# Emails

DocNumber: C05767355
MetadataSubject: BRAVO! BRAVA! ISSUE YOUR STATEMENT! SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-05T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0063/DOC_0C05767355/C05767355.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedCc: MillsCD@state.gov; Sullivanil@state.gov
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, February 5, 2010 6:58 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767355
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Northern Ireland agrees power-sharing deal
  Gordon Brown hails historic deal which will see justice and policing powers be devolved to Stormont from 12 April
  • Henry McDonald
  • quardian.co.uk, Friday 5 February 2010 11.42 GMT
  •
  Gordon Brown, the DUP leader, Peter Robinson, and Sinn Fein's Martin McGuinness (I to r) talk to the press after the
  Northern Ireland power-sharing deal was announced. Photograph: Julien Behal/PA
  Justice and policing powers will be devolved to Northern Ireland's power-sharing government from 12 April in a historic
  deal agreed by the main parties that "opens a new chapter" after decades of violence, Gordon Brown said today.
  Standing alongside his Irish counterpart, Brian Cowen, at a press conference at Hillsborough Castle outside Belfast, the
  prime minister said the "inspirational" agreement between Sinn Fein and the Democratic Unionist party (DUP) was a
  foundation for lasting peace.
  The deal — finally agreed to by the DUP last night and described as a final piece in the jigsaw after a long search for
  peace — comes after two weeks of round-the-clock negotiations and brings an end to fears that the power-sharing
  government might collapse.
  It will see policing and justice powers devolved from Westminster to the assembly within weeks and includes new plans
  on overseeing parades.
  Brown, who travelled to Belfast this morning, said the agreement had been possible because of "a new spirit of mutual co-
  operation and respect".
  The deal meets a key Sinn Fein demand and prevents the republican party from walking out of the power-sharing
  executive. In return, the DUP has secured reforms to the way loyalist marches are handled in Northern Ireland, including
  the abolition of the Parades Commission, a body most unionists regard as biased in favour of nationalists.
  A cross-community vote will now be held in the Stormont assembly on 9 March before the policing and justice powers are
  devolved from London on 12 April.
  Brown told reporters: "The achievements have been as great as they are inspirational. This moment and this agreement
  belongs to the people of Northern Ireland, all of the people, and now more than ever before so does their future ... This is
  the last chapter of a long and troubled story and the beginning of a new chapter after decades of violence, years of talks,
  weeks of stalemate."
  Cowen praised both unionists and nationalists for making "fair and balanced compromises" to bridge the divisions and
  said the quality of the negotiations meant that the "devolved institutions can and will work".
  The Northern Ireland secretary, Shaun Woodward, said the deal would further isolate republican dissidents who have
  launched three separate gun and bomb attacks against police stations in the province over the last 10 days. The deal
  would "absolutely" make Northern Ireland a safer place, he said.
  The DUP leader, Peter Robinson, said the agreement "will be more enduring because of the time spent" in forming it.
  Referring back to the Belfast Agreement of 1998 when negotiations bore fruit at the 11th hour, the Sinn Fein president,
  Gerry Adams, described the current deal and the rescue of power-sharing as "yet another very good Friday".
  Jeffrey Donaldson told the Guardian the DUP's 36-strong assembly team was now unanimously in favour of the deal.
  But the Ulster Unionist party (UUP) has yet to officially back the package which will allow the assembly to set up
  legislation to change the way parades are judged.
  A UUP spokeswoman said members wanted to see the proposed agreement before giving their response to the two
  governments. "We have not had sight of this agreement and until we do we will not be signing up to it," she said.
  The talks, which centred on Hillsborough Castle, outside Belfast, are the longest set of continuous negotiations held in the
  near 20-year peace process. Sinn Fein had accused the DUP of stalling on the transfer of policing powers for the last
  three years and it was feared that failure to find agreement could see the collapse of the power-sharing government led by
  the two parties.
  The agreement finally came near midnight at Stormont's parliament building. Earlier in the evening Sinn Fein had said the
  basis of a deal was on the table and it was giving the DUP leadership the time to persuade its party to accept it. Robinson
  emerged from a meeting of party colleagues to confirm that he had secured unanimous support for the proposals. Earlier
  in the week up to 14 DUP assembly members had opposed a proposed deal because it did not give unionists enough
  concessions.
  Robinson said he would now look to gain the support of the community and the smaller assembly parties for the deal. "We
  have a basis upon which we can go forward and recommend it [the deal] to our party, to the other parties in Northern
  Ireland and to the community.
  "An essential element of the Democratic Unionist Party's manifesto is the requirement for community confidence; we
  believe this can be the basis for gaining that confidence."
  However the leader of the hardline Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV), Jim Allister, questioned why the 14 DUP rebels had
  changed their minds.
  "The deal hasn't changed, only the snowmen of the DUP, who melted once the heat came on," Allister said.
  The DUP now faces a struggle to ward off the TUV threat in the forthcoming general election: Allister will portray the deal
  as a sell-out of unionist principles and a sop to republicanism.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767355 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Friday, February 5, 2010 6:58 AM
  To:
  Cc: MillsCD@state.gov; Sullivanil@state.gov
  Subject: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Northern Ireland agrees power-sharing deal
  Gordon Brown hails historic deal which will see justice and policing powers be devolved to Stormont from 12 April
  • Henry McDonald
  • quardian.co.uk, Friday 5 February 2010 11.42 GMT
  •
  Gordon Brown, the DUP leader, Peter Robinson, and Sinn Fein's Martin McGuinness (I to r) talk to the press after the
  Northern Ireland power-sharing deal was announced. Photograph: Julien Behal/PA
  Justice and policing powers will be devolved to Northern Ireland's power-sharing government from 12 April in a historic
  deal agreed by the main parties that "opens a new chapter" after decades of violence, Gordon Brown said today.
  Standing alongside his Irish counterpart, Brian Cowen, at a press conference at Hillsborough Castle outside Belfast, the
  prime minister said the "inspirational" agreement between Sinn Fein and the Democratic Unionist party (DUP) was a
  foundation for lasting peace.
  The deal — finally agreed to by the DUP last night and described as a final piece in the jigsaw after a long search for
  peace — comes after two weeks of round-the-clock negotiations and brings an end to fears that the power-sharing
  government might collapse.
  It will see policing and justice powers devolved from Westminster to the assembly within weeks and includes new plans
  on overseeing parades.
  Brown, who travelled to Belfast this morning, said the agreement had been possible because of "a new spirit of mutual co-
  operation and respect".
  The deal meets a key Sinn Fein demand and prevents the republican party from walking out of the power-sharing
  executive. In return, the DUP has secured reforms to the way loyalist marches are handled in Northern Ireland, including
  the abolition of the Parades Commission, a body most unionists regard as biased in favour of nationalists.
  A cross-community vote will now be held in the Stormont assembly on 9 March before the policing and justice powers are
  devolved from London on 12 April.
  Brown told reporters: "The achievements have been as great as they are inspirational. This moment and this agreement
  belongs to the people of Northern Ireland, all of the people, and now more than ever before so does their future ... This is
  the last chapter of a long and troubled story and the beginning of a new chapter after decades of violence, years of talks,
  weeks of stalemate."
  Cowen praised both unionists and nationalists for making "fair and balanced compromises" to bridge the divisions and
  said the quality of the negotiations meant that the "devolved institutions can and will work".
  The Northern Ireland secretary, Shaun Woodward, said the deal would further isolate republican dissidents who have
  launched three separate gun and bomb attacks against police stations in the province over the last 10 days. The deal
  would "absolutely" make Northern Ireland a safer place, he said.
  The DUP leader, Peter Robinson, said the agreement "will be more enduring because of the time spent" in forming it.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767355 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767355 Date: 08/31/2015
  Referring back to the Belfast Agreement of 1998 when negotiations bore fruit at the 11th hour, the Sinn Fein president,
  Gerry Adams, described the current deal and the rescue of power-sharing as "yet another very good Friday".
  Jeffrey Donaldson told the Guardian the DUP's 36-strong assembly team was now unanimously in favour of the deal.
  But the Ulster Unionist party (UUP) has yet to officially back the package which will allow the assembly to set up
  legislation to change the way parades are judged.
  A UUP spokeswoman said members wanted to see the proposed agreement before giving their response to the two
  governments. "We have not had sight of this agreement and until we do we will not be signing up to it," she said.
  The talks, which centred on Hillsborough Castle, outside Belfast, are the longest set of continuous negotiations held in the
  near 20-year peace process. Sinn Fein had accused the DUP of stalling on the transfer of policing powers for the last
  three years and it was feared that failure to find agreement could see the collapse of the power-sharing government led by
  the two parties.
  The agreement finally came near midnight at Stormont's parliament building. Earlier in the evening Sinn Fein had said the
  basis of a deal was on the table and it was giving the DUP leadership the time to persuade its party to accept it. Robinson
  emerged from a meeting of party colleagues to confirm that he had secured unanimous support for the proposals. Earlier
  in the week up to 14 DUP assembly members had opposed a proposed deal because it did not give unionists enough
  concessions.
  Robinson said he would now look to gain the support of the community and the smaller assembly parties for the deal. "We
  have a basis upon which we can go forward and recommend it [the deal] to our party, to the other parties in Northern
  Ireland and to the community.
  "An essential element of the Democratic Unionist Party's manifesto is the requirement for community confidence; we
  believe this can be the basis for gaining that confidence."
  However the leader of the hardline Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV), Jim Allister, questioned why the 14 DUP rebels had
  changed their minds.
  "The deal hasn't changed, only the snowmen of the DUP, who melted once the heat came on," Allister said.
  The DUP now faces a struggle to ward off the TUV threat in the forthcoming general election: Allister will portray the deal
  as a sell-out of unionist principles and a sop to republicanism.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767355 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767356
MetadataSubject: (REUTERS) CAR BOMB EXPLODES OUTSIDE NORTHERN IRISH COURT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-22T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767356/C05767356.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (Reuters) Car bomb explodes outside Northern Irish court
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob 1 <SullivanJ1@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, February 22, 2010 7:36 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767356
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: FYI. Seeking info.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767356 Date: 08/31/2015
  -
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob 1 <SullivanJ1@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 7:36 PM
  To: H
  Subject: Fw: (Reuters) Car bomb explodes outside Northern Irish court
  FYI. Seeking info.
  From: Johnson, Andrew Kim
  To: NEWS-EUR; NEWS-Mahogany
  Sent: Mon Feb 22 19:28:48 2010
  Subject: (Reuters) Car bomb explodes outside Northern Irish court
  BELFAST (Reuters) - A car bomb exploded outside a courthouse in the Northern Ireland border town of Newry on
  Monday, police said, in the latest of increasingly frequent attacks in the province. Police were in the process of
  evacuating people from the area when there was a large explosion in a car which left the vehicle ablaze close to the
  courthouse gates, a spokeswoman for the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) said.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767356 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767357
MetadataSubject: RIO GROUP-HAITI
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-22T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767357/C05767357.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: Rio Group-Haiti
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: McMullen, Christopher 1; De Pirro, Velia M
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, February 22, 2010 10:25 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767357
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Assume you know about this?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767357 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  1.4(B),B1,1.4(D)
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 10:25 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW: Rio Group-Haiti
  Assume you know about this?
  Original Message-----
  From: Simons, Paul E (Santiago)
  Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 9:33 PM
  To: Reynoso, Julissa; Mills, Cheryl D; Valenzuela, Arturo A; Curtis, Meghann A; Kelly, Craig A; Brigety, Reuben; Shannon,
  Thomas A
  Cc: McMullen, Christopher 1; De Pirro, Velia M
  Subject: Re: Rio Group-Haiti
  Julissa/Cheryl -- Per Foreign Minister Fernandez,
  Original Message ---- 1.4(B)
  From: Reynoso, Julissa 1.4(D)
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Valenzuela, Arturo A; Curtis, Meghann A; Kelly, Craig A; Brigety, Reuben; Shannon, Thomas A; B1
  Simons, Paul E (Santiago)
  Cc: McMullen, Christopher J; De Pirro, Velia M
  Sent: Mon Feb 22 23:03:06 2010
  Subject: Re: Rio Group-Haiti
  Including Tom Shannon and Paul Simons who know more.
  The position is not clearly defined. B1
  1.4(D)
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  To: Reynoso, Julissa; Valenzuela, Arturo A; Curtis, Meghann A; Kelly, Craig A; Brigety, Reuben
  Sent: Mon Feb 22 20:40:54 2010
  Subject: RE: Rio Group-Haiti
  What is the position? To whom does it report? What is the function?
  cdm
  Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 08/27/2015 — Class: CONFIDENTIAL — Reason: 1.4(B), 1.4(D) — Declassify
  on: 02/22/2020
  Original Message--
  From: Reynoso, Julissa
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767357 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767357 Date: 08/31/2015
  Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 7:57 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Valenzuela, Arturo A; Curtis, Meghann A; Kelly, Craig A; Brigety, Reuben
  Subject: Rio Group-Haiti
  Julissa
  1.4(D)
  B1
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767357 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767358
MetadataSubject: BARBARA HAIG - ALEXANDER HAIG'S DAUGHTER
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-22T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767358/C05767358.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Barbara Haig - Alexander Haig's daughter
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, February 22, 2010 10:48 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767358
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: It has been prepared- ready for your signature tomorrow.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767358 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 10:48 PM
  To:
  Subject Re: Barbara Haig - Alexander Haig's daughter
  It has been prepared- ready for your signature tomorrow.
  Original Message ---
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Mon Feb 22 22:17:40 2010
  Subject: Re: Barbara Haig - Alexander Haig's daughter
  Have I written the family a condolence letter?
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Mon Feb 22 17:12:32 2010
  Subject: Barbara Haig - Alexander Haig's daughter
  Barbara haig — Alexander Haig's daughter / Called to say thank you for the statement that you made. Her father really
  respected you. He would been so happy and humbled about what you said. Barbara works for the Nat'l Endowment
  for Democracy and says she is grateful for what a help you have been to them, too.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767358 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767359
MetadataSubject: SHANGHAI EXPO
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Balderston, Kris M
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-22T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767359/C05767359.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Shanghai Expo
ExtractedTo: H; markjpenn
ExtractedFrom: Balderston, Kris M <BalderstonKM@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Balderston, Kris M
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, February 22, 2010 11:02 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767359
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Mark
  Thnx for the offer to help on Expo. I can send you the full list tomorrow. Would be happy to download in the am.
  Dell, Intel, Microsoft (and about 20 others) all in but HP is not and Ford despite our best efforts keeps turning us down -
  they are the only major global auto company not represented in Shanghai (Blanchard and Gephardt going back at them
  yet again this week). Oracle, Alt, ADM, Monsanto, and financial and insurance companies among the other logical
  companies not in yet.
  Will call you in the am
  Kris

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767359 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Balderston, Kris M <BalderstonKM@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 11:02 PM
  To: H; markjpenn
  Subject: Re: Shanghai Expo
  Mark
  Thnx for the offer to help on Expo. I can send you the full list tomorrow. Would be happy to download in the am.
  Dell, Intel, Microsoft (and about 20 others) all in but HP is not and Ford despite our best efforts keeps turning us down -
  they are the only major global auto company not represented in Shanghai (Blanchard and Gephardt going back at them
  yet again this week). Oracle, Alt, ADM, Monsanto, and financial and insurance companies among the other logical
  companies not in yet.
  Will call you in the am
  Kris
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: 'markjpenr
  Cc: Balderston, Kris M
  Sent: Mon Feb 22 22:17:03 2010
  Subject: Re: Shanghai Expo
  Mark--thanks for the offer of help. I'd appreciate anything you can to do assist w the completion of the American
  Pavilion. I am copying Kris Balderston, who is working on the Expo project for me, and asking him to contact you to
  follow up. All the best.
  Original Message
  From: Mark J. Penn
  To: H
  Sent: Mon Feb 22 17:21:09 2010
  Subject: Shanghai Expo
  Wondering why no one called me since I have probably 20 clients from Ford, Microsoft, Intel, HP, Dell all very interested
  in Shanghai Expo as well as 100 people in China.
  Kind of late but happy to help if someone still needs anything.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767359 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767360
MetadataSubject: (REUTERS) CAR BOMB EXPLODES OUTSIDE NORTHERN IRISH COURT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-22T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767360/C05767360.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: (Reuters) Car bomb explodes outside Northern Irish court
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, February 22, 2010 11:08 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767360
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Not yet. Will keep tabs.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767360 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 11:08 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: (Reuters) Car bomb explodes outside Northern Irish court
  Not yet. Will keep tabs.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Sullivan, Jacob
  Sent: Mon Feb 22 21:28:46 2010
  Subject: Re: (Reuters) Car bomb explodes outside Northern Irish court
  Did anyone claim responsibility?
  Original Message
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J<Sullivan.11@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Mon Feb 22 19:35:37 2010
  Subject: Fw: (Reuters) Car bomb explodes outside Northern Irish court
  FYI. Seeking info.
  From: Johnson, Andrew Kim
  To: NEWS-EUR; NEWS-Mahogany
  Sent: Mon Feb 22 19:28:48 2010
  Subject: (Reuters) Car bomb explodes outside Northern Irish court
  BELFAST (Reuters) - A car bomb exploded outside a courthouse in the Northern Ireland border town of Newry on
  Monday, police said, in the latest of increasingly frequent attacks in the province. Police were in the process of
  evacuating people from the area when there was a large explosion in a car which left the vehicle ablaze close to the
  courthouse gates, a spokeswoman for the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) said.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767360 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767361
MetadataSubject: BRAVO! BRAVA! ISSUE YOUR STATEMENT! SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-05T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0063/DOC_0C05767361/C05767361.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCc: MillsCD@state.gov <MillsCD@state.gov>; Sullivann@state.gov <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767361
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  sbwhoeop
  Friday, February 5, 2010 7:11 AM
  H
  Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Will find out. Why not invite uk and irish ambassadors to State to brief press with you today?
  Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767361 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  sbwhoeop
  Friday, February 5, 2010 7:11 AM
  H
  Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Will find out. Why not invite uk and irish ambassadors to State to brief press with you today?
  Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 07:06:39
  To: 'sbwhoeop
  Subject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  I will be doing a press event at 8:30. Do you know if Gordon mentioned me? Can you find out? Is Shaun still coming
  Monday? If so, I want to take you both out to dinner!
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Cc: MillsCD@state.gov <MillsCD@state.gov>; Sullivann@state.gov <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 06:58:04 2010
  Subject: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Northern Ireland agrees power-sharing deal
  Gordon Brown hails historic deal which will see justice and policing powers be devolved to Stormont from 12 April
  * Henry McDonald <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/henrymcdonald>
  * guardian.co.uk <http://www.guardian.co.ukh , Friday 5 February 2010 11.42 GMT
  *
  <http://www.guardian.co.uk/help/accessibility>
  Gordon Brown, Peter Robinson and Martin McGuinness <http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-
  images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/2/5/1265368562294/Gordon-Brown-Peter-Robins-001.jpg>
  Gordon Brown, the DUP leader, Peter Robinson, and Sinn Fein's Martin McGuinness (I to r) talk to the press after the
  Northern Ireland power-sharing deal was announced. Photograph: Julien Behal/PA
  Justice and policing powers will be devolved to Northern Ireland <http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/northernireland> 's
  power-sharing government from 12 April in a historic deal agreed by the main parties that "opens a new chapter" after
  decades of violence, Gordon Brown said today.
  Standing alongside his Irish counterpart, Brian Cowen, at a press conference at Hillsborough Castle outside Belfast, the
  prime minister said the "inspirational" agreement between Sinn Fein <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/sinn-fein>
  and the Democratic Unionist party (DUP) <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/dup> was a foundation for lasting peace.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767361 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767361 Date: 08/31/2015
  The deal — finally agreed to by the DUP <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/feb/05/northern-ireland-dup-ulster-
  deal> last night and described as a final piece in the jigsaw after a long search for peace — comes after two weeks of
  round-the-clock negotiations and brings an end to fears that the power-sharing government might collapse.
  It will see policing and justice powers devolved from Westminster to the assembly within weeks and includes new plans
  on overseeing parades.
  Brown, who travelled to Belfast this morning, said the agreement had been possible because of "a new spirit of mutual
  co-operation and respect".
  The deal meets a key Sinn Fein demand and prevents the republican party from walking out of the power-sharing
  executive. In return, the DUP has secured reforms to the way loyalist marches are handled in Northern Ireland, including
  the abolition of the Parades Commission, a body most unionists regard as biased in favour of nationalists.
  A cross-community vote will now be held in the Stormont assembly on 9 March before the policing and justice powers
  are devolved from London on 12 April.
  Brown told reporters: "The achievements have been as great as they are inspirational. This moment and this agreement
  belongs to the people of Northern Ireland, all of the people, and now more than ever before so does their future ... This
  is the last chapter of a long and troubled story and the beginning of a new chapter after decades of violence, years of
  talks, weeks of stalemate."
  Cowen praised both unionists and nationalists for making "fair and balanced compromises" to bridge the divisions and
  said the quality of the negotiations meant that the "devolved institutions can and will work".
  The Northern Ireland secretary, Shaun Woodward, said the deal would further isolate republican dissidents who have
  launched three separate gun and bomb attacks against police stations in the province over the last 10 days. The deal
  would "absolutely" make Northern Ireland a safer place, he said.
  The DUP leader, Peter Robinson, said the agreement "will be more enduring because of the time spent" in forming it.
  Referring back to the Belfast Agreement of 1998 <http://www.nio.gov.uk/the-agreement> when negotiations bore fruit
  at the 11th hour, the Sinn Fein president, Gerry Adams, described the current deal and the rescue of power-sharing as
  "yet another very good Friday".
  Jeffrey Donaldson told the Guardian the DUP's 36-strong assembly team was now unanimously in favour of the deal.
  But the Ulster Unionist party (UUP) has yet to officially back the package which will allow the assembly to set up
  legislation to change the way parades are judged.
  A UUP spokeswoman said members wanted to see the proposed agreement before giving their response to the two
  governments. "We have not had sight of this agreement and until we do we will not be signing up to it," she said.
  The talks, which centred on Hillsborough Castle, outside Belfast, are the longest set of continuous negotiations held in
  the near 20-year peace process. Sinn Fein had accused the DUP of stalling on the transfer of policing powers for the last
  three years and it was feared that failure to find agreement could see the collapse of the power-sharing government led
  by the two parties.
  The agreement finally came near midnight at Stormont's parliament building. Earlier in the evening Sinn Fein had said
  the basis of a deal was on the table and it was giving the DUP leadership the time to persuade its party to accept it.
  Robinson emerged from a meeting of party colleagues to confirm that he had secured unanimous support for the
  proposals. Earlier in the week up to 14 DUP assembly members had opposed a proposed deal because it did not give
  unionists enough concessions.
  Robinson said he would now look to gain the support of the community and the smaller assembly parties for the deal.
  "We have a basis upon which we can go forward and recommend it [the deal] to our party, to the other parties in
  Northern Ireland and to the community.
  "An essential element of the Democratic Unionist Party's manifesto is the requirement for community confidence; we
  believe this can be the basis for gaining that confidence."
  However the leader of the hardline Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV), Jim Allister, questioned why the 14 DUP rebels had
  changed their minds.
  "The deal hasn't changed, only the snowmen of the DUP, who melted once the heat came on," Allister said.
  The DUP now faces a struggle to ward off the TUV threat in the forthcoming general election. Allister will portray the
  deal as a sell-out of unionist principles and a sop to republicanism.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767361 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767362
MetadataSubject: BRAVO! BRAVA! ISSUE YOUR STATEMENT! SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-05T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0063/DOC_0C05767362/C05767362.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedCc: MillsCD@state.gov <MillsCD@state.gov>; SullivanJJ@state.gov <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, February 5, 2010 7:15 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767362
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Take credit and announce Kelly taking next step, etc Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767362 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Friday, February 5, 2010 7:15 AM
  To:
  Subject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Take credit and announce Kelly taking next step, etc Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 07:06:39
  To: 'sbwhoeop
  Subject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  I will be doing a press event at 8:30. Do you know if Gordon mentioned me? Can you find out? Is Shaun still coming
  Monday? If so, I want to take you both out to dinner!
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Cc: MillsCD@state.gov <MillsCD@state.gov>; SullivanJJ@state.gov <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 06:58:04 2010
  Subject: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Northern Ireland agrees power-sharing deal
  Gordon Brown hails historic deal which will see justice and policing powers be devolved to Stormont from 12 April
  * Henry McDonald <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/henrymcdonald>
  * guardian.co.uk <http://www.guardian.co.uk/>, Friday 5 February 2010 11.42 GMT
  <http://www.guardian.co.uk/help/accessibility>
  Gordon Brown, Peter Robinson and Martin McGuinness <http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-
  images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/2/5/1265368562294/Gordon-Brown-Peter-Robins-001.jpg>
  Gordon Brown, the DUP leader, Peter Robinson, and Sinn Fein's Martin McGuinness (I to r) talk to the press after the
  Northern Ireland power-sharing deal was announced. Photograph: Julien Behal/PA
  Justice and policing powers will be devolved to Northern Ireland <http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/northernireland> 's
  power-sharing government from 12 April in a historic deal agreed by the main parties that "opens a new chapter" after
  decades of violence, Gordon Brown said today.
  Standing alongside his Irish counterpart, Brian Cowen, at a press conference at Hillsborough Castle outside Belfast, the
  prime minister said the "inspirational" agreement between Sinn Fein <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/sinn-fein>
  and the Democratic Unionist party (DUP) <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/dup> was a foundation for lasting peace.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767362 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767362 Date: 08/31/2015
  The deal — finally agreed to by the DUP <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/feb/05/northern-ireland-dup-ulster-
  deal> last night and described as a final piece in the jigsaw after a long search for peace — comes after two weeks of
  round-the-clock negotiations and brings an end to fears that the power-sharing government might collapse.
  It will see policing and justice powers devolved from Westminster to the assembly within weeks and includes new plans
  on overseeing parades.
  Brown, who travelled to Belfast this morning, said the agreement had been possible because of "a new spirit of mutual
  co-operation and respect".
  The deal meets a key Sinn Fein demand and prevents the republican party from walking out of the power-sharing
  executive. In return, the DUP has secured reforms to the way loyalist marches are handled in Northern Ireland, including
  the abolition of the Parades Commission, a body most unionists regard as biased in favour of nationalists.
  A cross-community vote will now be held in the Stormont assembly on 9 March before the policing and justice powers
  are devolved from London on 12 April.
  Brown told reporters: "The achievements have been as great as they are inspirational. This moment and this agreement
  belongs to the people of Northern Ireland, all of the people, and now more than ever before so does their future ... This
  is the last chapter of a long and troubled story and the beginning of a new chapter after decades of violence, years of
  talks, weeks of stalemate."
  Cowen praised both unionists and nationalists for making "fair and balanced compromises" to bridge the divisions and
  said the quality of the negotiations meant that the "devolved institutions can and will work".
  The Northern Ireland secretary, Shaun Woodward, said the deal would further isolate republican dissidents who have
  launched three separate gun and bomb attacks against police stations in the province over the last 10 days. The deal
  would "absolutely" make Northern Ireland a safer place, he said.
  The DUP leader, Peter Robinson, said the agreement "will be more enduring because of the time spent" in forming it.
  Referring back to the Belfast Agreement of 1998 <http://www.nio.gov.uk/the-agreement> when negotiations bore fruit
  at the 11th hour, the Sinn Fein president, Gerry Adams, described the current deal and the rescue of power-sharing as
  "yet another very good Friday".
  Jeffrey Donaldson told the Guardian the DUP's 36-strong assembly team was now unanimously in favour of the deal.
  But the Ulster Unionist party (UUP) has yet to officially back the package which will allow the assembly to set up
  legislation to change the way parades are judged.
  A UUP spokeswoman said members wanted to see the proposed agreement before giving their response to the two
  governments. "We have not had sight of this agreement and until we do we will not be signing up to it," she said.
  The talks, which centred on Hillsborough Castle, outside Belfast, are the longest set of continuous negotiations held in
  the near 20-year peace process. Sinn Fein had accused the DUP of stalling on the transfer of policing powers for the last
  three years and it was feared that failure to find agreement could see the collapse of the power-sharing government led
  by the two parties.
  The agreement finally came near midnight at Stormont's parliament building. Earlier in the evening Sinn Fein had said
  the basis of a deal was on the table and it was giving the DUP leadership the time to persuade its party to accept it.
  Robinson emerged from a meeting of party colleagues to confirm that he had secured unanimous support for the
  proposals. Earlier in the week up to 14 DUP assembly members had opposed a proposed deal because it did not give
  unionists enough concessions.
  Robinson said he would now look to gain the support of the community and the smaller assembly parties for the deal.
  "We have a basis upon which we can go forward and recommend it [the deal] to our party, to the other parties in
  Northern Ireland and to the community.
  "An essential element of the Democratic Unionist Party's manifesto is the requirement for community confidence; we
  believe this can be the basis for gaining that confidence."
  However the leader of the hardline Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV), Jim Allister, questioned why the 14 DUP rebels had
  changed their minds.
  "The deal hasn't changed, only the snowmen of the DUP, who melted once the heat came on," Allister said.
  The DUP now faces a struggle to ward off the TUV threat in the forthcoming general election. Allister will portray the
  deal as a sell-out of unionist principles and a sop to republicanism.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767362 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767363
MetadataSubject: TV TALK SHOWS' SUMMARY - FEBRUARY 21-22 2010
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: McHale, Judith A
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-23T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767363/C05767363.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: TV Talk Shows' Summary - February 21-22, 2010
ExtractedTo: H; Reines, Philippe I; Holbrooke, Richard C
ExtractedFrom: McHale, Judith A <McHaleJA@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Schwartz, Larry; Gill, Muazzam; Wade, Joseph W (Peshawar)
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 6:52 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767363
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Interesting. Slight change of tone.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767363 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: McHale, Judith A <McHaleJA@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 6:52 AM
  To: H; Reines, Philippe I; Holbrooke, Richard C
  Subject FW: TV Talk Shows' Summary - February 21-22, 2010
  Interesting. Slight change of tone.
  From: Baber, Suhail On Behalf Of Islamabad, Information Section
  Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 6:23 AM
  To: Snelsire, Richard W
  Cc: Schwartz, Larry; Gill, Muazzam; Wade, Joseph W (Peshawar)
  Subject: TV Talk Shows' Summary - February 21-22, 2010
  TV Talk Shows' Summary
  February 21-22, 2010
  Program: "Policy Matters" Dunya TV (01/22)
  Host: Nasim Zehra
  Participants: Hussain Haqqani (Pakistani Ambassador To United States)
  Topic: Future Of Pak-U.S. Relations
  Host: It is a common perception that you had advised the American authorities to include some clauses in the
  Kerry-Lugar Bill which were deemed against the armed forces of Pakistan. Did your recent meetings with Army
  Chief General Kayani and DG Inter-Services Intelligence (151), Lt. General Ahmed Shuja Pasha, improved your
  strained relations with these military leaders?
  Hussain Haqqani: I have never had bad relations with the military. I had played no role in the draft of the
  Kerry-Lugar Bill. It was the Pakistani media which spread such rumors.
  Host: In your recent book, you had suggested the U.S. government to link the financial assistance with the
  civilian control over the Pakistan Army.
  Hussain Haqqani: I had written it in the perspective of Pakistan's situation in 2005.1 argued that if the U.S.
  wanted to maintain its influence in Pakistan, it should use its aid to stabilize the democratic institutions in the
  country rather than supporting the Musharraf regime.
  Host: But you had also alleged that the ISI was providing support and protection to the Taliban.
  Hussain Haqqani: You need to understand that everything has some specific perspective. The ISI is playing a
  very important role in the national security of Pakistan, but a policy changes with a change in the
  circumstances under which it was formulated. At that time, the Taliban were being considered as friends of
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767363 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767363 Date: 08/31/2015
  Pakistan but later they became a potential threat to our national security. Hence, we were left with no other
  option but to abandon them.
  Host: What was wrong with the Kerry-Lugar Bill? Why was it so vehemently opposed by the Pakistani masses
  and the armed forces? As the Ambassador of Pakistan, had you expressed any reservations and concerns
  during the preparation of this legislation?
  Hussain Haqqani: During the drafting of the Kerry-Lugar Bill, I sent as many as 35 telegrams to the Foreign
  Office and other concerned institutions including the armed forces. I was against attaching even a single string
  to this aid package, and urged that all the assistance for Pakistan should be unconditional. Americans wanted
  us to hand Dr. Abdul Qadeer Khan over to them for investigation but we made it clear that it would never be
  possible for us, and that this chapter had been closed. Similarly, we rejected the U.S. demand to link the aid
  with the performance of our institutions.
  Host: But at that time, you said that the Pakistanis had failed to understand the benefits of Kerry-Lugar Bill
  because they do not know English language.
  Hussain Haqqani: It was just a joke. However, I want to make it clear that the Kerry-Lugar Bill is a U.S.
  legislation. It is not an agreement between the two countries and, therefore, is not binding upon us.
  Host: Do you think that a donor country has the right to monitor the performance of the national institutions
  of the recipient country?
  Hussain Haqqani: During the visit of Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi, the explanatory note by the
  U.S. Congress diluted this condition.
  Host: According to some reports, you have issued visas to the Blackwater personnel and some other
  Americans who pose a threat to our national security while the Pakistani intelligence agencies had expressed
  reservations in this regard.
  Hussain Haqqani: It is a grave misunderstanding. Everyone knows that the issuance of visas is not the
  prerogative of an ambassador. The interior ministry gives approval for working visas which also consults the
  military authorities on certain issues relating to the security of the country. So far, I have never interfered in
  any visa case. I utilize all my energies to lobby for Pakistan. The DynaCorp was allowed to work in Pakistan,
  and its owner is a close friend of former President Pervez Musharraf.
  Host: Presently, how many U.S. security agencies are operating in Pakistan?
  Hussain Haqqani: I think that that DynaCorp and Wakenhut are working in the country but there is no
  evidence regarding the presence of other companies.
  Host: Will the U.S. give us drone technology?
  Hussain Haqqani: Currently, they are offering drone technology for surveillance purposes.
  Host: The drone attacks in Pakistan kill innocent people including women and children. Do the American
  masses protest these attacks?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767363 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767363 Date: 08/31/2015
  Hussain Haqqani: Yes, they also protest over these attacks. We want there should not be anti-Pakistan
  elements in the future Afghan government and the U.S. understands our point of view.
  Host: What is the latest situation of Dr. Aafia case?
  Hussain Haqqani: We have done our level best, and are still doing, on the diplomatic and legal fronts for the
  early release of Dr. Aafia Siddiqui. No doubt, we had to suffer a setback on the legal grounds but we are still
  working on other option which cannot be made public at this time.
  Program: "Meray Mutabiq" Geo TV (01/21)
  Host: Dr. Shahid Masood
  Participants: Mushahid Hussain Syed (PML-Q); Lt. Gen Hameed Gul (Former Head ISI)
  Topic: Americans Increase Frequency Of Their Visits To Pakistan; Why?
  Host: At a time when the PPP government is facing gigantic problems and crises at home, what are the real
  motives of Americans' visits to Pakistan? These U.S. dignitaries also go the GHQ in Rawalpindi and meet with
  high-ranking military officials. Which institution is the actual policy-maker in Pakistan?
  Mushahid Hussain: I think the regional geopolitical situation has changed, and still changing, in Pakistan's
  favor. The U.S. economy and Afghanistan are the two cornerstones of President Barack Obama's strategy. For
  the former, he needs china's help, and for the latter he depends upon Pakistan. Now, instead of G-7, the G-2,
  China and the United States, has become the focus of international economic discussion. It means that, for the
  first time, Washington has recognized Beijing as an equal partner, at least in the economic sector. China is our
  time-tested friend, in other words, the regional situation is changing in our favor. The present Pakistani
  government is incompetent and has no strategy to skillfully use this opportunity. Hence, I do not think that the
  Americans will support it.
  Host: The U.S. has been entangled in the Afghan quagmire. There are reports that the U.S. negotiating with
  the Taliban. Has the U.S. taken Saudi Arabia and Pakistan on board, or it is directly talking to the Taliban?
  Hameed Gul: At present, no dialogue is underway between Taliban and the U.S., neither directly nor indirectly,
  because Washington has refused to give the deadline for withdrawal of its troops from Afghanistan. In fact,
  India is exerting pressure on the U.S. to avoid withdrawing its troops because New Delhi has invested sums in
  Afghanistan. Besides, it has also strategic interests there. But Americans can no longer afford to continue their
  military presence in this country therefore India fear that it would be the prime loser in case the foreign forces
  withdraw from Afghanistan. The U.S. military defeat at the hands of the Taliban has provided Pakistan a
  golden opportunity. To face the Indian threat, we are in dire need of a safe and peaceful border in our west.
  Mushahid Hussain: We need to be very careful at this moment. Our blind support for the Afghan Taliban may
  alienate Iran, Turkey and China, all our best friends, who fear that the establishment of a extremist religious
  regime will have serious repercussions for their own security. To avoid such an eventuality, these countries
  may opt to join the Indian camp. Hence, we will have to take all the stakeholders on board while formulating
  our future strategy regarding the post-war Afghanistan.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767363 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767363 Date: 08/31/2015
  Program: "Jawab Deyh" Geo TV (02/21)
  Host: lftikhar Ahmed
  Participants: Lt. Gen (R) Nishat Ahmed (Defense Analyst); Dr Hassan Askari (Analyst)
  Topic: U.S. Role In Pak-India Dialogue
  Host: It seems that India has offered to resume peace negotiations with Pakistan under the U.S. pressure. Is it
  reality? Do you have any evidence in this regard?
  Dr Hassan Askari: Washington and London have been working to convince Pakistan and India to resume talks
  in order to remove their mutual misunderstandings. At present, the U.S. enjoys cordial relations with both
  India and Pakistan. Particularly, since 2005, Washington is in better position to give advice to New Delhi on
  regional and global issues. I think that the fast-changing geopolitical situation in Afghanistan has prompted
  India to reduce tension in its relations with Pakistan through dialogue. Moreover, the U.S. thinks that Pakistan
  cannot fully concentrate on its border with Afghanistan, which is vital to win the war against terrorism, unless
  its eastern borders are not secured. Hence, the perception, that the U.S. is behind the Indian offer of dialogue,
  holds water and cannot be dismissed as mere a speculation.
  Host: Do you think that the U.S. understands our concerns regarding the Indian threat on our eastern border?
  Lt. Gen (R) Nishat Ahmed: Washington and its allies want that Pakistan should deploy its full military power on
  its western border in order to deal with the menace of terrorism. I think that the government as well as the
  military leadership of Pakistan have succeeded in convincing the U.S. that our country faces serious and
  potential threat from its eastern neighbor, India. Hence, it would be impossible for us to fully concentrate on
  the war against terrorism as long as the Indian threat on our eastern border is not eliminated, or at least not
  reduced. The entire world knows that Pakistan has always been attacked from its eastern border while India
  even played pivotal role in the dismemberment of Pakistan in 1971. Hence, I think that the U.S. and its allies
  convinced New Delhi that it would be in its own interest to hold dialogue with Islamabad.
  The following programs were also monitored, but as they dealt with domestic issues, therefore, were not
  summarized:
  Program: "Crisis Cell" Geo TV (01/22)
  Host: Sana Buchcha
  Participants: Khawaja Asif (PML-N); Yasir Hashmi (Psychologist); Musharraf Zaidi (Analyst)
  Topic: Growing Confrontation Between PPP & PML-N
  Program: "Front Line" Express TV (02/21)
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767363 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767363 Date: 08/31/2015
  Host: Kamran Shahid
  Participants: Shakeel Awan (PML-N); Sheikh Rasheed (AML); Dr. Kamal (Jamaat-i-Islami)
  Topic: By-Elections In Rawalpindi
  Program: "Meray Mutabiq" Geo TV (02/21)
  Host: Dr. Shahid Masood
  Participants: Faisal Raza Abidi (PPP); Insar Abbasi (Investigative Reporter The News)
  Topic: Swiss Cases And Immunity To President Asif Zardari
  Program: "In Session" Dunya TV (02/21)
  Host: Asma Chaudhry
  Participants: Kashmala Tariq (PML-Q); Asma Arbab Alamgir (PPP); Khurram Dastgir (PML-N)
  Topic: An Overview Of Government's Performance
  Monitored by Info Office
  Public Affairs Section
  U.S. Embassy Islamabad
  Pakistan
  htto://islamabad.usembassy.gov
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767363 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767364
MetadataSubject: RIO GROUP-HAITI
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-23T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767364/C05767364.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCc: McMullen, Christopher J; De Pirro, Velia M
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767364
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Fyi below
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
  Tuesday, February 23, 2010 7:38 AM
  FW: Rio Group-Haiti
  Declassify on: 02/23/2020

RawText:
  The position is not clearly defined.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767364 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B1,1.4(B),1.4(D)
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Fyi below
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
  Tuesday, February 23, 2010 7:38 AM
  FW: Rio Group-Haiti
  Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 08/27/2015 — Class: CONFIDENTIAL — Reason: 1.4(B), 1.4(D) —
  Declassify on: 02/23/2020
  Original Message----
  From: Simons, Paul E (Santiago)
  Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 6:08 AM
  To: Reynoso, Julissa; Mills, Cheryl D; Valenzuela, Arturo A; Curtis, Meghann A; Kelly, Craig A; Brigety, Reuben; Shannon,
  Thomas A
  Cc: McMullen, Christopher J; De Pirro, Velia M
  Subject: Re: Rio Group-Haiti
  Reinforcing my note yesterday on the high side,
  B1
  1.4(B)
  1 4(C)
  Original Message
  From: Simons, Paul E (Santiago)
  To: Reynoso, Julissa; Mills, Cheryl D; Valenzuela, Arturo A; Curtis, Meghann A; Kelly, Craig A; Brigety, Reuben; Shannon,
  Thomas A
  1.4(B)
  Cc: McMullen, Christopher J; De Pirro, Velia M
  1.4(D)
  Sent: Mon Feb 22 23:32:44 2010
  B1
  Subject: Re: Rio Group-Haiti
  Julissa/Cheryl Per Foreign Minister Fernandez,'
  Original Message
  From: Reynoso, Julissa
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Valenzuela, Arturo A; Curtis, Meghann A; Kelly, Craig A; Brigety, Reuben; Shannon, Thomas A;
  Simons, Paul E (Santiago)
  Cc: McMullen, Christopher J; De Pirro, Velia M
  Sent: Mon Feb 22 23:03:06 2010
  Subject: Re: Rio Group-Haiti
  1.4(D)
  B1
  Including Tom Shannon and Paul Simons who know more.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767364 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767364 Date: 08/31/2015
  Original Message ----
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  To: Reynoso, Julissa; Valenzuela, Arturo A; Curtis, Meghann A; Kelly, Craig A; Brigety, Reuben
  Sent: Mon Feb 22 20:40:54 2010
  Subject: RE: Rio Group-Haiti
  What is the position? To whom does it report? What is the function?
  cdm
  Original Message
  From: Reynoso, Julissa
  Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 7:57 PM 1.4(D)
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Valenzuela, Arturo A; Curtis, Meghann A; Kelly, Craig A; Brigety, Reuben B1
  Subject: Rio Group-Haiti
  Julissa
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767364 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767365
MetadataSubject: WITTEN STATEMENT NOW?
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: PIR
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-05T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0063/DOC_0C05767365/C05767365.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Witten statement now?
ExtractedTo: H; Jake Sullivan; Huma Abedin
ExtractedFrom: PIR <preines(
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, February 5, 2010 7:17 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767365
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Yes, will connect with Jake now on remarks as prepared
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767365 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: PIR <preines(
  Sent: Friday, February 5, 2010 7:17 AM
  To: H; Jake Sullivan; Huma Abedin
  Subject: Re: Witten statement now?
  Yes, will connect with Jake now on remarks as prepared
  Original Message
  From: Evergreen
  To: Jake Sullivan
  To: PIR
  To: Huma Abed in
  Subject: Witten statement now?
  Sent: Feb 5, 2010 7:15 AM
  I'd like to be first w statement on behalf of USG. Can we do asap and then repeat on camera?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767365 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767366
MetadataSubject: TODAY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Valmoro, Lona J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-23T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767366/C05767366.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Today
ExtractedTo: H; Huma Abedin
ExtractedFrom: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 7:50 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767366
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  I am checking on Bill Burns right now -- Huma has the best update on the WH tonight. Sid knows we may need to push
  dinner a bit too.
  Lona Valmoro
  Special Assistant to the Secretary of State
  (202) 647-9071 (direct)

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767366 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 7:50 AM
  To: H; Huma Abedin
  Subject: Re: Today
  I am checking on Bill Burns right now -- Huma has the best update on the WH tonight. Sid knows we may need to push
  dinner a bit too.
  Lona Valmoro
  Special Assistant to the Secretary of State
  (202) 647-9071 (direct)
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Valmoro, Lona J; Huma Abedin <Huma@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Tue Feb 23 07:25:35 2010
  Subject: Today
  Is the UAE FM is meeting.w Bill Burns before my lunch w him? If so when and where?
  What happened to the idea of my going by dinner at WH? Any other way I could see the CEOs who will be here?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767366 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767367
MetadataSubject: TODAY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Valmoro, Lona J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-23T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767367/C05767367.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Today
ExtractedTo: H; Huma Abedin
ExtractedFrom: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 8:02 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767367
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  UAE with Bill -- 11:15am-11:45am in Bill's office. You could join after you finish up with Shaun Woodward at 11:30am.
  Lunch with UAE starts at 12pm.
  Lona Valmoro
  Special Assistant to the Secretary of State
  (202) 647-9071 (direct)

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767367 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 8:02 AM
  To: H; Huma Abedin
  Subject Re: Today
  UAE with Bill -- 11:15am-11:45am in Bill's office. You could join after you finish up with Shaun Woodward at 11:30am.
  Lunch with UAE starts at 12pm.
  Lona Valmoro
  Special Assistant to the Secretary of State
  (202) 647-9071 (direct)
  Original Message ----
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Valmoro, Lona J; Huma Abedin <Huma@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Tue Feb 23 07:25:35 2010
  Subject: Today
  Is the UAE FM is meeting w Bill Burns before my lunch w him? If so when and where?
  What happened to the idea of my going by dinner at WH? Any other way I could see the CEOs who will be here?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767367 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767369
MetadataSubject: BRAVO! BRAVA! ISSUE YOUR STATEMENT! SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-05T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0063/DOC_0C05767369/C05767369.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacobi <Sullivanii@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: MillsCD@state.gov <MillsCD@state.gov>; Sullivanii@state.gov <Sullivanii@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, February 5, 2010 7:17 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767369
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Pretty good stuff!
  Robinson and McG have confirmed to speak with you.
  In his remarks, Brown indicated that you would host an investment conference this spring. Declan believes this is much
  too soon. We might try to steer it to you meeting with Robinson and McG this spring — ie in a few weeks time -- with an
  eye toward an investment conference once it is well prepared.
  I think we are okay waiting an hour to do the statement, but we'll work to get excerpts out. Kamala announced that you
  are speaking at 830.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767369 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Sullivan, Jacobi <Sullivanii@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, February 5, 2010 7:17 AM
  To:
  Subject Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Pretty good stuff!
  Robinson and McG have confirmed to speak with you.
  In his remarks, Brown indicated that you would host an investment conference this spring. Declan believes this is much
  too soon. We might try to steer it to you meeting with Robinson and McG this spring — ie in a few weeks time -- with an
  eye toward an investment conference once it is well prepared.
  I think we are okay waiting an hour to do the statement, but we'll work to get excerpts out. Kamala announced that you
  are speaking at 830.
  Original Message ---
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Sullivan, Jacob
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 07:12:32 2010
  Subject: Fw: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Reaction?
  Original Message ---
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 07:10:49 2010
  Subject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Will find out. Why not invite uk and irish ambassadors to State to brief press with you today?
  Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Date: Fri, 5 Feb 201007:06:39
  To: 'sbwhoeop
  Subject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  I will be doing a press event at 8:30. Do you know if Gordon mentioned me? Can you find out? Is Shaun still coming
  Monday? If so, I want to take you both out to dinner!
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Cc: MillsCD@state.gov <MillsCD@state.gov>; Sullivanii@state.gov <Sullivanii@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 06:58:04 2010
  Subject: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767369 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767369 Date: 08/31/2015
  Northern Ireland agrees power-sharing deal
  Gordon Brown hails historic deal which will see justice and policing powers be devolved to Stormont from 12 April
  * Henry McDonald <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/henrymcdonald>
  * guardian.co.uk <http://www.guardian.co.uk/>, Friday 5 February 2010 11.42 GMT
  <http://www.guardian.co.uk/help/accessibility>
  Gordon Brown, Peter Robinson and Martin McGuinness <http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-
  images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/2/5/1265368562294/Gordon-Brown-Peter-Robins-001.jpg>
  Gordon Brown, the DUP leader, Peter Robinson, and Sinn Fein's Martin McGuinness (I to r) talk to the press after the
  Northern Ireland power-sharing deal was announced. Photograph: Julien Behal/PA
  Justice and policing powers will be devolved to Northern Ireland <http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/northernireland> 's
  power-sharing government from 12 April in a historic deal agreed by the main parties that "opens a new chapter" after
  decades of violence, Gordon Brown said today.
  Standing alongside his Irish counterpart, Brian Cowen, at a press conference at Hillsborough Castle outside Belfast, the
  prime minister said the "inspirational" agreement between Sinn Fein <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/sinn-fein>
  and the Democratic Unionist party (DUP) <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/dup> was a foundation for lasting peace.
  The deal — finally agreed to by the DUP <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/feb/05/northern-ireland-dup-ulster-
  deal> last night and described as a final piece in the jigsaw after a long search for peace — comes after two weeks of
  round-the-clock negotiations and brings an end to fears that the power-sharing government might collapse.
  It will see policing and justice powers devolved from Westminster to the assembly within weeks and includes new plans
  on overseeing parades.
  Brown, who travelled to Belfast this morning, said the agreement had been possible because of "a new spirit of mutual
  co-operation and respect".
  The deal meets a key Sinn Fein demand and prevents the republican party from walking out of the power-sharing
  executive. In return, the DUP has secured reforms to the way loyalist marches are handled in Northern Ireland, including
  the abolition of the Parades Commission, a body most unionists regard as biased in favour of nationalists.
  A cross-community vote will now be held in the Stormont assembly on 9 March before the policing and justice powers
  are devolved from London on 12 April.
  Brown told reporters: "The achievements have been as great as they are inspirational. This moment and this agreement
  belongs to the people of Northern Ireland, all of the people, and now more than ever before so does their future ... This
  is the last chapter of a long and troubled story and the beginning of a new chapter after decades of violence, years of
  talks, weeks of stalemate."
  Cowen praised both unionists and nationalists for making "fair and balanced compromises" to bridge the divisions and
  said the quality of the negotiations meant that the "devolved institutions can and will work".
  The Northern Ireland secretary, Shaun Woodward, said the deal would further isolate republican dissidents who have
  launched three separate gun and bomb attacks against police stations in the province over the last 10 days. The deal
  would "absolutely" make Northern Ireland a safer place, he said.
  The DUP leader, Peter Robinson, said the agreement "will be more enduring because of the time spent" in forming it.
  Referring back to the Belfast Agreement of 1998 <http://www.nio.gov.uk/the-agreement> when negotiations bore fruit
  at the 11th hour, the Sinn Fein president, Gerry Adams, described the current deal and the rescue of power-sharing as
  "yet another very good Friday".
  Jeffrey Donaldson told the Guardian the DUP's 36-strong assembly team was now unanimously in favour of the deal.
  But the Ulster Unionist party (UUP) has yet to officially back the package which will allow the assembly to set up
  legislation to change the way parades are judged.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767369 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767369 Date: 08/31/2015
  A UUP spokeswoman said members wanted to see the proposed agreement before giving their response to the two
  governments. "We have not had sight of this agreement and until we do we will not be signing up to it," she said.
  The talks, which centred on Hillsborough Castle, outside Belfast, are the longest set of continuous negotiations held in
  the near 20-year peace process. Sinn Fein had accused the DUP of stalling on the transfer of policing powers for the last
  three years and it was feared that failure to find agreement could see the collapse of the power-sharing government led
  by the two parties.
  The agreement finally came near midnight at Stormont's parliament building. Earlier in the evening Sinn Fein had said
  the basis of a deal was on the table and it was giving the DUP leadership the time to persuade its party to accept it.
  Robinson emerged from a meeting of party colleagues to confirm that he had secured unanimous support for the
  proposals. Earlier in the week up to 14 DUP assembly members had opposed a proposed deal because it did not give
  unionists enough concessions.
  Robinson said he would now look to gain the support of the community and the smaller assembly parties for the deal.
  "We have a basis upon which we can go forward and recommend it [the deal] to our party, to the other parties in
  Northern Ireland and to the community.
  "An essential element of the Democratic Unionist Party's manifesto is the requirement for community confidence; we
  believe this can be the basis for gaining that confidence."
  However the leader of the hardline Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV), Jim Allister, questioned why the 14 DUP rebels had
  changed their minds.
  "The deal hasn't changed, only the snowmen of the DUP, who melted once the heat came on," Allister said.
  The DUP now faces a struggle to ward off the TUV threat in the forthcoming general election. Allister will portray the
  deal as a sell-out of unionist principles and a sop to republicanism.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767369 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767371
MetadataSubject: BAGHDAD STAFFING THOUGHTS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Feltman, Jeffrey D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-23T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767371/C05767371.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Feltman, Jeffrey D <FeltmanJD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Coleman, Claire L
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 8:47 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767371
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Sure. In touch with Claire about timing.
  Jeffrey Feltman
  Assistant Secretary
  Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs
  Department of State
  202-647-7209

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767371 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Feltman, Jeffrey D <FeltmanJD@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 8:47 AM
  To: H
  Cc: Coleman, Claire L
  Subject RE: Baghdad staffing thoughts (PERSONNEL SENSITIVE)
  Sure. In touch with Claire about timing.
  Jeffrey Feltman
  Assistant Secretary
  Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs
  Department of State
  202-647-7209
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767371 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767372
MetadataSubject: WITTEN STATEMENT NOW?
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-05T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0063/DOC_0C05767372/C05767372.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Witten statement now?
ExtractedTo: H; preines Huma Abedin
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, February 5, 2010 7:18 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767372
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  I have a good story for you on this. Your 830 statement will be first react. But I will have them release excerpts of your
  statement now.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767372 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, February 5, 2010 7:18 AM
  To: H; preines Huma Abedin
  Subject: Re: Witten statement now?
  I have a good story for you on this. Your 830 statement will be first react. But I will have them release excerpts of your
  statement now.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J; 'preines
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 07:15:07 2010
  Subject: Witten statement now?
  Huma Abedin
  I'd like to be first w statement on behalf of USG. Can we do asap and then repeat on camera?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767372 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767374
MetadataSubject: BRAVO! BRAVA! ISSUE YOUR STATEMENT! SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-05T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0063/DOC_0C05767374/C05767374.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeor
ExtractedCc: MillsCD@state.gov <MillsCD@state.gov>; SullivanJJ@state.gov <Sullivanil@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, February 5, 2010 7:24 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767374
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Ambos at event would praise your role
  Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767374 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: sbwhoeor
  Sent: Friday, February 5, 2010 7:24 AM
  To:
  Subject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Ambos at event would praise your role
  Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 07:06:39
  To: 'sbwhoeop
  Subject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  I will be doing a press event at 8:30. Do you know if Gordon mentioned me? Can you find out? Is Shaun still coming
  Monday? If so, I want to take you both out to dinner!
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Cc: MillsCD@state.gov <MillsCD@state.gov>; SullivanJJ@state.gov <Sullivanil@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 06:58:04 2010
  Subject: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Northern Ireland agrees power-sharing deal
  Gordon Brown hails historic deal which will see justice and policing powers be devolved to Stormont from 12 April
  * Henry McDonald <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/henrymcdonald>
  * guardian.co.uk <http://www.guardian.co.uk/>, Friday 5 February 2010 11.42 GMT
  <http://www.guardian.co.uk/help/accessibility>
  Gordon Brown, Peter Robinson and Martin McGuinness <http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-
  images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/2/5/1265368562294/Gordon-Brown-Peter-Robins-001.jpg>
  Gordon Brown, the DUP leader, Peter Robinson, and Sinn Fein's Martin McGuinness (I to r) talk to the press after the
  Northern Ireland power-sharing deal was announced. Photograph: Julien Behal/PA
  Justice and policing powers will be devolved to Northern Ireland <http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/northernireland> 's
  power-sharing government from 12 April in a historic deal agreed by the main parties that "opens a new chapter" after
  decades of violence, Gordon Brown said today.
  Standing alongside his Irish counterpart, Brian Cowen, at a press conference at Hillsborough Castle outside Belfast, the
  prime minister said the "inspirational" agreement between Sinn Fein <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/sinn-fein>
  and the Democratic Unionist party (DUP) <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/dup> was a foundation for lasting peace.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767374 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767374 Date: 08/31/2015
  The deal —finally agreed to by the DUP <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/feb/05/northern-ireland-dup-ulster-
  deal> last night and described as a final piece in the jigsaw after a long search for peace — comes after two weeks of
  round-the-clock negotiations and brings an end to fears that the power-sharing government might collapse.
  It will see policing and justice powers devolved from Westminster to the assembly within weeks and includes new plans
  on overseeing parades.
  Brown, who travelled to Belfast this morning, said the agreement had been possible because of "a new spirit of mutual
  co-operation and respect".
  The deal meets a key Sinn Fein demand and prevents the republican party from walking out of the power-sharing
  executive. In return, the DUP has secured reforms to the way loyalist marches are handled in Northern Ireland, including
  the abolition of the Parades Commission, a body most unionists regard as biased in favour of nationalists.
  A cross-community vote will now be held in the Stormont assembly on 9 March before the policing and justice powers
  are devolved from London on 12 April.
  Brown told reporters: "The achievements have been as great as they are inspirational. This moment and this agreement
  belongs to the people of Northern Ireland, all of the people, and now more than ever before so does their future ... This
  is the last chapter of a long and troubled story and the beginning of a new chapter after decades of violence, years of
  talks, weeks of stalemate."
  Cowen praised both unionists and nationalists for making "fair and balanced compromises" to bridge the divisions and
  said the quality of the negotiations meant that the "devolved institutions can and will work".
  The Northern Ireland secretary, Shaun Woodward, said the deal would further isolate republican dissidents who have
  launched three separate gun and bomb attacks against police stations in the province over the last 10 days. The deal
  would "absolutely" make Northern Ireland a safer place, he said.
  The DUP leader, Peter Robinson, said the agreement "will be more enduring because of the time spent" in forming it.
  Referring back to the Belfast Agreement of 1998 <http://www.nio.gov.uk/the-agreement> when negotiations bore fruit
  at the 11th hour, the Sinn Fein president, Gerry Adams, described the current deal and the rescue of power-sharing as
  "yet another very good Friday".
  Jeffrey Donaldson told the Guardian the DUP's 36-strong assembly team was now unanimously in favour of the deal.
  But the Ulster Unionist party (UUP) has yet to officially back the package which will allow the assembly to set up
  legislation to change the way parades are judged.
  A UUP spokeswoman said members wanted to see the proposed agreement before giving their response to the two
  governments. "We have not had sight of this agreement and until we do we will not be signing up to it," she said.
  The talks, which centred on Hillsborough Castle, outside Belfast, are the longest set of continuous negotiations held in
  the near 20-year peace process. Sinn Fein had accused the DUP of stalling on the transfer of policing powers for the last
  three years and it was feared that failure to find agreement could see the collapse of the power-sharing government led
  by the two parties.
  The agreement finally came near midnight at Stormont's parliament building. Earlier in the evening Sinn Fein had said
  the basis of a deal was on the table and it was giving the DUP leadership the time to persuade its party to accept it.
  Robinson emerged from a meeting of party colleagues to confirm that he had secured unanimous support for the
  proposals. Earlier in the week up to 14 DUP assembly members had opposed a proposed deal because it did not give
  unionists enough concessions.
  Robinson said he would now look to gain the support of the community and the smaller assembly parties for the deal.
  "We have a basis upon which we can go forward and recommend it [the deal] to our party, to the other parties in
  Northern Ireland and to the community.
  "An essential element of the Democratic Unionist Party's manifesto is the requirement for community confidence; we
  believe this can be the basis for gaining that confidence."
  However the leader of the hardline Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV), Jim Allister, questioned why the 14 DUP rebels had
  changed their minds.
  "The deal hasn't changed, only the snowmen of the DUP, who melted once the heat came on," Allister said.
  The DUP now faces a struggle to ward off the TUV threat in the forthcoming general election. Allister will portray the
  deal as a sell-out of unionist principles and a sop to republicanism.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767374 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767375
MetadataSubject: BRAVO! BRAVA! ISSUE YOUR STATEMENT! SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-05T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0063/DOC_0C05767375/C05767375.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivann@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: MillsCD@state.gov <MillsCD@state.gov>; SullivanJJ@state.gov <Sullivann@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, February 5, 2010 7:32 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767375
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Brown mentioned you and your role. Kamala was there at their invitation representing you. She told everyone that you
  would speak at 830.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767375 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivann@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, February 5, 2010 7:32 AM
  To:
  Subject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Brown mentioned you and your role. Kamala was there at their invitation representing you. She told everyone that you
  would speak at 830.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Sullivan, JacobJ
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 07:27:21 2010
  Subject: Fw: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Fyi
  Original Message ---
  From: sbwhoeor
  To: H
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 07:24:17 2010
  Subject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Ambos at event would praise your role
  Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  Original Message----
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 07:06:39
  To: 'sbwhoeop
  Subject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  I will be doing a press event at 8:30. Do you know if Gordon mentioned me? Can you find out? Is Shaun still coming
  Monday? If so, I want to take you both out to dinner!
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Cc: MillsCD@state.gov <MillsCD@state.gov>; SullivanJJ@state.gov <Sullivann@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 06:58:04 2010
  Subject: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Northern Ireland agrees power-sharing deal
  Gordon Brown hails historic deal which will see justice and policing powers be devolved to Stormont from 12 April
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767375 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767375 Date: 08/31/2015
  * Henry McDonald <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/henrymcdonald>
  * guardian.co.uk <http://www.guardian.co.uk/>, Friday 5 February 2010 11.42 GMT
  <http://www.guardian.co.uk/help/accessibility>
  Gordon Brown, Peter Robinson and Martin McGuinness <http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-
  images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/2/5/1265368562294/Gordon-Brown-Peter-Robins-001.jpg>
  Gordon Brown, the DUP leader, Peter Robinson, and Sinn Fein's Martin McGuinness (I to r) talk to the press after the
  Northern Ireland power-sharing deal was announced. Photograph: Julien Behal/PA
  Justice and policing powers will be devolved to Northern Ireland <http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/northernireland> 's
  power-sharing government from 12 April in a historic deal agreed by the main parties that "opens a new chapter" after
  decades of violence, Gordon Brown said today.
  Standing alongside his Irish counterpart, Brian Cowen, at a press conference at Hillsborough Castle outside Belfast, the
  prime minister said the "inspirational" agreement between Sinn Fein <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/sinn-fein>
  and the Democratic Unionist party (DUP) <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/dup> was a foundation for lasting peace.
  The deal — finally agreed to by the DUP <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/feb/05/northern-ireland-dup-ulster-
  deal> last night and described as a final piece in the jigsaw after a long search for peace — comes after two weeks of
  round-the-clock negotiations and brings an end to fears that the power-sharing government might collapse.
  It will see policing and justice powers devolved from Westminster to the assembly within weeks and includes new plans
  on overseeing parades.
  Brown, who travelled to Belfast this morning, said the agreement had been possible because of "a new spirit of mutual
  co-operation and respect".
  The deal meets a key Sinn Fein demand and prevents the republican party from walking out of the power-sharing
  executive. In return, the DUP has secured reforms to the way loyalist marches are handled in Northern Ireland, including
  the abolition of the Parades Commission, a body most unionists regard as biased in favour of nationalists.
  A cross-community vote will now be held in the Stormont assembly on 9 March before the policing and justice powers
  are devolved from London on 12 April.
  Brown told reporters: "The achievements have been as great as they are inspirational. This moment and this agreement
  belongs to the people of Northern Ireland, all of the people, and now more than ever before so does their future ... This
  is the last chapter of a long and troubled story and the beginning of a new chapter after decades of violence, years of
  talks, weeks of stalemate."
  Cowen praised both unionists and nationalists for making "fair and balanced compromises" to bridge the divisions and
  said the quality of the negotiations meant that the "devolved institutions can and will work".
  The Northern Ireland secretary, Shaun Woodward, said the deal would further isolate republican dissidents who have
  launched three separate gun and bomb attacks against police stations in the province over the last 10 days. The deal
  would "absolutely" make Northern Ireland a safer place, he said.
  The DUP leader, Peter Robinson, said the agreement "will be more enduring because of the time spent" in forming it.
  Referring back to the Belfast Agreement of 1998 <http://www.nio.gov.ukithe-agreement> when negotiations bore fruit
  at the 11th hour, the Sinn Fein president, Gerry Adams, described the current deal and the rescue of power-sharing as
  "yet another very good Friday".
  Jeffrey Donaldson told the Guardian the DUP's 36-strong assembly team was now unanimously in favour of the deal.
  But the Ulster Unionist party (UUP) has yet to officially back the package which will allow the assembly to set up
  legislation to change the way parades are judged.
  A UUP spokeswoman said members wanted to see the proposed agreement before giving their response to the two
  governments. "We have not had sight of this agreement and until we do we will not be signing up to it," she said.
  The talks, which centred on Hillsborough Castle, outside Belfast, are the longest set of continuous negotiations held in
  the near 20-year peace process. Sinn Fein had accused the DUP of stalling on the transfer of policing powers for the last
  three years and it was feared that failure to find agreement could see the collapse of the power-sharing government led
  by the two parties.
  The agreement finally came near midnight at Stormont's parliament building. Earlier in the evening Sinn Fein had said
  the basis of a deal was on the table and it was giving the DUP leadership the time to persuade its party to accept it.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767375 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767375 Date: 08/31/2015
  Robinson emerged from a meeting of party colleagues to confirm that he had secured unanimous support for the
  proposals. Earlier in the week up to 14 DUP assembly members had opposed a proposed deal because it did not give
  unionists enough concessions.
  Robinson said he would now look to gain the support of the community and the smaller assembly parties for the deal.
  "We have a basis upon which we can go forward and recommend it [the deal] to our party, to the other parties in
  Northern Ireland and to the community.
  "An essential element of the Democratic Unionist Party's manifesto is the requirement for community confidence; we
  believe this can be the basis for gaining that confidence."
  However the leader of the hardline Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV), Jim Allister, questioned why the 14 DUP rebels had
  changed their minds.
  "The deal hasn't changed, only the snowmen of the DUP, who melted once the heat came on," Allister said.
  The DUP now faces a struggle to ward off the TUV threat in the forthcoming general election. Allister will portray the
  deal as a sell-out of unionist principles and a sop to republicanism.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767375 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767377
MetadataSubject: BRAVO! BRAVA! ISSUE YOUR STATEMENT! SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-05T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0063/DOC_0C05767377/C05767377.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: MillsCD@state.gov <MillsCD@state.gov>; SullivanJJ@state.gov <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, February 5, 2010 7:33 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767377
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  This did not occur to me. I'm not sure it's a good idea -- there has been a heavy emphasis on how this deal was made in
  NI. Calling Declan for his take.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767377 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B5,B6
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, February 5, 2010 7:33 AM
  To:
  Subject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  This did not occur to me. I'm not sure it's a good idea -- there has been a heavy emphasis on how this deal was made in
  NI. Calling Declan for his take.
  Original Message ---
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 07:27:05 2010
  Subject: Fw: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Original Message ---
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 07:10:49 2010
  Subject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Will find out. Why not invite uk and irish ambassadors to State to brief press with you today?
  Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  Original Message-----
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 07:06:39
  To: 'sbwhoeop
  Subject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  I will be doing a press event at 8:30. Do you know if Gordon mentioned me? Can you find out? Is Shaun still coming
  Monday? If so, I want to take you both out to dinner!
  Original Message ----
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Cc: MillsCD@state.gov <MillsCD@state.gov>; SullivanJJ@state.gov <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 06:58:04 2010
  Subject: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Northern Ireland agrees power-sharing deal
  Gordon Brown hails historic deal which will see justice and policing powers be devolved to Stormont from 12 April
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767377 Date: 08/31/2015
  B5
  B6

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767377 Date: 08/31/2015
  * Henry McDonald <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/henrymcdonald>
  * guardian.co.uk <http://www.guardian.co.uk/>, Friday 5 February 2010 11.42 GMT
  <http://www.guardian.co.uk/help/accessibility>
  Gordon Brown, Peter Robinson and Martin McGuinness <http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-
  images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/2/5/1265368562294/Gordon-Brown-Peter-Robins-001.jpg>
  Gordon Brown, the DUP leader, Peter Robinson, and Sinn Fein's Martin McGuinness (I to r) talk to the press after the
  Northern Ireland power-sharing deal was announced. Photograph: Julien Behal/PA
  Justice and policing powers will be devolved to Northern Ireland <http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/northernireland> 's
  power-sharing government from 12 April in a historic deal agreed by the main parties that "opens a new chapter" after
  decades of violence, Gordon Brown said today.
  Standing alongside his Irish counterpart, Brian Cowen, at a press conference at Hillsborough Castle outside Belfast, the
  prime minister said the "inspirational" agreement between Sinn Fein <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/sinn-fein>
  and the Democratic Unionist party (DUP) <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/dup> was a foundation for lasting peace.
  The deal — finally agreed to by the DUP <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/feb/05/northern-ireland-dup-ulster-
  deal> last night and described as a final piece in the jigsaw after a long search for peace — comes after two weeks of
  round-the-clock negotiations and brings an end to fears that the power-sharing government might collapse.
  It will see policing and justice powers devolved from Westminster to the assembly within weeks and includes new plans
  on overseeing parades.
  Brown, who travelled to Belfast this morning, said the agreement had been possible because of "a new spirit of mutual
  co-operation and respect".
  The deal meets a key Sinn Fein demand and prevents the republican party from walking out of the power-sharing
  executive. In return, the DUP has secured reforms to the way loyalist marches are handled in Northern Ireland, including
  the abolition of the Parades Commission, a body most unionists regard as biased in favour of nationalists.
  A cross-community vote will now be held in the Stormont assembly on 9 March before the policing and justice powers
  are devolved from London on 12 April.
  Brown told reporters: "The achievements have been as great as they are inspirational. This moment and this agreement
  belongs to the people of Northern Ireland, all of the people, and now more than ever before so does their future ... This
  is the last chapter of a long and troubled story and the beginning of a new chapter after decades of violence, years of
  talks, weeks of stalemate."
  Cowen praised both unionists and nationalists for making "fair and balanced compromises" to bridge the divisions and
  said the quality of the negotiations meant that the "devolved institutions can and will work".
  The Northern Ireland secretary, Shaun Woodward, said the deal would further isolate republican dissidents who have
  launched three separate gun and bomb attacks against police stations in the province over the last 10 days. The deal
  would "absolutely" make Northern Ireland a safer place, he said.
  The DUP leader, Peter Robinson, said the agreement "will be more enduring because of the time spent" in forming it.
  Referring back to the Belfast Agreement of 1998 <http://www.nio.gov.uk/the-agreement> when negotiations bore fruit
  at the 11th hour, the Sinn Fein president, Gerry Adams, described the current deal and the rescue of power-sharing as
  "yet another very good Friday".
  Jeffrey Donaldson told the Guardian the DUP's 36-strong assembly team was now unanimously in favour of the deal.
  But the Ulster Unionist party (UUP) has yet to officially back the package which will allow the assembly to set up
  legislation to change the way parades are judged.
  A UUP spokeswoman said members wanted to see the proposed agreement before giving their response to the two
  governments. "We have not had sight of this agreement and until we do we will not be signing up to it," she said.
  The talks, which centred on Hillsborough Castle, outside Belfast, are the longest set of continuous negotiations held in
  the near 20-year peace process. Sinn Fein had accused the DUP of stalling on the transfer of policing powers for the last
  three years and it was feared that failure to find agreement could see the collapse of the power-sharing government led
  by the two parties.
  The agreement finally came near midnight at Stormont's parliament building. Earlier in the evening Sinn Fein had said
  the basis of a deal was on the table and it was giving the DUP leadership the time to persuade its party to accept it.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767377 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767377 Date: 08/31/2015
  Robinson emerged from a meeting of party colleagues to confirm that he had secured unanimous support for the
  proposals. Earlier in the week up to 14 DUP assembly members had opposed a proposed deal because it did not give
  unionists enough concessions.
  Robinson said he would now look to gain the support of the community and the smaller assembly parties for the deal.
  "We have a basis upon which we can go forward and recommend it [the deal] to our party, to the other parties in
  Northern Ireland and to the community.
  "An essential element of the Democratic Unionist Party's manifesto is the requirement for community confidence; we
  believe this can be the basis for gaining that confidence."
  However the leader of the hardline Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV), Jim Allister, questioned why the 14 DUP rebels had
  changed their minds.
  "The deal hasn't changed, only the snowmen of the DUP, who melted once the heat came on," Allister said.
  The DUP now faces a struggle to ward off the TUV threat in the forthcoming general election. Allister will portray the
  deal as a sell-out of unionist principles and a sop to republicanism.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767377 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767378
MetadataSubject: BRAVO! BRAVA! ISSUE YOUR STATEMENT! SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-05T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0063/DOC_0C05767378/C05767378.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: MillsCD@state.gov <MillsCD@state.gov>; SullivanJJ@state.gov <Sullivan.1.1@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, February 5, 2010 7:39 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767378
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  DecIan thinks bad idea because sends wrong message to NI and because this is your moment.
  Philippe thinks practically impossible to do.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767378 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, February 5, 2010 7:39 AM
  To: H
  Subject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  DecIan thinks bad idea because sends wrong message to NI and because this is your moment.
  Philippe thinks practically impossible to do.
  Original Message ---
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Sullivan, Jacob 1
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 07:27:21 2010
  Subject: Fw: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Fyi
  Original Message ---
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 07:24:17 2010
  Subject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Ambos at event would praise your role
  Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 07:06:39
  To: 'sbwhoeor
  Subject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  I will be doing a press event at 8:30. Do you know if Gordon mentioned me? Can you find out? Is Shaun still coming
  Monday? If so, I want to take you both out to dinner!
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop(
  To: H
  Cc: MillsCD@state.gov <MillsCD@state.gov>; SullivanJJ@state.gov <Sullivan.1.1@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 06:58:04 2010
  Subject: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Northern Ireland agrees power-sharing deal
  Gordon Brown hails historic deal which will see justice and policing powers be devolved to Stormont from 12 April
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767378 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767378 Date: 08/31/2015
  * Henry McDonald <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/henrymcdonald>
  * guardian.co.uk <http://www.guardian.co.ukk , Friday 5 February 2010 11.42 GMT
  <http://www.guardian.co.uk/help/accessibility>
  Gordon Brown, Peter Robinson and Martin McGuinness <http://static.guim.co.uk/sys- '
  images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/2/5/1265368562294/Gordon-Brown-Peter-Robins-001.jpg>
  Gordon Brown, the DUP leader, Peter Robinson, and Sinn Fein's Martin McGuinness (I to r) talk to the press after the
  Northern Ireland power-sharing deal was announced. Photograph: Julien Behal/PA
  Justice and policing powers will be devolved to Northern Ireland <http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/northernireland> 's
  power-sharing government from 12 April in a historic deal agreed by the main parties that "opens a new chapter" after
  decades of violence, Gordon Brown said today.
  Standing alongside his Irish counterpart, Brian Cowen, at a press conference at Hillsborough Castle outside Belfast, the
  prime minister said the "inspirational" agreement between Sinn Fein <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/sinn-fein>
  and the Democratic Unionist party (DUP) <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/dup> was a foundation for lasting peace.
  The deal —finally agreed to by the DUP <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/feb/05/northern-ireland-dup-ulster-
  deal> last night and described as a final piece in the jigsaw after a long search for peace — comes after two weeks of
  round-the-clock negotiations and brings an end to fears that the power-sharing government might collapse.
  It will see policing and justice powers devolved from Westminster to the assembly within weeks and includes new plans
  on overseeing parades.
  Brown, who travelled to Belfast this morning, said the agreement had been possible because of "a new spirit of mutual
  co-operation and respect".
  The deal meets a key Sinn Fein demand and prevents the republican party from walking out of the power-sharing
  executive. In return, the DUP has secured reforms to the way loyalist marches are handled in Northern Ireland, including
  the abolition of the Parades Commission, a body most unionists regard as biased in favour of nationalists.
  A cross-community vote will now be held in the Stormont assembly on 9 March before the policing and justice powers
  are devolved from London on 12 April.
  Brown told reporters: "The achievements have been as great as they are inspirational. This moment and this agreement
  belongs to the people of Northern Ireland, all of the people, and now more than ever before so does their future ... This
  is the last chapter of a long and troubled story and the beginning of a new chapter after decades of violence, years of
  talks, weeks of stalemate."
  Cowen praised both unionists and nationalists for making "fair and balanced compromises" to bridge the divisions and
  said the quality of the negotiations meant that the "devolved institutions can and will work".
  The Northern Ireland secretary, Shaun Woodward, said the deal would further isolate republican dissidents who have
  launched three separate gun and bomb attacks against police stations in the province over the last 10 days. The deal
  would "absolutely" make Northern Ireland a safer place, he said.
  The DUP leader, Peter Robinson, said the agreement "will be more enduring because of the time spent" in forming it.
  Referring back to the Belfast Agreement of 1998 <http://www.nio.gov.uk/the-agreement> when negotiations bore fruit
  at the 11th hour, the Sinn Fein president, Gerry Adams, described the current deal and the rescue of power-sharing as
  "yet another very good Friday".
  Jeffrey Donaldson told the Guardian the DUP's 36-strong assembly team was now unanimously in favour of the deal.
  But the Ulster Unionist party (UUP) has yet to officially back the package which will allow the assembly to set up
  legislation to change the way parades are judged.
  A UUP spokeswoman said members wanted to see the proposed agreement before giving their response to the two
  governments. "We have not had sight of this agreement and until we do we will not be signing up to it," she said.
  The talks, which centred on Hillsborough Castle, outside Belfast, are the longest set of continuous negotiations held in
  the near 20-year peace process. Sinn Fein had accused the DUP of stalling on the transfer of policing powers for the last
  three years and it was feared that failure to find agreement could see the collapse of the power-sharing government led
  by the two parties.
  The agreement finally came near midnight at Stormont's parliament building. Earlier in the evening Sinn Fein had said
  the basis of a deal was on the table and it was giving the DUP leadership the time to persuade its party to accept it.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767378 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767378 Date: 08/31/2015
  Robinson emerged from a meeting of party colleagues to confirm that he had secured unanimous support for the
  proposals. Earlier in the week up to 14 DUP assembly members had opposed a proposed deal because it did not give
  unionists enough concessions.
  Robinson said he would now look to gain the support of the community and the smaller assembly parties for the deal.
  "We have a basis upon which we can go forward and recommend it [the deal] to our party, to the other parties in
  Northern Ireland and to the community.
  "An essential element of the Democratic Unionist Party's manifesto is the requirement for community confidence; we
  believe this can be the basis for gaining that confidence."
  However the leader of the hardline Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV), Jim Allister, questioned why the 14 DUP rebels had
  changed their minds.
  "The deal hasn't changed, only the snowmen of the DUP, who melted once the heat came on," Allister said.
  The DUP now faces a struggle to ward off the TUV threat in the forthcoming general election. Allister will portray the
  deal as a sell-out of unionist principles and a sop to republicanism.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767378 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767380
MetadataSubject: POSTSCRIPT TO MEETING
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767380/C05767380.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Postscript to Meeting
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 2:38 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767380
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Fyi
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767380 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 2:38 AM
  To:
  Subject Fw: Postscript to Meeting
  Attachments: ole0.bmp
  Fyi
  From: Reynoso, Julissa
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Tue Feb 23 23:26:18 2010
  Subject: Postscript to Meeting
  Cheryl;
  As a postscript to what you mentioned about Haiti efforts being the prime example of a new form of shared
  responsibility in the region and how Haiti reconstruction going forward can serve as the basis for this
  organizing principle, I want to share some additional thoughts to support your point with the hope that Haiti
  becomes a major theme of S's trip. To my knowledge, all the countries in the region (from richest to poorest)
  have contributed in some form or another to the relief efforts. This is unprecedented in this region. And given
  that this effort relates to Haiti in particular, it is even more remarkable. As you know, Haiti since its
  independence in 1804 has often been seen by the rest of the region as a second class nation. As the Spanish-
  speaking nations of South America gained independence in the 1820s, they excluded Haiti from their designs
  for regional union — mostly out of fear by the Latins of slave revolts and uprisings by their own black and
  indigenous populations. (Of course, we have had our own complex and unfortunate relationship with Haiti.) As
  has been demonstrated by the recent UNASUR and Grupo Rio sessions, the same cannot be said of the region
  today. And of the countries S is visiting, Chile is the richest and Guatemala is by the far the poorest but each of
  these countries — and all in between - has been contributing in its own way to Haiti's recovery: Chile with
  significant MINUSTAH forces, a portable hospital, supplies, and monetary pledge; Guatemala with food, a
  rescue unit and a MINUSTAH pledge (and the fact that UN ASG Edmond Mulet is Guatemalan!). In the
  context of the relief response, each country in the region has given, more or less, relative to their means.
  Through this process of cooperation in Haiti's recovery, we as a region can collectively turn around Haiti's
  history of isolation. This is a very significant historic moment and we need to run with it.
  Sorry about the long email but wanted to share these thoughts — as one who has a particular relationship with
  the island of Hispaniola. In this context, I want to share a 1994 Washington Post below which, although •
  covering a different type of crisis, is demonstrative of how times have changed.
  Thanks. Julissa
  hi- Haiti's History of Isolation Makes U.S. Task Harder
  Article from:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767380 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767380 Date: 08/31/2015
  The Washington Post
  Article date:
  Author:
  July 25, 1994
  Roberto Suro
  More results for:
  haiti history of isolation
  The United States finds itself virtually alone struggling with the Haitian crisis.
  A handful of tiny Caribbean nations have agreed to shelter a few thousand refugees. But not one
  major political ally or trading partner in the Western Hemisphere has stepped up to help. In a joint
  statement yesterday, three of six Central American countries said they might take in Haitians. The
  other three said they would not.
  Slippery promises are all that President Clinton gets when he seeks recruits for a peacekeeping
  force; none seems willing to join an invasion to oust the military leaders who seized power in 1991.
  Panama's president-elect, Ernesto Perez Balladares, explained the lack of support in a recent
  interview: "It is for the very simple reason that in Latin America Haiti is not recognized as a Latin
  American country. Haitians speak a different language. They have different ethnic roots, a different
  culture. They are very different altogether."
  Overwhelmingly black, speaking Creole French, practicing voodoo, a nation of liberated slaves long
  locked in deep poverty, Haiti has a history ofisolation within the hemisphere. It doesn't fit with the big
  countries of South America. It is not part of Central America. It has no real kinship with the other
  island-nations of the Caribbean.
  "Haitians are strangers even among the other black nations of the Caribbean," said Jocelyn McCalla,
  executive director of the National Coalition for Haitian Refugees, a New York-based advocacy group.
  Haitians are "just as strange to someone from Grenada or Jamaica as they would be to someone
  from Iowa or Montana."
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767380 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767380 Date: 08/31/2015
  When Suriname agreed to take in 2,000 Haitian boat people, neighboring French Guiana announced
  it would tighten border security in case any Haitians escaped.
  In recent years, the Organization of American States (OAS) and the United Nations have worked to
  compel elections in Haiti, to put sanctions on its military regime and to monitor human rights abuses.
  Now, Clinton is asking for much more as he tries to create a network of refugee camps around the
  region and to assemble multinational backing for the forcible removal of Haiti's military regime.
  Finding partners for either sheltering refugees or invading would be a challenge no matter what
  country was involved. Petitioning on behalf of Haiti makes it much harder.
  "Unsympathetic perceptions of Haiti as a hopeless case work against the kind of cooperation that the
  administration is seeking, and those perceptions are deeply ingrained," said Wayne Smith, a senior
  fellow at the Center for International Policy.
  Haiti's isolation goes back to its 1804 independence. "Here was a nation born of a slave revolt. It
  raised fears of another slave revolt in many other nations which then simply shunned Haiti for
  decades to come," Smith said.
  As the Spanish-speaking nations of South America gained independence in the 1820s, they excluded
  Haiti from their designs for regional union. U.S. recognition did not come until 1862, when the Civil
  War made it politically expedient.
  Haiti's chronic poverty, its chaotic succession of despots and its conflicts with the Dominican Republic
  have deepened its isolation.
  Is racism a factor in the shunning of Haiti? Perhaps not: Black and mixed-race nations have
  sometimes demonstrated biases against Haiti.
  But allegations of racism have often beset U.S. policy toward Haiti and are a major factor in the
  evolution of the current crisis.
  The U.S. invasion of Haiti in 1915 produced a 19-year occupation that included the imposition of
  racial segregation and the use of forced labor.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767380 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767380 Date: 08/31/2015
  Randall Robinson, head of the TransAfrica lobbying organization, said, "For almost 200 years U.S.
  policies have treated Haiti differently than other nations with the painful consequences always visited
  on Haitians who happen to be black."
  This history, Robinson said, combined with the fact that the slave revolt earned Haiti "a place of pride
  for people in the African diaspora," has made U.S. policy toward Haiti a logical target for U.S. blacks.
  The activism has focused on what Robinson called "the despicable practice of repatriation."
  Since 1991 the United States has tried to intercept Haitian boat people fleeing the military regime
  before they could reach U.S. shores; most have been taken back to Haiti. No other nationality has
  suffered that form of rejection.
  As Robinson went into the 27th day of a hunger strike on May 8, Clinton announced he would end the
  repatriation policy and begin more aggressive efforts to remove the Haitian military regime.
  But Haiti's isolation has contributed to Clinton's setbacks trying to deal with the intertwined problems
  of the generals and the refugees fleeing them.
  On July 7, Panama backed out of an agreement to accept 10,000 Haitians, citing technicalities in the
  Panama Canal Treaty. Balladares, who has promised to consider a more limited safe haven for
  Haitians after he takes office Sept. 1, said the decision had nothing to do with the 1978 treaty and
  everything to do with the way ordinary Panamanians view Haitians.
  "People were very afraid of having the Haitians in the country and justifiably so," he said. "They were
  afraid of competing for scarce resources, afraid of people whose culture is different in many ways,
  afraid of the AIDS problem. That is why the government backed out and everything else is excuses."
  Piero Gleijeses, a professor at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, said:
  "Even if the Latin Americans felt some kinship to the Haitians, they would not be anxious to take in
  refugees under these circumstances. They see the big, rich United States, a traditional nation of
  resettlement, turning away the Haitians and they ask why they should have to take up the burden."
  Nearly all nations of the hemisphere have rallied around the idea of restoring democracy to Haiti, but
  they are as reluctant to pursue that goal with force as they are to shelter Haitian refugees. Both
  fundamental trends and the peculiarities of the Haitian case are at work.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767380 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767380 Date: 08/31/2015
  Among Latin American governments the traditional distaste for U.S. military intervention has been
  growing more explicit in recent years. For example, an OAS resolution censuring the United States
  for the 1989 invasion of Panama marked the first time since the founding of the organization 42 years
  earlier that it had formally criticized the United States.
  In addition, the absence of a functioning political infrastructure and the prospects for lingering
  violence in Haiti have made many Latin American countries leery of joining a peacekeeping force.
  Chile, which in early July said it would support the restoration of democracy through a multinational
  effort, has since insisted that it would offer "technical assistance" only after a democratic government
  was operating in Haiti and could specifically request such help.
  Summing up the attitudes across the region, Balladares said, "Everyone just wishes that this problem
  would go away."
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767380 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767382
MetadataSubject: HAITIAN JUDGE SAYS AMERICAN MISSIONARIES WILL BE FREED THIS WEEK
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767382/C05767382.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Haitian Judge says American missionaries will be freed this week (U)
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Klevorick, Caitlin B
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 5:56 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767382
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Fyi
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767382 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 5:56 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Haitian Judge says American missionaries will be freed this week (U)
  Fyi
  From: Kennedy, Patrick F
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Cc: Klevorick, Caitlin B
  Sent: Tue Feb 23 17:37:48 2010
  Subject: FW: Haitian Judge says American missionaries will be freed this week (U)
  From: Bond, Michele T
  Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 4:42 PM
  To: Kennedy, Patrick F; Jacobs, Janice L
  Subject: FW: Haitian Judge says American missionaries will be freed this week (U)
  According to post this info has not been confirmed. They report: "The judge said he's made a decision but that he will
  not announce it until after he receives some paperwork. The next session is tomorrow and he may announce then."
  Post is working to coordinate departure arrangements in case a decision to allow the two women to depart occurs
  tomorrow.
  Michele
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767382 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767384
MetadataSubject: BRAVO! BRAVA! ISSUE YOUR STATEMENT! SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-05T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0063/DOC_0C05767384/C05767384.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
ExtractedTo: H; Reines, Philippe I
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: MillsCD@state.gov <MillsCD@state.gov>; SullivanJJ@state.gov <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, February 5, 2010 7:42 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767384
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Here is what Brown said:
  Let me thank the American Government for their unstinting support -- especially Secretary of State Clinton, her efforts
  over these last few weeks. And Presidents Obama, Bush and Clinton. And we particularly welcome Secretary of State
  Clinton's initiative today that she will host a Northern Ireland Investment Conference this spring.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767384 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, February 5, 2010 7:42 AM
  To: H; Reines, Philippe I
  Subject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Here is what Brown said:
  Let me thank the American Government for their unstinting support -- especially Secretary of State Clinton, her efforts
  over these last few weeks. And Presidents Obama, Bush and Clinton. And we particularly welcome Secretary of State
  Clinton's initiative today that she will host a Northern Ireland Investment Conference this spring.
  Original Message ---
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Sullivan, Jacob
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 07:27:21 2010
  Subject: Fw: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Fyi
  Original Message ----
  From: sbwhoeop B6
  To: H
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 07:24:17 2010
  Subject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Ambos at event would praise your role
  Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 07:06:39
  To: 'sbwhoeop
  Subject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  B6
  I will be doing a press event at 8:30. Do you know if Gordon mentioned me? Can you find out? Is Shaun still coming
  Monday? If so, I want to take you both out to dinner!
  Original Message --
  From: sbwhoeop B6
  To: H
  Cc: MillsCD@state.gov <MillsCD@state.gov>; SullivanJJ@state.gov <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 06:58:04 2010
  Subject: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Northern Ireland agrees power-sharing deal
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767384 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767384 Date: 08/31/2015
  Gordon Brown hails historic deal which will see justice and policing powers be devolved to Stormont from 12 April
  * Henry McDonald <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/henrymcdonald>
  * guardian.co.uk <http://www.guardian.co.ulç/>, Friday 5 February 2010 11.42 GMT
  <http://www.guardian.co.uk/help/accessibility>
  Gordon Brown, Peter Robinson and Martin McGuinness <http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-
  images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/2/5/1265368562294/Gordon-Brown-Peter-Robins-001.jpg>
  Gordon Brown, the DUP leader, Peter Robinson, and Sinn Fein's Martin McGuinness (I to r) talk to the press after the
  Northern Ireland power-sharing deal was announced. Photograph: Julien Behal/PA
  Justice and policing powers will be devolved to Northern Ireland <http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/northernireland> 's
  power-sharing government from 12 April in a historic deal agreed by the main parties that "opens a new chapter" after
  decades of violence, Gordon Brown said today.
  Standing alongside his Irish counterpart, Brian Cowen, at a press conference at Hillsborough Castle outside Belfast, the
  prime minister said the "inspirational" agreement between Sinn Fein <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/sinn-fein>
  and the Democratic Unionist party (DUP) <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/dup> was a foundation for lasting peace.
  The deal — finally agreed to by the DUP <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/feb/05/northern-ireland-dup-ulster-
  deal> last night and described as a final piece in the jigsaw after a long search for peace — comes after two weeks of
  round-the-clock negotiations and brings an end to fears that the power-sharing government might collapse.
  It will see policing and justice powers devolved from Westminster to the assembly within weeks and includes new plans
  on overseeing parades.
  Brown, who travelled to Belfast this morning, said the agreement had been possible because of "a new spirit of mutual
  co-operation and respect".
  The deal meets a key Sinn Fein demand and prevents the republican party from walking out of the power-sharing
  executive. In return, the DUP has secured reforms to the way loyalist marches are handled in Northern Ireland, including
  the abolition of the Parades Commission, a body most unionists regard as biased in favour of nationalists.
  A cross-community vote will now be held in the Stormont assembly on 9 March before the policing and justice powers
  are devolved from London on 12 April.
  Brown told reporters: "The achievements have been as great as they are inspirational. This moment and this agreement
  belongs to the people of Northern Ireland, all of the people, and now more than ever before so does their future ... This
  is the last chapter of a long and troubled story and the beginning of a new chapter after decades of violence, years of
  talks, weeks of stalemate."
  Cowen praised both unionists and nationalists for making "fair and balanced compromises" to bridge the divisions and
  said the quality of the negotiations meant that the "devolved institutions can and will work".
  The Northern Ireland secretary, Shaun Woodward, said the deal would further isolate republican dissidents who have
  launched three separate gun and bomb attacks against police stations in the province over the last 10 days. The deal
  would "absolutely" make Northern Ireland a safer place, he said.
  The DUP leader, Peter Robinson, said the agreement "will be more enduring because of the time spent" in forming it.
  Referring back to the Belfast Agreement of 1998 <http://www.nio.gov.uk/the-agreement> when negotiations bore fruit
  at the 11th hour, the Sinn Fein president, Gerry Adams, described the current deal and the rescue of power-sharing as
  "yet another very good Friday".
  Jeffrey Donaldson told the Guardian the DUP's 36-strong assembly team was now unanimously in favour of the deal.
  But the Ulster Unionist party (UUP) has yet to officially back the package which will allow the assembly to set up
  legislation to change the way parades are judged.
  A UUP spokeswoman said members wanted to see the proposed agreement before giving their response to the two
  governments. "We have not had sight of this agreement and until we do we will not be signing up to it," she said.
  The talks, which centred on Hillsborough Castle, outside Belfast, are the longest set of continuous negotiations held in
  the near 20-year peace process. Sinn Fein had accused the DUP of stalling on the transfer of policing powers for the last
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767384 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767384 Date: 08/31/2015
  three years and it was feared that failure to find agreement could see the collapse of the power-sharing government led
  by the two parties.
  The agreement finally came near midnight at Stormont's parliament building. Earlier in the evening Sinn Fein had said
  the basis of a deal was on the table and it was giving the DUP leadership the time to persuade its party to accept it.
  Robinson emerged from a meeting of party colleagues to confirm that he had secured unanimous support for the
  proposals. Earlier in the week up to 14 DUP assembly members had opposed a proposed deal because it did not give
  unionists enough concessions.
  Robinson said he would now look to gain the support of the community and the smaller assembly parties for the deal.
  "We have a basis upon which we can go forward and recommend it [the deal] to our party, to the other parties in
  Northern Ireland and to the community.
  "An essential element of the Democratic Unionist Party's manifesto is the requirement for community confidence; we
  believe this can be the basis for gaining that confidence."
  However the leader of the hardline Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV), Jim Allister, questioned why the 14 DUP rebels had
  changed their minds.
  "The deal hasn't changed, only the snowmen of the DUP, who melted once the heat came on," Allister said.
  The DUP now faces a struggle to ward off the TUV threat in the forthcoming general election. Allister will portray the
  deal as a sell-out of unionist principles and a sop to republicanism.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767384 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767385
MetadataSubject: EIKENBERRY HAS ASKED TO TALK TO YOU TODAY NON SECURE.
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-29T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_050/DOC_0C05767385/C05767385.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Eikenberry has asked to talk to you today non secure.
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 1:47 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767385
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: He just called in again asking if you could talk
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767385 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE
  IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 1:47 PM
  To: H
  Subject: Re: Eikenberry has asked to talk to you today non secure.
  He just called in again asking if you could talk
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma
  To: 'hdr22@clintonemail.com' <hdr22@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sun Nov 29 09:50:58 2009
  Subject: Eikenberry has asked to talk to you today non secure.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767385 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767389
MetadataSubject: TESTIMONY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Verma, Richard R
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767389/C05767389.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Testimony
ExtractedTo: H; Lew, Jacob J; Sullivan, Jacob
ExtractedFrom: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 6:48 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767389
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Sure. I am available.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767389 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 6:48 AM
  To: H; Lew, Jacob J; Sullivan, Jacob
  Subject Re: Testimony
  Sure. I am available.
  Original Message ----
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Verma, Richard R; Lew, Jacob J; Sullivan, Jacob .1
  Sent: Wed Feb 24 06:36:35 2010
  Subject: Testimony
  Could we do conf call at 7am to go over some questions?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767389 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767391
MetadataSubject: JUST TRIED TO CALL BUT ITS BUSY. THINK OPS IS CONNECTING EIKENBERRY.
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-29T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_050/DOC_0C05767391/C05767391.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 2:43 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767391
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767391 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE
  IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 2:43 PM
  To: H
  Subject Just tried to call but its busy. Think ops is connecting eikenberry.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767391 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767393
MetadataSubject: TESTIMONY
MetadataTo: Verma, Richard R
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767393/C05767393.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Testimony
ExtractedTo: Verma, Richard R; H; Lew, Jacob J
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 6:55 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767393
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Same here.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767393 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 6:55 AM
  To: Verma, Richard R; H; Lew, Jacob J
  Subject: Re: Testimony
  Same here.
  Original Message
  From: Verma, Richard R
  To: 'HDR22@clintonemail.comi <HDR22@clintonemail.com>; Lew, Jacob J; Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Wed Feb 24 06:47:55 2010
  Subject: Re: Testimony
  Sure. I am available.
  Original Message ----
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Verma, Richard R; Lew, Jacob J; Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Wed Feb 24 06:36:35 2010
  Subject: Testimony
  Could we do conf call at 7am to go over some questions?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767393 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767394
MetadataSubject: MINI SCHEDULE 2/24/10 WEDNESDAY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767394/C05767394.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 8:17 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767394
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  7:55 am ARRIVE State Department
  8:00 am COFFEE w/JEFF IMMELT AND INDRA NOOYI
  8:30 am Secretary's Outer Office
  8:30 am DAILY SENIOR STAFF MEETING
  8:45 am Secretary's Conference Room
  8:45 am MEETING ON THE SHANGHAI EXPO
  9:30 am Secretary's Outer Office
  9:30 am PRIVATE DROP-BY w/ "WILL-I-AM"
  9:40 am Secretary's Outer Office
  9:45 am
  9:50 am
  PHOTO OP
  Treaty Room
  9:55 am DEPART State Department *En route Dirksen Senate Office Building
  10:10 am ARRIVE Dirlcsen Senate Office Building
  10:15 am PULL-ASIDE MEETING w/SENATORS LEAHY AND GREGG
  10:25 am 105 Dirksen Senate Office Building
  10:30 am TESTIMONY BEFORE SENATE APPROPRIATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE
  12:30 pm (t) ON STATE AND FOREIGN OPERATIONS
  192 Dirksen Senate Office Building
  12:35 pm (t) DEPART Dirksen Senate Office Building
  En route Russell Senate Office Building
  12:40 pm (t) ARRIVE Russell Senate Office Building
  12:40 pm RIBBON-CUTTING CEREMONY FOR THE DEPARTMENT'S
  12:50 pm SENATE LIAISON OFFICE 189 Russell Senate Office Building
  12:50 pm DEPART Russell Senate Office Building *En route Capitol Building
  12:55 pm ARRIVE Capitol Building
  1:00 pm LUNCH w/SENATOR BARBARA MIKULSKI
  2:00 pm Senator's Dining Room
  2:05 pm DEPART Capitol Building *En route Dirksen Senate Building
  2:10 pm ARRIVE Dirksen Senate Building
  2:30 pm TESTIMONY BEFORE SENATE FOREIGN RELATIONS COMMITTEE
  4:30 pm (t) 419 Dirksen Senate Office Building
  4:35 pm (t) DEPART Dirksen Senate Office Building *En route State Department
  4:50 pm (t) ARRIVE State Department
  4:55 pm OFFICE TIME
  5:40 pm Secretary's Office
  5:40 pm MEETING w/RICR, JACK AND JAKE
  6:00 pm Secretary's Office
  6:15 pm DEPART State Department *En route Bibiana Restaurant
  6:30 pm ARRIVE Bibiana Restaurant
  6:30 pm PRIVATE DINNER w/MADELEINE ALBRIGHT Bibiana Restaurant
  8:00 pm (t) DEPART Bibiana Restaurant *En route Private Residence
  8:15 pm (t) ARRIVE Private Residence
  ###

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767394 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 8:17 AM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject Mini Schedule 2/24/10 Wednesday
  7:55 am ARRIVE State Department
  8:00 am COFFEE w/JEFF IMMELT AND INDRA NOOYI
  8:30 am Secretary's Outer Office
  8:30 am DAILY SENIOR STAFF MEETING
  8:45 am Secretary's Conference Room
  8:45 am MEETING ON THE SHANGHAI EXPO
  9:30 am Secretary's Outer Office
  9:30 am PRIVATE DROP-BY w/ "WILL-I-AM"
  9:40 am Secretary's Outer Office
  9:45 am
  9:50 am
  PHOTO OP
  Treaty Room
  9:55 am DEPART State Department *En route Dirksen Senate Office Building
  10:10 am ARRIVE Dirlcsen Senate Office Building
  10:15 am PULL-ASIDE MEETING w/SENATORS LEAHY AND GREGG
  10:25 am 105 Dirksen Senate Office Building
  10:30 am TESTIMONY BEFORE SENATE APPROPRIATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE
  12:30 pm (t) ON STATE AND FOREIGN OPERATIONS
  192 Dirksen Senate Office Building
  12:35 pm (t) DEPART Dirksen Senate Office Building
  En route Russell Senate Office Building
  12:40 pm (t) ARRIVE Russell Senate Office Building
  12:40 pm RIBBON-CUTTING CEREMONY FOR THE DEPARTMENT'S
  12:50 pm SENATE LIAISON OFFICE 189 Russell Senate Office Building
  12:50 pm DEPART Russell Senate Office Building *En route Capitol Building
  12:55 pm ARRIVE Capitol Building
  1:00 pm LUNCH w/SENATOR BARBARA MIKULSKI
  2:00 pm Senator's Dining Room
  2:05 pm DEPART Capitol Building *En route Dirksen Senate Building
  2:10 pm ARRIVE Dirksen Senate Building
  2:30 pm TESTIMONY BEFORE SENATE FOREIGN RELATIONS COMMITTEE
  4:30 pm (t) 419 Dirksen Senate Office Building
  4:35 pm (t) DEPART Dirksen Senate Office Building *En route State Department
  4:50 pm (t) ARRIVE State Department
  4:55 pm OFFICE TIME
  5:40 pm Secretary's Office
  5:40 pm MEETING w/RICR, JACK AND JAKE
  6:00 pm Secretary's Office
  6:15 pm DEPART State Department *En route Bibiana Restaurant
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767394 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767394 Date: 08/31/2015
  6:30 pm ARRIVE Bibiana Restaurant
  6:30 pm PRIVATE DINNER w/MADELEINE ALBRIGHT Bibiana Restaurant
  8:00 pm (t) DEPART Bibiana Restaurant *En route Private Residence
  8:15 pm (t) ARRIVE Private Residence
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767394 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767395
MetadataSubject: THANKS FROM SENATOR KLOBUCHAR
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767395/C05767395.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: Thanks from Senator Klobuchar
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 9:23 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767395
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: fyi
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767395 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 9:23 AM
  To:
  Subject FW: Thanks from Senator Klobuchar
  fyi
  Original Message--
  From: Bond, Michele T
  Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 8:21 AM
  To: 'Klobuchar, Amy (Klobuchar)'
  Subject: RE: Thanks from Senator Klobuchar
  Dear Sen. Klobuchar,
  Thank you for taking the time to send this message; you can be sure it will be read by many people. We know that we
  touch lives in the course of our work, sometimes during moments of unimaginable anguish, nearly always at a time of
  tremendous stress and worry. It is a privilege to be in a position to help. We never forget that the spirit and heart with
  which we respond to citizens in trouble matter as much as the actions we take.
  We are all celebrating the safe travel to the U.S. of these six little children, and the hundreds of others we've been able
  to assist under the orphan humanitarian parole program. Thank you very much for your great work and for the valuable
  information you kept sending us throughout the past few days.
  Sincerely, Michele Bond
  Original Message
  From: Klobuchar, Amy (Klobuchar) [mailto:AJK60@klobuchar.senate.gov]
  Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 7:45 AM
  To: Bond, Michele T
  Subject: Thanks from Senator Klobuchar
  Ambassador, Counsel General Moore, Deputy Secretary Bond and embassy staff
  Thanks again for all your great work on allowing the six adopted kids to leave haiti to go to their adopting families.
  Please forward this to all involved. I was very impressed by how all of you handled such a difficult situation. I got a little
  sense of what you were facing as the moms would call me on the hour! I know these six children are such a small part
  of the challenges everyone working in haiti faces each day, but the fact that people cared so much to help gives me such
  faith in our efforts and State Department staff. I will write all of this in a letter to Secretary Clinton, but please know
  that there are six little children that may never meet all of you who helped, who may be too young to remeber your
  work as they grow up in our country, but it is your good work that has given them their new lives. Thank you.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767395 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767396
MetadataSubject: THANKS FROM SENATOR KLOBUCHAR
MetadataTo: Bond, Michele T
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767396/C05767396.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: Thanks from Senator Klobuchar
ExtractedTo: Bond, Michele T
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.goy>
ExtractedCc: Kennedy, Patrick F; Lew, Jacob J; Jacobs, Janice L
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 1:46 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767396
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  So nice - congrats to you and thanks for all the work you are doing.
  cdm

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767396 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.goy>
  Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 1:46 PM
  To: Bond, Michele T
  Cc: Kennedy, Patrick F; Lew, Jacob J; Jacobs, Janice L
  Subject: RE: Thanks from Senator Klobuchar
  So nice - congrats to you and thanks for all the work you are doing.
  cdm
  Original Message
  From: Bond, Michele T
  Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 8:21 AM
  To: 'Klobuchar, Amy (Klobuchar)'
  Subject: RE: Thanks from Senator Klobuchar
  Dear Sen. Klobuchar,
  Thank you for taking the time to send this message; you can be sure it will be read by many people. We know that we
  touch lives in the course of our work, sometimes during moments of unimaginable anguish, nearly always at a time of
  tremendous stress and worry. It is a privilege to be in a position to help. We never forget that the spirit and heart with
  which we respond to citizens in trouble matter as much as the actions we take.
  We are all celebrating the safe travel to the U.S. of these six little children, and the hundreds of others we've been able
  to assist under the orphan humanitarian parole program. Thank you very much for your great work and for the valuable
  information you kept sending us throughout the past few days.
  Sincerely, Michele Bond
  Original Message
  From: Klobuchar, Amy (Klobuchar) [mailto:AJK60@klobuchar.senate.gov]
  Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 7:45 AM
  To: Bond, Michele T
  Subject: Thanks from Senator Klobuchar
  Ambassador, Counsel General Moore, Deputy Secretary Bond and embassy staff
  Thanks again for all your great work on allowing the six adopted kids to leave haiti to go to their adopting families.
  Please forward this to all involved. I was very impressed by how all of you handled such a difficult situation. I got a little
  sense of what you were facing as the moms would call me on the hour! I know these six children are such a small part
  of the challenges everyone working in haiti faces each day, but the fact that people cared so much to help gives me such
  faith in our efforts and State Department staff. I will write all of this in a letter to Secretary Clinton, but please know
  that there are six little children that may never meet all of you who helped, who may be too young to remeber your
  work as they grow up in our country, but it is your good work that has given them their new lives. Thank you.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767396 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767400
MetadataSubject: HAITI'S PRIME MINISTER TARGETED FOR OUSTER BY LAWMAKERS - MIAMI HERALD
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: MillsCD@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2009-10-27T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_045/DOC_0C05767400/C05767400.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: RE: Haiti's prime minister targeted for ouster by lawmakers - Miami Herald
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-II
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 10:44 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767400
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767400 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 10:44 AM
  To:
  Subject FW: Haiti's prime minister targeted for ouster by lawmakers - Miami Herald
  From: Morgan, Jack A
  Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 10:27 AM
  To: NEWS-Haiti; NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-II
  Subject: RE: Haiti's prime minister targeted for ouster by lawmakers - Miami Herald
  Haiti®s prime minister targeted for
  ouster by lawmakers
  Haitian senators want to oust the country's prime minister, clad ing
  she has moved too slowly in addressing crucial problems.
  BY JACQUELINE CHARLES
  JCHARLES@MIAMIHERALD.COM
  PORT-AU-PRINCE -- With Haiti poised to enjoy the economic benefits of long-elusive stability, foreign
  diplomats are scrambling behind the scenes to keep it all from unraveling as several lawmakers derhand the
  ouster of the country's prime minister.
  A small but powerful group of senators is seeking the removal of Prime Minister Miche&grave;le Pierre-Louis --
  and possibly several of her ministers -- on charges that she has moved too slowly to solve Haiti's problems.
  "The situation is critical," said Sen. Jean Hector Anacasis, who is among the six senators behind a recent
  summons for Pierre-Louis to appear before Haiti's Senate on Thursday. Under Haiti's constitution, the Senate
  can fire a sitting government.
  "We are the ones on the ground who hear the people's cry, who hear them criticizing us, the government,
  saying nothing has been done. We have to replace the woman," Anacasis said. "If they are accusing us of
  inviting a crisis, then we are inviting a crisis to avert another crisis."
  The internal political maneuvering comes just three weeks after former U.S. President and U.N. Special Envoy
  to Haiti Bill Clinton led a historic trade mission here, triggering optimism that this land of seemingly missed
  opportunities may finally be turning around.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767400 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767400 Date: 07/31/2015
  Before a gathering of 600 investors -- 200 of them foreign -- Clinton championed Haiti's stability, promising that
  the risks were the lowest they have ever been in a crisis-prone Haiti. Now, both Haitian and foreign observers
  fear that political differences could trigger a crisis and send potential investors packing.
  "They cannot afford to do this. It is not good for investments," said one diplomat who asked for anonymity
  because of the sensitivity of what is viewed as a domestic matter. "It is all so frustrating."
  On Monday, diplomats spent the day shuffling between meetings with President Rene Preval, and discussions
  with Pierre-Louis. The matter even warranted a weekend phone call to Preval from U.S. Secretary of State
  Hillary Clinton. Clinton spoke of her concerns and reiterated U.S. support for Pierre-Louis, according to several
  sources privy to the conversation.
  Preval, in turn, told Clinton that he was not behind the move to oust Pierre-Louis and has no control over the
  lawmakers. Critics disagree, pointing out that following the recent Senate elections, marred by fraud
  allegations and low turnout, Preval now controls two-thirds of the chamber, and that most of the six senators
  leading the charge are from his Lespwa (HOPE) political coalition,
  POLITICALLY RISKY
  Still, some are asking whether he's willing to spend the political capital to prevent the ouster of Pierre-Louis, a
  one-time friend and confidante who accepted her appointment as a storm-battered Haiti was gripped by
  political gridlock after the Senate fired then-Prime Minister Jacques-Edouard Alexis following food riots then
  failed to ratify two of Preval's choices.
  Neither Preval nor Pierre-Louis responded to interview requests from The Miami Herald. In a taped message to
  the nation Monday night, Pierre-Louis defended her government's record and explained her reasons for taking
  the job.
  Since her appointment a year ago, Pierre-Louis has appeared often before parliament but this is the first time
  she has been summoned, a move that usually signals a no-confidence vote.
  Pierre-Louis has mustered considerable support abroad from her many trips, including stops in South Florida.
  But she has failed to win over supporters in parliament. Her dismissal, in effect, would topple her government.
  Initially, senators were seeking to dismiss the ministers of finance and justice, both of whom are close to
  Pierre-Louis. But after three days of meetings at a hotel near the palace, senators decided to issue the
  summons to Pierre-Louis, Anacasis told The Miami Herald.
  A majority of the 29 senators have indicated they would vote to fire Pierre-Louis, Anacasis said.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767400 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767400 Date: 07/31/2015
  Pierre-Louis was in Europe on business, and returned to Haiti Sunday night where she was greeted by a small
  group of protesters waving signs saying, "We are tired of changing governments."
  In her defense, a handful of lawmakers and supporters have pleaded with the group of six to cancel Thursday's
  hearing.
  'SELF-INTEREST
  "Since becoming prime minister, she,has struggled with limited human and financial resources and with a
  structure of government that has been emasculated over decades of mismanagement and selfish politics," said
  Robert Maguire, a Haiti expert at Washington, D.C.-based Trinity University.
  "She has had to confront the narrow politics of self-interest imposed upon her ability to govern. And yet, she
  has persevered, building a solid track record of relief and recovery in the aftermath of Haiti's devastating
  storms of late 2008 and thereby contributing immensely to that spirit of Haiti's hope for a brighter future."
  It's unclear what has triggered the move, though some believe it revolves around Haiti's presidential elections.
  While still a year away, political jockeying already has begun, with some suggesting politicians may be seeking
  to position themselves and candidates for the scheduled November 2010 elections.
  Meanwhile on Monday, as politicians weighed whether Pierre-Louis would fight or resign, some supporters
  tried to persuade her to visit Preval to see if the two could reach a compromise. She has said she will fight, but
  has no plans to go before parliament and be humiliated. That has some wondering whether she would resign
  before Thursday.
  Patrick Delatour, Haiti's tourism and acting commerce minister, said lawmakers should weigh the
  consequences of their actions carefully.
  "They should understand solving problems by any government is a process, a slow process," he said. "Firing
  this government does not mean the next government will be able to solve the problems any faster. It definitely
  means the process of solving problems will stop and will have to start again."
  Robert P. Sanders
  Senior Watch Officer
  Operations Center
  U.S. Department of State
  (202) 647 - 1512
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767400 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767402
MetadataSubject: YOUR MEETING TOMORROW WITH HOLBROOKE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Otero, Maria
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767402/C05767402.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Your Meeting Tomorrow with Holbrooke
ExtractedFrom: Otero, Maria <OteroM2@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 6:54 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767402
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Hillary:
  I met with Holbrooke today on water. Pakistani military called it their third most important strategic issue. Great
  worries about India/Pakistan tension over 1960 agreement that regulates Indus River. We agreed our teams will work
  together, most likely through the World Bank supporting the Abu Dhabi Dialogue, which brings together representatives
  from the seven countries that share the Indus River Basin. This is the best forum we know of where India and Pakistan
  can meet to discuss water issues. In the context of the shared waters memo and chart I gave you last week, this ranks as
  potentially one of the most conflict prone, and one where the US should engage to get the parties to work together.
  We are advancing well in developing a policy/action plan for you to announce on World Water Day on March 22.
  Safe travels to Latin America, so glad you are going.
  Maria
  Under Secretary of State
  for Democracy and Global Affairs
  Department of State
  2201 C St. NW Room 7261
  Washington DC 20520
  202- 647-6240

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767402 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Otero, Maria <OteroM2@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 6:54 PM
  To:
  Subject: Your Meeting Tomorrow with Holbrooke
  Hillary:
  I met with Holbrooke today on water. Pakistani military called it their third most important strategic issue. Great
  worries about India/Pakistan tension over 1960 agreement that regulates Indus River. We agreed our teams will work
  together, most likely through the World Bank supporting the Abu Dhabi Dialogue, which brings together representatives
  from the seven countries that share the Indus River Basin. This is the best forum we know of where India and Pakistan
  can meet to discuss water issues. In the context of the shared waters memo and chart I gave you last week, this ranks as
  potentially one of the most conflict prone, and one where the US should engage to get the parties to work together.
  We are advancing well in developing a policy/action plan for you to announce on World Water Day on March 22.
  Safe travels to Latin America, so glad you are going.
  Maria
  Under Secretary of State
  for Democracy and Global Affairs
  Department of State
  2201 C St. NW Room 7261
  Washington DC 20520
  202- 647-6240
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767402 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767409
MetadataSubject: (AP) DANISH INTELLIGENCE PLANNED ATTACKS NOT IMMINENT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-10-27T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_045/DOC_0C05767409/C05767409.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (AP) Danish intelligence: Planned, attacks not imminent
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-II
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 2:44 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767409
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767409 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 2:44 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (AP) Danish intelligence: Planned, attacks not imminent
  From: Morgan, Jack A
  To: NEWS-EUR; NEWS-WHA; NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-II
  Sent: Tue Oct 27 12:10:48 2009
  Subject: (AP) Danish intelligence: Planned attacks not imminent.
  CHICAGO (AP) - Danish intelligence officials say they worked closely with the FBI to thwart an alleged terrorist plot by
  two Chicago men against a Danish newspaper. The Danish Security and Intelligence Service, or PET, said that attacks
  against the newspaper were not imminent.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767409 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767410
MetadataSubject: GATES ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE RESOLUTION
MetadataTo: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataFrom: VermaRR@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-25T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767410/C05767410.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Gates on Armenian Genocide Resolution
ExtractedTo: H; Sullivan, Jacob J
ExtractedFrom: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 12:05 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767410
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  "Our view is that the negotiations that have been taking place between Turkey and
  Armenia offer a positive path for the future. Anything that would impede the
  success of those discussions and negotiations I think is objectionable and I
  would just leave it there."
  --Secretary Gates, News Conference, Ankara Turkey, 2/9/10 (Response to
  question: Do you think it will be helpful to US-Turkish relations if the Armenian
  Genocide Resolution passes?)

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767410 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 12:05 AM
  To: H; Sullivan, Jacob J
  Subject: Gates on Armenian Genocide Resolution
  "Our view is that the negotiations that have been taking place between Turkey and
  Armenia offer a positive path for the future. Anything that would impede the
  success of those discussions and negotiations I think is objectionable and I
  would just leave it there."
  --Secretary Gates, News Conference, Ankara Turkey, 2/9/10 (Response to
  question: Do you think it will be helpful to US-Turkish relations if the Armenian
  Genocide Resolution passes?)
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767410 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767419
MetadataSubject: RE:
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-25T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767419/C05767419.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re:
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 8:20 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767419
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Sorry -- just seeing. Ryabkov called for Ellen this morning and they are set to talk at 1030. Plan is for her to deliver same
  message and go to Geneva this evening.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767419 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 8:20 AM
  To: H
  Subject: Re:
  Sorry -- just seeing. Ryabkov called for Ellen this morning and they are set to talk at 1030. Plan is for her to deliver same
  message and go to Geneva this evening.
  Original Message
  From: H <H0R22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Thu Feb 25 07:40:47 2010
  Subject: Fw:
  I assume he's avoiding the call. I hope Ellen is going anyway and that she will chase Antonov to Moscow if necessary.
  What more can we do?
  Original Message
  From: Huma Abedin
  To: H
  Sent: Thu Feb 25 07:23:13 2010
  Subject:
  Lavrov cannot do call this morning.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767419 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767420
MetadataSubject: MINI SCHEDULE 2/25/10 THURSDAY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-25T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767420/C05767420.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Mini Schedule 2/25/10 Thursday
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC©state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 8:34 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767420
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  9:00 am DEPART Private Residence
  En route Rayburn House Office Building
  9:00 am CONFERENCE CALL w/PREP TEAM
  En route Rayburn House Office Building
  9:20 am ARRIVE Rayburn House Office Building
  9:30 am TESTIMONY BEFORE HOUSE FOREIGN AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
  12:15 pm 2172 Rayburn House Office Building
  12:20 pm DROP-BY w/CONGRESSWOMAN DIANE WATSON
  12:30 pm 2358A Raybum House Office Building
  12:30 pm HOLD/LUNCH
  12:55 pm 2358A Rayburn House Office Building
  1:00 pm TESTIMONY BEFORE HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE
  3:00 pm FOR STATE, FOREIGN OPERATIONS AND RELATED AGENCIES
  2359 Rayburn House Office Building
  3:05 pm DEPART Rayburn House Office Building
  En route State Department
  3:25 pm ARRIVE State Department
  3:30 pm OFFICE TIME
  4:30 pm Secretary's Office
  4:30 pm MEETING w/ RICHARD HOLBROOICE
  5:15 pm Secretary's Outer Office
  5:30 pm MEETING vv./ADMIRAL MIKE MULLEN, CHAIRMAN JOINT CHIEFS
  6:00 pm OF STAFF Secretary's Office
  6:00 pm MEETING w/DENNIS ROSS (I)
  6:30 pm Secretary's Office
  6:30 pm DEPART State Department
  En route Private Residence
  6:40 pm ARRIVE Private Residence
  ###

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767420 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC©state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 8:34 AM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Mini Schedule 2/25/10 Thursday
  9:00 am DEPART Private Residence
  En route Rayburn House Office Building
  9:00 am CONFERENCE CALL w/PREP TEAM
  En route Rayburn House Office Building
  9:20 am ARRIVE Rayburn House Office Building
  9:30 am TESTIMONY BEFORE HOUSE FOREIGN AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
  12:15 pm 2172 Rayburn House Office Building
  12:20 pm DROP-BY w/CONGRESSWOMAN DIANE WATSON
  12:30 pm 2358A Raybum House Office Building
  12:30 pm HOLD/LUNCH
  12:55 pm 2358A Rayburn House Office Building
  1:00 pm TESTIMONY BEFORE HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE
  3:00 pm FOR STATE, FOREIGN OPERATIONS AND RELATED AGENCIES
  2359 Rayburn House Office Building
  3:05 pm DEPART Rayburn House Office Building
  En route State Department
  3:25 pm ARRIVE State Department
  3:30 pm OFFICE TIME
  4:30 pm Secretary's Office
  4:30 pm MEETING w/ RICHARD HOLBROOICE
  5:15 pm Secretary's Outer Office
  5:30 pm MEETING vv./ADMIRAL MIKE MULLEN, CHAIRMAN JOINT CHIEFS
  6:00 pm OF STAFF Secretary's Office
  6:00 pm MEETING w/DENNIS ROSS (I)
  6:30 pm Secretary's Office
  6:30 pm DEPART State Department
  En route Private Residence
  6:40 pm ARRIVE Private Residence
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767420 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767423
MetadataSubject: WSJ: OBAMA ADVISERS TO AID TORIES' ELECTION TV BATTLE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-25T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767423/C05767423.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: WSJ: Obama Advisers to Aid Tories Election TV Battle
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 9:02 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767423
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  •
  • EUROPE NEWS
  • FEBRUARY 25, 2010
  Obama Advisers to Aid Tories' Election TV
  Battle
  By IAIN MARTIN
  Advisers close to U.S. President Barack Obama have been drafted by David Cameron to help the Conservatives in their
  election campaign against Gordon Brown and Labour.
  The Tories have signed a contract with Squier, Knapp, Dunn Communications—a Washington-based Democrat-leaning
  political consultancy— to help them prepare for the first-ever television debates between leaders during a British election
  camialin.
  David Cameron
  The firm also is expected to offer some advice more broadly to the Tory leader on the Conservative campaign in the lead-
  up to voting, likely to take place on May 6.
  Opinion polls have suggested a narrowing of the gap between the two main parties—with the Conservative lead cut to six
  to seven points in the two most recent polls earlier this week.
  A Conservative spokesman confirmed Wednesday night that Squier, Knapp, Dunn will act as consultants for the television
  debates.
  Anita Dunn, one of the firm's senior partners, was hired by Mr. Obama in 2006 ahead of his run for president and was the
  communications director at the White House until November. Bill Knapp, another senior partner and veteran of the
  successful Obama campaign, is a close adviser to the mayor of New York City, Michael Bloomberg.
  Tory campaign insiders say they have been talking to the firm for several months after a recommendation from Mayor
  Bloomberg, who retains close links with the British Tory leadership.
  He was a lifelong Democrat who switched to the Republicans when he first ran for mayor.
  The British general election is taking on a particularly American flavor, with the prime minister also understood to be
  seeking advice from a consultant based in the U.S. The Times of London reported that Joel Benenson, a polling and
  strategy adviser who worked on the team that readied Mr. Obama for the American TV debates, is helping Mr. Brown.
  None of the British parties has experience of leaders' debates and as a consequence are looking outside for help.
  However, it is the decision of the Tories to reach out across the traditional ideological divide to senior Democrats that is
  surprising. Their party usually has looked to Republican strategists for advice, with Labour and the Democrats retaining
  close links.
  Ms. Dunn is a veteran of Democrat politics, beginning her career in Jimmy Carter's administration and subsequently
  working as a consultant on many election campaigns. She returned to the White House with President Obama but left late
  last year when her husband, Robert Bauer, the president's personal attorney, was unveiled as the incoming White House
  counsel.
  Mr. Knapp made television ads for the Obama campaign, has worked on five presidential campaigns and played a leading
  role in Mayor Bloomberg's three election wins.
  The pre-election atmosphere in the U.K. has become increasingly fraught, with the parties trading blows on allegations of
  bullying inside No. 10 Downing Street made in a new book on the Labour government by journalist Andrew Rawnsley.
  In the latest developments, the prime minister Wednesday in a GMTV breakfast television interview denied that he had
  known about briefings by some of his aides against Alistair Darling, his chancellor of the exchequer.
  In a remarkably frank interview Tuesday with Jeff Randall of Sky News, Mr. Darling said that when he remarked in the
  summer of 2008 that the worst global recession in 60 years was underway, No. 10 had "unleashed the forces of hell."
  Mr Brown said on GMTV: "I was never part of anything to do with this. Look, this was the most amazing time.. .and lots of
  things were happening in this time. But I would never instruct anybody to do anything other than support my chancellor,
  and I think Alistair will confirm that."
  At a rowdy Prime Minister's Questions in the House of Commons Wednesday, Mr. Cameron questioned Mr. Brown on the
  row.
  Write to lain Martin at iain.martinwsi.com
  Copyright 2009 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767423 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 9:02 AM
  To:
  Subject: WSJ: Obama Advisers to Aid Tories Election TV Battle
  •
  • EUROPE NEWS
  • FEBRUARY 25, 2010
  Obama Advisers to Aid Tories' Election TV
  Battle
  By IAIN MARTIN
  Advisers close to U.S. President Barack Obama have been drafted by David Cameron to help the Conservatives in their
  election campaign against Gordon Brown and Labour.
  The Tories have signed a contract with Squier, Knapp, Dunn Communications—a Washington-based Democrat-leaning
  political consultancy— to help them prepare for the first-ever television debates between leaders during a British election
  camialin.
  David Cameron
  The firm also is expected to offer some advice more broadly to the Tory leader on the Conservative campaign in the lead-
  up to voting, likely to take place on May 6.
  Opinion polls have suggested a narrowing of the gap between the two main parties—with the Conservative lead cut to six
  to seven points in the two most recent polls earlier this week.
  A Conservative spokesman confirmed Wednesday night that Squier, Knapp, Dunn will act as consultants for the television
  debates.
  Anita Dunn, one of the firm's senior partners, was hired by Mr. Obama in 2006 ahead of his run for president and was the
  communications director at the White House until November. Bill Knapp, another senior partner and veteran of the
  successful Obama campaign, is a close adviser to the mayor of New York City, Michael Bloomberg.
  Tory campaign insiders say they have been talking to the firm for several months after a recommendation from Mayor
  Bloomberg, who retains close links with the British Tory leadership.
  He was a lifelong Democrat who switched to the Republicans when he first ran for mayor.
  The British general election is taking on a particularly American flavor, with the prime minister also understood to be
  seeking advice from a consultant based in the U.S. The Times of London reported that Joel Benenson, a polling and
  strategy adviser who worked on the team that readied Mr. Obama for the American TV debates, is helping Mr. Brown.
  None of the British parties has experience of leaders' debates and as a consequence are looking outside for help.
  However, it is the decision of the Tories to reach out across the traditional ideological divide to senior Democrats that is
  surprising. Their party usually has looked to Republican strategists for advice, with Labour and the Democrats retaining
  close links.
  Ms. Dunn is a veteran of Democrat politics, beginning her career in Jimmy Carter's administration and subsequently
  working as a consultant on many election campaigns. She returned to the White House with President Obama but left late
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767423 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767423 Date: 08/31/2015
  last year when her husband, Robert Bauer, the president's personal attorney, was unveiled as the incoming White House
  counsel.
  Mr. Knapp made television ads for the Obama campaign, has worked on five presidential campaigns and played a leading
  role in Mayor Bloomberg's three election wins.
  The pre-election atmosphere in the U.K. has become increasingly fraught, with the parties trading blows on allegations of
  bullying inside No. 10 Downing Street made in a new book on the Labour government by journalist Andrew Rawnsley.
  In the latest developments, the prime minister Wednesday in a GMTV breakfast television interview denied that he had
  known about briefings by some of his aides against Alistair Darling, his chancellor of the exchequer.
  In a remarkably frank interview Tuesday with Jeff Randall of Sky News, Mr. Darling said that when he remarked in the
  summer of 2008 that the worst global recession in 60 years was underway, No. 10 had "unleashed the forces of hell."
  Mr Brown said on GMTV: "I was never part of anything to do with this. Look, this was the most amazing time.. .and lots of
  things were happening in this time. But I would never instruct anybody to do anything other than support my chancellor,
  and I think Alistair will confirm that."
  At a rowdy Prime Minister's Questions in the House of Commons Wednesday, Mr. Cameron questioned Mr. Brown on the
  row.
  Write to lain Martin at iain.martinwsi.com
  Copyright 2009 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767423 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767425
MetadataSubject: MARGARET'S LAST DAY EXTENDED
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-25T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767425/C05767425.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Margaret's last day extended
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 9:28 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767425
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  She is staying a few more weeks b/c it lets her retire.
  Lona already has been at work per an earlier email from me I forgot on a party for her and picked a date that works for
  you and her.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767425 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 9:28 AM
  To: H
  Subject: Margaret's last day extended
  She is staying a few more weeks b/c it lets her retire.
  Lona already has been at work per an earlier email from me I forgot on a party for her and picked a date that works for
  you and her.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767425 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767429
MetadataSubject: BRAVO! BRAVA! ISSUE YOUR STATEMENT! SID
MetadataTo: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataFrom: Reines, Philippe I
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-05T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0063/DOC_0C05767429/C05767429.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
ExtractedTo: Sullivan, Jacob J; H
ExtractedFrom: Reines, Philippe I <reinesp@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: MillsCD@state.gov <MillsCD@state.gov>; Sullivann@state.gov <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, February 5, 2010 7:44 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767429
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: And your statement is out
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767429 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Reines, Philippe I <reinesp@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, February 5, 2010 7:44 AM
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J; H
  Subject Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  And your statement is out
  Original Message ---
  From: Sullivan, Jacobi
  To: 'HDR22@clintonemail.com' <HDR22@clintonemail.com>; Reines, Philippe I
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 07:41:36 2010
  Subject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Here is what Brown said:
  Let me thank the American Government for their unstinting support -- especially Secretary of State Clinton, her efforts
  over these last few weeks. And Presidents Obama, Bush and Clinton. And we particularly welcome Secretary of State
  Clinton's initiative today that she will host a Northern Ireland Investment Conference this spring.
  Original Message ---
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 07:27:21 2010
  Subject: Fw: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Fyi
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeor
  To: H
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 07:24:17 2010
  Subject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Ambos at event would praise your role
  Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  Original Message----
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 07:06:39
  To: 'sbwhoeop
  Subject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  I will be doing a press event at 8:30. Do you know if Gordon mentioned me? Can you find out? Is Shaun still coming
  Monday? If so, I want to take you both out to dinner!
  Original Message ----
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767429 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767429 Date: 08/31/2015
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Cc: MillsCD@state.gov <MillsCD@state.gov>; Sullivann@state.gov <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 06:58:04 2010
  Subject: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Northern Ireland agrees power-sharing deal
  Gordon Brown hails historic deal which will see justice and policing powers be devolved to Stormont from 12 April
  * Henry McDonald <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/henrymcdonald>
  * guardian.co.uk <http://www.guardian.co.uk/>, Friday 5 February 2010 11.42 GMT
  <http://www.guardian.co.uk/help/accessibility>
  Gordon Brown, Peter Robinson and Martin McGuinness <http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-
  images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/2/5/1265368562294/Gordon-Brown-Peter-Robins-001.jpg>
  Gordon Brown, the DUP leader, Peter Robinson, and Sinn Fein's Martin McGuinness (I to r) talk to the press after the
  Northern Ireland power-sharing deal was announced. Photograph: Julien Behal/PA
  Justice and policing powers will be devolved to Northern Ireland <http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/northernireland> 's
  power-sharing government from 12 April in a historic deal agreed by the main parties that "opens a new chapter" after
  decades of violence, Gordon Brown said today.
  Standing alongside his Irish counterpart, Brian Cowen, at a press conference at Hillsborough Castle outside Belfast, the
  prime minister said the "inspirational" agreement between Sinn Fein <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/sinn-fein>
  and the Democratic Unionist party (DUP) <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/dup> was a foundation for lasting peace.
  The deal —finally agreed to by the DUP <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/feb/05/northern-ireland-dup-ulster-
  deal> last night and described as a final piece in the jigsaw after a long search for peace — comes after two weeks of
  round-the-clock negotiations and brings an end to fears that the power-sharing government might collapse.
  It will see policing and justice powers devolved from Westminster to the assembly within weeks and includes new plans
  on overseeing parades.
  Brown, who travelled to Belfast this morning, said the agreement had been possible because of "a new spirit of mutual
  co-operation and respect".
  The deal meets a key Sinn Fein demand and prevents the republican party from walking out of the power-sharing
  executive. In return, the DUP has secured reforms to the way loyalist marches are handled in Northern Ireland, including
  the abolition of the Parades Commission, a body most unionists regard as biased in favour of nationalists.
  A cross-community vote will now be held in the Stormont assembly on 9 March before the policing and justice powers
  are devolved from London on 12 April.
  Brown told reporters: "The achievements have been as great as they are inspirational. This moment and this agreement
  belongs to the people of Northern Ireland, all of the people, and now more than ever before so does their future ... This
  is the last chapter of a long and troubled story and the beginning of a new chapter after decades of violence, years of
  talks, weeks of stalemate."
  Cowen praised both unionists and nationalists for making "fair and balanced compromises" to bridge the divisions and
  said the quality of the negotiations meant that the "devolved institutions can and will work".
  The Northern Ireland secretary, Shaun Woodward, said the deal would further isolate republican dissidents who have
  launched three separate gun and bomb attacks against police stations in the province over the last 10 days. The deal
  would "absolutely" make Northern Ireland a safer place, he said.
  The DUP leader, Peter Robinson, said the agreement "will be more enduring because of the time spent" in forming it.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767429 Date: 08/31/2015
  B6

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767429 Date: 08/31/2015
  Referring back to the Belfast Agreement of 1998 <http://www.nio.gov.uk/the-agreement> when negotiations bore fruit
  at the 11th hour, the Sinn Fein president, Gerry Adams, described the current deal and the rescue of power-sharing as
  "yet another very good Friday".
  Jeffrey Donaldson told the Guardian the DUP's 36-strong assembly team was now unanimously in favour of the deal.
  But the Ulster Unionist party (UUP) has yet to officially back the package which will allow the assembly to set up
  legislation to change the way parades are judged.
  A UUP spokeswoman said members wanted to see the proposed agreement before giving their response to the two
  governments. "We have not had sight of this agreement and until we do we will not be signing up to it," she said.
  The talks, which centred on Hillsborough Castle, outside Belfast, are the longest set of continuous negotiations held in
  the near 20-year peace process. Sinn Fein had accused the DUP of stalling on the transfer of policing powers for the last
  three years and it was feared that failure to find agreement could see the collapse of the power-sharing government led
  by the two parties.
  The agreement finally came near midnight at Stormont's parliament building. Earlier in the evening Sinn Fein had said
  the basis of a deal was on the table and it was giving the DUP leadership the time to persuade its party to accept it.
  Robinson emerged from a meeting of party colleagues to confirm that he had secured unanimous support for the
  proposals. Earlier in the week up to 14 DUP assembly members had opposed a proposed deal because it did not give
  unionists enough concessions.
  Robinson said he would now look to gain the support of the community and the smaller assembly parties for the deal.
  "We have a basis upon which we can go forward and recommend it [the deal] to our party, to the other parties in
  Northern Ireland and to the community.
  "An essential element of the Democratic Unionist Party's manifesto is the requirement for community confidence; we
  believe this can be the basis for gaining that confidence."
  However the leader of the hardline Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV), Jim Allister, questioned why the 14 DUP rebels had
  changed their minds.
  "The deal hasn't changed, only the snowmen of the DUP, who melted once the heat came on," Allister said.
  The DUP now faces a struggle to ward off the TUV threat in the forthcoming general election. Allister will portray the
  deal as a sell-out of unionist principles and a sop to republicanism.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767429 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767431
MetadataSubject: 2/25/10 SENIOR STAFF AND REGIONAL BUREAUS MEETINGS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-25T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767431/C05767431.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: 2/25/10 Senior Staff and Regional Bureaus Meetings
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 1:01 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767431
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: fyi
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767431 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 1:01 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW: 2/25/10 Senior Staff and Regional Bureaus Meetings
  fyi
  From: Smith, Daniel B
  Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 12:30 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Abedin, Huma; Sullivan, Jacob J
  Subject: 2/25/10 Senior Staff and Regional Bureaus Meetings
  SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSFIED
  HAITI
  • Jack reported briefly on his conversations with Lowey and Oberstar on Haiti. Lowey raised two concerns: first,
  that we don't care about education in Haiti and, second, that we don't care about education in general. Jack
  pushed back on both fronts. He noted that Lowey also emphasized the need for accountability in what we are
  spending. Oberstar identified the type of trees that need to be planted for reforestation in Haiti, and said that
  the shift to propane gas won't work; we need instead to focus on providing the right sort of charcoal.
  • H reported Friday's CODEL to Haiti has been cancelled.
  Iraq
  • Jack noted that we will set up monthly meetings on Iraq transition with the team here in Washington and the
  team in Baghdad. He also reported on a meeting with a two-star General and our DCM yesterday, in which the
  two-star complained about allegedly inadequate funding in our budget for transition issues in 2011. Jack said
  that the budget had been agreed interagency and DoD had endorsed it.
  Middle East
  •
  Northern Mexico
  Pat voiced concern over the uptick in violence in northern Mexico and possible threats to our employees, noting
  we were doing everything possible to keep our people safe.
  PUBLIC AFFAIRS
  • PJ said his description of recent Israeli designation of new heritage sites in the West Bank as "provocative" had
  attracted some attention.
  • PA will put out a statement expressing concern over the Italian court decision against Google.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767431 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767431 Date: 08/31/2015
  LEGAL AFFAIRS
  • L, AF and others will send the Secretary a memo on the implications of the coup in Niger.
  * Harold believes we are close to an understanding with the Canadian on the return of Khadr, if we can return him
  under the right terms.
  * SecDef Gates has still not signed off on Article 75 of the First Additional Geneva Protocol. It may require another
  intervention by the Secretary.
  • Harold suggested, if possible, that the Secretary make an appearance at the American Society of International
  Law in late March.
  REGIONAL BUREAUS MEETING
  10
  • There will be a vote in the General Assembly tomorrow on a resolution on the Goldstone Report. The text is
  relatively moderate, but U.S. and Israel will likely be alone in opposing it. (Our friends in the Pacific have lost
  their votes for the time being because of non-payment of dues.)
  o Human Rights Council begins Monday and runs for four weeks. Maria Otero will be there for the opening.
  EUR
  • Inauguration in Ukraine went without incident, though Tymoshenko boycotted the ceremony. Yanukovich has
  said he wants to visit Washington early on to focus on bilateral relations and meet with IMF officials.
  • Jim Steinberg will travel to China next week. Chinese have made an official invitation. Will be no public
  announcement for the time being.
  • Kurt Campbell will meet with Tom Donilon to discuss the President's Indonesia trip, preparations for which are
  not going well. The changing political climate in Indonesia has made them extremely cautious.
  • Yar'Adua's return to Nigeria has unsettled the political situation and sparked rumors of possible military
  intervention. WH is considering a letter from the President to Nigeria's political elite urging restraint and
  cooperation.
  • On the good news front, the rapprochement between Chad and Sudan and the signing of a ceasefire agreement
  with the JEM represent real progress.
  • Situation in Somalia remains poor, with reports of a likely TFG offensive in Mogadishu and a build-up of forces
  on both sides.
  SCA
  EAP
  AF
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767431 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767431 Date: 08/31/2015
  • SCA will send the Secretary a memo on the first official India-Pakistan talks in capitals since the 2008 Mumbai
  attacks.
  • Kazakhs have provided us with a draft over flight agreement.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767431 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767432
MetadataSubject: ANOTHER MEMO ON BACKDROP TO THIS WEEK. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-29T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_050/DOC_0C05767432/C05767432.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 12:19 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767432
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Wasn't meant that way. Meant as sarcasm. Hoagland dislikes McD, thinks he's a problem.
  Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767432 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE
  IN PART
  B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 12:19 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  Wasn't meant that way. Meant as sarcasm. Hoagland dislikes McD, thinks he's a problem.
  Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:04:27
  To: 'sbwhoeop
  Subject: Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  I didn't read the McD reference that way. I actually thought it was complimentary of his spin skills. What am I missing?
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Nov 29 11:51:28 2009
  Subject: Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  It's there, just scroll down
  Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:38:00
  To: 'sbwhoeop
  Subject: Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  Can you send me the Hoagland piece?
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Nov 29 10:58:16 2009
  Subject: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  CONFIDENTIAL
  November 29, 2009
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767432 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767432 Date: 07/31/2015
  For: Hillary
  From: Sid
  Re: Backdrop to your coming week
  Below is a piece published today in The Observer, the Sunday newspaper of The Guardian, on the Chilcot inquiry,
  summarizing the testimony so far and what is expected this week while you are drumming up support for the
  Afghanistan initiative. Britain and Europe are riveted by Chilcot, especially official circles. The objective correlative, of
  course, is trust in any U.S. administration and deep skepticism about the Afghanistan project. Yet another undercurrent
  among the mandarins is disdainful resentment of indifference to Britain, a sentiment beyond Labour or the Tories but
  what has emerged as the view of the permanent establishment at Whitehall and elsewhere.
  Mendelson Watch: After Miliband declined to reach for the EU foreign secretaryship (though Sarkozy wanted him to
  take it and Brown was not averse, even favorable), Mendelson personally campaigned on his own for it among the
  Europeans. !Mendelson was eager to Miliband to take the EU post, allowing Mendelson to be appointed foreign
  minister. When Miliband refused, Mendelson's ambition was thwarted, and tried to seize the EU position for himself,
  but without any backing in Europe or from Gordon. The Europeans thought him mad. Suddenly, they recalled his bad or
  strange behavior as UK commissioner to the EU. When Christine Ashton was named, Mendelson briefed the press on her
  lack of credentials, etc. Ashton, as it happens, had worked the press to try to help Mendelson when he had gotten into
  the mess that led to his first resignation. Those inside the government who remember this see it as an illustration of the
  principle that no good deed goes unpunished. Mendelson, in a snit, is now not speaking to Gordon as though his
  rejection were Gordon's fault.
  One more item: Did you read Jim Hoagland in the Washington Post today? He nails McDonough for trashing Biden,
  among other things. Enclosed below story on Chilcot:
  http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/nov/29/iraq-war-inquiry-chilcot-blair
  Chilcot Inquiry: Mandarins take revenge on Tony Blair over Iraq Civil servants and diplomats are lining up to stick a knife
  into former PM's reputation
  * Toby Helm <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/tobyhelm> and Rajeev Syal
  <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/rajeev-syal>
  * The Observer <http://observer.guardian.co.uk> , Sunday 29 November 2009
  * Whitehall mandarins are supreme masters of subtle evasion. But they do not rise to the top of their trade without
  also knowing how to stick in the knife.
  At times the Chilcot inquiry into Britain's involvement in Iraq since 2001, which opened last week, resembled a
  gentlemen's club moved to the sanitised surroundings of the Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre in Westminster.
  Oxbridge-educated pillars of the establishment politely questioned other Oxbridge-educated pillars of the establishment
  about who said what to whom in which memo. The inquiry is a peculiar mixture of the old and the new, the open and
  closed. It is conducted in the language of Whitehall, yet beamed live by webcam to the world.
  Critics are convinced that, for all Sir John Chilcot's promises to the contrary, it will turn out to be another Whitehall
  whitewash. For the cognoscenti, little new information has yet emerged, and when the final report is written it will not
  seek to apportion blame. Yet beneath the equivocation and mandarin-speak, Whitehall seems, in as much as it knows
  how, to be using Chilcot to wield the scalpel. Throughout the first week the pent-up frustrations of diplomats and career
  civil servants over the way Tony Blair <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/tonyblair> and George Bush secretly plotted
  to oust Saddam Hussein, bypassing the "official channels" in which they operate, has been there for all to see.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767432 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767432 Date: 07/31/2015
  Chilcot is said to have been warned by his Whitehall friends that many witnesses will be ready to unburden themselves -
  finally to take revenge. In session after session they have appeared to do that. Blair's reputation has been sliced like
  salami day after day.
  Sir William Ehrman, the Foreign Office's former director of international security, volunteered last Wednesday that the
  threat from Saddam's supposed weapons of mass destruction was known to be limited.
  In the gentlest way he drove in the dagger. "We did, I think on 10 March [2003], get a report that chemical weapons
  might have remained disassembled and Saddam hadn't yet ordered their assembly. There was a suggestion that Iraq
  might lack warheads capable of effective dispersal of agents."
  Ever the diplomat, however, Ehrman went on to say that the intelligence warnings had not made any difference to the
  case for war. "I don't think it invalidated the point about the programmes he had. It was more about use," he said. But
  he had set the tone.
  On Thursday, Sir Christopher Meyer, UK ambassador in Washington from 1997 to 2003, who has already criticised the
  government over Iraq in his memoirs, went for Blair, mercilessly comparing his qualities as a war leader to those of
  Margaret Thatcher. "I'm not trying to make a party political point here whatsoever, but quite often I think about this:
  what would Margaret Thatcher have done?" Meyer asked. "I think she would have insisted on a coherent political and
  diplomatic strategy and she would have demanded the greatest clarity about what the heck happened if, and when, you
  removed Saddam Hussein."
  A former press secretary to John Major who can speak like a mandarin but, equally, can talk like a layman, he said Blair
  had failed miserably to extract a price from George Bush for his loyalty. "We could have achieved more by playing a
  tougher role... if, for example... Tony Blair had said: 'I want to help you, George, on this, but I have to say, in all honesty,
  that I will not be able to take part in any military operation unless we have palpable progress on the [Middle East] peace
  process and we have absolute clarity on what happens in Iraq if it comes up.' I think that would have changed the nature
  — it would not have led to a rupture — it would have changed the nature of American planning. "
  Even when defending UK policy, he was on the offensive. Asked if policy had been adapted to stay in line with
  Washington's, Meyer added: "I wouldn't say it was as extremely poodle-ish as that."
  On Friday, Sir Jeremy Greenstock, Britain's former ambassador to the United Nations, told Chilcot he had threatened to
  resign in 2002 if at least one security council resolution was not passed. He added: "I regard our participation in the
  military action in Iraq in March 2003 as legal but of questionable legitimacy, in that it did not have the democratically
  observable backing of the great majority of [UN] member states, or even perhaps of the majority of people inside the
  UK."
  Today new arguments are raging over whether the inquiry will have access to, and publish, the most sensitive
  documents — including legal advice given to the government by the former attorney general, Lord Goldsmith, during the
  lead-up to war. Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat leader, has written to Gordon Brown saying that, unless all such
  material is published, the inquiry will be a sham and the public's sense that it has been denied the facts will remain.
  But it will still be essential viewing nonetheless. This week will see more key witnesses. The most revealing testimony
  could come tomorrow when Sir David Manning, Blair's former foreign policy
  <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/foreignpolicy> adviser, is certain to be asked about his authorship of a memo
  which purportedly revealed details of a secret meeting between Bush and Blair in January 2003. According to reports,
  the five pages of secret documents, known as the Manning memo, recorded the White House meeting on 31 January
  which allegedly shows that Bush and Blair made a deal to carry out an invasion regardless of whether weapons of mass
  destruction were discovered by UN weapons inspectors. It appears to be in direct contradiction with statements that
  Blair made to parliament afterwards that Saddam would be given a final chance to disarm.
  The memo also disclosed that Bush floated the idea of painting a U-2 spyplane in UN colours and letting it fly low over
  Iraq to provoke Saddam into ordering it to be shot down, providing a pretext for the subsequent invasion by America
  and Britain.
  Manning, educated at Oriel College, Oxford, and a career diplomat, is fiercely independent. He may choose to say more
  than Blair would like, according to one former colleague. He could also be asked to either confirm or deny Meyer's
  evidence that Meyer received "new instructions" in early 2005 indicating that it was a "complete waste of time" to
  oppose regime change, so strong was the US determination to go down that road.
  On Tuesday, Edward Chaplin, the Foreign Office Middle East director at the time of the invasion, and Sir Peter Ricketts,
  the top official in the Foreign Office, will appear. Ricketts, a former chairman of Britain's powerful joint intelligence
  committee, has already given evidence to the inquiry alleging that officials in London knew even before Bush came to
  office in 2001 that there were "voices" in Washington calling for Saddam to be removed from power. Ricketts also told
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767432 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767432 Date: 07/31/2015
  the inquiry that, until March 2002, Whitehall distanced itself from regime change. Only one month later, Blair told Bush
  that he would support military action "to bring about regime change".
  According to documents leaked five years ago, Ricketts described the US in 2002 as "scrambling to establish a link
  between Iraq and al-Qaida" — a connection that was "so far, frankly unconvincing". On Thursday, Sir Kevin Tebbit, the
  Ministry of Defence's permanent secretary during the invasion, will be asked to give evidence about the military
  planning. Chilcot will, most likely, want to know when the government first began to amass resources for the war and
  what, if any, preparations were made for the aftermath of an invasion. Tebbit could also be urged to divulge the level of
  intelligence he received on the likelihood of an attack with chemical or biological weapons.
  After Tebbit, a succession of heavy-hitting military men will give evidence. The former chief of the defence staff, Admiral
  the Lord Boyce, could be asked whether he believes that the invasion was legal. On Friday, Lieutenant General Sir
  Anthony Pigott, former deputy chief of the defence staff, and Major General David Wilson, senior British military adviser
  to the US military's central command between 2002 and 2003, will be questioned about military planning for the
  conflict.
  The last witness to appear this week will be Dominic Asquith, Britain's ambassador to Iraq between 2006 and 2007, who
  will come armed with knowledge of the view from Baghdad.
  When Chilcot has made his way through the officials, he will turn in the new year to former ministers, including Jack
  Straw, the former foreign secretary, and Blair himself. The panel has said that it will also begin to examine the highly
  controversial issue of whether the invasion was legal — which may turn out to be the focal point of the whole inquiry — in
  January.
  In his final report, which is not expected until late 2010 at the earliest, Chilcot has said he will not seek to attribute
  blame. But after only one week it is already clear where much of Whitehall believes that lies.
  The Washington Post
  Afghanistan: The speech you'll miss
  By Jim Hoagland
  Sunday, November 29, 2009
  Dec. 1, 2009:
  My fellow Americans,
  This is not the speech you expected to hear. But my wordsmiths are tied in knots writing an acceptance speech for the
  only Nobel Peace Prize ever awarded for making speeches. So I am going to tell you how I really feel about Afghanistan.
  Which is: steamed.
  I want to accomplish three goals tonight without naming them.
  First, to let those know-it-alls, Generals Petraeus and McChrystal, know one more thing: This is the last big troop
  increase you get, so make it work.
  I am not going down the incrementalist road that wrecked Lyndon Johnson's presidency. This is not July 1965, when
  Westmoreland jumped the shark of escalation in Vietnam and then never stopped asking for more troops. For all the
  trouble he has been, Dick Holbrooke helped by recalling that history in the shadowboxing that dominated my long war
  council meetings.
  Joe Biden has been good in there, too. He's been willing, though not happy, to be characterized in the media as being
  ready to bug out now. This helped us push back against McChrystal's effort to box me in at 40,000 additional U.S.
  soldiers.
  Denis McDonough, my strategic communications man, sold Biden-as-dove brilliantly. Wasn't somebody just saying I
  should promote Denis? Maybe it was Denis?
  Never mind. That tactic won me room to maneuver toward a more realistic number of, say, 23,000 new combat troops,
  5,000 additional trainers and a "NATO surge" of 5,000 foreign troops.
  That's my second unspoken goal: to come out of this buildup speech without losing the left of the Democratic Party--
  while being able to refute John McCain's charges that I ignored my own generals. Triangulation lives.
  Bush put the generals in the limelight to sell the Iraq surge after he lost all credibility, and David Petraeus's performance
  was dazzling. Which presents two big problems. Petraeus is the only person who could get the Republican nomination in
  2012 and make a serious run against me. (I get paid to think ahead.) And if the generals box me in, civilian control of the
  military in this country becomes a mockery. Clinton was afraid of the military; Bush was deep in hock to it. I've got to get
  the right balance back.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767432 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767432 Date: 07/31/2015
  That's why I need Bob Gates and Jim Jones. Those who scoffed at my keeping on Bush's defense secretary, and then
  making a retired Marine four-star I hardly knew my NSC guy, were not thinking that moments like this would come. I
  already was.
  Gates has maneuvered flawlessly through my waterboarding-by-leaks on Afghanistan. He will sell my final number to the
  uniforms as the "floor" for U.S. troops that Petraeus argues we need for three years. But Gates knows I will make it a
  ceiling.
  We can't afford an open-ended commitment. I put Peter Orszag, as good a budget overseer as you can find, front and
  center for the photographers in that last war council. Many missed it, but NBC's Andrea Mitchell got it right away. No
  wonder she's married to Alan Greenspan.
  I will bet that Stan McChrystal never drew up a budget in his life.
  Jones tells me these Special Operations commanders are used to getting whatever they ask for, especially since
  September 11th. Nobody on the Hill will deny them anything.
  Jones is also squeezing the Europeans to join the battle and is getting results, even from the Germans. What is it Jones
  says? Maybe the worst thing of all would be to be perceived to lose in Afghanistan and then have the Europeans say:
  Well, you never asked for more help at the crucial time. Makes sense to me.
  We have sent NATO members the numbers we think they can and should provide, country by country. That new
  secretary general, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, is pulling out the stops, visiting the capitals to get commitments.
  "Say it now, pay it later," we tell the Europeans. They have until mid-2010 to deploy their new units. But I need pledges
  now so I can get across tonight that this is NATO's war, not Obama's war. That's' unspoken-goal number three.
  So I have frontloaded the speech with allusions to this being about an exit strategy, without boxing myself in on timing,
  and am presenting the "civilian surge" as being as essential as the troop buildup. That helps set up my Oslo speech. And
  who knows? It may even work out that way. If God blesses us all.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767432 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767434
MetadataSubject: ANOTHER MEMO ON BACKDROP TO THIS WEEK. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-29T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_050/DOC_0C05767434/C05767434.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767434
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  sbwhoeop
  Sunday, November 29, 2009 12:20 PM
  H
  Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  8119110,
  RELEASE
  IN PART B6
  Did you read nyt lead editorial yesterday?
  Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry

RawText:
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  sbwhoeop
  Sunday, November 29, 2009 12:20 PM
  H
  Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  8119110,
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767434 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE
  IN PART B6
  Did you read nyt lead editorial yesterday?
  Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:04:27
  To: 'sbwhoeop
  Subject: Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  I didn't read the McD reference that way. I actually thought it was complimentary of his spin skills. What am I missing?
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Nov 29 11:51:28 2009
  Subject: Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  It's there, just scroll down
  Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:38:00
  To: 'sbwhoeop
  Subject: Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  Can you send me the Hoagland piece?
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Nov 29 10:58:16 2009
  Subject: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  CONFIDENTIAL
  November 29, 2009
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767434 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767434 Date: 07/31/2015
  For: Hillary
  From: Sid
  Re: Backdrop to your coming week
  Below is a piece published today in The Observer, the Sunday newspaper of The Guardian, on the Chilcot inquiry,
  summarizing the testimony so far and what is expected this week while you are drumming up support for the
  Afghanistan initiative. Britain and Europe are riveted by Chilcot, especially official circles. The objective correlative, of
  course, is trust in any U.S. administration and deep skepticism about the Afghanistan project. Yet another undercurrent
  among the mandarins is disdainful resentment of indifference to Britain, a sentiment beyond Labour or the Tories but
  what has emerged as the view of the permanent establishment at Whitehall and elsewhere.
  Mandelson Watch: After Miliband declined to reach for the EU foreign secretaryship (though Sarkozy wanted him to
  take it and Brown was not averse, even favorable), Mandelson personally campaigned on his own for it among the
  Europeans. Mandelson was eager to Miliband to take the EU post, allowing Mandelson to be appointed foreign
  minister. When Miliband refused, Mandelson's ambition was thwarted, and tried to seize the EU position for himself,
  but without any backing in Europe or from Gordon. The Europeans thought him mad. Suddenly, they recalled his bad or
  strange behavior as UK commissioner to the EU. When Christine Ashton was named, Mandelson briefed the press on her
  lack of credentials, etc. Ashton, as it happens, had worked the press to try to help Mandelson when he had gotten into
  the mess that led to his first resignation. Those inside the government who remember this see it as an illustration of the
  principle that no good deed goes unpunished. Mandelson, in a snit, is now not speaking to Gordon as though his
  rejection were Gordon's fault.
  One more item: Did you read Jim Hoagland in the Washington Post today,? He nails McDonough for trashing Biden,
  among other things. Enclosed below story on Chilcot:
  http://www.guardian.co.uk/Lik/2009/nov/29/iraq-war-inquiry-chilcot-blair
  Chilcot Inquiry: Mandarins take revenge on Tony Blair over Iraq Civil servants and diplomats are lining up to stick a knife
  into former PM's reputation
  * Toby Helm <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/tobyhelm> and Rajeev Syal
  <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/rajeev-syal>
  * The Observer <http://observer.guardian.co.uk> , Sunday 29 November 2009
  * Whitehall mandarins are supreme masters of subtle evasion. But they do not rise to the top of their trade without
  also knowing how to stick in the knife.
  At times the Chilcot inquiry into Britain's involvement in Iraq since 2001, which opened last week, resembled a
  gentlemen's club moved to the sanitised surroundings of the Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre in Westminster.
  Oxbridge-educated pillars of the establishment politely questioned other Oxbridge-educated pillars of the establishment
  about who said what to whom in which memo. The inquiry is a peculiar mixture of the old and the new, the open and
  closed. It is conducted in the language of Whitehall, yet beamed live by webcam to the world.
  Critics are convinced that, for all Sir John Chilcot's promises to the contrary, it will turn out to be another Whitehall
  whitewash. For the cognoscenti, little new information has yet emerged, and when the final report is written it will not
  seek to apportion blame. Yet beneath the equivocation and mandarin-speak, Whitehall seems, in as much as it knows
  how, to be using Chilcot to wield the scalpel. Throughout the first week the pent-up frustrations of diplomats and career
  civil servants over the way Tony Blair <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/tonyblair> and George Bush secretly plotted
  to oust Saddam Hussein, bypassing the "official channels" in which they operate, has been there for all to see.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767434 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767434 Date: 07/31/2015
  Chilcot is said to have been warned by his Whitehall friends that many witnesses will be ready to unburden themselves -
  finally to take revenge. In session after session they have appeared to do that. Blair's reputation has been sliced like
  salami day after day.
  Sir William Ehrman, the Foreign Office's former director of international security, volunteered last Wednesday that the
  threat from Saddam's supposed weapons of mass destruction was known to be limited.
  In the gentlest way he drove in the dagger. "We did, I think on 10 March [2003], get a report that chemical weapons
  might have remained disassembled and Saddam hadn't yet ordered their assembly. There was a suggestion that Iraq
  might lack warheads capable of effective dispersal of agents."
  Ever the diplomat, however, Ehrman went on to say that the intelligence warnings had not made any difference to the
  case for war. "I don't think it invalidated the point about the programmes he had. It was more about use," he said. But
  he had set the tone.
  On Thursday, Sir Christopher Meyer, UK ambassador in Washington from 1997 to 2003, who has already criticised the
  government over Iraq in his memoirs, went for Blair, mercilessly comparing his qualities as a war leader to those of
  Margaret Thatcher. "I'm not trying to make a party political point here whatsoever, but quite often I think about this:
  what would Margaret Thatcher have done?" Meyer asked. "I think she would have insisted on a coherent political-and
  diplomatic strategy and she would have demanded the greatest clarity about what the heck happened if, and when, you
  removed Saddam Hussein."
  A former press secretary to John Major who can speak like a mandarin but, equally, can talk like a layman, he said Blair
  had failed miserably to extract a price from George Bush for his loyalty. "We could have achieved more by playing a
  tougher role... if, for example... Tony Blair had said: 'I want to help you, George, on this, but I have to say, in all honesty,
  that I will not be able to take part in any military• operation unless we have palpable progress on the [Middle East] peace
  process and we have absolute clarity on what happens in Iraq if it comes up.' I think that would have changed the nature
  — it would not have led to a rupture — it would have changed the nature of American planning. "
  Even when defending UK policy, he was on the offensive. Asked if policy had been adapted to stay in line with
  Washington's, Meyer added: "I wouldn't say it was as extremely poodle-ish as that."
  On Friday, Sir Jeremy Greenstock, Britain's former ambassador to the United Nations, told Chilcot he had threatened to
  resign in 2002 if at least one security council resolution was not passed. He added: "I regard our participation in the
  military action in Iraq in March 2003 as legal but of questionable legitimacy, in that it did not have the democratically
  observable backing of the great majority of [UN] member states, or even perhaps of the majority of people inside the
  UK."
  Today new arguments are raging over whether the inquiry will have access to, and publish, the most sensitive
  documents — including legal advice given to the government by the former attorney general, Lord Goldsmith, during the
  lead-up to war. Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat leader, has written to Gordon Brown saying that, unless all such
  material is published, the inquiry will be a sham and the public's sense that it has been denied the facts will remain.
  But it will still be essential viewing nonetheless. This week will see more key witnesses. The most revealing testimony
  could come tomorrow when Sir David Manning, Blair's former foreign policy
  <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/foreignpolicy> adviser, is certain to be asked about his authorship of a memo
  which purportedly revealed details of a secret meeting between Bush and Blair in January 2003. According to reports,
  the five pages of secret documents, known as the Manning memo, recorded the White House meeting on 31 January
  which allegedly shows that Bush and Blair made a deal to carry out an invasion regardless of whether weapons of mass
  destruction were discovered by UN weapons inspectors. It appears to be in direct contradiction with statements that
  Blair made to parliament afterwards that Saddam would be given a final chance to disarm.
  The memo also disclosed that Bush floated the idea of painting a U-2 spyplane in UN colours and letting it fly low over
  Iraq to provoke Saddam into ordering it to be shot down, providing a pretext for the subsequent invasion by America
  and Britain.
  Manning, educated at Oriel College, Oxford, and a career diplomat, is fiercely independent. He may choose to say more
  than Blair would like, according to one former colleague. He could also be asked to either confirm or deny Meyer's
  evidence that Meyer received "new instructions" in early 2005 indicating that it was a "complete waste of time" to
  oppose regime change, so strong was the US determination to go down that road.
  On Tuesday, Edward Chaplin, the Foreign Office Middle East director at the time of the invasion, and Sir Peter Ricketts,
  the top official in the Foreign Office, will appear. Ricketts, a former chairman of Britain's powerful joint intelligence
  committee, has already given evidence to the inquiry alleging that officials in London knew even before Bush came to
  office in 2001 that there were "voices" in Washington calling for Saddam to be removed from power. Ricketts also told
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767434 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767434 Date: 07/31/2015
  the inquiry that, until March 2002, Whitehall distanced itself from regime change. Only one month later, Blair told Bush
  that he would support military action "to bring about regime change".
  According to documents leaked five years ago, Ricketts described the US in 2002 as "scrambling to establish a link
  between Iraq and al-Qaida" — a connection that was "so far, frankly unconvincing". On Thursday, Sir Kevin Tebbit, the
  Ministry of Defence's permanent secretary during the invasion, will be asked to give evidence about the military
  planning. Chilcot will, most likely, want to know when the government first began to amass resources for the war and
  what, if any, preparations were made for the aftermath of an invasion. Tebbit could also be urged to divulge the level of
  intelligence he received on the likelihood of an attack with chemical or biological weapons.
  After Tebbit, a succession of heavy-hitting military men will give evidence. The former chief of the defence staff, Admiral
  the Lord Boyce, could be asked whether he believes that the invasion was legal. On Friday, Lieutenant General Sir
  Anthony Pigott, former deputy chief of the defence staff, and Major General David Wilson, senior British military adviser
  to the US military's central command between 2002 and 2003, will be questioned about military planning for the
  conflict.
  The last witness to appear this week will be Dominic Asquith, Britain's ambassador to Iraq between 2006 and 2007, who
  will come armed with knowledge of the view from Baghdad.
  When Chilcot has made his way through the officials, he will turn in the new year to former ministers, including Jack
  Straw, the former foreign secretary, and Blair himself. The panel has said that it will also begin to examine the highly
  controversial issue of whether the invasion was legal — which may turn out to be the focal point of the whole inquiry — in
  January.
  In his final report, which is not expected until late 2010 at the earliest, Chilcot has said he will not seek to attribute
  blame. But after only one week it is already clear where much of Whitehall believes that lies.
  The Washington Post
  Afghanistan: The speech you'll miss
  By Jim Hoagland
  Sunday, November 29, 2009
  Dec. 1, 2009:
  My fellow Americans,
  This is not the speech you expected to hear. But my wordsmiths are tied in knots writing an acceptance speech for the
  only Nobel Peace Prize ever awarded for making speeches. So I am going to tell you how I really feel about Afghanistan.
  Which is: steamed.
  I want to accomplish three goals tonight without naming them.
  First, to let those know-it-alls, Generals Petraeus and McChrystal, know one more thing: This is the last big troop
  increase you get, so make it work.
  I am not going down the incrementalist road that wrecked Lyndon Johnson's presidency. This is not July 1965, when
  Westmoreland jumped the shark of escalation in Vietnam and then never stopped asking for more troops. For all the
  trouble he has been, Dick Holbrooke helped by recalling that history in the shadowboxing that dominated my long war
  council meetings.
  Joe Biden has been good in there, too. He's been willing, though not happy, to be characterized in the media as being
  ready to bug out now. This helped us push back against McChrystal's effort to box me in at 40,000 additional U.S.
  soldiers.
  Denis McDonough, my strategic communications man, sold Biden-as-dove brilliantly. Wasn't somebody just saying
  should promote Denis? Maybe it was Denis?
  Never mind. That tactic won me room to maneuver toward a more realistic number of, say, 23,000 new combat troops,
  5,000 additional trainers and a "NATO surge" of 5,000 foreign troops.
  That's my second unspoken goal: to come out of this buildup speech without losing the left of the Democratic Party --
  while being able to refute John McCain's charges that I ignored my own generals. Triangulation lives.
  Bush put the generals in the limelight to sell the Iraq surge after he lost all credibility, and David Petraeus's performance
  was dazzling. Which presents two big problems. Petraeus is the only person who could get the Republican nomination in
  2012 and make a serious run against me. (I get paid to think ahead.) And if the generals box me in, civilian control of the
  military in this country becomes a mockery. Clinton was afraid of the military; Bush was deep in hock to it. I've got to get
  the right balance back.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767434 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767434 Date: 07/31/2015
  That's why I need Bob Gates and Jim Jones. Those who scoffed at my keeping on Bush's defense secretary, and then
  making a retired Marine four-star I hardly knew my NSC guy, were not thinking that moments like this would come. I
  already was.
  Gates has maneuvered flawlessly through my waterboarding-by-leaks on Afghanistan. He will sell my final number to the
  uniforms as the "floor" for U.S. troops that Petraeus argues we need for three years. But Gates knows I will make it a
  ceiling.
  We can't afford an open-ended commitment. I put Peter Orszag, as good a budget overseer as you can find, front and
  center for the photographers in that last war council. Many missed it, but NBC's Andrea Mitchell got it right away. No
  wonder she's married to Alan Greenspan.
  I will bet that Stan McChrystal never drew up a budget in his life.
  Jones tells me these Special Operations commanders are used to getting whatever they ask for, especially since
  September 11th. Nobody on the Hill will deny them anything.
  Jones is also squeezing the Europeans to join the battle and is getting results, even from the Germans. What is it Jones
  says? Maybe the worst thing of all would be to be perceived to lose in Afghanistan and then have the Europeans say:
  Well, you never asked for more help at the crucial time. Makes sense to me.
  We have sent NATO members the numbers we think they can and should provide, country by country. That new
  secretary general, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, is pulling out the stops, visiting the capitals to get commitments.
  "Say it now, pay it later," we tell the Europeans. They have until mid-2010 to deploy their new units. But I need pledges
  now so I can get across tonight that this is NATO's war, not Obarna's war. That's unspoken-goal number three.
  So I have frontloaded the speech with allusions to this being about an exit strategy, without boxing myself in on timing,
  and am presenting the "civilian surge" as being as essential as the troop buildup. That helps set up my Oslo speech. And
  who knows? It may even work out that way. If God blesses us all.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767434 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767436
MetadataSubject: BRAVO! BRAVA! ISSUE YOUR STATEMENT! SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-05T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0063/DOC_0C05767436/C05767436.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: MillsCD@state.gov <MillsCD@state.gov>; Sullivanil@state.gov <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, February 5, 2010 7:46 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767436
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Declan urges that you be somewhat vague w invites to PR and MM and steer clear of inv conference
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767436 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  PART B6
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, February 5, 2010 7:46 AM
  To: H
  Subject Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Declan urges that you be somewhat vague w invites to PR and MM and steer clear of inv conference
  Original Message ---
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Sullivan, Jacob i
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 07:40:27 2010
  Subject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Agreed.
  Original Message
  From: Sullivan, Jacob 1 <Sullivanii@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 07:38:57 2010
  Subject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Declan thinks bad idea because sends wrong message to NI and because this is your moment.
  Philippe thinks practically impossible to do.
  Original Message ----
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Sullivan, Jacob i
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 07:27:21 2010
  Subject: Fw: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Fyi
  Original Message ---
  From: sbwhoeo
  To: H
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 07:24:17 2010
  Subject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Ambos at event would praise your role
  Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 07:06:39
  To: 'sbwhoeop
  Subject: Re: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767436 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767436 Date: 08/31/2015
  I will be doing a press event at 8:30. Do you know if Gordon mentioned me? Can you find out? Is Shaun still coming
  Monday? If so, I want to take you both out to dinner!
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeor
  To: H
  Cc: MillsCD@state.gov <MillsCD@state.gov>; Sullivanil@state.gov <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 06:58:04 2010
  Subject: Bravo! Brava! Issue your statement! Sid
  Northern Ireland agrees power-sharing deal
  Gordon Brown hails historic deal which will see justice and policing powers be devolved to Stormont from 12 April
  * Henry McDonald <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/henrymcdonald>
  * guardian.co.uk <http://www.guardian.co.ukh , Friday 5 February 2010 11.42 GMT
  <http://www.guardian.co.uk/help/accessibility>
  Gordon Brown, Peter Robinson and Martin McGuinness <http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-
  images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/2/5/1265368562294/Gordon-Brown-Peter-Robins-001.jpg>
  Gordon Brown, the DUP leader, Peter Robinson, and Sinn Fein's Martin McGuinness (I to r) talk to the press after the
  Northern Ireland power-sharing deal was announced. Photograph: Julien Behal/PA
  Justice and policing powers will be devolved to Northern Ireland <http://www.guadian.co.uk/uk/northernireland> 's
  power-sharing government from 12 April in a historic deal agreed by the main parties that "opens a new chapter" after
  decades of violence, Gordon Brown said today.
  Standing alongside his Irish counterpart, Brian Cowen, at a press conference at Hillsborough Castle outside Belfast, the
  prime minister said the "inspirational" agreement between Sinn Fein <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/sinn-fein>
  and the Democratic Unionist party (DUP) <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/dup> was a foundation for lasting peace.
  The deal —finally agreed to by the DUP <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/feb/05/northern-ireland-dup-ulster-
  deal> last night and described as a final piece in the jigsaw after a long search for peace — comes after two weeks of
  round-the-clock negotiations and brings an end to fears that the power-sharing government might collapse.
  It will see policing and justice powers devolved from Westminster to the assembly within weeks and includes new plans
  on overseeing parades.
  Brown, who travelled to Belfast this morning, said the agreement had been possible because of "a new spirit of mutual
  co-operation and respect".
  The deal meets a key Sinn Fein demand and prevents the republican party from walking out of the power-sharing
  executive. In return, the DUP has secured reforms to the way loyalist marches are handled in Northern Ireland, including
  the abolition of the Parades Commission, a body most unionists regard as biased in favour of nationalists.
  A cross-community vote will now be held in the Stormont assembly on 9 March before the policing and justice powers
  are devolved from London on 12 April.
  Brown told reporters: "The achievements have been as great as they are inspirational. This moment and this agreement
  belongs to the people of Northern Ireland, all of the people, and now more than ever before so does their future ... This
  is the last chapter of a long and troubled story and the beginning of a new chapter after decades of violence, years of
  talks, weeks of stalemate."
  Cowen praised both unionists and nationalists for making "fair and balanced compromises" to bridge the divisions and
  said the quality of the negotiations meant that the "devolved institutions can and will work".
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767436 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767436 Date: 08/31/2015
  The Northern Ireland secretary, Shaun Woodward, said the deal would further isolate republican dissidents who have
  launched three separate gun and bomb attacks against police stations in the province over the last 10 days. The deal
  would "absolutely" make Northern Ireland a safer place, he said.
  The DUP leader, Peter Robinson, said the agreement will be more enduring because of the time spent" in forming it.
  Referring back to the Belfast Agreement of 1998 <http://www.nio.gov.uk/the-agreement> when negotiations bore fruit
  at the 11th hour, the Sinn Féin president, Gerry Adams, described the current deal and the rescue of power-sharing as
  "yet another very good Friday".
  Jeffrey Donaldson told the Guardian the DUP's 36-strong assembly team was now unanimously in favour of the deal.
  But the Ulster Unionist party (UUP) has yet to officially back the package which will allow the assembly to set up
  legislation to change the way parades are judged.
  A UUP spokeswoman said members wanted to see the proposed agreement before giving their response to the two
  governments. "We have not had sight of this agreement and until we do we will not be signing up to it," she said.
  The talks, which centred on Hillsborough Castle, outside Belfast, are the longest set of continuous negotiations held in
  the near 20-year peace process. Sinn Fein had accused the DUP of stalling on the transfer of policing powers for the last
  three years and it was feared that failure to find agreement could see the collapse of the power-sharing government led
  by the two parties.
  The agreement finally came near midnight at Stormont's parliament building. Earlier in the evening Sinn Fein had said
  the basis of a deal was on the table and it was giving the DUP leadership the time to persuade its party to accept it.
  Robinson emerged from a meeting of party colleagues to confirm that he had secured unanimous support for the
  proposals. Earlier in the week up to 14 DUP assembly members had opposed a proposed deal because it did not give
  unionists enough concessions.
  Robinson said he would now look to gain the support of the community and the smaller assembly parties for the deal.
  "We have a basis upon which we can go forward and recommend it [the deal] to our party, to the other parties in
  Northern Ireland and to the community.
  "An essential element of the Democratic Unionist Party's manifesto is the requirement for community confidence; we
  believe this can be the basis for gaining that confidence."
  However the leader of the hardline Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV), Jim Allister, questioned why the 14 DUP rebels had
  changed their minds.
  "The deal hasn't changed, only the snowmen of the DUP, who melted once the heat came on," Allister said.
  The DUP now faces a struggle to ward off the TUV threat in the forthcoming general election. Allister will portray the
  deal as a sell-out of unionist principles and a sop to republicanism.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767436 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767437
MetadataSubject: OUT OF OFFICE AUTOREPLY: HAVE YOU LEFT YET?
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-26T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767437/C05767437.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Out of Office AutoReply: Have you left yet?
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, February 26, 2010 7:33 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767437
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  I am traveling outside of the country, with intermittent access to my email. If you need to reach me urgently please
  contact Nora Toiv, Toivnf@state.gov, 202-647-8633 or Joanne Laszczych, laszczychj@state.gov, 202-647-5548.
  Thank you
  cdm

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767437 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 7:33 AM
  To:
  Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Have you left yet?
  I am traveling outside of the country, with intermittent access to my email. If you need to reach me urgently please
  contact Nora Toiv, Toivnf@state.gov, 202-647-8633 or Joanne Laszczych, laszczychj@state.gov, 202-647-5548.
  Thank you
  cdm
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767437 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767440
MetadataSubject: HAVE YOU LEFT YET?
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: MillsCD@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-26T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767440/C05767440.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Have you left yet?
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, February 26, 2010 7:55 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767440
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: What is mullen's first name?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767440 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 7:55 AM
  To: H
  Subject Re: Have you left yet?
  What is mullen's first name?
  Original Message ---
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: 'cheryl.mills
  Sent: Fri Feb 26 07:30:39 2010
  Subject: Have you left yet?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767440 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767443
MetadataSubject: AFGHANISTAN MEDIA COVERAGE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: McHale, Judith A
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-26T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767443/C05767443.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: Afghanistan media coverage
ExtractedFrom: McHale, Judith A <McHaleJA@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, February 26, 2010 9:28 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767443
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedCc:
  DiMartino, Kitty; Douglas, Walter T; Perez, Lea; Singh, Vikram J; Crowley, Philip J; Breeden, Philip X; LeBaron,

ExtractedBodyText:
  Importance: High
  See email chain below about media coverage of Afghanistan. I will work with SRAP to be sure we have a Haiti-like plan
  in place for Afghanistan.
  jmis

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767443 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: McHale, Judith A <McHaleJA@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 9:28 AM
  To:
  Subject FW: Afghanistan media coverage
  Importance: High
  See email chain below about media coverage of Afghanistan. I will work with SRAP to be sure we have a Haiti-like plan
  in place for Afghanistan.
  jmis
  From: Kaiser, Sandra L
  Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 9:07 AM
  To: McHale, Judith A
  Cc: DiMartino, Kitty; Douglas, Walter T; Perez, Lea; Singh, Vikram J; Crowley, Philip J; Breeden, Philip X; LeBaron,
  Richard B
  Subject: RE: Afghanistan media coverage
  Importance: High
  Hi Judith—I am due to speak momentarily to Times editor James Harding on the cartoon. It's
  disgusting and completely unfair.
  On overall Afghanistan coverage, Embassy London is also concerned. We engage every day on
  this topic, either through briefings, interviews with policy makers coming through (recent
  highlight was a brilliant interview by Newsnight's Paxman with Holbrooke), facilitating media
  enbeds and reporting on the ground, making and pushing out speeches, discussions with
  journalists. We work closely with colleagues in Kabul, NATO and elsewhere. We get decent
  support from Washington and other field elements, although sometimes we struggle to get basic
  information from our colleagues, such as total number of troops involved in Operation
  Moshtarak.
  One challenge for us is that we are tightly bound here in the public mind to HMG on this
  issue. And in the run-up to the UK election, some media outlets see criticism of the effort in
  Afghanistan as an effective way to campaign against Gordon Brown. Sometimes they ricochet a
  shot off of us in order to hit the main target. The Murdoch outlets, of which the Times is one,
  have a headline goal of getting Cameron elected, which is what
  told me outright earlier this week. This cartoon was possibly one of those ricochet shots, but
  that sure doesn't excuse it. Thanks for your note—I really appreciate you thinking of us. We
  will continue to fight hard and we'll rely on your support.
  Ambassador Susman and I will discuss the Times and other News Corporation coverage of the
  war with James Murdoch, whom we will see on March 15.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767443 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767443 Date: 08/31/2015
  Sandy
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  From: McHale, Judith A
  Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 1:19 PM
  To: Kaiser, Sandra L
  Cc: DiMartino, Kitty; Douglas, Walter T; Perez, Lea; Singh, Vikram 3; Crowley, Philip 3
  Subject: Afghanistan media coverage
  Sandy:
  I am increasingly concerned about the tone of the media coverage about Afghanistan. Note the reference to the Times
  cartoon below. As you know we waged a very successful campaign against the negative stories concerning our
  involvement in Haiti. Can you let me know what our strategy is with regard to Afghanistan and if you need any additional
  help/support from us. Any thoughts about the cartoon ?
  im
  EUR Early Alert
  Ankara, Berlin, Tr-missions Brussels, London, Madrid, Moscow, Paris, Rome, Warsaw
  February 26, 2010 — AFGHANISTAN // HEALTH CARE REFORM // TURKEY// FALKLANDS
  AFGHANISTAN
  This morning, media note the latest "Suicide attack on Afghan capital"(BBC on-line).
  La Stampa on-line says the "Safi Hotel, where foreigners stay, was targeted.... The attack [comes] as India-
  Pakistan negotiations resume." France 24 TV comments, "What needs to be understood is that this is a nine-
  level hotel in which all the windows exploded, up to the very top of the hotel, which proves how powerful the
  explosion was. Afghan policemen are very nervous." Meanwhile, print media report the "Afghan government
  hoists flag over Taliban stronghold Marjah" (Dutch daily Trouw). Dziennik Gazeta Prawna notes that locals
  "testify that most of the Taliban withdrew from Marja without fighting, and they will try to return when the U.S.
  forces leave the area." The Independent says that "despite victories in the Marjah offensive, Afghans worry that
  militants have lived to fight another day." Other coverage notes civilian casualties. A day after leading with the
  story that "NATO admits that deaths of 8 boys were a mistake," The Times runs a large editorial cartoon
  showing U.S. soldiers in the pose of the Iwo Jima memorial, hoisting the Afghan flag into the bloody body of an
  Afghan civilian.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767443 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767444
MetadataSubject: FYI - LYN SWEET SAYING DESIREE WILL QUIT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-26T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0066/DOC_0C05767444/C05767444.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: fyi - lyn sweet saying desiree will quit
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, February 26, 2010 2:28 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767444
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: http://www.suntimes.com/2072121,desiree-rogers-quits-022610.article
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767444 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 2:28 PM
  To: H
  Subject: fyi - lyn sweet saying desiree will quit
  http://www.suntimes.com/2072121,desiree-rogers-quits-022610.article
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767444 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767447
MetadataSubject: H: LATEST ON TONY, EU PRESIDENCY, TIMING. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2009-10-28T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_045/DOC_0C05767447/C05767447.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: H: Latest on Tony, EU presidency, timing. Sid
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 2:10 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767447
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  October 27, 2009
  For: Hillary

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767447 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6 .
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 2:10 PM
  To:
  Subject: H: Latest on Tony, EU presidency, timing. Sid
  Attachments:, hrc memo EU pres 102709.docx
  CONFIDENTIAL
  October 27, 2009
  For: Hillary
  From: Sid
  Re: Latest on EU presidency
  The political timing on the EU presidency is accelerating. Sarkozy and Merkel are meeting tonight (October 18)
  to discuss it. The Czech constitutional court will issue its verdict on the legality of the Lisbon treaty on
  November 3. Shortly after, perhaps that week, before you meet with Merkel on November 8-9, there may be an
  EU Council meeting to decide the matter. So you may want to weigh in before then.
  Tony is somewhat downcast on his chances. (He met with Jim Hoagland of the Washington Post yesterday; his
  mood was described to me.) The Tories have ramped up their campaign against him—not only do they not want
  him but they also do not want an effective EU president. Cameron has come down on the side of the anti-EU
  wing of his party on this, an easy move. In an intriguing complication, there's talk now of David Miliband
  becoming EU foreign secretary if Tony does not become EU president. Miliband denied he was interested and
  endorsed Tony. This is part of the anti-Blair campaign ginned up by the Tories, extended to hurt Miliband if
  they can. Jonathan Powell is less gloomy than Tony, thinks everything is still in play, which is why your part in
  this may yet be important.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767447 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767448
MetadataSubject: LATEST ON EU PRESIDENCY
MetadataTo: Hillary
MetadataFrom: Sid
MetadataDateSent: 2009-10-27T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_045/DOC_0C05767448/C05767448.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedFrom: Sid
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767448
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767448 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  CONFIDENTIAL
  October 27, 2009
  For: Hillary
  From: Sid
  Re: Latest on EU presidency
  The political timing on the EU presidency is accelerating. Sarkozy and Merkel are meeting
  tonight (October 18) to discuss it. The Czech constitutional court will issue its verdict on the
  legality of the Lisbon treaty on November 3. Shortly after, perhaps that week, before you meet
  with Merkel on November 8-9, there may be an EU Council meeting to decide the matter. So
  you may want to weigh in before then.
  Tony is somewhat downcast on his chances. (He met with Jim Hoagland of the Washington Post
  yesterday; his mood was described to me.) The Tories have ramped up their campaign against
  him—not only do they not want him but they also do not want an effective EU president.
  Cameron has come down on the side of the anti-EU wing of his party on this, an easy move. In
  an intriguing complication, there's talk now of David Miliband becoming EU foreign secretary if
  Tony does not become EU president. Miliband denied he was interested and endorsed Tony. This
  is part of the anti-Blair campaign ginned up by the Tories, extended to hurt Miliband if they can.
  Jonathan Powell is less gloomy than Tony, thinks everything is still in play, which is why your
  part in this may yet be important.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767448 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767449
MetadataSubject: DO WE NEED TO TALK?
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-10-28T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_045/DOC_0C05767449/C05767449.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Do we need to talk?
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 2:35 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767449
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Calling you
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767449 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 2:35 PM
  To:
  Subject RE: Do we need to talk?
  Calling you
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.corn]
  Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 2:24 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Do we need to talk?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767449 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767451
MetadataSubject: FW:
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-05T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0063/DOC_0C05767451/C05767451.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767451
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Friday, February 5, 2010 8:24 AM
  H
  Fw:
  There may be hope ... See traffic

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767451 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Friday, February 5, 2010 8:24 AM
  H
  Fw:
  There may be hope ... See traffic
  Original Message --
  From: williamsbarrett
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 08:02:54 2010
  Subject: Fw:
  Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
  Original Message
  From: williamsbarrett
  Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 13:00:43
  To: Ricki Seidman
  Subject: Re:
  Don't call her today. She is in Haiti but early next week will be fine I amsure. Would you mind if I gave her a home phone
  number? M ------Original Message
  From: Ricki Seidman
  To: Maggie Williams
  Subject: RE:
  Sent: Feb 5, 2010 7:57 AM
  It's my bad. Something was wrong with my cellphone voicemail and I just heard the messages at 11:00 last night. I will
  call her as soon as I get to the office this morning.
  Best, r
  Original Message-----
  From: williamsbarrett
  Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 7:55 AM
  To: Ricki Seidman
  Subject:
  Hi
  I know Cheryl has been trying to connect to you. Can I help make that happen in any way. M Sent from my Verizon
  Wireless BlackBerry
  Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767451 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767452
MetadataSubject: H: GOOD COVERAGE IN BRIT PRESS. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-06T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0063/DOC_0C05767452/C05767452.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: H: Good coverage in Brit press. Sid
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, February 6, 2010 8:30 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767452
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/feb/05/northern-ireland-police-powers-agreement
  Brown hails 'new chapter' in Northern Ireland
  as end to years of violence
  Promise of US investment follows 'momentous' agreement that seals power-sharing framework
  • Henry McDonald, Ireland correspondent
  • quardian.co.uk, Friday 5 February 2010 19.11 GMT
  •
  X
  British and Irish PMs endorse power-sharing deal Link to this video
  Northern Ireland's leaders have been rewarded with the promise of a new US investment programme after securing a
  historic deal today which saved power sharing.
  Gordon Brown and his Irish counterpart, Brian Cowen, flew into Northern Ireland to put their seal of approval on the deal,
  which will create a Department of Justice, gives unionists concessions on the issue of Protestant parades and saves the
  power-sharing executive from collapse.
  Brown said the achievements over the longest period of unbroken negotiations since the peace process began 16 years
  ago were inspirational.
  "This is the last chapter of a long and troubled story and the beginning of a new chapter after decades of violence, years
  of talks, weeks of stalemate."
  Tonight the White House said Barack Obama saw the deal as "an important step to greater peace and prosperity for all
  communities on the island."
  Obama would also meet Cowen, the DUP leader and first minister Peter Robinson and the deputy first minister, Sinn
  Fein's Martin McGuinness, in Washington on St Patrick's Day next month.
  Earlier, Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, said the agreement between the DUP and Sinn Fein was a "shining
  example to other parts of the world locked in religious and ethnic conflicts".
  As a result of the deal, she said: "The people of Northern Ireland are poised to build a thriving society on this stronger
  foundation.
  Our economic envoy, DecIan Kelly, will continue to help Northern Ireland reap the dividends of peace, including economic
  growth, international investment and new opportunities. -
  In the near future, Declan and I will host first minister Robinson and deputy first minister McGuinness in Washington."
  The Irish prime minister said the agreement reached "presents a real opportunity to renew the partnership which is the life
  blood of the devolved institutions. The people of Northern Ireland yearn for this constructive partnership to deliver tangible
  outcomes that improve their lives."
  Referring back to the Belfast agreement of 1998, Gerry Adams, the Sinn Fein president, described today's agreement as
  "yet another good Friday." After reaching an agreement just before midnight on Thursday, the parties in the Northern
  Ireland assembly must now vote to put the compromise package in place. They will vote on 9 March to devolve policing
  and justice powers, which will then create a justice ministry on 12 April — a key Sinn Fein demand throughout these
  negotiations.
  Under the agreement, a six-member working group, appointed by Robinson and McGuinness, will formulate a framework
  for handling contentious marches and the phasing out of the Parades Commission.
  The new body will encourage local people to find solutions to parading problems, with the rights of marchers and
  residents taken into account. It will complete its work within three weeks, when the Northern Ireland executive will transfer
  responsibilities for parading legislation from Westminster and table a new bill based on the group's proposals.
  An executive working group will be set up, in the hands of the SDLP and Ulster Unionists, to improve the way the power-
  sharing cabinet is run. Robinson and McGuinness will address issues still outstanding from the 2006 St Andrews
  agreement that led to the DUP-Sinn Fein deals. These include legislative measures to protect the rights of Irish language
  speakers.
  Ian Paisley Jr, the North Antrim assembly member and son of the DUP's founder, described the agreement as a "win for
  unionism".
  Paisley said his party had negotiated the end of the Parades Commission, which most unionists regard as biased in
  favour of nationalists. He added that unionist critics of the deal had "no alternative except the imposition of joint authority
  from London and Dublin".
  Mindful of attacks on the DUP by the hardline Traditional Unionist Voice, Robinson said: "There are some who will play
  politics with this agreement, but the real focus in the months to come must be on building an administration at Stormont
  that our whole community identifies with and supports."
  Jim Allister, the TUV leader and a former DUP MEP, said he was "relishing the prospect" of a general election contest
  with his former party. Allister will stand for the TUV in Ian Paisley Sr's North Antrim constituency.
  "In football terms I see this result as a five to one win for Sinn Fein. They get their date for policing and justice. Secondly,
  their veto can be exercised over the justice ministry. They now have working party on Irish language. North/South bodies
  are strengthened. And finally there is a stronger north-south parliamentary forum. The DUP only get a view of parading
  issues.
  "Sinn Fein are laughing all the way to the next staging post," he said.
  Shaun Woodward, the Northern Ireland secretary, said the deal was bad news for republican dissidents determined to
  destabilise the power-sharing government.
  He said a powerful message was being sent out to the dissidents that there are now "two groups of people who were once
  terrible rivals [who] have found a way through a very big challenge".
  But the Real IRA, Continuity IRA and Oglaigh na hEireann are unlikely to be moved by the accord at Hillsborough. In the
  past seven days the republican dissidents have carried out three gun and bomb attacks on police stations across
  Northern Ireland.
  Republican sources have told the Guardian that the groups are likely to intensify their armed campaigns when policing
  and justice powers are transferred to Belfast.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767452 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Saturday, February 6, 2010 8:30 AM
  To:
  Subject: H: Good coverage in Brit press. Sid
  http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/feb/05/northern-ireland-police-powers-agreement
  Brown hails 'new chapter' in Northern Ireland
  as end to years of violence
  Promise of US investment follows 'momentous' agreement that seals power-sharing framework
  • Henry McDonald, Ireland correspondent
  • quardian.co.uk, Friday 5 February 2010 19.11 GMT
  •
  X
  British and Irish PMs endorse power-sharing deal Link to this video
  Northern Ireland's leaders have been rewarded with the promise of a new US investment programme after securing a
  historic deal today which saved power sharing.
  Gordon Brown and his Irish counterpart, Brian Cowen, flew into Northern Ireland to put their seal of approval on the deal,
  which will create a Department of Justice, gives unionists concessions on the issue of Protestant parades and saves the
  power-sharing executive from collapse.
  Brown said the achievements over the longest period of unbroken negotiations since the peace process began 16 years
  ago were inspirational.
  "This is the last chapter of a long and troubled story and the beginning of a new chapter after decades of violence, years
  of talks, weeks of stalemate."
  Tonight the White House said Barack Obama saw the deal as "an important step to greater peace and prosperity for all
  communities on the island."
  Obama would also meet Cowen, the DUP leader and first minister Peter Robinson and the deputy first minister, Sinn
  Fein's Martin McGuinness, in Washington on St Patrick's Day next month.
  Earlier, Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, said the agreement between the DUP and Sinn Fein was a "shining
  example to other parts of the world locked in religious and ethnic conflicts".
  As a result of the deal, she said: "The people of Northern Ireland are poised to build a thriving society on this stronger
  foundation.
  Our economic envoy, DecIan Kelly, will continue to help Northern Ireland reap the dividends of peace, including economic
  growth, international investment and new opportunities. -
  In the near future, Declan and I will host first minister Robinson and deputy first minister McGuinness in Washington."
  The Irish prime minister said the agreement reached "presents a real opportunity to renew the partnership which is the life
  blood of the devolved institutions. The people of Northern Ireland yearn for this constructive partnership to deliver tangible
  outcomes that improve their lives."
  Referring back to the Belfast agreement of 1998, Gerry Adams, the Sinn Fein president, described today's agreement as
  "yet another good Friday." After reaching an agreement just before midnight on Thursday, the parties in the Northern
  Ireland assembly must now vote to put the compromise package in place. They will vote on 9 March to devolve policing
  and justice powers, which will then create a justice ministry on 12 April — a key Sinn Fein demand throughout these
  negotiations.
  Under the agreement, a six-member working group, appointed by Robinson and McGuinness, will formulate a framework
  for handling contentious marches and the phasing out of the Parades Commission.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767452 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767452 Date: 08/31/2015
  The new body will encourage local people to find solutions to parading problems, with the rights of marchers and
  residents taken into account. It will complete its work within three weeks, when the Northern Ireland executive will transfer
  responsibilities for parading legislation from Westminster and table a new bill based on the group's proposals.
  An executive working group will be set up, in the hands of the SDLP and Ulster Unionists, to improve the way the power-
  sharing cabinet is run. Robinson and McGuinness will address issues still outstanding from the 2006 St Andrews
  agreement that led to the DUP-Sinn Fein deals. These include legislative measures to protect the rights of Irish language
  speakers.
  Ian Paisley Jr, the North Antrim assembly member and son of the DUP's founder, described the agreement as a "win for
  unionism".
  Paisley said his party had negotiated the end of the Parades Commission, which most unionists regard as biased in
  favour of nationalists. He added that unionist critics of the deal had "no alternative except the imposition of joint authority
  from London and Dublin".
  Mindful of attacks on the DUP by the hardline Traditional Unionist Voice, Robinson said: "There are some who will play
  politics with this agreement, but the real focus in the months to come must be on building an administration at Stormont
  that our whole community identifies with and supports."
  Jim Allister, the TUV leader and a former DUP MEP, said he was "relishing the prospect" of a general election contest
  with his former party. Allister will stand for the TUV in Ian Paisley Sr's North Antrim constituency.
  "In football terms I see this result as a five to one win for Sinn Fein. They get their date for policing and justice. Secondly,
  their veto can be exercised over the justice ministry. They now have working party on Irish language. North/South bodies
  are strengthened. And finally there is a stronger north-south parliamentary forum. The DUP only get a view of parading
  issues.
  "Sinn Fein are laughing all the way to the next staging post," he said.
  Shaun Woodward, the Northern Ireland secretary, said the deal was bad news for republican dissidents determined to
  destabilise the power-sharing government.
  He said a powerful message was being sent out to the dissidents that there are now "two groups of people who were once
  terrible rivals [who] have found a way through a very big challenge".
  But the Real IRA, Continuity IRA and Oglaigh na hEireann are unlikely to be moved by the accord at Hillsborough. In the
  past seven days the republican dissidents have carried out three gun and bomb attacks on police stations across
  Northern Ireland.
  Republican sources have told the Guardian that the groups are likely to intensify their armed campaigns when policing
  and justice powers are transferred to Belfast.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767452 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767453
MetadataSubject: I SPOKE W CHERYL AND WE'RE WAITING UNTIL TOMORROW TO DECIDE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2009-10-28T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_045/DOC_0C05767453/C05767453.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: I spoke w Cheryl and we're waiting until tomorrow to decide.
ExtractedTo: H; Huma Abedin
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 2:54 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767453
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: We're here next door and about to check in w cdm.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767453 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 2:54 PM
  To: H; Huma Abedin
  Subject Re: I spoke w Cheryl and we're waiting until tomorrow to decide.
  We're here next door and about to check in w cdm.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Sullivan, Jacob 1; Huma Abedin
  Sent: Wed Oct 28 14:52:46 2009
  Subject: I spoke w Cheryl and we're waiting until tomorrow to decide.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767453 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767454
MetadataSubject: CONFIRMATIONS UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Verma, Richard R
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-05T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0063/DOC_0C05767454/C05767454.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: Confirmations Update
ExtractedTo: H; Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedFrom: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR©state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, February 5, 2010 9:46 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767454
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  FYI --
  Reid: Shelby Has Hold On All Nominees
  Friday, Feb. 5, 2010
  Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., has placed a blanket hold on all executive nominations on the Senate calendar in an effort
  to win concessions from the Obama administration and Pentagon on a variety of fronts affecting his home state, according
  to aides to Senate Majority Leader Reid.
  Reid spokeswoman Regan Lachapelle said Shelby is blocking more than 70 pending nominations. Reid can force a vote
  on any nomination by filing cloture.
  Because of the time required to vote on multiple nominations, the Senate processes most nominations by unanimous
  consent. Any one senator can block any of those nominations by objecting to a unanimous consent request to take it up.
  The nominations will remain stalled unless Reid files cloture.
  While holds are frequent, Senate aides said a blanket hold represents a far more aggressive use of the power than is
  normal.
  "He should not be holding up 70-plus nominees for a parochial issue," a Democratic aide said. "They're qualified and they
  should be moving forward."
  Disclosure of the blanket hold came after two days in which top Democrats voiced mounting frustration with Republican
  holds on executive nominees.
  'We've got a huge backlog of folks who are unanimously viewed as well qualified -- nobody has a specific objection to
  them -- but end up having a hold on them because of some completely unrelated piece of business," President Obama
  said Wednesday in a televised meeting with Senate Democrats.
  On the Senate floor Thursday, Reid, Senate Majority Whip Durbin, Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy and
  Senate Armed Services Chairman Carl Levin ripped Republicans for holds on national security nominees and judges.
  Reid, who kept the Senate in pro forma session over recent holidays to prevent former President George W. Bush from
  making recess appointments, said he has grown so frustrated he might advocate such appointments, which the president
  can make when the Senate is out of session.
  'What alternatives do we have?" Reid said on the floor Thursday. "What alternative do we have?"
  Earlier in the day, a spokesman for Shelby said the senator has placed holds on "several pending nominees due to
  unaddressed national security concerns," including frustrations with the Air Force's handling of the competition for an
  aerial refueling tanker. The spokesman did not respond to later requests for comment about the blanket hold.
  Northrop Grumman Corp. and EADS, the European consortium behind Airbus, and Boeing Co. are vying for the high-
  stakes contract, potentially worth $40 billion. The Northrop/EADS team would build the planes in Mobile, Ala., but has
  threatened to pull out of the competition unless the Air Force makes changes to a draft request for proposals.
  "Nearly 10 years after the U.S. Air Force announced plans to replace the aging tanker fleet, we still do not have a
  transparent and fair acquisition process to move forward," the spokesman said. "The Department of Defense must
  recognize that the draft request for proposal needs to be significantly and substantively changed."
  Defense Secretary Gates Wednesday told House lawmakers the Pentagon plans to issue the final request for proposals
  soon, and will proceed with the program whether or not there is a competition.
  "Obviously we would like to have a competition for it, and we hope that both companies will agree to participate, but we
  will move forward," Gates said. "We have to have new tankers."
  In addition to the tanker issue, Shelby's spokesman said he is frustrated that the Obama administration won't build an
  Alabama-based FBI center to analyze improvised explosive devices.
  Shelby secured a $45 million earmark in the FY08 omnibus appropriations bill for a Terrorist Explosive Device Analytical
  Center to be set up at the Army's Redstone Arsenal.
  "Sen. Shelby will continue to work with the FBI to give them the capability to coordinate intelligence as well as forensic
  and technical exploitation related to IEDs, but this administration's coddling of terrorists makes this an uphill effort," the
  spokesman said. "He has made the administration aware of these concerns and is willing to discuss them at any time."
  Also Thursday, Vice President Biden said he was so frustrated by Republican foot-dragging that he was considering
  whether Senate rules should be changed.
  "There's a little disappointment in that it seems like the only way to do business up here anymore is with a supermajority
  on almost everything," Biden said moments after swearing in Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass., who gives Republicans 41
  votes, enough to filibuster on any issue.
  'What I have been doing is spending a lot of time having my staff go back and scrub this, you know, the use of the
  filibuster and how it's worked," Biden said. "This is not a constitutional requirement."
  Biden defended the 60-vote requirement, calling it "a useful tool. It's legitimate, but from my perspective having served
  here, having been elected seven times, I've never seen a time when it's become sort of standard operating procedure. ...
  Requiring a supermajority is just not a good way to do business."
  by Dan Friedman and Megan Scully

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767454 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR©state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, February 5, 2010 9:46 AM
  To: H; Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: FW: Confirmations Update
  FYI --
  Reid: Shelby Has Hold On All Nominees
  Friday, Feb. 5, 2010
  Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., has placed a blanket hold on all executive nominations on the Senate calendar in an effort
  to win concessions from the Obama administration and Pentagon on a variety of fronts affecting his home state, according
  to aides to Senate Majority Leader Reid.
  Reid spokeswoman Regan Lachapelle said Shelby is blocking more than 70 pending nominations. Reid can force a vote
  on any nomination by filing cloture.
  Because of the time required to vote on multiple nominations, the Senate processes most nominations by unanimous
  consent. Any one senator can block any of those nominations by objecting to a unanimous consent request to take it up.
  The nominations will remain stalled unless Reid files cloture.
  While holds are frequent, Senate aides said a blanket hold represents a far more aggressive use of the power than is
  normal.
  "He should not be holding up 70-plus nominees for a parochial issue," a Democratic aide said. "They're qualified and they
  should be moving forward."
  Disclosure of the blanket hold came after two days in which top Democrats voiced mounting frustration with Republican
  holds on executive nominees.
  'We've got a huge backlog of folks who are unanimously viewed as well qualified -- nobody has a specific objection to
  them -- but end up having a hold on them because of some completely unrelated piece of business," President Obama
  said Wednesday in a televised meeting with Senate Democrats.
  On the Senate floor Thursday, Reid, Senate Majority Whip Durbin, Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy and
  Senate Armed Services Chairman Carl Levin ripped Republicans for holds on national security nominees and judges.
  Reid, who kept the Senate in pro forma session over recent holidays to prevent former President George W. Bush from
  making recess appointments, said he has grown so frustrated he might advocate such appointments, which the president
  can make when the Senate is out of session.
  'What alternatives do we have?" Reid said on the floor Thursday. "What alternative do we have?"
  Earlier in the day, a spokesman for Shelby said the senator has placed holds on "several pending nominees due to
  unaddressed national security concerns," including frustrations with the Air Force's handling of the competition for an
  aerial refueling tanker. The spokesman did not respond to later requests for comment about the blanket hold.
  Northrop Grumman Corp. and EADS, the European consortium behind Airbus, and Boeing Co. are vying for the high-
  stakes contract, potentially worth $40 billion. The Northrop/EADS team would build the planes in Mobile, Ala., but has
  threatened to pull out of the competition unless the Air Force makes changes to a draft request for proposals.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767454 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767454 Date: 08/31/2015
  "Nearly 10 years after the U.S. Air Force announced plans to replace the aging tanker fleet, we still do not have a
  transparent and fair acquisition process to move forward," the spokesman said. "The Department of Defense must
  recognize that the draft request for proposal needs to be significantly and substantively changed."
  Defense Secretary Gates Wednesday told House lawmakers the Pentagon plans to issue the final request for proposals
  soon, and will proceed with the program whether or not there is a competition.
  "Obviously we would like to have a competition for it, and we hope that both companies will agree to participate, but we
  will move forward," Gates said. "We have to have new tankers."
  In addition to the tanker issue, Shelby's spokesman said he is frustrated that the Obama administration won't build an
  Alabama-based FBI center to analyze improvised explosive devices.
  Shelby secured a $45 million earmark in the FY08 omnibus appropriations bill for a Terrorist Explosive Device Analytical
  Center to be set up at the Army's Redstone Arsenal.
  "Sen. Shelby will continue to work with the FBI to give them the capability to coordinate intelligence as well as forensic
  and technical exploitation related to IEDs, but this administration's coddling of terrorists makes this an uphill effort," the
  spokesman said. "He has made the administration aware of these concerns and is willing to discuss them at any time."
  Also Thursday, Vice President Biden said he was so frustrated by Republican foot-dragging that he was considering
  whether Senate rules should be changed.
  "There's a little disappointment in that it seems like the only way to do business up here anymore is with a supermajority
  on almost everything," Biden said moments after swearing in Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass., who gives Republicans 41
  votes, enough to filibuster on any issue.
  'What I have been doing is spending a lot of time having my staff go back and scrub this, you know, the use of the
  filibuster and how it's worked," Biden said. "This is not a constitutional requirement."
  Biden defended the 60-vote requirement, calling it "a useful tool. It's legitimate, but from my perspective having served
  here, having been elected seven times, I've never seen a time when it's become sort of standard operating procedure. ...
  Requiring a supermajority is just not a good way to do business."
  by Dan Friedman and Megan Scully
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767454 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767457
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: betsyebeling
MetadataDateSent: 2009-10-28T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_045/DOC_0C05767457/C05767457.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedTo: H; Huma Abedin
ExtractedFrom: betsyebelin
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 6:48 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767457
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  My hair is getting whiter by the minute watching these reports of your trip to Pakistan. I know you'll do a smart job but
  be very cautious as well-- I need you both in excellent shape to see ME on Nov 6 at your DC event. Love, Betsy Sent
  from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767457 Date: 07/31/2015_
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: betsyebelin
  Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 6:48 PM
  To: H; Huma Abedin
  My hair is getting whiter by the minute watching these reports of your trip to Pakistan. I know you'll do a smart job but
  be very cautious as well-- I need you both in excellent shape to see ME on Nov 6 at your DC event. Love, Betsy Sent
  from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767457 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767460
MetadataSubject: GEITHNER
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-05T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0063/DOC_0C05767460/C05767460.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Geithner
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivanil@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, February 5, 2010 1:36 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767460
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  They may seek Geithner's co-signature on the letter, if they can get him while he's in Canada snow-boarding. You can't
  make this stuff up.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767460 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivanil@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, February 5, 2010 1:36 PM
  To:
  Subject: Geithner
  They may seek Geithner's co-signature on the letter, if they can get him while he's in Canada snow-boarding. You can't
  make this stuff up.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767460 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767462
MetadataSubject: GOOD MORNING
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-05T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0063/DOC_0C05767462/C05767462.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Good meeting
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, February 5, 2010 3:03 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767462
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  I just spent an extra hour explaining the architecture of the IHRC/HDA.
  They had misconstrued it to be something that wjc now could not do b/c of his new un role.
  We can discuss.
  Will fill wjc in on the plane.
  I hear it's snowing - won't likely make it back to dc until sun or mon

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767462 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, February 5, 2010 3:03 PM
  To:
  Subject: Good meeting
  I just spent an extra hour explaining the architecture of the IHRC/HDA.
  They had misconstrued it to be something that wjc now could not do b/c of his new un role.
  We can discuss.
  Will fill wjc in on the plane.
  I hear it's snowing - won't likely make it back to dc until sun or mon
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767462 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767463
MetadataSubject: GOOD MORNING
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-05T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0063/DOC_0C05767463/C05767463.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Good meeting
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, February 5, 2010 3:09 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767463
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: You are s000 lucky!!!
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767463 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, February 5, 2010 3:09 PM
  To: H
  Subject: Re: Good meeting
  You are s000 lucky!!!
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 15:08:25 2010
  Subject: Re: Good meeting
  Are you getting ready to leave?
  Original Message ----
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Fri Feb 05 15:02:32 2010
  Subject: Good meeting
  I just spent an extra hour explaining the architecture of the IHRC/HDA.
  They had misconstrued it to be something that wjc now could not do b/c of his new un role.
  We can discuss.
  Will fill wjc in on the plane.
  I hear it's snowing - won't likely make it back to dc until sun or mon
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767463 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767469
MetadataSubject: WJC WANTED YOU TO SEE THIS ARTICLE.
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: AbedinH@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-06T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0063/DOC_0C05767469/C05767469.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, February 6, 2010 12:04 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767469
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Soaring cost of healthcare sets a record By Noam N. Levey February 4, 2010 Los Angeles Times
  Spending was 17.3% of the economy last year. The share paid by the U.S. will soon exceed 50%, a study says.
  In a stark reminder of growing costs, the government has released a new estimate that healthcare spending grew to a
  record 17.3% of the U.S. economy last year, marking the largest one-year jump in its share of the economy since the
  government started keeping such records half a century ago.
  The almost $2.5 trillion spent in 2009 was $134 billion more than the previous year, when healthcare consumed 16.2%
  of the gross domestic product, according to an annual report by independent actuaries at the federal Centers for
  Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, scheduled for release Thursday.
  The nonpartisan accounting agency also projected that as early as next year, the country could mark another milestone
  as government picks up more than half of the nation's total healthcare tab for the first time.
  The rise in current costs, driven in part by surging spending in Medicare and Medicaid, and the bleak projections for the
  future do not take into account changes that may come if Democrats revive their healthcare overhaul legislation.
  The report appears likely to fuel further debate about the health bills now stalled in Congress.
  In the absence of change, the report raises a grim prospect for the country -- a healthcare system consuming an ever
  greater and potentially unsustainable share of the economy even as private health coverage lags.
  Last year, CMS estimated that government spending on healthcare would not overtake private spending until 2016,
  compared with 2011 or 2012 in the current report.
  "The health system is hurting, and we are seeing that in these numbers," said Karen Davis, president of the
  Commonwealth Fund, a leading authority on healthcare policy.
  The report also points up the financial cost of the so-called Great Recession and the growing pressure it is putting on
  state and local governments.
  Federal and state spending on Medicaid, the nation's primary health insurance program for low-income Americans,
  jumped nearly 10% in 2009, according to the report. Medicare spending, meanwhile, shot up just over 8%.
  Obama and many healthcare experts have argued that reshaping the healthcare system will ultimately make it more
  efficient, even if overall health spending continues to increase -- a claim Republicans dispute.
  Fueled by new technology, an aging population, rising incomes and other changes, spending on medical care has been
  consuming a larger and larger share of the nation's economy for years, jumping from about 5% of the gross domestic
  product in 1960 to nearly 14% in 2000.
  But the recession that began in 2007 accelerated that trend, as the economy contracted while healthcare spending
  continued to increase, according to CMS.
  Even now, with the economy slowly recovering, the government expects that the growth of healthcare spending will
  outpace the expansion of the economy. By 2020, 1 of every 5 dollars spent in the U.S. is expected to go to healthcare.
  Some economists believe that this is not necessarily a problem, as the healthcare industry can provide good jobs and
  improve both health and productivity.
  But there is growing concern that as much as a third of the medical care delivered in this country does not help patients.
  "Are we getting value for the dollar? That is the question," said Len Nichols, health policy director at the centrist New
  America Foundation. "If you believe that so much medical care is unnecessary, as I do, then it is criminal that we are
  spending so much."
  Stuart Butler, vice president for domestic and economic policy at the conservative Heritage Foundation, said that the
  numbers underscore the need for more aggressive action to curb spending.
  "The only way to do this is to simply spend less," Butler said, warning that the health bills being pushed on Capitol Hill do
  the opposite.
  CMS officials noted that healthcare spending has been increasing even as the number of Americans without health
  insurance is growing, another sign of problems with the system.
  "With higher unemployment, people lose their jobs [and] many of them lose their healthcare coverage in the process.
  And under current law, they don't have much to fall back on," said Richard S. Foster, chief actuary.
  Foster said that the report by his office indicated that two of the main trends driving calls for a health overhaul -- rising
  costs and shrinking numbers of people with health coverage -- are essentially the same as they were when the
  healthcare debate began last year.
  "Nothing much has changed in that regard," he said.
  Inefficiency is becoming a particularly acute problem for state and federal governments, which the report shows are
  increasingly supporting the nation's healthcare system.
  Half a century ago, government accounted for just a quarter of all healthcare spending. Now, as the cost of caring for
  elderly and poor Americans swells, government's share of the total bill is fast becoming greater than that of the private
  sector.
  The trend accelerated in the recession, as Washington spent billions of dollars to help states prop up Medicaid programs
  being strained by the growing ranks of the unemployed and uninsured.
  The healthcare legislation being debated on Capitol Hill could increase the government commitment to healthcare as
  the federal government boosts the Medicaid program and provides billions of dollars of subsidies to low- and moderate-
  income Americans to help them buy insurance.
  But in a separate report a month ago, CMS actuaries estimated that the Senate healthcare bill would boost total
  healthcare spending by less than 1% over the next decade, in large part because the legislation includes initiatives to
  make Medicare more efficient.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767469 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, February 6, 2010 12:04 AM
  To:
  Subject Wjc wanted you to see this article.
  Soaring cost of healthcare sets a record By Noam N. Levey February 4, 2010 Los Angeles Times
  Spending was 17.3% of the economy last year. The share paid by the U.S. will soon exceed 50%, a study says.
  In a stark reminder of growing costs, the government has released a new estimate that healthcare spending grew to a
  record 17.3% of the U.S. economy last year, marking the largest one-year jump in its share of the economy since the
  government started keeping such records half a century ago.
  The almost $2.5 trillion spent in 2009 was $134 billion more than the previous year, when healthcare consumed 16.2%
  of the gross domestic product, according to an annual report by independent actuaries at the federal Centers for
  Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, scheduled for release Thursday.
  The nonpartisan accounting agency also projected that as early as next year, the country could mark another milestone
  as government picks up more than half of the nation's total healthcare tab for the first time.
  The rise in current costs, driven in part by surging spending in Medicare and Medicaid, and the bleak projections for the
  future do not take into account changes that may come if Democrats revive their healthcare overhaul legislation.
  The report appears likely to fuel further debate about the health bills now stalled in Congress.
  In the absence of change, the report raises a grim prospect for the country -- a healthcare system consuming an ever
  greater and potentially unsustainable share of the economy even as private health coverage lags.
  Last year, CMS estimated that government spending on healthcare would not overtake private spending until 2016,
  compared with 2011 or 2012 in the current report.
  "The health system is hurting, and we are seeing that in these numbers," said Karen Davis, president of the
  Commonwealth Fund, a leading authority on healthcare policy.
  The report also points up the financial cost of the so-called Great Recession and the growing pressure it is putting on
  state and local governments.
  Federal and state spending on Medicaid, the nation's primary health insurance program for low-income Americans,
  jumped nearly 10% in 2009, according to the report. Medicare spending, meanwhile, shot up just over 8%.
  Obama and many healthcare experts have argued that reshaping the healthcare system will ultimately make it more
  efficient, even if overall health spending continues to increase -- a claim Republicans dispute.
  Fueled by new technology, an aging population, rising incomes and other changes, spending on medical care has been
  consuming a larger and larger share of the nation's economy for years, jumping from about 5% of the gross domestic
  product in 1960 to nearly 14% in 2000.
  But the recession that began in 2007 accelerated that trend, as the economy contracted while healthcare spending
  continued to increase, according to CMS.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767469 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767469 Date: 08/31/2015
  Even now, with the economy slowly recovering, the government expects that the growth of healthcare spending will
  outpace the expansion of the economy. By 2020, 1 of every 5 dollars spent in the U.S. is expected to go to healthcare.
  Some economists believe that this is not necessarily a problem, as the healthcare industry can provide good jobs and
  improve both health and productivity.
  But there is growing concern that as much as a third of the medical care delivered in this country does not help patients.
  "Are we getting value for the dollar? That is the question," said Len Nichols, health policy director at the centrist New
  America Foundation. "If you believe that so much medical care is unnecessary, as I do, then it is criminal that we are
  spending so much."
  Stuart Butler, vice president for domestic and economic policy at the conservative Heritage Foundation, said that the
  numbers underscore the need for more aggressive action to curb spending.
  "The only way to do this is to simply spend less," Butler said, warning that the health bills being pushed on Capitol Hill do
  the opposite.
  CMS officials noted that healthcare spending has been increasing even as the number of Americans without health
  insurance is growing, another sign of problems with the system.
  "With higher unemployment, people lose their jobs [and] many of them lose their healthcare coverage in the process.
  And under current law, they don't have much to fall back on," said Richard S. Foster, chief actuary.
  Foster said that the report by his office indicated that two of the main trends driving calls for a health overhaul -- rising
  costs and shrinking numbers of people with health coverage -- are essentially the same as they were when the
  healthcare debate began last year.
  "Nothing much has changed in that regard," he said.
  Inefficiency is becoming a particularly acute problem for state and federal governments, which the report shows are
  increasingly supporting the nation's healthcare system.
  Half a century ago, government accounted for just a quarter of all healthcare spending. Now, as the cost of caring for
  elderly and poor Americans swells, government's share of the total bill is fast becoming greater than that of the private
  sector.
  The trend accelerated in the recession, as Washington spent billions of dollars to help states prop up Medicaid programs
  being strained by the growing ranks of the unemployed and uninsured.
  The healthcare legislation being debated on Capitol Hill could increase the government commitment to healthcare as
  the federal government boosts the Medicaid program and provides billions of dollars of subsidies to low- and moderate-
  income Americans to help them buy insurance.
  But in a separate report a month ago, CMS actuaries estimated that the Senate healthcare bill would boost total
  healthcare spending by less than 1% over the next decade, in large part because the legislation includes initiatives to
  make Medicare more efficient.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767469 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767470
MetadataSubject: ANGOLA
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-06T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0063/DOC_0C05767470/C05767470.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, February 6, 2010 6:37 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767470
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  ANGOLANS TO VOTE IN 2012, PRESIDENT MAY EXTEND TERM(SBU) Constitutional revisions signed by President dos
  Santos abolish direct presidential elections and would allow dos Santos to remain in power until 2022, according to
  press. The Angola desk comments the move is a step backwards for democratic reform, and adds the changes shuffle
  the government, keeping Foreign Minister dos Anjos in office but removing Defense Minister Paihama. (Ops/Angola
  desk telcon, Reuters

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767470 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, February 6, 2010 6:37 AM
  To:
  Subject Angola
  ANGOLANS TO VOTE IN 2012, PRESIDENT MAY EXTEND TERM(SBU) Constitutional revisions signed by President dos
  Santos abolish direct presidential elections and would allow dos Santos to remain in power until 2022, according to
  press. The Angola desk comments the move is a step backwards for democratic reform, and adds the changes shuffle
  the government, keeping Foreign Minister dos Anjos in office but removing Defense Minister Paihama. (Ops/Angola
  desk telcon, Reuters
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767470 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767472
MetadataSubject: MUBARAK IS AVAILABLE FOR A CALL BETWEEN 10:30 AND 12 THIS MORNING. WILL THAT WORK FOR YOU?
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-06T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0063/DOC_0C05767472/C05767472.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, February 6, 2010 7:25 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767472
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: you?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767472 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, February 6, 2010 7:25 AM
  To: H
  Subject Mubarak is available for a call between 10:30 and 12 this morning. Will that work for
  you?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767472 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767473
MetadataSubject: MUBARAK IS AVAILABLE FOR A CALL BETWEEN 10:30 AND 12 THIS MORNING. WILL THAT WORK FOR YOU?
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-06T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0063/DOC_0C05767473/C05767473.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Mubarak is available for a call between 10:30 and 12 this morning. Will that work for you?
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, February 6, 2010 8:10 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767473
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  you?
  Actually he called back and took the earlier time of 9:30. So strobe, lobo, patino, mubarak. Then u can decide on johnnie
  and alec ross.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767473 Date: 08/31/2015
  -
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, February 6, 2010 8:10 AM
  To: H
  Subject Re: Mubarak is available for a call between 10:30 and 12 this morning. Will that work for
  you?
  Actually he called back and took the earlier time of 9:30. So strobe, lobo, patino, mubarak. Then u can decide on johnnie
  and alec ross.
  Original Message ----
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Sat Feb 06 08:08:37 2010
  Subject: Re: Mubarak is available for a call between 10:30 and 12 this morning. Will that work for you?
  Ok at 10:30.
  Original Message ----
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Feb 06 07:25:26 2010
  Subject: Mubarak is available for a call between 10:30 and 12 this morning. Will that work for you?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767473 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767474
MetadataSubject: FYI: LATEST ON BLAIR CANDIDACY. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2009-10-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_045/DOC_0C05767474/C05767474.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: fyi: latest on Blair candidacy. Sid
ExtractedTo: H; Doug Band
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 10:31 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767474
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  EU leaders to debate Blair presidency on
  summit sidelines
  Climate talks overshadowed by divisive subject of Tony Blair's candidacy to be Europe's first president
  European government chiefs gather in Brussels this evening for a summit likely to be the first occasion to broach the
  divisive subject of Tony Blair's candidacy to be Europe's first president.
  The topic is not formally on the agenda of a meeting that will be dominated by wrangling over climate change funding and
  how to get the Czech president, Vaclav Klaus, to add the final signature to the reformist Lisbon treaty. But senior
  diplomats predicted there would be intense private discussion on the fringes of the summit over the question: who will get
  the plum job of first sitting president of the European council, the pre-eminent EU forum that brings leaders together for
  summits at least four times a year.
  David Miliband, the foreign secretary, said today that Blair would give Europe a "strong voice" on the global stage, but his
  comments were seized on by his Conservative shadow, William Hague, who said the debate over the presidency proved
  that the UK should have held a referendum on the Lisbon treaty.
  Officially, the job does not exist until Klaus finalises Czech ratification of the treaty, expected within weeks. While Blair
  personally has kept quiet about his ambitions, the British government is campaigning increasingly assertively on the
  former prime minister's behalf.
  "We will be making the case for a strong, internationally known figure who can open doors in [foreign] capitals," said an
  official. "There is only one candidate."
  That was not a reference to Jean-Claude Juncker, the veteran Luxembourg prime minister and European fixer, who is the
  only contender so far to have openly declared his candidacy. He emerged this week as the anti-Blair.
  Juncker looks certain to fail in his bid for the top job. But he may well succeed in destroying Blair's chances, being viewed
  as a stalking horse who will vanish to make way for a third unknown contender.
  While the Blair debate rages on the sidelines of the summit, the big priority for the Swedish government chairing the
  meeting is to try to break a deadlock on EU funding of climate change programmes in the developing world ahead of the
  Copenhagen conference in December.
  Berlin and Warsaw are the keys to a deal, but the prospects for a breakthrough look dim. Fredrik Reinfeldt, the Swedish
  prime minister, warned that Europe's credibility on global warming was at stake.
  In recent weeks European governments have locked horns over the financing package and have been unable to reach
  agreement. The aim is to come up with pledges of an EU fund of up to €15bn (£13.4bn) a year by 2020 for transfers to the
  developing countries to combat global warming. The overall package is central to a Copenhagen deal.
  But with the other big players, especially the US, which is reluctant to commit to a figure, Germany believes Europe
  should not show its hand until the Copenhagen negotiations. The European commission and others such as the UK and
  the Scandinavians believe agreeing on a figure in advance would strengthen Europe's global leadership role on climate
  change and send a strong signal to other potential signatories.
  The Poles and other eastern Europeans are unhappy at being asked to stump up for developing countries such as Brazil,
  which is wealthier than the poorer EU members. The Poles are refusing to agree a package and figures for Copenhagen
  unless it is first decided how the bill will be split among the EU's 27 governments. In the midst of a financial crisis, the
  eastern Europeans say they cannot afford the climate change fund.
  Angela Merkel, sworn in yesterday for a second term as German chancellor, will be pivotal to any climate change
  financing deal and her answer to the Blair question may also be decisive. So far, she has been hedging her bets.
  While Nicolas Sarkozy, the French president, is known to support Blair with reservations, there are no German candidates
  for the two big new jobs being created under Lisbon — the European president and a European foreign minister or high
  representative for foreign and security policy.
  In Paris last night the French and German leaders discussed the posts, although there was little information on whether
  they reached a pact. Sarkozy said the two leaders agreed on "almost everything".
  Austria, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg — all said to nurse ambitions to secure the presidential post
  themselves — have come out publicly against Blair on the grounds that he would neglect the interests of smaller EU
  member states — 19 out of the total 27.
  Adding his voice to the argument, Demitris Christofias, the president of Cyprus, said a council president "from a small
  country would be more objective and more consensual. The European Union is a family of compromises."
  The Dutch centre-right prime minister and possible contender, Jan-Peter Balkenende, has come under pressure this week
  to renounce European presidential ambitions since his move to Brussels could trigger early elections and the fall of his
  government.
  Christofias emphasised that tonight the priority would be to get the Klaus blocking of the Lisbon treaty lifted rather than
  focusing on who gets what under Lisbon.
  Senior diplomats agreed it was too early to discuss names. If Klaus signs thetreaty soon, a special summit would be
  convened next month to decide on the president and foreign minister, also leaving the European commission chief, Jose
  Manuel Barroso, to put together a new team.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767474 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 10:31 AM
  To: H; Doug Band
  Subject: fyi: latest on Blair candidacy. Sid
  EU leaders to debate Blair presidency on
  summit sidelines
  Climate talks overshadowed by divisive subject of Tony Blair's candidacy to be Europe's first president
  European government chiefs gather in Brussels this evening for a summit likely to be the first occasion to broach the
  divisive subject of Tony Blair's candidacy to be Europe's first president.
  The topic is not formally on the agenda of a meeting that will be dominated by wrangling over climate change funding and
  how to get the Czech president, Vaclav Klaus, to add the final signature to the reformist Lisbon treaty. But senior
  diplomats predicted there would be intense private discussion on the fringes of the summit over the question: who will get
  the plum job of first sitting president of the European council, the pre-eminent EU forum that brings leaders together for
  summits at least four times a year.
  David Miliband, the foreign secretary, said today that Blair would give Europe a "strong voice" on the global stage, but his
  comments were seized on by his Conservative shadow, William Hague, who said the debate over the presidency proved
  that the UK should have held a referendum on the Lisbon treaty.
  Officially, the job does not exist until Klaus finalises Czech ratification of the treaty, expected within weeks. While Blair
  personally has kept quiet about his ambitions, the British government is campaigning increasingly assertively on the
  former prime minister's behalf.
  "We will be making the case for a strong, internationally known figure who can open doors in [foreign] capitals," said an
  official. "There is only one candidate."
  That was not a reference to Jean-Claude Juncker, the veteran Luxembourg prime minister and European fixer, who is the
  only contender so far to have openly declared his candidacy. He emerged this week as the anti-Blair.
  Juncker looks certain to fail in his bid for the top job. But he may well succeed in destroying Blair's chances, being viewed
  as a stalking horse who will vanish to make way for a third unknown contender.
  While the Blair debate rages on the sidelines of the summit, the big priority for the Swedish government chairing the
  meeting is to try to break a deadlock on EU funding of climate change programmes in the developing world ahead of the
  Copenhagen conference in December.
  Berlin and Warsaw are the keys to a deal, but the prospects for a breakthrough look dim. Fredrik Reinfeldt, the Swedish
  prime minister, warned that Europe's credibility on global warming was at stake.
  In recent weeks European governments have locked horns over the financing package and have been unable to reach
  agreement. The aim is to come up with pledges of an EU fund of up to €15bn (£13.4bn) a year by 2020 for transfers to the
  developing countries to combat global warming. The overall package is central to a Copenhagen deal.
  But with the other big players, especially the US, which is reluctant to commit to a figure, Germany believes Europe
  should not show its hand until the Copenhagen negotiations. The European commission and others such as the UK and
  the Scandinavians believe agreeing on a figure in advance would strengthen Europe's global leadership role on climate
  change and send a strong signal to other potential signatories.
  The Poles and other eastern Europeans are unhappy at being asked to stump up for developing countries such as Brazil,
  which is wealthier than the poorer EU members. The Poles are refusing to agree a package and figures for Copenhagen
  unless it is first decided how the bill will be split among the EU's 27 governments. In the midst of a financial crisis, the
  eastern Europeans say they cannot afford the climate change fund.
  Angela Merkel, sworn in yesterday for a second term as German chancellor, will be pivotal to any climate change
  financing deal and her answer to the Blair question may also be decisive. So far, she has been hedging her bets.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767474 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767474 Date: 07/31/2015
  While Nicolas Sarkozy, the French president, is known to support Blair with reservations, there are no German candidates
  for the two big new jobs being created under Lisbon — the European president and a European foreign minister or high
  representative for foreign and security policy.
  In Paris last night the French and German leaders discussed the posts, although there was little information on whether
  they reached a pact. Sarkozy said the two leaders agreed on "almost everything".
  Austria, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg — all said to nurse ambitions to secure the presidential post
  themselves — have come out publicly against Blair on the grounds that he would neglect the interests of smaller EU
  member states — 19 out of the total 27.
  Adding his voice to the argument, Demitris Christofias, the president of Cyprus, said a council president "from a small
  country would be more objective and more consensual. The European Union is a family of compromises."
  The Dutch centre-right prime minister and possible contender, Jan-Peter Balkenende, has come under pressure this week
  to renounce European presidential ambitions since his move to Brussels could trigger early elections and the fall of his
  government.
  Christofias emphasised that tonight the priority would be to get the Klaus blocking of the Lisbon treaty lifted rather than
  focusing on who gets what under Lisbon.
  Senior diplomats agreed it was too early to discuss names. If Klaus signs thetreaty soon, a special summit would be
  convened next month to decide on the president and foreign minister, also leaving the European commission chief, Jose
  Manuel Barroso, to put together a new team.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767474 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767475
MetadataSubject: MUBARAK IS AVAILABLE FOR A CALL BETWEEN 10:30 AND 12 THIS MORNING. WILL THAT WORK FOR YOU?
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-06T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0063/DOC_0C05767475/C05767475.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Mubarak is available for a call between 10:30 and 12 this morning. Will that work for you?
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, February 6, 2010 8:14 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767475
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  you?
  Coming over secure fax at 9am.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767475 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, February 6, 2010 8:14 AM
  To:
  Subject Re: Mubarak is available for a call between 10:30 and 12 this morning. Will that work for
  you?
  Coming over secure fax at 9am.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Sat Feb 06 08:09:01 2010
  Subject: Re: Mubarak is available for a call between 10:30 and 12 this morning. Will that work for you?
  Is there a call sheet?
  Original Message --
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Feb 06 07:25:26 2010
  Subject: Mubarak is available for a call between 10:30 and 12 this morning. Will that work for you?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767475 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767477
MetadataSubject: (AP) CLINTON SAYS PAKISTAN MISSED CHANCES WITH AL-QAIDA
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2009-10-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_045/DOC_0C05767477/C05767477.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: (AP) Clinton says Pakistan missed chances with al-Qaida
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-II
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 11:47 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767477
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767477 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 11:47 AM
  To:
  Subject Fw: (AP) Clinton says. Pakistan missed chances with al-Qaida
  From: Morris, James M
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-II
  Sent: Thu Oct 29 11:38:22 2009
  Subject: (AP) Clinton says Pakistan missed chances with al-Qaida
  ISLAMABAD (AP) - U.S. Secretary of State Clinton is suggesting that Pakistan's government has squandered chances to
  kill or capture al-Qaida leaders. She made the remark in an interview with Pakistani journalists during a trip to the city
  of Lahore. She said she finds it hard to believe that nobody in Pakistan's government knows where the leaders of Osama
  bin Laden's terrorist network are hiding.
  James M. Morris
  Watch Officer (S/ES-O)
  (202)647-1512
  morrisjm@state.gov
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767477 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767479
MetadataSubject: ANOTHER MEMO ON BACKDROP TO THIS WEEK. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-29T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_050/DOC_0C05767479/C05767479.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767479
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  RELEASE
  IN PART
  B6
  sbwhoeop
  Sunday, November 29, 2009 12:24 PM
  H
  Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  McD v unpopular with key members of press was so incensed by his dealings that he nearly wrote a
  column on it. People collecting string. Hoagland chief among them Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767479 Date: 07/31/2015
  nonawsnosarass.
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  RELEASE
  IN PART
  B6
  sbwhoeop
  Sunday, November 29, 2009 12:24 PM
  H
  Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  McD v unpopular with key members of press was so incensed by his dealings that he nearly wrote a
  column on it. People collecting string. Hoagland chief among them Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:04:27
  To: 'sbwhoeop
  Subject: Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  I didn't read the McD reference that way. I actually thought it was complimentary of his spin skills. What am I missing?
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Nov 29 11:51:28 2009
  Subject: Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  It's there, just scroll down
  Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:38:00
  To: 'sbwhoeop
  Subject: Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  Can you send me the Hoagland piece?
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Nov 29 10:58:16 2009
  Subject: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  CONFIDENTIAL
  November 29, 2009
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767479 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767479 Date: 07/31/2015
  For: Hillary
  From: Sid
  Re: Backdrop to your coming week
  Below is a piece published today in The Observer, the Sunday newspaper of The Guardian, on the Chilcot inquiry,
  summarizing the testimony so far and what is expected this week while you are drumming up support for the
  Afghanistan initiative. Britain and Europe are riveted by Chilcot, especially official circles. The objective correlative, of
  course, is trust in any U.S. administration and deep skepticism about the Afghanistan project. Yet another undercurrent
  among the mandarins is disdainful resentment of indifference to Britain, a sentiment beyond Labour or the Tories but
  what has emerged as the view of the permanent establishment at Whitehall and elsewhere.
  Mandelson Watch: After Miliband declined to reach for the EU foreign secretaryship (though Sarkozy wanted him to
  take it and Brown was not averse, even favorable), Mandelson personally campaigned on his own for it among the
  Europeans. Mandelson was eager to Miliband to take the EU post, allowing Mandelson to be appointed foreign
  minister. When Miliband refused, Mandelson's ambition was thwarted, and tried to seize the EU position for himself,
  but without any backing in Europe or from Gordon. The Europeans thought him mad. Suddenly, they recalled his bad or
  strange behavior as UK commissioner to the EU. When Christine Ashton was named, Mandelson briefed the press on her
  lack of credentials, etc. Ashton, as it happens, had worked the press to try to help Mandelson when he had gotten into
  the mess that led to his first resignation. Those inside the government who remember this see it as an illustration of the
  principle that no good deed goes unpunished. Mandelson, in a snit, is now not speaking to Gordon as though his
  rejection were Gordon's fault.
  One more item: Did you read Jim Hoagland in the Washington Post today? He nails McDonough for trashing Biden,
  among other things. Enclosed below story on Chilcot:
  http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/nov/29/iraq-war-inquiry-chilcot-blair
  Chilcot Inquiry: Mandarins take revenge on Tony Blair over Iraq Civil servants and diplomats are lining up to stick a knife
  into former PM's reputation
  * Toby Helm <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/tobyhelm> and Rajeev Syal
  <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/rajeev-syal>
  * The Observer <http://observerguardian.co.uk> , Sunday 29 November 2009
  * Whitehall mandarins are supreme masters of subtle evasion. But they do not rise to the top of their trade without
  also knowing how to stick in the knife.
  At times the Chilcot inquiry into Britain's involvement in Iraq since 2001, which opened last week, resembled a
  gentlemen's club moved to the sanitised surroundings of the Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre in Westminster.
  Oxbridge-educated pillars of the establishment politely questioned other Oxbridge-educated pillars of the establishment
  about who said what to whom in which memo. The inquiry is a peculiar mixture of the old and the new, the open and
  closed. It is conducted in the language of Whitehall, yet beamed live by webcam to the world.
  Critics are convinced that, for all Sir John Chilcot's promises to the contrary, it will turn out to be another Whitehall
  whitewash. For the cognoscenti, little new information has yet emerged, and when the final report is written it will not
  seek to apportion blame. Yet beneath the equivocation and mandarin-speak, Whitehall seems, in as much as it knows
  how, to be using Chilcot to wield the scalpel. Throughout the first week the pent-up frustrations of diplomats and career
  civil servants over the way Tony Blair <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/tonyblair> and George Bush secretly plotted
  to oust Saddam Hussein, bypassing the "official channels" in which they operate, has been there for all to see.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767479 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767479 Date: 07/31/2015
  Chilcot is said to have been warned by his Whitehall friends that many witnesses will be ready to unburden themselves -
  finally to take revenge. In session after session they have appeared to do that. Blair's reputation has been sliced like
  salami day after day.
  Sir William Ehrman, the Foreign Office's former director of international security, volunteered last Wednesday that the
  threat from Saddam's supposed weapons of mass destruction was known to be limited.
  In the gentlest way he drove in the dagger. "We did, I think on 10 March [2003], get a report that chemical weapons
  might have remained disassembled and Saddam hadn't yet ordered their assembly. There was a suggestion that Iraq
  might lack warheads capable of effective dispersal of agents."
  Ever the diplomat, however, Ehrman went on to say that the intelligence warnings had not made any difference to the
  case for war. "I don't think it invalidated the point about the programmes he had. It was more about use," he said. But
  he had set the tone.
  On Thursday, Sir Christopher Meyer, UK ambassador in Washington from 1997 to 2003, who has already criticised the
  government over Iraq in his memoirs, went for Blair, mercilessly comparing his qualities as a war leader to those of
  Margaret Thatcher. "I'm not trying to make a party political point here whatsoever, but quite often I think about this:
  what would Margaret Thatcher have done?" Meyer asked. "I think she would have insisted on a coherent political and
  diplomatic strategy and she would have demanded the greatest clarity about what the heck happened if, and when, you
  removed Saddam Hussein."
  A former press secretary to John Major who can speak like a mandarin but, equally, can talk like a layman, he said Blair
  had failed miserably to extract a price from George Bush for his loyalty. "We could have achieved more by playing a
  tougher role... if, for example... Tony Blair had said: 'I want to help you, George, on this, but I have to say, in all honesty,
  that I will not be able to take part in any military operation unless we have palpable progress on the [Middle East] peace
  process and we have absolute clarity on what happens in Iraq if it comes up.' I think that would have changed the nature
  -- it would not have led to a rupture — it would have changed the nature of American planning. "
  Even when defending UK policy, he was on the offensive. Asked if policy had been adapted to stay in line with
  Washington's, Meyer added: "I wouldn't say it was as extremely poodle-ish as that."
  On Friday, Sir Jeremy Greenstock, Britain's former ambassador to the United Nations, told Chilcot he had threatened to
  resign in 2002 if at least one security council resolution was not passed. He added: "I regard our participation in the
  military action in Iraq in March 2003 as legal but of questionable legitimacy, in that it did not have the democratically
  observable backing of the great majority of [UN] member states, or even perhaps of the majority of people inside the
  UK."
  Today new arguments are raging over whether the inquiry will have access to, and publish, the most sensitive
  documents — including legal advice given to the government by the former attorney general, Lord Goldsmith, during the
  lead-up to war. Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat leader, has written to Gordon Brown saying that, unless all such
  material is published, the inquiry will be a sham and the public's sense that it has been denied the facts will remain.
  But it will still be essential viewing nonetheless. This week will see more key witnesses. The most revealing testimony
  could come tomorrow when Sir David Manning, Blair's former foreign policy
  <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/foreignpolicy> adviser, is certain to be asked about his authorship of a memo
  which purportedly revealed details of a secret meeting between Bush and Blair in January 2003. According to reports,
  the five pages of secret documents, known as the Manning memo, recorded the White House meeting on 31 January
  which allegedly shows that Bush and Blair made a deal to carry out an invasion regardless of whether weapons of mass
  destruction were discovered by UN weapons inspectors. It appears to be in direct contradiction with statements that
  Blair made to parliament afterwards that Saddam would be given a final chance to disarm.
  The memo also disclosed that Bush floated the idea of painting a U-2 spyplane in UN colours and letting it fly low over
  Iraq to provoke Saddam into ordering it to be shot down, providing a pretext for the subsequent invasion by America
  and Britain.
  Manning, educated at Oriel College, Oxford, and a career diplomat, is fiercely independent. He may choose to say more
  than Blair would like, according to one former colleague. He could also be asked to either confirm or deny Meyer's
  evidence that Meyer received "new instructions" in early 2005 indicating that it was a "complete waste of time" to
  oppose regime change, so strong was the US determination to go down that road.
  On Tuesday, Edward Chaplin, the Foreign Office Middle East director at the time of the invasion, and Sir Peter Ricketts,
  the top official in the Foreign Office, will appear. Ricketts, a former chairman of Britain's powerful joint intelligence
  committee, has already given evidence to the inquiry alleging that officials in London knew even before Bush came to
  office in 2001 that there were "voices" in Washington calling for Saddam to be removed from power. Ricketts also told
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767479 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767479 Date: 07/31/2015
  the inquiry that, until March 2002, Whitehall distanced itself from regime change. Only one month later, Blair told Bush
  that he would support military action "to bring about regime change".
  According to documents leaked five years ago, Ricketts described the US in 2002 as "scrambling to establish a link
  between Iraq and al-Qaida" — a connection that was "so far, frankly unconvincing". On Thursday, Sir Kevin Tebbit, the
  Ministry of Defence's permanent secretary during the invasion, will be asked to give evidence about the military
  planning. Chilcot will, most likely, want to know when the government first began to amass resources for the war and
  what, if any, preparations were made for the aftermath of an invasion. Tebbit could also be urged to divulge the level of
  intelligence he received on the likelihood of an attack with chemical or biological weapons.
  After Tebbit, a succession of heavy-hitting military men will give evidence. The former chief of the defence staff, Admiral
  the Lord Boyce, could be asked whether he believes that the invasion was legal. On Friday, Lieutenant General Sir
  Anthony Pigott, former deputy chief of the defence staff, and Major General David Wilson, senior British military adviser
  to the US military's central command between 2002 and 2003, will be questioned about military planning for the
  conflict.
  The last witness to appear this week will be Dominic Asquith, Britain's ambassador to Iraq between 2006 and 2007, who
  will come armed with knowledge of the view from Baghdad.
  When Chilcot has made his way through the officials, he will turn in the new year to former ministers, including Jack
  Straw, the former foreign secretary, and Blair himself. The panel has said that it will also begin to examine the highly
  controversial issue of whether the invasion was legal — which may turn out to be the focal point of the whole inquiry — in
  January.
  In his final report, which is not expected until late 2010 at the earliest, Chilcot has said he will not seek to attribute
  blame. But after only one week it is already clear where much of Whitehall believes that lies.
  The Washington Post
  Afghanistan: The speech you'll miss
  By Jim Hoagland
  Sunday, November 29, 2009
  Dec. 1, 2009:
  My fellow Americans,
  This is not the speech you expected to hear. But my wordsmiths are tied in knots writing an acceptance speech for the
  only Nobel Peace Prize ever awarded for making speeches. So I am going to tell you how I really feel about Afghanistan.
  Which is: steamed.
  I want to accomplish three goals tonight without naming them.
  First, to let those know-it-alls, Generals Petraeus and McChrystal, know one more thing: This is the last big troop
  increase you get, so make it work.
  am not going down the incrementalist road that wrecked Lyndon Johnson's presidency. This is not July 1965, when
  Westmoreland jumped the shark of escalation in Vietnam and then never stopped asking for more troops. For all the
  trouble he has been, Dick Holbrooke helped by recalling that history in the shadowboxing that dominated my long war
  council meetings.
  Joe Biden has been good in there, too. He's been willing, though not happy, to be characterized in the media as being
  ready to bug out now. This helped us push back against McChrystal's effort to box me in at 40,000 additional U.S.
  soldiers.
  Denis McDonough, my strategic communications man, sold Biden-as-dove brilliantly. Wasn't somebody just saying I
  should promote Denis? Maybe it was Denis?
  Never mind. That tactic won me room to maneuver toward a more realistic number of, say, 23,000 new combat troops,
  5,000 additional trainers and a "NATO surge" of 5,000 foreign troops.
  That's my second unspoken goal: to come out of this buildup speech without losing the left of the Democratic Party --
  while being able to refute John McCain's charges that I ignored my own generals. Triangulation lives.
  Bush put the generals in the limelight to sell the Iraq surge after he lost all credibility, and David Petraeus's performance
  was dazzling. Which presents two big problems. Petraeus is the only person who could get the Republican nomination in
  2012 and make a serious run against me. (I get paid to think ahead.) And if the generals box me in, civilian control of the
  military in this country becomes a mockery. Clinton was afraid of the military; Bush was deep in hock to it. I've got to get
  the right balance back.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767479 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767479 Date: 07/31/2015
  That's why I need Bob Gates and Jim Jones. Those who scoffed at my keeping on Bush's defense secretary, and then
  making a retired Marine four-star I hardly knew my NSC guy, were not thinking that moments like this would come. I
  already was.
  Gates has maneuvered flawlessly through my waterboarding-by-leaks on Afghanistan. He will sell my final number to the
  uniforms as the "floor" for U.S. troops that Petraeus argues we need for three years. But Gates knows I will make it a
  ceiling.
  We can't afford an open-ended commitment. I put Peter Orszag, as good a budget overseer as you can find, front and
  center for the photographers in that last war council. Many missed it, but NBC's Andrea Mitchell got it right away. No
  wonder she's married to Alan Greenspan.
  I will bet that Stan McChrystal never drew up a budget in his life.
  Jones tells me these Special Operations commanders are used to getting whatever they ask for, especially since
  September 11th. Nobody on the Hill will deny them anything.
  Jones is also squeezing the Europeans to join the battle and is getting results, even from the Germans. What is it Jones
  says? Maybe the worst thing of all would be to be perceived to lose in Afghanistan and then have the Europeans say:
  Well, you never asked for more help at the crucial time. Makes sense to me.
  We have sent NATO members the numbers we think they can and should provide, country by country. That new
  secretary general, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, is pulling out the stops, visiting the capitals to get commitments.
  "Say it now, pay it later," we tell the Europeans. They have until mid-2010 to deploy their new units. But I need pledges
  now so I can get across tonight that this is NATO's war, not Obama's war. That's unspoken-goal number three.
  So I have frontloaded the speech with allusions to this being about an exit strategy, without boxing myself in on timing,
  and am presenting the "civilian surge" as being as essential as the troop buildup. That helps set up my Oslo speech. And
  who knows? It may even work out that way. If God blesses us all.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767479 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767480
MetadataSubject: ANOTHER MEMO ON BACKDROP TO THIS WEEK. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-29T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_050/DOC_0C05767480/C05767480.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedSubject: Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 12:29 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767480
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  I copied it to memo on chilcot but will resend in an hour when I'm home. But check Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with
  Blackberry

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767480 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE
  IN PART
  B6
  B6
  B6
  B6
  B6
  B6
  From sbwhoeor
  Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 12:29 PM
  To: H
  Subject: Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  I copied it to memo on chilcot but will resend in an hour when I'm home. But check Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with
  Blackberry
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:25:27
  To: 'sbwhoeop
  Subject: Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  No. Can you send?
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Nov 29 12:20:25 2009
  Subject: Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  Did you read nyt lead editorial yesterday?
  Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:04:27
  To: 'sbwhoeop
  Subject: Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  I didn't read the McD reference that way. I actually thought it was complimentary of his spin skills. What am I missing?
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Nov 29 11:51:28 2009
  Subject: Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  It's there, just scroll down
  Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:38:00
  To: 'sbwhoeop B6
  Subject: Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  Can you send me the Hoagland piece?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767480 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767480 Date: 07/31/2015
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Nov 29 10:58:16 2009
  Subject: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  CONFIDENTIAL
  November 29, 2009
  For: Hillary
  From: Sid
  Re: Backdrop to your coming week
  Below is a piece published today in The Observer, the Sunday newspaper of The Guardian, on the Chilcot inquiry,
  summarizing the testimony so far and what is expected this week while you are drumming up support for the
  Afghanistan initiative. Britain and Europe are riveted by Chilcot, especially official circles. The objective correlative, of
  course, is trust in any U.S. administration and deep skepticism about the Afghanistan project. Yet another undercurrent
  among the mandarins is disdainful resentment of indifference to Britain, a sentiment beyond Labour or the Tories but
  what has emerged as the view of the permanent establishment at Whitehall and elsewhere.
  Mandelson Watch: After Miliband declined to reach for the EU foreign secretaryship (though Sarkozy wanted him to
  take it and Brown was not averse, even favorable), Mandelson personally campaigned on his own for it among the
  Europeans. Mandelson was eager to Miliband to take the EU post, allowing Mandelson to be appointed foreign
  minister. When Miliband refused, Mandelson's ambition was thwarted, and tried to seize the EU position for himself,
  but without any backing in Europe or from Gordon. The Europeans thought him mad. Suddenly, they recalled his bad or
  strange behavior as UK commissioner to the EU. When Christine Ashton was named, IVIandelson briefed the press on her
  lack of credentials, etc. Ashton, as it happens, had worked the press to try to help Mandelson when he had gotten into
  the mess that led to his first resignation. Those inside the government who remember this see it as an illustration of the
  principle that no good deed goes unpunished. Mandelson, in a snit, is now not speaking to Gordon as though his
  rejection were Gordon's fault.
  One more item: Did you read Jim Hoagland in the Washington Post today? He nails McDonough for trashing Biden,
  among other things. Enclosed below story on Chilcot:
  http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/nov/29/iraq-war-inquiry-chilcot-blair
  Chilcot Inquiry: Mandarins take revenge on Tony Blair over Iraq Civil servants and diplomats are lining up to stick a knife
  into former PM's reputation
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767480 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767480 Date: 07/31/2015
  * Toby Helm <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/tobyhelm> and Rajeev Syal
  <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/rajeev-syal>
  * The Observer <http://observerguardian.co.uk> , Sunday 29 November 2009
  * Whitehall mandarins are supreme masters of subtle evasion. But they do not rise to the top of their trade without
  also knowing how to stick in the knife.
  At times the Chilcot inquiry into Britain's involvement in Iraq since 2001, which opened last week, resembled a
  gentlemen's club moved to the sanitised surroundings of the Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre in Westminster.
  Oxbridge-educated pillars of the establishment politely questioned other Oxbridge-educated pillars of the establishment
  about who said what to whom in which memo. The inquiry is a peculiar mixture of the old and the new, the open and
  closed. It is conducted in the language of Whitehall, yet beamed live by webcam to the world.
  Critics are convinced that, for all Sir John Chilcot's promises to the contrary, it will turn out to be another Whitehall
  whitewash. For the cognoscenti, little new information has yet emerged, and when the final report is written it will not
  seek to apportion blame. Yet beneath the equivocation and mandarin-speak, Whitehall seems, in as much as it knows
  how, to be using Chilcot to wield the scalpel. Throughout the first week the pent-up frustrations of diplomats and career
  civil servants over the way Tony Blair <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/tonyblair> and George Bush secretly plotted
  to oust Saddam Hussein, bypassing the "official channels" in which they operate, has been there for all to see.
  Chilcot is said to have been warned by his Whitehall friends that many witnesses will be ready to unburden themselves -
  finally to take revenge. In session after session they have appeared to do that. Blair's reputation has been sliced like
  salami day after day.
  Sir William Ehrman, the Foreign Office's former director of international security, volunteered last Wednesday that the
  threat from Saddam's supposed weapons of mass destruction was known to be limited.
  In the gentlest way he drove in the dagger. "We did, I think on 10 March [2003], get a report that chemical weapons
  might have remained disassembled and Saddam hadn't yet ordered their assembly. There was a suggestion that Iraq
  might lack warheads capable of effective dispersal of agents."
  Ever the diplomat, however, Ehrman went on to say that the intelligence warnings had not made any difference to the
  case for war. "I don't think it invalidated the point about the programmes he had. It was more about use," he said. But
  he had set the tone.
  On Thursday, Sir Christopher Meyer, UK ambassador in Washington from 1997 to 2003, who has already criticised the
  government over Iraq in his memoirs, went for Blair, mercilessly comparing his qualities as a war leader to those of
  Margaret Thatcher. "I'm not trying to make a party political point here whatsoever, but quite often I think about this:
  what would Margaret Thatcher have done?" Meyer asked. "I think she would have insisted on a coherent political and
  diplomatic strategy and she would have demanded the greatest clarity about what the heck happened if, and when, you
  removed Saddam Hussein."
  A former press secretary to John Major who can speak like a mandarin but, equally, can talk like a layman, he said Blair
  had failed miserably to extract a price from George Bush for his loyalty. "We could have achieved more by playing a
  tougher role... if, for example... Tony Blair had said: 'I want to help you, George, on this, but I have to say, in all honesty,
  that I will not be able to take part in any military operation unless we have palpable progress on the [Middle East] peace
  process and we have absolute clarity on what happens in Iraq if it comes up.' I think that would have changed the nature
  — it would not have led to a rupture — it would have changed the nature of American planning. "
  Even when defending UK policy, he was on the offensive. Asked if policy had been adapted to stay in line with
  Washington's, Meyer added: "I wouldn't say it was as extremely poodle-ish as that."
  On Friday, Sir Jeremy Greenstbck, Britain's former ambassador to the United Nations, told Chilcot he had threatened to
  resign in 2002 if at least one security council resolution was not passed. He added: "I regard our participation in the
  military action in Iraq in March 2003 as legal but of questionable legitimacy, in that it did not have the democratically
  observable backing of the great majority of [UN] member states, or even perhaps of the majority of people inside the
  UK."
  Today new arguments are raging over whether the inquiry will have access to, and publish, the most sensitive
  documents — including legal advice given to the government by the former attorney general, Lord Goldsmith, during the
  lead-up to war. Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat leader, has written to Gordon Brown saying that, unless ail such
  material is published, the inquiry will be a sham and the public's sense that it has been denied the facts will remain.
  But it will still be essential viewing nonetheless. This week will see more key witnesses. The most revealing testimony
  could come tomorrow when Sir David Manning, Blair's former foreign policy
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767480 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767480 Date: 07/31/2015
  <http://www.guardian.co.uk/politicsfforeignpolicy> adviser, is certain to be asked about his authorship of a memo
  which purportedly revealed details of a secret meeting between Bush and Blair in January 2003. According to reports,
  the five pages of secret documents, known as the Manning memo, recorded the White House meeting on 31 January
  which allegedly shows that Bush and Blair made a deal to carry out an invasion regardless of whether weapons of mass
  destruction were discovered by UN weapons inspectors. It appears to be in direct contradiction with statements that
  Blair made to parliament afterwards that Saddam would be given a final chance to disarm.
  The memo also disclosed that Bush floated the idea of painting a U-2 spyplane in UN colours and letting it fly low over
  Iraq to provoke Saddam into ordering it to be shot down, providing a pretext for the subsequent invasion by America
  and Britain.
  Manning, educated at Oriel College, Oxford, and a career diplomat, is fiercely independent. He may choose to say more
  than Blair would like, according to one former colleague. He could also be asked to either confirm or deny Meyer's
  evidence that Meyer received "new instructions" in early 2005 indicating that it was a "complete waste of time to
  oppose regime change, so strong was the US determination to go down that road.
  On Tuesday, Edward Chaplin, the Foreign Office Middle East director at the time of the invasion, and Sir Peter Ricketts,
  the top official in the Foreign Office, will appear. Ricketts, a former chairman of Britain's powerful joint intelligence
  committee, has already given evidence to the inquiry alleging that officials in London knew even before Bush came to
  office in 2001 that there were "voices" in Washington calling for Saddam to be removed from power. Ricketts also told
  the inquiry that, until March 2002, Whitehall distanced itself from regime change. Only one month later, Blair told Bush
  that he would support military action "to bring about regime change".
  According to documents leaked five years ago, Ricketts described the US in 2002 as "scrambling to establish a link
  between Iraq and al-Qaida" — a connection that was "so far, frankly unconvincing". Or. Thursday, Sir Kevin Tebbit, the
  Ministry of Defence's permanent secretary during the invasion, will be asked to give evidence about the military
  planning. Chilcot will, most likely, want to know when the government first began to amass resources for the war and
  what, if any, preparations were made for the aftermath of an invasion. Tebbit could also be urged to divulge the level of
  intelligence he received on the likelihood of an attack with chemical or biological weapons.
  After Tebbit, a succession of heavy-hitting military men will give evidence. The former chief of the defence staff, Admiral
  the Lord Boyce, could be asked whether he believes that the invasion was legal. On Friday, Lieutenant Genera! Sir
  Anthony Pigott, former deputy chief of the defence staff, and Major General David Wilson, senior British military adviser
  to the US military's central command between 2002 and 2003, will be questioned about military planning for the
  conflict.
  The last witness to appear this week will be Dominic Asquith, Britain's ambassador to Iraq between 2006 and 2007, who
  will come armed with knowledge of the view from Baghdad.
  When Chilcot has made his way through the officials, he will turn in the new year to former ministers, including Jack
  Straw, the former foreign secretary, and Blair himself. The panel has said that it will also begin to examine the highly
  controversial issue of whether the invasion was legal — which may turn out to be the focal point of the whole inquiry — in
  January.
  In his final report, which is not expected until late 2010 at the earliest, Chilcot has said he will not seek to attribute
  blame. But after only one ✓eek it is already clear where much of Whitehall believes that lies.
  The Washington Post
  Afghanistan: The speech you'll miss
  By Jim Hoagland
  Sunday, November 29, 2009
  Dec. 1, 2009:
  My fellow Americans,
  This is not the speech you expected to hear. But my wordsmiths are tied in knots writing an acceptance speech for the
  only Nobel Peace Prize ever awarded for making speeches. So I am going to tell you how I really feel about Afghanistan.
  Which is: steamed.
  I want to accomplish three goals tonight without naming them.
  First, to let those know-it-ails, Generals Petraeus and McChrysta!, know one more thing: This is the last big troop
  increase you get, so make it work.
  I am not going down the incrementalist road that wrecked Lyndon Johnson's presidency. This is not July 1965, when
  Westmoreland jumped the shark of escalation in Vietnam and then never stopped asking for more troops. For all the
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767480 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767480 Date: 07/31/2015
  trouble he has been, Dick Holbrooke helped by recalling that history in the shadowboxing that dominated my long war
  council meetings.
  Joe Biden has been good in there, too. He's been willing, though not happy, to be characterized in the media as being
  ready to bug out now. This helped us push back against McChrysters effort to box me in at 40,000 additional U.S.
  soldiers.
  Denis McDonough, my strategic communications man, sold Biden-as-dove brilliantly. Wasn't somebody just saying I
  should promote Denis? Maybe it was Denis?
  Never mind. That tactic won me room to maneuver toward a more realistic number of, say, 23,000 new combat troops,
  5,000 additional trainers and a "NATO surge" of 5,000 foreign troops.
  That's my second unspoken goal: to come out of this buildup speech without losing the left of the Democratic Party --
  while being able to refute John McCain's charges that I ignored my own generals. Triangulation lives.
  Bush put the generals in the limelight to sell the Iraq surge after he lost all credibility, and David Petraeus's performance
  was dazzling. Which presents two big problems. Petraeus is the only person who could get the Republican nomination in
  2012 and make a serious run against me. (I get paid to think ahead.) And if the generals box me in, civilian control of the
  military in this country becomes a mockery. Clinton was afraid of the military; Bush was deep in hock to it. I've got to get
  the right balance back.
  That's why I need Bob Gates and Jim Jones. Those who scoffed at my keeping on. Bush's defense secretary, and then
  making a retired Marine four-star I hardly knew my NSC guy, were not thinking that moments like this would come. I
  already was.
  Gates has maneuvered flawlessly through my waterboarding-by-leaks on Afghanistan. He will sell my final number to the
  uniforms as the "floor" for U.S. troops that Petraeus argues we need for three years. But Gates knows I will make it a
  ceiling.
  We can't afford an open-ended commitment. I put Peter Orszag, as good a budget overseer as you can find, front and
  center for the photographers in that last war council. Many missed it, but NBC's Andrea Mitchell got it right away. No
  wonder she's married to Alan Greenspan.
  I will bet that Stan McChrystal never drew up a budget in his life.
  Jones tells me these Special Operations commanders are used to getting whatever they ask for, especially since
  September 11th. Nobody on the Hill will deny them anything.
  Jones is also squeezing the Europeans to join the battle and is getting results, even from the Germans. What is it Jones
  says? Maybe the worst thing of all would be to be perceived to lose in Afghanistan and then have the Europeans say:
  Well, you never asked for more help at the crucial time. Makes sense to me.
  We have sent NATO members the numbers we think they can and should provide, country by country. That new
  secretary general, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, is pulling out the stops, visiting the capitals to get commitments.
  "Say it now, pay it later," we tell the Europeans. They have until mid-2010 to deploy their new units. But I need pledges
  now so I can get across tonight that this is NATO's war, not Obama's war. That's unspoken-goal number three.
  So I have frontioaded the speech with allusions to this being about an exit strategy, without boxing myself in on timing,
  and am presenting the "civilian surge" as being as essential as the troop buildup. That helps set up my Oslo speech. And
  who knows? It may even work out that way. If God blesses us all.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767480 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767482
MetadataSubject: ANOTHER MEMO ON BACKDROP TO THIS WEEK. SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-29T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_050/DOC_0C05767482/C05767482.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767482
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  sbwhoeor
  Sunday, November 29, 2009 1:0S PM
  H
  Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  November 28, 2009
  Editorial
  Diplomacy 101
  We were thrilled when President Obama decided to plunge fully into the Middle East peace effort. He appointed a skilled
  special envoy, George Mitchell, and demanded that Israel freeze settlements, Palestinians crack down on anti-Israel
  violence and Arab leaders demonstrate their readiness to reach out to Israel.
  Nine months later, the president's promising peace initiative has unraveled.
  The Israelis have refused to stop ail building. The Palestinians say that they won't talk to the Israelis until they do, and
  President Mahmoud Abbas is so despondent he has threatened to quit. Arab states are refusing to do anything.
  Mr. Obama's own credibility is so diminished (his approval rating in Israel is 4 percent) that serious negotiations may be
  farther off than ever.
  Peacemaking takes strategic skill. But we see no sign that President Obama and Mr. Mitchell were thinking more than one
  move down the board. The president went public with his demand for a full freeze on settlements before securing Israel's
  commitment. And he and his aides apparently had no plan for what they would do if Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
  said no.
  Most important, they allowed the controversy to obscure the real goal: nudging Israel and the Palestinians into peace
  talks. (We don't know exactly what happened but we are told that Mr. Obama relied more on the judgment of his political
  advisers — specifically his chief of staff, Rehm Emanuel -- than of his Mideast specialists.)
  The idea made sense: have each side do something tangible to prove it was serious about peace and then start
  negotiations. But when Mr. Netanyahu refused the total freeze, President Obama backed down.
  Mr. Netanyahu has since offered a compromise 10-month freeze that exempts Jerusalem, schools and synagogues and
  permits Israel to complete 3,000 housing units already under construction. The irony is that while this offer goes beyond
  what past Israeli governments accepted, Mr. Obama had called for more. And the Palestinians promptly rejected the
  compromise.
  Washington isn't the only one to blow it. After pushing President Obama to lead the peace effort, Arab states, especially
  Saudi Arabia, refused to make any concessions until settlements were halted. Mr. Mitchell was asking them to allow Israel
  to fly commercial planes through Arab airspace or open a trade office. They have also done far too little to strengthen Mr.
  Abbas, who is a weak leader but is still the best hope for negotiating a peace deal. Ditto for Washington and Israel.
  All this raises two questions: What has President Obama learned from the experience so he can improve his diplomatic
  performance generally? And does he plan to revive the peace talks?
  The president has no choice but to keep trying. At some point extremists will try to provoke another war. and the absence
  of a dialogue will only make things worse. Advancing his own final-status plan for a two-state solution is one high-risk way
  forward that we think is worth the gamble. Stalemate is unsustainable.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767482 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE
  IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  sbwhoeor
  Sunday, November 29, 2009 1:0S PM
  H
  Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  November 28, 2009
  Editorial
  Diplomacy 101
  We were thrilled when President Obama decided to plunge fully into the Middle East peace effort. He appointed a skilled
  special envoy, George Mitchell, and demanded that Israel freeze settlements, Palestinians crack down on anti-Israel
  violence and Arab leaders demonstrate their readiness to reach out to Israel.
  Nine months later, the president's promising peace initiative has unraveled.
  The Israelis have refused to stop ail building. The Palestinians say that they won't talk to the Israelis until they do, and
  President Mahmoud Abbas is so despondent he has threatened to quit. Arab states are refusing to do anything.
  Mr. Obama's own credibility is so diminished (his approval rating in Israel is 4 percent) that serious negotiations may be
  farther off than ever.
  Peacemaking takes strategic skill. But we see no sign that President Obama and Mr. Mitchell were thinking more than one
  move down the board. The president went public with his demand for a full freeze on settlements before securing Israel's
  commitment. And he and his aides apparently had no plan for what they would do if Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
  said no.
  Most important, they allowed the controversy to obscure the real goal: nudging Israel and the Palestinians into peace
  talks. (We don't know exactly what happened but we are told that Mr. Obama relied more on the judgment of his political
  advisers — specifically his chief of staff, Rehm Emanuel -- than of his Mideast specialists.)
  The idea made sense: have each side do something tangible to prove it was serious about peace and then start
  negotiations. But when Mr. Netanyahu refused the total freeze, President Obama backed down.
  Mr. Netanyahu has since offered a compromise 10-month freeze that exempts Jerusalem, schools and synagogues and
  permits Israel to complete 3,000 housing units already under construction. The irony is that while this offer goes beyond
  what past Israeli governments accepted, Mr. Obama had called for more. And the Palestinians promptly rejected the
  compromise.
  Washington isn't the only one to blow it. After pushing President Obama to lead the peace effort, Arab states, especially
  Saudi Arabia, refused to make any concessions until settlements were halted. Mr. Mitchell was asking them to allow Israel
  to fly commercial planes through Arab airspace or open a trade office. They have also done far too little to strengthen Mr.
  Abbas, who is a weak leader but is still the best hope for negotiating a peace deal. Ditto for Washington and Israel.
  All this raises two questions: What has President Obama learned from the experience so he can improve his diplomatic
  performance generally? And does he plan to revive the peace talks?
  The president has no choice but to keep trying. At some point extremists will try to provoke another war. and the absence
  of a dialogue will only make things worse. Advancing his own final-status plan for a two-state solution is one high-risk way
  forward that we think is worth the gamble. Stalemate is unsustainable.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.corn>
  To: 'sbwhoeop
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767482 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767482 Date: 07/31/2015
  Sent: Sun, Nov 29, 2009 12:25 pm
  Subject: Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  No. Can you send?
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeoL
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Nov 29 12:20:25 2009
  Subject: Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  Did you read nyt lead editorial yesterday?
  Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  Original Message
  From: H <fir)R220d ntonemai 1. Com>
  Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:04:27
  To: 'sbwhoeoa!
  Subject: Re: Another memo on backdrop t this week. Sid
  I didn't read the McD reference that way. I actually thought it was
  complimentary of his spin skills. What am I missing?
  Original Message
  From: sbwhpeo2
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Nov 29 11:51:28 2009
  Subject: Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  It's there, lust scroll down
  Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  Original Message
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767482 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767482 Date: 07/31/2015
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemaii.com>
  Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:38:00
  To: Tsbwhoecb(.
  Subject: Re: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  Can you send me the Hoagland piece?
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeoc
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Nov 29 10:58:16 2009
  Subject: Another memo on backdrop to this week. Sid
  CONFIDENTIAL
  November
  29, 2009
  For: Hillary
  From: Sid
  Re: Backdrop to your coming week
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767482 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767482 Date: 07/31/2015
  Below is a piece published today in The Observer, the Sunday newspaper of The
  Guardian, on the Chilcot inquiry, summarizing the testimony so far and what is
  expected this week while you are drumming up support for the Afghanistan
  initiative. Britain and Europe are riveted by Chilcot, especially official
  circles. The objective correlative, of course, is trust in any U.S.
  administration and deep skepticism about the Afghanistan project. Yet another
  undercurrent among the mandarins is disdainful resentment of indifference to
  Britain, a sentiment beyond Labour or the Tories but what has emerged as the
  view of the permanent establishment at Whitehall and elsewhere.
  Mandelson Watch: After Miliband declined to reach for the EU foreign
  secretaryship (though Sarkozy wanted him to take it and Brown was not averse,
  even favorable), Mandelson personally campaigned on his own for it among the
  Europeans. Mandelson was eager to Miliband to take the EU post, allowing
  Mandelson to be appointed foreign minister. When Miliband refused, Mandelson's
  ambition was thwarted, and tried to seize the EU position for himself, but
  without any backing in Europe or from Gordon. The Europeans thought him mad.
  Suddenly, they recalled his had or strange behavior as UK commissioner to the
  EU. When Christine Ashton was named, Mandelson briefed the press on her lack of
  credentials, etc. Ashton, as it happens, had worked the press to try to help
  Mandelson when he had gotten into the mess that led to his first resignation.
  Those inside the government who remember this see it as an illustration of the
  principle that no good deed goes unpunished. Mandelson, in a snit, is now not
  speaking to Gordon as though his rejection were Gordon's fault.
  One more item: Did you read Jim Hoagland in the Washington Post today? He nails
  McDonough for trashing Biden, among other things. Enclosed below story on
  Chilcot:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767482 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767482 Date: 07/31/2015
  http://www.qcaralan.cc.uk/uk/2009/n aa-war-inguiry-chilcot-blair
  Chilcot Inquiry: Mandarins take revenge on Tony Blair over Iraq
  Civil servants and diplomats are lining up to stick a knife into former PM's
  reputation
  Toby Helm <htto: /www.guardian.co.ukiprofileitobvhelm> and Rajeev Syal
  <htto:/ vww.(4uardian.cc.uk/Drofi- /rajjeev-syal>
  The Observer <httQ://observar.guardianco.uk> , Sunday 29 November 2009
  Whitehall mandarins are supreme masters of subtle evasion. But they do
  not rise to the top of their trade without also knowing how to stick in the
  knife.
  At times the Chilcot inquiry into Britain's involvement in Iraq since 2001,
  which opened last week, resembled a gentlemen's club moved to the_ sanitised
  surroundings of the Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre in Westminster.
  Oxbridge-educated pillars of the establishment politely questioned other
  Oxbridge-educated pillars of the establishment about who said what to whom in
  which memo. The inquiry is a peculiar mixture of the old and the new, the open
  and closed. It is conducted in the language of Whitehall, yet beamed live by
  webcam to the world.
  Critics are convinced that, for all Sir John Chilcot's promises to the contrary,
  it will turn out to be another Whitehall whitewash. For the cognoscenti, little
  new information has yet emerged, and when the final report is written it will
  not seek to apportion blame. Yet beneath the equivocation and mandarin-speak,
  Whitehall seems, in as much as it knows how, to be using Chilcot to wield the
  scalpel. Throughout the first week the pent-up frustrations of diplomats and
  career civil servants over the way Tony Blair
  <htn.//www civardLan.so.ukl/politics/tonybiair>
  and George Bush secretly plotted to oust Saddam Hussein, bypassing the "official
  channels" in which they operate, has been there for all to see.
  Chilcot is said to have been warned by his Whitehall friends that many witnesses
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767482 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767482 Date: 07/31/2015
  will be ready to unburden themselves - finally to take revenge. In session after
  session they have appeared to do that. Blair's reputation has been sliced like
  salami day after day.
  Sir William Ehrman, the Foreign Office's forMer director of international
  security, volunteered last Wednesday that the threat from Saddam's supposed
  weapons of mass destruction was known to be limited.
  In the gentlest way he drove in the dagger. "We did, I think on 10 March [2003],
  get a report that chemical weapons might have remained disassembled and Saddam
  hadn't yet ordered their assembly. There was a suggestion that Iraq might lack
  warheads capable of effective dispersal of agents."
  Ever the diplomat, however, Ehrman went on to say that the intelligence warnings
  had not made any difference to the case for war. "I don't think it invalidated
  the point about the programmes he had. It was more about use," he said. But he
  had set the tone.
  On Thursday, Sir Christopher Meyer, UK ambassador in Washington from 1997 to
  2003, who has already criticised the government over Iraq in his memoirs, went
  for Blair, mercilessly comparing his qualities as a war leader to those of
  Margaret Thatcher. "I'm not trying to make a party political point here
  whatsoever, but quite often I think about this: what would Margaret Thatcher
  have done?" Meyer asked. "I think she would have insisted on a coherent
  political and diplomatic strategy and she would have demanded the greatest
  clarity about what the heck happened if, and when, you removed Saddam Hussein."
  A former press secretary to John Major who can speak like a mandarin but,
  equally, can talk like a layman, he said Blair had failed miserably to extract a
  price from George Bush for his loyalty. "We could have achieved more by playing
  a tougher role... if, for example... Tony Blair had said: 'I want to help you,
  George, on this, but I have to say, in all honesty, that I will not be able to
  take part in any military operation unless we have palpable progress on the
  [Middle East] peace process and we have absolute clarity on what happens in Iraq
  if it comes up.' I think that would have changed the nature - it would not have
  led to a rupture - it would have changed. the nature of American planning. "
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767482 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767482 Date: 07/31/2015
  Even when defending UK policy, he was on the offensive. Asked if policy had been
  adapted to stay in line with Washington's, Meyer added: "I wouldn't say it was
  as extremely poodle-ish as that."
  On Friday, Sir Jeremy Greenstock, Britain's former ambassador to the United
  Nations, told Chilcot he had threatened to resign in 2002 if at least one
  security council resolution was not passed. He added: "I regard our
  participation in the military action in Iraq in March 2003 as legal but of
  questionable legitimacy, in that it did not have the democratically observable
  backing of the great majority of [UN] member states, or even perhaps of the
  majority of people inside the UK."
  Today new arguments are raging over whether the inquiry will have access to, and
  publish, the most sensitive documents - including legal advice given to the
  government by the former attorney general, Lord Goldsmith, during the lead-up to
  war. Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat leader, has written to Gordon Brown saying
  that, unless all such material is published, the inquiry will be a sham and the
  public's sense that it has been denied the facts will remain.
  But it will still be essential viewing nonetheless. This week will see more key
  witnesses. The most revealing testimony could come tomorrow when Sir David
  Manning, Blair's former foreign policy <hl:t37)://www.guardia. .uk/oo.Litics/ oreignpolioy>
  adviser, is certain to be asked about his authorship of a memo which purportedly
  revealed details of a secret meeting between Bush and Blair in January 2003.
  According to reports, the five pages of secret documents, known as the Manning
  memo, recorded the White House meeting on 31 January which allegedly shows that
  Bush and Blair made a deal to carry out an invasion regardless of whether
  weapons of mass destruction were discovered by UN weapons inspectors. It appears
  to be in direct contradiction with statements that Blair made to parliament
  afterwards that Saddam would be given a final chance to disarm.
  The memo also disclosed that Bush floated the idea of painting a U-2 spyplane in
  UN colours and letting it fly low over Iraq to provoke Saddam into ordering it
  to be shot down, providing a pretext for the subsequent invasion by America and
  Britain.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767482 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767482 Date: 07/31/2015
  Manning, educated at Oriel College, Oxford, and a career diplomat, is fiercely
  independent. He may choose to say more than Blair would like, according to one
  former colleague. He could also be asked to either confirm or deny Meyer's
  evidence that Meyer received "new instructions" in early 2005 indicating that it
  was a "complete waste of time" to oppose regime change, so strong was the US
  determination to go down that road.
  On Tuesday, Edward Chaplin, the Foreign Office Middle East director at the time
  of the invasion, and Sir Peter Ricketts, the top official in the Foreign Office,
  will appear. Ricketts, a former chairman of Britain's powerful joint
  intelligence committee, has already given evidence to the inquiry alleging that
  officials in London knew even before Bush came to office in 2001 that there were
  "voices" in Washington calling for Saddam to be removed from power. Ricketts
  also told the inquiry that, until March 2002, Whitehall distanced itself from
  regime change. Only one month later, Blair told Bush that he would support
  military action "to bring about regime change".
  According to documents leaked five years ago, Ricketts described the US in 2002
  as "scrambling to establish a link between Iraq and al-Qaida" - a connection
  that was "so far, frankly unconvincing". On Thursday, Sir Kevin Tebbit, the
  Ministry of Defence's permanent secretary during the invasion, will be asked to
  give evidence about the military planning. Chilcot will, most likely, want to
  know when the government first began to amass resources for the war and what, if
  any, preparations were made for the aftermath of an invasion. Tebbit could also
  be urged to divulge the level of intelligence he received on the likelihood of
  an attack with chemical or biological weapons.
  After Tebbit, a succession of heavy-hitting military men will give evidence. The
  former chief of the defence staff, Admiral the Lord Boyce, could be asked
  whether he believes that the invasion was legal. On Friday, Lieutenant General
  Sir Anthony Pigott, former deputy chief of the defence staff, and Major General
  David Wilson, senior British military adviser to the US military's central
  command between 2002 and 2003, will be questioned about military planning for
  the conflict.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767482 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767482 Date: 07/31/2015
  The last witness to appear this week will be Dominic Asquith, Britain's
  ambassador to Iraq between 2006 and 2007, who will come armed with knowledge of
  the view from Baghdad.
  When Chilcot has made his way through the officials, he will turn in the new
  year to former ministers, including Jack Straw, the former foreign secretary,
  and Blair himself. The panel has said that it will also begin to examine the
  highly controversial issue of whether the invasion was legal - which may turn
  out to be the focal point of the whole inquiry - in January.
  In his final report, which is not expected until late 2010 at the earliest,
  Chilcot has said he will not seek to attribute blame. But after only one week it
  is already clear where much of Whitehall believes that lies.
  The Washington Post
  Afghanistan: The speech you'll miss
  By Jim Hoagland
  Sunday, November 29, 2009
  Dec. 1, 2009:
  My fellow Americans,
  This is not the speech you expected to hear. But my wordsmiths are tied in knots
  writing an acceptance speech for the only Nobel Peace Prize- ever awarded for
  making speeches. So I am going to tell you how I really feel about Afghanistan.
  Which is: steamed.
  I want to accomplish three goals tonight without naming them.
  First, to let those know-it-alls, Generals Petraeus and McChrystal, know one
  more thing: This is the last big troop increase you get, so make it work.
  I am not going down the incrementalist road that wrecked Lyndon Johnson's
  presidency. This is not July 1965, when Westmoreland jumped the shark of
  escalation in Vietnam and then never stopped asking for more troops. For all the
  trouble he has been, Dick Holbrooke helped by recalling that history in the
  shadowboxing that dominated my long war council meetings.
  Joe Biden has been good in there, too. He's been willing, though not happy, to
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767482 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767482 Date: 07/31/2015
  be characterized in the media as being ready to bug out now. This helped us push
  back against McChrystal's effort to box me in at 40,000 additional U.S.
  soldiers.
  Denis McDonough, my strategic communications man, sold Biden-as-dove
  brilliantly. Wasn't somebody just saying I should promote Denis? Maybe it was
  Denis?
  Never mind. That tactic won me room to maneuver toward a more realistic number
  of, say, 23,000 new combat troops, 5,000 additional trainers and a "NATO surge"
  of 5,000 foreign troops.
  That's my second unspoken goal: to come out of this buildup speech Without
  losing the left of the Democratic Party -- while being able to refute John
  McCain's charges that I ignored my own generals. Triangulation lives.
  Bush put the generals in the limelight to sell the Iraq surge after he lost all
  credibility, and David Petraeus's performance was dazzling. Which presents two
  big problems. Petraeus is the only person who could aet the Republican
  nomination in 2012 and make a serious run against me. (I get paid to think
  ahead.)
  And if the generals box me in, civilian control. of the military in this country
  becomes a mockery. Clinton was afraid of the military; Bush was deep in hock to
  it. I've got to get the right balance back.
  That's why I need Bob Gates and Jim Jones. Those who scoffed at my keeping on
  Bush's defense secretary, and then making a retired Marine four-star I hardly
  knew my NSC guy, were not thinking that moments like this would come. I already
  was.
  Gates has maneuvered flawlessly through my waterboarding-by-leaks on
  Afghanistan. He will sell my final number to the uniforms as the "floor" for
  U.S. troops that Petraeus argues we need for three years. But Gates knows I will
  make it a ceiling.
  We can't afford an open-ended commitment. I put Peter Orszag, as good a budget
  overseer as you can find, front and center for the photographers in that last
  war council. Many missed it, but NBC's Andrea Mitchell got it right away. No
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767482 Date: 07/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767482 Date: 07/31/2015
  wonder she's married to Alan Greenspan.
  I will bet that Stan McChrystal never drew up a budget in his life.
  Jones tells me these Special Operations commanders are used to getting whatever
  they ask for, especially since September 11th. Nobody on the Hill will deny them
  anything.
  Jones is also squeezing the Europeans to join the battle and is getting results,
  even from the Germans. What is it Jones says? Maybe the worst thing of all would
  be to be perceived to lose in Afghanistan and then have the Europeans say: Well,
  you never asked for more help at the crucial time. Makes sense to me.
  We have sent NATO members the numbers we think they can and should provide,
  country by country. That new secretary general, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, is
  pulling out the stops, visiting the capitals to get commitments.
  "Say it now, pay it later," we tell the Europeans. They have until mid-2010 to
  deploy their new units. But I need pledges now so I can get across tonight that
  this is NATO's war, not Obama's war. That's unspoken-goal number three.
  So I have frontloaded the speech with allusions to this being about an exit
  strategy, without boxing myself in on timing, and am presenting the "civilian
  surge" as being as essential as the troop buildup. That helps set up my Oslo
  speech. And who knows? It may even work out that way. If God blesses us all.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767482 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767483
MetadataSubject: ARE YOU HEAR NOW?
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-29T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-07-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_JulyWeb/Web_050/DOC_0C05767483/C05767483.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: HRCEmail_JulyWeb
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 3:09 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767483
ExtractedDateReleased: 07/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767483 Date: 07/31/2015
  RELEASE
  IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 3:09 PM
  To: H
  Subject Are you hear now?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767483 Date: 07/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767486
MetadataSubject: SPANISH LANGUAGE DOCUMENT - COMUNICADO CONJUNTO DE LOS GOBIERNOS DE HAITI Y ESTADOS UNIDOS
MetadataTo: Estados Unidos Da America
MetadataFrom: Haiti
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-17T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0058/DOC_0C05767486/C05767486.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-020439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767486
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767486 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  COMUNICADO CONJUNTO DOS
  GOVERNOS DO HAITI E DOS ESTADOS UNIDOS DA AMERICA
  DIVULGADO EM PORTO PRINCIPE, HAITI
  17 DE JANEIRO DE 2010
  0 Presidente Rene Preval do Haiti e a Secretaria de Estado Hillary Rodham Clinton
  dos Estados Unidos da America reuniram-se em Porto Principe, ape's o catastredico
  terremoto de 12 de janeiro de 2010 e suas tragicas consequencias, e divulgaram o seguinte
  comunicado conjunto:
  Reconhecendo:
  a longa historia de amizade entre os povos do Haiti e dos Estados Unidos e seu respeito
  mirtuo pela respectiva soberania;
  o terrivel sofrimento do povo do Haiti, corn a perda de vidas em grande escala, lesOes
  fisicas generalizadas e danos amplos a infra-estrutura pitblica e propriedade privada;
  a necessidade urgente de uma resposta imediata aos pedidos do Governo do Haiti e a
  importancia primordial de implementacao de trabalhos de resgate, assistencia, recuperacao
  e reconstrucao corn seguranca, rapidez e eficacia;
  os desafios correntes e sem precedentes que o Governo do Haiti enfrenta; e
  a conversa entre o Presidente Obama e o Presidente Preval, ocorrida em 15 de janeiro de
  2010, que salientou as necessidades urgentes do Haiti e sua populacdo, a promessa feita
  pelo Presidente Obama, de dar o apoio total do povo norte-americano para o Governo e
  povo do Haiti, tanto no trabalho imediato de recuperacao como na iniciativa de
  reconstrucao a longo prazo, e o compromisso assumido por ambos os Presidentes, de
  coordenar a assistencia oferecida pelas varias partes, inclusive o Governo do Haiti, a
  Organizacao das NacOes Unidas, os Estados Unidos e os varios parceiros e organizacOes
  internacionais presentes no terreno;
  0 Presidente Preval, em nome do Governo e povo do Haiti, acolhe as iniciativas
  essenciais empreendidas pelo Governo e povo dos Estados Unidos no Haiti, em apoio
  recuperacao e a estabilidade imediatas e a reconstrucao do Haiti a longo prazo, e solicita dos
  Estados Unidos a assistencia necessaria para reforcar a seguranca em apoio ao Governo e povo
  do Haiti e a Organizacao das Nacties Unidas e aos parceiros e organizacOes internacionais
  presentes no terreno; •
  A Secretaria Clinton, em nome do Governo e povo dos Estados Unidos, reafirma a
  intencao dos Estados Unidos, por meio de sua assistencia, de dar apoio ao povo do Haiti neste
  momento de grande tragedia; e
  0 Presidente Preval e a Secretaria Clinton conjuntamente reafirmam que os Governos do
  Haiti e dos Estados Unidos dardo continuidade a cooperacao nos termos deste entendimento
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767486 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767486 Date: 08/31/2015
  miltuo, corn o objetivo de promover os trabalhos de resgate, assistencia, recuperacao e
  reconstrucao com o maxim° de seguranca e eficacia possivel.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767486 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05767487
MetadataSubject: MUBARAK CALL SHEET
MetadataTo: Flores, Oscar
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-02-06T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0063/DOC_0C05767487/C05767487.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Mubarak Call Sheet
ExtractedTo: Oscar Flores
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, February 6, 2010 8:43 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05767487
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Oscar, can u print this asap for hrc. Its for her 9:30am call. Thx.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767487 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, February 6, 2010 8:43 AM
  To: Oscar Flores
  Cc:
  Subject Fw: Mubarak Call Sheet
  Attachments: 020510 S-Mubarak Talking Points.doc
  Oscar, can u print this asap for hrc. Its for her 9:30am call. Thx.
  Original Message ---
  From: Johnson, Andrew Kim
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Cc: S_SpecialAssistants; SES-O_Shift-II
  Sent: Sat Feb 06 08:25:57 2010
  Subject: Mubarak Call Sheet
  «020510 S-Mubarak Talking Points.doc» «020510 S-Mubarak Talking Points.doc» Hi Huma,
  Per our conversation earlier this morning, here's the call sheet for President Mubarak. We are standing by to begin the
  secure fax as well.
  Best regards,
  Andrew Kim Johnson
  Watch Officer
  State Department Operations Center S/ES-0
  202-647-1512
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05767487 Date: 08/31/2015



