# Emails

DocNumber: C05765220
MetadataSubject: (REUTERS) ZELAYA SAYS PACT TO END HONDURAN CRISIS HAS FAILED
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-06T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_046/DOC_0C05765220/C05765220.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: (Reuters) Zelaya says pact to end Honduran crisis has failed
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob 3
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, November 6, 2009 8:05 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765220
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Fyi
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765220 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, November 6, 2009 8:05 AM
  To:
  Subject Fw: (Reuters) Zelaya says pact to end Honduran crisis has failed
  Fyi
  From: Shannon, Thomas A
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Fri Nov 06 07:38:09 2009
  Subject: Re: (Reuters) Zelaya says pact to end Honduran crisis has failed
  I will forward Hugo's latest note. As Monty Python would say, "It's not dead yet."
  Big fight over forming national unity government. Both sides taking maximalist positions, and our friends in the region are
  not helping. Rio Group statement emboldened Zelaya and caused the de factos to dig in.
  We might need S and Secretary Solis to call Zelaya and convince him to participate in forming the unity government.
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  To: Kelly, Craig A; Shannon, Thomas A
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob 3
  Sent: Fri Nov 06 06:38:52 2009
  Subject: Fw: (Reuters) Zelaya says pact to end Honduran crisis has failed
  Update?
  From: Krayman, Igor
  To: NEWS-WHA; NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-I
  Sent: Fri Nov 06 06:21:11 2009
  Subject: (Reuters) Zelaya says pact to end Honduran crisis has failed
  TEGUCIGALPA - Ousted Honduran President Manuel Zelaya said an accord to end a political crisis has failed after de
  facto leader Roberto Micheletti announced he would form a new cabinet without Zelaya.
  Igor Krayman
  Operations Specialist
  Department of State Operations Center
  202-647-1512
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765220 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765222
MetadataSubject: RS CELL
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-06T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_046/DOC_0C05765222/C05765222.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Hume
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, November 6, 2009 8:28 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765222
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765222 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, November 6, 2009 8:28 AM
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Hume
  Subject RS cell
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765222 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765224
MetadataSubject: EDWARD SCHUMACHER-MATOS - A HONDURAS HIJACKED BY IDEOLOGY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-06T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_046/DOC_0C05765224/C05765224.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: FW: Edward Schumacher-Matos - A Honduras hijacked by ideology
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Aguilera, Patricia
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, November 6, 2009 8:31 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765224
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765224 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, November 6, 2009 8:31 AM
  To:
  Subject Fw: Edward Schumacher-Matos - A H6nduras hijacked by ideology
  From: Kelly, Craig A
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma
  Cc: Aguilera, Patricia
  Sent: Fri Nov 06 08:28:07 2009
  Subject: FW: Edward Schumacher-Matos - A Honduras hijacked by ideology
  I assume you saw this, but just in case:
  CElje Illashington ost
  NEWS I POLITICS I OPINIONS I BUSINESS I LOCAL I SPORTS I ARTS & LIVING I GOING OUT GUIDE I JOBS I CARS I REAL ESTATE
  SHOPPING
  Ideologues hijack a compromise
  By Edward Schumacher-Matos
  Friday, November 6, 2009
  Adults learn that human conflicts are seldom black and white. So the way the international community jumped
  to punish tiny Honduras for the ouster of its president, without knowing the facts, was foolish.
  That some Senate Republicans have been extremist in the other direction borders on galling. Opposing a U.S.-
  brokered agreement reached a week ago by Hondurans to defuse the crisis, the senators, led by South Carolina's
  Jim DeMint, have been grandstanding on principles that have little to do with reality, contributing to looming
  chaos in that Central American country and undermining U.S. policy in the region.
  In this, the age of fundamentalist ayatollahs, the knee-jerk cold warriors among the Senate Republicans are no
  better than the knee-jerk anti-military officials in the Organization of American States.
  The compromise leaves egg on the face of the OAS and an intelligentsia that refused to see Honduras as more
  than a banana republic that somehow could infect the region, only to be confronted by a Senate cabal that treats
  Honduras as . . . a banana republic that somehow could infect the rest of the region.
  The former see this impoverished backwater of 8 million people setting off a chain of military coups, while the
  latter see it setting off a chain of leftist dictatorships. The two share an equally misguided domino theory.
  Poor Honduras, in the meantime.
  The compromise, put together by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and -- yes -- sensible State Department
  diplomats, creatively settled on a process instead of an end. Ousted President Manuel Zelaya and de facto
  President Roberto Micheletti agreed to allow the Honduran Congress, with the advice of that country's Supreme
  Court, to resolve the question of whether Zelaya should return to office for the last 2 1/2 months of his term.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765224 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765224 Date: 07/31/2015
  Zelaya created the crisis by instigating mob rule in June to try to carry out an unconstitutional referendum
  designed to lift a limit on a president's time in office. The Supreme Court ordered the military to arrest him, but
  the generals, fearful of riots, went one step further and illegally exiled him. Congress, not the military, then took
  political control. Zelaya later snuck back into Honduras, however, and is now holed up in the Brazilian
  Embassy.
  The Honduran Congress is likely to allow Zelaya's reinstatement, with limited powers, as a way to gain
  legitimacy for long-scheduled presidential elections later this month. That is what it should do, but Zelaya has
  postponed discussing the makeup of the cabinet, and Congress could shut him out. Public tension is high, but
  DeMint and other Republicans, instead of counseling caution, opposed even the compromise agreement and are
  demanding that Zelaya be rejected, setting up the country for revolution.
  They have been doing reckless damage in Washington as well. Since the spring, they have held up the
  appointments of the administration's Latin America policy team. DeMint lifted the hold only late Thursday,
  after Clinton promised him that the United States would recognize the Honduran elections even if Zelaya is not
  reinstated, an end the Republicans are unwisely pushing.
  The intellectual force behind the Republican obstruction is the Wall Street Journal's influential Americas
  columnist, Mary O'Grady. Beating the Honduran drum for months, O'Grady maintains that Zelaya's return
  would be a victory for Hugo Chavez, Venezuela's leftist president. She further accuses President Obama of
  being Chavez's virtual ally. As she wrote this week: "Mr. Chavez and Fidel Castro were supporting Mr. Zelaya,
  and Mr. Obama apparently wanted to be part of the gang."
  O'Grady is a friend and former colleague of mine, so I know that she is concerned for Latin America's welfare.
  But her scorched-earth accusations against Obama and Clinton are wrong. An obsession with Chavez and
  Castro also builds both up when their influence is waning in the region. Being ideologically black or white may
  feel good, but it isn't helpful in resolving gray constitutional -- or human -- affairs.
  Anyway, it's the grays that make life interesting.
  The administration was right to calibrate its response, working with the de facto government while slowly
  increasing the pressure for Zelaya's return by cutting aid to Honduras. The policy recognized that both sides
  have valid arguments. It also deftly sidelined Chavez, making him irrelevant. A deal was possible only as the
  election approached and both sides became ready to compromise. What the deal needs now is support, not
  obstruction, from the U.S. Senate.
  Edward Schumacher-Matos is syndicated by the Washington Post Writers Group. His e-mail address is
  edward.schumachermatosgyahoo.com.
  i Post a Comment
  Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally,
  entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block
  users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full
  rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
  © 2009 The Washington Post Company
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765224 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765224 Date: 07/31/2015
  ■
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765224 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765228
MetadataSubject: CHARLIE ROSE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-06T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_046/DOC_0C05765228/C05765228.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: FYI: Charlie Rose
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, November 6, 2009 10:39 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765228
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  I ran into Charlie in NY this week. He talked about his upcoming interview with you. He said he wanted to focus a lot on
  China. That he will be in Berlin will help focus him, too, on the transatlantic relationship, which I would also bring up if he
  doesn't. Sid

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765228 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Friday, November 6, 2009 10:39 AM
  To:
  Subject: FYI: Charlie Rose
  I ran into Charlie in NY this week. He talked about his upcoming interview with you. He said he wanted to focus a lot on
  China. That he will be in Berlin will help focus him, too, on the transatlantic relationship, which I would also bring up if he
  doesn't. Sid
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765228 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765230
MetadataSubject: UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-06T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_046/DOC_0C05765230/C05765230.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Update
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, November 6, 2009 3:26 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765230
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: FYI
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765230 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, November 6, 2009 3:26 PM
  To:
  Subject FW: Update
  FYI
  Original Message
  From: Llorens, Hugo
  Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 12:53 PM
  To: Kelly, Craig A; Shannon, Thomas A;
  Subject: Update
  Had lengthy talk w Z. Could not turn him around on his desire to pull out from Accord despite a lengthy effort. He
  believes M not negotiating in good faith. Says he has direct channel to M and the word back is that M not willing to
  implement Accord. Z claims his prestige and that of US and OAS are on the line if there is no dignified way out. He said
  he was most appreciative of strong support from the US. He said he planned to call Lagos and Solis and explain his
  reasons on the matter.
  Z said he would keep the door open if M was willing to offer a creative and serious way out. He asked that I discuss w
  Corrales, Reina and the OAS.
  We just discussed various ways to manage this situation. Suggest conference call. Hugo
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765230 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765231
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-06T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_046/DOC_0C05765231/C05765231.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, November 6, 2009 3:26 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765231
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
MetadataSubject:
  PRESIDENT OBAMA TAPS CASSANDRA BUTTS TO SERVE AS SENIOR ADVISOR AT THE MILENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION

ExtractedBodyText:
  Millennium Challenge Corporation
  THE WHITE HOUSE
  Office of the Press Secretary
  FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
  November 6, 2009
  President Obama Taps Cassandra Butts to Serve as Senior Advisor at the
  Millennium Challenge Corporation
  WASHINGTON - Today, President Barack Obama announced that he will name Deputy White
  House Counsel Cassandra Q. Butts as Senior Advisor in the Office of the Chief Executive Officer at
  the Millennium Challenge Corporation.
  President Obama said, "I am honored to appoint my dear friend and trusted colleague Cassandra to
  serve in this important role. The Millennium Challenge Corporation is an essential partner as we
  work to combat global poverty, and Cassandra brings a depth of experience and true passion for
  justice that will be invaluable to its success in the future. I am grateful for Cassandra's tireless service
  in this administration and look forward to continuing to work with her in the years ahead."
  President Obama made the following announcement today:
  Cassandra Q. Butts, Senior Advisor, Office of the Chief Executive Officer, Millennium Challenge
  Corporation
  Cassandra Butts is currently the Deputy White House Counsel where she has focused on judicial
  nominations. Ms. Butts was the general counsel to the Obama-Biden Transition Project. She also
  served as the Senior Vice President for Domestic Policy at the Center for American Progress. Prior to
  joining CAP, she was a senior advisor to House Democratic Leader Richard A. Gephardt (D-MO)
  where she worked on refugee, asylum and immigration issues and served as the policy director on
  his 2004 presidential campaign. Ms. Butts also served as director of Senator Obama's Senate
  transition in 2004-2005. Previously, she was an Assistant Counsel for the NAACP Legal Defense &
  Educational Fund and also served as Legislative Counsel to Senator Harris L. Wofford (D-PA). Ms.
  Butts was an international election observer to the Zimbabwean parliamentary elections in 2000. She
  is a graduate of Harvard Law School and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
  ###

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765231 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, November 6, 2009 3:26 PM
  To:
  Subject FW: President Obama Taps Cassandra Butts to Serve as Senior Advisor at the
  Millennium Challenge Corporation
  THE WHITE HOUSE
  Office of the Press Secretary
  FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
  November 6, 2009
  President Obama Taps Cassandra Butts to Serve as Senior Advisor at the
  Millennium Challenge Corporation
  WASHINGTON - Today, President Barack Obama announced that he will name Deputy White
  House Counsel Cassandra Q. Butts as Senior Advisor in the Office of the Chief Executive Officer at
  the Millennium Challenge Corporation.
  President Obama said, "I am honored to appoint my dear friend and trusted colleague Cassandra to
  serve in this important role. The Millennium Challenge Corporation is an essential partner as we
  work to combat global poverty, and Cassandra brings a depth of experience and true passion for
  justice that will be invaluable to its success in the future. I am grateful for Cassandra's tireless service
  in this administration and look forward to continuing to work with her in the years ahead."
  President Obama made the following announcement today:
  Cassandra Q. Butts, Senior Advisor, Office of the Chief Executive Officer, Millennium Challenge
  Corporation
  Cassandra Butts is currently the Deputy White House Counsel where she has focused on judicial
  nominations. Ms. Butts was the general counsel to the Obama-Biden Transition Project. She also
  served as the Senior Vice President for Domestic Policy at the Center for American Progress. Prior to
  joining CAP, she was a senior advisor to House Democratic Leader Richard A. Gephardt (D-MO)
  where she worked on refugee, asylum and immigration issues and served as the policy director on
  his 2004 presidential campaign. Ms. Butts also served as director of Senator Obama's Senate
  transition in 2004-2005. Previously, she was an Assistant Counsel for the NAACP Legal Defense &
  Educational Fund and also served as Legislative Counsel to Senator Harris L. Wofford (D-PA). Ms.
  Butts was an international election observer to the Zimbabwean parliamentary elections in 2000. She
  is a graduate of Harvard Law School and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765231 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765232
MetadataSubject: FYI: CHARLIE ROSE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-06T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_046/DOC_0C05765232/C05765232.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: FYI: Charlie Rose
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, November 6, 2009 5:21 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765232
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Thanks! See you then and in the meantime happy trails and I'll send notes along the way
RawText:
  <sbwhoeop
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765232 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Friday, November 6, 2009 5:21 PM
  To: H
  Subject: Re: FYI: Charlie Rose
  Thanks! See you then and in the meantime happy trails and I'll send notes along the way
  From: Hillary Clinton
  To: 'sbwhoeop
  Sent: Nov 6, 2009 5:14 PM
  Subject: Re: FYI: Charlie Rose
  Original Message
  Ok. And, by the way, We'll celebrate in December.
  Original Messa e
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Fri Nov 06 10:38:35 2009
  Subject: FYI: Charlie Rose
  I ran into Charlie in NY this week. He talked about his upcoming interview with you. He said he wanted to focus a lot on
  China. That he will be in Berlin will help focus him, too, on the transatlantic relationship, which I would also bring up if he
  doesn't. Sid
  Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765232 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765237
MetadataSubject: HOLBROOKE ASKING TO TALK
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-06T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_046/DOC_0C05765237/C05765237.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: holbrooke asking to talk
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, November 6, 2009 7:57 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765237
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765237 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, November 6, 2009 7:57 PM
  To:
  Subject: holbrooke asking to talk
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765237 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765244
MetadataSubject: HOLIDAY LUNCH DEC 17
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Valmoro, Lona J
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-07T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765244/C05765244.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Holiday lunch Dec 17
ExtractedTo: H; Huma Abedin
ExtractedFrom: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: 'ValmoroU@state.gov' <ValmoroU@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, November 7, 2009 6:15 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765244
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Will do.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765244 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, November 7, 2009 6:15 AM
  To: H; Huma Abedin
  Subject Re: Holiday lunch Dec 17
  Will do.
  Original Message ---
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Valmoro, Lona J; Huma Abedin <
  Sent: Sat Nov 07 06:11:37 2009
  Subject: Fw: Holiday lunch Dec 17
  PIs add to schedule from 12:30 to 2:30. Thx.
  Original Message ----
  From: Caputo, Lisa
  To: H
  Cc: 'ValmoroU@state.gov' <ValmoroU@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Nov 05 14:04:38 2009
  Subject: RE: Holiday lunch Dec 17
  Great! Will revert with time (likely 12:30pm) and location (a private room in a DC restaurant). Hope you get a little
  downtime! We'll make sure you laugh plenty at lunch. L
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 9:00 PM
  To: Caputo, Lisa [NAM-CCC]
  Cc: 'ValmoroU@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Holiday lunch Dec 17
  Lisa---
  I just landed from Cairo and would love to come to lunch and, as of now, I will be in DC. So just let me know time and
  place!
  I'm copying Lona so she can connect w you since I leave again on Sat for two weeks. This travel gig is never ending--
  can't wait for Thanksgiving for a few days off.
  Hope you're well, my friend.
  Original Message
  From: Caputo, Lisa
  To: H2; H
  Sent: Tue Nov 03 09:03:22 2009
  Subject: Holiday lunch Dec 17
  Hillary,
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765244 Date: 07/31/2015

  Xxoo,
  Lisa
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765244 Date: 07/31/2015
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765244 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765250
MetadataSubject: NYT: UN BLAMES US FOR CRITICALLY SHORT FOOD SUPPLIES IN SOMALIA
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-07T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765250/C05765250.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fw: NYT: UN Blames US For Critically Short Food Supplies In Somalia.
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, November 7, 2009 7:24 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765250
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765250 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, November 7, 2009 7:24 AM
  To:
  Subject Fw: NYT: UN Blames US For Critically Short Food Supplies In Somalia.
  From: Cousin, Ertharin
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Sat Nov 07 07:15:15 2009
  Subject: Fw: NYT: UN Blames US For Critically Short Food Supplies In Somalia.
  Any movement on this issue?
  From: deValcourt-Ayala, Lillian G
  To: Astibia, Miren E; Clark, Jeanne L; Cousin, Ertharin; Glover, Michael P; Heffern, Keith L; Hegadorn, Chris S; Heinen,
  Suzanne E; Luedig, Erika A; Petrovski, Elizabeth A; Snow, Michelle S; Spanos, Harriet ; Tuminaro, John D; Wendell,
  George C
  Sent: Sat Nov 07 07:04:46 2009
  Subject: NYT: UN Blames US For Critically Short Food Supplies In Somalia.
  UN Blames US For Critically Short Food Supplies in Somalia. The New York Times (11/7, A4,
  Gettleman, 1.09M) reports that the UN on Friday called "the food supply line to Somalia...broken," in part
  because the US delayed some 40 million pounds of food contributions in Kenyan warehouses "out of fears that
  they would be diverted" to the Shabab insurgents by Somali contractors. The US, however, "played down the
  impact of the delays" and said food would again be shipped when it was "assured that the United Nations was
  doing more to police the aid deliveries." The UN said Friday that food rations would need to be cut and "said
  the American government was insisting on guarantees that were unrealistic in Somalia." The Times adds that
  some Somalis whose "entire communities are on the brink of famine...said that many children who had been
  surviving off the American donations were now dying from hunger."
  Full text:
  U.N. Says U.S. Delays Led to Aid Cuts in Somalia
  By JEFFREY GETTLEMAN
  Published: November 6, 2009
  NAIROBI, Kenya — United Nations officials said Friday that the supply of critical food
  aid to Somalia had been interrupted and that rations to starving people needed to be
  cut, partly because the American government had delayed food contributions out of
  fears that they would be diverted to terrorists.
  Last month, American officials said they had suspended millions of dollars of food aid
  because of concerns that Somali contractors working for the United Nations were
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765250 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765250 Date: 07/31/2015
  funneling food and money to the Shabab, an Islamist insurgent group with growing ties
  to Al Qaeda.
  American officials played down the impact of the delays and said the food shipments
  would resume soon, once the United States government was assured that the United
  Nations was doing more to police the aid deliveries.
  But on Friday, the World Food Program said, "The food supply line to. Somalia is
  effectively broken."
  United Nations officials said that around 40 million pounds of American-donated food
  was being held up in warehouses in Mombasa, in neighboring Kenya, because
  American officials were not allowing aid workers to distribute it until a new set of
  tighter regulations was ironed out.
  United Nations officials said the American government was insisting on guarantees
  that were unrealistic in Somalia, like demanding that aid transporters not pay fees at
  roadblocks, which are ubiquitous and virtually unavoidable in a nation widely
  considered a case study in chaos.
  American aid officials declined to comment on Friday.
  In the drought-stricken regions of central Somalia, where entire communities are on
  the brink of famine, elders said that many children who had been surviving off the
  American donations were now dying from hunger.
  "We are totally dependent on this food, and people are now suffering," said Ahmed
  Mahamoud Hassan, the chairman of the drought committee in Galcaio, central
  Somalia. "We have nothing else to eat."
  Somalia is one of the neediest nations in the world — and one of the most complex
  environments to deliver aid. Ever since the central government imploded in 1991, the
  country has lurched from one crisis to the next, the latest being a vicious civil war
  between a weak government and an extremist Islamist insurgency during one of the
  worst droughts in years.
  The United States has played a huge role in saving lives by supplying about 40 percent
  of the $850 million annual aid budget for Somalia. But that aid is often only loosely
  monitored at best once it enters the country because of the dangers of working in
  Somalia and the fact that so much of it is a no-go zone for foreigners.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765250 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765250 Date: 07/31/2015
  For months now, United Nations officials have been negotiating with their American
  counterparts, trying to agree on language for new rules that would ensure, as much as
  possible, that American donated food goes to needy people and not to the Shabab.
  Last month, American officials said they were legally bound to do this, because the
  American government has listed the Shabab as a terrorist organization, a designation
  that means that aiding or abetting the Shabab is a serious crime.
  There is increasing evidence, according to United Nations documents, that some of the
  United Nations contractors in Somalia have been stealing food and channeling the
  proceeds to the Shabab and other militant groups. United Nations officials are
  investigating some of their biggest contractors.
  United Nations officials say that other donor nations have been skittish about
  contributing aid during these investigations, which is another reason for the aid
  shortages in Somalia. The global recession has also taken a toll on aid operations
  around the world.
  That said, "the United States is traditionally W.F.P.'s largest single donor," said Peter
  Smerdon, a spokesman for the World Food Program, "and other donors cannot make
  up the difference."
  He warned that the food supplies for Somalia were steadily dwindling each month and
  that by December, "we will completely run out."
  Partly because of the standoff over the new rules and the ensuing interruption in the
  food pipeline, the World Food Program recently halved the emergency rations to the
  more than one million displaced Somalis.
  United Nations officials said they had been urging the American government to release
  at least some of the food from the warehouses in Kenya while they worked out the new
  rules.
  The officials said that even if they wanted to bypass the American government and ship
  in food from other countries, which would cost millions of dollars, it would be
  impossible to get it to Somalia in time and that the American sacks of grain sitting in
  Mombasa were the only solution to averting a widespread famine.
  "The urgency of the situation has been communicated," said one United Nations official
  in Nairobi, who spoke on condition of anonymity because negotiations were
  continuing. "Basically, USAID," the United States Agency for International
  Development, "has to come through, one way or the other."
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765250 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765255
MetadataSubject: #S
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: PIR
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-17T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765255/C05765255.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: #s
ExtractedFrom: PIR <preines
ExtractedCc: CDM; Huma Abedin; Jake Sullivan
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 11:42 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765255
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  WASHINGTON (CNN) — Fewer than three in 10 Americans think Sarah Palin's qualified to be president, according to a
  new national poll - the least of any of the five potential candidates included in the survey.
  But another woman tops that list in the CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Monday: two-thirds of the
  public thinks that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's qualified for the Oval Office. That's more than Vice President Joe
  Biden, who's currently next in line for the presidency.
  According to the poll, 28 percent of Americans say Palin is qualified to run the White House, with seven in 10 saying the
  former Alaska governor and 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee is not qualified.
  The survey indicates that a majority of Republicans, 54 percent, feel Palin is qualified, with 44 percent indicating she
  isn't. But only 29 percent of independent voters questioned feel she is qualified to serve as president, with 68 percent
  disagreeing. According to the poll, nine in 10 Democrats feel Palin is not qualified.
  The poll's release comes one day before the release of Palin's book, "Going Rogue: An American Life."
  "The perception that Palin is not qualified to be president puts her significantly behind two potential rivals for the GOP
  nomination in 2012 - Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee," says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland.
  According to the survey, nearly half of all Americans think Romney is qualified to be president, with 43 percent feeling
  the same way about Huckabee. Among Republicans, Palin is still lagging other potential 2012 primary candidates: 63
  percent of GOPers think that Romney and Huckabee are qualified, 9 points higher than the number that say the same of
  Palin."
  Palin has many strengths - recent CNN polls indicate that Americans believe that she is not a typical politician, that she
  cares about average Americans, and that she is honest and trustworthy," says Holland. "But the perception that she is
  not qualified for the White House is her biggest Achilles heel."An ABC News/Washington Post poll also released Monday
  indicates that 38 percent of Americans say Palin's qualified to serve as president, with six in 10 saying she's not qualified.
  The CNN survey indicates that 67 percent of people questioned say that Clinton is qualified to serve in the Oval Office,
  17 points higher than the 50 percent of Americans who think that Biden's qualified to take over as president.Biden's low
  number may be attributable to negative feelings about the Obama/Biden administration rather than views of Biden
  personally."
  In the past, poll respondents who dislike an administration have sometimes taken it out on the vice president," say
  Holland. Polls from the late 1990s showed that Americans felt Al Gore was qualified to be president, but only if
  respondents were given the chance to say something negative about Gore that was unrelated to his qualifications, he
  adds. In the Bush administration, the number who thought Dick Cheney was qualified to be president dropped as the
  administration grew more unpopular. "Cheney's experience in office didn't change during that period - attitudes toward
  the Bush/Cheney administration did," he says.
  Hillary Clinton also has the advantage of having been able to stay out of domestic policy debates, including health care,
  the economic stimulus, and other controversial matters, while adding almost daily to her experience in foreign policy,
  Holland adds, while Biden has been involved in the domestic policy disputes - "which might explain why some
  respondents were looking for a reason to say something negative about the veep."
  The CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll was conducted November 13-15, with 1,014 adult Americans questioned by
  telephone. The survey's sampling error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for the overall sample.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765255 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: PIR <preines
  Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 11:42 AM
  To:
  Cc: CDM; Huma Abedin; Jake Sullivan
  Subject: #s
  WASHINGTON (CNN) — Fewer than three in 10 Americans think Sarah Palin's qualified to be president, according to a
  new national poll - the least of any of the five potential candidates included in the survey.
  But another woman tops that list in the CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Monday: two-thirds of the
  public thinks that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's qualified for the Oval Office. That's more than Vice President Joe
  Biden, who's currently next in line for the presidency.
  According to the poll, 28 percent of Americans say Palin is qualified to run the White House, with seven in 10 saying the
  former Alaska governor and 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee is not qualified.
  The survey indicates that a majority of Republicans, 54 percent, feel Palin is qualified, with 44 percent indicating she
  isn't. But only 29 percent of independent voters questioned feel she is qualified to serve as president, with 68 percent
  disagreeing. According to the poll, nine in 10 Democrats feel Palin is not qualified.
  The poll's release comes one day before the release of Palin's book, "Going Rogue: An American Life."
  "The perception that Palin is not qualified to be president puts her significantly behind two potential rivals for the GOP
  nomination in 2012 - Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee," says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland.
  According to the survey, nearly half of all Americans think Romney is qualified to be president, with 43 percent feeling
  the same way about Huckabee. Among Republicans, Palin is still lagging other potential 2012 primary candidates: 63
  percent of GOPers think that Romney and Huckabee are qualified, 9 points higher than the number that say the same of
  Palin."
  Palin has many strengths - recent CNN polls indicate that Americans believe that she is not a typical politician, that she
  cares about average Americans, and that she is honest and trustworthy," says Holland. "But the perception that she is
  not qualified for the White House is her biggest Achilles heel."An ABC News/Washington Post poll also released Monday
  indicates that 38 percent of Americans say Palin's qualified to serve as president, with six in 10 saying she's not qualified.
  The CNN survey indicates that 67 percent of people questioned say that Clinton is qualified to serve in the Oval Office,
  17 points higher than the 50 percent of Americans who think that Biden's qualified to take over as president.Biden's low
  number may be attributable to negative feelings about the Obama/Biden administration rather than views of Biden
  personally."
  In the past, poll respondents who dislike an administration have sometimes taken it out on the vice president," say
  Holland. Polls from the late 1990s showed that Americans felt Al Gore was qualified to be president, but only if
  respondents were given the chance to say something negative about Gore that was unrelated to his qualifications, he
  adds. In the Bush administration, the number who thought Dick Cheney was qualified to be president dropped as the
  administration grew more unpopular. "Cheney's experience in office didn't change during that period - attitudes toward
  the Bush/Cheney administration did," he says.
  Hillary Clinton also has the advantage of having been able to stay out of domestic policy debates, including health care,
  the economic stimulus, and other controversial matters, while adding almost daily to her experience in foreign policy,
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765255 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765255 Date: 07/31/2015
  Holland adds, while Biden has been involved in the domestic policy disputes - "which might explain why some
  respondents were looking for a reason to say something negative about the veep."
  The CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll was conducted November 13-15, with 1,014 adult Americans questioned by
  telephone. The survey's sampling error is plus or minus 3 percentage points for the overall sample.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765255 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765275
MetadataSubject: DEATH OF JOHNNIE MAE WALKER SPARGO 11.8.09
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Russo, Robert V
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-17T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765275/C05765275.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Death of Johnnie Mae Walker Spargo 11.8.09
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Russo, Robert V <RussoRV@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Huma Abedin
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 11:33 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765275
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: I will prepare for you to sign upon your return. Safe travels!
RawText:
  and still works for the
  HRC is bound to know
  I think. also good friend of
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765275 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Russo, Robert V <RussoRV@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 11:33 PM
  To: H
  Subject: Re: Death of Johnnie Mae Walker Spargo 11.8.09
  I will prepare for you to sign upon your return. Safe travels!
  Original Message ----
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C; Russo, Robert V
  Sent: Tue Nov 17 22:30:41 2009
  Subject: Fw: Death of Johnnie Mae Walker Spargo 11.8.09
  B6
  Pls do letter to
  Original Message
  From: cheryl.mills
  To: H
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Sent: Tue Nov 17 22:26:03 2009
  Subject: Fw: Death of Johnnie Mae Walker Spargo 11.8.09
  Fyi
  Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
  From: "Meredith Cabe"
  Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:54:03 -0500
  To: 'Cheryl Mills .
  Subject: FW: Death of Johnnie Mae Walker Spargo 11.8.09
  See para 7.
  From: Lynda Dixon
  Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 8:06 AM
  To: Lynda Dixon
  Subject: FW: Death of Johnnie Mae Walker Spargo 11.8.09
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765275 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765275 Date: 07/31/2015
  • ARKADELPHIA — Johnnie Mae Walker Spargo was born on the first day of Spring, March 20, 1919, and from that
  day until her last on this earth, Nov. 8, 2009, she cast her beautiful blue eyes and dimpled smile on all of those around
  her.
  Johnnie Mae was the youngest daughter of Garland Lee and Hettie Mann Walker of Red Oak, Arkansas, now part of Hot
  Springs on the southeast shores of Lake Hamilton. She was predeceased by her parents and siblings, Claude, Eddie,
  Grady, Hansel, Clara, Isli, and Doyle. She was predeceased by her loving husband of 67 years, Stephen Fowler Spargo,
  and by Jamie and Billy Gibbs, her daughter and sonin-law, and her son-in-law Allen Brown DeLamar. The Spargos, natives
  of Hot Springs, made Arkadelphia home when Steve joined Reynolds Aluminum Company in 1954.
  Mrs. Spargo is survived by her son and daughter-in-law, Byron and Mary Lynda Spargo, of Baton Rouge, La., and her
  daughters, Nancy Spargo DeLamar, of Little Rock, and Dr. Linda Spargo, of Oxford, Miss. Her grandchildren include
  Megan DeLamar Schroeder and her husband, Trey, of Texarkana; Hattie Alton of Oxford, Miss.; Johni Beth Gibbs and her
  fiance Jeremy Teague of Sheridan; Gwendy Clingman and her husband, Ed, of Mechanicsville, Va.; and Leslie Spargo of
  Baton Rouge. Johnnie Mae was especially proud of her great-grandchildren: Frances and Eleanor Schroeder and Ryan
  and Lauren Clingman.
  She was a fierce and loyal advocate for each and every one of her offspring and truly believed that they could be
  anything in the world they wanted to be. She was a member of the First Methodist Church in Arkadelphia. Johnnie Mae
  was a pre-school teacher for many years at Margo Nelson's Wonderland School in Arkadelphia. She also helped her
  community as a constant and reliable election poll worker. Even though Johnnie Mae was determined that she not be
  perceived as a retiring little granny, her family was her universe. She was a strong, vibrant woman with black hair coiffed
  on top of her head and clicking high heels, and she had beautiful skin that all of her progeny hope to inherit. She
  believed in living to the fullest until the end, doing good works, helping all whom she encountered in ways that she
  could, and imbuing her children and grandchildren with a strong work ethic and deep empathy for those less fortunate.
  Many people in Arkansas have been the recipient of one of her lemon butter pound cakes for doing something kind for
  one of her girls. When she won the 2003 Clark County Democrat of the Year, Johnnie Mae was described as a cross
  between Eva Peron and Mary Poppins.
  Johnnie Mae made her mark on Arkadelphia, determined that her children would enjoy to the fullest the experiences
  that the Norman Rockwellian setting provided. She threw herself into any endeavor that her children and grandchildren
  wanted to pursue. When Becky Fuller, now Rebecca Ward, was the first person from the city to win a statewide election
  at Girl's State, Johnnie Mae organized a city-wide homecoming celebration complete with a parade for all the
  Arkadelphia delegates that included her daughter Nancy. When Johnnie Mae's daughter Jamie wanted to pursue rodeo
  and barrel racing, Nonnie perfected her ability to sew cowgirl outfits while also cheering-on her daughter from the
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765275 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765275 Date: 07/31/2015
  stands. When her daughter Linda wanted to serve as a cheerleader for Arkadelphia High School and then Ouachita
  Baptist University, Johnnie Mae and Steve's house became nerve-center for all events athletic. When daughter Nancy
  returned to Arkadelphia in 1964 with seven-month-old Megan to raise, Johnnie and Steve provided a nurturing, loving
  home for daughter and granddaughter. Megan was the grandchild who gave Johnnie Mae her proudest title: Johnnie
  Mae became "Nonnie."
  Nonnie was queen of a tribe of three generations of women known as "Spargo Girls." When her great-granddaughters
  Frances and Eleanor were born in 1999, Nonnie was determined that the twin girls would not use an exclusive
  communication method. Nonnie's special task was to talk with them extensively and one-on-one, making sure that the
  girls' first desire was to talk to her. Active in Democratic politics at all levels and with a passion, she was equally a
  dedicated life master of duplicate bridge and played many a set with her friends at the House of Bridge in Hot Springs.
  Johnnie ultimately spent most of her time driving to wherever one of her children lived to help with whatever tasks of
  life needed tending. In response to this demanding schedule, she famously responded, "You can sleep when you are
  dead!" Her stock question when confronted with news from one of her children of a pending event — whether one was
  receiving an award or going out for lunch — was "Well, what will you wear?" Raising all these Spargo girls, she was
  expert not only at re-upholstering an entire set of living room furniture, she also sewed countless, spontaneous-yet-
  appropriate attire, from couture evening gowns to cowgirl wear. Making ball gowns from the draperies was not
  exclusive to other southern heroines.
  Perhaps Johnnie Mae's most endearing qualities were unfailing optimism combined with great pragmatism. She lived in
  the present and did not believe in guilt or regrets. Born before women could vote, she cast one of her last votes for the
  woman she hoped would be the first woman President. When Hillary did not prevail, she once again enjoyed casting a
  vote for a straight Democratic ticket. Nonnie would want the family to express special gratitude for the many kindnesses
  extended to her by the staff and nurses at Presbyterian Village in Little Rock, where she resided since June 2009. Thank
  you is extended also to Arkansas Hospice whose compassion and care comforted both family and friends. Thanks are
  also expressed to the staff of Home Instead and their compassionate caregiver, Bette White. John Lee Roberts of
  Arkadelphia provided unwavering help and assistance and was a much loved friend and companion to both Steve and
  Johnnie Mae.
  The family will have a visitation at 9:30-10:30 a.m. Wednesday at Ruggles-Wilcox Funeral Home in Arkadelphia, followed
  by a graveside service at 10:30 a.m. Wednesday at Rose Hill Cemetery led by Father Douglas Anderson of St. James
  Episcopal Church, Texarkana. Memorials may be made to Arkansas Hospice, 5600 W 12th St., Little Rock, Ark. 72204;
  Presbyterian Village Foundation, 510 Brookside, Little Rock, Ark. 72205; or the Arkansas Nature Conservancy, 601 North
  University, Little Rock, Ark. 72205. Sign on line guest book at www.ruggleswilcox.com.
  B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765275 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765277
MetadataSubject: AFGHANISTAN
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: PVerveer
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-18T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765277/C05765277.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Afghanistan
ExtractedFrom: PVerveer
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 12:33 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765277
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  I'm writing in the hope that when you're in Afghanistan you will be able to demonstrate in some public way your support
  for the Afghan women. There is much disillusionment over the aftermath of the elections and the ongoing violence. It
  would be a wonderful signal to the women that we do value the role that they are and must continue to play to move
  Afghanistan forward.
  Secondly, it would also be helpful because there is growing concern at home that the women are going to be abandoned.
  I have to meet with Sen. Casey tom'w, for example. He believes that the women are critical to stability and peace in
  Afghanistan and wants to discuss our commitment.
  Lastly, as Pres, Karzai is beginning to plan his cabinet, perhaps you could mention to him the need to bring in some of the
  talented and experienced women into his government. At our Shura meeting yesterday, we discussed upcoming
  ministerial positions. We, of course, have no guarantee that Karzai will listen, but his government would be a lot better if
  he tapped women and so many are highly qualified.
  Thanks.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765277 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: PVerveer
  Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 12:33 AM
  To:
  Subject: Afghanistan
  I'm writing in the hope that when you're in Afghanistan you will be able to demonstrate in some public way your support
  for the Afghan women. There is much disillusionment over the aftermath of the elections and the ongoing violence. It
  would be a wonderful signal to the women that we do value the role that they are and must continue to play to move
  Afghanistan forward.
  Secondly, it would also be helpful because there is growing concern at home that the women are going to be abandoned.
  I have to meet with Sen. Casey tom'w, for example. He believes that the women are critical to stability and peace in
  Afghanistan and wants to discuss our commitment.
  Lastly, as Pres, Karzai is beginning to plan his cabinet, perhaps you could mention to him the need to bring in some of the
  talented and experienced women into his government. At our Shura meeting yesterday, we discussed upcoming
  ministerial positions. We, of course, have no guarantee that Karzai will listen, but his government would be a lot better if
  he tapped women and so many are highly qualified.
  Thanks.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765277 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765283
MetadataSubject: HONDURAN CONGRESS WILL RULE ON ZELAYA AFTER VOTE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-18T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765283/C05765283.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Honduran Congress will rule on Zelaya after vote
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-III
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 7:15 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765283
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765283 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 7:15 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Honduran Congress will rule on Zelaya after vote
  From: Riggs, Susan
  To: NEWS-Mahogany; NEWS-WHA; Task Force Honduras
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-III
  Sent: Tue Nov 17 16:11:18 2009
  Subject: Honduran Congress will rule on Zelaya after vote
  TEGUCIGALPA (AP) -The leader of the Honduran Congress said lawmakers would not decide whether to restore ousted
  President Manuel Zelaya until after the November 29 presidential elections. Congressional president Jose Alfredo
  Saavedra said lawmakers would vote December 2 on whether Zelaya should return to the presidency. The decision
  raises questions about whether the international community would recognize the outcome of the elections. Several
  countries have warned they would not recognize the vote unless Zelaya is restored beforehand. The United States has
  not ruled out restoring diplomatic ties with a newly elected Honduran government even if Zelaya remains out of power
  through the vote.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765283 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765287
MetadataSubject: RENDEZ-VOUS IN KABUL...
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-18T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765287/C05765287.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765287
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Importance:
  FYI
  Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Wednesday, November 18, 2009 8:17 AM
  H
  Fw: Rendez-vous in Kabul....
  High
  B6

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765287 Date: 07/31/2015
  Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 07/30/2015 - Class: CONFIDENTIAL
  - Reason: 1.4(B), 1.4(D) - Declassify on: 11/18/2024
  RELEASE IN PART
  B1,1.4(B),1.4(D),B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Importance:
  FYI
  Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Wednesday, November 18, 2009 8:17 AM
  H
  Fw: Rendez-vous in Kabul....
  High
  B6
  From: Daalder, No H
  To: Gordon, Philip H; 'Lute, Douglas E.' 'Sherwood-Randall, Elizabeth D.'
  Sullivan, Jacob 3; Holbrooke, Richard C
  Sent: Wed Nov 18 08:02:28 2009
  Subject: FW: Rendez-vous in Kabul....
  1.4(B)
  1.4(D)
  B1
  No Daalder +32 (0)2-724-3230
  daalderih@state.gov
  From: Stefanini Stefano
  Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 12:39 AM
  To: Daalder, No H
  Subject: Rendez-vous in Kabul....
  Importance: High
  B6
  1.4(B)
  1.4(D)
  B1
  Dear No
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765287 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765287 Date: 07/31/2015
  1.4(By
  1.4(D)
  B1
  Stefano
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765287 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765290
MetadataSubject: RAJ
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-18T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765290/C05765290.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: FW: Raj
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 12:59 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765290
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: fyi
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765290 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 12:59 PM
  To: H
  Subject: FW: Raj
  fyi
  Original Message----
  From: Rodriguez, Miguel E
  Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 12:39 PM
  To: Reines, Philippe I; Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Raj
  I've been to probably well over 200 courtesy visits with nominees, so I don't say this lightly -- Raj was great, amongst the
  best I've seen.
  Knocked it out of the park with Feingold.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765290 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765298
MetadataSubject: LOVE THE COAT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Crowley, Philip J
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-19T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765298/C05765298.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedFrom: Crowley, Philip J <CrowleyPJ@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Reines, Philippe I; Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 5:48 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765298
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Your arrival in Kabul landed the front page picture in the NYT and sparked an on-line poll in Huff Post about your coat. At
  last check, its favorability rating was 77 percent. Safe travels back. PJ

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765298 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Crowley, Philip J <CrowleyPJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 5:48 AM
  To:
  Cc: Reines, Philippe I; Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma
  Subject Love the Coat
  Your arrival in Kabul landed the front page picture in the NYT and sparked an on-line poll in Huff Post about your coat. At
  last check, its favorability rating was 77 percent. Safe travels back. PJ
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765298 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765302
MetadataSubject: LOVE THE COAT
MetadataTo: Crowley, Philip J
MetadataFrom: Reines, Philippe I
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-19T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765302/C05765302.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Love the Coat
ExtractedTo: Crowley, Philip J; H
ExtractedFrom: Reines, Philippe I <reinesp@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 5:49 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765302
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Now I now why Huma has been at a computer all day clicking the mouse incessantly
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765302 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Reines, Philippe I <reinesp@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 5:49 AM
  To: Crowley, Philip J; H
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma
  Subject Re: Love the Coat
  Now I now why Huma has been at a computer all day clicking the mouse incessantly
  Original Message
  From: Crowley, Philip J
  To: 'HDR22@clintonemail.com' <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Cc: Reines, Philippe I; Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Nov 19 05:47:42 2009
  Subject: Love the Coat
  Your arrival in Kabul landed the front page picture in the NYT and sparked an on-line poll in Huff Post about your coat. At
  last check, its favorability rating was 77 percent. Safe travels back. PJ
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765302 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765313
MetadataSubject: MICHELETTI STEP-ASIDE?
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-19T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765313/C05765313.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Micheletti Step-Aside?
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 6:11 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765313
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765313 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 6:11 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Micheletti Step-Aside?
  From: Kelly, Craig A
  To: Sullivan, Jacob 3; Abedin, Huma; Mills, Cheryl D; Steinberg, James B; Burns, William J
  Sent: Thu Nov 19 16:32:14 2009
  Subject: Micheletti Step-Aside?
  To All:
  Yesterday, when I left Tegucigalpa, we used the departure to put more pressure on M. I called a top M aide and said I
  was leaving, and that if my message in Washington was that M refused to help us help him, we would have to take our
  own steps to make clear our position on Honduras. (They assume that means visas stay revoked and more could be
  pulled.) We preferred to achieve our objectives through a patriotic gesture on M's part (a step-aside) but we have to
  protect our principles and our interests in the region. Washington would be very disappointed that M refused to
  cooperate with the country that has done the most to promote support for the October 30 Accord and promote support
  for elections in his country. Moreover, M would be passing up a chance to go down in history as a statesman as
  opposed the man who launched a coup.
  Last night the aide called Hugo to say that M had considered this again and was sensitive to our arguments. He had
  decided to make a speech today (November 19) to announce that he as "absenting himself" for the days preceding the
  election through December 2 —the date of the vote on Z's restitution in the Congress. The latter is a significant date,
  because if Z wins the vote, M is gone, and if Z loses the vote, M has no reason to stay to keep Z out. M will leave the
  country in the control of a sort of executive council.
  This afternoon M's staff shared with us the draft of a speech that M plans to make tonight at 7:00 pm EST (6:00 pm in
  Honduras). We have been suggesting edits to the text, which M has accepted.
  This is Honduras, so we will wait to see what happens at 7:00 pm. If M goes through with it, we will launch calls to key
  countries to urged them to recognize that the situation on the ground has changed enough to allow more vigorous
  support for elections. Zelaya and ALBA will say this is not enough, but we will work on countries that matter.
  Best,
  ck
  SBU
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765313 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765321
MetadataSubject: THEY'RE TORTURING ME, ZELAYA CLAIMS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-09-24T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_040_042_043/DOC_0C05765321/C05765321.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: FW: They're torturing me, Zelaya claims
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: NEWS-WHA; SES-Line_UNGA; M_SpecialAssistants; SES-O_SWO-Only
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 1:18 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765321
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765321 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 1:18 AM
  To:
  Subject Fw: They're torturing me, Zelaya claims
  From: Greene, Malcolm
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: NEWS-WHA; SES-Line_UNGA; M_SpecialAssistants; SES-O_SWO-Only
  Sent: Thu Sep 24 01:14:47 2009
  Subject: FW: They're torturing me, Zelaya claims
  From: Rathod, Rona R
  Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 1:05 AM
  To: Task Force Honduras
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-I
  Subject: They're torturing me, Zelaya claims
  BY FRANCES ROBLES
  froblesaMiamiHerald.com
  It's been 89 days since Manuel Zelaya was booted from power. He's sleeping on chairs, and he claims his
  throat is sore from toxic gases and "Israeli mercenaries" are torturing him with high-frequency radiation.
  "We are being threatened with death," he said in an interview with The Miami Herald, adding that
  mercenaries were likely to storm the embassy where he has been holed up since Monday and
  assassinate him.
  "I prefer to march on my feet than to live on my knees before a military dictatorship," Zelaya said in a
  series of back-to-back interviews.
  Zelaya was deposed at gunpoint on June 28 and slipped back into his country on Monday, just two
  days before he was scheduled to speak before the United Nations. He sought refuge at the Brazilian
  Embassy, where Zelaya said he is being subjected to toxic gases and radiation that alter his physical
  and mental state.
  Witnesses said that for a short time Tuesday morning, soldiers used a device that looked like a large
  satellite dish to emit a loud shrill noise.
  Honduran police spokesman Orlin Cerrato said he knew nothing of any radiation devices being used
  against the former president.
  "He says there are mercenaries against him? Using some kind of apparatus?" Cerrato said. "No, no,
  no, no. Sincerely: no. The only elements surrounding that embassy are police and military, and they
  have no such apparatus."
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765321 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765321 Date: 07/31/2015
  Police responded to reports of looting throughout the city Tuesday night. Civil disturbances subsided
  Wednesday afternoon, when a crush of people rushed grocery stores and gas stations in the capital.
  Israeli government sources in Miami said they could not confirm the presence of any "Israelis
  mercenaries" in Honduras.
  Zelaya, 56, is at the embassy with his family and other supporters, without a change of clothes or
  toothpaste. The power and water were turned back on, and the U.N. brought in some food. Photos
  showed Zelaya, his trademark cowboy hat across his face, napping on a few chairs he had pushed
  together.
  "Look at the shape he's in — sleeping on chairs," de facto President Roberto Micheletti told a local TV
  news station.
  Micheletti took Zelaya's place after the military, executing a Supreme Court arrest warrant, burst into
  Zelaya's house and forced him into exile. The country's military, congress, Supreme Court and
  economic leaders have backed the ouster, arguing that Zelaya was bent on conducting an illegal
  plebiscite that they feared would ultimately lead to his reelection.
  Micheletti said he was prepared to meet with Zelaya and a delegation from the Organization of
  American States, but only to discuss one topic: November elections.
  On Wednesday, the U.N. cut off all technical aid that would have supported and given credibility to
  that presidential race. Conditions do not exist for credible elections, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-
  moon said.
  "I proposed dialogue, and they answered with bullets, bombs, a state of siege and by closing the
  airport," Zelaya said.
  Zelaya told The Herald that Washington should be taking a stronger stance against the elite
  economic interests that "financed and benefited" from the coup that ousted him three months ago.
  If President Barack Obama hit Honduras with commercial sanctions or suspended free-trade
  agreements, the coup "would last just five minutes."
  The Obama administration suspended economic aid to Honduras and withdrew the visas of members
  of the current administration.
  About 75 percent of Honduras' commerce depends on the United States, Zelaya said. And because
  powerful economic forces were behind Zelaya's ouster, Obama should hit those forces where it hurts
  most, Zelaya said.
  "I have told this to Obama, to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, to the U.S. Embassy here and
  anyone else who will listen," Zelaya said. "They know how to act. Until now, they have been very
  prudent."
  With Micheletti showing a new willingness to talk with the OAS, and the U.N. Security Council set to
  meet to discuss the embassy situation soon, it isn't the moment for more penalties, the U.S. State
  Department said.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765321 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765321 Date: 07/31/2015
  "Right now, when there are openings for dialogue, is not the time to announce new sanctions," a
  State Department official said.
  Dates for the OAS visit, which could include emissaries from 10 countries, are being worked out, the
  official said.
  Spokesman Ian Kelly said the U.N. Security Council meeting came at the request of the Brazilian
  government. No date has been set for the meeting.
  "In general, we continue to work with our partners in the U.N. and the OAS to come up with means to
  promote a dialogue and defuse the tensions, of course with the ultimate goal of resolving the crisis,"
  State Department spokesman Ian Kelly said at a media briefing in Washington. "And we're
  continuing our consultations with our partners in the region, and enlisting wherever we can their
  assistance in this process."
  The U.S. Embassy here spent the day denying rumors that Zelaya planned to move to American
  grounds. The rumor may have started because U.S. Embassy vehicles were used to evacuate Zelaya
  supporters who left the Brazilian Embassy willingly Tuesday.
  "The embassy has been turned into a bunker for Zelaya," Assistant Foreign Minister Martha Lorena
  Alvarado de Casco told The Herald. "He's turned it into his headquarters, and he is using it to call for
  insurrection."
  Brazilian Foreign Minister Celso Amorim told CNN en Espanol that his government asked Zelaya to
  tone down his rhetoric while he remains an embassy guest.
  "The word 'death' should not even be mentioned," he said.
  Rioting broke out in various parts of the capital Tuesday night, and lines hundreds deep formed at
  supermarkets when desperate shoppers scrambled to buy food after a round-the-clock curfew was
  briefly lifted.
  "I have no food in my house," said Patti Vasquez, a housewife who, after two hours, still had not
  reached the front doors of a supermarket in an upscale shopping mall. "I need to get milk and juice
  and eggs."
  Zelaya says he has no plans to leave the embassy anytime soon.
  . "I am the president the people of Honduras chose," Zelaya said. "A country can't have two
  presidents --just one."
  Miami Herald staff writer Jim Wyss and special correspondent Stewart Stogel contributed to this
  report.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765321 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765334
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Verma, Richard R
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-07T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765334/C05765334.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, November 7, 2009 11:55 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765334
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Think your calls to House members made all the difference. Close, but good result. Reid still waiting on cbo scoring
  before taking up senate bill. Could slide at least a week, maybe more.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765334 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, November 7, 2009 11:55 PM
  To: H
  Think your calls to House members made all the difference. Close, but good result. Reid still waiting on cbo scoring
  before taking up senate bill. Could slide at least a week, maybe more.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765334 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765335
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Verveer, Melanne S
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-08T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765335/C05765335.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedFrom: Verveer, Melanne S <VerveerMS@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 8, 2009 12:37 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765335
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  I know you're embarked on another big trip and wish you well.
  I met with Reema Navatany, Ela Bhatt's right hand, whom you know. She sends her greetings and underscored again
  what you mean to them. SEWA is on the cutting edge of so many exciting developments.
  We had a great conversation on many things, including how much women in the developing world can and must do to
  address climate change and drive low tech green industries. In the villages, I could feel the pollution in my eyes and
  throat -- so much needs to be done at the local level. Much pollution is produced because of the way women cook, etc.
  When I get back, will work up some ideas on this. Delhi's been enshrouded in smog for the last couple days.
  The SEWA project I visited 2 hours outside of Delhi was so impressive. Women who were among the poorst of the poor
  had become businesswomen capable of traveling to London and Brussels to negotiate contracts with companies for
  their embroidery etc We're going to have SEWA play a key role in the Vital Voices summit that you announced that will
  take place here next year.
  Maria Otero was still here when - arrived so she joined me for the SEWA mtgs.
  I also went to one of Rushira Gupta's antitrafficking projects. You know her as we've been working with her thru WH
  years. She got the global citizens award at CGI this year. I don't think I've seen worse conditions than what she's trying to
  address. In Mumbai we launched an anti- trafficking campaign with Bollywood which brought in new players to the
  cause.
  Tomw, I will be speaking on this year's World Economic Forum Gender Gap report for India. There's so much potential
  for India's economic growth -- as the WEF points out --- if they'd tap women's potential here. India is last of the BRIC
  countries on most indicators and comes out poorly generally. Will be raising some of these issues with govt in Dialogue
  mtgs.
  Anyway, I thought of you so much everywhere I went. I'm so happy to be part of your legacy on these issues.
  Travel well.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765335 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Verveer, Melanne S <VerveerMS@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, November 8, 2009 12:37 AM
  To:
  I know you're embarked on another big trip and wish you well.
  I met with Reema Navatany, Ela Bhatt's right hand, whom you know. She sends her greetings and underscored again
  what you mean to them. SEWA is on the cutting edge of so many exciting developments.
  We had a great conversation on many things, including how much women in the developing world can and must do to
  address climate change and drive low tech green industries. In the villages, I could feel the pollution in my eyes and
  throat -- so much needs to be done at the local level. Much pollution is produced because of the way women cook, etc.
  When I get back, will work up some ideas on this. Delhi's been enshrouded in smog for the last couple days.
  The SEWA project I visited 2 hours outside of Delhi was so impressive. Women who were among the poorst of the poor
  had become businesswomen capable of traveling to London and Brussels to negotiate contracts with companies for
  their embroidery etc We're going to have SEWA play a key role in the Vital Voices summit that you announced that will
  take place here next year.
  Maria Otero was still here when - arrived so she joined me for the SEWA mtgs.
  I also went to one of Rushira Gupta's antitrafficking projects. You know her as we've been working with her thru WH
  years. She got the global citizens award at CGI this year. I don't think I've seen worse conditions than what she's trying to
  address. In Mumbai we launched an anti- trafficking campaign with Bollywood which brought in new players to the
  cause.
  Tomw, I will be speaking on this year's World Economic Forum Gender Gap report for India. There's so much potential
  for India's economic growth -- as the WEF points out --- if they'd tap women's potential here. India is last of the BRIC
  countries on most indicators and comes out poorly generally. Will be raising some of these issues with govt in Dialogue
  mtgs.
  Anyway, I thought of you so much everywhere I went. I'm so happy to be part of your legacy on these issues.
  Travel well.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765335 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765338
MetadataSubject: DEMS NO VOTES ON HC
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Rodriguez, Miguel E
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-08T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765338/C05765338.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Dems NO Votes on HC
ExtractedFrom: Rodriguez, Miguel E <RodriguezME@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 8, 2009 8:15 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765338
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Below please find the list of those 39 Democrats who voted against the H.3962 (The Affordable Health Care for America
  Act).
  Bobby Bright, Alabama District 2-Montgomery
  Parker Griffith, Alabama District 5-Huntsville
  Artur Davis, Alabama District 7-Birmingham (retiring)
  Mike Ross, Arkansas District 4-Prescott
  Betsy Markey, Colorado District 4-Fort Collins
  Allen Boyd, Florida District 2-Monticello
  Suzanne Kosmas, Florida District 24-New Smyrna Beach
  Jim Marshall, Georgia District 8-Macon
  John Barrow, Georgia District 12-Savannah
  Walt Minnick, Idaho District 1-Boise
  Ben Chandler, Kentucky District 6-Versailles
  Charles Melancon, Louisiana District 3-Napoleonville (retiring)
  Frank Kratovil, Maryland District 1-Stevensville
  Collin Peterson, Minnesota District 7-Detroit Lakes
  Travis Childers, Mississippi District 1-Booneville
  Gene Taylor, Mississippi District 4-Bay St. Louis
  Ike Skelton, Missouri District 4-Lexington
  John Adler, New Jersey District 3-Cherry Hill
  Harry Teague, New Mexico District 2-Hobbs
  Michael McMahon, New York District 13-Staten Island
  Scott Murphy, New York District 20-Glens Falls
  Eric Massa, New York District 29-Corning
  Mike McIntyre, North Carolina District 7-Lumberton
  Larry Kissel!, North Carolina District 8-Biscoe
  Heath Shuler, North Carolina District 11-Waynesville
  Dennis Kucinich, Ohio District 10-Cleveland
  John Boccieri, Ohio District 16-Alliance
  Dan Boren, Oklahoma District 2-Muskogee
  Jason Altmire, Pennsylvania District 4-McCandless
  Tim Holden, Pennsylvania District 17-Saint Clair
  Stephanie Herseth Sandlin, South Dakota At Large Member-Brookings
  Lincoln Davis, Tennessee District 4-Pall Mall
  Bart Gordon, Tennessee District 6-Murfreesboro
  John Tanner, Tennessee District 8-Union City
  Chet Edwards, Texas District 17-Waco
  Jim Matheson, Utah District 2-Salt Lake City
  Glenn Nye, Virginia District 2-Norfolk
  Rick Boucher, Virginia District 9-Abingdon
  Brian Baird, Washington District 3-Vancouver

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765338 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Rodriguez, Miguel E <RodriguezME@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, November 8, 2009 8:15 AM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Dems NO Votes on HC
  Below please find the list of those 39 Democrats who voted against the H.3962 (The Affordable Health Care for America
  Act).
  Bobby Bright, Alabama District 2-Montgomery
  Parker Griffith, Alabama District 5-Huntsville
  Artur Davis, Alabama District 7-Birmingham (retiring)
  Mike Ross, Arkansas District 4-Prescott
  Betsy Markey, Colorado District 4-Fort Collins
  Allen Boyd, Florida District 2-Monticello
  Suzanne Kosmas, Florida District 24-New Smyrna Beach
  Jim Marshall, Georgia District 8-Macon
  John Barrow, Georgia District 12-Savannah
  Walt Minnick, Idaho District 1-Boise
  Ben Chandler, Kentucky District 6-Versailles
  Charles Melancon, Louisiana District 3-Napoleonville (retiring)
  Frank Kratovil, Maryland District 1-Stevensville
  Collin Peterson, Minnesota District 7-Detroit Lakes
  Travis Childers, Mississippi District 1-Booneville
  Gene Taylor, Mississippi District 4-Bay St. Louis
  Ike Skelton, Missouri District 4-Lexington
  John Adler, New Jersey District 3-Cherry Hill
  Harry Teague, New Mexico District 2-Hobbs
  Michael McMahon, New York District 13-Staten Island
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765338 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765338 Date: 07/31/2015
  Scott Murphy, New York District 20-Glens Falls
  Eric Massa, New York District 29-Corning
  Mike McIntyre, North Carolina District 7-Lumberton
  Larry Kissel!, North Carolina District 8-Biscoe
  Heath Shuler, North Carolina District 11-Waynesville
  Dennis Kucinich, Ohio District 10-Cleveland
  John Boccieri, Ohio District 16-Alliance
  Dan Boren, Oklahoma District 2-Muskogee
  Jason Altmire, Pennsylvania District 4-McCandless
  Tim Holden, Pennsylvania District 17-Saint Clair
  Stephanie Herseth Sandlin, South Dakota At Large Member-Brookings
  Lincoln Davis, Tennessee District 4-Pall Mall
  Bart Gordon, Tennessee District 6-Murfreesboro
  John Tanner, Tennessee District 8-Union City
  Chet Edwards, Texas District 17-Waco
  Jim Matheson, Utah District 2-Salt Lake City
  Glenn Nye, Virginia District 2-Norfolk
  Rick Boucher, Virginia District 9-Abingdon
  Brian Baird, Washington District 3-Vancouver
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765338 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765340
MetadataSubject: NEW MEMO: WESTERWELLE. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-08T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765340/C05765340.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: New memo: Westerwelle. Sid
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedCc: MillsCD@state.gov
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 8, 2009 10:14 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765340
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  November 8, 2009
  For: Hillary

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765340 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Sunday, November 8, 2009 10:14 AM
  To:
  Cc: MillsCD@state.gov
  Subject: New memo: Westerwelle. Sid
  Attachments: hrc memo westerwelle 110809.docx
  CONFIDENTIAL
  November 8, 2009
  For: Hillary
  From: Sid
  Re: Westerwelle
  CC: Cheryl
  The following are notes of my conversation this morning with Wolfgang Ischinger (who will be at the Berlin
  event tonight). You will of course recall Wolfgang as the former director of the German Foreign Ministry and
  ambassador to the UK and US. He knows Westerwelle very well, Wolfgang's former staff is now mostly
  Westerwelle's senior staff and he understands Westerwelle's personality.
  Wolfgang Ischinger
  11/08/09
  The important thing about Guido Westerwelle is that he's spent his entire life in politics. He's scored a dramatic
  success for a small party, which has traditionally scored 9 to 10 percent, but now at 15 percent. He wants to
  translate this victory into a sustained role for the Free Democrats in the system. There's a lot of ambition there.
  He has not spent any significant amount of time on foreign policy, not his area of expertise, but he's a quick
  study. He's a fluent English speaker, not a conservative at all, advocated the idea of a nuclear free world,
  embraced fully. That is one operational area where the US can expect a lot of support.
  He will make a real effort to maintain and expand a meaningful relationship with Russia. I don't see any friction
  at all with the US. He's a transatlanticist by nature and training.
  One footnote: Westerwelle has argued during the campaign and in recent speeches that he wishes to promote a
  process that would allow the remaining US weapons in Germany, holdovers form the Cold War, to be
  eliminated. It's not an anti-US point, but a German way of saying we are in favor of nuclear disarmament. It
  should not be seen as a hostile act, but a German contribution to a nuclear free world.
  He lives with a partner who has a PR agency. He represents a new generation that doesn't mind same sex
  partnership, symbolizes a new, more liberal society where the traditional taboos are no longer in existence. He's
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765340 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765340 Date: 07/31/2015
  highly sensitive about it. He didn't come out of the closet for many years. There's a degree of vulnerability
  behind it.
  He's not a 'buddy" guy, who slaps people on the back. It takes time to develop a trusting relationship with him.
  It's more difficult for him than others. He's a careful person in terms of personal relationships.
  Hans-Dietrich Genscher is considered a trademark in Germany of successful diplomacy in the last decade
  before the end of the Cold War and the transition. (Genscher was foreign minsiter from 1974-92.) If you can say
  Genscher is your mentor that is thought to be reassuring in Germany. Kohl is out of circulation. Schmidt is
  retired. Genscher is really the only one. That Westerwelle refers to his relationship is reassuring given that
  Guido is not a foreign policy specialist. Genscher's blessing is good for him. At the personal level, the
  relationship was never intimate. It would not be correct to say Westerwelle is a Genscher creation. He made his
  own career.
  Westerwelle is going to rely to a great extent on staff members who earned their experience in the Genscher
  days (and worked with Ischinger). The senior staff that will now be appointed at the foreign minister will be
  excellent—a lot of pro-transatlantic people in the lineup.
  This is good news for the bilateral relationship. It will be easier to work this German foreign ministry than was
  the case with Steinmeier.
  Westerwelle knows that the one relationship he must manage well is the one with Secretary clinton.
  My advice is that she works with him closely, as closely as with any European foreign minister, that would be
  very beneficial. If she can embrace him and make him look good that make will things go well.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765340 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765343
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Talbott, Strobe
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-08T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765343/C05765343.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Strobe Talbott
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 8, 2009 11:11 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765343
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Assume you're in Berlin. Holbrooke just dazzled &, in some key cases, mollified, even persuaded Trilateral Commission re
  Afpak. It was off-record. I strongly feel he & others shd be out there publicly establishing the theory of the case, not
  least because that will help manage the delay before the Pres's decision/announcement.
  Safe travels & hi to Gorby (just kidding--he regards me as a Yeltsinite)

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765343 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Strobe Talbott
  Sent: Sunday, November 8, 2009 11:11 AM
  To: H
  Assume you're in Berlin. Holbrooke just dazzled &, in some key cases, mollified, even persuaded Trilateral Commission re
  Afpak. It was off-record. I strongly feel he & others shd be out there publicly establishing the theory of the case, not
  least because that will help manage the delay before the Pres's decision/announcement.
  Safe travels & hi to Gorby (just kidding--he regards me as a Yeltsinite)
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765343 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765345
MetadataSubject: RE:
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: cheryl.mills
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-08T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765345/C05765345.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re:
ExtractedFrom: cheryl.mills B6
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 8, 2009 11:37 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765345
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: K
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765345 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: cheryl.mills B6
  Sent: Sunday, November 8, 2009 11:37 AM
  To:
  Subject: Re:
  K
  Original Message
  From: Hrc New
  To: Cheryl Mills
  Sent: Nov 8, 2009 11:15 AM
  Subject: Fw:
  Can you use this w wh to make case.
  Original Message
  From: Strobe Talbott
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Nov 08 11:11:05 2009
  Subject:
  Assume you're in Berlin. Holbrooke just dazzled &, in some key cases, mollified, even persuaded Trilateral Commission re
  Afpak. It was off-record. I strongly feel he & others shd be out there publicly establishing the theory of the case, not
  least because that will help manage the delay before the Pres's decision/announcement.
  Safe travels & hi to Gorby (just kidding--he regards me as a Yeltsinite)
  Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765345 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765347
MetadataSubject: GOOD NEWS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Hill, Christopher R (Baghdad)
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-08T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765347/C05765347.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Good news
ExtractedFrom: Hill, Christopher R (Baghdad) <HilICR@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 8, 2009 4:30 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765347
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Many thx for your kind note. I wish I felt better about Iraqis as a result, but I truly remain worried about these people.
  They are truly a collective pain in the neck. Chris
  This e-mail is unclassified based on the definitions outlined in E.O. 12958
  *** Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld ***

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765347 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Hill, Christopher R (Baghdad) <HilICR@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, November 8, 2009 4:30 PM
  To:
  Subject Re: Good news
  Many thx for your kind note. I wish I felt better about Iraqis as a result, but I truly remain worried about these people.
  They are truly a collective pain in the neck. Chris
  This e-mail is unclassified based on the definitions outlined in E.O. 12958
  *** Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld ***
  Original Message ----
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Hill, Christopher R (Baghdad)
  Sent: Mon Nov 09 00:17:20 2009
  Subject: Good news
  Dear Chris--
  I heard about the election law passing and the agreement about Kirkuk, which sound like positive steps forward.
  Thanks to you and your team for all you did to support the Iraqis in these decisions. Kudos all around. Take care, Hillary
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765347 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765355
MetadataSubject: WHY THE GREG CRAIG DEBACLE MATTERS
MetadataFrom: Politico - Drew, Elizabeth
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-19T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765355/C05765355.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765355
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765355 Date: 07/31/2015
  http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29716 Page3.html
  RELEASE IN FULL
  Why the Greg Craig debacle matters
  By: Elizabeth Drew
  November 19, 2009 11:58 AM EST
  President Barack Obama is returning from his trek to Asia Thursday to a capital that is a
  considerably more dangerous place for him than when he departed.
  While he was abroad, there was a palpable sense at home of something gone wrong. A
  critical mass of influential people who once held big hopes for his presidency began to
  wonder whether they had misjudged the man. Most significant, these doubters now find
  themselves with a new reluctance to defend Obama at a phase of his presidency when he
  needs defenders more urgently than ever.
  This is the price Obama has paid with his complicity and most likely his active
  participation, in the shabbiest episode of his presidency: The firing by leaks of White
  House counsel Gregory Craig, a well-respected Washington veteran and influential early
  supporter of Obama.
  The people who are most aghast by the handling of the Craig departure can't be
  dismissed by the White House as Republican partisans, or still-embittered Hillary Clinton
  supporters. They are not naïve activists who don't understand that the exercise of power
  can be a rough business and that trade-offs and personal disappointments are inevitable.
  Instead, they are people, either in politics or close observers, who once held an
  unromantically high opinion of Obama. They were important to his rise, and are likely
  more important to the success or failure of his presidency than Obama or his distressingly
  insular and small-minded West Wing team appreciate.
  The Craig embarrassment gives these people a new reason — not the first or only reason
  — to conclude that he wasn't the person of integrity and even classiness they had thought,
  and, more fundamentally, that his ability to move people and actually lead a fractured and
  troubled country (the reason many preferred him over Hillary Clinton) is not what had been
  promised in the campaign.
  This may seem like a lot to hang on a Washington personnel move. After all, intramural
  back-stabbing or making people fall guys when things go wrong (think Bill Clinton's
  Defense Secretary Les Aspin after the disaster in Somalia) are not new to
  Washingtonians.
  But Craig's ouster did not occur in a vacuum. It served as a focal point to concerns that
  have been building for months that Obama wasn't pressing for all that might be possible
  within the existing political constraints (all that one could ask of a president); that his
  presidential voice hadn't fulfilled the hopes raised by his campaign voice (which had also
  taken him a while to find); that he hadn't created a movement, as he had raised
  expectations that he would; that would be there to back him up and help him fulfill his
  promises.
  That is why it is worth pondering how the Craig story, unfolded in detail — its
  consequences likely will echo far longer than anything Obama said or did in Asia.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765355 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765355 Date: 07/31/2015
  Briefly, here's what happened, some of it told for the first time: Craig, who had known the
  Clintons since they were all at Yale Law School together, had served as a senior adviser
  to Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, but in 1998 gave up that job to help defend Bill
  Clinton against impeachment. Yet in 2008, he supported Obama for the nomination — not
  so much a turning against Hillary Clinton as being impressed early, as were some other
  prominent Washingtonians, by the then-state senator but would-be U.S. Senate candidate
  at a fundraiser held by Vernon Jordan, seeing Obama as the first potentially inspiring
  Democratic figure since Robert Kennedy. In the course of the campaign, Craig wrote a
  highly publicized memo questioning some of Hillary Clinton's claims of foreign policy
  experience, such as coming under enemy fire in Tuzla, Bosnia. During the campaign,
  Craig coached Obama for the debates (playing McCain), and praised him highly. Craig's
  imprimatur helped the neophyte Obama in certain influential circles.
  He hoped to get a high foreign policy position in an Obama administration, but when
  Clinton was named secretary of state, this of course became untenable. The Clintons are
  an unforgiving lot. So, Obama and Craig agreed that Craig would take the job of White
  House counsel for a year, and then they'd discuss what he'd do next. Thus, Craig was
  handed a very tricky portfolio.
  During the transition, about mid-December, Craig presented to a group of the president's
  newly named national security advisers meeting in Washington — including Clinton,
  Defense Secretary Robert Gates, national security adviser General James Jones, and
  others — three proposed executive orders: One ordered the shutting down of Guantanamo
  in a year. (The others banned torture and closed down the C.I.A.'s "black sites"; and
  addressed future detainee policy.) The one-year target for closing Guantanamo resulted
  from consultations with human rights and detainee rights groups, who argued that
  Guantanamo could be shut down in three months, and with Pentagon officials, who had
  no united position but argued that it would take from a year to 18 months.
  At the meeting, only the newly named Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano,
  beamed in from Arizona, questioned whether a year was realistic. When Gates, as he
  later confirmed publicly, said that though it was an "ambitious" deadline, he supported it
  because setting it was the only way to get things, especially the bureaucracy, moving
  toward that end, and that it could be extended if it couldn't be met, that was it.
  Obama's new national security team signed off on the executive order to close
  Guantanamo in a year. This was passed along to the president as well as his top aides;
  Craig was never in a meeting with the political side of the White House on the
  Guantanamo matter — and the president-elect and then president raised no objection
  before, when, or after he signed off on it.
  Unsurprisingly, the deadline became hard to meet, for various legal and political reasons -
  including the congressional outburst of NIMBYISM (similar to its earlier outbursts on Dubai
  Ports and even Terri Schiavo — short-term, irrational, and politically motivated fits that
  erupt from the Congress from time to time). If Craig failed to foresee this (as some later
  charged), he had a lot of company.
  The closing of Guantanamo is undoubtedly far further along than it would have been
  without the executive order. But along the way, Craig fell out of favor with the president's
  political aides and, apparently, the president himself. Whether he was simply being made
  the fall guy, or the tight circle of Chicagoans in the White House didn't care for this
  outsider, or he committed some unknown errors, suddenly, in August, leaks began to
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765355 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765355 Date: 07/31/2015
  surface that his job was in danger. Non-denial denials were issued from the White House.
  The leaks became a pattern, a systematic, anonymous, tipping off of reporters that Craig
  would soon be gone.
  Craig was accused, anonymously of course, of a welter of charges: of being "too close to
  the human rights groups" (if so, what was wrong with that?), of not playing well with
  others, of being a bad manager, of being fixated on Guantanamo to the detriment of other
  issues. In the summer, Obama offered Craig another job, which Craig declined, and the
  two agreed that they would discuss the matter further later in the year. But the leaks
  continued, and Craig decided that his situation was untenable, and he had to leave.
  To make sure he did, he was leaked his way out, up to the day before he planned to
  .resign. What caused so many Obama supporters' stomachs to turn was that Obama could
  have stopped the leaking at any time; he or White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel
  could have arranged a dignified departure. (They're within their rights to get rid of
  someone if they're dissatisfied, for good reasons or not — but a preferred route would be to
  call that person in and ask what day would suit him or her to resign, and then just let that
  person do it. This happens a lot in administrations; even if people don't believe the
  resignation was voluntary, there's a soupcon of dignity left to that person.) Even some
  Hillary Clinton supporters, who still hold no brief for Craig, think he was treated shabbily.
  And this opinion is not confined to "political junkies." Thomas Wilner, a distinguished
  Washington attorney who challenged Bush administration detainee policies, particularly on
  Guantanamo, and had worked with Craig on these issues, told me, "There's a lot of
  concern among a lot of lawyers in this town, especially those who were supporting
  Obama, that somebody this bright, this respected, this good, and with this integrity, was
  treated in such a way."
  Yes, we knew, or should have, during the campaign that the supposed idealist Obama
  had a bit of the Chicago cut-throat in him, but there was little sign that he could be as
  brutal and heedless of loyalty as he was in the Craig affair. An unexpected climate of fear
  emanates from the Obama White House.
  The incident underscored worries that several had held about the Obama White House for
  some time: that it was too tightly controlled and narrowly focused by the Chicago crowd;
  that it seemed from the outset to need an older, wiser head, someone with a bit more
  detachment.
  The current crowd displays a certain impulsiveness and vindictiveness that do it no good -
  as in the silly war-let on Fox News that it is now trying to back out of. Even if Craig was
  making a hash of his job — and there's no independent evidence of this — it just wasn't
  smart to treat someone widely held in such high respect in this manner; once again, the
  impulsiveness backfired.
  The replacing of Craig with Washington attorney Robert Bauer, Obama's own attorney for
  years as well as counsel for the Democratic National Committee and the Obama
  campaign, further narrowed the White House circle just when it needed broadening,
  lowered the stature of the office, and choosing the president's personal attorney for a
  position that calls for dispassionate judgment is hazardous. (Does anyone remember
  Alberto Gonzalez?)
  The Obama's themselves hang tight with a small Chicago crowd. Yes, he talks to others,
  and yes, a president's time is very limited, but the Obama's themselves seem as closed-
  off and unto themselves as does his inner White House circle. (Is this a coincidence?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765355 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765355 Date: 07/31/2015
  What is all this wariness about?) When the Obama's go to someone's house for dinner,
  almost invariably it's to that of Valerie Jarrett, the old friend from Chicago who serves as a
  counselor and whom they see all day. Old Chicago friends fly in for weekends frequently.
  Old friends, who had helped launch him, helped them personally, have been left behind.
  At the same time as the Craig imbroglio happened, many people who had defended
  Obama against charges that he wasn't what he'd been cracked up to be were now
  becoming concerned themselves: though it was a relief to have a president who thought
  through crucial decisions about sending the country's young to war, it was taking him
  awfully long to make up his mind about what to do about Afghanistan and Pakistan, and
  the decision-making was bafflingly leak-ridden (was this a deliberate airing of ideas or a
  loss of control over the process?); that the health care debate had in fact careened out of
  his control and it seemed less and less likely that, having used up almost a year of his
  presidency on it (his "deadlines" had become irrelevant, and so, in a way, had he), he
  would end up with a bill, if at all, that did enough net good.
  Certain things are not his fault: the unprecedented truculence of the Republican Party,
  scared silly by right-wing ranters on cable television; the unholy economic and foreign-
  policy mess that he inherited; the fact that he never had, as so many liberal commentators
  asserted, the 60 (or 58 or 59) Senate votes that would enable him to get what he wanted
  from the Congress. It's not his fault that unemployment rates remain stubbornly high
  following a traumatic recession.
  And it's always risky to project the long-term from the moment. Perhaps this will prove to
  have been a passing moment. Perhaps Obama will still salvage a health care bill that is a
  real step forward (though there will be a humongous fight over its definition); maybe he'll
  come up with a smart strategy — or the best of bad options — on Afghanistan and Pakistan;
  it's not impossible that he'll add real progress on climate change and regulatory reform to
  his list of achievements, and that he'll start to get the deficit under control.
  Maybe there'll be enough examples of grace that will make people forget this period of
  pettiness. He's been lucky before; maybe he'll get lucky again. Meanwhile, serious people
  who had a lot of hope about him and who defended him are more worried than ever, and
  in this if anything over-communicative society the White House can't write them off as "a
  bunch of Washington insiders." So meanwhile, there's a palpable mood change in
  Washington that could signify that Barack Obama is in deeper trouble than he was even a
  week ago.
  Elizabeth Drew is a journalist and author in Washington. She is the author of 14 books,
  most recently "Richard M. Nixon" (Times Books, 2007)
  © 2009 Capitol News Company, LLC
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765355 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765552
MetadataSubject: HIKERS IN IRAN
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-09T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765552/C05765552.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: RE: Hikers in Iran
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma; SES_DutyDeputies; S_SpecialAssistants
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, November 9, 2009 8:49 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765552
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765552 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, November 9, 2009 8:49 AM
  To:
  Subject Fw: Hikers in Iran
  Original Message
  From: Macris, Gregory P
  To: Reines, Philippe I; SES-O_SWO-Only
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma; SES_DutyDeputies; S_SpecialAssistants
  Sent: Mon Nov 09 08:47:44 2009
  Subject: RE: Hikers in Iran
  Mr. Reines:
  Here's the latest ticker we have. We are reaching out to NEA for more context and will pass it on once we get it. Greg
  Macris, SWO
  Iran charges three detained Americans with espionage
  (Adds background)
  TEHRAN, Nov 9 (Reuters) - Iran has charged three detained U.S. citizens with espionage, the official IRNA news agency
  quoted a judiciary official as saying on Monday. "The three are charged with espionage. Investigations continue into the
  three detained Americans in Iran," Tehran general prosecutor Abbas Jafari Dolatabadi said. The three were held after
  they strayed into Iran from northern Iraq at the end of July. The three, Shane Bauer, 27, Sarah Shourd, 31, and Josh
  Fattal, 27, crossed into Iranian territory nearly two months ago. Their families say they strayed across the border
  accidentally. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad suggested in an interview with the American television network
  NBC in September that the Americans' release might be linked to the release of Iranian diplomats he said were being
  held by U.S. troops in Iraq. Under Iran's Islamic sharia law, espionage is punishable by death.
  (Reporting by Ramin Mostafavi, Writing by Parisa Hafezi)
  Original Message--
  From: Reines, Philippe I
  Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 8:44 AM
  To: SES-O_SWO-Only
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Fw: Hikers
  Do you have anything on the below?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765552 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765552 Date: 07/31/2015
  Original Message ---
  From: Reines, Philippe I
  To: Feltman, Jeffrey D; Crowley, Philip J; Kelly, Ian C
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Mon Nov 09 08:42:33 2009
  Subject: Hikers
  The 3 detained hikers in Iran were charged with espionage?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765552 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765556
MetadataSubject: IRAN RES UNGA
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-20T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765556/C05765556.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fw: IRAN Res UNGA
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Anderson, Gerald C
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, November 20, 2009 12:19 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765556
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765556 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 12:19 PM
  To: H
  Subject: Fw: IRAN Res UNGA
  From: Brimmer, Esther D
  To: Abedin, Huma; Sullivan, Jacob J; Macmanus, Joseph E
  Cc: Anderson, Gerald C
  Sent: Fri Nov 20 12:16:38 2009
  Subject: IRAN Res UNGA
  Huma, Jake, Joe,
  Here is the vote on the Iran human rights resolution at UNGA. I briefed the S during the retreat coffee break. She asked
  for the text of the resolution. The link is below. Do you want a hard copy here at the retreat?
  2009 FINAL VOTE (3C): 74 YES (US) — 48 NO (Iran) — 59 (ABSTAIN)
  Wider margin than last year:
  2008 FINAL VOTE (3C): 70 YES (U.S.) — 51 NO (Iran) -60 (ABSTAIN).
  Link:
  http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/dodUNDOC/LTD/N09/587/20/PDF/N0958720.pdf?OpenElement
  Esther
  From: Ostermeier, Amy A
  To: Brimmer, Esther D; Keshap, Atul
  Cc: Anderson, Gerald C; Nossel, Suzanne F
  Sent: Fri Nov 20 11:21:34 2009
  Subject: RE: IRAN 3C debate webcast NOW
  Here is the link to the resolution, perhaps a staffer can print it off for the Secretary?
  http:fidaccess-dds-ny.un.oredoc/UNDOULTDM09/587/20/PDF/N0958720.pdf?OpenElement
  From: Brimmer, Esther D
  Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 11:18 AM
  To: Ostermeier, Amy A; Keshap, Atul
  Cc: Anderson, Gerald C; Nossel, Suzanne F
  Subject: Re: IRAN 3C debate webcast NOW
  Thanks! I just told the S, Sen Mitchell and A/S Posner. Will seek out A/S Feltman.
  The S has asked for the text of the resolution. I'll check on how to get document here.
  Esther
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765556 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765556 Date: 07/31/2015
  From: Ostermeier, Amy A
  To: Keshap, Atul; Brimmer, Esther D
  Cc: Anderson, Gerald C; Nossel, Suzanne F
  Sent: Fri Nov 20 11:11:29 2009
  Subject: RE: IRAN 3C debate webcast NOW
  2009 FINAL VOTE (3C): 74 YES (US) — 48 NO (Iran) — 59 (ABSTAIN)
  2008 FINAL VOTE (3C): 70 YES (U.S.) — 51 NO (Iran) -60 (ABSTAIN).
  A better margin this year.
  From: Keshap, Atul
  Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 11:09 AM
  To: 'Keshap, Atul'; 'Brimmer, Esther D'
  Cc: 'Anderson, Gerald C'; 'Nossel, Suzanne F; 'Ostermeier, Amy A'
  Subject: RE: IRAN 3C debate webcast NOW
  HURRAH! FINAL VOTE: 74 YES (US) — 48 NO (Iran) — 59 (ABSTAIN)
  Amy please send ASAP last year's vote tally for comparison
  EOVs now beginning. Brazil explaining why it abstained.
  From: Keshap, Atul
  Egypt, Libya, Venezuela all spoke briefly to reject country specific resolutions.
  From: Keshap, Atul
  Syria speaking now urging that all Human Rights items should be discussed only in the HRC, not 3C.
  From: Brimmer, Esther D
  Atul,
  Thanks. Keep me posted. I am at a retreat with S, Ds, etc.
  EDB
  From: Keshap, Atul
  http:fiwww.un.org/webcastM
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765556 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765559
MetadataSubject: !
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Reines, Philipe I
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-20T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765559/C05765559.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedFrom: Reines, Philippe I <reinesp@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, November 20, 2009 1:02 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765559
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: You can't email Huma when she's in the same room, I set it to be loud & grating when you do!
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765559 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Reines, Philippe I <reinesp@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 1:02 PM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject:
  You can't email Huma when she's in the same room, I set it to be loud & grating when you do!
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765559 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765560
MetadataSubject: CALL
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-20T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765560/C05765560.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Call
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765560
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  As a reminder, ehud barak called for you. Call sheet just came through. Its at house.
  Also, pdb coming at 10am.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765560 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent Friday, November 20, 2009 10:45 PM
  To: H
  Subject: Call
  As a reminder, ehud barak called for you. Call sheet just came through. Its at house.
  Also, pdb coming at 10am.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765560 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765578
MetadataSubject: A DEATH IN FAMILY
MetadataTo: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-09T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765578/C05765578.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: FW: A death in family
ExtractedTo: Jiloty, Lauren C
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma; H
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, November 9, 2009 12:23 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765578
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Can we find out more?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765578 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, November 9, 2009 12:23 PM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Cc: Abedin, Huma; H
  Subject: FW: A death in family
  Can we find out more?
  From: Anderson, Brooke D (USUN)
  Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 11:26 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: A death in family
  Cheryl,
  As you know, is serving as a public delegate to UNGA. I don't have details, but we have just
  learned that son died this weekend. We do not know more than that and so far, there is nothing in the
  press about it. I thought you and the Secretary would want know about this. Will update you if I learn more.
  Brooke
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765578 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765589
MetadataSubject: FW:
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-21T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765589/C05765589.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765589
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  FYI

RawText:
  B6
  Cheryl Mills
  Saturday, November 21, 2009 5:39 AM
  H
  FW:
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765589 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  FYI
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Thu Nov 19 22:38:47 2009
  Subject:
  http://wvvw.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29716 Page3.html
  Why the Greg Craig debacle matters
  By: Elizabeth Drew
  November 19, 2009 11:58 AM EST
  President Barack Obama is returning from his trek to Asia Thursday to a capital that is a
  considerably more dangerous place for him than when he departed.
  While he was abroad, there was a palpable sense at home of something gone wrong. A
  critical mass of influential people who once held big hopes for his presidency began to
  wonder whether they had misjudged the man. Most significant, these doubters now find
  themselves with a new reluctance to defend Obama at a phase of his presidency when he
  needs defenders more urgently than ever.
  This is the price Obama has paid with his complicity and most likely his active
  participation, in the shabbiest episode of his presidency: The firing by leaks of White
  House counsel Gregory Craig, a well-respected Washington veteran and influential early
  supporter of Obama.
  The people who are most aghast by the handling of the Craig departure can't be
  dismissed by the White House as Republican partisans, or still-embittered Hillary Clinton
  supporters. They are not naïve activists who don't understand that the exercise of power
  can be a rough business and that trade-offs and personal disappointments are inevitable.
  Instead, they are people, either in politics or close observers, who once held an
  unromantically high opinion of Obama. They were important to his rise, and are likely
  more important to the success or failure of his presidency than Obama or his distressingly
  insular and small-minded West Wing team appreciate.
  The Craig embarrassment gives these people a new reason — not the first or only reason
  — to conclude that he wasn't the person of integrity and even classiness they had thought,
  and, more fundamentally, that his ability to move people and actually lead a fractured and
  troubled country (the reason many preferred him over Hillary Clinton) is not what had been
  promised in the campaign.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765589 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765589 Date: 07/31/2015
  This may seem like a lot to hang on a Washington personnel move. After all, intramural
  back-stabbing or making people fall guys when things go wrong (think Bill Clinton's
  Defense Secretary Les Aspin after the disaster in Somalia) are not new to
  Washingtonians.
  But Craig's ouster did not occur in a vacuum. It served as a focal point to concerns that
  have been building for months that Obama wasn't pressing for all that might be possible
  within the existing political constraints (all that one could ask of a president); that his
  presidential voice hadn't fulfilled the hopes raised by his campaign voice (which had also
  taken him a while to find); that he hadn't created a movement, as he had raised
  expectations that he would; that would be there to back him up and help him fulfill his
  promises.
  That is why it is worth pondering how the Craig story, unfolded in detail — its
  consequences likely will echo far longer than anything Obama said or did in Asia.
  Briefly, here's what happened, some of it told for the first time: Craig, who had known the
  Clintons since they were all at Yale Law School together, had served as a senior adviser
  to Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, but in 1998 gave up that job to help defend Bill
  Clinton against impeachment. Yet in 2008, he supported Obama for the nomination — not
  so much a turning against Hillary Clinton as being impressed early, as were some other
  prominent Washingtonians, by the then-state senator but would-be U.S. Senate candidate
  at a fundraiser held by Vernon Jordan, seeing Obama as the first potentially inspiring
  Democratic figure since Robert Kennedy. In the course of the campaign, Craig wrote a
  highly publicized memo questioning some of Hillary Clinton's claims of foreign policy
  experience, such as coming under enemy fire in Tuzla, Bosnia. During the campaign,
  Craig coached Obama for the debates (playing McCain), and praised him highly. Craig's
  imprimatur helped the neophyte Obama in certain influential circles.
  He hoped to get a high foreign policy position in an Obama administration, but when
  Clinton was named secretary of state, this of course became untenable. The Clintons are
  an unforgiving lot. So, Obama and Craig agreed that Craig would take the job of White
  House counsel for a year, and then they'd discuss what he'd do next. Thus, Craig was
  handed a very tricky portfolio.
  During the transition, about mid-December, Craig presented to a group of the president's
  newly named national security advisers meeting in Washington — including Clinton,
  Defense Secretary Robert Gates, national security adviser General James Jones, and
  others — three proposed executive orders: One ordered the shutting down of Guantanamo
  in a year. (The others banned torture and closed down the C.I.A.'s "black sites"; and
  addressed future detainee policy.) The one-year target for closing Guantanamo resulted
  from consultations with human rights and detainee rights groups, who argued that
  Guantanamo could be shut down in three months, and with Pentagon officials, who had
  no united position but argued that it would take from a year to 18 months.
  At the meeting, only the newly named Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano,
  beamed in from Arizona, questioned whether a year was realistic. When Gates, as he
  later confirmed publicly, said that though it was an "ambitious" deadline, he supported it
  because setting it was the only way to get things, especially the bureaucracy, moving
  toward that end, and that it could be extended if it couldn't be met, that was it.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765589 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765589 Date: 07/31/2015
  Obama's new national security team signed off on the executive order to close
  Guantanamo in a year. This was passed along to the president as well as his top aides;
  Craig was never in a meeting with the political side of the White House on the
  Guantanamo matter — and the president-elect and then president raised no objection
  before, when, or after he signed off on it.
  Unsurprisingly, the deadline became hard to meet, for various legal and political reasons -
  including the congressional outburst of NIMBYISM (similar to its earlier outbursts on Dubai
  Ports and even Terri Schiavo — short-term, irrational, and politically motivated fits that
  erupt from the Congress from time to time). If Craig failed to foresee this (as some later
  charged), he had a lot of company.
  The closing of Guantanamo is undoubtedly far further along than it would have been
  without the executive order. But along the way, Craig fell out of favor with the president's
  political aides and, apparently, the president himself. Whether he was simply being made
  the fall guy, or the tight circle of Chicagoans in the White House didn't care for this
  outsider, or he committed some unknown errors, suddenly, in August, leaks began to
  surface that his job was in danger. Non-denial denials were issued from the White House.
  The leaks became a pattern, a systematic, anonymous, tipping off of reporters that Craig
  would soon be gone.
  Craig was accused, anonymously of course, of a welter of charges: of being "too close to
  the human rights groups" (if so, what was wrong with that?), of not playing well with
  others, of being a bad manager, of being fixated on Guantanamo to the detriment of other
  issues. In the summer, Obama offered Craig another job, which Craig declined, and the
  two agreed that they would discuss the matter further later in the year. But the leaks
  continued, and Craig decided that his situation was untenable, and he had to leave.
  To make sure he did, he was leaked his way out, up to the day before he planned to
  resign. What caused so many Obama supporters' stomachs to turn was that Obama could
  have stopped the leaking at any time; he or White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel
  could have arranged a dignified departure. (They're within their rights to get rid of
  someone if they're dissatisfied, for good reasons or not — but a preferred route would be to
  call that person in and ask what day would suit him or her to resign, and then just let that
  person do it. This happens a lot in administrations; even if people don't believe the
  resignation was voluntary, there's a soupcon of dignity left to that person.) Even some
  Hillary Clinton supporters, who still hold no brief for Craig, think he was treated shabbily.
  And this opinion is not confined to "political junkies." Thomas Wilner, a distinguished
  Washington attorney who challenged Bush administration detainee policies, particularly on
  Guantanamo, and had worked with Craig on these issues, told me, "There's a lot of
  concern among a lot of lawyers in this town, especially those who were supporting
  Obama, that somebody this bright, this respected, this good, and with this integrity, was
  treated in such a way."
  Yes, we knew, or should have, during the campaign that the supposed idealist Obama
  had a bit of the Chicago cut-throat in him, but there was little sign that he could be as
  brutal and heedless of loyalty as he was in the Craig affair. An unexpected climate of fear
  emanates from the Obama White House.
  The incident underscored worries that several had held about the Obama White House for
  some time: that it was too tightly controlled and narrowly focused by the Chicago crowd;
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765589 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765589 Date: 07/31/2015
  that it seemed from the outset to need an older, wiser head, someone with a bit more
  detachment.
  The current crowd displays a certain impulsiveness and vindictiveness that do it no good -
  as in the silly war-let on Fox News that it is now trying to back out of. Even if Craig was
  making a hash of his job — and there's no independent evidence of this — it just wasn't
  smart to treat someone widely held in such high respect in this manner; once again, the
  impulsiveness backfired.
  The replacing of Craig with Washington attorney Robert Bauer, Obama's own attorney for
  years as well as counsel for the Democratic National Committee and the Obama
  campaign, further narrowed the White House circle just when it needed broadening,
  lowered the stature of the office, and choosing the president's personal attorney for a
  position that calls for dispassionate judgment is hazardous. (Does anyone remember
  Alberto Gonzalez?)
  The Obama's themselves hang tight with a small Chicago crowd. Yes, he talks to others,
  and yes, a president's time is very limited, but the Obama's themselves seem as closed-
  off and unto themselves as does his inner White House circle. (Is this a coincidence?
  What is all this wariness about?) When the Obama's go to someone's house for dinner,
  almost invariably it's to that of Valerie Jarrett, the old friend from Chicago who serves as a
  counselor and whom they see all day. Old Chicago friends fly in for weekends frequently.
  Old friends, who had helped launch him, helped them personally, have been left behind.
  At the same time as the Craig imbroglio happened, many people who had defended
  Obama against charges that he wasn't what he'd been cracked up to be were now
  becoming concerned themselves: though it was a relief to have a president who thought
  through crucial decisions about sending the country's young to war, it was taking him
  awfully long to make up his mind about what to do about Afghanistan and Pakistan, and
  the decision-making was bafflingly leak-ridden (was this a deliberate airing of ideas or a
  loss of control over the process?); that the health care debate had in fact careened out of
  his control and it seemed less and less likely that, having used up almost a year of his
  presidency on it (his "deadlines" had become irrelevant, and so, in a way, had he), he
  would end up with a bill, if at all, that did enough net good.
  Certain things are not his fault: the unprecedented truculence of the Republican Party,
  scared silly by right-wing ranters on cable television; the unholy economic and foreign-
  policy mess that he inherited; the fact that he never had, as so many liberal commentators
  asserted, the 60 (or 58 or 59) Senate votes that would enable him to get what he wanted
  from the Congress. It's not his fault that unemployment rates remain stubbornly high
  following a traumatic recession.
  And it's always risky to project the long-term from the moment. Perhaps this will prove to
  have been a passing moment. Perhaps Obama will still salvage a health care bill that is a
  real step forward (though there will be a humongous fight over its definition); maybe he'll
  come up with a smart strategy — or the best of bad options — on Afghanistan and Pakistan;
  it's not impossible that he'll add real progress on climate change and regulatory reform to
  his list of achievements, and that he'll start to get the deficit under control.
  Maybe there'll be enough examples of grace that will make people forget this period of
  pettiness. He's been lucky before; maybe he'll get lucky again. Meanwhile, serious people
  who had a lot of hope about him and who defended him are more worried than ever, and
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765589 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765589 Date: 07/31/2015
  in this if anything over-communicative society the White House can't write them off as "a
  bunch of Washington insiders." So meanwhile, there's a palpable mood change in
  Washington that could signify that Barack Obama is in deeper trouble than he was even a
  week ago.
  Elizabeth Drew is a journalist and author in Washington. She is the author of 14 books,
  most recently "Richard M. Nixon" (Times Books, 2007)
  © 2009 Capitol News Company, LLC
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765589 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765599
MetadataSubject: LEBANON HAS A CABINET
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-09T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765599/C05765599.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Lebanon has a cabinet
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, November 9, 2009 1:27 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765599
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765599 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B1,1.4(D)
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, November 9, 2009 1:27 PM
  To:
  Subject Fw: Lebanon has a cabinet
  From: Feltman, Jeffrey D
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Mon Nov 09 13:25:52 2009
  Subject: Lebanon has a cabinet
  Hariri just announced the formation of a cabinet. It's divided 15-10-5 (15 ministers with March 14, 10
  ministers with March 8, 5 ministers with President Sleiman). The ones of most concern to us -- Defense (our
  help to LAF), Interior (help to police plus municipal elections), Justice (Hariri Tribunal), Finance (can veto
  anything because of financial implications) are all either with March 14 or Presidency. That's good. Foreign .
  Affairs is with a new guy from Nabih Berri's bloc. with Lebanon rotating onto the Security Council. 1.4(D)
  B1
  Next step: Hariri and his cabinet have 30 days to come up with the ministerial declaration, basically a
  platform, that must be presented to the Parliament along with the cabinet slate for a vote of confidence. This,
  too, may be painful, as they debate how to describe "the resistance" in ways that don't cross either U.S. or
  Hizballah red lines.
  Jeffrey Feltman
  Assistant Secretary
  Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs
  Department of State
  202-647-7209
  Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 07/30/2015 - Class: CONFIDENTIAL - Reason: 1.4(D) - Declassify
  on: 11/08/2024
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765599 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765604
MetadataSubject: SAMUAL HEYMAN
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-09T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765604/C05765604.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Samual heyman
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, November 9, 2009 5:21 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765604
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  November 09, 2009
  Samuel J. Heyman, who stood out as a corporate raider who preferred to hold on to companies he bought and run them
  rather that sell them for a quick profit, died Sunday at Mount Sinai Hospital in Manhattan. He was 70.
  Mr. Heyman's death was confirmed by his wife, Ronnie, who said he had died after complications from open heart
  surgery.
  Mr. Heyman was most recently chairman of the GAF Corporation, a manufacturer of roofing materials, and a chemical
  company that was spun off from GAF, called International Specialty Products. Both companies are based in Wayne, N.J.
  A group led by Mr. Heyman bought GAF in 1983 and took it private in 1987 after the stock market crashed. He later spun
  off GAF's chemical business into a separate company, I.S.P.
  During that period, corporate raiders tended to buy companies, cut operational costs and then sell them at a profit. But
  after Mr. Heyman won a battle with GAF's management for control of the company, he told The New York Times: "There
  is a very strong potential in chemicals, and we plan to make them grow."
  Mr. Heyman, who was also a lawyer, had diverse business holdings, including Heyman Properties, which owns shopping
  malls in the Northeast and which grew out of a business he had inherited from his father.
  "He was extremely methodical. There was a rhyme and reason to everything he did," said Leon Black, the chairman of
  Apollo Management, a private equity firm, and a longtime friend who was once Mr. Heyman's investment banker.
  Mr. Black added: "He combined a strong legal background with a strong analytical business strength, and he was a fierce
  negotiator. But what really made Sam kick was that he was a builder. It was all about building, whether it was his
  companies, his real estate, his art collection or his family."
  Mr. Heyman was born March 1, 1939, in Danbury, Conn., to Annette and Lazarus Heyman. His father was a real estate
  developer. After graduating from Yale in 1960 and Harvard Law School in 1964, Mr. Heyman went to work in the Justice
  Department under Robert F. Kennedy and served as chief assistant United States attorney for Connecticut. He had to cut
  that career short when his father needed him to take over the real estate development business.
  Mr. Heyman made his biggest mark in the 1983 battle for GAF. A group of shareholders led by Mr. Heyman became
  frustrated by management's resistance to selling some of its biggest assets, including the chemicals business.
  Mr. Heyman waged an aggressive campaign against the company's chairman and ultimately forced his removal through
  a shareholder vote - a rare victory for shareholders during a time when executives of public companies were considered
  virtually untouchable.
  Once Mr. Heyman took control of GAF, he reversed course and held on to the chemicals business, ultimately making it a
  big contributor to the company's profit.
  He also moved quickly to cut costs and revamp the business, saying at the time that he was an "impatient man. When I
  see a place where money can be saved, I don't waste time."
  Mr. Heyman also gave away money. In 1999, he founded the Partnership for Public Service, which provides fellowships
  to encourage students to pursue careers in public service. For his charity work, Mr. Heyman won the President's Citizens
  Award in 2008.
  His other philanthropic interests included the establishment of the Samuel and Ronnie Heyman Center on Corporate
  Governance at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law.
  He and his wife also collected art. Among their holdings are works by Mark Rothko and Jackson Pollock.
  In addition to his wife, the former Ronnie Feuerstein, Mr. Heyman is survived by his mother, Annette Heyman of Palm
  Beach, Fla.; four children, Lazarus Heyman, Eleanor Propp, Jennifer Millstone and Elizabeth Winter; and nine
  grandchildren.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765604 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, November 9, 2009 5:21 PM
  To:
  Subject: Samual heyman
  November 09, 2009
  Samuel J. Heyman, who stood out as a corporate raider who preferred to hold on to companies he bought and run them
  rather that sell them for a quick profit, died Sunday at Mount Sinai Hospital in Manhattan. He was 70.
  Mr. Heyman's death was confirmed by his wife, Ronnie, who said he had died after complications from open heart
  surgery.
  Mr. Heyman was most recently chairman of the GAF Corporation, a manufacturer of roofing materials, and a chemical
  company that was spun off from GAF, called International Specialty Products. Both companies are based in Wayne, N.J.
  A group led by Mr. Heyman bought GAF in 1983 and took it private in 1987 after the stock market crashed. He later spun
  off GAF's chemical business into a separate company, I.S.P.
  During that period, corporate raiders tended to buy companies, cut operational costs and then sell them at a profit. But
  after Mr. Heyman won a battle with GAF's management for control of the company, he told The New York Times: "There
  is a very strong potential in chemicals, and we plan to make them grow."
  Mr. Heyman, who was also a lawyer, had diverse business holdings, including Heyman Properties, which owns shopping
  malls in the Northeast and which grew out of a business he had inherited from his father.
  "He was extremely methodical. There was a rhyme and reason to everything he did," said Leon Black, the chairman of
  Apollo Management, a private equity firm, and a longtime friend who was once Mr. Heyman's investment banker.
  Mr. Black added: "He combined a strong legal background with a strong analytical business strength, and he was a fierce
  negotiator. But what really made Sam kick was that he was a builder. It was all about building, whether it was his
  companies, his real estate, his art collection or his family."
  Mr. Heyman was born March 1, 1939, in Danbury, Conn., to Annette and Lazarus Heyman. His father was a real estate
  developer. After graduating from Yale in 1960 and Harvard Law School in 1964, Mr. Heyman went to work in the Justice
  Department under Robert F. Kennedy and served as chief assistant United States attorney for Connecticut. He had to cut
  that career short when his father needed him to take over the real estate development business.
  Mr. Heyman made his biggest mark in the 1983 battle for GAF. A group of shareholders led by Mr. Heyman became
  frustrated by management's resistance to selling some of its biggest assets, including the chemicals business.
  Mr. Heyman waged an aggressive campaign against the company's chairman and ultimately forced his removal through
  a shareholder vote - a rare victory for shareholders during a time when executives of public companies were considered
  virtually untouchable.
  Once Mr. Heyman took control of GAF, he reversed course and held on to the chemicals business, ultimately making it a
  big contributor to the company's profit.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765604 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765604 Date: 07/31/2015
  He also moved quickly to cut costs and revamp the business, saying at the time that he was an "impatient man. When I
  see a place where money can be saved, I don't waste time."
  Mr. Heyman also gave away money. In 1999, he founded the Partnership for Public Service, which provides fellowships
  to encourage students to pursue careers in public service. For his charity work, Mr. Heyman won the President's Citizens
  Award in 2008.
  His other philanthropic interests included the establishment of the Samuel and Ronnie Heyman Center on Corporate
  Governance at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law.
  He and his wife also collected art. Among their holdings are works by Mark Rothko and Jackson Pollock.
  In addition to his wife, the former Ronnie Feuerstein, Mr. Heyman is survived by his mother, Annette Heyman of Palm
  Beach, Fla.; four children, Lazarus Heyman, Eleanor Propp, Jennifer Millstone and Elizabeth Winter; and nine
  grandchildren.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765604 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765608
MetadataSubject: NAVIES OF DPRK AND ROK EXCHANGE FIRE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-10T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765608/C05765608.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Navies of DPRK and ROK exchange fire
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-I
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 12:15 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765608
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765608 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 12:15 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Navies of DPRK and ROK exchange fire
  From: Riggs, Susan 3
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-I
  Sent: Tue Nov 10 00:13:34 2009
  Subject: Navies of DPRK and ROK exchange fire
  SEOUL (AP) - Navy ships of the two Koreas exchanged fire November 10 along their disputed western sea
  border, South Korean military officers said.
  A South Korean warship shot at a North Korean navy ship that crossed the disputed western sea border on the
  morning of November 10 and the North's ship shot back, said an officer at the Seoul's Joint Chiefs of
  Staff. Another officer said there were no South Korean casualties, though it was unclear whether there were
  any on the North Korean side. He said that the North Korean ship was seriously damaged and that it turned
  back toward northern waters after the brief skirmish. Both officers spoke on condition of anonymity, citing
  department policy.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765608 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765609
MetadataSubject: WOW
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765609/C05765609.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765609
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  fyi

RawText:
  B6
  Cheryl Mills
  Tuesday, November 24, 2009 9:14 PM
  H
  FW: Wow
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765609 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  fyi
  Original Message
  From: Minyon Moore
  Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 8:23 AM
  To: Maggie Williams; Capricia Penavic Marshall; Cheryl Mills
  Subject: Wow
  "He had little record but lots of rhetoric -- much of it morally stirring and beautifully written," Richard Cohen writes in his
  Washington Post column. "As president, though, he has tried so hard to be the un-George Bush that the former
  president's overweening moralism -- his insistence on seeing things as either black or white -- has become an Obama
  gray. Human rights in general has been treated as if it's a Republican idea. Obama should reread his Philadelphia speech.
  He'll find a good man there."
  http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/23/AR2009112302
  897.html
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765609 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765610
MetadataSubject: POLICE: BOMB KILLS 5 IN NORTHWEST PAKISTAN
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-10T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765610/C05765610.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Police: Bomb kills 5 in northwest Pakistan
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-I; SES-O_Shift-II
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 9:33 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765610
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765610 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 9:33 AM
  To: H
  Subject Fw: Police: Bomb kills 5 in northwest Pakistan
  From: Riggs, Susan 3
  To: NEWS-SCA; NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-I; SES-O_Shift-II
  Sent: Tue Nov 10 07:17:49 2009
  Subject: Police: Bomb kills 5 in northwest Pakistan
  PESHAWAR (AP) - A police officer said a bomb near a crowded market in northwest Pakistan has killed at least five
  people. The bombing is the third attack in as many days in or close to Peshawar, the capital of Pakistan's North West
  Frontier Province. Police officer Maazullah Khan said Tuesday's bombing in Charsada city also wounded at least 20
  people. The city is some 25 miles north of Peshawar. Local TV footage showed a destroyed car and several badly
  damaged stalls and shops. Ambulances ferried the dead and injured to the hospital along roads littered with debris.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765610 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765611
MetadataSubject: IN STAFF OFFICE IF U NEED ME.
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-10T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765611/C05765611.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH©state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: . Tuesday, November 10, 2009 10:40 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765611
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765611 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH©state.gov>
  Sent:. Tuesday, November 10, 2009 10:40 AM
  To:
  Subject In staff office if u need me.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765611 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765613
MetadataSubject: PUSHING ZELAYA
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-10T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765613/C05765613.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Pushing Zelaya
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivanil@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 11:05 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765613
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: FYI. Craig is on his way to Honduras now.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765613 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B5
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivanil@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 11:05 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Pushing Zelaya
  FYI. Craig is on his way to Honduras now.
  From: Slaughter, Anne-Marie
  To: Kelly, Craig A; Valenzuela, Arturo A; Sullivan, Jacob J
  Cc: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Tue Nov 10 10:59:31 2009
  Subject: Pushing Zelaya
  Craig,
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765613 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765613 Date: 07/31/2015
  AM
  Anne-Marie Slaughter
  Director of Policy Planning
  U.S. Department of State
  (202) 647-2972
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765613 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765622
MetadataSubject: IN STAFF OFFICE IF U NEED ME.
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-10T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765622/C05765622.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: In staff office if u need me.
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 11:12 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765622
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Its midnight here.
  U have someone coming at 7.
  We don't need to leave till 8:15 or 8:30.
  Will do pre-brief in am
  I'm coming up now.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765622 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 11:12 AM
  To: H
  Subject Re: In staff office if u need me.
  Its midnight here.
  U have someone coming at 7.
  We don't need to leave till 8:15 or 8:30.
  Will do pre-brief in am
  I'm coming up now.
  Original Message ----
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Tue Nov 10 11:04:25 2009
  Subject: Re: In staff office if u need me.
  Is it 1:30 here? Do I have a hairdresser? Can you stop by? Thx.
  Original Message ----
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Tue Nov 10 10:39:57 2009
  Subject: In staff office if u need me.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765622 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765644
MetadataSubject: FROM JOE WILSON
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-10T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765644/C05765644.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fwd: From Joe Wilson
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 11:47 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765644
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: FYI. How did it go in Berlin? Looked terrific. What does Merkel think of the Blair option? Sid
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765644 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B4,B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 11:47 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fwd: From Joe Wilson
  FYI. How did it go in Berlin? Looked terrific. What does Merkel think of the Blair option? Sid
  Original Message
  From: Joseph Wilson
  To: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Tue, Nov 10, 2009 11:44 am
  Subject: From Joe Wilson
  Sid,
  Could you please pass the following to HRC. Thanks. Joe
  Dear Madame Secretary,
  When we last spoke at the Corporate Council on Africa you were kind enough to invite me to pay a call on you when in
  DC. As it turns out, I will be in Washington for most of next week, arriving the afternoon of the 16th and returning to Santa
  Fe the evening of the 201h ( the return is flexible if you were available to see me over the weekend.) I realize that you are
  traveling this week and possibly into next, but I wanted to reach out to you. As I wrote to you earlier, I am a director for
  Symbion Power and may soon assume more direct responsibility for all of Africa as Symbion expands there from its
  current operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Symbion's competitive advantage is its reliance on local partnering and
  human capacity development in the execution of its projects. Its success in the most difficult and dangerous
  environments has been very impressive, as the four minute video that Sid gave to you on my behalf demonstrates. We
  now want to bring that business model and philosophy to Africa where the social entrepreneurship and the development
  of skilled labor is imperative for Africa's long term economic prospects, as you have so forcefully articulated in past
  comments.
  am very enthusiastic about Symbion. It is one or
  the very few American companies outside the petroleum sector willing to establish itself and to undertake projects in
  Africa. With our record of success elsewhere, we are certain that our approach to project development and execution will
  mesh nicely with African needs and U.S. policy priorities.
  Valerie, Trevor and Samantha join me in extending our best wishes to you, Bill, and Chelsea as we enter the holiday
  season.
  Joe
  Ambassador Joseph Wilson
  Director, Symbion Power
  Email: joseph.wilsonsymbion-power.com
  Tel. No. +1 505 629-9142
  website: www.symbion-power.com ;
  This transmission is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged, confidential
  and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any use of this communication is
  strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify immediately.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765644 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765646
MetadataSubject: SAMUAL HEYMAN
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-10T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765646/C05765646.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Samual heyman
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Jiloty, Lauren C
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 1:41 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765646
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  We are doing letter
  Also have a number if you want to call
  Wjc is supposed to call as well.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765646 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 1:41 PM
  To:
  Cc: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject Re: Samual heyman
  We are doing letter
  Also have a number if you want to call
  Wjc is supposed to call as well.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Cc: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Tue Nov 10 13:35:39 2009
  Subject: Re: Samual heyman
  Pls be sure I do letter to his wife and my friend, Ronnie and add her to call list.
  Original Message ---
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Mon Nov 09 17:20:48 2009
  Subject: Samual heyman
  November 09, 2009
  Samuel J. Heyman, who stood out as a corporate raider who preferred to hold on to companies he bought and run them
  rather that sell them for a quick profit, died Sunday at Mount Sinai Hospital in Manhattan. He was 70.
  Mr. Heyman's death was confirmed by his wife, Ronnie, who said he had died after complications from open heart
  surgery.
  Mr. Heyman was most recently chairman of the GAF Corporation, a manufacturer of roofing materials, and a chemical
  company that was spun off from GAF, called International Specialty Products. Both companies are based in Wayne, N.J.
  A group led by Mr. Heyman bought GAF in 1983 and took it private in 1987 after the stock market crashed. He later spun
  off GAF's chemical business into a separate company, I.S.P.
  During that period, corporate raiders tended to buy companies, cut operational costs and then sell them at a profit. But
  after Mr. Heyman won a battle with GAF's management for control of the company, he told The New York Times: "There
  is a very strong potential in chemicals, and we plan to make them grow."
  Mr. Heyman, who was also a lawyer, had diverse business holdings, including Heyman Properties, which owns shopping
  malls in the Northeast and which grew out of a business he had inherited from his father.
  "He was extremely methodical. There was a rhyme and reason to everything he did," said Leon Black, the chairman of
  Apollo Management, a private equity firm, and a longtime friend who was once Mr. Heyman's investment banker.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765646 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765646 Date: 07/31/2015
  Mr. Black added: "He combined a strong legal background with a strong analytical business strength, and he was a fierce
  negotiator. But what really made Sam kick was that he was a builder. It was all about building, whether it was his
  companies, his real estate, his art collection or his family."
  Mr. Heyman was born March 1, 1939, in Danbury, Conn., to Annette and Lazarus Heyman. His father was a real estate
  developer. After graduating from Yale in 1960 and Harvard Law School in 1964, Mr. Heyman went to work in the Justice
  Department under Robert F. Kennedy and served as chief assistant United States attorney for Connecticut. He had to cut
  that career short when his father needed him to take over the real estate development business.
  Mr. Heyman made his biggest mark in the 1983 battle for GAF. A group of shareholders led by Mr. Heyman became
  frustrated by management's resistance to selling some of its biggest assets, including the chemicals business.
  Mr. Heyman waged an aggressive campaign against the company's chairman and ultimately forced his removal through
  a shareholder vote - a rare victory for shareholders during a time when executives of public companies were considered
  virtually untouchable.
  Once Mr. Heyman took control of GAF, he reversed course and held on to the chemicals business, ultimately making it a
  big contributor to the company's profit.
  He also moved quickly to cut costs and revamp the business, saying at the time that he was an "impatient man. When I
  see a place where money can be saved, I don't waste time."
  Mr. Heyman also gave away money. In 1999, he founded the Partnership for Public Service, which provides fellowships
  to encourage students to pursue careers in public service. For his charity work, Mr. Heyman won the President's Citizens
  Award in 2008.
  His other philanthropic interests included the establishment of the Samuel and Ronnie Heyman Center on Corporate
  Governance at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law.
  He and his wife also collected art. Among their holdings are works by Mark Rothko and Jackson Pollock.
  In addition to his wife, the former Ronnie Feuerstein, Mr. Heyman is survived by his mother, Annette Heyman of Palm
  Beach, Fla.; four children, Lazarus Heyman, Eleanor Propp, Jennifer Millstone and Elizabeth Winter; and nine
  grandchildren.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765646 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765648
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-10T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765648/C05765648.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 1:52 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765648
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Confirmed wjc still in dem caucus lunch
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765648 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 1:52 PM
  To: H
  Confirmed wjc still in dem caucus lunch
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765648 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765650
MetadataSubject: RAJ SHAH
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Reines, Philippe I
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-10T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765650/C05765650.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Raj Shah
ExtractedFrom: Reines, Philippe I <reinesp@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 2:04 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765650
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  ill Ex-Gates Foundation exec named foreign aid chief
  Obama administration picks former Gates Foundation official to run US foreign aid
  By MATTHEW LEE
  Associated Press
  ij 11-10-2009 13:46
  11 SINGAPORE (AP) _ The Obama administration will nominate a young former executive with the Bill and
  Melinda Gates Foundation to run America's top foreign assistance program, ending months of speculation
  and complaints about who would take the vacant post, U.S. officials said Tuesday.
  $ President Barack Obama has chosen Rajiv Shah, a medical doctor and currently a senior official at the
  Department of Agriculture dealing with food security, to run the U.S. Agency for International
  Development, the officials said.
  ¶ The officials spoke on condition of anonymity pending notification to Congress and a formal public
  announcement of the choice.
  11 Shah's selection, which must still be confirmed by the Senate, would end a 10-month leadership
  vacuum at USAID, which has been operating with an acting director since Obama took office despite his
  campaign pledges to have the agency play a greater role in foreign policy.
  11 Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton have said USAID is crucial to deploying their
  preferred "smart power" foreign policy strategy, which envisions more equal roles for diplomacy and
  development alongside defense. They plan to double the amount of foreign aid.
  11 The agency will play a key role in the administration's efforts in Afghanistan and Pakistan, where
  officials believe the civilian component must be strengthened.
  $ But the top job at the agency has remained vacant until now, with several prime candidates'
  withdrawing from consideration amid a White House vetting process that Clinton denounced in July as
  "ridiculous," "a nightmare," and "frustrating beyond words."
  $ Shah, 36, whose family immigrated to the U.S. from India, is now the Under Secretary for Research,
  Education and Economics and Chief Scientist at the Agriculture Department where he manages a budget
  of more than $2.6 billion and more than 10,000 staff around the world.
  ¶ Before that, he had several positions at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, including managing its
  $1.5 billion contribution to a global vaccination fund and helping launch the foundation's Global
  Development program where he oversaw a $1.3 billion investment portfolio.
  The lingering USAID vacancy, particularly after several leading candidates pulled out, had upset
  development experts and Congress. Some lawmakers had suggested that Obama choose someone who
  had already gone through the vetting process.
  ¶ Shah fits that bill and has important political credentials, having worked with or for several leading
  Democratic politicians.
  il

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765650 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Reines, Philippe I <reinesp@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 2:04 PM
  To:
  Subject: Raj Shah
  ill Ex-Gates Foundation exec named foreign aid chief
  Obama administration picks former Gates Foundation official to run US foreign aid
  By MATTHEW LEE
  Associated Press
  ij 11-10-2009 13:46
  11 SINGAPORE (AP) _ The Obama administration will nominate a young former executive with the Bill and
  Melinda Gates Foundation to run America's top foreign assistance program, ending months of speculation
  and complaints about who would take the vacant post, U.S. officials said Tuesday.
  $ President Barack Obama has chosen Rajiv Shah, a medical doctor and currently a senior official at the
  Department of Agriculture dealing with food security, to run the U.S. Agency for International
  Development, the officials said.
  ¶ The officials spoke on condition of anonymity pending notification to Congress and a formal public
  announcement of the choice.
  11 Shah's selection, which must still be confirmed by the Senate, would end a 10-month leadership
  vacuum at USAID, which has been operating with an acting director since Obama took office despite his
  campaign pledges to have the agency play a greater role in foreign policy.
  11 Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton have said USAID is crucial to deploying their
  preferred "smart power" foreign policy strategy, which envisions more equal roles for diplomacy and
  development alongside defense. They plan to double the amount of foreign aid.
  11 The agency will play a key role in the administration's efforts in Afghanistan and Pakistan, where
  officials believe the civilian component must be strengthened.
  $ But the top job at the agency has remained vacant until now, with several prime candidates'
  withdrawing from consideration amid a White House vetting process that Clinton denounced in July as
  "ridiculous," "a nightmare," and "frustrating beyond words."
  $ Shah, 36, whose family immigrated to the U.S. from India, is now the Under Secretary for Research,
  Education and Economics and Chief Scientist at the Agriculture Department where he manages a budget
  of more than $2.6 billion and more than 10,000 staff around the world.
  ¶ Before that, he had several positions at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, including managing its
  $1.5 billion contribution to a global vaccination fund and helping launch the foundation's Global
  Development program where he oversaw a $1.3 billion investment portfolio.
  The lingering USAID vacancy, particularly after several leading candidates pulled out, had upset
  development experts and Congress. Some lawmakers had suggested that Obama choose someone who
  had already gone through the vetting process.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765650 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765650 Date: 07/31/2015
  ¶ Shah fits that bill and has important political credentials, having worked with or for several leading
  Democratic politicians.
  il
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765650 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765652
MetadataSubject: QUESTION ON S RETREAT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-10T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765652/C05765652.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Question on S Retreat
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, November 10,.2009 2:19 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765652
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  We're getting ready to get a lot of these — I think not b/c it defeats the purpose of having A/S and others meet and get
  to know each other.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765652 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, November 10,.2009 2:19 PM
  To:
  Subject FW: Question on S Retreat
  We're getting ready to get a lot of these — I think not b/c it defeats the purpose of having A/S and others meet and get
  to know each other.
  From: Shortley, Timothy R
  Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 1:40 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Question on S Retreat
  Cheryl, the General will be traveling during the November 20 Secretary's retreat. May I attend in his absence?
  Thank you
  Timothy R. Shortley
  Deputy to SE Gration
  Office of the U.S. Special Envoy to Sudan (S/USSES)
  Department of State, Room 5819
  202-647-4531
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765652 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765653
MetadataSubject: HOLBROOKE ASKING TO TALK.
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-21T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765653/C05765653.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 8:30 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765653
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765653 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 8:30 AM
  To:
  Subject Holbrooke asking to talk.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765653 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765654
MetadataSubject: A DEATH IN FAMILY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-10T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765654/C05765654.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: RE: A death in family
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Jiloty, Lauren C
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 2:25 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765654
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Not yet.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765654 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 2:25 PM
  To:
  Cc: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: RE: A death in family
  Not yet.
  Original Message--
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemaiicom]
  Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 1:36 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Cc: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Re: A death in family
  Have you learned any more? I'm copying Lauren to get his #5.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>; H
  Sent: Mon Nov 09 12:23:16 2009
  Subject: FW: A death in ; family
  Can we find out more?
  From: Anderson, Brooke D (USUN)
  Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 11:26 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: A death in family
  Cheryl,
  As you know, is serving as a public delegate to UNGA. I don't have details, but we have just
  learned that died this weekend. We do not know more than that and so far, there is nothing in the
  press about it. I thought you and the Secretary would want know about this. Will update you if I learn more.
  Brooke
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765654 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765657
MetadataSubject: A DEATH IN FAMILY
MetadataTo: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-10T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765657/C05765657.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: RE: A death in family
ExtractedTo: Mills, Cheryl D; H
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Jiloty, Lauren C
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 3:30 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765657
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  I also haven't been able to get any further details, but will continue to work on it. It hasn't been in the press yet.
  The home number is
  I'll add to your call grid.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765657 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 3:30 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; H
  Subject RE: A death in family
  I also haven't been able to get any further details, but will continue to work on it. It hasn't been in the press yet.
  The home number is
  I'll add to your call grid.
  Original Message--
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 2:25 PM
  To: 'H'
  Cc: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: RE: A death in family
  Not yet.
  Original Message----
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 1:36 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Cc: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Re: A death in family
  Have you learned any more? I'm copying Lauren to get his #s.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>; H
  Sent: Mon Nov 09 12:23:16 2009
  Subject: FW: A death in family
  Can we find out more?
  From: Anderson, Brooke D (USUN)
  Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 11:26 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: A death in family
  Cheryl,
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765657 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765657 Date: 07/31/2015
  As you know) is serving as a public delegate to UNGA. I don't have details, but we have just
  learned that died this weekend. We do not know more than that and so far, there is nothing in the
  press about it. I thought you and the Secretary would want know about this. Will update you if I learn more.
  Brooke
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765657 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765659
MetadataSubject: CALL LIST
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-10T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765659/C05765659.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Call list
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 4:26 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765659
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Tutu:
  Gail Collins:
  I'm working on addresses for both, and will all of the below to your call grid. I'll send an updated grid to Huma within
  the hour.
  The Gail Collins book will be on your desk when you return.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765659 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 4:26 PM
  To:
  Subject RE: Call list
  Tutu:
  Gail Collins:
  I'm working on addresses for both, and will all of the below to your call grid. I'll send an updated grid to Huma within
  the hour.
  The Gail Collins book will be on your desk when you return.
  Original Message----
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 1:44 PM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Call list
  Pls add Elaine Schuster,
  Vicki Kennedy at
  General Lloyd Austin
  I want to do letters/calls to Archbishop Tutu, and to Gail Collins at NYTimes (pls get copy of her book, When Everything
  Changed) so pls send me their addresses and numbers
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765659 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765661
MetadataSubject: A DEATH IN FAMILY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-10T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765661/C05765661.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: A death in family
ExtractedCc: Jiloty, Lauren C
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765661
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Tuesday, November 10, 2009 5:12 PM
  H
  RE: A death in family
  I added these numbers to your grid, too:
  Working on getting more details.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765661 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject
  Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Tuesday, November 10, 2009 5:12 PM
  H
  RE: A death in family
  I added these numbers to your grid, too:
  Working on getting more details.
  Original Message----
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 1:36 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Cc: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Re: A death in family
  Have you learned any more? I'm copying Lauren to get his #s.
  Original Message ----
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>; H
  Sent: Mon Nov 09 12:23:16 2009
  Subject: FW: A death in family
  Can we find out more?
  From: Anderson, Brooke D (USUN)
  Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 11:26 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: A death in family
  Cheryl,
  As you know, is serving as a public delegate to UNGA. I don't have details, but we have just
  learned that died this weekend. We do not know more than that and so far, there is nothing in the
  press about it. I thought you and the Secretary would want know about this. Will update you if I learn more.
  Brooke
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765661 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765662
MetadataSubject: CONGRATS ON USAID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-10T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765662/C05765662.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Congrats on USAID
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765662
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Tuesday, November 10, 2009 5:36 PM
  H
  FW: Congrats on USAID
  USAID Administrator Nominee 11'10'09.pdf

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765662 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject
  Attachments:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Tuesday, November 10, 2009 5:36 PM
  H
  FW: Congrats on USAID
  USAID Administrator Nominee 11'10'09.pdf
  From: Liz Schrayer
  Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 4:39 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Congrats on USAID
  Cheryl,
  Congratulations on a fabulous nomination. We look forward to working with Raj and continuing to help you and the
  Secretary. Our USGLC statement is attached and pasted below. Best, Liz
  Liz Schrayer
  U.S. Global Leadership Coalition
  1220 19th Street, NW
  Washin on DC 20036
  USGLC Applauds Choice of Dr. Rajiv Shah as USAID Administrator
  In Choosing Dr. Shah, President Signals Important Role Development Plays in Foreign Policy
  Washington, DC — The U.S. Global Leadership Coalition released the following statement from Executive Director Liz
  Schrayer on President Obama's announcement of Dr. Rajiv Shah to be Administrator of the U.S. Agency for International
  Development:
  `The USGLC applauds the President's nomination of Dr. Rajiv Shah to be USAID Administrator as yet another example of
  the President's commitment to elevating our civilian-led, smart power tools. With a robust International Affairs Budget
  request for FY 2010, a pledge to double foreign assistance by 2015, a Presidential Study Directive on Global Development
  and the State Department's Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review, the Administration continues to demonstrate
  the essential role development and diplomacy play in our foreign policy.
  "Rajiv Shah is a fresh and dynamic addition to President Obama's foreign policy team. Dr. Shah will bring expertise and
  energy to a critical agency in need of strong, empowered leadership. His career in global development, global health and
  agricultural development give him real perspective to lead USAID. He is already an important player in the Administration's
  food security initiative, and his additional background in fighting global poverty and promoting global health make him an
  ideal candidate for this important post.
  "The USGLC's broad, bipartisan coalition welcomes Dr. Shah's nomination to be USAID Administrator, and we look forward
  to working with him to strengthen the role of development"
  The U.S. Global Leadership Coalition (www.usglc.orq) is a broad-based influential network of 400 businesses and NGOs;
  national security and foreign policy experts; and business, faith-based, academic and community leaders in all 50 states
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765662 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765662 Date: 07/31/2015
  who support a smart power approach of elevating diplomacy and development alongside defense in order to build a better,
  safer world.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765662 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765663
MetadataSubject: USGLC APPLAUDS CHOICE OF DR. RAJIV SHAH AS USAID ADMINISTRATOR
MetadataFrom: U.S. Global Leadership Coalition
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-10T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765663/C05765663.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765663
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765663 Date: 07/31/2015
  U.S. GLOBAL
  LEADERSHIP
  COALITION RELEASE IN FULL
  Contact: Richard Parker
  202-730-4163
  FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
  November 10, 2009
  USGLC Applauds Choice of Dr. Rajiv Shah as USAID Administrator
  In Choosing Dr. Shah, President Signals Important Role Development Plays in Foreign Policy
  Washington, DC — The U.S. Global Leadership Coalition released the following statement from Executive
  Director Liz Schrayer on President Obama's announcement of Dr. Rajiv Shah to be Administrator of the
  U.S. Agency for International Development:
  "The USGLC applauds the President's nomination of Dr. Rajiv Shah to be USAID Administrator as yet
  another example of the President's commitment to elevating our civilian-led, smart power tools. With a
  robust International Affairs Budget request for FY 2010, a pledge to double foreign assistance by 2015, a
  Presidential Study Directive on Global Development and the State Department's Quadrennial Diplomacy
  and Development Review, the Administration continues to demonstrate the essential role development and
  diplomacy play in our foreign policy.
  "Rajiv Shah is a fresh and dynamic addition to President Obama's foreign policy team. Dr. Shah will bring
  expertise and energy to a critical agency in need of strong, empowered leadership. His career in global
  development, global health and agricultural development give him real perspective to lead USAID. He is
  already an important player in the Administration's food security initiative, and his additional background in
  fighting global poverty and promoting global health make him an ideal candidate for this important post.
  "The USGLC's broad, bipartisan coalition welcomes Dr. Shah's nomination to be USAID Administrator, and
  we look forward to working with him to strengthen the role of development."
  The U.S. Global Leadership Coalition (www.usglc.org) is a broad-based influential network of 400
  businesses and NGOs; national security and foreign policy experts; and business, faith-based, academic
  and community leaders in all 50 states who support a smart power approach of elevating diplomacy and
  development alongside defense in order to build a better, safer world.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765663 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765670
MetadataSubject: MICHELETTI UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-21T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765670/C05765670.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Michelletti update
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 11:03 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765670
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: B6
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765670 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 11:03 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Michelletti update
  B6
  Original Message
  From: Kelly, Craig A
  To: Valenzuela, Arturo A; Llorens, Hugo;
  Williams, Bisa; Webster, Christopher W; Amselem, W Lewis; Mills, Cheryl D; Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma; Amselem,
  W Lewis
  Sent: Sat Nov 21 07:01:03 2009
  Subject: Michelletti update
  To All:
  Friday evening Hugo and I began picking up from de facto sources that M was about to enter a meeting with supporters
  and that some of the hardliners were making yet another attempt to dissuade M from taking a leave of absence. We
  immediately phoned contacts close to M and warned that if M reneged, we would launch a massive round of visa
  revocations, to include families. A couple hours later, sources began to report that M had decided definitively to step
  aside as announced. Former President Maduro played a key role in persuading M to keep his promise.
  Later, Panamanian VP/FM Varela called me to say he had heard from his private sector contacts in Honduras that M had
  "ratified" the decision to take a leave of absence.
  We will stay on top of this until M actually leaves.
  ck
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765670 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765673
MetadataSubject: GAZA MILITANTS AGREE TO HALT ROCKET FIRE (AP)
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-21T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765673/C05765673.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Gaza militants agree to halt rocket fire (AP)
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: S_SpecialAssistants
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 4:07 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765673
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765673 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 4:07 PM
  To: H
  Subject Fw: Gaza militants agree to halt rocket fire (AP)
  From: Syed, Zia S
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma; Macmanus, Joseph E; Mills, Cheryl D
  Cc: S_SpecialAssistants
  Sent: Sat Nov 21 15:29:57 2009
  Subject: Fw: Gaza militants agree to halt rocket fire (AP)
  See below for a report that Hamas is announcing that militants will stop launching rockets from Gaza into Southern Israel.
  From: Macris, Gregory P
  To: SES_DutyDeputies; NEA-Staff-Assistants-DL; I0 Staff Assistants-DL; S_SpecialAssistants; D(S)_Officers; P; D(L);
  Knopf, Payton L; Sachar, Alon (NEA/IPA); Rudman, Mara
  Cc: SES-O_SWO-Only
  Sent: Sat Nov 21 15:19:57 2009
  Subject: Gaza militants agree to halt rocket fire (AP)
  Colleagues:
  Ops is transmitting this press ticker for your situational awareness.
  Greg Macris, Senior Watch Officer
  GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip - (AP) Palestinian militants in Gaza have agreed to stop firing rockets into southern Israel. Hamas
  announced the agreement this evening, saying it's intended to prevent Israeli retaliation and give Gaza residents more
  stability. Hamas' interior minister says it should make it easier for residents to rebuild the infrastructure that was
  destroyed in last winter's war with Israel. Hamas has mostly refrained from firing rockets since Israel's three-week
  offensive ended in January. Some Gaza militant groups have continued with rocket attacks since the end of the war, but
  they've been far less frequent. The latest came this morning, but it caused no injuries. A small faction affiliated with al-
  Qaida claimed responsibility.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765673 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765674
MetadataTo: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-10T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765674/C05765674.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765674
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  All did some quiet digging
  See Ali's note below.
  She wasn't able to get specifics, but it sounds as though it

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765674 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  All did some quiet digging
  See Ali's note below.
  She wasn't able to get specifics, but it sounds as though it
  From: Rubin, All M
  Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 5:54 PM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject:
  He did in fact pass away on Saturday and the circumstances are
  is inconsolable, so it's better to call
  Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Tuesday, November 10, 2009 6:08 PM
  Mills, Cheryl D; Abedin, Huma; H
  FW:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765674 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765675
MetadataSubject: PERSONAL: AFGHANISTAN
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-21T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765675/C05765675.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Personal: Afghanistan
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 4:10 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765675
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Another note from milliband that he doesn't want to send through the system.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765675 Date: 07/31/2015
  Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 07/30/2015 — Class:
  CONFIDENTIAL — Reason: 1.4(B), 1.4(D) — Declassify on: 11/21/2029
  RELEASE IN PART
  B1,1.4(B),1.4(D),B6
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 4:10 PM
  To: H
  Subject: Fw: Personal: Afghanistan
  Another note from milliband that he doesn't want to send through the system.
  From: Matthew Gould
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Sat Nov 21 14:10:55 2009
  Subject: Personal: Afghanistan
  Hi Huma
  1.4(B)
  1.4(D)
  B1
  I'm e-mailing you from my home account, as we're just back from Kabul. David has downloaded to
  me and very much wants the Secretary (only) to see this note. He would like to talk it over with her as
  soon as convenient in the next couple of days (and before Thanksgiving).
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765675 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765675 Date: 07/31/2015
  1.4
  1.4
  B1
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765675 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765675 Date: 07/31/2015
  1.4
  1.4
  B1
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765675 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765675 Date: 07/31/2015
  1.
  1.
  B1
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765675 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765675 Date: 07/31/2015
  1.
  1.
  B
  I hope we can arrange for our bosses to talk through all this in the next day or two.
  Best wishes,
  Matthew
  4(B)
  4(D)
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765675 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765676
MetadataTo: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-10T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765676/C05765676.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765676
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: And just to underscore, this info is not public, and it seems
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765676 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  And just to underscore, this info is not public, and it seems
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Abedin, Huma; 'H' <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Tue Nov 10 18:07:57 2009
  Subject: FW:
  Ali did some quiet digging
  See Ali's note below.
  She wasn't able to get specifics, but it sounds as though it
  From: Rubin, Ali M
  Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 5:54 PM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject:
  He did in fact pass away on Saturday and the circumstances are
  is inconsolable, so it's better to call
  Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Tuesday, November 10, 2009 6:25 PM
  Mills, Cheryl D; Abedin, Huma; H
  Re
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765676 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765677
MetadataSubject: CALL TO CHINESE FM YANG
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-21T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765677/C05765677.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Call to Chinese FM Yang
ExtractedCc: Steinberg, James B; Sullivan, Jacob 3; Macmanus, Joseph E
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765677
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Saturday, November 21, 2009 4:55 PM
  H
  Fw: Call to Chinese FM Yang
  See below
  Bill burns is asking if you would call yang
  We can send you formal call sheet and set up call if you want.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765677 Date: 07/31/2015
  Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 06/30/2015 — Class: CONFIDENTIAL — Reason: 1.4(D) — Declassify
  on: 11/20/2024
  RELEASE IN PART
  B1,1.4(D), B5
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject
  Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Saturday, November 21, 2009 4:55 PM
  H
  Fw: Call to Chinese FM Yang
  See below
  Bill burns is asking if you would call yang
  We can send you formal call sheet and set up call if you want.
  From: Burns, William J
  To: Abedin, Huma; S_SpecialAssistants
  Cc: Steinberg, James B; Sullivan, Jacob 3; Macmanus, Joseph E
  Sent: Sat Nov 21 16:51:15 2009
  Subject: Call to Chinese FM Yang
  Madam Secretary,
  I'm.really sorry to disturb your weekend.
  1.4(D)
  B1
  1.4(D)
  Jim and I agree that it would be
  very helpful if you could call FM Yang as soon as possible this weekend and press the point with him. If you're
  able to, here are a few suggested points.
  B1
  Begin points:
  B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765677 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765677 Date: 07/31/2015
  Many thanks again.
  Bill Burns
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765677 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765679
MetadataSubject: NATO REPORT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Albright, M K
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-10T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765679/C05765679.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: NATO report
ExtractedFrom: M.K Albright <
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 6:58 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765679
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedCc:
  'gordonph@state.gov' <gordonph@state.gov>; 'DaalderlH@state.gov' <DaalderIH@state.gov>; 'sullivanjj@state.gov'

ExtractedBodyText:
  Dear Hillary
  Thanks for your encouragement on NATO. I am honored that you asked me to work on this fascinating challenge.
  I leave for Slovenia tomorrow for the second seminar. I then go to Prague to celebrate the Velvet revolution. Will be in touch when I
  get back with another update for you to have before the ministerial and then can figure out when we meet
  All best
  Madeleine
  Sent using BlackBerry

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765679 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: M.K Albright <
  Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 6:58 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: NATO report
  Dear Hillary
  Thanks for your encouragement on NATO. I am honored that you asked me to work on this fascinating challenge.
  I leave for Slovenia tomorrow for the second seminar. I then go to Prague to celebrate the Velvet revolution. Will be in touch when I
  get back with another update for you to have before the ministerial and then can figure out when we meet
  All best
  Madeleine
  Sent using BlackBerry
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: M.K Albright
  Cc: 'gordonph@state.gov' <gordonph@state.gov>; 'DaalderlH@state.gov' <DaalderIH@state.gov>; 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  <sullivanjj@state.gov>; 'Valmoroll@state.gov' <Valmoroll@state.gov>
  Sent: Tue Nov 10 13:49:55 2009
  Subject: NATO report
  Dear Madeleine,
  Thank you for your letter report to me about the excellent work you are doing. All the outreach is reassuring the Central and Eastern
  members. We face some hard choices ahead and should plan to meet in December to review. I will be in Brussels for the NATO
  Ministerial the first week, so let's aim for a time after that.
  All the best, Hillary
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765679 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765680
MetadataSubject: CALL LIST
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-21T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765680/C05765680.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Call list
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 5:51 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765680
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Yes- they are both on.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765680 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 5:51 PM
  To: H
  Subject: Re: Call list
  Yes- they are both on.
  Original Message ----
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Sat Nov 21 17:32:16 2009
  Subject: Re: Call list
  Were these added?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Tue Nov 10 16:25:43 2009
  Subject: RE: Call list
  B6
  Tutu:
  Gail Collins:
  I'm working on addresses for both, and will all of the below to your call grid. I'll send an updated grid to Huma within
  the hour.
  The Gail Collins book will be on your desk when you return.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 1:44 PM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Call list
  Pls add Elaine Schuster,
  Vicki Kennedy at
  General Lloyd Austin
  I want to do letters/calls to Archbishop Tutu, and to Gail Collins at NYTimes (pls get copy of her book, When Everything
  Changed) so pls send me their addresses and numbers
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765680 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765682
MetadataSubject: HOLBROOKE CALLED AGAIN
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: AbedinH@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-21T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765682/C05765682.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 5:31 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765682
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765682 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 5:31 PM
  To: H
  Subject Holbrooke called again
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765682 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765684
MetadataSubject: BLAIR
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-21T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765684/C05765684.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH©state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 7:50 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765684
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Tony blair asking if you are free to talk tomorrow (sunday) at 12:30?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765684 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH©state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 7:50 PM
  To: H
  Subject Blair
  Tony blair asking if you are free to talk tomorrow (sunday) at 12:30?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765684 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765685
MetadataSubject: UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-11T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765685/C05765685.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: FW: Update
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 5:49 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765685
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Do you still want this night (assuming also af/pak is that day?)
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765685 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 5:49 AM
  To: H
  Subject Fw: Update
  Do you still want this night (assuming also af/pak is that day?)
  From: Valmoro, Lona 3
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Tue Nov 10 14:34:30 2009
  Subject: FW: Update
  Nancy Parrish following up — okay to relay the night of the 231d yet?
  From: Nancy Parrish [mailto:
  Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 11:03 AM
  To: Valmoro, Lona 3
  Subject: Re: Update
  Original Message ---
  From: Nancy Parrish <
  To: Valmoro, Lona J
  Sent: Tue Nov 10 09:23:00 2009
  Subject: Update
  Hi Lona, are we close to coming up with a date?
  Sent from my iPhone
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765685 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765686
MetadataSubject: BLAIR
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-21T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765686/C05765686.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Blair
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 7:52 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765686
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  No word back from chinese on his availability.
  Blair will be fine with that.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765686 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 7:52 PM
  To: H
  Subject: Re: Blair
  No word back from chinese on his availability.
  Blair will be fine with that.
  Original Message ----
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Sat Nov 21 19:51:49 2009
  Subject: Re: Blair
  12:45 would be better for Blair. What about Yang call?
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Nov 21 19:50:08 2009
  Subject: Blair
  Tony blair asking if you are free to talk tomorrow (sunday) at 12:30?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765686 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765687
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-11T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765687/C05765687.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Holbrooke called me to say why I shouldn't make the call to eik so i've pushed it to back
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 9:54 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765687
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: -- we need to talk
MetadataSubject:
  HOLBROOKE CALLED ME TO SAY WHY I SHOULDN'T MAKE THE CALL TO EIK SO I'VE PUSHED IT TO BACK -- WE NEED TO TALK

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765687 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 9:54 AM
  To:
  Subject: Holbrooke called me to say why I shouldn't make the call to eik so i've pushed it to back
  -- we need to talk
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765687 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765688
MetadataSubject: LETTER FROM SENATOR BAUCUS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-11T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765688/C05765688.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: FW: Letter from Senator Baucus
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 9:18 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765688
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  H RC:
  Here is background on the letter from Baucus and the anticipated response prepared by H.
  Take a look and see if you want to go in a different direction.
  Including the background below so you have the context for the letter.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765688 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 9:18 AM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: FW: Letter from Senator Baucus
  Attachments: 2009 11 09 17 07 26.pdf
  H RC:
  Here is background on the letter from Baucus and the anticipated response prepared by H.
  Take a look and see if you want to go in a different direction.
  Including the background below so you have the context for the letter.
  From: Jacobson, Roberta S
  To: Toiv, Nora F
  Cc: Sheaffer, Gary L; Nolan, Edwin R
  Sent: Tue Nov 10 13:12:52 2009
  Subject: FW: Letter from Senator Baucus
  Nora: I'm responding on Tom's behalf. We've drafted up a letter in response, and I believe it's with H right now.
  We've had a near-constant dialogue with Baucus' office on this, and I'm afraid we haven't been able to, and aren't likely in
  the near future, to satisfy them.
  1) Development and environmental protection on the Flathead River is a long-running source of tension between Montana
  and British Columbia. To protect the Flathead Basin, Sen. Baucus has long championed restrictions against development
  on both sides of the border.
  2) Over the years, the USG has worked closely with the Canadian federal government to ensure several Canadian
  mining proposals were fully assessed for environmental impact. To date, the British Columbia provincial government has
  not approved any mining proposals in the Flathead Basin—and there are no additional proposals on the horizon.
  3) The Senator would like to see B.C. and Canada move toward a more permanent way to protect the region, rather than
  having to battle each new mining proposal. For example, environmental NGOs advocate the Canadians establishing a
  national park or other development moratorium.
  4) While we certainly agree with that approach in principal, the problem is that under Canada's system, provincial
  governments hold the authority over natural resource management. Therefore, even though the Canadian park
  service likewise would favor a national park in the northern Flathead Basin, nothing can happen without the agreement of
  the Province of British Columbia.
  5) British Columbia has informed us that they see no need for broader, more permanent protections in the Flathead Basin,
  and believe their environmental assessment process gives adequate protection against development-related threats.
  6) Because of the federal-provincial dynamic in Canada, the Canadian federal government can't really compel British
  Columbia to establish permanent protections in the Flathead Basin.
  7) Glacier National Park and the Canadian Waterton Lakes National Park are U.N. World Heritage Sites. The U.N. World
  Heritage committee recently sent a mission to the Flathead basin, to assess potential threats to the two national
  parks. Their report is expected this month or next. The release of the report will provide us an opportunity to engage B.C.
  and Canada again on the future of the Flathead region.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765688 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765688 Date: 07/31/2015
  So, we will use the release of the UN report to re-engage with both Canada and B.C. If we're lucky, perhaps the UN will
  recommend the broader "Baucus" approach, and we might find we have more luck armed with that—but that's not at all
  clear. In the meantime, we continue to reassure Baucus and staff that there is no/no planned development currently for
  the area about which he's concerned.
  I hope that helps, and sorry for slightly long-winded explanation. The draft response to Baucus is on the high side, and
  please let me know if you have any further questions or concerns. Many thanks, Roberta
  Roberta S. Jacobson
  Deputy Assistant Secretary
  Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs
  Department of State
  (202)-647-8387
  SBU
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  From: Toiv, Nora F
  Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 5:09 PM
  To: Shannon, Thomas A
  Subject: Letter from Senator Baucus
  Hi Tom. I don't think you ever followed back up on this. Can you let me know how we can address his concerns? Thanks.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765688 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765689
MetadataSubject: HEALTH CARE UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Rodriguez, Miguel E
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-21T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765689/C05765689.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Health Care Update
ExtractedFrom: Rodriguez, Miguel E <RodriguezME@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Toiv, Nora F; Verma, Richard R
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 8:10 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765689
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  This evening cloture was invoked on the motion to proceed to Majority Leader Reid's health care bill, 60 to 39.
  It was a straight party line vote. Despite some early concern over how they would vote, Senators Ben Nelson, Landrieu,
  and Lincoln voted with the caucus. Each has warned they're not a guaranteed "yes" vote on final passage.
  Senators voted from their seats, and Senator Dodd sat in the chair during the vote. The vote was followed by brief
  applause.
  Per the UC agreement negotiated by Reid and McConnell, this evening's cloture vote will also double as the vote on the
  underlying motion to proceed, meaning the Senate will recess after the vote and will be on the health care bill when it
  returns from the Thanksgiving recess.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765689 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Rodriguez, Miguel E <RodriguezME@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 8:10 PM
  To:
  Subject Health Care Update
  This evening cloture was invoked on the motion to proceed to Majority Leader Reid's health care bill, 60 to 39.
  It was a straight party line vote. Despite some early concern over how they would vote, Senators Ben Nelson, Landrieu,
  and Lincoln voted with the caucus. Each has warned they're not a guaranteed "yes" vote on final passage.
  Senators voted from their seats, and Senator Dodd sat in the chair during the vote. The vote was followed by brief
  applause.
  Per the UC agreement negotiated by Reid and McConnell, this evening's cloture vote will also double as the vote on the
  underlying motion to proceed, meaning the Senate will recess after the vote and will be on the health care bill when it
  returns from the Thanksgiving recess.
  Original Message
  From: Rodriguez, Miguel E
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma
  Cc: Toiv, Nora F; Verma, Richard R
  Sent: Fri Nov 20 08:20:18 2009
  Subject: Health Care Update
  Just a brief update on the Senate health care debate.
  The Senate will take its first vote on health care legislation Saturday night now that Leader Reid seems to have secured
  the requisite votes to invoke cloture. The vote to invoke cloture will double as a vote on the motion to proceed,
  allowing senators to head home for Thanksgiving recess following the 8 p.m. vote.
  If cloture is invoked, Reid would immediately call up his bill as a substitute amendment to a House measure that will
  serve as the shell for the motion to proceed vote. Senator Coburn had threatened to require the clerk to read the 2,000-
  page bill following the vote on the motion to proceed, but Reid will call up the bill by number only, which prevents a
  reading.
  Whether Reid has the votes to break the filibuster Saturday hangs on three Democrats: Senators Lincoln, Landrieu, and
  Ben Nelson. All three say they are undecided, but appear to indicate they are leaning toward voting in favor of cloture.
  Reportedly Landrieu has been using her leverage to attempt to change the bill as it moves forward and won a
  particularly sweet deal that could bring billions to Louisiana. Following 2005's Hurricane Katrina, Louisiana saw an
  increase in per capita income, which led to a significant drop in federal Medicaid funding. Reid included language in the
  bill that will increase funding by 50 percent of the total decrease.
  You will recall that Senator Snowe was the only Republican to vote in favor of the Finance bill, but said she has too many
  concerns with Reid's version to support the cloture vote Saturday.
  Earlier this week, the CBO scored the Reid bill. The CBO estimates the total cost of the legislation is $848 billion.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765689 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765689 Date: 07/31/2015
  Below please find a copy of the President's statement on the roll out of Reid's legislation:
  STATEMENT FROM PRESIDENT OBAMA ON THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT
  'Today we passed another critical milestone in the health reform effort with the release of the Patient Protection and
  Affordable Care Act. I was particularly pleased to see that the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the bill will
  reduce the deficit by $127 billion over the next ten years and as much as $650 billion in the decade following, saving
  hundreds of billions while extending coverage to 31 million more Americans.
  From day one, our goal has been to enact legislation that offers stability and security to those who have insurance and
  affordable coverage to those who don't, and that lowers costs for families, businesses and governments across the
  country. Majority Leader Reid, Chairmen Baucus and Dodd, and countless Senators have worked tirelessly to craft
  legislation that meets those principles.
  Just yesterday, a bipartisan group of more than 20 leading health economists released a letter urging passage of
  meaningful reform and praising four key provisions that are in the Senate legislation: a fee on insurance companies
  offering high-premium plans, the establishment of an independent Medicare commission, reforms to the health care
  delivery system, and overall deficit neutrality. The economists said that these provisions 'will reduce long-term deficits,
  improve the quality of care, and put the nation on a firm fiscal footing.' Those are precisely the goals we should be
  seeking to attain.
  The challenges facing our health care system aren't new — but if we fail to act they'll surely get even worse, meaning
  higher premiums, skyrocketing costs, and deeper instability for those with coverage. Today, thanks to the Senate's hard
  work, we're closer than ever to enacting solutions to these problems.
  I look forward to working with the Senate and House to get a finished bill to my desk as soon as possible."
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765689 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765691
MetadataSubject: HELP WITH BI-LATERAL NEGOTIATIONS WITH CANADA ON A SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES IN MONTANA
MetadataTo: Clinton, Hillary Rodham
MetadataFrom: Baucus, Max
MetadataDateSent: 2009-10-22T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765691/C05765691.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765691
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765691 Date: 07/31/2015
  MAX BAUCUS
  MONTANA
  RELEASE IN FULL
  WASHINGTON, DC
  (2021224-2051
  MONTANA TOLL FREE NUMBER
  1-EO-332-6106
  INTERNET:
  max ellaticus.sonatu.gov
  IIIII)Wwww.senoto.uov/-baucus
  'United Mates e$Enate
  WASHINGTON, DC 20510-2602
  October 22, 2009
  The Honorable Hillary Rodham Clinton
  Secretary
  .Department of State
  2201 C Street NW
  Washington, District of Columbia 20520
  Dear Secretary Clinton:
  I write to request your help with bi-lateral negotiations with Canada on a significant environmental issue
  in Montana. During your confirmation process we spoke about the need to engage with Canada to find
  permanent way to protect the natural resources in the North Fork of the Flathead River whiCh drains into
  northwestern Montana
  I appreciate your mentioning the need to address this issue to Canadian Foreign Minister Cannon at the
  June 2009 commemoration of the International Boundary Waters Treaty. I know that your team met on
  September I 1th with the Canadian government but that the scope of the meeting was focused solely on
  the environmental review process for mining proposals in British Columbia and Canada and that no next
  steps were identified.
  Following Interior Secretary Salazar's visit to Montana in August—a trip 1 hope you will make soon—
  we are working together on a plan to engage Canada in negotiations on this topic over the next five
  months. 1 hope this can be a joint effort with Interior and the State Department, but I need your
  leadership to make this a priority, assign one of your senior staff to take on this task, and work together
  to get bi-lateral talks started this year.
  Sincerely,
  BILLINGS BOZEMAN BUTTE GIENDIVE GREAT FALLS HELENA KALISPELL MISSOULA
  iAnnt nr, r-resn rAnct COP 1,111A
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765691 Date: 07/31/2015)329-3123



DocNumber: C05765692
MetadataSubject: HEALTH CARE UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Rodriguez, Miguel E
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-21T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765692/C05765692.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Health Care Update
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Rodriguez, Miguel E <RodriguezME@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Toiv, Nora F; Verma, Richard R
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 8:32 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765692
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Senator Voinovich missed the vote.
  I'm trying to find out if Leadership knew he was going to be missing or not. Although he is retiring, it's a little odd given
  how historically significant the vote is.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765692 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Rodriguez, Miguel E <RodriguezME@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 8:32 PM
  To: H
  Subject: Re: Health Care Update
  Senator Voinovich missed the vote.
  I'm trying to find out if Leadership knew he was going to be missing or not. Although he is retiring, it's a little odd given
  how historically significant the vote is.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Rodriguez, Miguel E
  Sent: Sat Nov 21 20:16:10 2009
  Subject: Re: Health Care Update
  Finally!!! Who didn't vote?
  Original Message ----
  From: Rodriguez, Miguel E <RodriguezME@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Nov 21 20:09:40 2009
  Subject: Health Care Update
  This evening cloture was invoked on the motion to proceed to Majority Leader Reid's health care bill, 60 to 39.
  It was a straight party line vote. Despite some early concern over how they would vote, Senators Ben Nelson, Landrieu,
  and Lincoln voted with the caucus. Each has warned they're not a guaranteed "yes" vote on final passage.
  Senators voted from their seats, and Senator Dodd sat in the chair during the vote. The vote was followed by brief
  applause.
  Per the UC agreement negotiated by Reid and McConnell, this evening's cloture vote will also double as the vote on the
  underlying motion to proceed, meaning the Senate will recess after the vote and will be on the health care bill when it
  returns from the Thanksgiving recess.
  Original Message ----
  From: Rodriguez, Miguel E
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma
  Cc: Toiv, Nora F; Verma, Richard R
  Sent: Fri Nov 20 08:20:18 2009
  Subject: Health Care Update
  Just a brief update on the Senate health care debate.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765692 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765692 Date: 07/31/2015
  The Senate will take its first vote on health care legislation Saturday night now that Leader Reid seems to have secured
  the requisite votes to invoke cloture. The vote to invoke cloture will double as a vote on the motion to proceed,
  allowing senators to head home for Thanksgiving recess following the 8 p.m. vote.
  If cloture is invoked, Reid would immediately call up his bill as a substitute amendment to a House measure that will
  serve as the shell for the motion to proceed vote. Senator Coburn had threatened to require the clerk to read the 2,000-
  page bill following the vote on the motion to proceed, but Reid will call up the bill by number only, which prevents a
  reading.
  Whether Reid has the votes to break the filibuster Saturday hangs on three Democrats: Senators Lincoln, Landrieu, and
  Ben Nelson. All three say they are undecided, but appear to indicate they are leaning toward voting in favor of cloture.
  Reportedly Landrieu has been using her leverage to attempt to change the bill as it moves forward and won a
  particularly sweet deal that could bring billions to Louisiana. Following 2005's Hurricane Katrina, Louisiana saw an
  increase in per capita income, which led to a significant drop in federal Medicaid funding. Reid included language in the
  bill that will increase funding by 50 percent of the total decrease.
  You will recall that Senator Snowe was the only Republican to vote in favor of the Finance bill, but said she has too many
  concerns with Reid's version to support the cloture vote Saturday.
  Earlier this week, the CBO scored the Reid bill. The CBO estimates the total cost of the legislation is $848 billion.
  Below please find a copy of the President's statement on the roll out of Reid's legislation:
  STATEMENT FROM PRESIDENT OBAMA ON THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT
  "Today we passed another critical milestone in the health reform effort with the release of the Patient Protection and
  Affordable Care Act. I was particularly pleased to see that the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the bill will
  reduce the deficit by $127 billion over the next ten years and as much as $650 billion in the decade following, saving
  hundreds of billions while extending coverage to 31 million more Americans.
  From day one, our goal has been to enact legislation that offers stability and security to those who have insurance and
  affordable coverage to those who don't, and that lowers costs for families, businesses and governments across the
  country. Majority Leader Reid, Chairmen Baucus and Dodd, and countless Senators have worked tirelessly to craft
  legislation that meets those principles.
  Just yesterday, a bipartisan group of more than 20 leading health economists released a letter urging passage of
  meaningful reform and praising four key provisions that are in the Senate legislation: a fee on insurance companies
  offering high-premium plans, the establishment of an independent Medicare commission, reforms to the health care
  delivery system, and overall deficit neutrality. The economists said that these provisions 'will reduce long-term deficits,
  improve the quality of care, and put the nation on a firm fiscal footing.' Those are precisely the goals we should be
  seeking to attain.
  The challenges facing our health care system aren't new — but if we fail to act they'll surely get even worse, meaning
  higher premiums, skyrocketing costs, and deeper instability for.those with coverage. Today, thanks to the Senate's hard
  work, we're closer than ever to enacting solutions to these problems.
  I look forward to working with the Senate and House to get a finished bill to my desk as soon as possible."
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765692 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765694
MetadataSubject: BLAIR
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-21T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_049/DOC_0C05765694/C05765694.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Blair
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 9:07 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765694
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Yang on travel
  Not free tonite.
  May work tomorrow

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765694 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 9:07 PM
  To: H
  Subject Re: Blair
  Yang on travel
  Not free tonite.
  May work tomorrow
  Original Message ----
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Sat Nov 21 19:51:49 2009
  Subject: Re: Blair
  12:45 would be better for Blair. What about Yang call?
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Nov 21 19:50:08 2009
  Subject: Blair
  Tony blair asking if you are free to talk tomorrow (sunday) at 12:30?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765694 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765695
MetadataSubject: FYI
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-22T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_049/DOC_0C05765695/C05765695.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fyi
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 2:11 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765695
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Richards office sending a secure fax tomorrow morning at 8:30am.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765695 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 2:11 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fyi
  Richards office sending a secure fax tomorrow morning at 8:30am.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765695 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765696
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-11T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765696/C05765696.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: RE: Holbrooke called me to say why I shouldn't make the call to eik so i've pushed it to
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:17 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765696
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  back -- we need to talk
  calling

MetadataSubject:
[cell repeats an earlier one in this file: 108 characters]

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765696 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:17 PM
  To:
  Subject: RE: Holbrooke called me to say why I shouldn't make the call to eik so i've pushed it to
  back -- we need to talk
  calling
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:00 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Re: Holbrooke called me to say why I shouldn't make the call to eik so i've pushed it to back -- we need to talk
  Can we talk now? I just woke up again.
  Original Message ---
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Wed Nov 11 09:53:38 2009
  Subject: Holbrooke called me to say why I shouldn't make the call to eik so i've pushed it to back -- we need to talk
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765696 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765701
MetadataSubject: ALSO REMINDER
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-22T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_049/DOC_0C05765701/C05765701.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 8:10 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765701
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Tony blair is confirmed for 12:45 today. Ops will connect to house.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765701 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 8:10 AM
  To: H
  Subject Also reminder
  Tony blair is confirmed for 12:45 today. Ops will connect to house.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765701 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765705
MetadataSubject: U.S. NATIONAL HELD OVER AFGHAN BOY'S SHOOTING
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-11T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765705/C05765705.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: U.S. national held over Afghan boy's shooting
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-II; SES-O_Shift-III; SWO; Bitter, Rena; Sullivan, Stephanie S
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:34 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765705
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: FYI
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765705 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:34 PM
  To: H
  Subject FW: U.S. national held over Afghan boy's shooting
  FYI
  From: Slattery, Phillip T
  Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 2:28 PM
  To: S; D(L); D(S); P; SSRAP_StaffAssistants; M_SpecialAssistants; CA-Staffers Mailbox; SCA-Staff-Assistants-DL; C
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-II; SES-O_Shift-III; SWO; Bitter, Rena; Sullivan, Stephanie S
  Subject: U.S. national held over Afghan boy's shooting
  Colleagues —
  I have attached a Reuters report below about a U.S. national who has been arrested in Northern Afghanistan over a
  shooting incident.
  Ops spoke with Kabul ACS Chief Katie Nutt who said that this incident occurred on November 8. Kabul has kept CA/OCS
  in the loop about the case. The man, who works for a NGO, has not yet been charged and is being held at a NDS
  (National Directorate of Security) site in a private cell. He is being treated well and has hired an attorney from the
  Consular Section's list. The Consular Section has kept in touch with him, and the Swedish-led PRT in Mazar-i-Sharif has
  also been in contact.
  -PhiII
  Phillip T. Slattery
  Senior Watch Officer
  U.S. aid worker held over Afghan boy's shooting
  KABUL, Nov 11 (Reuters) - An American aid worker in northern Afghanistan is being held by Afghan authorities over the
  fatal shooting of an Afghan teenager at his home, a provincial police chief said on Wednesday.
  Mohammad Bilal Niram, chief of police in the northern Sar-i-pul province, said the aid worker had killed his landlord's
  16-year-old son with three gunshots, possibly suspecting a burglary when the boy tried to enter his home.
  "He is in Afghan government custody for investigation. He has not been charged," Niram said.
  The man worked for GP he said, referring to Global Partners, a UK-based aid group which says it has run programmes in
  Afghanistan since 1993. Staff at the organisation's London headquarters declined to comment on the incident.
  John Groch, a spokesman for the U.S. embassy, confirmed that an American had been arrested in Sar-i-pul but said he
  could give no further details pending the Afghan police investigation.
  (Reporting by Hamid Shalizi and Peter Graff, writing by Peter Graff, editing by Mark Trevelyan)
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765705 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765707
MetadataSubject: BOEING - NOW $2 MILLION!
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-11T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765707/C05765707.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: FW: BOEING - Now $2 Million!
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 4:10 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765707
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: fyi
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765707 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 4:10 PM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject FW: BOEING - Now $2 Million!
  fyi
  From: Balderston, Kris M
  Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 4:07 PM
  To: Abedin, Huma; Mills, Cheryl D; Toiv, Nora F
  Subject: FW: BOEING - Now $2 Million!
  Just got this good news in anticipation to the Expo event next week.
  From: Balderston, Kris M
  Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 4:06 PM
  To: BagleElizabeth F; 'eeliasoph Haynie, Robert R; Gupta, Benjamin K; 'Villarreal, Jose'; 'Miller, Ken';
  franklavin ; 'kevin
  Subject: BOEING - Now $2 Million!
  Spoke to Boeing and they are upping their $1 million cash to $2 million cash!!!
  Ellen — can you make sure we invite their China Rep David Wang. We should also note it in the S speech along
  w the other new and improved sponsors.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765707 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765708
MetadataSubject: RONNIE HEYMAN
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-12T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765708/C05765708.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Ronnie heyman
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 2:41 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765708
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765708 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 2:41 AM
  To: H
  Subject: Ronnie heyman
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765708 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765712
MetadataSubject: FYI: MURDOCH MAKES HIS MOVE TO CAMERON. ATTACK ON BBC TO FOLLOW. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-12T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765712/C05765712.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765712
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  The Independent
  November 12, 2009
  sbwhoeop
  Thursday, November 12, 2009 8:52 AM
  H
  FYI: Murdoch makes his move to Cameron. Attack on BBC to follow. Sid
  Has Cameron done a deal with Murdoch?
  By Andy McSmith
  Lord Mandelson's attack shines spotlight on Tory leader's
  links with media mogul
  David Cameron has been accused of making a "contract" with Britain's biggest media company to trade political support
  before an election for government favours afterwards if the Tories win.
  The accusation was levelled yesterday by the Business Secretary Peter Mandelson, who is increasingly the public face of
  Gordon Brown's government. Ministers are angry at the campaign that The Sun has run against the Prime Minister all this
  week over the spelling mistakes in a letter Mr Brown sent to the mother of a young soldier killed in Afghanistan.
  They suspect that the Conservative Party has been tailoring its policies on media regulation and the BBC to suit the
  commercial interests of News International, which owns The Sun, and that the paper's aggressive support for the Tories is
  a pay-off that could spread to other parts of the mass media.
  Examples of the apparent tie-in between what News International's boss, James Murdoch, wants, and what David
  Cameron is ready to promise include the recent decision by the Conservatives to abandon the idea of "top slicing" the
  BBC licence fee. It had been proposed that part of the money paid to the BBC would be siphoned off to help regional
  television companies meet the threat from the internet. But this would also have helped them compete more effectively
  against Sky News, which is part of the Murdoch media empire.
  When the policy was abandoned in September, Jeremy Hunt, the shadow Culture Secretary, said that it was because
  enacting it might make the commercial television companies "focus not on attracting viewers but on attracting subsidies".
  There was no gain for the BBC in the climbdown, because David Cameron had already said that the Tories will freeze the
  licence fee. What it will mean is that the BBC's income will be capped, without the regional television companies seeing
  any government help, which will strengthen the market position of Britain's only satellite television company, Sky. "This
  was done for News International," a Tory insider said yesterday. "Murdoch wants Sky to go head to head with the BBC.
  He doesn't want the independent companies strengthened."
  In April 2008, James Murdoch complained bitterly about the media regulator Ofcom in his first major speech after taking
  over as chief executive of News Corporation in Europe and Asia. The following year, David Cameron announced that a
  Conservative government would cut Ofcom down to size.
  Last summer James Murdoch attacked the "abysmal record" of the BBC Trust - the body created by Labour to over see
  the BBC - in a lecture he gave at the Edinburgh Festival, singling out its "total failure" to stop the BBC buying the Lonely
  Planet travel guides, a takeover that Murdoch denounced as an "egregious" invasion of private enterprise by the state.
  Less than two months later, Jeremy Hunt promised that the Tories would abolish the Trust.
  In the same lecture, Murdoch complained that BBC performers like Jonathan Ross are being paid salaries that "no
  commercial competitor can afford". He had barely uttered the words before Ed Vaizey, a shadow media minister,
  promised that a Tory government would compel the BBC to publish the salaries of its top performers.
  Lord Mandelson alleged yesterday that the Conservatives and News International had "effectively formed a contract, over
  the head, incidentally, of the newspaper's editor and their readers, in which they are sort of bound to one another".
  Speaking to the BBC's Today programme, he added: "What The Sun can do for the Conservatives during the election is
  one part of the contract and, presumably, what the Conservatives can do for News International if they are elected is the
  other side of the bargain. But there is a wider question. When The Sun creates the news in this way, this is then followed
  up by Sky News, which then puts pressure on the BBC to follow suit."
  This was "absolutely, categorically" denied yesterday by The Sun's political editor, Tom Newton Dunn, who accused Lord
  Mandelson of talking "preposterous nonsense".
  The Sun, which supported Labour through three general elections under Tony Blair's leadership, announced that it was
  jumping ship on the day that Gordon Brown delivered his annual speech to the Labour Party conference in September.
  Its onslaught on Gordon Brown for the mistakes made in a handwritten letter to Jacqui Janes is the most aggressive
  attack that the newspaper has directed at any Labour Party leader since Neil Kinnock stood down after losing the 1992
  general election, a defeat for which The Sun claimed victory with the slogan "It was The Sun wot won it".
  But there were signs yesterday that the attack may have rebounded on The Sun. Mr Brown, who is blind in one eye, has
  admitted that his handwriting is bad and has apologised to Mrs Janes, whose 20-year-old son, Jamie, was killed by a
  makeshift bomb in Afghanistan last month.
  A poll yesterday for the website PoliticsHome, whose main shareholder is the Conservative Party deputy chairman Lord
  Ashcroft, found that 65 per cent of those polled thought that The Sun's attack was "inappropriate" compared with 23 per
  cent who thought it was "legitimate".
  The closeness of the new Tory-Sun axis is shown up by the revelation, from an inside source, that David Cameron
  personally consulted the editor of The Sun, Dominic Mohan, in three separate conversations before he abandoned his
  "cast-iron" promise to hold a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, now that all 27 members states of the EU have ratified it.
  Mr Cameron was understandably wary of how The Sun might react to the abandonment of that promise. The paper has
  campaigned for years against what it sees as the growth of an EU superstate. It was in an open letter to readers of The
  Sun that Cameron first made his guarantee, two years ago.
  His announcement that a referendum is off the agenda was subjected to a scathing attack in'the Daily Mail, but in The
  Sun it was given kid-glove treatment under the headline "Cameron's crusade for UK rights".
  The person behind this aggressively pro-Tory policy is James Murdoch, not his father, Rupert, who created The Sun
  virtually from scratch in the 1970s. Rupert Murdoch claimed in an interview with Sky News Australia that he "regretted" his
  son's decision to turn against Gordon Brown, "who is a friend of mine", but defended it on the grounds that Brown has
  been a "disappointment".
  Yesterday, The Times, another Murdoch newspaper, announced that its veteran political editor, Phil Webster, is leaving
  the Commons, where he has been based for decades. Mr Webster is very well thought of by New Labour. His
  replacement, Roland Watson, was a friend of David Cameron's at Eton but has no political ties with the Tories.
  Tom Newton Dunn, newly appointed as The Sun's political editor, is another Old Etonian. His father, Bill, used to be a
  Tory MEP, but defected to the Liberal Democrats in 2000.
  Independent News and Media Limited

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765712 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  The Independent
  November 12, 2009
  sbwhoeop
  Thursday, November 12, 2009 8:52 AM
  H
  FYI: Murdoch makes his move to Cameron. Attack on BBC to follow. Sid
  Has Cameron done a deal with Murdoch?
  By Andy McSmith
  Lord Mandelson's attack shines spotlight on Tory leader's
  links with media mogul
  David Cameron has been accused of making a "contract" with Britain's biggest media company to trade political support
  before an election for government favours afterwards if the Tories win.
  The accusation was levelled yesterday by the Business Secretary Peter Mandelson, who is increasingly the public face of
  Gordon Brown's government. Ministers are angry at the campaign that The Sun has run against the Prime Minister all this
  week over the spelling mistakes in a letter Mr Brown sent to the mother of a young soldier killed in Afghanistan.
  They suspect that the Conservative Party has been tailoring its policies on media regulation and the BBC to suit the
  commercial interests of News International, which owns The Sun, and that the paper's aggressive support for the Tories is
  a pay-off that could spread to other parts of the mass media.
  Examples of the apparent tie-in between what News International's boss, James Murdoch, wants, and what David
  Cameron is ready to promise include the recent decision by the Conservatives to abandon the idea of "top slicing" the
  BBC licence fee. It had been proposed that part of the money paid to the BBC would be siphoned off to help regional
  television companies meet the threat from the internet. But this would also have helped them compete more effectively
  against Sky News, which is part of the Murdoch media empire.
  When the policy was abandoned in September, Jeremy Hunt, the shadow Culture Secretary, said that it was because
  enacting it might make the commercial television companies "focus not on attracting viewers but on attracting subsidies".
  There was no gain for the BBC in the climbdown, because David Cameron had already said that the Tories will freeze the
  licence fee. What it will mean is that the BBC's income will be capped, without the regional television companies seeing
  any government help, which will strengthen the market position of Britain's only satellite television company, Sky. "This
  was done for News International," a Tory insider said yesterday. "Murdoch wants Sky to go head to head with the BBC.
  He doesn't want the independent companies strengthened."
  In April 2008, James Murdoch complained bitterly about the media regulator Ofcom in his first major speech after taking
  over as chief executive of News Corporation in Europe and Asia. The following year, David Cameron announced that a
  Conservative government would cut Ofcom down to size.
  Last summer James Murdoch attacked the "abysmal record" of the BBC Trust - the body created by Labour to over see
  the BBC - in a lecture he gave at the Edinburgh Festival, singling out its "total failure" to stop the BBC buying the Lonely
  Planet travel guides, a takeover that Murdoch denounced as an "egregious" invasion of private enterprise by the state.
  Less than two months later, Jeremy Hunt promised that the Tories would abolish the Trust.
  In the same lecture, Murdoch complained that BBC performers like Jonathan Ross are being paid salaries that "no
  commercial competitor can afford". He had barely uttered the words before Ed Vaizey, a shadow media minister,
  promised that a Tory government would compel the BBC to publish the salaries of its top performers.
  Lord Mandelson alleged yesterday that the Conservatives and News International had "effectively formed a contract, over
  the head, incidentally, of the newspaper's editor and their readers, in which they are sort of bound to one another".
  Speaking to the BBC's Today programme, he added: "What The Sun can do for the Conservatives during the election is
  one part of the contract and, presumably, what the Conservatives can do for News International if they are elected is the
  other side of the bargain. But there is a wider question. When The Sun creates the news in this way, this is then followed
  up by Sky News, which then puts pressure on the BBC to follow suit."
  This was "absolutely, categorically" denied yesterday by The Sun's political editor, Tom Newton Dunn, who accused Lord
  Mandelson of talking "preposterous nonsense".
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765712 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765712 Date: 07/31/2015
  The Sun, which supported Labour through three general elections under Tony Blair's leadership, announced that it was
  jumping ship on the day that Gordon Brown delivered his annual speech to the Labour Party conference in September.
  Its onslaught on Gordon Brown for the mistakes made in a handwritten letter to Jacqui Janes is the most aggressive
  attack that the newspaper has directed at any Labour Party leader since Neil Kinnock stood down after losing the 1992
  general election, a defeat for which The Sun claimed victory with the slogan "It was The Sun wot won it".
  But there were signs yesterday that the attack may have rebounded on The Sun. Mr Brown, who is blind in one eye, has
  admitted that his handwriting is bad and has apologised to Mrs Janes, whose 20-year-old son, Jamie, was killed by a
  makeshift bomb in Afghanistan last month.
  A poll yesterday for the website PoliticsHome, whose main shareholder is the Conservative Party deputy chairman Lord
  Ashcroft, found that 65 per cent of those polled thought that The Sun's attack was "inappropriate" compared with 23 per
  cent who thought it was "legitimate".
  The closeness of the new Tory-Sun axis is shown up by the revelation, from an inside source, that David Cameron
  personally consulted the editor of The Sun, Dominic Mohan, in three separate conversations before he abandoned his
  "cast-iron" promise to hold a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, now that all 27 members states of the EU have ratified it.
  Mr Cameron was understandably wary of how The Sun might react to the abandonment of that promise. The paper has
  campaigned for years against what it sees as the growth of an EU superstate. It was in an open letter to readers of The
  Sun that Cameron first made his guarantee, two years ago.
  His announcement that a referendum is off the agenda was subjected to a scathing attack in'the Daily Mail, but in The
  Sun it was given kid-glove treatment under the headline "Cameron's crusade for UK rights".
  The person behind this aggressively pro-Tory policy is James Murdoch, not his father, Rupert, who created The Sun
  virtually from scratch in the 1970s. Rupert Murdoch claimed in an interview with Sky News Australia that he "regretted" his
  son's decision to turn against Gordon Brown, "who is a friend of mine", but defended it on the grounds that Brown has
  been a "disappointment".
  Yesterday, The Times, another Murdoch newspaper, announced that its veteran political editor, Phil Webster, is leaving
  the Commons, where he has been based for decades. Mr Webster is very well thought of by New Labour. His
  replacement, Roland Watson, was a friend of David Cameron's at Eton but has no political ties with the Tories.
  Tom Newton Dunn, newly appointed as The Sun's political editor, is another Old Etonian. His father, Bill, used to be a
  Tory MEP, but defected to the Liberal Democrats in 2000.
  Independent News and Media Limited
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765712 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765715
MetadataSubject: OUT OF OFFICE AUTO REPLY:
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Dewan, Linda L
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-12T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765715/C05765715.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Dewan, Linda L <DewanLL@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 9:33 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765715
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Linda Dewan is out of the office/back on Monday, November 16
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765715 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Dewan, Linda L <DewanLL@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 9:33 AM
  To: H
  Subject Out of Office AutoReply:
  Linda Dewan is out of the office/back on Monday, November 16
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765715 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765717
MetadataSubject: WILL CALL YOU SHORTLY - VERY GOOD CALL WITH JES
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-22T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_049/DOC_0C05765717/C05765717.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: will call you shortly - very good call with JES
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 9:13 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765717
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765717 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 9:13 AM
  To: H
  Subject: will call you shortly - very good call with JES
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765717 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765718
MetadataSubject: H: ALSO, TWO QUINNIPIAC POLLS, CT AND OH, NOT GOOD. S
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-12T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765718/C05765718.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: H: Also, two Quinnipiac polls, CT and OH, not good. S
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 9:58 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765718
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  November 12, 2009 - Dems Fade In Ohio Senate Race, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Obama Gets
  Negative Score In Key Swing State
  Word format
  For the first time, Republican Rob Portman is inching ahead of the two Democrats in the 2010 race for Ohio's
  U.S. Senate seat, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today. Also for the first time, Ohio voters
  disapprove 50 - 45 percent of the job President Barack Obama is doing, down from his 53 - 42 percent approval
  September 16 and 49 - 44 percent approval July 7.
  In still another first, voters are split 40 - 40 percent on who is doing a better job handling health care, the
  President or Congressional Republicans, the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh- pe-ack) University survey
  finds. In a September 16 survey on the same question, Obama was on top 49 - 28 percent.
  Ohio voters disapprove 53 - 42 percent of the way the President is handling the economy and disapprove 57 -
  36 percent of the way he is handling health care. In September, they approved of his handling of the economy
  48 - 46 percent and split on his handling of health care 44 - 45 percent.
  "The Democratic wave that swept through Ohio in 2006 and 2008 may be cresting. The Democratic lead in the
  Governor's and Senate races has evaporated and for the first time President Barack Obama is under water in the
  most important swing state in the country," said Peter Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University
  Polling Institute.
  "Ohio voters are not happy with the President's handling of health care and the economy. The fact that they now
  are split whether he or the Republicans in Congress are better able to handle health care should be a very
  worrisome number at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. since the GOP is still pretty much a four-letter word in most of
  America."
  Independent voters, often the group that decides Ohio elections, disapprove 49 - 45 percent of the overall job
  Obama is doing and disapprove 54 - 39 percent of his handling of the economy. They disapprove 62 - 34
  percent, almost 2-1, of his handling of health care.
  "In July, when the President's job approval began falling nationally from the high 50s and low 60s into the low
  50s, Ohio was the first place it showed up in the polls," said Brown.
  Portman, a former Congressman running for the U.S. Senate in 2010, has small leads over two Democrats,
  topping Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner 38 - 34 percent and Lt. Gov. Lee Fisher 39 - 36 percent. In the
  battle for the Democratic Senate nomination, Fisher gets 24 percent to Brunner's 22 percent, with 51 percent
  undecided. Portman leads car dealer Tom Ganley 26 - 7 percent in a GOP primary with 64 percent undecided.
  "None of the Senate candidates are very well known, but what is significant is that until now Democrats were
  winning all the Senate matchups. Clearly there is an at least temporary swing toward the GOP in Ohio. Whether
  it continues is anyone's guess," said Brown.
  Ohio voters oppose Obama's health care plan 55 - 36 percent, with independents against it 57 - 33 percent. By a
  61 - 35 percent margin, voters don't think Congress should approve a health care overhaul if it only gets
  Democratic votes.
  But Ohio voters support 53 - 40 percent giving people the option of a government health insurance plan.
  Independent voters support this public option 55 - 38 percent.
  Afghanistan
  The United States is doing the right thing fighting in Afghanistan, Ohio voters say 48 - 43 percent. Voters
  support 51 - 40 percent the recommendations of the top U.S. commanders in Afghanistan that 40,000 more U.S.
  troops should be sent.
  "But 55 percent of Ohioans say they are only willing to see large numbers of American troops in Afghanistan
  for two years or less, which is hardly a mandate for the type of long-term commitment that the Pentagon has
  said will be needed for victory," said Brown.
  From November 5 - 9, Quinnipiac University surveyed 1,123 Ohio voters, with a margin of error of +/- 2.9
  percentage points. The survey includes 406 Republicans and 394 Democrats, each with a margin of error of +/-
  4.9 percentage points.
  The Quinnipiac University Poll, directed by Douglas Schwartz, Ph.D., conducts public opinion surveys in
  Florida, Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Ohio and the nation as a public service and for
  research. For more data or RSS feed- http://www.quinnipiac.edu/polling.xml, call (203) 582-5201, or follow us
  on Twitter.
  Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-CT) is still in serious trouble in his re-election race with 53% of voters saying he does not
  deserve re-election, a new Quinnipiac poll finds.
  Connecticut voters disapprove, 54% to 40%, of the job Dodd is doing, compared to a 49% to 43% disapproval in
  September.
  In general election match ups, Dodd loses to both Rob Simmons (R), 49% to 38%, and to Linda McMahon (R), 43% to
  41%.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765718 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 9:58 AM
  To:
  Subject: H: Also, two Quinnipiac polls, CT and OH, not good. S
  November 12, 2009 - Dems Fade In Ohio Senate Race, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Obama Gets
  Negative Score In Key Swing State
  Word format
  For the first time, Republican Rob Portman is inching ahead of the two Democrats in the 2010 race for Ohio's
  U.S. Senate seat, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today. Also for the first time, Ohio voters
  disapprove 50 - 45 percent of the job President Barack Obama is doing, down from his 53 - 42 percent approval
  September 16 and 49 - 44 percent approval July 7.
  In still another first, voters are split 40 - 40 percent on who is doing a better job handling health care, the
  President or Congressional Republicans, the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh- pe-ack) University survey
  finds. In a September 16 survey on the same question, Obama was on top 49 - 28 percent.
  Ohio voters disapprove 53 - 42 percent of the way the President is handling the economy and disapprove 57 -
  36 percent of the way he is handling health care. In September, they approved of his handling of the economy
  48 - 46 percent and split on his handling of health care 44 - 45 percent.
  "The Democratic wave that swept through Ohio in 2006 and 2008 may be cresting. The Democratic lead in the
  Governor's and Senate races has evaporated and for the first time President Barack Obama is under water in the
  most important swing state in the country," said Peter Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University
  Polling Institute.
  "Ohio voters are not happy with the President's handling of health care and the economy. The fact that they now
  are split whether he or the Republicans in Congress are better able to handle health care should be a very
  worrisome number at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. since the GOP is still pretty much a four-letter word in most of
  America."
  Independent voters, often the group that decides Ohio elections, disapprove 49 - 45 percent of the overall job
  Obama is doing and disapprove 54 - 39 percent of his handling of the economy. They disapprove 62 - 34
  percent, almost 2-1, of his handling of health care.
  "In July, when the President's job approval began falling nationally from the high 50s and low 60s into the low
  50s, Ohio was the first place it showed up in the polls," said Brown.
  Portman, a former Congressman running for the U.S. Senate in 2010, has small leads over two Democrats,
  topping Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner 38 - 34 percent and Lt. Gov. Lee Fisher 39 - 36 percent. In the
  battle for the Democratic Senate nomination, Fisher gets 24 percent to Brunner's 22 percent, with 51 percent
  undecided. Portman leads car dealer Tom Ganley 26 - 7 percent in a GOP primary with 64 percent undecided.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765718 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765718 Date: 07/31/2015
  "None of the Senate candidates are very well known, but what is significant is that until now Democrats were
  winning all the Senate matchups. Clearly there is an at least temporary swing toward the GOP in Ohio. Whether
  it continues is anyone's guess," said Brown.
  Ohio voters oppose Obama's health care plan 55 - 36 percent, with independents against it 57 - 33 percent. By a
  61 - 35 percent margin, voters don't think Congress should approve a health care overhaul if it only gets
  Democratic votes.
  But Ohio voters support 53 - 40 percent giving people the option of a government health insurance plan.
  Independent voters support this public option 55 - 38 percent.
  Afghanistan
  The United States is doing the right thing fighting in Afghanistan, Ohio voters say 48 - 43 percent. Voters
  support 51 - 40 percent the recommendations of the top U.S. commanders in Afghanistan that 40,000 more U.S.
  troops should be sent.
  "But 55 percent of Ohioans say they are only willing to see large numbers of American troops in Afghanistan
  for two years or less, which is hardly a mandate for the type of long-term commitment that the Pentagon has
  said will be needed for victory," said Brown.
  From November 5 - 9, Quinnipiac University surveyed 1,123 Ohio voters, with a margin of error of +/- 2.9
  percentage points. The survey includes 406 Republicans and 394 Democrats, each with a margin of error of +/-
  4.9 percentage points.
  The Quinnipiac University Poll, directed by Douglas Schwartz, Ph.D., conducts public opinion surveys in
  Florida, Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Ohio and the nation as a public service and for
  research. For more data or RSS feed- http://www.quinnipiac.edu/polling.xml, call (203) 582-5201, or follow us
  on Twitter.
  Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-CT) is still in serious trouble in his re-election race with 53% of voters saying he does not
  deserve re-election, a new Quinnipiac poll finds.
  Connecticut voters disapprove, 54% to 40%, of the job Dodd is doing, compared to a 49% to 43% disapproval in
  September.
  In general election match ups, Dodd loses to both Rob Simmons (R), 49% to 38%, and to Linda McMahon (R), 43% to
  41%.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765718 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765719
MetadataSubject: ARE YOU AWAKE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-12T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765719/C05765719.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 10:19 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765719
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765719 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 10:19 AM
  To:
  Subject are you awake
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765719 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765720
MetadataSubject: FW:
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-22T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_049/DOC_0C05765720/C05765720.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765720
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sunday, November 22, 2009 10:44 AM
  H
  FW:
  FYI

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765720 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE
  IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sunday, November 22, 2009 10:44 AM
  H
  FW:
  FYI
  Original Message
  From: williamsbarrett
  Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 10:19 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; DIANNE
  Subject:
  I am catching the next train
  from NY to RI to be with him.
  Cheryl believe I can do early morning tomorrow call if you wantto discuss agenda.
  M
  Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765720 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765721
MetadataSubject: ARE YOU AWAKE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-12T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765721/C05765721.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: are you awake
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 10:25 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765721
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Just tried you - went to vox - calling ops
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765721 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 10:25 AM
  To: H
  Subject RE: are you awake
  Just tried you - went to vox - calling ops
  Original Message----
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2009 10:21 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Re: are you awake
  Yes—call my berry or the black phone in my room.
  Original Message ----
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Thu Nov 12 10:19:26 2009
  Subject: are you awake
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765721 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765723
MetadataSubject: HOLBROOKE JUST CALLED FOR YOU.
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-22T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_049/DOC_0C05765723/C05765723.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 11:58 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765723
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765723 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 11:58 AM
  To: H
  Subject Holbrooke just called for you.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765723 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765725
MetadataSubject: HOLBROOKE JUST CALLED FOR YOU.
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-22T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_049/DOC_0C05765725/C05765725.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Holbrooke just called for you.
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 11:59 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765725
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Also, assume you are giving any edits to documents directly to richard? Ops called to see if you were going to send edits
  back thru secure fax. I assume you are not.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765725 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 11:59 AM
  To:
  Subject: Re: Holbrooke just called for you.
  Also, assume you are giving any edits to documents directly to richard? Ops called to see if you were going to send edits
  back thru secure fax. I assume you are not.
  Original Message ---
  From: Abedin, Huma
  To: 'hdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sun Nov 22 11:57:50 2009
  Subject: Holbrooke just called for you.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765725 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765727
MetadataSubject: MITCHELL JUST CALLED FOR YOU.
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-22T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_049/DOC_0C05765727/C05765727.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 6:10 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765727
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765727 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 6:10 PM
  To: H
  Subject Mitchell just called for you.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765727 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765730
MetadataSubject: ADMIRAL PLATT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-13T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765730/C05765730.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Admiral Platt
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, November 13, 2009 7:10 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765730
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Will do
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765730 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 7:10 AM
  To:
  Subject Re: Admiral Platt
  Will do
  Original Message ----
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Fri Nov 13 06:58:30 2009
  Subject: Fw: Admiral Platt
  See if you can get a copy of the intro Navy Sec Mabus gave me that's referred to below.
  Original Message ----
  From: Burns Strider
  To: H
  Sent: Wed Nov 11 16:38:01 2009
  Subject: Admiral Platt
  I have breakfast this morning with Adm. Platt at the Army/Navy Club... he said he attended the NY event launching the
  new vessel... he applauds your comments... and noted that the Secretary of the Navy gave you quite the stirring intro...
  the Admiral sends his finest to you...
  Burns Strider
  Founding Partner
  The Eleison Group
  Join Me on Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1279552305&ref=name>
  Follow Me on Twitter <http://twitter.com/BStrider>
  Visit The Eleison Group Website <http://www.eleisongroup.com/>
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765730 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765730 Date: 07/31/2015
  Visit Pea Ridge Confidential, My Personal Blog <http://pearidgeconfidential.blogspot.com/>
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765730 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765732
MetadataSubject: FOR H. AND DOUG, FOR WJC TO PONDER. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-13T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_047/DOC_0C05765732/C05765732.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: For H. And Doug, for WJC to ponder. Sid
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop B6
ExtractedCc: Doug Band
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, November 13, 2009 9:32 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765732
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Hillary: This is the most provocative and significant analysis to come out of the recent election. Its author is a right-wing
  Republican lawyer based in Richmond who also writes a column for Human Events. I disagree with the ideological and
  partisan undercurrent of the piece, especially his overemphasis of the deficit as an overriding political factor rather than
  the administration's lack of achievable results so far in improving the living standards of ordinary people. There is no
  reason why the deficit shouldn't become a merely abstract factor once there are actual benefits delivered. The pattern of
  the past is that the deficit, the talisman of Hoover Republicans, moves only partisan Republicans and that Democrats
  ascend if the economy is progressing, its gains are widely spread and new social programs have favorable universal
  impact. That is not happening now. This analysis, therefore, may be portentous. Worth reading. The electoral maps of VA
  don't show up in the email but they are described. Sid
  Return to the Article
  November 13, 2009
  Can the Clinton Coalition Survive Obama?
  By Sean Trende
  John Judis and Ruy Teixeira's well-regarded 2002 work The Emerging Democratic Majority begins with a vignette set in
  Virginia. They tell the story of a telecom executive named Mark Warner, who runs a moderate campaign that appeals to
  upper-middle class suburbanites and working class rural voters, and manages to put together a winning coalition that, if
  imitated in other states, might put the Democrats in power for decades to come.
  Democrats did build coalitions similar to Warner's, and in fact had been doing so for the better part of a decade. Warner's
  coalition was essentially Bill Clinton's 1996 coalition. The coalition and brand that Clinton built was an extraordinarily
  successful one for Democrats, breaking the momentum of a resurgent GOP in 1996, and ultimately enabling the election
  of the most liberal President in American History last year.
  Given this background, it's only appropriate that the first tangible sign that this coalition is coming unglued has come in
  Virginia. Republican Bob McDonnell won the governorship with almost 59% of the vote — the highest percentage (though
  not the highest victory margin) for any governor since 1961. The entire Republican ticket won by similar margins, and the
  GOP picked up six seats in the General Assembly. It could have been even worse — five Democrats won their Assembly
  races by fewer than 1,000 votes.
  There are some superficial lessons to be drawn here. After last week's election, it's silly to argue that the GOP brand is
  too damaged for them to take advantage of Democratic weakness. And the Democrats' latest spin — that their weakness
  among Independents was simply a function of more Republicans calling themselves independents but retaining their
  Republican voting habits — puts the lie to the argument that Republicans' low self-identification is a salient factor in
  elections.
  But the most important lesson is this: while there's little predictive value in off-year elections, they do provide snapshots of
  the mood of the electorate, and the present state of political coalitions. Given Virginia's primacy in the story of Democratic
  coalition building, it gives us a good snapshot of the state of that coalition. And it's not a pretty one for Democrats.
  The historical base of the Democratic Party for two centuries has long been what Jay Cost and I call Jacksonians:
  Culturally conservative, hawkish, and populist whites located throughout the South and Border states. They began
  breaking away from Democrats in the 1950s and 1960s — their reaction to the Party's embrace of unions, blacks and
  liberals is a story is so well known there's no need to rehash it here.
  But this group remained at least in play for the Democrats. Clinton inherited a coalition consisting of minorities, liberals,
  urban voters, and a decent remnant of Jacksonian voters in the Ohio River Valley and the South, who still preferred a
  moderate-to-conservative Democrat to a Republican. This coalition became a majority coalition when Clinton used a
  combination of fiscal conservatism and social moderation to bring suburban voters on board. This was a huge innovation
  for Democrats; suburbs like Nassau County, NY, Orange County, CA and Fairfax County, VA had fueled the rise of the
  Republican parties in those states. Clinton moved them substantially toward his side. This coalition allowed him to win by
  eight points in 1996; absent Perot and a last-minute fundraising scandal, he probably would have won by more.
  Clinton intuited that suburban voters are, generally speaking, culturally cosmopolitan — they don't like it when you call
  someone "macaca," and aren't crazy about the religious right. But they're generally not particularly socially liberal either,
  and are fans of "law and order." They like taxes low and appreciate economic growth, but like good schools and a clean
  environment. Having to balance a bunch of spending priorities with somewhat limited income in their daily lives, balanced
  budgets are the ultimate "good government" indicator for these voters.
  Clinton delivered on all of these issues, keeping tax increases fairly small, and balancing the budget for much of his term.
  In so doing — and this is very important — he re-branded the Democrats as the party of fiscal responsibility, economic
  growth, moderate taxes, and smart government. In other words, he finally shed the "Carter" label for the Democrats. This,
  in turn, made it plausible for his much more liberal heirs to benefit from this presumption of competence for Democrats -
  one that they probably would not have enjoyed without him.
  George W. Bush's presidency, in turn, was an upper-middle class suburbanite's nightmare. An aggressive social agenda,
  a fiscal trainwreck, two poorly-managed wars and a financial collapse later, these suburban voters trended even more
  heavily Democratic then they were in the Clinton era. By 2008, Democrats held most of the suburban districts around ,
  major metropolitan areas, and were threatening in the exurbs. The right Democratic candidate probably could have put
  together a massive 2008 Presidential majority, combining minorities, liberals, Jacksonians, Catholics, and suburbanites.
  The mood of the country was certainly right for a 1920/1932/1952/1980 result.
  But the Democrats nominated Barack Obama. The party's grip among Jacksonians had weakened since Clinton left the
  stage, but they abandoned Obama completely. Jay Cost and I have detailed this here. This movement is why Obama
  received 53% of the vote, instead of the 60% or so we might expect given the voters' attitude toward Bush's Presidency.
  Obama was able to win even without this branch of the Democratic party because he generated such intensity among the
  remaining portions of his base. In other words, while his base wasn't as broad as Clinton's, it was deeper. Faced with
  vanishing 401ks and home values, and disgust with Bush's presidency, suburbanites flocked to him. Liberals were
  enthralled to finally elect one of their own. And minorities turned out heavily for the opportunity to elect the first black
  President.
  But this presents a problem. You only get to elect the first black President once, and governing a coalition of suburbanites,
  poor blacks, and upper class liberals isn't easy. It is hard to keep that enthusiasm up. And with the Jacksonian wing of the
  party gone, if that enthusiasm dissipates, or if one of the coalition groups becomes disgruntled and starts to shuffle out the
  door, the party isn't left with much.
  We see a microcosm of this story in last Tuesday's elections, especially in Virginia. Let's backtrack to 2001, and look at
  the counties that Mark Warner won.
  The coalition that Warner built was similar to Clinton's. To oversimplify some, it blended together rural Democrats in the
  mining counties in the west of the state, college voters around Charlottesville, and black voters combined with rural whites
  in the south central and southeastern portion of the state with suburban voters in the northeast. It was a diverse coalition,
  but it worked.
  Now let's compare Warner's map with Obama's map in 2008:
  The suburbs stayed in the Democrat's camp, for reasons discussed above. But look what happens in the west! That area
  becomes solidly Republican. Buchanan and Dickenson counties in the Virginia panhandle voted for Dukakis, Mondale,
  and Adlai Stevenson (twice). Obama became only the second Democrat to lose these counties since the UMW moved in
  during the 1920s.
  As I said, this isn't a problem so long as (1) the Jacksonians show a willingness to come back for a candidate other than
  Obama and/or (2) the suburbs continue their love affair with the Democrats. But we see indications in Virginia that the
  Jacksonian divorce may, in fact, be permanent. Creigh Deeds was from the western section of the state, and seemed — at
  least on paper — capable of remaking the Mark Warner map. It didn't happen, obviously. Let's look at how Virginia
  changed from Bush's 2000 election to Deeds' loss last week:
  The redder a county is, the more it moved toward the Republicans from 2000 to 2009; bluer counties moved toward
  Democrats.
  We see that McDonnell did as well as Bush did in the suburbs — but no better. Those pockets of white are the DC
  suburbs in the northeast, the Hampton Roads area in the southeast, and Richmond just to the north and west of Hampton
  Roads. Its rural Virginia — which is still about 1/3 of the electorate — that made the difference between Bush's 54% in
  2004 and McDonnell's 59% on Tuesday. Even with Obama off the ticket, and a much less cosmopolitan figure atop the
  ticket, rural Virginia went solidly Republican.
  We can take another angle here. Deeds and McDonnell squared off in a very close Attorney General race in 2005. Let's
  compare Deeds' 2005 showing to his 2009 performance. [NOTE: In this map, we look at "relative movement." Because
  everything in the state moved toward McDonnell, a map just showing "movement" would be solid dark red, and not of
  much use. So instead, if something moved more than 9 points toward McDonnell, it is colored a shade of red, if it moved
  less than 9 points toward McDonnell, it is blue. Think of this as showing the change in the counties' PVI].
  We see the same result. Just since 2005, rural Virginia has moved sharply against the Democrats. The suburbs haven't
  moved much at all, relative to the rest of the state, while the more heavily African American counties in the southern
  portion of the state have moved a few notches leftward (in absolute terms, they voted in 2009 as they had in 2005). This
  suggests lasting damage to the Democratic brand here that is not simply personal to Obama.
  Now let's look at how McDonnell did when compared to McCain in 2008. Again, because the movement here was so
  dramatic statewide, we need to isolate the biggest and smallest changes by looking only at "relative" shifts.
  The western counties of the state didn't shift much from 2008, but that's because they were already giving Republicans
  around 70% of the vote — there wasn't much room for Republican growth (and remember, "blue" in a relative map still
  means slight movement toward the Republican since 2008)! The real Republican gains over the past year have come in
  the DC exurbs, in the 1-95 corridor, and to a lesser extent in the Hampton Roads area.
  In other words, the Jacksonians aren't returning to the Democrats, at least in Virginia. Deeds might still have been able to
  win without them, but the Democrats are also showing weakness in the Virginia suburbs. In other words, two pieces of the
  Clinton-Warner coalition are starting to break away.
  This is a real problem for the Democrats. If the suburbanites and the Jacksonians move away from the party, there is
  very, very little left for them. And there's reason to think that the suburban weakness is real. Obama's fiscal policy, to
  make an understatement, hasn't been Clintonian. It may not be entirely his fault, but the $787 billion stimulus, the trillion
  dollar healthcare bill, the automobile bailout, and the budget showing trillion dollar deficits extending for the next decade
  make suburbanites shudder. They don't much like debt, and they intuit this spending is going to have to be paid for at
  some point — probably by them. Voters still give Obama some benefit of the doubt, as they do most Presidents in their first
  year, but they are becoming very, very worried, and probably don't put much stock in Candidate Obama's promise to
  enact a net spending cut any more.
  Democrats will doubtless chalk this up to Creigh Deeds' inept campaign. Deeds wasn't a great candidate, but when the
  mood of the country is starting to swing against your party, it is hard to run a good campaign. Jerry Kilgore found this out
  when he ran in a similar environment in 2005, and was reduced to attacking Tim Kaine for his religious views on the death
  penalty. And if you run the Deeds-McDonnell race in 2006 or 2008, I think its hard to argue McDonnell would win by 18
  points, even holding everything else equal.
  The other problem with this explanation is that we saw similar results replicated around the country. Most of the seats in
  the House of Delegates that the Democrats lost in Virginia, or came close to losing, were suburban. The Philly suburbs
  voted Republican for the state Supreme Court. Bergen County New Jersey didn't give the Republican 60% of the vote like
  it did in 1984, but Chris Christie nearly carried it, and even though he is significantly more conservative than Christie Todd
  Whitman or Tom Kean, he won the largest margin for a first-term Republican Governor since 1969. Conservative
  Republicans won elections in Westchester County, New York, and Republicans picked up two City Council seats on the
  outskirts of Queens. Republicans won back the Nassau County legislature -- the Democrats' capture of that body figures
  prominently in the introduction to Emerging Democratic Majority -- and nearly defeated the Democratic County Executive
  there with an obscure, underfunded candidate. In other words, in places that have never heard of Creigh Deeds or seen
  his attack ads on McDonell's thesis, the Democrats still lost suburban voters.
  States with a Democratic base of liberals, urbanites, and minority voters -- like California and New York -- haven't moved
  much against Democrats. Obama's polling numbers, as well as those of Democratic candidates for Governor and
  Senator, in classic "Emerging Democratic Majority" states like Colorado and Nevada are not looking good at all. And of
  course in Jacksonian states like Kentucky, he's below 40%.
  This doesn't mean that Democrats are doomed in 2010. An improved economy, Republican missteps, and a host of other
  factors could keep the band together for them. Maybe some of the more marginal voters that Obama brought to the polls
  to enact hope and change will return in 2010 to keep hope alive. But the personal nature of Obama's victory is starting to
  show its downside for downticket Democrats.
  The Clinton coalition is looking creaky. If Obama doesn't improve and the coalition comes apart, Democrats could find
  themselves weaker than they were even in the 1980s and 1990s.
  Sean Trende can be reached at strende@realclearpolitics.com.
  Page Printed from:
  http://www.realclearpolitics.comiarticles/2009111/13/can_the_clinton_coalition_survivethe_age_of_obama_99046
  .html at November 13, 2009 - 08:19:49 AM CST

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765732 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: sbwhoeop B6
  Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 9:32 AM
  To:
  Cc: Doug Band
  Subject: For H. And Doug, for WJC to ponder. Sid
  Hillary: This is the most provocative and significant analysis to come out of the recent election. Its author is a right-wing
  Republican lawyer based in Richmond who also writes a column for Human Events. I disagree with the ideological and
  partisan undercurrent of the piece, especially his overemphasis of the deficit as an overriding political factor rather than
  the administration's lack of achievable results so far in improving the living standards of ordinary people. There is no
  reason why the deficit shouldn't become a merely abstract factor once there are actual benefits delivered. The pattern of
  the past is that the deficit, the talisman of Hoover Republicans, moves only partisan Republicans and that Democrats
  ascend if the economy is progressing, its gains are widely spread and new social programs have favorable universal
  impact. That is not happening now. This analysis, therefore, may be portentous. Worth reading. The electoral maps of VA
  don't show up in the email but they are described. Sid
  Return to the Article
  November 13, 2009
  Can the Clinton Coalition Survive Obama?
  By Sean Trende
  John Judis and Ruy Teixeira's well-regarded 2002 work The Emerging Democratic Majority begins with a vignette set in
  Virginia. They tell the story of a telecom executive named Mark Warner, who runs a moderate campaign that appeals to
  upper-middle class suburbanites and working class rural voters, and manages to put together a winning coalition that, if
  imitated in other states, might put the Democrats in power for decades to come.
  Democrats did build coalitions similar to Warner's, and in fact had been doing so for the better part of a decade. Warner's
  coalition was essentially Bill Clinton's 1996 coalition. The coalition and brand that Clinton built was an extraordinarily
  successful one for Democrats, breaking the momentum of a resurgent GOP in 1996, and ultimately enabling the election
  of the most liberal President in American History last year.
  Given this background, it's only appropriate that the first tangible sign that this coalition is coming unglued has come in
  Virginia. Republican Bob McDonnell won the governorship with almost 59% of the vote — the highest percentage (though
  not the highest victory margin) for any governor since 1961. The entire Republican ticket won by similar margins, and the
  GOP picked up six seats in the General Assembly. It could have been even worse — five Democrats won their Assembly
  races by fewer than 1,000 votes.
  There are some superficial lessons to be drawn here. After last week's election, it's silly to argue that the GOP brand is
  too damaged for them to take advantage of Democratic weakness. And the Democrats' latest spin — that their weakness
  among Independents was simply a function of more Republicans calling themselves independents but retaining their
  Republican voting habits — puts the lie to the argument that Republicans' low self-identification is a salient factor in
  elections.
  But the most important lesson is this: while there's little predictive value in off-year elections, they do provide snapshots of
  the mood of the electorate, and the present state of political coalitions. Given Virginia's primacy in the story of Democratic
  coalition building, it gives us a good snapshot of the state of that coalition. And it's not a pretty one for Democrats.
  The historical base of the Democratic Party for two centuries has long been what Jay Cost and I call Jacksonians:
  Culturally conservative, hawkish, and populist whites located throughout the South and Border states. They began
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765732 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765732 Date: 07/31/2015
  breaking away from Democrats in the 1950s and 1960s — their reaction to the Party's embrace of unions, blacks and
  liberals is a story is so well known there's no need to rehash it here.
  But this group remained at least in play for the Democrats. Clinton inherited a coalition consisting of minorities, liberals,
  urban voters, and a decent remnant of Jacksonian voters in the Ohio River Valley and the South, who still preferred a
  moderate-to-conservative Democrat to a Republican. This coalition became a majority coalition when Clinton used a
  combination of fiscal conservatism and social moderation to bring suburban voters on board. This was a huge innovation
  for Democrats; suburbs like Nassau County, NY, Orange County, CA and Fairfax County, VA had fueled the rise of the
  Republican parties in those states. Clinton moved them substantially toward his side. This coalition allowed him to win by
  eight points in 1996; absent Perot and a last-minute fundraising scandal, he probably would have won by more.
  Clinton intuited that suburban voters are, generally speaking, culturally cosmopolitan — they don't like it when you call
  someone "macaca," and aren't crazy about the religious right. But they're generally not particularly socially liberal either,
  and are fans of "law and order." They like taxes low and appreciate economic growth, but like good schools and a clean
  environment. Having to balance a bunch of spending priorities with somewhat limited income in their daily lives, balanced
  budgets are the ultimate "good government" indicator for these voters.
  Clinton delivered on all of these issues, keeping tax increases fairly small, and balancing the budget for much of his term.
  In so doing — and this is very important — he re-branded the Democrats as the party of fiscal responsibility, economic
  growth, moderate taxes, and smart government. In other words, he finally shed the "Carter" label for the Democrats. This,
  in turn, made it plausible for his much more liberal heirs to benefit from this presumption of competence for Democrats -
  one that they probably would not have enjoyed without him.
  George W. Bush's presidency, in turn, was an upper-middle class suburbanite's nightmare. An aggressive social agenda,
  a fiscal trainwreck, two poorly-managed wars and a financial collapse later, these suburban voters trended even more
  heavily Democratic then they were in the Clinton era. By 2008, Democrats held most of the suburban districts around ,
  major metropolitan areas, and were threatening in the exurbs. The right Democratic candidate probably could have put
  together a massive 2008 Presidential majority, combining minorities, liberals, Jacksonians, Catholics, and suburbanites.
  The mood of the country was certainly right for a 1920/1932/1952/1980 result.
  But the Democrats nominated Barack Obama. The party's grip among Jacksonians had weakened since Clinton left the
  stage, but they abandoned Obama completely. Jay Cost and I have detailed this here. This movement is why Obama
  received 53% of the vote, instead of the 60% or so we might expect given the voters' attitude toward Bush's Presidency.
  Obama was able to win even without this branch of the Democratic party because he generated such intensity among the
  remaining portions of his base. In other words, while his base wasn't as broad as Clinton's, it was deeper. Faced with
  vanishing 401ks and home values, and disgust with Bush's presidency, suburbanites flocked to him. Liberals were
  enthralled to finally elect one of their own. And minorities turned out heavily for the opportunity to elect the first black
  President.
  But this presents a problem. You only get to elect the first black President once, and governing a coalition of suburbanites,
  poor blacks, and upper class liberals isn't easy. It is hard to keep that enthusiasm up. And with the Jacksonian wing of the
  party gone, if that enthusiasm dissipates, or if one of the coalition groups becomes disgruntled and starts to shuffle out the
  door, the party isn't left with much.
  We see a microcosm of this story in last Tuesday's elections, especially in Virginia. Let's backtrack to 2001, and look at
  the counties that Mark Warner won.
  The coalition that Warner built was similar to Clinton's. To oversimplify some, it blended together rural Democrats in the
  mining counties in the west of the state, college voters around Charlottesville, and black voters combined with rural whites
  in the south central and southeastern portion of the state with suburban voters in the northeast. It was a diverse coalition,
  but it worked.
  Now let's compare Warner's map with Obama's map in 2008:
  The suburbs stayed in the Democrat's camp, for reasons discussed above. But look what happens in the west! That area
  becomes solidly Republican. Buchanan and Dickenson counties in the Virginia panhandle voted for Dukakis, Mondale,
  and Adlai Stevenson (twice). Obama became only the second Democrat to lose these counties since the UMW moved in
  during the 1920s.
  As I said, this isn't a problem so long as (1) the Jacksonians show a willingness to come back for a candidate other than
  Obama and/or (2) the suburbs continue their love affair with the Democrats. But we see indications in Virginia that the
  Jacksonian divorce may, in fact, be permanent. Creigh Deeds was from the western section of the state, and seemed — at
  least on paper — capable of remaking the Mark Warner map. It didn't happen, obviously. Let's look at how Virginia
  changed from Bush's 2000 election to Deeds' loss last week:
  The redder a county is, the more it moved toward the Republicans from 2000 to 2009; bluer counties moved toward
  Democrats.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765732 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765732 Date: 07/31/2015
  We see that McDonnell did as well as Bush did in the suburbs — but no better. Those pockets of white are the DC
  suburbs in the northeast, the Hampton Roads area in the southeast, and Richmond just to the north and west of Hampton
  Roads. Its rural Virginia — which is still about 1/3 of the electorate — that made the difference between Bush's 54% in
  2004 and McDonnell's 59% on Tuesday. Even with Obama off the ticket, and a much less cosmopolitan figure atop the
  ticket, rural Virginia went solidly Republican.
  We can take another angle here. Deeds and McDonnell squared off in a very close Attorney General race in 2005. Let's
  compare Deeds' 2005 showing to his 2009 performance. [NOTE: In this map, we look at "relative movement." Because
  everything in the state moved toward McDonnell, a map just showing "movement" would be solid dark red, and not of
  much use. So instead, if something moved more than 9 points toward McDonnell, it is colored a shade of red, if it moved
  less than 9 points toward McDonnell, it is blue. Think of this as showing the change in the counties' PVI].
  We see the same result. Just since 2005, rural Virginia has moved sharply against the Democrats. The suburbs haven't
  moved much at all, relative to the rest of the state, while the more heavily African American counties in the southern
  portion of the state have moved a few notches leftward (in absolute terms, they voted in 2009 as they had in 2005). This
  suggests lasting damage to the Democratic brand here that is not simply personal to Obama.
  Now let's look at how McDonnell did when compared to McCain in 2008. Again, because the movement here was so
  dramatic statewide, we need to isolate the biggest and smallest changes by looking only at "relative" shifts.
  The western counties of the state didn't shift much from 2008, but that's because they were already giving Republicans
  around 70% of the vote — there wasn't much room for Republican growth (and remember, "blue" in a relative map still
  means slight movement toward the Republican since 2008)! The real Republican gains over the past year have come in
  the DC exurbs, in the 1-95 corridor, and to a lesser extent in the Hampton Roads area.
  In other words, the Jacksonians aren't returning to the Democrats, at least in Virginia. Deeds might still have been able to
  win without them, but the Democrats are also showing weakness in the Virginia suburbs. In other words, two pieces of the
  Clinton-Warner coalition are starting to break away.
  This is a real problem for the Democrats. If the suburbanites and the Jacksonians move away from the party, there is
  very, very little left for them. And there's reason to think that the suburban weakness is real. Obama's fiscal policy, to
  make an understatement, hasn't been Clintonian. It may not be entirely his fault, but the $787 billion stimulus, the trillion
  dollar healthcare bill, the automobile bailout, and the budget showing trillion dollar deficits extending for the next decade
  make suburbanites shudder. They don't much like debt, and they intuit this spending is going to have to be paid for at
  some point — probably by them. Voters still give Obama some benefit of the doubt, as they do most Presidents in their first
  year, but they are becoming very, very worried, and probably don't put much stock in Candidate Obama's promise to
  enact a net spending cut any more.
  Democrats will doubtless chalk this up to Creigh Deeds' inept campaign. Deeds wasn't a great candidate, but when the
  mood of the country is starting to swing against your party, it is hard to run a good campaign. Jerry Kilgore found this out
  when he ran in a similar environment in 2005, and was reduced to attacking Tim Kaine for his religious views on the death
  penalty. And if you run the Deeds-McDonnell race in 2006 or 2008, I think its hard to argue McDonnell would win by 18
  points, even holding everything else equal.
  The other problem with this explanation is that we saw similar results replicated around the country. Most of the seats in
  the House of Delegates that the Democrats lost in Virginia, or came close to losing, were suburban. The Philly suburbs
  voted Republican for the state Supreme Court. Bergen County New Jersey didn't give the Republican 60% of the vote like
  it did in 1984, but Chris Christie nearly carried it, and even though he is significantly more conservative than Christie Todd
  Whitman or Tom Kean, he won the largest margin for a first-term Republican Governor since 1969. Conservative
  Republicans won elections in Westchester County, New York, and Republicans picked up two City Council seats on the
  outskirts of Queens. Republicans won back the Nassau County legislature -- the Democrats' capture of that body figures
  prominently in the introduction to Emerging Democratic Majority -- and nearly defeated the Democratic County Executive
  there with an obscure, underfunded candidate. In other words, in places that have never heard of Creigh Deeds or seen
  his attack ads on McDonell's thesis, the Democrats still lost suburban voters.
  States with a Democratic base of liberals, urbanites, and minority voters -- like California and New York -- haven't moved
  much against Democrats. Obama's polling numbers, as well as those of Democratic candidates for Governor and
  Senator, in classic "Emerging Democratic Majority" states like Colorado and Nevada are not looking good at all. And of
  course in Jacksonian states like Kentucky, he's below 40%.
  This doesn't mean that Democrats are doomed in 2010. An improved economy, Republican missteps, and a host of other
  factors could keep the band together for them. Maybe some of the more marginal voters that Obama brought to the polls
  to enact hope and change will return in 2010 to keep hope alive. But the personal nature of Obama's victory is starting to
  show its downside for downticket Democrats.
  The Clinton coalition is looking creaky. If Obama doesn't improve and the coalition comes apart, Democrats could find
  themselves weaker than they were even in the 1980s and 1990s.
  Sean Trende can be reached at strende@realclearpolitics.com.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765732 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765732 Date: 07/31/2015
  Page Printed from:
  http://www.realclearpolitics.comiarticles/2009111/13/can_the_clinton_coalition_survivethe_age_of_obama_99046
  .html at November 13, 2009 - 08:19:49 AM CST
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765732 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765733
MetadataSubject: YANG CAN TAKE CALL AT 9 AM TODAY? OK?
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-23T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_049/DOC_0C05765733/C05765733.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, November 23, 2009 4:03 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765733
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765733 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE
  IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 4:03 AM
  To: H
  Subject Yang can take call at 9am today? Ok?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765733 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765739
MetadataSubject: PREBRIEF
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Valmoro, Lona J
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-23T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_049/DOC_0C05765739/C05765739.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Prebrief
ExtractedFrom: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, November 23, 2009 5:51 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765739
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Yes
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765739 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE
  IN FULL
  From: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 5:51 AM
  To:
  Subject: Re: Prebrief
  Yes
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Valmoro, Lona J
  Sent: Sun Nov 22 22:04:55 2009
  Subject: Prebrief
  Will Eikenberry be there?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765739 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765741
MetadataSubject: ADMIRAL PLATT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-13T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765741/C05765741.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Admiral Platt
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC©state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, November 13, 2009 3:39 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765741
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Ihave a copy.
RawText:
  B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765741 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC©state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 3:39 PM
  To:
  Subject RE: Admiral Platt
  Ihave a copy.
  Original Message--
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 6:59 AM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Fw: Admiral Platt
  See if you can get a copy of the intro Navy Sec Mabus gave me that's referred to below.
  Original Message
  From: Burns Strider
  To: H
  Sent: Wed Nov 11 16:38:01 2009
  Subject: Admiral Platt
  I have breakfast this morning with Adm. Platt at the Army/Navy Club... he said he attended the NY event launching the
  new vessel... he applauds your comments... and noted that the Secretary of the Navy gave you quite the stirring intro...
  the Admiral sends his finest to you...
  Burns Strider
  Founding Partner
  The Eleison Group
  Join Me on Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1279552305&ref=name>
  Follow Me on Twitter <http://twitter.com/BStrider>
  Visit The Eleison Group Website <http://www.eleisongroup.com/>
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765741 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765741 Date: 07/31/2015
  Visit Pea Ridge Confidential, My Personal Blog <http://pearidgeconfidential.blogspot.com/>
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765741 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765742
MetadataSubject: FW:
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-13T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765742/C05765742.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedCc: Lindsey, Bruce; Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765742
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Friday, November 13, 2009 4:06 PM
  H
  FW:
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  fyi

RawText:
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Friday, November 13, 2009 4:06 PM
  H
  FW:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765742 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  fyi
  From: Lyons, James M.
  Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 3:45 PM
  To: Band, Doug
  Cc: Lindsey, Bruce; Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject:
  Hope you are all well and off the road (for a while anyway).
  James M. Lyons, Attorney-at-Law
  Rothgerber Johnson & Lyons LLP 'One Tabor Center, Suite 3000
  1200 Seventeenth Street I Denver, CO 80202 I
  Direct I Main 303.623.9000 I Fax 303.623.9222
  E-mail: I Website: www.rothgerber.corn
  - - -
  The information contained in this electronic communication and any document attached hereto or transmitted herewith is attorney-client privileged, work product,
  or otherwise confidential and intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or
  the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any examination, use, dissemination, distribution, or
  copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by
  telephone or reply e-mail and destroy this communication. Thank you.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765742 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765743
MetadataSubject: SHE'S ASKING IF CRAIG HAS AN UPDATE.
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-13T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765743/C05765743.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: She's asking if craig has an update.
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, November 13, 2009 10:08 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765743
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765743 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 10:08 PM
  To:
  Subject Fw: She's asking if craig has an update.
  Original Message
  From: Kelly, Craig A
  To: Abedin, Huma; Shannon, Thomas A; Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Fri Nov 13 21:27:54 2009
  Subject: Re: She's asking if craig has an update.
  Huma: I was just typing one. Not surprisingly, the hardliner supporters of the regime, when they got wind of the deal
  today, mounted a counterattack, urging M not to leave. We are pushing back as we speak, and our de facto sources
  who support the deal are working to nail it down.
  We are making the point that M's agreement to us to step aside fueled our successful efforts over last couple days to
  keep Euros and many Latins in the game but they need a change on the ground to support elections. M cannot pull
  rug out now. Moreover, we said since the de factos claim moral authority (over Zelaya) for carrying out the Oct 30
  Accord, they cannot go back on this deal with us.
  Will give you updates. I have an open ticket to go back down at any moment if necessary. Will let you know if an S call
  would help.
  Best,
  ck
  Original Message ----
  From: Abedin, Huma
  To: Kelly, Craig A; Shannon, Thomas A; Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Fri Nov 13 21:09:40 2009
  Subject: She's asking if craig has an update.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765743 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765744
MetadataSubject: UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-13T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765744/C05765744.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Update
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, November 13, 2009 11:35 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765744
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765744 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 11:35 PM
  To:
  Subject Fw: Update
  Original Message ----
  From: Kelly, Craig A
  To: Abedin, Huma; Sullivan, Jacob J; Burns, William J; Steinberg, James B; Valenzuela, Arturo A; Shannon, Thomas A
  Sent: Fri Nov 13 23:12:29 2009
  Subject: Update
  Huma/Jake:
  Just got further updates from a de facto rep and Amb Llorens. The de facto authorities have decided to turn this
  exercise into a sort of loya girga to get buy-in for M's departure. This evening the discussions included religious groups
  and business leaders. Tomorrow government officials and others. My de facto contact says results tonight were good
  although it was not easy for many to accept the logic behind M's exit. He said the US once again has been the catalyst
  for movement in Honduras. Thinking is now for a Monday announcement.
  We'll stay on it and update you.
  ck
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765744 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765746
MetadataSubject: LEFT MESSAGE FOR FUNES
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-14T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765746/C05765746.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Left message for funes.
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 10:44 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765746
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765746 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 10:44 AM
  To:
  Subject: Left message for funes.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765746 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765758
MetadataSubject: KURT IS SLEEPING. HE ANSWERED THE PHONE TO SAY H E WAS SLEEPING AND ASKED TO CHECK IN TOMORROW
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-14T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765758/C05765758.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Kurt is sleeping. He answered the phone to say he was sleeping and asked to check in
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 11:42 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765758
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: tomorrow.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765758 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 11:42 AM
  To: H
  Subject: Kurt is sleeping. He answered the phone to say he was sleeping and asked to check in
  tomorrow.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765758 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765760
MetadataSubject: GATES OFFICE JUST CALLED TO SAY THEY NEEDED CALL TO BE SECURE. WE WILL DO AT7:30.
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-14T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765760/C05765760.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 12:19 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765760
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765760 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 12:19 PM
  To: H
  Subject Gates office just called to say they needed call to be secure. We will do at7:30.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765760 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765761
MetadataSubject: FYI: LES GELB: "AMATEUR HOUR AT THE WHITE HOUSE"
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-23T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_049/DOC_0C05765761/C05765761.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: FYI: Les Gelb: "Amateur Hour at the White House"
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedCc: MilIsCD@state.gov
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, November 23, 2009 12:00 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765761
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-11-22/think-before-you-travel/?cid=hp:mainpromo2
  The White House might try to blame the State Department (such an easy and delicious target) for the missteps. But
  State's role in the conceptual planning of the trip was not central, and the department's senior Asia hand, Kurt Campbell,
  surely knew better. It's also hard to tar the National Security Council's own senior Asia expert, Jeff Bader, another pro like
  Campbell. Perhaps even higher officials at the NSC dropped the ball. Perhaps Mr. Obama might take responsibility
  himself, as President Kennedy did after the Bay of Pigs fiasco in 1961. Now, that would truly clear the air—and open the
  door to some obvious and necessary changes in the administration's decision-making machinery. Every decision, large
  and small, is shaped and made by the president himself and enforced by Denis McDonough, a deputy NSC adviser and
  the administration's Lord High Executioner. Does Obama get enough pushback? Is he hearing a range of views? Can he
  see that his powerful intellect might profit from bowing to the voices of experience? If Mr. Obama reflects on the Asia
  journey and other mishaps, he might loosen the reins and bring in additional policy and diplomatic pros as inside
  counselors or outside advisers.
  Amateur Hour at the White House
  by Leslie H. Gelb
  November 22, 2009 I 10:50pm
  The Asia trip was not worth Obama's time. Leslie H. Gelb on why the president should shake up his
  foreign policy team—and make sure the deals are done before he leaves home.
  President Obama's nine-day trip to Asia is worth a look back to fix two potent problems, past and future. First, the trip's
  limited value per day of presidential effort suggests a disturbing amateurishness in managing America's power. On top of
  the inexcusably clumsy review of Afghan policy and the fumbling of Mideast negotiations, the message for Mr. Obama
  should be clear: He should stare hard at the skills of his foreign-policy team and, more so, at his own dominant role in
  decision-making. Something is awry somewhere, and he's got to fix it.
  Secondly, the Asia trip presented an important opportunity to carve out a new American leadership role in the world's
  most dynamic economic region, and Mr. Obama missed it. He only scratched the surface in his calls for multilateralism
  and mutual understanding. He needs to paint pictures of how Washington will help solve regional security and trade
  problems. Otherwise, most Asian nations will continue their unwanted drift toward China and away from the United States.
  A meditation on his journey should start by forgetting half of the last week's commentary. Unbelievably, some criticized
  Obama for not getting China to "throw its weight around." What Asian leaders want that? None that I know of. Others
  lamented that Obama couldn't make "demands" on China anymore. The presumption here is that China is now king, and
  that Washington can no longer have its way with Beijing. The facts are that Washington never did boss Beijing around,
  and that China is not now ruling the roost (more accurately, it's sitting on its own eggs). Others contended that Obama
  continued his pattern of trashing America's friends and coddling its authoritarian enemies like China. It's hard to stomach
  this nonsense from the same conservative crowd that forever praised George W. Bush for accommodating China and
  alienating America's allies.
  Some analysts played fair and acknowledged that administration officials tried to tell reporters not to expect "deliverables"
  on the trip, and to see the journey more as a recognition of Asia's new importance and America's desire for a new co-
  operative spirit. That's a commendable thought, but hardly justification for almost two weeks of the president's time (when
  you consider preparations)— especially when he's got a tanking economy, health-care reform woes, and decisions to
  make on Afghanistan. Presidents take trips like this one only when they need breakthroughs and accomplishments on
  certain issues that can't be agreed on without the pressure of an impending presidential visit. In fact, most presidents
  wouldn't even commit to trips abroad without knowing that key deals would be finally agreed on and announced during the
  visit itself. The prospective visit is the power jackhammer to nail down the deals. Just take a gander at trips planned for
  Richard Nixon by Henry Kissinger or for George H. W. Bush by James Baker.
  Obama's travels were a chance to settle or make concrete progress on thorny issues like greenhouse-gas emissions, and
  the fate of U.S. bases on Okinawa, which the new Japanese government insists on moving. It was time to announce ways
  to gain fixes on the U.S.-South Korean trade treaty, long stalled in Congress. It was a moment to show that Beijing would
  actually make some mutually beneficial compromises on exchange rates or economic sanctions against Iranian and North
  Korean nuclear programs. Absent guarantees of progress on issues such as these, Mr. Obama should have taken a well-
  deserved vacation in Hawaii.
  Matters were made worse on the scene. It was not good optics for Obama to bow to Japan's emperor. He seems to do
  this stuff spontaneously and inexplicably, as with his bow to the Saudi King some months ago. And it was truly unfortunate
  that Obama and his aides didn't flatly insist that he be allowed to address the Chinese people directly on television and
  meet with non-stacked Chinese groups—as has been the case during previous presidential visits. Beijing's leaders
  obviously didn't feel confident enough of their own standing at home to give the popular Mr. Obama such access. But he
  and his team should have made it a precondition of the visit. Its absence left an unhappy taste.
  The Asia trip presented an important opportunity to carve out a new American leadership role in the world's most dynamic
  economic region, and Mr. Obama missed it.
  The White House might try to blame the State Department (such an easy and delicious target) for the missteps. But
  State's role in the conceptual planning of the trip was not central, and the department's senior Asia hand, Kurt Campbell,
  surely knew better. It's also hard to tar the National Security Council's own senior Asia expert, Jeff Bader, another pro like
  Campbell. Perhaps even higher officials at the NSC dropped the ball. Perhaps Mr. Obama might take responsibility
  himself, as President Kennedy did after the Bay of Pigs fiasco in 1961. Now, that would truly clear the air—and open the
  door to some obvious and necessary changes in the administration's decision-making machinery. Every decision, large
  and small, is shaped and made by the president himself and enforced by Denis McDonough, a deputy NSC adviser and
  the administration's Lord High Executioner. Does Obama get enough pushback? Is he hearing a range of views? Can he
  see that his powerful intellect might profit from bowing to the voices of experience? If Mr. Obama reflects on the Asia
  journey and other mishaps, he might loosen the reins and bring in additional policy and diplomatic pros as inside
  counselors or outside advisers.
  If most Asia hands inside and outside the government had designed the Obama trip, here's what they would have
  advised: Go beyond the usual and trite message of building mutual understanding and cooperation, and stop invoking the
  God of Multilateralism without spelling out America's leadership role. Asia is now overflowing with multilateral
  organizations. Washington is a member of a few key ones, like Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation and the Asian
  Development Bank. But that has little to do with other new and key groupings such as the Shanghai Cooperation
  Organization (Russia, China, Uzbekistan, etc.) and ASEAN, the association of Southeast Asian nations. Asian nations are
  increasingly organizing themselves into these groups, and Washington hasn't really figured out its role. Most Asian
  nations want that role to be a prominent one—in fact, the leadership position. They're afraid of China, afraid that China
  won't be as attentive to their concerns in the future as America was in the past. At the same time, they don't want
  Washington to come into these groupings and cause problems with Beijing. They want Washington to figure out a
  leadership position constructed on the proven American ability to help solve common problems in the common interest.
  They want an America they remember, one that can get things done and doesn't let problems fester.
  That U.S. policy was the main missing ingredient on Obama's trip. Washington played architect and solidified its
  leadership in Europe after World War II with NATO, the Marshall Plan, and various trade and economic organizations like
  the World Bank. Asian nations are yearning for the same kind of creativity today from a brilliant American president in the
  new Pacific Era.
  Leslie H. Gelb, a former New York Times columnist and senior government official, is author of Power Rules: How
  Common Sense Can Rescue American Foreign Policy (HarperCollins 2009), a book that shows how to think about and
  use power in the 21st century. He is president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations.
  For more of The Daily Beast, become a fan on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorialathedailvbeast.com.
  http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-11-22/think-before-you-travel/p/

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765761 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  PART B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 12:00 PM
  To:
  Cc: MilIsCD@state.gov
  Subject: FYI: Les Gelb: "Amateur Hour at the White House"
  http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-11-22/think-before-you-travel/?cid=hp:mainpromo2
  The White House might try to blame the State Department (such an easy and delicious target) for the missteps. But
  State's role in the conceptual planning of the trip was not central, and the department's senior Asia hand, Kurt Campbell,
  surely knew better. It's also hard to tar the National Security Council's own senior Asia expert, Jeff Bader, another pro like
  Campbell. Perhaps even higher officials at the NSC dropped the ball. Perhaps Mr. Obama might take responsibility
  himself, as President Kennedy did after the Bay of Pigs fiasco in 1961. Now, that would truly clear the air—and open the
  door to some obvious and necessary changes in the administration's decision-making machinery. Every decision, large
  and small, is shaped and made by the president himself and enforced by Denis McDonough, a deputy NSC adviser and
  the administration's Lord High Executioner. Does Obama get enough pushback? Is he hearing a range of views? Can he
  see that his powerful intellect might profit from bowing to the voices of experience? If Mr. Obama reflects on the Asia
  journey and other mishaps, he might loosen the reins and bring in additional policy and diplomatic pros as inside
  counselors or outside advisers.
  Amateur Hour at the White House
  by Leslie H. Gelb
  November 22, 2009 I 10:50pm
  The Asia trip was not worth Obama's time. Leslie H. Gelb on why the president should shake up his
  foreign policy team—and make sure the deals are done before he leaves home.
  President Obama's nine-day trip to Asia is worth a look back to fix two potent problems, past and future. First, the trip's
  limited value per day of presidential effort suggests a disturbing amateurishness in managing America's power. On top of
  the inexcusably clumsy review of Afghan policy and the fumbling of Mideast negotiations, the message for Mr. Obama
  should be clear: He should stare hard at the skills of his foreign-policy team and, more so, at his own dominant role in
  decision-making. Something is awry somewhere, and he's got to fix it.
  Secondly, the Asia trip presented an important opportunity to carve out a new American leadership role in the world's
  most dynamic economic region, and Mr. Obama missed it. He only scratched the surface in his calls for multilateralism
  and mutual understanding. He needs to paint pictures of how Washington will help solve regional security and trade
  problems. Otherwise, most Asian nations will continue their unwanted drift toward China and away from the United States.
  A meditation on his journey should start by forgetting half of the last week's commentary. Unbelievably, some criticized
  Obama for not getting China to "throw its weight around." What Asian leaders want that? None that I know of. Others
  lamented that Obama couldn't make "demands" on China anymore. The presumption here is that China is now king, and
  that Washington can no longer have its way with Beijing. The facts are that Washington never did boss Beijing around,
  and that China is not now ruling the roost (more accurately, it's sitting on its own eggs). Others contended that Obama
  continued his pattern of trashing America's friends and coddling its authoritarian enemies like China. It's hard to stomach
  this nonsense from the same conservative crowd that forever praised George W. Bush for accommodating China and
  alienating America's allies.
  Some analysts played fair and acknowledged that administration officials tried to tell reporters not to expect "deliverables"
  on the trip, and to see the journey more as a recognition of Asia's new importance and America's desire for a new co-
  operative spirit. That's a commendable thought, but hardly justification for almost two weeks of the president's time (when
  you consider preparations)— especially when he's got a tanking economy, health-care reform woes, and decisions to
  make on Afghanistan. Presidents take trips like this one only when they need breakthroughs and accomplishments on
  certain issues that can't be agreed on without the pressure of an impending presidential visit. In fact, most presidents
  wouldn't even commit to trips abroad without knowing that key deals would be finally agreed on and announced during the
  visit itself. The prospective visit is the power jackhammer to nail down the deals. Just take a gander at trips planned for
  Richard Nixon by Henry Kissinger or for George H. W. Bush by James Baker.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765761 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765761 Date: 07/31/2015
  Obama's travels were a chance to settle or make concrete progress on thorny issues like greenhouse-gas emissions, and
  the fate of U.S. bases on Okinawa, which the new Japanese government insists on moving. It was time to announce ways
  to gain fixes on the U.S.-South Korean trade treaty, long stalled in Congress. It was a moment to show that Beijing would
  actually make some mutually beneficial compromises on exchange rates or economic sanctions against Iranian and North
  Korean nuclear programs. Absent guarantees of progress on issues such as these, Mr. Obama should have taken a well-
  deserved vacation in Hawaii.
  Matters were made worse on the scene. It was not good optics for Obama to bow to Japan's emperor. He seems to do
  this stuff spontaneously and inexplicably, as with his bow to the Saudi King some months ago. And it was truly unfortunate
  that Obama and his aides didn't flatly insist that he be allowed to address the Chinese people directly on television and
  meet with non-stacked Chinese groups—as has been the case during previous presidential visits. Beijing's leaders
  obviously didn't feel confident enough of their own standing at home to give the popular Mr. Obama such access. But he
  and his team should have made it a precondition of the visit. Its absence left an unhappy taste.
  The Asia trip presented an important opportunity to carve out a new American leadership role in the world's most dynamic
  economic region, and Mr. Obama missed it.
  The White House might try to blame the State Department (such an easy and delicious target) for the missteps. But
  State's role in the conceptual planning of the trip was not central, and the department's senior Asia hand, Kurt Campbell,
  surely knew better. It's also hard to tar the National Security Council's own senior Asia expert, Jeff Bader, another pro like
  Campbell. Perhaps even higher officials at the NSC dropped the ball. Perhaps Mr. Obama might take responsibility
  himself, as President Kennedy did after the Bay of Pigs fiasco in 1961. Now, that would truly clear the air—and open the
  door to some obvious and necessary changes in the administration's decision-making machinery. Every decision, large
  and small, is shaped and made by the president himself and enforced by Denis McDonough, a deputy NSC adviser and
  the administration's Lord High Executioner. Does Obama get enough pushback? Is he hearing a range of views? Can he
  see that his powerful intellect might profit from bowing to the voices of experience? If Mr. Obama reflects on the Asia
  journey and other mishaps, he might loosen the reins and bring in additional policy and diplomatic pros as inside
  counselors or outside advisers.
  If most Asia hands inside and outside the government had designed the Obama trip, here's what they would have
  advised: Go beyond the usual and trite message of building mutual understanding and cooperation, and stop invoking the
  God of Multilateralism without spelling out America's leadership role. Asia is now overflowing with multilateral
  organizations. Washington is a member of a few key ones, like Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation and the Asian
  Development Bank. But that has little to do with other new and key groupings such as the Shanghai Cooperation
  Organization (Russia, China, Uzbekistan, etc.) and ASEAN, the association of Southeast Asian nations. Asian nations are
  increasingly organizing themselves into these groups, and Washington hasn't really figured out its role. Most Asian
  nations want that role to be a prominent one—in fact, the leadership position. They're afraid of China, afraid that China
  won't be as attentive to their concerns in the future as America was in the past. At the same time, they don't want
  Washington to come into these groupings and cause problems with Beijing. They want Washington to figure out a
  leadership position constructed on the proven American ability to help solve common problems in the common interest.
  They want an America they remember, one that can get things done and doesn't let problems fester.
  That U.S. policy was the main missing ingredient on Obama's trip. Washington played architect and solidified its
  leadership in Europe after World War II with NATO, the Marshall Plan, and various trade and economic organizations like
  the World Bank. Asian nations are yearning for the same kind of creativity today from a brilliant American president in the
  new Pacific Era.
  Leslie H. Gelb, a former New York Times columnist and senior government official, is author of Power Rules: How
  Common Sense Can Rescue American Foreign Policy (HarperCollins 2009), a book that shows how to think about and
  use power in the 21st century. He is president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations.
  For more of The Daily Beast, become a fan on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
  For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorialathedailvbeast.com.
  http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-11-22/think-before-you-travel/p/
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765761 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765762
MetadataSubject: LAST THOUGHTS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-14T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765762/C05765762.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Last thoughts
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MilIsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 3:50 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765762
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Let me know when you are up
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765762 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MilIsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 3:50 PM
  To:
  Subject Fw: Last thoughts
  Let me know when you are up
  Original Message ----
  From: Shannon, Thomas A
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Abedin, Huma; Sullivan, Jacob
  Sent: Sat Nov 14 08:43:30 2009
  Subject: Last thoughts
  I want to thank all three of you for the tremendous support you have given me and WHA since the beginning of the
  Obama Administration. I am especially grateful to the Secretary for the confidence she has shown in me, and her
  willingness to make me part of her team. I consider this an enormous honor and I hope that I have met her
  expectations. I look forward to continuing to be part of her team from Brazil.
  I am preparing a "Last Thoughts" paper for the Secretary, which will look back over the past ten months, identify
  accomplishments, and point toward what I think needs to come next. I will share this paper with Arturo.
  Regarding Honduras, Craig did heroic work there this week, and we are moving toward a potentially big step by
  Micheletti that would open space for many of our allies to support the elections. As we move forward, it is important to
  note that the solution to the crisis is becoming more and more Honduran with each step in the process. This is a good
  thing, because it increases the chances that the resolution will be peaceful, enduring, and a platform for the political
  reforms that must come next.
  It is worth highlighting that the Secretary, through her outreach to both sides and her clear commitment to the future of
  Honduran democracy, has positioned us as an honest broker in this dispute. The only honest broker. Everyone one else
  in this drama -- from Insulza to the Brazilians to the Albinos -- has other agendas and motives in play. In this regard, we
  are the only hope of the Honduran people. The internal dialogue taking place, within the de facto regime, among its
  supporters, and between the Micheletti and Zelaya camps, is the product of our engagement. No one else could have
  done this. I urge that you keep this in mind as we move forward and as we consider how we will support the November
  29 elections.
  Finally, I leave behind a great Bureau. I believe it is the best in the State Department. Craig and the other DASes are
  superb, and I believe we have an extraordinary cadre of Ambassadors. This is a huge resource for the Secretary and the
  President. Use it.
  Again, my deepest thanks to you and the Secretary.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765762 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765763
MetadataSubject: REMINDER
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-14T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765763/C05765763.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Reminder
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 5:00 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765763
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  roy spence asked if u would say hello and take a picture with his friends. Its not john wren but someone else who works
  at omni corn and his wife. Can we do later today in lobby on way out to airport?
  Also, cathy hall is in town too. Also asking if she can say hello and thought we could do the same. What do u think?

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765763 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 5:00 PM
  To: H
  Subject: Reminder
  roy spence asked if u would say hello and take a picture with his friends. Its not john wren but someone else who works
  at omni corn and his wife. Can we do later today in lobby on way out to airport?
  Also, cathy hall is in town too. Also asking if she can say hello and thought we could do the same. What do u think?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765763 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765765
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Tauscher, Ellen O
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-15T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765765/C05765765.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765765
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Tauscher, Ellen 0 <TauscherE0@state.gov>
  Sunday, November 15, 2009 12:17 PM
  H B6
  Hillary! Thank you so much. How fabulous you were on Meet the Press. I'm so proud of you. I'm in Prague on my way to
  Ankara Tuesday. Started off in New Delhi on Thursday and yes, Jim will be with us at your house for dinner Friday night.
  Please stay safe on your travels and I'm so thrilled to work for you.
  Best,
  Ellen

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765765 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Tauscher, Ellen 0 <TauscherE0@state.gov>
  Sunday, November 15, 2009 12:17 PM
  H B6
  Hillary! Thank you so much. How fabulous you were on Meet the Press. I'm so proud of you. I'm in Prague on my way to
  Ankara Tuesday. Started off in New Delhi on Thursday and yes, Jim will be with us at your house for dinner Friday night.
  Please stay safe on your travels and I'm so thrilled to work for you.
  Best,
  Ellen
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Tauscher, Ellen 0
  Sent: Sun Nov 15 12:01:49 2009
  Subject:
  Ellen--
  HappyHappy from Shanghai! Can't wait to catch up in person at the retreat on Friday. Is your husband coming to the
  dinner at my house that night? Safe travels to you too! Hillary
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765765 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765766
MetadataSubject: HONDURAS UPDATE SAT 10:00 PM EST
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-14T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765766/C05765766.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Honduras Update Sat 10:00 pm EST
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 10:22 PM.
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765766
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765766 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 10:22 PM.
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Honduras Update Sat 10:00 pm EST
  Original Message
  From: Kelly, Craig A
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma; Burns, William J; Steinberg, James B
  Sent: Sat Nov 14 22:15:24 2009
  Subject: Honduras Update Sat 10:00 pm EST
  To All:
  The de facto authorities' consultations continued today -- with government agencies, Congress and judicial branch. The
  meetings just wrapped up. Our sources tell us the process is moving forward and will result in a series of measures
  Mon-Wed: some govt resignations and replacements; possible announcement of Dec 2 or 3 for Congressional action on
  Z issue; M "step aside." We have reiterated that latter is crucial for our diplomacy to boost election support.
  The de factos say the M speech announcing that is being drafted.
  De facto negotiators say the military played a useful role today in pushing the process forward.
  Amb Llorens notes that while the de facto consultations may look like a stall, the tendency to seek this sort of buy-in is
  one reason Honduras historically has been more peaceful than its neighors.
  While our role on the most sensitive issue is not known outside of very few people, the impression is growing in the
  country and among careful observers in region that something is happening. Insulza told Arturo today that he wants to
  find a pragmatic way forward and could use a fig leaf. We hope to produce something more than that. Z's negotiators
  are aware something is moving and appear keen to get back in the game, but Z has them on a tight leash and refuses to
  play. If things go well in next few days, we will ask S should call Z to encourage him back to the table.
  We are in constant touch with the de factos to help keep this on track. While most Hondurans want to move on, there is
  still a great deal of polarization that makes progress complicated.
  Best,
  ck
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765766 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765769
MetadataSubject: MILIBAND CALL
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-23T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_049/DOC_0C05765769/C05765769.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Miliband call
ExtractedTo: H; Huma Abedin
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, November 23, 2009 5:49 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765769
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: They are calling you now.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765769 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  PART B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 5:49 PM
  To: H; Huma Abedin
  Subject: Re: Miliband call
  They are calling you now.
  Original Message ----
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Huma Abedin
  Sent: Mon Nov 23 17:46:07 2009
  Subject: Miliband call
  Jiloty, Lauren C
  I'm in the car. Will ops call me or should I call in?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765769 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765771
MetadataSubject: MILIBAND CALL
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-23T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_049/DOC_0C05765771/C05765771.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Miliband call
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, November 23, 2009 6:02 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765771
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  I forgot to verbally tell you this today, but kiobuchar also has a call into you and she is on your grid.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765771 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  PART B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 6:02 PM
  To: H
  Subject Re: Miliband call
  I forgot to verbally tell you this today, but kiobuchar also has a call into you and she is on your grid.
  Original Message ---
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Huma Abedin
  Sent: Mon Nov 23 17:46:07 2009
  Subject: Miliband call
  Jiloty, Lauren C B6
  I'm in the car. Will ops call me or should I call in?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765771 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765772
MetadataSubject: FYI. SID FWD: STRONG RECORD OF TERRORIST TRIALS IN NYC FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-15T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765772/C05765772.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: H: FYI. Sid Fwd: Strong Record of Terrorist Trials in NYC Federal Court System
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 7:44 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765772
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  H: The NYU Center on Law and Security, (where I remain associated as a senior fellow), has doen the work on terrorism
  trials, especially in NY. The Center is closely involved with the NYPD terrorism unit; Mike Sheehan, whom you remember
  as director of counterterrorism at State in the Clinton administration and at NYPD terrorism unit, is at the Center as a
  fellow. Key statistic to cite:
  What Kind of Results Can We Expect?
  The New York City conviction rate for individuals charged with terrorism when it involved a US target
  is 100%.
  Sid

RawText:
  0
  CENTER ON LAW AND
  SECURITY
  PRESS RELEASE
  Attorney General Eric Holder today
  announced the transfer of five
  detainees to the Southern District
  of New York. He expressed
  confidence in the ability of the US
  courts and specifically the
  Southern District of New York to
  get prosecutions for these
  individuals. Here's Why -
  According to the Terrorism Trial
  Report Card of the NYU Center on
  Law and Security, the following
  findings suggest a strong record
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765772 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 7:44 AM
  To:
  Subject: H: FYI. Sid Fwd: Strong Record of Terrorist Trials in NYC Federal Court System
  H: The NYU Center on Law and Security, (where I remain associated as a senior fellow), has doen the work on terrorism
  trials, especially in NY. The Center is closely involved with the NYPD terrorism unit; Mike Sheehan, whom you remember
  as director of counterterrorism at State in the Clinton administration and at NYPD terrorism unit, is at the Center as a
  fellow. Key statistic to cite:
  What Kind of Results Can We Expect?
  The New York City conviction rate for individuals charged with terrorism when it involved a US target
  is 100%.
  Sid
  Original Message
  From: Center Security <CLS@exchange.law.nyu.edu>
  To: sbwhoeo
  Sent: Fri, Nov 13, 2009 1:05 pm
  Subject: Strong Record of Terrorist Trials in NYC Federal Court System
  If you're having trouble viewing this email, you may see it online.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765772 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765772 Date: 07/31/2015
  for prosecuting terrorism.
  According to Karen Greenberg,
  executive Director of the Center on
  Law and Security at NYU School of
  Law, "Fears that the trials of these
  high value detainees are likely to
  falter in the courts are unfounded
  given the historical record."
  See: Record of NYC Terrorism
  Trials; Record of US DOJ
  Terrorism Trials.
  Why the federal courts?
  The conviction rate for federal
  prosecutions of terrorism suspects
  after 9/11:
  88% overall and approximately
  94% for 2006 and 2007.
  (Federal conviction rate for federal
  felonies overall is 92%)
  Why New York?
  In addition to it being the "scene of
  the crime" as Attorney General
  Holder described it, New York has
  been the venue for more terrorism
  cases than any other jurisdiction.
  (see TTRC).
  What Kind of Charges Can We
  Expect?
  Terrorism Charges - 2332a, plus
  2339 a and b (material support and
  murder charges).
  What Kind of Results Can We
  Expect?
  The New York City conviction rate
  for individuals charged with
  terrorism when it involved a US
  target is 100%.
  Please see the attached Highlights
  from the 2001-2009 Terrorist Trial
  Report Card. The full TTRC will be
  issued in December.
  For further comment, please
  contact Karen Greenberg,
  executive director of The Center on
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765772 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765772 Date: 07/31/2015
  Law and Security at 212-992-8854
  or email her at
  karen.greenberg@nyu.edu.
  The Center on Law and Security at NYU
  School of Law
  110 W. 3rd Street, Suite 217 I New York, NY
  10012
  phone: 212-992-8854 I fax: 212-995-4769 I
  www.lawandsecurity.org I
  CLS@exchange.law.nyu.edu
  This email was sent to sbwhoeop@aol.com. To
  ensure that you continue receiving our emails,
  please add us to your address book or safe list.
  manage your preferences I opt out using
  TrueRemove®.
  Got this as a forward? Sign uo to receive our
  future emails.
  powered by
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765772 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765774
MetadataSubject: OUT OF OFFICE AUTOREPLY:
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Tauscher, Ellen O
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-15T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765774/C05765774.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedFrom: Tauscher, Ellen 0 <TauscherE0@state.gov>
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765774
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  I am traveling and have limited access to email. Please contact my office Chief of Staff, Simon Limage at
  LimageSG@state.gov.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765774 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Tauscher, Ellen 0 <TauscherE0@state.gov>
  Sent Sunday, November 15, 2009 12:02 PM
  To:
  Subject Out of Office AutoReply:
  I am traveling and have limited access to email. Please contact my office Chief of Staff, Simon Limage at
  LimageSG@state.gov.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765774 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765775
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-23T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_049/DOC_0C05765775/C05765775.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, November 23, 2009 7:43 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765775
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  You should leave soon. They confirmed they are starting on time at 8pm.
  Yang confirmed for 10:30. Ops will connect to the house.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765775 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 7:43 PM
  To:
  You should leave soon. They confirmed they are starting on time at 8pm.
  Yang confirmed for 10:30. Ops will connect to the house.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765775 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765778
MetadataSubject: HEARD ANYTHING RE SHOWS TODAY?
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: PIR
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-15T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765778/C05765778.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Heard anything re shows today?
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: PIR <preines(
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 12:16 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765778
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Was just scanning now. All I'm finding are wire headlines on the coffee.
  Looking to see if your KSM answer - specifically, "I'm not going to second guess - is taken as less than full throated

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765778 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: PIR <preines(
  Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 12:16 PM
  To: H
  Subject: Re: Heard anything re shows today?
  Was just scanning now. All I'm finding are wire headlines on the coffee.
  Looking to see if your KSM answer - specifically, "I'm not going to second guess - is taken as less than full throated
  Original Message
  From: Evergreen
  To: PIR
  Subject: Heard anything re shows today?
  Sent: Nov 16, 2009 1:10 AM
  Besides the invite to coffee?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765778 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765780
MetadataSubject: WJC
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-15T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765780/C05765780.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 12:43 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765780
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Not sure where you went but wjc tried to reach you.
  He's now in with netanyahu.
  Will call back when he's done.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765780 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 12:43 PM
  To: H
  Subject Wjc
  Not sure where you went but wjc tried to reach you.
  He's now in with netanyahu.
  Will call back when he's done.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765780 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765782
MetadataSubject: EXPO LINE (CORNY, LITERALLY)
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Reines, Philippe I
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-15T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765782/C05765782.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedFrom: Reines, Philippe I <reinesp@state.gov>
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765782
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  There is a famous American movie called Field of Dreams, and in it, the hero - Kevin Costner - builds a baseball field at
  his remote farm, he carves it out of his crop. Some people don't think what he's doing makes sense, they think it's a risk
  - but he is a true baseball fanatic and he loves the game and he takes on the project because he keeps hearing...
  "If you build it., they will come...
  If you build it, they will come."
  Well ladies and gentlemen, I am proud to say that we built it, and we care coming to the Shanghai World Expo

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765782 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Reines, Philippe I <reinesp@state.gov>
  Sent Sunday, November 15, 2009 6:34 PM
  To:
  Subject Expo Line (Corny, literally)
  There is a famous American movie called Field of Dreams, and in it, the hero - Kevin Costner - builds a baseball field at
  his remote farm, he carves it out of his crop. Some people don't think what he's doing makes sense, they think it's a risk
  - but he is a true baseball fanatic and he loves the game and he takes on the project because he keeps hearing...
  "If you build it., they will come...
  If you build it, they will come."
  Well ladies and gentlemen, I am proud to say that we built it, and we care coming to the Shanghai World Expo
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765782 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765783
MetadataSubject: POLICY IMPLICATIONS OF JOBS LOSSES. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-15T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765783/C05765783.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: FYI: Policy implications of jobs losses. Sid
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 9:46 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765783
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  H: If Roubini is right, and he's been mostly right so far, one of the few, then without additional and large stimulus
  devoted to putting a floor on job loss, the pressure on protectionism will be far more intense. (Protectionism, by
  any name, should not be dismissed as a targeted tool in an ongoing policy to force China to revalue its currency.
  The US is not without means here.) The deficit will be high in any case and the Republicans will always attempt to
  exploit it no matter what its number. Whether another stimulus can pass Congress is another matter. Still, what
  matters in the short-run--and long-run--are achievable results. To most people, the deficit is an abstraction;
  employment and housing--and insecurity about both--are their vital, concrete and immediate issues. Sid
  http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2009/11/15/2009-11-
  15_the_worst_is_yet_to_come_unemployed_americans_should_hunker_down_for_more job_lo.html
  The worst is yet to come: Unemployed
  Americans should hunker down for more job
  losses
  BY Nouriel Roubini
  Sunday, November 15th 2009, 4:00 AM
  Think the worst is over? Wrong. Conditions in the U.S. labor markets are awful and worsening. While the official
  unemployment rate is already 10.2% and another 200,000 jobs were lost in October, when you include discouraged
  workers and partially employed workers the figure is a whopping 17.5%.
  While losing 200,000 jobs per month is better than the 700,000 jobs lost in January, current job losses still average more
  than the per month rate of 150,000 during the last recession.
  Also, remember: The last recession ended in November 2001, but job losses continued for more than a year and half until
  June of 2003; ditto for the 1990-91 recession.
  So we can expect that job losses will continue until the end of 2010 at the earliest. In other words, if you are unemployed
  and looking for work and just waiting for the economy to turn the corner, you had better hunker down. All the economic
  numbers suggest this will take a while. The jobs just are not coming back.
  There's really just one hope for our leaders to turn things around: a bold prescription that increases the fiscal stimulus with
  another round of labor-intensive, shovel-ready infrastructure projects, helps fiscally strapped state and local governments
  and provides a temporary tax credit to the private sector to hire more workers. Helping the unemployed just by extending
  unemployment benefits is necessary not sufficient; it leads to persistent unemployment rather than job creation.
  The long-term picture for workers and families is even worse than current job loss numbers alone would suggest. Now as
  a way of sharing the pain, many firms are telling their workers to cut hours, take furloughs and accept lower wages.
  Specifically, that fall in hours worked is equivalent to another 3 million full time jobs lost on top of the 7.5 million jobs
  formally lost.
  This is very bad news but we must face facts. Many of the lost jobs are gone forever, including construction jobs, finance
  jobs and manufacturing jobs. Recent studies suggest that a quarter of U.S. jobs are fully out-sourceable over time to other
  countries.
  Other measures tell the same ugly story: The average length of unemployment is at an all time high; the ratio of job
  applicants to vacancies is 6 to 1; initial claims are down but continued claims are very high and now millions of
  unemployed are resorting to the exceptional extended unemployment benefits programs and are staying in them longer.
  Based on my best judgment, it is most likely that the unemployment rate will peak close to 11% and will remain at a very
  high level for two years or more.
  The weakness in labor markets and the sharp fall in labor income ensure a weak recovery of private consumption and an
  anemic recovery of the economy, and increases the risk of a double dip recession.
  As a result of these terribly weak labor markets, we can expect weak recovery of consumption and economic growth;
  larger budget deficits; greater delinquencies in residential and commercial real estate and greater fall in home and
  commercial real estate prices; greater losses for banks and financial institutions on residential and commercial real estate
  mortgages, and in credit cards, auto loans and student loans and thus a greater rate of failures of banks; and greater
  protectionist,pressures.
  The damage will be extensive and severe unless bold policy action is undertaken now.
  Roubini is professor of Economics at the Stern School of Business at New York University and Chairman of Roubini
  Global Economics.
  Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2009/11/15/2009-11-
  15 the worst is yet to come unemployed americans should hunker down for more job lo.html?print=1&paqe=all#i
  xzz0WwHGikNI

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765783 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 9:46 AM
  To:
  Subject: FYI: Policy implications of jobs losses. Sid
  H: If Roubini is right, and he's been mostly right so far, one of the few, then without additional and large stimulus
  devoted to putting a floor on job loss, the pressure on protectionism will be far more intense. (Protectionism, by
  any name, should not be dismissed as a targeted tool in an ongoing policy to force China to revalue its currency.
  The US is not without means here.) The deficit will be high in any case and the Republicans will always attempt to
  exploit it no matter what its number. Whether another stimulus can pass Congress is another matter. Still, what
  matters in the short-run--and long-run--are achievable results. To most people, the deficit is an abstraction;
  employment and housing--and insecurity about both--are their vital, concrete and immediate issues. Sid
  http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2009/11/15/2009-11-
  15_the_worst_is_yet_to_come_unemployed_americans_should_hunker_down_for_more job_lo.html
  The worst is yet to come: Unemployed
  Americans should hunker down for more job
  losses
  BY Nouriel Roubini
  Sunday, November 15th 2009, 4:00 AM
  Think the worst is over? Wrong. Conditions in the U.S. labor markets are awful and worsening. While the official
  unemployment rate is already 10.2% and another 200,000 jobs were lost in October, when you include discouraged
  workers and partially employed workers the figure is a whopping 17.5%.
  While losing 200,000 jobs per month is better than the 700,000 jobs lost in January, current job losses still average more
  than the per month rate of 150,000 during the last recession.
  Also, remember: The last recession ended in November 2001, but job losses continued for more than a year and half until
  June of 2003; ditto for the 1990-91 recession.
  So we can expect that job losses will continue until the end of 2010 at the earliest. In other words, if you are unemployed
  and looking for work and just waiting for the economy to turn the corner, you had better hunker down. All the economic
  numbers suggest this will take a while. The jobs just are not coming back.
  There's really just one hope for our leaders to turn things around: a bold prescription that increases the fiscal stimulus with
  another round of labor-intensive, shovel-ready infrastructure projects, helps fiscally strapped state and local governments
  and provides a temporary tax credit to the private sector to hire more workers. Helping the unemployed just by extending
  unemployment benefits is necessary not sufficient; it leads to persistent unemployment rather than job creation.
  The long-term picture for workers and families is even worse than current job loss numbers alone would suggest. Now as
  a way of sharing the pain, many firms are telling their workers to cut hours, take furloughs and accept lower wages.
  Specifically, that fall in hours worked is equivalent to another 3 million full time jobs lost on top of the 7.5 million jobs
  formally lost.
  This is very bad news but we must face facts. Many of the lost jobs are gone forever, including construction jobs, finance
  jobs and manufacturing jobs. Recent studies suggest that a quarter of U.S. jobs are fully out-sourceable over time to other
  countries.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765783 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765783 Date: 07/31/2015
  Other measures tell the same ugly story: The average length of unemployment is at an all time high; the ratio of job
  applicants to vacancies is 6 to 1; initial claims are down but continued claims are very high and now millions of
  unemployed are resorting to the exceptional extended unemployment benefits programs and are staying in them longer.
  Based on my best judgment, it is most likely that the unemployment rate will peak close to 11% and will remain at a very
  high level for two years or more.
  The weakness in labor markets and the sharp fall in labor income ensure a weak recovery of private consumption and an
  anemic recovery of the economy, and increases the risk of a double dip recession.
  As a result of these terribly weak labor markets, we can expect weak recovery of consumption and economic growth;
  larger budget deficits; greater delinquencies in residential and commercial real estate and greater fall in home and
  commercial real estate prices; greater losses for banks and financial institutions on residential and commercial real estate
  mortgages, and in credit cards, auto loans and student loans and thus a greater rate of failures of banks; and greater
  protectionist,pressures.
  The damage will be extensive and severe unless bold policy action is undertaken now.
  Roubini is professor of Economics at the Stern School of Business at New York University and Chairman of Roubini
  Global Economics.
  Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2009/11/15/2009-11-
  15 the worst is yet to come unemployed americans should hunker down for more job lo.html?print=1&paqe=all#i
  xzz0WwHGikNI
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765783 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765785
MetadataSubject: FOLLOW UP
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-16T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765785/C05765785.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Follow up
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, November 16, 2009 5:38 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765785
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  I met with Steve.
  We had a good cony and discussed a number of areas of focus, most of which are WI.
  Take a look and flag any concerns.
  I am going to discuss with Jack this am.
  Cdm

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765785 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5,B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 5:38 AM
  To:
  Cc: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Fw: Follow up
  I met with Steve.
  We had a good cony and discussed a number of areas of focus, most of which are WI.
  Take a look and flag any concerns.
  I am going to discuss with Jack this am.
  Cdm
  From: Steve Radelet
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Sun Nov 15 21:19:29 2009
  Subject: Follow up
  Hi Cheryl,
  Thanks for the meeting on Friday. I am excited about the possibilities. As we discussed, here are some initial
  ideas on some of the isssues I might work on. Let me know if this is more-or-less in the right direction -- I am
  not quite sure what wold be most helpful. Feel free to drop, add, or otherwise change anything. Anyway, here is
  a first shot.
  Best,
  Steve
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765785 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765785 Date: 07/31/2015
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765785 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765786
MetadataSubject: FOLLOW UP
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-16T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765786/C05765786.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Follow up
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, November 16, 2009 8:22 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765786
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: calling
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765786 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5,B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 8:22 AM
  To: H
  Subject RE: Follow up
  calling
  Original Message----
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com)
  Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 8:16 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Re: Follow up
  The devil will be in the details, but I see no flags. Can you talk?
  Original Message ----
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Mon Nov 16 05:38:24 2009
  Subject: Fw: Follow up
  I met with Steve.
  We had a good cony and discussed a number of areas of focus, most of which are M.
  Take a look and flag any concerns.
  I am going to discuss with Jack this am.
  Cdm
  From: Steve Radelet
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Sun Nov 15 21:19:29 2009
  Subject: Follow up
  Hi Cheryl,
  Thanks for the meeting on Friday. I am excited about the possibilities. As we discussed, here are some initial ideas on
  some of the isssues I might work on. Let me know if this is more-or-less in the right direction -- I am not quite sure what
  wold be most helpful. Feel free to drop, add, or otherwise change anything. Anyway, here is a first shot.
  Best,
  Steve
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765786 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765786 Date: 07/31/2015
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765786 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765787
MetadataSubject: FW:
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Verveer, Melanne S
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-16T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765787/C05765787.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedFrom: Verveer, Melanne S <VerveerMS@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, November 16, 2009 8:28 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765787
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  1.4(D)
  B1
  Heading home after visit to Bangladesh where you are remembered with great affection and where they are eager to
  have you make a return visit.
  It was a reunion for me in many ways -- the experiences from '95 still vivid, and it was a positive message that I came 1.4(B)
  back! 1.4(D)
  B1
  Our amb there is terrific. (Moriarty). He's going to keep close tabs on the situation. The sum of all this seems to be
  political. It's so sad.
  I'll give you a fuller readout on this and the trip more generally.
  — Reason: 1.4(B), 1.4(D) — Declassify on: 11/16/2024

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765787 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  1.4(B),B1,1.4(D)
  From: Verveer, Melanne S <VerveerMS@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 8:28 AM
  To:
  Subject FW: 1.4(B)
  1.4(D)
  B1
  Heading home after visit to Bangladesh where you are remembered with great affection and where they are eager to
  have you make a return visit.
  It was a reunion for me in many ways -- the experiences from '95 still vivid, and it was a positive message that I came 1.4(B)
  back! 1.4(D)
  B1
  Our amb there is terrific. (Moriarty). He's going to keep close tabs on the situation. The sum of all this seems to be
  political. It's so sad.
  I'll give you a fuller readout on this and the trip more generally.
  Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 07/30/2015 — Class: CONFIDENTIAL
  — Reason: 1.4(B), 1.4(D) — Declassify on: 11/16/2024
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765787 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05765788
MetadataSubject: REGRET: 2009/11/20 - SENIOR LEADERSHIP TEAM RETREAT & DINNER
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-16T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_048/DOC_0C05765788/C05765788.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: FW: REGRET: 2009/11/20 - Senior Leadership Team Retreat & Dinner
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, November 16, 2009 11:43 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05765788
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: FYI — Bill Burns cannot move his meeting.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765788 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 11:43 AM
  To:
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma
  Subject FW: REGRET: 2009/11/20 - Senior Leadership Team Retreat & Dinner
  FYI — Bill Burns cannot move his meeting.
  From: Fielder, Rebecca A
  Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 11:09 AM
  To: Toiv, Nora F
  Cc: Jones, Natalie R
  Subject: FW: REGRET: 2009/11/20 - Senior Leadership Team Retreat & Dinner
  Burns has now had to Regret for Friday.
  Rehecca
  U.S. Department of State
  Office of The Chief of Protocol
  Direct: (202) 647-3377
  Email: FielderRA@state.gov
  From: Woytovech, Suzonne M
  Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 10:56 AM
  To: U.S. Dept of State Protocol
  Subject: REGRET: 2009/11/20 - Senior Leadership Team Retreat & Dinner
  Unfortunately, U/S Burns will be out of the country on November 20, so cannot attend the
  Senior Leadership Team Retreat and Dinner. U/S Burns has asked that you pass his regrets to
  the Secretary.
  Thanks,
  Sue
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05765788 Date: 07/31/2015



