# Emails

DocNumber: C05776370
MetadataSubject: STRIDER, HUFFINGTON POST: BIG DADDY'S RULES FOR THE 2010 CAMPAIGN TRAIL
MetadataTo: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-14T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0127/DOC_0C05776370/C05776370.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Strider, Huffington Post: Big Daddy's Rules for the 2010 Campaign Trail
ExtractedTo: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, June 14, 2010 9:30 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776370
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Pis print for me.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776370 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 9:30 PM
  To: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
  Subject: Fw: Strider, Huffington Post: Big Daddy's Rules for the 2010 Campaign Trail
  Pis print for me.
  Original Message
  From: Burns Strider
  To: H
  Sent: Fri Jun 11 12:51:45 2010
  Subject: Strider, Huffington Post: Big Daddy's Rules for the 2010 Campaign Trail
  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/burns-strideribig-daddys-rules-for-the_b_609004.html
  "Sarah Palin's brand of politics, for example, defining some Americans as being from "real America" and others as
  wherever it is she thinks they are from (a city, perhaps?) is bad for America. Such political warmongering implodes our
  core values...
  Our first calling, in politics, is to protect, honor and leave better our American system...
  If we tear down the American political process by doing and saying anything to win then we have failed that calling
  before we ever begin...
  The campaign cycle of 2010 has had a tumultuous start. Tea Party libertarians screaming from street corners, unhappy
  workers taking on incumbents, disgruntled faithful praying that the administration will keep its promises, Birthers
  repelling from black helicopters into the American mainstream and town hall meetings resembling Three Stooges re-
  runs have been forever social networked into our national psyche. Something is askew!"
  THE RULES FOR 2010... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/burns-strider/big-daddys-rules-for-the_b_609004.html
  Burns Strider
  Founding Partner
  The Eleison Group
  Join Me on Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1279552305&ref=name>
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776370 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776370 Date: 08/31/2015
  Follow Me on Twitter <http://twitter.com/BStrider>
  Visit The Eleison Group Website <http://www.eleisongroup.comh
  Visit Pea Ridge Confidential, My Personal Blog <http://pearidgeconfidential.blogspot.com/>
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776370 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776372
MetadataSubject: (REUTERS) EGYPT ISLAMISTS PULL OUT OF "RIGGED" ELECTION - TV
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-01T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05776372/C05776372.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (Reuters) Egypt Islamists pull out of "rigged" election -TV
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-0_05; SES-O_Shift-II
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, December 1, 2010 9:38 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776372
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776372 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, December 1, 2010 9:38 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (Reuters) Egypt Islamists pull out of "rigged" election -TV
  From: Simmons, Krista M
  To: NEWS-Mahogany; NEWS-NEA
  Cc: SES-0_05; SES-O_Shift-II
  Sent: Wed Dec 01 09:34:51 2010
  Subject: (Reuters) Egypt Islamists pull out of "rigged" election -TV
  CAIRO (Reuters) - Egypt's opposition Muslim Brotherhood, which held a fifth of seats in the outgoing parliament, has
  pulled out of an election race after winning no seats in the first round, al-Arabiya television reported.
  The group, which runs candidates as independents to skirt a ban on religious parties, said the vote was rigged in favor
  of President Mubarak's ruling party.
  Al-Arabiya said the group was pulling out of a run-off to be held on December 5. The group said 26 of its candidates
  had made it through to the run-off. A senior Brotherhood official told Reuters an announcement would be made later
  on December 1.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776372 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776376
MetadataSubject: CONFIDENTIAL
MetadataTo: CHERIE BLAIR
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-14T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0127/DOC_0C05776376/C05776376.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776376
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Monday, June 14, 2010 9:35 PM
  'cb
  Re: contiaentia!
  I would be happy to meet w him. How should I follow up to arrange a mutually agreeable time? All the best to you.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776376 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Monday, June 14, 2010 9:35 PM
  'cb
  Re: contiaentia!
  I would be happy to meet w him. How should I follow up to arrange a mutually agreeable time? All the best to you.
  Original Message
  From: Cherie Blair
  To: H
  Sent: Mon Jun 07 09:56:45 2010
  Subject: confidential
  As you know I have good links to the Qataris. Sheikha Mosah's son is the 31/32 year old Crown Prince and she is keen
  that he starts to build a wider international profile. He has been appointed head of the Qatar National Food Security
  Programme which is designed to deal with Qatar's food security issues its a $30 billion programme. He is aware that
  food security is an issue you are majoring on and would love to meet with you in person to discuss this and to explore
  potential partnership areas between US and Qatar including possible participation in the US/World Bank Food Security
  Fund. He is also keen to talk more generally about US/Qatari cooperation and even suggested they could help out with
  the Oil spill problem. There is apparently a Arab Food Security Summit in October 2010 and he would like to discuss Us
  participation in that too.
  IS a meeting possible he is more flexible on place and times than his mother! Or maybe we could set up an initial phone
  call.
  Can you let me know if this appeals to you at all?
  Cherie Blair
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776376 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776387
MetadataSubject: FOLLOW UP ON AFGHAN MATTER
MetadataTo: stallbott
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-14T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0127/DOC_0C05776387/C05776387.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: follow up on Afghan matter
ExtractedTo: 'stalbott
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: 'Cheryl Mills'
ExtractedDateSent: Wed Jun 0
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776387
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Jake Sullivan (DOS) <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6

RawText:
  Cc: 'Cheryl Mills'
  Sent: Wed Jun 0
  Subject: follow up on Afghan matter
  Jake Sullivan (DOS) <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776387 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 9:36 PM
  To: 'stalbott
  Subject: Re: follow up on Afghan matter
  Thx so much for your quick and thorough followup. I'm not surprised that he believes he has to wait awhile. Let's aim for
  a time to catch up. When will you be back in DC?
  Original Message
  From: Strobe Talbott
  To: H
  Hillary, as promised, I connected with Bruce Jones at NYU about Spanta. Bruce got in touch offered to help Spanta put
  together an arrangement at NYU that might have a Brookings offshoot. Spanta said he needed to decide with Karzai
  whether in fact the timing was right for him to leave. He just got back in touch with Bruce saying he's decided to stay on
  a bit longer. That said, he's agreed to participate in some Track II regional work that Bruce has underway. All in all, it
  sounds as though this has ended up in the right place for now. Bruce, Martin and I will be open to other NY/DC
  possibilities down the road when Spanta's situation changes. Thanks again for the truly terrific event at Brookings.
  Regards, Strobe
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776387 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776399
MetadataSubject: HRC UNIVERSITY. A QUICK THOUGHT
MetadataTo: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-14T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0127/DOC_0C05776399/C05776399.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776399
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Pis print.
  H < hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Monday, June 14, 2010 9:39 PM
  'JilotyLC@state.gov.
  Fw: HRC University. A quick thought

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776399 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Pis print.
  H < hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Monday, June 14, 2010 9:39 PM
  'JilotyLC@state.gov.
  Fw: HRC University. A quick thought
  Original Message
  From: Roy Spence
  To: H
  Sent: Wed May 19 07:15:44 2010
  Subject: HRC University. A quick thought
  HRC University.
  Purpose:
  To empower people everywhere with knowledge, purpose and passion so that they are destined-not lucky-to fully
  develop their God-given talents
  We are in the Full Potential Business-here and around the world.
  Love Rs
  Ride at Dawn
  This e-mail is intended only for the named person or entity to which it is addressed and contains valuable business
  information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you received this
  email in error, any review, use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. Please notify us
  immediately of the error via email to disclaimerinquiries@ideacity.com and please delete the email from your system,
  retaining no copies in any media. We appreciate your cooperation.
  ideacity.legal.disclaimer.01112008
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776399 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776431
MetadataSubject: CONFIDENTIAL
MetadataTo: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-16T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0127/DOC_0C05776431/C05776431.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776431
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Pls print.
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Wednesday, June 16, 2010 8:59 PM
  'JilotyLC@state.gov.
  Fw: confidential

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776431 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Pls print.
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Wednesday, June 16, 2010 8:59 PM
  'JilotyLC@state.gov.
  Fw: confidential
  Original Message
  From: Cherie Blair
  To: H
  Sent: Tue Jun 15 09:38:26 2010
  Subject: RE: confidential
  How about arranging a phone call between the two of you first to discuss the issues briefly then you could agree
  mutually when to meet.
  If you give me a time when you can take a quick phone call from the Crown Prince I will get the number for you to ring.
  Cherie Blair
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: 15 June 2010 02:35
  To: Cherie Blair
  Subject: Re: confidential
  I would be happy to meet w him. How should I follow up to arrange a mutually agreeable time? All the best to you.
  Original Message
  From: Cherie Blair
  To: H
  Sent: Mon Jun 07 09:56:45 2010
  Subject: confidential
  As you know I have good links to the Qataris. Sheikha Mosah's son is the 31/32 year old Crown Prince and she is keen
  that he starts to build a wider international profile. He has been appointed head of the Qatar National Food Security
  Programme which is designed to deal with Qatar's food security issues its a $30 billion programme. He is aware that
  food security is an issue you are majoring on and would love to meet with you in person to discuss this and to explore
  potential partnership areas between US and Qatar including possible participation in the US/World Bank Food Security
  Fund. He is also keen to talk more generally about US/Qatari cooperation and even suggested they could help out with
  the Oil spill problem. There is apparently a Arab Food Security Summit in October 2010 and he would like to discuss Us
  participation in that too.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776431 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776431 Date: 08/31/2015
  IS a meeting possible he is more flexible on place and times than his mother! Or maybe we could set up an initial phone
  call.
  Can you let me know if this appeals to you at all?
  Cherie Blair
  This message has been scanned by MailController - www.MailController.altohiway.com
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776431 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776454
MetadataSubject: LES GELB'S DAILY BEAST BLOG, 12/1/2010
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-01T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05776454/C05776454.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Les Gelb's Daily Beast Blog, 12/1/2010
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob I <Sullivan11@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, December 1, 2010 9:58 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776454
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Good stuff.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776454 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Sullivan, Jacob I <Sullivan11@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, December 1, 2010 9:58 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Les Gelb's Daily Beast Blog, 12/1/2010
  Good stuff.
  Original Message ---
  From: Leslie H. Gelb
  To: Sullivan, Jacob
  Sent: Wed Dec 01 09:48:41 2010
  Subject: Les Gelb's Daily Beast Blog, 12/1/2010
  Dear Mr. Sullivan:
  Intending to expose U.S. government lies, the latest Wikileaks only prove U.S. diplomats' professionalism, writes Les
  Gelb in his latest blog.
  The full text of the piece is included below.
  http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-11-30/wikileaks-helps-america-how-julian-assange-proved-us-
  working-hard-on-policy-problems/
  Sincerely,
  Jonathan E. Hillman
  Research Associate for Leslie H. Gelb
  Council on Foreign Relations
  58 East 68th Street, New York, New York 10065
  tel 212.434.9742 fax 212.434.9813
  Wikileaks Accidentally Helps U.S.
  by Leslie H. Gelb
  November 30, 2010 I 10:42pm
  **Julian Assange clearly intended the State Dept. cable leaks to smear the U.S. as evil and selfish. Leslie H. Gelb on how
  he inadvertently proved the opposite.**
  The Wikileakers dumped a vast pile of secrets to prove that the United States was selfish, stupid and wicked-but their
  revelations proved just the opposite. When you remove the gossip and obvious trivia that mesmerized the press, you
  clearly see what the Wikileakers never expected: A United States seriously and professionally trying to solve the most
  dangerous problems in a frighteningly complicated world, yet lacking the power to dictate solutions. U.S. policymakers
  and diplomats are shown, quite accurately, doing what they are supposed to do: ferreting out critical information from
  foreign leaders, searching for paths to common action, and struggling with the right amount of pressure to apply on
  allies and adversaries. And in most cases, the villain is not Washington, but foreign leaders escaping common action with
  cowardice and hypocrisy.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776454 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776454 Date: 08/31/2015
  Don't think for a New York minute that Julian Assange, the Wikileaker, unloaded this trove to save humankind. Why did
  he toss in those cables about Italy's leader being a rake and Germany's chancellor being a cautious fuddy-duddy, and
  President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan being "paranoid"? To save the world? Not a chance. He did it to get attention,
  and he got attention from a drooling press, which then went on to call the very material they were highlighting trivial.
  Did Assange leak critical conversations with Chinese or Arab leaders to help solve the problems in Korea and Iran? Not
  by the hair on your chinny chin chin. He did it to show that he could do it-and for the attention. Anyone who is not a
  hopeless left-wing ideologue knows that such leaks will crush future serious conversations with those leaders for some
  time to come. Just think: if you told someone a serious and critical confidence about someone else, and your confidant
  went out and told others, would you soon repeat that mistake? Assange did not leak these cables to help solve world
  problems. These leaks were absolutely gratuitous and served only the purpose of making him a media marvel.
  In explaining his deed publicly, Assange suggests that what he's doing is uncovering American misdeeds and lies. His aim,
  he says, is to inform citizens of democracies and peoples around the world about what their leaders are really doing.
  Assange also insists he did this for transparency's sake. Yet when he got to look inside, he didn't see what was plain: that
  our diplomats were doing a good job. Indeed, when you turn off his nonsense and stop listening to the strange
  commentary on cable news and even on the front pages of great newspapers, when you actually read the cables, here's
  what you see: American leaders and American diplomats trying to solve crucial world problems.
  But when you turn off his nonsense and stop listening to the strange commentary on cable news and even on the front
  pages of great newspapers, when you actually read the cables, here's what you see: American leaders and American
  diplomats trying to solve crucial world problems.
  -Washington needs China's help in bolstering sanctions against Iran, and China balks for fear of jeopardizing its oil and
  gas flow from that country. The Obama team arranges for Saudi Arabia to guarantee any loss in supply to China. If the
  world wants to slow or even prevent Iran's march to nuclear weaponry, this is a key path to doing so.
  -The U.S. discovers that North Korea has manufactured new medium-range missiles and is trying to deliver them to Iran
  through China. The Obama team discovers this, informs Beijing, and asks Beijing to stop the transfer. Beijing declines.
  Really creepy.
  -Yemen's leader takes public responsibility for American missile attacks against Al Qaeda in Yemen. He wants to diminish
  the power of these terrorists, as do Americans and most others in the world. The "lie" by the Yemeni president is a
  harmless way to get a critical job done-that is, the job of fighting international terrorism. Wikileaks tears away the
  political cover of Yemen's leaders.
  -No country has anywhere near as much influence over nutty North Korea as China. So, U.S. diplomats are searching
  desperately to figure out Chinese thinking about North Korea in order to compose a plan for avoiding war on the Korean
  Peninsula. So, the Wikileakers expose some Chinese leaders who are actually trying to give us some insight into Chinese
  thinking about North Korean craziness. They won't do that again soon.
  Time and again, as one actually reads these cables, one has to be heartened by the professionalism and the insights of
  U.S. diplomats. What are they doing? They are not lying, and U.S. leaders are not lying. They are actually, believe it or
  not, trying to solve problems. That seriousness of purpose and the professionalism to execute it is what jumps out at you
  in these materials.
  So, the naïve say, it's good to show the effectiveness of our diplomats. Give me a break. Ask any American diplomat to
  choose between looking intelligent in leaked cables and making progress toward avoiding war.
  None of this is to say that there should not be leaks, or that the press should not pursue classified information that is
  necessary or very helpful to a sensible public debate on policy. If a U.S. administration is lying, or distorting the facts, or
  telling one story to the public and another to itself, then by all means, let's have it out in public. If the U.S. government is
  concocting intelligence in order to justify wars, let's hope an enterprising reporter finds it out for the rest of us.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776454 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776454 Date: 08/31/2015
  But the Wikileaks dump is not about providing essential information to Americans or to others-information they need
  for serious policy discussion. This massive trashing by Wikileaks of a legitimate effort by the U.S. government to preserve
  confidentiality is the very least a shame and at the most, a crime.
  Leslie H. Gelb, a former New York Times columnist and senior government official, is author of Power Rules: How
  Common Sense Can Rescue American Foreign Policy (HarperCollins 2009), a book that shows how to think about and use
  power in the 21st century. He is president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776454 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776459
MetadataSubject: ANY NEWS?
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-02T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05776459/C05776459.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Any news?
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob J
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:51 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776459
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Update from phil
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776459 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 1:51 AM
  To:
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Subject: Fw: Any news?
  Update from phil
  Original Message
  From: Gordon, Philip H
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Dec 02 01:21:52 2010
  Subject: Re: Any news?
  After more back and forth with Russians we've concluded that we will not reach agreement on conflict language. Trying
  to work w/ Kazakhs to drop the Action Plan settle on the commemoration. Will let you know if we succeed...
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma
  To: Gordon, Philip H
  Sent: Thu Dec 02 00:59:40 2010
  Subject: Any news?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776459 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776474
MetadataSubject: THE REPUBLICAN CASE FOR RATIFYING NEW START
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Verma, Richard R
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-02T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05776474/C05776474.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: The Republican case for ratifying New START
ExtractedFrom: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Verma, Richard R
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 6:20 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776474
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Here is the Republican former Secretaries of State op ed, which ran in today's wash post.
  The Republican case for ratifying New START
  bn)://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/01/AR2010120104598.html?hpid=topnews
  By Henry A. Kissinger, George P. Shultz, James A. Baker III, Lawrence S. Eagleburger and Colin L. Powell
  Thursday, December 2, 2010;
  Republican presidents have long led the crucial fight to protect the United States against nuclear dangers. That
  is why Presidents Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush negotiated the SALT I, START I and
  START II agreements. It is why President George W. Bush negotiated the Moscow Treaty. All four recognized
  that reducing the number of nuclear arms in an open, verifiable manner would reduce the risk of nuclear
  catastrophe and increase the stability of America's relationship with the Soviet Union and, later, the Russian
  Federation. The world is safer today because of the decades-long effort to reduce its supply of nuclear weapons.
  As a result, we urge the Senate to ratify the New START treaty signed by President Obama and Russian
  President Dmitry Medvedev. It is a modest and appropriate continuation of the START I treaty that expired
  almost a year ago. It reduces the number of nuclear weapons that each side deploys while enabling the United
  States to maintain a strong nuclear deterrent and preserving the flexibility to deploy those forces as we see fit.
  Along with our obligation to protect the homeland, the United States has responsibilities to allies around the
  world. The commander of our nuclear forces has testified that the 1,550 warheads allowed under this treaty are
  sufficient for all our missions - and seven former nuclear commanders agree. The defense secretary, the
  chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the head of the Missile Defense Agency - all originally appointed by a
  Republican president - argue that New START is essential for our national defense.
  We do not make a recommendation about the exact timing of a Senate ratification vote. That is a matter for the
  administration and Senate leaders. The most important thing is to have bipartisan support for the treaty, as
  previous nuclear arms treaties did.
  Although each of us had initial questions about New START, administration officials have provided reasonable
  answers. We believe there are compelling reasons Republicans should support ratification.
  First, the agreement emphasizes verification, providing a valuable window into Russia's nuclear arsenal. Since
  the original START expired last December, Russia has not been required to provide notifications about changes
  in its strategic nuclear arsenal, and the United States has been unable to conduct on-site inspections. Each day,
  America's understanding of Russia's arsenal has been degraded, and resources have been diverted from national
  security tasks to try to fill the gaps. Our military planners increasingly lack the best possible insight into
  Russia's activity with its strategic nuclear arsenal, making it more difficult to carry out their nuclear deterrent
  mission.
  Second, New START preserves our ability to deploy effective missile defenses. The testimonies of our military
  commanders and civilian leaders make clear that the treaty does not limit U.S. missile defense plans. Although
  the treaty prohibits the conversion of existing launchers for intercontinental and submarine-based ballistic
  missiles, our military leaders say they do not want to do that because it is more expensive and less effective than
  building new ones for defense purposes.
  Finally, the Obama administration has agreed to provide for modernization of the infrastructure essential to
  maintaining our nuclear arsenal. Funding these efforts has become part of the negotiations in the ratification
  process. The administration has put forth a 10-year plan to spend $84 billion on the Energy Department's
  nuclear weapons complex. Much of the credit for getting the administration to add $14 billion to the originally
  proposed $70 billion for modernization goes to Sen. Jon Kyl, the Arizona Republican who has been vigilant in
  this effort. Implementing this modernization program in a timely fashion would be important in ensuring that
  our nuclear arsenal is maintained appropriately over the next decade and beyond.
  Although the United States needs a strong and reliable nuclear force, the chief nuclear danger today comes not
  from Russia but from rogue states such as Iran and North Korea and the potential for nuclear material to fall
  into the hands of terrorists. Given those pressing dangers, some question why an arms control treaty with Russia
  matters. It matters because it is in both parties' interest that there be transparency and stability in their strategic
  nuclear relationship. It also matters because Russia's cooperation will be needed if we are to make progress in
  rolling back the Iranian and North Korean programs. Russian help will be needed to continue our work to
  secure "loose nukes" in Russia and elsewhere. And Russian assistance is needed to improve the situation in
  Afghanistan, a breeding ground for international terrorism.
  Obviously, the United States does not sign arms control agreements just to make friends. Any treaty must be
  considered on its merits. But we have here an agreement that is clearly in our national interest, and we should
  consider the ramifications of not ratifying it.
  Whenever New START is brought up for debate, we encourage all senators to focus on national security. There
  are plenty of opportunities to battle on domestic political issues linked to the future of the American economy.
  With our country facing the dual threats of unemployment and a growing federal debt bomb, we anticipate
  significant conflict between Democrats and Republicans. It is, however, in the national interest to ratify New
  START.
  The writers were secretaries of state for the past five Republican presidents.
  Unsubscribe
  The White House • 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW • Washington DC 20500 • 202-456-1111

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776474 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 6:20 AM
  To:
  Cc: Verma, Richard R
  Subject: FW: The Republican case for ratifying New START
  Here is the Republican former Secretaries of State op ed, which ran in today's wash post.
  The Republican case for ratifying New START
  bn)://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/01/AR2010120104598.html?hpid=topnews
  By Henry A. Kissinger, George P. Shultz, James A. Baker III, Lawrence S. Eagleburger and Colin L. Powell
  Thursday, December 2, 2010;
  Republican presidents have long led the crucial fight to protect the United States against nuclear dangers. That
  is why Presidents Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush negotiated the SALT I, START I and
  START II agreements. It is why President George W. Bush negotiated the Moscow Treaty. All four recognized
  that reducing the number of nuclear arms in an open, verifiable manner would reduce the risk of nuclear
  catastrophe and increase the stability of America's relationship with the Soviet Union and, later, the Russian
  Federation. The world is safer today because of the decades-long effort to reduce its supply of nuclear weapons.
  As a result, we urge the Senate to ratify the New START treaty signed by President Obama and Russian
  President Dmitry Medvedev. It is a modest and appropriate continuation of the START I treaty that expired
  almost a year ago. It reduces the number of nuclear weapons that each side deploys while enabling the United
  States to maintain a strong nuclear deterrent and preserving the flexibility to deploy those forces as we see fit.
  Along with our obligation to protect the homeland, the United States has responsibilities to allies around the
  world. The commander of our nuclear forces has testified that the 1,550 warheads allowed under this treaty are
  sufficient for all our missions - and seven former nuclear commanders agree. The defense secretary, the
  chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the head of the Missile Defense Agency - all originally appointed by a
  Republican president - argue that New START is essential for our national defense.
  We do not make a recommendation about the exact timing of a Senate ratification vote. That is a matter for the
  administration and Senate leaders. The most important thing is to have bipartisan support for the treaty, as
  previous nuclear arms treaties did.
  Although each of us had initial questions about New START, administration officials have provided reasonable
  answers. We believe there are compelling reasons Republicans should support ratification.
  First, the agreement emphasizes verification, providing a valuable window into Russia's nuclear arsenal. Since
  the original START expired last December, Russia has not been required to provide notifications about changes
  in its strategic nuclear arsenal, and the United States has been unable to conduct on-site inspections. Each day,
  America's understanding of Russia's arsenal has been degraded, and resources have been diverted from national
  security tasks to try to fill the gaps. Our military planners increasingly lack the best possible insight into
  Russia's activity with its strategic nuclear arsenal, making it more difficult to carry out their nuclear deterrent
  mission.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776474 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776474 Date: 08/31/2015
  Second, New START preserves our ability to deploy effective missile defenses. The testimonies of our military
  commanders and civilian leaders make clear that the treaty does not limit U.S. missile defense plans. Although
  the treaty prohibits the conversion of existing launchers for intercontinental and submarine-based ballistic
  missiles, our military leaders say they do not want to do that because it is more expensive and less effective than
  building new ones for defense purposes.
  Finally, the Obama administration has agreed to provide for modernization of the infrastructure essential to
  maintaining our nuclear arsenal. Funding these efforts has become part of the negotiations in the ratification
  process. The administration has put forth a 10-year plan to spend $84 billion on the Energy Department's
  nuclear weapons complex. Much of the credit for getting the administration to add $14 billion to the originally
  proposed $70 billion for modernization goes to Sen. Jon Kyl, the Arizona Republican who has been vigilant in
  this effort. Implementing this modernization program in a timely fashion would be important in ensuring that
  our nuclear arsenal is maintained appropriately over the next decade and beyond.
  Although the United States needs a strong and reliable nuclear force, the chief nuclear danger today comes not
  from Russia but from rogue states such as Iran and North Korea and the potential for nuclear material to fall
  into the hands of terrorists. Given those pressing dangers, some question why an arms control treaty with Russia
  matters. It matters because it is in both parties' interest that there be transparency and stability in their strategic
  nuclear relationship. It also matters because Russia's cooperation will be needed if we are to make progress in
  rolling back the Iranian and North Korean programs. Russian help will be needed to continue our work to
  secure "loose nukes" in Russia and elsewhere. And Russian assistance is needed to improve the situation in
  Afghanistan, a breeding ground for international terrorism.
  Obviously, the United States does not sign arms control agreements just to make friends. Any treaty must be
  considered on its merits. But we have here an agreement that is clearly in our national interest, and we should
  consider the ramifications of not ratifying it.
  Whenever New START is brought up for debate, we encourage all senators to focus on national security. There
  are plenty of opportunities to battle on domestic political issues linked to the future of the American economy.
  With our country facing the dual threats of unemployment and a growing federal debt bomb, we anticipate
  significant conflict between Democrats and Republicans. It is, however, in the national interest to ratify New
  START.
  The writers were secretaries of state for the past five Republican presidents.
  Unsubscribe
  The White House • 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW • Washington DC 20500 • 202-456-1111
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776474 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776479
MetadataSubject: H: MEMO ON URGENT KYRGYZSTAN CRISIS, FIRST HAND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. SID
MetadataTo: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-18T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05776479/C05776479.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: H: Memo on urgent Kyrgyzstan crisis, first hand report and recommendations. Sid
ExtractedTo: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, June 18, 2010 7:30 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776479
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: PIs make 3 copies.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776479 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 7:30 AM
  To: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
  Subject: Fw: H: Memo on urgent Kyrgyzstan crisis, first hand report and recommendations. Sid
  Attachments: horton memo kyrgyzstan 061710.docx; horton memo kyrgyzstan 061710.docx
  PIs make 3 copies.
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop <sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Thu Jun 17 16:46:31 2010
  Subject: H: Memo on urgent Kyrgyzstan crisis, first hand report and recommendations. Sid
  CONFIDENTIAL
  For: Hillary
  From: Sid
  Re: Kyrgyzstan crisis, report and recommendations
  Scott Horton has just returned from a week in Kyrgyzstan, where he held lengthy private conversations with a range of
  leaders. He has sent me his confidential report. In light of the crisis there—the pogroms that have created perhaps as
  many as 450,000 refugees, according to the U.N.—and on the eve of the June 27 constitutional referendum—he
  explains why and how this is an opportunity for joint U.S.-Russian action and other U.S. initiatives. His policy
  recommendations follow his report.
  To: Sid Blumenthal
  From: Scott Horton
  Date: June 17, 2010
  Subj: Developments in Kyrgyzstan
  I was in Kyrgyzstan from June 1– 6, during which time I met with almost all the members of the interim government,
  with special focus on foreign relations, security and legal issues. Here are major points that emerged from my visit:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776479 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776479 Date: 08/31/2015
  1. Crisis in the South. Although I departed before the pogroms had commenced in Osh, I found that the interim
  government fully expected violence to break out there but did not anticipate the inter-ethnic element. Several candidly
  acknowledged that the government's grip on the south, particularly Osh and Djalalabad provinces, was extremely
  tenuous. They said they had severe "loyalty" problems with key figures in the police and military. When I pressed on
  what they meant by "loyalty," I was told that the Bakiyev family had "its people" in key positions in the police and army
  and that they had intercepted communications between Janysh Bakiyev and a number of key security officers in the
  south. "Something is being planned to disrupt the referendum," I was told. Beknazarov told me he believed that,
  following the pattern of the last two revolutions, they anticipated that there would be an attack on administrative
  offices in the south, following quickly within a few days by attacks in Bishkek. Government leaders I spoke with over the
  weekend told me they now recognize they had misassessed the data they had, that the Bakiyev plan was obviously to
  instigate inter-ethnic violence.
  Precisely what led to the tragedy in and around Osh is still unclear and requires careful investigation, but people I have
  spoken with in Osh describe police and army leaders directing the pogroms, and they were able to identify some of
  these individuals as persons close to the Bakiyevs. Moreover, the timing and some of the specific descriptions of events
  support this thesis—Bakiyev was the only person who clearly had something to gain from the violence. If that is so, then
  Bakiyev adopted an extremely cynical, indeed criminal strategy. His objectives would have been to derail the
  referendum, demonstrate the weakness of the interim government, and fuel calls for an iron-fisted central government
  through the resurrection of his presidency. The tactics used bear comparison with those used by Slobodan Milosevic
  and Radovan Kara&'id as Yugoslavia disintegrated or by the Soviet MVD in the waning days of the Soviet empire in
  programs like "Operation Koltso." If the government's charges bear out, serious crimes were committed by the Bakiyev
  faction.
  While Otunbayeva publicly states that order has been restored in the south and that foreign intervention is no longer
  needed, I am not persuaded that this is what she actually thinks. She is anxious to build public confidence in her
  government and its abilities. Confidentially she acknowledges that the interim government's grip over the situation in
  the south is extremely weak and that the government does not feel it can necessarily count on the local police and
  military there, whose loyalties are plainly divided. This in turn suggests that the international community should give
  active consideration to both the humanitarian and the security dimensions of the situation in the south. My sense
  remains that Otunbayeva would strongly welcome such an initiative.
  2. Internal Workings of the Interim Government. The interim government verges on being completely dysfunctional. It
  operates as a collection of individual fiefdoms, with leaders engaged in constant squabbles over patronage
  appointments. Career civil service personnel report being terrorized and extorted. I spent the better part of three days
  inside the current government headquarters on Staraya Ploshchod and was able to directly observe primitive horse-
  trading, threats and counterthreats between key government functionaries, sometimes in agitated voices. Roza
  Otunbayeva and a handful of figures closest to her were exceptions in this process—admonishing others about the
  unseemliness of their conduct, urging moderation and restraint. But Otunbayeva also acknowledges that the limitations
  on her own authority and states that she "has to put up with it," at least for the moment. Three government members
  advised me during meetings of their intention to resign before the end of the month in order to start running for
  parliament. Significantly, I sense sharp rifts within the government—between Atembayev and Beknazarov, for instance,
  who could not refrain from criticizing one another in my interviews with them, or between Sariyev and Beknazarov.
  Only Otunbayeva (and to a lesser extent her close ally Elmira Ibraimova) appear to be the glue that holds things
  together, commanding the respect of the other government members. I found that the admiration for Otunbayeva was
  almost universal—she appears to be the only figure in the government emerging from the interim period with an
  untarnished reputation. Still the special order under which she has assumed power as "president of the interim
  government" presents some clear problems for her authority. She has a fixed term into 2011, but she will have no
  democratic mandate. After the new government is formed, based on the parliamentary elections, they will have
  democratic legitimacy and she will not—this sets up a situation in which her authority may well be eclipsed or at least
  made more narrow. Still, all the members of the current government recognize that she has essential skills that they do
  not—particularly her ability to conciliate and her ability to reach out to other leaders on the international stage.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776479 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776479 Date: 08/31/2015
  There is an expectation that the parliamentary elections will result in a weeding out of the government. The next
  government is expected to be formed through a parliamentary coalition. But only two or perhaps three of the current
  seven factions will survive. Much of the bickering and instability in the current government is keyed to the coming game
  of parliamentary moving chairs—there is an intense struggle now to secure personal loyalty and funds to use in the
  parliamentary elections; the entire process has an aura of sink or swim about it. Ironically the immediate prospect of
  parliamentary elections and the sense that they will be genuinely open and fair thus contributes to the ineptness and
  near chaotic appearance of the current government.
  3. Constitution and Referendum. Under the guidance of Tekebayev, the government put forward a proposed new
  constitution, which it seeks to have confirmed through a referendum vote on June 27. The constitution itself does shift
  the country further in the direction of a parliamentary democracy, and it contains unusual protection for parliamentary
  minority factions. Government leaders told me that Kazakh president Nursultan Nazarbayev had waded in on the
  question of the constitution directly, pressing them to retain a "strong president" system. They say this was coupled
  with not-very-subtle threats, and that the frontier between Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan remains closed, with harmful
  consequences for the Kyrgyz economy. A major question exists about holding the referendum as scheduled. The events
  in the south have resulted in the mass displacement of population and if held as planned, a large part of the population
  in the south would probably be disenfranchised. However, government leaders say that their current problems all come
  back to legitimacy, and they will not be able to form a government with democratic legitimacy without a new
  constitution and new elections. Accordingly, they resist any further delays and are even contemplating moving the date
  of the parliamentary election forward to the last week of August (it is now set for October 10). The crisis in the south
  presents a severe dilemma in this regards, and it seems that this would have been Bakiyev's objective in instigating it, if
  indeed he did.
  4. Manas Transit Center. As expected, I discovered that the interim government is deeply fragmented on the question
  of MTC. One faction headed by Otunbayeva favors a "pragmatic solution" to the base issue under which it will be
  continued but placed on a more transparent basis in which the economic benefits to the government are clear.
  Otunbayeva argues that the base can only be accepted under circumstances in which it presents no friction for Kyrgyz-
  Russian relations; she seeks to have disputes surrounding fuel supply, for instance, resolved directly between the United
  States and Russia. Another faction, headed by Beknazarov, takes a more demagogic approach, denouncing the base and
  seeking its closing in internal meetings. Talking with Beknazarov, I had the clear impression that his attitudes were
  entirely opportunistic—he thinks this will be a good campaign issue to use on the hustings. He suggested rather strongly
  that he could accept a continued base presence under the right circumstances and that he views threats to close the
  base as a sort of stick to use to extort more money and other concessions from the Americans. In general, Beknazarov
  strikes me as hot-headed and crass and an untrustworthy partner in any future discussions. Atembayev also has
  somewhat demagogic impulses, though they are mild by comparison. Otunbayeva, the third and most senior member
  of the government engaged on base issues, is the critical voice of reason in the process. My impression based on
  discussions with numerous figures is that Otunbayeva's views currently hold sway. However, all the government
  members are agreed that the economic deal struck by Bakiyev is unfavorable to the Kyrgyz state and that the base must
  rest on transparent economic concessions and there can be no more under-the-table dealings with political figures.
  5. Resolving the Crisis in the South. I believe that two key points should be kept in mind when approaching the
  humanitarian crisis that has emerged in the south. First, the crisis probably has its origins in a raw struggle for power.
  The interim government's legitimacy deficit contributed to the problem, because it left the government with weak tools
  to control the situation in the south. A long-term solution to the problem must involve the creation of governments at
  the national (Bishkek) and regional (Osh, Djalalabad) levels that have an essential modicum of democratic legitimacy.
  Delaying this process may only hasten the entire country's continued descent into chaos. This highlights the need to
  conduct free, fair and open elections as quickly as possible. Second, the last thing the interim government needs is a
  "Sophie's choice" between the United States and Russian Federation. International assistance needs to reflect a joint
  U.S.-Russian approach and showcase U.S. and Russian leadership (not merely participation). With President Medvedev's
  visit to the White House now on the horizon, this would be a good opportunity to establish joint sponsorship of an
  international humanitarian initiative. Here, I believe, are the essential elements of a program that could achieve U.S.-
  Russian co-sponsorship:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776479 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776479 Date: 08/31/2015
  • An Appeal for Restraint: Although the instigation of the conflict appears clearly to rest with ethnic Kyrgyz
  agitators, including a number in uniform and operating military equipment, at present both Uzbek and Kyrgyz armed
  groups are involved in random shootings designed to reinforce perceptions of their group being persecuted (rapes etc.)
  by another. Credible reports are suggesting that there has been political manipulation (including payment of money to
  drug and other criminal gangs) aimed at fomenting violence. The attack on a sports facility set up by a prominent Uzbek
  drug baron (murdered several years earlier) in Osh shortly before the violence started also suggests that criminal gangs
  involved in drug transshipment had another motivation for engaging in the violence. It may be that the violence was an
  initiative of the deposed president, but once it began, it provided cover for numerous incidents of score-settling and
  criminal mischief. In these circumstances, a strong appeal for restraint is appropriate and martial law rules including
  curfews may legitimately be imposed by the interim government. An imprimatur of support from the international
  community would help establish the authority of the interim government in this process.
  • Exit Corridors for Civilians: Civilians who feel threatened must be allowed to leave the high risk zones, and access
  of humanitarian aid, and creation of a safe zone for humanitarian operation should be priorities at locations created to
  shelter them. The EU, OSCE and UN issued a statement on June 16 calling for a humanitarian corridor in the southern
  regions of Osh and Jalalabad provinces, as well as of ensuring the equitable distribution of humanitarian aid among
  those in need. The cooperation of the Uzbek government may be particularly important in this process.
  • Peacekeeping/Policing Operation: The international community should support special arrangements with broad
  international legitimacy and participation to enhance peacekeeping and police operations in the affected area. As I
  noted, even though Otunbayeva made a public statement on June 15 to the effect that foreign military/police
  intervention was no longer needed, the situation remains precarious and in her confidential discussions Otunbayeva
  acknowledges the benefits in confidence building that would emerge from an qualified, professional and international
  presence in the region. Peacekeeping/policing operations should at a minimum include security for designated
  sheltering areas for refugees and internally displaced persons and monitoring operations in tandem with local police and
  military, to build confidence in their protective functions.
  • Investigation of Events: a broad, credible, independent investigation should be undertaken into the events and
  their origin. The investigation should be under the aegis of an international organization, such as the Security Council or
  OSCE and it should be conducted by an individual of stature with strong credentials as a fact-finder and prosecutor. The
  investigation should particularly take cognizance of accusations that crimes against humanity were perpetrated,
  potentially including crimes of genocide. The involvement of persons exercising ostensible government authority—
  policemen, military figures, leaders of the civil administration—should be given special scrutiny in this process. The
  person commissioned to handle the investigation should be specifically empowered to recommend criminal charges be
  brought against individuals identified in his investigation—either by the criminal authorities of the Kyrgyz Republic or
  before an international body seized of proper jurisdiction.
  • Effective Post-Conflict Reconstruction. UN authorities are estimating that as many as 450,000 persons may have
  been displaced by the current violence. The devastation in central Osh and in numerous villages is reported to be near
  total. There will be an intense housing shortage and a crisis with respect to food supply and healthcare. The
  international community under United States and Russian leadership should provide generous support to jumpstart the
  reconstruction process, prioritizing its assistance to benefit those most egregiously injured by the violence.
  • The Referendum/Parliamentary Elections. In view of the disruption and violence, the interim government may
  well conclude that the constitutional referendum must be postponed. However, if it does not postpone the referendum,
  then extraordinary measures should be taken to insure that internally displaced persons and refugees are given an
  opportunity to vote—in both cases this will be a reemphasis of the bond of citizenship and a promise of inclusion in the
  democratic process that will be critical to the resolution of the crisis. The international community should also mobilize
  observers in connection with the parliamentary elections to help assure that candidates have fair access to the ballot
  and to media, that campaigns are permitted to proceed without unreasonable limitations and that voting occurs in a fair
  and free manner across the country. Special attention in this process should be given to the affected areas to insure
  that refugees and IDPs have a fair opportunity to vote and are freed from unreasonable limitations in the process.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776479 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776480
MetadataSubject: LATEST CON'T
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-02T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05776480/C05776480.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Latest cont
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivann@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:09 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776480
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Fyi
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776480 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivann@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:09 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Latest cont
  Fyi
  Original Message
  From: Gordon, Philip H
  To: Abedin, Huma; Sullivan, Jacob .1
  Sent: Thu Dec 02 06:02:14 2010
  Subject: Latest con't
  Deal is falling apart (predictably), as each delegation proposes to ad "just one thing." Best that can be said is that it
  won't be our fault. Will keep trying but looking grim.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776480 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776492
MetadataSubject: KYRGYZSTAN CRISIS, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
MetadataTo: Hillary
MetadataFrom: Sid
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05776492/C05776492.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedTo: Sid Blumenthal
ExtractedFrom: Sid
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776492
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776492 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  CONFIDENTIAL
  For: Hillary
  From: Sid
  Re: Kyrgyzstan crisis, report and recommendations
  Scott Horton has just returned from a week in Kyrgyzstan, where he held lengthy private
  conversations with a range of leaders. He has sent me his confidential report. In light of
  the crisis there—the pogroms that have created perhaps as many as 450,000 refugees,
  according to the U.N.—and on the eve of the June 27 constitutional referendum—he
  explains. why and how this is an opportunity for joint U.S.-Russian action and other U.S.
  initiatives. His policy recommendations follow his report.
  To: Sid Blumenthal
  From: Scott Horton
  Date: June 17, 2010
  Subj: Developments in Kyrgyzstan
  I was in Kyrgyzstan from June 1– 6, during which time I met with almost all the
  members of the interim government, with special focus on foreign relations, security and
  legal issues. Here are major points that emerged from my visit:
  1. Crisis in the South. Although I departed before the pogroms had commenced in Osh,
  I found that the interim government fully expected violence to break out there but did not
  anticipate the inter-ethnic element. Several candidly acknowledged that the
  government's grip on the south, particularly Osh and Djalalabad provinces, was
  extremely tenuous. They said they had severe "loyalty" problems with key figures in the
  police and military. When I pressed on what they meant by "loyalty," I was told that the
  Bakiyev family had "its people" in key positions in the police and army and that they had
  intercepted communications between Janysh Bakiyev and a number of key security
  officers in the south. "Something is being planned to disrupt the referendum," I was told.
  Beknazarov told me he believed that, following the pattern of the last two revolutions,
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776492 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776492 Date: 08/31/2015
  they anticipated that there would be an attack on administrative offices in the south,
  following quickly within a few days by attacks in Bishkek. Government leaders I spoke
  with over the weekend told me they now recognize they had misassessed the data they
  had, that the Bakiyev plan was obviously to instigate inter-ethnic violence.
  Precisely what led to the tragedy in and around Osh is still unclear and requires careful
  investigation, but people I have spoken with in Osh describe police and army leaders
  directing the pogroms, and they were able to identify some of these individuals as
  persons close to the Bakiyevs. Moreover, the timing and some of the specific
  descriptions of events support this thesis—Bakiyev was the only person who clearly had
  something to gain from the violence. If that is so, then Bakiyev adopted an extremely
  cynical, indeed criminal strategy. His objectives would have been to derail the
  referendum, demonstrate the weakness of the interim government, and fuel calls for an
  iron-fisted central government through the resurrection of his presidency. The tactics
  used bear comparison with those used by Slobodan Milosevia and Radovan Karathle as
  Yugoslavia disintegrated or by the Soviet MVD in the waning days of the Soviet empire
  in programs like "Operation Koltso." If the government's charges bear out, serious
  crimes were committed by the Bakiyev faction.
  While Otunbayeva publicly states that order has been restored in the south and that
  foreign intervention is no longer needed, I am not persuaded that this is what she actually
  thinks. She is anxious to build public confidence in her government and its abilities.
  Confidentially she acknowledges that the interim government's grip over the situation in
  the south is extremely weak and that the government does not feel it can necessarily
  count on the local police and military there, whose loyalties are plainly divided. This in
  turn suggests that the international community should give active consideration to both
  the humanitarian and the security dimensions of the situation in the south. My sense
  remains that Otunbayeva would strongly welcome such an initiative.
  2. Internal Workings of the Interim Government. The interim government verges on
  being completely dysfunctional. It operates as a collection of individual fiefdoms, with
  leaders engaged in constant squabbles over patronage appointments. Career civil service
  personnel report being terrorized and extorted. I spent the better part of three days inside
  the current government headquarters on Staraya Ploshchod and was able to directly
  observe primitive horse-trading, threats and counterthreats between key government
  functionaries, sometimes in agitated voices. Roza Otunbayeva and a handful of figures
  closest to her were exceptions in this process—admonishing others about the
  unseemliness of their conduct, urging moderation and. restraint. But Otunbayeva also
  acknowledges that the limitations on her own authority and states that she "has to put up
  with it," at least for the moment. Three government members advised me during
  meetings of their intention to resign before the end of the month in order to start running
  for parliament. Significantly, I sense sharp rifts within the government—between
  Atembayev and Beknazarov, for instance, who could not refrain from criticizing one
  another in my interviews with them, or between Sariyev and Beknazarov.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776492 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776492 Date: 08/31/2015
  Only Otunbayeva (and to a lesser extent her close ally Elmira Ibraimova) appear to be the
  glue that holds things together, commanding the respect of the other government
  members. I found that the admiration for Otunbayeva was almost universal—she appears
  to be the only figure in the government emerging from the interim period with an
  untarnished reputation. Still the special order under which she has assumed power as
  "president of the interim government" presents some clear problems for her authority.
  She has a fixed term into 2011, but she will have no democratic mandate. After the new
  government is formed, based on the parliamentary elections, they will have democratic
  legitimacy and she will not—this sets up a situation in which her authority may well be
  eclipsed or at least made more narrow. Still, all the members of the current government
  recognize that she has essential skills that they do not—particularly her ability to
  conciliate and her ability to reach out to other leaders on the international stage.
  There is an expectation that the parliamentary elections will result in a weeding out of the
  government. The next government is expected to be formed through a parliamentary
  coalition. But only two or perhaps three of the current seven factions will survive. Much
  of the bickering and instability in the current government is keyed to the coming game of
  parliamentary moving chairs—there is an intense struggle now to secure personal loyalty
  and funds to use in the parliamentary elections; the entire process has an aura of sink or
  swim about it. Ironically the immediate prospect of parliamentary elections and the sense
  that they will be genuinely open and fair thus contributes to the ineptness and near
  chaotic appearance of the current government.
  3. Constitution and Referendum. Under the guidance of Tekebayev, the government
  put forward a proposed new constitution, which it seeks to have confirmed through a
  referendum vote on June 27. The constitution itself does shift the country further in the
  direction of a parliamentary democracy, and it contains unusual protection for
  parliamentary minority factions. Government leaders told me that Kazakh president
  Nursultan Nazarbayev had waded in on the question of the constitution directly, pressing
  them to retain a "strong president" system. They say this was coupled with not-very-
  subtle threats, and that the frontier between Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan remains closed,
  with harmful consequences for the Kyrgyz economy. A major question exists about
  holding the referendum as scheduled. The events in the south have resulted in the mass
  displacement of population and if held as planned, a large part of the population in the
  south would probably be disenfranchised. However, government leaders say that their
  current problems all come back to legitimacy, and they will not be able to form a
  government with democratic legitimacy without a new constitution and new elections.
  Accordingly, they resist any further delays and are even contemplating moving the date
  of the parliamentary election forward to the last week of August (it is now set for October
  10). The crisis in the south presents a severe dilemma in this regards, and it seems that
  this would have been Bakiyev's objective in instigating it, if indeed he did.
  4. Manas Transit Center. As expected, I discovered that the interim government is
  deeply fragmented on the question of MTC. One faction headed by Otunbayeva favors a
  "pragmatic solution" to the base issue under which it will be continued but placed on a
  more transparent basis in which the economic benefits to the government are clear.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776492 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776492 Date: 08/31/2015
  Otunbayeva argues that the base can only be accepted under circumstances in which it
  presents no friction for Kyrgyz-Russian relations; she seeks to have disputes surrounding
  fuel supply, for instance, resolved directly between the United States and Russia.
  Another faction, headed by Beknazarov, takes a more demagogic approach, denouncing
  the base and seeking its closing in internal meetings. Talking with Beknazarov, I had the
  clear impression that his attitudes were entirely opportunistic—he thinks this will be a
  good campaign issue to use on the hustings. He suggested rather strongly that he could
  accept a continued base presence under the right circumstances and that he views threats
  to close the base as a sort of stick to use to extort more money and other concessions
  from the Americans. In general, Beknazarov strikes me as hot-headed and crass and an
  untrustworthy partner in any future discussions. Atembayev also has somewhat
  demagogic impulses, though they are mild by comparison. Otunbayeva, the third and
  most senior member of the government engaged on base issues, is the critical voice of
  reason in the process. My impression based on discussions with numerous figures is that
  Otunbayeva's views currently hold sway. However, all the government members are
  agreed that the economic deal struck by Bakiyev is unfavorable to the Kyrgyz state and
  that the base must rest on transparent economic concessions and there can be no more
  under-the-table dealings with political figures.
  5. Resolving the Crisis in the South. I believe that two key points should be kept in
  mind when approaching the humanitarian crisis that has emerged in the south. First, the
  crisis probably has its origins in a raw struggle for power. The interim government's
  legitimacy deficit contributed to the problem, because it left the government with weak
  tools to control the situation in the south. A long-term solution to the problem must
  involve the creation of governments at the national (Bishkek) and regional (Osh,
  Djalalabad) levels that have an essential modicum of democratic legitimacy. Delaying
  this process may only hasten the entire country's continued descent into chaos. This
  highlights the need to conduct free, fair and open elections as quickly as possible.
  Second, the last thing the interim government needs is a "Sophie's choice" between the
  United States and Russian Federation. International assistance needs to reflect a joint
  U.S.-Russian approach and showcase U.S. and Russian leadership (not merely
  participation). With President Medvedev's visit to the White House now on the horizon,
  this would be a good opportunity to establish joint sponsorship of an international
  humanitarian initiative. Here, I believe, are the essential elements of a program that
  could achieve U.S.-Russian co-sponsorship:
  An Appeal for Restraint: Although the instigation of the conflict appears clearly
  to rest with ethnic Kyrgyz agitators, including a number in uniform and operating
  military equipment, at present both Uzbek and Kyrgyz armed groups are involved in
  random shootings designed to reinforce perceptions of their group being persecuted
  (rapes etc.) by another. Credible reports are suggesting that there has been political
  manipulation (including payment of money to drug and other criminal gangs) aimed at
  fomenting violence. The attack on a sports facility set up by a prominent Uzbek drug
  baron (murdered several years earlier) in Osh shortly before the violence started also
  suggests that criminal gangs involved in drug transshipment had another motivation for
  engaging in the violence. It may be that the violence was an initiative of the deposed
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776492 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776492 Date: 08/31/2015
  president, but once it began, it provided cover for numerous incidents of score-settling
  and criminal mischief. In these circumstances, a strong appeal for restraint is appropriate
  and martial law rules including curfews may legitimately be imposed by the interim
  government. An imprimatur of support from the international community would help
  establish the authority of the interim government in this process.
  • Exit Corridors for Civilians: Civilians who feel threatened must be allowed to
  leave the high risk zones, and access of humanitarian aid, and creation of a safe zone for
  humanitarian operation should be priorities at locations created to shelter them. The EU,
  OSCE and UN issued a statement on June 16 calling for a humanitarian corridor in the
  southern regions of Osh and Jalalabad provinces, as well as of ensuring the equitable
  distribution of humanitarian aid among those in need. The cooperation of the Uzbek
  government may be particularly important in this process.
  • Peacekeeping/Policing Operation: The international community should support
  special arrangements with broad international legitimacy and participation to enhance
  peacekeeping and police operations in the affected area. As I noted, even though
  Otunbayeva made a public statement on June 15 to the effect that foreign military/police
  intervention was no longer needed, the situation remains precarious and in her
  confidential discussions Otunbayeva acknowledges the benefits in confidence building
  that would emerge from an qualified, professional and international presence in the
  region. Peacekeeping/policing operations should at a minimum include security for
  designated sheltering areas for refugees and internally displaced persons and monitoring
  operations in tandem with local police and military, to build confidence in their protective
  functions.
  • Investigation of Events: a broad, credible, independent investigation should be
  undertaken into the events and their origin. The investigation should be under the aegis
  of an international organization, such as the Security Council or OSCE and it should be
  conducted by an individual of stature with strong credentials as a fact-finder and
  prosecutor. The investigation should particularly take cognizance of accusations that
  crimes against humanity were perpetrated, potentially including crimes of genocide. The
  involvement of persons exercising ostensible government authority—policemen, military
  figures, leaders of the civil administration—should be given special scrutiny in this
  process. The person commissioned to handle the investigation should be specifically
  empowered to recommend criminal charges be brought against individuals identified in
  his investigation—either by the criminal authorities of the Kyrgyz Republic or before an
  international body seized of proper jurisdiction.
  Effective Post-Conflict Reconstruction. UN authorities are estimating that as
  many as 450,000 persons may have been displaced by the current violence. The
  devastation in central Osh and in numerous villages is reported to be near total. There
  will be an intense housing shortage and a crisis with respect to food supply and
  healthcare. The international community under United States and Russian leadership
  should provide generous support to jumpstart the reconstruction process, prioritizing its
  assistance to benefit those most egregiously injured by the violence.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776492 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776492 Date: 08/31/2015
  • The Referendum/Parliamentary Elections. In view of the disruption and
  violence, the interim government may well conclude that the constitutional referendum
  must be postponed. However, if it does not postpone the referendum, then extraordinary
  measures should be taken.to insure that internally displaced persons and refugees are
  given an opportunity to vote—in both cases this will be a reemphasis of the bond of
  citizenship and a promise of inclusion in the democratic process that will be critical to the
  resolution of the crisis. The international community should also mobilize observers in
  connection with the parliamentary elections to help assure that candidates have fair
  access to the ballot and to media, that campaigns are permitted to proceed without
  unreasonable limitations and that voting occurs in a fair and free manner across the
  country. Special attention in this process should be given to the affected areas to insure
  that refugees and IDPs have a fair opportunity to vote and are freed from unreasonable
  limitations in the process.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776492 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776496
MetadataSubject: UPDATE: (REUTERS) SWEDISH HIGH COURT DECIDES AGAINST HEARING APPEAL FROM WIKILEAKS FOUNDER ASSANGE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-02T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05776496/C05776496.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: UPDATE: (Reuters) SWEDISH HIGH COURT DECIDES AGAINST HEARING APPEAL
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-I; SES-O_OS
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:20 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776496
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: FROM WIKILEAKS FOUNDER ASSANGE
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776496 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:20 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: UPDATE: (Reuters) SWEDISH HIGH COURT DECIDES AGAINST HEARING APPEAL
  FROM WIKILEAKS FOUNDER ASSANGE
  From: Jackson, Christine P
  To: NEWS-WikiLealcs; NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-I; SES-O_OS
  Sent: Thu Dec 02 05:49:24 2010
  Subject: UPDATE: (Reuters) SWEDISH HIGH COURT DECIDES AGAINST HEARING APPEAL FROM WIKILEAKS FOUNDER
  ASSANGE
  STOCKHOLM (Reuters) - Sweden's highest court has refused permission to Wikileaks founder Julian Assange to appeal
  against an arrest order issued over alleged sexual crimes, the court said on December 2. Assange's lawyer had this week
  appealed against an arrest warrant, which has also led to an Interpol notice. Assange has denied the allegations. The
  court decision means the domestic and international arrest warrants still stand.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776496 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776502
MetadataSubject: (REUTERS) EGYPT OPPOSITION PARTY TO ABANDON SEATS WON IN VOTE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-02T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05776502/C05776502.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (Reuters) Egypt opposition party to abandon seats won in vote
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-I; SES-O_OS
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:20 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776502
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776502 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:20 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (Reuters) Egypt opposition party to abandon seats won in vote
  From: Jackson, Christine P
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-I; SES-O_OS
  Sent: Thu Dec 02 05:56:21 2010
  Subject: FW: (Reuters) Egypt opposition party to abandon seats won in vote
  CAIRO (Reuters) - Egypt's liberal Wafd party, which controls the second biggest opposition bloc in the outgoing
  parliament, said on December 2 it had withdrawn backing for two seats won in the first round of elections which it said
  was rigged. Wafd and the biggest opposition group, the Muslim Brotherhood, said they were quitting the election race
  before run-offs next week after a vote on November 28 they said was marred by ballot box stuffing, thuggery and dirty
  tricks.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776502 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776507
MetadataSubject: LATEST
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-02T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05776507/C05776507.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Latest
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:18 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776507
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: -----
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776507 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:18 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Latest
  ----- Original Message
  From: Gordon, Philip H
  To: Abedin, Huma; Sullivan, Jacob
  Sent: Thu Dec 02 04:21:08 2010
  Subject: Latest
  To quote Huma, I don't get paid enough.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776507 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776517
MetadataSubject: (AP) PALESTINIANS ANGERED OVER NEW ISRAELI CONSTRUCTION
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-02T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05776517/C05776517.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (AP) Palestinians angered over new Israeli construction
ExtractedFrom: Abed in, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-0_05; SES-O_CMS; SES-O_Shift-II
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:49 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776517
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776517 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abed in, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 9:49 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (AP) Palestinians angered over new Israeli construction
  From: Moore, Anna W
  To: NEWS-NEA; NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-0_05; SES-O_CMS; SES-O_Shift-II
  Sent: Thu Dec 02 07:19:39 2010
  Subject: (AP) Palestinians angered over new Israeli construction
  JERUSALEM (AP) - Israel is moving ahead with a plan for 625 new homes in east Jerusalem, angering Palestinians as
  peace talks remain stuck over settlement construction. The plan received preliminary approval from a district planning
  committee, which published an announcement on November 25. Further approval is required and construction will not
  begin for about two years. Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat said December 2 the move showed Israel had chosen
  "settlements and not peace." The units are slated for Pisgat Zeev. While Israelis consider it a neighborhood of their
  capital, the Palestinians see it as a settlement.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776517 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776539
MetadataSubject: RICE/BAKER
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-02T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05776539/C05776539.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Rice/Baker
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Wells, Alice G
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 4:13 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776539
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Fyi
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776539 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B5
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 4:13 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Rice/Baker
  Fyi
  From: Burns, William 3
  To: Sullivan, Jacob 3; Verma, Richard R
  Cc: Wells, Alice G
  Sent: Thu Dec 02 15:43:43 2010
  Subject: Rice/Baker
  Spoke to both Condi Rice and Jim Baker this afternoon re START op-ed. Condi said she plans her own op-ed, arguing in
  favor of treaty ratification, due out in next few days. She asked that I tell the Secretary again that she'll be supportive.
  Baker said he agreed that things were breaking the right way on the Hill, and shared the view that ratification before the
  holidays is an increasing possibility. He was glad to have done the op-ed (even while complaining mildly about how
  much effort it took to "herd the cats" to get it out), and hopeful of its effect.
  Bill
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776539 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776545
MetadataSubject: DONE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-02T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05776545/C05776545.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Done
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 4:10 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776545
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776545 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 4:10 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Done
  Original Message
  From: Gordon, Philip H
  To: Abedin, Huma; Sullivan, Jacob 1
  Sent: Thu Dec 02 12:44:31 2010
  Subject: Done
  We have just agreed the Astana Commemorative Declaration, which Nazerbayev should soon gavel into existence.
  Agony getting there but decent outcome -- Kazakhs pleased, Georgians defended, reset preserved, Liths reassured, osce
  alive. But let's agree no more summits for a while, ok?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776545 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776573
MetadataSubject: YOU GET KYRGYZSTAN MEMO?
MetadataTo: sbwhoeop
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-18T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05776573/C05776573.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: You get Kyrgyzstan memo?
ExtractedTo: 'sbwhoeop
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, June 18, 2010 8:37 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776573
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: I did and thank you. I'll try to call later.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776573 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 8:37 AM
  To: 'sbwhoeop
  Subject: Re: You get Kyrgyzstan memo?
  I did and thank you. I'll try to call later.
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop <sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Fri Jun 18 07:24:29 2010
  Subject: You get Kyrgyzstan memo?
  Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776573 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776576
MetadataSubject: CHECKING ON YOU - GETTING ON CALL IN 8MIN (6PM EST) FOR THE NEXT HOUR BUT THEN FREE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-02T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05776576/C05776576.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: checking on you - getting on call in 8min (6pm est) for the next hour but then free
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 5:53 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776576
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776576 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 5:53 PM
  To: H
  Subject: checking on you - getting on call in 8min (6pm est) for the next hour but then free
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776576 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776580
MetadataSubject: AIPAC?
MetadataTo: vermarr@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-18T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05776580/C05776580.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: AIPAC?
ExtractedTo: 'vermarr@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, June 18, 2010 12:57 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776580
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: What happened?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776580 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 12:57 PM
  To: 'vermarr@state.gov'
  Subject: AIPAC?
  What happened?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776580 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776583
MetadataSubject: (AP) HOUSE VOTES TO CENSURE NEW YORK REP. RANGEL
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-02T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05776583/C05776583.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (AP) House votes to censure New York Rep. Rangel
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-0_0S;
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 6:18 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776583
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776583 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 6:18 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (AP) House votes to censure New York Rep. Rangel
  From: Simmons, Krista M
  To: NEWS-Mahogany; NEWS-H
  Cc: SES-0_0S;
  Sent: Thu Dec 02 18:15:18 2010
  Subject: (AP) House votes to censure New York Rep. Rangel
  WASHINGTON (AP) - Rep. Charles Rangel of New York has been censured by the House for financial and fundraising
  misconduct.
  The vote December 2 was 333-79. It was only the 23rd time that the House invoked its most serious punishment
  short of expulsion.
  The solemn procedure calls for Rangel to appear at the front of the chamber while Speaker Nancy Pelosi reads the
  censure resolution.
  The 80-year-old Democrat has served in the House for 40 years.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776583 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776593
MetadataSubject: CALL WHEN YOU ARE UP - REMIND ME TO DISCUSS QDDR, AFGH, AND OUR FAV TOPIC OF THE WEEK
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-02T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05776593/C05776593.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: call when you are up - remind me to discuss qddr, afgh, and our fav topic of the week
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 6:20 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776593
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776593 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 6:20 PM
  To:
  Subject: call when you are up - remind me to discuss qddr, afgh, and our fav topic of the week
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776593 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776604
MetadataSubject: THE SPEECH
MetadataTo: abedinh@state.gov
MetadataFrom: Huma@clintonemail.com
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-02T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05776604/C05776604.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: The speech
ExtractedTo: H; 'abedinh@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: Huma Abedin <
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:02 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776604
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Ok. No problem.
  We leave at 10:45. They will be here 9:45.
  Brief at 10:15 with jeff etc.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776604 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Huma Abedin <
  Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:02 PM
  To: H; 'abedinh@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: The speech
  Ok. No problem.
  We leave at 10:45. They will be here 9:45.
  Brief at 10:15 with jeff etc.
  Original Message
  From: H
  To: Huma Abedin; 'abedinh@state.govi <abedinh@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Dec 02 19:00:24 2010
  Subject: The speech
  I will need to see Jake and Megan in the am an hour before we leave.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776604 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776619
MetadataSubject: SPECIAL INTERNATIONAL MEDIA REPORT ON WIKILEAKS, 1700, 12-02-10
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-02T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05776619/C05776619.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: Special International Media Report on WikiLeaks, 1700, 12-02-10
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:06 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776619
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776619 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 7:06 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW: Special International Media Report on WikiLeaks, 1700, 12-02-10
  From: Rapid-Response [mailto:Rapid-Response@state.gov]
  Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 5:01 PM
  To:
  Subject: Special International Media Report on WikiLeaks, 1700, 12-02-10
  Special Report
  WikiLeaks
  17:00; 12/2/10
  Media coverage in many countries of WikiLeaks releases is decreasing, with new stories from wire services on
  Assanage and Interpol and the latest Russia reports. Reporting on specific cables is shifting to more local
  issues, such as US military use of Ireland's Shannon Airport or US interest in Iran's activities in
  Peru. Governments and many commentators assert US relationships will not be significantly damages, and
  there are frequent observations that the releases have not revealed "anything new." Anti-US writers and media
  continue to use the opportunity to skewer the United States.
  Many of the items below are digests of more extensive Embassy reporting. Additional reporting is available
  from post email submissions.
  AF:
  Burundi
  Swahili Bonesha FM radio broadcast a report that a Spanish official told Embassy Madrid that Russia, Belarus,
  and Chechnya had become a mafia states, and also mentioned anti-terrorism expert Russell Travers would
  investigate the leak. The story suggested the leaks have embarrassed US diplomats.
  Mali
  No local mention in print or broadcast media in Mali.
  Niger
  No local media coverage.
  Zimbabwe
  An online website reports Zimbabwean political parties in a fragile coalition government on Tuesday dismissed
  WikiLeaks revelations that a power sharing deal between them is doomed because of acute differences between
  rival politicians.
  NEA:
  Jordan
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776619 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776619 Date: 08/31/2015
  Most local newspapers carry wire reports on Assange's legal situation. Dailies also cited Assange calling for
  Secretary Clinton to if it's proved she ordered American diplomats to spy on U.N. officials. Local dailies focus
  on Iran's President Ahmadinejad saying "the documents lack the legality and the credibility and they will not
  affect on Iran's relations with other countries in the region." Dailies also focused on one alleged report that
  Syrian President Al-Asad's "is not convinced Iran is developing nuclear weapons." There is no mention of the
  Jordan-specific leaks in any print media.
  A columnist writing for Al-Ghad contends the leaks will not harm the region or the US, although they could
  undermine trust. He sates the documents show that the positions of the US and Middle Eastern states on
  regional issues is clear. Another columnist writing for the same paper catalogues criticisms of international
  leaders and concludes by wondering "what will happen next."
  EIJR:
  Azerbaijan
  The only Azerbaijan-specific newspaper reporting is an article in opposition daily Yeni Musavat containing a
  denial by the Bank of Baku of an allegation that it is involved in Iran's sanction-busting. Wide coverage of a
  document comparing President Aliyev to both Sonny and Michael Corleone in the online news websites. TV
  maintains tone that Wikileaks is criminal conspiracy and that the documents are inaccurate.
  Finland
  Coverage continues, but much reduced. Focus has shifted to the refusal of Finnish authorities, notably
  President Halonen and FM Stubb, to comment on revelations about Finland that have emerged from the leaks.
  Much speculation has focused on suggestions in the leaked documents that China had pressured Finland not to
  accept Uigur prisoners being released by the U.S. from Guantanamo Bay. Finnish officials continue to assert
  publicly that the leaks will not affect relations with the United States. It was also reported that Finland has no
  plans to reassess its own policy on confidentiality. Commentary speculates about what may be revealed in the
  future, but expects little damage to relations.
  Germany
  Coverage is still primarily focused on the domestic impact of the leaks, particularly on the hunt for the young
  politician who allegedly provided the U.S. Embassy with confidential government documents. Frankfurter
  Allgemeine Zeitung and Sueddeutsche Zeitung said in a joint editorial that "those in Germany who thought
  North Korea was a dark empire but not a real threat have been proven wrong by the WikiLeaks revelations."
  Der Spiegel is continuing to publish new material on roughly the same timeline and topics as the New York
  Times; today's coverage focused on Russia and was substantively the same as the English-language reporting
  over the past few days.
  Ireland
  Media is focusing on specific revelations about the use of Shannon Airport by the U.S. military. According to
  the Irish Daily Mirror "it appears the (Irish) government was not serious about dealing with real concerns about
  the use of Shannon by the U.S. military on their way to Iraq and Afghanistan. Bloggers opine the Irish
  government felt conflicted — it liked the revenue it received from U.S. troops passing through, as well as the
  diplomatic benefits, but felt it had to placate the Irish public before the 2007 elections and publicly decry the
  use of Shannon. The Irish Examiner relied on an excerpt from TIME Magazine's interview with Assange. An
  analyst writing for the Irish Independent headlines "Diplomatic corps' horror is pure gold for historians,"
  concluding that, ith 900 further Irish cables set to be published in the coming months, the trouble may only be
  starting for the mandarins of Iveagh House (Department of Foreign Affairs)."
  Malta
  Interest in Wikileaks continues in the online media, with comments on the more general revelations. There
  were no new pieces about Malta itself.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776619 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776619 Date: 08/31/2015
  Montenegro
  Over the course of the last two days, the Wikileaks story has moved from the cover pages and headlines of
  Montenegro's media to the international news sections. All major electronic and print media carried the first
  official statement of a Montenegrin official on the topic. PM Djukanovic said American diplomats were doing
  their job and nothing can spoil the US-Montenegran relationship. There was wire coverage of the Interpol
  warrant and Secretary Clinton at the OSCE.
  Portugal
  Calling it "an Invaluable Service to Democracy, a columnist for Niblico condemns "the orders that American
  diplomats received to collect personal information from high-ranking international officials, and in particular,
  Ban Ki-Moon's." He concludes that "The future of freedom is linked to the security and integrity of our
  personal data — and I do not know that the U.S., after having lost 250,000 of its secret documents, is in any
  condition to guarantee either one of them."
  Switzerland:
  Swiss press reports feature extensive coverage; however, very little new information. Items reported included
  preparations for a Clinton meeting with Foreign Minister Micheline Calmy-Rey in 2009; the Swiss - Libya
  affair; FBI-Swiss Federal Police liaison in 2006; Papers also reported that Julian Assange has contacts in
  Switzerland and that a Swiss citizen from Basel is allegedly in charge of processing donations for
  Wikileaks. According to the press, Assange met representatives of the Swiss Pirate Party in Geneva. Finally,
  Swiss papers took up the story that Wikileaks might be targeting Bank of America, writing that the bank is
  trying to calm down the stock markets. The NZZ published two opinion pieces. Both critical of the leaks for the
  harm they do to diplomacy.
  WHA:
  Brazil
  Brazilian media today featured extensive coverage. Folha de Sao Paulo dedicated six pages, including an op-ed
  by Ambassador Shannon outlining the U.S. viewpoint. Folha's editorial said the information released is
  relevant but neither surprising nor dangerous, while another outlet praised efforts by certain papers to filter the
  information and adding that Wikileaks is on the whole valuable to society. A commentator in Folha wrote that
  President Lula should not so quickly dismiss the U.S. observations about the GoB (which he claimed are likely
  accurate), and another used the documents' description of President Medvedev and Prime Minister Putin to
  analyze the possible role of Lula in the Rousseff Administration.
  Cuba
  Cuban media coverage continues at levels similar to yesterday's. Online Cubadebate and Juventudrebelde.cu
  publish wide-ranging articles, many of them culled from news wires, covering USG reaction, third country
  reaction (Canada), and Wikileaks reaction (Julian Assange's "insurance" against prosecution and accusations
  that Amazon violated the First Amendment). In commentary, Granma's Manuel E. Yepe, a Cuban lawyer,
  economist, journalist and former Cuban ambassador to Romania, suggests that Wikileaks "yielded to pressure
  from the USG and the media in managing how and when information was released, and insinuates that right
  wing elements in the U.S. are behind the disclosure of the documents.
  Eastern Caribbean:
  Reporting continues to be general, with the exception of one radio report on StarCom's LOVE FM 104.1 that
  WikiLeaks may soon release cables about the Caribbean, and mentioning that the U.S. Embassy in Port of Spain
  released a statement that WikiLeaks' actions jeopardize the U.S. national security.
  Ecuador
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776619 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776619 Date: 08/31/2015
  Discussion continues to dominate the front pages of major newspapers as well as the editorial pages--with an
  increase in the number of opinion articles. Press continues to report and opine on the invitation to Ecuador
  offered by Deputy Foreign Minister Kintto Lucas to Assange and the subsequent disclaimer and withdrawal of
  the invitation by President Correa. Most articles criticized Lucas for his error. A tongue-in-cheek editorial in El
  Universo "The Coming of Julian" expressed regrets that Assange would not be coming to Ecuador as he might
  have revealed the secrets of the GOE and then would have faced the same or worse treatment that Ecuadorian
  investigative journalists receive.
  El Salvador
  A columnist for El Diario de Hoy asked "What is the big deal?" He said the cables about Honduras "tell us
  that the American diplomats were lost and did not understand what was happening" during the coup
  there. Any Ambassador who is not reporting on the mental state of people like Hugo Chavez, Daniel Ortega,
  Evo Morales and Cristina Kirchner, is not doing his job ... This is all so routine that it cannot greatly affect
  American diplomacy ..." Salvadoran media reporting continues to rely almost exclusively on wire
  stories. Locally produced articles and TV/radio reports have focused on reaction from Foreign Minister
  Martinez and Ambassador Aponte, both of whom have repeatedly explained the nature of diplomatic
  correspondence and have underscored the strength of the US-Salvadoran bilateral relationship.
  Honduras
  The buzz around the WikiLeaks scandal is slowly taking a backseat — for now -- to Honduran issues such as
  taxes and security issues. Conservative Tribuna had a positive editorial arguing countries maintain relations
  with each other based on national interest. It suggested "the importance of the U.S. on the global stage will
  ensure that other countries will continue to work closely with Washington in the pursuit of those interests." An
  op-ed in liberal daily Tiempo titled "In defense of Ambassador Hugo Llorens," stressed that diplomats must
  provide honest advice to their government. Tiempo's op-ed claims that "the documents divulged so far
  havebeen, in their majority, frivolities without importance, however highly sensitive and dangerous issues could
  pop up in them...[d]iplomacy is a prolonged example of hypocrisy and cynicism."
  Mexico
  El Universal in its editorial questions the wholesale, unfiltered dumping of classified information; "the fact that
  a government hides something does not make it damnable. It's normal.. .for diplomats to prepare reports about
  the countries and leaders where they are posted." The paper asserts that "it may be interesting to know that
  U.S. officials had questions about the mental health of the president of Argentina, but the benefit to citizens of
  such a revelation is marginal in proportion to the potential damage to relations between the two countries." An
  op-ed writer for El Universal, claims that the "released documents show U.S. diplomats rummaging through
  personal lives and privately mocking the same leaders whom they publicly treat as friends." Another daily La
  Jornada's in its editorial concludes that "the main factor of diplomatic tension and greatest security risk to
  world peace is not Wikileaks but Washington's belligerent, unilateral and imperialist warmongering, aggravated
  now by its defense of opacity."
  Peru
  Peru media are focusing on the first alleged cable to come from Peru, on US concern about Iran's interest in
  Peru's uranium, as well as regional "revelations" in regards neighboring Chile, Venezuela and Argentina. TV,
  radio and internet reflect similar slants.
  Venezuela
  Articles on Interpol's "Red Notice" for Julian Assange appeared in most dailies. El Nacional cites assessments
  by the Embassy's Economic Counselor about the development of nuclear energy in Venezuela. El Mundo
  reports alleged comments by then Ambassador Duddy describing the Venezuelan bank interventions in
  November 2009. A columnist in government owned Correo de Orinoco says accuses the U.S. of diplomatic
  'excesses,' torture in occupied territories, hiring contractors that fire on crowds, using lies to justify wars in
  Iraq, Afghanistan, and Yemen. Taking a different tack, an Op-Ed in El Universal remarks sarcastically, "the
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776619 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776619 Date: 08/31/2015
  U.S. does not have friends, only interests. Bold discovery! Only the ignorant, the naïve, or the crazy — or a
  combination of those three — can say that this constitutes an international declassification." An article in the
  online edition of La Verdad of Maracaibo speculates the State Department is using Wikileaks to put out
  information it does not want to release directly.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776619 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776627
MetadataSubject: QUARTET
MetadataTo: sullivanjj@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-19T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05776627/C05776627.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Quartet
ExtractedTo: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 10:00 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776627
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Can you pls call me thru ops?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776627 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 10:00 AM
  To: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Quartet
  Can you pls call me thru ops?
  Original Message
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Jun 19 09:44:53 2010
  Subject: Quartet
  Dan will stay through Monday to work
  The next step would be to work
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776627 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776633
MetadataSubject: QDDR
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-02T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05776633/C05776633.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: QDDR
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: 'Dana Hyde'
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:17 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776633
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Email from Eric
  Background for you

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776633 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2010 8:17 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW: QDDR
  Email from Eric
  Background for you
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 7:52 PM
  To: Goosby, Eric
  Cc: 'Dana Hyde'
  Subject: RE: QDDR
  My comments in text below — need to talk to you — if you get this and can talk — call me through ops — I am still in office.
  cdm
  From: Goosby, Eric
  Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 8:40 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Cc: 'Dana Hyde'
  Subject: QDDR
  Cheryl:
  I know you are busy but I wanted to close the loop with you on the ED position (Lois Quam), the chair position for
  Operations Committee, and the need to ensure that there is specific language in the QDDR that keeps PEPFAR in the
  State Department (one or two sentences). I believe it is in all our interests to do this. [AGREE] I also wanted to discuss
  with you the process to determine the benchmarks. [I WISH WE COULD GET THEM IN QDDR SO THERE IS FIRMNESS
  AND CLARITY— WORRIED IF WE DO IT LATER IT WILL BE A NEGOTIATION AND SQUISHY]; Raj is hesitant to concretize,
  plus I know he is very busy. We are going to deliver to him today a version that has been agreed on by CDC and OGAC. I
  will propose a process that would include a public vetting of the benchmarks but do not think the benchmarks need to
  be specifically defined in the QDDR. [FINE BUT SEE ABOVE — CAN I SEE DRAFT AS IS?] The reference to the Operations
  Committee and the Secretary as the trigger for movement into USAID is enough.
  I have been made aware of a growing discussion on the Hill around GHI as an attempt by the Administration to diminish
  the PEPFAR program contributions because of its association with President Bush. Last night's prime time FOX news
  piece (>10 minutes) on PEPFAR was well done. President Bush was clear about why he started PEPFAR and why he feels
  it is still the right thing to do and to continue (Humanitarian/Security both addressed). He also spoke directly to the
  bipartisan nature of the program (from inception) and the need to continue bipartisan support. It was a missed
  opportunity not to have had President Obama on the FOX piece to make the point that "GNI is building on PEPFAR..."
  and to begin a bipartisan dialogue. (WH declined as I understand it) [WE SHOULD MAKE THIS POINT — S ALWAYS CREDITS
  BUSH ON THIS B/C HE EARNED IT— WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE IT'S PART OF OUR NARRATIVE — I BELIEVE IT CAN BE
  DROPPED IN QDDR DRAFT TO THAT EFFECT — CAN YOU WORK WITH DANA TO MAKE SURE THAT LANGUAGE GETS IN BY
  SUNDAY?]
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776633 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776633 Date: 08/31/2015
  Global Fund
  I am here through Saturday, then off to Bulgaria to lay in the reform efforts at the Global Fund retreat followed by the
  GF Board meeting in Geneva (I won't stay for the whole meeting, just the first day). John Monahan and I have been
  aggressive in insisting on Board Chair (BC)and Vice Chair (VC) coordination of the reform effort. This has been reflected
  in a letter from BC and VC with ED support that the retreat directly address and coordinate the reform effort, establish a
  level for round 10 and address the Maternal and Child Health GF expansion (GWI supports). I feel we will establish
  targets and timelines in this meeting with a reporting structure directly to the Board. In addition, there will be
  politicking on the election of a new Board Chair (Tedros' term ends in April). It is critical the new chair be fully aligned
  with the reform efforts. [GOT IT— FLAGGING FOR S TOO]
  Eric
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776633 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776637
MetadataSubject: NETANYAHU
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-03T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05776637/C05776637.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Netanyahu
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, December 3, 2010 12:58 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776637
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Jake suggesting we do a condolence call to netanyahu and offer assistance. Ok?
  Israel rescuers: forest fire leaves about 40 dead JERUSALEM (AP) - Israel's national rescue service said about 40 people
  died in the wake of a massive forest fire in northern Israel. The blaze, which has torched some 1,600 acres, remains out
  of control.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776637 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, December 3, 2010 12:58 AM
  To:
  Subject: Netanyahu
  Jake suggesting we do a condolence call to netanyahu and offer assistance. Ok?
  Israel rescuers: forest fire leaves about 40 dead JERUSALEM (AP) - Israel's national rescue service said about 40 people
  died in the wake of a massive forest fire in northern Israel. The blaze, which has torched some 1,600 acres, remains out
  of control.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776637 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776640
MetadataSubject: SPEECH
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-03T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05776640/C05776640.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Speech
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, December 3, 2010 1:04 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776640
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  We'll keep working it.
  We can make the Iran fix.
  On the overall wordiness, etc., Megan has known that it needs smoothing/streamlining/sharpening and intended to
  spend the day doing that.

RawText:
  We'll come see you at 945.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776640 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, December 3, 2010 1:04 AM
  To:
  Subject: Speech
  We'll keep working it.
  We can make the Iran fix.
  On the overall wordiness, etc., Megan has known that it needs smoothing/streamlining/sharpening and intended to
  spend the day doing that.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776640 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776644
MetadataSubject: CABLES
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-03T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05776644/C05776644.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: Cables
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Schlicher, Ronald L
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, December 3, 2010 6:35 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776644
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776644 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, December 3, 2010 6:35 AM
  To:
  Subject: FW: Cables
  Original Message
  From: Mull, Stephen D
  Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 6:33 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: FW: Cables
  fyi
  Original Message
  From: Sanderson, Janet A
  Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 06:25 AM
  To: Mull, Stephen D
  Cc: Schlicher, Ronald L
  Subject: Cables
  Steve, I briefly talked to Jeff when he got up in Bahrain. He is reluctant to turn over cables and is worried about
  precedent. He'll discuss it with S in prebrief today for the ABZ mtg. If we hear anything more, I'll let you know.
  Janet
  Janet A. Sanderson
  Deputy Assistant Secretary
  Bureau of Near East Affairs
  Department of State
  202-647-7166
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776644 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776653
MetadataSubject: LAVROV
MetadataTo: sullivanjj@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-20T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05776653/C05776653.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Lavrov
ExtractedTo: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 9:56 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776653
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Can you run the traps
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776653 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 9:56 AM
  To: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Lavrov
  Can you run the traps
  Original Message
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  To: H; Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Sun Jun 20 09:27:19 2010
  Subject: Lavrov
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776653 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776654
MetadataSubject: H: ROGER COHEN IN NYT: "AMERICAN DIPLOMACY REVEALED --- AS GOOD"
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-03T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05776654/C05776654.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776654
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  sbwhoeop
  Friday, December 3, 2010 9:55 AM
  H: Roger Cohen in NYT: "American Diplomacy Revealed — as Good"
  http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/03/opinion/03iht-edcohen.html?hp
  December 2, 2010
  American Diplomacy Revealed as Good
  By ROGER COHEN
  NEW YORK — Let's hear it for the men and women of the U.S. Foreign Service!
  They are, to judge from the WikiLeaks dump of a quarter-million of their private or secret cables, thoughtful, well-informed
  and dedicated servants of the American interest who write clear, declarative English sentences.
  I've not heard much in the torrent of Wiki-chatter about these admirable career diplomats whose diplomacy is now
  condemned to be unquiet. Yet it is they whose lives have been upturned. Every journalist knows that if their
  correspondence over several years was suddenly made public, they would lose most of their sources. That should give
  every journalist pause.
  So it will be on the front line of U.S. diplomacy. Contacts will self-censor. They will go quiet, particularly in the more
  conspiratorial parts of the world which also tend to be the most unstable, like the Middle East. Layers of secrecy will be
  added.
  Julian Assange, the thin-skinned founder of WikiLeaks, has hurt U.S. interests across a broad but probably shallow
  spectrum. That will satisfy him in that he's a self-styled foe of the United States. The guy makes me queasy.
  Perhaps the most shocking thing about the Assange treasure trove — beyond the "shock" of venal Gulf Arab Sunni
  leaders looking for war on the cheap against Shiite Iran so long as it doesn't disrupt their U.S.-armed fiefdoms; or the
  "shock" of Pakistani double-dealing and nuclear procrastination; or the "shock" of yet more premature Israeli predictions
  on when Iran will have a nuclear weapon; or the "shock" of continued Saudi funding of Al Qaeda; or the "shock" of the
  Chinese Politburo hacking into Google; or the "shock" of Muammar el-Qaddafi's taste for voluptuous Slavic women and
  Silvio Berlusconi's taste for all women — perhaps the biggest shock of all is just how professional, sober and short on
  embarrassment all these cables are and just how much they conform with the world as we already knew it, right down to
  the familiar adjectives evoking French President Nicolas Sarkozy: "hyperactive," "mercurial," "authoritarian," "erratic,"
  "monarch-like."
  I swear, if they hadn't become diplomats a lot of these State Department people could have become good hacks.
  Overall, my longstanding admiration for America's conscientious diplomats has been redoubled, not least for this
  underreported nugget on the turbulent Iranian election of 2009, contained in a cable of Jan. 12, 2010, from Dubai: "While
  we don't know nor might not ever know the real June 12 vote count, it is clear that the turnout was at record high levels
  and that there was systematic vote count fraud (if in fact the votes were even counted) to ensure that Ahmadinejad 'won
  big' in the first round."
  It is good to know that this is the innermost conviction of American diplomacy: the fraud was evident to anyone in Tehran
  during the election and its violent aftermath.
  A couple more observations on Iran: The first is that the Sunni autocrats of the Gulf are as exercised as they are about
  Tehran in part because they know that any U.S.-Iranian breakthrough might make them more dispensable to the United
  States. Their vested interest in the prevailing Middle Eastern strategic equation is strong; nothing would redraw the Middle
  East more than overcoming the U.S.-Iranian psychosis.
  The second is that President Barack Obama's approach to Iran has been much more conventional than his initial outreach
  suggested. Old habits of attempted coercion trumped originality. Very quickly he fell back on Dennis Ross's tired thinking
  about balancing "appetizing carrots" with "sharp sticks" in tackling Iran's nuclear program.
  The cables reveal that as early as March 2009, a senior U.S. diplomat was talking "dual track," telling Europeans that
  "engagement alone is unlikely to succeed" and calling for added "pressure." Perhaps Iranian skepticism could never have
  been overcome; certainly this approach guaranteed longstanding Iranian grievances would fester.
  Assange himself clearly understands nothing of Iran or the Middle East or diplomacy. In an interview with Time, he
  expressed approval for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu "coming out with a very interesting statement that
  leaders should speak in public like they do in private whenever they can" and bought into Netanyahu's view that this, in
  Assange's words, would "lead to some kind of increase in the peace process in the Middle East and particularly in relation
  to Iran.
  It
  Huh? Netanyahu was referring to Arab leaders' now-documented private calls for a U.S.-led war against Iran, an option he
  also favors. And that, for Assange, is a step forward to peace! He's all over the place.
  What should we make of this brainy naïf who told my colleague John Burns that America is a threat to democracy? He's a
  loose canon; let him be. My impression is he's self-armed with a spade and he's digging.
  And what of the messenger's message? The cables are intriguing, offering plenty of voyeuristic titillation but no gasp of
  discovery. They provide texture but break little new ground. Yet their publication has done significant damage to the
  courageous work of America's diplomats and may endanger lives. That's a tradeoff that I find troubling and unpersuasive.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776654 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  sbwhoeop
  Friday, December 3, 2010 9:55 AM
  H: Roger Cohen in NYT: "American Diplomacy Revealed — as Good"
  http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/03/opinion/03iht-edcohen.html?hp
  December 2, 2010
  American Diplomacy Revealed as Good
  By ROGER COHEN
  NEW YORK — Let's hear it for the men and women of the U.S. Foreign Service!
  They are, to judge from the WikiLeaks dump of a quarter-million of their private or secret cables, thoughtful, well-informed
  and dedicated servants of the American interest who write clear, declarative English sentences.
  I've not heard much in the torrent of Wiki-chatter about these admirable career diplomats whose diplomacy is now
  condemned to be unquiet. Yet it is they whose lives have been upturned. Every journalist knows that if their
  correspondence over several years was suddenly made public, they would lose most of their sources. That should give
  every journalist pause.
  So it will be on the front line of U.S. diplomacy. Contacts will self-censor. They will go quiet, particularly in the more
  conspiratorial parts of the world which also tend to be the most unstable, like the Middle East. Layers of secrecy will be
  added.
  Julian Assange, the thin-skinned founder of WikiLeaks, has hurt U.S. interests across a broad but probably shallow
  spectrum. That will satisfy him in that he's a self-styled foe of the United States. The guy makes me queasy.
  Perhaps the most shocking thing about the Assange treasure trove — beyond the "shock" of venal Gulf Arab Sunni
  leaders looking for war on the cheap against Shiite Iran so long as it doesn't disrupt their U.S.-armed fiefdoms; or the
  "shock" of Pakistani double-dealing and nuclear procrastination; or the "shock" of yet more premature Israeli predictions
  on when Iran will have a nuclear weapon; or the "shock" of continued Saudi funding of Al Qaeda; or the "shock" of the
  Chinese Politburo hacking into Google; or the "shock" of Muammar el-Qaddafi's taste for voluptuous Slavic women and
  Silvio Berlusconi's taste for all women — perhaps the biggest shock of all is just how professional, sober and short on
  embarrassment all these cables are and just how much they conform with the world as we already knew it, right down to
  the familiar adjectives evoking French President Nicolas Sarkozy: "hyperactive," "mercurial," "authoritarian," "erratic,"
  "monarch-like."
  I swear, if they hadn't become diplomats a lot of these State Department people could have become good hacks.
  Overall, my longstanding admiration for America's conscientious diplomats has been redoubled, not least for this
  underreported nugget on the turbulent Iranian election of 2009, contained in a cable of Jan. 12, 2010, from Dubai: "While
  we don't know nor might not ever know the real June 12 vote count, it is clear that the turnout was at record high levels
  and that there was systematic vote count fraud (if in fact the votes were even counted) to ensure that Ahmadinejad 'won
  big' in the first round."
  It is good to know that this is the innermost conviction of American diplomacy: the fraud was evident to anyone in Tehran
  during the election and its violent aftermath.
  A couple more observations on Iran: The first is that the Sunni autocrats of the Gulf are as exercised as they are about
  Tehran in part because they know that any U.S.-Iranian breakthrough might make them more dispensable to the United
  States. Their vested interest in the prevailing Middle Eastern strategic equation is strong; nothing would redraw the Middle
  East more than overcoming the U.S.-Iranian psychosis.
  The second is that President Barack Obama's approach to Iran has been much more conventional than his initial outreach
  suggested. Old habits of attempted coercion trumped originality. Very quickly he fell back on Dennis Ross's tired thinking
  about balancing "appetizing carrots" with "sharp sticks" in tackling Iran's nuclear program.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776654 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776654 Date: 08/31/2015
  The cables reveal that as early as March 2009, a senior U.S. diplomat was talking "dual track," telling Europeans that
  "engagement alone is unlikely to succeed" and calling for added "pressure." Perhaps Iranian skepticism could never have
  been overcome; certainly this approach guaranteed longstanding Iranian grievances would fester.
  Assange himself clearly understands nothing of Iran or the Middle East or diplomacy. In an interview with Time, he
  expressed approval for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu "coming out with a very interesting statement that
  leaders should speak in public like they do in private whenever they can" and bought into Netanyahu's view that this, in
  Assange's words, would "lead to some kind of increase in the peace process in the Middle East and particularly in relation
  to Iran.
  It
  Huh? Netanyahu was referring to Arab leaders' now-documented private calls for a U.S.-led war against Iran, an option he
  also favors. And that, for Assange, is a step forward to peace! He's all over the place.
  What should we make of this brainy naïf who told my colleague John Burns that America is a threat to democracy? He's a
  loose canon; let him be. My impression is he's self-armed with a spade and he's digging.
  And what of the messenger's message? The cables are intriguing, offering plenty of voyeuristic titillation but no gasp of
  discovery. They provide texture but break little new ground. Yet their publication has done significant damage to the
  courageous work of America's diplomats and may endanger lives. That's a tradeoff that I find troubling and unpersuasive.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776654 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776670
MetadataSubject: CONSULAR FEES
MetadataTo: vermarr@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-20T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05776670/C05776670.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: consular fees
ExtractedTo: 'vermarr@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 10:53 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776670
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776670 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 10:53 AM
  To: 'vermarr@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: consular fees
  Original Message
  From: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Fri Jun 18 17:24:20 2010
  Subject: consular fees
  We sent the paper on consular fees to Tanner today, and his staff confirmed that he has received it. Assuming Tanner
  continues to be supportive, we need him to let Hoyer know he supports our effort.
  Additionally, Jack thinks it is important for you to talk to Pelosi. Berman mentioned that as well. I can send a call sheet
  just in case you have a chance to connect with her.
  Thanks again for stopping by the AIPAC meeting. It really helped close out some important issues.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776670 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776679
MetadataSubject: STATEMENT
MetadataTo: sullivanjj@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-20T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05776679/C05776679.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Statement
ExtractedTo: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 1:13 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776679
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Ok but be sure it's proofread
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776679 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 1:13 PM
  To: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Statement
  Ok but be sure it's proofread
  Original Message
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jun 20 13:07:04 2010
  Subject: Statement
  This is what we propose to put out, with Rs putting out similar:
  Today, Secretary Clinton spoke by telephone with Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov. They discussed preparations for the
  upcoming June 24 summit between President Obama and President Medvedev. Secretary Clinton and Foreign Minister
  Lavrov reveiwed developments in Kyrgyzstan and stressed their shared concern over the recent violence and continuing
  interethnic tensions. The ministers agreed that the issue of the upcoming referendum us the sovereign decision of
  Kyrgyzstan to make and agreed to encourage the authorities of Kyrgyzstan to conduct it according to international
  standards with the monitoring support of OSCE and others. The ministers also discussed coordination of U.S. and
  Russian humanitarian assistance and other support to Kyrgyzstan to help its authorities restore security, stability, and
  reconciliation among all citizens of Kyrgyzstan.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776679 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776686
MetadataSubject: QUESTION POSED
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-03T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05776686/C05776686.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Question Posed
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, December 3, 2010 1:48 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776686
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedCc:
  Hammer, Michael A; 'Chang, Benjamin'; Harris, Jennifer D; Ratney, Michael A; Boland, Matthew H; Crowley, Philip J

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776686 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, December 3, 2010 1:48 PM
  To:
  Subject: Question Posed
  From: Breeden, Philip X
  Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 12:25 PM
  To: Smith, Dana S
  Cc: Hammer, Michael A; 'Chang, Benjamin'; Harris, Jennifer D; Ratney, Michael A; Boland, Matthew H; Crowley, Philip J
  Subject: excerpt from Julian Assange live online Q and A with the Guardian today
  I am a former British diplomat. In the course of my former duties I helped to coordinate multilateral action against a
  brutal regime in the Balkans, impose sanctions on a renegade state threatening ethnic cleansing, and negotiate a
  debt relief programme for an impoverished nation. None of this would have been possible without the security and
  secrecy of diplomatic correspondence, and the protection of that correspondence from publication under the laws of
  the UK and many other liberal and democratic states. An embassy which cannot securely offer advice or pass
  messages back to London is an embassy which cannot operate. Diplomacy cannot operate without discretion and the
  protection of sources. This applies to the UK and the UN as much as the US.
  In publishing this massive volume of correspondence, Wikileaks is not highlighting specific cases of wrongdoing but
  undermining the entire process of diplomacy. If you can publish US cables then you can publish UK telegrams and UN
  emails.
  My question to you is: why should we not hold you personally responsible when next an international crisis goes
  unresolved because diplomats cannot function.
  Julian Assange:
  If you trim the vast editorial letter to the singular question actually asked, I would be happy to give it my attention.
  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
  Philip Breeden
  Press Counselor, US Embassy London
  Tel: 44-(o) 20-7894-0672
  Fax: 44-(o) 20-7491-2485
  Cell:
  Email: breedenpx(a)state.gov
  Web: http://london.usembassy.gov/
  See the New US Embassy Design: http://go.usa.gov/ciM
  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
  01:1d5
  This Email is Unclassified
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776686 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776688
MetadataSubject: AM UP AND AVAILABLE UNTIL 1030PM
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-20T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05776688/C05776688.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Am up and availabe until 1030pm
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 10:02 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776688
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: What # should I call?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776688 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 10:02 PM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Am up and availabe until 1030pm
  What # should I call?
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jun 20 22:01:09 2010
  Subject: Am up and availabe until 1030pm
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776688 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776736
MetadataSubject: QUARTET STATEMENT
MetadataTo: sullivanjj@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-21T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05776736/C05776736.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Quartet statement
ExtractedTo: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, June 21, 2010 8:02 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776736
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Better than we could have expected so good to go.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776736 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 8:02 AM
  To: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Quartet statement
  Better than we could have expected so good to go.
  Original Message
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Mon Jun 21 07:32:51 2010
  Subject: Quartet statement
  Below is the final text of the Quartet statement, which Lavrov, Ban, and Ashton have now agreed to release *without a
  call.* Sounds like your discussion with Lavrov did the trick:
  The Quartet re-affirms that the current situation in Gaza, including the humanitarian and human rights situation of the
  civilian population, is unsustainable, unacceptable, and not in the interests of any of those concerned. The Quartet
  reiterates its call for a solution that addresses Israel's legitimate security concerns, including an end to weapons
  smuggling into Gaza; promotes Palestinian unity based on the Palestine Liberation Organization commitments and the
  reunification of Gaza and the West Bank under the legitimate Palestinian Authority; and ensures the unimpeded flow of
  humanitarian aid, commercial goods and persons to and from Gaza, consistent with United Nations Security Council
  resolution 1860 (2009). The Quartet declares its readiness to work closely with Israel, the Palestinian Government and
  international donors in order to achieve sustainable economic development on the basis of the full implementation of
  the Agreement on Access and Movement of 2005 and in the broader perspective of the two-state solution.
  Consistent with these objectives, the Quartet and the Quartet Representative have worked with Israel, as well as
  consulting the Palestinian Authority, Egypt, and other concerned parties, to effect a fundamental change in policy in
  Gaza. The new policy towards Gaza just announced by the Government of Israel is a welcome development. The Quartet
  notes that the elaboration of further details and modalities of implementation will be important in ensuring the
  effectiveness of the new policy. Full and effective implementation will comprise a significant shift in strategy towards
  meeting the needs of Gaza's population for humanitarian and commercial goods, civilian reconstruction and
  infrastructure, and legitimate economic activity as well as the security needs of Israel. The Quartet will continue to work
  with Israel, the Palestinian Authority, and other concerned parties to ensure these arrangements are implemented as
  quickly as possible. The Quartet affirms that much work remains to achieve fully the solution stated above, and, in
  consultation with the concerned parties, it will monitor closely the implementation of the policy in all its aspects. It will
  actively explore additional ways to improve the situation in Gaza, encourage involvement of the PA at the crossings and
  promote greater commerce between the West Bank and Gaza.
  The Quartet stresses the importance of United Nations and other international interventions, as well as the work of local
  non-governmental organizations, to be expanded in Gaza to meet urgent civilian needs, and calls on all parties to fully
  enable this work.
  The Quartet recognizes that Israel has legitimate security concerns that must continue to be safeguarded, and believes
  efforts to maintain security while enabling movement and access for Palestinian people and goods are critical. The
  Quartet commits to work with Israel and the international community to prevent the illicit trafficking of arms and
  ammunition into Gaza. It urges all those wishing to deliver goods to do so through established channels so that their
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776736 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776736 Date: 08/31/2015
  cargo can be inspected and transferred via land crossings into Gaza. The Quartet emphasizes that there is no need for
  unnecessary confrontations and calls on all parties to act responsibly in meeting the needs of the people of Gaza.
  The Quartet also calls for an end to the deplorable detention of Gilad Shalit in advance of the fourth anniversary of his
  capture on June 25; it further condemns the violation of Hamas' international obligation to provide him access by the
  International Committee of the Red Cross and demands that Hamas immediately remedy the situation.
  The Quartet also reiterates its support for proximity talks toward the resumption, without pre-conditions, of direct
  bilateral negotiations that resolve all final status issues as previously agreed by the parties. The Quartet believes these
  negotiations should lead to a settlement, negotiated between the parties within 24 months, that ends the occupation
  which began in 1967 and results in the emergence of an independent, democratic, and viable Palestinian state in the
  West Bank and Gaza, living side by side in peace and security with Israel and its other neighbours.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776736 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776821
MetadataSubject: H: ROGER COHEN IN NYT: "AMERICAN DIPLOMA CY REVEALED --- AS GOOD"
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-04T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05776821/C05776821.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: H: Roger Cohen in NYT: "American Diploma cy Revealed as Good"
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, December 4, 2010 8:51 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776821
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  141737V7SMIZITMItlfaliZZI%
  Good luck out there. Talk sometime
  Sent via DROID on Verizon Wireless
  --Original message

RawText:
  B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776821 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  IMISIMISCSTRIIIEUVITIIMXAMIWZINCISCZCSIZINCONC-MICZTAMICISZIOZEMIIVMAZZACCIEIELMITS/12=1:MMUUMISt747MOIVLSMISIVROMMIMETSVOMMNIECITM127=4.150171VOMEM.K
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Saturday, December 4, 2010 8:51 AM
  To:
  Subject: Re: H: Roger Cohen in NYT: "American Diploma cy Revealed as Good"
  141737V7SMIZITMItlfaliZZI%
  Good luck out there. Talk sometime
  Sent via DROID on Verizon Wireless
  --Original message
  From: H <HDR22@olintonemail.com>
  To: "&apos;slowhoeop
  Sent: Sat, Dec 4, 2010 13:44:25 GMT+00:00
  Subject: Re: H: Roger Cohen in NYT: "American Diploma oy Revealed -- as Good"
  Not bad--thx.
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: 14
  Sent: Fri Dec 03 09:54:38 2010
  Subject: H: Roger Cohen in NYT: "American Diplomacy Revealed -- as Good"
  The NOW York Times <1' ' I ;
  December 2, 201.0
  American Diplomacy Revealed -- as Good
  By ROGER COH.E,N
  NEW YORK-- Let's hear it for the men and women of the U.S. Foreign Service!
  They are, to judge from the WikiteakS dump of a 'quarter-million of their private or secret
  cables, thoughtful, well-informed and dedicated servants of the American interest who write
  clear, declarative English sentences.
  I've not heard much in the torrent of Wiki-c.hatter about these admirable career diplomats whose
  diplomacy is now condemned to be unquiet. Yet it is they whose byes have been upturned. Every
  journalist knows that if their correspondence over several years was suddenly made public, they
  would lose most of their sources. That should give every journalist pause.
  So it will be on the front line of U.S. diplomacy. Contacts will self-censor. They will go quiet,
  particularly in the more conspiratorial parts of the world which also tend to be the most unstable,
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776821 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776821 Date: 08/31/2015
  like the Middle East. Layers of secrecy will be added.
  Julian Assange, the thin-skinned founder of WikiLeaks, has hurt U.S. interests across a broad but
  probably shallow spectrum. That will satisfy him in that he's a self-styled foe of the United
  States. The guy makes me queasy.
  Perhaps the most shocking thing about the Assange treasure trove — beyond the "shock" of
  venal Gulf Arab Sunni leaders looking for war on the cheap against Shiite Iran so long as it
  doesn't disrupt their U.S.-armed fiefdoms; or the "shock" of Pakistani double-dealing and
  nuclear procrastination; or the "shock" of yet more premature Israeli predictions on when Iran
  will have a nuclear weapon; or the "shock" of continued Saudi funding of Al Qaeda; or the
  "shock" of the Chinese Politburo hacking into Google; or the "shock" of Muammar el-Qaddati's
  taste for voluptuous Slavic women and Silvio Berlusconi's taste for all women — perhaps the
  biggest shock of all is just how professional, sober and short on embarrassment all these cables
  are and just how much they conform with the world as we already knew it, right down to the
  familiar adjectives evoking French President Nicolas Sarkozy: "hyperactive," "mercurial,"
  "authoritarian," "erratic," "monarch-like."
  I swear, if they hadn't become diplomats a lot of these State Department people could have
  become good hacks.
  Overall, my longstanding admiration for America's conscientious diplomats has been redoubled,
  not least for this underreported nugget on the turbulent Iranian election of 2009, contained in a
  cable of Jan. 12, 2010, from Dubai: "While we don't know nor might not ever know the real
  June 12 vote count, it is clear that the turnout was at record high levels and that there was
  systematic vote count fraud (if in fact the votes were even counted) to ensure that Ahmadinejad
  'won big' in the first round."
  It is good to know that this is the innermost conviction of American diplomacy: the fraud was
  evident to anyone in Tehran during_ the election and its violent aftermath.
  A couple more observations on Iran: The. .first is that the Sunni autocrats of the Gulf are as
  exercised a.s they are about Tehran in part because they know that any U.','_-;.-Iranian breakthrough
  might make them more dispensable to the United States. Their vested interest in the prevailing
  Middle Eastern strategic equation is strong; nothing would redraw the Middle East more than
  overcoming the U.S.-Iranian Psychosis.
  The second is that President .Barack Obarna's approach to Iran has been much more conventional
  than his initial outreach suggested. Old habits of attempted coercion trumped originality. Very
  quickly he fell back on Dennis Ross's tired thinking about balancing "appetizing carrots" with
  "sharp sticks" in tackling Iran's nuclear program.
  The cables reveal that as early as March 2009, a senior U.S. diplomat was talking "dual track,"
  telling Europeans that "engagement alone is unlikely to succeed" and calling for added
  "pressure." Perhaps Iranian skepticism could never have been overcome; certainly this approach
  guaranteed longstanding Iranian grievances would fester.
  .Assange himself clearly understands nothing of Iran or the Middle East or diplomacy. In an
  interview with Time, he expressed approval for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
  "coming out with a. very interesting statement that leaders should speak in public like they do in
  private whenever they can" and bought into Netanyahu's view that this, in Assange's words,
  would "lead to some kind of increase in the peace process in the Middle East and particularly in
  relation to Iran."
  Huh? Netanyahu was referring to Arab leaders' now-documented private calls for a U.S.-led war
  against Iran, an option he also favors. And. that, for Assange, is a step forward to peace! He's all
  over the place.
  What should we make of this brainy naïf who told my colleague John Burns that America is a
  threat to democracy? He's a loose canon; let him be. My impression is he's self-armed with a
  spade and he's digging.
  And what of the messenger's message? The cables are intriguing, offering plenty of voyeuristic
  titillation but no gasp of discovery. They provide texture but break little new ground. Yet their
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776821 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776821 Date: 08/31/2015
  publication has done significant damage to the courageous work of America's diplomats and
  may endanger lives. That's a tradeoff that I find troubling and unpersuasive.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776821 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05776989
MetadataSubject: PUBLIC OPINION IN PERSPECTIVE: RUSSIA
MetadataFrom: Opinion Research
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-21T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05776989/C05776989.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05776989
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  Russian Approval of the U.S. Reaches Highest Point in Five Years
  -4—Favorable —0—Unfavorable
  17
  44
  43
  43
  47
  54
  39 36
  Russia-Georgia Conflict
  7
  55
  2
  46 48 47
  42
  41 37
  ‘
  ?c %c
  v
  N)t 06e
  -
  Source: Office of Opinion Research surveys, 2005 - 2010
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776989 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  FOR OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT USE ONLY
  Public Opinion in Perspective: Russia
  CAI= cv
  ©m um Eas
  FAVORABLE VIEWS OF U.S. ON THE RISE
  Public views of the United States have risen steadily since their low point just after the 2008 Georgia war:
  • 47% have a favorable opinion of the United
  States, up from 17% in November 2008.
  • 71% describe the relationship between
  Russia and the United States as "friendly"
  and 79% say it is important for Russia to
  maintain good relations with the United
  States.
  These views are bolstered by favorable views of the
  new START agreement and the desire for greater
  cooperation between Russia and the United States:
  • 66% say it is in Russia's interest to work
  closely with the United States and Western
  powers.
  • 60% think the previous START agreement
  benefitted both the United States and Russia equally, and 72% feel that the new START agreement is important.
  • A majority would welcome U.S.-Russian cooperation on combating terrorism (87%), stopping the spread of WMDs
  (86%), stopping climate change (81%), and halting the flow of drugs through Central Asia (76%).
  But Russians are wary of the international mission in Afghanistan and sanctions against Iran:
  • 78% oppose their country providing troops to military operations in Afghanistan, and 63% oppose the transit of
  international troops through Russian territory or air space. However, pluralities would support taking a larger role in
  development assistance (43%) and the transit of aid (45%) to Afghanistan.
  • 48% are unaware of Iran's nuclear program. Among those who have heard of the program, 42% see it as a minor
  threat to global stability, while 21% see it as no threat at all.
  • 45% of those who have heard of the program would support economic sanctions to discourage Iran from continuing
  its nuclear program. Only 8% would support military action.
  RUSSIANS SEE COMPETITION FOR WORLD LEADERSHIP
  Russians feel their country should be a leader on the world stage and appear open to greater integration with the world
  economy:
  • 87% say it is desirable for Russia to exert leadership in global affairs.
  • 63% favor closer economic ties with other countries.
  This global outlook is coupled with wariness about the intentions of other countries, and suggests that improved bilateral
  cooperation has not erased skepticism about the United States:
  • 52% say that the West is trying to impoverish Russia.
  • Though increasingly "friendly" toward the United States, 58% still see the U.S. more as a competitor than a partner,
  and 79% say it is not in Russia's interest for the United States to play a leadership role in global affairs.
  RUSSIANS DON'T WANT COOPERATION IN THEIR SPHERE OF INFLUENCE
  In one arena of international affairs Russian views are especially clear:
  • 81% feel that Russia will always have a privileged interest in the CIS countries.
  • A majority oppose U.S.-Russian cooperation on resolving the conflicts in South Ossetia (67%), Transnistria (63%),
  or Nagorno-Karabakh (60%).
  June 21 2010 FOR OFFICIAL U.S. COVFRNMFNT USF ONI Y NA-7R-10
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05776989 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777030
MetadataSubject: ROLLING STONE
MetadataTo: preines
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-21T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777030/C05777030.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Rolling Stone
ExtractedTo: 'preines Huma Abedin
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, June 21, 2010 7:02 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777030
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Can you get me copy of article about McChrystal that is coming out?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777030 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 7:02 PM
  To: 'preines Huma Abedin
  Subject: Rolling Stone
  Can you get me copy of article about McChrystal that is coming out?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777030 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777032
MetadataSubject: ROLLING STONE
MetadataTo: sullivanjj@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-21T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777032/C05777032.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Rolling Stone
ExtractedTo: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, June 21, 2010 11:16 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777032
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: can you talk now?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777032 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 11:16 PM
  To: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Rolling Stone
  can you talk now?
  Original Message
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J<Sullivann@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Mon Jun 21 22:34:49 2010
  Subject: Rolling Stone
  Talked to Ben. Much to report.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777032 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777033
MetadataSubject: ROLLING STONE
MetadataTo: sullivanjj@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-22T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777033/C05777033.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Rolling Stone
ExtractedTo: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 7:02 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777033
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Can you call me thru ops.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777033 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 7:02 AM
  To: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Rolling Stone
  Can you call me thru ops.
  Original Message
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Mon Jun 21 23:57:30 2010
  Subject: Re: Rolling Stone
  Oh darn it - sorry I missed your message - I was engrossed in the PSD script.
  If you're still up please call.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Mon Jun 21 23:16:02 2010
  Subject: Re: Rolling Stone
  can you talk now?
  Original Message
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SuIlivanJ1@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Mon Jun 21 22:34:49 2010
  Subject: Rolling Stone
  Talked to Ben. Much to report.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777033 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777048
MetadataSubject: ARE YOU STILL AT OFFICE?
MetadataTo: hanleymr@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-22T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777048/C05777048.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Are you still at office?
ExtractedTo: 'hanleymr@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 7:40 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777048
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: I'm on the way back.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777048 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 7:40 PM
  To: 'hanleymr@state.gov'
  Subject: Are you still at office?
  I'm on the way back.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777048 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777050
MetadataSubject: CALL
MetadataTo: abedinh@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-23T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777050/C05777050.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Call
ExtractedTo: 'abedinh@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 7:30 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777050
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: GW is dodging me so ask that letter be drafted that I could send him asap making case.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777050 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 7:30 AM
  To: 'abedinh@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Call
  GW is dodging me so ask that letter be drafted that I could send him asap making case.
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Wed Jun 23 07:04:00 2010
  Subject: Call
  Westewelle cannot do call at 7:30.
  Holbrooke says he needs to talk to you
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777050 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777056
MetadataSubject: FW:
MetadataTo: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-23T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777056/C05777056.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw:
ExtractedTo: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 11:27 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777056
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  B6
  Pls add Jill Iscol and Melanne to call list for

RawText:
  tomorrow.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777056 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 11:27 AM
  To: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
  Subject: Fw:
  B6
  Pls add Jill Iscol and Melanne to call list for
  Original Message
  From: Hillary Clinton
  To: Hillary Clinton
  Subject:
  Sent: Jun 11, 2010 9:55 PM
  -Jill and Melanne
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777056 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777061
MetadataSubject: ASSESSING OUR PROGRESS TO DATE AND PROPOSING POSSIBLE WAYS TO CREATE MORE LEVERAGE
MetadataTo: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-23T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777061/C05777061.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Assessing our progress to date and proposing possible ways to create more
ExtractedTo: 'JilotyLC@state.gov.
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivanil@state.gov>; Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 11:29 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777061
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  leverage
  Pls print.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777061 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 11:29 AM
  To: 'JilotyLC@state.gov.
  Subject: Re: Assessing our progress to date and proposing possible ways to create more
  leverage
  Pls print.
  Original Message
  From: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivanil@state.gov>; Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Wed May 26 09:04:23 2010
  Subject: Assessing our progress to date and proposing possible ways to create more leverage
  For your reading pleasure on the way home, S/P has been working on a project that I discussed with Jake a while back --
  aimed at figuring out where we could do better and above all create more leverage to achieve our goals. The papers are
  blunter than anything you would see from the bureaus -- they should not necessarily be read as policy blueprints but
  rather as illustrations of alternative strategies. We have made sure that the special assistants have them on the plane. I
  will also share the individual papers with the relevant assistant secretaries. We will then be happy to take the project
  further if you approve.
  You will be happy to know that rain has stopped at the Expo!
  AM
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777061 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777063
MetadataSubject: DEAR MADAM SECRETARY, THANK YOU
MetadataTo: Russorv@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-23T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777063/C05777063.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Dear Madam Secretary, Thank you
ExtractedTo: 'Russorv@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrodl7@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 11:30 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777063
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Pls do letter of congrats, ty etc.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777063 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrodl7@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 11:30 AM
  To: 'Russorv@state.gov'
  Subject: Fw: Dear Madam Secretary, Thank you
  Pls do letter of congrats, ty etc.
  Original Message
  From: David Helfenbein <
  To: H
  Sent: Tue Jun 15 10:29:11 2010
  Subject: Dear Madam Secretary, Thank you
  Madam Secretary:
  If you don't know my personal news yet (and I assume that you might through either Huma or Philippe), then here it is: I
  Let me say first and foremost: I hope you don't see this as me leaving you or your team. I have asked the question many
  times to Philippe and Huma about how you would take this news and the answer has always been the same - that you
  would be happy for me - and I truly do hope that this is the case. The truth is that I applied while working in PA/PL and
  was eventually wait listed and usually when wait listed you are not given the option to defer. That is neither here nor
  there, but Philippe and Huma have both been incredible mentors to me throughout this entire decision-making process,
  and for this, I am most grateful to them both.
  The decision was not an easy one. First, Madam Secretary, you know when we first met: Believe it or not, it has been
  over ten years now, You have not only been a role model and a
  mentor for me throughout the years, but I have watched you behind closed doors; out in public; and quite frankly, I have
  watched you both win and lose. And whether winning or losing, you are courageous: no matter what, you are
  determined and inspirational.
  I have seen many people join your team, leave your team, some work for a few years, others for many - and everyone
  says they will still be "part of the family." Some seem to remain in touch; others don't. I see myself as a little different;
  maybe you don't. Both you and President Clinton have watched me grow since I was young. More than anything, I truly
  hope to remain a "part of the family."
  Sometimes people ask me why I have been dedicated to working for you for so many years. It is not for fame or glory.
  The truth is, I have worked for you because I have always believed in you. You are one of a kind -
  there is no other one like you, and there never will be. I truly believe that the world needs you in whatever capacity that
  you are in. And more than anything, I am most appreciative and thankful for all that you have offered me: Not only the
  mentorship and guidance but the continuous opportunities to learn. On my own path of public service, I can truly say
  that I was able to learn time and time again from the very best.
  Parting from your team is thus not an easy task for me, especially leaving Philippe's direct team, where I really enjoy
  what I am doing. But I also feel that I want to take another next step forward/a different one in my own life. And I am
  hopeful that this is not a permanent goodbye in any way. I hope that you and I can remain in touch via email, and I
  promise not to email too often, as I know how busy you are.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777063 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777063 Date: 08/31/2015
  But I must reiterate one comment that I made: I have worked for you for so long for a reason: Not for my resume. Not
  for myself, But because of you. I am confident enough to say that I know you well enough to tell others that I have
  worked for the most brilliant mind and strongest leader I will ever see in my lifetime. And I am incredibly proud of that.
  With eternal thanks and appreciation, of which cannot be summed up in words, let alone in an email,
  My best, always,
  David H.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777063 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777064
MetadataSubject: JACKSON/VANIK
MetadataTo: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-23T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777064/C05777064.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: jackson/vanik
ExtractedTo: 'filotyLC@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob J
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 1:09 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777064
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Pls print.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777064 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
  Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 1:09 PM
  To: 'filotyLC@state.gov'
  Subject: Fw: jackson/vanik
  Pls print.
  Original Message
  From: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Fri Jun 18 06:21:31 2010
  Subject: FW: jackson/vanik
  FYI — on Jackon/Vanik re: Russia. Will send more information as we get it.
  From: Hormats, Robert D
  Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 12:14 AM
  To: Verma, Richard R
  Subject: Re:
  Hi Rich,
  This is not quite the case....the russians certainly do want it lifted.
  Levin wants two votes: one to lift it with provisions that the russians would be committed to meet and then another
  vote to determine if they have been met.
  I will send her a more detailed memo when I get back.
  Thanks,
  Bob
  From: Verma, Richard R
  To: Hormats, Robert D
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Thu Jun 17 18:23:28 2010
  Subject:
  Hi Bob —
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777064 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777064 Date: 08/31/2015
  The Secretary had a conversation with Senator Levin today about Jackson/Vanik — Levin told her that the Administration
  has been opposed to his efforts to lift the Jackson Vanik restrictions pertaining to Russia. He said that Administration
  officials have been telling him that the Russians don't want them lifted. This didn't make a whole lot of sense to me, but
  she asked me to follow-up with you to find out our current posture on Jackson Vanik and Russia. She'd like to get back
  to Senator Levin soon. I leave it up to you how you want to get the info to her, but I did want to pass along her request.
  Thanks, and hope all else is well.
  Rich
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777064 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777095
MetadataSubject: FOLLOWUP
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-04T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777095/C05777095.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Followup
ExtractedTo: H; monica.hanle
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Huma Abedin
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, December 4, 2010 8:55 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777095
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Ok
  -----

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777095 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, December 4, 2010 8:55 AM
  To: H; monica.hanle
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Subject: Re: Followup
  Ok
  ----- Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C; 'monica.hanley
  Cc: Huma Abedin <Huma@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sat Dec 04 08:40:36 2010
  Subject: Followup
  <monica.hanley
  Pls get me two hard copies of Foreign Policy's Top 100 Global Thinkers
  Pis see if the library has a copy of Claire Parkinson: Coming Climate Crisis? Consider the past, Beware the Big Fix
  Pis see if library has copy of Mary Gardiner Jones, Tearing down Walls
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777095 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777099
MetadataSubject: (REUTERS) COTE D'LVOIRE PM SAYS PLANS TO RESIGN OVER ELECTION ROW
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-04T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777099/C05777099.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (Reuters) Cote d'Ivoire PM says plans to resign over election row
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shlft-II; SES-O_OS
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, December 4, 2010 9:12 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777099
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777099 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, December 4, 2010 9:12 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (Reuters) Cote d'Ivoire PM says plans to resign over election row
  From: Moore, Anna W
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-O_Shlft-II; SES-O_OS
  Sent: Sat Dec 04 09:11:11 2010
  Subject: (Reuters) Cote d'Ivoire PM says plans to resign over election row
  ABIDJAN (Reuters) — Cote d'Ivoire Prime Minister Guillaume Soro said he believes Alassane Ouattara won the country's
  presidential election, not incumbent Laurent Gbagbo, and will resign after Gbagbo is sworn in. "We recognize that
  Alassane Ouattara is the winner of this election. I have decided I will hand in the resignation of my government and my
  resignation as prime minister," he said in a statement obtained by Reuters.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777099 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777104
MetadataSubject: (REUTERS) NETANYAHU, ABBAS HOLD RARE PHONE CHAT OVER FIRES
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-04T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777104/C05777104.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (Reuters) Netanyahu, Abbas hold rare phone chat over fires
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-0_05; SES-O_Shift-II
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, December 4, 2010 10:52 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777104
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777104 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, December 4, 2010 10:52 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (Reuters) Netanyahu, Abbas hold rare phone chat over fires
  From: Moore, Anna W
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-0_05; SES-O_Shift-II
  Sent: Sat Dec 04 10:24:20 2010
  Subject: (Reuters) Netanyahu, Abbas hold rare phone chat over fires
  JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas expressed condolences in a rare telephone call with
  Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu December 4 over the deadly fires raging in northern Israel, Israeli officials
  said. The two leaders were not believed to have spoken since they last met in September when U.S.-backed peace talks
  stalled in a spat over Jewish settlement construction. A statement from Netanyahu's office said Abbas "expressed his
  condolences to the people of Israel on those who died in the fire and said he would be happy to provide any necessary
  help."
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777104 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777152
MetadataSubject: TONI AND MARTIN SOSNOFF'S INFORMATION
MetadataTo: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-23T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777152/C05777152.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Toni and Martin Sosnoff's information
ExtractedTo: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 1:12 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777152
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: PIs add to call list.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777152 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 1:12 PM
  To: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
  Subject: Fw: Toni and Martin Sosnoff's information
  PIs add to call list.
  Original Message
  From: Jill Iscol <
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jun 20 20:06:30 2010
  Subject: Toni and Martin Sosnoff's information
  Office
  Toni's cell:
  Rhinebeck:
  NYC apt.
  The sooner the better! Thanks a zillion.
  Love,
  Jill
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777152 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777169
MetadataSubject: TONIGHT
MetadataTo: ValmoroLJ@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-23T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777169/C05777169.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777169
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6

RawText:
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Wednesday, June 23, 2010 5:32 PM
  'ValmoroU@state.gov'; 'preines
  'hanleymr@state.gov'
  Tonight
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Cc:
  Subject:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777169 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777169 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777175
MetadataSubject: CONCERT
MetadataTo: hanleymr@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-23T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777175/C05777175.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Concert
ExtractedTo: 'hanleymr@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 7:36 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777175
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: I'm on the way.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777175 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 7:36 PM
  To: 'hanleymr@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Concert
  I'm on the way.
  Original Message
  From: Hanley, Monica R <HanleyMR@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
  Sent: Wed Jun 23 19:14:35 2010
  Subject: Concert
  Bagley and Tauscher are all set with their tickets.
  Mikulski will get here close to your arrival time so you might walk in with her - pls let me know if that's a problem.
  Pelosi is coming separately and is seated close to you.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777175 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777186
MetadataTo: hanleymr@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-23T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777186/C05777186.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedTo: 'hanle mr@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 10:41 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777186
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Did you reach her?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777186 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 10:41 PM
  To: 'hanle mr@state.gov'
  Subject:
  Did you reach her?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777186 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777188
MetadataTo: hanleymr@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-23T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777188/C05777188.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re:
ExtractedTo: 'hanle mr@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Huma Abedin
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 10:41 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777188
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Thx.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777188 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 10:41 PM
  To: 'hanle mr@state.gov'
  Subject: Re:
  Thx.
  Original Message
  From: Hanley, Monica R <HanleyMR@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Sent: Wed Jun 23 22:40:32 2010
  Subject:
  She unfortunately can't come this week - she's away until Tuesday. Will see if Tuesday night or Wednesday morning
  works with your schedule.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777188 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777196
MetadataSubject: WITH DEEP GRATITUDE
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-25T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777196/C05777196.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: With deep gratitude
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, June 25, 2010 1:30 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777196
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Is there a backstory?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777196 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
  Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 1:30 PM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: With deep gratitude
  Is there a backstory?
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Fri Jun 25 11:27:27 2010
  Subject: FW: With deep gratitude
  fyi
  From: Stanton, Katie
  Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 10:31 AM
  Subject: With deep gratitude
  Dear friends,
  I'm so grateful to have had the pleasure of working with you over the past 18 months. Public service is an honor and I
  feel so lucky to have had the opportunity to serve our country in both the White House and the State.Department. I'm
  deeply impressed by the important work you do and will leave Washington, DC knowing that our country's best days are
  ahead of us thanks to your commitment, hard work, and passion.
  My last day at the State Department will be July 9th.
  would love to see you before I go — please save the date of July 8th for a cupcakes and champagne party in DC.
  My personal email is Please visit me in J
  Best,
  Katie
  B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777196 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777196 Date: 08/31/2015
  Katie Jacobs Stanton
  Office of the Secretary of State
  e: stantonk@state.gov I I t: 202-647-0419 I c:
  twitter: @StateDept @KatieS
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777196 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777199
MetadataSubject: HPAD
MetadataTo: preines
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777199/C05777199.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: hPad
ExtractedTo: 'preine
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Huma Abedin
ExtractedDateSent: Saturda June 26 2010 7:24 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777199
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  That is exciting news--do you think you can teach me to use it on the flight to Kyev next week?
  Original Messa

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777199 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  PART B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Saturda June 26 2010 7:24 AM
  To: 'preine
  Subject: Re: hPad
  That is exciting news--do you think you can teach me to use it on the flight to Kyev next week?
  Original Messa
  From: PIR <preines
  To: H
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Sent: Fri Jun 25 20:23:28 2010
  Subject: hPad
  your iPad has arrived!
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777199 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777200
MetadataSubject: AF/PAK TRIP
MetadataTo: ValmoroLJ@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777200/C05777200.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Af/Pak trip
ExtractedTo: 'ValmoroU©state.gov'; Huma Abedin
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, June 26, 2010 8:17 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777200
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: I think I should spend the night of the 19th in Kabul before the conference there.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777200 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2010 8:17 AM
  To: 'ValmoroU©state.gov'; Huma Abedin
  Subject: Af/Pak trip
  I think I should spend the night of the 19th in Kabul before the conference there.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777200 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777208
MetadataSubject: TOMORROW
MetadataTo: ValmoroLJ@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-27T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777208/C05777208.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Tomorrow
ExtractedTo: 'ValmoroU@state.gov'; Huma Abedin
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 7:21 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777208
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Katie Stanton is leaving to go back to California. Will you ask her to come by to say goodbye to me? Thx.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777208 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 7:21 AM
  To: 'ValmoroU@state.gov'; Huma Abedin
  Subject: Tomorrow
  Katie Stanton is leaving to go back to California. Will you ask her to come by to say goodbye to me? Thx.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777208 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777211
MetadataSubject: NOTES FORMAT
MetadataTo: Russorv@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-27T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777211/C05777211.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Notes format
ExtractedTo: 'Russorv@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 8:56 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777211
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Pls come see me tomorrow about redesigning and updating the format. Thx.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777211 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 8:56 AM
  To: 'Russorv@state.gov'
  Subject: Notes format
  Pls come see me tomorrow about redesigning and updating the format. Thx.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777211 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777221
MetadataSubject: H: MEMO ON UK POLITICS/BUDGET/ECONOMY SID
MetadataTo: sbwhoeop
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-27T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777221/C05777221.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: H: memo on UK politics/budget/economy Sid
ExtractedTo: 'sbwhoeop
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 6:47 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777221
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Very interesting. Thanks. Speaking of Australia, I was sorry about Kevin Rudd.
  Original Messa e

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777221 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 6:47 PM
  To: 'sbwhoeop
  Subject: Re: H: memo on UK politics/budget/economy Sid
  Very interesting. Thanks. Speaking of Australia, I was sorry about Kevin Rudd.
  Original Messa e
  From: sbwhoeop <sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jun 27 10:35:18 2010
  Subject: H: memo on UK politics/budget/economy Sid
  CONFIDENTIAL
  June 27, 2010
  For: HRC
  From: Sid
  Re: UK politics/economy
  1. UK polls show support for the Lib-Dems after the launch of the draconian Cameron government budget cratering.
  LD support is down to 16 percent, half what it was at its peak during the election and half of LD members now express a
  desire to defect from their party. They feel deceived by LD ministers' participation in a Tory budget opposed to their
  own beliefs. In Parliament, a secret caucus of LDs is meeting with Labour about opposing the budget. Meanwhile, short
  term support for Cameron is static and for the government slightly up, but only translated to the Tories. Both the Tories
  and Labour are up, profiting from the LD quandary. The scenario is potentially portentous for the LD Party: There was
  once an influential Australian Liberal Democratic Party, holding 11 percent of the vote and the balance of power in the
  Australian Senate. Upon reaching its zenith in 1996 the ALDP supported a Liberal (that is to say, a conservative)
  government's budget and suffered collapse. Today the ALDP holds 1 percent of the seats in the lower House. The
  political effect of the conservative budget will almost certainly lead to an implosion of the Tory-LD coalition. In the short
  run it's possible the Tories will emerge having the greatest plurality of support. But if their budget does not produce
  prosperity they will pay the price, too. See Stiglitz's analysis below on the Tory budget with cold analysis of the US
  predicament.
  2. The implications for US-UK cooperation are apparent. While there are spheres that remain, they are contingent,
  including the Afghanistan War, opposed by 75 percent of UK public and about which Cameron felt compelled this week
  to declare UK engagement would end in five years (that is, before the next UK election). On economic policy, the UK is
  no partner and no bridge to Europe, where the Merkel government has entered a fugue state of vertigo (another
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777221 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777221 Date: 08/31/2015
  subject). At no other time since World War II have the US and UK governments been at such odds over international
  economics. With JFK and Macmillan, Macmillan accepted the postwar Keynesian consensus. Reagan and Thatcher, of
  course, were of one mind ideologically, and the international economy was buoyed by Reagan's hyper-Keynesianism
  masked as Thatcherism. Unfortunately, Obama did not reach out to Brown, who sought to reestablish the special
  relationship around international economic recovery. Speaking of laissez faire, Cameron must be let alone to receive the
  consequences (within 18 months) of his ideologically driven economics. Can he be engaged on international
  development? Or does his budget rule that out too? There's not much there.
  3. The Labour Party leadership contest is heating up. David Miliband has an article out today on how the Cameron
  budget will foster "a lost generation." More on that soon...
  http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politicsksbornes-first-budget-its-wrong-wrong-wrong-2011501.html
  Osborne's first Budget? It's wrong, wrong, wrong!
  Joseph Stiglitz, the Nobel prizewinner who predicted the global crisis, delivers his verdict on the Chancellor's first Budget
  and tells Paul Vallely it will take the UK deeper into recession and hit millions — the poorest — badly Sunday, 27 June 2010
  George Osborne will probably not be very bothered that there is a man who thinks he got last week's emergency Budget
  almost entirely wrong. But he should be. Because that man is a former chief economist at the World Bank who won the
  Nobel Prize for Economics for his work on why markets do not produce the outcomes which, in theory, they ought to.
  Professor Joseph Stiglitz, who has been described as the biggest brain in economics, is distinctly unimpressed by George
  Osborne's strategy. This, he predicts, will make Britain's recovery from recession longer, slower and harder than it needs
  to be. The rise in VAT could even tip us into a double-dip recession.
  Stiglitz, who was once Bill Clinton's senior economic adviser, is now professor of economics and finance at Columbia
  Business School. He was in the UK this week at the University of Manchester, where he chairs the Brooks World Poverty
  Institute, but he lifted his head from the detail of international development to scrutinise the economic strategy of the
  Conservative Chancellor whose Liberal Democrat partners recently reversed their judgement that massive public
  spending cuts now would endanger the economy and joined in the Tory slash-and-burn strategy. They were deeply
  wrong to do so, he believes.
  It would be a mistake to ignore Stiglitz on this. He has a track record of getting his predictions right. He was one of the
  few economists who predicted the global financial meltdown long before it occurred.
  "What happened was very much in accord with what I expected," he tells me when we meet for a coffee outside the
  Blackwell bookshop in the centre of the university. "The data was pretty clear about that." And the scale of the crash?
  "That wasn't a surprise," he adds, in a matter-of-fact manner. "The bigger the bubble, the bigger the burst.
  "The thing most economists did not fully grasp was the extent to which the banks engaged in murky risk-taking activities.
  They were taking a risk with our money, their shareholders' money, the bond-holders' money," he says. Banks were
  demanding up to 40 per cent of the corporate profits, saying their innovative financing was adding value. But "all this
  talk about innovation was a sham" because it did not relate to any real increase in the economy's productivity, he says.
  "There was a prima facie case of something screwy going on [with all the] perverse incentives that would lead them to
  take excessive risk. But there was no way anyone could know or believe that the banks were [conducting themselves] at
  that level of stupidity. I predicted that there was going to be a collapse because of the information asymmetry problems
  that were being created." His Nobel prize was given for exactly that — showing how markets fail because different people
  in them hold different levels of information.
  Yet there is no hint of I-told-you-so about Stiglitz's tone as he asks the waiter for coffee. He orders decaffeinated, but
  suggests the British economy needs the opposite: a stiff stimulant rather than the "fiscal consolidation" which is George
  Osborne's economic euphemism for cuts.
  Fiscal stimulus is out of fashion now. World leaders embarked on that strategy — injecting money to re-energise the
  economy — after the banking crash three years ago. It was widely perceived not to have worked because the money
  governments pumped into the banks was not passed on to ailing businesses or individuals in trouble with their
  mortgages.
  "The problem was that, in the US, the stimulus wasn't big enough," he says. "Too much of it was in tax cuts. And when
  they gave money to the banks they gave it to the wrong banks and, as a result, credit has not been restored — we can
  expect a couple of million or more homes to be repossessed this year than last year — and the economy has not been
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777221 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777221 Date: 08/31/2015
  restarted." Instead of producing a consensus that the government should have done more, it has created disillusion that
  the government can do anything, Stiglitz says.
  The result is that, following the attacks by the financial markets on Greece and then Spain, everybody is now in a mood
  of retrenchment. "It's not just pre-Keynesian, it's Hooverite," he says. By which he means governments are not just
  refusing to stimulate, they are making cuts, as Herbert Hoover did in the US in 1929 — when he turned the Wall Street
  Crash into the Great Depression. "Hoover had this idea that, whenever you go into recession, deficits grow, so he
  decided to go for cuts — which is what the foolish financial markets that got us into this trouble in the first place now
  want."
  It has become the new received wisdom throughout Europe. But it is the classic error made by those who confuse a
  household's economics with those of a national economy.
  "If you have a household that can't pay its debts, you tell it to cut back on spending to free up the cash to pay the debts.
  But in a national economy, if you cut back on your spending, then economic activity goes down, nobody invests, the
  amount of tax you take goes down, the amount you pay out in unemployment benefits goes up — and you don't have
  enough money to pay your debts.
  "The old story is still true: you cut expenditures and the economy goes down. We have lots of experiments which show
  this, thanks to Herbert Hoover and the IMF," he adds. The IMF imposed that mistaken policy in Korea, Thailand,
  Indonesia, Argentina and hosts of other developing countries in the 1980s and 1990s. "So we know what will happen:
  economies will get weaker, investment will get stymied and it's a downward vicious spiral. How far down we don't know
  — it could be a Japanese malaise. Japan did an experiment just like this in 1997; just as it was recovering, it raised VAT
  and went into another recession."
  Then why have we not learned from all that? Because politicians like George Osborne are driven by ideology; the
  national deficit is an excuse to shrink the state because that is what he wanted anyway. Because the financial market
  only cares about one thing — getting repaid. And because other European governments are panicking because of the
  market's wild attack on Greece and Spain, and they don't want to be next.
  "But cutbacks in Germany, Britain and France will mean all of Europe will suffer. The cuts will all feed back negatively.
  And if everyone follows this policy, their budget deficits will get worse, so they will have to make more cuts and raise
  taxes more. It's a vicious downward spiral. We're now looking at a long, hard, slow recovery with the possibility of a
  double dip if everybody cuts back at the same time. The best scenario is long and hard ... and the worst is much worse. If
  any one of these countries is forced into default, the banking system is so highly leveraged that it could cause real
  problems. This is really risky, really scary."
  So what should we be doing? "The lesson is not that you cut back spending, but that you redirect it. You cut out the war
  in Afghanistan. You cut a couple of hundred billion dollars of wasteful military expenditure. You cut out oil subsidies.
  There's a long list of things we can cut. But you increase spending in other areas, such as research and development,
  infrastructure, education" — areas where government can get a good return on the investment of public money. "I
  haven't done the calculation for Britain, but, for the US, all you need is a return on government investment of 5 to 6 per
  cent and the long-term deficit debt is lowered."
  Taxes also need to be restructured. Osborne has increased capital gains tax for high earners from 18 to 28 per cent.
  "There's absolutely no reason why you couldn't tax speculative gains [from rising house or land prices] by 40 per cent.
  There's no social return on it and land is going to be there whether people have speculated or not. But you lower the tax
  on investment in things like R&D."
  Stiglitz has one more practical solution to offer. Governments should set up their own banks to restart lending to
  businesses and save struggling homeowners from repossession. "If the banks aren't lending, let's create a new lending
  facility to do that job," he says. "In the US, we gave $700bn to the banks; if we had used a fraction of that to create a
  new bank, we could have financed all the lending that was needed."
  Indeed, it could be done for far less. "Take $100bn, lever that at 10 to 1 [by attracting funds from the private sector] and
  that's a trillion-dollar new lending capacity — more than the real economy needs."
  Such a move would help ordinary people more than all Osborne's rhetoric about being tough but fair. Stiglitz is sceptical,
  too, about the moral underpinning of a Budget which claims that "we are all in this together", but then hits the poorest
  hardest.
  Analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies has suggested that the Chancellor's Budget will cost the poor 2.5 per cent of
  their income, while the rich will lose just 1 per cent. "I've not made an independent study on that point, but cuts in
  public services will have a disproportionate effect on the poor," Stiglitz says. Osborne's Budget "may be well-
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777221 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777221 Date: 08/31/2015
  intentioned, but it takes an enormous amount of work to make sure that a package of public spending cuts of that
  magnitude doesn't hit the poor disproportionately".
  His big fear is that overseas aid, which has been protected in this first round of cuts, will not escape a second.
  "Developing countries have redirected themselves towards Asia, and China in particular, in recent years, so growth in
  Africa will be more robust than one might have expected, given the severity of the downturn," he says.
  Even so, aid remains vital to poor countries. "If aid is cut back, growth will be badly affected," he says. "China is
  providing aid, but its aid is all in infrastructure, whereas aid from the US and Europe is mainly in education and health -
  areas in which ordinary people will suffer most if there are cuts."
  Joseph Stiglitz has come full circle. What the world needs now — developing and developed — is not retrenchment but
  greater economic stimulus. It is not a message many are in the mood to hear. But they didn't listen to him last time,
  either. And he turned out to be right, and they were wrong — and at what a cost to us all.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777221 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777223
MetadataSubject: CALL LIST
MetadataTo: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-27T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777223/C05777223.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Call list
ExtractedTo: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'; Huma Abedin
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 6:48 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777223
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  PIs add the following:
  Paul Charron about Haiti
  Mickey and Heidi Kantor
  John Kao
  Do letter of thanks to
  Gen Kean who was commander in Haiti

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777223 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 6:48 PM
  To: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'; Huma Abedin
  Subject: Call list
  PIs add the following:
  Paul Charron about Haiti
  Mickey and Heidi Kantor
  John Kao
  Do letter of thanks to
  Gen Kean who was commander in Haiti
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777223 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777225
MetadataSubject: SCHEDULE
MetadataTo: ValmoroLJ@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-27T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777225/C05777225.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Schedule
ExtractedTo: 'ValmoroU@state.gov'; Huma Abedin
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 6:49 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777225
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  PIs reach out to Dianne Feinstein for a dinner which will be very hard for me in July but if I have to be back for a few days
  in early August, might work then. Just so she knows we are trying.
  Also, I want to see Jack Keane for a drink.
  FM Lieberman wants to see me in July--let's discuss
  Also FM Zebari of Iraq will be in US in July. PIs find out when he is coming
  Have you heard from Carlos Slim about a date for a mtg?
  Don't forget:
  the Skoll mtg,
  the Arctic Council in Greenland,
  Harlan Dalton's visit,
  Carol Evans' request for an interview,
  the Vital Voices Summit 9/14-17,
  the request for a mtg or call w Dellums
  the AGOA conf in DC which I was told is 8/3-4
  The Putin conf about tigers in Vladivostock 9/11-19
  What happened w the Baucus mtg?
  Also, I'd like a working lunch w Ron Kirk and a mtg about Latin America w Chris Dodd
  Pls schedule Hannah Rosenthal to see me
  David Rockefeller Sr has asked to see me. I'd like to do when I'm in NY or if there is a State Dept award we could give him
  for his citizen diplomacy esp in Latin America--could you run traps on that idea?
  During UNGA, I have to do bilat w Cathy Ashton

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777225 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
  Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 6:49 PM
  To: 'ValmoroU@state.gov'; Huma Abedin
  Cc:
  Subject: Schedule
  PIs reach out to Dianne Feinstein for a dinner which will be very hard for me in July but if I have to be back for a few days
  in early August, might work then. Just so she knows we are trying.
  Also, I want to see Jack Keane for a drink.
  FM Lieberman wants to see me in July--let's discuss
  Also FM Zebari of Iraq will be in US in July. PIs find out when he is coming
  Have you heard from Carlos Slim about a date for a mtg?
  Don't forget:
  the Skoll mtg,
  the Arctic Council in Greenland,
  Harlan Dalton's visit,
  Carol Evans' request for an interview,
  the Vital Voices Summit 9/14-17,
  the request for a mtg or call w Dellums
  the AGOA conf in DC which I was told is 8/3-4
  The Putin conf about tigers in Vladivostock 9/11-19
  What happened w the Baucus mtg?
  Also, I'd like a working lunch w Ron Kirk and a mtg about Latin America w Chris Dodd
  Pls schedule Hannah Rosenthal to see me
  David Rockefeller Sr has asked to see me. I'd like to do when I'm in NY or if there is a State Dept award we could give him
  for his citizen diplomacy esp in Latin America--could you run traps on that idea?
  During UNGA, I have to do bilat w Cathy Ashton
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777225 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777240
MetadataSubject: DAVE STONE
MetadataTo: ValmoroLJ@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-28T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777240/C05777240.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Dave Stone
ExtractedTo: 'ValmoroU@state.gov.
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, June 28, 2010 7:48 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777240
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Pls add his burial ceremony at Arlington on July 14 as option for me. Thx.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777240 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 7:48 PM
  To: 'ValmoroU@state.gov.
  Subject: Dave Stone
  Pls add his burial ceremony at Arlington on July 14 as option for me. Thx.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777240 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777242
MetadataSubject: ARE YOU STILL UP?
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-28T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777242/C05777242.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Ae you still up?
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, June 28, 2010 10:09 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777242
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Yes--call me.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777242 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 10:09 PM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Ae you still up?
  Yes--call me.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Mon Jun 28 22:03:53 2010
  Subject: Ae you still up?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777242 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777243
MetadataTo: hanleymr@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777243/C05777243.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re:
ExtractedTo: 'ha nleym r@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Huma Abedin
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 12:42 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777243
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  B6
  Let's do Tues evening. Do you know when I can see Maryann?

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777243 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 12:42 AM
  To: 'ha nleym r@state.gov'
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Subject: Re:
  B6
  Let's do Tues evening. Do you know when I can see Maryann?
  Original Message
  From: Hanley, Monica R <HanleyMR@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Wed Jun 23 22:41:18 2010
  Subject: Re:
  Yes she's in Hawaii until Tuesday morning. She can do Tuesday evening of Wednesday if that works for you
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Hanley, Monica R
  Sent: Wed Jun 23 22:40:38 2010
  Subject:
  Did you reach her?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777243 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777248
MetadataSubject: SCHEDULE
MetadataTo: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777248/C05777248.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Schedule
ExtractedTo: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: H
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 12:44 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777248
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Pls print.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777248 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 12:44 AM
  To: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
  Subject: Fw: Schedule
  Pls print.
  Original Message
  From: H
  To: 'ValmoroU@state.gov' <ValmoroU@state.gov>; Huma Abedin
  Cc: H
  Sent: Sun Jun 27 18:49:01 2010
  Subject: Schedule
  Pls reach out to Dianne Feinstein for a dinner which will be very hard for me in July but if I have to be back for a few days
  in early August, might work then. Just so she knows we are trying.
  Also, I want to see Jack Keane for a drink.
  FM Lieberman wants to see me in July--let's discuss
  Also FM Zebari of Iraq will be in US in July. Pls find out when he is coming
  Have you heard from Carlos Slim about a date for a mtg?
  Don't forget:
  the Skoll mtg,
  the Arctic Council in Greenland,
  Harlan Dalton's visit,
  Carol Evans' request for an interview,
  the Vital Voices Summit 9/14-17,
  the request for a mtg or call w Dellums
  the AGOA conf in DC which I was told is 8/3-4
  The Putin conf about tigers in Vladivostock 9/11-19
  What happened w the Baucus mtg?
  Also, I'd like a working lunch w Ron Kirk and a mtg about Latin America w Chris Dodd
  Pls schedule Hannah Rosenthal to see me
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777248 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777248 Date: 08/31/2015
  David Rockefeller Sr has asked to see me. I'd like to do when I'm in NY or if there is a State Dept award we could give him
  for his citizen diplomacy esp in Latin America--could you run traps on that idea?
  During UNGA, I have to do bilat w Cathy Ashton
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777248 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777256
MetadataTo: Abedin, Huma
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777256/C05777256.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re:
ExtractedTo: Huma Abedin; 'hanleymr@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Huma Abedin
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 7:46 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777256
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Could we move to 8:30?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777256 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 7:46 AM
  To: Huma Abedin; 'hanleymr@state.gov'
  Subject: Re:
  Could we move to 8:30?
  Original Message
  From: Huma Abedin
  To: 'hanleymr@state.gov' <hanleymr@state.gov>; H
  Sent: Tue Jun 29 06:00:45 2010
  Subject: Re:
  Monica - is already is locked for tonite. I am seeing her right before actually.
  Original Message
  From: Hanley, Monica R <HanleyMR@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Sent: Tue Jun 29 05:51:47 2010
  Subject: Re:
  Will lock in for tonight.
  We spoke to Marianne about coming in on the 8th.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Hanley, Monica R
  Cc: Huma Abedin <Huma@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Tue Jun 29 00:42:02 2010
  Subject: Re:
  Let's do Tues evening. Do you know when I can see Maryann?
  Original Message
  From: Hanley, Monica R <HanleyMR@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Wed Jun 23 22:41:18 2010
  Subject: Re:
  Yes she's in Hawaii until Tuesday morning. She can do Tuesday evening of Wednesday if that works for you
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Hanley, Monica R
  Sent: Wed Jun 23 22:40:38 2010
  Subject:
  Did you reach her?
  B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777256 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777261
MetadataSubject: RCH
MetadataTo: sullivanjj@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777261/C05777261.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RCH
ExtractedTo: 'sullivanjj@state.gov.
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 7:18 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777261
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Did you and/or PIR talk to him today? Do I need to see him tomorrow?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777261 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 7:18 PM
  To: 'sullivanjj@state.gov.
  Subject: RCH
  Did you and/or PIR talk to him today? Do I need to see him tomorrow?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777261 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777266
MetadataSubject: GINZBURG LETTER
MetadataTo: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777266/C05777266.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Ginzburg letter
ExtractedTo: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'; 'Russorv@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 7:21 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777266
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Pls prepare condolence letter to Justice RBG for loss of her husband, Martin.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777266 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 7:21 PM
  To: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'; 'Russorv@state.gov'
  Subject: Ginzburg letter
  Pls prepare condolence letter to Justice RBG for loss of her husband, Martin.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777266 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777269
MetadataSubject: CONFIDENTIAL
MetadataTo: hanleymr@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-06-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05777269/C05777269.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCc: dband
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777269
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Wednesday, June 30, 2010 12:00 PM
  'hanleymr@state.gov'
  Fw: confidential
  Fyi

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777269 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Wednesday, June 30, 2010 12:00 PM
  'hanleymr@state.gov'
  Fw: confidential
  Fyi
  Original Message
  From: Cherie Blair <cb
  To: H
  Cc: dband
  Sent: Wed Jun 30 09:00:41 2010
  Subject: RE: confidential
  Hilary can you give me a telephone number the Qatar Crown Prince can ring you on and he will get in touch.
  Alternatively I can get his personal phone number for you. What is the best for you?
  Cherie Blair
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: 15 June 2010 02:35
  To: Cherie Blair
  Subject: Re: confidential
  I would be happy to meet w him. How should I follow up to arrange a mutually agreeable time? All the best to you.
  Original Message
  From: Cherie Blair <cb
  To: H
  Sent: Mon Jun 07 09:56:45 2010
  Subject: confidential
  As you know I have good links to the Qataris. Sheikha Mosah's son is the 31/32 year old Crown Prince and she is keen
  that he starts to build a wider international profile. He has been appointed head of the Qatar National Food Security
  Programme which is designed to deal with Qatar's food security issues its a $30 billion programme. He is aware that
  food security is an issue you are majoring on and would love to meet with you in person to discuss this and to explore
  potential partnership areas between US and Qatar including possible participation in the US/World Bank Food Security
  Fund. He is also keen to talk more generally about US/Qatari cooperation and even suggested they could help out with
  the Oil spill problem. There is apparently a Arab Food Security Summit in October 2010 and he would like to discuss Us
  participation in that too.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777269 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777269 Date: 08/31/2015
  IS a meeting possible he is more flexible on place and times than his mother! Or maybe we could set up an initial phone
  call.
  Can you let me know if this appeals to you at all?
  Cherie. Blair
  This message has been scanned by MailController - www.MailController.altohiway.com
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777269 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777389
MetadataSubject: H: ROGER COHEN IN NYT: "AMERICAN DIPLOMA CY REVEALED --- AS GOOD"
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-04T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777389/C05777389.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777389
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  sbwhoeop
  Saturday, December 4, 2010 1:58 PM
  Re: H: Roger Cohen in NYT: "American Diploma cy Revealed — as Good"
  I'm at home now. or on cell

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777389 Date: 08/31/2015
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  sbwhoeop
  Saturday, December 4, 2010 1:58 PM
  Re: H: Roger Cohen in NYT: "American Diploma cy Revealed — as Good"
  I'm at home now. or on cell
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22©clintonemail.com>
  To: 'sbwhoeop
  Sent: Sat, Dec 4, 2010 11:42 am
  Subject: Re: H: Roger Cohen in NYT: "American Diploma cy Revealed — as Good"
  Tried calling your home and cell so let me know when you can talk and what #.
  Original Message -----
  From: sbwhoec.o
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Dec 04 08:51:11 2010
  Subject: Re: H: Roger Cohen in NYT: "American Diploma cy Revealed — as Good"
  Good luck out there. Talk sometime
  Sent via DROID on Verizon Wireless
  Original message
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777389 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777389 Date: 08/31/2015
  From: H <H0R22@clintonemai' com>
  To: shwhoeci.
  Sent: Sat, Dec 4, 2010 13:44:25 GMT+00:00
  Subject: Re: H: Roger Cohen in NYT: "American Diploma cy Revealed — as Good"
  Not bad--thx.
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoe.p
  To: H
  Sent: Fri Dec 03 09:54:38 2010
  Subject: H: Roger Cohen in NYT: "American Diplomacy Revealed — as Good"
  http*www.nyti_me
  .s.com 0/12 n/03_ -edcohen.htmi?hp
  The New York Times <htta:i. w.ptimes.comi>
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777389 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777389 Date: 08/31/2015
  December 2, 2010
  American Diplomacy Revealed — as Good
  By ROGER COHEN
  NEW YORK — Let's hear it for the men and women of the U.S. Foreign Service!
  They are, to judge from the WikiLeaks dump of a quarter-million of their
  private or secret cables, thoughtful, well-informed and dedicated servants of
  the American interest who write clear, declarative English sentences.
  I've not heard much in the torrent of Wiki-chatter about these admirable
  career diplomats whose diplomacy is now condemned to be unquiet. Yet it is they
  whose lives have been upturned. Every journalist knows that if their
  correspondence over several years was suddenly made public, they would lose most
  of their sources. That should give every journalist pause.
  So it will be on the front line of U.S. diplomacy. Contacts will
  self-censor. They will go quiet, particularly in the more conspiratorial parts
  of the world which also tend to be the most unstable, like the Middle East.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777389 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777389 Date: 08/31/2015
  Layers of secrecy will be added.
  Julian Assange, the thin-skinned founder of WikiLeaks, has hurt U.S.
  interests across a broad but probably shallow spectrum. That will satisfy him in
  that he's a self-styled foe of the United States. The guy makes me queasy.
  Perhaps the most shocking thing about the Assange treasure trove — beyond
  the "shock" of venal Gulf Arab Sunni leaders looking for war on the cheap
  against Shiite Iran so long as it doesn't disrupt their U.S.-armed fiefdoms; or
  the "shock" of Pakistani double-dealing and nuclear procrastination; or the
  "shock" of yet more premature Israeli predictions on when Iran will have a
  nuclear weapon; or the "shock" of continued Saudi funding of Al Qaeda; or the
  "shock" of the Chinese Politburo hacking into Google; or the "shock" of Muammar
  el-Qaddafi's taste for voluptuous Slavic women and Silvio Beriusconi's taste for
  all women — perhaps the biggest shock of all is just how professional, sober and
  short on embarrassment all these cables are and just how much they conform with
  the world as we already knew it, right down to the familiar adjectives evoking
  French President Nicolas Sarkozy: "hyperactive," "mercurial," "authoritarian,"
  "erratic," "monarch-like."
  I swear, if they hadn't become diplomats a lot of these State Department
  people could have become good hacks.
  Overall, my longstanding admiration for America's conscientious diplomats
  has been redoubled, not least for this underreported nugget on the turbulent
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777389 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777389 Date: 08/31/2015
  Iranian election of 2009, contained in a cable of Jan. 12, 2010, from Dubai:
  "While we don't know nor might not ever know the real June 12 vote count, it is
  clear that the turnout was at record high levels and that there was systematic
  vote count fraud (if in fact the votes were even counted) to ensure that
  Ahmadinejad 'won big' in the first round."
  It is good to know that this is the innermost conviction of American
  diplomacy: the fraud was evident to anyone in Tehran during the election and its
  violent aftermath.
  A couple more observations on Iran: The first is that the Sunni autocrats of
  the Gulf are as exercised as they are about Tehran in part because they know
  that any U.S.-Iranian breakthrough might make them more dispensable to the
  United States. Their vested interest in the prevailing Middle Eastern strategic
  equation is strong; nothing would redraw the Middle East more than overcoming
  the U.S.-Iranian psychosis.
  The second is that President Barack Obama's approach to Iran has been much
  more conventional than his initial outreach suggested_ Old habits of attempted
  coercion trumped originality. Very quickly he fell back on Dennis Ross's tired
  thinking about balancing "appetizing carrots" with "sharp sticks" in tackling
  Iran's nuclear program.
  The cables reveal that as early as March 2009, a senior U.S. diplomat was
  talking "dual track," telling Europeans that "engagement alone is unlikely to
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777389 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777389 Date: 08/31/2015
  succeed" and calling for added "pressure." Perhaps Iranian skepticism could
  never have been overcome; certainly this approach guaranteed longstanding
  Iranian grievances would fester.
  Assange himself clearly understands nothing of Iran or the Middle East or
  diplomacy. In an interview with Time, he expressed approval for Israeli Prime
  Minister Benjamin Netanyahu "coming out with a very interesting statement that
  leaders should speak in public like they do in private whenever they can" and
  bought into Netanyahu's view that this, in Assange's words, would "lead to some
  kind of increase in the peace process in the Middle East and particularly in
  relation to Iran."
  Huh? Netanyahu was referring to Arab leaders' now-documented private calls
  for a U.S.-led war against Iran, an option he also favors. And that, for
  Assange, is a step forward to peace! He's all over the place.
  What should we make of this brainy naïf who told my colleague John Burns
  that America is a threat to democracy? He's a loose canon; let him be. My
  impression is he's self-armed with a spade and he's digging.
  And what of the messenger's message? The cables are intriguing, offering
  plenty of voyeuristic titillation but no gasp of discovery. They provide texture
  but break little new ground. Yet their publication has done significant damage
  to the courageous work of America's diplomats and may endanger lives. That's a
  tradeoff that I find troubling and unpersuasive.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777389 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777389 Date: 08/31/2015
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777389 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777399
MetadataSubject: OUT OF OFFICE AUTOREPLY: T/C W
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Feltman, Jeffrey D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-04T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777399/C05777399.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Out of Office AutoReply: TIC w
ExtractedFrom: Feltman, Jeffrey D <FeltmanJD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, December 4, 2010 1:53 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777399
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  I am on official travel and should be back in the office on Monday, December 6. I will check this system intermittently.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777399 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Feltman, Jeffrey D <FeltmanJD@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, December 4, 2010 1:53 PM
  To:
  Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: TIC w
  I am on official travel and should be back in the office on Monday, December 6. I will check this system intermittently.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777399 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777404
MetadataSubject: T/C W MUSA KUSA
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-04T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777404/C05777404.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: TIC w Musa Kusa
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob J
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, December 4, 2010 1:59 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777404
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  I've told ops to hold any further dissemination until you have talked with these guys about how to execute the call back.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777404 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, December 4, 2010 1:59 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: TIC w Musa Kusa
  I've told ops to hold any further dissemination until you have talked with these guys about how to execute the call back.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemailcom>
  To: Burns, William J.
  , Feltman, Jeffrey 0; Kennedy, Patrick F
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Sat Dec 04 13:53:21 2010
  Subject: TIC w Musa Kusa
  You will read in the memcon that Musa Kusa asked me that Bill come to Tripoli to discuss the US-Libya relationship and
  that Pat come to discuss embassy issues. I also, as per Jeff s suggestion, said I was asking Amb Cretz to come back to DC
  for consultations. Let's discuss how we follow up Monday.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777404 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777458
MetadataSubject: H: KATHLEEN ON PALIN ON JFK. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-04T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777458/C05777458.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777458
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  sbwhoeop
  Saturday, December 4, 2010 7:08 PM
  H: Kathleen on Palin on JFK. Sid
  B6
  Sarah Palin is wrong about John F. Kennedy, religion and
  politics
  By Kathleen Kennedy Townsend
  Friday, December 3, 2010; 6:00 PM
  Sarah Palin has found a new opponent to debate: John F. Kennedy.
  In her new book, "America by Heart," Palin objects to my uncle's famous 1960 speech to the Greater Houston Ministerial
  Association, in which he challenged the ministers - and the country - to judge him, a Catholic presidential candidate, by
  his views rather than his faith. "Contrary to common newspaper usage, I am not the Catholic candidate for president,"
  Kennedy said. "I am the Democratic Party's candidate for president who happens also to be a Catholic."
  Palin writes that when she was growing up, she was taught that Kennedy's speech had "succeeded in the best possible
  way: It reconciled public service and religion without compromising either." Now, however, she says she has revisited the
  speech and changed her mind. She finds it "defensive . . . in tone and content" and is upset that Kennedy, rather than
  presenting a reconciliation of his private faith and his public role, had instead offered an "unequivocal divorce of the two."
  Palin's argument seems to challenge a great American tradition, enshrined in the Constitution, stipulating that there be no
  religious test for public office. A careful reading of her book leads me to conclude that Palin wishes for precisely such a
  test. And she seems to think that she, and those who think like her, are qualified to judge who would pass and who would
  not.
  If there is no religious test, then there is no need for a candidate's religious affiliation to be "reconciled." My uncle urged
  that religion be private, removed from politics, because he feared that making faith an arena for public contention would
  lead American politics into ill-disguised religious warfare, with candidates tempted to use faith to manipulate voters and
  demean their opponents.
  Kennedy cited Thomas Jefferson to argue that. as part of the American tradition, it was essential to keep any semblance
  of a religious test out of the political realm. Best to judge candidates on their public records, their positions on war and
  peace, jobs, poverty, and health care. No one, Kennedy pointed out, asked those who died at the Alamo which church
  they belonged to.
  But Palin insists on evaluating and acting as an authority on candidates' faith. She faults Kennedy for not "telling the
  country how his faith had enriched him." With that line, she proceeds down a path fraught with danger - precisely the path
  my uncle warned against when he said that a president's religious views should be "neither imposed by him upon the
  nation or imposed by the nation upon him as a condition to holding that office."
  After all, a candidate's faith will matter most to those who believe that they have the right to serve as arbiters of that faith.
  Is it worthy? Is it deep? Is it reflected in a certain ideology?
  Palin further criticizes Kennedy because, "rather than spelling out how faith groups had provided life-changing services
  and education to millions of Americans, he repeatedly objected to any government assistance to religious schools." She
  does not seem to appreciate that Kennedy was courageous in arguing that government funds should not be used in
  parochial schools, despite the temptation to please his constituents. Many Catholics would have liked the money. But he
  wisely thought that the use of public dollars in places where nuns explicitly proselytized would be unconstitutional. Tax
  money should not be used to persuade someone to join a religion.
  As a contrast to Kennedy's speech, Palin cites former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney's remarks during the 2008
  Republican primary campaign, in which he spoke publicly of "how my own faith would inform my presidency, if I were
  elected." After paying lip service to the separation of church and state, Romney condemned unnamed enemies "intent on
  establishing a new religion in America - the religion of secularism."
  "There is one fundamental question about which I am often asked," Romney said. "What do I believe about Jesus Christ?"
  Romney, of course, is a Mormon. He answered the question, proclaiming that "Jesus Christ is the son of God."
  Palin praises Romney for delivering a "thoughtful speech that eloquently and correctly described the role of faith in
  American public life." But if there should be no religious test in politics, then why should a candidate feel compelled to
  respond to misplaced questions about his belief in Jesus?
  When George Romney, Mitt Romney's father, was a presidential candidate in 1968, he felt no such compulsion. Respect
  for the Constitution and the founders' belief in the separation of church and state suggests that those kinds of questions
  should not play a role in political campaigns.
  Palin contends that Kennedy sought to "run away from religion." The truth is that my uncle knew quite well that what made
  America so special was its revolutionary assertion of freedom of religion. No nation on Earth had ever framed in law that
  faith should be of no interest to government officials. For centuries, European authorities had murdered and tortured those
  whose religious beliefs differed from their own.
  To demand that citizens display their religious beliefs attacks the very foundation of our nation and undermines the
  precise reason that America is exceptional.
  Palin's book makes clear just how dangerous her proposed path can be. Not only does she want people to reveal their
  beliefs, but she wants to sit in judgment of them if their views don't match her own. For instance, she criticizes Rep. Nancy
  Pelosi (Calif.), a Democrat and a faithful Catholic, for "talking the (God) talk but not walking the walk."
  Who is Palin to say what God's "walk" is? Who anointed her our grand inquisitor?
  This is a woman who also praises Abraham Lincoln's Second Inaugural, even though Lincoln explicitly declared, "But let
  us judge not that we not be judged." The problem for those setting up a free-floating tribunal to evaluate faith is that,
  contrary to Lincoln, they are installing themselves as judges who can look into others' souls and assess their worthiness.
  Kennedy did not and would not do that, but not because he was indifferent to faith. In fact, unlike Romney or Palin, in
  fealty to both his faith and the Constitution, he promised on that day in Houston that he would resign if his religion ever
  interfered with his duty as president.
  My uncle was a man who had his faith tested. His brother and brother-in-law were killed in World War II, and his sister
  died in a plane crash soon after the war. He suffered from painful injuries inflicted during his Navy service when his PT
  boat was cut in two by a Japanese destroyer. His God did not make life easy but did require a commitment to justice.
  America's first and oniy Catholic president referred to God three times in p_;.-:
  .:1,rai.adc'res and invoked the Bible's
  command to care for poor and the sick. Later in his presidency, 1.-.a ur;:•:-.1uvocaliv. about riohi:s: We are
  confronted primarily with a moral issue. It is as old as the Scriptures and is as clear as the American Constitution."
  Faith runs as a deep current through my family. Faith inspired my uncles' and my father's dedication to justice. My father,
  Robert F. Kennedy, on returning from apartheid-era South Africa in 1966, wrote a magazine article titled "Suppose God Is -
  Black." And my uncle Teddy fought for health care for all Americans, even if in her book }Dalin presumes to judge that he
  took positions "directly at odds with his Catholic faith."
  Teddy Kennedy believed that his stands were at one with his faith. He did disagree with the Roman Catholic hierarchy at
  times. But as we have seen, the hierarchy's positions can change, and in our church, we have an obligation to help bring
  about those changes. That may not be Palin's theology, but the glory of America is its support for those who would
  disagree - even on the most difficult and personal matters, such as religion.
  John F. Kennedy knew that tearing down the wall separating church and state would tempt us toward self-righteousness
  and contempt for others. That is one reason he delivered his Houston speech.
  Palin, for her part, argues that "morality itself cannot be sustained without the support of religious beliefs." That statement
  amounts to a wholesale attack on countless Americans, and no study or reasonable argument I have seen or heard would
  support such a blanket condemnation. For a person who claims to admire Lincoln, Palin curiously ignores his injunction
  that Americans, even those engaged in a Civil War, show "malice toward none, with charity for ail."
  Pal in fails to understand the genius of our nation. The United States is one of the most vibrant religious countries on Earth
  precisely because of its religious freedom. When power and faith are entwined, faith loses. Power tends to obfuscate,
  corrupt and focus on temporal rather than eternal purposes.
  Somehow Palin misses this. Perhaps she didn't read the full Houston speech; she certainly doesn't know it by heart. Or
  she may be appealing to a religious right that really seeks secular power. I don't know.
  I am certain, however, that no American political leader should cavalierly - or out of political calculation - dismiss the hard-
  won ideal of religious freedom that is among our country's greatest gifts to the world. As John F. Kennedy said in Houston,
  that is the "kind of America I believe in."
  Kathleen Kennedy Townsend is a former lieutenant governor of Maryland and the author of "Failing America's Faithful:
  How Today's Churches Are Mixing God With Politics and Losing Their Wav." She will be online on Monday, Dec. 6 at 11
  a.m. EST to chat. Submit your questions before or during the discussion.
  © 2010 The Washington Post Company

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777458 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  PART B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  sbwhoeop
  Saturday, December 4, 2010 7:08 PM
  H: Kathleen on Palin on JFK. Sid
  B6
  Sarah Palin is wrong about John F. Kennedy, religion and
  politics
  By Kathleen Kennedy Townsend
  Friday, December 3, 2010; 6:00 PM
  Sarah Palin has found a new opponent to debate: John F. Kennedy.
  In her new book, "America by Heart," Palin objects to my uncle's famous 1960 speech to the Greater Houston Ministerial
  Association, in which he challenged the ministers - and the country - to judge him, a Catholic presidential candidate, by
  his views rather than his faith. "Contrary to common newspaper usage, I am not the Catholic candidate for president,"
  Kennedy said. "I am the Democratic Party's candidate for president who happens also to be a Catholic."
  Palin writes that when she was growing up, she was taught that Kennedy's speech had "succeeded in the best possible
  way: It reconciled public service and religion without compromising either." Now, however, she says she has revisited the
  speech and changed her mind. She finds it "defensive . . . in tone and content" and is upset that Kennedy, rather than
  presenting a reconciliation of his private faith and his public role, had instead offered an "unequivocal divorce of the two."
  Palin's argument seems to challenge a great American tradition, enshrined in the Constitution, stipulating that there be no
  religious test for public office. A careful reading of her book leads me to conclude that Palin wishes for precisely such a
  test. And she seems to think that she, and those who think like her, are qualified to judge who would pass and who would
  not.
  If there is no religious test, then there is no need for a candidate's religious affiliation to be "reconciled." My uncle urged
  that religion be private, removed from politics, because he feared that making faith an arena for public contention would
  lead American politics into ill-disguised religious warfare, with candidates tempted to use faith to manipulate voters and
  demean their opponents.
  Kennedy cited Thomas Jefferson to argue that. as part of the American tradition, it was essential to keep any semblance
  of a religious test out of the political realm. Best to judge candidates on their public records, their positions on war and
  peace, jobs, poverty, and health care. No one, Kennedy pointed out, asked those who died at the Alamo which church
  they belonged to.
  But Palin insists on evaluating and acting as an authority on candidates' faith. She faults Kennedy for not "telling the
  country how his faith had enriched him." With that line, she proceeds down a path fraught with danger - precisely the path
  my uncle warned against when he said that a president's religious views should be "neither imposed by him upon the
  nation or imposed by the nation upon him as a condition to holding that office."
  After all, a candidate's faith will matter most to those who believe that they have the right to serve as arbiters of that faith.
  Is it worthy? Is it deep? Is it reflected in a certain ideology?
  Palin further criticizes Kennedy because, "rather than spelling out how faith groups had provided life-changing services
  and education to millions of Americans, he repeatedly objected to any government assistance to religious schools." She
  does not seem to appreciate that Kennedy was courageous in arguing that government funds should not be used in
  parochial schools, despite the temptation to please his constituents. Many Catholics would have liked the money. But he
  wisely thought that the use of public dollars in places where nuns explicitly proselytized would be unconstitutional. Tax
  money should not be used to persuade someone to join a religion.
  As a contrast to Kennedy's speech, Palin cites former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney's remarks during the 2008
  Republican primary campaign, in which he spoke publicly of "how my own faith would inform my presidency, if I were
  elected." After paying lip service to the separation of church and state, Romney condemned unnamed enemies "intent on
  establishing a new religion in America - the religion of secularism."
  "There is one fundamental question about which I am often asked," Romney said. "What do I believe about Jesus Christ?"
  Romney, of course, is a Mormon. He answered the question, proclaiming that "Jesus Christ is the son of God."
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777458 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777458 Date: 08/31/2015
  Palin praises Romney for delivering a "thoughtful speech that eloquently and correctly described the role of faith in
  American public life." But if there should be no religious test in politics, then why should a candidate feel compelled to
  respond to misplaced questions about his belief in Jesus?
  When George Romney, Mitt Romney's father, was a presidential candidate in 1968, he felt no such compulsion. Respect
  for the Constitution and the founders' belief in the separation of church and state suggests that those kinds of questions
  should not play a role in political campaigns.
  Palin contends that Kennedy sought to "run away from religion." The truth is that my uncle knew quite well that what made
  America so special was its revolutionary assertion of freedom of religion. No nation on Earth had ever framed in law that
  faith should be of no interest to government officials. For centuries, European authorities had murdered and tortured those
  whose religious beliefs differed from their own.
  To demand that citizens display their religious beliefs attacks the very foundation of our nation and undermines the
  precise reason that America is exceptional.
  Palin's book makes clear just how dangerous her proposed path can be. Not only does she want people to reveal their
  beliefs, but she wants to sit in judgment of them if their views don't match her own. For instance, she criticizes Rep. Nancy
  Pelosi (Calif.), a Democrat and a faithful Catholic, for "talking the (God) talk but not walking the walk."
  Who is Palin to say what God's "walk" is? Who anointed her our grand inquisitor?
  This is a woman who also praises Abraham Lincoln's Second Inaugural, even though Lincoln explicitly declared, "But let
  us judge not that we not be judged." The problem for those setting up a free-floating tribunal to evaluate faith is that,
  contrary to Lincoln, they are installing themselves as judges who can look into others' souls and assess their worthiness.
  Kennedy did not and would not do that, but not because he was indifferent to faith. In fact, unlike Romney or Palin, in
  fealty to both his faith and the Constitution, he promised on that day in Houston that he would resign if his religion ever
  interfered with his duty as president.
  My uncle was a man who had his faith tested. His brother and brother-in-law were killed in World War II, and his sister
  died in a plane crash soon after the war. He suffered from painful injuries inflicted during his Navy service when his PT
  boat was cut in two by a Japanese destroyer. His God did not make life easy but did require a commitment to justice.
  America's first and oniy Catholic president referred to God three times in p_;.-:
  .:1,rai.adc'res and invoked the Bible's
  command to care for poor and the sick. Later in his presidency, 1.-.a ur;:•:-.1uvocaliv. about riohi:s: We are
  confronted primarily with a moral issue. It is as old as the Scriptures and is as clear as the American Constitution."
  Faith runs as a deep current through my family. Faith inspired my uncles' and my father's dedication to justice. My father,
  Robert F. Kennedy, on returning from apartheid-era South Africa in 1966, wrote a magazine article titled "Suppose God Is -
  Black." And my uncle Teddy fought for health care for all Americans, even if in her book }Dalin presumes to judge that he
  took positions "directly at odds with his Catholic faith."
  Teddy Kennedy believed that his stands were at one with his faith. He did disagree with the Roman Catholic hierarchy at
  times. But as we have seen, the hierarchy's positions can change, and in our church, we have an obligation to help bring
  about those changes. That may not be Palin's theology, but the glory of America is its support for those who would
  disagree - even on the most difficult and personal matters, such as religion.
  John F. Kennedy knew that tearing down the wall separating church and state would tempt us toward self-righteousness
  and contempt for others. That is one reason he delivered his Houston speech.
  Palin, for her part, argues that "morality itself cannot be sustained without the support of religious beliefs." That statement
  amounts to a wholesale attack on countless Americans, and no study or reasonable argument I have seen or heard would
  support such a blanket condemnation. For a person who claims to admire Lincoln, Palin curiously ignores his injunction
  that Americans, even those engaged in a Civil War, show "malice toward none, with charity for ail."
  Pal in fails to understand the genius of our nation. The United States is one of the most vibrant religious countries on Earth
  precisely because of its religious freedom. When power and faith are entwined, faith loses. Power tends to obfuscate,
  corrupt and focus on temporal rather than eternal purposes.
  Somehow Palin misses this. Perhaps she didn't read the full Houston speech; she certainly doesn't know it by heart. Or
  she may be appealing to a religious right that really seeks secular power. I don't know.
  I am certain, however, that no American political leader should cavalierly - or out of political calculation - dismiss the hard-
  won ideal of religious freedom that is among our country's greatest gifts to the world. As John F. Kennedy said in Houston,
  that is the "kind of America I believe in."
  Kathleen Kennedy Townsend is a former lieutenant governor of Maryland and the author of "Failing America's Faithful:
  How Today's Churches Are Mixing God With Politics and Losing Their Wav." She will be online on Monday, Dec. 6 at 11
  a.m. EST to chat. Submit your questions before or during the discussion.
  © 2010 The Washington Post Company
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777458 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777470
MetadataSubject: (AP) MEDIATORS TRY TO INTERVENE IN IVORY COAST CHAOS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-05T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777470/C05777470.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (AP) Mediators try to intervene in Ivory Coast chaos
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_ShIft-H
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, December 5, 2010 11:10 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777470
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777470 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, December 5, 2010 11:10 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (AP) Mediators try to intervene in Ivory Coast chaos
  From: Larkins, Neal B
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_ShIft-H
  Sent: Sun Dec 05 10:55:54 2010
  Subject: (AP) Mediators try to intervene in Ivory Coast chaos
  ABIDJAN (AP) - International mediators tried to intervene in Ivory Coast's growing political crisis after both candidates in
  the disputed election said they were now president, raising fears the country could again be divided along the lines
  established during its 2002-2003 civil war. In the northern opposition stronghold of Bouake, several hundred people
  marched down a main boulevard, calling for incumbent Laurent Gbagbo to stand down. Villagers wielding machetes also
  created their own checkpoint in protest along one major road in the region.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777470 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777475
MetadataSubject: HOLBROOKE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-05T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777475/C05777475.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Holbrooke
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivan.11@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, December 5, 2010 1:40 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777475
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  One thing I forgot - Holbrooke called me this morning. He urged again that you see Lam bah (Tom is seeing him; Bill
  Burns has provided guidance on points you could make if you do). He also inquired aggressively about Karl's future. And
  he wants to come see you about Frank's last trip.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777475 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivan.11@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, December 5, 2010 1:40 PM
  To:
  Subject: Holbrooke
  One thing I forgot - Holbrooke called me this morning. He urged again that you see Lam bah (Tom is seeing him; Bill
  Burns has provided guidance on points you could make if you do). He also inquired aggressively about Karl's future. And
  he wants to come see you about Frank's last trip.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777475 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777504
MetadataSubject: H: LES GELB MAKES THE POINTS. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-05T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777504/C05777504.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: H: Les Gelb makes the points. Sid
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, December 5, 2010 7:15 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777504
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777504 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, December 5, 2010 7:15 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: H: Les Gelb makes the points. Sid
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C; 'Laurenjilot
  Sent: Sun Dec 05 19:12:10 2010
  Subject: Fw: H: Les Gelb makes the points. Sid
  Pis point.
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Wed Dec 01 09:20:19 2010
  Subject: H: Les Gelb makes the points. Sid
  H:
  Les Gelb, who oversaw the writing of the Pentagon Papers, makes the points that Wikileaks show US today trying to
  solve difficult international problems, telling the truth and diplomats acting professionally.
  <http://www.tdbimg.comflimage/print_blogs_header.gif?v=7.79.12>
  WikiLeaks Accidentally Helps U.S.
  by Leslie H. Gelb
  November 30, 2010 I 10:42pm
  Julian Assange clearly intended the State Dept. cable leaks to smear the U.S. as evil and selfish. Leslie H. Gelb on how he
  inadvertently proved the opposite.
  The Wikileakers dumped a vast pile of secrets <http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-11-28/wikileaks-
  documents-chinas-google-hack-un-spying-more-secrets/> to prove that the United States was selfish, stupid and
  wicked—but their revelations proved just the opposite. When you remove the gossip and obvious trivia that mesmerized
  the press, you clearly see what the Wikileakers never expected: A United States seriously and professionally trying to
  solve the most dangerous problems in a frighteningly complicated world, yet lacking the power to dictate solutions. U.S.
  policymakers and diplomats are shown, quite accurately, doing what they are supposed to do: ferreting out critical
  information from foreign leaders, searching for paths to common action, and struggling with the right amount of
  pressure to apply on allies and adversaries. And in most cases, the villain is not Washington, but foreign leaders escaping
  common action with cowardice and hypocrisy.
  Don't think for a New York minute that Julian Assange, the Wikileaker, unloaded this trove to save humankind. Why did
  he toss in those cables about Italy's leader being a rake and Germany's chancellor being a cautious fuddy-duddy, and
  President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan being "paranoid"? To save the world? Not a chance. He did it to get attention,
  and he got attention from a drooling press, which then went on to call the very material they were highlighting trivial.
  Did Assange leak critical conversations with Chinese or Arab leaders to help solve the problems in Korea and Iran? Not
  by the hair on your chinny chin chin. He did it to show that he could do it—and for the attention. Anyone who is not a
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777504 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777504 Date: 08/31/2015
  hopeless left-wing ideologue knows that such leaks will crush future serious conversations with those leaders for some
  time to come. Just think: if you told someone a serious and critical confidence about someone else, and your confidant
  went out and told others, would you soon repeat that mistake? Assange did not leak these cables to help solve world
  problems. These leaks were absolutely gratuitous and served only the purpose of making him a media marvel.
  When you actually read the cables, here's what you see: American leaders and American diplomats trying to solve
  crucial world In explaining his deed publicly, Assange suggests that what he's doing is uncovering American misdeeds
  and lies. His aim, he says, is to inform citizens of democracies and peoples around the world about what their leaders
  are really doing. Assange also insists he did this for transparency's sake. Yet when he got to look inside, he didn't see
  what was plain: that our diplomats were doing a good job. Indeed, when you turn off his nonsense and stop listening to
  the strange commentary on cable news and even on the front pages of great newspapers, when you actually read the
  cables, here's what you see: American leaders and American diplomats trying to solve crucial world problems.
  But when you turn off his nonsense and stop listening to the strange commentary on cable news and even on the front
  pages of great newspapers, when you actually read the cables, here's what you see: American leaders and American
  diplomats trying to solve crucial world problems.
  —Washington needs China's help in bolstering sanctions against Iran, and China balks for fear of jeopardizing its oil and
  gas flow from that country. The Obama team arranges for Saudi Arabia to guarantee any loss in supply to China. If the
  world wants to slow or even prevent Iran's march to nuclear weaponry, this is a key path to doing so.
  —The U.S. discovers that North Korea has manufactured new medium-range missiles and is trying to deliver them to Iran
  through China. The Obama team discovers this, informs Beijing, and asks Beijing to stop the transfer. Beijing declines.
  Really creepy.
  —
  Yemen's leader takes public responsibility for American missile attacks against Al Qaeda in Yemen. He wants to
  diminish the power of these terrorists, as do Americans and most others in the world. The "lie" by the Yemeni president
  is a harmless way to get a critical job done—that is, the job of fighting international terrorism. Wikileaks tears away the
  political cover of Yemen's leaders.
  —
  No country has anywhere near as much influence over nutty North Korea as China. So, U.S. diplomats are searching
  desperately to figure out Chinese thinking about North Korea in order to compose a plan for avoiding war on the Korean
  Peninsula. So, the Wikileakers expose some Chinese leaders who are actually trying to give us some insight into Chinese
  thinking about North Korean craziness. They won't do that again soon.
  Time and again, as one actually reads these cables, one has to be heartened by the professionalism and the insights of
  U.S. diplomats. What are they doing? They are not lying, and U.S. leaders are not lying. They are actually, believe it or
  not, trying to solve problems. That seriousness of purpose and the professionalism to execute it is what jumps out at you
  in these materials.
  So, the naïve say, it's good to show the effectiveness of our diplomats. Give me a break. Ask any American diplomat to
  choose between looking intelligent in leaked cables and making progress toward avoiding war.
  None of this is to say that there should not be leaks, or that the press should not pursue classified information that is
  necessary or very helpful to a sensible public debate on policy. If a U.S. administration is lying, or distorting the facts, or
  telling one story to the public and another to itself, then by all means, let's have it out in public. If the U.S. government is
  concocting intelligence in order to justify wars, let's hope an enterprising reporter finds it out for the rest of us.
  But the Wikileaks dump is not about providing essential information to Americans or to others—information they need
  for serious policy discussion. This massive trashing by Wikileaks of a legitimate effort by the U.S. government to preserve
  confidentiality is the very least a shame and at the most, a crime.
  Leslie H. Gelb, a former New York Times columnist and senior government official, is author of Power Rules: How
  Common Sense Can Rescue American Foreign Policy
  <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0061714542/thedaibea-20> (HarperCollins 2009), a book that shows how
  to think about and use power in the 21st century. He is president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations.
  Like The Daily Beast on Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/thedailybeast> and follow us on Twitter
  <http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-11-30/wikileaks-helps-america-how-julian-assange-proved-us-
  working-hard-on-policy-problems/p/follow> for updates all day long.
  For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com <http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-
  stories/2010-11-30/wikileaks-helps-america-how-julian-assange-proved-us-working-hard-on-policy-
  problems/p/editorial@thedailybeast.commailto:editorial@thedailybeast.com> .
  <http://www.tdbimg.com//image/printfooter.gif?v=7.79.12>
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777504 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777504 Date: 08/31/2015
  URL: http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-11-30/wikileaks-helps-america-how-julian-assange-proved-
  us-working-hard-on-policy-problems/p/
  <http://b.scorecardresearch.com/b?c1=2&c2=6433482&c3=&c4=&c5=&c6=&c15=&cv=1.3&cj=1>
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777504 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777514
MetadataSubject: AMB. KHALILZAD ON THIS WEEK WITH CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-05T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777514/C05777514.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Amb. Khalilzad on This Week with Christiane Amanpour
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: LaVine, Christopher M
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, December 5, 2010 9:52 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777514
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Fyi
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777514 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, December 5, 2010 9:52 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Amb. Khalilzad on This Week with Christiane Amanpour
  Fyi
  From: Zhu, Ningchuan
  To: Ruggiero, Frank); Feldman, Daniel F; Singh, Vikram 3; Pauli, Rosemarie; Bommer, Ashley F; Sullivan, Jacob );
  S_SpecialAssistants; SSRAP StaffAssistants
  Cc: LaVine, Christopher M
  Sent: Sun Dec 05 12:24:41 2010
  Subject: Amb. KhallIzad on This Week with Christiane Amanpour
  From today's roundtable on Afghanistan with Amb. Khalilzad, George Will, and Zbigniew Brzezinski:
  ZB: ... We haven't had a better alternative than Karzai, and yet some of our officials have
  made a sport of maligning him. This business of corruption doesn't take into account
  cultural differences. And last but not least, who are we here in Washington to be moaning
  and groaning about corruption?
  CA: Let me ask you then, should Ambassador Eikenberry leave? I mean, has he done a good job,
  do you think, for the diplomacy, George?
  GW: Well he has a hopeless job to do, so it's hard to say whether he's done it well. If he
  should leave because of what was said in the -
  CA: What he has written in the cables?
  GW: Well, who's going to be left in the government, starting with the Secretary of State?
  ZK: I think he has been damaged very badly by the leaks that have taken place here in
  Washington, before WikiLeaks and afterwards. And a trusting relationship, if that is the
  objective, and I believe it ought to be, would require I think changes to the personnel that
  are responsible on a day-to-day basis in dealing with President Karzai.
  ... [exchange about corruption and about Iran]
  CA: Do you think, I asked George, Ambassador Eikenberry is doing a good job and should he
  stay in his position?
  ZK: Well I think he's doing a good job, but I think he's no longer an effective interlocutor
  due to the leaks.
  CA: Which means?
  ZK: Which means that if we want to deal with the issue of partnership with the government of
  Afghanistan, if we want to deal with the issue of domestic politics effectively, catalyzing
  cooperation, we would need to have a new team to be able to do that.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777514 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777521
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Verveer, Melanne S
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-06T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777521/C05777521.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777521
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Verveer, Melanne S <VerveerMS@state.gov>
  Monday, December 6, 2010 3:02 AM
  Fw:
  1.4(D)
  B1
  Just when we thought thing had calmed down....

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777521 Date: 08/31/2015
  Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 08/27/2015 — Class: CONFIDENTIAL
  — Reason: 1.4(D) — Declassify on: 12/07/2025
  RELEASE IN PART
  B1,1.4(D)
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Verveer, Melanne S <VerveerMS@state.gov>
  Monday, December 6, 2010 3:02 AM
  Fw:
  1.4(D)
  B1
  Just when we thought thing had calmed down....
  Original Message
  From
  To: Verveer, Melanne S
  Sent: Mon Dec 06 02:20:02 2010
  Subject:
  1.4(D)
  B1
  Dear Melanne
  1.4
  B1
  ******************
  The allegation against Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus of 'diverting foreign aid from Grameen Bank to another
  company' should be investigated, the prime minister has said.
  "Bangladesh has set many examples. Deceiving people by siphoning off their money is another such example. This is
  nothing but sucking out money from the people after giving them loans," she said replying to questions from journalists
  on Sunday.
  "There has been no improvement in the lifestyle of the poor so far. They were just used as pawns to get more aids,"
  Hasina added.
  She was speaking at a press conference at her office on Sunday following her three-nation tour of Russia, Belgium and
  Japan.
  "The people of Bangladesh have been made guinea pigs. I have never supported that. And now I protest," Hasina told
  journalists.
  Naimul Islam Khan, editor of Amader Shomoy, said, "Initially, the government had 60 percent share of the Grameen
  Bank which now has shrunk to 25 percent. It seems Mr Yunus wanted to empty the government exchequer, if he could.
  The government, however, didn't let that happen."
  He also asked whether the government would investigate the allegation raised against Yunus and his Grameen Bank.
  Responding to the query, the prime minister said, "Grameen Bank had been grabbed in such a manner as if it's a
  personal property. This should also be investigated. The poor people are becoming paupers. They have been tricked by
  sweet talks. Finally, things are getting out."
  Hasina compared Khaleda Zia's 'affection' for her cantonment house with Yunus' affection' for his Grameen Bank and
  said, "Grameen Bank is a public property. But it's being privatised out of 'love'. Yunus Sahib has fallen in love with
  Grameen Bank.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777521 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777521 Date: 08/31/2015
  "One can't but get caught if play with the money of the poor," she added.
  Norway's national TV NRK aired a documentary on November 30 titled "Fanget i Mikrogjeld" or "Caught in Micro debt",
  based on which bdnews24.com ran a report on December 1.
  According to the documentary, Yunus transferred the money to Grameen Kalyan, which was in no way involved with
  microcredit operations.
  Responding to the allegations, Grameen Bank claimed there was no wrongdoing in the agreement between the bank
  and Grameen Kalyan under which it received Tk 3,917 million from the bank.
  "Decisions were taken by the Grameen Bank Board, with due deliberation, good faith, and with good intentions to
  benefit the poor," the Grameen Bank rejoinder said.
  Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777521 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777523
MetadataSubject: MORE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Verveer, Melanne S
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-06T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777523/C05777523.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777523
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Verveer, Melanne S <VerveerMS@state.gov>
  Monday, December 6, 2010 6:01 AM
  More
  1.4(D)
  B1

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777523 Date: 08/31/2015
  Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 08/27/2015 — Class: CONFIDENTIAL
  — Reason: 1.4(D) — Declassify on: 12/07/2025
  RELEASE IN PART
  B1,1.4(D)
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Verveer, Melanne S <VerveerMS@state.gov>
  Monday, December 6, 2010 6:01 AM
  More
  1.4(D)
  B1
  Original Message
  From
  To: Verveer, Melanne s
  Sent: Mon Dec 0605:31:39 2010
  Subject: Re 1.4(D)
  B1
  Thank you for getting back to me.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777523 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777523 Date: 08/31/2015
  1.4(D)
  1
  Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry
  Original Message
  From: "Verveer, Melanne S" <VerveerMS@state.gov>
  Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 04:41:49
  To:
  Subject
  1.4(D)
  B1
  Original Message
  From:
  To: Verveer, Melanne S
  Sent: Mon Dec 06 02:20:02 2010
  Subject:
  1.4(D)
  B1
  1.4(D)
  B1
  Dear Melanne
  ******************
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777523 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777523 Date: 08/31/2015
  The allegation against Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus of 'diverting foreign aid from Grameen Bank to another
  company' should be investigated, the prime minister has said.
  "Bangladesh has set many examples. Deceiving people by siphoning off their money is another such example. This is
  nothing but sucking out money from the people after giving them loans," she said replying to questions from journalists
  on Sunday.
  "There has been no improvement in the lifestyle of the poor so far. They were just used as pawns to get more aids,"
  Hasina added.
  She was speaking at a press conference at her office on Sunday following her three-nation tour of Russia, Belgium and
  Japan.
  "The people of Bangladesh have been made guinea pigs. I have never supported that. And now I protest," Hasina told
  journalists.
  Naimul Islam Khan, editor of Amader Shomoy, said, "Initially, the government had 60 percent share of the Grameen
  Bank which now has shrunk to 25 percent. It seems Mr Yunus wanted to empty the government exchequer, if he could.
  The government, however, didn't let that happen."
  He also asked whether the government would investigate the allegation raised against Yunus and his Grameen Bank.
  Responding to the query, the prime minister said, "Grameen Bank had been grabbed in such a manner as if it's a
  personal property. This should also be investigated. The poor people are becoming paupers. They have been tricked by
  sweet talks. Finally, things are getting out."
  Hasina compared Khaleda Zia's 'affection' for her cantonment house with Yunus' affection' for his Grameen Bank and
  said, "Grameen Bank is a public property. But it's being privatised out of 'love'. Yunus Sahib has fallen in love with
  Grameen Bank.
  "One can't but get caught if play with the money of the poor," she added.
  Norway's national TV NRK aired a documentary on November 30 titled "Fanget i Mikrogjeld" or "Caught in Micro debt",
  based on which bdnews24.com ran a report on December 1.
  According to the documentary, Yunus transferred the money to Grameen Kalyan, which was in no way involved with
  microcredit operations.
  Responding to the allegations, Grameen Bank claimed there was no wrongdoing in the agreement between the bank
  and Grameen Kalyan under which it received Tk 3,917 million from the bank.
  "Decisions were taken by the Grameen Bank Board, with due deliberation, good faith, and with good intentions to
  benefit the poor," the Grameen Bank rejoinder said.
  Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777523 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777529
MetadataSubject: MINI SCHEDULE 12/6/10 MONDAY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-06T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777529/C05777529.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Mini Schedule 12/6/10 Monday
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC©state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, December 6, 2010 7:37 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777529
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  8:15 am DEPART Private Residence
  En route State Department
  8:25 am ARRIVE State Department
  8:25 am PRESIDENTIAL DAILY BR/EFING
  8:30 am Secretary's Office
  8:45 am DAILY SENIOR STAFF MEETING
  9:15 am Secretary's Conference Room
  9:15 am MONDAY MEETING w/ASSISTANT SECRETARIES
  10:00 am HST 7516, Principals Conference Room
  10:00 am OFFICE TIME
  11:15 am Secretary's Office
  11:15 am MEETING w/SOUTH KOREAN FOREIGN MINISTER KIM SUNG-HWAN
  11:45 am Secretary's Conference Room *Camera spray at top in Treaty Room.
  11:45 am OFFICE TIME
  12:15 pm Secretary's Office
  12:15 pm MEETING w/JAPANESE FOREIGN MINISTER SEIJI MAEHARA
  12:45 pm Deputy Secretary's Conference Room *Camera spray at top in Treaty Room.
  1:00 pm MEETING w/JAPANESE FOREIGN MINISTER SEIJI MAEHARA AND
  3:00 pm SOUTH KOREAN FOREIGN MINISTER KIM SUNG-HWAN
  Franklin Room, 811' Floor *Open press at top.
  3:00 pm PRESS PREP/PULL-ASIDE TIME
  3:15 pm Madison Room, 8th Floor
  3:30 pm PRESS AVAILABILITY w/JAPANESE FOREIGN MINISTER SEIJI
  4:00 pm MAEHARA AND SOUTH KOREAN FOREIGN MINISTER KIM SUNG-HWAN
  Franklin Room, 8' Floor
  4:00 pm OFFICE TIME
  4:30 pm Secretary's Office
  4:30 pm MEETING w/SENATOR RUSS FEINGOLD
  5:00 pm Secretary's Outer Office
  Tbd pm DEPART State Department
  En route Private Residence
  Tbd pm ARRIVE Private Residence
  ###

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777529 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC©state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, December 6, 2010 7:37 AM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Mini Schedule 12/6/10 Monday
  8:15 am DEPART Private Residence
  En route State Department
  8:25 am ARRIVE State Department
  8:25 am PRESIDENTIAL DAILY BR/EFING
  8:30 am Secretary's Office
  8:45 am DAILY SENIOR STAFF MEETING
  9:15 am Secretary's Conference Room
  9:15 am MONDAY MEETING w/ASSISTANT SECRETARIES
  10:00 am HST 7516, Principals Conference Room
  10:00 am OFFICE TIME
  11:15 am Secretary's Office
  11:15 am MEETING w/SOUTH KOREAN FOREIGN MINISTER KIM SUNG-HWAN
  11:45 am Secretary's Conference Room *Camera spray at top in Treaty Room.
  11:45 am OFFICE TIME
  12:15 pm Secretary's Office
  12:15 pm MEETING w/JAPANESE FOREIGN MINISTER SEIJI MAEHARA
  12:45 pm Deputy Secretary's Conference Room *Camera spray at top in Treaty Room.
  1:00 pm MEETING w/JAPANESE FOREIGN MINISTER SEIJI MAEHARA AND
  3:00 pm SOUTH KOREAN FOREIGN MINISTER KIM SUNG-HWAN
  Franklin Room, 811' Floor *Open press at top.
  3:00 pm PRESS PREP/PULL-ASIDE TIME
  3:15 pm Madison Room, 8th Floor
  3:30 pm PRESS AVAILABILITY w/JAPANESE FOREIGN MINISTER SEIJI
  4:00 pm MAEHARA AND SOUTH KOREAN FOREIGN MINISTER KIM SUNG-HWAN
  Franklin Room, 8' Floor
  4:00 pm OFFICE TIME
  4:30 pm Secretary's Office
  4:30 pm MEETING w/SENATOR RUSS FEINGOLD
  5:00 pm Secretary's Outer Office
  Tbd pm DEPART State Department
  En route Private Residence
  Tbd pm ARRIVE Private Residence
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777529 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777544
MetadataSubject: MORE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Verveer, Melanne S
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-06T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777544/C05777544.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777544
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Verveer, Melanne S <VerveerMS©state.gov>
  Monday, December 6, 2010 8:18 AM
  Re: More 1.4(D)
  B1
  I just left DC last night and got to Brussels this morning.They have me on a treadmill but I will get to Bob. I already
  emailed our ambassador to Bangladesh who was pulled into this several months ago.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777544 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B1,1.4(D)
  Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 08/27/2015 — Class: CONFIDENTIAL
  — Reason: 1.4(D) — Declassify on: 12/07/2025
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Verveer, Melanne S <VerveerMS©state.gov>
  Monday, December 6, 2010 8:18 AM
  Re: More 1.4(D)
  B1
  I just left DC last night and got to Brussels this morning.They have me on a treadmill but I will get to Bob. I already
  emailed our ambassador to Bangladesh who was pulled into this several months ago.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemailcom>
  To: Verveer, Melanne S
  Sent: Mon Dec 06 07:09:55 2010
  Subject: Re: More
  Are you back yet? Let's discuss w Bob Blake asap.
  Original Message
  From: Verveer, Melanne S <VerveerMS@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Mon Dec 06 06:01:07 2010
  Subject: More
  Original Message
  From
  To: Verveer, Melanne S
  Sent: Mon Dec 06 05:31:39 2010
  Subject: Re:
  1.4(D)
  B1
  1.4(D)
  Thank you for getting back to me.
  B1
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777544 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777544 Date: 08/31/2015
  1.4(D
  B1
  Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry
  -----Original Message
  From: "Verveer, Melanne S" <VerveerMS@state.gov>
  Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 04:41:49
  To:
  Subject: Re:
  1.4(D)
  B1
  Original Message
  From
  To: Verveer, Melanne 5
  Sent: Mon Dec 06 02:20:02 2010
  1.4(D)
  B1
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777544 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777544 Date: 08/31/2015
  Subject: 1.4(D)
  B1
  Dear Melanne
  ******************
  The allegation against Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus of 'diverting foreign aid from Grameen Bank to another
  company' should be investigated, the prime minister has said.
  "Bangladesh has set many examples. Deceiving people by siphoning off their money is another such example. This is
  nothing but sucking out money from the people after giving them loans," she said replying to questions from journalists
  on Sunday.
  "There has been no improvement in the lifestyle of the poor so far. They were just used as pawns to get more aids,"
  Hasina added.
  She was speaking at a press conference at her office on Sunday following her three-nation tour of Russia, Belgium and
  Japan.
  "The people of Bangladesh have been made guinea pigs. I have never supported that. And now I protest," Hasina told
  journalists.
  Naimul Islam Khan, editor of Amader Shomoy, said, "Initially, the government had 60 percent share of the Grameen
  Bank which now has shrunk to 25 percent. It seems Mr Yunus wanted to empty the government exchequer, if he could.
  The government, however, didn't let that happen."
  He also asked whether the government would investigate the allegation raised against Yunus and his Grameen Bank.
  Responding to the query, the prime minister said, "Grameen Bank had been grabbed in such a manner as if it's a
  personal property. This should also be investigated. The poor people are becoming paupers. They have been tricked by
  sweet talks. Finally, things are getting out."
  Hasina compared Khaleda Zia's 'affection' for her cantonment house with Yunus"affection' for his Grameen Bank and
  said, "Grameen Bank is a public property. But it's being privatised out of 'love'. Yunus Sahib has fallen in love with
  Grameen Bank.
  "One can't but get caught if play with the money of the poor," she added.
  Norway's national TV NRK aired a documentary on November 30 titled "Fanget i Mikrogjeld" or "Caught in Micro debt",
  based on which bdnews24.com ran a report on December 1.
  According to the documentary, Yunus transferred the money to Grameen Kalyan, which was in no way involved with
  microcredit operations.
  Responding to the allegations, Grameen Bank claimed there was no wrongdoing in the agreement between the bank
  and Grameen Kalyan under which it received Tk 3,917 million from the bank.
  "Decisions were taken by the Grameen Bank Board, with due deliberation, good faith, and with good intentions to
  benefit the poor," the Grameen Bank rejoinder said.
  Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777544 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777553
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Fuchs, Michael H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-06T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777553/C05777553.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777553
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Will do
  Fuchs, Michael H <FuchsMH@state.gov>
  Monday, December 6, 2010 8:27 AM
  Re:

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777553 Date: 08/31/2015
  Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 08/27/2015 — Class: CONFIDENTIAL
  — Reason: 1.4(D) — Declassify on: 12/07/2025 RELEASE IN PART
  B1,1.4(D)
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Will do
  Fuchs, Michael H <FuchsMH@state.gov>
  Monday, December 6, 2010 8:27 AM
  Re:
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Fuchs, Michael H
  Sent: Mon Dec 06 04:39:48 2010
  Subject: Fw 1.4(D)
  B1
  Mike--pis look into this for me. I'd like to know what really is going on. Thx.
  Original Message
  From: Verveer, Melanne S <VerveerMS@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Mon Dec 06 03:02:28 2010
  Subject: Fw
  Just when we thought thing had calmed down....
  Original Message
  From:
  To: Verveer, Melanne S
  Sent: Mon Dec 06 02:20:02 2010
  Subject: 1.4(D)
  B1
  Dear Melanne
  ******************
  The allegation against Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus of 'diverting foreign aid from Grameen Bank to another
  company' should be investigated, the prime minister has said.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777553 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777553 Date: 08/31/2015
  "Bangladesh has set many examples. Deceiving people by siphoning off their money is another such example. This is
  nothing but sucking out money from the people after giving them loans," she said replying to questions from journalists
  on Sunday.
  "There has been no improvement in the lifestyle of the poor so far. They were just used as pawns to get more aids,"
  Hasina added.
  She was speaking at a press conference at her office on Sunday following her three-nation tour of Russia, Belgium and
  Japan.
  "The people of Bangladesh have been made guinea pigs. I have never supported that. And now I protest," Hasina told
  journalists.
  Naimul Islam Khan, editor of Amader Shomoy, said, "Initially, the government had 60 percent share of the Grameen
  Bank which now has shrunk to 25 percent. It seems Mr Yunus wanted to empty the government exchequer, if he could.
  The government, however, didn't let that happen."
  He also asked whether the government would investigate the allegation raised against Yunus and his Grameen Bank.
  Responding to the query, the prime minister said, "Grameen Bank had been grabbed in such a manner as if it's a
  personal property. This should also be investigated. The poor people are becoming paupers. They have been tricked by
  sweet talks. Finally, things are getting out."
  Hasina compared Khaleda Zia's 'affection' for her cantonment house with Yunus"affection' for his Grameen Bank and
  said, "Grameen Bank is a public property. But it's being privatised out of 'love'. Yunus Sahib has fallen in love with
  Grameen Bank.
  "One can't but get caught if play with the money of the poor," she added.
  Norway's national TV NRK aired a documentary on November 30 titled "Fanget i Mikrogjeld" or "Caught in Micro debt",
  based on which bdnews24.com ran a report on December 1.
  According to the documentary, Yunus transferred the money to Grameen Kalyan, which was in no way involved with
  microcredit operations.
  Responding to the allegations, Grameen Bank claimed there was no wrongdoing in the agreement between the bank
  and Grameen Kalyan under which it received Tk 3,917 million from the bank.
  "Decisions were taken by the Grameen Bank Board, with due deliberation, good faith, and with good intentions to
  benefit the poor," the Grameen Bank rejoinder said.
  Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777553 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777588
MetadataSubject: BLANK
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-06T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777588/C05777588.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop B6
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, December 6, 2010 9:03 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777588
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  U.S. Orders Diplomats to Sto Telling Truth
  httrzquIrmw.truf,hdig.coardreipiartliteir/us orders dirtbrnats to stoo teilinq truth 20'1012051
  Posted on Dec 5, 2010
  Fake news by Andy Borovvibe;
  WASHINGTON—In the first major policy fallout from the WikiLeaks disclosures, the State Department has ordered all
  U.S. diplomats to "cease and desist telling the truth until further notice."
  "We are working overtime to fly to make sure that leaks like these don't happen again," Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
  told reporters. "But until we've got the leaks plugged, it's incumbent on all our diplomats to put on their lying caps."
  Clinton noted that since many U.S. diplomats are major political donors with long careers in the business world, "this
  shouldn't be a reach for them." But for those career diplomats who came up through the Foreign Service, the State
  Department will be holding a series of "truth avoidance seminars," led by executives of Goldman Sachs.
  Additionally, Clinton said, the State Department would install on all diplomats' computers new software called
  CandorShield', which automatically translates truthful language into a less embarrassing truth-free version. For
  example, she explained, the software would translate the phrase "two-faced weasels" into "trusted Pakistani allies" and
  would delete all references to French President Nicolas Sarkozy as "Monsieur Shorty Pants."
  Elsewhere, Interpol issued this statement about its pursuit of WikiLea.ks founder Julian Assange: "We will find Julian
  Assange, and then we will hire him."

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777588 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  INSSZOSIMUIll
  From: sbwhoeop B6
  Sent: Monday, December 6, 2010 9:03 AM
  To:
  U.S. Orders Diplomats to Sto Telling Truth
  httrzquIrmw.truf,hdig.coardreipiartliteir/us orders dirtbrnats to stoo teilinq truth 20'1012051
  Posted on Dec 5, 2010
  Fake news by Andy Borovvibe;
  WASHINGTON—In the first major policy fallout from the WikiLeaks disclosures, the State Department has ordered all
  U.S. diplomats to "cease and desist telling the truth until further notice."
  "We are working overtime to fly to make sure that leaks like these don't happen again," Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
  told reporters. "But until we've got the leaks plugged, it's incumbent on all our diplomats to put on their lying caps."
  Clinton noted that since many U.S. diplomats are major political donors with long careers in the business world, "this
  shouldn't be a reach for them." But for those career diplomats who came up through the Foreign Service, the State
  Department will be holding a series of "truth avoidance seminars," led by executives of Goldman Sachs.
  Additionally, Clinton said, the State Department would install on all diplomats' computers new software called
  CandorShield', which automatically translates truthful language into a less embarrassing truth-free version. For
  example, she explained, the software would translate the phrase "two-faced weasels" into "trusted Pakistani allies" and
  would delete all references to French President Nicolas Sarkozy as "Monsieur Shorty Pants."
  Elsewhere, Interpol issued this statement about its pursuit of WikiLea.ks founder Julian Assange: "We will find Julian
  Assange, and then we will hire him."
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777588 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777602
MetadataSubject: ONWARD, MY FRIEND
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Tauscher, Ellen O
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-06T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777602/C05777602.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Onward, my friend.
ExtractedFrom: Tauscher, Ellen 0 <TauscherE0@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, December 6, 2010 5:51 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777602
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Dear Hillary,
  I hear from Dianne and my staff that New Start is in play in the final CR/tax extension deal so I'm hopeful although I find
  the process disturbing.
  B6
  -----

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777602 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Tauscher, Ellen 0 <TauscherE0@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, December 6, 2010 5:51 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: Onward, my friend.
  Dear Hillary,
  I hear from Dianne and my staff that New Start is in play in the final CR/tax extension deal so I'm hopeful although I find
  the process disturbing.
  B6
  ----- Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Tauscher, Ellen 0
  Sent: Sun Dec 05 18:59:57 2010
  Subject: Onward, my friend.
  Dear Ellen,
  We're making progress on New START
  Hillary
  B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777602 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777610
MetadataSubject: LAVROV
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-06T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777610/C05777610.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Lavrov
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob 1 <Sullivann@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Jake Sullivan
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, December 6, 2010 8:17 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777610
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Turns out the French got through to him today on Cote d'Ivoire — would you be up for calling him tomorrow?

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777610 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob 1 <Sullivann@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, December 6, 2010 8:17 PM
  To: H
  Cc: Jake Sullivan
  Subject: Lavrov
  Turns out the French got through to him today on Cote d'Ivoire — would you be up for calling him tomorrow?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777610 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777614
MetadataSubject: TOMORROW'S MEETING WITH HUMAN RIGHTS NGOS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-06T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777614/C05777614.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: Tomorrow's meeting with human rights ngos
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, December 6, 2010 8:37 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777614
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: For your viz.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777614 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, December 6, 2010 8:37 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW: Tomorrow's meeting with human rights ngos
  For your viz.
  From: Posner, Michael H
  Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 3:33 PM
  To: Sullivan, Jacob 3
  Subject: Tomorrow's meeting with human rights ngos
  I tried to get them to switch the agenda to include Egypt instead of China — they are determined to raise China but we
  agreed that it will come last — so right now there will be a quick mention of Egypt at the top by Elisa Massimino from
  Human Rights First (who will open the meeting and serve as traffic cop). Then Karen Ryan from the Carter Center will
  raise DRC, followed by Ken Roth of Human Rights Watch who will raise Af/Pak issues, then David Kramer (former A/S in
  DRL now at Freedom House) raising China issues. The goal is to allow 15 minutes at the end for S (along with Dan Friend
  and Harold ) to raise Gitmo issues and ask for their support. We now have 45 minutes for the meeting
  Michael H. Posner
  Assistant Secretary
  Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor
  U.S. Department of State
  Room 7802
  (202) 647-2126 office
  (202) 647-5283 fax
  PosnerMH@state.gov
  http://www.state.goy/adri
  ntrNnir
  BLOC
  Oh)
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777614 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777623
MetadataSubject: TODAY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Verveer, Melanne S
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-07T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777623/C05777623.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Today
ExtractedFrom: Verveer, Melanne S <VerveerMS©state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, December 7, 2010 3:39 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777623
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  I won't be there for some of your meetings today;however, wanted you to know that Norwegians agreed to match our
  contribution to facilitate high crime cases and forensics work in DRC. They have been consistently excellent partners and
  are very happy about your announcement to do a national plan on 1325, where they have also led. At NATO yesterday, I
  learned about their recently adopted action plan on 1325, which the Dep SG said will have application in Afgh.
  For the OECD meeting today, know that their leadership has been very supportive of our efforts to get OECD to collect
  better data on women and economy as this is important to accelerating economic growth by addressing existing
  barriers to women's economic participation.
  I had very good mtgs at EU on potential development partnerships and sharing of successful models for gender
  mainstreaming. Many greetings extended to you from all your friends.
  Heading to Ukraine in the snow!

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777623 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Verveer, Melanne S <VerveerMS©state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2010 3:39 AM
  To:
  Subject: Today
  I won't be there for some of your meetings today;however, wanted you to know that Norwegians agreed to match our
  contribution to facilitate high crime cases and forensics work in DRC. They have been consistently excellent partners and
  are very happy about your announcement to do a national plan on 1325, where they have also led. At NATO yesterday, I
  learned about their recently adopted action plan on 1325, which the Dep SG said will have application in Afgh.
  For the OECD meeting today, know that their leadership has been very supportive of our efforts to get OECD to collect
  better data on women and economy as this is important to accelerating economic growth by addressing existing
  barriers to women's economic participation.
  I had very good mtgs at EU on potential development partnerships and sharing of successful models for gender
  mainstreaming. Many greetings extended to you from all your friends.
  Heading to Ukraine in the snow!
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777623 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777626
MetadataSubject: NORWEGIANS TO ISSUE STATEMENT ON
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Verveer, Melanne S
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-07T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777626/C05777626.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCc: Blake, Robert 0; Heg, James T.; Dean, Nicholas J
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777626
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Verveer, Melanne S <VerveerMS@state.gov>
  Tuesday, December 7, 2010 3:41 AM
  Fw: Norwegians to Issue Statement on
  Also appropriate for today. Scroll down from top email to first in chain.
  1.4(D)

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777626 Date: 08/31/2015
  Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 08/27/2015 — Class:
  CONFIDENTIAL — Reason: 1.4(D) — Declassify on:
  12/07/2025
  RELEASE IN PART
  B1,B5,1.4(D),B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Verveer, Melanne S <VerveerMS@state.gov>
  Tuesday, December 7, 2010 3:41 AM
  Fw: Norwegians to Issue Statement on
  Also appropriate for today. Scroll down from top email to first in chain.
  1.4(D)
  Original Message B1
  From: Moriarty, James F
  To: Verveer, Melanne S
  Cc: Blake, Robert 0; Heg, James T.; Dean, Nicholas J
  Sent: Tue Dec 07 03:31:23 2010
  Subject: Norwegians to Issue Statement
  Melanne,
  I got through to my Norwegian counterpart here and she told me that the Norwegian
  Foreign Ministry is working on the text of a statement that Oslo hopes to issue today. She was very worried that Norway
  had somehow end up catalyzing unjustified attacks on and thought it important that Oslo set the record 1.4(D)
  straight. She believed the statement would be short and concise. She encouraged us to raise the issue also in Oslo. The B1
  phone connection was a little shaky, but I think she mentioned that her Minister would be in Washington over the next
  couple of days.
  Aloha,
  Jim
  SBU
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED
  B6
  Original Message
  From: Verveer, Melanne S
  Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 10:24 AM
  To: Moriarty, James F
  Subject: Re troubles
  I hope you can get through to your counterpart We have excellent relations with N Maybe EUR can help.
  Original Message
  From: Moriarty, James F
  To: Verveer, Melanne S
  Sent: Mon Dec 06 22:49:19 2010
  Subject: RE troubles
  I hope the Norwegians prove helpful. So far, however, the lower levels wouldn't tell us anything of importance, and I'm
  having a little difficulty getting through to my counterpart.
  Aloha
  Original Message
  From: Verveer, Melanne S
  Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 9:46 AM
  To: Moriarty, James F
  Subject: Re troubles
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777626 Date: 08/31/2015
  1.4(D)
  B1
  1.4(D)
  B1
  1.4(D)
  B1

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777626 Date: 08/31/2015
  Very interesting, Jim. First of all, my apologies for not linking up by phone. I'm at the Eu and there was no way in the
  midst of events here to take a call.
  It was far too late to call when I was freed up.
  The pain he is feeling is palpable.
  B5
  Original Message
  From: Moriarty, James F
  To: Verveer, Melanne S
  Cc: Blake, Robert 0
  Sent: Mon Dec 06 22:39:28 2010
  Subject: troubles
  1.4(D)
  B1
  Melanne,
  .4(D)
  B1
  Aloha,
  Jim
  SBU
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED
  SBU
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED
  -----Original Message
  From: Verveer, Melanne S
  Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 5:04 PM
  To: Moriarty, James F
  Subject:
  B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777626 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777636
MetadataSubject: (REUTERS) WIKILEAKS FOUNDER ASSANGE ARRESTED IN BRITIAN
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-07T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777636/C05777636.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (Reuters) WikiLeaks founder Assange arrested in Britain
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shift-I
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, December 7, 2010 7:05 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777636
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777636 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2010 7:05 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (Reuters) WikiLeaks founder Assange arrested in Britain
  From: Virgil, Lynn C
  To: NEWS-Mahogany; NEWS-EUR; NEWS-WikiLeaks
  Cc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shift-I
  Sent: Tue Dec 07 05:26:33 2010
  Subject: (Reuters) WildLeaks founder Assange arrested in Britain
  LONDON (Reuters) - Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has been arrested by British police on a European warrant issued
  by Sweden, London's Metropolitan Police said on Tuesday.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777636 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777640
MetadataSubject: RICE: NEW START: RATIFY, WITH CAVEATS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Verma, Richard R
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-07T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777640/C05777640.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: Rice: New Start: Ratify, With Caveats
ExtractedTo: H; Burns, William J
ExtractedFrom: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, December 7, 2010 7:20 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777640
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  OPINION DECEMBER 7, 2010
  New Start: Ratify, With Caveats
  The treaty helpfully reinstates on-site verification of Russian nuclear forces, but senators should make it clear to
  Moscow that they don't see it as limiting U.S. missile defenses.
  By CONDOLEEZZA RICE
  When U.S. President Bush and Russian President Putin signed the Moscow Treaty in 2002, they addressed the nuclear
  threat by reducing offensive weapons,-as their predecessors had. But the Moscow Treaty was different. It came in the
  wake of America's 2001 withdrawal from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty of 1972, and for the first time the United States
  and Russia reduced their offensive nuclear weapons with no agreement in place that constrained missile defenses.
  Breaking the link between offensive force reductions and limits on defense marked a key moment in the establishment
  of a new nuclear agenda no longer focused on the Cold War face-off between the Warsaw Pact and NATO. The real
  threat was that the world's most dangerous weapons could end up in the hands of the world's most dangerous
  regimes—or of terrorists who would launch attacks more devastating than 9/11. And since those very rogue states also
  pursued ballistic missiles, defenses would (alongside offensive weapons) be integral to the security of the United States
  and our allies.
  It is in this context that we should consider the potential contribution of the New Start treaty to U.S. national security.
  The treaty is modest, reducing offensive nuclear weapons to 1,550 on each side—more than enough for deterrence.
  While the treaty puts limits on launchers, U.S. military commanders have testified that we will be able to maintain a
  triad of bombers, submarine-based delivery vehicles and land-based delivery vehicles. Moreover, the treaty helpfully
  reinstates on-site verification of Russian nuclear forces, which lapsed with the expiration of the original Start treaty last
  year.
  Meaningful verification was a significant achievement of Presidents Reagan and George H.W. Bush, and its
  reinstatement is crucial.
  Still, there are legitimate concerns about New Start that must and can be addressed in the ratification process and, if the
  treaty is ratified, in future monitoring of the Obama administration's commitments.
  First, smaller forces make the modernization of our nuclear infrastructure even more urgent. Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona has
  led a valiant effort in this regard. Thanks to his efforts, roughly $84 billion is being allocated to the Department of
  Energy's nuclear weapons complex. Ratifying the treaty will help cement these commitments, and Congress should fully
  fund the president's program.
  Congress should also support the Defense Department in modernizing our launchers as suggested in the recent defense
  strategy study coauthored by former Secretary of Defense Bill Perry and former National Security Adviser Stephen
  Hadley.
  Second, the Senate must make absolutely clear that in ratifying this treaty, the U.S. is not re-establishing the Cold War
  link between offensive forces and missile defenses. New Start's preamble is worrying in this regard, as it recognizes the
  "interrelationship" of the two. Administration officials have testified that there is no link, and that the treaty will not
  limit U.S. missile defenses. But Congress should ensure that future Defense Department budgets reflect this.
  Moscow contends that only current U.S. missile-defense plans are acceptable under the treaty. But the U.S. must remain
  fully free to explore and then deploy the best defenses—not just those imagined today. That includes pursuing both
  potential qualitative breakthroughs and quantitative increases.
  I have personally witnessed Moscow's tendency to interpret every utterance as a binding commitment. The Russians
  need to understand that the U.S. will use the full-range of American technology and talent to improve our ability to
  intercept and destroy the ballistic missiles of hostile countries.
  Russia should be reassured by the fact that its nuclear arsenal is far too sophisticated and large to be degraded by our
  missile defenses. In addition, the welcome agreements on missile-defense cooperation reached in Lisbon recently
  between NATO and Russia can improve transparency and allow Moscow and Washington to work together in this field.
  After all, a North Korean or Iranian missile is not a threat only to the United States, but to international stability broadly.
  Ratification of the treaty also should not be sold as a way to buy Moscow's cooperation on other issues. The men in the
  Kremlin know that loose nukes in the hands of terrorists—some who operate in Russia's unstable south—are dangerous.
  That alone should give our governments a reason to work together beyond New Start and address the threat from
  tactical nuclear weapons, which are smaller and more dispersed, and therefore harder to monitor and control. Russia
  knows too that a nuclear Iran in the volatile Middle East or the further development of North Korea's arsenal is not in its
  interest. Russia lives in those neighborhoods. That helps explain Moscow's toughening stance toward Tehran and its
  longstanding concern about Pyongyang.
  The issue before the Senate is the place of New Start in America's future security. Nuclear weapons will be with us for a
  long time.
  After this treaty, our focus must be on stopping dangerous proliferators—not on further reductions in the U.S. and
  Russian strategic arsenals, which are really no threat to each other or to international stability.
  A modern but smaller nuclear arsenal and increasingly sophisticated defenses are the right bases for U.S. nuclear
  security (and that of our allies) going forward. With the right commitments and understandings, ratification of the New
  Start treaty can contribute to this goal. If the Senate enters those commitments and understandings into the record of
  ratification, New Start deserves bipartisan support, whether in the lame-duck session or next year.
  Ms. Rice, a professor of political economy at the Stanford Graduate School of Business and a senior fellow at Stanford's
  Hoover Institution, was U.S. national security adviser from 2001 to 2005 and U.S. secretary of state from 2005 to 2009.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777640 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2010 7:20 AM
  To: H; Burns, William J
  Subject: FW: Rice: New Start: Ratify, With Caveats
  OPINION DECEMBER 7, 2010
  New Start: Ratify, With Caveats
  The treaty helpfully reinstates on-site verification of Russian nuclear forces, but senators should make it clear to
  Moscow that they don't see it as limiting U.S. missile defenses.
  By CONDOLEEZZA RICE
  When U.S. President Bush and Russian President Putin signed the Moscow Treaty in 2002, they addressed the nuclear
  threat by reducing offensive weapons,-as their predecessors had. But the Moscow Treaty was different. It came in the
  wake of America's 2001 withdrawal from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty of 1972, and for the first time the United States
  and Russia reduced their offensive nuclear weapons with no agreement in place that constrained missile defenses.
  Breaking the link between offensive force reductions and limits on defense marked a key moment in the establishment
  of a new nuclear agenda no longer focused on the Cold War face-off between the Warsaw Pact and NATO. The real
  threat was that the world's most dangerous weapons could end up in the hands of the world's most dangerous
  regimes—or of terrorists who would launch attacks more devastating than 9/11. And since those very rogue states also
  pursued ballistic missiles, defenses would (alongside offensive weapons) be integral to the security of the United States
  and our allies.
  It is in this context that we should consider the potential contribution of the New Start treaty to U.S. national security.
  The treaty is modest, reducing offensive nuclear weapons to 1,550 on each side—more than enough for deterrence.
  While the treaty puts limits on launchers, U.S. military commanders have testified that we will be able to maintain a
  triad of bombers, submarine-based delivery vehicles and land-based delivery vehicles. Moreover, the treaty helpfully
  reinstates on-site verification of Russian nuclear forces, which lapsed with the expiration of the original Start treaty last
  year.
  Meaningful verification was a significant achievement of Presidents Reagan and George H.W. Bush, and its
  reinstatement is crucial.
  Still, there are legitimate concerns about New Start that must and can be addressed in the ratification process and, if the
  treaty is ratified, in future monitoring of the Obama administration's commitments.
  First, smaller forces make the modernization of our nuclear infrastructure even more urgent. Sen. Jon Kyl of Arizona has
  led a valiant effort in this regard. Thanks to his efforts, roughly $84 billion is being allocated to the Department of
  Energy's nuclear weapons complex. Ratifying the treaty will help cement these commitments, and Congress should fully
  fund the president's program.
  Congress should also support the Defense Department in modernizing our launchers as suggested in the recent defense
  strategy study coauthored by former Secretary of Defense Bill Perry and former National Security Adviser Stephen
  Hadley.
  Second, the Senate must make absolutely clear that in ratifying this treaty, the U.S. is not re-establishing the Cold War
  link between offensive forces and missile defenses. New Start's preamble is worrying in this regard, as it recognizes the
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777640 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777640 Date: 08/31/2015
  "interrelationship" of the two. Administration officials have testified that there is no link, and that the treaty will not
  limit U.S. missile defenses. But Congress should ensure that future Defense Department budgets reflect this.
  Moscow contends that only current U.S. missile-defense plans are acceptable under the treaty. But the U.S. must remain
  fully free to explore and then deploy the best defenses—not just those imagined today. That includes pursuing both
  potential qualitative breakthroughs and quantitative increases.
  I have personally witnessed Moscow's tendency to interpret every utterance as a binding commitment. The Russians
  need to understand that the U.S. will use the full-range of American technology and talent to improve our ability to
  intercept and destroy the ballistic missiles of hostile countries.
  Russia should be reassured by the fact that its nuclear arsenal is far too sophisticated and large to be degraded by our
  missile defenses. In addition, the welcome agreements on missile-defense cooperation reached in Lisbon recently
  between NATO and Russia can improve transparency and allow Moscow and Washington to work together in this field.
  After all, a North Korean or Iranian missile is not a threat only to the United States, but to international stability broadly.
  Ratification of the treaty also should not be sold as a way to buy Moscow's cooperation on other issues. The men in the
  Kremlin know that loose nukes in the hands of terrorists—some who operate in Russia's unstable south—are dangerous.
  That alone should give our governments a reason to work together beyond New Start and address the threat from
  tactical nuclear weapons, which are smaller and more dispersed, and therefore harder to monitor and control. Russia
  knows too that a nuclear Iran in the volatile Middle East or the further development of North Korea's arsenal is not in its
  interest. Russia lives in those neighborhoods. That helps explain Moscow's toughening stance toward Tehran and its
  longstanding concern about Pyongyang.
  The issue before the Senate is the place of New Start in America's future security. Nuclear weapons will be with us for a
  long time.
  After this treaty, our focus must be on stopping dangerous proliferators—not on further reductions in the U.S. and
  Russian strategic arsenals, which are really no threat to each other or to international stability.
  A modern but smaller nuclear arsenal and increasingly sophisticated defenses are the right bases for U.S. nuclear
  security (and that of our allies) going forward. With the right commitments and understandings, ratification of the New
  Start treaty can contribute to this goal. If the Senate enters those commitments and understandings into the record of
  ratification, New Start deserves bipartisan support, whether in the lame-duck session or next year.
  Ms. Rice, a professor of political economy at the Stanford Graduate School of Business and a senior fellow at Stanford's
  Hoover Institution, was U.S. national security adviser from 2001 to 2005 and U.S. secretary of state from 2005 to 2009.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777640 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777658
MetadataSubject: YOUR LEGACY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-07T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777658/C05777658.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: your legacy
ExtractedFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA©state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Mills, Cheryl D; Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, December 7, 2010 12:04 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777658
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  I just want to say that as I brief the QDDR (20 times and counting), one of the points that makes
  the strongest impression, and that I frankly think is an enormous part of your intellectual and
  practical legacy, is putting together all the bureaus that focus on protecting individuals — protecting
  them from insurgent or criminal violence (CCO and INL), protecting their rights through law
  (DRL, GTIP, S/WCI), or meeting their basic needs in humanitarian emergencies (PRM). It is a
  major statement about the direction that the world is going and we must follow. This was really
  your idea, and it is a powerful one. I know your decision today and applaud it. AM
  Anne-Marie Slaughter
  Director of Policy Planning
  U.S. Department of State
  (202) 647-2972

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777658 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA©state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2010 12:04 PM
  To:
  Cc: Mills, Cheryl D; Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma
  Subject: your legacy
  I just want to say that as I brief the QDDR (20 times and counting), one of the points that makes
  the strongest impression, and that I frankly think is an enormous part of your intellectual and
  practical legacy, is putting together all the bureaus that focus on protecting individuals — protecting
  them from insurgent or criminal violence (CCO and INL), protecting their rights through law
  (DRL, GTIP, S/WCI), or meeting their basic needs in humanitarian emergencies (PRM). It is a
  major statement about the direction that the world is going and we must follow. This was really
  your idea, and it is a powerful one. I know your decision today and applaud it. AM
  Anne-Marie Slaughter
  Director of Policy Planning
  U.S. Department of State
  (202) 647-2972
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777658 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777664
MetadataSubject: DRAFT EMBASSY STATEMENT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-07T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777664/C05777664.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777664
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Tuesday, December 7, 2010 1:28 PM
  Laszczych, Joanne
  Fw: Draft Embassy Statement
  Print this traffic for HRC

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777664 Date: 08/31/2015
  Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 08/27/2015 — Class:
  CONFIDENTIAL — Reason: 1.4(B), 1.4(D) — Declassify on: 12/07/2025
  RELEASE IN PART
  1.4(B),B1,B5,1.4(D),B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Cc:
  Subject:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Tuesday, December 7, 2010 1:28 PM
  Laszczych, Joanne
  Fw: Draft Embassy Statement
  Print this traffic for HRC
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  To: Adams, Thomas C; Merten, Kenneth H; Lindwall, David E
  Cc: Mcdonald, Kara C; Laszczych, Joanne; Reynoso, Julissa; Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Tue Dec 07 13:24:21 2010
  Subject: Re: Draft Embassy Statement
  Can we do a call at 4pm
  From: Adams, Thomas C
  To: Merten, Kenneth H; Mills, Cheryl D; Lindwall, David E
  Cc: Mcdonald, Kara C
  Sent: Tue Dec 07 13:20:13 2010
  Subject: FW: Draft Embassy Statement
  1.4(B)
  Dan should be back from the oval office credentialing ceremony around 2 or so and it would be good to do a confer1.4(D)
  call then on all of this. B1
  —that the observation in the tabulation center did not show
  that to be possible.
  On tabulation process,
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777664 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777664 Date: 08/31/2015
  B1
  .4(B)
  .4(D)1
  We are reaching out to Luis Vassy at the French Embassy here, who is their man on Haiti matters, to get his help
  connecting with senior officials in Paris. They have not answered any of our direct messages.
  That's it for now.
  Tom
  SBU
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  From: Adams, Thomas C
  Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 12:39 PM
  To: Dan Restrepo
  Cc: B6
  Subject: Draft Embassy Statement
  B5
  SBU
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777664 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777672
MetadataSubject: THE ADVOCATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: PIR
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-07T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0111/DOC_0C05777672/C05777672.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: The Advocate
ExtractedFrom: PIR <preine;
ExtractedCc: Huma Abedin; CEA
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, December 7, 2010 1:57 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777672
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  A reporter named Kerry Elleveld of The Advocate is doing a possible cover story on your LBGT efforts at State. Caroline
  has put her through the ringer of Cheryl, GLIFFA leaders and members, gay ambassadors, Pat Kennedy, etc etc. Would
  love to put you on the phone with her in the next day or two. Should be super positive.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777672 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: PIR <preine;
  Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2010 1:57 PM
  To:
  Cc: Huma Abedin; CEA
  Subject: The Advocate
  A reporter named Kerry Elleveld of The Advocate is doing a possible cover story on your LBGT efforts at State. Caroline
  has put her through the ringer of Cheryl, GLIFFA leaders and members, gay ambassadors, Pat Kennedy, etc etc. Would
  love to put you on the phone with her in the next day or two. Should be super positive.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777672 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777673
MetadataSubject: THE ADVOCATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: PIR
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-07T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0112/DOC_0C05777673/C05777673.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: The Advocate
ExtractedFrom: PIR <preines
ExtractedCc: Hume Abedin
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, December 7, 2010 2:24 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777673
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Of course
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777673 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: PIR <preines
  Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2010 2:24 PM
  To:
  Cc: Hume Abedin
  Subject: Re: The Advocate
  Of course
  Original Message
  From: Evergreen
  To: PIR
  Subject: Re: The Advocate
  Sent: Dec 7, 2010 2:22 PM
  Ok as long as I have tps.
  Original Message
  From: PIR <preines
  To: H
  Cc: Huma Abedin; CEA <caroline.adler
  Sent: Tue Dec 07 13:57:16 2010
  Subject: The Advocate
  A reporter named Kerry Elleveld of The Advocate is doing a possible cover story on your LBGT efforts at State. Caroline
  has put her through the ringer of Cheryl, GLIFFA leaders and members, gay ambassadors, Pat Kennedy, etc etc. Would
  love to put you on the phone with her in the next day or two. Should be super positive.
  B6
  B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777673 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777677
MetadataSubject: LATEST
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Verveer, Melanne S
MetadataDateSent: 2012-12-07T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0112/DOC_0C05777677/C05777677.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777677
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Verveer, Melanne S <VerveerMS@state.gov>
  Tuesday, December 7, 2010 4:52 PM
  Fw: latest B1
  1.4(D)

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777677 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  PART B1 1.4(D)
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Verveer, Melanne S <VerveerMS@state.gov>
  Tuesday, December 7, 2010 4:52 PM
  Fw: latest B1
  1.4(D)
  Original Message
  From:
  To: Verveer, Melanne S
  Sent: Tue Dec 07 13:15:18 2010
  Subject: Re:
  Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 08/27/2015 —
  Class: CONFIDENTIAL — Reason: 1.4(D) — Declassify
  on: 12/06/2025
  Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry
  Original Message
  From: "Verveer, Melanne 5" <VerveerMS@state.gov>
  Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 08:06:47
  To:
  Subject: Re
  We understand that the Norwegians may be putting out a statement.
  Original Message
  From
  To: Verveer, Melanne S
  Sent: Mon Dec 06 05:31:39 2010
  Subject: Re
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777677 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777677 Date: 08/31/2015 B1
  1.4(D)
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777677 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777677 Date: 08/31/2015
  Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry
  Original Message
  From: "Verveer, Melanne 5" <VerveerMS@state.gov>
  Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 04:41:49
  To:
  Subject: Re: 1.4(D)
  B1
  ----- Original Message
  From
  To: Verveer, Melanne
  Sent: Mon Dec 06 02:20:02 2010
  Subject:
  Dear Melanne
  ******************
  The allegation against Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus of 'diverting foreign aid from Grameen Bank to another
  company' should be investigated, the prime minister has said.
  "Bangladesh has set many examples. Deceiving people by siphoning off their money is another such example. This is
  nothing but sucking out money from the people after giving them loans," she said replying to questions from journalists
  on Sunday.
  "There has been no improvement in the lifestyle of the poor so far. They were just used as pawns to get more aids,"
  Hasina added.
  She was speaking at a press conference at her office on Sunday following her three-nation tour of Russia, Belgium and
  Japan.
  "The people of Bangladesh have been made guinea pigs. I have never supported that. And now I protest," Hasina told
  journalists.
  Naimul Islam Khan, editor of Amader Shomoy, said, "Initially, the government had 60 percent share of the Grameen
  Bank which now has shrunk to 25 percent. It seems Mr Yunus wanted to empty the government exchequer, if he could.
  The government, however, didn't let that happen."
  He also asked whether the government would investigate the allegation raised against Yunus and his Grameen Bank.
  Responding to the query, the prime minister said, "Grameen Bank had been grabbed in such a manner as if it's a
  personal property. This should also be investigated. The poor people are becoming paupers. They have been tricked by
  sweet talks. Finally, things are getting out."
  Hasina compared Khaleda Zia's 'affection' for her cantonment house with Yunus' affection' for his Grameen Bank and
  said, "Grameen Bank is a public property. But it's being privatised out of 'love'. Yunus Sahib has fallen in love with
  Grameen Bank.
  "One can't but get caught if play with the money of the poor," she added.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777677 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777677 Date: 08/31/2015
  Norway's national TV NRK aired a documentary on November 30 titled "Fanget i Mikrogjeld" or "Caught in Micro debt",
  based on which bdnews24.com ran a report on December 1.
  According to the documentary, Yunus transferred the money to Grameen Kalyan, which was in no way involved with
  microcredit operations.
  Responding to the allegations, Grameen Bank claimed there was no wrongdoing in the agreement between the bank
  and Grameen Kalyan under which it received Tk 3,917 million from the bank.
  "Decisions were taken by the Grameen Bank Board, with due deliberation, good faith, and with good intentions to
  benefit the poor," the Grameen Bank rejoinder said.
  Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777677 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777683
MetadataSubject: WED. CHINA PC: RECOMMEND S
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-07T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0112/DOC_0C05777683/C05777683.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: Wed. China PC: Recommend S
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob 1 <Sullivan11@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, December 7, 2010 7:51 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777683
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: FYI.
ExtractedCc:
  McCarthy, Deborah A; Verville, Elizabeth G; Kelley, John C; Meale, David; Rosenberger, Laura M; Harrell, Peter E

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777683 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: Sullivan, Jacob 1 <Sullivan11@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2010 7:51 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW: Wed. China PC: Recommend S
  FYI.
  From: Engle, Thomas S
  Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 6:50 PM
  To: Sullivan, Jacob .1
  Cc: McCarthy, Deborah A; Verville, Elizabeth G; Kelley, John C; Meale, David; Rosenberger, Laura M; Harrell, Peter E
  Subject: Wed. China PC: Recommend S
  Hi Jake,
  I understand S will participate in the PC tomorrow on the Hu visit. We've just learned Commerce Sec'y Locke plans to
  propose
  Thanks very much.
  Cheers,
  Tom
  Tom Engle
  Director, Monetary Affairs
  U.S. Department of State
  2201 C Street, N. W.
  Washington, DC 20520
  202-647-5935
  englets@state.gov
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777683 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777692
MetadataSubject: OVERNIGHT BRIEF 12/08/I
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-08T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0112/DOC_0C05777692/C05777692.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Overnight Brief 12/08/1 (SBU)
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 5:52 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777692
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777692 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 5:52 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Overnight Brief 12/08/1 (SBU)
  From: OpsAlert
  Sent: Wed Dec 08 05:26:31 2010
  Subject: Overnight Brief 12/08/I (SBU)
  SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
  EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT
  Operations Center
  Overnight Brief
  Wednesday, December 08, 2010
  0530 EST
  VIOLENCE IN HAITI AS MANIGAT, CELESTIN ADVANCE TO RUNOFF
  (SBU) Announced results conflicted with the EU-backed National Observation Council's preliminary reports
  that Michel Martelly led government-backed candidate Jude Celestin in the vote, media report. Embassy Port-
  au-Prince reports civil society representatives took care in announcing early findings, but the information was
  reported locally as hard fact. Post notes gunfire could be heard throughout Port-au-Prince after results were
  announced late December 7.
  (Ops/Embassy Port-au-Prince e-mail, Port-au-Prince 1590, CNN)
  MBEKI MEETS WITH SUDANESE LEADERS TO DISCUSS ABYEI
  (SBU) Thabo Mbeki, head of the African Union Panel on Sudan, described the meeting with President Bashir
  and First Vice President Kiir as positive, according to press. The Office of the Special Envoy for Sudan comments
  the meeting was held to discuss an African Union paper outlining options for resolving the Abyei issue. Bashir
  and Kiir committed to meet one-on-one to develop a solution and said they would keep Mbeki informed as their
  discussions progress.
  (Ops/Office of the Special Envoy for Sudan e-mail, Sudan Tribune)
  DPRK CONDUCTS ARTILLERY DRILL NEAR MARITIME BORDER
  (SBU) The drill, heard in the Republic of Korea, was contained within Democratic People's Republic of Korea
  territory, according to press. Embassy Seoul comments the action was a defiant gesture in the face of international
  pressure to show restraint and likely connected to Admiral Mullen's visit to the ROK. (Ops/Embassy Seoul e-
  mail, AP)
  Please see our classified website at http://ses.state.sgov.gov
  Drafted: KMSimmons/MKBunt Approved: CTCrosby
  Dist: State (all bureaus), NSS, OSD, NMCC, JCS, CIA, OSC, NCTC, DHS, DNI
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777692 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777692 Date: 08/31/2015
  SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777692 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777696
MetadataSubject: EMBASSY STATEMENT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-08T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0112/DOC_0C05777696/C05777696.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Embassy Statement
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 5:52 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777696
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  This is the statement we released late last night.
  Election results order Manigault, Celestin, MartieIly.
  May be good to have Tom Adams give you a quick update today.
  Cdm

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777696 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 5:52 AM
  To:
  Cc: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Fw: Embassy Statement
  This is the statement we released late last night.
  Election results order Manigault, Celestin, MartieIly.
  May be good to have Tom Adams give you a quick update today.
  Cdm
  From: Adams, Thomas C
  To: 'Restrepo, Daniel A.'
  Reynoso, Julissa; Gray, Eugene
  Cc: Laszczych, Joanne; Mcdonald, Kara C
  Sent: Tue Dec 07 17:46:05 2010
  Subject: Embassy Statement
  Mills, Cheryl D; Lindwall, David E; Merten, Kenneth H; B61
  As Haiti enters the period of electoral contestation, it is essential that all political actors remain
  calm and encourage their supporters to do the same. The United States, together with Haiti's
  international community partners, stands ready to support efforts to thoroughly review irregularities
  in support of electoral results that are consistent with the will of the Haitian people expressed in
  their votes.
  Like others, the Government of the United States is concerned by the Provisional Electoral
  Council's announcement of results from the November 28 national elections that are inconsistent
  with the published results of the National Election Observation Council (CNO), which had more
  than 5,500 observers and observed the vote count in 1,600 voting centers nationwide, election-day
  observations by official U.S. observers accredited by the CEP, and vote counts observed around the
  country by numerous domestic and international observers.
  Haiti's transition to democracy over the past 24 years has seen many successes, overcoming major
  challenges. The 2010 elections represent a critical test of whether the Haitian people will
  determine their destiny through their vote. The United States is committed to the consolidation of
  democracy in Haiti and calls on the Government of Haiti, the CEP and all political forces to ensure
  that the will of the people is fully reflected in the outcome of this election.
  SBU
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777696 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777705
MetadataSubject: NEW START TREATY - - JUDD GREGG
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Verma, Richard R
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-08T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0112/DOC_0C05777705/C05777705.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: New START Treaty -- Judd Gregg
ExtractedFrom: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 7:52 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777705
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Good public movement on START by Judd Gregg.
  G.O.P. Support for Arms Treaty
  By
  PETER BAKER
  Another Republican senator signaled Tuesday that he may vote for the new arms control treaty with Russia if it comes
  up for a vote before the Senate adjourns for the year later this month.
  Senator Judd Gregg of New Hampshire, who did not run for re-election, said he hopes that the Senate will get a chance
  to vote on the treaty, known as New Start, right after a deal on tax cuts and a spending resolution to keep the
  government operating.
  "Start is an important issue. It should be fully debated. I am leaning towards supporting it," he told Andrea Mitchell on
  MSNBC. "I haven't made a final decision," he added, noting that Senator Jon Kyl of Arizona, the lead Republican
  negotiator on the treaty, still has concerns. "He has some reservations, but I believe many of those reservations are
  being addressed," Mr. Gregg said.
  President Obama has made passing the treaty his top foreign policy priority for the lame-duck session. Under the
  Constitution, approving a treaty requires a two-thirds super-majority, or 67 votes, meaning that Mr. Obama needs nine
  Republicans assuming all 58 Democrats stick with him.
  At this point, more than that many Republicans have offered positive-sounding statements like that made on Tuesday

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777705 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 7:52 AM
  To:
  Subject: FW: New START Treaty -- Judd Gregg
  Good public movement on START by Judd Gregg.
  G.O.P. Support for Arms Treaty
  By
  PETER BAKER
  Another Republican senator signaled Tuesday that he may vote for the new arms control treaty with Russia if it comes
  up for a vote before the Senate adjourns for the year later this month.
  Senator Judd Gregg of New Hampshire, who did not run for re-election, said he hopes that the Senate will get a chance
  to vote on the treaty, known as New Start, right after a deal on tax cuts and a spending resolution to keep the
  government operating.
  "Start is an important issue. It should be fully debated. I am leaning towards supporting it," he told Andrea Mitchell on
  MSNBC. "I haven't made a final decision," he added, noting that Senator Jon Kyl of Arizona, the lead Republican
  negotiator on the treaty, still has concerns. "He has some reservations, but I believe many of those reservations are
  being addressed," Mr. Gregg said.
  President Obama has made passing the treaty his top foreign policy priority for the lame-duck session. Under the
  Constitution, approving a treaty requires a two-thirds super-majority, or 67 votes, meaning that Mr. Obama needs nine
  Republicans assuming all 58 Democrats stick with him.
  At this point, more than that many Republicans have offered positive-sounding statements like that made on Tuesday
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777705 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777755
MetadataSubject: WIKILEAKS CARTOON
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: CrowleyPJ@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-08T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0112/DOC_0C05777755/C05777755.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: WikiLeaks cartoon
ExtractedFrom: Crowley, Philip J <CrowleyPJ@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma; Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D; Reines, Philippe I
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 11:18 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777755
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Madame Secretary, thought you might appreciate this.
  PJ
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777755 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Crowley, Philip J <CrowleyPJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 11:18 AM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma; Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D; Reines, Philippe I
  Subject: FW: WikiLeaks cartoon
  Attachments: 67704578-hillary-the-plumberjpg
  Madame Secretary, thought you might appreciate this.
  PJ
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  From: Barnes, Jennifer L [mailto:Barnes12©state.gov]
  Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 5:11 AM
  To: Crowley, Philip J; Ratney, Michael A; Smith, Dana S; Chitre, Nanda S
  Subject: WikiLeaks cartoon
  from 01le Johansson, Sweden
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777755 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777757
MetadataSubject: START
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Verma, Richard R
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-08T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0112/DOC_0C05777757/C05777757.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: START
ExtractedFrom: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 12:17 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777757
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Senate may move to START tonight....after failed cloture votes....and before fy 11 budget and tax issues.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777757 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 12:17 PM
  To:
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob
  Subject: START
  Senate may move to START tonight....after failed cloture votes....and before fy 11 budget and tax issues.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777757 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777826
MetadataSubject: LA TIMES/LAURA KING - AFGHAN TV POLICE DRAMA DELIVERS MESSAGE WITH ZEST
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: McHale, Judith A
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-08T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0112/DOC_0C05777826/C05777826.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: LA Times/Laura King - Afghan TV police drama delivers message with zest
ExtractedFrom: McHale, Judith A <McHaleJA@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 2:00 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777826
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedCc:
  Sreebny, Daniel; Hensman, Chris D; Namba, Nicholas; Kenna, Corley; Guimond, Gabrielle; Moore, James R

ExtractedBodyText:
  Interesting approach towards influencing popular attitudes. We are
  I'm speaking at the Democracy conference in Bali today and then heading home tomorrow. Had a great trip to Indonesia.
  Was also in Malaysia and met with Paul Jones on the educational initiative.
  See you next week.
  Jm

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777826 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  PART B5
  From: McHale, Judith A <McHaleJA@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 2:00 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: LA Times/Laura King - Afghan TV police drama delivers message with zest
  Interesting approach towards influencing popular attitudes. We are
  I'm speaking at the Democracy conference in Bali today and then heading home tomorrow. Had a great trip to Indonesia.
  Was also in Malaysia and met with Paul Jones on the educational initiative.
  See you next week.
  Jm
  From: Sreebny, Daniel
  To: McHale, Judith A; DiMartino, Kitty; Cormack, Maureen E; Schwartz, Larry R/PPR; Whitaker, Elizabeth A; Cedar,
  Andrew N
  Cc: Sreebny, Daniel; Hensman, Chris D; Namba, Nicholas; Kenna, Corley; Guimond, Gabrielle; Moore, James R
  Sent: Wed Dec 08 09:30:55 2010
  Subject: LA Times/Laura King - Afghan TV police drama delivers message with zest
  latimes.cominews/nationworld/world/la-fg-afghan-cop-show-20101208,0,6019051.story
  latimes.com
  Afghan TV police drama delivers message with zest
  Partially funded by the U.S. and aided by Australian TV veterans, the series 'Eagle Four'
  follows an elite Afghan police squad. It has a political agenda but gets points for being
  entertaining.
  By Laura King, Los Angeles Times
  6:20 PM PST, December 7, 2010
  Reporting from Kabul, Afghanistan
  Advertisement
  A suicide bomber is loose in the city, and the clock is ticking. But an elite squad of Afghan cops is on the case,
  working street sources and mining databases, equally at ease with witty one-liners and fully loaded assault
  rifles, looking cool and soulful all the while.
  In real life, the Afghan police are better known for illiteracy, drug abuse and shaking down citizens than for
  daring exploits worthy of the big screen—or the small one. But on the popular new TV series "Eagle Four,"
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777826 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777826 Date: 08/31/2015
  the squad's resourcefulness, heroism and teamwork never fail to carry the day.
  The show, which has slick production values and a noir-ish soundtrack, is midway through its initial run of 13
  episodes, and has already garnered a large, loyal following on Tolo TV, the country's most-watched station.
  With the show shot entirely in Kabul, the Afghan capital, open-air takes were sometimes ruined by eager
  onlookers — from ragged street urchins to cellphone-toting businessmen — trying to get close to the cast and
  crew.
  But overly enthusiastic fans were a happy diversion from challenges such as placating an angry mullah who
  tried to raise a mob to halt the production or dealing with Taliban death threats against several cast members.
  "We didn't know at first what the response was going to be," said Faramjan Abrahim, who plays the cocky,
  hotheaded rookie Baktash. "But then actual policemen started to come up and call me 'brother' and congratulate
  me for doing a good job solving the case."
  Most viewers are probably unaware that the series is financed at least in part by the public diplomacy arm of the
  U.S. Embassy, which acknowledged its monetary support while declining to disclose a dollar amount. A team
  of Australian TV veterans was brought in to mentor the Afghans working on the show.
  Boosting public respect for the Afghan security forces and drawing higher-quality recruits are crucial to U.S.
  hopes that the police and army will be ready to assume responsibility for the country's security in three years —
  a goal some consider way too optimistic.
  "We see this as an opportunity not only to help support the Afghan media sector, but hopefully also encourage a
  dialogue among Afghans about the role of police in society, and their growing capabilities," said embassy
  spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden. Another U.S.-funded effort is planned for next year: a reality show that will seek
  to impart a frisson of glamour to joining the Afghan army.
  If it's entertainment with a political agenda, "Eagle Four" gets points for being, well, entertaining. It's got all the
  requisite cop-show elements: rapid-fire action; a gritty, cinema verite feel; and engrossing interplay among the
  four squad members and their hard-edged but beloved leader, Chief Amin (who is tormented by a dark secret;
  more on that later).
  The show's Afghan and Australian creators said "Eagle Four" was inspired by the hit U.S. drama "24." The
  mood and pacing are similar, but the resemblance doesn't extend to American Jack Bauer's propensity for
  torturing suspects until they crack.
  Baktash occasionally gets carried away and roughs someone up, but he is reprimanded by his older, more-
  seasoned partner, Kamran, who shows him that finesse works better than brute force.
  "My character is basically a good guy, but he's sort of undisciplined, and he has a lot to learn," Abrahim said. A
  recurring theme is that when Baktash disregards Kamran's counsel, he usually gets injured within the next few
  scenes. "He disobeys, he gets hurt," Abrahim said, laughing.
  The show's producers take plenty of dramatic license, including the presence of two women on the four-member
  team, a mingling of the sexes unlikely to be found in any police squad room in this tradition-bound, male-
  dominated Islamic society. The show's makers see gender equality as an ideal worth reinforcing, even if there's
  little real-life evidence of it in Afghanistan.
  Finding actresses to play the female leads was extremely difficult. Men outnumbered women more than 10 to 1
  at auditions. One actress dropped out of the production because of family pressure; writers had to kill off her
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777826 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777826 Date: 08/31/2015
  character. At one point, executive producer Trudi-Ann Tierney, one of the Australians brought in to bolster
  Afghan-owned production company Kaboora, stepped in and donned a burka to play a suspect's silent wife and
  a woman's bloodied corpse.
  The female characters mainly stay in the office, mirroring the reality that Afghan women are relatively little
  seen in public. But one of them, Ludmilla, is a computer whiz who relentlessly chases suspects through
  cyberspace. The script calls for periodic crisp pronouncements from her such as "I've got a fix on the location"
  or "Looks like the bomber is a decoy."
  Somewhat daringly, there's even a love story, albeit a chaste one, between Ludmilla, who manages to make her
  black head scarf and loose-fitting clothing look Hollywood sultry, and the impetuous Baktash. The two of them
  bicker their way through much of the season, in classic romantic-comedy tradition.
  She eventually softens toward him after he shows sensitivity and understanding about her feelings of guilt over
  having inadvertently contributed to someone's death. In the final episode of the season — spoiler alert! — they
  make plans for him to meet her father.
  "The whole time, they don't even lock eyes," Tierney said. "But everyone can see they have feelings for each
  other."
  Even if the show's popularity doesn't translate into heightened respect for the Afghan police, the principals
  believe it does justice to many aspects of Afghan life. One plot line has the seemingly incorruptible Chief Amin
  submitting to blackmail and deliberately compromising a case after his son is kidnapped.
  "It's all part of our social reality: drug-smuggling, suicide bombs, insurgents, graft, abductions," director Ghafar
  Azad said. "That's all in the show. So in a lot of ways, it's telling the truth."
  laura.king@latimes.com
  Copyright © 2010, Los Angeles Times
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777826 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777829
MetadataSubject: QDDR BREAKFAST
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-08T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0112/DOC_0C05777829/C05777829.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: QDDR Breakfast
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 2:09 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777829
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Fyi
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777829 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 2:09 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: QDDR Breakfast
  Fyi
  From: Hyde, Dana
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Sullivan, Jacob 3; Slaughter, Anne-Marie; ChoIlet, Derek H; Verma, Richard R
  Sent: Wed Dec 08 14:08:19 2010
  Subject: FW: QDDR Breakfast
  I spoke to Liz this morning and explained where we are in terms of the interagency and green lighting invitations (i.e.,
  very close, but not there yet). She said that at this point we will probably not be able to attract the number and level of
  corporate leaders we originally envisioned for next Tuesday. Liz certainly could pull together something with USGLC
  board members and some military leadership, but if she is to only get one bite of the apple with HRC her
  recommendation is to "do it right" and move this to January (either the week of the 10th or 241. The idea in January
  would be to include members of congress and frame the event as the QDDR making the case for State/USAID's mission
  and resources in the new environment. We could take the event in a number of directions (Liz would LOVE to get Gates
  together with Clinton) but the idea to launch the QDDR in January with USGLC as the blueprint for supporting
  international affairs and the 150 account.
  Thoughts? -D
  From: Liz Schrayer [mailto
  Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 11:17 AM
  To: Hyde, Dana
  Subject:
  I am sure you are all scrambling to release this next week — I assume we are off for next Tuesday -- Please confirm
  Liz Schrayer I President
  Schrayer & Associates, Inc.
  1129 20th Street NW, Suite 600
  Washington, DC 20036
  www.schrayer.com
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777829 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777836
MetadataSubject: WIKILEAKS CARTOON
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Crowley, Philip J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-08T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0112/DOC_0C05777836/C05777836.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: WikiLeaks cartoon
ExtractedFrom: Crowley, Philip J <CrowleyPJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 4:17 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777836
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  I can think of several folks for you to toss that wrench at!
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED

ExtractedCc:
  Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>; Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>; Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>;

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777836 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Crowley, Philip J <CrowleyPJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 4:17 PM
  To:
  Subject: RE: WikiLeaks cartoon
  I can think of several folks for you to toss that wrench at!
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 2:27 PM
  To: Crowley, Philip J
  Subject: Re: WikiLeaks cartoon
  It certainly hits the mark! Can you hand me a wrench?
  Original Message
  From: Crowley, Philip J <CrowleyPJ@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>; Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>; Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>;
  Reines, Philippe I <reinesp@state.gov>
  Sent: Wed Dec 08 11:18:08 2010
  Subject: FW: WikiLeaks cartoon
  Madame Secretary, thought you might appreciate this.
  PJ
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  From: Barnes, Jennifer L [mailto:Barnesk2@state.gov]
  Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 5:11 AM
  To: Crowley, Philip J; Ratney, Michael A; Smith, Dana S; Chitre, Nanda S
  Subject: WikiLeaks cartoon
  from 01le Johansson, Sweden
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777836 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777843
MetadataSubject: QUOTER ABOUT MITCH MCCONNELL
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-08T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0112/DOC_0C05777843/C05777843.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: Quote about Mitch McConnell
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 7:23 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777843
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: FYI
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777843 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 7:23 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW: Quote about Mitch McConnell
  FYI
  From: Djerassi, Alexander M
  Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 7:22 PM
  To: Sullivan, Jacob
  Subject: Quote about Mitch McConnell
  Hey Jake,
  Jeff asked me to let you and S know the source of the quote he shared earlier regarding Netanyahu and McConnell — it
  was I know the quote, it's not uplifting.
  Alex
  Alexander M. Djerassi
  Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs
  U.S. Department of State
  T: (202) 647-8769
  E: djerassiam@state.gov
  SBU
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777843 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777849
MetadataSubject: MOLHO MTG
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: SullivanJJ@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-08T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0112/DOC_0C05777849/C05777849.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Molho mtg
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivann@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 7:39 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777849
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  You have the points for the Motho meeting (what Sen Mitchell handed you today). Not sure if you got the non-paper — it
  is being faxed to your house tonight.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777849 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivann@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 7:39 PM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Molho mtg
  You have the points for the Motho meeting (what Sen Mitchell handed you today). Not sure if you got the non-paper — it
  is being faxed to your house tonight.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777849 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777856
MetadataSubject: MOLHO MTG
MetadataTo: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-08T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0112/DOC_0C05777856/C05777856.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Molho mtg
ExtractedTo: Sullivan, Jacob J; H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedln, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 8:10 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777856
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: When is it coming?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777856 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 8:10 PM
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J; H
  Subject: Re: Molho mtg
  When is it coming?
  From: Sullivan, Jacob)
  To: ihdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clIntonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedln, Huma
  Sent: Wed Dec 08 19:39:17 2010
  Subject: Molho mtg
  You have the points for the Molho meeting (what Sen Mitchell handed you today). Not sure if you got the non-paper — it
  is being faxed to your house tonight.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777856 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777860
MetadataSubject: MOLHO MTG
MetadataTo: Abedin, Huma
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-08T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0112/DOC_0C05777860/C05777860.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: Molho mtg
ExtractedTo: Abedin, Huma; H
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivann@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 8:10 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777860
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Dan should've sent it.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777860 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivann@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 8:10 PM
  To: Abedin, Huma; H
  Subject: RE: Molho mtg
  Dan should've sent it.
  From: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 8:10 PM
  To: Sullivan, Jacob); ihdr22@clintonemall.comt
  Subject: Re: Molho mtg
  When is it coming?
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J
  To: thdr22@clintonemailcomi <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Wed Dec 08 19:39:17 2010
  Subject: Molho mtg
  You have the points for the Molho meeting (what Sen Mitchell handed you today). Not sure if you got the non-paper — it
  is being faxed to your house tonight.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777860 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777872
MetadataSubject: ELLEN'S VIEWS ON PROPOSED ADDR CHANGE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-08T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0112/DOC_0C05777872/C05777872.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Ellen's views on proposed QDDR change
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 9:43 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777872
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  See traffic b/I
  I think this is - I think this may be
  That said, you can have a longer process on this for folks to feel heard.
  But in name of intellectual honesty,
  See b/I - from bottom up.
  Cdm

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777872 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5,B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 9:43 PM
  To:
  Cc: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Fw: Ellen's views on proposed QDDR change
  See traffic b/I
  I think this is - I think this may be
  That said, you can have a longer process on this for folks to feel heard.
  But in name of intellectual honesty,
  See b/I - from bottom up.
  Cdm
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  To: Tauscher, Ellen 0
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Wed Dec 08 21:26:55 2010
  Subject: Re: Ellen's views on proposed QDDR change
  Ellen -
  Give me a call - I would support this:
  Cdm
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Wed Dec 08 20:34:52 2010
  Subject: Fw: Ellen's views on proposed QDDR change
  Fyi
  From: Kirshner, Josh H
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Cc: Boese, Wade; Limage, Simon G
  Sent: Wed Dec 08 20:20:22 2010
  Subject: Ellen's views on proposed QDDR change
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777872 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777872 Date: 08/31/2015
  Jake — We just got off the phone with Ellen She's asked that we send up a note to S with her views,
  which we'll write up now and bootleg to you tonight. She may call Cheryl in the AM.
  In a nutshell, she's concerned
  However, I assume you wouldn't want something like this in the system, correct?
  Wade and I will be here for a while, so we're happy to swing by if you'd like.
  Josh Kirshner
  Special Assistant
  Office of the Under Secretary for
  Arms Control and International Security
  (202) 647-0071
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777872 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777878
MetadataSubject: ANNE MULCAHY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-09T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0112/DOC_0C05777878/C05777878.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Anne Mulcahy
ExtractedTo: H; 'abedinh@state.gov'; 'woodardew@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: Huma Abedin
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, December 9, 2010 6:10 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777878
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Ok
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777878 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Huma Abedin
  Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2010 6:10 AM
  To: H; 'abedinh@state.gov'; 'woodardew@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Anne Mulcahy
  Ok
  Original Message
  From: H
  To: 'abedinh@state.govi <abedinh@state.gov>; Huma Abedin; 'WoodardEW@state.gov' <WoodardEW@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Dec 09 06:07:52 2010
  Subject: Anne Mulcahy
  After (or before) I see her she should see the right people from NEA, Melanne's staff and AID to discuss Iraq. So could
  they be gathered in the D conf room or the Marshall room and I could intro her or drop into the mtg?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777878 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777892
MetadataSubject: ELLEN'S VIEWS ON PROPOSED QDDR CHANGE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-09T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0112/DOC_0C05777892/C05777892.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Ellen's views on proposed QDDR change
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, December 9, 2010 6:20 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777892
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Can I call you
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777892 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5,B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2010 6:20 AM
  To:
  Subject: Re: Ellen's views on proposed QDDR change
  Can I call you
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Thu Dec 09 05:38:42 2010
  Subject: Re: Ellen's views on proposed QDDR change
  Also, I thought we were
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Wed Dec 08 21:43:05 2010
  Subject: Fw: Ellen's views on proposed QDDR change
  See traffic WI
  I think this is - I think this may be
  That said, you can have a longer process on this for folks to feel heard.
  But in name of intellectual honesty,
  See 13/1- from bottom up.
  Cdm
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  To: Tauscher, Ellen 0
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Wed Dec 08 21:26:55 2010
  Subject: Re: Ellen's views on proposed QDDR change
  Ellen -
  Give me a call - I would support this:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777892 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777892 Date: 08/31/2015
  Cdm
  From: Sullivan, Jacobi
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Wed Dec 08 20:34:52 2010
  Subject: Fw: Ellen's views on proposed QDDR change
  Fyi
  From: Kirshner, Josh H
  To: Sullivan, Jacob
  Cc: Boese, Wade; Limage, Simon G
  Sent: Wed Dec 08 20:20:22 2010
  Subject: Ellen's views on proposed QDDR change
  Jake — We just got off the phone with Ellen She's asked that we send up a note to S with her views,
  which we'll write up now and bootleg to you tonight. She may call Cheryl in the AM.
  In a nutshell, she's concerned
  However, I assume you wouldn't want something like this in the system, correct?
  Wade and I will be here for a while, so we're happy to swing by if you'd like.
  Josh Kirshner
  Special Assistant
  Office of the Under Secretary for
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777892 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777892 Date: 08/31/2015
  Arms Control and International Security
  (202) 647-0071
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777892 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777897
MetadataSubject: ELLEN'S VIEWS ON PROPOSED QDDR CHANGE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-09T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0112/DOC_0C05777897/C05777897.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Ellen's views on proposed QDDR change
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, December 9, 2010 6:25 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777897
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  You have agreed
  Ellen is making last argument
  I want you to know that is coming in case you want to do that.
  Cdm

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777897 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5,B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2010 6:25 AM
  To:
  Cc: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Re: Ellen's views on proposed QDDR change
  You have agreed
  Ellen is making last argument
  I want you to know that is coming in case you want to do that.
  Cdm
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Thu Dec 09 05:38:09 2010
  Subject: Re: Ellen's views on proposed QDDR change
  I thought I had told Jake
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Wed Dec 08 21:43:05 2010
  Subject: Fw: Ellen's views on proposed QDDR change
  See traffic NI
  I think this is - I think this may be
  That said, you can have a longer process on this for folks to feel heard.
  But in name of intellectual honesty
  See NI - from bottom up.
  Cdm
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777897 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777897 Date: 08/31/2015
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  To: Tauscher, Ellen 0
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Wed Dec 08 21:26:55 2010
  Subject: Re: Ellen's views on proposed QDDR change
  Ellen-
  Give me a call - I would support this:
  Cdm
  From: Sullivan, Jacob
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Wed Dec 08 20:34:52 2010
  Subject: Fw: Ellen's views on proposed QDDR change
  Fyi
  From: Kirshner, Josh H
  To: Sullivan, Jacob
  Cc: Boese, Wade; Limage, Simon G
  Sent: Wed Dec 08 20:20:22 2010
  Subject: Ellen's views on proposed QDDR change
  Jake — We just got off the phone with Ellen She's asked that we send up a note to S with her views,
  which we'll write up now and bootleg to you tonight. She may call Cheryl in the AM.
  In a nutshell, she's concerned
  However, I assume you wouldn't want something like this in the system, correct?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777897 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777897 Date: 08/31/2015
  Wade and I will be here for a while, so we're happy to swing by if you'd like.
  Josh Kirshner
  Special Assistant
  Office of the Under Secretary for
  Arms Control and International Security
  (202) 647-0071
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777897 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777898
MetadataSubject: ELLEN'S VIEWS ON PROPOSED QDDR CHANGE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-09T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0112/DOC_0C05777898/C05777898.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Ellen's views on proposed QDDR change
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, December 9, 2010 6:27 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777898
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  We have that two, but again
  Jake was talking to
  Cdm

RawText:
  I think this may be
  I think this is
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777898 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5,B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2010 6:27 AM
  To:
  Subject: Re: Ellen's views on proposed QDDR change
  We have that two, but again
  Jake was talking to
  Cdm
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Thu Dec 09 05:38:42 2010
  Subject: Re: Ellen's views on proposed QDDR change
  Also, I thought we were
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Wed Dec 08 21:43:05 2010
  Subject: Fw: Ellen's views on proposed QDDR change
  See traffic b/I
  That said, you can have a longer process on this for folks to feel heard.
  But in name of intellectual honesty,
  See b/I - from bottom up.
  Cdm
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  To: Tauscher, Ellen 0
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Wed Dec 08 21:26:55 2010
  Subject: Re: Ellen's views on proposed QDDR change
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777898 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777898 Date: 08/31/2015
  Ellen-
  Give me a call - I would support this:
  Cdm
  From: Sullivan, Jacob 1
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Wed Dec 08 20:34:52 2010
  Subject: Fw: Ellen's views on proposed QDDR change
  Fyi
  From: Kirshner, Josh H
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Cc: Boese, Wade; Limage, Simon G
  Sent: Wed Dec 08 20:20:22 2010
  Subject: Ellen's views on proposed QDDR change
  Jake — We just got off the phone with Eller She's asked that we send up a note to S with her views,
  which we'll write up now and bootleg to you tonight. She may call Cheryl in the AM.
  In a nutshell, she's concerned
  However, I assume you wouldn't want something like this in the system, correct?
  Wade and I will be here for a while, so we're happy to swing by if you'd like.
  Josh Kirshner
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777898 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777898 Date: 08/31/2015
  Special Assistant
  Office of the Under Secretary for
  Arms Control and International Security
  (202) 647-0071
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777898 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05777925
MetadataSubject: MINI SCHEDULE 12/9/10 THURSDAY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-12-09T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0112/DOC_0C05777925/C05777925.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Mini Schedule 12/9/10 Thursday
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, December 9, 2010 8:00 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05777925
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  8:15 am DEPART Private Residence *En route State Department
  8:25 am ARRIVE State Department
  8:25 am PRESIDENTIAL DAILY BRIEFING
  8:30 am Secretary's Office
  8:45 am DAILY SENIOR STAFF MEETING
  9:00 am Secretary's Conference Room
  9:00 am MEETING w/ISRAELI CHIEF NEGOTIATOR YITZHAK MOLHO
  10:00 am Secretary's Outer Office
  10:00 am WEEKLY MEETING w/REGIONAL BUREAU ASSISTANT SECRETARIES
  10:30 am Deputy Secretary's Conference Room
  10:30 am MEETING w/SAVE THE CHILDREN BOARD CHAIR ANNE MULCAHY
  10:55 am Secretary's Outer Office *Official photo.
  10:55 am PRE-BRIEF w/TOM COUNTRYMAN
  11:00 am Secretary's Office
  11:00 am MEETING w/ALBANIAN FOREIGN MINISTER EDMOND HAXHINASTO
  11:30 am Secretary's Conference Room *Camera spray at top in Treaty Room.
  11:30 am OFFICE TIME
  1:00 pm Secretary's Office
  1:00 pm MEETING w/NIGERIAN FOREIGN MINISTER HENRY (MEIN AJUMOGOBIA
  1:30 pm Secretary's Conference Room *Official photo at top in East Hall.
  1:30 pm PRESS PRE-BRIEF
  1:35 pm Secretary's Office
  1:35 pm JOINT PRESS AVAILABILITY w/NIGERIAN FOREIGN MINISTER
  1:55 pm HENRY ODEIN AJUMOGOBIA Treaty Room
  2:20 pm MEETING w/U.S. AMBASSADOR TO CHINA JON HUNTSMAN
  2:50 pm Secretary's Office
  3:00 pm DROP-BY THE FULBRIGHT FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING
  3:10 pm ASSISTANT MID-YEAR CONFERENCE Dean Acheson Auditorium
  3:15 pm OFFICE TIME
  4:15 pm Secretary's Office
  4:30 pm MEETING ON ENTREPRENEURSHIP
  5:00 pm Secretary's Outer Office
  5:00 pm MEETING w/STATE DEPARTMENT AFFINITY GROUPS
  6:00 pm D Conference Room *Official photo.
  7:20 pm DEPART State Department *En route 1789
  7:30 pm ARRIVE 1789
  7:30 pm PRIVATE DINNER*
  9:00 pm 1789
  9:00 pm DEPART 1789 *En route Private Residence
  9:10 pm ARRIVE Private Residence
  FYI:
  6:30 pm BLAIR HOUSE HOLIDAY RECEPTION
  8:30 pm Blair House *Note: Reception runs from 6:30 pm to 8:00 pm
  ###

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777925 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, December 9, 2010 8:00 AM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Mini Schedule 12/9/10 Thursday
  8:15 am DEPART Private Residence *En route State Department
  8:25 am ARRIVE State Department
  8:25 am PRESIDENTIAL DAILY BRIEFING
  8:30 am Secretary's Office
  8:45 am DAILY SENIOR STAFF MEETING
  9:00 am Secretary's Conference Room
  9:00 am MEETING w/ISRAELI CHIEF NEGOTIATOR YITZHAK MOLHO
  10:00 am Secretary's Outer Office
  10:00 am WEEKLY MEETING w/REGIONAL BUREAU ASSISTANT SECRETARIES
  10:30 am Deputy Secretary's Conference Room
  10:30 am MEETING w/SAVE THE CHILDREN BOARD CHAIR ANNE MULCAHY
  10:55 am Secretary's Outer Office *Official photo.
  10:55 am PRE-BRIEF w/TOM COUNTRYMAN
  11:00 am Secretary's Office
  11:00 am MEETING w/ALBANIAN FOREIGN MINISTER EDMOND HAXHINASTO
  11:30 am Secretary's Conference Room *Camera spray at top in Treaty Room.
  11:30 am OFFICE TIME
  1:00 pm Secretary's Office
  1:00 pm MEETING w/NIGERIAN FOREIGN MINISTER HENRY (MEIN AJUMOGOBIA
  1:30 pm Secretary's Conference Room *Official photo at top in East Hall.
  1:30 pm PRESS PRE-BRIEF
  1:35 pm Secretary's Office
  1:35 pm JOINT PRESS AVAILABILITY w/NIGERIAN FOREIGN MINISTER
  1:55 pm HENRY ODEIN AJUMOGOBIA Treaty Room
  2:20 pm MEETING w/U.S. AMBASSADOR TO CHINA JON HUNTSMAN
  2:50 pm Secretary's Office
  3:00 pm DROP-BY THE FULBRIGHT FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING
  3:10 pm ASSISTANT MID-YEAR CONFERENCE Dean Acheson Auditorium
  3:15 pm OFFICE TIME
  4:15 pm Secretary's Office
  4:30 pm MEETING ON ENTREPRENEURSHIP
  5:00 pm Secretary's Outer Office
  5:00 pm MEETING w/STATE DEPARTMENT AFFINITY GROUPS
  6:00 pm D Conference Room *Official photo.
  7:20 pm DEPART State Department *En route 1789
  7:30 pm ARRIVE 1789
  7:30 pm PRIVATE DINNER*
  9:00 pm 1789
  9:00 pm DEPART 1789 *En route Private Residence
  9:10 pm ARRIVE Private Residence
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777925 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777925 Date: 08/31/2015
  FYI:
  6:30 pm BLAIR HOUSE HOLIDAY RECEPTION
  8:30 pm Blair House *Note: Reception runs from 6:30 pm to 8:00 pm
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05777925 Date: 08/31/2015



