# Emails

DocNumber: C05772306
MetadataSubject: MEANT TO TELL YOU
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Muscatine, Lissa
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-10T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0097/DOC_0C05772306/C05772306.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: O-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: meant to tell you
ExtractedFrom: Muscatine, Lissa <MuscatineL©state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, September 10, 2010 12:49 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772306
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  I'm meeting with Judith on Monday before I leave (that's my last day/morning) to talk about sports diplomacy. Will
  keep you posted.
  Lissa Muscatine
  Senior Advisor and Director of Speechwriting
  Department of State
  (w) 202-647-9841
  (bb)

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772306 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Muscatine, Lissa <MuscatineL©state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 12:49 PM
  To:
  Subject: meant to tell you
  I'm meeting with Judith on Monday before I leave (that's my last day/morning) to talk about sports diplomacy. Will
  keep you posted.
  Lissa Muscatine
  Senior Advisor and Director of Speechwriting
  Department of State
  (w) 202-647-9841
  (bb)
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772306 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772308
MetadataSubject: BRAVO
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren c
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-10T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0097/DOC_0C05772308/C05772308.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: O-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Bravo
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, September 10, 2010 1:27 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772308
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Ok
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772308 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 1:27 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: Bravo
  Ok
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Fri Sep 10 12:22:18 2010
  Subject: Fw: Bravo
  Pis print.
  Original Message
  From: Susan Kennedy
  To: H
  Sent: Fri Sep 10 10:37:23 2010
  Subject: Bravo
  The way you are coming across couldn't be better.
  Hillary Clinton sends strong message to world
  SF Chronicle Editorial Friday, September 10, 2010
  Hillary Clinton's blend of diligence, caution and toughness didn't always serve her well as a presidential candidate. But
  these attributes make her a powerful secretary of state, the unsung hero for a White House team trying to mend global
  fences without looking weak.
  In a speech this week, Clinton laid down the law for an audience wondering where Obama is headed on foreign policy.
  Would she favor hand-holding with rivals such as China and Russia, a sign that Washington was ducking trouble in the
  name of consensus building?
  Not at all, suggested Clinton in a lengthy speech to the Council of Foreign Relations. In her diplomatic travels, she found
  a hunger for U.S. leadership, and she wants everyone to know it. "The U.S. can, must and will lead in this century," she
  said. The "complexities of this world" mean there's an opening for "a new American moment, a moment when our
  global leadership is essential."
  Her message of strength and obligation may make Obama truehearts swoon. Clinton's thoughts also come at the start of
  an election season when President Obama will be knocked for failures overseas along with the economy.
  But it's also vintage Clinton. From her days on the Senate's Armed Services Committee, she was always a proponent of
  military muscle and a tough regard for American foes. She and Defense Secretary Robert Gates, another hawkish voice,
  are running the Obama foreign policy store.
  Diplomatic speeches, even one as striking as Clinton's, are a dime a dozen. Clinton's challenge will be delivering on any
  of the disputes facing her. There's a long line: a truculent North Korea, new Mideast talks, a rising China, a defiant Iran,
  and a half dozen lesser conflicts ranging from African civil wars to drug gangs in Mexico.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772308 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772308 Date: 08/31/2015
  There is newness and complication in her outlook, she indicated. Her job is essentially a permanent road trip, meaning
  success will hinge on "shoe-leather diplomacy," the steady attention that the wonky, workaholic Clinton believes is
  needed for any breakthrough. The Israeli-Palestinian talks, which begin again next week with her at the center, are a
  chance for her patience and force to pay off. On Iran, she believes that ever-tightening sanctions accepted by a larger
  group of nations will eventually pay off.
  Her remarks come with other conditions. A soaring national debt and recession worries preoccupy the White House. The
  nation's global reach is bounded by financial limits. Her robust views about American might could easily fade next to
  more pressing domestic worries. Also, no matter how thoughtful or acute her remarks, there will always be detractors
  who think she's angling for the top job in the White House.
  Clinton's doctrine adds urgency in settling affairs on a crowded world stage. Washington has a special duty to lead, a
  role that much of the world appreciates. It's time to accept that role, not shy away from it because of political risk or
  recent history.
  Susan P Kennedy
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772308 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772309
MetadataSubject: SOME PARAGRAPHS ON THE TEA PARTY
MetadataTo: Hillary
MetadataFrom: Sid
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0095/DOC_0C05772309/C05772309.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedFrom: Sid
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772309
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772309 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  CONFIDENTIAL
  August 31, 2010 .
  For: Hillary
  From: Sid
  Re: Some paragraphs on the Tea Party
  First, of course your instinct is right to attempt to save the situation. I think, however, it is
  fraught. Being, right easily might be worse than being wrong. (Doing absolutely nothing,
  meanwhile, would bear no cost, just to note the benefits of irresponsibility.) So, how any advice
  can be proposed without potential pitfalls is a mystery to me. It may be that Bill delivers the
  message in public, on the stump. This message, on extremism and the GOP, ought to be given
  soon, on Labor Day or immediately thereafter. Urgently, the momentum of the far right needs to
  be blunted; it must be redefined; the political discussion must be shaped and shifted; and the
  GOP must be put on the defensive and begin to pay the price.
  I will send you another memo soon, with other messages, themes and strategies.
  Here, for better or worse, is some language on extremism and the Republican Party:
  The Republican Party today is a captive party. It is captive to the swamp fevers of the extreme
  right. It is captive to its out-of-power desperation for political power—willing to do and say
  anything to grab it—willing to use extremists to help climb back to power—willing to give the
  extremists power. No one is speaking up for responsible conservatism within the Republican
  Party. Who will play the role of William F. Buckley, Jr.? Or Richard Nixon? Or Ronald Reagan?
  Or Barry Goldwater? They all drew lines to separate the party from the extremists. Now who has
  the courage to condemn the outrageous bigotry and slander against the President? Have they at
  long last no sense of decency?
  If the Republicans don't have the nerve to speak up for their own best heritage, then someone has
  to do it. The Republican Party is in a state of political disorder. Into the midst of its chaos a
  Trojan Horse has been thrust in the form of a self-proclaimed Tea Party as though the extremists
  behind it have something to do with the American Revolution and are not a stealth takeover
  operation of a confused political party funded by the same people who paid for the extremist
  movements against President Eisenhower and President Kennedy.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772309 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772309 Date: 08/31/2015
  There is a straight line between extremists then and extremists now. One of those lines is a
  money line. Follow the money. Another continuity is the far right John Birch Society that is
  praised today by Glenn Beck. Listen closely. Yet another of those lines are the same accusations
  of disloyalty. Ike was a Communist. John F. Kennedy was a Communist. They said President
  Nixon was a tool of international Communism. And when the Cold War was ending they said
  Ronald Reagan was "a useful idiot of the Kremlin." Now they are saying that President Obama is
  a socialist and at the same time a fascist. They say he's a racist and a secret Muslim. They claim
  the President of the United States is not an American. It's so crazy it sounds like a science fiction
  novel, but we've heard it all before. The extremists have not changed. From Ike to JFK, from
  Nixon to Reagan, and now Obama, it's the same old horsestuff.
  For anyone with common sense it might seem like one big joke, a big put-on, or maybe just a big
  con job. But it's dangerous. It's toxic. Why? In the name of the founding fathers, the
  Constitution and the flag, in the name of taking back our country and restoring it, they would
  transform our democracy into something we wouldn't recognize. The extremists of the far right
  want to replace the greatest experiment in constitutional democracy with their own far-out
  ideology—trashing everything from religious liberty to protections from a dog-eat-dog boom and
  bust economy. Public education, a safe environment, national highways, safe transportation,
  Social Security, Medicare, health care for all, even the Federal Reserve created to curb economic
  chaos—they want to get rid of all of it. If you think that if they had their way they wouldn't kick
  the country into an economic abyss, produce another Great Depression, then I've got a reality
  show in Alaska for you. And that's not all that's in their sweeping blueprint for power.
  The Republican Party is being purged of moderates, responsible conservatives, anyone who has a
  thought they don't like. It's divide and conquer. Divide the Republican Party. Divide the nation.
  Region against region, South against North, West against East, rural America against cities, state
  governments against the federal government, religion against religion, and soon, before you
  know it, it won't look or feel like America. Out of loud declarations of love of country, they will
  break this country apart.
  How far do the extremists want to go? The demonizing of enemies and even religions is a means
  to an end. That end is political power. Political power for themselves, for their political leaders—
  characters who are hardly outsiders but dusty denizens roaming the corridors of power for.
  decades. They want political power—political power for favors, exemptions and loopholes for
  the Daddy Warbucks and Scrooge McDucks funding them. Political power for special interests.
  Political power against the national interest. Political power against the common good. Political
  power against the good society.
  President Obama is their target because the people have put him in his office and he stands in the
  way of the extremists. They are against him precisely because he's making progress. And
  progress is not what they want. They want power for themselves. So they will say anything to
  tear down the President. But they are at war with more than President Obama. They are at war
  with President Andrew Jackson. That's how far back they want to go. They want to go back the
  1830s. They want to go back to before the Civil War, "lips dripping with the words of
  interposition and nullification," to quote Martin Luther King, Jr. in his famous "I have a dream"
  speech. They want to interpose their rule and their power above that of majority rule and
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772309 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772309 Date: 08/31/2015
  democratic 2ov-eminent—and nullify the law of the land in the name of their strange doctrines.
  So when I say that this is dangerous and toxic, we've been there before. Fanatics have divided
  America in the past. We know, as another president said, "A house divided against itself cannot
  stand."
  And when you see them demonizing the President, Ike, JFK. Obama, take your pick—when you
  see them accusing members of the Republican Party of treason—when you hear them compare
  the American experiment in democracy to Hitler's Nazi state or Stalin's Communist
  totalitarianism—when you hear them talk of "liberty" and they mean taking away Social
  Security from people who worked their whole lives to earn it—when you hear them talk of
  "freedom" when they want to bring back good old fashioned discrimination—when you hear
  them talk of "the Constitution" when they want to get rid of the letter and spirit of the
  government designed by the framers of the Constitution—when you hear them talk of
  "democracy" when they want to get rid of direct election of senators—when you hear them talk
  about "restoration" when they want to gut public education and Medicare and basic economic
  and environmental protections--trashing the work and progress of generations--then you know
  that behind the patriotic words lies a truly radical agenda.
  It was Dwight Eisenhower who warned: "Should any political party attempt to abolish Social
  Security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not
  heal• of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that
  believes you can do these things. Among them are H. L. Hunt (you possibly know his
  background), a few other Texas oil millionaires, and an occasional politician or business man
  from other areas. Their number is negligible and they are stupid."
  It was John F. Kennedy who said: "In the most critical periods of our nation's history, there have
  always been those fringes of our society who have sought to escape their own responsibility by
  finding a simple solution, an appealing slogan, or a convenient scapegoat. Financial crises could
  be explained by the presence of too many immigrants or too few greenbacks... So let us not heed
  these counsels of fear and suspicion... Let our patriotism be reflected in the creation of
  confidence rather than crusades of suspicion. Let us prove we think our country great by striving
  to make it greater."
  Outspoken conservatives like William F. Buckley drew the line and stood up for principle
  against the extremists, calling them "idiotic" and "paranoid." Barry Goldwater, at the end of his
  life, said, "Do not associate my name with anything you do. You are extremists, and you've hurt
  the Republican Party much more than the Democrats have."
  Then, this sort of thing, instilling a tone of confidence: Come together, right now...for a new era
  of progress...rebuilding America...the work of a new generation...building on the progress of
  generations...facing any challenge...resolving that we can and will overcome any
  obstacle...keeping the faith, not succumbing to temptations of fear and suspicion...not retreating
  but advancing...not dividing the American people for short-term politics but bringing the
  American people together for long-term progress...combining our will, our work, our
  intelligence, creativity, enterprise, and energy to make a new world of freedom for ourselves and
  our children...
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772309 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772310
MetadataSubject: SOME PARAGRAPHS ON THE TEA PARTY
MetadataTo: Hillary
MetadataFrom: Sid
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0095/DOC_0C05772310/C05772310.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedFrom: Sid
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772310
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772310 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  CONFIDENTIAL
  August 31, 2010
  For: Hillary
  From: Sid
  Re: Some paragraphs on the Tea Party
  First, of course your instinct is right to attempt to save the situation. I think, however, it is
  fraught. Being right easily might be worse than being wrong. (Doing absolutely nothing,
  meanwhile, would bear no cost, just to note the benefits of irresponsibility.) So, how any advice
  can be proposed without potential pitfalls is a mystery to me. It may be that Bill delivers the
  message in public, on the stump. This message, on extremism and the GOP, ought to be given
  soon, on Labor Day or immediately thereafter. Urgently, the momentum of the far right needs to
  be blunted; it must be redefined; the political discussion must be shaped and shifted; and the
  GOP must be put on the defensive and begin to pay the price.
  I will send you another memo soon, with other messages, themes and strategies.
  Here, for better or worse, is some language on extremism and the Republican Party:
  The Republican Party today is a captive party. It is captive to the swamp fevers of the extreme
  right. It is captive to its out-of-power desperation for political power—willing to do and say
  anything to grab it--willing to use extremists to help climb back to power—willing to give the
  extremists power. No one is speaking up for responsible conservatism within the Republican
  Party. Who will play the role of William F. Buckley, Jr.? Or Richard Nixon? Or Ronald Reagan?
  Or Barry Goldwater? They all drew lines to separate the party from the extremists. Now who has
  the courage to condemn the outrageous bigotry and slander against the President? Have they at
  long last no sense of decency?
  If the Republicans don't have the nerve to speak up for their own best heritage, then someone has
  to do it. The Republican Party is in a state of political disorder. Into the midst of its chaos a
  Trojan Horse has been thrust in the form of a self-proclaimed Tea Party as though the extremists
  behind it have something to do with the American Revolution and are not a stealth takeover
  operation of a confused political party funded by the same people who paid for the extremist
  movements against President Eisenhower and President Kennedy.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772310 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772310 Date: 08/31/2015
  There is a straight line between extremists then and extremists now. One of those lines is a
  money line. Follow the money. Another continuity is the far right John Birch Society that is
  praised today by Glenn Beck. Listen closely. Yet another of those lines are the same accusations
  of disloyalty. Ike was a Communist. John F. Kennedy was a Communist. They said President
  Nixon was a tool of international Communism. And when the Cold War was ending they said
  Ronald Reagan was "a useful idiot of the Kremlin." Now they are saying that President Obama is
  a socialist and at the same time a fascist. They say he's a racist and a secret Muslim. They claim
  the President of the United States is not an American. It's so crazy it sounds like a science fiction
  novel, but we've heard it all before. The extremists have not changed. From Ike to JFK, from
  Nixon to Reagan, and now Obama, it's the same old horsestuff.
  For anyone with common sense it might seem like one big joke, a big put-on, or maybe just a big
  con job. But it's dangerous. It's toxic. Why? In the name of the founding fathers, the
  Constitution and the flag, in the name of taking back our country and restoring it, they would
  transform our democracy into something we wouldn't recognize. The extremists of the far right
  want to replace the greatest experiment in constitutional democracy with their own far-out
  ideology—trashing everything from religious liberty to protections from a dog-eat-dog boom and
  bust economy. Public education, a safe environment, national highways, safe transportation,
  Social Security, Medicare, health care for all, even the Federal Reserve created to curb economic
  chaos—they want to get rid of all of it. If you think that if they had their way they wouldn't kick
  the country into an economic abyss, produce another Great Depression, then I've got a reality
  show in Alaska for you. And that's not all that's in their sweeping blueprint for power.
  The Republican Party is being purged of moderates, responsible conservatives, anyone who has a
  thought they don't like. If s divide and conquer. Divide.the Republican Party. Divide the nation.
  Region against region, South against North, West against East. rural America against cities, state
  governments against the federal government, religion against religion, and soon. before you
  know it, it won't look or feel like America. Out of loud declarations of love of country, they will
  break this country apart.
  How far do the extremists want to go? The demonizing of enemies and even religions is a means
  to an end. That end is political power. Political power for themselves, for their political leaders—
  characters who are hardly outsiders but dusty denizens roaming the corridors of power for
  decades. They want political power—political power for favors, exemptions and loopholes for
  the Daddy Warbucks and Scrooge McDucks funding them. Political power for special interests.
  Political power against the national interest. Political power against the common good. Political
  power against the good society.
  President Obama is their target because the people have put him in his office and he stands in the
  way of the extremists. They are against him precisely because he's making progress. And
  progress is not what they want. They want power for themselves. So they will say anything to
  tear down the President. But they are at war with more than President Obama. They are at war
  with President Andrew Jackson. That's how far back they want to go. They want to go back the
  1830s. They want to go back to before the Civil War; "lips dripping with the words of
  interposition and nullification," to quote Martin Luther King, Jr. in his famous "I have a dream"
  speech. They want to interpose their rule and their power above that of majority rule and
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772310 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772310 Date: 08/31/2015
  democratic government—and nullify the law of the land in the name of their strange doctrines.
  So when I say that this is dangerous and toxic, we've been there before. Fanatics have divided
  America in the past. We know, as another president said, "A house divided against itself cannot
  stand."
  And when you see them demonizing the President, Ike, JFK, Obama, take your pick—when you
  see them accusing members of the Republican Party of treason—when you hear them compare
  the American experiment in democracy to Hitler's Nazi state or Stalin's Communist
  totalitarianism—when you hear them talk of "liberty" and they mean taking away Social
  Security from people who worked their whole lives to earn it—when you hear them talk of
  "freedom" when they want to bring back good old fashioned discrimination—when you hear
  them talk of "the Constitution" when they want to get rid of the letter and spirit of the
  government designed by the framers of the Constitution—when you hear them talk of
  "democracy" when they want to get rid of direct election of senators—when you hear them talk
  about "restoration" when they want to gut public education and Medicare and basic economic
  and environmental protections—trashing the work and progress of generations—then you know
  that behind the patriotic words lies a truly radical agenda.
  It was Dwight Eisenhower who warned: "Should any political party attempt to abolish Social
  Security, unemployment insurance, and eliminate labor laws and farm programs, you would not
  hear of that party again in our political history. There is a tiny splinter group, of course, that
  believes you can do these things. Among them are H. L. Hunt (you possibly know his
  background), a few other Texas oil millionaires, and an occasional politician or business man
  from other areas. Their number is negligible and they are stupid."
  It was John F. Kennedy who said: "In the most critical periods of our nation's history, there have
  always been those fringes of our society who have sought to escape their own responsibility by
  finding a simple solution, an appealing slogan, or a convenient scapegoat. Financial crises could
  be explained by the presence of too many immigrants or too few greenbacks... So let us not heed
  these counsels of fear and suspicion... Let our patriotism be reflected in the creation of
  confidence rather than crusades of suspicion. Let us prove we think our country great by striving
  to make it greater."
  Outspoken conservatives like William F. Buckley drew the line and stood up for principle
  against the extremists, calling them "idiotic" and "paranoid." Barry Goldwater, at the end of his
  life, said, "Do not associate my name with anything you do. You are extremists, and you've hurt
  the Republican Party much more than the Democrats have."
  Then, this sort of thing, instilling a tone of confidence: Come together, right now...for a new era
  of progress...rebuilding America... the work of a new generation...building on the progress of
  generations...facing any challenge...resolving that we can and will overcome any
  obstacle...keeping the faith, not succumbing to temptations of fear and suspicion...not retreating
  but advancing...not dividing the American people for short-term politics but bringing the
  American people together for long-term progress...combining our will, our work, our
  intelligence, creativity, enterprise, and energy to make a new world of freedom for ourselves and
  our children...
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772310 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772314
MetadataSubject: (REUTERS) UAE GIVES PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY $42 MILLION
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-10T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0097/DOC_0C05772314/C05772314.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: O-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (Reuters) UAE gives Palestinian Authority $42 million
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-III
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, September 10, 2010 5:51 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772314
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772314 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 5:51 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (Reuters) UAE gives Palestinian Authority $42 million
  From: Simmons, Krista M
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-III
  Sent: Fri Sep 10 17:42:28 2010
  Subject: (Reuters) UAE gives Palestinian Authority $42 million
  WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United Arab Emirates donated S42 million to the Palestinian Authority, boosting support
  for President Mahmoud Abbas' cash-strapped government as it embarks on direct peace talks with Israel, Arab officials
  said on September 10. An Arab source in Washington said the donation, which was confirmed by a Palestinian
  government spokesman, was made after repeated calls by senior U.S. officials for more Arab support to help build
  Palestinian government capacity. "It is a timely gesture of support both for the talks and the institution-building project
  of the PA, as well as a response to the public urging from President Obama and Secretary Clinton," the source said.
  Palestinian government spokesman Ghassan al-Khatib confirmed the UAE donation but declined to give further details.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772314 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772315
MetadataSubject: CORKER
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-10T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0097/DOC_0C05772315/C05772315.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: O-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Corker
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH©state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, September 10, 2010 5:56 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772315
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Points for corker call.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772315 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH©state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 5:56 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Corker
  Points for corker call.
  Original Message
  From: Verma, Richard R
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Fri Sep 10 17:54:37 2010
  Subject: Re: Corker
  He allegedly has 2 remaining concerns:
  1 - getting an updated 1251 report (10 year plan) (she can tell him we will do some kind of update...may just be a letter
  but we will agree to udpate);
  2 - and he still has concerns about verification. For the last 30 days, we have tried to connect him with rose g and ted
  warner from DoD. Looks like that will finally happen next week. They can and will alleviate his concerns (we hope).
  That's what I know. I am sure he will be pleased to hear that we had a constructive meeting with Senator Kyl and are
  moving to meet many of his funding concerns.
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma
  To: Verma, Richard R
  Sent: Fri Sep 10 17:49:43 2010
  Subject: Corker
  She will do tonite on her drive home tonite or tomorrow morning.
  But she did ask if there were any specific points u wanted her to make to him? Or if you knew what he might be telling
  her? We are on 6pm shuttle
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772315 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772317
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: pverveer
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0097/DOC_0C05772317/C05772317.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: O-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772317
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  pverveer
  Saturday, September 11, 2010 5:05 AM
  As you probably heard from Bill Burns there are elements in Ukraine who keep trying to revert to the bad old days. The
  SBU (who went after have now gone after soros foundation there and there are new media freedom
  challenges. I hope you'll be able to meet with Yanukovych during UNGA because it's going to take steady engagement
  from keeping the worst backsliding from happening. I met w Ukr arnb and Lou Debaca yesterday to establish ways we
  can work with them on trafficking. Some officials have reached out to us which is good. Others are going backwards so
  we want to keep the good progress they've made over the last few years going forward. The amb was grateful so we
  shall see.
  I'm en route to India for the Vital Voices Asia summit and for a round of rntgs on the dialogue. Will see SEWA on
  cookstoves. Good luck on the Middle East.
  By the way, it looks like Bacheiet will lead UNWomen. I hope that's the case. SG to announce his choice before UNGA.
  Will let you know as soon as we hear definitively.
  Sent via Blackberry from T-Mobile

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772317 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  pverveer
  Saturday, September 11, 2010 5:05 AM
  As you probably heard from Bill Burns there are elements in Ukraine who keep trying to revert to the bad old days. The
  SBU (who went after have now gone after soros foundation there and there are new media freedom
  challenges. I hope you'll be able to meet with Yanukovych during UNGA because it's going to take steady engagement
  from keeping the worst backsliding from happening. I met w Ukr arnb and Lou Debaca yesterday to establish ways we
  can work with them on trafficking. Some officials have reached out to us which is good. Others are going backwards so
  we want to keep the good progress they've made over the last few years going forward. The amb was grateful so we
  shall see.
  I'm en route to India for the Vital Voices Asia summit and for a round of rntgs on the dialogue. Will see SEWA on
  cookstoves. Good luck on the Middle East.
  By the way, it looks like Bacheiet will lead UNWomen. I hope that's the case. SG to announce his choice before UNGA.
  Will let you know as soon as we hear definitively.
  Sent via Blackberry from T-Mobile
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772317 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772320
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: pverveer
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0097/DOC_0C05772320/C05772320.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: O-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772320
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  pverveer
  . Saturday September 11, 2010 2:11 PM
  As you probably heard from Bill Burns there are elements in Ukraine who keep trying to revert to the bad old days. The
  SBU (who went after have now gone after soros foundation there and there are new media freedom
  challenges. I hope you'll be able to meet with Yanukovych during UNGA because it's going to take steady engagement
  from keeping the worst backsliding from happening. I met w Ukr amb and Lou Debaca yesterday to establish ways we
  can work with them on trafficking. Some officials have reached out to us which is good. Others are going backwards so
  we want to keep the good progress they've made over the last few years going forward. The amb was grateful so we
  shall see.
  I'm en route to India for the Vital Voices Asia summit and for a round of mtgs on the dialogue. Will see SEWA on
  eookstoves. Good luck on the Middle East.
  By the way, it looks like Bachelet will lead UNWomen. I hope that's the case. SG to announce his choice before UNGA.
  Will let you know as soon as we hear definitively.
  Sent via BlackBe.rry from 1-Mobile

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772320 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  pverveer
  . Saturday September 11, 2010 2:11 PM
  As you probably heard from Bill Burns there are elements in Ukraine who keep trying to revert to the bad old days. The
  SBU (who went after have now gone after soros foundation there and there are new media freedom
  challenges. I hope you'll be able to meet with Yanukovych during UNGA because it's going to take steady engagement
  from keeping the worst backsliding from happening. I met w Ukr amb and Lou Debaca yesterday to establish ways we
  can work with them on trafficking. Some officials have reached out to us which is good. Others are going backwards so
  we want to keep the good progress they've made over the last few years going forward. The amb was grateful so we
  shall see.
  I'm en route to India for the Vital Voices Asia summit and for a round of mtgs on the dialogue. Will see SEWA on
  eookstoves. Good luck on the Middle East.
  By the way, it looks like Bachelet will lead UNWomen. I hope that's the case. SG to announce his choice before UNGA.
  Will let you know as soon as we hear definitively.
  Sent via BlackBe.rry from 1-Mobile
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772320 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772322
MetadataSubject: STATE DEPT PAKISTAN RELIEF FUND
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0095/DOC_0C05772322/C05772322.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Fwd: State Dept Pakistan Relief Fund
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Caitlin Klevorick <KlevorickCB@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 4:47 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772322
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Fyi
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772322 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 4:47 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Fwd: State Dept Pakistan Relief Fund
  Fyi
  Original Message
  From: Caitlin Klevorick
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Mon Aug 30 14:05:39 2010
  Subject: Fwd: State Dept Pakistan Relief Fund
  CDM:
  Thought S might be interested in this from the head of Coke in Pakistan who is also the Chairman of the American
  Business Forum.
  B6
  Forwarded message
  From: Rizwan Khan
  Date: Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:51 PM
  Subject: Re: State Dept Pakistan Relief Fund
  To: cklevorick Afzaal Malik
  Cc: Caitlin Klevorick <KlevorickCB@state.gov>
  Caitlin
  I must congratulate state department on setting up the fund for Pakistan. In my opinion this is a great initiative and will
  message to all American Business Forum members regarding the information on the fund.
  Once again thank for all your support to Pakistan and look forward to working with you. Please do let me know if I or the
  Forum could be any help to you in Pakistan.
  Best regards
  CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
  This message (including any attachments) contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the intended
  recipient (or authorized to receive for the intended recipient), you may not read, print, retain, use, copy, distribute or
  disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error,
  please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and destroy all copies of the original message (including any attachments).
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772322 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772323
MetadataSubject: H: ON NYT WEBSITE WITHIN LAST HOUR, IN TOMORROW'S PAPER. PAID TV ADS, PLEASE. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0097/DOC_0C05772323/C05772323.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: O-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772323
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  sbwhoeop
  Saturday, September 11, 2010 2:20 PM
  H: On NYT website within last hour, in tomorrow's paper. Paid TV ads, please. Sid
  September 11,2010
  G.O.P. Leader Is Tightly Bound to Lobbyists
  By ERIC LIPTON
  WASHINGTON — House Democrats were preparing late last year for the first floor vote on the financial regulatory
  overhaul when Representative John A. Boehner of Ohio and other Republican leaders summoned more than 100 industry
  lobbyists to Capitol Hill for a private strategy session.
  The bill's passage in the House already seemed inevitable. But Mr. Boehner and his deputies told the Wall Street
  lobbyists and trade association leaders that by teaming up, they could still perhaps block its final passage or at least water
  it down.
  "We need you to get out there and speak up against this," Mr. Boehner said that December afternoon, according to three
  people familiar with his remarks, while also warning against cutting side deals with Democrats.
  That sort of alliance — they won a few skirmishes, though they lost the war on the regulatory bill — is business as usual
  for Mr. Boehner, the House minority leader and would-be speaker if Republicans win the House in November. He
  maintains especially tight ties with a circle of lobbyists and former aides representing some of the nation's biggest
  businesses, including Goldman Sachs, Google, Citigroup, R. J. Reynolds, MillerCoors and UPS.
  They have contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to his campaigns over the years, provided him rides on their
  corporate jets, socialized with him at luxury golf resorts and waterfront bashes and are now leading fund-raising efforts for
  his Boehner for Speaker campaign, which is soliciting checks of up to $37,800 each, the maximum allowed.
  Some of the lobbyists readily acknowledge routinely seeking his office's help — calling the congressman and his aides as
  often as several times a week — to advance their agenda in Washington. And in many cases, Mr. Boehner has helped
  them out.
  As Democrats increasingly try to cast the Ohio congressman as the face of the Republican Party — President Obama
  mentioned his name eight times in a speech last week — and as Mr. Boehner becomes more visible, his ties to lobbyists,
  cultivated since he arrived here in 1991, are coming under attack.
  The woman he hopes to replace, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, derided him on Friday as having met "countless times with
  special-interest lobbyists in an effort to stop tough legislation" that would regulate corporations and protect consumers.
  And the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, through a spokeswoman, charged that he "epitomizes the
  smoked-filled, backroom, special-interest deal making that turns off voters about Washington."
  Mr. Boehner, who declined to be interviewed for this article, and his lobbyist allies ridicule such criticism as politically
  motivated by desperate Democrats. His actions, they say, simply reflect the pro-business, antiregulatory philosophy that
  he has espoused for more than three decades, dating back to when Mr. Boehner, the son of a tavern owner, ran a small
  plastics company in Ohio. And fielding requests from lobbyists is nothing unusual, he says.
  "I get lobbied every day by somebody," he said last month after a speech in Cleveland. "It could be by my wife. It could be
  the bellman. It goes on all day, everyday, everyplace."
  Mr. Boehner — a 60-year-old, perpetually tanned, sharply tailored, chain-smoking golfer — is not as fiery as Newt
  Gingrich or as unrelenting an arm-twister as Tom DeLay, two of his Republican predecessors in top House posts. It is his
  reputation as a "Chamber of Commerce" Republican and his fund-raising skills — he has raised $36 million for
  Republican causes during this election cycle, more than almost anyone else in his party — that explain, in part, his rise.
  If elected as his party's leader in the House, Mr. Boehner will certainly lean on his industry allies for help as he builds
  coalitions necessary to push legislation through Congress, his office acknowledges. His friends say there is nothing wrong
  with that.
  "Does he have a lot of relationships in this city? Yes, absolutely," said Mark lsakowitz, a friend whose Republican firm
  represents more than three dozen financial, telecommunications, energy and consumer products companies as diverse
  as Coca-Cola and Zurich Financial Services. "But I think all the good lawmakers do."
  Mr. Boehner won some of his first national headlines back in 1996 after he was caught handing out checks from tobacco
  lobbyists to fellow Republicans on the House floor. Then the fourth-ranking House Republican, Mr. Boehner said he had
  broken no rules and was simply assisting his lobbyist friends, who were contributing to other Republicans' campaigns.
  His business-friendly reputation was enhanced through the weekly powwows he organized on Capitol Hill nicknamed the
  Thursday Group, a gathering of conservative leaders and business lobbyists whom he relied on to help push the party's
  legislative agenda. The Thursday gathering was disbanded after a Republican power struggle that cost him his leadership
  position.
  But he continued to routinely meet with business leaders, particularly in his role as chairman of the Education and the
  Workforce Committee, and returned to power as House G.O.P. leader in 2006. Several of the onetime Thursday regulars,
  along with some newcomers, are among the close-knit group that routinely call on Mr. Boehner's office for client matters,
  write checks to his campaign and socialize with him.
  That tight circle includes Mr. lsakowitz; Bruce Gates, a lobbyist for the cigarette maker Altria; Nicholas E. Calio, a
  Citigroup lobbyist; and two former aides, Marc Lampkin and Sam Geduldig, both now financial services lobbyists.
  The tobacco industry is particularly well represented, with both Mr. Gates and John Fish, a lobbyist for R. J. Reynolds,
  maker of Camel cigarettes, in the group. People affiliated with those companies have contributed at least $340,000 to Mr.
  Boehner's political campaigns, with Mr. Gates being the top individual donor among the thousands during Mr. Boehner's
  political career, according to a tally by the Center for Public Integrity.
  While many lawmakers in each party have networks of donors, lobbyists and former aides who now represent corporate
  interests, Mr. Boehner's ties seem especially deep. His clique even has a nickname on Capitol Hill, Boehner Land. The
  members of this inner circle said their association with Mr. Boehner translates into open access to him and his staff.
  "He likes to bring similarly minded people together to try to advance legislation or oppose it," said Drew Maloney, a
  lobbyist at Ogilvy Government Relations. "That is how you get things done."
  One lobbyist in the club — after lauding each staff member in Mr. Boehner's office that he routinely calls to ask for help —
  ticked off the list of recent issues for which he had won the lawmaker's backing: combating fee increases for the oil
  industry, fighting a proposed cap on debit card fees, protecting tax breaks for hedge fund executives and opposing a cap
  on greenhouse gas emissions.
  Still, with Mr. Boehner and his party in the minority, they often lost the fights.
  But despite the recent string of defeats on the House floor, Mr. Boehner has benefited from his alliance with lobbyists.
  From 2000 to 2007, Mr. Boehner flew at least 45 times, often with his wife, Debbie, on corporate jets provided by
  companies including R. J. Reynolds. (As required, Mr. Boehner reimbursed part of the costs.)
  In addition, over the last decade, he has taken 41 other trips paid for by corporate sponsors or industry groups, often to
  popular golf spots. Those trips make him one of the top House beneficiaries of such travel, which has recently been
  curbed as a result of changes in ethics rules in Washington.
  Mr. Boehner continues to travel to popular golf destinations on a corporate-subsidized tab, although now it is paid for
  through his political action committee, the Freedom Project. In the last 18 months, it has spent at least $67,000 at the Ritz
  Carlton Naples in Florida, at least $20,000 at the Robert Trent Jones Golf Club in Gainesville, Va., and at least $29,000 at
  the Muirfield Village Golf Club in Dublin, Ohio, federal records show, for fund-raising events.
  In June, with the prospects for a Republican takeover of the House rising, Mr. Boehner moved to accelerate his fund-
  raising effort, starting what he called the Boehner for Speaker campaign. The idea was to use his high profile to draw
  large donations that would be mostly allocated to help elect other House Republicans.
  He turned again to the same group of lobbyists, former aides and friends during a July meeting at the headquarters of the
  Republican National Committee.
  "The wave is there, there is a rebellion in the country, and we have good candidates," Mr. Boehner told his supporters,
  one of the lobbyists present at the meeting recalled. "But I don't want to miss this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity because
  we have not raised enough money. They might be able to stop us with a wall of money."
  Mr. Calio of Citigroup was among the first to write a large check. So far, a party spokesman said, the campaign has raised
  nearly $2 million. Mr. Boehner has helped raise millions more in the last six weeks for Republican House candidates
  across the country and the party, appearing at more than 40 fund-raisers.
  The Boehner for Speaker campaign offers donors who give the maximum amount special perks, like "meetings with
  Leader Boehner and much much more."
  But his lobbyist friends and former aides said these incentives did not mean too much, because they already had plenty of
  access to Mr. Boehner. They just now want to see him as the speaker of the House.
  "He knows this is going to be a tough election," said Samuel J. Baptista, a friend, golf partner and lobbyist whose clients
  include Goldman Sachs and Discover Financial. "But people who underestimate him really do so at their own peril."

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772323 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  sbwhoeop
  Saturday, September 11, 2010 2:20 PM
  H: On NYT website within last hour, in tomorrow's paper. Paid TV ads, please. Sid
  September 11,2010
  G.O.P. Leader Is Tightly Bound to Lobbyists
  By ERIC LIPTON
  WASHINGTON — House Democrats were preparing late last year for the first floor vote on the financial regulatory
  overhaul when Representative John A. Boehner of Ohio and other Republican leaders summoned more than 100 industry
  lobbyists to Capitol Hill for a private strategy session.
  The bill's passage in the House already seemed inevitable. But Mr. Boehner and his deputies told the Wall Street
  lobbyists and trade association leaders that by teaming up, they could still perhaps block its final passage or at least water
  it down.
  "We need you to get out there and speak up against this," Mr. Boehner said that December afternoon, according to three
  people familiar with his remarks, while also warning against cutting side deals with Democrats.
  That sort of alliance — they won a few skirmishes, though they lost the war on the regulatory bill — is business as usual
  for Mr. Boehner, the House minority leader and would-be speaker if Republicans win the House in November. He
  maintains especially tight ties with a circle of lobbyists and former aides representing some of the nation's biggest
  businesses, including Goldman Sachs, Google, Citigroup, R. J. Reynolds, MillerCoors and UPS.
  They have contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to his campaigns over the years, provided him rides on their
  corporate jets, socialized with him at luxury golf resorts and waterfront bashes and are now leading fund-raising efforts for
  his Boehner for Speaker campaign, which is soliciting checks of up to $37,800 each, the maximum allowed.
  Some of the lobbyists readily acknowledge routinely seeking his office's help — calling the congressman and his aides as
  often as several times a week — to advance their agenda in Washington. And in many cases, Mr. Boehner has helped
  them out.
  As Democrats increasingly try to cast the Ohio congressman as the face of the Republican Party — President Obama
  mentioned his name eight times in a speech last week — and as Mr. Boehner becomes more visible, his ties to lobbyists,
  cultivated since he arrived here in 1991, are coming under attack.
  The woman he hopes to replace, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, derided him on Friday as having met "countless times with
  special-interest lobbyists in an effort to stop tough legislation" that would regulate corporations and protect consumers.
  And the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, through a spokeswoman, charged that he "epitomizes the
  smoked-filled, backroom, special-interest deal making that turns off voters about Washington."
  Mr. Boehner, who declined to be interviewed for this article, and his lobbyist allies ridicule such criticism as politically
  motivated by desperate Democrats. His actions, they say, simply reflect the pro-business, antiregulatory philosophy that
  he has espoused for more than three decades, dating back to when Mr. Boehner, the son of a tavern owner, ran a small
  plastics company in Ohio. And fielding requests from lobbyists is nothing unusual, he says.
  "I get lobbied every day by somebody," he said last month after a speech in Cleveland. "It could be by my wife. It could be
  the bellman. It goes on all day, everyday, everyplace."
  Mr. Boehner — a 60-year-old, perpetually tanned, sharply tailored, chain-smoking golfer — is not as fiery as Newt
  Gingrich or as unrelenting an arm-twister as Tom DeLay, two of his Republican predecessors in top House posts. It is his
  reputation as a "Chamber of Commerce" Republican and his fund-raising skills — he has raised $36 million for
  Republican causes during this election cycle, more than almost anyone else in his party — that explain, in part, his rise.
  If elected as his party's leader in the House, Mr. Boehner will certainly lean on his industry allies for help as he builds
  coalitions necessary to push legislation through Congress, his office acknowledges. His friends say there is nothing wrong
  with that.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772323 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772323 Date: 08/31/2015
  "Does he have a lot of relationships in this city? Yes, absolutely," said Mark lsakowitz, a friend whose Republican firm
  represents more than three dozen financial, telecommunications, energy and consumer products companies as diverse
  as Coca-Cola and Zurich Financial Services. "But I think all the good lawmakers do."
  Mr. Boehner won some of his first national headlines back in 1996 after he was caught handing out checks from tobacco
  lobbyists to fellow Republicans on the House floor. Then the fourth-ranking House Republican, Mr. Boehner said he had
  broken no rules and was simply assisting his lobbyist friends, who were contributing to other Republicans' campaigns.
  His business-friendly reputation was enhanced through the weekly powwows he organized on Capitol Hill nicknamed the
  Thursday Group, a gathering of conservative leaders and business lobbyists whom he relied on to help push the party's
  legislative agenda. The Thursday gathering was disbanded after a Republican power struggle that cost him his leadership
  position.
  But he continued to routinely meet with business leaders, particularly in his role as chairman of the Education and the
  Workforce Committee, and returned to power as House G.O.P. leader in 2006. Several of the onetime Thursday regulars,
  along with some newcomers, are among the close-knit group that routinely call on Mr. Boehner's office for client matters,
  write checks to his campaign and socialize with him.
  That tight circle includes Mr. lsakowitz; Bruce Gates, a lobbyist for the cigarette maker Altria; Nicholas E. Calio, a
  Citigroup lobbyist; and two former aides, Marc Lampkin and Sam Geduldig, both now financial services lobbyists.
  The tobacco industry is particularly well represented, with both Mr. Gates and John Fish, a lobbyist for R. J. Reynolds,
  maker of Camel cigarettes, in the group. People affiliated with those companies have contributed at least $340,000 to Mr.
  Boehner's political campaigns, with Mr. Gates being the top individual donor among the thousands during Mr. Boehner's
  political career, according to a tally by the Center for Public Integrity.
  While many lawmakers in each party have networks of donors, lobbyists and former aides who now represent corporate
  interests, Mr. Boehner's ties seem especially deep. His clique even has a nickname on Capitol Hill, Boehner Land. The
  members of this inner circle said their association with Mr. Boehner translates into open access to him and his staff.
  "He likes to bring similarly minded people together to try to advance legislation or oppose it," said Drew Maloney, a
  lobbyist at Ogilvy Government Relations. "That is how you get things done."
  One lobbyist in the club — after lauding each staff member in Mr. Boehner's office that he routinely calls to ask for help —
  ticked off the list of recent issues for which he had won the lawmaker's backing: combating fee increases for the oil
  industry, fighting a proposed cap on debit card fees, protecting tax breaks for hedge fund executives and opposing a cap
  on greenhouse gas emissions.
  Still, with Mr. Boehner and his party in the minority, they often lost the fights.
  But despite the recent string of defeats on the House floor, Mr. Boehner has benefited from his alliance with lobbyists.
  From 2000 to 2007, Mr. Boehner flew at least 45 times, often with his wife, Debbie, on corporate jets provided by
  companies including R. J. Reynolds. (As required, Mr. Boehner reimbursed part of the costs.)
  In addition, over the last decade, he has taken 41 other trips paid for by corporate sponsors or industry groups, often to
  popular golf spots. Those trips make him one of the top House beneficiaries of such travel, which has recently been
  curbed as a result of changes in ethics rules in Washington.
  Mr. Boehner continues to travel to popular golf destinations on a corporate-subsidized tab, although now it is paid for
  through his political action committee, the Freedom Project. In the last 18 months, it has spent at least $67,000 at the Ritz
  Carlton Naples in Florida, at least $20,000 at the Robert Trent Jones Golf Club in Gainesville, Va., and at least $29,000 at
  the Muirfield Village Golf Club in Dublin, Ohio, federal records show, for fund-raising events.
  In June, with the prospects for a Republican takeover of the House rising, Mr. Boehner moved to accelerate his fund-
  raising effort, starting what he called the Boehner for Speaker campaign. The idea was to use his high profile to draw
  large donations that would be mostly allocated to help elect other House Republicans.
  He turned again to the same group of lobbyists, former aides and friends during a July meeting at the headquarters of the
  Republican National Committee.
  "The wave is there, there is a rebellion in the country, and we have good candidates," Mr. Boehner told his supporters,
  one of the lobbyists present at the meeting recalled. "But I don't want to miss this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity because
  we have not raised enough money. They might be able to stop us with a wall of money."
  Mr. Calio of Citigroup was among the first to write a large check. So far, a party spokesman said, the campaign has raised
  nearly $2 million. Mr. Boehner has helped raise millions more in the last six weeks for Republican House candidates
  across the country and the party, appearing at more than 40 fund-raisers.
  The Boehner for Speaker campaign offers donors who give the maximum amount special perks, like "meetings with
  Leader Boehner and much much more."
  But his lobbyist friends and former aides said these incentives did not mean too much, because they already had plenty of
  access to Mr. Boehner. They just now want to see him as the speaker of the House.
  "He knows this is going to be a tough election," said Samuel J. Baptista, a friend, golf partner and lobbyist whose clients
  include Goldman Sachs and Discover Financial. "But people who underestimate him really do so at their own peril."
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772323 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772325
MetadataSubject: (REUTERS) ISRAELI AIR STRIKE KILLS MILITANT IN GAZA STRIP
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-17T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0103/DOC_0C05772325/C05772325.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (Reuters) Israeli air strike kills militant in Gaza Strip
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-0
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 3:14 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772325
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772325 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 3:14 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (Reuters) Israeli air strike kills militant in Gaza Strip
  From: Goldberg, Joshua W
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-0
  Sent: Sun Oct 17 06:07:31 2010
  Subject: (Reuters) Israeli air strike kills militant in Gaza Strip
  GAZA (Reuters) - An Israeli air strike killed a Palestinian militant in the northern Gaza Strip when he and others
  attempted to launch a rocket or mortar shell towards Israel, the Israeli army and Palestinian medics said. Palestinian
  medical officials at a Gaza hospital said the dead man had been identified as a member of the Islamic Jihad militant
  group. It was the first killing in an Israeli attack on militants in the Gaza Strip since September 27.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772325 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772340
MetadataSubject: OPINION ANALYSIS
MetadataFrom: State
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0097/DOC_0C05772340/C05772340.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: O-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772340
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  FOR OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT USE ONLY RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  flOffice of
  Research
  Global Opinion in Perspective
  Opinion Analysis
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772340 Date: 08/31/2015
  Turkish Views of U.S. Improve in July
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772340 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772340 Date: 08/31/2015 B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772340 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772340 Date: 08/31/2015 B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772340 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772340 Date: 08/31/2015 B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772340 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772340 Date: 08/31/2015 B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772340 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772349
MetadataSubject: BOUT EXTRADITON UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0095/DOC_0C05772349/C05772349.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: Bout Extradition Update
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Harris, Robert K; Wilson, Kathleen A
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 12:12 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772349
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: FYI
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772349 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5, B6
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 12:12 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW: Bout Extradition Update
  FYI
  From: Johnson, Clifton M
  To: Koh, Harold Hongju
  Cc: Harris, Robert K; Wilson, Kathleen A
  Sent: Tue Aug 31 08:56:37 2010
  Subject: Bout Extradition Update
  SBU — close hold
  Harold,
  Best, Cliff
  PS — I'll be on TDY in China for 10 days with Peter G., starting tomorrow morning, working on concluding two
  updates to our aviation counterterrorism agreements.
  Clifton M. Johnson
  Assistant Legal Adviser
  Law Enforcement and Intelligence
  (202) 647-7324 (Office)
  (202) 647-4802 (Fax)
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772349 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772350
MetadataSubject: (THE DAILY MAIL) HOW BLAIR RESCUED PALESTINE DEAL WORTH $200M TO HIS �2M-A-YEAR PAYMASTERS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jake
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0097/DOC_0C05772350/C05772350.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: O-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: (The Daily Mail) How Blair rescued Palestine deal worth $200m to his £2m-a-year
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES_DutyDeputies; SES-O_SWO
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 10:53 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772350
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  paymasters
  FYI

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772350 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 10:53 AM
  To:
  Subject: FW: (The Daily Mail) How Blair rescued Palestine deal worth $200m to his £2m-a-year
  paymasters
  FYI
  From: Sidereas, Evyenia M
  To: S_SpecialAssistants
  Cc: SES_DutyDeputies; SES-O_SWO
  Sent: Sun Sep 12 03:46:23 2010
  Subject: FW: (The Daily Mail) How Blair rescued Palestine deal worth $200m to his Um-a-year paymasters
  Colleagues,
  FYI, in light of pending phone call with Blair later today.
  Regards,
  Evyenia
  aiiOnline
  Special investigation: How Blair rescued Palestine
  deal worth $200m to his Um-a-year paymasters
  By David Rose
  Last updated at 12:42 AM on 12th September 2010
  Tony Blair mounted an intense political lobbying campaign to rescue a struggling mobile-phone business owned by a client of the bank
  that pays him a £2 million annual salary.
  The firm, Wataniya, had already built a brand-new network in the Israeli-occupied Palestinian West Bank. But it almost collapsed before
  launching its service, jeopardising a £450 million investment, because Israel's government was refusing to let it use the frequencies it
  needed to operate. Acting in his capacity as the international Middle East peace envoy, Mr Blair helped to save the company by
  spending months putting pressure on Israel's prime minister and his colleagues in a bid to change their minds.
  An investigation by The Mail on Sunday has revealed:
  • Mr Blair spoke of the need to get Wataniya up and running in order to boost the Palestinian economy. However JP Morgan,
  the American investment bank that employs him as a consultant, has a financial stake in Wataniya through Wataniya's owner,
  the Qatari firm Qtel, which is an important client of JP Morgan.
  • Financial documents show that back in 2007, JP Morgan had been one of four 'mandated lead arrangers' of a $2 billion loan
  with which Qtel bought Wataniya from its original Kuwaiti owners. Last year, the bank joined a syndicate that lent Qtel a further
  $500 million, and became a 'lead arranger' for a Qtel bond issue which raised yet another $1.5billion.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772350 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772350 Date: 08/31/2015
  In these deals, JP Morgan would have been paid many millions of pounds in fees, and if the loans had gone bad, could have been
  exposed to substantial losses. 'Its original exposure was probably around $200 million,' one Wall Street expert said yesterday.
  Last night a bank spokesman refused to comment, or to disclose any further details. He did not deny that Qtel was a significant JP
  Morgan client. A spokesman for Mr Blair said he had no knowledge of any connection between JP Morgan and Qtel.
  Mr Blair's lobbying campaign also helped to enrich the family of the Palestinian Authority president, Mahmoud Abbas — a central figure
  in the search for Middle East peace. A firm run by his son Tarek has secured a lucrative contract to provide advertising for
  Wataniya. Mr Blair's envoy role — for which, as he has often boasted, he is not paid
  a salary — has now been enhanced.
  Earlier this month, Mr Abbas, Mr Blair and the most important man he lobbied, Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, sat down
  together in Washington with President Obama to begin new direct peace talks.
  Last night Mr Blair faced calls to publish full details of the myriad business interests that have netted him a personal fortune estimated
  to be at least £15 million since he left office.
  He is paid not only by JP Morgan but also by the insurance giant Zurich, and his own private consulting firm, Tony Blair Associates,
  counts among its clients the royal families of Abu Dhabi and Kuwait.
  A frequent visitor to Libya, he has used his personal friendship with the dictator Colonel Gaddafi to explore business opportunities there
  on behalf of JP Morgan.
  David Davis, the senior backbench Tory MP, said: 'There are now clear questions about how he has used his powers as a peace envoy
  and whether that has benefited his commercial sponsors.
  'He must now put all his financial affairs into the public domain. Only then can we be sure he has behaved in an appropriate manner.'
  Mr Blair was appointed an envoy on leaving Downing Street in June 2007. He represents the 'Quartet' — the United Nations, the US, the
  EU and Russia.
  His special area of responsibility is the Palestinian economy.
  With ten rooms permanently booked at Jerusalem's most expensive hotel, the American Colony, at an annual cost of £1.1 million, he
  spends a few days there each month.
  As The Mail on Sunday reported last year, many Palestinian businessmen say his achievements have been limited. Projects he has
  loudly supported — such as an international business park near the holy city of Hebron — have come to nothing.
  'But Wataniya is the great exception,' one leading West Bank entrepeneur said yesterday. 'Indeed, until he finally managed to sort it out
  at the end of last year, it was difficult to get him to engage with anything else.'
  When Mr Blair arrived in the Middle East in 2007, there was only one mobile firm, Jawwal, operating in the Palestinian Occupied
  Territories, Gaza and the West Bank. But Wataniya had already purchased licences for £313 million from Mr Abbas's Palestinian
  Authority to provide a competing service.
  In July 2008, Mr Blair brokered what Wataniya thought was a cast-iron deal with Israel to make the frequencies it needed available. In
  order to provide a modern 3G service to include mobile intemet, Wataniya had been seeking a bandwidth of 4.8 megahertz.
  On the strength of this agreement, it continued to build mobile-phone masts, switching centres and other installations it needed to
  operate, spending a further £100 million.
  It was set to launch in June last year. Meanwhile, amid fierce local controversy, Wataniya managed to secure special additional loans
  from a US government programme that had been set up to help Palestinian farmers and small businesses — despite the backing it had
  from Qtel and, indirectly, banks such as JP Morgan.
  Launching this programme in 2007, the State Department said it was aimed at 'an olive grower who wants to expand operations, a
  young person with a small information technology company, or someone who wants to hire neighbours to produce and export
  Palestinian embroidery' — not a £450 million mobile network.
  The US loans to Wataniya, though worth a relatively modest £11 million, deprived other enterprises of them.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772350 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772350 Date: 08/31/2015
  Critics pointed to the fact that involved with Wataniya were leading members of the Palestinian elite around Mr Abbas. Its Palestine
  chairman is Mohammad Mustafa — his financial adviser and closest associate, who accompanies him on virtually every foreign trip.
  'In the meetings he had with the Prime Minister, he brought it up time
  and time again, and kept pushing, pushing.'
  In the late spring of 2009, Mr Blair's frequency deal unravelled. Claiming.that the Palestinian Authority had failed to fulfil unspecified
  commitments, Israel refused to release the necessary bandwidth. Wataniya teetered on the brink of collapse as first the June and then
  a second October launch date, came and went, with the network still inoperative.
  Alan Richardson, a Scottish engineer who had already set up a mobile network in Iraq, was Wataniya's Palestine chief executive until
  June this year.
  'We invested according to a business plan that was based on false promises,' he told me last October. We cannot meet our subscriber
  targets with the frequencies they are offering.'
  However, Mr Blair was furiously trying to rescue the company. 'From day one of this problem, he's been very proactive through his role
  as Quartet representative,' Mr Richardson said.
  A senior Israeli official said last week: 'In the meetings he had with the Prime Minister, he brought it up time and time again, and kept
  pushing, pushing.'
  One reason the Israelis advanced for not releasing the bandwidth was security — claiming it needed the frequencies for military
  communications. Another Israeli source confirmed that Mr Blair repeatedly raised the matter in meetings with Israel's defence minister,
  Ehud Barak.
  Mr Blair made several public statements about the Wataniya frequency dispute, and did not mention JP Morgan at all.
  'If we cannot get the proper frequency and it cannot go forward then we don't have proper competition on mobile telephony and we
  don't get the investment and jobs,' he said after the first launch was cancelled in June 2009.
  'It may seem a small thing in one sense but it's very important for the Palestinian economy.'
  Finally, after Qtel threatened legal action, Mr Blair got his way. Although Israel agreed to release only 3.8 megahertz at first, local
  sources say it has promised to expand this to 4.8 megahertz once Wataniya has 350,000 customers.
  Wataniya launched on November 10, with Mr Blair at the opening ceremony. He said it proved that 'Palestine is open for business'.
  Earlier this year, Mr Blair singled out the affair in a report he wrote on his envoy work to the Commons' Foreign Affairs Committee.
  'Wataniya's launch is overdue, but extremely welcome,' he wrote, '[it] means the completion of a key milestone in the economic reform
  and state building agenda ...Wataniya is an example of a flagship project, which has a significant impact on people's perceptions and
  hopes for what a lasting peace might bring.'
  Yesterday The Mail on Sunday asked Mr Blair's spokesman Matthew Doyle whether he had declared the bank's interest in his meetings
  with the Israelis.
  He replied in an email, saying only: 'Tony Blair raised Wataniya at the request of the Palestinian Authority in his role as Quartet
  Representative. He has no knowledge of any connection between QTel and JP Morgan and has never discussed the issue with JP
  Morgan nor have they ever raised it with him. Any suggestion that he raised it for any reason other than the one stated to help the
  Palestinians or that in some way he has benefited from Wataniya is untrue and defamatory.'
  Critics Of the Wataniya mobile- phone project backed so strongly by Tony Blair claim it is marred by a longstanding feature of the
  Palestinian scene — cronyism, in which close associates of the ruling Fatah party leadership somehow manage to derive lucrative
  benefits.
  In the case of Wataniya, the link could hardly be closer — for one big beneficiary of the firm's investments is none other than Tarek
  Abbas, the son of the Palestinian Authority president, Mahmoud Abbas.
  American-educated Tarek runs Sky, the West Bank's biggest advertising agency. Last year, it was awarded a contract to be Wataniya's
  lead advertising agent, with both a monthly retainer and further payments for individual campaigns.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772350 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772350 Date: 08/31/2015
  Palestinian business sources say that its work for Wataniya has been worth approximately £700,000 in the past 12 months — almost
  certainly, the biggest advertising 'spend' in Palestine.
  Meanwhile, businessman Firas Nasruddin, a friend of both Tarek and his father, owns Hemaya, a security company staffed by men in
  sunglasses and black uniforms, some of whom are former fighters against Israel in groups such as the AI-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades.
  Others are former Palestinian Authority police.
  Hemaya has a contract to provide security for Wataniya personnel and installations.
  It also serves several other firms that are supported by the Palestine Investment Fund, a large pot of money that is meant to be used to
  benefit the Palestinian people.
  The fund has a 43 per cent stake in Wataniya. President Abbas's chief adviser Mohammad Mustafa is chairman and CEO of the fund,
  and chairman of Wataniya.
  Wataniya's spokesman, Mohammad Nasser said last night he could not answer any questions about how the Sky and Hemaya
  contracts were awarded until next week, while Tarek Abbas's lawyer — who usually speaks on his behalf — could not be reached.
  In an interview last year, Wataniya's former Palestine chief, Scot Alan Richardson, said there had been 'a straightforward contract
  process that went through all the normal procedures', adding that Sky and Hemaya had been given their deals because they
  represented 'best price, best quality'.
  Wataniya, he said, operated in a 'fair and transparent manner'.
  Nevertheless, the outcome means that as Tony Blair takes part in the renewed search for a peace deal, both sides will know that his
  support for Wataniya has produced sizeable benefits for President Abbas's family and friends.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772350 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772357
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0097/DOC_0C05772357/C05772357.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: O-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fwd: POLITICO Playbook, presented by Washington's NewsChannel 8: To deprive Dems
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 9:34 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772357
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
MetadataSubject:
  POLITICO PLAYBOOK, PRESENTED BY WASHINGTON'S NEWCHANNEL 8: TO DEPRIVE DEMS OF AN ISSUE, BOEHNER WOULD COMPROMISE ON TAX-CUT EXTENSION -- NYT SOFTENS BOEHNER WORKING AFTER AIDE COMPLAINS -- MAUREEN DOWD;S SISTER, PEGGY, MAY SWITCH FROM OBAMA TO RO...

ExtractedBodyText:
  of an issue, Boehner would compromise on tax-cut extension -- NYT softens Boehner
  wording after aide complains -- Maureen Dowd's sister, Peggy, may switch from Obama
  to RO...
  BREAKING — DNC goes up on national cable Tuesday with an ad on "The Boehner plan." A
  DNC official says it'll be up a little less than a week: 'This ad is one product we'll use to
  define Mr. Boehner, his ethics and priorities for the American people - and there will be others."
  You Tube http://bit.ly/dB6Yb1
  ROBERT GIBBS (*PressSec) tweets on the NYT front-pager on House Republican
  Leader John Boehner: "Headline says it all.. .A G.O.P. Leader Tightly Bound to Lobbyists
  http://nyti.ms/bxbF4D ... Don't forget this handy clip & save graphic of 'I( Street Cabinet'
  (black & white photo doesn't do that tan justice!) http://nyti.ms/9n1wVp"
  BOEHNER taped "Face the Nation" yesterday from West Chester, Ohio:
  Bob Schieffer: "I want to make sure I heard what you said correctly: you're saying that you are
  willing to vote for those middle class tax cuts, even though the bill will not include ... extending
  the tax cuts for the upper bracket American."
  Rep. Boehner: "Bob, we don't know what the bill's going to say, alright? If the only option I
  have is to vote for those at 250 and below, of course I'm going to do that. But I'm going to do
  everything I can to fight to make sure that we extend the current tax rates for all Americans."
  A Boehner aide reads between the lines: "Despite what Obama says, Republicans are not
  holding middle-class tax cuts hostage and we're not going to let him get away with those types of
  false claims. Our focus remains on getting bipartisan support for a freeze on all current rates,
  because that is what is best for the economy and small business job creation. Boehner's words
  were calculated to deprive Obama of the ability to continue making those false claims, and as a
  result we are in a better position rhetorically to pressure more Democrats to support a full
  freeze."
  AN INSTANT CLASSIC:
  Schieffer: "Mr. Boehner, I'm going to ask you this question because I'm not objective about this
  - I'm a cancer survivor, I used to be a heavy smoker. Do you still smoke?"
  Boehner: "I do."
  Schieffer: "You have taken $340,000 from the tobacco industry. They've been the largest
  contributor to your political campaigns over the year. How do you square that with the fact that
  cigarette smoking is the leading cause of preventable deaths in this country, 435,000 people,
  their deaths are linked to cancer, that's 1 in 5. How do you justify that in your own mind?"
  Boehner:i"Bob, tobacco is a legal product in America. The American people have a right to
  decide for themselves whether they want to partake or not. There are lots of things that we deal
  with and come in contact with every day, from alcohol to food to cigarettes, a lot of the things
  that aren't good for our health. But the American people ought to have the right to make those
  decisions on their own." ...
  Schleifer: "If you should become Speaker, you could set a good example for the country by
  saying, 'I'm going to stop smoking.' Maybe you could get the President, I understand he smokes
  too, maybe the two of you could find a way to try to stop smoking. That'd be kind of a good
  thing, wouldn't it?"
  I Boehner: "Bob, I appreciate your suggestion."

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772357 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 9:34 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fwd: POLITICO Playbook, presented by Washington's NewsChannel 8: To deprive Dems
  of an issue, Boehner would compromise on tax-cut extension -- NYT softens Boehner
  wording after aide complains -- Maureen Dowd's sister, Peggy, may switch from Obama
  to RO...
  BREAKING — DNC goes up on national cable Tuesday with an ad on "The Boehner plan." A
  DNC official says it'll be up a little less than a week: 'This ad is one product we'll use to
  define Mr. Boehner, his ethics and priorities for the American people - and there will be others."
  You Tube http://bit.ly/dB6Yb1
  ROBERT GIBBS (*PressSec) tweets on the NYT front-pager on House Republican
  Leader John Boehner: "Headline says it all.. .A G.O.P. Leader Tightly Bound to Lobbyists
  http://nyti.ms/bxbF4D ... Don't forget this handy clip & save graphic of 'I( Street Cabinet'
  (black & white photo doesn't do that tan justice!) http://nyti.ms/9n1wVp"
  BOEHNER taped "Face the Nation" yesterday from West Chester, Ohio:
  Bob Schieffer: "I want to make sure I heard what you said correctly: you're saying that you are
  willing to vote for those middle class tax cuts, even though the bill will not include ... extending
  the tax cuts for the upper bracket American."
  Rep. Boehner: "Bob, we don't know what the bill's going to say, alright? If the only option I
  have is to vote for those at 250 and below, of course I'm going to do that. But I'm going to do
  everything I can to fight to make sure that we extend the current tax rates for all Americans."
  A Boehner aide reads between the lines: "Despite what Obama says, Republicans are not
  holding middle-class tax cuts hostage and we're not going to let him get away with those types of
  false claims. Our focus remains on getting bipartisan support for a freeze on all current rates,
  because that is what is best for the economy and small business job creation. Boehner's words
  were calculated to deprive Obama of the ability to continue making those false claims, and as a
  result we are in a better position rhetorically to pressure more Democrats to support a full
  freeze."
  AN INSTANT CLASSIC:
  Schieffer: "Mr. Boehner, I'm going to ask you this question because I'm not objective about this
  - I'm a cancer survivor, I used to be a heavy smoker. Do you still smoke?"
  Boehner: "I do."
  Schieffer: "You have taken $340,000 from the tobacco industry. They've been the largest
  contributor to your political campaigns over the year. How do you square that with the fact that
  cigarette smoking is the leading cause of preventable deaths in this country, 435,000 people,
  their deaths are linked to cancer, that's 1 in 5. How do you justify that in your own mind?"
  Boehner:i"Bob, tobacco is a legal product in America. The American people have a right to
  decide for themselves whether they want to partake or not. There are lots of things that we deal
  with and come in contact with every day, from alcohol to food to cigarettes, a lot of the things
  that aren't good for our health. But the American people ought to have the right to make those
  decisions on their own." ...
  Schleifer: "If you should become Speaker, you could set a good example for the country by
  saying, 'I'm going to stop smoking.' Maybe you could get the President, I understand he smokes
  too, maybe the two of you could find a way to try to stop smoking. That'd be kind of a good
  thing, wouldn't it?"
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772357 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772357 Date: 08/31/2015
  I Boehner: "Bob, I appreciate your suggestion."
  Original Message
  From: Mike Allen
  To: Undisclosed recipients:;
  Sent: Sun, Sep 12, 2010 8:43 am
  Subject: POLITICO Playbook, presented by Washington's NewsChannel 8: To deprive Dems of an issue, Boehner would
  compromise on tax-cut extension -- NYT softens Boehner wording after aide complains -- Maureen Dowd's sister, Peggy,
  may switch from Obama to ROMNEY
  BREAKING — DNC goes up on national cable Tuesday with an ad on "The Boehner plan." A DNC official
  says it'll be up a little less than a week: "This ad is one product we'll use to define Mr. Boehner, his ethics
  and priorities for the American people - and there will be others." YouTube http://bit.ly/dB6Ybl
  ROBERT GIBBS (gPressSec) tweets on the NYT front-pager on House Republican Leader John
  Boehner: "Headline says it all.. .A G.O.P. Leader Tightly Bound to Lobbyists http://nyti.ms/bxbF4D ... Don't
  forget this handy clip & save graphic of 'I( Street Cabinet' (black & white photo doesn't do that tan justice!)
  http://nyti.ms/9n1wVp"
  BOEHNER taped "Face the Nation" yesterday from West Chester, Ohio:
  Bob Schieffer: "I want to make sure I heard what you said correctly: you're saying that you are willing to vote
  for those middle class tax cuts, even though the bill will not include ... extending the tax cuts for the upper
  bracket American."
  Rep. Boehner: "Bob, we don't know what the bill's going to say, alright? If the only option I have is to vote
  for those at 250 and below, of course I'm going to do that. But I'm going to do everything I can to fight to make
  sure that we extend the current tax rates for all Americans."
  A Boehner aide reads between the lines: "Despite what Obama says, Republicans are not holding middle-
  class tax cuts hostage and we're not going to let him get away with those types of false claims. Our focus
  remains on getting bipartisan support for a freeze on all current rates, because that is what is best for the
  economy and small business job creation. Boehner's words were calculated to deprive Obama of the ability to
  continue making those false claims, and as a result we are in a better position rhetorically to pressure more
  Democrats to support a full freeze."
  AN INSTANT CLASSIC:
  Schleifer: "Mr. Boehner, I'm going to ask you this question because I'm not objective about this - I'm a cancer
  survivor, I used to be a heavy smoker. Do you still smoke?"
  Boehner: "I do."
  Schieffer: "You have taken $340,000 from the tobacco industry. They've been the largest contributor to your
  political campaigns over the year. How do you square that with the fact that cigarette smoking is the leading
  cause of preventable deaths in this country, 435,000 people, their deaths are linked to cancer, that's 1 in 5. How
  do you justify that in your own mind?"
  Boehner: "Bob, tobacco is a legal product in America. The American people have a right to decide for
  themselves whether they want to partake or not. There are lots of things that we deal with and come in contact
  with every day, from alcohol to food to cigarettes, a lot of the things that aren't good for our health. But the
  American people ought to have the right to make those decisions on their own." ...
  Schleifer: "If you should become Speaker, you could set a good example for the country by saying, 'I'm going
  to stop smoking.' Maybe you could get the President, I understand he smokes too, maybe the two of you could
  find a way to try to stop smoking. That'd be kind of a good thing, wouldn't it?"
  Boehner: "Bob, I appreciate your suggestion."
  ** A message from Washington's NewsChannel 8: Comcast has hired a vast army of lobbyists to rush
  through the largest media merger in American history. The Comcast/NBC monopoly would present serious
  problems for local news in communities across our country. Washington's decision makers must resist the
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772357 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772357 Date: 08/31/2015
  pressure from Comcast and take the necessary time to carefully review this controversial merger to protect the
  public interest. **
  SPOTTED -- Saturday joggers: Sunlen Miller spotted at 18th and Columbia. Lizzie O'Leary at Connecticut
  and T.
  BIRTHDAYS – CBS News' irreplaceable Capitol Hill Producer Jill Jackson (hat tips Kurt Bardella, Joe
  Brettell) ... Henry Waxman ... Sam Brownback ... Politics Daily's Matt Lewis ... (hits Patrick Gavin).
  TOMORROW: Jim Angle
  SLIDE SHOW: The First Lady and Laura Bush embrace yesterday in Shanksville, Pa. Philly Inquirer:
  "Michelle Obama and Laura Bush led the ceremony on a windswept mountaintop Saturday commemorating the
  ninth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, which also marked a turning point in the evolution of the Flight 93 crash
  site from a scarred landscape to national memorial park." http://yhoo.it/b29QPM
  TECH BLOGS: Apple may rush out new iPad version for holidays. http://bit.ly/aBj31P
  GAME CHANGE: 2012 OFF TO SLOW START – GOP heavyweights hold back, freezing field
  compared to past cycles -- Jonathan Martin and Ben Smith: "[T]he primary is on track to start later, and
  more cautiously, than it has in the recent past. In the fall of 2006, Mitt Romney and John McCain were openly
  battling over endorsements from Republican operatives, donors and even county sheriffs in the early primary
  states. The two men beat a well-worn path to New Hampshire, South Carolina, and especially Iowa, where they
  had to watch their step to avoid tripping over Democratic hopefuls like John Edwards and Evan Bayh. But at the
  same point four years later, as the 2010 election enters the home stretch, top-tier Republican presidential
  contenders are hesitant to set foot in the states that kick off the presidential campaign process, let alone issue
  press releases touting their latest gets there.
  --"[Thell GOP nominating contest is shaping up ... as a game of chicken ... Romney, Sarah Palin, Haley
  Barbour, Mitch Daniels and a few other ambitious figures are largely eyeing each other while publicly holding
  back, leaving Tim Pawlenty as the only mainstream Republican trudging down the traditional, early path ...
  Together, they're all making a mockery of the conventional wisdom about the longer and longer arcs that
  modern White House campaigns demand. ... There are three main reasons for the delay: The intense focus on
  the 2010 midterms; the risks of starting too early; and, especially for the best-prepared candidate, Romney, a
  paralyzing fear of failure in Iowa. In a sense, the incentives this year are reversed: candidates have better
  reasons to publicly hold off on declaring their candidacy than to try to gain an early foothold."
  http://bit.ly/an4YWO
  STORY DU JOUR – N.Y. Times Al, 1 col. at the fold, "G.O.P. Leader Tightly Bound to Lobbyists," by
  Eric Lipton: "Mr. Boehner ... maintains especially tight ties with a circle of lobbyists and former aides
  representing some of the nation's biggest businesses ... They have contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars
  to his campaigns, provided him with rides on their corporate jets, socialized with him at luxury golf resorts and
  waterfront bashes and are now leading fund-raising efforts for his Boehner for Speaker campaign, which is
  soliciting checks of up to $37,800 each, the maximum allowed. Some of the lobbyists readily acknowledge
  routinely seeking his office's help — calling the congressman and his aides as often as several times a week."
  http://nyti.ms/asBs02
  --BOEHNER OFFICE REBUTTAL: "Setting the Record Straight: The New York Times' Misleading Attack
  on Boehner": "There is no surer sign that the liberal establishment is threatened by Leader Boehner than the
  story that will appear in ... [The] New York Times." http://bit.ly/94TOD
  --A BOEHNER AIDE: "Boehner's positions on the issues he cited are longstanding, and are obviously not the
  result of one lobbyist's influence. The fact that any reporter would believe or write that Boehner's opposition to
  a 'cap and trade' national energy tax, for example, is 1) recent, or 2) the result of one lobbyist's influence is
  ridiculous."
  --BEHIND THE CURTAIN: Byron York documents changes the NYT made AFTER the story posted:
  "Boehner spokesman Michael Steel says he received a fact-checking email from Times reporter Eric Lipton
  Friday evening asking if Boehner did in fact oppose the cap on greenhouse gases, the tax change for hedge fund
  executives, the debit card fee cap, and increased fees on oil and gas companies. 'Yes, that is correct,' Steel
  responded to Lipton, adding 'I can tell you why, if you care.' Steel says he received no further notes from
  Lipton. Steel says Boehner has long held those positions and does not hold them as a result of lobbying. Hours
  after the email exchange, the Times story was published online, with the statement from the lobbyist that he had
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772357 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772357 Date: 08/31/2015
  'won' Boehner's backing on those matters. After Boehner's aides complained, ... [t]he statement that a lobbyist
  'won' Boehner's backing was changed to one in which a lobbyist 'sought' Boehner's backing. That's a rather
  critical change. The Times also added Boehner's defense that these were long-held positions."
  http://bit.ly/dewsnU
  --RATES JUST WENT UP -- GRAPHIC WITH LIPTON STORY — "Boehner's K Street Cabinet: Some
  of the lobbyists and public affairs consultants with tight links to Representative John A. Boehner:
  http://nyti.ms/cHYFOy
  "FORMER AIDES: John Fish, Reynolds American (Tobacco); Teresa Fish, Electronic Industries Alliance
  (Electronics); Sam Geduldig, Clark Lytle & Geduldig (Financial services, telecommunications); Terry Holt,
  HDMK (Health care, energy); Marc Lampkin, Quinn Gillespie & Associates (Financial services, energy,
  telecommunications); Kevin Madden*, Jim Dyke & Associates (Public affairs, political consulting); Greg
  Maurer, UPS.
  "LONGTIME ASSOCIATES AND FRIENDS: Gary Andres, Dutko Worldwide (Manufacturing, health care,
  shipping); Sue Andres, Union Pacific; Samuel J. Baptista, The Baptista Group (Financial services); Michael
  Boland*, Dome Advisors (Financial services); James Boland, Sundquist Anthony LLC (Waste management,
  financial services); Nicholas E. Calio Citigroup (Financial services); Donald Danner, National Federation of
  Independent Business; Bruce Gates Altria (Tobacco); Mark Isakowitz, Fierce, Isakowitz and Blalock
  (Telecommunications, health care, energy); Drew Maloney, Ogilvy Government Relations (energy,
  pharmaceuticals, finance); Bill Paxon, Akin Gump (Manufacturing, gambling); Dirk Van Dongen, National
  Association of Wholesaler- Distributors.
  "*Not registered as a lobbyist, but works in the political consulting business." http://nyti.ms/cHYFOy
  TOP TWEETS:
  --Washingtonian editor Garrett M. Graff (@vermontgmg): "At Opening Night for the Opera. Down my row
  are Justices Ginsburg and Kagan. Ginsburg has a large piece of anti-Fenty lit in her handbag."
  —*LarrySabato: "USA has pop of 300m+. At least 1 million are nuts. All have been encouraged to seek fame
  via outrageous actions, thx to FL feeding frenzy."
  TOP STORY — NYT col. 1, "Afghan Security Growing Worse, Aid Groups Say," by Rod Nordland, in
  Kabul: "Large parts of the country that were once completely safe, like most of the northern provinces, now
  have a substantial Taliban presence ... The worsening security comes as the Obama administration is under
  increasing pressure to show results to maintain public support for the war, and raises serious concerns about
  whether the country can hold legitimate nationwide elections for Parliament next Saturday. Unarmed
  government employees can no longer travel safely in 30 percent of the country's 368 districts, according to
  published United Nations estimates ... The number of insurgent attacks has increased significantly ... American
  military officials say the increased level of violence is related to the rise in the number of its forces here. The
  last 2,000 of 30,000 new American troops are expected to arrive in the next week or two, military officials say.
  The result is more military operations, they say, and more opportunities for the insurgents to attack coalition
  forces." http://nyti.ms/bImb8E
  --DOYLE McMANUS, in L.A. Times "Opinion" section, "High-level doubts on Afghanistan: Former
  officials who once supported the war are now questioning it's worth the cost": "The doubters include
  Richard N. Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations, the closest thing the United States has to an
  official 'foreign policy establishment'; Leslie H. Gelb, his predecessor; and Robert D. Blackwill, a former aide
  to President George W. Bush. 'The current strategy isn't working, and it's costing roughly $100 billion a year,'
  Haass, a former aide to then-Secretary of State Colin L. Powell, told me last week. 'It's time for a major
  recalibration: not an immediate withdrawal but a significant scaling down of our ambitions.' And last week, a
  group of 46 foreign policy experts issued a joint report arguing that the goal of building a unified, stable
  Afghanistan is beyond the ability of the United States, and unnecessary to boot. The panel, the Afghanistan
  Study Group, included both longtime critics of the war and some who supported U.S. policy until recently. ...
  They cite three main reasons for their escalating pessimism. The first: setbacks (including a major offensive in
  Kandahar that was scheduled to be in full swing by now but is only getting underway). Next: Afghan President
  Hamid Karzai's failure to support a U.S.-sponsored anti-corruption campaign. And finally, there's that $100-
  billion annual price tag. ... [A]s Obama approaches a December review of his strategy in Afghanistan, the
  debate is noticeably opening up, driven in part by the weight of that $100-billion cost." http://lat.ms/9XfIcyC
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772357 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772357 Date: 08/31/2015
  9 YEARS AGO THIS MORNING, the WP lede, by Michael Grunwald: "Terrorists unleashed an
  astonishing air assault on America's military and financial power centers yesterday morning, hijacking four
  commercial jets and then crashing them into the World Trade Center in New York, the Pentagon and the
  Pennsylvania countryside."
  TOM BROKAW, 9/11/01, as he watched the second tower fall, live on NBC's air: "Manhattan has been
  changed. Terrorists have declared war ... This is war."
  WHERE WERE YOU ON 9/11?
  --Robert Gibbs (@PressSec) tweets: "Just drove by the Pentagon.. .remember the smoke coming from it nine
  yrs ago.. .thinking of all those we lost that day here and in NY and PA."
  --Howard Wolfson: "Was on the 7am train from NYC to DC. We were the last train into Union Station before
  it was evacuated. Got off the train and was instructed to run out of the building. Discovered hundreds of staffers
  streaming out of the Senate office buildings towards us. All of the cabs lined up waiting for fares had their
  radios on and their windows open. I heard the buildings collapse that way. I connected with my wife who was in
  NYC and prayed for the people I had worked with many years before on the 103rd floor of the WTC."
  --Karen Finney: "Saw the first plane from 6th Ave and 11th in NYC - got on what was the last #2 train to stop
  at Wall Street headed to the NYC Board of Education (where I worked at the time). Will never forget the black
  smoke that flooded the train car as people ran in; then spent the and night working with the schools Chancellor
  trying to assess situation in seven schools around ground zero and how to get 1.1 million kids home safely,
  knowing that in some cases their parent might not be coming home. Quite a shocker to step out of the subway in
  Brooklyn. Like 5 minutes later, the towers come down."
  TOP TALKERS:
  MAUREEN DOWD, "When Peggy Left Barry: Plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose": "One of the
  independent voters Obama will be trying to charm over the next two years is my sister, Peggy, a formerly ardent
  Obamican (a Republican who changed spots to vote for Obama). ... Despite being a Washington native, Peggy
  believed that the dazzling young newcomer could change Washington. But she has lost a lot of faith now,
  saying she might vote for Mitt Romney over Obama if Romney is the Republican nominee in 2012. (Sarah
  Palin shouldn't count on her vote though. In Peggy's words, 'Are you nuts?') Peggy thinks the president has
  done fine managing W.'s messes in Iraq and Afghanistan. And she lights up at the mention of his vice president,
  Joe Biden. But she thinks Obama has to get 'a backbone' if he wants to lure her back to the fold. ... While
  Obama's out in the country trying to save Congressional Democrats, he should also think about how he's going
  to save himself. http://nyti.ms/92Dudr
  FRANK RICH, "Time for This Big Dog to Bite Back: The Democrats' obituaries may yet prove
  premature.": "On Labor Day, the fighting Obama abruptly re-emerged, a far cry from the man whose Oval
  Office address on Iraq days earlier was about as persuasive as a hostage video. ... For a guy facing a tidal wave,
  the president was so ebullient, you had to wonder if he knew something we didn't. Maybe he simply read the
  unabridged poll numbers ... Those numbers are hardly as monochromatic as advertised. Obama's approval
  rating, for months a consistent (not imploding) 45-ish percent, still makes him arguably America's most popular
  national politician. The polls also continue to show that, while both political parties are despised, Democrats are
  slightly less despised than Republicans. ... In a second forceful speech last week, delivered outside Cleveland,
  Obama titillated the political press by calling out Boehner by name eight times. But though Boehner is a nice
  soft target ... he's merely a front-man. Obama must also call out the powerful interests who are pulling the
  G.O.P.'s strings (and filling its coffers), whether on Wall Street or in Big Oil or any other sector where special
  interests are aligned against reform in the public interest. If Obama can speak lucidly about a subject as thorny
  as race, he can surely do a far more specific job of telling the story of how we got to this economic impasse."
  http://nyti.ms/bgj S89
  WEEK AHEAD — "Pope to warn of dangers of secular society" -- The (London) Sunday Telegraph:
  "THE POPE will this week urge the Government to protect religious freedoms to allow Christians to follow
  their beliefs [during a British tour and state visit, Thursday to Saturday]. In a speech to political and
  religious leaders in Westminster Hall, the Pontiff will deliver a thinly veiled attack on the perceived liberal
  direction of the country. ... Senior Roman Catholic sources said his message would be seen as a criticism of the
  introduction of equality laws that have impinged on the freedom of religious groups, although he will not
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772357 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772357 Date: 08/31/2015
  directly refer to government policy. A number of Christians have lost their jobs or faced disciplinary action for
  practising their faith at work by wearing a crucifix or sharing their views on biblical teaching."
  MEDIA WATCH – "Bret Baier is the new face of Election Night coverage at Fox News: 40-year-old
  reporter part of a new generation of political news anchors," by Baltimore Sun's David Zurawik: "Baier
  steps up this fall as lead political news anchor on Election Night replacing Brit Hume, who moved after the
  2008 elections to the role of senior political analyst. Given the way Fox News has come to lead in ratings for
  coverage of political events since CNN's glory days during the presidential campaign of 2008, Baier's ascension
  makes for a significant changing of the guard in broadcast journalism. The seat he now occupies in Fox's
  Washington studios is one of the most influential in American political life — a fact not lost on the boyish-
  looking anchorman who turned 40 on Aug. 4, which also is President Barack Obama's birthday. ... He has been
  invited for the first time in his career to moderate a televised debate — a role more often reserved for the likes
  of Jim Lehrer or Bob Schieffer of public and network TV. This one will be held Oct. 4 in Hartford, Conn., in a
  hotly contested race between Democrat Richard Blumenthal and Republican Linda McMahon for a U.S. Senate
  seat. ...
  "As for his hour of news from 6 p.m. to 7 p.m. weeknights ['Special Report], Baier almost doubles the
  combined audience of his competitors on CNN and MSNBC. So far this year, 'Special Report' has an
  average nightly audience of 2,107,000 in viewers — compared with 604,000 for 'The Ed Show' on MSNBC
  and 545,000 for Wolf Blitzer's 'Situation Room' on CNN. ... Michael Clemente, senior vice president at Fox
  News, says the foundation laid down by Hume has played a crucial role in Baler's success. 'Brit Hume had the
  legacy with the audience — a legacy that went back to his days with ABC News,' Clemente says. `So why has
  it worked with Bret? First of all, the transition was handled well; Bret filled in quite a bit as Brit was winding
  down. But people make a judgment pretty quickly, and I think they judged Bret as being an honest, fair and
  smart reporter. And it wasn't like pulling some guy out of thin air who had just been a news reader on some
  local station.' ... [Baier:] 'You know the Fox Atlanta bureau that I joined in 1998 — that started in my
  apartment in Atlanta with a fax machine and a cell phone. That was the bureau. And I still have that sense of us
  being that startup that is still trying to make it all come together." http://bit.ly/apgxA2
  SPORTS BLINK – COLLEGE FOOTBALL – AP: "Ohio State and Oklahoma won their BCS
  championship game rematches and showed that a couple of former powerhouses from the Sunshine State are
  not quite ready to return to elite status. Behind the running of Terrelle Pryor and a ball-hawking defense, the
  second-ranked Buckeyes beat No. 12 Miami 36-24 on Saturday at the Horseshoe in Columbus. ... In Norman,
  Okla., Landry Jones bounced back from a sluggish opener and led the 10th-ranked Sooners to an easy 47-17
  victory over No. 17 Florida State."
  --"USC hangs on for a 17-14 victory over Virginia," by L.A. Times' Gary Klein: "USC's defense is not as
  bad as it looked in the opener, the offense not nearly as good. Those were the immediate impressions Trojans
  fans came away with Saturday night at the Coliseum after the 16th-ranked Trojans' 17-14 victory over Virginia.
  The undisciplined style that resulted in multiple costly penalties? That remained consistent as the Trojans
  improved to 2-0 under first-year Coach Lane Kiffin. Quarterback Matt Barkley passed for two touchdowns late
  in the first half and, though the defense gave up a last-minute touchdown, the Trojans earned a harder-than-
  expected victory over the Cavaliers, a near three-touchdown underdog playing their first game in California.
  'I'm extremely disappointed with our performance,' Kiffin said. 'That's the most miserable 2-0 locker room I've
  ever been in, which is good. I think our players understand." http://lat.ms/99w6au
  --ESPN TODAY – From release –"ESPN's NFL studio shows return in earnest ... for Kickoff Weekend ...
  Chris Berman, recipient of the Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2010 Pete Rozelle Radio-Television Award, returns
  for his 25th season as host of the Emmy Award-winning Sunday NFL Countdown presented by IBM (11 a.m.),
  where he will be joined by analysts Cris Carter, Mike Ditka, Tom Jackson, Keyshawn Johnson and Chris
  Mortensen, and Insider Adam Schefter for the two-hour weekly NFL preview show. After the games, Berman
  and Jackson will be joined by John Saunders and Trent Dilfer throughout the season during the 7 p.m.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772357 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772357 Date: 08/31/2015
  SportsCenter to review all the day's action. Berman and Jackson will team up again at 11 p.m. for 'The Blitz' on
  SportsCenter."
  ** A message from Washington's NewsChannel 8: If the Comcast and NBC merger is rushed through the
  process, our country risks losing a powerful part of our democracy -- locally-owned, independent voices in
  markets where Comcast/NBC will control both access to the home and multiple channels of news. Dropping the
  independent news voice won't serve the consumer. It will only serve the interests of Comcast which would also
  own the other news channels. Please make sure that any merger approval serves the public interest and protects
  the local news consumers you represent. Don't let Comcast ram this monopoly merger through the review
  process. **
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772357 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772359
MetadataSubject: UPDATE ON PSA
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0095/DOC_0C05772359/C05772359.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: Update on PSA
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MiilsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Klevorick, Caitlin B; Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 1:21 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772359
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: fyi
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772359 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MiilsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 1:21 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW: Update on PSA
  fyi
  From: McHale, Judith A
  Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 10:30 AM
  To: Dowd, Katie W; McCall, Dawn L; Kenna, Corley; Hensman, Chris D; MacInnes, Duncan H; Bosshardt, Marcia P;
  Harper, Benjamin W; Jarvis, Catherine J; Sreebny, Daniel
  Cc: Klevorick, Caitlin B; Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Re: Update on PSA
  Thx katie. As soon as we have clearances let's send out a cable to all pao's asking them to try and get placement on local
  media outlets.
  Jm
  From: Dowd, Katie W
  To: McHale, Judith A; McCall, Dawn L; Kenna, Corley; Hensman, Chris D; Macinnes, Duncan H; Bosshardt, Marcia P;
  Harper, Benjamin W; Jarvis, Catherine J; Sreebny, Daniel
  Cc: Klevorick, Caitlin B
  Sent: Tue Aug 31 10:26:39 2010
  Subject: Update on PSA
  Morning all, wanted to update you on where we are with the PSA for Pakistan that we produced in conjunction with Ad
  Council. You can view the PSAs here: http://multivu.prnewswire.com/mnr/adcouncil/45926/ - please note this is NOT
  public yet.
  The Ad Council is releasing the PSA @ 1pm today and we will be sending (once approved) a press release out as well
  linked to state.gov where the PSA's will live. There are TV, Radio and Web versions of the PSA cut into 30 and 60 second
  spots.
  We still are working through some music and image questions with the Ad Council to secure international distribution.
  We are waiting to hear from them on this. Once we hear, the Ad Council will make some minor edits to the PSA e.g.
  removing the Text Donation information as it applies only to Americans and re-send the files with the revised transcript.
  Once we have that, then we can move forward translating into local languages. The Ad Council said they will need an
  additional 2 to 3 days to make edits but again I am waiting to confirm.
  Hope this update is helpful. Please let me know if you have questions. Best, Katie
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772359 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772364
MetadataSubject: CAMERA
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: reines@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-22T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0099/DOC_0C05772364/C05772364.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Camera
ExtractedFrom: Reines, Philippe I <reinesp@state.goy>
ExtractedCc: Adler, Caroline E
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 2:53 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772364
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Monica said you asked about the camera
  He is shooting broil for the interview you will do with Julia Roberts later in October - focusing mainly on women's issues.
  By the time you read this they will be all done.
  And FYI, the cameraman (Allan Palmer) and produce(Coby Atlas) might look familiar to you - they are from Tavis Smiley's
  team, they did his special on you.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772364 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Reines, Philippe I <reinesp@state.goy>
  Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 2:53 PM
  To:
  Cc: Adler, Caroline E
  Subject: Camera
  Monica said you asked about the camera
  He is shooting broil for the interview you will do with Julia Roberts later in October - focusing mainly on women's issues.
  By the time you read this they will be all done.
  And FYI, the cameraman (Allan Palmer) and produce(Coby Atlas) might look familiar to you - they are from Tavis Smiley's
  team, they did his special on you.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772364 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772369
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0095/DOC_0C05772369/C05772369.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Ten Lessons re Middle East negotiations boiled down from Sandy and Steve Hadley's
ExtractedFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D; Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 1:27 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772369
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
MetadataSubject:
  TEN LESSONS RE MIDDLE EAST NEGOTIATIONS BOILED DOWN FROM SANDY AND STEVE HADLEY'S SET OF WORKING PAPERS

ExtractedBodyText:
  set of working papers
  _final.doc; Ten Lessons for 2010 Jinal.pdf
  We asked Dan Kurtzer and Scott Lasensky to boil down 10 key lessons from the big book of working papers that Sandy
  and Steve's USIP task force has produced. They are attached. I think the most useful lessons are #3 re the process is not
  an end in itself but an opportunity to put forward substantive proposals; #4 re avoiding incrementalism and developing
  a regional strategy, and #7 on making sure we have a backroom operation to work through all the strategic dimensions
  of possible bridging proposals.
  AM

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772369 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 1:27 PM
  To:
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D; Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Ten Lessons re Middle East negotiations boiled down from Sandy and Steve Hadley's
  set of working papers
  Attachments: Ten Lessons for 2010_final.doc; Ten Lessons for 2010_final.pdf; Ten Lessons for 2010
  _final.doc; Ten Lessons for 2010 Jinal.pdf
  We asked Dan Kurtzer and Scott Lasensky to boil down 10 key lessons from the big book of working papers that Sandy
  and Steve's USIP task force has produced. They are attached. I think the most useful lessons are #3 re the process is not
  an end in itself but an opportunity to put forward substantive proposals; #4 re avoiding incrementalism and developing
  a regional strategy, and #7 on making sure we have a backroom operation to work through all the strategic dimensions
  of possible bridging proposals.
  AM
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772369 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772371
MetadataSubject: NHL SCORES BIG PD WIN IN ST. PETE!
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: McHale, Judith A
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-06T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0101/DOC_0C05772371/C05772371.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: NHL scores big PD win in St. Pete!
ExtractedTo: H; Sullivan, JacobJ
ExtractedFrom: McHale, Judith A <McHaleJA@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 8:48 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772371
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: At the end of the day, it's all about sports
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772371 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: McHale, Judith A <McHaleJA@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 8:48 AM
  To: H; Sullivan, JacobJ
  Subject: FW: NHL scores big PD win in St. Pete!
  At the end of the day, it's all about sports
  From: Mellott, Joseph
  Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 8:43 AM
  To: McHale, Judith A; DiMartino, Kitty
  Subject: NHL scores big PD win in St. Pete!
  First-Ever NHL-CHL Exhibition Game Helps Break International Ice in St. Petersburg: Thanks to U/S
  Judith McHale who brought National Hockey League VP Ken Yaffe to Moscow under the auspices of the U.S.-
  Russia Bilateral Presidential Commission for an icebreaker with Continental Hockey League representatives, St.
  Petersburg's beloved SKA hockey team hosted the Carolina Hurricanes for an exhilarating exhibition game at
  the Ice Palace. From the opening ceremony featuring both the U.S. and Russian national anthems, the capacity
  crowd of 4,500 — including St. Petersburg Governor Valentina Matviyenko, SKA owner and Gazprom
  Chairman Alexey Miller, Hurricanes owner and Compuware Corporation CEO Peter Karmanos, Jr., and U.S.
  Consul General Sheila Gwaltney — cheered the two teams on. The heart-pounding, high-scoring game included
  dazzling play by the 'Canes Eric Staal and Jeff Skinner (Carolina's game MVP) plus SKA favorites Alexei
  Yashin (SKA's game MVP) and Maksim Sushinski. With Rossiya TV announcing that "we've waited 20 years
  for this," SKA broke the second period tie and led their team to a 5-3 victory over the 'Canes in the last
  period. SKA's enthusiastic organ player rocked the crowd with themes from "Ghostbusters" and "The Addams
  Family" — plus Tina Turner's "Simply the Best" — and helped the Russian crowd give their home team their
  traditional electrifying support. Continuing the "sports diplomacy" after the game, dozens of avid Russian
  hockey fans waited patiently by the team buses and were elated when 'Canes Goalie Cam Ward signed
  autographs and posed for photographs with them. The Russian crowd's enthusiasm for this match as well as
  their admiration for the American team were ice-crystal clear from the capacity crowd (the stadium only sells
  out for championship matches or games against their arch rival Moscow team), their cheers for the Hurricanes,
  plus the extensive media presence, including live nation-wide coverage on Rossiya TV.
  Joe Mellott
  Special Assistant
  Office of the Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy
  U.S. Department of State
  HST Rm. 5931
  202-647-9901
  mellottistate.qov
  "A Help save paper - do you need to print this email?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772371 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772373
MetadataSubject: CELEBRATION OF STEVEN RATNER'S "OVERHAUL"
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-22T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0099/DOC_0C05772373/C05772373.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: Celebration of Steven Rattner's "Overhaul"
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 3:04 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772373
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: ok
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772373 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 3:04 PM
  To:
  Subject: RE: Celebration of Steven Rattner's "Overhaul"
  ok
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 3:13 PM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Fw: Celebration of Steven Rattner's "Overhaul"
  Pis print and give copy to Eric and one to me.
  Original Message
  From: Hajera Dehqanzada <
  To: Hajera Dehqanzada <
  Sent: Wed Sep 22 13:04:20 2010
  Subject: Celebration of Steven Rattner's "Overhaul"
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772373 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772375
MetadataSubject: (AP) AMERICAN VISITS IRAN BLAST SITE UNDER FREEDOM DEAL
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-17T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0103/DOC_0C05772375/C05772375.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (AP) American visits Iran blast site under freedom deal
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Hume <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shift-III
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 4:09 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772375
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772375 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Hume <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 4:09 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (AP) American visits Iran blast site under freedom deal
  From: Vu, Anny T
  To: NEWS-Mahogany; NEWS-Iran
  Cc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shift-III
  Sent: Sun Oct 17 16:07:39 2010
  Subject: (AP) American visits Iran blast site under freedom deal
  TEHRAN (AP) — An Iranian-American businessman freed after more than two years in Tehran's main prison visited
  survivors of a deadly 2008 mosque bombing as a condition of his release in a scripted event that could carry propaganda
  value at home. Iranian authorities did not immediately explain their demand for 71-year-old Reza Taghavi to pay homage
  in the southern city of Shiraz and personally acknowledge an attack in which he denies having any connection. But it
  would fit neatly into possible Iranian attempts to squeeze multiple messages from Taghavi's October 16 release after 29
  months in custody. Taghavi, accompanied by his wife and lawyer, fulfilled his pledge to visit the site of the mosque
  bombing. They later met with survivors, including people who lost relatives in the attack.
  The U.S. and allies fear Iran could use its nuclear fuel labs to eventually produce weapons-grade material. Iran says it
  only seeks peaceful energy-producing reactors. Taghavi's attorney, former U.S. diplomat Pierre Prosper, said he
  purposely left American officials out of the negotiations to avoid having his client become a bargaining chip. "Our strategy
  was to make sure that our dialogue with the [Iranian] government was between us and them," said Prosper, who held five
  rounds of direct talks with Iranian envoys since Taghavi was jailed.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772375 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772377
MetadataSubject: NHL SCORES BIG PD WIN IN ST. PETE!
MetadataTo: McHale, Judith A
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jake J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-06T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0101/DOC_0C05772377/C05772377.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: NHL scores big PD win in St. Pete!
ExtractedTo: McHale, Judith A; H
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 9:40 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772377
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: This is awesome.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772377 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 9:40 AM
  To: McHale, Judith A; H
  Subject: RE: NHL scores big PD win in St. Pete!
  This is awesome.
  From: McHale, Judith A
  Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 8:48 AM
  To: 'H'; Sullivan, Jacob )
  Subject: FW: NHL scores big PD win in St. Pete!
  At the end of the day, it's all about sports
  From: Mellott, Joseph
  Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 8:43 AM
  To: McHale, Judith A; DiMartino, Kitty
  Subject: NHL scores big PD win in St. Pete!
  First-Ever NHL-CHL Exhibition Game Helps Break International Ice in St. Petersburg: Thanks to U/S
  Judith McHale who brought National Hockey League VP Ken Yaffe to Moscow under the auspices of the U.S.-
  Russia Bilateral Presidential Commission for an icebreaker with Continental Hockey League representatives, St.
  Petersburg's beloved SKA hockey team hosted the Carolina Hurricanes for an exhilarating exhibition game at
  the Ice Palace. From the opening ceremony featuring both the U.S. and Russian national anthems, the capacity
  crowd of 4,500 — including St. Petersburg Governor Valentina Matviyenko, SKA owner and Gazprom
  Chairman Alexey Miller, Hurricanes owner and Compuware Corporation CEO Peter Karmanos, Jr., and U.S.
  Consul General Sheila Gwaltney — cheered the two teams on. The heart-pounding, high-scoring game included
  dazzling play by the 'Canes Eric Staal and Jeff Skinner (Carolina's game MVP) plus SKA favorites Alexei
  Yashin (SKA's game MVP) and Maksim Sushinski. With Rossiya TV announcing that "we've waited 20 years
  for this," SKA broke the second period tie and led their team to a 5-3 victory over the 'Canes in the last
  period. SKA's enthusiastic organ player rocked the crowd with themes from "Ghostbusters" and "The Addams
  Family" — plus Tina Turner's "Simply the Best" — and helped the Russian crowd give their home team their
  traditional electrifying support. Continuing the "sports diplomacy" after the game, dozens of avid Russian
  hockey fans waited patiently by the team buses and were elated when 'Canes Goalie Cam Ward signed
  autographs and posed for photographs with them. The Russian crowd's enthusiasm for this match as well as
  their admiration for the American team were ice-crystal clear from the capacity crowd (the stadium only sells
  out for championship matches or games against their arch rival Moscow team), their cheers for the Hurricanes,
  plus the extensive media presence, including live nation-wide coverage on Rossiya TV.
  Joe Mellott
  Special Assistant
  Office of the Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy
  U.S. Department of State
  FIST Rm. 5931
  202-647-9901
  mellotti(a.state.qov
  ,A Help save paper - do you need to print this email?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772377 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772378
MetadataSubject: H: GOT THIS POLL DONE WITH BROCK; BEGALA HELPED. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-06T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0101/DOC_0C05772378/C05772378.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: H: Got this poll done with Brock; Begala helped. Sid
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 9:48 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772378
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  http://www.politico.com/static/PPM170_101005_boehner.html
  Our top message--exposing Boehner as beholden to special interests--beat the Republicans" attack by 20 points
  with swing voters. Our second highest rated message--connecting Karl Rove"s secret efforts to hijack our
  elections to Boehner--beat the Republican attack by 15 points with swing voters and was the top rated message
  among Democratic likely voters.
  Branding Boehner
  RAPIDRESPONSEMEMO•OCTOBER 6 , 2 1 0
  ANALYST:DREWWESTEN,PH.D.,WESTENSTRATEGIES
  Karl Rove is back in business -- directing tens of millions in secret corporate cash to GOP campaigns to
  hijack our elections and our public discourse. If he's successful, John Boehner will become Speaker of the
  House. But the last thing Rove wants is for Boehner to be seen as the face of the GOP. That's why he's
  claiming it's an —inexplicable— mistake for President Obama to put Boehner front and center. Progressives
  know better than to take advice from Rove.
  Our new message testing shows that progressives should not only talk about Boehner but define him and
  his agenda. Every narrative we tested about Boehner -- from his loyalty to special interests and
  corporate donors over the interests of the middle class to Karl Rove's efforts to elevate him as
  Speaker -- beat the Republicans" toughest attack language on Obama, Pelosi and Reid. Currently,
  Boehner is largely unknown, but when voters are told about him, they don't like what they hear.
  The following ""one-liners" beat GOP attack rhetoric by double digits with both likely and swing
  votersii:
  The brief statements above beat this Republican attack:
  "Obama, Pelosi and Reid have abused their power to impose an expansive government and
  destroyed our economy in the process. John Boehner and the Republicans won't let them
  continue.—
  Does Not Speak for Us or Our Values
  We need a Speaker who is also a listener, who can hear the voices of ordinary Americans.
  I.] The Speaker of the House is a heartbeat away from the Presidency. Unfortunately, we know
  where John Boehner"s heart is, and it ish"t with the middle class.
  C.,' We need moderation, not extremism. If John Boehner wants to speak for a party that has
  vowed to end Social Security, Medicare and public education--and force women who"ve
  been raped to bear their rapist's child--that's his business. But he doesn"t speak for America
  or American values.
  Cares More about Special Interests
  LI Ordinary Americans need a Speaker for their interests, not for the interests of billionaires
  and corporations that are outsourcing our jobs.
  OIt's not hard to keep a tan like John Boehner"s when you"re always out on the golf course with
  some CEO or lobbyist.
  • It's time we return to government of, by, and for the people, not government of, bought, and
  paid for by special interests. But in John Boehner, big business has finally found their man.
  Helped Invent the Problems We Face
  OJohn Boehner understands deficits. He"s spent nearly 20 years in Washington creating them.
  OJohn Boehner knows the ways of Washington. He helped invent them: Earmarks, deficits, and
  tax breaks for corporations that outsource our jobs to China.
  Branding Boehner
  Page 2
  KEYS TO CONNECTING
  1. Emphasize whose voices matter to Boehner: Voters want a Speaker who listens to the voice of the people,
  not the big corporations and lobbyists who Boehner represents.
  2.Draw a strong contrast between the interests of working Americans and the special interests of powerful
  corporations: Speak strongly to populist themes that focus on the loyalty of Boehner and the Republicans in
  Congress to their corporate donors, like the tobacco CEOs whose campaign donations Boehner handed out on
  the House floor, over the interests and values of ordinary Americans.
  3.Focus on realities that are hard for Boehner to defend: the social and economic extremism of his party and
  his long history in Washington helping to create the problems we face today.
  NARRATIVES THAT BEAT THE GOP ATTACK
  Longer narratives against Boehner beat a similar, but more in-depth Republican message, based on language
  drawn directly from Boehner and other conservative leaders:
  Our top message--exposing Boehner as beholden to special interests--beat the Republicans" attack by 20 points
  with swing voters. Our second highest rated message--connecting Karl Rove"s secret efforts to hijack our
  elections to Boehner--beat the Republican attack by 15 points with swing voters and was the top rated message
  among Democratic likely voters.
  i We surveyed a national sample of 1,013 adults matching the demographics of registered voters from October 2-3, 2010
  using online dial testing. We
  analyzed their responses as they listened to narratives to understand what they found compelling, as well as their overall
  ratings of each narrative and
  additional "one-liners." The numbers reported here are likely underestimates of the strength of the narratives, as the
  statistics refer to the original narratives
  tested prior to revising them based on analysis of online dial tests.
  ii Swing voters are defined as those who described themselves as anywhere from weak/moderate Republicans through
  Independents to weak/moderate
  Democrats.
  THE REPUBLICAN ATTACK ON OBAMA, PELOS1 AND REID
  Obama, Pelosi and Reid have abused their power to impose an expansive and intrusive government and destroyed our
  economy in the process. Democrats think they can get away with their job-killing agenda by ramming it down people's
  throats, excluding opposing viewpoints and eliminating fair debate. They are turning their backs on American families
  and businesses as they continue to tax, borrow and spend into oblivion. John Boehner and the Republicans believe
  government should reflect the priorities of the American people--priorities that have been ignored, even mocked by the
  powers-that-be in Washington. Obama, Pelosi and Reid must be stopped from raising taxes on any American during a
  recession and spending money we don"t have on big government programs no one wants. John Boehner and the
  Republicans are listening to the American people and understand that government is not the answer, it's the problem.
  "Boehner and Rove"- After the Iraq War went south and the economy went under, most of us
  thought we"d never hear again from Karl Rove, the architect of the Bush revolution. But Rove is
  back in business, directing tens of millions in secret corporate cash to hijack our elections, running
  ads against Members of Congress who want to put the public interest over the special interests.
  He and John Boehner aren't working for ordinary Americans. They"re working for the big
  corporations that outsource our jobs and get tax breaks for doing it. Boehner"s voted down the
  line for big bonuses for bankers, big tax breaks for big oil, and big loopholes for insurance
  companies that discriminate against people with "pre-existing conditions" which is all of us if we
  just live long enough. We should be restoring the American Dream for all Americans, not just for
  the few, and we need a Speaker who stands with the middle class.
  "They found their man"- We need to return to government of, by, and for the people, not
  government of, bought, and paid for by special interests. It"s time billionaires and big businesses
  paid their fair share of taxes rather than paying politicians to give them special tax breaks and
  loopholes. They"re putting a lot of money into John Boehner, and for good reason: they know as
  Speaker, he"d speak for them, not for ordinary Americans. Just ask the tobacco company CEOs
  whose campaign donations he handed out on the floor of the House of Representatives—which is
  supposed to be the People's House, not the smokers" lounge. Or ask the bankers who played
  Russian roulette with our homes and jobs, who got out their checkbooks as he and his fellow
  Republicans held a special meeting with them this summer promising to block any efforts to hold
  Wall Street accountable. We need a Speaker whose voice is our voice, who'll spend less time
  working on his tan and more time working on the problems of middle class Americans.
  ""Boehner and Rove"- After the Iraq War went south and the economy went under, most of us
  thought we''d never hear again from Karl Rove, the architect of the Bush revolution. But Rove is
  back in business, directing tens of millions in secret corporate cash to hijack our elections, running
  ads against Members of Congress who want to put the public interest over the special interests.
  He and John Boehner aren"t working for ordinary Americans. They"re working for the big
  corporations that outsource our jobs and get tax breaks for doing it. Boehner"s voted down the
  line for big bonuses for bankers, big tax breaks for big oil, and big loopholes for insurance
  companies that discriminate against people with "pre-existing conditions—which is all of us if we
  just live long enough. We should be restoring the American Dream for all Americans, not just for
  the few, and we need a Speaker who stands with the middle class.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772378 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 9:48 AM
  To:
  Subject: H: Got this poll done with Brock; Begala helped. Sid
  http://www.politico.com/static/PPM170_101005_boehner.html
  Our top message--exposing Boehner as beholden to special interests--beat the Republicans" attack by 20 points
  with swing voters. Our second highest rated message--connecting Karl Rove"s secret efforts to hijack our
  elections to Boehner--beat the Republican attack by 15 points with swing voters and was the top rated message
  among Democratic likely voters.
  Branding Boehner
  RAPIDRESPONSEMEMO•OCTOBER 6 , 2 1 0
  ANALYST:DREWWESTEN,PH.D.,WESTENSTRATEGIES
  Karl Rove is back in business -- directing tens of millions in secret corporate cash to GOP campaigns to
  hijack our elections and our public discourse. If he's successful, John Boehner will become Speaker of the
  House. But the last thing Rove wants is for Boehner to be seen as the face of the GOP. That's why he's
  claiming it's an —inexplicable— mistake for President Obama to put Boehner front and center. Progressives
  know better than to take advice from Rove.
  Our new message testing shows that progressives should not only talk about Boehner but define him and
  his agenda. Every narrative we tested about Boehner -- from his loyalty to special interests and
  corporate donors over the interests of the middle class to Karl Rove's efforts to elevate him as
  Speaker -- beat the Republicans" toughest attack language on Obama, Pelosi and Reid. Currently,
  Boehner is largely unknown, but when voters are told about him, they don't like what they hear.
  The following ""one-liners" beat GOP attack rhetoric by double digits with both likely and swing
  votersii:
  The brief statements above beat this Republican attack:
  "Obama, Pelosi and Reid have abused their power to impose an expansive government and
  destroyed our economy in the process. John Boehner and the Republicans won't let them
  continue.—
  Does Not Speak for Us or Our Values
  We need a Speaker who is also a listener, who can hear the voices of ordinary Americans.
  I.] The Speaker of the House is a heartbeat away from the Presidency. Unfortunately, we know
  where John Boehner"s heart is, and it ish"t with the middle class.
  C.,' We need moderation, not extremism. If John Boehner wants to speak for a party that has
  vowed to end Social Security, Medicare and public education--and force women who"ve
  been raped to bear their rapist's child--that's his business. But he doesn"t speak for America
  or American values.
  Cares More about Special Interests
  LI Ordinary Americans need a Speaker for their interests, not for the interests of billionaires
  and corporations that are outsourcing our jobs.
  OIt's not hard to keep a tan like John Boehner"s when you"re always out on the golf course with
  some CEO or lobbyist.
  • It's time we return to government of, by, and for the people, not government of, bought, and
  paid for by special interests. But in John Boehner, big business has finally found their man.
  Helped Invent the Problems We Face
  OJohn Boehner understands deficits. He"s spent nearly 20 years in Washington creating them.
  OJohn Boehner knows the ways of Washington. He helped invent them: Earmarks, deficits, and
  tax breaks for corporations that outsource our jobs to China.
  Branding Boehner
  Page 2
  KEYS TO CONNECTING
  1. Emphasize whose voices matter to Boehner: Voters want a Speaker who listens to the voice of the people,
  not the big corporations and lobbyists who Boehner represents.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772378 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772378 Date: 08/31/2015
  2.Draw a strong contrast between the interests of working Americans and the special interests of powerful
  corporations: Speak strongly to populist themes that focus on the loyalty of Boehner and the Republicans in
  Congress to their corporate donors, like the tobacco CEOs whose campaign donations Boehner handed out on
  the House floor, over the interests and values of ordinary Americans.
  3.Focus on realities that are hard for Boehner to defend: the social and economic extremism of his party and
  his long history in Washington helping to create the problems we face today.
  NARRATIVES THAT BEAT THE GOP ATTACK
  Longer narratives against Boehner beat a similar, but more in-depth Republican message, based on language
  drawn directly from Boehner and other conservative leaders:
  Our top message--exposing Boehner as beholden to special interests--beat the Republicans" attack by 20 points
  with swing voters. Our second highest rated message--connecting Karl Rove"s secret efforts to hijack our
  elections to Boehner--beat the Republican attack by 15 points with swing voters and was the top rated message
  among Democratic likely voters.
  i We surveyed a national sample of 1,013 adults matching the demographics of registered voters from October 2-3, 2010
  using online dial testing. We
  analyzed their responses as they listened to narratives to understand what they found compelling, as well as their overall
  ratings of each narrative and
  additional "one-liners." The numbers reported here are likely underestimates of the strength of the narratives, as the
  statistics refer to the original narratives
  tested prior to revising them based on analysis of online dial tests.
  ii Swing voters are defined as those who described themselves as anywhere from weak/moderate Republicans through
  Independents to weak/moderate
  Democrats.
  THE REPUBLICAN ATTACK ON OBAMA, PELOS1 AND REID
  Obama, Pelosi and Reid have abused their power to impose an expansive and intrusive government and destroyed our
  economy in the process. Democrats think they can get away with their job-killing agenda by ramming it down people's
  throats, excluding opposing viewpoints and eliminating fair debate. They are turning their backs on American families
  and businesses as they continue to tax, borrow and spend into oblivion. John Boehner and the Republicans believe
  government should reflect the priorities of the American people--priorities that have been ignored, even mocked by the
  powers-that-be in Washington. Obama, Pelosi and Reid must be stopped from raising taxes on any American during a
  recession and spending money we don"t have on big government programs no one wants. John Boehner and the
  Republicans are listening to the American people and understand that government is not the answer, it's the problem.
  "Boehner and Rove"- After the Iraq War went south and the economy went under, most of us
  thought we"d never hear again from Karl Rove, the architect of the Bush revolution. But Rove is
  back in business, directing tens of millions in secret corporate cash to hijack our elections, running
  ads against Members of Congress who want to put the public interest over the special interests.
  He and John Boehner aren't working for ordinary Americans. They"re working for the big
  corporations that outsource our jobs and get tax breaks for doing it. Boehner"s voted down the
  line for big bonuses for bankers, big tax breaks for big oil, and big loopholes for insurance
  companies that discriminate against people with "pre-existing conditions" which is all of us if we
  just live long enough. We should be restoring the American Dream for all Americans, not just for
  the few, and we need a Speaker who stands with the middle class.
  "They found their man"- We need to return to government of, by, and for the people, not
  government of, bought, and paid for by special interests. It"s time billionaires and big businesses
  paid their fair share of taxes rather than paying politicians to give them special tax breaks and
  loopholes. They"re putting a lot of money into John Boehner, and for good reason: they know as
  Speaker, he"d speak for them, not for ordinary Americans. Just ask the tobacco company CEOs
  whose campaign donations he handed out on the floor of the House of Representatives—which is
  supposed to be the People's House, not the smokers" lounge. Or ask the bankers who played
  Russian roulette with our homes and jobs, who got out their checkbooks as he and his fellow
  Republicans held a special meeting with them this summer promising to block any efforts to hold
  Wall Street accountable. We need a Speaker whose voice is our voice, who'll spend less time
  working on his tan and more time working on the problems of middle class Americans.
  ""Boehner and Rove"- After the Iraq War went south and the economy went under, most of us
  thought we''d never hear again from Karl Rove, the architect of the Bush revolution. But Rove is
  back in business, directing tens of millions in secret corporate cash to hijack our elections, running
  ads against Members of Congress who want to put the public interest over the special interests.
  He and John Boehner aren"t working for ordinary Americans. They"re working for the big
  corporations that outsource our jobs and get tax breaks for doing it. Boehner"s voted down the
  line for big bonuses for bankers, big tax breaks for big oil, and big loopholes for insurance
  companies that discriminate against people with "pre-existing conditions—which is all of us if we
  just live long enough. We should be restoring the American Dream for all Americans, not just for
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772378 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772378 Date: 08/31/2015
  the few, and we need a Speaker who stands with the middle class.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772378 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772379
MetadataSubject: ONE MORE, AND I'LL STOP BOMBARDING YOU
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0095/DOC_0C05772379/C05772379.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: one more, and I'll stop bombarding you
ExtractedFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D; Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 1:36 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772379
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  I don't know if you had time to read the longer paper from Louise Diamond that I sent you, but here she has boiled
  down her basic arguments into 700 words.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772379 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 1:36 PM
  To:
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D; Abedin, Huma
  Subject: one more, and I'll stop bombarding you
  Attachments: Peace Talks Short.doc; ATT1381640.txt; Peace Talks Short.doc; ATT1381640.txt
  I don't know if you had time to read the longer paper from Louise Diamond that I sent you, but here she has boiled
  down her basic arguments into 700 words.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772379 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772380
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-17T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0103/DOC_0C05772380/C05772380.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 5:10 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772380
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772380 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 5:10 PM
  To:
  Subject:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772380 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772381
MetadataSubject: FW:
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-22T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0099/DOC_0C05772381/C05772381.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw:
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Stein, Daniel D; Goldwyn, David L
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 3:30 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772381
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Fyi
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772381 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B11.4(B) 1.4(D)
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 3:30 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw:
  Fyi
  Original Message
  From: Morningstar, Richard L
  To: Sullivan, Jacob
  Cc: Stein, Daniel D; Goldwyn, David L
  Sent: Wed Sep 22 15:15:34 2010
  Subject:
  Please pass on to S.
  Dear Madam Secretary,
  B1
  1.4(B)
  1.4(D)
  I would like to update you on the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) pipeline. Pres. Berdimuhamedov has
  been very active politically over the past several weeks. He has had several meetings of experts from the four countries
  and will have a Summit of the leaders of the four countries in December.
  Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 08/27/2015 — Class: CONFIDENTIAL — Reason: 1.4(B), 1.4(D) — Declassify
  on: 09/21/2035
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772381 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772382
MetadataSubject: BILL BURNS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jake J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-06T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0101/DOC_0C05772382/C05772382.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Bill Burns
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivan.11@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 10:45 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772382
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  It's worth you checking in with him before the meeting. His quick report of meeting with Allawi:
  1. Allawi said he pulled back from striking a deal with ISCI because he is concerned that the Shia representation is
  too small and there is too much difficulty in trying to widen
  2. Allawi asked bill if he thought Maliki was serious, suggesting that he was toying with the idea of a grand coalition
  3. Allawi will see Barzani on the 11th
  Bill's overall take is that Allawi might now be looking to test the wider coalition proposition and is not as interested in
  the ISCI gambit as first option.
  Bill has also seen AI-Mahdi Talabani and Zebari. He said there would be a good meeting with Maliki he's obviously
  feeling confident, but was firm on limiting role of Sadrists and need to bring Iraqiyya into inclusive govt.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772382 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivan.11@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 10:45 AM
  To:
  Subject: Bill Burns
  It's worth you checking in with him before the meeting. His quick report of meeting with Allawi:
  1. Allawi said he pulled back from striking a deal with ISCI because he is concerned that the Shia representation is
  too small and there is too much difficulty in trying to widen
  2. Allawi asked bill if he thought Maliki was serious, suggesting that he was toying with the idea of a grand coalition
  3. Allawi will see Barzani on the 11th
  Bill's overall take is that Allawi might now be looking to test the wider coalition proposition and is not as interested in
  the ISCI gambit as first option.
  Bill has also seen AI-Mahdi Talabani and Zebari. He said there would be a good meeting with Maliki he's obviously
  feeling confident, but was firm on limiting role of Sadrists and need to bring Iraqiyya into inclusive govt.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772382 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772383
MetadataSubject: REFLECTIONS ON THE MIDEAST PEACE TALKS
MetadataFrom: Diamond, Louise
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0095/DOC_0C05772383/C05772383.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772383
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772383 Date: 08/31/2015
  Reflections on the Mideast Peace Talks
  By Louise Diamond, Ph.D.
  RELEASE IN FULL
  As the direct Israeli-Palestinian peace talks in Washington progress, the U.S.
  mediation team will need to be attentive to several invisible dynamics. Even as the
  parties are talking about specifics - boundary lines, water rights, and such - there's
  more going on under the surface that, if ignored, can derail a successful conclusion.
  The first concerns leadership. Everyone already knows the basic elements of a two-
  state solution. What we have never seen is the personal and political will and
  courage, on all sides and at the same time, to make the deal. There are bitter pills
  and unfulfilled dreams for both parties in this settlement, and pockets of resistance
  to it - sometimes violent - in both populations.
  To manage that successfully, leaders need to articulate the immense gains as well, a
  positive future vision so compelling as to make the sacrifices worthwhile. This
  vision needs to be framed from a big-picture perspective: a just, viable, and
  sustainable peace between Israeli and Palestinian states and peoples that also
  brings regional security, stability, and prosperity. Every concrete item under
  discussion should be referred to that goal: how will agreeing or not agreeing on any
  one matter contribute to that ultimate outcome?
  In addition to a shared vision, the other factor essential to true peace is a
  commitment to end, and eventually heal, the acute pain and suffering. In deep-
  rooted conflicts such as this, the parties develop recognizable patterns intended to
  help ameliorate the pain. They will emphasize accusing each other of being the
  roadblock; setting up the other side to fail so it can be blamed for lack of progress;
  or seeking to convince outsiders that the other side is at fault so as to avoid taking
  responsibility for its own actions.
  Another pattern involves competing victimhoods. While each side has indeed been
  the target of un-rightable wrongs, emphasizing the role of victim might seem easier
  than seeing how one's own behavior has contributed to a mutual dance of spiraling
  enmity. Or each party may insist that its suffering is bigger, stronger, or more
  worthy of sympathy than that of the other side, as if there were a yardstick for
  suffering.
  What is true, here and in all violent conflicts, is that the loss of life, homes, loved
  ones, hope, land, and way of life in each individual's experience is immeasurable.
  There is deep trauma on both sides. Each side has inflicted harm on the other, and
  has experienced its own pain within the context of its history and collective
  narrative. Clearly the road to peace will need to involve the building of trust, the
  healing of wounds, and ultimately, reconciliation.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772383 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772383 Date: 08/31/2015
  These current peace talks are an opportunity for the parties to stop the cycle of
  violence before it escalates, even further. Each missed opportunity only makes the
  healing journey that much harder, and with decades of broken bodies, agreements,
  and dreams, that road is already difficult enough.
  So, the combination of a compelling vision and a commitment to stop the violence
  and start the healing are the true components of a successful peace process,
  regardless of any specific details of an agreement. Necessary, but not sufficient, I
  would suggest. The third element has to do with transforming the essential story of
  the relationship.
  Jews and Arabs have been in a family relationship from biblical times. Every family
  fights occasionally, but this feud has infected the whole world with its bitter and
  deadly consequences. The only way to get a viable peace is to change the core story
  of this relationship from the rabid `us' against 'them' narrative to one about 'we.'
  `We' are in this relationship together and always will be, and can choose to take
  each other down or raise each other up. `We' are more than just ourselves; `we' are
  also our neighbors in a larger regional story. `We' are our ancestors through whose
  courage and anguish we came to this point, and our grandchildren who will bear the
  consequences of what we create. Forging a partnership of `we' can and must be the
  lynchpin of this peace journey.
  There is a difference between signing a peace accord and securing a lasting peace.
  The U.S. mediation team will be concerned primarily with the former in this current
  round of talks. I sincerely hope they will also keep in mind the latter, and the
  invisible dynamics at play in the process. Secretary Clinton speaks of moving from a
  multi-polar world to a multi-partner world. These peace talks are a unique
  opportunity on that road.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772383 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772385
MetadataSubject: STATEMENT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-06T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0101/DOC_0C05772385/C05772385.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Statement
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, October 6,2010 11:01 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772385
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  You asked about this. It was Walter Isaacson.
  New BBG chief wants more money to combat "enemies" such as China and Russia Posted By Josh Rogin Tuesday,
  October 5, 2010 - 4:43 PM
  The Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) has a new chairman in Walter Isaacson, and the former CNN and Time
  magazine chief is calling for even more money for the BBG to combat the public diplomacy efforts of America's
  "enemies," which he identifies as Iran, Venezuela, Russia, and China.
  The BBG, which oversees a $700 million annual budget to run such organizations as the Voice of America, Radio Free
  Europe, and Radio Free Asia, funds breakthrough reporting in some of the most dangerous parts of the world, but at the
  same time is facing increased competition from other governments' forays into international broadcasting.
  Isaacson said that other countries are stepping up their international broadcasting efforts and that the Congress must
  allow the U.S. government to do the same.
  "We can't allow ourselves to be out-communicated by our enemies," he said. "You've got Russia Today, Iran's Press TV,
  Venezuela's TeleSUR, and of course, China is launching an international broadcasting 24-hour news channel with
  correspondents around the world [and has] reportedly set aside six to ten billion [dollars] -- we've to go to Capitol Hill
  with that number -- to expand their overseas media operations."
  Isaacson said that combating internet censorship would be a major focus of the BBG under his leadership and that China
  and Iran were the prime targets.
  "China, Iran, and other countries block democratic impulses using their later technologies, and Beijing has deployed
  armies of cyber militias to go after their country's cyber dissidents," he said. "The BBG is at the forefront of combating
  this. Through constant innovation and technical evolution, our engineers are opening up the Internet gateway for
  audiences in China and Iran."
  "We know where we stand in the fight for Internet freedom," Isaacson said. "Wherever there is a firewall, it's our duty
  to storm it, to denounce it and to circumvent it."
  Isaacson was speaking at last week's 60th anniversary celebration for Radio Free Europe, which he credited as
  contributing to the end of the Cold War. He made it clear the BBG's outlets will stick to reporting the news objectively,
  even if that conflicts with the foreign policy of the Obama administration.
  "It's sometimes said that our international broadcasting is in a difficult position because by law and by tradition it's
  tasked with two separate missions that might conflict: first of all, covering the news with the highest journalistic
  standards and secondly, being a part of America's public diplomacy by accurately conveying its policies and values to the
  world," Isaacson said.
  "Let me say to you, my fellow journalists, that I will stress and we will stress the primacy of the first of these missions,
  our mission of being credible journalists, because in fact, it's the only way to carry out the second mission. You can't do
  it unless you're credible and telling the truth, and in the end, the truth is on our side."
  Pressed by The Cable to explain exactly what that means, especially in light of reports that the Obama administration
  sought to influence BBG reporting after the disputed Iranian presidential elections, Isaacson promised he wouldn't
  hesitate to air views that contradict American foreign policy on BBG stations.
  He said that the goals of American foreign policy and the objectives of credible journalism overlap about 90 percent of
  the time -- as for the other 10 percent, a choice must be made.
  "I feel it's the role of the BBG to always make the choice on the side of credible journalism, just as you would in the
  private sector," Isaacson said. "We can never compromise our credibility. And in doing so, that will probably help further
  the foreign policy interests of the United States. But if it's ever a real conflict, our goal one is to protect our credibility."

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772385 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, October 6,2010 11:01 AM
  To:
  Subject: Statement
  You asked about this. It was Walter Isaacson.
  New BBG chief wants more money to combat "enemies" such as China and Russia Posted By Josh Rogin Tuesday,
  October 5, 2010 - 4:43 PM
  The Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) has a new chairman in Walter Isaacson, and the former CNN and Time
  magazine chief is calling for even more money for the BBG to combat the public diplomacy efforts of America's
  "enemies," which he identifies as Iran, Venezuela, Russia, and China.
  The BBG, which oversees a $700 million annual budget to run such organizations as the Voice of America, Radio Free
  Europe, and Radio Free Asia, funds breakthrough reporting in some of the most dangerous parts of the world, but at the
  same time is facing increased competition from other governments' forays into international broadcasting.
  Isaacson said that other countries are stepping up their international broadcasting efforts and that the Congress must
  allow the U.S. government to do the same.
  "We can't allow ourselves to be out-communicated by our enemies," he said. "You've got Russia Today, Iran's Press TV,
  Venezuela's TeleSUR, and of course, China is launching an international broadcasting 24-hour news channel with
  correspondents around the world [and has] reportedly set aside six to ten billion [dollars] -- we've to go to Capitol Hill
  with that number -- to expand their overseas media operations."
  Isaacson said that combating internet censorship would be a major focus of the BBG under his leadership and that China
  and Iran were the prime targets.
  "China, Iran, and other countries block democratic impulses using their later technologies, and Beijing has deployed
  armies of cyber militias to go after their country's cyber dissidents," he said. "The BBG is at the forefront of combating
  this. Through constant innovation and technical evolution, our engineers are opening up the Internet gateway for
  audiences in China and Iran."
  "We know where we stand in the fight for Internet freedom," Isaacson said. "Wherever there is a firewall, it's our duty
  to storm it, to denounce it and to circumvent it."
  Isaacson was speaking at last week's 60th anniversary celebration for Radio Free Europe, which he credited as
  contributing to the end of the Cold War. He made it clear the BBG's outlets will stick to reporting the news objectively,
  even if that conflicts with the foreign policy of the Obama administration.
  "It's sometimes said that our international broadcasting is in a difficult position because by law and by tradition it's
  tasked with two separate missions that might conflict: first of all, covering the news with the highest journalistic
  standards and secondly, being a part of America's public diplomacy by accurately conveying its policies and values to the
  world," Isaacson said.
  "Let me say to you, my fellow journalists, that I will stress and we will stress the primacy of the first of these missions,
  our mission of being credible journalists, because in fact, it's the only way to carry out the second mission. You can't do
  it unless you're credible and telling the truth, and in the end, the truth is on our side."
  Pressed by The Cable to explain exactly what that means, especially in light of reports that the Obama administration
  sought to influence BBG reporting after the disputed Iranian presidential elections, Isaacson promised he wouldn't
  hesitate to air views that contradict American foreign policy on BBG stations.
  He said that the goals of American foreign policy and the objectives of credible journalism overlap about 90 percent of
  the time -- as for the other 10 percent, a choice must be made.
  "I feel it's the role of the BBG to always make the choice on the side of credible journalism, just as you would in the
  private sector," Isaacson said. "We can never compromise our credibility. And in doing so, that will probably help further
  the foreign policy interests of the United States. But if it's ever a real conflict, our goal one is to protect our credibility."
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772385 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772386
MetadataSubject: COOKSTOVES
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Balderstone, Kris M
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0097/DOC_0C05772386/C05772386.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: O-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Cookstoves
ExtractedTo: H; Fuchs, Michael H
ExtractedFrom: Balderston, Kris M <BalderstonKM@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 11:55 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772386
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Great news. Thanks for doing the call. We will get in touch to nail down their participation.
  It has not been announced yet but we also learned that Shell Company is coming in as a founding member at $6M over
  three years.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772386 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Balderston, Kris M <BalderstonKM@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 11:55 AM
  To: H; Fuchs, Michael H
  Subject: Re: Cookstoves
  Great news. Thanks for doing the call. We will get in touch to nail down their participation.
  It has not been announced yet but we also learned that Shell Company is coming in as a founding member at $6M over
  three years.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Balderston, Kris M; Fuchs, Michael H
  Sent: Sun Sep 12 07:48:57 2010
  Subject: Cookstoves
  The Norwegian FM told me Norway would join the Alliance and we should coordinate w his UN Rep. Will you pls follow
  up? Thx.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772386 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772388
MetadataSubject: JOHN KERRY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Feltman, Jeffrey D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0097/DOC_0C05772388/C05772388.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: O-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: John Kerry
ExtractedTo: H; Sullivan, Jacob
ExtractedFrom: Feltman, Jeffrey D <FeltmanJD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 12:07 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772388
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  I will have with me a big file on this; I raised the case on the margins of Aboul-Gheit's meeting with you on August 30.
  We will work with CA to have a letter prepared to take.
  The case is typical in that the U.S. parent has custody that the Egyptian courts have not yet recognized (case is pending).
  But it's atypical in that it's the mother who took the kids to Egypt and the father who is in the U.S. We're in touch with
  Senator Kerry's office on this.
  Jeffrey Feltman
  Assistant Secretary
  Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs
  Department of State
  202-647-7209

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772388 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Feltman, Jeffrey D <FeltmanJD@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 12:07 PM
  To: H; Sullivan, Jacob
  Subject: RE: John Kerry
  I will have with me a big file on this; I raised the case on the margins of Aboul-Gheit's meeting with you on August 30.
  We will work with CA to have a letter prepared to take.
  The case is typical in that the U.S. parent has custody that the Egyptian courts have not yet recognized (case is pending).
  But it's atypical in that it's the mother who took the kids to Egypt and the father who is in the U.S. We're in touch with
  Senator Kerry's office on this.
  Jeffrey Feltman
  Assistant Secretary
  Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs
  Department of State
  202-647-7209
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 5:56 PM
  To: Feltman, Jeffrey D; Sullivan, Jacob J
  Subject: John Kerry
  The Senator called to ask me to raise the Egyptian custody case of the mother absconding w her children from the US
  using fake passports. He said he has reason to believe if I ask Mubarak directly, "you could bring the kids home w you."
  Do you know about this?
  I'd like to have a letter to Mubarak prepared outlining the facts that I could discuss and leave w him, assuming any of
  this makes sense.
  Pis advise.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772388 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772390
MetadataSubject: ONE MORE, AND I'LL STOP BOMBARDING YOU
MetadataTo: Slaughter, Anne-Marie
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0095/DOC_0C05772390/C05772390.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: one more, and I'll stop bombarding you
ExtractedTo: Slaughter, Anne-Marie; H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 3:14 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772390
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Printed for her
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772390 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 3:14 PM
  To: Slaughter, Anne-Marie; H
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: RE: one more, and I'll stop bombarding you
  Printed for her
  Original Message
  From: Slaughter, Anne-Made
  Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 1:36 PM
  To: 'H'
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D; Abedin, Huma
  Subject: one more, and I'll stop bombarding you
  I don't know if you had time to read the longer paper from Louise Diamond that I sent you, but here she has boiled
  down her basic arguments into 700 words.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772390 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772392
MetadataSubject: (AP) WITH STATEHOOD, PALESTINE READY TO END ALL CLAIMS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-17T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0103/DOC_0C05772392/C05772392.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (AP) With statehood, Palestine ready to end all claims
ExtractedFrom: - Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-0_05; SES-O_Shift-III
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 5:34 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772392
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772392 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: - Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 5:34 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (AP) With statehood, Palestine ready to end all claims
  From: Vu, Anny T
  To: NEWS-Mahogany; NEWS-NEA
  Cc: SES-0_05; SES-O_Shift-III
  Sent: Sun Oct 17 17:25:43 2010
  Subject: (AP) With statehood, Palestine ready to end all claims
  RAMALLAH (AP) — Palestinian President Abbas said the Palestinians are willing to end all historic claims against Israel
  once they get their state as part of a peace deal. An end-of-claims declaration is a long-standing Israeli demand, and
  Abbas addressed the issue in an interview with Israel TV on October 17. Abbas said negotiating with Israeli Prime
  Minister Benjamin Netanyahu remains his preferred choice, but that he cannot return to talks unless settlement expansion
  stops. Abbas said other options remain on the table, including seeking UN recognition of a Palestinian state. He said
  resignation is not an option for now.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772392 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772394
MetadataSubject: (REUTERS) RUSSIA WARNS OF CONFLICT BETWEEN NORTH AND SOUTH KOREA
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-22T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0099/DOC_0C05772394/C05772394.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (Reuters) Russia warns of conflict between North and South Korea
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-III
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 5:08 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772394
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772394 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 5:08 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (Reuters) Russia warns of conflict between North and South Korea
  From: Sidereas, Evyenia M
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-III
  Sent: Wed Sep 22 16:27:55 2010
  Subject: (Reuters) Russia warns of conflict between North and South Korea
  MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia warned that "conflict" could break out any day between North and South Korea, saying
  tension between the two countries was at its worst in a decade. The unusually stark words by Russian deputy foreign
  minister Alexei Borodavkin come two months after the North said it would wage a "sacred war" against the United
  States and its ally, South Korea. Washington replied that it would not enter a "war of words" with the North.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772394 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772398
MetadataSubject: (AP) ISRAELI PM: CURRENT SETTLEMENT CURBS WON'T REMAIN
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0097/DOC_0C05772398/C05772398.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: O-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (AP) Israeli PM: Current settlement curbs won't remain
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.goy>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-II
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 12:54 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772398
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772398 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.goy>
  Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 12:54 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (AP) Israeli PM: Current settlement curbs won't remain
  From: Simmons, Krista M
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-II
  Sent: Sun Sep 12 12:47:42 2010
  Subject: (AP) Israeli PM: Current settlement curbs won't remain
  JERUSALEM (AP) - Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu said the current restrictions on West Bank settlements will not
  remain in place, however there will still be some limits on construction.
  Israel's 10-month slowdown on new housing starts in West Bank settlements expires at the end of this month and is a
  key point of contention in newly launched peace talks with Palestinians.
  Netanyahu told Mideast envoy Tony Blair the Palestinians want a total freeze in construction. "That will not happen,"
  he said.
  Israel will not build "tens of thousands of housing units that are in the pipeline, but we will not freeze the lives of the
  residents" of the settlements, Netanyahu said.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772398 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772399
MetadataSubject: 8/31 PAKISTAN FLOOD RELIEF DONATIONS REPORT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0095/DOC_0C05772399/C05772399.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: 8/31 Pakistan Flood Relief Donations Report
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 5:39 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772399
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: FYI
ExtractedCc:
  Davisson, Brandon; Anderson, Roger W; Bordley, Donna; Klevorick, Caitlin B; Shah, Khushali P; Thessin, James H;

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772399 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 5:39 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW: 8/31 Pakistan Flood Relief Donations Report
  FYI
  From: Klevorick, Caitlin B
  Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 3:16 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Reines, Philippe I
  Subject: Fw: 8/31 Pakistan Flood Relief Donations Report
  From: Grover, Charles H
  To: Kennedy, Patrick F
  Cc: Davisson, Brandon; Anderson, Roger W; Bordley, Donna; Klevorick, Caitlin B; Shah, Khushali P; Thessin, James H;
  Kaplan, Sid L; Millette, James L
  Sent: Tue Aug 31 15:15:38 2010
  Subject: 8/31 Pakistan Flood Relief Donations Report
  Please find the updated Pakistan Flood Relief donation totals through August 30:
  1. Have received $37,780 in pledge funds from texting all at $10 each so 3,778 pledges
  2. Have received $246,423 in credit card donations from 2,736 donors
  3. Have received $ 9,760 in ACH donations from 118 donors
  4. Have received $50,144 in mailed in checks/cash from 276 donors
  So in total we have received $344,107 in pledges and donations from 6,908 donors
  On average this is about $50 per donation/pledge. If you excluded the ten dollar pledges/donations the
  average donation was $98 dollars.
  Charlie
  Charles H. Grover
  Deputy Director
  Bureau of Resource Management
  Global Financial Services (RM/GFS)
  Department of State
  Charleston, SC
  843-308-5607 phone
  843-308-5577 fax
  Save a tree... please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772399 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772402
MetadataSubject: YOU UP? CAN YOU TALK?
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-22T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0099/DOC_0C05772402/C05772402.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: You up? Can you talk?
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 9:25 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772402
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772402 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 9:25 PM
  To:
  Subject: You up? Can you talk?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772402 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772404
MetadataSubject: (AP) HAMAS: ISRAELI STRIKE IN GAZA KILLS 3 PALESTINIANS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0097/DOC_0C05772404/C05772404.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: O-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (AP) Hamas: Israeli strike in Gaza kills 3 Palestinians
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-II
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 1:56 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772404
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772404 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 1:56 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (AP) Hamas: Israeli strike in Gaza kills 3 Palestinians
  From: Simmons, Krista M
  To: NEWS-NEA; NEWS-Mahogany; PA FO Group
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-II
  Sent: Sun Sep 12 13:15:13 2010
  Subject: (AP) llamas: Israeli strike in Gaza kills 3 Palestinians
  JERUSALEM (AP) - Hamas security officials said three Palestinians were killed by Israeli tank fire in the northern Gaza
  Strip. Five people were wounded.
  There was no immediate comment September 12 from the Israeli military.
  Israeli forces and Palestinians frequently clash in the area.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772404 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772406
MetadataSubject: REMINDER RE MIKE RIENZI
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Coleman, Claire L
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-06T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0101/DOC_0C05772406/C05772406.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Reminder re Mike Rienzi
ExtractedFrom: Coleman, Claire L <ColemanCL@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 3:55 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772406
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Madame Secretary,
  You asked me to remind you to have President Clinton get in touch with Mike Rienzi. His contact info is below.
  Mike Rienzi
  Rienzi and Sons
  18-81 Steinway St
  Astoria NY 11105
  Claire L. Coleman
  Office Manager to the Secretary of State
  U.S. Department of State
  Tel: 202-647-7098
  E-Mail: ColemanCL@state.gov

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772406 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Coleman, Claire L <ColemanCL@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 3:55 PM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Reminder re Mike Rienzi
  Madame Secretary,
  You asked me to remind you to have President Clinton get in touch with Mike Rienzi. His contact info is below.
  Mike Rienzi
  Rienzi and Sons
  18-81 Steinway St
  Astoria NY 11105
  Claire L. Coleman
  Office Manager to the Secretary of State
  U.S. Department of State
  Tel: 202-647-7098
  E-Mail: ColemanCL@state.gov
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772406 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772407
MetadataSubject: (THE DETROIT NEWS) BURNED QURAN SMEARED WITH FECES FOUND AT EAST LANSING MOSQUE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0097/DOC_0C05772407/C05772407.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: O-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (The Detroit News) Burned Quran smeared with feces found at East Lansing mosque
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH©state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_CMS; SES-O_Shift-II; SES-O_Shift-III
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 1:58 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772407
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: In case u didn't see story?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772407 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH©state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 1:58 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (The Detroit News) Burned Quran smeared with feces found at East Lansing mosque
  In case u didn't see story?
  From: Simmons, Krista M
  To: NEWS-Mahogany; Hensman, Chris D
  Cc: SES-O_CMS; SES-O_Shift-II; SES-O_Shift-III
  Sent: Sun Sep 12 11:41:08 2010
  Subject: (The Detroit News) Burned Quran smeared with feces found at East Lansing mosque
  (The Detroit News) - A burned Quran was found at a mosque in East Lansing September 11, prompting the Michigan
  chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-MI) to ask the FBI to investigate.
  CAIR-MI reports that officials of the Islamic Center of East Lansing say vandals left a burned Quran at the front entrance
  of the mosque and scatted pages in the street nearby.
  "The perpetrators of this unconscionable act of religious intimidation must be apprehended and prosecuted to the full
  extent of state and federal law," CAIR-MI Executive Director Dawud Walid, said in a statement.
  Torn pages of the Quran appeared to be smeared with feces, CAIR officials said.
  A spokesman for the FBI could not immediately be reached for comment.
  A Florida pastor's plan to burn a Quran on Saturday, the ninth anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, resulted in
  worldwide condemnation and protests. Pastor Terry Jones of Gainesville, Fla., later abandoned his plan.
  From The Detroit News: http://www.detnews.com/article/20100912/METRO/9120311/1361/Burned-Quran-smeared-
  with-feces-found-at-East-Lansing-mosque#ixzzOzKXB6o00
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772407 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772408
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0097/DOC_0C05772408/C05772408.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: O-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772408
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Ops update on sara shourd:
  Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.goy>
  Sunday, September 12, 2010 1:59 PM
  1.4(B)
  1.4(D)
  B1
  Per 0420 telcon with Embassy Bern CG Ed Birsner:
  — Reason: 1.4(B), 1.4(D) — Declassify on: 09/12/2030

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772408 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  1.4(B),B1,1.4(D)
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Ops update on sara shourd:
  Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.goy>
  Sunday, September 12, 2010 1:59 PM
  1.4(B)
  1.4(D)
  B1
  Per 0420 telcon with Embassy Bern CG Ed Birsner:
  Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 08/27/2015 — Class: CONFIDENTIAL
  — Reason: 1.4(B), 1.4(D) — Declassify on: 09/12/2030
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772408 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772409
MetadataSubject: (REUTERS) NETANYAHU SEEKS LOYALTY OATH TO JEWISH NATION-STATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-06T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0101/DOC_0C05772409/C05772409.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: (Reuters) Netanyahu seeks loyalty oath to Jewish nation-state
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-11I; SES-0_OS
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 6:11 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772409
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772409 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 6:11 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW: (Reuters) Netanyahu seeks loyalty oath to Jewish nation-state
  From: Hsiang, Margaret E
  Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 5:57 PM
  To: NEWS-NEA; NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-11I; SES-0_OS
  Subject: (Reuters) Netanyahu seeks loyalty oath to Jewish nation-state
  JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will push for legislation to require those wanting to become
  Israeli citizens to pledge loyalty to the "nation-state of the Jewish people." Under Israeli law, Jews wanting to immigrate
  to Israel are granted automatic citizenship and non-Jews have to take a loyalty oath to the "state of Israel".
  The amendment would win favor with one of Netanyahu's key coalition partners, Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman,
  who leads the right-wing Israel our Home party. Lieberman has advocated a loyalty oath to the Jewish state for all
  Israelis, including Arab citizens who make up some 20 percent of the population.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772409 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772410
MetadataSubject: CHAS FREEMAN'S SPEECH IN OSLO -- YOU SHOULD READ
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0097/DOC_0C05772410/C05772410.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: O-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Chas Freeman's Speech in Oslo -- YOU SHOULD READ
ExtractedFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma; Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 3:27 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772410
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B5,B6
  From: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 3:27 PM
  To:
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma; Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Fw: Chas Freeman's Speech in Oslo -- YOU SHOULD READ
  Attachments: Chas Freeman Speech.docx; Chas Freeman Speech.docx
  Original Message
  From: Anne-Marie Slaughter
  To: Slaughter, Anne-Marie
  Sent: Sun Sep 12 15:20:15 2010
  Subject: Chas Freeman's Speech in Oslo -- YOU SHOULD READ
  Fmr. Amb. Chas Freeman, whom I know is on the outs w/ us but who nevertheless merits the respect of many of the
  smartest foreign policy analysts I know, gave the attached speech to the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs in
  Oslo on Sept 1, the day before you held the opening peace talks in DC. His speech has been widely circulated on the
  Internet since then, so you should at least skim it for that reason alone. It is long, and there are parts of it you will
  strongly disagree with, but I would still recommend reading it, above all now. But given your time constraints, in the
  attached document I have excerpted the parts I think are most valuable for us and added a few comments of my own
  and then included the speech as a whole. In particular, given your interest in Palestinian/Arab psychology and where I
  think you personally can make a mark that has eluded others, I would point you to the three excerpted graphs below.
  "Arabic has two quite different words that are both translated as "negotiation," making a distinction that doesn't exist in
  either English or Hebrew. One word, "musaawama," refers to the no-holds-barred bargaining process that takes place in
  bazaars between strangers who may never see each other again and who therefore feel no obligation not to scam each
  other. Another, "mufaawadhat," describes the dignified formal discussions about matters of honor and high principle
  that take place on a basis of mutual respect and equality between statesmen who seek a continuing relationship.
  Egyptian President Anwar Sadat's travel to Jerusalem was a grand act of statesmanship to initiate a process of
  mufaawadhat - relationship-building between leaders and their polities. So was the Arab peace initiative of 2002. It
  called for a response in kind. The
  West muttered approvingly but did not act. After a while, Israel
  responded with intermittent, somewhat oblique suggestions of willingness to haggle over terms. But an offer to bicker
  over the terms on which a grand gesture has been granted is, not surprisingly, seen as insultingly unresponsive.
  I [this is Freeman talking] cite this not to suggest that non-Arabs should adopt Arabic canons of thought, but to make a
  point about diplomatic effectiveness. To move a negotiating partner in a desired direction, one must understand how
  that partner understands things and help him to see a way forward that will bring him to an end he has been persuaded
  to want. One of the reasons we can't seem to move things as we desire in the Middle East is that we don't make much
  effort to understand how others reason and how they rank their interests."
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015
  Arabic has two quite different words that are both translated as
  "negotiation," making a distinction that doesn't exist in either English or
  Hebrew. One word, "musaawama," refers to the no-holds-barred bargaining
  process that takes place in bazaars between strangers who may never see each
  other again and who therefore feel no obligation not to scam each other.
  Another, "mufaawadhat," describes the dignified formal discussions about
  matters of honor and high principle that take place on a basis of mutual
  respect and equality between statesmen who seek a continuing relationship.
  Egyptian President Anwar Sadat's travel to Jerusalem was a grand act of
  statesmanship to initiate a process of mufaawadhat - relationship-building
  between leaders and their polities. So was the Arab peace initiative of 2002. It
  called for a response in kind. The West muttered approvingly but did not act.
  After a while, Israel responded with intermittent, somewhat oblique
  suggestions of willingness to haggle over terms. But an offer to bicker over the
  terms on which a grand gesture has been granted is, not surprisingly, seen as
  insultingly unresponsive.
  I cite this not to suggest that non-Arabs should adopt Arabic canons of
  thought, but to make a point about diplomatic effectiveness. To move a
  negotiating partner in a desired direction, one must understand how that
  partner understands things and help him to see a way forward that will bring
  him to an end he has been persuaded to want. One of the reasons we can't
  seem to move things as we desire in the Middle East is that we don't make
  much effort to understand how others reason and how they rank their interests.
  EXCERPTS FROM CHAS FREEMAN SPEECH WITH SOME NOTES
  FROM AMS (SPEECH IN ITS ENTIRELY FOLLOWS)
  Peace is a pattern of stability acceptable to those with the capacity to disturb it
  by violence. It is almost impossible to impose. It cannot become a reality, still less be
  sustained, if those who must accept it are excluded from it. This reality directs our
  attention to who is not at this gathering in Washington and what must be done to
  remedy the problems these absences create.
  Obviously, the party that won the democratically expressed mandate of the
  Palestinian people to represent them - Hamas - is not there. Yet there can be no
  peace without its buy-in. Egypt and Jordan have been invited as observers. Yet they
  have nothing to add to the separate peace agreements each long ago made with Israel.
  (Both these agreements were explicitly premised on grudging Israeli undertakings to
  accept Palestinian self-determination. The Jewish state quickly finessed both.)
  1
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015
  Activists from the Jewish diaspora disproportionately staff the American delegation.
  A failure to reconcile either American Jews or the Palestine diaspora to peace would
  doom any accord. But the Palestinian diaspora will be represented in Washington
  only in tenuous theory, not in fact.
  Other Arabs, including the Arab League and the author of its peace initiative,
  Saudi Arabia, will not be at the talks tomorrow. The reasons for this are both simple
  and complex. At one level they reflect both a conviction that this latest installment of
  the "peace process" is just another in a long series of public entertainments for the
  American electorate and also a lack of confidence in the authenticity of the Palestinian
  delegation. At another level, they result from the way the United States has
  defined the problems to be solved and the indifference to Arab interests and
  views this definition evidences. Then too, they reflect disconnects in political
  culture and negotiating style between Israelis, Arabs, and Americans.
  To begin with, neither Israel nor the conveners of this proposed new
  "peace process" have officially acknowledged or responded to the Arab peace
  initiative of 2002. This offered normalization of relations with the Jewish state,
  should Israel make peace with the Palestinians. Instead, the United States and the
  Quartet have seemed to pocket the Arab offer, ignore its precondition that Israelis
  come to terms with Palestinians, and gone on to levy new demands.
  In this connection, making Arab recognition of Israel's "right to exist"
  the central purpose of the "peace process" offends Arabs on many levels. In
  framing the issue this way, Israel and the United States appear to be asking for
  something well beyond pragmatic accommodation of the reality of a Jewish
  state in the Middle East. To the Arabs, Americans now seem to be insisting on
  Arab endorsement of the idea of the state of Israel, the means by which that
  state was established, and the manner in which it has comported itself. Must
  Arabs really embrace Zionism before Israel can cease expansion and accept
  peace?
  Arabs and Muslims familiar with European history can accept that
  European anti-Semitism justified the establishment of a homeland for
  traumatized European Jews. But asking them even implicitly to agree that the
  forcible eviction of Palestinian Arabs was a morally appropriate means to this
  end is both a nonstarter and seriously off-putting. So is asking them to affirm
  that resistance to such displacement was and is sinful. Similarly, the Arabs see
  the demand that they recognize a Jewish state with no fixed borders as a clever
  attempt to extract their endorsement of Israel's unilateral expansion at Palestinian
  expense.
  2
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015
  The lack of appeal in this approach has been compounded by a
  longstanding American habit of treating Arab concerns about Israel as a form
  of anti-Semitism and tuning them out. Instead of hearing out and addressing
  Arab views, U.S. peace processors have repeatedly focused on soliciting Arab
  acts of kindness toward Israel. They argue that gestures of acceptance can
  help Israelis overcome their Holocaust-inspired political neuroses and take
  risks for peace.
  Each time this notion of Arab diplomacy as psychotherapy for Israelis has
  been trotted out, it has been met with incredulity. To most in the region, it
  encapsulates the contrast between Washington's sympathy and solicitude for Israelis
  and its condescendingly exploitative view of Arabs. Some see it as a barely disguised
  appeal for a policy of appeasement of Israel. Still others suspect an attempt to
  construct a "peace process" in which Arabs begin to supply Israel with gifts of carrots
  so that Americans can continue to avoid applying sticks to it.
  The effort to encourage Arab generosity as an offset to American political
  pusillanimity vis-a-vis Israel is ludicrously unpersuasive. It has failed so many times
  that it should be obvious that it will not work. Yet it was a central element of George
  Mitchell's mandate for "peace process" diplomacy. And it appears to have resurfaced
  as part of the proposed follow-up to tomorrow's meeting between the parties in
  Washington. It should be no puzzle why the Saudis and other Arabs could not be
  persuaded to join this gathering.
  As a last thought before turning to what must be done, let me make a
  quick comment on a relevant cultural factor. Arabic has two quite different
  words that are both translated as "negotiation," making a distinction that
  doesn't exist in either English or Hebrew. One word, "musaawama," refers to
  the no-holds-barred bargaining process that takes place in bazaars between
  strangers who may never see each other again and who therefore feel no
  obligation not to scam each other. Another, "rnufaawadhat," describes the
  dignified formal discussions about matters of honor and high principle that
  3
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015
  take place on a basis of mutual respect and equality between statesmen who
  seek a continuing relationship.
  Egyptian President Anwar Sadat's travel to Jerusalem was a grand act of
  statesmanship to initiate a process of mufaawadhat - relationship-building
  between leaders and their polities. So was the Arab peace initiative of 2002. It
  called for a response in kind. The West muttered approvingly but did not act.
  After a while, Israel responded with intermittent, somewhat oblique
  suggestions of willingness to haggle over terms. But an offer to bicker over the
  terms on which a grand gesture has been granted is, not surprisingly, seen as
  insultingly unresponsive.
  I cite this not to suggest that non-Arabs should adopt Arabic canons of
  thought, but to make a point about diplomatic effectiveness. To move a
  negotiating partner in a desired direction, one must understand how that
  partner understands things and help him to see a way forward that will bring
  him to an end he has been persuaded to want. One of the reasons we can't
  seem to move things as we desire in the Middle East is that we don't make
  much effort to understand how others reason and how they rank their interests.
  In the case of the Israel-Palestine conundrum, we Americans are long on empathy and
  expertise about Israel and very, very short on these for the various Arab parties. The
  essential militarism of U.S. policies in the Middle East adds to our difficulties. We
  have become skilled at killing Arabs. We have forgotten how to listen to them or
  persuade them.
  *********
  This brings me to a few thoughts about the Western and Arab interests at stake in the
  Holy Land and their implications for what must be done.
  In foreign affairs, interests are the measure of all things. My assumption is that
  Americans and Norwegians, indeed Europeans in general, share common interests
  that require peace in the Holy Land. To my mind, these interests include - but are, of
  course, not limited to - gaining security and acceptance for a democratic state of
  Israel; eliminating the gross injustices and daily humiliations that foster Arab terrorism
  against Israel and its foreign allies and supporters, as well as friendly Arab regimes;
  and reversing the global spread of religious strife and prejudice, including, very likely,
  a revival of anti-Semitism in the West if current trends are not arrested. None of
  these aspirations can be fulfilled without an end to the Israeli occupation and freedom
  for Palestinians.
  4
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015
  Arab states, like Saudi Arabia, also have compelling reasons to want relief from
  occupation as well as self-determination for Palestinians. They may not be concerned
  to preserve Israel's democracy, as we are, but they share an urgent interest in ending
  the radicalization of their own populations, curbing the spread of Islamist terrorism,
  and eliminating the tensions with the West that the conflict in the Holy Land fuels.
  These are the concerns that have driven them to propose peace, as they very clearly
  did eight years ago. For related reasons, Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah has
  made inter-faith dialogue and the promotion of religious tolerance a main
  focus of his domestic and international policy.
  As the custodian of two of Islam's three sacred places of pilgrimage -
  Mecca and Medina - Saudi Arabia has long transcended its own notorious
  religious narrow-mindedness to hold the holy places in its charge open to
  Muslims of all sects and persuasions. This experience, joined with Islamic
  piety, reinforces a Saudi insistence on the exemption of religious pilgrimage to
  Jerusalem from political interference or manipulation. The Ottoman Turks were
  careful to ensure freedom of access for worship to adherents of the three Abrahamic
  faiths when they administered the city. It is an interest that Jews, Christians, and
  Muslims share.
  There is, in short, far greater congruity between Western and Arab
  interests affecting the Israel-Palestine dispute than is generally recognized.
  This can be the basis for creative diplomacy. The fact that this has not occurred
  reflects pathologies of political life in the United States that paralyze the American
  diplomatic imagination. Tomorrow's meeting may well demonstrate that, the election
  of Barack Obama notwithstanding, the United States is still unfit to manage the
  achievement of peace between Israel and the Arabs. If so, it is in the American
  interest as well as everyone else's that others become the path-breakers, enlisting the
  United States as best they can in support of what they achieve, but not expecting
  America to overcome its incapacity to lead.
  Here, I think, there is a lesson to be drawn from the Norwegian experience in
  • the 1990s. The Clinton Administration was happy to organize the public relations for
  5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015
  the Oslo accords but did not take ownership of them. It did little to protect them
  from subversion and overthrow, and nothing to insist on their implementation. Only
  a peace process that is protected from Israel's ability to manipulate American politics
  can succeed.
  This brings me to how Europeans and Arabs might work together to
  realize the objectives both share with most Americans: establishing
  internationally recognized borders for Israel, securing freedom for the
  Palestinians, and ending the stimulus to terrorism in the region and beyond it
  that strife in the Holy Land entails. I have only four suggestions to present today.
  I expect that more ideas will emerge from the discussion period. A serious effort to
  cooperate with the Arabs of the sort that Norway is uniquely capable of contriving
  could lead to the development of still more options for joint or parallel action on
  behalf of peace.
  Now to my suggestions, presented in ascending order of difficulty, from the
  least to the most controversial.
  First, get behind the Arab peace initiative. Saudi Arab culture frowns on self-
  promotion and the Kingdom is less gifted than most at public diplomacy. Political
  factors inhibit official Arab access to the Israeli press. The Israeli media have
  published some - mostly dismissive - commentary on the Arab peace initiative but left
  most Israelis ignorant of its contents and unfamiliar with its text. Why not buy space
  in the Israeli media to give Israelis a chance to read the Arab League declaration and
  consider the opportunities it presents? I suspect the Saudis, as well as other members
  of the Arab League, would consider it constructive for an outside party to do this. It
  might facilitate other sorts of cooperation with them in which European capabilities
  can also compensate for Arab reticence. The Turks and other non-Arab Muslims
  should be brought in as full participants in any such efforts. This wouldn't be bad for
  Europe's relations with both. By the way, given the U.S. media's notorious one-
  sidedness and American ignorance about the Arab peace plan, a well-targeted
  advertising campaign in the United States might not be a bad idea either.
  Second, help create a Palestinian partner for peace. There can be no peace
  with Israel unless there are officials who are empowered by the Palestinian people to
  negotiate and ratify it. Israel has worked hard to divide the Palestinians so as to
  consolidate its conquest of their homeland. Saudi Arabia has several times sought to
  create a Palestinian peace partner for Israel by bringing Fatah, Hamas, and other
  factions together. On each occasion, Israel, with U.S. support, has acted to preclude
  this. Active organization of non-American Western support for diplomacy aimed at
  restoring a unity government to the Palestinian Authority could make a big difference.
  6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015
  The Obama Administration would be under strong domestic political pressure to join
  Israel in blocking a joint European-Arab effort to accomplish this. Under some
  circumstances, however, it might welcome being put to this test.
  Third, reaffirm and enforce international law. The UN Security Council is
  charged with enforcing the rule of law internationally. In the case of the Middle East,
  however, the Council's position at the apex of the international system has served to
  erode and subvert the ideal of a rule-bound international order. Almost forty
  American vetoes have prevented the application to the Israeli occupying authorities of
  the Geneva Conventions, the Nuremberg precedents, human rights conventions, and
  relevant Security Council directives. American diplomacy on behalf of the Jewish
  state has silenced the collective voice of the international community as Israel has
  illegally colonized and annexed broad swaths of occupied territory, administered
  collective punishment to a captive people, assassinated their political leaders,
  massacred civilians, barred UN investigators, defied mandatory Security Council
  resolutions, and otherwise engaged in scofflaw behavior, usually with only the
  flimsiest of legally irrelevant excuses.
  7
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015
  America's Faltering Search for Peace in the Middle East: Openings for Others?
  Remarks to staff of the Royal Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
  and, separately, to members of the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs
  Ambassador Chas W. Freeman, Jr. (USFS, Ret.)
  1 September 2010, Oslo, Norway
  You have asked me to speak to current American policies in the Middle East,
  with an emphasis on the prospects for peace in the Holy Land. You have further
  suggested that I touch on the relationship of the Gulf Arabs, especially Saudi Arabia,
  to this. It is both an honor and a challenge to address this subject in this capital / at
  this ministry.
  The declaration of principles worked out in Oslo seventeen years ago was the
  last direct negotiation between Israelis and Palestinian Arabs to reach consequential,
  positive results. The Oslo accords were a real step toward peace, not another
  deceptive pseudo-event in an endlessly unproductive, so-called "peace process." And
  if that one step forward in Oslo in 1993 was followed by several steps backwards,
  there is a great deal to be learned from how and why that happened.
  There can be no doubt about the importance of today's topic. The ongoing
  conflict in the Holy Land increasingly disturbs the world's conscience as well as its
  tranquility. The Israel-Palestine issue began as a struggle in the context of European
  colonialism. In the post-colonial era, tension between Israelis and the Palestinians
  they dispossessed became, by degrees, the principal source of radicalization and
  instability in the Arab East and then the Arab world as a whole. It stimulated
  escalating terrorism against Israelis at home and their allies abroad. Since the end of
  the Cold War, the interaction between Israel and its captive Palestinian population has
  emerged as the fountainhead of global strife. It is increasingly difficult to distinguish
  this strife from a war of religions or a conflict of civilizations.
  For better or ill, my own country, the United States has played and continues to
  play the key international part in this contest. American policies, more than those of
  any other external actor, have the capacity to stoke or stifle the hatreds in the Middle
  East and to spread or reverse their infection of the wider world. American policies
  and actions in the Middle East thus affect much more than that region.
  8
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015
  Yet, as I will argue, the United States has been obsessed with process rather
  than substance. It has failed to involve parties who are essential to peace. It has acted
  on Israel's behalf to preempt rather than enlist international and regional support for
  peace. It has defined the issues in ways that preclude rather than promote progress.
  Its concept of a "peace process" has therefore become the handmaiden of Israeli
  expansionism rather than a driver for peace. There are alternatives to tomorrow's
  diplomatic peace pageant on the Potomac. And, as Norway has shown, there is a role
  for powers other than America in crafting peace in the Holy Land.
  Over thirty years ago, at Camp David, Jimmy Carter pushed Israel through the
  door to peace that Egypt's Anwar Sadat had opened. Twenty years ago, the first Bush
  administration pressed Israel to the negotiating table with Palestinian leaders, setting
  the stage for their clandestine meetings in Oslo. The capacity of the United States to
  rally other governments behind a cause that it espouses may have atrophied, but
  American power remains far greater than that of any other nation. Nowhere is this
  more evident than in the Middle East.
  For more than four decades, Israel has been able to rely on aid from the United
  States to dominate its region militarily and to sustain its economic prosperity. It has
  counted on its leverage in American politics to block the application of international
  law and to protect itself from the political repercussions of its policies and actions.
  Unquestioning American support has enabled Israel to put the seizure of ever more
  land ahead of the achievement of a modus vivendi with the Palestinians or other
  Arabs. Neither violent resistance from the dispossessed nor objections from abroad
  have brought successive Israeli governments to question, let alone alter the priority
  they assign to land over peace.
  Ironically, Palestinians too have developed a dependency relationship with
  America. This has locked them into a political framework over which Israel exercises
  decisive influence. They have been powerless to end occupation, pogroms, ethnic
  cleansing, and other humiliations by Jewish soldiers and settlers. Nor have they been
  able to prevent their progressive confinement in checkpoint-encircled ghettos on the
  West Bank and the great open-air prison of Gaza.
  Despite this appalling record of failure, the American monopoly on the
  management of the search for peace in Palestine remains unchallenged. Since the end
  of the Cold War, Russia - once a contender for countervailing influence in the region -
  has lapsed into impotence. The former colonial powers of the European Union,
  having earlier laid the basis for conflict in the region, have largely sat on their hands
  while ringing them, content to let America take the lead. China, India, and other
  Asian powers have prudently kept their political and military distance. In the region
  9
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015
  itself, Iran has postured and exploited the Palestinian cause without doing anything to
  advance it. Until recently, Turkey remained aloof.
  On rare occasions, as in the case of the 1973 Arab oil embargo, the Arabs have
  backed their verbal opposition to Israel with action. Egypt and Jordan have settled
  into an unpopular coexistence with Israel that is now sustained only by U.S.
  subventions. Saudi Arabia has twice taken the initiative to offer Israel diplomatic
  concessions if it were to conclude arrangements for peaceful coexistence with the
  Palestinians. But, overall, Arab governments have earned the contempt of the
  Palestinians and their own people for their lack of serious engagement. For the most
  part, Arab leaders have timorously demanded that America solve the Israel-Palestine
  problem for them, while obsequiously courting American protection against Israel,
  each other, Iran, and - in some cases - their own increasingly frustrated and angry
  subjects and citizens.
  Islam charges rulers with the duty to defend the faithful and to uphold justice.
  It demands that they embody righteousness. The resentment of mostly Muslim Arabs
  at their governing elites' failure to meet these standards generates sympathy for
  terrorism directed not just at Israel but at both the United States and Arab
  governments associated with it.
  The perpetrators of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack on the United
  States saw it in part as reprisal for American complicity in Israeli cruelties to
  Palestinians and other Arabs. They justified it as a strike against Washington's
  protection of Arab governments willing to overlook American contributions to
  Muslim suffering. Washington's response to the attack included suspending its efforts
  to make peace in the Holy Land as well as invading and occupying Afghanistan and
  Iraq. All three actions inadvertently strengthened the terrorist case for further attacks
  on America and its allies. The armed struggle between Americans and Muslim
  radicals has already spilled over to Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, and other countries.
  Authoritative voices in Israel now call for adding Iran to the list of countries at war
  with America. They are echoed by Zionist and neo-conservative spokesmen in the
  United States,
  The widening involvement of Americans in combat in Muslim lands has
  inflamed anti-American passions and catalyzed a metastasis of terrorism. It has
  caused a growing majority of the world's 1.6 billion Muslims to see the United States
  as a menace to their faith, their way of life, their homelands, and their personal
  security. American populists and European xenophobes have meanwhile undercut
  liberal and centrist Muslim arguments against the intolerance that empowers terrorism
  by equating terrorism and its extremist advocates with Islam and its followers. The
  10
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015
  current outburst of bigoted demagoguery over the construction of an Islamic cultural
  center and mosque in New York is merely the most recent illustration of this. It
  suggests that the blatant racism and Islamophobia of contemporary Israeli politics is
  contagious. It rules out the global alliances against religious extremists that are
  essential to encompass their political defeat.
  President Obama's inability to break this pattern must be an enormous
  personal disappointment to him. He came into office committed to crafting a new
  relationship with the Arab and Muslim worlds. His first interview with the
  international media was with Arab satellite television. He reached out publicly and
  privately to Iran. He addressed the Turkish parliament with persuasive empathy. He
  traveled to a great center of Islamic learning in Cairo to deliver a remarkably eloquent
  message of conciliation to Muslims everywhere. He made it clear that he understood
  the centrality of injustices in the Holy Land to Muslim estrangement from the West.
  He promised a responsible withdrawal from Iraq and a judicious recrafting of strategy
  in Afghanistan. Few doubt Mr. Obama's sincerity. Yet none of his initiatives has led
  to policy change anyone can detect, let alone believe in.
  It is not for me to analyze or explain the wide gaps between rhetoric and
  achievement in the Obama Administration's stewardship of so many aspects of my
  country's affairs. American voters will render their first formal verdict on this two
  months from tomorrow, on the 2nd of November. The situation in the Holy Land,
  Iraq, Afghanistan, and adjacent areas is only part of what they will consider as they do
  so. But I do think it worthwhile briefly to examine some of the changes in the
  situation that ensure that many policies that once helped us to get by in the Middle
  East will no longer do this.
  Let me begin with the "peace process," a hardy perennial of America's
  diplomatic repertoire that the Obama Administration will put back on public display
  tomorrow. In the Cold War, the appearance of an earnest and "even-handed"
  American search for peace in the Holy Land was the price of U.S. access and
  influence in the Middle East. It provided political cover for conservative Arab
  governments to set aside their anger at American backing of Israel so as to stand with
  America and the Western bloc against Soviet Communism. It kept American
  relations with Israel and the Arabs from becoming a zero-sum game. It mobilized
  domestic Jewish support for incumbent presidents. Of course, there hasn't been an
  American-led "peace process" in the Middle East for at least a decade. Still the
  conceit of a "peace process" became an essential political convenience for all
  concerned. No one could bear to admit that the "peace process" had expired. It
  therefore lived on in phantom form.
  11
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015
  Even when there was no "peace process," the possibility of resurrecting one
  provided hope to the gullible, cover to the guileful, beguilement for the press, an
  excuse for doing nothing to those gaining from the status quo, and - last but far from
  least - lifetime employment for career "peace processors." The perpetual processing
  of peace without the requirement to produce it has been especially appreciated by
  Israeli leaders. It has enabled them to behave like magicians, riveting foreign attention
  on meaningless distractions as they systematically removed Palestinians from their
  homes, settled half a million or more Jews in newly vacated areas of the occupied
  territories, and annexed a widening swath of land to a Jerusalem they insist belongs
  only to Israel.
  Palestinian leaders with legitimacy problems have also had reason to collaborate
  in the search for a "peace process." It's not just that there has been no obviously
  better way to end their people's suffering. Playing "peace process" charades justifies
  the international patronage and Israeli backing these leaders need to retain their status
  in the occupied territories. It ensures that they have media access and high-level
  visiting rights in Washington. Meanwhile, for American leaders, engagement in some
  sort of Middle East "peace process" has been essential to credibility in the Arab and
  Islamic worlds, as well as with the ever-generous American Jewish community. Polls
  show that most American Jews are impatient for peace. Despite all the evidence to
  the contrary, they are eager to believe in the willingness of the government of Israel to
  trade land for it.
  Previous "peace processes" have exploited all these impulses. In practice,
  however, these diplomatic distractions have served to obscure Israeli actions and
  evasions that were more often prejudicial to peace than helpful in achieving it.
  Behind all the blather, the rumble of bulldozers has never stopped. Given this
  history, it has taken a year and a half of relentless effort by U.S. Special Envoy George
  Mitchell to persuade the parties even to meet directly to talk about talks as they first
  did here in Oslo, seventeen years ago. When the curtain goes up on the diplomatic
  show in Washington tomorrow, will the players put on a different skit? There are
  many reasons to doubt that they will.
  One is that the Obama administration has engaged the same aging impresarios
  who staged all the previously failed "peace processes" to produce and direct this one
  with no agreed script. The last time these guys staged such an ill-prepared meeting, at
  Camp David in 2000, it cost both heads of delegation, Ehud Barak and Yasser Arafat,
  their political authority. It led not to peace but to escalating violence. The parties are
  showing up this time to minimize President Obama's political embarrassment in
  advance of midterm elections in the United States, not to address his agenda - still less
  to address each other's agendas. These are indeed difficulties. But the problems with
  12
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015
  this latest - and possibly final - iteration of the perpetually ineffectual "peace process"
  are more fundamental.
  The Likud Party charter flatly rejects the establishment of a Palestinian Arab
  state west of the Jordan River and stipulates that: "The Palestinians can run their lives
  freely in the framework of self-rule, but not as an independent and sovereign state."
  This Israeli government is committed to that charter as well as to the Jewish holy war
  for land in Palestine. It has no interest in trading land it covets for a peace that might
  thwart further territorial expansion. It considers itself unbound by the applicable UN
  resolutions, agreements from past peace talks, the "Roadmap," or the premise of the
  "two-state solution."
  The Palestinians are desperate for the dignity and security that only the end of
  the Israeli occupation can provide. But the authority of Palestinian negotiators to
  negotiate rests on their recognition by Israel and the United States, not on their
  standing in the occupied territories, Gaza, or the Palestinian diaspora. Fatah is the
  ruling faction in part of Palestine. Its authority to govern was repudiated by voters in
  the last Palestinian elections. The Mahmoud Abbas administration retains power by
  grace of the Israeli occupation authorities and the United States, which prefer it to the
  government empowered by the Palestinian people at the polls. Mr. Abbas's
  constitutional term of office has long since expired. He presides over a parliament
  whose most influential members are locked up in Israeli jails. It is not clear for
  whom he, his faction, or his administration can now speak.
  So the talks that begin tomorrow promise to be a case of the uninterested going
  through the motions of negotiating with the mandate-less. The parties to these talks
  seek to mollify an America that has severely lessened international credibility. The
  United States government had to borrow the modest reputations for objectivity of
  others - the EU, Russia, and the UN - to be able to convene this discussion. It will be
  held under the auspices of an American president who was publicly humiliated by
  Israel's prime minister on the issue that is at the center of the Israel-Palestine dispute -
  Israel's continuing seizure and colonization of Arab land.
  Vague promises of a Palestinian state within a year now waft through the air.
  But the "peace process" has always sneered at deadlines, even much, much firmer
  ones. A more definitive promise of an independent Palestine within a year was made
  at Annapolis three years ago. Analogous promises of Palestinian self-determination
  have preceded or resulted from previous meetings over the decades, beginning with
  the Camp David accords of 1979. Many in this audience will recall the five-year
  deadline fixed at Oslo. The talks about talks that begin tomorrow can yield concrete
  results only if the international community is prepared this time to insist on the one-
  13
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015
  year deadline put forward for recognizing a Palestinian state. Even then there will be
  no peace unless long-neglected issues are addressed.
  Peace is a pattern of stability acceptable to those with the capacity to disturb it
  by violence. It is almost impossible to impose. It cannot become a reality, still less be
  sustained, if those who must accept it are excluded from it. This reality directs our
  attention to who is not at this gathering in Washington and what must be done to
  remedy the problems these absences create.
  Obviously, the party that won the democratically expressed mandate of the
  Palestinian people to represent them - Hamas - is not there. Yet there can be no
  peace without its buy-in. Egypt and Jordan have been invited as observers. Yet they
  have nothing to add to the separate peace agreements each long ago made with Israel.
  (Both these agreements were explicitly premised on grudging Israeli undertakings to
  accept Palestinian self-determination. The Jewish state quickly finessed both.)
  Activists from the Jewish diaspora disproportionately staff the American delegation.
  A failure to reconcile either American Jews or the Palestine diaspora to peace would
  doom any accord. But the Palestinian diaspora will be represented in Washington
  only in tenuous theory, not in fact.
  Other Arabs, including the Arab League and the author of its peace initiative,
  Saudi Arabia, will not be at the talks tomorrow. The reasons for this are both simple
  and complex. At one level they reflect both a conviction that this latest installment of
  the "peace process" is just another in a long series of public entertainments for the
  American electorate and also a lack of confidence in the authenticity of the Palestinian
  delegation. At another level, they result from the way the United States has defined
  the problems to be solved and the indifference to Arab interests and views this
  definition evidences. Then too, they reflect disconnects in political culture and
  negotiating style between Israelis, Arabs, and Americans.
  To begin with, neither Israel nor the conveners of this proposed new "peace
  process" have officially acknowledged or responded to the Arab peace initiative of
  2002. This offered normalization of relations with the Jewish state, should Israel
  make peace with the Palestinians. Instead, the United States and the Quartet have
  seemed to pocket the Arab offer, ignore its precondition that Israelis come to terms
  with Palestinians, and gone on to levy new demands.
  In this connection, making Arab recognition of Israel's "right to exist" the
  central purpose of the "peace process" offends Arabs on many levels. In framing the
  issue this way, Israel and the United States appear to be asking for something well
  beyond pragmatic accommodation of the reality of a Jewish state in the Middle East.
  14
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015
  To the Arabs, Americans now seem to be insisting on Arab endorsement of the idea
  of the state of Israel, the means by which that state was established, and the manner in
  which it has comported itself. Must Arabs really embrace Zionism before Israel can
  cease expansion and accept peace?
  Arabs and Muslims familiar with European history can accept that European
  anti-Semitism justified the establishment of a homeland for traumatized European
  Jews. But asking them even implicitly to agree that the forcible eviction of Palestinian
  Arabs was a morally appropriate means to this end is both a nonstarter and seriously
  off-putting. So is asking them to affirm that resistance to such displacement was and
  is sinful. Similarly, the Arabs see the demand that they recognize a Jewish state with
  no fixed borders as a clever attempt to extract their endorsement of Israel's unilateral
  expansion at Palestinian expense.
  The lack of appeal in this approach has been compounded by a longstanding
  American habit of treating Arab concerns about Israel as a form of anti-Semitism and
  tuning them out. Instead of hearing out and addressing Arab views, U.S. peace
  processors have repeatedly focused on soliciting Arab acts of kindness toward Israel.
  They argue that gestures of acceptance can help Israelis overcome their Holocaust-
  inspired political neuroses and take risks for peace.
  Each time this notion of Arab diplomacy as psychotherapy for Israelis has-
  been trotted out, it has been met with incredulity. To most in the region, it
  encapsulates the contrast between Washington's sympathy and solicitude for Israelis
  and its condescendingly exploitative view of Arabs. Some see it as a barely disguised
  appeal for a policy of appeasement of Israel. Still others suspect an attempt to
  construct a "peace process" in which Arabs begin to supply Israel with gifts of carrots
  so that Americans can continue to avoid applying sticks to it.
  The effort to encourage Arab generosity as an offset to American political
  pusillanimity vis-à-vis Israel is ludicrously unpersuasive. It has failed so many times
  that it should be obvious that it will not work. Yet it was a central element of George
  Mitchell's mandate for "peace process" diplomacy. And it appears to have resurfaced
  as part of the proposed follow-up to tomorrow's meeting between the parties in
  Washington. It should be no puzzle why the Saudis and other Arabs could not be
  persuaded to join this gathering.
  As a last thought before turning to what must be done, let me make a quick
  comment on a relevant cultural factor. Arabic has two quite different words that are
  both translated as "negotiation," making a distinction that doesn't exist in either
  English or Hebrew. One word, "musaawama," refers to the no-holds-barred
  15
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015
  bargaining process that takes place in bazaars between strangers who may never see
  each other again and who therefore feel no obligation not to scam each other.
  Another, "mufaawadhat," describes the dignified formal discussions about matters of
  honor and high principle that take place on a basis of mutual respect and equality
  between statesmen who seek a continuing relationship.
  Egyptian President Anwar Sadat's travel to Jerusalem was a grand act of
  statesmanship to initiate a process of mufaawadhat - relationship-building between
  leaders and their polities. So was the Arab peace initiative of 2002. It called for a
  response in kind. The West muttered approvingly but did not act. After a while,
  Israel responded with intermittent, somewhat oblique suggestions of willingness to
  haggle over terms. But an offer to bicker over the terms on which a grand gesture has
  been granted is, not surprisingly, seen as insultingly unresponsive.
  I cite this not to suggest that non-Arabs should adopt Arabic canons of
  thought, but to make a point about diplomatic effectiveness. To move a negotiating
  partner in a desired direction, one must understand how that partner understands
  things and help him to see a way forward that will bring him to an end he has been
  persuaded to want. One of the reasons we can't seem to move things as we desire in
  the Middle East is that we don't make much effort to understand how others reason
  and how they rank their interests. In the case of the Israel-Palestine conundrum, we
  Americans are long on empathy and expertise about Israel and very, very short on
  these for the various Arab parties. The essential militarism of U.S. policies in the
  Middle East adds to our difficulties. We have become skilled at killing Arabs. We
  have forgotten how to listen to them or persuade them.
  I am not myself an "Arabist," but I am old enough to remember when there
  were more than a few such people in the American diplomatic service. These were
  officers who had devoted themselves to the cultivation of understanding and empathy
  with Arab leaders so as to be able to convince these leaders that it was in their own
  interest to do things we saw as in our interest. If we still have such people, we are
  hiding them well; we are certainly not applying their skills in our Middle East
  diplomacy.
  This brings me to a few thoughts about the Western and Arab interests at stake
  in the Holy Land and their implications for what must be done.
  In foreign affairs, interests are the measure of all things. My assumption is that
  Americans and Norwegians, indeed Europeans in general, share common interests
  that require peace in the Holy Land. To my mind, these interests include - but are, of
  course, not limited to - gaining security and acceptance for a democratic state of
  16
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015
  Israel; eliminating the gross injustices and daily humiliations that foster Arab terrorism
  against Israel and its foreign allies and supporters, as well as friendly Arab regimes;
  and reversing the global spread of religious strife and prejudice, including, very likely,
  a revival of anti-Semitism in the West if current trends are not arrested. None of
  these aspirations can be fulfilled without an end to the Israeli occupation and freedom
  for Palestinians.
  Arab states, like Saudi Arabia, also have compelling reasons to want relief from
  occupation as well as self-determination for Palestinians. They may not be concerned
  to preserve Israel's democracy, as we are, but they share an urgent interest in ending
  the radicalization of their own populations, curbing the spread of Islamist terrorism,
  and eliminating the tensions with the West that the conflict in the Holy Land fuels.
  These are the concerns that have driven them to propose peace, as they very clearly
  did eight years ago. For related reasons, Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah has made
  inter-faith dialogue and the promotion of religious tolerance a main focus of his
  domestic and international policy.
  As the custodian of two of Islam's three sacred places of pilgrimage - Mecca
  and Medina - Saudi Arabia has long transcended its own notorious religious narrow-
  mindedness to hold the holy places in its charge open to Muslims of all sects and
  persuasions. This experience, joined with Islamic piety, reinforces a Saudi insistence
  on the exemption of religious pilgrimage to Jerusalem from political interference or
  manipulation. The Ottoman Turks were careful to ensure freedom of access for
  worship to adherents of the three Abrahamic faiths when they administered the city.
  It is an interest that Jews, Christians, and Muslims share.
  There is, in short, far greater congruity between Western and Arab interests
  affecting the Israel-Palestine dispute than is generally recognized. This can be the
  basis for creative diplomacy. The fact that this has not occurred reflects pathologies
  of political life in the United States that paralyze the American diplomatic imagination.
  Tomorrow's meeting may well demonstrate that, the election of Barack Obama
  notwithstanding, the United States is still unfit to manage the achievement of peace
  between Israel and the Arabs. If so, it is in the American interest as well as everyone
  else's that others become the path-breakers, enlisting the United States as best they
  can in support of what they achieve, but not expecting America to overcome its
  incapacity to lead.
  Here, I think, there is a lesson to be drawn from the Norwegian experience in
  the 1990s. The Clinton Administration was happy to organize the public relations for •
  the Oslo accords but did not take ownership of them. It did little to protect them
  from subversion and overthrow, and nothing to insist on their implementation. Only
  17
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015
  a peace process that is protected from Israel's ability to manipulate American politics
  can succeed.
  This brings me to how Europeans and Arabs might work together to realize
  the objectives both share with most Americans: establishing internationally recognized
  borders for Israel, securing freedom for the Palestinians, and ending the stimulus to
  terrorism in the region and beyond it that strife in the Holy Land entails. I have only
  four suggestions to present today. I expect that more ideas will emerge from the
  discussion period. A serious effort to cooperate with the Arabs of the sort that •
  Norway is uniquely capable of contriving could lead to the development of still more
  options for joint or parallel action on behalf of peace.
  Now to my suggestions, presented in ascending order of difficulty, from the
  least to the most controversial.
  First, get behind the Arab peace initiative. Saudi Arab culture frowns on self-
  promotion and the Kingdom is less gifted than most at public diplomacy. Political
  factors inhibit official Arab access to the Israeli press. The Israeli media have
  published some - mostly dismissive - commentary on the Arab peace initiative but left
  most Israelis ignorant of its contents and unfamiliar with its text. Why not buy space
  in the Israeli media to give Israelis a chance to read the Arab League declaration and
  consider the opportunities it presents? I suspect the Saudis, as well as other members
  of the Arab League, would consider it constructive for an outside party to do this. It
  might facilitate other sorts of cooperation with them in which European capabilities
  can also compensate for Arab reticence. The Turks and other non-Arab Muslims
  should be brought in as full participants in any such efforts. This wouldn't be bad for
  Europe's relations with both. By the way, given the U.S. media's notorious one-
  sidedness and American ignorance about the Arab peace plan, a well-targeted
  advertising campaign in the United States might not be a bad idea either.
  Second, help create a Palestinian partner for peace. There can be no peace
  with Israel unless there are officials who are empowered by the Palestinian people to
  negotiate and ratify it. Israel has worked hard to divide the Palestinians so as to
  consolidate its conquest of their homeland. Saudi Arabia has several times sought to
  create a Palestinian peace partner for Israel by bringing Fatah, Hamas, and other
  factions together. On each occasion, Israel, with U.S. support, has acted to preclude
  this. Active organization of non-American Western support for diplomacy aimed at
  restoring a unity government to the Palestinian Authority could make a big difference.
  The Obama Administration would be under strong domestic political pressure to join
  Israel in blocking a joint European-Arab effort to accomplish this. Under some
  circumstances, however, it might welcome being put to this test.
  18
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015
  Third, reaffirm and enforce international law. The UN Security Council is
  charged with enforcing the rule of law internationally. In the case of the Middle East,
  however, the Council's position at the apex of the international system has served to
  erode and subvert the ideal of a rule-bound international order. Almost forty
  American vetoes have prevented the application to the Israeli occupying authorities of
  the Geneva Conventions, the Nuremberg precedents, human rights conventions, and
  relevant Security Council directives. American diplomacy on behalf of the Jewish
  state has silenced the collective voice of the international community as Israel has
  illegally colonized and annexed broad swaths of occupied territory, administered
  collective punishment to a captive people, assassinated their political leaders,
  massacred civilians, barred UN investigators, defied mandatory Security Council
  resolutions, and otherwise engaged in scofflaw behavior, usually with only the
  flimsiest of legally irrelevant excuses.
  If ethnic cleansing, settlement activity, and the like are not just "unhelpful" but
  illegal, the international community should find a way to say so, even if the UN
  Security Council cannot. Otherwise, the most valuable legacy of Atlantic civilization -
  its vision of the rule of law - will be lost. When one side to a dispute is routinely
  exempted from principles, all exempt themselves, and the law of the jungle prevails.
  The international community needs collectively to affirm that Israel, both as occupier
  and as regional military hegemon, is legally accountable internationally for its actions.
  If the UN General Assembly cannot "unite for peace" to do what an incapacitated
  Security Council cannot, member states should not shrink from working in
  conference outside the UN framework. All sides in the murder and mayhem in the
  Holy Land and beyond need to understand that they are not above the law. If this
  message is firmly delivered and enforced, there will be a better chance for peace.
  Fourth, set a deadline linked to an ultimatum. Accept that the United States
  will frustrate any attempt by the UN Security Council to address the continuing
  impasse between Israel and the Palestinians. Organize a global conference outside the
  UN system to coordinate a decision to inform the parties to the dispute that if they
  cannot reach agreement in a year, one of two solutions will be imposed. Schedule a
  follow-up conference for a year later. The second conference would consider
  whether to recommend universal recognition of a Palestinian state in the area beyond
  Israel's 1967 borders or recognition of Israel's achievement of de jure as well as de
  facto sovereignty throughout Palestine (requiring Israel to grant all governed by it
  citizenship and equal rights at pain of international sanctions, boycott, and
  disinvestment). Either formula would force the parties to make a serious effort to
  strike a deal or to face the consequences of their recalcitrance. Either formula could
  be implemented directly by the states members of the international community.
  19
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015
  Admittedly, any serious deadline would provoke a political crisis in Israel and lead to
  diplomatic confrontation with the United States as well as Israel, despite the Obama
  Administration itself having proclaimed a one-year deadline in order to entice the
  Palestinians to tomorrow's talks. Yet both Israel and the United States would benefit
  immensely from peace with the Palestinians.
  Time is running out. The two-state solution may already have been overtaken
  by Israeli land grabs and settlement activity. Another cycle of violence is likely in the
  offing. If so, it will not be local or regional, but global in its reach. Israel's actions are
  delegitimizing and isolating it even as they multiply the numbers of those in the region
  and beyond who are determined to destroy it. Palestinian suffering is a reproach to all
  humanity that posturing alone cannot begin to alleviate. It has become a cancer on
  the Islamic body politic. It is infecting every extremity of the globe with the rage
  against injustice that incites terrorism.
  It is time to try new approaches. That is why the question of whether there is a
  basis for expanded diplomatic cooperation between Europeans and Arabs is such a
  timely one. And it is why I was pleased as well as honored to have been asked to set
  the stage for a discussion of this issue.
  20
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772410 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772414
MetadataSubject: YOUR SPEECH ON THE MIDEAST
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Daniel, Joshua J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-17T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0103/DOC_0C05772414/C05772414.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Your speech on the Mideast
ExtractedFrom: Daniel, Joshua J <DanieW@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma; Schwerin, Daniel B
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 6:58 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772414
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Madame Secretary,
  On Wednesday, you're scheduled to give a 15-minute talk at a gala hosted by the American Task Force on
  Palestine, a moderate, pro-peace Palestinian-American organization. Here's a quick overview of our plans for
  the speech, which we developed with NEA. Please let us know if you have any reactions.
  The audience in the room will include Palestinian-Americans who are influential in their communities: lawyers,
  doctors, business leaders, etc. Of course, a much larger audience beyond the room will read this speech as
  well. This is your first opportunity to address this issue in a serious way since the end of the moratorium.
  Key points:
  ###

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772414 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: Daniel, Joshua J <DanieW@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 6:58 PM
  To:
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma; Schwerin, Daniel B
  Subject: Your speech on the Mideast
  Madame Secretary,
  On Wednesday, you're scheduled to give a 15-minute talk at a gala hosted by the American Task Force on
  Palestine, a moderate, pro-peace Palestinian-American organization. Here's a quick overview of our plans for
  the speech, which we developed with NEA. Please let us know if you have any reactions.
  The audience in the room will include Palestinian-Americans who are influential in their communities: lawyers,
  doctors, business leaders, etc. Of course, a much larger audience beyond the room will read this speech as
  well. This is your first opportunity to address this issue in a serious way since the end of the moratorium.
  Key points:
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772414 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772420
MetadataSubject: ISRAEL FLIGHTS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-23T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0099/DOC_0C05772420/C05772420.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772420
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivann@state.gov>
  Thursday, September 23, 2010 10:24 AM
  H
  Israel flights
  Flight from JFK leaves 725pm tonight and gets in at 1215pm tomorrow.
  I told Hale Blair was thinking of

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772420 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivann@state.gov>
  Thursday, September 23, 2010 10:24 AM
  H
  Israel flights
  Flight from JFK leaves 725pm tonight and gets in at 1215pm tomorrow.
  I told Hale Blair was thinking of
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772420 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772421
MetadataSubject: (REUTERS) ASSAD SAYS PEACE CHANCES WITH ISRAEL UP IN THE AIR
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-06T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772421/C05772421.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: S Fw: (Reuters) Assad says peace chances with Israel up in the air
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-III; SES-O_ShIft-III
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 9:46 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772421
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772421 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 9:46 PM
  To:
  Subject: S Fw: (Reuters) Assad says peace chances with Israel up in the air
  From: Hsiang, Margaret E
  To: NEWS-NEA; NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-III; SES-O_ShIft-III
  Sent: Wed Oct 06 20:19:50 2010
  Subject: (Reuters) Assad says peace chances with Israel up in the air
  DAMASCUS (Reuters) - Western efforts to renew peace talks between Syria and Israel are focusing on finding common
  ground, but nothing has crystallized yet and the chances of success are unknown, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad said.
  In his first public assessment of U.S. and French moves to relaunch the talks, Assad told Turkey's TRT television that
  envoys from the two countries are trying to accommodate Syria's demands for the return of the Golan Heights and
  Israel's security objectives.
  Assad said that if the talks were to resume they would be initially indirect, similar to the last four rounds that were
  mediated by Turkey and broke off in 2008 without a deal.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772421 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772422
MetadataSubject: MORATORIUM
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: jake.sullivan
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-13T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0097/DOC_0C05772422/C05772422.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: O-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Moratorium
ExtractedTo: H; 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: jake.sullivar
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, September 13, 2010 8:02 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772422
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Copy that - will do.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772422 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: jake.sullivar
  Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 8:02 AM
  To: H; 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Moratorium
  Copy that - will do.
  Original Message
  From: H
  To: 'jake.sullivan
  To: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: Moratorium
  Sent: Sep 13, 2010 7:34 AM
  Can you ask SEMP/NEA to put together a chronology of the path to the morarat last year--especially all that we did?
  Maybe one already exists but I need as much detail as possible. If we can get an outline, Jeff and Dan (who both seem to
  have vivid memories) can add to it. Thx.
  Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772422 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772423
MetadataSubject: YOU WERE GREAT TODAY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-06T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772423/C05772423.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: You were great today
ExtractedFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 10:06 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772423
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  And your answer to the question about your proudest achievement made all the work on the qddr worth it!
  AM

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772423 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 10:06 PM
  To:
  Subject: You were great today
  And your answer to the question about your proudest achievement made all the work on the qddr worth it!
  AM
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772423 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772425
MetadataSubject: CHANGING THE SUBJECT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-17T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0103/DOC_0C05772425/C05772425.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772425
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Attached is a strategy memo --
RawText:
  Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
  Sunday, October 17, 2010 8:07 PM
  Abedin, Huma; Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D
  Changing the subject
  0.17.10.docx; 10.17.10.docx
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772425 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Cc:
  Subject:
  Attachments:
  Attached is a strategy memo --
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772425 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772427
MetadataSubject: (HAARETZ) ISRAELI LABOR PARTY EXPECTS NEW SETTLEMENT FREEZE AS PAYOFF FOR LOYALTY OATH
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jake J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-06T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772427/C05772427.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-III; SES-0_05; SES-O_Shift-I
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772427
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivarW@state.gov>
  Wednesday, October 6, 2010 10:57 PM
  Fw: (Haaretz) Israeli Labor party expects new settlement freeze as payoff for loyalty oath

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772427 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivarW@state.gov>
  Wednesday, October 6, 2010 10:57 PM
  Fw: (Haaretz) Israeli Labor party expects new settlement freeze as payoff for loyalty oath
  From: Hsiang, Margaret E
  To: NEWS-NEA; NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-III; SES-0_05; SES-O_Shift-I
  Sent: Wed Oct 06 22:53:57 2010
  Subject: (Haaretz) Israeli Labor party expects new settlement freeze as payoff for loyalty oath
  (Hareetz) Labor party ministers angered by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's snap decision to back a
  controversial citizenship loyalty oath said late October 6 that they expected a new freeze in settlement
  building as a payoff. Netanyahu neglected to inform his Labor coalition partners that he had approved a
  right-wing minister's draft of a new oath that would require anyone taking Israeli citizenship to swear
  allegiance to Israel as a "Jewish and democratic state."
  The move paves the way for a vote in the Knesset and was hailed as victory by ultra-nationalist Foreign
  Minister Avigdor Lieberman's Israel our Home party, Netanyahu's major coalition partner. But the prime
  minister must perform a balancing act. Allies at both ends of the political spectrum and the Labor party
  hope that his latest concession is a sop to right-wingers ahead of a decision to renew a ban on settlement
  building in the West Bank - a key demand of the left.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772427 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772429
MetadataSubject: (REUTERS) RUSSIA TO PAY IRAN $800 MILLION FOR SCRAPPED S-300 DEAL
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-07T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772429/C05772429.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (Reuters) Russia to pay Iran $800 million for scrapped S-300 deal
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-I; SES-0_05
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, October 7, 2010 6:31 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772429
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772429 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2010 6:31 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (Reuters) Russia to pay Iran $800 million for scrapped S-300 deal
  From: Abdalla, Alyce N
  To: NEWS-Mahogany; NEWS-Iran; NEWS-EUR; NEWS-EB; Einhorn, Robert J
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-I; SES-0_05
  Sent: Thu Oct 07 05:50:06 2010
  Subject: (Reuters) Russia to pay Iran $800 million for scrapped S-300 deal
  NICOSIA (Reuters) - Russia plans to pay Iran about $800 million to compensate for its failure to deliver S-300 missile
  systems, the head of state-controlled conglomerate Russian Technologies Sergei Chemezov said. Russian President
  Medvedev outlawed the delivery of the high-precision missiles to Iran last month, saying that sending them would
  violate sanctions adopted by the UN Security Council in June.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772429 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772434
MetadataSubject: update
MetadataFrom: Kieffer, Judith
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-08T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772434/C05772434.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772434
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Update
  Heidi reports from the hospital this morning that Mickey had a quiet night.
  Judith Kieffer
  Executive Director
  Los Angeles Parks Foundation
  11973 San Vicente Blvd.
  Suite 200
  Los Angeles, CA 90049
  Office: 310-472-1990
  FAX: 310-472-0992
  Mobile

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772434 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  "Judith Kieffer"
  To
  01/08/2010 08:46
  AM
  CC
  Subject
  Update
  Heidi reports from the hospital this morning that Mickey had a quiet night.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772434 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772434 Date: 08/31/2015
  Judith Kieffer
  Executive Director
  Los Angeles Parks Foundation
  11973 San Vicente Blvd.
  Suite 200
  Los Angeles, CA 90049
  Office: 310-472-1990
  FAX: 310-472-0992
  Mobile
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772434 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772436
MetadataSubject: (HAARETZ) ISRAELI LABOR PARTY EXPECTS NEW SETTLEMENT FREEZE AS PAYOFF FOR LOYALTY OATH
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-07T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772436/C05772436.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (Haaretz) Israeli Labor party expects new settlement freeze as payoff for loyalty oath
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-HI; SES-0_05; SES-O_Shift-I
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, October 7, 2010 6:32 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772436
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772436 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2010 6:32 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (Haaretz) Israeli Labor party expects new settlement freeze as payoff for loyalty oath
  From: Hsiang, Margaret E
  To: NEWS-NEA; NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-HI; SES-0_05; SES-O_Shift-I
  Sent: Wed Oct 06 22:53:57 2010
  Subject: (Haaretz) Israeli Labor party expects new settlement freeze as payoff for loyalty oath
  (Hareetz) Labor party ministers angered by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's snap decision to back a
  controversial citizenship loyalty oath said late October 6 that they expected a new freeze in settlement
  building as a payoff. Netanyahu neglected to inform his Labor coalition partners that he had approved a
  right-wing minister's draft of a new oath that would require anyone taking Israeli citizenship to swear
  allegiance to Israel as a "Jewish and democratic state."
  The move paves the way for a vote in the Knesset and was hailed as victory by ultra-nationalist Foreign
  Minister Avigdor Lieberman's Israel our Home party, Netanyahu's major coalition partner. But the prime
  minister must perform a balancing act. Allies at both ends of the political spectrum and the Labor party
  hope that his latest concession is a sop to right-wingers ahead of a decision to renew a ban on settlement
  building in the West Bank - a key demand of the left.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772436 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772437
MetadataSubject: (AP) THREE EMBASSIES IN ISRAEL RECEIVE SUSPICIOUS LETTERS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-14T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0097/DOC_0C05772437/C05772437.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: O-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (AP) Three embassies in Israel receive suspicious letters
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-II
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 11:13 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772437
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772437 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 11:13 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (AP) Three embassies in Israel receive suspicious letters
  From: Rudnitski, Jennine R
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-II
  Sent: Tue Sep 14 11:11:29 2010
  Subject: (AP) Three embassies in Israel receive suspicious letters
  JERUSALEM (AP) - Israeli police said envelopes containing a suspicious white powder have been discovered at the
  American, Spanish and Swedish embassies in Tel Aviv. Police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld said workers at the three
  embassies alerted police after opening the envelopes September 14. Rosenfeld said it is still unclear what the substance
  is though police said the substance was not poisonous since no one was hurt. Police are trying to find who sent the
  envelopes and determine whether the incidents were connected.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772437 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772438
MetadataSubject: HERE'S IRAN HIKER STATEMENT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-14T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0097/DOC_0C05772438/C05772438.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: O-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Here's Iran hiker statement
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Reines, Philippe I
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 11:59 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772438
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772438 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  • From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 11:59 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Here's Iran hiker statement
  Original Message
  From: Schwerin, Daniel B
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Reines, Philippe I
  Sent: Tue Sep 14 11:56:36 2010
  Subject: Here's Iran hiker statement
  STATEMENT BY SECRETARY CLINTON
  Release of Sarah Shourd
  I welcome Sarah Shourd's release from detention in Iran, and am pleased that she will soon be reunited with her
  family. I appreciate the efforts of all those who have worked for her release, in particular the Swiss Protecting Power in
  Tehran, the Omani Government, and the many other world leaders who have raised this case and the cases of other
  detained or missing American citizens. Sarah's fiancé Shane Bauer, Joshua Fattal, and other U.S. citizens remain detained
  or missing in Iran. We urge Iranian authorities to extend the same consideration to them by resolving their cases
  without delay and allowing them to immediately return to their families.
  ###
  Drafted by: NEA/IR: M Schwedt
  NEA/PPD: A Sayles, x74184
  Approved by:D(S): J Steinberg
  NEA/FO: P Dibbleok
  Cleared by:NEA/IR: J Hoodok
  NEA/IR: S Hornerok
  NEA/PPD: E Vasquezok
  CA: J Echardok
  P: E Catalano ok
  D(S): D Schrepelok
  S/P: J Burnsok
  NSC: K Magsamenok
  PA: D Schwerin ok
  PA: P Reines ok
  S: J Sullivan ok
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772438 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772440
MetadataSubject: WEN
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-23T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0099/DOC_0C05772440/C05772440.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772440
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Thursday, September 23, 2010 11:47 AM
  Wen
  B1
  1.4(B)
  1.4(D)
  on: 09/22/2025

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772440 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  1.4(B),B1,1.4(D)
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Thursday, September 23, 2010 11:47 AM
  Wen
  B1
  1.4(B)
  1.4(D)
  Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 08/27/2015 — Class: CONFIDENTIAL — Reason: 1.4(B), 1.4(D) — Declassify
  on: 09/22/2025
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772440 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772445
MetadataSubject: ANN
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-07T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772445/C05772445.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Ann
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, January 7, 2010 10:09 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772445
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Agreed--Maura is so smart!
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772445 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
  Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2010 10:09 PM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Ann
  Agreed--Maura is so smart!
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Thu Jan 07 22:03:37 2010
  Subject: FW: Ann
  FYI
  From: Pally, Maura M
  Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 1:36 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Ann
  is so wonderful. Brilliant pick. Every time I meet with her I like her more and more and she is really the right pick for
  ECA. She brings so much to the table that we need. Everyone here is so pleased with the selection and the fact that R is
  equally pleased is even better —that we can both think she is "ours" is a testament to Ann. It may have taken a long time
  but it will be well worth the wait. She can take ECA in a new direction. And if she has the help of Joe Macmanus she can
  do it even quicker and better (I can't pass up a good plug opportunity!).
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772445 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772446
MetadataSubject: RE:
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Valmoro, Lona J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-14T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0097/DOC_0C05772446/C05772446.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: O-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE:
ExtractedFrom: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroLJ@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Huma Abedin
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 2:33 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772446
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Will do.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772446 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroLJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 2:33 PM
  To:
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Subject: RE:
  Will do.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 2:31 PM
  To: Valmoro, Lona J
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Subject: Fw:
  Pls check w Tamera to see if we can do dinner the 30th at her choice.
  Original Message
  From: Tamera Luzzatto
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Sep 12 08:30:17 2010
  Subject: Re:
  Hooray. 30th looks great (have to go to Edie's on the 29th for Gillibrand, but I can meet you after if that's better).
  My other updates are:
  With Gina, I'm hosting one of several dinner parties to welcome the new SEIU prez (yes a bit of an unstated message) to
  women leaders. I think Wendy S and Judy L are doing the others. It's another of Gina's great ideas.
  And we're holding a fundraiser for Bennet on the 27th that is looking really good.
  Finally, I did a brief intv with a Center for Public Service rep for their regular feature in the Post abt compelling leaders in
  the federal govnt. And this one will be about Kate Beale!
  Oh, and after confirming to do so with PIR, did a quickie recalling the thoroughly positive vibes and experiences of you
  and Laura Bush to our pal at Politico!!
  Finally, finally, and hope I didn't say this already, I started yesterday am sending an anniversary greeting and ode to
  Team 9-11 Clinton to everyone there when we waited for you to come in (for the Mrs. Bush testimony coincidentally)
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772446 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772446 Date: 08/31/2015
  and watched the 2nd plane, and of course the rest was our amazing journey together of work to be so proud of. I even
  included Ramon on the chain!!! Impossible it now seems.
  Done blabbing. Have a restful Sunday. Everyone, and I mean everyone despite what I recall about some, is singing your
  praises.
  Xox
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 08:02:45
  To: 'Luzzatto
  Subject: Re:
  I'm all updated now! So, I will offer up some dates and you will pick the place for a catchup dinner--sounds like a deal!
  I'm looking at 9/29 or 9/30. Do either of those work for you?
  Original Message
  From: Tamera Luzzatto
  To: H
  Cc: Lauren Jiloty <JilotyLC@state.gov>; Lissa Muscatine
  <ValmoroU@state.gov>
  Sent: Sat Sep 11 10:43:58 2010
  Subject: Re:
  Huma Abedin; Lona Valmoro
  Ps to all. My new work address is and direct is The job is utterly fascinating and
  invigorating, and only major deficiency is not working with you. Am at 9th and E so great restaurants galore, hint hint.
  Original Message
  From: "Tamera Luzzatto"
  Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 14:38:25
  To: H<hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Reply-To: luzzatto
  Cc: Lauren Jiloty<JilotyLC@state.gov>; Lissa Muscatine<
  HRC<
  Huma Abedin-
  Subject: Fw:
  Am forwarding this for you to see Al's appreciation to you, and for Lauren to print out his edited as given beautiful and
  touching eulogy.
  Splendid to see you and hope for a fall visit.
  Xoxo, T
  Original Message
  From: Tamera Luzzatto
  Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 10:10:37
  To: 'Tamera S. Luzzatto'
  Subject: FW:
  Sent by Good Messaging (www.good.com)
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772446 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772446 Date: 08/31/2015
  Original Message
  From: Mottur, Alfred E. [mailto
  Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 09:18 AM Eastern Standard Time
  To: Tamera Luzzatto
  Subject:
  Al
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772446 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772447
MetadataSubject: CORKER
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Verma, Richard R
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-14T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0097/DOC_0C05772447/C05772447.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: O-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Corker
ExtractedFrom: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma; Sullivan, Jacob J
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 4:00 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772447
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Will vote yes on START....
  Thanks for all your help with him.
  Now, we need to

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772447 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 4:00 PM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma; Sullivan, Jacob J
  Subject: Corker
  Will vote yes on START....
  Thanks for all your help with him.
  Now, we need to
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772447 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772449
MetadataSubject: NYE ON JAPAN ALLIANCE
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-07T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772449/C05772449.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Nye on Japan Alliance
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov.
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, January 7, 2010 10:55 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772449
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Indeed. I'm a berry farmer.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772449 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2010 10:55 PM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov.
  Subject: Re: Nye on Japan Alliance
  Indeed. I'm a berry farmer.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Thu Jan 07 21:55:58 2010
  Subject: RE: Nye on Japan Alliance
  Ahh — you will reap what you sow.
  ... J
  From: Slaughter, Anne-Marie
  Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 9:27 PM
  To: 'H'
  Cc: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: FW: Nye on Japan Alliance
  Madame S,
  • I promise I won't abuse the privilege of emailing you directly, but here is the piece by Joe Nye that I mentioned
  this morning. You may note that my S/P staffer who does Asia, and who is very good, agrees with my assessment that it
  was a valuable piece to write.
  AM
  From: Green, James B
  Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 10:49 AM
  To: Slaughter, Anne-Marie
  Cc: Sokolsky, Richard D
  Subject: Nye on Japan Alliance
  From today's New York Times. Not sure if someone in this building (or the NSC) put Nye up to this, but agree with this
  assessment
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772449 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772449 Date: 08/31/2015
  Not surprisingly, some in Washington want to play hardball with the new Japanese government. But that would be
  unwise
  January 7, 2010
  Op-Ed Contributor
  An Alliance Larger Than One Issue
  By JOSEPH S. NYE Jr.
  Cambridge, Mass.
  SEEN from Tokyo, America's relationship with Japan faces a crisis. The immediate problem is deadlock over a plan to
  move an American military base on the island of Okinawa. It sounds simple, but this is an issue with a long back story
  that could create a serious rift with one of our most crucial allies.
  When I was in the Pentagon more than a decade ago, we began planning to reduce the burden that our presence places
  on Okinawa, which houses more than half of the 47,000 American troops in Japan. The Marine Corps Air Station
  Futenma was a particular problem because of its proximity to a crowded city, Ginowan. After years of negotiation, the
  Japanese and American governments agreed in 2006 to move the base to a less populated part of Okinawa and to move
  8,000 Marines from Okinawa to Guam by 2014.
  The plan was thrown into jeopardy last summer when the Japanese voted out the Liberal Democratic Party that had
  governed the country for nearly half a century in favor of the Democratic Party of Japan. The new prime minister, Yukio
  Hatoyama, leads a government that is inexperienced, divided and still in the thrall of campaign promises to move the
  base off the island or out of Japan completely.
  The Pentagon is properly annoyed that Mr. Hatoyama is trying to go back on an agreement that took more than a
  decade to work out and that has major implications for the Marine Corps' budget and force realignment. Secretary of
  Defense Robert Gates expressed displeasure during a trip to Japan in October, calling any reassessment of the plan
  "counterproductive." When he visited Tokyo in November, President Obama agreed to a high-level working group to
  consider the Futenma question. But since then, Mr. Hatoyama has said he will delay a final decision on relocation until at
  least May.
  Not surprisingly, some in Washington want to play hardball with the new Japanese government. But that would be
  unwise, for Mr. Hatoyama is caught in a vise, with the Americans squeezing from one side and a small left-wing party
  (upon which his majority in the upper house of the legislature depends) threatening to quit the coalition if he makes any
  significant concessions to the Americans. Further complicating matters, the future of Futenma is deeply contentious for
  Okinawans.
  Even if Mr. Hatoyama eventually gives in on the base plan, we need a more patient and strategic approach to Japan. We
  are allowing a second-order issue to threaten our long-term strategy for East Asia. Futenma, it is worth noting, is not the
  only matter that the new government has raised. It also speaks of wanting a more equal alliance and better relations
  with China, and of creating an East Asian community — though it is far from clear what any of this means.
  When I helped to develop the Pentagon's East Asian Strategy Report in 1995, we started with the reality that there were
  three major powers in the region — the United States, Japan and China — and that maintaining our alliance with Japan
  would shape the environment into which China was emerging. We wanted to integrate China into the international
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772449 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772449 Date: 08/31/2015
  system by, say, inviting it to join the World Trade Organization, but we needed to hedge against the danger that a future
  and stronger China might turn aggressive.
  After a year and a half of extensive negotiations, the United States and Japan agreed that our alliance, rather than
  representing a cold war relic, was the basis for stability and prosperity in the region. President Bill Clinton and Prime
  Minister Ryutaro Hashimoto affirmed that in their 1996 Tokyo declaration <http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/n-
  america/us/security/security.html> . This strategy of "integrate, but hedge" continued to guide American foreign policy
  through the years of the Bush administration.
  This year is the 50th anniversary of the United States-Japan security treaty. <http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/n-
  america/us/q&a/refahtml> The two countries will miss a major opportunity if they let the base controversy lead to
  bitter feelings or the further reduction of American forces in Japan. The best guarantee of security in a region where
  China remains a long-term challenge and a nuclear North Korea poses a clear threat remains the presence of American
  troops, which Japan helps to maintain with generous host nation support.
  Sometimes Japanese officials quietly welcome "gaiatsu," or foreign pressure, to help resolve their own bureaucratic
  deadlocks. But that is not the case here: if the United States undercuts the new Japanese government and creates
  resentment among the Japanese public, then a victory on Futenma could prove Pyrrhic.
  Joseph S. Nye Jr., a professor of government at Harvard and the author of "The Powers to Lead," was an assistant
  secretary of defense from 1994 to 1995.
  James Green
  Policy Planning Staff
  U.S. Department of State
  (202) 647 1178
  greenjb@state.gov
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772449 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772450
MetadataSubject: CORKER
MetadataTo: Verma, Richard R
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-14T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0097/DOC_0C05772450/C05772450.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: O-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Corker
ExtractedTo: Verma, Richard R; H
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivann@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 4:24 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772450
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Yes!
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772450 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivann@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 4:24 PM
  To: Verma, Richard R; H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Re: Corker
  Yes!
  From: Verma, Richard R
  To: 'H' <HDFt22@clintonemall.com>
  Cc: Abedin, Huma; Sullivan, Jacob
  Sent: Tue Sep 14 16:00:08 2010
  Subject: Corker
  Will vote yes on START....
  Thanks for all your help with him.
  Now, we need to
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772450 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772455
MetadataSubject: FYI
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-14T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0097/DOC_0C05772455/C05772455.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: O-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fyi
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob 1 <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 5:10 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772455
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  From Israel Radio
  By Shmuel Tal
  "Prime Minister Exploring a trip to the U.S. next week
  Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is exploring the possibility of leaving at the beginning of next week to New York
  and Washington in order to meet with European leaders under the auspices of a gathering that is initiated by President
  Obama with the leaders. In addition, he is requesting to meet with the President of the United States Barack Obama and
  discuss the issue of Iran sanctions and its nuclear program. No confirmation has been given yet for those meetings to the
  trip has not been finalized yet."

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772455 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob 1 <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 5:10 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fyi
  From Israel Radio
  By Shmuel Tal
  "Prime Minister Exploring a trip to the U.S. next week
  Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is exploring the possibility of leaving at the beginning of next week to New York
  and Washington in order to meet with European leaders under the auspices of a gathering that is initiated by President
  Obama with the leaders. In addition, he is requesting to meet with the President of the United States Barack Obama and
  discuss the issue of Iran sanctions and its nuclear program. No confirmation has been given yet for those meetings to the
  trip has not been finalized yet."
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772455 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772458
MetadataSubject: BLANK
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-07T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772458/C05772458.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, October 7, 2010 8:32 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772458
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772458 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2010 8:32 PM
  To:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772458 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772459
MetadataSubject: (REUTERS) EU TO CALL ON ISRAEL TO EXTEND SETTLEMENT HALT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-15T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0097/DOC_0C05772459/C05772459.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: O-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (Reuters) EU to call on Israel to extend settlement halt
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-II
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 3:12 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772459
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772459 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 3:12 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (Reuters) EU to call on Israel to extend settlement halt
  From: Withers, Anne M
  To: NEWS-Mahogany; NEWS-NEA
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-II
  Sent: Wed Sep 15 15:10:21 2010
  Subject: (Reuters) EU to call on Israel to extend settlement halt
  BRUSSELS (Reuters) - European Union leaders meeting in Brussels on September 16 will call on Israel to extend a
  moratorium on settlement building in the occupied West Bank, according to a draft of the summit conclusions. "The
  European Union deems it indispensable that both parties observe calm and restraint and refrain from actions that could
  affect negatively the progress of the negotiation," reads the draft, referring to direct Israeli-Palestinian peace talks that
  began this month. "In this regard, it recalls that settlements are illegal under international law and, with a view to
  ensure that these talks continue in a constructive manner, calls for an extension of the moratorium decided by Israel."
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772459 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772460
MetadataSubject: RE:
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-07T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772460/C05772460.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re:
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, October 7, 2010 8:33 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772460
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Just called you - call when cony
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772460 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2010 8:33 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re:
  Just called you - call when cony
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  To: 'hdr22@clintonemail.comi <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Thu Oct 07 20:32:16 2010
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772460 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772472
MetadataSubject: OUT OF OFFICE AUTOREPLY: MARC PACHECO
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-07T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772472/C05772472.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Out of Office AutoReply: Marc Pacheco
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, October 7, 2010 10:17 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772472
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  I am currently out of the office with limited access to email. If you need immediate assistance, please contact Nora Toiv,
  toivnf@state.gov, or Joanne Laszczych, laszczychj@state.gov, at 202-647-5548.
  If this is an emergency, please call the Operations Center and have them reach out to me.
  thank you.
  cdm

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772472 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2010 10:17 PM
  To:
  Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Marc Pacheco
  I am currently out of the office with limited access to email. If you need immediate assistance, please contact Nora Toiv,
  toivnf@state.gov, or Joanne Laszczych, laszczychj@state.gov, at 202-647-5548.
  If this is an emergency, please call the Operations Center and have them reach out to me.
  thank you.
  cdm
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772472 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772490
MetadataSubject: ECONOMIST OP-ED
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Schwerin, Daniel B
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-07T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772490/C05772490.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Economist op-ed
ExtractedTo: H; preine
ExtractedFrom: Schwerin, Daniel B <SchwerinDB@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Huma Abedin; Sullivan, Jacob J; Reines, Philippe I
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, October 7, 2010 11:40 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772490
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Here's some background: This piece is for a year-ending look-ahead issue of The Economist and we were asked to write
  about America's priorities and place in the world in 2011, ten years after 9/11 and twenty years after the end of the Cold
  War. The team (Jake, Josh, Anne-Marie, Derek) felt that this was a good opportunity to pull together for a wide audience
  some of the key themes you sounded in Krakow and elsewhere, and build on the President's call to action at UNGA. We
  don't say anything new here, its true, but the idea was to lay down another marker that these are issues that are
  important to you and to the administration.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772490 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Schwerin, Daniel B <SchwerinDB@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2010 11:40 PM
  To: H; preine
  Cc: Huma Abedin; Sullivan, Jacob J; Reines, Philippe I
  Subject: Re: Economist op-ed
  Here's some background: This piece is for a year-ending look-ahead issue of The Economist and we were asked to write
  about America's priorities and place in the world in 2011, ten years after 9/11 and twenty years after the end of the Cold
  War. The team (Jake, Josh, Anne-Marie, Derek) felt that this was a good opportunity to pull together for a wide audience
  some of the key themes you sounded in Krakow and elsewhere, and build on the President's call to action at UNGA. We
  don't say anything new here, its true, but the idea was to lay down another marker that these are issues that are
  important to you and to the administration.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: 'preines
  Cc: Huma Abedin <Huma@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Thu Oct 07 22:36:30 2010
  Subject: Economist op-ed
  ; Schwerin, Daniel B
  I just got the draft and don't think it says anything. What is the question we are trying to answer or issue we were asked
  to address in this?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772490 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772492
MetadataSubject: TECH DINNER TYS
MetadataTo: Russorv@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-09T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772492/C05772492.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Tech dinner TYs
ExtractedTo: 'Russorv@state.gov'; 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Huma Abedin
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, January 9, 2010 12:28 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772492
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Pis get list from Thursday dinner and do TYs. I'd like to sign letters. Thx.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772492 Date: 08/31/2015
  -
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Saturday, January 9, 2010 12:28 PM
  To: 'Russorv@state.gov'; 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
  Cc: Huma Abedin
  Subject: Tech dinner TYs
  Pis get list from Thursday dinner and do TYs. I'd like to sign letters. Thx.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772492 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772500
MetadataSubject: TECH DINNER TYS
MetadataTo: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-09T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772500/C05772500.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Tech dinner TYs
ExtractedTo: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Huma Abedin <Huma@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, January 9, 2010 1:17 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772500
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Also, pis add Gerry Ferraro to my call list.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772500 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Saturday, January 9, 2010 1:17 PM
  To: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
  Subject Re: Tech dinner TYs
  Also, pis add Gerry Ferraro to my call list.
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Jan 09 12:29:55 2010
  Subject: Re: Tech dinner TYs
  Ok
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Russo, Robert V; Jiloty, Lauren C
  Cc: Huma Abedin <Huma@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sat Jan 09 12:28:08 2010
  Subject: Tech dinner TYs
  Pls get list from Thursday dinner and do TYs. I'd like to sign letters. Thx.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772500 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772511
MetadataSubject: (AP) HAMAS SAYS GROUP'S LAWMAKER ARRESTED IN WEST BANK
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-18T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0103/DOC_0C05772511/C05772511.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (AP) Hamas says group's lawmaker arrested in West Bank
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shift-I
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, October 18, 2010 8:05 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772511
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772511 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 8:05 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (AP) Hamas says group's lawmaker arrested in West Bank
  From: Simmons, Krista M
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shift-I
  Sent: Mon Oct 18 03:45:04 2010
  Subject: (AP) Hamas says group's lawmaker arrested in West Bank
  HEBRON (AP) - The Palestinian militant Hamas group says Israeli soldiers have arrested one of its lawmakers in the West
  Bank.
  A Hamas official said Hathem Qufishe was arrested early October 18 at his home in the city of Hebron. The official,
  Mushir al-Masri, said Israel is trying to "quash the legitimate representatives" of the Palestinian people.
  The Israeli military had no comment on the arrest.
  Qufishe was recently released from an Israeli prison after more than three years. He was among dozens of Hamas
  officials arrested after Hamas-affiliated militants captured Israeli soldier Sgt. Gilad Schalit in June 2006.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772511 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772525
MetadataSubject: (AP) ISRAELI OFFICIAL: MOROCCAN KING WON'T MEET PERES
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: AbedinH@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-18T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0103/DOC_0C05772525/C05772525.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (AP) Israeli official: Moroccan king won't meet Peres
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shift-I
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, October 18, 2010 8:06 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772525
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772525 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 8:06 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (AP) Israeli official: Moroccan king won't meet Peres
  From: Simmons, Krista M
  To: NEWS-Mahogany; NEWS-NEA
  Cc: SES-0_0S; SES-O_Shift-I
  Sent: Mon Oct 18 04:46:28 2010
  Subject: (AP) Israeli official: Moroccan king won't meet Peres
  JERUSALEM (AP) - An aide to Israel's president says the king of Morocco won't meet with the Israeli statesman because
  of the impasse in Mideast peace talks.
  The aide says King Mohammed VI cited the deadlocked talks in turning down President Shimon Peres' request to meet
  at an upcoming international conference in Marrakech.
  Peace talks have stalled over Israel's refusal to extend building curbs in the West Bank. The Palestinians say they won't
  negotiate if Israel doesn't relent, but have given the U.S. until early November to try to resolve the dispute.
  The aide, who wasn't authorized to discuss the issue with the media and spoke on condition of anonymity, said
  October 18 that if Peres can't meet with the king, he won't attend the World Economic Forum on the Middle East and
  North Africa.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772525 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772527
MetadataSubject: GOOD TO SEE YOU
MetadataTo: doug
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-10T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772527/C05772527.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Good to see you
ExtractedTo: 'doug
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
ExtractedCc: 'mchaleja@state.gov'
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 10, 2010 5:45 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772527
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Raj is off to a brilliant start and thank you for the help you provided him.
  We share your assessment of Pakistan's need for a public narrative and better capacity to communicate effectively.
  Judith has been working on how we improve our comm work there, and I know you were talking to the Pakistani
  Ambassador about helping them. I'm copying Judith and asking that the two of you discuss what we could do given the
  very difficult political landscape.
  Thx for all your good counsel. We need to follow thru on the campaign for women we discussed some months back. Are
  you still assisting Melanne? Let me know what I can do to hurry it along. H

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772527 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
  Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2010 5:45 PM
  To: 'doug
  Cc: 'mchaleja@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Good to see you
  Raj is off to a brilliant start and thank you for the help you provided him.
  We share your assessment of Pakistan's need for a public narrative and better capacity to communicate effectively.
  Judith has been working on how we improve our comm work there, and I know you were talking to the Pakistani
  Ambassador about helping them. I'm copying Judith and asking that the two of you discuss what we could do given the
  very difficult political landscape.
  Thx for all your good counsel. We need to follow thru on the campaign for women we discussed some months back. Are
  you still assisting Melanne? Let me know what I can do to hurry it along. H
  Original Message
  From: doug
  To: H
  Sent: Thu Jan 07 16:36:51 2010
  Subject: Good to see you
  Mme Secretary:
  I'm glad I got to see you at Raj's swearing-in. Hope you liked the speech. Alonzo said we hit the right notes and Raj is off
  to a strong start.
  Of course I was kidding about "running away" from your "long list" of things you wanted to talk about with me. I'm
  happy to talk anytime.
  In fact, it would be good to touch base on the women's initiative and Pakistan. I've been talking with ND1's highly
  regarded country director in Pakistan, who says communications is a desperate need and will definitely do some good
  for the government.
  Look forward to seeing you again soon. All the best, Doug
  Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772527 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772530
MetadataSubject: YOUR TECHNOLOGY DINNER THIS EVENING
MetadataTo: balderstonkm@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-10T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772530/C05772530.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Your technology dinner this evening
ExtractedTo: 'balderstonkm@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 10, 2010 5:47 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772530
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  I don't think I made any progress. What will it mean if we can't raise the remaining $? Where else can we try?

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772530 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2010 5:47 PM
  To: 'balderstonkm@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Your technology dinner this evening
  I don't think I made any progress. What will it mean if we can't raise the remaining $? Where else can we try?
  Original Message
  From: Balderston, Kris M <BalderstonKM@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Thu Jan 07 18:33:26 2010
  Subject: Your technology dinner this evening
  I noticed on your schedule that you are meeting with a number of tech CEO's this evening. Google should be an obvious
  co-sponsor of the USA Pavilion and they have consistently pushed us off. Although they bring up IP issues as a reason
  not to participate, the Chinese frequently note that they do a lot of business in China. We are now at $54 million. If the
  opportunity arises, it would be helpful to note the importance of a USA standing in Shanghai.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772530 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772531
MetadataSubject: ANDY YOUNG
MetadataTo: ValmoroLJ@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-10T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772531/C05772531.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Andy Young
ExtractedTo: 'ValmoroU@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: 'cheryl.mills
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 10, 2010 5:49 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772531
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Pis set up appointment for Andy Young to come see me.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772531 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2010 5:49 PM
  To: 'ValmoroU@state.gov'
  Cc: 'cheryl.mills
  Subject: Fw: Andy Young
  Pis set up appointment for Andy Young to come see me.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Thu Jan 07 20:32:57 2010
  Subject: FW: Andy Young
  fyi
  Original Message
  From: Giffin, Gordon [mailto
  Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 8:16 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Andy Young
  Happy New Year. I hope you got some time to enjoy the holiday season and could relax before getting back at it this
  year.
  Andy Young is a very good friend of mine, and has been a stalwart for the Clintons over the years. He is also one of the
  most recognized and respected experts on Africa in America. He asked me today if I thought it would be appropriate for
  him to seek to see the Secretary to share some of his thoughts on Africa and current issues being confronted there. I
  told him of course and suggested that he reach out to you to try to arrange that dialogue. Hopefully that is ok from your
  perspective. Andy is a thoughtful, remarkable and decent man. If you don't know him you will enjoy getting to know
  him. Thanks and maybe one of these days when I am in DC we can grab a coffee together. Cheers.
  Gordon b. Giffin
  McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP
  303 Peachtree St. Suite 5300
  Atlanta, Ga. 30308
  404-527-4020
  CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
  This e-mail and any attachments contain information from the law firm of McKenna Long & Aldridge LIP, and are
  intended solely for the use of the named recipient or recipients. This e-mail may contain privileged attorney/client
  communications or work product. Any dissemination of this e-mail by anyone other than an intended recipient is strictly
  prohibited. If you are not a named recipient, you are prohibited from any further viewing of the e-mail or any
  attachments or from making any use of the e-mail or attachments. If you believe you have received this e-mail in error,
  notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the e-mail, any attachments, and all copies thereof from any
  drives or storage media and destroy any printouts of the e-mail or attachments.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772531 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772532
MetadataSubject: HAGUE IS NOT AVAILABLE RIGHT NOW
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-18T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0103/DOC_0C05772532/C05772532.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Hague is not available right now
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, October 18, 2010 11:00 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772532
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  We will try to get a time for later. He won't be available until after 4:45 PM today.
  ###

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772532 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 11:00 AM
  To: H
  Subject: Hague is not available right now
  We will try to get a time for later. He won't be available until after 4:45 PM today.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772532 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772542
MetadataSubject: THE VMI DISTINGUISHED DIPLOMAT AWARD
MetadataTo: sbwhoeop
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-10T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772542/C05772542.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: The VMI "Distinguished Diplomat Award"
ExtractedTo: 'sbwhoeop B6
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: 'ValmoroU@state.govi <ValmoroU@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 10, 2010 6:00 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772542
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Ok.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772542 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2010 6:00 PM
  To: 'sbwhoeop B6
  Subject: Re: The VMI "Distinguished Diplomat Award"
  Ok.
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jan 10 17:57:56 2010
  Subject: Re: The VMI "Distinguished Diplomat Award"
  That's good. I know he'll be delighted to hear that. I think it will be more than a good event.
  On Coakley, the Globe has her up 15 today, but my friends in Mass say the Globe screen may be too broad. She's not a
  very good candidate, dull, dutiful, rote, voters are looking to vent on Deval Patrick, Dem enthusiasm flat. Nonetheless,
  Dems should pull her across, Danger is coming in below 10 percent win and effect on health care debate if any.
  Will write you on NI and UK. Going back and forth with Shaun.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: 'sbwhoeop
  Cc: 'ValmoroU@state.govi <ValmoroU@state.gov>
  Sent: Sun, Jan 10, 2010 5:51 pm
  Subject: Re: Fwd: The VMI "Distinguished Diplomat Award"
  Thx for sending this along. I am very interested and am copying Lona so she can
  follow up w Pat.
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Jan 09 15:06:56 2010
  Subject: Fwd: The VMI "Distinguished Diplomat Award"
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772542 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772542 Date: 08/31/2015
  Hillary: Virginia Military Institute, George C. Marshall's school, through Pat
  Lang, would like to give you the Distinguished Diplomat Award. See Pat's note
  below. Though you must receive endless invitations, I think this one would be a
  particularly good venue for you for a host of obvious reasons, and where you
  could deliver a speech. You will have various speeches to give. You can give one
  at VMI and get honored. You can respond through me or to Pat directly one way or
  another. Also, I had a long conversation with Pat, who has many sources within
  the higher echelons of the military, and he describes what the generals are
  doing on Afghanistan deployment as a "slow motion mutiny." He believes the White
  House trying to counter it through press leaks as though this is a primary
  campaign generates contempt. Cheers, Sid
  Original Message
  From: Patrick Lang
  To: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Sat, Jan 9, 2010 2:54 pm
  Subject: The VMI "Distinguished Diplomat Award"
  Madame Secretary
  I am a 1962 graduate of the Virginia Military Institute. VMI ha always been
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F- 2014-20439 Doc No. C05772542 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772542 Date: 08/31/2015
  predominately a hard science and engineering school. I happen to have been an
  English major there. Today, there are more cadets with a "major" or "minor" in
  International Relations and Political Science than in any other field. The
  whole student body is around 1200 in number and deliberately kept to that size
  to keep quality up and to continue to rely on a teaching system that is almost
  tutorial in nature.
  The Institute's most revered alumnus is George C. Marshall. His library is
  there as well as a brand new "Marshall Center for the Study of Leadership and
  Ethics."
  I am a member of the advisory board of the "International Relations and
  Political Science" Department. The Institute (and the department) gives a prize
  from time to time to truly "Distinguished Diplomats. " Under that rubric have
  been included a few who were not strictly diplomats but who have been of great
  service to the United States. Jim Lilley was a recipient as was Susan
  Eisenhower, last year's recipient.
  When I recently met with the Superintendent of VMI (my classmate), I told him
  that you would make an admirable recipient for the "Distinguished Diplomat"
  award. He was very welcoming of the idea. You may know him, General (ret.)
  JHB Peay.
  I enclose a page from the VMI website that described Ms. Eisenhower's award last
  year.
  VMI now has a substantial number of women cadets. It seems to me that your
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772542 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772542 Date: 08/31/2015
  presence there for this purpose would be a great symbol and a vast encouragement
  for them.
  Best Regards
  W. Patrick Lang (Pat)
  http://academics.vmi.edurnewsCenteraspx?id=38929
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772542 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772543
MetadataSubject: ECONOMIST OP-ED
MetadataTo: Schwerin, Daniel B
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jake J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-07T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772543/C05772543.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Economist op-ed
ExtractedTo: Schwerin, Daniel B; H; preines
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Huma Abedin; Reines, Philippe I
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, October 8, 2010 12:07 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772543
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  To follow up - the team tried its hand at a boiled down version of the CFR speech, but in 700 words it lost the nuance
  and amounted to a series of generalisms. We felt that a more specific topic would allow for a sharper message. We
  selected democracy because it allows you to talk about a broad and relevant trend that cuts across global affairs; to
  reprise signature themes like Internet freedom, civil society, and the democracy/development nexus; and to underscore
  that this administration takes these issues seriously. This was also an element of your CFR speech and provides some
  continuity in that respect as well. We were not looking to break new ground but rather to reinforce.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772543 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, October 8, 2010 12:07 AM
  To: Schwerin, Daniel B; H; preines
  Cc: Huma Abedin; Reines, Philippe I
  Subject: Re: Economist op-ed
  To follow up - the team tried its hand at a boiled down version of the CFR speech, but in 700 words it lost the nuance
  and amounted to a series of generalisms. We felt that a more specific topic would allow for a sharper message. We
  selected democracy because it allows you to talk about a broad and relevant trend that cuts across global affairs; to
  reprise signature themes like Internet freedom, civil society, and the democracy/development nexus; and to underscore
  that this administration takes these issues seriously. This was also an element of your CFR speech and provides some
  continuity in that respect as well. We were not looking to break new ground but rather to reinforce.
  Original Message
  From: Schwerin, Daniel B
  To: 'HDR22@clintonemail.com' <HDR22@clintonemail.com>; 'preines
  Cc: 'Huma@clintonemail.com' <Huma@clintonemailcom>; Sullivan, Jacobi; Reines, Philippe I
  Sent: Thu Oct 07 23:40:16 2010
  Subject: Re: Economist op-ed
  Here's some background: This piece is for a year-ending look-ahead issue of The Economist and we were asked to write
  about America's priorities and place in the world in 2011, ten years after 9/11 and twenty years after the end of the Cold
  War. The team (Jake, Josh, Anne-Marie, Derek) felt that this was a good opportunity to pull together for a wide audience
  some of the key themes you sounded in Krakow and elsewhere, and build on the President's call to action at UNGA. We
  don't say anything new here, its true, but the idea was to lay down another marker that these are issues that are
  important to you and to the administration.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: 'preines
  Cc: Huma Abedin <Huma@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Thu Oct 07 22:36:30 2010
  Subject: Economist op-ed
  Schwerin, Daniel B B6
  I just got the draft and don't think it says anything. What is the question we are trying to answer or issue we were asked
  to address in this?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772543 Date: 08/31/2015
  B6
  B6



DocNumber: C05772544
MetadataSubject: YOUR TECHNOLOGY DINNER THIS EVENING
MetadataTo: balderstonkm@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-10T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772544/C05772544.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Your technology dinner this evening
ExtractedTo: 'balderstonkm@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 10, 2010 8:13 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772544
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: What else can I do to help?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772544 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B4,B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2010 8:13 PM
  To: 'balderstonkm@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Your technology dinner this evening
  What else can I do to help?
  Original Message
  From: Balderston, Kris M <BalderstonKM@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jan 10 19:03:24 2010
  Subject: Re: Your technology dinner this evening
  Google has been wierd about this whole deal but this whole Espo experience has been fascinating. Some companies will
  say absolutely no for months (Qualcomm, Bloomberg, .1&.1) and then pop out of nowhere and say yes. Others like All are
  in for and then decide not to give us a penny. Therefore we have to keep bugging these guys.
  We WILL raise the money. We are at $54M+ (this wk Hawaii came in for $500k and Bloomberg LLC and need $7M
  more. Ideally we would like to raise $10 to 11M to cover any overruns (it's getting more expensive because the US was
  so late we are paying more now to build it quicker).
  Where it will come from?
  A- Right now we have three big companies talking to us in the range of each - Monsanto, Disney, and Oracle.
  Haier may go from If two or three come thru big we are done.
  B- We also have a number of other companies like Invitrogen, Hormel, Mattel and Major League Baseball in the
  range.
  C- Interestingly the cities and states are going to their private funders and trying to raise money on their own to
  promote their jurisdictions - Chicago, Houston, Georgia, Montana, TN. (In the past, over 20 states participated with
  public funds but current budgets are tough). Maybe a chat w Mayor Bloomberg would be worthwhile. For example, I
  spoke to the University of WA and they will probably get benefactors to cosponsor at $250k making them the only
  university represented.
  D- We have approached groups like Pharma and the fashion industry thru Diane von Furstenburg to get them to bundle
  smaller companies and both have agreed to do it. I met w DVL and she wants you to know that she is very excited about
  helping (they are in the range).
  E-We have talked to the elusive Chamber of Commerce again about getting SME's to raise $2-3M in smaller increments.
  They are contemplating it.
  Finally the two obvious industries that are not involved are the banks (and we know why) and the insurance companies
  who are starting to look into the market over there.
  Anyway, I did not mean to go on and on but that's where we stand and these are the potential areas to tap. We'll get
  there.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772544 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772544 Date: 08/31/2015
  On your last Q - I too heard that
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Balderston, Kris M
  Sent: Sun Jan 10 17:47:22 2010
  Subject: Re: Your technology dinner this evening
  I don't think I made any progress. What will it mean if we can't raise the remaining 5? Where else can we try?
  Do you know how
  Original Message
  From: Balderston, Kris M <BalderstonKM@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Thu Jan 07 18:33:26 2010
  Subject: Your technology dinner this evening
  I noticed on your schedule that you are meeting with a number of tech CEO's this evening. Google should be an obvious
  co-sponsor of the USA Pavilion and they have consistently pushed us off. Although they bring up IP issues as a reason
  not to participate, the Chinese frequently note that they do a lot of business in China. We are now at $54 million. If the
  opportunity arises, it would be helpful to note the importance of a USA standing in Shanghai.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772544 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772545
MetadataSubject: YOUR TECHNOLOGY DINNER THIS EVENING
MetadataTo: balderstonkm@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-10T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772545/C05772545.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Your technology dinner this evening
ExtractedTo: 'balderstonkm@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 10, 2010 8:41 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772545
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: If a city gives $ do they put up display/exhibits?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772545 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B4,B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2010 8:41 PM
  To: 'balderstonkm@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Your technology dinner this evening
  If a city gives $ do they put up display/exhibits?
  Original Message
  From: Balderston, Kris M <BalderstonKM@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jan 10 20:37:29 2010
  Subject: Re: Your technology dinner this evening
  This will be an important two weeks to nail down these big companies. We are negotiating with them now about
  possible options. I'll keep you posted.
  May be good to mention this to Mayor Bloomberg if you run into him or see him. Doctoroff gave us
  Bloomberg, LLC but he thght the Mayor may be interested for the city.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Balderston, Kris M
  Sent: Sun Jan 10 20:13:04 2010
  Subject: Re: Your technology dinner this evening
  What else can I do to help?
  Original Message
  From: Balderston, Kris M <BalderstonKM@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jan 10 19:03:24 2010
  Subject: Re: Your technology dinner this evening
  from B4
  Google has been wierd about this whole deal but this whole Espo experience has been fascinating. Some companies will
  say absolutely no for months (Qualcomm, Bloomberg, J&J) and then pop out of nowhere and say yes. Others like ATT are
  in for and then decide not to give us a penny. Therefore we have to keep bugging these guys.
  We WILL raise the money. We are at $54M+ (this wk Hawaii came in for $500k and Bloomberg LLC and need $7M
  more. Ideally we would like to raise $10 to 11M to cover any overruns (it's getting more expensive because the US was
  so late we are paying more now to build it quicker).
  Where it will come from?
  A- Right now we have three big companies talking to us in the range o each - Monsanto, Disney, and Oracle.
  Haier may go from . If two or three come thru big we are done.
  B-We also have a number of other companies like Invitrogen, Hormel, Mattel and Major League Baseball in the
  range.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772545 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772545 Date: 08/31/2015
  C- Interestingly the cities and states are going to their private funders and trying to raise money on their own to
  promote their jurisdictions - Chicago, Houston, Georgia, Montana, TN. (In the past, over 20 states participated with
  public funds but current budgets are tough). Maybe a chat w Mayor Bloomberg would be worthwhile. For example, I
  spoke to the University of WA and they will probably get benefactors to cosponsor at $250k making them the only
  university represented.
  D- We have approached groups like Pharma and the fashion industry thru Diane von Furstenburg to get them to bundle
  smaller companies and both have agreed to do it. I met w DVL and she wants you to know that she is very excited about
  helping (they are in the range).
  E- We have talked to the elusive Chamber of Commerce again about getting SME's to raise $2-3M in smaller increments.
  They are contemplating it.
  Finally the two obvious industries that are not involved are the banks (and we know why) and the insurance companies
  who are starting to look into the market over there.
  Anyway, I did not mean to go on and on but that's where we stand and these are the potential areas to tap. We'll get
  there.
  On your last Q - I too heard that
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Balderston, Kris M
  Sent: Sun Jan 10 17:47:22 2010
  Subject: Re: Your technology dinner this evening
  I don't think I made any progress. What will it mean if we can't raise the remaining $? Where else can we try?
  Do you know how
  Original Message
  From: Balderston, Kris M <BalderstonKM@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Thu Jan 07 18:33:26 2010
  Subject: Your technology dinner this evening
  I noticed on your schedule that you are meeting with a number of tech CEO's this evening. Google should be an obvious
  co-sponsor of the USA Pavilion and they have consistently pushed us off. Although they bring up IP issues as a reason
  not to participate, the Chinese frequently note that they do a lot of business in China. We are now at $54 million. If the
  opportunity arises, it would be helpful to note the importance of a USA standing in Shanghai.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772545 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772546
MetadataSubject: MINI SCHEDULE 10/8/10 FRIDAY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jilloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-08T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772546/C05772546.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Mini Schedule 10/8/10 Friday
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, October 8, 2010 8:05 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772546
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  8:25 am PRESIDENTIAL DAILY BRIEFING
  8:30 am Secretary's Office
  8:30 am DAILY SMALL STAFF MEETING
  8:45 am Secretary's Office
  8:45 am DAILY SENIOR STAFF MEETING
  9:15 am Secretary's Conference Room
  9:20 am EUROPE TRIP MEETING
  9:45 am Secretary's Outer Office
  10:00 am VIDEOS (5)
  10:40 am George Marshall Room, 7th Floor
  10:40 am CALL w/QATARI PRIME MINISTER AND FOREIGN MINISTER
  11:00 am HAMAD BIN JASIM (T) Secretary's Office
  11:00 am CALL w/L1BYAN FOREIGN SECRETARY MOUSA KOUSA
  11:15 am Secretary's Office
  11:30 am MEETING w/CHERYL MILLS
  12:00 pm Secretary's Office
  12:00 pm MEETING ON QDDR
  1:00 pm Secretary's Conference Room
  1:00 pm OFFICE TIME
  1:50 pm Secretary's Office
  1:50 pm DROP BY w/CALVIN & JANE CAFRITZ*
  1:55 pm Secretary's Office
  2:00 pm DEEP DIVE ON MEXICO*
  3:30 pm Secretary's Conference Room
  4:00 pm CALL w/BRITISH FOREIGN SECRETARY WILLIAM HAGUE
  4:15 pm Secretary's Office
  4:15 pm OFFICE TIME
  5:15 pm Secretary's Office
  5:20 pm DEPART State Department
  En route Washington Reagan National Airport
  5:40 pm ARRIVE Washington Reagan National Airport (DCA)
  6:00 pm WHEELS UP Washington Reagan National Airport via US Air 2182
  En route LaGuardia Airport
  7:15 pm ARRIVE LaGuardia Airport (LGA)
  7:25 pm DEPART LaGuardia Airport
  En route Private Residence
  8:15 pm ARRIVE Private Residence
  ###

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772546 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, October 8, 2010 8:05 AM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Mini Schedule 10/8/10 Friday
  8:25 am PRESIDENTIAL DAILY BRIEFING
  8:30 am Secretary's Office
  8:30 am DAILY SMALL STAFF MEETING
  8:45 am Secretary's Office
  8:45 am DAILY SENIOR STAFF MEETING
  9:15 am Secretary's Conference Room
  9:20 am EUROPE TRIP MEETING
  9:45 am Secretary's Outer Office
  10:00 am VIDEOS (5)
  10:40 am George Marshall Room, 7th Floor
  10:40 am CALL w/QATARI PRIME MINISTER AND FOREIGN MINISTER
  11:00 am HAMAD BIN JASIM (T) Secretary's Office
  11:00 am CALL w/L1BYAN FOREIGN SECRETARY MOUSA KOUSA
  11:15 am Secretary's Office
  11:30 am MEETING w/CHERYL MILLS
  12:00 pm Secretary's Office
  12:00 pm MEETING ON QDDR
  1:00 pm Secretary's Conference Room
  1:00 pm OFFICE TIME
  1:50 pm Secretary's Office
  1:50 pm DROP BY w/CALVIN & JANE CAFRITZ*
  1:55 pm Secretary's Office
  2:00 pm DEEP DIVE ON MEXICO*
  3:30 pm Secretary's Conference Room
  4:00 pm CALL w/BRITISH FOREIGN SECRETARY WILLIAM HAGUE
  4:15 pm Secretary's Office
  4:15 pm OFFICE TIME
  5:15 pm Secretary's Office
  5:20 pm DEPART State Department
  En route Washington Reagan National Airport
  5:40 pm ARRIVE Washington Reagan National Airport (DCA)
  6:00 pm WHEELS UP Washington Reagan National Airport via US Air 2182
  En route LaGuardia Airport
  7:15 pm ARRIVE LaGuardia Airport (LGA)
  7:25 pm DEPART LaGuardia Airport
  En route Private Residence
  8:15 pm ARRIVE Private Residence
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772546 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772549
MetadataSubject: FOR HRC REVIEW: STATEMENT ON JONES & DONILON
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-08T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772549/C05772549.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: For HRC Review: Statement on Jones & Donilon
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Reines, Philippe I; Sullivan, Jacob J
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, October 8, 2010 8:34 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772549
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772549 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, October 8, 2010 8:34 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: For HRC Review: Statement on Jones & Donilon
  Original Message
  From: Schwerin, Daniel B
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Cc: Reines, Philippe I; Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Fri Oct 08 08:29:01 2010
  Subject: For HRC Review: Statement on Jones & Donilon
  Huma, below is a proposed statement on Jones & Donilon.
  Dan
  General Jim Jones has spent a lifetime serving our country with honor and distinction. In war and in peace, from foreign
  battlefields to the highest levels of our government, he has exemplified the best traditions of the Marine Corps and the
  United States. I have been honored to serve with him and to call him my friend. As National Security Advisor he brought
  a steady hand and clear vision to an unforgiving agenda. His leadership was crucial in winding down the combat mission
  in Iraq, refocusing the war in Afghanistan, and advancing our nation's interests and values around the world. America is
  more secure and the world is more stable because of Jim's tireless efforts. He will be sorely missed, but I am pleased
  that Jim will now be able to spend more time with his wife Diane and their wonderful family.
  General Jones leaves Marine-sized shoes to fill, but we are fortunate that a public servant as talented and dedicated as
  Tom Donilon has agreed to take on the task. I have known Tom for many years and he brings deep experience and
  valuable skills to this crucial job. He has a proven ability to translate big-picture vision into concrete action. As Deputy
  National Security Advisor, Tom has been a trusted member of our team and has contributed to every major policy
  decision. I appreciate his support for the State Department and our diplomacy and development efforts around the
  world and I look forward to working closely with him to implement the President's agenda.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772549 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772552
MetadataSubject: NPR
MetadataTo: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-11T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772552/C05772552.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: NPR
ExtractedTo: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, January 11, 2010 8:00 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772552
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Can you get me transcript of story on NPR this am about how nearsightedness is cause?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772552 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 8:00 AM
  To: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
  Subject: NPR
  Can you get me transcript of story on NPR this am about how nearsightedness is cause?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772552 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772553
MetadataSubject: S/P STAFF MEMBER'S ARTICLE ON MARIO VARGAS LLOSA
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-08T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772553/C05772553.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: S/P staff member's article on Mario Vargas Llosa
ExtractedFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, October 8, 2010 9:47 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772553
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  I thought that you might enjoy this by our newest S/P member, who was a journalist for the Wall Street Journalist and
  other places before she joined us in September. She is on an International Affairs Fellowship from the Council on Foreign
  Relations. They asked her to write the following; it was cleared by L. It is quite profound.
  By EMILY PARKER
  In 2007 I flew down to Lima to interview Mario Vargas Llosa for this newspaper. We talked in his elegant home,
  surrounded by thousands of books. Mr. Vargas Llosa offered me a glass of red wine. Then he proceeded to
  discuss why he believes that literature can change the world.
  Mr. Vargas Llosa's Nobel Prize is a great victory—and not just for a talented and prolific author. His work is
  perhaps the greatest rebuttal to those who believe that literature exists on the periphery of history and politics,
  or who claim that they have "no time" for fiction.
  In a New Republic essay in 2001, Mr. Vargas Llosa argued for granting literature "an important place in the life
  of nations." He wrote, 'Without it, the critical mind, which is the real engine of historical change and the best
  protector of liberty, would suffer an irreparable loss."
  Mr. Vargas Llosa's novels reflect his deep, personal hatred of dictatorships and his staunch belief in the value
  of individual liberty. He is hardly the only novelist to have shed light on these themes, but I would argue that he
  is among the most successful.
  Columnist Mary Anastasia O'Grady on the anti-Communist Peruvian writer.
  A case in point is "Conversation in the Cathedral," the work that Mr. Vargas Llosa has said he would rescue
  first from a fire. The novel is set in Peru, in the dark days of the Manuel Odria dictatorship of the 1950s, which
  is when Mr. Vargas Llosa grew up. He told me that this was the book in which he wanted to describe how
  dictatorships impregnate "every act of life."
  To demonstrate this, Mr. Vargas Llosa paints around Odria rather than confronting him outright. The book
  opens with a grim landscape of "uneven and faded buildings" and describes "dull and defeated eyes at the
  tables of Zela bar, hands that reach for ashtrays and glasses of beer." The narrative, which rapidly jumps from
  past to present, describes a stalled, confused world. You don't know who to trust.
  Mr. Vargas Llosa attacks politics more openly in "The Feast of the Goat," which explicitly details the horrors of
  the Trujillo regime in the Dominican Republic. Rafael Trujillo was notorious for his victimization of women, and
  so we see life under his rule through the eyes of one young girl unlucky enough to have crossed his path. "The
  woman is almost always the first victim of a dictatorship," Mr. Vargas Llosa told me.
  For some, Mr. Vargas Llosa's victory will be controversial because of his political background and his
  outspoken views. He unsuccessfully ran for president of Peru in 1990, losing to Alberto Fujimori. During the
  campaign Mr. Vargas Llosa gained notoriety for his emphasis on a market economy, free trade and private
  property. He was no less controversial for his support of the invasion of Iraq, which he saw as necessary to
  ending what he called the "monstrous dictatorship" of Saddam Hussein.
  Mr. Vargas Llosa has now left politics, and he believes that he can better shape the world with his pen. Or as
  he told me in Lima: 'Through writing, one can change history."
  Not all of his work is dark. "Aunt Julia and the Scriptwriter" is punctuated with humor, and 'The Bad Girl," about
  one man's world-wide pursuit of an elusive lover, is a thoroughly entertaining read. The one constant is a
  perceptive and empathetic glimpse into a wide range of human experience.
  As Mr. Vargas Llosa wrote in his 2001 essay about literature, "Nothing better protects a human being against
  the stupidity of prejudice, racism, religious or political sectarianism, and exclusivist nationalism than this truth
  that invariably appears in great literature: that men and women of all nations and places are essentially equal."
  Ms. Parker is an international affairs fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772553 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, October 8, 2010 9:47 AM
  To:
  Subject: S/P staff member's article on Mario Vargas Llosa
  I thought that you might enjoy this by our newest S/P member, who was a journalist for the Wall Street Journalist and
  other places before she joined us in September. She is on an International Affairs Fellowship from the Council on Foreign
  Relations. They asked her to write the following; it was cleared by L. It is quite profound.
  By EMILY PARKER
  In 2007 I flew down to Lima to interview Mario Vargas Llosa for this newspaper. We talked in his elegant home,
  surrounded by thousands of books. Mr. Vargas Llosa offered me a glass of red wine. Then he proceeded to
  discuss why he believes that literature can change the world.
  Mr. Vargas Llosa's Nobel Prize is a great victory—and not just for a talented and prolific author. His work is
  perhaps the greatest rebuttal to those who believe that literature exists on the periphery of history and politics,
  or who claim that they have "no time" for fiction.
  In a New Republic essay in 2001, Mr. Vargas Llosa argued for granting literature "an important place in the life
  of nations." He wrote, 'Without it, the critical mind, which is the real engine of historical change and the best
  protector of liberty, would suffer an irreparable loss."
  Mr. Vargas Llosa's novels reflect his deep, personal hatred of dictatorships and his staunch belief in the value
  of individual liberty. He is hardly the only novelist to have shed light on these themes, but I would argue that he
  is among the most successful.
  Columnist Mary Anastasia O'Grady on the anti-Communist Peruvian writer.
  A case in point is "Conversation in the Cathedral," the work that Mr. Vargas Llosa has said he would rescue
  first from a fire. The novel is set in Peru, in the dark days of the Manuel Odria dictatorship of the 1950s, which
  is when Mr. Vargas Llosa grew up. He told me that this was the book in which he wanted to describe how
  dictatorships impregnate "every act of life."
  To demonstrate this, Mr. Vargas Llosa paints around Odria rather than confronting him outright. The book
  opens with a grim landscape of "uneven and faded buildings" and describes "dull and defeated eyes at the
  tables of Zela bar, hands that reach for ashtrays and glasses of beer." The narrative, which rapidly jumps from
  past to present, describes a stalled, confused world. You don't know who to trust.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772553 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772553 Date: 08/31/2015
  Mr. Vargas Llosa attacks politics more openly in "The Feast of the Goat," which explicitly details the horrors of
  the Trujillo regime in the Dominican Republic. Rafael Trujillo was notorious for his victimization of women, and
  so we see life under his rule through the eyes of one young girl unlucky enough to have crossed his path. "The
  woman is almost always the first victim of a dictatorship," Mr. Vargas Llosa told me.
  For some, Mr. Vargas Llosa's victory will be controversial because of his political background and his
  outspoken views. He unsuccessfully ran for president of Peru in 1990, losing to Alberto Fujimori. During the
  campaign Mr. Vargas Llosa gained notoriety for his emphasis on a market economy, free trade and private
  property. He was no less controversial for his support of the invasion of Iraq, which he saw as necessary to
  ending what he called the "monstrous dictatorship" of Saddam Hussein.
  Mr. Vargas Llosa has now left politics, and he believes that he can better shape the world with his pen. Or as
  he told me in Lima: 'Through writing, one can change history."
  Not all of his work is dark. "Aunt Julia and the Scriptwriter" is punctuated with humor, and 'The Bad Girl," about
  one man's world-wide pursuit of an elusive lover, is a thoroughly entertaining read. The one constant is a
  perceptive and empathetic glimpse into a wide range of human experience.
  As Mr. Vargas Llosa wrote in his 2001 essay about literature, "Nothing better protects a human being against
  the stupidity of prejudice, racism, religious or political sectarianism, and exclusivist nationalism than this truth
  that invariably appears in great literature: that men and women of all nations and places are essentially equal."
  Ms. Parker is an international affairs fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772553 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772554
MetadataSubject: BEN FEDER
MetadataTo: balderstonkm@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-11T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772554/C05772554.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Ben Feder
ExtractedTo: 'balderstonkm@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, January 11, 2010 2:38 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772554
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Can you also send me Rocco's #?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772554 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
  Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 2:38 PM
  To: 'balderstonkm@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Ben Feder
  Can you also send me Rocco's #?
  Original Message
  From: Balderston, Kris M <BalderstonKM@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Mon Jan 11 12:43:16 2010
  Subject: Ben Feder
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772554 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772555
MetadataSubject: H: THE BOEHNER POLL. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-08T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772555/C05772555.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772555
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  sbwhoeo1
  Friday, 0c
  3 10 4:08 PM
  H: The Boehner poll. Sid
  raw Westen
  Psychologist and neuroscientist; Emory University Professor
  Posted: October 8, 2010 09:23 AM
  dJnLM L t
  ,
  -.
  -1.117.=1MIC2VAILISIrie ll=a===.1
  According to news reports, today Republican minority leader and Coppertone model John Boehner will give his "closing
  argument" to the American people on why they should throw out the Democrats and kill the Obama-Pelosi-Reid "job-
  killing agenda." He will be returning to his working class roots, speaking at a piping manufacturing plant, an unusual venue
  these days for a man who is seen much more frequently at gatherings of Wall Street executives with open checkbooks
  and the males-only country club where he works on his tan when not making the rounds at other clubs with industry
  lobbyists.
  Either the Speaker-to-be is following the model of Michael Steele and free-lancing, or Karl Rove and the Republicans
  believe it is safe or even advantageous to bring him out in public after the White House made an effort to put Boehner's
  face on what a Republican majority might look like, with the president invoking his name eight times in one speech.
  I have to admit that at the time I was agnostic as to whether it made sense to try to brand him at this late date, as Boehner
  has minimal name recognition among voters. But the White House was no doubt responding to three realities.
  First, Boehner is an unknown to most Americans, which means that, unlike most Republicans in the news, he has not
  been well branded by the GOP -- which means for once Democrats might actually brand someone or something first
  rather than playing catch-up. Second, Boehner would indeed be the highest-ranking Republican were the GOP to assume
  control over the House (other than of course Karl Rove, who is now directing traffic on the right side of the street in
  Washington again). And third, a concrete face is always better than an abstraction when telling a story, and other than
  perhaps Sarah Palin, who Republicans could alternately accept and decline as the leader of their party, Boehner's tanned
  visage and history as errand-boy for virtually every major corporate special interest in his two decades in Washington
  (including his stint as the Marlboro Man, handing out tobacco lobby campaign checks to his fellow Republicans on the
  floor of the House) made him a potential counter-villain to the Republican's bogeywoman, Nancy Pelosi.
  I remained agnostic until this week, when colleagues at Media Matters Action Network and I conducted a national
  5urye:y with 1,000 registered voters, selected to match the demographics of the voting and likely voting
  populations. The goal was to see how effectively we could speak with voters about Boehner as not only the symbol and
  standard-bearer for the GOP but also the water-boy for corporate America. (The results were surprisingly similar whether
  we looked at registered voters or likely voters, although as others have described, precisely how to determine who is a
  "likely voter" in this election is as much art as science, and the point of good messaging at this point is actually to change
  the dynamics of likely voting, not just to reflect them.)
  As detailed in a memo published in Politico, what we found was clear: Boehner is a target well worth defining, who readily
  stands for precisely what Americans perceive to be the reasons they would have to hold their noses to vote for
  Congressional Republicans (perhaps the only group left who poll worse than Congressional Democrats with swing
  voters). We tested both paragraph-length narratives and single-sentence language designed to capture the essence of
  those narratives, and in each case, we tested them against the toughest opposition language we could test them against:
  the words of Boehner, Cantor, Limbaugh and others combined in defining the "Obama-Pelosi-Reid" agenda.
  What we found, in brief: is that we could beat a tough GOP narrative about the "job-killing" socialists in the White House
  and Congress by 15 to 20 points with two narratives starring Boehner in the leading role (with best supporting bad actor
  going in one of the narratives to Karl Rove and his corporate allies), and we could win with over 15 different sentence-long
  descriptions of "what's the matter with Boehner" with margins ranging from 10 to 60 points against a tough conservative
  attack on the Obama-Pelosi-Reid axis of conservative evil.
  The narratives that most moved likely voters -- including swing voters, who preferred them by double-digits over tough
  Republican rhetoric -- made clear whose voices Boehner would be speaking for as Speaker (e.g., the Wall Street
  executives he convened to try to block Wall Street reform). They harnessed the same populist anger at the hijacking of
  Washington by corporate special interests that has enlivened the tea partiers and is palpable across the political
  spectrum, and they focused on the extremism of the party Boehner would Speak for. A narrative that brought Karl Rove
  into the picture was slightly more polarizing with swing voters but slightly more powerful with likely Democratic voters.
  In some ways what was most surprising was the success of the single-line statements of what we need in a Speaker and
  who John Boehner really speaks for (although these single-line statements came after the narratives, and likely reflect the
  power of branding, even over the course of a brief online encounter with voters). They ranged from relatively lofty and
  aspirational (e.g., "We need a Speaker who is also a listener, who can hear the voices of ordinary Americans" -- a theme
  colleagues and I found highly resonant across the political spectrum in message testing on the role of money in politics) --
  to the harder-edged (e.g., "The Speaker of the House is a heartbeat away from the Presidency. Unfortunately, we know
  where John Boehner's heart is, and it isn't with the middle class," or "John Boehner understands deficits. He's spent
  nearly 20 years in Washington creating them.")
  If there's a message in this message research, it is at once short-term and long-term. In the short run, if Democrats want
  to hang onto their seats in November, they would do well to define this election in terms of the middle class and small
  business versus the billionaires and big corporations that are hijacking our democracy; to use Boehner as a poster child
  for the party whose primary commitment is to the latter and whose tan is a testament to that commitment; and to avoid
  giving voters reason to regret their vote if they give it to Democrats again this time, by supporting the things they say they
  stand for and avoiding that golden mean between the public interest and the special interests that finance campaigns on
  both sides of the aisle.
  In the longer run, branding matters. One of the biggest strategic and messaging mistakes of the last two years was the
  failure of Democrats to brand their opponents while their opponents were busy branding them -- and in particular the
  failure to brand the Bush Recession as the natural consequence of faded Republican economic principles. Two years ago,
  that was a virtually uncontested political proposition, as the voters made clear in handing Democrats the White House and
  supermajorities in both the House and Senate. Today, the public is split down the middle as to who caused the recession.
  Reality doesn't brand itself. Hopefully it won't take a debacle in November and another 10 million jobs lost for reality to
  unveil itself again for a brief political moment and for progressives to have a second bite at the apple.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772555 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  sbwhoeo1
  Friday, 0c
  3 10 4:08 PM
  H: The Boehner poll. Sid
  raw Westen
  Psychologist and neuroscientist; Emory University Professor
  Posted: October 8, 2010 09:23 AM
  dJnLM L t
  ,
  -.
  -1.117.=1MIC2VAILISIrie ll=a===.1
  According to news reports, today Republican minority leader and Coppertone model John Boehner will give his "closing
  argument" to the American people on why they should throw out the Democrats and kill the Obama-Pelosi-Reid "job-
  killing agenda." He will be returning to his working class roots, speaking at a piping manufacturing plant, an unusual venue
  these days for a man who is seen much more frequently at gatherings of Wall Street executives with open checkbooks
  and the males-only country club where he works on his tan when not making the rounds at other clubs with industry
  lobbyists.
  Either the Speaker-to-be is following the model of Michael Steele and free-lancing, or Karl Rove and the Republicans
  believe it is safe or even advantageous to bring him out in public after the White House made an effort to put Boehner's
  face on what a Republican majority might look like, with the president invoking his name eight times in one speech.
  I have to admit that at the time I was agnostic as to whether it made sense to try to brand him at this late date, as Boehner
  has minimal name recognition among voters. But the White House was no doubt responding to three realities.
  First, Boehner is an unknown to most Americans, which means that, unlike most Republicans in the news, he has not
  been well branded by the GOP -- which means for once Democrats might actually brand someone or something first
  rather than playing catch-up. Second, Boehner would indeed be the highest-ranking Republican were the GOP to assume
  control over the House (other than of course Karl Rove, who is now directing traffic on the right side of the street in
  Washington again). And third, a concrete face is always better than an abstraction when telling a story, and other than
  perhaps Sarah Palin, who Republicans could alternately accept and decline as the leader of their party, Boehner's tanned
  visage and history as errand-boy for virtually every major corporate special interest in his two decades in Washington
  (including his stint as the Marlboro Man, handing out tobacco lobby campaign checks to his fellow Republicans on the
  floor of the House) made him a potential counter-villain to the Republican's bogeywoman, Nancy Pelosi.
  I remained agnostic until this week, when colleagues at Media Matters Action Network and I conducted a national
  5urye:y with 1,000 registered voters, selected to match the demographics of the voting and likely voting
  populations. The goal was to see how effectively we could speak with voters about Boehner as not only the symbol and
  standard-bearer for the GOP but also the water-boy for corporate America. (The results were surprisingly similar whether
  we looked at registered voters or likely voters, although as others have described, precisely how to determine who is a
  "likely voter" in this election is as much art as science, and the point of good messaging at this point is actually to change
  the dynamics of likely voting, not just to reflect them.)
  As detailed in a memo published in Politico, what we found was clear: Boehner is a target well worth defining, who readily
  stands for precisely what Americans perceive to be the reasons they would have to hold their noses to vote for
  Congressional Republicans (perhaps the only group left who poll worse than Congressional Democrats with swing
  voters). We tested both paragraph-length narratives and single-sentence language designed to capture the essence of
  those narratives, and in each case, we tested them against the toughest opposition language we could test them against:
  the words of Boehner, Cantor, Limbaugh and others combined in defining the "Obama-Pelosi-Reid" agenda.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772555 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772555 Date: 08/31/2015
  What we found, in brief: is that we could beat a tough GOP narrative about the "job-killing" socialists in the White House
  and Congress by 15 to 20 points with two narratives starring Boehner in the leading role (with best supporting bad actor
  going in one of the narratives to Karl Rove and his corporate allies), and we could win with over 15 different sentence-long
  descriptions of "what's the matter with Boehner" with margins ranging from 10 to 60 points against a tough conservative
  attack on the Obama-Pelosi-Reid axis of conservative evil.
  The narratives that most moved likely voters -- including swing voters, who preferred them by double-digits over tough
  Republican rhetoric -- made clear whose voices Boehner would be speaking for as Speaker (e.g., the Wall Street
  executives he convened to try to block Wall Street reform). They harnessed the same populist anger at the hijacking of
  Washington by corporate special interests that has enlivened the tea partiers and is palpable across the political
  spectrum, and they focused on the extremism of the party Boehner would Speak for. A narrative that brought Karl Rove
  into the picture was slightly more polarizing with swing voters but slightly more powerful with likely Democratic voters.
  In some ways what was most surprising was the success of the single-line statements of what we need in a Speaker and
  who John Boehner really speaks for (although these single-line statements came after the narratives, and likely reflect the
  power of branding, even over the course of a brief online encounter with voters). They ranged from relatively lofty and
  aspirational (e.g., "We need a Speaker who is also a listener, who can hear the voices of ordinary Americans" -- a theme
  colleagues and I found highly resonant across the political spectrum in message testing on the role of money in politics) --
  to the harder-edged (e.g., "The Speaker of the House is a heartbeat away from the Presidency. Unfortunately, we know
  where John Boehner's heart is, and it isn't with the middle class," or "John Boehner understands deficits. He's spent
  nearly 20 years in Washington creating them.")
  If there's a message in this message research, it is at once short-term and long-term. In the short run, if Democrats want
  to hang onto their seats in November, they would do well to define this election in terms of the middle class and small
  business versus the billionaires and big corporations that are hijacking our democracy; to use Boehner as a poster child
  for the party whose primary commitment is to the latter and whose tan is a testament to that commitment; and to avoid
  giving voters reason to regret their vote if they give it to Democrats again this time, by supporting the things they say they
  stand for and avoiding that golden mean between the public interest and the special interests that finance campaigns on
  both sides of the aisle.
  In the longer run, branding matters. One of the biggest strategic and messaging mistakes of the last two years was the
  failure of Democrats to brand their opponents while their opponents were busy branding them -- and in particular the
  failure to brand the Bush Recession as the natural consequence of faded Republican economic principles. Two years ago,
  that was a virtually uncontested political proposition, as the voters made clear in handing Democrats the White House and
  supermajorities in both the House and Senate. Today, the public is split down the middle as to who caused the recession.
  Reality doesn't brand itself. Hopefully it won't take a debacle in November and another 10 million jobs lost for reality to
  unveil itself again for a brief political moment and for progressives to have a second bite at the apple.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772555 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772557
MetadataSubject: ROY SPENCE
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-11T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772557/C05772557.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Roy Spence
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, January 11, 2010 2:38 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772557
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: That's what I thought too. Can you get that done?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772557 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5,B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 2:38 PM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Roy Spence
  That's what I thought too. Can you get that done?
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Mon Jan 11 12:04:35 2010
  Subject: FW: Roy Spence
  This is the role we discussec for.
  cdm
  From: McHale, Judith A
  Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 11:53 AM
  To: 'H'
  Cc: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Roy Spence
  As per your suggestion, I spoke with Roy Spence over the weekend and will be meeting with him on Wednesday to
  discuss candidates for the International Information programs (IIP) position. Will let you know how it goes.
  JM
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772557 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772558
MetadataSubject: KURT CAMPBELL
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-08T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772558/C05772558.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: kurt campbell
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, October 8, 2010 5:21 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772558
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  MS — Kurt Campbell returned your call
  ###

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772558 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, October 8, 2010 5:21 PM
  To: H
  Subject: kurt campbell
  MS — Kurt Campbell returned your call
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772558 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772560
MetadataSubject: BEN FEDER
MetadataTo: balderstonkm@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-11T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772560/C05772560.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Ben Feder
ExtractedTo: 'balderstonkm@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: 'Russorv@state.gov'
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, January 11, 2010 3:20 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772560
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772560 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 3:20 PM
  To: 'balderstonkm@state.gov'
  Cc: 'Russorv@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Ben Feder
  Original Message
  From: Balderston, Kris M <BalderstonKM@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Mon Jan 11 15:04:47 2010
  Subject: RE: Ben Feder
  Rocco DiFazio - cell work
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 2:38 PM
  To: Balderston, Kris M
  Subject: Re: Ben Feder
  Can you also send me Rocco's #?
  Original Message
  From: Balderston, Kris M <BalderstonKM@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Mon Jan 11 12:43:16 2010
  Subject: Ben Feder
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772560 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772561
MetadataSubject: H: THE BOEHNER POLL. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-08T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0102/DOC_0C05772561/C05772561.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772561
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  sbwhoeop
  Friday, October 8, 2010 5:46 PM
  Re: H: The Boehner poll. Sid
  Yes will be at home after early rattner book party
  Sent via DROlD on Verizon Wireless
  Original message

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772561 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  sbwhoeop
  Friday, October 8, 2010 5:46 PM
  Re: H: The Boehner poll. Sid
  Yes will be at home after early rattner book party
  Sent via DROlD on Verizon Wireless
  Original message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: ;sbwhoeop <sbwhoeop(
  Sent: Fri, Oct 8, 2010 21:30:19 GMT-'-00:00
  Subject: Re: H: The Boehner poll. Sid
  Are you reachable by phone tonight?
  Original Messaae
  From: sbwhoeo
  To: H
  Sent: Fri Oct 08 16:08:27 2010
  Subject: H: The Boehner poll. Sid
  The Huiffington Post <http://www.huffinotorkpostcorn> <http2//www.huffir3gt±)npostcorn/>
  Drew Westen <httn://www.huffingtpimostcom/drew-westen>
  Psychologist and neuroscientist; Emory University Professor
  Posted: October 8, 2010 09:23 AM
  Bringing Up Boehner <httn://www.huffingtonpost.com/drew-
  westen/post 1034 b 755497.html>
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772561 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772561 Date: 08/31/2015
  According to news reports, today Republican minority leader and Coppertone model John
  Boehner will give his "closing argument" to the American people on why they should throw out
  the Democrats and kill the Obama-Pelosi-Reid "job-killing agenda." He will be returning to his
  working class roots, speaking at a piping manufacturing plant, an unusual venue these days for a
  man who is seen much more frequently at gatherings of Wall Street executives with open
  checkbooks and the males-only country club where he works on his tan when not making the
  rounds at other clubs with industry lobbyists.
  Either the Speaker-to-be is following the model of Michael Steele and ifree-lancing. or Karl Rove
  and the Republicans believe it is safe or even advantageous to bring him out in public after the
  White House made an effort to put Boehner's face on what a Republican majority might look
  like, with the president invoking his name eight times in one speech.
  I have to admit that at the time I was agnostic as to whether it made sense to try to brand him at
  this late date, as Boehner has minimal name recognition among voters. But the White House was
  no doubt responding to three realities.
  First, Buchner is an unknown to most Americans, which means that, unlike most Republicans in
  the news, he has not been well branded by the GOP -- which means for once Democrats might
  actually brand someone or something first rather than playing catch-up. Second, Boehner would
  indeed be the highest-ranking Republican were the GOP to assume control over the House (other
  than of course Karl Rove, who is now directing traffic on the right side of the street in
  Washington again). And third, a concrete face is always better than an abstraction when telling a
  story, and other than perhaps Sarah Palin, who Republicans could alternately accept and decline
  as the leader of their party, Boehner's tanned visage and history as errand-boy for virtually every
  major corporate special interest in his two decades in Washington (including his stint as the
  Marlboro Man, handing out tobacco lobby campaign checks to his fellow Republicans on the
  floor of the House) made him a potential counter-villain to the Republican's bogeywoman,
  Nancy Pelosi.
  I remained agnostic until, this week, when colleagues at Media Matters Action Network and I
  conducted a national messaging survey
  <httpiLiclogdfront.:qe0iamattei:sp..;.-Aior2sx,-m"static/ima.ges/pcifBranclip8Doehiler.pcjf> with 1,000
  registered voters, selected to match the demographics of the voting and likely voting populations.
  The goal was to see how effectively we could speak with voters about Boehner as not only the
  symbol and standard-bearer for the GOP but also the water-boy for corporate America. (The
  results were surprisingly similar whether we looked at registered voters or likely voters, although
  as others have described, precisely how to determine who is a "likely voter" in this election is as
  much art as science, and the point of good messaging at this point is actually to change the
  dynamics of likely voting, not just to reflect them.)
  As detailed in a memo published in Politico, what we found was clear: Boehner is a target well
  worth defining, who readily stands for precisely what Americans perceive to be the reasons they
  would have to hold their noses to vote for Congressional Republicans (perhaps the only group
  left who poll worse than Congressional Democrats with swing voters). We tested both
  paragraph-length narratives and single-sentence language designed to capture the essence of
  those narratives, and in each case, we tested them against the toughest opposition language we
  could test them against: the words of Boehner, Cantor, Limbaugh and others combined in
  defining the "Obama-Pelosi-Reid" agenda.
  What we found, in brief, is that we could beat a tough GOP narrative about the "job-killing"
  socialists in the White House and Congress by 1.5 to 20 points with two narratives starring
  Boehner in the leading role (with best supporting bad actor going in one of the narratives to Karl
  Rove and his corporate allies), and we could win with over 15 different sentence-long
  descriptions of "what's the matter with Boehner" with margins ranging from 10 to 60 points
  against a tough conservative attack on the Obama-Pelosi-Reid axis of conservative evil.
  The narratives that most moved likely voters -- including swing voters, who preferred them by
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772561 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772561 Date: 08/31/2015
  double-digits over tough Republican rhetoric -- made clear whose voices Boehner would be
  speaking for as Speaker (e.g., the Wall Street executives he convened to try to block Wall Street
  reform). They harnessed the same populist anger at the hijacking of Washington by corporate
  special interests that has enlivened the tea partiers and is palpable across the political spectrum,
  and they focused on the extremism of the party Boehner would Speak for. A narrative that
  brought Karl Rove into the picture was slightly more polarizing with swing voters but slightly
  more powerful with likely Democratic voters.
  In some ways what was most surprising was the success of the single-line statements of what we
  need in a Speaker and who John Boehner really speaks for (although these single-line statements
  came after the narratives, and likely reflect the power of branding, even over the course of a brief
  online encounter with voters). They ranged from relatively lofty and aspirational (e.g., "We need
  a Speaker who is also a listener, who can hear the voices of ordinary Americans" -- a theme
  colleagues and I found highly resonant across the political spectrum in message testing on the
  role of money in politics) -- to the harder-edged (e.g., "The Speaker of the House is a heartbeat
  away from the Presidency. Unfortunately, we know where John Boehner's heart is, and it isn't
  with the middle class,". or "John Boehner understands deficits. He's spent nearly 20 years in
  Washington creating them.")
  If there's a message in this message research, it is at once short-term and long-term. In the short
  run, if Democrats want to hang onto their seats in November, they would do well to define this
  election in terms of the middle class and small business versus the billionaires and big
  corporations that are hijacking our democracy; to use Boehner as a poster child for the party
  whose primary commitment is to the latter and whose tan is a testament to that commitment; and
  to avoid giving voters reason to regret their vote if they give it to Democrats again this time, by
  supporting the things they say they stand for and avoiding that golden mean between the public
  interest and the special interests that finance campaigns on both sides of the aisle.
  In the longer run, branding matters. One of the biggest strategic. and messaging mistakes of the
  last two years was the failure of Democrats to brand their opponents while their opponents were
  busy branding them -- and in particular the failure to brand the Bush Recess:ion as the natural
  consequence of failed Republican economic principles. Two years ago, that was a virtually
  uncontested political proposition, as the voters made clear in handing Democrats the White
  House and supermajorities in both the House and Senate. Today, the public is split down the
  middle as to who caused the recession.
  Reality doesn't brand itself Hopefully it won't take a debacle in November and another 10
  million jobs lost for reality to unveil itself again for a brief political moment and for progressives
  to have a second bite at the apple.
  <IiiT:t1getglite.comP2s—NAT>
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772561 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772562
MetadataSubject: BEN FEDER
MetadataTo: Russorv@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-11T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772562/C05772562.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Ben Feder
ExtractedTo: 'Russorv@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: 'balderstonkm@state.gov'
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, January 11, 2010 3:22 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772562
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772562 Date: 08/31/2015
  -
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 3:22 PM
  To: 'Russorv@state.gov'
  Cc: 'balderstonkm@state.gov'
  Subject: Fw: Ben Feder
  Original Message
  From: Balderston, Kris M <BalderstonKM@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Mon Jan 11 12:43:16 2010
  Subject: Ben Feder
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772562 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05772563
MetadataSubject: BEN FEDER
MetadataTo: Russorv@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-11T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0115/DOC_0C05772563/C05772563.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Ben Feder
ExtractedTo: 'Russorv@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Balderston, Kris M <BalderstonKM@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, January 11, 2010 3:27 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05772563
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Thanks.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772563 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 3:27 PM
  To: 'Russorv@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Ben Feder
  Thanks.
  Original Message
  From: Russo, Robert V <RussoRV@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Balderston, Kris M <BalderstonKM@state.gov>
  Sent: Mon Jan 11 15:25:38 2010
  Subject: RE: Ben Feder
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 3:22 PM
  To: Russo, Robert V
  Cc: Balderston, Kris M
  Subject: Fw: Ben Feder
  Original Message
  From: Balderston, Kris M <BalderstonKM@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Mon Jan 11 12:43:16 2010
  Subject: Ben Feder
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772563 Date: 08/31/2015



