.D.R.'s adviser
  Harry Hopkins had treasonously delivered to the Soviets a large supply of uranium, and that the Russians built the first
  Sputnik with plans stolen from the United States. A year before Richard Condon's novel "The Manchurian Candidate"
  appeared, Skousen announced that the Communists were creating "a regimented breed of Pavlovian men whose minds
  could be triggered into immediate action by signals from their masters." A later book, "The Naked Capitalist," decried the
  Ivy League Establishment, who, through the Federal Reserve, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Rockefeller
  Foundation, formed "the world's secret power structure." The conspiracy had begun, Skousen wrote, when reformers like
  the wealthy banker Edward M. (Colonel) House, a close adviser to President Woodrow Wilson, helped put into place the
  Federal Reserve and the graduated income tax.
  In 1971, Skousen organized another group, the Freemen Institute, which he later renamed the National Center for
  Constitutional Studies. According to an article published in the Review of Religious Research, the center's targets
  included "the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Federal
  Communication Commission's fairness doctrine in editorial broadcasting, the federal government's change of the gold
  standard in currency, all subsidies to farmers, all federal aid to education, all federal social welfare, foreign aid, social
  security, elimination of public school prayer and Bible reading, and (that familiar right-wing nemesis) the United Nations."
  Skousen's pronouncements made him a pariah among most conservative activists, including some on the right-wing
  fringe. In 1962, the ultraconservative American Security Council threw him out, because members felt that he had "gone
  off the deep end." In 1971, a review in the Mormon journal Dialogue accused Skousen of "inventing fantastic ideas and
  making inferences that go far beyond the bounds of honest commentary," and advancing doctrines that came "perilously
  close" to Nazism. And in 1979, after Skousen called President.Jimmy Carter a puppet of the Council on Foreign Relations
  and the Rockefeller family, the president of the Mormon church issued a national order banning announcements about his
  organizations.
  Skousen was undeterred. In 1981, he produced "The 5,000 Year Leap," a treatise that assembles selective quotations
  and groundless assertions to claim that the U.S. Constitution is rooted not in the Enlightenment but in the Bible, and that
  the framers believed in minimal central government. Either proposition would have astounded James Madison, often
  described as the guiding spirit behind the Constitution, who rejected state-established religions and, like Alexander
  Hamilton, proposed a central government so strong that it could veto state laws. "The 5,000 Year Leap" is not a fervid
  book. Instead, it is calmly, ingratiatingly misleading. Skousen quotes various eighteenth-century patriots on the evils of
  what Samuel Adams, in 1768, called "the Utopian schemes of leveling," which Skousen equates with redistribution of
  wealth. But he does not mention the Founders' endorsement of taxing the rich to support the general welfare. Thomas
  Jefferson, for example, wrote approvingly in 1811 of having federal taxes (then limited to tariffs) fall solely on the wealthy,
  which meant that "the farmer will see his government supported, his children educated, and the face of his country made
  a paradise by the contributions of the rich alone, without his being called on to spend a cent from his earnings."
  Skousen also challenges the separation of church and state, asserting that "the Founders were not indulging in any idle
  gesture when they adopted the motto 'In God We Trust.' "In reality, the motto that came out of the Constitutional
  Convention was "E Pluribus Unum": out of many, one. "In God We Trust" came much later; its use on coins was first
  permitted in 1864, and only in 1955, at the height of the Cold War, did Congress mandate that it appear on all currency.
  The following year, President Eisenhower—who Welch charged was a Communist agent—approved "In God We Trust" as
  the national motto.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772691 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772691 Date: 08/31/2015
  In 1982, Skousen published a follow-up work, an ancestor-worshipping history text titled The Making of America," and
  prepared a study guide for nationwide seminars based on its contents. As Alexander Zaitchik reports in his informative
  study of Beck, "Common Nonsense," the new book became an object of controversy in 1987, after the California
  Bicentennial Commission sold it as part of a fund-raising drive. Among its offenses was an account of slavery drawn from
  long-disgraced work by the historian Fred A. Shannon, which characterized slave children as "pickaninnies" and
  suggested that the worst victims of slavery were the slaveholders themselves. The constitutional scholar Jack Rakove, of
  Stanford, inspected Skousen's book and seminars and pronounced them "a joke that no self-respecting scholar would
  think is worth a warm pitcher of spit."
  By the time Skousen died, in 2006, he was little remembered outside the ranks of the furthest-right Mormons. Then, in
  2009, Glenn Beck began touting his work: "The Naked Communist," "The Naked Capitalist," and, especially, "The 5,000
  Year Leap," which he called "essential to understanding why our Founders built this Republic the way they did." After
  Beck put the book in the first spot on his required-reading list—and wrote an enthusiastic new introduction for its reissue—
  it shot to the top of the Amazon best-seller list. In the first half of 2009, it sold more than two hundred and fifty thousand
  copies. Local branches of the Tea Party Patriots, the United American Tea Party, and other groups across the country
  have since organized study groups around it. "It is time we learn and follow the FREEDOM principles of our Founding
  Fathers," a United American Tea Party video declares, referring to the principles expounded by Skousen's book. If Beck is
  the movement's teacher, "The 5,000 Year Leap" has become its primer, with "The Making of America" as a kind of 102-
  level text.
  The popularity of Beck's broadcasts, which now reach two million viewers each day, has brought neo-Birchite ideas to an
  audience beyond any that Welch or Skousen might have dreamed of. Several times a week, Beck informs his audience
  that socialists (whom he also sometimes calls Fascists or Communists) led by Obama have seized power, and that
  patriotic Americans must take their country back. His TV show for some time featured "Comrade Updates," in which Beck
  described perfidy while the Soviet anthem played in the background. He attacks all the familiar bogeymen: the Federal
  Reserve System (which he asserts is a private conglomerate, unaccountable to the public); the Council on Foreign
  Relations (born of a "progressive idea" to manipulate the media in order to "let the masses know what should be done");
  and a historical procession of evildoers, including Skousen's old target Colonel House and Welch's old target Woodrow
  Wilson. His sources on these matters, quite apart from Skousen's books, can be unreliable. On September 22nd, amid a
  diatribe about House, Beck cited a passage from "Secrets of the Federal Reserve," by Eustace Mullins. The book,
  commissioned in 1948 by Ezra Pound, is a startlingly anti-Semitic fantasy of how a Jewish-led conspiracy of all-powerful
  bankers established the Federal Reserve in service of their plot to dominate the world.
  Part of Beck's allure is the promise that he will reveal secret information. In one segment last year, he produced a drawing
  of fasces—which he described, anachronistically, as "the Roman symbol of Fascism"—and then a picture of an old
  Mercury dime, with fasces on the reverse side. "Who brought this dime in? It happened in 1916—Woodrow Wilson was
  the President," he said. "We've been on the road to Fascism for a while." Benito Mussolini, of course, didn't adopt the
  ancient symbol of authority as the Fascist emblem until the nineteen-twenties; the designer of the coin, the sculptor
  Adolph A. Weinman, intended it to signify the nation's military preparedness, and paired it with an olive branch to illustrate
  the desire for peace.
  Beck's readings of Progressive-era politics are nearly as bizarre. Whatever can be said about Theodore Roosevelt, he
  was not a crypto-radical. It was Roosevelt who coined the term "lunatic fringe" to describe the extreme leftists of his day,
  and his concept of New Nationalism—in which an activist government built a vibrant capitalism, partly by regulating big
  business—looked back to Alexander Hamilton, not Karl Marx. Nor was Wilson a Bolshevik; in fact, in 1917 he sent
  American troops to Russia to support the anti-Bolshevik White Army. At home, his reforms sought to break up monopolies
  in order to restore competition among small companies. "If America is not to have free enterprise," Wilson declared, "then
  she can have no freedom of any sort whatever."
  In 2007, Beck, then the host of "Glenn Beck," on CNN's Headline News, brought to his show a John Birch Society
  spokesman named Sam Antonio, who warned of a government plot to abolish U.S. borders with Mexico and Canada,
  "and eventually all throughout the Americas." Beck told Antonio, "When I was growing up, the John Birch Society—I
  thought they were a bunch of nuts." But now, he said, "you guys are starting to make more and more sense to me." His
  guest beamed. "Yes, we at the John Birch Society are not nuts," Antonio said. "We are just exposing the truth that's been
  out there for many, many years." Since then, the Birch Society's Web site has run clips from Beck's Fox broadcasts,
  proudly pointing out similarities with their own ideas. Last June, an essay on the site described a presentation by Beck on
  Communism in America as "the ultimate in complete agreement between the Beck and JBS presentations of American
  history."
  Beck has also praised Ezra Taft Benson, one of Skousen's close associates. Benson, the Secretary of Agriculture under
  President Eisenhower and the thirteenth president of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, gained notoriety for
  a speech in 1966 in which he denounced Democratic officeholders and intellectuals (including the historian Arthur M.
  Schlesinger, Jr.) as socialists and Communist sympathizers, warned that "the Constitution will be endangered and hang,
  as it were, by a single thread," and praised the John Birch Society as "the most effective non-church organization in our
  fight against creeping socialism and Godless Communism." Last June, Beck aired a clip from another Benson speech,
  intoning, "Ezra Taft Benson warned about what was coming." The Birch Society's Web site subsequently praised Beck for
  "getting progressively (sorry for the bad word choice) closer to presenting American history in the way that The John Birch
  Society has been doing it for over 50 years."
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772691 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772691 Date: 08/31/2015
  Beck is no more the sole representative of today's multifaceted Tea Party than Welch or Skousen was of the nineteen-
  sixties far right; he recently told the Times, a bit disingenuously, that he was "not involved with the Tea Party." Why, then,
  have the politics of Skousen, Benson, and the John Birch Society had such a resurgence among conservative
  Republicans—not just through Beck but through Tea Party heroes like the Nevada Republican Senate candidate Sharron
  Angle? (Last month, Angle gave a warm address to a "freedom conference" in Salt Lake City, co-sponsored by the John
  Birch Society and Skousen's old group, the National Center for Constitutional Studies, praising her audience as
  "mainstream America" and patriots who had "heard the call.") The columnist Frank Rich, among others, has suggested
  that the election of a black President sowed "fears of disenfranchisement among a dwindling and threatened minority in
  the country." There are signs that this is so: Republicans' singling out of Thurgood Marshall as an "activist Justice" during
  Elena Kagan's Supreme Court confirmation hearings, the warnings on Fox News about the terrible dangers posed by the
  minuscule New Black Panther Party. But "socialist" is not a racial slur. Jim Crow was not built out of fears of the Federal
  Reserve and the I.R.S. The Tea Party's fulminations against cap-and-trade, federal-government bailouts, and big
  government generally play on very old themes that have nothing to do with the color of President Obama's skin.
  The current right-wing resurgence has more to do with the inner dynamics of American conservatism in the past half
  century. In the nineteen-fifties and nineteen-sixties, the far right was condemned by liberals, as might be expected; in
  November, 1961, President Kennedy devoted part of a speech in Los Angeles to denouncing those "discordant voices of
  extremism" that "equate the Democratic Party with the welfare state, the welfare state with socialism, and socialism with
  Communism." But the Bircher right also provoked deep anxiety among conservatives, who feared being perceived as
  paranoids and conspiracy-mongers.
  The leading intellectual spokesman and organizer of the anti-Bircher conservatives was William F. Buckley, Jr., the editor
  of National Review. Buckley was by no means moderate in his conservatism. He was a lifelong defender of Joseph
  McCarthy and a foe of New Deal liberalism. But he drew the line at claiming that the course of American government was
  set by a socialist conspiracy, and he feared that the ravings of the extreme right would cost more balanced, practical
  conservatives their chance at national power. "By 1961," his biographer John B. Judis writes, "Buckley was beginning to
  worry that with the John Birch Society growing so rapidly, the right-wing upsurge in the country would take an ugly, even
  Fascist turn rather than leading toward the kind of conservatism National Review had promoted." In the next two decades,
  with Buckley's support and counsel, Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan completed a conservative revolution that
  succeeded by keeping extremist elements far from the centers of power.
  As confidant and adviser to leading conservative politicians, Buckley had far more political influence than might be
  expected from the editor of a weekly journal. Yet in the early nineteen-sixties he found fighting the Birchers and their
  fellow-travellers extremely difficult. Even though some of Buckley's colleagues at National Review thought that the Birch
  Society went too far, they would not attack the society publicly, for fear of alienating both the Birchers and the
  conservatives who sympathized with their views. When Buckley wrote an editorial in 1962 that accused Welch of
  "distorting reality" and failing to make "the crucial moral and political distinction" between Communists and liberals, the
  magazine immediately lost subscriptions and financial support.
  By 1960, Senator Barry Goldwater, of Arizona, was emerging as the great political hope of conservative Republicans, and
  he consulted closely with Buckley. At a meeting at the Breakers hotel, in Palm Beach, in January, 1962, Buckley urged
  Goldwater to repudiate the Birch Society. Goldwater demurred; though he conceded that some embarrassing "kooks"
  lurked among the Birchers, he insisted to Buckley that there were also some "nice guys," and that it would be injudicious
  to attack the group in public. The Birchers' support helped gain Goldwater the Republican Presidential nomination in
  1964, and he winked at them in his acceptance speech with his famous line: "Extremism in the defense of liberty is no
  vice. . . . Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue."
  In the general election, though, Goldwater suffered a crushing loss to Lyndon Johnson, partly because Democrats
  succeeded in making him look like a captive of the loony right. (To the Goldwater slogan "In Your Heart, You Know He's
  Right," the Democrats shot back, "In Your Guts, You Know He's Nuts.") Buckley's fears had been confirmed. But he was
  undeterred in his efforts to build a respectable and viable conservative movement. In 1967, he favored Richard Nixon
  among a field of Republican aspirants. He liked Ronald Reagan's politics, but considered Reagan, who had only recently
  been elected the governor of California, too new to national politics. George Romney, the governor of Michigan, a wishy-
  washy moderate, was obviously unsuitable, to say nothing of the Republican archliberal Nelson Rockefeller, of New York.
  Nixon was a hard-nosed Republican with strong conservative views, especially on Communism and the Cold War; he had
  established himself as a Communist-hunter in the nineteen-forties by pressing the charge that Alger Hiss, a former official
  at the State Department, had spied for the Soviets. And, promisingly, Nixon was the front-runner. "It seems to me that we
  ought to have a real chance of winning this year," Buckley wrote to Goldwater around the time of the Republican National
  Convention. He served the campaign as an adviser, and by aiding his friend Frank Shakespeare, who had taken charge
  of Nixon's media operations.
  But Buckley's candidate had a reputation for shiftiness that made him unpopular across the political spectrum. Some of
  the editors of National Review, recalling that Nixon had cut a deal with Rockefeller in order to secure the G.O.P.
  nomination in 1960, didn't sufficiently trust him. And the Birch Society had nothing but contempt for the figure whom
  Welch had called one of "the slipperiest politicians that ever showed up on the American scene." As President, in 1969,
  Nixon began to open diplomatic relations with Communist China, and the right wing placed him on its list of perfidious
  appeasers. When he visited Beijing in 1972, even Buckley was deeply offended. But when the general election took place
  later that year, with the antiwar Democratic candidate, George McGovern, voicing the country's anxieties over Vietnam,
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772691 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772691 Date: 08/31/2015
  Buckley and the mainstream of what he called "responsible conservatism" returned to Nixon. The purist conservatives
  were left to back the third-party candidacy of John Schmitz, a Republican congressman and a member of the John Birch
  Society.
  Nixon won in a landslide, and the next year he appointed Buckley the American delegate to the United Nations. The
  conservative pragmatists had found the way to real power. And, despite the embarrassment of Watergate, in Nixon's
  second term, their strategy proved effective over time. Nixon's campaign against McGovern sharpened the Democrats'
  internal divisions over civil rights and Vietnam, and, Buckley wrote, revealed that the Democrats had "an indifference
  toward national independence and a hostility toward national freedom." Meanwhile, the Buckley mainstream, having read
  the Birchers out of the conservative movement, established itself as a permanent and growing force in the Republican
  Party and in national politics.
  In 1976, Buckley and National Review supported Ronald Reagan's primary challenge to Nixon's successor, Gerald Ford.
  After two terms as governor, Reagan had matured into what Buckley considered a nearly ideal conservative politician: a
  shrewd leader as well as a man of principle. Reagan nearly succeeded in wresting the nomination from Ford,
  demonstrating how formidable a national figure he had become. The Bircher right had flourished in his political bastion of
  Orange County, and Reagan was adept at winning extremists' allegiance while he pursued realistic strategies. His
  pragmatic side showed immediately after he finally secured the Republican nomination in 1980, when he chose the
  relatively moderate George H. W. Bush, his bitter foe during the primaries, as his running mate. Though the decision
  dismayed right-wing ideologues, it had two practical benefits: it instantly healed the divisions between Republican
  moderates and conservatives, and it helped dampen charges from the Democrats that Reagan was a reckless right-
  winger. Nobody was more pleased by Bush's selection than his fellow Skull and Bones man William F. Buckley, who
  understood the political logic as clearly as Reagan had.
  As President, Reagan flattered the extremists—he even delivered some admiring words about Skousen's Freemen
  Institute—but he saved his political capital for his real goals: undoing the fiscal underpinnings of New Deal-style
  government, and redirecting U.S. foreign policy by battling the Soviet Union and its proxies around the world. He
  appointed moderates to positions of importance, as when he made James Baker III, Bush's close associate, his first chief
  of staff, rather than the far more ideological Edwin Meese III, his former chief of staff from California. (As a top policy
  adviser, Meese helped Reagan stack the federal bench with conservatives, but he was otherwise eclipsed by Baker and
  Baker's deputy, the pragmatic Reaganite Michael Deaver, and his crusade, as Attorney General, to roll back civil-rights
  legislation largely failed.) When zealots in the Administration were exposed, as in the Iran-Contra scandal, Reagan
  skillfully evaded responsibility and replaced them with more centrist Republicans. And, when he recognized in Mikhail
  Gorbachev a Soviet leader with whom he could undertake genuine efforts to reduce the nuclear threat, Reagan pushed
  forward, ignoring the complaints that he had become, in the hard-liner Howard Phillips's phrase, "a useful idiot for Soviet
  propaganda."
  Whatever misgivings may have arisen about him on the right, Reagan achieved a dramatic conservative overhaul of the
  federal tax code, a profound reconfiguring of the judiciary, and a near-victory for the West in the Cold War. From the
  standpoint of the mainstream right, the only problem with his legacy was that no other Republican could come close to
  matching his public appeal and political savvy. For the party of Reagan, his departure was the beginning of a long decline,
  and it is the absence of a similarly totemic figure, during the past twenty years, that has allowed the current resurgence of
  extremism. George H. W. Bush repelled right-wingers with his moderate tendencies—not least when, in the face of fiscal
  calamity, he broke his campaign pledge not to raise taxes. Bill Clinton inspired them to an almost ecstatic series of
  attacks, and though there remained enough of an older conservative establishment, personified by Senator Bob Dole, to
  check some of the wildest charges, the new Republican House majority after 1994, pushed by such ideologues as Tom
  DeLay and Dick Armey, had little interest in maintaining the center. They harassed Clinton, forcing an impeachment even
  though polls showed that more than sixty per cent of the American people disapproved. George W. Bush seemed at first
  to have a bit of Reagan's conservative charisma, but the right wing turned against him for failing to win the war in Iraq, for
  his moderate position on immigration, and for spending hundreds of millions of federal dollars to combat the financial
  collapse in 2008. When William F. Buckley died, during the 2008 primary season, it seemed to symbolize the end of a
  conservative era. David Klinghoffer, a former literary editor at National Review, lamented that "urbane visionaries and
  builders of institutions" such as Buckley have been replaced by media figures "who make their money by stirring fears and
  resentments." Conservatism, Klinghoffer added, "has undergone a shift toward demagoguery and hucksterism," and is
  now ruled by those he called "the crazy-cons."
  Some Republicans have tried to extend the Buckley tradition, but to little effect. The commentator David Frum, a former
  speechwriter for George W. Bush, lost his job at the American Enterprise Institute after he complained about the
  Republicans' obstruction of health-care reform and called the right-wing surge a threat to conservatism. In June, the
  congressman Bob Inglis, of South Carolina, a tough conservative who nonetheless backed Bush's financial bailout, lost a
  vicious primary fight with a right-wing insurgent named Trey Gowdy. To his amazement, Inglis was confronted on the
  campaign trail by voters who were convinced that numbers on their Social Security cards indicated that a secret bank had
  bought them at birth. "And then, of course," he recalls, "it turned into something about the Federal Reserve and the
  Bilderbergers and all that stuff." Not even Karl Rove can afford open dissent with the Tea Partiers. Appearing on Fox
  News the night of the recent primaries, he described the Tea Party-backed Senate candidate in Delaware, Christine
  O'Donnell, as probably unelectable and said that some of her statements were "nutty." Instantly, criticism came from
  Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh, and other right-wing Republicans. Within days, he was back on Fox, proclaiming himself "a
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772691 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772691 Date: 08/31/2015
  huge Tea Party fan," endorsing O'Donnell, and affirming that the National Republican Senatorial Committee would give
  her its full backing.
  So far, Rove, an unlikely dissident, is the only prominent Republican leader to so much as gesture at stepping forward, as
  Buckley and his allies did. Even strong conservatives like Inglis have been pushed aside, as have such former G.O.P.
  stalwarts as Charlie Crist, in Florida, and Mike Castle, in Delaware, both beaten in the primaries by Tea Party candidates;
  Grist is now running a long-shot campaign as an Independent. Desperate for gains in the midterm elections, the
  Republicans are neglecting the struggle it took to make politics safe for Reagan.
  Fifty years ago, President Kennedy deplored the far right's "counsels of fear and suspicion." Today, Obama's White
  House is still struggling to make sense of its enemies. In the absence of forthright leadership, on both the right and the
  left, the job of standing up to extremists appears to have been left to the electorate. Candidates like O'Donnell may prove
  too eccentric to prevail, or voters may simply become disillusioned by politicians who campaign on their hatred of
  government. After the election, mainstream conservatives may well engage in what Richard Viguerie has forecast as "a
  massive, almost historic battle for the heart and soul of the Republican Party." (Already, Rove and some leading Bush
  political operatives, including the former Republican National Committee chairman Ed Gillespie, have been quietly
  supplanting the battered G.O.P. establishment in the effort to raise funds for this year's candidates.) But, according to a
  recent poll, more than seventy per cent of Republicans support the Tea Party, and it seems almost certain that a
  Republican Party that has unstintingly appeased the far right will enjoy a strong and perhaps smashing victory in the
  coming midterm elections.
  In 1906, early in the Progressive era, the humorist Finley Peter Dunne's fictional barroom sage, Mr. Dooley, put the social
  and political tumult of the day into perspective. "Th' noise ye hear is not th' first gun iv a revolution," Dooley remarked. "It's
  on'y th' people iv th' United States batin' a carpet." A century from now, or even a year from now, Americans may say the
  same about the Tea Party. For the moment, though, it appears that the extreme right wing is on the verge of securing a
  degree of power over Congress and the Republican Party that is unprecedented in modern American history. For
  defenders of national cohesion and tempered adversity in our politics, it is an alarming state of affairs. •
  Read more http://www.newyorker.com/reportinq/2010/10/18/101018fa fact wilentz?printable=true#ixzz123hWc5bz
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: 'sbwhoeop <sbwhoeop
  Sent: Sun, Oct 10, 2010 8:24 pm
  Subject: Re: H: The Boehner poll. Sid
  I gave to Bill who is trying to influence strategy.
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeoF <sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Fri Oct 08 16:08:27 2010
  Subject: H: The Boehner poll. Sid
  The Huffington Post <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/> <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/>
  Drew Westen <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/drew-westen>
  Psychologist and neuroscientist; Emory University Professor
  Posted: October 8, 2010 09:23 AM -
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772691 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772691 Date: 08/31/2015
  Bringing Up Boehner <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/drew-westen/post 1034 b 755497.html>
  According to news reports, today Republican minority leader and Coppertone model
  John Boehner will give his "closing argument" to the American people on why they
  should throw out the Democrats and kill the Obama-Pelosi-Reid "job-killing
  agenda." He will be returning to his working class roots, speaking at a piping
  manufacturing plant, an unusual venue these days for a man who is seen much more
  frequently at gatherings of Wall Street executives with open checkbooks and the
  males-only country club where he works on his tan when not making the rounds at
  other clubs with industry lobbyists.
  Either the Speaker-to-be is following the model of Michael Steele and
  free-lancing, or Karl Rove and the Republicans believe it is safe or even
  advantageous to bring him out in public after the White House made an effort to
  put Boehner's face on what a Republican majority might look like, with the
  president invoking his name eight times in one speech.
  I have to admit that at the time I was agnostic as to whether it made sense to
  try to brand him at this late date, as Boehner has minimal name recognition
  among voters. But the White House was no doubt responding to three realities.
  First, Boehner is an unknown to most Americans, which means that, unlike most
  Republicans in the news, he has not been well branded by the GOP -- which means
  for once Democrats might actually brand someone or something first rather than
  playing catch-up. Second, Boehner would indeed be the highest-ranking Republican
  were the GOP to assume control over the House (other than of course Karl Rove,
  who is now directing traffic on the right side of the street in Washington
  again). And third, a concrete face is always better than an abstraction when
  telling a story, and other than perhaps Sarah Palin, who Republicans could
  alternately accept and decline as the leader of their party, Boehner's tanned
  visage and history as errand-boy for virtually every major corporate special
  interest in his two decades in Washington (including his stint as the Marlboro
  Man, handing out tobacco lobby campaign checks to his fellow Republicans on the
  floor of the House) made him a potential counter-villain to the Republican's
  bogeywoman, Nancy Pelosi.
  I remained agnostic until this week, when colleagues at Media Matters Action
  Network and I conducted a national messaging survey
  <http://cloudfront.mediamattersaction.org/static/images/pdf/BrandingBoehner.pdf>
  with 1,000 registered voters, selected to match the demographics of the voting
  and likely voting populations. The goal was to see how effectively we could
  speak with voters about Boehner as not only the symbol and standard-bearer for
  the GOP but also the water-boy for corporate America. (The results were
  surprisingly similar whether we looked at registered voters or likely voters,
  although as others have described, precisely how to determine who is a "likely
  voter" in this election is as much art as science, and the point of good
  messaging at this point is actually to change the dynamics of likely voting, not
  just to reflect them.)
  As detailed in a memo published in Politico, what we found was clear: Boehner is
  a target well worth defining, who readily stands for precisely what Americans
  perceive to be the reasons they would have to hold their noses to vote for
  Congressional Republicans (perhaps the only group left who poll worse than
  Congressional Democrats with swing voters). We tested both paragraph-length
  narratives and single-sentence language designed to capture the essence of those
  narratives, and in each case, we tested them against the toughest opposition
  language we could test them against: the words of Boehner, Cantor, Limbaugh and
  others combined in defining the "Obama-Pelosi-Reid" agenda.
  What we found, in brief, is that we could beat a tough GOP narrative about the
  "job-killing" socialists in the White House and Congress by 15 to 20 points with
  two narratives starring Boehner in the leading role (with best supporting bad
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772691 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772691 Date: 08/31/2015
  actor going in one of the narratives to Karl Rove and his corporate allies), and
  we could win with over 15 different sentence-long descriptions of "what's the
  matter with Boehner" with margins ranging from 10 to 60 points against a tough
  conservative attack on the Obama-Pelosi-Reid axis of conservative evil.
  The narratives that most moved likely voters -- including swing voters, who
  preferred them by double-digits over tough Republican rhetoric -- made clear
  whose voices Boehner would be speaking for as Speaker (e.g., the Wall Street
  executives he convened to try to block Wall Street reform). They harnessed the
  same populist anger at the hijacking of Washington by corporate special
  interests that has enlivened the tea partiers and is palpable across the
  political spectrum, and they focused on the extremism of the party Boehner would
  Speak for. A narrative that brought Karl Rove into the picture was slightly more
  polarizing with swing voters but slightly more powerful with likely Democratic
  voters.
  In some ways what was most surprising was the success of the single-line
  statements of what we need in a Speaker and who John Boehner really speaks for
  (although these single-line statements came after the narratives, and likely
  reflect the power of branding, even over the course of a brief online encounter
  with voters). They ranged from relatively lofty and aspirational (e.g., "We need
  a Speaker who is also a listener, who can hear the voices of ordinary Americans"
  -- a theme colleagues and I found highly resonant across the political spectrum
  in message testing on the role of money in politics) -- to the harder-edged
  (e.g., "The Speaker of the House is a heartbeat away from the Presidency.
  Unfortunately, we know where John Boehner's heart is, and it isn't with the
  middle class," or "John Boehner understands deficits. He's spent nearly 20 years
  in Washington creating them.")
  If there's a message in this message research, it is at once short-term and
  long-term. In the short run, if Democrats want to hang onto their seats in
  November, they would do well to define this election in terms of the middle
  class and small business versus the billionaires and big corporations that are
  hijacking our democracy; to use Boehner as a poster child for the party whose
  primary commitment is to the latter and whose tan is a testament to that
  commitment; and to avoid giving voters reason to regret their vote if they give
  it to Democrats again this time, by supporting the things they say they stand
  for and avoiding that golden mean between the public interest and the special
  interests that finance campaigns on both sides of the aisle.
  In the longer run, branding matters. One of the biggest strategic and messaging
  mistakes of the last two years was the failure of Democrats to brand their
  opponents while their opponents were busy branding them -- and in particular the
  failure to brand the Bush Recession as the natural consequence of failed
  Republican economic principles. Two years ago, that was a virtually uncontested
  political proposition, as the voters made clear in handing Democrats the White
  House and supermajorities in both the House and Senate. Today, the public is
  split down the middle as to who caused the recession.
  Reality doesn't brand itself. Hopefully it won't take a. debacle in November and
  another 10 million jobs lost for reality to unveil itself again for a brief
  political moment and for progressives to have a second bite at the apple.
  <http://getglue.com/?s=w>
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772691 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772693
MetadataSubject: H: THE BOEHNER POLL. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772693/C05772693.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: H: The Boehner poll. Sid
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop B6
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, October 11,2010 10:14 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772693
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  This is the distilled, pure and utterly conventional wisdom of much of the DC political chattering class at this moment. The
  first two paragraphs are the most important, completely accurate in assessment, the rest twaddle:
  1:1
  Monday, Oct. 11,2010
  Why Obama Is Losing the Political War
  By Mark Halperin
  Barack Obama is being politically crushed in a vise. From above, by elite opinion about his competence. From below, by
  mass anger and anxiety over unemployment. And it is too late for him to do anything about this predicament until after
  November's elections.
  With the exception of core Obama Administration loyalists, most politically engaged elites have reached the same
  conclusions: the White House is in over its head, isolated, insular, arrogant and clueless about how to get along with or
  persuade members of Congress, the media, the business community or working-class voters. This view is held by Fox
  News pundits, executives and anchors at the major old-media outlets, reporters who cover the White House, Democratic
  and Republican congressional leaders and governors, many Democratic business people and lawyers who raised big
  money for Obama in 2008, and even some members of the Administration just beyond the inner circle. (See Obama's
  troubled first year, issue by issue.)
  On Friday, after the release of the latest bleak unemployment data — the last major jobs figures before the midterms —
  Obama said, "Putting the American people back to work, expanding opportunity, rebuilding the economic security of the
  middle class is the moral and national challenge of our time." But elites feel the President has failed to meet that challenge
  and are convinced he will be unable to do so in the remainder of his term. Moreover, there is a growing perception that
  Obama's decisions are causing harm — that businesses are being hurt by the Administration's legislation and that
  economic recovery is stalling because of the uncertainty surrounding energy policy, health care, deficits, housing,
  immigration and spending.
  And that sentiment is spreading. Many members of the general public appear deeply skeptical of Obama's capacity to turn
  things around, especially, but not exclusively, those inclined to dislike him — Tea Partyers and John McCain voters, but
  also tens of millions of middle-class Americans, including quite a few who turned out for Obama in 2008. (See how some
  Americans are facing the prospect of long-term unemployment.)
  The misery afflicting the country has no political affiliation. Listen to the voices from this striking TV ad for Rob Portman,
  the Republican former Congressman and Bush budget director who is running for Senate from Ohio. One woman at a
  Dayton career fair says starkly, "There are no jobs." A man announces plaintively and with obvious frustration, "I've been
  looking for a job now for 13 months." Events like this job fair are becoming the grim iconic gatherings of our time, the
  breadlines for the Obama years.
  Most of Obama's private (and sometimes public) rebuttals to the voices slamming him on all sides are justified or spot on.
  He did inherit a lot of problems from the Bush Administration. He did act quickly in the initial weeks of his Administration to
  stave off a worldwide depression. His efforts at job creation have been obstructed by Republicans (even the proposals
  based on policies supported by the GOP in the past). His opponents haven't put forth specifics of their own, nor offered
  genuine compromise, while the media have allowed the right's activists and gabbers to run wild with criticism without
  furnishing legitimate alternative solutions. (See Barack Obama's top 10 sound bites.)
  But Obama has exacerbated his political problems not just by failing to enact policies that would have actually turned the
  economy around, but also by authorizing a series of tactical moves intended to demonize Republicans and distract from
  the problems at hand. He has wasted time lambasting his foes when he should have been putting forth his agenda in a
  clear, optimistic fashion, defending the benefits of his key decisions during the past two years (health care and the
  Troubled Asset Relief Program, for example) and explaining what he would do with a re-elected Democratic majority to
  spur growth.
  Throughout the year, we have been treated to Obama-led attacks on George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, Rush Limbaugh,
  Congressman Joe Barton (for his odd apology to BP), John Boehner (for seeking the speakership — or was it something
  about an ant?) and Fox News (for everything). Suitable Democratic targets in some cases, perhaps, but not worth the time
  of a busy Commander in Chief. In the past few days, we have witnessed the spectacle of the President himself and his
  top advisers wading into allegations that Republicans are attempting to buy the election using foreign money laundered
  through the Chamber of Commerce, combining with Karl Rove and his wealthy backers to fund a flood of negative
  television commercials. Not only is this issue convoluted and far-fetched, but it also distracts from the issues voters care
  about, frustrating political insiders and alienating struggling citizens (not that many are following such an offbeat story
  line). Feinting and gibing can't obscure those job numbers. (See the best viral campaign ads of 2010.)
  The President and Democrats have passed many significant measures (the stimulus spending, the auto-company rescue,
  the health care law and the financial regulation effort) that someday may be seen as brave and bold, the foundation for a
  better economy. Obama and his closest aides certainly think that will happen. But the President was correct when he said
  Friday, "the only piece of economic news that folks still looking for work want to hear is, 'You're hired," and that's still not
  occurring for too many Americans.
  The politically good news for Obama is that no matter what the outcome of the midterm elections, everything changes in
  January. Republicans will have a greater obligation, politically and morally, to help govern, rather than thwart and badger.
  The President will get a chance, in his State of the Union address and in his budget proposal, to show he is turning the
  page on the political horrors of 2010 for his party and the nation. But before then, Republicans are almost certainly going
  to demonstrate that you can beat something with nothing, especially when Americans seem to think that the Obama
  Administration hasn't much to offer either, except more of the same that isn't working.
  • Find this article at:
  • http://www.time.com/time/golitics/article/0,8599,2024718,00.html
  Copyright © 2010 Time Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772693 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: sbwhoeop B6
  Sent: Monday, October 11,2010 10:14 AM
  To:
  Subject: Re: H: The Boehner poll. Sid
  This is the distilled, pure and utterly conventional wisdom of much of the DC political chattering class at this moment. The
  first two paragraphs are the most important, completely accurate in assessment, the rest twaddle:
  1:1
  Monday, Oct. 11,2010
  Why Obama Is Losing the Political War
  By Mark Halperin
  Barack Obama is being politically crushed in a vise. From above, by elite opinion about his competence. From below, by
  mass anger and anxiety over unemployment. And it is too late for him to do anything about this predicament until after
  November's elections.
  With the exception of core Obama Administration loyalists, most politically engaged elites have reached the same
  conclusions: the White House is in over its head, isolated, insular, arrogant and clueless about how to get along with or
  persuade members of Congress, the media, the business community or working-class voters. This view is held by Fox
  News pundits, executives and anchors at the major old-media outlets, reporters who cover the White House, Democratic
  and Republican congressional leaders and governors, many Democratic business people and lawyers who raised big
  money for Obama in 2008, and even some members of the Administration just beyond the inner circle. (See Obama's
  troubled first year, issue by issue.)
  On Friday, after the release of the latest bleak unemployment data — the last major jobs figures before the midterms —
  Obama said, "Putting the American people back to work, expanding opportunity, rebuilding the economic security of the
  middle class is the moral and national challenge of our time." But elites feel the President has failed to meet that challenge
  and are convinced he will be unable to do so in the remainder of his term. Moreover, there is a growing perception that
  Obama's decisions are causing harm — that businesses are being hurt by the Administration's legislation and that
  economic recovery is stalling because of the uncertainty surrounding energy policy, health care, deficits, housing,
  immigration and spending.
  And that sentiment is spreading. Many members of the general public appear deeply skeptical of Obama's capacity to turn
  things around, especially, but not exclusively, those inclined to dislike him — Tea Partyers and John McCain voters, but
  also tens of millions of middle-class Americans, including quite a few who turned out for Obama in 2008. (See how some
  Americans are facing the prospect of long-term unemployment.)
  The misery afflicting the country has no political affiliation. Listen to the voices from this striking TV ad for Rob Portman,
  the Republican former Congressman and Bush budget director who is running for Senate from Ohio. One woman at a
  Dayton career fair says starkly, "There are no jobs." A man announces plaintively and with obvious frustration, "I've been
  looking for a job now for 13 months." Events like this job fair are becoming the grim iconic gatherings of our time, the
  breadlines for the Obama years.
  Most of Obama's private (and sometimes public) rebuttals to the voices slamming him on all sides are justified or spot on.
  He did inherit a lot of problems from the Bush Administration. He did act quickly in the initial weeks of his Administration to
  stave off a worldwide depression. His efforts at job creation have been obstructed by Republicans (even the proposals
  based on policies supported by the GOP in the past). His opponents haven't put forth specifics of their own, nor offered
  genuine compromise, while the media have allowed the right's activists and gabbers to run wild with criticism without
  furnishing legitimate alternative solutions. (See Barack Obama's top 10 sound bites.)
  But Obama has exacerbated his political problems not just by failing to enact policies that would have actually turned the
  economy around, but also by authorizing a series of tactical moves intended to demonize Republicans and distract from
  the problems at hand. He has wasted time lambasting his foes when he should have been putting forth his agenda in a
  clear, optimistic fashion, defending the benefits of his key decisions during the past two years (health care and the
  Troubled Asset Relief Program, for example) and explaining what he would do with a re-elected Democratic majority to
  spur growth.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772693 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772693 Date: 08/31/2015
  Throughout the year, we have been treated to Obama-led attacks on George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, Rush Limbaugh,
  Congressman Joe Barton (for his odd apology to BP), John Boehner (for seeking the speakership — or was it something
  about an ant?) and Fox News (for everything). Suitable Democratic targets in some cases, perhaps, but not worth the time
  of a busy Commander in Chief. In the past few days, we have witnessed the spectacle of the President himself and his
  top advisers wading into allegations that Republicans are attempting to buy the election using foreign money laundered
  through the Chamber of Commerce, combining with Karl Rove and his wealthy backers to fund a flood of negative
  television commercials. Not only is this issue convoluted and far-fetched, but it also distracts from the issues voters care
  about, frustrating political insiders and alienating struggling citizens (not that many are following such an offbeat story
  line). Feinting and gibing can't obscure those job numbers. (See the best viral campaign ads of 2010.)
  The President and Democrats have passed many significant measures (the stimulus spending, the auto-company rescue,
  the health care law and the financial regulation effort) that someday may be seen as brave and bold, the foundation for a
  better economy. Obama and his closest aides certainly think that will happen. But the President was correct when he said
  Friday, "the only piece of economic news that folks still looking for work want to hear is, 'You're hired," and that's still not
  occurring for too many Americans.
  The politically good news for Obama is that no matter what the outcome of the midterm elections, everything changes in
  January. Republicans will have a greater obligation, politically and morally, to help govern, rather than thwart and badger.
  The President will get a chance, in his State of the Union address and in his budget proposal, to show he is turning the
  page on the political horrors of 2010 for his party and the nation. But before then, Republicans are almost certainly going
  to demonstrate that you can beat something with nothing, especially when Americans seem to think that the Obama
  Administration hasn't much to offer either, except more of the same that isn't working.
  • Find this article at:
  • http://www.time.com/time/golitics/article/0,8599,2024718,00.html
  Copyright © 2010 Time Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22 • clintonemail.com>
  To: 'sbwhoeop <sbwhoeop
  Sent: Sun, Oct 10, 2010 8:24 pm
  Subject: Re: H: The Boehner poll. Sid
  I gave to Bill who is trying to influence strategy.
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeo <sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Fri Oct 08 16:08:27 2010
  Subject: H: The Boehner poll. Sid
  The Huffington Post <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/> <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/>
  Drew Westen <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/drew-westen>
  Psychologist and neuroscientist; Emory University Professor
  Posted: October 8, 2010 09:23 AM
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772693 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772693 Date: 08/31/2015
  Bringing Up Boehner <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/drew-westen/post 1034 b 755497.html>
  According to news reports, today Republican minority leader and Coppertone model
  John Boehner will give his "closing argument" to the American people on why they
  should throw out the Democrats and kill the Obama-Pelosi-Reid "job-killing
  agenda." He will be returning to his working class roots, speaking at a piping
  manufacturing plant, an unusual venue these days for a man who is seen much more
  frequently at gatherings of Wall Street executives with open checkbooks and the
  males-only country club where he works on his tan when not making the rounds at
  other clubs with industry lobbyists.
  Either the Speaker-to-be is following the model of Michael Steele and
  free-lancing, or Karl Rove and the Republicans believe it is safe or even
  advantageous to bring him out in public after the White House made an effort to
  put Boehner's face on what a Republican majority might look like, with the
  president invoking his name eight times in one speech:
  I have to admit that at the time I was agnostic as to whether it made sense to
  try to brand him at this late date, as Boehner has minimal name recognition
  among voters. But the White House was no doubt responding to three realities.
  First, Boehner is an unknown to most Americans, which means that, unlike most
  Republicans in the news, he has not been well branded by the GOP -- which means
  for once Democrats might actually brand someone or something first rather than
  playing catch-up. Second, Boehner would indeed be the highest-ranking Republican
  were the GOP to assume control over the House (other than of course Karl Rove,
  who is now directing traffic on the right side of the street in Washington
  again). And third, a concrete face is always better than an abstraction when
  telling a story, and other than perhaps Sarah Palin, who Republicans could
  alternately accept and decline as the leader of their party, Boehner's tanned
  visage and history as errand-boy for virtually every major corporate special
  interest in his two decades in Washington (including his stint as the Marlboro
  Man, handing out tobacco lobby campaign checks to his fellow Republicans on the
  floor of the House) made him a potential counter-villain to the Republican's
  bogeywoman, Nancy Pelosi.
  I remained agnostic until this week, when colleagues at Media Matters Action
  Network and I conducted a national messaging survey
  <http://cloudfront.mediamattersaction.org/static/images/pdf/BrandingBoehner.pdf>
  with 1,000 registered voters, selected to match the demographics of the voting
  and likely voting populations. The goal was to see how effectively we could
  speak with voters about Boehner as not only the symbol and standard-bearer for
  the GOP but also the water-boy for corporate America. (The results were
  surprisingly similar whether we looked at registered voters or likely voters,
  although as others have described, precisely how to determine who is a "likely
  voter" in this election is as much art as science, and the point of good
  messaging at this point is actually to change the dynamics of likely voting, not
  just to reflect them.)
  As detailed in a memo published in Politico, what we found was clear: Boehner is
  a target well worth defining, who readily stands for precisely what Americans
  perceive to be the reasons they would have to hold their noses to vote for
  Congressional Republicans (perhaps the only group left who poll worse than
  Congressional Democrats with swing voters). We tested both paragraph-length
  narratives and single-sentence language designed to capture the essence of those
  narratives, and in each case, we tested them against the toughest opposition
  language we could test them against: the words of Boehner, Cantor, Limbaugh and
  others combined in defining the "Obama-Pelosi-Reid" agenda.
  What we found, in brief, is that we could beat a tough GOP narrative about the
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772693 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772693 Date: 08/31/2015
  "job-killing" socialists in the White House and Congress by 15 to 20 points with
  two narratives starring Boehner in the leading role (with best supporting bad
  actor going in one of the narratives to Karl Rove and his corporate allies), and
  we could win with over 15 different sentence-long descriptions of "what's the
  matter with Boehner" with margins ranging from 10 to 60 points against a tough
  conservative attack on the Obama-Pelosi-Reid axis of conservative evil.
  The narratives that most moved likely voters -- including swing voters, who
  preferred them by double-digits over tough Republican rhetoric -- made clear
  whose voices Boehner would be speaking for as Speaker (e.g., the Wall Street
  executives he convened to try to block Wall Street reform). They harnessed the
  same populist anger at the hijacking of Washington by corporate special
  interests that has enlivened the tea partiers and is palpable across the
  political spectrum, and they focused on the extremism of the party Boehner would
  Speak for. A narrative that brought Karl Rove into the picture was slightly more
  polarizing with swing voters but slightly more powerful with likely Democratic
  voters.
  In some ways what was most surprising was the success of the single-line
  statements of what we need in a Speaker and who John Boehner really speaks for
  (although these single-line statements came after the narratives, and likely
  reflect the power of branding, even over the course of a brief online encounter
  with voters). They ranged from relatively lofty and aspirational (e.g., "We need
  a Speaker who is also a listener, who can hear the voices of ordinary Americans"
  -- a theme colleagues and I found highly resonant across the political spectrum
  in message testing on the role of money in politics) -- to the harder-edged
  (e.g., "The Speaker of the House is a heartbeat away from the Presidency.
  Unfortunately, we know where John Boehner's heart is, and it isn't with the
  middle class," or "John Boehner understands deficits. He's spent nearly 20 years
  in Washington creating them.")
  If there's a message in this message research, it is at once short-term and
  long-term. In the short run, if Democrats want to hang onto their seats in
  November, they would do well to define this election in terms of the middle
  class and small business versus the billionaires and big corporations that are
  hijacking our democracy; to use Boehner as a poster child for the party whose
  primary commitment is to the latter and whose tan is a testament to that
  commitment; and to avoid giving voters reason to regret their vote if they give
  it to Democrats again this time, by supporting the things they say they stand
  for and avoiding that golden mean between the public interest and the special
  interests that finance campaigns on both sides of the aisle.
  In the longer run, branding matters. One of the biggest strategic and messaging
  mistakes of the last two years was the failure of Democrats to brand their
  opponents while their opponents were busy branding them -- and in particular the
  failure to brand the Bush Recession as the natural consequence of failed
  Republican economic principles. Two years ago, that was a virtually uncontested
  political proposition, as the voters made clear in handing Democrats the White
  House and supermajorities in both the House and Senate. Today, the public is
  split down the middle as to who caused the recession.
  Reality doesn't brand itself. Hopefully it won't take a debacle in November and
  another 10 million jobs lost for reality to unveil itself again for a brief
  . political moment and for progressives to have a second bite at the apple.
  <http://getglue.com/?s=w>
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772693 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772695
MetadataSubject: WHEN YOU HAVE TIME...SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772695/C05772695.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: H: when you have time... Sid
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, October 11, 2010 10:24 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772695
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  October 11,2010
  For: Hillary

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772695 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 10:24 AM
  To: H
  Subject: H: when you have time... Sid
  CONFIDENTIAL
  October 11,2010
  For: Hillary
  From: Sid
  Re: David Miliband, Third Way, etc.
  I just had a conversation with Jonathan Powell. David Sainsbury (chief donor to the Labour Party, Shaun's wife's cousin)
  wants to fund a new Third Way organization headed by David Miliband. David is up for it. Tony very keen. To discuss.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772695 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772697
MetadataSubject: (REUTERS) QAEDA OFFERS TO FREE FRENCH IF BURQA BAN ENDED - TV
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772697/C05772697.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (Reuters) Qaeda offers to free French if burqa ban ended - TV
ExtractedFrom: Abed in, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-0
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, October 11, 2010 10:34 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772697
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772697 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abed in, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 10:34 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (Reuters) Qaeda offers to free French if burqa ban ended - TV
  From: Deyo, Justin A
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-0
  Sent: Mon Oct 11 10:30:48 2010
  Subject: (Reuters) Qaeda offers to free French if burqa ban ended - TV
  DUBAI/PARIS (Reuters) - Al Qaeda's north African arm wants a repeal of a ban on the Muslim face veil in France, the
  release of militants and 7 million Euros in exchange for freeing hostages who include five French, Al Arabiya TV said. Al
  Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) is holding seven foreigners in the Sahara desert after kidnapping them last
  month. "The abductors have unrealistic demands which Mali and France could not accept... including withdrawing a ban
  on the face veil in France and the release of some of the group's elements detained in France, Mauritania and other
  countries," the television quoted unnamed sources as saying. The sources did not specify which militants the hostage-
  takers wanted released. France's Foreign Ministry dismissed the report as one of several "rumors" since the kidnappings
  in mid-September.
  Justin Deyo
  U.S. Department of State
  Operations Center (S/ES-0)
  202-647-1512
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772697 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772699
MetadataSubject: ROTHKOPF ON JONES, ET AL
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772699/C05772699.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Rothkopf on Jones, et al
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, October 11,2010 10:43 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772699
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/10/08/goodbye_mr_ jones
  Goodbye, Mr. Jones
  And good riddance. Why Jim Jones was the worst national
  security advisor in decades.
  BY DAVID J. ROTHKOPF I OCTOBER 8, 2010
  The president's inexperience did in Jones more than any of the general's deficits. He didn't know what he wanted. He
  vacillated on key issues. He simply demonstrated the problems America repeatedly has when it hires men with no foreign-
  policy background to take on the most important international job in the world. Further, he did not really know enough
  about how the presidency works to nip in the bud the creation of the inner-circle bubble that effectively negated much of
  the work that the formal policy process did. Obama encouraged (or tolerated for long-enough that it looks like
  encouragement) his campaign foreign-policy deputies to continue to report directly to him, and this led to some public and
  private backdooring of Jones that undercut his authority dramatically. He did not empower Jones, and that combined with
  Jones's own shortcomings led to the zero-chemistry, ineffective collaboration that has been openly criticized by senior
  White House and foreign policy officials since the spring of Obama's first year in office.
  In fact the situation got so bad that Jones was publicly undercut by true Obama confidante Denis McDonough more than
  once. It is something of a surprise he lasted this long. As one former national security advisor said to me while we were
  discussing a well-known instance of McDonough publicly undercutting Jones, "That would have only happened once on
  my watch. It would have been me or him."

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772699 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Monday, October 11,2010 10:43 AM
  Subject: Rothkopf on Jones, et al
  http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/10/08/goodbye_mr_ jones
  Goodbye, Mr. Jones
  And good riddance. Why Jim Jones was the worst national
  security advisor in decades.
  BY DAVID J. ROTHKOPF I OCTOBER 8, 2010
  The president's inexperience did in Jones more than any of the general's deficits. He didn't know what he wanted. He
  vacillated on key issues. He simply demonstrated the problems America repeatedly has when it hires men with no foreign-
  policy background to take on the most important international job in the world. Further, he did not really know enough
  about how the presidency works to nip in the bud the creation of the inner-circle bubble that effectively negated much of
  the work that the formal policy process did. Obama encouraged (or tolerated for long-enough that it looks like
  encouragement) his campaign foreign-policy deputies to continue to report directly to him, and this led to some public and
  private backdooring of Jones that undercut his authority dramatically. He did not empower Jones, and that combined with
  Jones's own shortcomings led to the zero-chemistry, ineffective collaboration that has been openly criticized by senior
  White House and foreign policy officials since the spring of Obama's first year in office.
  In fact the situation got so bad that Jones was publicly undercut by true Obama confidante Denis McDonough more than
  once. It is something of a surprise he lasted this long. As one former national security advisor said to me while we were
  discussing a well-known instance of McDonough publicly undercutting Jones, "That would have only happened once on
  my watch. It would have been me or him."
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772699 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772700
MetadataSubject: (REUTERS) KOSOVO-SERBIA TALKS LIKELY DELAYED TO MARCH
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772700/C05772700.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (Reuters) Kosovo-Serbia talks likely delayed to March
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Shaker, Joan P
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, October 11,2010 12:27 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772700
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772700 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, October 11,2010 12:27 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (Reuters) Kosovo-Serbia talks likely delayed to March
  From: Deyo, Justin A
  To: SES-0_0S; NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: Shaker, Joan P
  Sent: Mon Oct 1112:13:47 2010
  Subject: (Reuters) Kosovo-Serbia talks likely delayed to March
  PRISTINA (Reuters) - European Union-mediated talks between Belgrade and Pristina will begin only after a new Kosovo
  government takes power following elections in February, Kosovo's acting president said. Last month Serbia, which does
  not recognize Kosovo's independence, agreed to hold talks with Pristina after it was told its hardline stance on its former
  province could halt progress to the EU. In an interview, acting President Jakup Krasniqi said it would be difficult to start
  talks during a political crisis that followed President Fatmir Sejdiju's resignation last month. "The first half of February is
  the optimal time to hold early elections," he told Reuters. "The end of March is the period when Kosovo will have its
  own institutions and then it can have talks with Serbia." Krasniqi said he will announce the date of early elections a day
  or two after U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton visits Pristina. Kosovo had scheduled elections for November 2011,
  but Sejdiju's resignation hurt relations between the two main coalition partners: the Democratic League of Kosovo (LDK)
  and Democratic Party of Kosovo (PDK). Krasniqi said early elections could postpone the sale of Telekom, which is
  expected to bring between 300 million - 600 million euros. Whether the government can secure a parliamentary
  majority for necessary legislation to sell Telekom is uncertain, he said. "This is complicated at this point," he said.
  Justin Deyo
  U.S. Department of State
  Operations Center (S/ES-0)
  202-647-1512
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772700 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772705
MetadataSubject: H: FYI. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772705/C05772705.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: H: FYI. Sid
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 4:46 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772705
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  The Huffington Post
  October 12, 2010
  oward Fineman
  finemanAhuffingtonpost.com I HuffPost Reporting
  The Power Of Clinton, The Invisibility Of
  Obama
  First Posted: 10-12-10 02:37 PM I Updated: 10-12-10 02:37 PM
  LOUISVILLE -- I see that Dr. Rand Paul has taken out after Bill Clinton, dredging up Monica Lewinsky. And I know why
  Paul did so. The former president was here in Kentucky yesterday and in this state, as in many others, he is a far more
  potent and popular foe than President Barack Obama.
  On my first day working for The Huffington Post, I came back to Kentucky, where I began my career many years ago at
  the Courier-Journal. The people who run the University of Louisville Kentucky Author Forum wanted me to do an on-stage
  interview with a certain best-selling author who is also my new boss: Arianna Huffington. It was a tricky mix of professional
  incest and personal nostalgia, but the event worked out well and I also got a chance to play Kentucky reporter once again
  out in the state.
  I raced over to Lexington and here is the ground-level, outside-the-Beltway reality I witnessed:
  Like Voldemort's, Obama's is a name no one dares utter -- and that includes Clinton speaking to Democrats.
  At a sunny, noontime rally on the campus of the University of Kentucky in Lexington yesterday, the former president made
  a stirring, well-argued case for Democratic Senate candidate Jack Conway and for Democrats generally -- without once
  mentioning Obama and rarely mentioning the presidency. It was as though we suddenly had only two branches of
  government.
  To be fair, almost no one else at the one-hour rally mentioned the sitting president. And Kentucky is staunch Republican
  territory. "We're farther ahead in the generic ballot here than ever," GOP Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky told me
  yesterday. "President Obama was never popular here, even at his peak."
  Still, the eerie invisibility of the president is a telling commentary on the Democrats' confused, divided and defensive
  predicament as they brace for the verdict of the voters on Election Day, Nov. 2. There was something odd -- and, if you're
  a Democrat, depressing -- about a former Democratic president avoiding any mention of his Democratic successor.
  Clinton sincerely wants to help out on the trail -- and certainly wants to avoid the accusation that he didn't try to help. But
  his travels have turned into a personal victory lap that often makes him -- not the candidate he's touting -- the center of
  attention. That was true here in Kentucky. The rally's mechanics were mostly handled by the Secret Service; more to the
  point, the final (and therefore top-billed) speaker wasn't Conway. It was Clinton. The Conway people didn't mind. They
  were glad to have him.
  Rail-thin but not frail, wearing a tweedy professorial sports coat and his signature rueful, knowing smile, Clinton was
  treated with a respect bordering on awe. His familiar mane of white hair, thinning now, was translucent in the sun, giving
  him an almost otherworldly look: the Sage from a Better Age.
  Clinton is beloved In Kentucky. He won the state twice. He speaks the local dialect, which contains Appalachian notes of
  working-class pride, suspicion of big shots and Baptist revivalism. But more than that -- and more than just in Kentucky --
  Clinton's economic record (22.7 million jobs created, and he tends not to forget to mention the .7) looks spectacularly
  good in the context of what has followed.
  These days there is almost an Old Testament, milk-and-honey reverence for that economic record, at least as expressed
  by former Kentucky Sen. Wendell Ford. An old-school podium pounder, Ford -- stooped but still strong voiced at 86 --
  talked of the former president in messianic terms. "Bill Clinton found us the path to gold!" he shouted. The crowd of 2,000,
  most of them students, didn't laugh. They seemed to think he was right.
  How any of this helps Obama is far from clear; it isn't even clear that it helps many Democrats -- since they'd be joining
  the same Washington party that the current president ostensibly heads.
  But Clinton is all too happy to show Obama how it's done. As a campaigner and as president, Clinton's gift was his ability
  to untangle the knots of even the most complex policy issue and explain it in plain language to people suspicious of the
  powerful -- but eager not to be screwed by them or to be seen as dupes. Republicans and their corporate allies were out
  to shut down the few good things that government does for you, he said, in the name of balancing a budget that they
  themselves destroyed. "I gave you budget surpluses!" Clinton said, as if this had been an act of personal beneficence.
  Knowing his audience, the former president focused on Pell Grants, and on a new program that allows graduates to pay
  back their loans over longer periods and at lower rates. Paul, he said, will try to take that new program away -- and, given
  the GOP's deliberate vagueness about spending cuts -- there is reason to think Clinton is right.
  Which is why Paul got personal today. Which means Clinton drew blood. Which means that he did what he came to do.
  Which means Obama will remain invisible, at least in Kentucky, at least for now, and probably for a long time to come.
  Ci

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772705 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 4:46 PM
  To:
  Subject: H: FYI. Sid
  The Huffington Post
  October 12, 2010
  oward Fineman
  finemanAhuffingtonpost.com I HuffPost Reporting
  The Power Of Clinton, The Invisibility Of
  Obama
  First Posted: 10-12-10 02:37 PM I Updated: 10-12-10 02:37 PM
  LOUISVILLE -- I see that Dr. Rand Paul has taken out after Bill Clinton, dredging up Monica Lewinsky. And I know why
  Paul did so. The former president was here in Kentucky yesterday and in this state, as in many others, he is a far more
  potent and popular foe than President Barack Obama.
  On my first day working for The Huffington Post, I came back to Kentucky, where I began my career many years ago at
  the Courier-Journal. The people who run the University of Louisville Kentucky Author Forum wanted me to do an on-stage
  interview with a certain best-selling author who is also my new boss: Arianna Huffington. It was a tricky mix of professional
  incest and personal nostalgia, but the event worked out well and I also got a chance to play Kentucky reporter once again
  out in the state.
  I raced over to Lexington and here is the ground-level, outside-the-Beltway reality I witnessed:
  Like Voldemort's, Obama's is a name no one dares utter -- and that includes Clinton speaking to Democrats.
  At a sunny, noontime rally on the campus of the University of Kentucky in Lexington yesterday, the former president made
  a stirring, well-argued case for Democratic Senate candidate Jack Conway and for Democrats generally -- without once
  mentioning Obama and rarely mentioning the presidency. It was as though we suddenly had only two branches of
  government.
  To be fair, almost no one else at the one-hour rally mentioned the sitting president. And Kentucky is staunch Republican
  territory. "We're farther ahead in the generic ballot here than ever," GOP Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky told me
  yesterday. "President Obama was never popular here, even at his peak."
  Still, the eerie invisibility of the president is a telling commentary on the Democrats' confused, divided and defensive
  predicament as they brace for the verdict of the voters on Election Day, Nov. 2. There was something odd -- and, if you're
  a Democrat, depressing -- about a former Democratic president avoiding any mention of his Democratic successor.
  Clinton sincerely wants to help out on the trail -- and certainly wants to avoid the accusation that he didn't try to help. But
  his travels have turned into a personal victory lap that often makes him -- not the candidate he's touting -- the center of
  attention. That was true here in Kentucky. The rally's mechanics were mostly handled by the Secret Service; more to the
  point, the final (and therefore top-billed) speaker wasn't Conway. It was Clinton. The Conway people didn't mind. They
  were glad to have him.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772705 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772705 Date: 08/31/2015
  Rail-thin but not frail, wearing a tweedy professorial sports coat and his signature rueful, knowing smile, Clinton was
  treated with a respect bordering on awe. His familiar mane of white hair, thinning now, was translucent in the sun, giving
  him an almost otherworldly look: the Sage from a Better Age.
  Clinton is beloved In Kentucky. He won the state twice. He speaks the local dialect, which contains Appalachian notes of
  working-class pride, suspicion of big shots and Baptist revivalism. But more than that -- and more than just in Kentucky --
  Clinton's economic record (22.7 million jobs created, and he tends not to forget to mention the .7) looks spectacularly
  good in the context of what has followed.
  These days there is almost an Old Testament, milk-and-honey reverence for that economic record, at least as expressed
  by former Kentucky Sen. Wendell Ford. An old-school podium pounder, Ford -- stooped but still strong voiced at 86 --
  talked of the former president in messianic terms. "Bill Clinton found us the path to gold!" he shouted. The crowd of 2,000,
  most of them students, didn't laugh. They seemed to think he was right.
  How any of this helps Obama is far from clear; it isn't even clear that it helps many Democrats -- since they'd be joining
  the same Washington party that the current president ostensibly heads.
  But Clinton is all too happy to show Obama how it's done. As a campaigner and as president, Clinton's gift was his ability
  to untangle the knots of even the most complex policy issue and explain it in plain language to people suspicious of the
  powerful -- but eager not to be screwed by them or to be seen as dupes. Republicans and their corporate allies were out
  to shut down the few good things that government does for you, he said, in the name of balancing a budget that they
  themselves destroyed. "I gave you budget surpluses!" Clinton said, as if this had been an act of personal beneficence.
  Knowing his audience, the former president focused on Pell Grants, and on a new program that allows graduates to pay
  back their loans over longer periods and at lower rates. Paul, he said, will try to take that new program away -- and, given
  the GOP's deliberate vagueness about spending cuts -- there is reason to think Clinton is right.
  Which is why Paul got personal today. Which means Clinton drew blood. Which means that he did what he came to do.
  Which means Obama will remain invisible, at least in Kentucky, at least for now, and probably for a long time to come.
  Ci
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772705 Date: 08/31/2015



