# Emails

DocNumber: C05775201
MetadataSubject: DIPLOMACY BEFORE AND AFTER CONFLICT
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0100/DOC_0C05775201/C05775201.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775201
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775201 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  '
  Diplomacy
  Before and After Conflict
  C
  onflict is a universal condition,' older than diplomacy. While conflict is a constant in
  human history, the nature of armed conflict, and especially the nature of 2P-century
  warfare, has been transformed. General Rupert Smith identified these changes in his book
  The Utility of Force: "The ends for which we fight are changing; we fight amongst the people; our
  conflicts tend to be timeless; we fight so as not to lose the force; on each occasion new uses are found
  for old weapons; the sides are mostly non-state."2
  The nature of 21st-century diplomacy is also changing. To be successful, diplomats must simul-
  taneously shape, act upon, and react to global challenges. As Hans Binnendijk and Richard Kugler
  of the National Defense University argue, no single problem, danger, or threat holds the key to the
  world's future. What matters is their interaction and the simultaneity of our responses.'
  The definition of victory, too, is different today. Twenty-first-century national security suc-
  cess will encompass a comprehensive definition of security, and will be achieved by the broadest
  PRISM 1, NO. 4 F EATU RES I 3
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775201 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775201 Date: 08/31/2015
  simultaneous application of all elements of
  national power. This is the key to understanding
  Philip Bobbitt's concept of "preclusive victory,"
  which he describes as "anticipatory, precaution-
  ary attention to possible futures," requiring an
  expansive and integrated approach to modern
  diplomacy, defense, and development. A diplo-
  matic strategy designed to produce preclusive
  victory will include conflict prevention, success-
  ful negotiation, deterrence, the preparation for
  conflict should all else fail, and efforts to estab-
  lish order, ensure stability, and promote political
  and economic pluralism after conflict.
  Diplomats have always been participants in
  both the prevention and management of con-
  flict and its aftermath. The conflict prevention
  side of diplomacy occupied much of my time
  at the State Department from 1993 to 1997 as
  the Department's Executive Secretary and U.S.
  Ambassador to Turkey. Postconflict diplomacy
  was a defining issue of the last third of my career at
  State as Assistant Secretary of State for European
  Affairs and as Under Secretary of State for Political
  Affairs from 2001 to 2005. I have tried to draw
  upon my experiences and observations to discuss
  here the scope and complexity of modem diplo-
  macy, the methods and goals needed to prevent
  conflict, diplomacy's role when conflict is or seems
  to be unavoidable, and the contribution diplomacy
  can make to restoring stability following conflict.
  Diplomacy and Conflict Prevention
  Thanks to the efforts of scholars and practi-
  tioners, we can now make better use of the meth-
  ods and theory of conflict prevention. The United
  States Institute of Peace and the Woodrow Wilson
  International Center for Scholars are two among
  many institutions that have taken a leadership
  role in these efforts. Michael Lund, a practitioner-
  scholar, notes that the present uncoordinated and
  patchy nature of preventive diplomacy reflects
  the absence of any accepted international conflict
  prevention regime or system of governance—that
  is, of agreed upon arrangements through which
  geographic jurisdictions are allocated, functional
  responsibilities are assigned, norms and procedures
  are formulated, and actors are held accountable for
  their responsibilities.5 He asks the crucial ques-
  tion to all those who seek to "coordinate and
  rationalize" a system of preventive diplomacy:
  where should responsibility for the tasks of pre-
  ventive action be located—early warning, the
  decision to act, the formulation of a response, or
  the provision of bureaucratic and political support?
  Should it be horizontal, across different organiza-
  tions or actors, or should it be vertical, up or down
  their chains of command?'
  An example of conflict prevention that
  meets Lund's tests was the effort undertaken
  by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
  (NATO), in close collaboration with the
  European Union (EU) and the Organisation
  for Security and Co-operation in Europe, and
  supported by the United States, to avoid civil
  war in Macedonia in 2001. It is difficult now to
  recall that, until September 11, 2001, the pos-
  sibility of civil war in Macedonia was a leading
  international headline. This successful cam-
  paign of conflict prevention was defined by the
  remarkable personal and institutional coopera-
  tion between the NATO Secretary General Lord
  Robertson and the EU High Representative for
  the Common Foreign and Security Policy (and
  a former NATO Secretary General) Javier
  Solana. I spoke often during this period to Lord
  Robertson, Solana, and Ambassador James
  Pardew, whom President George W. Bush and
  Secretary Colin Powell appointed as the U.S.
  representative to the effort and who, along with
  Francois Leotard, the EU Special Envoy, played
  a crucial role in negotiating and implementing
  the Ohrid Framework Agreement.
  4 I FEATURES PRISM 1, NO. 4
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775201 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775201 Date: 08/31/2015
  As a direct participant, senior NATO official
  Mark Laity stated that there are insights about
  modem diplomacy and conflict prevention to be
  drawn from this effort, including the need for per-
  sonal and institutional teamwork, the importance
  of early engagement in trying to head off violence,
  the need to choose the right people for tasks of
  this kind (including 21-century diplomats who
  can act "unconventionally"), and the necessity
  of being able to apply appropriate force quickly.'
  Diplomacy When Conflict Is or Seems
  to Be Unavoidable
  When diplomacy fails to prevent conflict,
  the role of the diplomat changes. The new
  requirement may be to justify the use of force
  when all efforts to avoid conflict fail or to seek
  to address the underlying source of conflict when
  force is or seems to be inevitable and imperative.
  The February 1999 diplomatic negotiations
  in Rambouillet, France, were designed to show
  the world that NATO and the Contact Group
  were willing to make one last effort to avoid
  using military force to stop Slobodan Milosevic's
  attacks in Kossovo. I was in Rambouillet as
  Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs
  to support Secretary Madeleine Albright. After
  the first day or so of the meeting, there was so
  much chaos that I urged Secretary Albright to
  depart Rambouillet and leave the "negotiating"
  to those of us more junior. My strategy was that
  by not being present, the Secretary of State—
  and the administration—could keep a distance
  from an outcome that might be unacceptable to
  the United States. The Secretary had a differ-
  ent vision. Albright hoped Rambouillet would
  end the brutality against the Kosovars, but she
  was also prepared for the meeting to fail, and
  thereby all options for avoiding military con-
  flict would be exhausted. Her idea was that we
  had to be seen to be doing everything we could
  diplomatically, including her continued pres-
  ence, so that if Rambouillet was a failure, there
  could be no further excuses against taking mili-
  tary action.
  Secretary of State James Baker had pursued
  a similar strategy before the first Gulf War in
  1991. Baker relates in his memoirs, The Politics of
  Diplomacy, that President George H.W. Bush had
  concluded the United States should offer a meet-
  ing in Washington for Iraqi Foreign Minister Tariq
  Aziz followed by a Baker trip to Baghdad to show
  America's commitment to avoiding war if pos-
  sible. Baker writes that he thought this proposal
  had three merits: it would give the administra-
  tion one last diplomatic opening to avoid war; it
  would shore up domestic support for conflict; and
  it would show that, as the deadline for Iraq's with-
  drawal from Kuwait neared, the administration
  was doing something other than just preparing for
  war. The President's offer turned into the famous
  meeting between Baker and Aziz on January 9,
  1991. As Baker recounts, "I was under no illusions.
  I assumed the talks would be unsuccessful and that
  within a matter of days, we would be at war."'
  In 2001-2003, the State Department lead-
  ership generally saw Iraq as a diversion from
  Afghanistan and not central to the war on ter-
  ror. Saddam Hussein was a dictator and a men-
  ace—but "in a box," posing no immediate, direct
  threat to the United States; focus should be
  kept on defeating al Qaeda in Afghanistan and
  supporting the new Afghan government.' Iraq
  had been a source of tension and disagreement
  inside the State Department since the begin-
  ning of the administration, and there were some
  who sought to move the policy from support for
  PRISM 1, NO. 4 FEATURES 5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775201 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775201 Date: 08/31/2015
  "smart" United Nations (UN) sanctions toward
  an aggressive posture against Saddam.
  Secretary of State Henry Kissinger wrote in
  Years of Upheaval about the second term of the
  Nixon administration that State Department
  culture emphasizes negotiability, which is a con-
  sciousness of what the other side will accept.°
  Kissinger did not consider this trait a particular
  positive at the time, and the department's culture
  of negotiability did not serve as a good guide to
  institutional behavior for most of the senior State
  officials who participated in the interagency
  debate leading to the invasion of Iraq. If that was
  so during the period surrounding 1970s détente
  with Russia, diplomatic efforts with the Shah of
  Iran, and the crisis in the Middle East and the
  resulting 1973 war, this culture of negotiability
  no longer served as a good guide to institutional
  behavior for most of the senior State officials who
  participated in the interagency debate leading to
  the invasion of Iraq. We took part in planning
  for the conflict and its aftermath assuming—or
  hoping—that events either at home or abroad
  would turn preparations for conflict into success-
  ful coercive diplomacy rather than the military
  action that was ordered in the spring of 2003.
  The State Department's Director of Policy
  Planning, Richard Haass, observed that while he
  was "60:40 against going to war.
  ... no organiza-
  tion could function if people left every time they
  lost out on a 60:40 decision." Haass was operat-
  ing under the belief that Iraq had weapons of mass
  destruction; if he had known they did not, he says
  he would have been 90:10 against the war.
  And no senior Department of State offi-
  cer resigned in protest. The department sought
  instead to try to recreate the successful Gulf
  War coalition of President George H.W. Bush
  and argued that the United States and its allies
  might compel Saddam to submit through a
  deployment of force in the region in early
  2003. If this failed, there should be a sustained
  diplomatic effort to create a broad coalition to
  move militarily later in 2003. This possibility of
  a broad international coalition lost all relevance
  on January 20, 2003, when the French govern-
  ment announced that it would never support
  a second UN Security Council resolution to
  authorize the use of force in Iraq.
  Diplomacy in Preparation for Conflict
  Once conflict is inevitable or is initiated,
  one job of diplomats is to support military com-
  manders in getting what they need to make
  conflict as short as possible, with the fewest
  casualties for Americans, allies, and civilians.
  This was the objective that the United States
  pursued in Turkey before the first Gulf War,
  which resulted in President Turgut Ozal's sup-
  port of American efforts. The diplomatic effort
  to prepare for conflict in Kosovo also involved
  the whole of the U.S. Government and the
  governments of the NATO Allies. To pursue
  a successful bombing campaign, diplomats in
  many NATO countries arranged for overflight
  and support for Allied forces. A similar effort by
  U.S. diplomats took place before the invasion of
  Afghanistan in 2001. American and allied dip-
  lomats worked closely with nations surrounding
  Afghanistan, including forging contacts with
  Central Asian states on security issues for the
  first time in order to achieve transit, overflight,
  and bed-down rights for American and coali-
  tion forces before the October 7, 2001, begin-
  ning of action in Afghanistan.
  6 I FEATURES PRISM 1, NO. 4
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775201 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775201 Date: 08/31/2015
  Before the invasion of Iraq in March 2003,
  and especially after January 20, 2003, a similar
  effort began in earnest. Diplomats supported U.S.
  Central Command commander General Tommy
  Franks in order to make the war as short and suc-
  cessful as possible and to limit American, allied,
  and Iraqi civilian casualties. American diplomats
  worked with military commanders to seek access
  to facilities for U.S. forces and to participate in
  the public diplomacy effort to gain as much sup-
  port as possible for the armed liberation of Iraq.
  American diplomats and Pentagon officials again
  paid particular attention to Turkey in an effort
  to convince the Turks to allow the 46 Infantry
  Division to transit that country to create a north-
  ern front in the battle against Saddam's forces.
  Although the State Department worried about
  the size of the Department of Defense (DOD)
  request to Ankara, it worked closely with both
  civilian and military authorities at the Pentagon
  to try to meet the need that had been identi-
  fied by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
  Joint DOD—State diplomacy, however, could not
  overcome a negative vote in the Turkish parlia-
  ment, which reflected strong public opposition
  to the war.
  The way the debate about using force is
  carried out inside the government influences
  attitudes and actions during and after conflict
  as well as future decisions on whether or not to
  use force. Military force may restore security, but
  it cannot resolve political or cultural sources of
  conflict. As Rupert Smith writes, "We are engag-
  ing in conflict for objectives that do not lead to a
  resolution of the matter directly by force of arms,
  since at all but the most basic tactical level our
  objectives tend to concern the intentions of the
  people and their leaders rather than their territory
  or forces."2 Smith argues that the civil-military
  structure designed to make political-military
  decisions is "deeply problematic" and distorts
  decisionmaking in many ways." In his book,
  Smith imagines a debate between British Foreign
  and Commonwealth Office (FCO) and Ministry
  of Defense (MOD) officials about how to address
  the genocide taking place over a number of weeks
  in Rwanda during the summer of 1994.
  FCO: What can we do in the face of events
  in Rwanda?
  MOD: What do you want us to do?
  FCO: We ought to act. Something must
  be done. We can't have people being
  massacred. As a permanent member
  of the UN Security Council we can-
  not be seen to be doing nothing.
  MOD: So you want us to use military force?
  FCO: Yes.
  MOD: To do what? To stop the killing?
  FCO: Yes. Exactly.
  MOD: Who do you want us to fight? We
  are not clear who is doing the kill-
  ing: is it tribe on tribe, or is it a force
  found from a tribe? And Rwanda is
  a big country. Where do we start?
  Kigali, presumably, it's the capital
  and we would want an airheacl.
  PRISM 1, NO. 4 FEATURES I 7
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775201 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775201 Date: 08/31/2015
  FCO: Well, there must be an international force, of course.
  MOD: And what would be the British aim in joining the force?
  FCO: To play our part as a permanent member of the UN Security Council.
  MOD: Is Britain to lead the force?
  FCO: No, it should be led by the UN—a proper UN mission.
  MOD: That will take some time to assemble, so it will probably be too late to stop the killing.
  FCO: Then the mission should be aimed at bringing postconflict order.
  MOD: OK. But we need to be clear how many British troops are currently available. Given our
  deployments in Ireland, Bosnia and a few other places, not many.
  FCO: What do you suggest?
  MOD: What are our government's priorities? Is contributing to this force a higher priority than
  these other tasks we are already undertaking?
  FCO: Probably not.
  MOD: In that case, these UN forces always lack expeditionary logistic support. And if we want
  to speed up the deployment of this force, offering a logistic unit would probably be the
  most valuable contribution.
  FCO: Will that put our soldiers at risk?
  MOD: Hardly any.'4
  Many American diplomats will recognize this imaginary conversation, having participated
  in something like it dozens of times since the fall of the Berlin Wall. In the American debate, the
  issue also quickly focuses on who pays the bills. It is worth stating, at least in the American case,
  that officials at the Pentagon and DOD often were legitimately frustrated by the State Department's
  inclination to promote military missions for the Pentagon and the Armed Forces in an increasing
  number of situations that were important, but not vital, to U.S. national interests. While this readi-
  ness to volunteer U.S. military forces to solve problems around the world was a direct result of the
  lack of civilian capacity to do the jobs required, it leads to understandable consternation among
  those in uniform.
  81 FEATURES PRISM 1. NO. 4
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775201 Date: 08/31/2015

  U.S. medics care for farmer injur
  .Vd by enemy forces
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775201 Date: 08/31/2015
  Diplomacy and Restoring Stability Following Conflict
  There are many issues—defeating extremism, promoting pluralism, bringing the benefits of
  globalization to those who have not yet benefited, living sustainably on the planet, nonprolifera-
  tion—that will be part of any definition of successful 21-century diplomacy. But getting postconflict
  diplomacy right--creating the conditions for a preclusive victory—may be the most crucial of all.
  This is not an easy assignment. The concept of success can be redefined after the fact, further com-
  plicating the assessment. Successful democratic governance and economic development cannot be
  delivered on a certain date, and therefore the need for time and patience is a necessity on the ground.
  However, patience is limited in home countries, and "fatigue" often sets in. Thus, the potential for
  failure is high. Industrial war produced winners and losers; today's lines are not so clearly drawn,
  and the timeline may be longer.
  Rupert Smith again brings clarity to this assessment:
  We intervene in or even decide to escalate to, a conflict in order to establish a condition in which the
  political objective can be achieved by other means and in other ways. We seek to create a conceptual
  space for diplomacy, economic incentives, political pressure and other measures to create a desired politi-
  cal outcome of stability, and if possible democracy. . . . if a decisive strategic victory was the hallmark
  of interstate industrial war, establishing a condition may be deemed a hallmark of the new paradigm of
  war amongst the people .15
  PRISM 1, NO. 4 F EATU RES I 9
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775201 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775201 Date: 08/31/2015
  Smith's point can be pressed even further by
  recognizing the additional distinction between a
  military operation carried out following Smith's
  rules and the ambiguity inherent in trying to
  create the conditions Smith identifies as objec-
  tives. Christopher Schnaubelt has noted that a
  typical military operation will have unambiguous
  geographic boundaries (areas of responsibility)
  and will assign specific units to be responsible for
  every inch of ground or cubic foot of airspace.
  There is an obvious chain of responsibilities and
  expected actions between each individual Soldier
  or Marine on the ground and the commanding
  general. Nothing comparable exists for economic
  development in governance tasks, which tend to
  be assigned by function rather than local geogra-
  phy or rigid hierarchy of authority.'6
  Postconflict diplomacy was among the
  defining diplomatic issues of the last third of
  my career at the State Department.
  In the aftermath of the first Gulf War in
  1991, almost 500,000 Kurds fled to the moun-
  tains between Iraq and Turkey. Stranded in
  harsh conditions, they began to starve by the
  thousands each day. I was then the Deputy Chief
  of Mission in Turkey. Inspired by the leadership
  of Ambassador Morton Abramowitz, American
  diplomats, followed by American military forces
  and then an international coalition of govern-
  ments and nongovernmental organizations, initi-
  ated Operation Provide Comfort (which became
  Operation Northern Watch). This was not just
  a "whole-of-government" but a "whole-of-the-
  international-community" campaign to provide
  humanitarian assistance and then return the
  Kurds to their homes in Northern Iraq. Once
  home, they needed to be protected, and for 11
  years, the United Sates and some of its allies,
  including Turkey, worked on the ground there to
  recreate a functioning society and then protected
  this area from Saddam by enforcing a no-fly zone.
  These years were also punctuated by activity
  in the Balkans. As Richard Holbrooke recounts,
  some of the pre-Dayton negotiations with Bosnian
  leader Alija Izetbegovi took place in my residence
  while I was Ambassador to Turkey." As one of
  Holbrooke's successors as Assistant Secretary for
  European Affairs, I watched the effort made by
  Ambassadors Robert Gelbard and James Dobbins
  to implement the Dayton Accords by applying
  whole-of-government efforts in postconflict post-
  Yugoslavia. I picked up the diplomatic thread
  again as Under Secretary of State for Political
  Affairs promoting reconciliation, development,
  political progress, and nationbuilding in Kosovo.
  Other postconflict diplomacy efforts in
  Haiti, East Timor, and Liberia called upon the
  resources of the United States and other gov-
  ernments to try to create the conceptual space
  for development and sustained peace. The U.S.
  effort in Colombia, too, highlighted the need
  to focus on an integrated and cross-sectoral.
  approach, which included disarmament, demo-
  bilization, and reintegration of former combat-
  ants and promoted justice in postconflict soci-
  ety. But the main events in modern diplomacy's
  postconflict paradigm are Afghanistan and Iraq.
  The key to understanding U.S. diplomacy
  in postconflict Afghanistan and Iraq is to recall
  the profound disagreement inside the U.S.
  Government, especially between DOD and
  State, about whether the United States should
  engage in "nationbuilding," a policy President
  Bush had campaigned against in 2000. State
  Department professionals were generally proud
  10 I FEATURES PRISM 1, NO. 4
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775201 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775201 Date: 08/31/2015
  of the effort the United States had made in
  nationbuilding and in peacekeeping, support-
  ing the deployment of U.S. military forces to
  participate, for example, in the Multinational
  Force and Observers in the Sinai and in peace-
  keeping and nationbuilding activities in East
  Timor, Haiti, and the Balkans. Most believed
  that nationbuilding, properly funded and exe-
  cuted, was an effective long-term tool of inte-
  grated modem diplomacy for the United States.
  The effort to create a new Afghan govern-
  ment after the overthrow of the Taliban was a
  piece of classical diplomacy carried out in the
  21-century context.'8 Secretary Powell directed
  Ambassador Dobbins to support the regional nego-
  tiation hosted by the Germans in Bonn in 2001
  to create a new Afghan government. To succeed,
  Dobbins worked with all the key players, includ-
  ing representatives from Iran, to support a major
  role for the United Nations and put Hamid Karzai
  in position to lead a new Afghanistan.'9 But, as
  Dobbins has written, the "Bush Administration,
  having overthrown the Taliban and installed a new
  government in Kabul, determined that American
  troops would do no peacekeeping and that peace-
  keepers from other countries would not be allowed
  to venture beyond the Kabul city limits. Public
  security throughout the rest of the country would
  be left entirely to Afghans, despite the fact that
  Afghanistan had no army and no police force.”"
  The struggle over nationbuilding also
  hampered American attempts to get sufficient
  amounts of U.S. or international assistance to
  Afghanistan. Washington accepted the diffusion
  of responsibility there, with the British taking
  charge of countemarcotics, the Italians reform-
  ing the justice sector, and the Germans training
  police. This satisfied the need for burden-sharing
  but did not lead to success. In addition, postcon-
  flict resources focused by the United States on
  Afghanistan were small compared to other recent
  postconflict situations, even including Kosovo."
  American diplomats who followed Dobbins to the
  Embassy in Kabul over the years faced the legacy
  of this lack of attention and underinvestment.22.
  The State Department participated at many
  levels in the National Security Council—led plan-
  ning for postconflict Iraq. Much of the planning
  was detailed, but focused on lessons learned from
  the first Gulf War. The department's Future of
  Iraq Project, while important, would not have
  solved Iraq's postwar problems. State did not
  have the capacity to take responsibility for
  the immediate postconflict administration of
  Iraq, and its leadership agreed to the Executive
  order creating a postconflict Iraq structure that
  reported to the Secretary of Defense.
  There is no need here to recount the lost lives
  and lost opportunities so well chronicled by oth-
  ers in the immediate postconflict period in Iraq,
  although Dobbins's argument that, looking back,
  the Coalition Provisional Authority accomplished
  a great deal under trying circumstances is worth
  noting." On July 1, 2004, the State Department
  did officially open (on time and on budget) an
  Embassy in Baghdad, which allowed an expan-
  sion of diplomacy and led to more comprehensive
  senior civilian-military cooperation.
  There is another important lesson to draw
  from recent postconflict efforts: the need to have
  adequate civilian capacity to respond, includ-
  ing a role for a revitalized U.S. Agency for
  International Development (USAID). As this
  journal chronicled in an article" by Ambassador
  John Herbst, the Secretary of State's Coordinator
  for Reconstruction and Stabilization (S/CRS),
  his office was mandated to develop a whole-of-
  government civilian response to stability opera-
  tions and to ensure civilian-military coordination.
  The Civilian Response Corps (CRC) is in
  an early stage, and ultimately will be made up of
  a reserve component, in addition to the existing
  PRISM 1, NO. 4 FEATURES I 11
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775201 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775201 Date: 08/31/2015
  active and standby components. The personnel
  are anticipated to represent the full range of sec-
  tor experts: engineers, lawyers, judges, corrections
  officials, diplomats, development experts, public
  administrators, public health officials, city planners,
  border control officials, economists, and others.
  Currently, the active and standby components that
  are being stepped up are drawn from State, USAID,
  and a core group of domestic U.S. agencies.
  Once congressionally funded, the reserves
  would be drawn from state and local govern-
  ments and the private sector. Between January
  2008 and May 2009, 56 CRC members deployed
  to 11 countries, including Afghanistan for plan-
  ning purposes, and there are realistic plans to
  have 250 active members and 1,000 standby
  members ready to deploy by the end of 2010.
  There are now at least 14 other countries with
  whom the United States allies that have a civil-
  ian peacebuilding capacity—some including sta-
  bility or civilian police, and employing whole-
  of-government or "comprehensive" approaches
  similar to that created by Washington. Several,
  in fact, have higher budgets proportionate to
  their gross national products than America's."
  One way for State to further support the
  S/CRS effort would be to consider creating a
  new personnel specialty: the "expeditionary
  diplomat." Washington's diplomatic personnel
  have, of course, always been in one sense expe-
  ditionary; the majority of the Foreign Service is
  deployed abroad the majority of the time. But
  the post-9/11 diplomatic experience, and espe-
  cially the effort in Iraq and Afghanistan, means
  that State needs to be more explicit about the
  expeditionary nature of some of its future dip-
  lomatic work and should prepare a small but
  significant number of people to serve success-
  fully in the hardest places at a moment's notice.
  . Experience with the Provincial Reconstruction
  Teams in Iraq and Afghanistan, the lessons learned
  with S/CRS, and the example of diplomats who
  have pursued careers in the toughest posts should
  lead State leadership to conclude that this is a
  step worth taking. The first requirement would be
  advanced training, some of it provided by DOD
  and some by the Central Intelligence Agency, for
  those entering diplomats who believe they want
  to pursue this special career path. These entering
  officers would make an explicit choice and under-
  stand that an investment in their extra training
  would require their service in hard places, just as
  we now ask diplomats who take the hardest lan-
  guages—Chinese or Arabic, for example—to serve
  more than one tour using their skills. Since these
  expeditionary diplomats will not need to meet
  the same age and physical requirements as special
  operations in the military, the State Department
  could allow people to opt in and out of this "special
  force" during their careers as long as they have the
  proper training. This would allow flexibility across
  the institution and encourage those who desire or
  whose family circumstances might change over
  time to participate as well. The department would
  also need to make sure those taking this career path
  are recognized for a career beyond the norm for
  Foreign Service and are promoted and rewarded.
  The creation of S/CRS is a symbol of the
  comprehensive, simultaneous diplomacy needed
  for the future, and this expeditionary diplo-
  mat could form the backbone of the State and
  USAID commitment to the civilian response
  capacity. There are still key questions to be
  answered about civilian capacity. In the face of
  a real world situation, will DOD really support a
  State Department–led operation? Will Congress
  adequately fund S/CRS, including a reasonable
  contingency fund? How will S/CRS and a resur-
  gent USAID work together? Where will the lines
  be drawn between immediate postconflict needs
  and nationbuilding? There seems to be no ques-
  tion that the path is the right one, consistent
  12 FEATURES PRISM 1, NO. 4
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775201 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775201 Date: 08/31/2015
  with the administration's focus on diplomacy,
  development, and defense. Success will come
  with clear direction and active implementation.
  If we combine the observations made by
  several authors," we arrive at this question:
  What national policies, supported by adequate
  human and financial resources, will create the
  conditions during and after war to bring about a
  preclusive victory? Nationbuilding, postconflict
  reconstruction and stability operations, and coun-
  terinsurgency strategy (call it what we will) will
  be part of modern diplomacy for years to come.
  Accomplishing this task does not have to be an
  exclusively American responsibility, and, indeed,
  one of the goals of modern American diplomats
  will be to make these efforts more international.
  But for the foreseeable future, the United States
  will need to learn the lessons of its role in nation-
  building from Germany to Iraq." These lessons
  include support for new institutions that bring all
  of the elements of power and influence together
  in the same theater, at the same time, and in close
  coordination so the United States and its allies
  and friends have a chance to succeed." As Philip
  Bobbitt has written, "The problem is the picture of
  warfare to which we cling. This picture unfolds in
  this way: peace making by diplomats; war making
  by the Armed Forces; peace building by EUSIA1D
  and reconstruction personnel. The reality of 21"
  century warfare, however, is that all of these tasks
  must be performed simultaneously."29
  While the challenges and opportunities of
  the 2lst century can be observed and analyzed
  individually, none of them can be solved with-
  out reference to the others. Diplomacy is not
  the answer to every question, but it has util-
  ity both before and after conflict. As General
  Smith writes at the end of his volume:
  For the general purpose of all interventions is
  clear: we seek to establish in the minds of the
  people and their leaders that the ever present
  option of conflict is not the preferable course of
  action when in confrontation over some matter
  or another. This applies as much to the state
  possessing nuclear weapons or seeking to obtain
  them, rogue or otherwise, as it does to the terror-
  ist or the machete-wielding rebel; each is posing
  an armed threat to people to establish a con-
  dition in which to achieve its political goal. To
  do this, military force is a valid option, a lever
  of intervention and influence, as much as eco-
  nomic, political and diplomatic levers, but to be
  effective it must be applied as a part of a greater
  scheme focusing all measures on the one goal."
  The connection to the utility of a mod-
  ern diplomacy is clear. Twenty-first-century
  diplomacy, working to prevent conflict, trying
  to get ready for it if it is inevitable, or dealing
  with the consequences, can be an effective tool
  of national security if it is adequately funded;
  carried out by well-trained, dedicated people,
  focused on clear goals set by national leaders,
  and backed by effective military force. This is
  the diplomacy of the future. PRISM
  The author expresses appreciation to The'
  Cohen Group for allowing him time to con-
  sider these issues and to the Woodrow Wilson
  International Center for Scholars and the
  Harvard John F. Kennedy School Project
  on Diplomacy for supporting the effort.
  The author also gratefully acknowledges the
  important contributions of Toni Getze, Jill
  O'Donnell, and Daniel Bliss in making this
  article a reality.
  PRISM I, NO. 4 FEATURES 13
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775201 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775201 Date: 08/31/2015
  Notes
  I. William Zartman, Preventive Negotiation: Avoiding Conflict Escalation (Lanham, MD: Rowman &
  Littlefield, 2001), 3.
  'Rupert Smith, The Utility of Force: The Art of War in the Modern World (New York: Vintage Books, 2008), 19.
  3 Hans Binnendijk and Richard L. Kugler, Seeing the Elephant: The U.S. Role in Global Security (Washington,
  DC: National Defense University Press and Potomac Books, 2006), 286.
  4 Philip Bobbitt, Terror and Consent: The Wars for the Twenty-first Century (New York: Alfred A. Knopf,
  2008), 207.
  5 Michael S. Lund, Preventing Violent Conflicts: A Strategy for Preventive Diplomacy (Washington, DC:
  United States Institute of Peace, 1996), 171.
  Ibid., 172.
  7 Mark Laity, Preventing War in Macedonia, Whitehall Paper Number 68 (London: Royal United Services
  Institute, January 2008).
  James A. Baker III, The Politics of Diplomacy (New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1995), 345-365.
  9 Richard Haass, War of Necessity, War of Choice: A Memoir of Two Iraq Wars (New York: Simon and
  Schuster, 2009), 211-212.
  10 Henry A. Kissinger, Years of Upheaval (Boston: Little, Brown, 1982), 445.
  " Haass, 247.
  IS Smith, 308.
  "
  " Ibid., 313-314.
  " Ibid., 272-273.
  16 Christopher M. Schnaubelt, "Complex Operations and Interagency Operational Art," PRISM 1, no. 1
  (December 2009), 41.
  17 Richard Holbrooke, To End a War (New York: Random House, 1999), 127-131.
  18 Bobbitt and Smith.
  19 James F. Dobbins, After the Taliban: Nation-building in Afghanistan (Washington, DC: Potomac Books, 2008).
  " James F. Dobbins, "Organizing for Victory," PRISM 1, no. 1 (December 2009), 54.
  " James F. Dobbins et al., America's Role in Nation Building: From Germany to Iraq (Santa Monica, CA:
  RAND, 2003).
  " Ronald E. Neumann, The Other War: Winning and Losing in Afghanistan (Washington, DC: Potomac
  Books, 2009).
  23 Dobbins, "Organizing," 61.
  24 John E. Herbst, "Addressing the Problem of Failed States: A New Instrument," PRISM 1, no. 1
  (December 2009), 21-26.
  25 Ibid.
  26 See Bobbitt, Smith, and Dobbins.
  27 Dobbins et al.
  28 Robert Hunter et al., Integrating Instruments of Power and Influence (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2008), 11.
  " Bobbitt, 155.
  3° Smith, 409.
  14 I FEATURES PRISM 1, NO. 4
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775201 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775203
MetadataSubject: WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THE ROAD SHOW?
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-28T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0100/DOC_0C05775203/C05775203.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: What did you think of the road show?
ExtractedFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 6:33 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775203
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  You hit it out of the park! Really, you touched on every point and set the stage perfectly for the QDDR. Now we just have
  to deliver, and we will.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775203 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 6:33 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: What did you think of the road show?
  You hit it out of the park! Really, you touched on every point and set the stage perfectly for the QDDR. Now we just have
  to deliver, and we will.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Slaughter, Anne-Marie
  Sent: Tue Sep 28 18:33:47 2010
  Subject: What did you think of the road show?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775203 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775204
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-28T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0100/DOC_0C05775204/C05775204.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.goy>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 6:52 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775204
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Margo 6am
  Isabelle 730
  Enjoy time with Glad she came. B6

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775204 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.goy>
  Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 6:52 PM
  To: H
  Margo 6am
  Isabelle 730
  Enjoy time with Glad she came. B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775204 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775205
MetadataSubject: TOMORROW
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0100/DOC_0C05775205/C05775205.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Tomorrow
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.goy>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 6:52 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775205
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  I talked to isabelle and explained the issue, she agreed and will speak with kristal.
  Kristal is confirmed for 6:30am
  Isabelle confirmed for 7:30am
  We will figure out kristy tomorrow.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775205 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.goy>
  Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 6:52 PM
  To: H
  Subject: Tomorrow
  I talked to isabelle and explained the issue, she agreed and will speak with kristal.
  Kristal is confirmed for 6:30am
  Isabelle confirmed for 7:30am
  We will figure out kristy tomorrow.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775205 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775207
MetadataSubject: "THE GIVING PLEDGE" AT-A-GLANCE
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0100/DOC_0C05775207/C05775207.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775207
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775207 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  "The Giving Pledge" At-A-Glance
  WHAT: Launched by Warren Buffett during the Summer of 2010, the Giving Pledge is an effort
  to invite the wealthiest individuals and families in America to commit to giving the majority of their
  wealth to the philanthropic causes and charitable organizations of their choice either during their
  lifetime or after their death. Each person who chooses to pledge will make this statement publicly,
  along with a letter explaining their decision to pledge. At an annual event, those who take the pledge
  will come together to share ideas and learn from each other.
  The Pledge is a moral commitment to give, not a legal contract. It does not involve pooling money
  or supporting a particular set of causes or organizations. While the Giving Pledge is specifically
  focused on billionaires, the idea takes its inspiration from efforts in the past and at present that
  encourage and recognize givers of all financial means and backgrounds. We are inspired by the
  example set by millions of Americans who give generously (and often at great personal sacrifice) to
  make the world a better place.
  WHO: The Pledge currently has forty participants, listed below in alphabetical order. To date, all
  are American, although a dinner is scheduled in Beijing for September 29, 2010, in hopes of
  generating interest for the Pledge among wealthy Chinese.
  Bernie and Bill Marcus
  Bernie Marcus
  Thomas S. Monaghan
  Tashia and John Morgridge
  Pierre and Pam Omidyar
  Bernard and Barbro Osher
  Ronald 0. Perelman
  Peter G. Peterson
  T. Boone Pickens
  Julian H. Robertson, Jr.
  David Rockefeller
  David M. Rubenstein
  Herb and Marion Sandler
  Vicki and Roger Sant
  Walter Scott, Jr.
  Jim and Marilyn Simons
  Jeff Skoll
  Tom Steyer and Kat Taylor
  Jim and Virginia Stowers
  Ted Turner
  Sanford and Joan Weill
  Shelby White
  Paul G. Allen
  Laura and John Arnold
  Michael R. Bloomberg
  Eli and Edythe Broad
  Warren Buffett
  Michele Chan and Patrick Soon-Shiong
  Barry Diller and Diane von Furstenberg
  Ann and John Doerr
  Larry Ellison
  Larry Ellison
  Bill and Melinda Gates
  Bill and Melinda Gates
  Barron Hilton
  Jon and Karen Huntsman
  Joan and Irwin Jacobs
  George B. Kaiser
  Elaine and Ken Langone
  Ken Langone
  Gerry and Marguerite Lenfest
  Lorry I. Lokey
  George Lucas
  George Lucas
  Alfred E. Mann
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775207 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775210
MetadataSubject: AIPAC
MetadataTo: sullivanjj@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-22T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0122/DOC_0C05775210/C05775210.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: AIPAC
ExtractedTo: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
ExtractedCc: Rudman, Mara; Sachar, Alon (NEA/IPA)
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, March 22, 2010 8:02 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775210
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Pls add to the acknowledgements: Howard Friedman, Ester Kurz and Richard Fishman.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775210 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  PART B5
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
  Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 8:02 AM
  To: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: AIPAC
  Pls add to the acknowledgements: Howard Friedman, Ester Kurz and Richard Fishman.
  Original Message
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Mon Mar 22 07:10:55 2010
  Subject: Fw: AIPAC
  See below. How would you like to proceed? B5
  Original Message
  From: Schwerin, Daniel B
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Mon Mar 22 07:07:38 2010
  Subject: Fw: AIPAC
  Original Message
  From: Knopf, Payton L
  To: Schwerin, Daniel B; Prince, Jonathan M; Djerassi, Alexander M
  Cc: Rudman, Mara; Sachar, Alon (NEA/IPA)
  Sent: Mon Mar 22 06:57:39 2010
  Subject: AIPAC
  We are boarding a plane from Amman to DC shortly but can be reached via the Operations Center if there are questions.
  Thanks.
  Payton
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775210 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775212
MetadataSubject: HEALTH CARE TOPPER
MetadataTo: sullivanjj@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-22T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0122/DOC_0C05775212/C05775212.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775212
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Monday, March 22, 2010 8:47 AM
  'sullivanjj@state.gov'; 'preines
  Health care topper

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775212 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B5,B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Monday, March 22, 2010 8:47 AM
  'sullivanjj@state.gov'; 'preines
  Health care topper
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775212 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775213
MetadataSubject: AT PHYSICAL THERAPY - NEED ME TO CALL?
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0100/DOC_0C05775213/C05775213.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: At physical therapy - need me to call?
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 7:37 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775213
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775213 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 7:37 AM
  To:
  Subject: At physical therapy - need me to call?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775213 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775217
MetadataSubject: MINI SCHEDULE 09/29/10 WEDNESDAY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0100/DOC_0C05775217/C05775217.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Mini Schedule 9/29/10 Wednesday
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 8:06 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775217
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  8:15 am DEPART Private Residence *En route State Department
  8:25 am ARRIVE State Department
  8:25 am PRESIDENTIAL DAILY BRIEFING
  8:30 am Secretary's Office
  8:30 am DAILY SMALL STAFF MEETING
  8:45 am Secretary's Office
  8:45 am DAILY MEETING w/SENIOR STAFF
  9:15 am Secretary's Conference Room
  9:15 am OFFICE TIME
  9:40 am Secretary's Office
  9:45 am REMARKS TO THE HISTORIC CONFERENCE ON THE AMERICAN
  10:00 am EXPERIENCE ON SOUTHEAST ASIA Marshall Conference Center
  10:30 am BILAT. MTG. w/EUROPEAN UNION HIGH REP. CATHERINE ASHTON
  11:30 am Secretary's Conference Room *Official photo in East Hall preceding.
  11:35 am JOINT PRESS AVAILABLITY w/LADY CATHERINE ASHTON
  11:45 am Treaty Room, 7.Floor
  11:45 am PRIVATE MEETING w/ LOIS QUAM
  12:00 pm Secretary's Office
  12:00 pm OFFICE TIME
  12:25 pm Secretary's Office
  12:25 pm PRE-BRIEF w/TREASURY SECRETARY TIM GEITHNER
  12:30 pm Secretary's Outer Office
  12:35 pm PRESS ANNOUNCEMENT ON IRAN HUMAN RIGHTS DESIGNATIONS
  12:50 pm wfIREASURY SECRETARY TIM GEITHNER State Department Press Briefing Room
  1:00 pm WORKING LUNCH w/GERMAN FOREIGN MINISTER GUIDO WESTERWELLE
  2:00 pm James Monroe Room, 8th Floor *Official photo preceding.
  2:05 pm JOINT PRESS AVAILABILITY w/GERMAN FOREIGN MINISTER
  2:15 pm GUIDO WESTERWELLE Treaty Room, 75 Floor
  2:30 pm BILATERAL MEETING w/EL SALVADOR PRESIDENT MAURICIO FUNES
  3:15 pm Secretary's Conference Room *Official photo preceding.
  3:15 pm JOINT PRESS STATEMENT w/ EL SALVADOR PRESIDENT MAURICIO FUNES
  3:25 pm Treaty Room, Th Floor
  3:40 pm DROP-BY NATIONAL INTERRELIGIOUS LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE
  3:50 pm FOR PEACE IN THE MIDDLE EAST GROUP D Conference Room
  4:00 pm OFFICE TIME
  5:00 pm Secretary's Office
  Tbd pm DEPART State Department *En route Private Residence
  Tbd pm ARRIVE Private Residence
  ###

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775217 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 8:06 AM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Mini Schedule 9/29/10 Wednesday
  8:15 am DEPART Private Residence *En route State Department
  8:25 am ARRIVE State Department
  8:25 am PRESIDENTIAL DAILY BRIEFING
  8:30 am Secretary's Office
  8:30 am DAILY SMALL STAFF MEETING
  8:45 am Secretary's Office
  8:45 am DAILY MEETING w/SENIOR STAFF
  9:15 am Secretary's Conference Room
  9:15 am OFFICE TIME
  9:40 am Secretary's Office
  9:45 am REMARKS TO THE HISTORIC CONFERENCE ON THE AMERICAN
  10:00 am EXPERIENCE ON SOUTHEAST ASIA Marshall Conference Center
  10:30 am BILAT. MTG. w/EUROPEAN UNION HIGH REP. CATHERINE ASHTON
  11:30 am Secretary's Conference Room *Official photo in East Hall preceding.
  11:35 am JOINT PRESS AVAILABLITY w/LADY CATHERINE ASHTON
  11:45 am Treaty Room, 7.Floor
  11:45 am PRIVATE MEETING w/ LOIS QUAM
  12:00 pm Secretary's Office
  12:00 pm OFFICE TIME
  12:25 pm Secretary's Office
  12:25 pm PRE-BRIEF w/TREASURY SECRETARY TIM GEITHNER
  12:30 pm Secretary's Outer Office
  12:35 pm PRESS ANNOUNCEMENT ON IRAN HUMAN RIGHTS DESIGNATIONS
  12:50 pm wfIREASURY SECRETARY TIM GEITHNER State Department Press Briefing Room
  1:00 pm WORKING LUNCH w/GERMAN FOREIGN MINISTER GUIDO WESTERWELLE
  2:00 pm James Monroe Room, 8th Floor *Official photo preceding.
  2:05 pm JOINT PRESS AVAILABILITY w/GERMAN FOREIGN MINISTER
  2:15 pm GUIDO WESTERWELLE Treaty Room, 75 Floor
  2:30 pm BILATERAL MEETING w/EL SALVADOR PRESIDENT MAURICIO FUNES
  3:15 pm Secretary's Conference Room *Official photo preceding.
  3:15 pm JOINT PRESS STATEMENT w/ EL SALVADOR PRESIDENT MAURICIO FUNES
  3:25 pm Treaty Room, Th Floor
  3:40 pm DROP-BY NATIONAL INTERRELIGIOUS LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE
  3:50 pm FOR PEACE IN THE MIDDLE EAST GROUP D Conference Room
  4:00 pm OFFICE TIME
  5:00 pm Secretary's Office
  Tbd pm DEPART State Department *En route Private Residence
  Tbd pm ARRIVE Private Residence
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775217 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775219
MetadataSubject: FROM DAVID MILIBAND
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: d.gunners2010
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0100/DOC_0C05775219/C05775219.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775219
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  d.gunners RELEASE IN PART
  B1,1.4(B),1.4(D), B6
  Wednesday, September 29, 2010 3:24 PM
  From David Miliband
  Hillary -
  1.4(B), 1.4(D), B1 — Declassify on: 09/29/2025
  Thanks a lot for all the good wishes you have sent via Lois. It has been one of the pleasures of the last few months to see
  you going from strength to strength. And the wedding looked fantastic!
  Your message on Saturday was poignant. Losing is tough. When you win the party members and MPs doubly so. (When
  it's your brother...). But I am so proud of the campaign we ran, the issues we raised etc. We got people to believe in a
  New Labour platform - and modernised the platform.
  I have announced today that I will stay in Parliament but not in shadow cabinet.
  Thanks for all your encouragement over the last couple of years. I will let you know when I am in DC.
  All best,
  1.4(B)
  1.4(D)
  David
  B1
  Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775219 Date: 08/31/2015
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  d.gunners RELEASE IN PART
  B1,1.4(B),1.4(D), B6
  Wednesday, September 29, 2010 3:24 PM
  From David Miliband
  Hillary -
  Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 08/27/2015 — Class: CONFIDENTIAL — Reason:
  1.4(B), 1.4(D), B1 — Declassify on: 09/29/2025
  Thanks a lot for all the good wishes you have sent via Lois. It has been one of the pleasures of the last few months to see
  you going from strength to strength. And the wedding looked fantastic!
  Your message on Saturday was poignant. Losing is tough. When you win the party members and MPs doubly so. (When
  it's your brother...). But I am so proud of the campaign we ran, the issues we raised etc. We got people to believe in a
  New Labour platform - and modernised the platform.
  I have announced today that I will stay in Parliament but not in shadow cabinet.
  Thanks for all your encouragement over the last couple of years. I will let you know when I am in DC.
  All best,
  1.4(B)
  1.4(D)
  David
  B1
  Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775219 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775225
MetadataSubject: NITA LOWEY AND AJC
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-23T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0122/DOC_0C05775225/C05775225.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Nita Lowey and AJC
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov'; 'ValmoroU@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 12:36 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775225
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: I think we should reconsider this invite.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775225 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 12:36 PM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov'; 'ValmoroU@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Nita Lowey and AJC
  I think we should reconsider this invite.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Mon Mar 22 21:44:02 2010
  Subject: FW: Nita Lowey and AJC
  fyi
  From: Lew, Jacob
  Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 5:08 PM
  To: Valmoro, Lona J
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Nita Lowey and AJC
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775225 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775226
MetadataSubject: NOMS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Verma, Richard R
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0100/DOC_0C05775226/C05775226.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775226
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
  Wednesday, September 29, 2010 8:02 PM
  noms
  Still unclear if they will go out tonight or tomorrow mid-morning. They have one vote left on the CR.
  And, you probably saw Tom Nides was officially nominated today.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775226 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
  Wednesday, September 29, 2010 8:02 PM
  noms
  Still unclear if they will go out tonight or tomorrow mid-morning. They have one vote left on the CR.
  And, you probably saw Tom Nides was officially nominated today.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775226 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775227
MetadataSubject: HI FROM MAGGIE
MetadataTo: williamsbarrett
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-23T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0122/DOC_0C05775227/C05775227.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Hi from Maggie
ExtractedTo: 'williamsbarrett
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: 'ValmoroU@state.gov'
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 4:14 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775227
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Am sending to Lona to work out time.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775227 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 4:14 PM
  To: 'williamsbarrett
  Cc: 'ValmoroU@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Hi from Maggie
  Am sending to Lona to work out time.
  Original Message
  From: williamsbarrett
  To: H
  Sent: Tue Mar 23 15:50:51 2010
  Subject: Hi from Maggie
  I want to speak to you about Shanghai--- I am coming to DC tomorrow and will be at the State Department for a meeting
  on Friday. Any hope of seeing you? M
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775227 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775231
MetadataSubject: RICH
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0100/DOC_0C05775231/C05775231.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Rich
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 1:34 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775231
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: See VI for sr team
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775231 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 1:34 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Rich
  See VI for sr team
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  To: Rodriguez, Miguel E
  Sent: Thu Sep 3001:33:10 2010
  Subject: Re: Rich
  Got it and agree - will have it noted by S at tomorrow's sr staff meeting
  Original Message
  From: Rodriguez, Miguel E
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Wed Sep 29 23:21:52 2010
  Subject: Rich
  This is just for you because I wouldn't want anyone to think this is motivated by a desire to curry favor with my boss.
  I know you're already fully aware, but with the shortened congressional work session coming to an end this evening, I
  thought it was worth repeating -- we're really lucky to have Rich. He seemingly willed the latest set of legislative
  accomplishments. In particular, the two defense treaties and the child support treaty never would have gotten across
  the finish line without his leadership.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775231 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775232
MetadataSubject: NUNS. HEALTH. CARE
MetadataTo: bam@mikulski.senate.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-24T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0122/DOC_0C05775232/C05775232.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Nuns. Health. Care
ExtractedTo: 'bam@mikulski.senate.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 6:47 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775232
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Let's hear it for the nuns--I knew when they came out, the die was cast and Bart would get his knuckles rapped. Now,
  let's wrap this up in the Senate and go drink something unhealthy! All your AIPAC friends told me you're doing well so
  take care and keep going--w the wind at you back and my fervent cheers--Hillary

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775232 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 6:47 AM
  To: 'bam@mikulski.senate.gov'
  Subject: Re: Nuns. Health. Care
  Let's hear it for the nuns--I knew when they came out, the die was cast and Bart would get his knuckles rapped. Now,
  let's wrap this up in the Senate and go drink something unhealthy! All your AIPAC friends told me you're doing well so
  take care and keep going--w the wind at you back and my fervent cheers--Hillary
  Original Message
  From: Mikulski, BAM (Mikulski) <BAM@Mikulski.senate.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Mon Mar 22 20:00:34 2010
  Subject: Nuns. Health. Care
  Whew once again u are in the thick of thing--- but didn't it make your heart feel good about the passage of. Health.
  Care----and. The. Nuns pushed it over the finish line----as usual in the fcore front of. Social. Justice and a daring
  willingness. To break with the. Boys if you need a tonic. Go to the. Nuns exhibit @ the. Smithsonian--- Ripley.
  Center. Gives the 250 year history of. Nuns in. Usa. And their role in shaping. Our country and producing 1000s of
  women leaders with names like. Pelosi. Mikulski. Ferrar0. Sebilius. takes less than a hour. You are doing great
  Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775232 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775235
MetadataSubject: FW:
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0100/DOC_0C05775235/C05775235.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw:
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 7:40 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775235
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Fyi
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775235 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 7:40 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw:
  Fyi
  From: Steinberg, James B
  To: Verma, Richard R; Burns, William);
  Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Thu Sep 30 06:35:18 2010
  Subject: Re:
  Awesome!
  From: Verma, Richard R
  To: Steinberg, James B; Burns, William J; Donilon, Thomas E.
  Sent: Wed Sep 29 23:06:37 2010
  Subject:
  UK/Australia defense trade treaties made it through the Senate tonight. We are all done!
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775235 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775236
MetadataSubject: ABBAS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0100/DOC_0C05775236/C05775236.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Abbas
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob 1 <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 7:41 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775236
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: We just finished More on secure line when you are available.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775236 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: Sullivan, Jacob 1 <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 7:41 AM
  To: H
  Subject: Abbas
  We just finished More on secure line when you are available.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775236 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775237
MetadataSubject: ARE YOU UP YET?
MetadataTo: sullivanjj@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-24T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0122/DOC_0C05775237/C05775237.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Are you up yet?
ExtractedTo: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 6:50 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775237
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: I need to discuss Pakistan agenda--pls call me thru Ops.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775237 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 6:50 AM
  To: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: Are you up yet?
  I need to discuss Pakistan agenda--pls call me thru Ops.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775237 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775238
MetadataSubject: MINI SCHEDULE 09/30/10 TUESDAY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0100/DOC_0C05775238/C05775238.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Mini Schedule 9/30/10 Thursday
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 7:47 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775238
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  8:25 am ARRIVE State Department
  8:25 am PRESIDENTIAL DAILY BRIEFING
  8:30 am Secretary's Office
  8:30 am DAILY SMALL STAFF MEETING
  8:45 am Secretary's Office
  8:45 am DAILY MEETING w/SENIOR STAFF
  9:15 am Secretary's Conference Room
  9:15 am WEEKLY MEETING w/REGIONAL BUREAU SECRETARIES
  10:00 am Deputy Secretary's Conference Room
  10:00 am VIDEOS (4)
  10:30 am George Marshall Room, 7" Floor
  10:40 am DEPART State Department *En route U.S. Capitol
  10:55 am ARRIVE U.S. Capitol (Senate Carriage Entrance)
  11:00 am MEETING w/US SENATOR JOHN KERRY
  11:55 am S-116 (Sen. Kerry Hideaway)
  12:00 pm PULL-ASIDE w/SENATOR CHUCK SCHUMER
  12:10 pm Outside H-122
  12:15 pm REFUGEE CONSULTATIONS w/HOUSE COMMITTEE MEMBERS
  1:00 pm H-122 (Speaker's Dining Room)
  1:00 pm DEPART U.S. Capitol (House Carriage Entrance) *En route State Department
  1:15 pm ARRIVE State Department
  1:15 pm OFFICE TIME
  2:15 pm Secretary's Office
  2:15 pm CALL w/SENATOR JOHN CORNYN
  2:25 pm Secretary's Office
  2:30 pm OFFICE TIME
  3:00 pm Secretary's Office
  3:00 pm BILAT. MTG w/PANAMANIAN VICE PRESIDENT & FOREIGN MINISTER
  3:30 pm JUAN CARLOS VARELA Secretary's Conference Room *Camera spray at top.
  3:30 pm OFFICE TIME
  4:00 pm Secretary's Office
  4:00 pm PHOTOS (3)
  4:15 pm Treaty Room, 7" Floor
  4:15 pm BILATERAL MEETING w/INDIAN NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR
  4:45 pm SHIV SHANKAR MENON Secretary's Conference Room *Official photo at top.
  5:00 pm OFFICE TIME
  6:30 pm Secretary's Office
  6:45 pm DROP-BY MERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTER RECEPTION
  7:00 pm HONORING AMBASSADOR ELIZABETH BAGLEY
  Monroe Room, Franklin Room, 8th Floor
  7:05 pm DEPART State Department *En route Jockey Club
  7:15 pm ARRIVE Jockey Club
  7:15 pm DINNER w/fAMERA*
  8:30 pm (t) Jockey Club, Fairfax Hotel
  8:30 pm (t) DEPART Jockey Club *En route Private Residence
  8:35 pm (t) ARRIVE Private Residence
  ###

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775238 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 7:47 AM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Mini Schedule 9/30/10 Thursday
  8:25 am ARRIVE State Department
  8:25 am PRESIDENTIAL DAILY BRIEFING
  8:30 am Secretary's Office
  8:30 am DAILY SMALL STAFF MEETING
  8:45 am Secretary's Office
  8:45 am DAILY MEETING w/SENIOR STAFF
  9:15 am Secretary's Conference Room
  9:15 am WEEKLY MEETING w/REGIONAL BUREAU SECRETARIES
  10:00 am Deputy Secretary's Conference Room
  10:00 am VIDEOS (4)
  10:30 am George Marshall Room, 7" Floor
  10:40 am DEPART State Department *En route U.S. Capitol
  10:55 am ARRIVE U.S. Capitol (Senate Carriage Entrance)
  11:00 am MEETING w/US SENATOR JOHN KERRY
  11:55 am S-116 (Sen. Kerry Hideaway)
  12:00 pm PULL-ASIDE w/SENATOR CHUCK SCHUMER
  12:10 pm Outside H-122
  12:15 pm REFUGEE CONSULTATIONS w/HOUSE COMMITTEE MEMBERS
  1:00 pm H-122 (Speaker's Dining Room)
  1:00 pm DEPART U.S. Capitol (House Carriage Entrance) *En route State Department
  1:15 pm ARRIVE State Department
  1:15 pm OFFICE TIME
  2:15 pm Secretary's Office
  2:15 pm CALL w/SENATOR JOHN CORNYN
  2:25 pm Secretary's Office
  2:30 pm OFFICE TIME
  3:00 pm Secretary's Office
  3:00 pm BILAT. MTG w/PANAMANIAN VICE PRESIDENT & FOREIGN MINISTER
  3:30 pm JUAN CARLOS VARELA Secretary's Conference Room *Camera spray at top.
  3:30 pm OFFICE TIME
  4:00 pm Secretary's Office
  4:00 pm PHOTOS (3)
  4:15 pm Treaty Room, 7" Floor
  4:15 pm BILATERAL MEETING w/INDIAN NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR
  4:45 pm SHIV SHANKAR MENON Secretary's Conference Room *Official photo at top.
  5:00 pm OFFICE TIME
  6:30 pm Secretary's Office
  6:45 pm DROP-BY MERIDIAN INTERNATIONAL CENTER RECEPTION
  7:00 pm HONORING AMBASSADOR ELIZABETH BAGLEY
  Monroe Room, Franklin Room, 8th Floor
  7:05 pm DEPART State Department *En route Jockey Club
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775238 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775238 Date: 08/31/2015
  7:15 pm ARRIVE Jockey Club
  7:15 pm DINNER w/fAMERA*
  8:30 pm (t) Jockey Club, Fairfax Hotel
  8:30 pm (t) DEPART Jockey Club *En route Private Residence
  8:35 pm (t) ARRIVE Private Residence
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775238 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775239
MetadataSubject: PAK-INDIA-BNGL
MetadataTo: slaughtera@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-24T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0122/DOC_0C05775239/C05775239.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Pak-India-Bang)
ExtractedTo: 'slaughtera@state.gov'; 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 6:53 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775239
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Remember the comparison I asked for? Is that ready--I'd like it today.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775239 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 6:53 AM
  To: 'slaughtera@state.gov'; 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: Pak-India-Bang)
  Remember the comparison I asked for? Is that ready--I'd like it today.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775239 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775240
MetadataSubject: PAK-INDIA-BNGL
MetadataTo: slaughtera@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-24T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0122/DOC_0C05775240/C05775240.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Pak-India-Bangl
ExtractedTo: 'slaughtera@state.gov'; 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Chollet, Derek H <CholletDH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 7:03 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775240
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: I haven't seen it yet and it's not in my materials for today.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775240 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 7:03 AM
  To: 'slaughtera@state.gov'; 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Pak-India-Bangl
  I haven't seen it yet and it's not in my materials for today.
  Original Message
  From: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
  To: H; Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Cc: Chollet, Derek H <CholletDH@state.gov>
  Sent: Wed Mar 24 06:56:05 2010
  Subject: Re: Pak-India-Bang!
  I checked last friday and was told it went up to you -- am checking again now. AM
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Slaughter, Anne-Marie; Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Wed Mar 24 06:53:05 2010
  Subject: Pak-India-Bangl
  Remember the comparison I asked for? Is that ready--I'd like it today.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775240 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775242
MetadataSubject: EXCELLENT NEWS ON ONE OF THE DEFENSE ADVOCACY CASES THE SECRETARY RAISED WITH ANTONY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: SullivanJJ@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0100/DOC_0C05775242/C05775242.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Excellent news on one of the defense advocacy cases the Secretary raised with
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Blake, Robert 0; SCA-INDIA-ONLY-DL; Keegan, David 3; Nawab, Ahmed E; Amend, Kurt E
ExtractedDateSent: • Thursday, September 30, 2010 7:58 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775242
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Antony
  Your time with Antony was well-spent.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775242 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: • Thursday, September 30, 2010 7:58 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Excellent news on one of the defense advocacy cases the Secretary raised with
  Antony
  Your time with Antony was well-spent.
  From: Pyatt, Geoffrey R
  To: Sullivan, Jacob]; Holmes, David A; Duncan, John D
  Cc: Blake, Robert 0; SCA-INDIA-ONLY-DL; Keegan, David 3; Nawab, Ahmed E; Amend, Kurt E
  Sent: Thu Sep 30 07:35:11 2010
  Subject: Excellent news on one of the defense advocacy cases the Secretary raised with Antony
  THE ECONOMIC TEVIES
  Thu, Sep 30, 2010 I Updated 04.20PMIST
  30 SEP, 2010, 04.03PM IST,PTI
  US major GE wins engine bid for Indian LCAs
  NEW DELHI: US aircraft engine manufacturer (GE) Aviation today won the bid for supplying engines for the Indian
  programme and the deal is estimated to be worth over $600 million.
  GE pipped its European competitor Eurojet for the deal after DRDO, which is developing the LCA's mark II version,
  formally announced that the American major's was the lowest bid in the tenders that saw a long-drawn battle for over
  two years.
  "GE was declared as the lowest bidder" by the Price Negotiating Committee headed by Chief Controller for Aerospace
  systems Dr Prahlada.
  "The Prime Negotiating Committee for the alternate engine for LCA Mk 2 has finalised the comparative statement of
  tenders...After evaluation and acceptance of the technical offer provided by both Eurojet and GE Aviation, the
  commercial quotes were compared in detail and GE Aviation was declared as the lowest bidder," an official statement
  from DRDO said in New Delhi.
  The committee also had representatives from Defence Ministry, Defence Finance, Aeronautical Development Agency,
  DRDO, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, Indian Air Force and Indian Navy.
  "Further price negotiations and contract finalisation will follow," the release added.
  Though the order could be for 99 engines initially, will have the option of order for another 100 engines in the future.
  GE had offered its GE F-414 engine as an alternative to its GE F-404 engines that are fitted in the first batch of LCAs that
  IAF would receive in a couple of years from now.
  Eurojet had offered its EJ-200 engines for the LCA Mk II aircraft that is under development now.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775242 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775242 Date: 08/31/2015
  The DRDO announcement comes a day after Defence Minister AK Antony returned here after a two-day visit to the US
  and met American Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Defence Secretary Robert Gates among others. Get a Quote
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775242 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775243
MetadataSubject: RE: FWD:
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0100/DOC_0C05775243/C05775243.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: Fwd:
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 7:59 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775243
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Yes,
  The Argentina desk is working this issue on your behalf. They are in touch with the sender of the letter (Mr. Ramer in
  California). The letter asks you to enter into a bilateral agreement with Argentina in order to rectify a Locally Employed
  Staffer's (in Argentina) personal tax predicament. I will also let Brian know that the department is in touch with his
  brother-in-law (the sender of the letter), in case he doesn't know already. - Lauren

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775243 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 7:59 AM
  To:
  Subject: RE: Fwd:
  Yes,
  The Argentina desk is working this issue on your behalf. They are in touch with the sender of the letter (Mr. Ramer in
  California). The letter asks you to enter into a bilateral agreement with Argentina in order to rectify a Locally Employed
  Staffer's (in Argentina) personal tax predicament. I will also let Brian know that the department is in touch with his
  brother-in-law (the sender of the letter), in case he doesn't know already. - Lauren
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 7:42 AM
  To: 'Laurenjiloty Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Fw: Fwd:
  Did you follow up w Brian about this matter? I think you told me what you did, but I can't remember!
  Original Message
  From: Brian Greenspun
  To: H
  Sent: Thu Sep 09 03:00:17 2010
  Subject: Fwd:
  Hi Hillary,
  Once again I am imposing on our friendship to get to you a matter that is important to my brother-in-law Bruce Ramer
  and, therefore, important to me. I am enclosing his note to me just so you can read how he really talks! I know his
  relationship with his friend and can attest to the personal nature of his appeal. Thank you for whatever
  attention you give to this which, by my understanding, seems to be a simple matter of justice. Alas, nothing is simple.
  All the best, Brian
  Begin forwarded message:
  From: "Bruce M. Ramer'
  To: "Brian Greenspun" <
  Brian, I so appreciate your willingness to get my letter (attached, with attachments) into Hilary's hands.
  This is purely an act of love for my friend As I say in the letter to her, I am N OT acting as an
  attorney (or for any organization--see end of my letter), but only for a friend who is getting screwed (not the
  terminology of the letter).
  You are more than welcome to read all of the enclosures. Naturally.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775243 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775243 Date: 08/31/2015
  The attachments to this email should be: Ramer letter to Secretary Clinton, with an attachment of the letter
  from tax lawyer (and three official attachments thereto--a letter from the IRS to the Argentine Embassy, a
  revenue ruling and a certification issued this year by the State Department.
  My letter contains a brief summary of the situation and argument.
  This is, as I said, very meaningful to me. Thank you for helping in an indispensible way.
  Love to the Greenspun clan. Bruce
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775243 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775245
MetadataSubject: FYI-ZARDARI CALLS FOR FLOOD TAX
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0100/DOC_0C05775245/C05775245.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: FYI-ZARDARI CALLS FOR FLOOD TAX
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 8:01 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775245
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Fyi
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775245 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 8:01 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: FYI-ZARDARI CALLS FOR FLOOD TAX
  Fyi
  Original Message
  From: Holbrooke, Richard
  To: Sullivan, Jacob
  Sent: Thu Sep 30 07:53:06 2010
  Subject: Fw: FYI-ZARDARI CALLS FOR FLOOD TAX
  Jake--Given H's public comments on this issue, she should see this.
  Original Message
  From: Bommer, Ashley F
  To: 'HolbrookeR@state.govl <HolbrookeR@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Sep 3004:54:51 2010
  Subject: Fw: FYI-ZARDARI CALLS FOR FLOOD TAX
  Original Message
  From: Husain Haqqani
  To: Bommer, Ashley F
  Sent: Thu Sep 30 01:16:01 2010
  Subject: FYI-ZARDARI CALLS FOR FLOOD TAX
  ZARDARI CALLS FOR FLOOD TAX
  By Syed Irfan Raza
  DAWN Thursday, 30 Sep, 2010
  ISLAMABAD: President Asif Ali Zardari asked the government on Wednesday to levy a one-time flood tax on wealthy
  people.
  "A one-time flood tax will have to be imposed on the well-off and people of means to help shore up relief and
  rehabilitation efforts," he said at a meeting of women ministers, parliamentarians and representatives of non-
  governmental organisations.
  "Unless we are prepared to share bread with our grief- and disaster-stricken brethren, we should not expect others to
  help us.
  "I have already advised the government to tap into indigenous resources wherever there is room," he said.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775245 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775245 Date: 08/31/2015
  The president said that funds would be disbursed transparently and every citizen would have access to information
  relating to the aid received and distributed.
  http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/the-newspaper/front-page/president-calls-for-
  flood-tax-090
  Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775245 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775250
MetadataSubject: (HAARETZ) PALESTINIANS EXPECTED TO LEAVE DIRECT TALKS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0100/DOC_0C05775250/C05775250.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: (Haaretz) Palestinians expected to leave direct talks
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-I; SES-O_Shift-II; SES-O_OS
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 8:47 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775250
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775250 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 8:47 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: (Haaretz) Palestinians expected to leave direct talks
  From: Rudnitski, Jennine R
  To: NEWS-NEA; NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-I; SES-O_Shift-II; SES-O_OS
  Sent: Thu Sep 30 06:07:26 2010
  Subject: (Haaretz) Palestinians expected to leave direct talks
  (Haaretz) - The Palestinian leadership plans to meet October 2 and is expected to officially decide to end
  negotiations with Israel if the renewed West Bank settlement construction is not halted. Those expected
  to attend the meeting include representatives of the PLO workers committee, the Fatah central committee,
  and the heads of other political parties. After making a decision, the Palestinian leadership is expected to
  announce that the final decision of whether to leave the talks will be made by the Arab League, who are
  planning to discuss the issue October 4. The head of the Palestinian negotiation team, Saeb Erekat, said
  "there are no half-way solutions on the settlements issue." In a statement released to the press after
  meeting with U.S. Consul General Daniel Rubinstein, Erekat called on the American government and the
  European Union to force Israel to stop all construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, in order to
  give peace a chance. Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit said the Palestinians would not be
  able to remain in the peace talks after Israel's decision not to extend the moratorium. Gheit added that
  "despite the international efforts, I am not optimistic [about peace talks]".
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775250 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775253
MetadataSubject: FW:
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0100/DOC_0C05775253/C05775253.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW:
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 11:07 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775253
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775253 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 11:07 AM
  To:
  Subject: FW:
  Original Message
  From: williamsbarrett
  Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 10:10 AM
  To: Minyon Moore; Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Re:
  nice that the country he loves so much loves him back.
  Original Message
  From: Minyon Moore
  To: Maggie Williams
  To: Cheryl D Mills
  Subject:
  Sent: Sep 30, 2010 6:45 AM
  Newsweek's Ben Adler: "Why is Bill Clinton So Much More Popular Than Barack Obama?" Here's a fun fact from the
  latest NBC/Wall Street Journal
  poll: Bill Clinton is the most popular political figure in the country.
  The former president, who never won an outright majority of the popular vote and was impeached by Congress, enjoys
  a 55-23 favorable/unfavorable rating. Clinton left office with an approval rating of 68 percent according to the CBS poll
  at the time, so his continuing popularity is not surprising. LINK
  Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775253 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775254
MetadataSubject: DEALING WITH NETANYAHU
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0100/DOC_0C05775254/C05775254.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Dealing with Netanyahu
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivann@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 10:43 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775254
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775254 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5, B6
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivann@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 10:43 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Dealing with Netanyahu
  Original Message B5
  From: Feltman, Jeffrey D
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J; Walles, Jacob; Hale, David M; Cunningham, James B; Schlicher, Ronald L
  Sent: Thu Sep 30 09:02:27 2010
  Subject: FW: Dealing with Netanyahu
  Jeffrey Feltman
  Assistant Secretary
  Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs
  Department of State
  202-647-7209
  Original Message
  From: Martin Indyk [mailto
  Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 8:59 AM
  To: George Mitchell; Feltman, Jeffrey D
  Subject: Dealing with Netanyahu
  The principle conclusion from a quick visit to Israel and Ramallah over the weekend is that Netanyahu is in a strong
  position politically, with an unusually stable ruling coalition. Nobody I spoke with believed that the government would
  have fallen if he had decided to extend the settlement freeze before its expiry, as a gesture to U.S. peacemaking efforts.
  In their view, he could have easily garnered the support of a large majority of the people, for whom the settlers are a
  marginal concern. And this would have given him leverage over his ministers to ensure their support or abstention in
  the cabinet. As Dan Meridor noted, Likud voters are to the left of their Knesset members when it comes to peacemaking
  (70 percent support the two-state solution, vs only 50 percent of the leadership).
  Lieberman, not the Likud, is Bibi's chief concern. He wants to keep him in the government for as long as possible for fear
  that when he leaves he will garner the support of those on the right, including from the Likud, who oppose
  peacemaking. For the time being, Bibi uses the threat of an alternative coalition with Kadima to keep Lieberman in the
  tent. But the clock is ticking. According to Tzipi Livni, she can bring her party into the government now, and is willing to
  do so without any demand for "rotation," provided Bibi is serious about negotiating peace. But as the elections grow
  closer, more and more of her party members are turning against the idea of joining the government. They are
  strengthened in their views by recent internal polling which shows Kadima with 32 seats (up from 28 now), Likud slightly
  down at 25, and Labor at only 5.
  Therefore, if Bibi intends to make a deal with Abu Mazen, he will need to do so sooner rather than later. The longer he
  waits, the less leverage he has on Lieberman and the more likely Lieberman will break away to oppose him in the next
  elections.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775254 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775254 Date: 08/31/2015
  In this context, Bibi's negotiating tactics become self-defeating. Believing that he is a great negotiator, and that he is
  operating in the Middle East bazaar, he inflates his requirements well beyond anything reasonable in the belief that this
  is the best way to secure the highest price. The process of bringing him down to a reasonable price uses up a lot of
  energy, uses up a lot of goodwill, humiliates his Palestinian negotiating partner, and raises doubts about his seriousness.
  In the end, under great pressure from all quarters, he will make the final concession, but only after wasting a lot of time,
  making everybody furious with him, and thereby securing no credit either with his supporters or negotiating partners.
  At heart, he seems to lack a generosity of spirit. This combines with his legendary fear of being seen as a "freier"
  (sucker) in front of his people to create a real problem in the negotiations, especially because he holds most of the
  cards.
  This is further complicated by his introduction of the notion of "creative ideas." Thinking out of the box, as he likes to
  do, will only further delay the negotiations because the box is already well-defined. To attempt to broaden the
  parameters will generate mistrust of his intentions on the Palestinian side just when direct negotiations provide the
  opportunity to build trust.
  The reason for dwelling on Bibi's psychology rather than his politics is that the latter all point in the direction of making a
  deal: the Israeli public is ready to get on with it; if Israel doesn't make a serious move, it will further delegitimize its
  standing internationally (something Bibi is deeply concerned about); Bibi needs President Obama in his corner to deal
  with the threat from Iran and to avoid punishment by the voters for mishandling relations with the U.S.; and if he
  doesn't make the deal with Abu Mazen now, he will have helped to advance the future he is most concerned about - a
  Hamas takeover of the Palestinian leadership.
  Yuval Diskin was quite clear about this latter point. After praising the Palestinian security services to the sky (unusual for
  him) he told me that he had warned Bibi that at the moment they have a high motivation to prevent terror because they
  believe they are building their state. If that proves to be an illusion, the motivation will disappear and then he cannot
  guarantee security in the West Bank. He considers it quite possible that if Bibi doesn't quickly demonstrate his
  seriousness to Abu Mazen, he will resign because his honor has now been seriously damaged. He told Bibi that he
  cannot predict who will lead the Palestinians if Abu Mazen resigns, but that Salam Fayyad will likely have to go too.
  What is to be done? I have no magic solution for what must be a deeply frustrating exercise for you. And please forgive
  me if what I recommend here is just repeating what you already know.
  1.Put your arm around Bibi: he still thinks we are out to bring him down. There is no substitute for working with him,
  even though he makes it such a frustrating process. But the purpose of embracing him is to nudge him forward, not to
  buy into his exaggerated political fears or accept his inflated demands.
  2.Try to find a way to make him understand that his negotiating tactics are counterproductive to his own purposes. The
  Obama Administration has done a great deal lately to underscore its concern for Israel's security, from the vote at the
  IAEA, to the sanctions on Iran, to the letter that Obama was willing to sign that accepted Bibi's security requirements.
  That should buy you credibility with him.
  3. As his friend, paint a realistic picture of the strategic consequences of his negotiating tactics, particularly in terms of
  what is likely to happen to the PA leadership if he worries only about his politics and not at all about Abu Mazen's
  politics.
  4. If all else fails, avoid recriminations in favor of a "clarifying moment." The world will of course blame Bibi. But you
  should avoid any kind of finger-pointing in favor of a repeated commitment to a negotiated solution and a willingness to
  engage with both sides in trying to make that happen, when they're ready. The Israeli public and the American Jewish
  Community should know how far the President was prepared to go and they should be allowed to draw their own
  conclusions. Bibi, Abu Mazen, and the Arab states need negotiations and time is not on the side of any of them. They
  will come back to the table sooner rather than later as long as we keep the door open.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775254 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775254 Date: 08/31/2015
  \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775254 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775256
MetadataSubject: MACK MCLARTY
MetadataTo: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-25T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0122/DOC_0C05775256/C05775256.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Mack McLarty
ExtractedTo: 'filotyLC@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 12:24 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775256
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Pis put him on my call list and call to ask how late tonight or early tomorrow I can call him.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775256 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 12:24 PM
  To: 'filotyLC@state.gov'
  Subject: Mack McLarty
  Pis put him on my call list and call to ask how late tonight or early tomorrow I can call him.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775256 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775263
MetadataSubject: RE:
MetadataTo: sbwhoeop
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0122/DOC_0C05775263/C05775263.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775263
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Friday, March 26, 2010 5:45 AM
  'sbwhoeop
  • Re:
  I have extended my congrats to all.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775263 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Friday, March 26, 2010 5:45 AM
  'sbwhoeop
  • Re:
  I have extended my congrats to all.
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Mon Mar 22 00:11:45 2010
  Subject:
  I just want to drop you a note congratulating you on the vote tonight on health care, that whatever its imperfections the
  establishment of the principle is a vindication. You might take a moment of personal privilege tomorrow to express
  gratitude to Nancy Pelosi, the House, and the President for finally achieving the work of years. Sid
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775263 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775264
MetadataSubject: BRAVA!
MetadataTo: slaughtera@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0122/DOC_0C05775264/C05775264.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Brava!
ExtractedTo: 'slaughtera@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, March 26, 2010 5:46 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775264
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: What a week!
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775264 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 5:46 AM
  To: 'slaughtera@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Brava!
  What a week!
  Original Message
  From: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Mon Mar 22 10:14:46 2010
  Subject: Brava!
  The way you did the ending was pitch perfect. The headlines may about the Iran language, but you laid a powerful
  predicate for moving forward. AM
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775264 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775265
MetadataSubject: CALL WITH SECRETARY CLINTON
MetadataTo: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0122/DOC_0C05775265/C05775265.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Call with Secretary Clinton
ExtractedTo: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, March 26, 2010 5:47 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775265
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Pls be sure that this # is on call list.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775265 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 5:47 AM
  To: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
  Subject: Fw: Call with Secretary Clinton
  Pls be sure that this # is on call list.
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Thu Mar 25 22:46:22 2010
  Subject: FW: Call with Secretary Clinton
  From: Thomas F. McLarty [mailto
  Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:24 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: RE: Call with Secretary Clinton
  Dear Cheryl,
  Thanks for your trademark prompt, clear and courteous response. As always, it and you are appreciated knowing the
  demands of your responsibilities.
  I fully realize that the Secretary is engaged (understatement of the year), so I will wait on and anticipate her call as soon
  as she has a convenient window to do so. The matters I would like to discuss with Hillary are very timely and important
  but not urgent.
  I will be available on my cell phone or through my assistant who
  will be traveling with me. Coordinates in London are as follows.
  Mack:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775265 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775265 Date: 08/31/2015
  Claridge's: 020-7629-8860
  Thank you.
  Mack
  From: Mills, Cheryl D [mailto:MillsCD@state.gov]
  Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 10:40 PM
  To: Thomas F. McLarty
  Subject: RE: Call with Secretary Clinton
  Dear Mack:
  Thank you for following up on this matter. I know she appreciated your conversation and has been concerned about this
  matter.
  I will flag for Lona — this week is relatively hectic so it may be a weekend or next week call but will flag now as this issue
  is ripe.
  Best.
  cdm
  From: Thomas F. McLarty [mailto
  Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 10:24 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Call with Secretary Clinton
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775265 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775265 Date: 08/31/2015
  Dear Cheryl,
  Good morning on a consequential and indeed historic week in the life of our country given the passage of health care
  reform. President Obama was courageous, persevering and skilled in his leadership and efforts. Having said that, in my
  humble opinion, he would not have been successful had it not been for President Clinton's, Hillary's and our efforts in
  1994. That's my story and I'm sticking to it, and I believe it's true.
  I know this has been a particularly demanding week in the life of the Secretary and in your life as well. Having
  Netanyahu, AIPAC and a major trip to Mexico to fight the narco-traffickers is a formidable task even for Hillary Clinton.
  Cheryl, I would like to respectfully request a brief meeting or phone call with Secretary Clinton following up on the
  conversation she initiated with me at the Vital Voices event regarding the IDB. It's my sense and belief that this matter
  needs to be carefully handled for a number of reasons including the longstanding friendship that both the Secretary and
  President Clinton have with Luis Alberto Moreno. I also have another important and timely matter (personal not
  business) that I would like to discuss with Hillary in our time together.
  As I think you know, I try to be very judicious about these types of requests. I think 15 minutes either in person or by
  phone will be adequate to cover both of these subjects. As always, I appreciate your consideration relating to my
  request. Thank you and I'll await your guidance and direction.
  Personally,
  Mack
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775265 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775266
MetadataSubject: TONIGHT
MetadataTo: ValmoroLJ@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0122/DOC_0C05775266/C05775266.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Tonight
ExtractedTo: 'ValmoroU@state.gov.; Huma Abedin
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, March 26, 2010 5:50 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775266
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Is it too late to get a plane for tonight? (I have too much stuff!) If it is, I may prefer to shuttle back Sunday and fly to
  Ottawa straight from DC on Monday in order to get better organized for next week.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775266 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 5:50 AM
  To: 'ValmoroU@state.gov.; Huma Abedin
  Subject: Tonight
  Is it too late to get a plane for tonight? (I have too much stuff!) If it is, I may prefer to shuttle back Sunday and fly to
  Ottawa straight from DC on Monday in order to get better organized for next week.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775266 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775268
MetadataSubject: KABUL IG REPORT
MetadataTo: sullivanjj@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0122/DOC_0C05775268/C05775268.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Kabul IG report
ExtractedTo: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, March 26, 2010 7:23 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775268
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Were you able to get a copy of it?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775268 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 7:23 AM
  To: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: Kabul IG report
  Were you able to get a copy of it?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775268 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775269
MetadataSubject: KABUL IG REPORT
MetadataTo: sullivanjj@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0122/DOC_0C05775269/C05775269.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Kabul IG report
ExtractedTo: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, March 26, 2010 7:40 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775269
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: I will call later.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775269 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 7:40 AM
  To: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Kabul IG report
  I will call later.
  Original Message
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Fri Mar 26 07:33:15 2010
  Subject: Re: Kabul IG report
  Yes. I will be finished going through it this morning before your meeting. Happy to discuss/report when you come in.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Fri Mar 26 07:23:02 2010
  Subject: Kabul IG report
  Were you able to get a copy of it?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775269 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775271
MetadataSubject: PAN ARAB PRESS CARTOONS FOR FRIDAY, MARCH 26, 2010 FROM THE LONDON-BASED MEDIA
MetadataTo: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0122/DOC_0C05775271/C05775271.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Pan Arab Press Cartoons for Friday, March 26, 2010 from the London-based Media
ExtractedTo: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemaiLcom>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, March 26, 2010 8:39 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775271
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Outreach Center
  Pls print.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775271 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemaiLcom>
  Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 8:39 AM
  To: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
  Subject: Fw: Pan Arab Press Cartoons for Friday, March 26, 2010 from the London-based Media
  Outreach Center
  Attachments: image005.jpg; Al-Quds, March 26, 2010.jpg; image005jpg; Al-Quds, March 26, 2010.jpg
  Pls print.
  Original Message
  From: McHale, Judith A <McHaleJA@state.gov>
  To: Otero, Maria <OteroM2@state.gov>; Waxman, Sharon L <WaxmanSL@state.gov>; DiMartino, Kitty
  <DiMartinoK@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Mar 26 08:10:33 2010
  Subject: FW: Pan Arab Press Cartoons for Friday, March 26, 2010 from the London-based Media Outreach Center
  From Al Quds should be the front piece of all our presentations !
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775271 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775274
MetadataSubject: WYNN RESORTS AS SPONSOR
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0123/DOC_0C05775274/C05775274.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Wynn Resorts as Sponsor
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
ExtractedCc: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, March 26, 2010 7:27 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775274
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775274 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B5,B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
  Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 7:27 PM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Wynn Resorts as Sponsor
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Mar 26 18:33:24 2010
  Subject: Fw: Wynn Resorts as Sponsor
  From: Balderston, Kris M
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Fri Mar 26 17:25:30 2010
  Subject: FW: Wynn Resorts as Sponsor
  CM
  Thghts
  Kris
  From: Haynie, Robert R
  Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 3:51 PM
  To: Balderston, Kris M
  Subject: FW: Wynn Resorts as Sponsor
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775274 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775274 Date: 08/31/2015
  What do you think?
  From: TJ Woodley [mailto
  Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 3:02 PM
  To: Haynie, Robert R
  Subject: Wynn Resorts as Sponsor
  Robert,
  Are you sure that the USA Pavilion would not be in a sponsorship by Wynn Resorts (specifically Wynn Macau)? There
  CFO, Matt Maddox, has expressed strong interest.
  The Wynn Macau well known brand in China and Steve Wynn is an extremely popular figure in China. In addition, he is
  well respected and well though of by the Chinese leadership and business leaders. A sponsorship by Wynn would be
  well received.
  I should be able to get an answer by early next week, but don't want to look foolish if they would be rejected.
  TJ
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775274 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775275
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0100/DOC_0C05775275/C05775275.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: CHICAGO (AP) - AP Sources: Emanuel to resign as White House chief of staff Friday,
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.goy>
ExtractedCc: SES-0 Shift-II; SES-O_OS
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 12:00 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775275
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: to begin Chicago mayor bid
MetadataSubject:
  CHICAGO (AP) - AP SOURCES: EMANUEL TO RESIGN AS WHITE HOUSE CHIEF OF STAFF FRIDAY, TO BEGIN CHICAGO MAYOR BID

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775275 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.goy>
  Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 12:00 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: CHICAGO (AP) - AP Sources: Emanuel to resign as White House chief of staff Friday,
  to begin Chicago mayor bid
  From: Moore, Anna W
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-0 Shift-II; SES-O_OS
  Sent: Thu Sep30 11:58:32 2010
  Subject: CHICAGO (AP) - AP Sources: Emanuel to resign as White House chief of staff Friday, to begin Chicago mayor
  bid
  (Headline only.)
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775275 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775277
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0100/DOC_0C05775277/C05775277.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: here is the article i mentioned where Merten's quote seems to substantiate the
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 2:29 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775277
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  need for authorization language and that money has not moved
  FYI

MetadataSubject:
  HERE IS THE ARTICLE I MENTIONED WHERE MERTEN'S QUOTE SEEMS TO SUBSTANTIATE THE NEED FOR AUTHORIZATION LANGUAGE AND THAT MONEY HAS NOT MOVED

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775277 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 2:29 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW: here is the article i mentioned where Merten's quote seems to substantiate the
  need for authorization language and that money has not moved
  FYI
  From: Curtis, Meghann A
  Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 2:05 PM
  To: Klevorick, Caitlin B; Bulgrin, Julie K; Chartrand, Jennifer; Mcdonald, Kara C
  Cc: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: RE: here is the article i mentioned where Merten's quote seems to substantiate the need for authorization
  language and that money has not moved
  From: Klevorick, Caitlin B
  Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 1:53 PM
  To: Bulgrin, Julie K; Chartrand, Jennifer; Curtis, Meghann A
  Subject: Re: here is the article i mentioned where Merten's quote seems to substantiate the need for authorization
  language and that money has not moved
  From: Bulgrin, Julie K
  To: Klevorick, Caitlin B; Chartrand, Jennifer; Curtis, Meghann A
  Sent: Thu Sep 30 13:51:51 2010
  Subject: RE: here is the article i mentioned where Merten's quote seems to substantiate the need for authorization
  language and that money has not moved
  There's an indirect quote of Merten through Coburn's office.
  From: Klevorick, Caitlin B
  Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 1:51 PM
  To: Chartrand, Jennifer; Curtis, Meghann A
  Cc: Bulgrin, Julie K
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775277 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775277 Date: 08/31/2015
  Subject: Re: here is the article i mentioned where Merten's quote seems to substantiate the need for authorization
  language and that money has not moved
  There is no quote from merten in this article.
  From: Sumilas, Michele [mailto:Michele.Surnilas@mail.house.gov]
  Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 1:38 PM
  To: Chartrand, Jennifer
  Subject: here is the article i mentioned where Merten's quote seems to substantiate the need for authorization language
  and that money has not moved
  Haiti Still Waiting For Pledged U.S. Aid
  JONATHAN M. KATZ and MARTHA MENDOZA I 09/29/10 02:54 AM I 4'
  Members of NGO Goal work in the Port-au-Prince streets on September 11, 2010. An United Nations report on the
  impoverished Caribbean state, where a magnitude 7.0 earthquake on January 12 killed 250,000 people, said criminal
  gangs are increasing their grip on many of the 1,300 camps where most of the estimated 1.3 million homeless are still
  based. It painted a desolate picture of Haiti's infrastructure, estimating that almost a quarter of the 230,000 buildings
  damaged, including about 150,000 hou
  PORT-AU-PRINCE, Haiti — Nearly nine months after the earthquake, more than a million Haitians still live on
  the streets between piles of rubble. One reason: Not a cent of the $1.15 billion the U.S. promised for rebuilding
  has arrived.
  The money was pledged by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton in March for use this year in rebuilding.
  The U.S. has already spent more than $1.1 billion on post-quake relief, but without long-term funds, the
  reconstruction of the wrecked capital cannot begin.
  With just a week to go before fiscal 2010 ends, the money is still tied up in Washington. At fault: bureaucracy,
  disorganization and a lack of urgency, The Associated Press learned in interviews with officials in the State
  Department, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the White House and the U.N. Office of the Special
  Envoy. One senator has held up a key authorization bill because of a $5 million provision he says will be
  wasteful.
  Meanwhile, deaths in Port-au-Prince are mounting, as quake survivors scramble to live without shelter or food.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775277 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775277 Date: 08/31/2015
  "There are truly lives at stake, and the idea that folks are spending more time finger-pointing than getting this
  solved is almost unbelievable," said John Simon, a former U.S. ambassador to the African Union who is now
  with the Center for Global Development, a Washington think tank.
  Nor is Haiti getting much from other donors. Some 50 other nations and organizations pledged a total of $8.75
  billion for reconstruction, but just $686 million of that has reached Haiti so far — less than 15 percent of the total
  promised for 2010-11.
  The lack of funds has all but halted reconstruction work by CHF International, the primary U.S.-funded group
  assigned to remove rubble and build temporary shelters. Just 2 percent of rubble has been cleared and 13,000
  temporary shelters have been built — less than 10 percent of the number planned.
  The Maryland-based agency is asking the U.S. government for $16.5 million to remove more than 21 million
  cubic feet (600,000 cubic meters) of additional rubble and build 4,000 more temporary houses out of wood and
  metal.
  "It's just a matter of one phone call and the trucks are out again. We have contractors ready to continue
  removing rubble. ... We have local suppliers and international suppliers ready to ship the amount of wood and
  construction materials we need," said CHF country director Alberto Wilde. "It's just a matter of money."
  Story continues below
  ADVERTISEMENT
  Last week the inaction bore tragic results. On Friday an isolated storm destroyed an estimated 8,000 tarps, tents
  and shacks in the capital and killed at least six people, including two children. And the threat of violence looms
  as landowners threaten entire camps with forced eviction.
  In Washington there is confusion about the money. At a July hearing, Ravij Shah, director of the U.S. Agency
  for International Development, thanked members of Congress for approving the funds, saying, "The resources
  are flowing and are being spent in country."
  It wasn't true then, and still hasn't happened.
  When the earthquake hit, U.S. agencies sent troops, rescuers, aid workers and supplies to the devastated capital,
  Port-au-Prince. On March 24, President Barack Obama asked Congress for $2.8 billion in emergency aid to
  Haiti — about half to pay back money already spent by USAID, the Defense Department and others. An
  additional $212 million was to write off debt.
  The heart of the request was $1.15 billion in new reconstruction funds.
  A week later, Clinton touted that figure in front of representatives of 50 nations at the U.N. secretariat, the
  president of Haiti at her side.
  "If the effort to rebuild is slow or insufficient, if it is marked by conflict, lack of coordination or lack of
  transparency, then the challenges that have plagued Haiti for years could erupt with regional and global
  consequences," Clinton said.
  That was nearly six months ago. It took until May for the Senate to pass a supplemental request for the Haiti
  funds and until July for the House to do the same. The votes made $917 million available but did not dictate
  how or when to spend it. Without that final step, the money remains in the U.S. Treasury.
  Then came summer recess, emergencies in Pakistan and elsewhere, and the distractions of election politics.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775277 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775277 Date: 08/31/2015
  Now the authorization bill that would direct how the aid is delivered remains sidelined by a senator who
  anonymously pulled it for further study. Through calls to dozens of senators' offices, the AP learned it was Sen.
  Tom Coburn, a Republican from Oklahoma.
  "He is holding the bill because it includes an unnecessary senior Haiti coordinator when we already have one"
  in U.S. Ambassador Kenneth Merten, Coburn spokeswoman Becky Bernhardt said.
  The bill proposes a new coordinator in Washington who would not oversee U.S. aid but would work with the
  USAID administrator in Washington to develop a rebuilding strategy. The position would cost $1 million a year
  for five years, including salaries and expenses for a staff of up to seven people.
  With the bill on hold, the State Department is trying to move the money along by avoiding Congress as much as
  possible. It sent lawmakers a "spending plan" on Sept. 20 and gave legislators 15 days to review it. If they fail
  to act on the plan, the money could be released as soon as specific projects get the OK.
  "We need to make sure that the needs of the Haitian people are not sacrificed to procedural and bureaucratic
  impediments," Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman John Kerry told the AP by e-mail. "As we
  approach nine months since the earthquake, further delays on any side are unacceptable."
  Asked when the money will actually come, State Department spokesman Charles Luoma-Overstreet said the
  department expects to start spending in the coming weeks and months. He added that $275 million in "bridge"
  funds were released in March and have gone toward agriculture, work, health and shelter programs — not long-
  term reconstruction.
  Haitian advocates say that is not enough.
  Jean-Claude Bajeux of the Ecumenical Center for Human Rights in Port-au-Prince said this phase was supposed
  to be about building semi-permanent houses.
  "Where are they? We haven't seen them," he said. "There is not much money that is being used. There is not
  much work that has actually been done."
  Of course there is no guarantee that the money would lead to the successful rebuilding of Haiti. Many past U.S.
  aid efforts have fallen short.
  "I don't think (the money) will make any difference," said Haitian human rights advocate Pierre Esperance.
  "Haitian people are not really involved in this process."
  But officials agree the funds could pay for new approaches to make Haiti more sustainable, and rebuilding
  projects could improve millions of lives.
  The AP found that $874 million of the funds pledged by other countries at the donors conference was money
  already promised to Haiti for work or aid before the quake. An additional $1.13 million wasn't ever going to be
  sent; it was debt relief. And $184 million was in loans to Haiti's government, not aid.
  The Office of the Special Envoy has been tracking the money delivered so far but does not know who got it.
  The envoy himself, former President Bill Clinton, told the AP in July and again in August that he was putting
  pressure on donors to meet their pledges.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775277 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775277 Date: 08/31/2015
  On the streets of Haiti, many simply feel abandoned. Mishna Gregoire, 22, said she was happy when she heard
  about the donors conference. But six months later she is still in a tarp city with 5,000 other people, on a foul-
  smelling plaza in the Port-au-Prince suburb of Petionville.
  "I thought it was something serious they were really going to do," Gregoire said, standing amid tarps torn apart
  by the sudden storm. "But nothing has been done. And I don't think anything will be done."
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775277 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775279
MetadataSubject: CAN YOU TALK THIS AM?
MetadataTo: cheryl.mills
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-27T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0123/DOC_0C05775279/C05775279.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Can you talk this am?
ExtractedTo: 'cheryl.mills 'millscd@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 8:25 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775279
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: I'm free until 10:30 and after 1. Sorry I couldn't get back to you last night.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775279 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 8:25 AM
  To: 'cheryl.mills 'millscd@state.gov'
  Subject: Can you talk this am?
  I'm free until 10:30 and after 1. Sorry I couldn't get back to you last night.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775279 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775280
MetadataSubject: LEE KUAN YEW ON SCS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Campbell, Kurt M
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0100/DOC_0C05775280/C05775280.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Lee Kuan Yew on SCS
ExtractedFrom: Campbell, Kurt M <CampbelIKM@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 7:33 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775280
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Madame Secretary -- a very sophisticated and supportive voice from Singapore. Kurt
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775280 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Campbell, Kurt M <CampbelIKM@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 7:33 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Lee Kuan Yew on SCS
  Madame Secretary -- a very sophisticated and supportive voice from Singapore. Kurt
  Original Message
  From: Heng Chee CHAN
  To: Campbell, Kurt M
  Sent: Thu Sep 30 19:04:40 2010
  Subject: Lee Kuan Yew on SCS
  Message Classification: Unclassified
  Kurt,
  Minister Mentor spoke in a Singapore-russia dialogue held in Singapore. I think Secretary Clinton would like his
  comments.
  Heng Chee
  Headline: The way to solve border disputes: MM
  Byline: JEREMY AU YONG
  Publication: STAST
  Date: Wednesday, 29 September 2010
  Page: A4
  (C) Singapore Press Holdings Limited
  It's fair for smaller countries to turn to international conventions
  MINISTER Mentor Lee Kuan Yew supports the use of international conventions to solve border disputes, especially when
  the countries involved are not of equal standing.
  By way of illustration, he said it was "fair" for smaller countries like Vietnam to resolve disputes with China using
  conventions like Unclos — the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.
  He made the point at a dialogue of the Russia-Singapore Business Forum yesterday, when he was asked by former
  Japanese senator Kotaro Tamura to comment on the ongoing China-Japan dispute.
  Mr Tamura, in his question, made his feelings clear, describing China as a "teenager" in its handling of the situation.
  Adding that China was also pushing around other countries like those in South-east Asia, he asked if it was a good idea
  for countries with potential border problems to team up and take China into a multilateral negotiation.
  Mr Lee, in his response, noted that multiparty negotiations had been proposed by United States Secretary of State
  Hillary Clinton in a visit to Vietnam this July.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775280 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775280 Date: 08/31/2015
  But Mrs Clinton's statement had upset China, he added.
  Mr Lee said: "It was a really quiet statement but I think it also drew a line, a red line which will not make the Chinese
  very happy.
  "As you can see its foreign minister says it's none of America's business, it is a bilateral matter with the Philippines, with
  Brunei, with Vietnam."
  The three South-east Asian countries, China and some others have all laid claim — either in whole or in part —to the
  Spratly Islands in the South China Sea.
  But any bilateral negotiation with China is unlikely to be a fair fight, he said.
  "So if you deal with China, and Vietnam with 100 million (people) and they've got 1,300 million, where is your punching
  power?" he asked.
  He cited a 2008 dispute over a deal Vietnam made with US oil giant ExxonMobil to do oil exploration in contested
  waters.
  "The Chinese told ExxonMobil: 'Move on or you'll get no business from China.' So ExxonMobil moved on," he said. That
  is why, he said, a multilateral, Unclos- based solution was just.
  He stressed that negotiations needed to be based on internationally accepted rules.
  Mrs Clinton, he said, probably did not act independently when making the statement in Hanoi and would have consulted
  her country's national security lobby and even the President.
  He said the US policy made it clear that territorial claims were more complex than producing a map with dotted lines
  and saying: "All this is mine".
  "I mean who produces this map? What is the authenticity of this map? Who kept it? And even if you can prove its
  antiquity, what does it show?
  "It shows that at that time these countries were not independent and (were) under French, American or British or other
  rule and so they could not object.
  "But now they're independent and they're entitled to protest. It's within their EEZ (exclusive economic zone); it's within
  their territorial waters,"
  he said.
  Mr Lee said the points made by the US in Hanoi draw an "important line against bilateral dealings which are unequal".
  He also spoke on Japan's current spat with China, the worst between the two countries in years, which was sparked
  earlier this month when Japan detained a Chinese ship captain following a sea collision near the disputed Senkaku
  islands.
  Japan, however, released the captain on Saturday.
  Mr Lee felt that moving to settle the dispute was probably the right thing to do.
  He said: "Supposing he (Japanese PM Naoto Kan) decided to do otherwise, then what? Then the Senkaku islands will
  become a dispute. Then they will send their navy there. Then you will send your navy there.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775280 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775280 Date: 08/31/2015
  "And normally (you) have better ships than they have. But they will build an aircraft carrier. So in 10 years they have a
  bigger fleet than you have, so you have to factor that into your calculation.
  "These are the realities of power."
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775280 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775281
MetadataSubject: MY STATUS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0100/DOC_0C05775281/C05775281.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: My status
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob 1 <Sullivan11@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 8:09 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775281
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Mitchell and team leave at 5 tomorrow for Qatar. My inclination is that my value add to the team declines in making
  these Arab rounds, so I was thinking of flying back overnight tomorrow night. But if you believe I can be of use out here,
  I'm certainly prepared to stay.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775281 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob 1 <Sullivan11@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 8:09 PM
  To:
  Subject: My status
  Mitchell and team leave at 5 tomorrow for Qatar. My inclination is that my value add to the team declines in making
  these Arab rounds, so I was thinking of flying back overnight tomorrow night. But if you believe I can be of use out here,
  I'm certainly prepared to stay.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775281 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775283
MetadataSubject: GAS AIR BALLON RACE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0100/DOC_0C05775283/C05775283.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Gas air ballon race
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 8:55 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775283
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: One of missing balloonist is
RawText:
  August
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775283 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 8:55 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Gas air ballon race
  One of missing balloonist is
  Original Message
  From:
  To: Toiv, Nora F; Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Thu Sep 30 17:46:51 2010
  Subject: Re: Gas air ballon race
  I cannot Thank you enough. I was just with
  As I read the e mail It is hard to believe this is happening
  brother is also on his way. He is a pilot
  B6
  Sent from my iP
  On Sep 30, 2010, at 5:05 PM, "Toiv, Nora F" <ToivNF@state.gov> wrote:
  > See below. I'll send you updates as I get them.
  > Original Message
  > From: Mull, Stephen D
  > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 2:40 PM
  > To: Toiv, Nora F
  > Subject: RE: Gas air ballon race
  > Absolutely!
  Original Message
  > From: Toiv, Nora F
  > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 13:30 PM
  > To: Mull, Stephen D
  > Subject: RE: Gas air ballon race
  > Thank you Steve!
  > Is it okay if I pass this info on
  > Original Message
  > From: Mull, Stephen D
  > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 1:23 PM
  > To: Toiv, Nora F
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775283 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775283 Date: 08/31/2015
  > Subject: RE: Gas air ballon race
  > Nora, here's the latest:
  > --Balloonists remain missing. Italian authorities continued the
  > search this morning at first light, but have encountered poor weather
  > and poor visibility.
  > --The Sixth Fleet has reached out to the Italians and offered to
  > provide airplane support for the search using resources based in
  > Sicily. The Italian government has agreed to accept the assistance.
  > The U.S. Navy is sending two planes to assist in the search (one from
  > Naples and one from Sigonella). The plane from Naples is a C-26 (a
  > passenger aircraft) and it should be lifting off this hour. Later
  > tonight, a P-3 (a maritime patrol plane) from Sigonella will be sent to the search area.
  > --CA/OCS has been in contact with Governor Richardson's office.
  > However, due to privacy act issues, CA/OCS told the Governor's office
  > that it cannot release certain information. However, CA/OCS stressed
  > that DOS is actively involved and knew about the incident immediately
  > after it occurred from race operators.
  > --Consulate Naples reports they notified next of kin.
  is in England at race heads uarters and
  Is going to Rome today. is
  > traveling with an Italian friend and will be met at the airport by the
  > balloon chase team and will proceed directly to Bari, where the
  > operations center overseeing the search is located. ConGen Naples has
  > been in touch with her directly and is working now with the GOI to
  > secure a permit for her to visit the operations center there. Consul
  > General Don Moore (whom Cheryl may remember from Haiti) is remaining
  > personally engaged and the Italian authorities to
  > facilitate contacts and otherwise support.
  > Original Message
  > From: Toiv, Nora F
  > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 11:07 AM
  > To: Mull, Stephen D
  > Subject: FW: Gas air ballon race
  > Saw your email. Is somebody here at State staying in touch
  > Thanks.
  > Original Message
  > From:
  > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 10:24 AM
  > To: Toiv, Nora F
  > Subject: Gas air ballon race
  > .please if you can give her call at and her e mail is
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775283 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775283 Date: 08/31/2015
  >
  >
  > I only have the information that she sent me and you have
  >
  > Sent from my iPad
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775283 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775284
MetadataSubject: ANYTHING TO REPORT?
MetadataTo: sullivanjj@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-27T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0123/DOC_0C05775284/C05775284.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Anything to report?
ExtractedTo: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 12:36 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775284
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Call me at home thru Ops.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775284 Date: 08/31/2015-
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 12:36 PM
  To: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: Anything to report?
  Call me at home thru Ops.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775284 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775285
MetadataSubject: MARTIN INDYK SENT THIS TO JEFF FELTMAN - - VERY INTERESTING ANALYSIS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie
MetadataDateSent: 2010-09-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0100/DOC_0C05775285/C05775285.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Martin Indyk sent this to Jeff Feltman -- very interesting analysis
ExtractedFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob J
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 9:04 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775285
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Jake probably passed this on to you, but just in case, I think it's definitely worth reading
  A few comments from one of my staff members who has long experience with
  the Middle East follow.
  From Martin: The principle conclusion from a quick visit to Israel and Ramallah over the weekend is that
  Netanyahu is in a strong position politically, with an unusually stable ruling coalition. Nobody I spoke with
  believed that the government would have fallen if he had decided to extend the settlement freeze before its
  expiry, as a gesture to U.S. peacemaking efforts. In their view, he could have easily garnered the support of a
  large majority of the people, for whom the settlers are a marginal concern. And this would have given him
  leverage over his ministers to ensure their support or abstention in the cabinet. As Dan Meridor noted, Likud
  voters are to the left of their Knesset members when it comes to peacemaking (70 percent support the two-state
  solution, vs only 50 percent of the leadership).
  Lieberman, not the Likud, is Bibi's chief concern. He wants to keep him in the government for as long as
  possible for fear that when he leaves he will garner the support of those on the right, including from the Likud,
  who oppose peacemaking. For the time being, Bibi uses the threat of an alternative coalition with Kadima to
  keep Lieberman in the tent. But the clock is ticking. According to Tzipi Livni, she can bring her party into the
  government now, and is willing to do so without any demand for "rotation," provided Bibi is serious about
  negotiating peace. But as the elections grow closer, more and more of her party members are turning against
  the idea of joining the government. They are strengthened in their views by recent internal polling which shows
  Kadima with 32 seats (up from 28 now), Likud slightly down at 25, and Labor at only 5.
  Therefore, if Bibi intends to make a deal with Abu Mazen, he will need to do so sooner rather than later. The
  longer he waits, the less leverage he has on Lieberman and the more likely Lieberman will break away to
  oppose him in the next elections.
  In this context, Bibi's negotiating tactics become self-defeating. Believing that he is a great negotiator, and that
  he is operating in the Middle East bazaar, he inflates his requirements well beyond anything reasonable in the
  belief that this is the best way to secure the highest price. The process of bringing him down to a reasonable
  price uses up a lot of energy, uses up a lot of goodwill, humiliates his Palestinian negotiating partner, and raises
  doubts about his seriousness. In the end, under great pressure from all quarters, he will make the final
  concession, but only after wasting a lot of time, making everybody furious with him, and thereby securing no
  credit either with his supporters or negotiating partners. At heart, he seems to lack a generosity of spirit. This
  combines with his legendary fear of being seen as a "freier" (sucker) in front of his people to create a real
  problem in the negotiations, especially because he holds most of the cards.
  This is further complicated by his introduction of the notion of "creative ideas." Thinking out of the box, as he
  likes to do, will only further delay the negotiations because the box is already well-defined. To attempt to
  broaden the parameters will generate mistrust of his intentions on the Palestinian side just when direct
  negotiations provide the opportunity to build trust.
  The reason for dwelling on Bibi's psychology rather than his politics is that the latter all point in the direction of
  making a deal: the Israeli public is ready to get on with it; if Israel doesn't make a serious move, it will further
  delegitimize its standing internationally (something Bibi is deeply concerned about); Bibi needs President
  Obama in his corner to deal with the threat from Iran and to avoid punishment by the voters for mishandling
  relations with the U.S.; and if he doesn't make the deal with Abu Mazen now, he will have helped to advance
  the future he is most concerned about - a llamas takeover of the Palestinian leadership.
  Yuval Diskin was quite clear about this latter point. After praising the Palestinian security services to the sky
  (unusual for him) he told me that he had warned Bibi that at the moment they have a high motivation to prevent
  terror because they believe they are building their state. If that proves to be an illusion, the motivation will
  disappear and then he cannot guarantee security in the West Bank. He considers it quite possible that if Bibi
  doesn't quickly demonstrate his seriousness to Abu Mazen, he will resign because his honor has now been
  seriously damaged. He told Bibi that he cannot predict who will lead the Palestinians if Abu Mazen resigns, but
  that Salam Fayyad will likely have to go too.
  What is to be done? I have no magic solution for what must be a deeply frustrating exercise for you. And
  please forgive me if what I recommend here is just repeating what you already know.
  1.Put your arm around Bibi: he still thinks we are out to bring him down. There is no substitute for working
  with him, even though he makes it such a frustrating process. But the purpose of embracing him is to nudge
  him forward, not to buy into his exaggerated political fears or accept his inflated demands.
  2. Try to find a way to make him understand that his negotiating tactics are counterproductive to his own
  purposes. The Obama Administration has done a great deal lately to underscore its concern for Israel's security,
  from the vote at the IAEA, to the sanctions on Iran, to the letter that Obama was willing to sign that accepted
  Bibi's security requirements. That should buy you credibility with him.
  3. As his friend, paint a realistic picture of the strategic consequences of his negotiating tactics, particularly in
  terms of what is likely to happen to the PA leadership if he worries only about his politics and not at all about
  Abu Mazen's politics.
  4. If all else fails, avoid recriminations in favor of a "clarifying moment." The world will of course blame
  Bibi. But you should avoid any kind of finger-pointing in favor of a repeated commitment to a negotiated
  solution and a willingness to engage with both sides in trying to make that happen, when they're ready. The
  Israeli public and the American Jewish Community should know how far the President was prepared to go and
  they should be allowed to draw their own conclusions. Bibi, Abu Mazen, and the Arab states need negotiations
  and time is not on the side of any of them. They will come back to the table sooner rather than later as long as
  we keep the door open.
  From my staffer:
  AM
  Anne-Marie Slaughter
  Director of Policy Planning
  U.S. Department of State
  (202) 647-2972

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775285 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 9:04 PM
  To:
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Subject: Martin Indyk sent this to Jeff Feltman -- very interesting analysis
  Jake probably passed this on to you, but just in case, I think it's definitely worth reading
  A few comments from one of my staff members who has long experience with
  the Middle East follow.
  From Martin: The principle conclusion from a quick visit to Israel and Ramallah over the weekend is that
  Netanyahu is in a strong position politically, with an unusually stable ruling coalition. Nobody I spoke with
  believed that the government would have fallen if he had decided to extend the settlement freeze before its
  expiry, as a gesture to U.S. peacemaking efforts. In their view, he could have easily garnered the support of a
  large majority of the people, for whom the settlers are a marginal concern. And this would have given him
  leverage over his ministers to ensure their support or abstention in the cabinet. As Dan Meridor noted, Likud
  voters are to the left of their Knesset members when it comes to peacemaking (70 percent support the two-state
  solution, vs only 50 percent of the leadership).
  Lieberman, not the Likud, is Bibi's chief concern. He wants to keep him in the government for as long as
  possible for fear that when he leaves he will garner the support of those on the right, including from the Likud,
  who oppose peacemaking. For the time being, Bibi uses the threat of an alternative coalition with Kadima to
  keep Lieberman in the tent. But the clock is ticking. According to Tzipi Livni, she can bring her party into the
  government now, and is willing to do so without any demand for "rotation," provided Bibi is serious about
  negotiating peace. But as the elections grow closer, more and more of her party members are turning against
  the idea of joining the government. They are strengthened in their views by recent internal polling which shows
  Kadima with 32 seats (up from 28 now), Likud slightly down at 25, and Labor at only 5.
  Therefore, if Bibi intends to make a deal with Abu Mazen, he will need to do so sooner rather than later. The
  longer he waits, the less leverage he has on Lieberman and the more likely Lieberman will break away to
  oppose him in the next elections.
  In this context, Bibi's negotiating tactics become self-defeating. Believing that he is a great negotiator, and that
  he is operating in the Middle East bazaar, he inflates his requirements well beyond anything reasonable in the
  belief that this is the best way to secure the highest price. The process of bringing him down to a reasonable
  price uses up a lot of energy, uses up a lot of goodwill, humiliates his Palestinian negotiating partner, and raises
  doubts about his seriousness. In the end, under great pressure from all quarters, he will make the final
  concession, but only after wasting a lot of time, making everybody furious with him, and thereby securing no
  credit either with his supporters or negotiating partners. At heart, he seems to lack a generosity of spirit. This
  combines with his legendary fear of being seen as a "freier" (sucker) in front of his people to create a real
  problem in the negotiations, especially because he holds most of the cards.
  This is further complicated by his introduction of the notion of "creative ideas." Thinking out of the box, as he
  likes to do, will only further delay the negotiations because the box is already well-defined. To attempt to
  broaden the parameters will generate mistrust of his intentions on the Palestinian side just when direct
  negotiations provide the opportunity to build trust.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775285 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775285 Date: 08/31/2015
  The reason for dwelling on Bibi's psychology rather than his politics is that the latter all point in the direction of
  making a deal: the Israeli public is ready to get on with it; if Israel doesn't make a serious move, it will further
  delegitimize its standing internationally (something Bibi is deeply concerned about); Bibi needs President
  Obama in his corner to deal with the threat from Iran and to avoid punishment by the voters for mishandling
  relations with the U.S.; and if he doesn't make the deal with Abu Mazen now, he will have helped to advance
  the future he is most concerned about - a llamas takeover of the Palestinian leadership.
  Yuval Diskin was quite clear about this latter point. After praising the Palestinian security services to the sky
  (unusual for him) he told me that he had warned Bibi that at the moment they have a high motivation to prevent
  terror because they believe they are building their state. If that proves to be an illusion, the motivation will
  disappear and then he cannot guarantee security in the West Bank. He considers it quite possible that if Bibi
  doesn't quickly demonstrate his seriousness to Abu Mazen, he will resign because his honor has now been
  seriously damaged. He told Bibi that he cannot predict who will lead the Palestinians if Abu Mazen resigns, but
  that Salam Fayyad will likely have to go too.
  What is to be done? I have no magic solution for what must be a deeply frustrating exercise for you. And
  please forgive me if what I recommend here is just repeating what you already know.
  1.Put your arm around Bibi: he still thinks we are out to bring him down. There is no substitute for working
  with him, even though he makes it such a frustrating process. But the purpose of embracing him is to nudge
  him forward, not to buy into his exaggerated political fears or accept his inflated demands.
  2. Try to find a way to make him understand that his negotiating tactics are counterproductive to his own
  purposes. The Obama Administration has done a great deal lately to underscore its concern for Israel's security,
  from the vote at the IAEA, to the sanctions on Iran, to the letter that Obama was willing to sign that accepted
  Bibi's security requirements. That should buy you credibility with him.
  3. As his friend, paint a realistic picture of the strategic consequences of his negotiating tactics, particularly in
  terms of what is likely to happen to the PA leadership if he worries only about his politics and not at all about
  Abu Mazen's politics.
  4. If all else fails, avoid recriminations in favor of a "clarifying moment." The world will of course blame
  Bibi. But you should avoid any kind of finger-pointing in favor of a repeated commitment to a negotiated
  solution and a willingness to engage with both sides in trying to make that happen, when they're ready. The
  Israeli public and the American Jewish Community should know how far the President was prepared to go and
  they should be allowed to draw their own conclusions. Bibi, Abu Mazen, and the Arab states need negotiations
  and time is not on the side of any of them. They will come back to the table sooner rather than later as long as
  we keep the door open.
  From my staffer:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775285 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775285 Date: 08/31/2015
  AM
  Anne-Marie Slaughter
  Director of Policy Planning
  U.S. Department of State
  (202) 647-2972
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775285 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775289
MetadataSubject: PUTIN TRIP
MetadataTo: Burnswj@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-28T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0123/DOC_0C05775289/C05775289.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Putin trip
ExtractedTo: 'Burnswj@state.gov'; 'wburns66
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 9:19 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775289
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Bill--My husband cannot go w PM Putin in mid-April because of his schedule, but he would be very interested in doing
  such events w the PM in the future. Will you pls pass on to the Russians? Thx. HRC

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775289 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 9:19 PM
  To: 'Burnswj@state.gov'; 'wburns66
  Cc: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: Putin trip
  Bill--My husband cannot go w PM Putin in mid-April because of his schedule, but he would be very interested in doing
  such events w the PM in the future. Will you pls pass on to the Russians? Thx. HRC
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775289 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775290
MetadataSubject: NPR
MetadataTo: sullivanjj@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-28T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0123/DOC_0C05775290/C05775290.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: NPR
ExtractedTo: 'sullivanij@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 9:27 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775290
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  I've reviewed the memo from Bob and Derek and can agree w its comments but would like to know what Jim thinks.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775290 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2010 9:27 PM
  To: 'sullivanij@state.gov'
  Subject: NPR
  I've reviewed the memo from Bob and Derek and can agree w its comments but would like to know what Jim thinks.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775290 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775292
MetadataSubject: NPR
MetadataTo: sullivanjj@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0123/DOC_0C05775292/C05775292.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: NPR
ExtractedTo: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, March 29, 2010 8:31 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775292
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Ok. Thx.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775292 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 8:31 AM
  To: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: NPR
  Ok. Thx.
  Original Message
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Mon Mar 29 08:30:17 2010
  Subject: Re: NPR
  Jim concurs in the memo recommendations.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Sun Mar 28 21:26:42 2010
  Subject: NPR
  I've reviewed the memo from Bob and Derek and can agree w its comments but would like to know what Jim thinks.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775292 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775293
MetadataSubject: SCHEDULE
MetadataTo: ValmoroLJ@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0123/DOC_0C05775293/C05775293.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Schedule
ExtractedTo: 'ValmoroU@state.gov'; Huma Abedin
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, March 29, 2010 8:47 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775293
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  I have to meet w Baucus after the recess on trade issues
  April 28--I want to meet w the Belgian FM
  Did we ever get a date for Mort Zuckerman dinner for the Wiesels?
  I'd like to meet w:
  Phil Goldberg
  Jackie Novogartz
  I'd like to see Missy Kincaid when she and her family are here June 27-July 8.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775293 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 8:47 AM
  To: 'ValmoroU@state.gov'; Huma Abedin
  Cc:
  Subject: Schedule
  I have to meet w Baucus after the recess on trade issues
  April 28--I want to meet w the Belgian FM
  Did we ever get a date for Mort Zuckerman dinner for the Wiesels?
  I'd like to meet w:
  Phil Goldberg
  Jackie Novogartz
  I'd like to see Missy Kincaid when she and her family are here June 27-July 8.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775293 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775294
MetadataSubject: CALL LIST
MetadataTo: JilotyLC@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-29T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0123/DOC_0C05775294/C05775294.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Call list
ExtractedTo: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, March 29, 2010 8:48 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775294
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  PIs put the following on the list:
  Walter Pincus (move him up from 12/9/08) Derek Harvey (move him up) Mona Ackerman (move from 9/24/08)
  And take off the following:
  Belgian FM
  Height
  Turkish FM
  Lowey
  Cannon
  Rosen
  Goldberg
  McLarty (the 1/4 entry
  Frist
  Foxman
  Stern
  Rhodeen
  Osteen
  Straley
  Jacobs
  Magee

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775294 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 8:48 AM
  To: 'JilotyLC@state.gov'
  Subject: Call list
  PIs put the following on the list:
  Walter Pincus (move him up from 12/9/08) Derek Harvey (move him up) Mona Ackerman (move from 9/24/08)
  And take off the following:
  Belgian FM
  Height
  Turkish FM
  Lowey
  Cannon
  Rosen
  Goldberg
  McLarty (the 1/4 entry
  Frist
  Foxman
  Stern
  Rhodeen
  Osteen
  Straley
  Jacobs
  Magee
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775294 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775298
MetadataSubject: CANADA
MetadataTo: sullivanjj@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0123/DOC_0C05775298/C05775298.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Canada
ExtractedTo: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'; 'preines
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:00 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775298
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  A friend just emailed me telling me she was so sorry I had such a tough day in Canada. What's the news that suggests
  that back here?

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775298 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:00 PM
  To: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'; 'preines
  Subject: Canada
  A friend just emailed me telling me she was so sorry I had such a tough day in Canada. What's the news that suggests
  that back here?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775298 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775299
MetadataSubject: CANADA
MetadataTo: jake.sullivan
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-30T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0123/DOC_0C05775299/C05775299.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Canada
ExtractedTo: jake.sullivar 'preines
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Jake Sullivan
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:09 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775299
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Here's what she said:
  Sounds like a tuff day in Canada. Sorry you have such a incredibly hard job but we do appreciate all you do.
  Beats me.
  Original Messa•e

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775299 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:09 PM
  To: jake.sullivar 'preines
  Subject: Re: Canada
  Here's what she said:
  Sounds like a tuff day in Canada. Sorry you have such a incredibly hard job but we do appreciate all you do.
  Beats me.
  Original Messa•e
  From: jake.sulliva <jake.sullivan
  To: preines <preines H
  Sent: Tue Mar 30 19:06:25 2010
  Subject: Re: Canada
  I haven't seen anything real in our press.
  Original Message
  From: PIR
  To: Evergreen
  Cc: Jake Sullivan
  ReplyTo: preines
  Subject: Re: Canada
  Sent: Mar 30, 2010 7:01 PM
  Just the stuff from yesterday. Maybe one of the cable nets or talking heads made a to do about it.
  But I'm surprised because it didn't seem anyone here cared, was all Canada
  Original Message
  From: Evergreen
  To: Jake Sullivan
  To: PIR
  Subject: Canada
  Sent: Mar 30, 2010 6:59 PM
  A friend just emailed me telling me she was so sorry I had such a tough day in Canada. What's the news that suggests
  that back here?
  Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with SprintSpeed
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775299 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775300
MetadataSubject: SEN. KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON
MetadataTo: abedinh@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0123/DOC_0C05775300/C05775300.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison
ExtractedTo: 'abedinh@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Verma, Richard R
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 10:20 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775300
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775300 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 10:20 AM
  To: 'abedinh@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Wed Mar 31 10:09:09 2010
  Subject: Fw: Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison
  Fyi
  From: Rodriguez, Miguel E
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Cc: Verma, Richard R
  Sent: Wed Mar 31 09:55:03 2010
  Subject: Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison
  Not much of a surprise. Later this morning KBH will announce that she will NOT resign her Senate seat.
  You'll recall that she had had promised during her gubernatorial campaign that, win or lose, she'd give up her seat.
  Miguel E. Rodriguez
  Deputy Assistant Secretary for Senate Affairs
  Bureau of Legislative Affairs
  U.S. Department of State
  (202) 647-2645
  rodriguezme@state.gov
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775300 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775301
MetadataSubject: SEN. KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON
MetadataTo: abedinh@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0123/DOC_0C05775301/C05775301.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison
ExtractedTo: 'abedinh@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemailcom>
ExtractedCc: Verma, Richard R
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 10:44 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775301
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: No.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775301 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemailcom>
  Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 10:44 AM
  To: 'abedinh@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison
  No.
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Wed Mar 31 10:23:59 2010
  Subject: Re: Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Wed Mar 31 10:20:18 2010
  Subject: Re: Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Wed Mar 31 10:09:09 2010
  Subject: Fw: Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison
  Fyi
  From: Rodriguez, Miguel E
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Cc: Verma, Richard R
  Sent: Wed Mar 31 09:55:03 2010
  Subject: Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison
  Not much of a surprise. Later this morning KBH will announce that she will NOT resign her Senate seat.
  You'll recall that she had had promised during her gubernatorial campaign that, win or lose, she'd give up her seat.
  Miguel E. Rodriguez
  Deputy Assistant Secretary for Senate Affairs
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775301 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775301 Date: 08/31/2015
  Bureau of Legislative Affairs
  U.S. Department of State
  (202) 647-2645
  rodriguezme@state.gov
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775301 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775302
MetadataSubject: TROIKA ON SUDAN
MetadataTo: sullivanjj@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0123/DOC_0C05775302/C05775302.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Troika on Sudan
ExtractedTo: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrodl7@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 10:50 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775302
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Ok. Did you see the latest FT article?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775302 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrodl7@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 10:50 AM
  To: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Troika on Sudan
  Ok. Did you see the latest FT article?
  Original Message
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Wed Mar 31 10:49:10 2010
  Subject: Troika on Sudan
  Team would like to release following statement. Okay by you?
  MEDIA NOTE
  Joint Statement on the Upcoming Sudan National Elections
  Following is the text of a joint statement by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas
  Store, and United Kingdom Foreign Secretary David Miliband on the upcoming national elections in Sudan.
  Begin Text:
  National elections in Sudan this month will represent a major milestone in the Comprehensive Peace Agreement that
  ended Sudan's twenty-two year civil war, and are an important opportunity for the people of Sudan to participate in the
  political process.
  We urge all parties in Sudan to work urgently to ensure that elections can proceed peacefully and credibly in April. We
  are deeply concerned by reports of continued administrative and logistical challenges, as well as restrictions on political
  freedoms. We call on the Government of Sudan, the National Elections Commission, and all political parties to engage in
  further dialogue to resolve practical obstacles, procedural impediments, and address allegations of intimidation,
  harassment, and safety concerns, and other legitimate concerns raised by various political parties. We continue to urge
  the parties to improve conditions on the ground in Darfur and create a secure environment conducive to Darfuri
  participation.
  Irrespective of the outcome of elections, it is essential that work continues and is accelerated to meet remaining CPA
  deadlines. Progress is needed urgently to complete border demarcation, to establish the commissions that will
  supervise the referenda for the South and Abyei, to conduct popular consultations in Blue Nile and Southern Kordofan,
  and to negotiate sustainable post-CPA arrangements in areas such as wealth-sharing, citizenship and assets, and
  liabilities.
  We reiterate our commitment to ensure that the referenda must happen on schedule and that their outcomes need to
  be respected. It is time to redouble efforts to achieve these ends. We urge all parties in Sudan and all regional and
  international partners to work together to achieve the peaceful future that the people of Sudan deserve.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775302 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775303
MetadataSubject: SEN.KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON
MetadataTo: abedinh@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0123/DOC_0C05775303/C05775303.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison
ExtractedTo: 'abedinh@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
ExtractedCc: Verma, Richard R
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 10:52 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775303
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775303 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
  Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 10:52 AM
  To: 'abedinh@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Wed Mar 31 10:23:59 2010
  Subject: Re: Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Wed Mar 31 10:20:18 2010
  Subject: Re: Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Wed Mar 31 10:09:09 2010
  Subject: Fw: Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison
  Fyi
  From: Rodriguez, Miguel E
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Cc: Verma, Richard R
  Sent: Wed Mar 3109:55:03 2010
  Subject: Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison
  Not much of a surprise. Later this morning KBH will announce that she will NOT resign her Senate seat.
  You'll recall that she had had promised during her gubernatorial campaign that, win or lose, she'd give up her seat.
  Miguel E. Rodriguez
  Deputy Assistant Secretary for Senate Affairs
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775303 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775303 Date: 08/31/2015
  Bureau of Legislative Affairs
  U.S. Department of State
  (202) 647-2645
  rodriguezme@state.gov
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775303 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775305
MetadataSubject: FT RE NSC
MetadataTo: cheryl.mills
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0123/DOC_0C05775305/C05775305.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: FT re NSC
ExtractedTo: 'cheryl.mills millscd@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 11:47 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775305
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775305 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 11:47 AM
  To: 'cheryl.mills millscd@state.gov'
  Subject: Fw: FT re NSC
  Original Message
  From: PIR
  To: Evergreen
  Subject: FT re NSC
  Sent: Mar 31, 2010 11:02 AM
  Sorry - the middle part most relevant to you was omitted from what I sent - here's the full article:
  US Foreign Policy: Waiting on a Sun King By Edward Luce and Daniel Dombey Financial Times
  Published: March 30 2010
  For better or for worse, Washington has grown used to the fact that Barack Obama runs the most centralised — or
  "White House-centric" — administration since Richard Nixon. When Nixon wanted foreign policy advice, everyone knew
  where he got it from: Henry Kissinger, variously his national security adviser and secretary of state.
  In contrast, Mr Obama has no big foreign policy strategist. Even insiders give different answers when asked to whom he
  turns for advice on the big international questions. But almost all agree with the following observation. "The truth is that
  President Obama is his own Henry Kissinger — no one else plays that role," says a senior official. "Every administration
  reflects the personality of the president. This president wants all the trains routed through the Oval Office."
  Fifteen months after he took office, the character and structure of Mr Obama's foreign policy machinery is still evolving.
  But from interviews with dozens of insiders and outsiders, including senior officials both authorised and unauthorised to
  speak, and three former national security advisers, it is clear the buck not only stops with, but often floats for quite a
  long time around, Mr Obama himself.
  Foreigners have complained about the tendency of his domestic agenda to crowd out the international one — the
  passage last week of healthcare reform was greeted with an audible sigh of relief among US allies. But within foreign
  policy itself, his centralised structure can also result in many issues being left on the back burner awaiting presidential
  attention, say critics.
  "On the positive side, we have a very conscientious president who takes advice widely," says the official. "On the debit
  side, for all the president's intelligence, Barack Obama came to office with very little experience. He just doesn't have
  much depth on some issues."
  The core of Mr Obama's foreign policy machinery is in the White House-based National Security Council, which advises
  the president and co-ordinates activities across an increasingly complex alphabet soup of Washington departments,
  military commands and intelligence agencies. The most widely questioned link in the chain is Jim Jones, whom, to many
  people's surprise, Mr Obama brought in as his national security adviser.
  Only briefly acquainted with Mr Obama beforehand, General Jones, a retired four-star marine corps general, shows little
  interest in running the "inter-agency" process — a key part of the job. Somewhat unconventionally, Gen Jones travels
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775305 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775305 Date: 08/31/2015
  frequently and is thus often out of town. Unusually, it is Mr Obama himself who usually chairs the weekly National
  Security Council, known as the "principals meeting", not Gen Jones.
  Rahm Emanuel, Mr Obama's chief of staff, is also a key part of it. "If you were to ask me who the real national security
  adviser is, I would say there were three or four, of whom Rahm is one and of which Gen Jones is probably the least
  important," says another official.
  Anyone who has dealt with Gen Jones speaks highly of his matter-of-factness, his geniality and the respect many foreign
  governments have for him — Pakistan and Israel among them. But as he himself admitted rather disarmingly last year, he
  does not have a taste for bureaucracy. Speaking at the Atlantic Council, a think-tank where he previously worked, Gen
  Jones provoked laughter when he said: "I fondly remember [the Atlantic Council] as a place where people actually did
  what you asked them to do. In my new role I'm finding out that an order is a basis for negotiation."
  STATE AND DEFENCE DEPARTMENTS
  An 'alliance of the unsackables' finds it can confront the inner circle
  If there is a caveat to the depiction of the Obama administration as White House-centric, it is in the alliance between
  Hillary Clinton and Robert Gates, the president's secretaries of state and defence.
  Mrs Clinton has proved one of the surprises of Barack Obama's tenure, forging a strong working relationship with her
  former rival and establishing herself as his chief foreign policy spokesperson internationally — if not at home, where Mr
  Obama's inner circle often seems to monopolise the explaining.
  Mr Gates, who recently decided to stay for at least another year, is seen as unsackable, not least for the credibility he
  lends on issues ranging from missile defence to Guantanamo Bay and Afghanistan. As a holdover from the Bush
  administration, his national security bona fides are hard to dispute. It is no coincidence that Mrs Clinton is probably the
  only other unsackable cabinet member.
  The combination has made itself felt in some of the administration's most significant debates, notably on Afghanistan,
  where both successfully urged the deployment of more troops."
  Gates and Clinton happen to like each other, which no one really predicted," says one official, who notes that while the
  traditional role of the NSC is to "play referee" between the state and defence departments, it is as often nowadays a
  combination of the two against the White House. This is very different from how it worked when Donald Rumsfeld and
  Colin Powell held those positions."We work together well," Mr Gates said at an appearance with Mrs Clinton on CNN
  last year. "I think it starts with, frankly, based on my experience, the secretary of defence being willing to acknowledge
  that the secretary of state is the principal spokesperson for United States foreign policy."
  Their outlooks often overlap. From the Pentagon, Mr Gates has long called for more US spending on diplomacy. As chief
  diplomat, Mrs Clinton has adopted a muscular approach. On Iran, both favour tough sanctions; on Russia, both have
  sought to reassure Moscow's neighbours even while improving relations with the Kremlin.
  But for all their workmanlike co-operation, there is no escaping the fact that Mrs Clinton is not part of the Obama inner
  circle — a traditionally helpful feature in that job. There is also a constant "residue of friction" between Mr Obama's and
  Mrs Clinton's teams, according to insiders. For example, Cheryl Mills, Mrs Clinton's chief of staff, has had several run-ins
  with others in the administration.
  One official describes Mrs Clinton as "totally loyal" to Mr Obama. He adds: "She and the president are not the best of
  friends — how could they be? But she totally respects the presidency — she was married to a president and she wanted to
  be one... She still might be."
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775305 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775305 Date: 08/31/2015
  The lack of a strong national security adviser has created recurring difficulties. Perhaps the best example is the Arab-
  Israeli peace process, which Mr Obama launched on his second day in office when he appointed George Mitchell as his
  envoy. Three months later, Mr Obama insisted Benjamin Netanyahu freeze all settlements activity in order to boost Arab
  confidence in the talks.
  In a heated showdown in the Oval Office last May, in which Mr Netanyahu refused to accede to Mr Obama's demand,
  the only officials present were Mr Emanuel and David Axelrod, senior adviser to Mr Obama in office and during the
  campaign. Gen Jones was not there. The fallout put the talks in abeyance and damped high Arab hopes for Mr Obama.
  "The question is, which bright spark advised the president to demand a settlements freeze without working out what
  the next step should be when Netanyahu inevitably said 'No'?" says Leslie Gelb, an official in the Carter administration
  and former head of the Council on Foreign Relations. "Why wasn't George Mitchell in the room? Where was Jones?"Mr
  Obama's character is also stamped on the inter-agency process, set up and managed by Tom Donilon, deputy national
  security adviser. The nitty-gritty of foreign policy-making is done at these frequent "deputies' meetings", which can
  sometimes consume four to six hours a day.
  Described by one insider as "the most powerful man in the White House whose name isn't widely known", Mr Donilon,
  who was an official in the Clinton administration, is the man who keeps Mr Obama's trains running on time. And there
  are a lot of trains. Last year, Mr Donilon held 270 deputies meetings — a workload described as "clinically insane" by a
  former senior diplomat under Bill Clinton.
  But as time goes on, it is becoming streamlined — now taking up roughly two to three hours a day, say officials. "People
  forget that we inherited two wars, terrorism threats, and perhaps the biggest single eight-year decline [George
  W. Bush's two terms] in America's power and reputation in our history," says a senior official. "It took time to put in
  place a process that could deal with the very complex decisions we had to take."
  Also the organiser of Mr Obama's 9.30am national security briefing, Mr Donilon reinstated the paper trails needed to
  prevent intra-governmental anarchy, using the model de-vised by Brent Scowcroft, national se-curity adviser to George
  Bush senior and Gerald Ford. Vice-president Joe Biden's team was also incorporated to prevent the kind of "parallel
  process" Dick Cheney used to circumvent the bureaucracy under George W. Bush.
  "If you look for the 2002 or 2003 meeting where the decision to go to war in Iraq was taken, you cannot find it," says the
  senior official. "By getting the process right, we are improving the quality of decisions."
  The deputies' ties go back years. For example, the families of Mr Donilon and Jim Steinberg, deputy secretary of state,
  often go on holiday together. Mr Donilon's wife, Cathy Russell, is chief of staff to Jill Biden, the vice-president's wife. Mr
  Steinberg's wife, Sherburne Abbott, is deputy to John Holdren, Mr Obama's chief scientific adviser.
  All those who regularly attend, including Michele Flournoy, a senior Pentagon official, and Susan Rice, the US
  ambassador to the United Nations, have known each other since at least 1993, when they started off in the Clinton
  administration. This is just as well, since they spend half their lives together:
  "A lot of work gets done in that group," says Ms Flournoy. "Sometimes it feels like shovelling coal to keep the fires
  going."
  The refurbished machinery was perhaps most in evidence during the build-up to Mr Obama's decision in December to
  send another 30,000 US troops to Afghanistan — a journey that took four months and involved him in 40 hours of Oval
  Office meetings.
  But the very diligence of the process crowded out Mr Obama's time to focus on other crises — of which there are many.
  "Time is the most precious commodity a president has," says a for-mer national security ad-viser.
  "On average he is only going to have 45 minutes a day for foreign policy, so you want to make sure it is well spent."
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775305 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775305 Date: 08/31/2015
  The widely expected departure of Gen Jones before the end of the year has also created rivalries within the engine
  room. Those who are thought to have ambitions to replace him include Mr Steinberg, Ms Rice, Mr Donilon and Denis
  McDonough, NSC chief of staff and the foreign policy official who is personally closest to Mr Obama. Although all are
  widely respected, none is considered a big strategic thinker in the Kissinger or Scowcroft mould.
  Described by Mr Gelb as Mr Obama's "Lord High Executioner", Mr McDonough "has appended himself to the Chicago
  crowd", says another official. Mr McDonough's widely feared role highlights some of the contradictions of Mr Obama's
  foreign policy apparatus.
  Once an adviser to former Senate majority leader Tom Daschle, Mr McDonough was frequently at Mr Obama's side
  during the campaign. Insiders describe him as the "en-forcer" and as the keeper of "message discipline", a key element
  of any campaign but something that can drastically slow the wheels of government.
  "McDonough is the guy from the campaign and the one who plays basketball with the president — they're very close,"
  says an official. "Instead of Jim Jones telling McDonough what the president thinks, it is the other way round."
  Indeed, if Mr Obama's highly centralised foreign policy machine had a face, it would be Mr McDonough's. "Donilon has
  been perceived to make the process inclusive and give everyone a seat at the table," says David Rothkopf, a former
  Clinton official and scholar on the NSC. "Fairly or not, McDonough has been perceived as representing a process that
  was taking place in another room, among the inner circle, at a table to which most weren't invited."Mr Obama has built
  a machine in which all roads lead to and from him. On the minus side, that means a lot of lower-level meetings without
  decisions. It also means neglecting issues that cannot be squeezed into his diary, such as trade policy, which continues to
  drift; or relations with India, which are unnecessarily tense.
  And it means that the fingerprints of Mr Obama's political inner circle are detected by the rumour mill even when they
  are absent, such as on the president's decision to begin the troop withdrawal from Afghanistan in July 2011 — a
  recommendation that came from Robert Gates, secretary of defence.
  On the plus side, Mr Obama has a sharp learning curve, which means his administration continues to evolve. On the plus
  side also, if it has to be White House-centric, it is perhaps better with him as the Sun King than, say, Nixon or George W.
  Bush."At the end of each meeting, the president summarises what everyone has said and the arguments each has made
  with a real lawyer's clarity," says a participant to the NSC principals meeting, which includes Mr Gates and Mrs Clinton.
  "When the president finally makes a decision, it is with the full facts and usually shows a high calibre of judgment."
  When Mr Obama makes a decision, that is.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775305 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775307
MetadataSubject: H: IN CASE YOU HAVEN'T SEEN THIS IN TODAY'S FT. SID
MetadataTo: sbwhoeop
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0123/DOC_0C05775307/C05775307.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775307
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Wednesday, March 31, 2010 4:36 PM
  'sbwhoeop
  Re: H: In case you haven't seen this in today's FT. Sid
  Saw it. What do you make of it?

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775307 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Wednesday, March 31, 2010 4:36 PM
  'sbwhoeop
  Re: H: In case you haven't seen this in today's FT. Sid
  Saw it. What do you make of it?
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop <sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Wed Mar 31 16:28:04 2010
  Subject: H: In case you haven't seen this in today's FT. Sid
  http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/df53a396-3c2a-11df-b40c-00144feabdc0.html
  * Skip to main content, accesskey 's' <http://www.ft.com/cms/s/c1f53a396-3c2a-11df-b40c-
  00144feabdc0,dwp_uuid=03d100e8-2fff-11da-ba9f-00000e2511c8,print=yes.htmIttaccess-content>
  * Homepage, accesskey '1' <http://www.ft.com>
  Financial Times FT.com
  FT.com logo <http://media.ft.com/FTCOM/Images/ftlogo2.gif>
  <http://media.ft.com/t.gif> COMMENT
  <http://media.ft.com/t.gif> Analysis
  * Close <http://www.ft.com/cms/s/df53a396-3c2a-11df-b40c-00144feabdc0,dwo_uuid=03d100e8-2fff-11da-ba9f-
  00000e2511c8,print=yes.html#>
  <http://www.ft.com/cms/s/df53a396-3c2a-11df-b40c-00144feabdc0,dwp_uuid=03d100e8-2fff-11da-ba9f-
  00000e2511c8,print=yes.htmitt>
  US foreign policy: Waiting on a sun king
  By Edward Luce and Daniel Dombey
  Published: March 30 2010 22:22 Last updated: March 30 2010 22:22 barack obama on the great wall of china
  <http://media.ft.com/cms/37d96f42-3c0c-11df-9412-00144feabdc0.jpg>
  Barack Obama at the Great Wall of China last year. Unlike his predecessor Richard Nixon, who turned to Henry Kissinger
  for advice, the US president has no big foreign policy strategist
  For better or for worse, Washington has grown used to the fact that Barack Obama
  <http://www.ft.com/indepth/obama-presidency> runs the most centralised — or "White House-centric" —
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775307 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775307 Date: 08/31/2015
  administration since Richard Nixon. When Nixon wanted foreign policy advice, everyone knew where he got it from:
  Henry Kissinger, variously his national security adviser and secretary of state.
  In contrast, Mr Obama has no big foreign policy strategist. Even insiders give different answers when asked to whom he
  turns for advice on the big international questions. But almost all agree with the following observation. "The truth is that
  President Obama is his own Henry Kissinger — no one else plays that role," says a senior official. "Every administration
  reflects the personality of the president. This president wants all the trains routed through the Oval Office."
  Fifteen months after he took office, the character and structure of Mr Obama's foreign policy machinery is still evolving.
  But from interviews with dozens of insiders and outsiders, including senior officials both authorised and unauthorised to
  speak, and three former national security advisers, it is clear the buck not only stops with, but often floats for quite a
  long time around, Mr Obama himself.
  Foreigners have complained about the tendency of his domestic agenda to crowd out the international one — the
  passage last week of healthcare reform <http://www.ft.com/indepth/us-healthcare-reform> was greeted with an
  audible sigh of relief among US allies. But within foreign policy itself, his centralised structure can also result in many
  issues being left on the back burner awaiting presidential attention, say critics.
  "On the positive side, we have a very conscientious president who takes advice widely," says the official. "On the debit
  side, for all the president's intelligence, Barack Obama came to office with very little experience. He just doesn't have
  much depth on some issues."
  The core of Mr Obama's foreign policy machinery is in the White House-based National Security Council, which advises
  the president and co-ordinates activities across an increasingly complex alphabet soup of Washington departments,
  military commands and intelligence agencies. The most widely questioned link in the chain is Jim Jones
  <http://www.ft.com/cms/s/Oc0c8c5a-c002-11dd-9222-0000779fdl8c.html> , whom, to many people's surprise, Mr
  Obama brought in as his national security adviser.
  Only briefly acquainted with Mr Obama beforehand, General Jones, a retired four-star marine corps general, shows little
  interest in running the "inter-agency" process— a key part of the job. Somewhat unconventionally, Gen Jones travels
  frequently and is thus often out of town. Unusually, it is Mr Obama himself who usually chairs the weekly National
  Security Council, known as the "principals meeting", not Gen Jones.
  Rahm Emanuel, Mr Obama's chief of staff, is also a key part of it. "If you were to ask me who the real national security
  adviser is, I would say there were three or four, of whom Rahm is one and of which Gen Jones is probably the least
  important," says another official.
  Anyone who has dealt with Gen Jones speaks highly of his matter-of-factness, his geniality and the respect many foreign
  governments have for him — Pakistan and Israel among them. But as he himself admitted rather disarmingly last year, he
  does not have a taste for bureaucracy. Speaking at the Atlantic Council, a think-tank where he previously worked, Gen
  Jones provoked laughter when he said: "I fondly remember [the Atlantic Council] as a place where people actually did
  what you asked them to do. In my new role I'm finding out that an order is a basis for negotiation."
  The lack of a strong national security adviser has created recurring difficulties. Perhaps the best example is the Arab-
  Israeli peace process, which Mr Obama launched on his second day in office when he appointed George Mitchell
  <http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b904d928-29ef-ildf-b940-00144feabdc0.htrni> as his envoy. Three months later, Mr
  Obama insisted Benjamin Netanyahu freeze all settlements activity in order to boost Arab confidence in the talks.
  In a heated showdown in the Oval Office <http://www.ft.com/cms/s/1.59f9c90-43e1-11de-a9be-00144feabdc0.html>
  last May, in which Mr Netanyahu refused to accede to Mr Obama's demand, the only officials present were Mr Emanuel
  and David Axelrod, senior adviser to Mr Obama in office and during the campaign. Gen Jones was not there. The fallout
  put the talks in abeyance and damped high Arab hopes for Mr Obama.
  "The question is, which bright spark advised the president to demand a settlements freeze without working out what
  the next step should be when Netanyahu inevitably said 'No'?" says Leslie Gelb, an official in the Carter administration
  and former head of the Council on Foreign Relations. "Why wasn't George Mitchell in the room? Where was Jones?"
  Mr Obama's character is also stamped on the inter-agency process, set up and managed by Tom Donilon, deputy
  national security adviser. The nitty-gritty of foreign policy-making is done at these frequent "deputies' meetings", which
  can sometimes consume four to six hours a day.
  Described by one insider as "the most powerful man in the White House whose name isn't widely known", Mr Donilon,
  who was an official in the Clinton administration, is the man who keeps Mr Obama's trains running on time. And there
  are a lot of trains. Last year, Mr Donilon held 270 deputies meetings — a workload described as "clinically insane" by a
  former senior diplomat under Bill Clinton.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775307 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775307 Date: 08/31/2015
  But as time goes on, it is becoming streamlined — now taking up roughly two to three hours a day, say officials. "People
  forget that we inherited two wars, terrorism threats, and perhaps the biggest single eight-year decline [George
  W. Bush's two terms] in America's power and reputation in our history," says a senior official. "It took time to put in
  place a process that could deal with the very complex decisions we had to take."
  Also the organiser of Mr Obama's 9.30am national security briefing, Mr Donilon reinstated the paper trails needed to
  prevent intra-governmental anarchy, using the model de-vised by Brent Scowcroft, national se-curity adviser to George
  Bush senior and Gerald Ford. Vice-president Joe Biden's team was also incorporated to prevent the kind of "parallel
  process" Dick Cheney used to circumvent the bureaucracy under George W. Bush.
  "If you look for the 2002 or 2003 meeting where the decision to go to war in Iraq was taken, you cannot find it," says the
  senior official. "By getting the process right, we are improving the quality of decisions."
  The deputies' ties go back years. For example, the families of Mr Donilon and Jim Steinberg, deputy secretary of state,
  often go on holiday together. Mr Donilon's wife, Cathy Russell, is chief of staff to Jill Biden, the vice-president's wife. Mr
  Steinberg's wife, Sherburne Abbott, is deputy to John Holdren, Mr Obama's chief scientific adviser.
  All those who regularly attend, including Michele Flournoy, a senior Pentagon official, and Susan Rice, the US
  ambassador to the United Nations, have known each other since at least 1993, when they started off in the Clinton
  administration. This is just as well, since they spend half their lives together: "A lot of work gets done in that group," says
  Ms Flournoy. "Sometimes it feels like shovelling coal to keep the fires going."
  The refurbished machinery was perhaps most in evidence during the build-up to Mr Obama's decision in December to
  send another 30,000 US troops to Afghanistan — a journey that took four months and involved him in 40 hours of Oval
  Office meetings.
  But the very diligence of the process crowded out Mr Obama's time to focus on other crises — of which there are many.
  "Time is the most precious commodity a president has," says a for-mer national security ad-viser. "On average he is only
  going to have 45 minutes a day for foreign policy, so you want to make sure it is well spent."
  The widely expected departure of Gen Jones before the end of the year has also created rivalries within the engine
  room. Those who are thought to have ambitions to replace him include Mr Steinberg, Ms Rice, Mr Donilon and Denis
  McDonough, NSC chief of staff and the foreign policy official who is personally closest to Mr Obama. Although all are
  widely respected, none is considered a big strategic thinker in the Kissinger or Scowcroft mould.
  Described by Mr Gelb as Mr Obama's "Lord High Executioner", Mr McDonough "has appended himself to the Chicago
  crowd", says another official. Mr McDonough's widely feared role highlights some of the contradictions of Mr Obama's
  foreign policy apparatus.
  Once an adviser to former Senate majority leader Torn Daschle, Mr McDonough was frequently at Mr Obama's side
  during the campaign. Insiders describe him as the "en-forcer" and as the keeper of "message discipline", a key element
  of any campaign but something that can drastically slow the wheels of government.
  "McDonough is the guy from the campaign and the one who plays basketball with the president — they're very close,"
  says an official. "Instead of Jim Jones telling McDonough what the president thinks, it is the other way round."
  Indeed, if Mr Obama's highly centralised foreign policy machine had a face, it would be Mr McDonough's. "Donilon has
  been perceived to make the process inclusive and give everyone a seat at the table," says David Rothkopf, a former
  Clinton official and scholar on the NSC. "Fairly or not, McDonough has been perceived as representing a process that
  was taking place in another room, among the inner circle, at a table to which most weren't invited."
  Mr Obama has built a machine in which all roads lead to and from him. On the minus side, that means a lot of lower-
  level meetings without decisions. It also means neglecting issues that cannot be squeezed into his diary, such as trade
  policy, which continues to drift; or relations with India, which are unnecessarily tense.
  And it means that the fingerprints of Mr Obama's political inner circle are detected by the rumour mill even when they
  are absent, such as on the president's decision to begin the troop withdrawal from Afghanistan
  <http://www.ft.com/cms/s/c4efd1d6-df74-11de-98ca-00144feab49a.html> in July 2011 — a recommendation that came
  from Robert Gates, secretary of defence.
  On the plus side, Mr Obama has a sharp learning curve, which means his administration continues to evolve. On the plus
  side also, if it has to be White House-centric, it is perhaps better with him as the Sun King than, say, Nixon or George W.
  Bush.
  "At the end of each meeting, the president summarises what everyone has said and the arguments each has made with
  a real lawyer's clarity," says a participant to the NSC principals meeting, which includes Mr Gates and Mrs Clinton.
  "When the president finally makes a decision, it is with the full facts and usually shows a high calibre of judgment."
  When Mr Obama makes a decision, that is.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775307 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775307 Date: 08/31/2015
  STATE AND DEFENCE DEPARTMENTS
  An 'alliance of the unsackables' finds it can confront the inner circle
  If there is a caveat to the depiction of the Obama administration as White House-centric, it is in the alliance
  between Hillary Clinton and Robert Gates, the president's secretaries of state and defence.
  Mrs Clinton has proved one of the surprises of Barack Obama's tenure, forging a strong working relationship with
  her former rival and establishing herself as his chief foreign policy spokesperson internationally — if not at home, where
  Mr Obama's inner circle often seems to monopolise the explaining.
  Mr Gates, who recently decided to stay for at least another year, is seen as unsackable, not least for the credibility
  he lends on issues ranging from missile defence to Guantanamo Bay and Afghanistan. As a holdover from the Bush
  administration, his national security bona fides are hard to dispute. It is no coincidence that Mrs Clinton is probably the
  only other unsackable cabinet member.
  The combination has made itself felt in some of the administration's most significant debates, notably on
  Afghanistan, where both successfully urged the deployment of more troops.
  "Gates and Clinton happen to like each other, which no one really predicted," says one official, who notes that while
  the traditional role of the NSC is to "play referee" between the state and defence departments, it is as often nowadays a
  combination of the two against the White House. This is very different from how it worked when Donald Rumsfeld and
  Colin Powell held those positions.
  "We work together well," Mr Gates said at an appearance with Mrs Clinton on CNN last year. "I think it starts with,
  frankly, based on my experience, the secretary of defence being willing to acknowledge that the secretary of state is the
  principal spokesperson for United States foreign policy."
  Their outlooks often overlap. From the Pentagon, Mr Gates has long called for more US spending on diplomacy. As
  chief diplomat, Mrs Clinton has adopted a muscular approach. On !ran, both favour tough sanctions; on Russia, both
  have sought to reassure Moscow's neighbours even while improving relations with the Kremlin.
  But for all their workmanlike co-operation. there is no escaping the fact that Mrs Clinton is not part of the Obama
  inner circle — a traditionally helpful feature in that job. There is also a constant "residue of friction" between Mr
  Obama's and Mrs Clinton's teams, according to insiders. For example, Cheryl Mills, Mrs Clinton's chief of staff, has had
  several run-ins with others in the administration.
  One official describes Mrs Clinton as "totally loyal" to Mr Obama. He adds: "She and the president are not the best
  of friends — how could they be? But she totally respects the presidency— she was married to a president and she wanted
  to be one ... She still might be."
  Copyright <http://www.ft.com/servicestools/help/copyright> The Financial Times Limited 2010. Print a single copy of
  this article for personal use. Contact us <http://ftcorporate.ft.com/contact-us.html> if you wish to print more to
  distribute to others.
  <http://track.ft.com/track/track.js?javascript=disabled> <http://stats.ft.com/si/track.gif?WT.js=No>
  "FT" and "Financial Times" are trademarks of the Financial Times. Privacy policy
  <http://www.ft.com/servicestools/help/privacy> I Terms <http://www.ft.com/servicestools/help/terms>
  © Copyright The Financial Times <http://www.ft.com/servicestools/help/copyright> Ltd 2010.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775307 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775308
MetadataSubject: KUDOS!
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-03-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0123/DOC_0C05775308/C05775308.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: KUDOS!
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov'; 'cheryl.mills
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 7:29 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775308
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  You did a fabulous job and everybody knew this would not have succeeded w/out your leadership. Onward.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775308 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 7:29 PM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov'; 'cheryl.mills
  Subject: KUDOS!
  You did a fabulous job and everybody knew this would not have succeeded w/out your leadership. Onward.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775308 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775309
MetadataSubject: PREVAL REJECTS US ADVICE ON PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION AND RESPOND TO LUGAR'S REPORT
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-01T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05775309/C05775309.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Preval rejects US Advice on Presidential election and respond to Lugar's report
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov.
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, July 1, 2010 5:56 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775309
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  1.4(D)
  B1

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775309 Date: 08/31/2015
  Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 08/27/2015 — Class:
  CONFIDENTIAL — Reason: 1.4(D) — Declassify on: 07/01/2025
  RELEASE IN PART
  B1,1.4(D),B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Thursday, July 1, 2010 5:56 AM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov.
  Subject: Re: Preval rejects US Advice on Presidential election and respond to Lugar's report
  1.4(D)
  B1
  Original Message
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Thu Jul 01 05:44:51 2010
  Subject: Fw: Preval rejects US Advice on Presidential election and respond to Lugar's report
  From: Guy Noel B6
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Wed Jun 30 22:44:31 2010
  Subject: Preval rejects US Advice on Presidential election and respond to Lugar's report
  A PALI PAPA..PONYET PREVAL GONFLE
  Preval rejects US advice on presidential election
  By JONATHAN M. KATZ (AP) — 2 hours ago
  PORT-AU-PRINCE, Haiti — Haiti's president on Wednesday rejected U.S. Senate recommendations on holding an election
  for his successor, brushing off criticism that the current process will leave the shattered country without a credible
  leader.
  A report issued this month by Sen. Richard Lugar, the ranking Republican on the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations
  Committee, "strongly encourages" Haiti to let its international partners help restructure the eight-member Provisional
  Electoral Council, which has been accused of corruption.
  The report also recommends ensuring the participation of the key opposition party of ousted former President Jean-
  Bertrand Aristide, which was blocked from participating in 2009 legislative contests because of a dispute over rival
  candidate lists.
  On Tuesday, President Rene Preval fulfilled one recommendation of the report by issuing a signed decree setting
  election day for Nov. 28.
  But speaking at a news conference in an open-air gazebo alongside the broken remains of the national palace a day
  later, Preval told reporters he had no intention of complying with the rest, including changing the election body, known
  as the CEP.
  "I'm not doing the CEP with international partners. I'm doing the CEP with national partners," Preval said. "The senator's
  proposition is inadmissible."
  Seeking to show the council was not "hand-picked," as he said in English, Preval handed out copies of nomination letters
  for the panel's members submitted by various national and religious organizations, including the National Council of
  Political Parties, Roman Catholic Church and National Confederation of Haitian Vodou.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775309 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775309 Date: 08/31/2015
  He also defended the prohibition on the exiled Aristide's Fanmi Lavalas party in last year's elections, a ban that came
  after rival factions of the party submitted competing lists of candidates.
  "International donors need to look for an accord with the CEP and the political parties and the factions of Fanmi
  Lavalas," Preval said. "We are giving (the parties) the support that they need, and the factions need to figure it out (for
  themselves)."
  Preval did not discuss the forced resignation of an electoral council member accused of stealing a staffer's pay or
  opponents' allegations that the council gave special privileges to the president's newly formed Unity Party ahead of
  planned Feb. 28 legislative elections, which were postponed because of the Jan. 12 earthquake that devastated the
  capital.
  He also declined to answer questions about another U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee report that criticizes
  Haiti's earthquake recovery, saying he would address that issue at a news conference on reconstruction next week.
  Elections have never been easy in Haiti, a country whose founding president crowned himself emperor. It took 186 years
  to hold what the international community considered a democratic election in 1990, which was then closely followed by
  a coup d'etat.
  Preval, in fact, is the only Haitian ever to be elected president, serve a full term and hand off power to an elected
  successor. Unable to run for re-election in the November contest, he pledged to relinquish power again as he did in the
  1990s — after protesters alleged earlier this year that he was dragging his feet on holding presidential the election.
  Doing so will require significant help. The electoral council's headquarters were destroyed and its records lost in the
  quake, while millions of voters were either killed, made homeless or displaced. Its new headquarters is a former Gold's
  Gym seized by drug agents.
  The election will also be a cost burden for this grindingly poor Caribbean nation: $29 million according to electoral
  officials at the news conference with Preval, $38 million according to the U.S. Senate report.
  The Organization of American States and United Nations have pledged support. U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon
  issued a statement Wednesday praising the decree setting the election date and pledged the help of U.N. peacekeepers
  and advisers in preparing and supporting the ballot. Ban urged member states to quickly provide the money needed to
  run the vote.
  Copyright © 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775309 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775313
MetadataSubject: FYI
MetadataTo: millscd@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-01T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05775313/C05775313.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: fyi
ExtractedTo: 'millscd@state.gov.; 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: cheryl.mills <cheryl.mills
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, July 1, 2010 11:09 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775313
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Let's discuss.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775313 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Thursday, July 1, 2010 11:09 AM
  To: 'millscd@state.gov.; 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: Fw: fyi
  Let's discuss.
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  <sbwhoeop
  Cc: cheryl.mills <cheryl.mills
  Sent: Thu Jul 01 11:06:04 2010
  Subject: fyi
  <http://coteret.com/author/didiremez/>
  Maariv: Netanyahu won't meet Clinton; 'sources' say she "isn't relevant" <http://coteret.com/2010/07/01/maariv-
  netanyahu-wont-meet-clinton-sources-say-she-isnt-relevant/>
  Didi Remez <http://coteret.com/author/didiremez/> I July 1, 2010 at 15:25 I Categories: Diplomacy
  <http://coteret.com/category/diplomacy/> I URL: http://wp.me/pHIQV-Ep
  Do they honestly think that publicizing a quote like this, on record or off, works to their advantage?
  Israeli diplomatic [euphemism for Prime Minister's Office -- DR] sources said: "Clinton isn't relevant and is out of
  the circle of influence. Mitchell has taken over the peace process to a great extent and Obama, in any event, is the
  important person in this story because he is the one who decides."
  <http://didiremez.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/maariv.gif>
  <http://didiremez.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/maariv.gif>
  <http://didiremez.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/maariv.gif> Netanyahu to meet Obama, but not Clinton
  Eli Bardenstein, Maariv, July 1 2010 [page 7; Hebrew original here and at bottom of post]
  <http://www.scribd.com/doc/33775924/Maariv-Jul01-10-Netanyahu-Will-Not-Meet-Clinton>
  <http://www.scribd.com/doc/33775924/Maariv-Jul01-10-Netanyahu-Will-Not-Meet-Clinton>
  <http://www.scribd.com/doc/33775924/Maariv-Jul01-10-Netanyahu-Will-Not-Meet-Clinton> Prime Minister Binyamin
  Netanyahu is to leave next week for Washington, where he will meet with US President Barack Obama. Rather curiously,
  he is not scheduled to meet with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in the course of his visit to Washington.
  Contrary to his previous visit in March, this time the US administration intends to create the impression,
  outwardly at least, that the severe crisis in the relationship has passed and that the relations between the two countries
  are as strong as ever. In order to bolster that impression, the two leaders will meet the media together and will be
  photographed. As opposed to the previous time, Netanyahu will also be put up at Blair House, the official White House
  guesthouse, and not at a hotel.
  That said, officials in Washington are waiting apprehensively for the answers that Netanyahu will provide in the
  course of the meeting, which is expected to address the transition from the proximity talks that are at an impasse to
  direct negotiations. Obama, apparently, will demand that Netanyahu agree to extend the construction freeze in Judea
  and Samaria beyond the September 26 expiration date in hope of securing PA Chairman Abu Mazen's consent to begin
  direct talks with Israel. For the time being, the forum of seven is divided over this issue.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775313 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775313 Date: 08/31/2015
  Read more of this post <http://coteret.com/2010/07/01/maariv-netanyahu-wont-meet-clinton-sources-say-she-
  isnt-relevantMmore-2505>
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775313 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775315
MetadataSubject: BOMB AT SUFI SHRINE
MetadataTo: sullivanjj@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-01T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05775315/C05775315.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Bomb at Sufi shrine
ExtractedTo: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.corn>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, July 1, 2010 6:25 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775315
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Can you get me more info about the shrine?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775315 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.corn>
  Sent: Thursday, July 1, 2010 6:25 PM
  To: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Bomb at Sufi shrine
  Can you get me more info about the shrine?
  Original Message
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Thu Jul 01 18:24:02 2010
  Subject: Fw: Bomb at Sufi shrine
  Fyi
  Original Message
  From: Holbrooke, Richard
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Thu Jul 01 18:07:11 2010
  Subject: Fw: Bomb at Sufi shrine
  Jake please pass to hillary. I will call. She may want to, especially given forthcoming trip. R PS--tell her I had a good (I
  think)u talk with Misha S today. Hope it helps trip.
  Original Message
  From: Nasr, S Vali R
  To: 'HolbrookeR@state.govi <HolbrookeR@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Jul 01 17:32:48 2010
  Subject: Bomb at Sufi shrine
  Richard
  3 bombs devastated the shrine of Data Ganjbakhsh (the most sacred Muslim place in all of South Asia, and the shrine S
  was supposed to go to). Aside from loss of life, this is a major blow to Pakistan. I recommend that you call Qureshi,
  Nawaz and Pasha (who will be here tomorrow). This will either break Pakistanis or will get them into the fight. This
  shrine is deeply tied to the foundation of Islam in Pakistan.
  Vali Nasr
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775315 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775316
MetadataSubject: TEST
MetadataTo: preines
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-01T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05775316/C05775316.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Test
ExtractedTo: 'preines
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Lona J Valmoro <ValmoroU@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, July 1, 2010 6:53 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775316
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Received.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775316 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Thursday, July 1, 2010 6:53 PM
  To: 'preines
  Subject: Re: Test
  Received.
  Original Message
  From: PIR <preines
  To: H
  Cc: Lona J Valmoro <ValmoroU@state.gov>
  Sent: Thu Jul 01 18:52:18 2010
  Subject: Test
  Testing in-flight communication
  Sent from my iPad
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775316 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775317
MetadataSubject: 8:10PM
MetadataTo: ValmoroLJ@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-01T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05775317/C05775317.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: 8:10pm
ExtractedTo: 'ValmoroU@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, July 1, 2010 8:09 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775317
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Yes--I'll come out and eat w you all.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775317 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Thursday, July 1, 2010 8:09 PM
  To: 'ValmoroU@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: 8:10pm
  Yes--I'll come out and eat w you all.
  Original Message
  From: Valmoro, Lona.' <ValmoroU@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Thu Jul 01 20:08:44 2010
  Subject: 8:10pm
  MS, the crew is asking if you would like dinner soon — I wanted to check with you before they interrupted you in the
  cabin.
  Lona Valmoro
  Special Assistant to the Secretary of State
  (direct)
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775317 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775318
MetadataSubject: PAKISTAN BOMBING
MetadataTo: sullivanjj@state.gov
MetadataFrom: H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-02T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0128/DOC_0C05775318/C05775318.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Pakistan bombing
ExtractedTo: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
ExtractedFrom: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, July 2, 2010 12:38 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775318
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Ok to go.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775318 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: H <hrod17@clintonemail.com >
  Sent: Friday, July 2, 2010 12:38 PM
  To: 'sullivanjj@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Pakistan bombing
  Ok to go.
  Original Message
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Fri Jul 02 12:33:08 2010
  Subject: Pakistan bombing
  FYI we are putting out the following statement.
  STATEMENT BY SECRETARY CLINTON
  Bombing of the Shrine of Syed Ali Hujviri in Lahore
  I was shocked and saddened by yesterday's attack on one of Pakistan's most popular places of worship, the Shrine of
  Syed Ali Hujviri (Data Ganjbakhsh) in Lahore, which claimed the lives of many innocent Pakistanis.
  The extremists have shown that they respect neither human dignity nor the fundamental religious values of Pakistani
  society. Violating the sanctity of this revered shrine is a particularly sinister attempt to destabilize Pakistan and to
  intimidate its people. The attackers will not succeed, as the Pakistani public refuses to be cowed by such violence.
  We condemn this brutal crime and reaffirm our commitment to support the Pakistani people in their efforts to defend
  their democracy from the violent extremists who seek to destroy it. Our thoughts and prayers are with the families of
  the victims and with all the people of Pakistan.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775318 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775403
MetadataSubject: LOOKS BAD
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-24T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775403/C05775403.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: Looks bad
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivann@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob J
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 11:29 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775403
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: FYI -- see chain on PSC issue.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775403 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE
  IN PART B5
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivann@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 11:29 AM
  To:
  Subject: FW: Looks bad
  FYI -- see chain on PSC issue.
  Original Message
  From: DeHart, James P
  Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 11:02 AM
  To: Singh, Vikram J; Feldman, Daniel F; Ruggiero, Frank
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Subject: Re: Looks bad
  Yep.
  Original Message
  From: Singh, Vikram J
  To: DeHart, James P; Feldman, Daniel F; Ruggiero, Frank J
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob
  Sent: Sun Oct 24 10:54:09 2010
  Subject: Re: Looks bad
  Looks like we will be leaving it to them. I spoke to someone who was there, and he said the whole int community was
  offended. HK said people would rather be with TB than have the pscs. HK has a press avail at 1030 tomorrow...
  Original Message
  From: DeHart, James P
  To: Singh, Vikram J; Feldman, Daniel F; Ruggiero, Frank J
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Sun Oct 24 10:13:53 2010
  Subject: Re: Looks bad
  Yes very bad. No movement and some ugly words. Rch is with ghani and eikenberry now. Next steps a bit unclear.
  Original Message
  From: Singh, Vikram J
  To: DeHart, James P; Feldman, Daniel F
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob .1
  Sent: Sun Oct 24 09:43:28 2010
  Subject: Looks bad
  B5
  Here's Panjwok's article:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775403 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775403 Date: 08/31/2015
  Karzai firm on deadline for security firms
  by Javed Hamim Kakar on 24 October, 2010 - 16:54 KABUL (PAN): President Hamid Karzai has firmly rejected a joint
  request from US, British and German ambassadors to extend the deadline for disbanding private security firms in the
  country, his office said on Sunday.
  At a special meeting, President Karzai told the foreign officials that the private security companies had established a
  parallel government in the war-torn country, something he would not allow.
  Ambassadors Karl Eikenberry (US), William Patey (UK), Ambassador Rijdiger Konig (Germany),ISAF Commander Gen.
  David Petraeus and NATO's special civilian representative, Mark Sidwell, were among the foreign officials who attended
  the meeting.
  Karzai issued a four-month deadline for dissolving all foreign and Afghan security companies, a move he believes will
  help stabilise Afghanistan."I addressed the problem five years ago but our international friends warned of halting
  development projects," Karzai was quoted in a statement from his office.
  "I again raised the issue three years ago and international community representatives asked for an additional two years.
  But now the Afghan government is determined to dissolve the companies," Karzai told the foreign envoys.
  Japan's deputy ambassador also took part in the meeting. The president told the ambassadors to convey their security
  concerns about the implementation of projects to the government. Karzai would continue to meet foreign officials who
  expressed serious concerns over the presidential decree banning the security firms, the statement added.
  In/mud
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775403 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775405
MetadataSubject: H: BROCK MEMO HERE, HAVE MANY MORE IDEAS ON THIS. S
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-24T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775405/C05775405.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: H: Brock memo here, have many more ideas on this. S
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 12:27 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775405
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: October 24, 2010
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775405 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE
  IN PART B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 12:27 PM
  To:
  Subject: H: Brock memo here, have many more ideas on this. S
  Attachments: Memo on Clarence Thomas.docx; Memo on Clarence Thomas.docx
  CONFIDENTIAL
  October 24, 2010
  From: David Brock
  Re: Memo on Impeaching Clarence Thomas
  Lillian McEwen — a former prosecutor, law professor and administrative law judge --says publicly for the first time she was
  romantically involved with Clarence Thomas during the entire time that Anita Hill worked for Thomas. She was
  subpoenaed neither by the Democrats nor the Republicans during the hearings (even though she wrote a personal note to
  Biden, for whom she had once worked on the Judiciary Committee, telling him that she had personal knowledge of
  Thomas). Her recent interviews with the Washington Post (10-22) and The NY Times (10-23) and the ABC Washington
  affiliate (10-23) are the first record of her information.
  (Personal note: During my reporting for The Real Anita Hill, every potential friendly witness for Thomas was made
  available to me through close Thomas associates. They held McEwen forth to me as evidence that her relationship with
  Thomas negated the possibility that he pressured Hill to date him and also that Hill's knowledge of the relationship made
  Hill angry that she could not attract Thomas's romantic attention. In his Senate testimony Thomas himself had made that
  suggestion in an exchange with Specter. Thomas said he had tensions with Hill because of "the complexion of the woman
  I dated." McEwen is light-skinned. McEwen, assumed by me to be a friendly witness, was NOT made available to me by
  the Thomas associates, however. It is now obvious why. They knew better).
  PORNOGRAPHY IN THE WORKPLACE
  NYT: Ms. McEwen said that pornography for Justice Thomas was "just a part of his personality structure." She said he
  kept a stack of pornographic magazines, "frequented a store on Dupont Circle that catered to his needs" and allowed his
  interest in pornography to bleed into his professional relationships.
  Dowd (10/24): In her interviews McEwen confirmed Thomas's obsession with women with "huge, huge breasts," with
  scouting the women he worked with as possible partners and with talking about porn at work— while he was the head of
  the federal agency that polices sexual harassment.
  Thomas testimony:
  Leahy: Let me ask you — she has asked whether this happened — let me ask you: Did you ever have a discussion of
  pornographic films with Professor Hill?
  Thomas: Absolutely not.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775405 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775405 Date: 08/31/2015
  LEAHY: Have you ever had such discussions with any woman?
  Thomas: Senator, I will not get into any discussion that I might have had about my personal life or my sex life with any
  person outside the workplace.
  Leahy: I'm not asking –
  Thomas: I will categorically say that I have not had any such discussions with Professor Hill.
  Leahy: Please don't misunderstand my question judge. I am confining it to the workplace. I have no interest in what may
  be your personal life in this. That's yours. What I'm asking is within – she alleges within the workplace. Make sure I fully
  understand—I'm asking you this question so that you can give the answer. Am I correct in understanding your answer,
  within the workplace with Professor Hill, you never had such a discussion?
  Thomas: Right.
  Leahy: You never had such discussions within the workplace with any other women?
  Thomas: That's right.
  Leahy: Or with anyone for that matter?
  Thomas: Right.
  WORKPLACE BEHAVIOR
  WP: To McEwen, Hill's allegations that Thomas had pressed her for dates and made lurid sexual references rang familiar.
  "He was always actively watching the women he worked with to see if they could be potential partners. It was a hobby of
  his."
  WP: According to McEwen, Thomas would also tell her about women he encountered at work. He was partial to women
  with large breasts, she said. In an instance at work, Thomas was so impressed that he asked one woman her bra size,
  McEwen recalled him telling her.
  McEwen told ABC News (10-22): "He was constantly evaluating women in terms of whether they would be a good sex
  partner or not."
  Thomas testimony:
  "Senator [Biden] my attitude at work was in my work environment my staffs were almost invariably predominantly women.
  The senior person on my staff was a woman. I could not tolerate individuals making that environment uncomfortable or
  hostile. I could tolerate individuals who had to segregate their language or conduct in order to get along. The conduct had
  to be purged of offensive attitudes and I made a constant effort, and that was something that I was proud of and it was
  something I am sure the people who worked for me felt comfortable with and understood."
  WP: In her Senate testimony, Hill, who worked with Thomas at two federal agencies, said that Thomas would make
  sexual comments to her at work, including references to scenes in hard-core pornographic films.
  Thomas testimony:
  "If I used that kind of grotesque language with one person it would seem to me that there would be traces of it throughout
  the employees who worked closely with me; there would be other individuals who heard it, or bits and pieces of it, or
  various levels of it."
  SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE
  There were five other individuals, including now McEwen, who had first-hand knowledge of Thomas's behavior as Hill
  described it, but none testified in the hearing.
  NYT: Ms. McEwen has generally kept a low profile all these years, largely, she explains, out of respect for the wishes of
  Justice Thomas, who asked her to "take the same position toward him as his first wife had take" and not speak publicly
  about their relationship. A former prosecutor and judge, she is now retired.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775405 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775405 Date: 08/31/2015
  WP: McEwen recalls writing Thomas a short note before the confirmation hearings, curious about what she should say if
  she were quizzed about their relationship. She said Thomas preferred that she would take the same attitude of his first
  wife" who never talked publicly about their relationship.
  WP: Angela Wright, who in 1984 worked as a public affairs director at the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission —
  which polices sexual harassment claims — during Thomas's long tenure as chairman, shared similar accounts with Senate
  investigators. Once when walking into an EEOC seminar with Thomas, he asked her "What size are your breasts?"
  according to the transcript of her Senate interview.
  WP: Her (Wright's) story was corroborated by a former EEOC speechwriter, Rose Jourdain, who told Senate investigators
  that Wright had become increasingly uneasy around Thomas because of his comments about her appearance.
  WP: Another woman, Sukari Hardnett, who worked as a special assistant to Thomas in 1985 and 1986, wrote in a letter to
  the Judiciary Committee: "If you were young, black, female and reasonably attractive, you knew full well you were being
  inspected and auditioned as a female" by Thomas.
  Neither Wright, nor Rose Jourdain (her corroborator), nor Sukari Hardnett testified at the hearing. As he drew the hearing
  to a close, Biden lifted a subpoena for Wright to testify and instead transcripts of the interviews with Wright and her
  corroborator were simply entered into the record then the hearing was concluded, and Thomas was confirmed the next
  day.
  Dowd: "For the written record Biden allowed negative accounts only from women who had worked for Thomas. He also
  ruled out testimony from women who simply had personal relationships with Thomas, and he did not respond to a note
  from McEwen — as a former US attorney who had once worked as a counsel for Biden's committee — reminding him of her
  long relationship with Thomas."
  INTIMIDATING A WITNESS
  A fourth woman with knowledge of Thomas's behavior, Kaye Savage, was first named in a 1994 book Strange Justice by
  Jill Abramson and Jane Mayer. Savage was a close colleague of Thomas's and Hill's in the Reagan Administration.
  Savage was interviewed by Judiciary Committee staff after she contacted the committee, and a staffer made notes, but
  she was never called to testify. Her story did not become public until Abramson and Mayer obtained the staff notes and
  interviewed Savage, who told the authors of visiting Thomas's apartment during the time Hill was working for Thomas and
  observing stacks of pornographic magazines and all of the walls of the apartment papered with centerfolds of large-
  breasted nude women.
  From Blinded by the Right:
  "The biggest problem raised by the Strange Justice authors for the Thomas camp was the testimony of yet another
  woman, Kaye Savage, who had not been heard from during the first round of hearings."
  "I called Mark Paoletta (a close Thomas friend and former associate White House counsel under Bush) at his Washington
  law office and discussed the Savage matter with him. Mark had been helping me on all other aspects of (my) review (of
  Strange Justice for The American Spectator) and we developed a plan for dealing with Savage. I needed to find out
  quickly who she was and what negative information might exist about her before confronting her and trying to force her
  into backing off the story she had told the Strange Justice authors. I was intent on doing to Savage what had been done to
  Anita Hill and Angela Wright during the Thomas hearings. Mark said he would call Clarence Thomas (then a sitting
  Justice) and see what he could find out."
  "Within an hour or so that morning Mark phoned me back. He said he had posed my question about how to discredit
  Savage to Thomas, who knew I was at work on a review of the Mayer and Abramson book. (Personal note: I had
  personally told Thomas this when I met him at a Paoletta family event only days prior). Mark told me that Thomas had, in
  fact, some derogatory information on his former friend Savage; he passed it along to Mark so that Mark could give it to
  me. Quoting Thomas directly, Mark told me of unverified embarrassing personal information about Savage that Thomas
  claimed had been raised against her in a sealed court record of a divorce and child custody battle more than a decade
  ago. Thomas also told Mark where Savage worked after Mark related that I was eager to hunt her down as soon as
  possible. Surely skirting the bounds of judicial propriety to intimidate and smear yet another witness against him, Thomas
  was playing dirty and so was I."
  After an excerpt of Blinded featuring the Savage story was published in TALK magazine in 2001, The NYT reported (6-27-
  01): "Reached at home in Washington last night, Ms. Savage said that Mr. Brock had tried to intimidate her but that he
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775405 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775405 Date: 08/31/2015
  had not told her the source of the negative information. 'I didn't think to ask,' she said. But she said that she had shared
  the information about her divorce with few people and that Justice Thomas and Ms. Hill were 'primarily' those to whom
  she had confided. 'He either got it from Clarence or he got it from Anita, Ms. Savage said. 'and Anita's my friend."
  (Personal note: Though I confronted Savage with the information in an effort to get her to recant, she never did, although I
  made it appear otherwise by journalistic sleight-of-hand involving a written statement Savage had given me under duress
  about her interviews with Mayer and Abramson in my Spectator review).
  Frank Rich, NYT (12-29-94): "This time Mr. Brock's partisan desperation has led him to a tactic that is beyond the pale of
  even tabloid journalism and that would make any citizen think twice before speaking freely to any journalist: He tried to
  bully a source in Strange Justice, a one-time Hill and Thomas associate named Kaye Savage, to get her to sign a
  statement denying her own contribution to the book."
  Jamin Raskin, a law professor and associate dean at American University in Washington, received a call seeking advice
  from Ms. Savage after her encounter with Mr. Brock a few weeks ago: "She was distraught and said Brock was
  threatening to reveal damaging information about her from a divorce situation unless she agreed to retract everything she
  had said to the authors of Strange Justice, he said in an interview. 'I told her this is a clear violation of journalistic ethics
  and might be blackmail and that she shouldn't give in to it. She was beside herself because she had told the truth."
  MORE CONFIRMATION ON PORNOGRAPHY
  Blinded by the Right:
  "I next set out to blow away the Mayer and Abramson story that Thomas had been a frequent customer of an X-rated
  video store near Dupont Circle, called Graffiti, where in the early 1980s he was alleged to have rented X-rated videos of
  the type that Hill claimed he had discussed with her in graphic terms. In the hearings Thomas had pointedly refused to
  answer questions about his personal use of pornography, other than to categorically deny that he had ever talked about
  porn with Hill (or with anyone in the workplace). The Graffiti story was another theretofore unknown piece of evidence for
  Hill's case..."
  "Now that Mark had opened up a channel directly to Thomas, I asked him to find out for me whether Thomas had owned
  the video equipment needed to view movies at home in the early 1980s...Mark came back with a straightforward answer:
  Thomas not only had the video equipment in his apartment, but he also habitually rented pornographic movies from
  Graffiti during the years Anita Hill worked for him. Here was the proof that Senate investigators and reporters had been
  searching for during the hearings.
  NYT: (Lillian McEwen) said he kept a stack of pornographic magazines, "frequented a store on Dupont Circle that catered
  to his needs."
  CALLS FOR INVESTIGATION
  Partial Transcript of CNN's Crossfire, 6-28-2001, after TALK published the excerpt from Blinded on Kaye Savage:
  Eleanor Smeal, President of Feminist Majority Foundation: "I think there should be a hearing. Not only do I think there
  should be a hearing, I think that we can get to the bottom of it. There's other people now involved. There's Kaye Savage,
  who was, in fact, discredited by Brock. There are other authors who have written and were discredited by Brock. There is
  — essentially what Brock is saying they're very serious charges, they're not light charges. They are charges that he was
  fed information, and being fed this information, they discredited people wrongfully and knowingly. And this is serious.
  "And let's face it, the Supreme Court these are life-time appointments. We are sitting here with a Supreme Court that
  elected this president by a five to four decision, but a Supreme Court that could reverse Roe v Wade and many many
  serious things affecting women...
  "Let's get right to — let's just get right to this, the problem with Clarence Thomas. There was a book that came out by two
  reputable reporters, Jill Abramson and Jane Mayer. And it collaborated — it confirmed a lot of what Anita Hill said. And we
  now know — of course we don't know this — it's alleged by Brock that he knew when he attacked that book and attacked it
  systematically that he was saying a lie. And so basically that is a reputable account that substantiates what she said...
  "Why don't you just bring it before a Senate judiciary committee and have Paoletta there, and not only that, why don't you
  investigate? I mean in fact there were — it's not just one person's word against another. He said that he was a regular
  participator in buying videos from a certain store. I mean why can't..."
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775405 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775405 Date: 08/31/2015
  Robert Novak: "Who said that? Who said that?"
  Smeal: "Paoletta. Paoletta said it to Brock but what I'm saying is you can check it. I mean you don't have to..."
  Novak: "He (Paoletta) denies it."
  Smeal: 'But that's a person's word. Is there no such thing as investigations? Is there no such thing as a hearing? I mean
  and why can't it be bipartisan? If in fact it's true that this man is just a liar, then you clear the name. But if it isn't we get at
  something also very serious. So — it's a serious allegation."
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775405 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775406
MetadataSubject: MEMO ON IMPEACHING CLARENCE THOMAS
MetadataFrom: Brock, David
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-24T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775406/C05775406.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedFrom: David Brock
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775406
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775406 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE
  IN FULL
  CONFIDENTIAL
  October 24, 2010
  From: David Brock
  Re: Memo on Impeaching Clarence Thomas
  Lillian McEwen - a former prosecutor, law professor and administrative law judge --
  says publicly for the first time she was romantically involved with Clarence Thomas
  during the entire time that Anita Hill worked for Thomas. She was subpoenaed
  neither by the Democrats nor the Republicans during the hearings (even though she
  wrote a personal note to Biden, for whom she had once worked on the Judiciary
  Committee, telling him that she had personal knowledge of Thomas). Her recent
  interviews with the Washington Post (10-22) and The NY Times (10-23) and the
  ABC Washington affiliate (10-23) are the first record of her information.
  (Personal note: During my reporting for The Real Anita Hill, every potential friendly
  witness for Thomas was made available to me through close Thomas associates.
  They held McEwen forth to me as evidence that her relationship with Thomas
  negated the possibility that he pressured Hill to date him and also that Hill's
  knowledge of the relationship made Hill angry that she could not attract Thomas's
  romantic attention. In his Senate testimony Thomas himself had made that
  suggestion in an exchange with Specter. Thomas said he had tensions with Hill
  because of "the complexion of the woman I dated." McEwen is light-skinned.
  McEwen, assumed by me to be a friendly witness, was NOT made available to me by
  the Thomas associates, however. It is now obvious why. They knew better).
  PORNOGRAPHY IN THE WORKPLACE
  NYT: Ms. McEwen said that pornography for justice Thomas was "just a part of his
  personality structure." She said he kept a stack of pornographic magazines,
  "frequented a store on Dupont Circle that catered to his needs" and allowed his
  interest in pornography to bleed into his professional relationships.
  Dowd (10/24): In her interviews McEwen confirmed Thomas's obsession with
  women with "huge, huge breasts," with scouting the women he worked with as
  1
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775406 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775406 Date: 08/31/2015
  possible partners and with talking about porn at work - while he was the head of the
  federal agency that polices sexual harassment.
  Thomas testimony:
  Leahy: Let me ask you - she has asked whether this happened - let me ask you: Did
  you ever have a discussion of pornographic films with Professor Hill?
  Thomas: Absolutely not.
  LEAHY: Have you ever had such discussions with any woman?
  Thomas: Senator, I will not get into any discussion that I might have had about my
  personal life or my sex life with any person outside the workplace.
  Leahy: I'm not asking -
  Thomas: I will categorically say that I have not had any such discussions with
  Professor Hill.
  Leahy: Please don't misunderstand my question judge. I am confining it to the
  workplace. I have no interest in what may be your personal life in this. That's yours.
  What I'm asking is within - she alleges within the workplace. Make sure I fully
  understand—I'm asking you this question so that you can give the answer. Am I
  correct in understanding your answer, within the workplace with Professor Hill, you
  never had such a discussion?
  Thomas: Right.
  Leahy: You never had such discussions within the workplace with any other
  women?
  Thomas: That's right.
  Leahy: Or with anyone for that matter?
  Thomas: Right.
  WORKPLACE BEHAVIOR
  WP: To McEwen, Hill's allegations that Thomas had pressed her for dates and made
  lurid sexual references rang familiar. "He was always actively watching the women
  he worked with to see if they could be potential partners. It was a hobby of his."
  2
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775406 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775406 Date: 08/31/2015
  WP: According to McEwen, Thomas would also tell her about women he
  encountered at work. He was partial to women with large breasts, she said. In an
  instance at work, Thomas was so impressed that he asked one woman her bra size,
  McEwen recalled him telling her.
  McEwen told ABC News (10-22): "He was constantly evaluating women in terms of
  whether they would be a good sex partner or not."
  Thomas testimony:
  "Senator [Biden] my attitude at work was in my work environment my staffs were
  almost invariably predominantly women. The senior person on my staff was a
  woman. I could not tolerate individuals making that environment uncomfortable or
  hostile. I could tolerate individuals who had to segregate their language or conduct
  in order to get along. The conduct had to be purged of offensive attitudes and I made
  a constant effort, and that was something that I was proud of and it was something I
  am sure the people who worked for me felt comfortable with and understood."
  WP: In her Senate testimony, Hill, who worked with Thomas at two federal agencies,
  said that Thomas would make sexual comments to her at work, including references
  to scenes in hard-core pornographic films.
  Thomas testimony:
  "If I used that kind of grotesque language with one person it would seem to me that
  there would be traces of it throughout the employees who worked closely with me;
  there would be other individuals who heard it, or bits and pieces of it, or various
  levels of it."
  SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE
  There were five other individuals, including now McEwen, who had first-hand
  knowledge of Thomas's behavior as Hill described it, but none testified in the
  hearing.
  NYT: Ms. McEwen has generally kept a low profile all these years, largely, she
  explains, out of respect for the wishes of justice Thomas, who asked her to "take the
  same position toward him as his first wife had take" and not speak publicly about
  their relationship. A former prosecutor and judge, she is now retired.
  WP: McEwen recalls writing Thomas a short note before the confirmation hearings,
  curious about what she should say if she were quizzed about their relationship. She
  said Thomas preferred that she would take "the same attitude of his first wife" who
  never talked publicly about their relationship.
  3
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775406 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775406 Date: 08/31/2015
  WP: Angela Wright, who in 1984 worked as a public affairs director at the Equal
  Opportunity Employment Commission - which polices sexual harassment claims -
  during Thomas's long tenure as chairman, shared similar accounts with Senate
  investigators. Once when walking into an EEOC seminar with Thomas, he asked her
  "What size are your breasts?" according to the transcript of her Senate interview.
  WP: Her (Wright's) story was corroborated by a former EEOC speechwriter, Rose
  Jourdain, who told Senate investigators that Wright had become increasingly uneasy
  around Thomas because of his comments about her appearance.
  WP: Another woman, Sukari Hardnett, who worked as a special assistant to Thomas
  in 1985 and 1986, wrote in a letter to the Judiciary Committee: "If you were young,
  black, female and reasonably attractive, you knew full well you were being
  inspected and auditioned as a female" by Thomas.
  Neither Wright, nor Rose Jourdain (her corroborator), nor Sukari Hardnett testified
  at the hearing. As he drew the hearing to a close, Biden lifted a subpoena for Wright
  to testify and instead transcripts of the interviews with Wright and her corroborator
  were simply entered into the record then the hearing was concluded, and Thomas
  was confirmed the next day.
  Dowd: "For the written record Biden allowed negative accounts only from women
  who had worked for Thomas. He also ruled out testimony from women who simply
  had personal relationships with Thomas, and he did not respond to a note from
  McEwen - as a former US attorney who had once worked as a counsel for Biden's
  committee - reminding him of her long relationship with Thomas."
  INTIMIDATING A WITNESS
  A fourth woman with knowledge of Thomas's behavior, Kaye Savage, was first
  named in a 1994 book Strange Justice by Jill Abramson and Jane Mayer. Savage was
  a close colleague of Thomas's and Hill's in the Reagan Administration. Savage was
  interviewed by Judiciary Committee staff after she contacted the committee, and a
  staffer made notes, but she was never called to testify. Her story did not become
  public until Abramson and Mayer obtained the staff notes and interviewed Savage,
  who told the authors of visiting Thomas's apartment during the time Hill was
  working for Thomas and observing stacks of pornographic magazines and all of the
  walls of the apartment papered with centerfolds of large-breasted nude women.
  From Blinded by the Right:
  "The biggest problem raised by the Strange Justice authors for the Thomas camp
  was the testimony of yet another woman, Kaye Savage, who had not been heard
  from during the first round of hearings."
  4
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775406 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775406 Date: 08/31/2015
  "I called Mark Paoletta (a close Thomas friend and former associate White House
  counsel under Bush) at his Washington law office and discussed the Savage matter
  with him. Mark had been helping me on all other aspects of (my) review (of Strange
  Justice for The American Spectator) and we developed a plan for dealing with
  Savage. I needed to find out quickly who she was and what negative information
  might exist about her before confronting her and trying to force her into backing off
  the story she had told the Strange Justice authors. I was intent on doing to Savage
  what had been done to Anita Hill and Angela Wright during the Thomas hearings.
  Mark said he would call Clarence Thomas (then a sitting Justice) and see what he
  could find out."
  "Within an hour or so that morning Mark phoned me back. He said he had posed my
  question about how to discredit Savage to Thomas, who knew I was at work on a
  review of the Mayer and Abramson book. (Personal note: I had personally told
  Thomas this when I met him at a Paoletta family event only days prior). Mark told
  me that Thomas had, in fact, some derogatory information on his former friend
  Savage; he passed it along to Mark so that Mark could give it to me. Quoting Thomas
  directly, Mark told me of unverified embarrassing personal information about
  Savage that Thomas claimed had been raised against her in a sealed court record of
  a divorce and child custody battle more than a decade ago. Thomas also told Mark
  where Savage worked after Mark related that I was eager to hunt her down as soon
  as possible. Surely skirting the bounds of judicial propriety to intimidate and smear
  yet another witness against him, Thomas was playing dirty and so was I."
  After an excerpt of Blinded featuring the Savage story was published in TALK
  magazine in 2001, The NYT reported (6-27-01): "Reached at home in Washington
  last night, Ms. Savage said that Mr. Brock had tried to intimidate her but that he had
  not told her the source of the negative information. `I didn't think to ask,' she said.
  But she said that she had shared the information about her divorce with few people
  and that Justice Thomas and Ms. Hill were `primarily' those to whom she had
  confided. 'He either got it from Clarence or he got it from Anita, Ms. Savage said. 'and
  Anita's my friend."
  (Personal note: Though I confronted Savage with the information in an effort to get
  her to recant, she never did, although I made it appear otherwise by journalistic
  sleight-of-hand involving a written statement Savage had given me under duress
  about her interviews with Mayer and Abramson in my Spectator review).
  Frank Rich, NYT (12-29-94): "This time Mr. Brock's partisan desperation has led
  him to a tactic that is beyond the pale of even tabloid journalism and that would
  make any citizen think twice before speaking freely to any journalist: He tried to
  bully a source in Strange Justice, a one-time Hill and Thomas associate named Kaye
  Savage, to get her to sign a statement denying her own contribution to the book."
  Jamin Raskin, a law professor and associate dean at American University in
  Washington, received a call seeking advice from Ms. Savage after her encounter with
  5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775406 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775406 Date: 08/31/2015
  Mr. Brock a few weeks ago: "She was distraught and said Brock was threatening to
  reveal damaging information about her from a divorce situation unless she agreed
  to retract everything she had said to the authors of Strange Justice, he said in an
  interview. 'I told her this is a clear violation of journalistic ethics and might be
  blackmail and that she shouldn't give in to it. She was beside herself because she had
  told the truth."
  MORE CONFIRMATION ON PORNOGRAPHY
  Blinded by the Right:
  "I next set out to blow away the Mayer and Abramson story that Thomas had been a
  frequent customer of an X-rated video store near Dupont Circle, called Graffiti,
  where in the early 1980s he was alleged to have rented X-rated videos of the type
  that Hill claimed he had discussed with her in graphic terms. In the hearings Thomas
  had pointedly refused to answer questions about his personal use of pornography,
  other than to categorically deny that he had ever talked about porn with Hill (or
  with anyone in the workplace). The Graffiti story was another theretofore unknown
  piece of evidence for Hill's case..."
  "Now that Mark had opened up a channel directly to Thomas, I asked him to find out
  for me whether Thomas had owned the video equipment needed to view movies at
  home in the early 1980s...Mark came back with a straightforward answer: Thomas
  not only had the video equipment in his apartment, but he also habitually rented
  pornographic movies from Graffiti during the years Anita Hill worked for him. Here
  was the proof that Senate investigators and reporters had been searching for during
  the hearings.
  NYT: (Lillian McEwen) said he kept a stack of pornographic magazines, "frequented
  a store on Dupont Circle that catered to his needs."
  CALLS FOR INVESTIGATION
  Partial Transcript of CNN's Crossfire, 6-28-2001, after TALK published the excerpt
  from Blinded on Kaye Savage:
  Eleanor Smeal, President of Feminist Majority Foundation: "I think there should be a
  hearing. Not only do I think there should be a hearing, I think that we can get to the
  bottom of it. There's other people now involved. There's Kaye Savage, who was, in
  fact, discredited by Brock. There are other authors who have written and were
  discredited by Brock. There is - essentially what Brock is saying they're very serious
  charges, they're not light charges. They are charges that he was fed information, and
  being fed this information, they discredited people wrongfully and knowingly. And
  this is serious.
  6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775406 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775406 Date: 08/31/2015
  "And let's face it, the Supreme Court these are life-time appointments. We are sitting
  here with a Supreme Court that elected this president by a five to four decision, but
  a Supreme Court that could reverse Roe v Wade and many many serious things
  affecting women...
  "Let's get right to - let's just get right to this, the problem with Clarence Thomas.
  There was a book that came out by two reputable reporters, Jill Abramson and Jane
  Mayer. And it collaborated - it confirmed a lot of what Anita Hill said. And we now
  know - of course we don't know this - it's alleged by Brock that he knew when he
  attacked that book and attacked it systematically that he was saying a lie. And so
  basically that is a reputable account that substantiates what she said...
  "Why don't you just bring it before a Senate judiciary committee and have Paoletta
  there, and not only that, why don't you investigate? I mean in fact there were - it's
  not just one person's word against another. He said that he was a regular
  participator in buying videos from a certain store. I mean why can't..."
  Robert Novak: "Who said that? Who said that?"
  Smeal: "Paoletta. Paoletta said it to Brock but what I'm saying is you can check it. I
  mean you don't have to..."
  Novak: "He (Paoletta) denies it."
  Smeal: 'But that's a person's word. Is there no such thing as investigations? Is there
  no such thing as a hearing? I mean and why can't it be bipartisan? If in fact it's true
  that this man is just a liar, then you clear the name. But if it isn't we get at something
  also very serious. So - it's a serious allegation."
  7
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775406 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775408
MetadataSubject: MEMO ON IMPEACHING CLARENCE THOMAS
MetadataFrom: Brock, David
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-24T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775408/C05775408.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedFrom: David Brock
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775408
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775408 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE
  IN FULL
  CONFIDENTIAL
  October 24, 2010
  From: David Brock
  Re: Memo on Impeaching Clarence Thomas
  Lillian McEwen - a former prosecutor, law professor and administrative law judge --
  says publicly for the first time she was romantically involved with Clarence Thomas
  during the entire time that Anita Hill worked for Thomas. She was subpoenaed
  neither by the Democrats nor the Republicans during the hearings (even though she
  wrote a personal note to Biden, for whom she had once worked on the judiciary
  Committee, telling him that she had personal knowledge of Thomas). Her recent
  interviews with the Washington Post (10-22) and The NY Times (10-23) and the
  ABC Washington affiliate (10-23) are the first record of her information.
  (Personal note: During my reporting for The Real Anita Hill, every potential friendly
  witness for Thomas was made available to me through close Thomas associates.
  They held McEwen forth to me as evidence that her relationship with Thomas
  negated the possibility that he pressured Hill to date him and also that Hill's
  knowledge of the relationship made Hill angry that she could not attract Thomas's
  romantic attention. In his Senate testimony Thomas himself had made that
  suggestion in an exchange with Specter. Thomas said he had tensions with Hill
  because of "the complexion of the woman I dated." McEwen is light-skinned.
  McEwen, assumed by me to be a friendly witness, was NOT made available to me by
  the Thomas associates, however. It is now obvious why. They knew better).
  PORNOGRAPHY IN THE WORKPLACE
  NYT: Ms. McEwen said that pornography for justice Thomas was "just a part of his
  personality structure." She said he kept a stack of pornographic magazines,
  "frequented a store on Dupont Circle that catered to his needs" and allowed his
  interest in pornography to bleed into his professional relationships.
  Dowd (10/24): In her interviews McEwen confirmed Thomas's obsession with
  women with "huge, huge breasts," with scouting the women he worked with as
  1
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775408 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775408 Date: 08/31/2015
  possible partners and with talking about porn at work - while he was the head of the
  federal agency that polices sexual harassment.
  Thomas testimony:
  Leahy: Let me ask you - she has asked whether this happened - let me ask you: Did
  you ever have a discussion of pornographic films with Professor Hill?
  Thomas: Absolutely not.
  LEAHY: Have you ever had such discussions with any woman?
  Thomas: Senator, I will not get into any discussion that I might have had about my
  personal life or my sex life with any person outside the workplace.
  Leahy: I'm not asking -
  Thomas: I will categorically say that I have not had any such discussions with
  Professor Hill.
  Leahy: Please don't misunderstand my question judge. I am confining it to the
  workplace. I have no interest in what may be your personal life in this. That's yours.
  What I'm asking is within 7 she alleges within the workplace. Make sure I fully
  understand—I'm asking you this question so that you can give the answer. Am I
  correct in understanding your answer, within the workplace with Professor Hill, you
  never had such a discussion?
  Thomas: Right.
  Leahy: You never had such discussions within the workplace with any other
  women?
  Thomas: That's right.
  Leahy: Or with anyone for that matter?
  Thomas: Right.
  WORKPLACE BEHAVIOR
  WP: To McEwen, Hill's allegations that Thomas had pressed her for dates and made
  lurid sexual references rang familiar. "He was always actively watching the women
  he worked with to see if they could be potential partners. It was a hobby of his."
  2
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775408 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775408 Date: 08/31/2015
  WP: According to McEwen, Thomas would also tell her about women he
  encountered at work. He was partial to women with large breasts, she said. In an
  instance at work, Thomas was so impressed that he asked one woman her bra size,
  McEwen recalled him telling her.
  McEwen told ABC News (10-22): "He was constantly evaluating women in terms of
  whether they would be a good sex partner or not."
  Thomas testimony:
  "Senator [Biden] my attitude at work was in my work environment my staffs were
  almost invariably predominantly women. The senior person on my staff was a
  woman. I could not tolerate individuals making that environment uncomfortable or
  hostile. I could tolerate individuals who had to segregate their language or conduct
  in order to get along. The conduct had to be purged of offensive attitudes and I made
  a constant effort, and that was something that I was proud of and it was something I
  am sure the people who worked for me felt comfortable with and understood."
  WP: In her Senate testimony, Hill, who worked with Thomas at two federal agencies,
  said that Thomas would make sexual comments to her at work, including references
  to scenes in hard-core pornographic films.
  Thomas testimony:
  "If I used that kind of grotesque language with one person it would seem to me that
  there would be traces of it throughout the employees who worked closely with me;
  there would be other individuals who heard it, or bits and pieces of it, or various
  levels of it."
  SUPPRESSED EVIDENCE
  There were five other individuals, including now McEwen, who had first-hand
  knowledge of Thomas's behavior as Hill described it, but none testified in the
  hearing.
  NYT: Ms. McEwen has generally kept a low profile all these years, largely, she
  explains, out of respect for the wishes of Justice Thomas, who asked her to "take the
  same position toward him as his first wife had take" and not speak publicly about
  their relationship. A former prosecutor and judge, she is now retired.
  WP: McEwen recalls writing Thomas a short note before the confirmation hearings,
  curious about what she should say if she were quizzed about their relationship. She
  said Thomas preferred that she would take "the same attitude of his first wife" who
  never talked publicly about their relationship.
  3
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775408 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775408 Date: 08/31/2015
  WP: Angela Wright, who in 1984 worked as a public affairs director at the Equal
  Opportunity Employment Commission - which polices sexual harassment claims -
  during Thomas's long tenure as chairman, shared similar accounts with Senate
  investigators. Once when walking into an EEOC seminar with Thomas, he asked her
  "What size are your breasts?" according to the transcript of her Senate interview.
  WP: Her (Wright's) story was corroborated by a former EEOC speechwriter, Rose
  Jourdain, who told Senate investigators that Wright had become increasingly uneasy
  around Thomas because of his comments about her appearance.
  WP: Another woman, Sukari Hardnett, who worked as a special assistant to Thomas
  in 1985 and 1986, wrote in a letter to the Judiciary Committee: "If you were young,
  black, female and reasonably attractive, you knew full well you were being
  inspected and auditioned as a female" by Thomas.
  Neither Wright, nor Rose Jourdain (her corroborator), nor Sukari Hardnett testified
  at the hearing. As he drew the hearing to a close, Biden lifted a subpoena for Wright
  to testify and instead transcripts of the interviews with Wright and her corroborator
  were simply entered into the record then the hearing was concluded, and Thomas
  was confirmed the next day.
  Dowd: "For the written record Biden allowed negative accounts only from women
  who had worked for Thomas. He also ruled out testimony from women who simply
  had personal relationships with Thomas, and he did not respond to a note from
  McEwen - as a former US attorney who had once worked as a counsel for Biden's
  committee - reminding him of her long relationship with Thomas."
  INTIMIDATING A WITNESS
  A fourth woman with knowledge of Thomas's behavior, Kaye Savage, was first
  named in a 1994 book Strange Justice by Jill Abramson and Jane Mayer. Savage was
  a close colleague of Thomas's and Hill's in the Reagan Administration. Savage was
  interviewed by Judiciary Committee staff after she contacted the committee, and a
  staffer made notes, but she was never called to testify. Her story did not become
  public until Abramson and Mayer obtained the staff notes and interviewed Savage,
  who told the authors of visiting Thomas's apartment during the time Hill was
  working for Thomas and observing stacks of pornographic magazines and all of the
  walls of the apartment papered with centerfolds of large-breasted nude women.
  From Blinded by the Right:
  "The biggest problem raised by the Strange Justice authors for the Thomas camp
  was the testimony of yet another woman, Kaye Savage, who had not been heard
  from during the first round of hearings."
  4
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775408 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775408 Date: 08/31/2015
  "I called Mark Paoletta (a close Thomas friend and former associate White House
  counsel under Bush) at his Washington law office and discussed the Savage Smatter
  with him. Mark had been helping me on all other aspects of (my) review (of Strange
  Justice for The American Spectator) and we developed a plan for dealing with
  Savage. I needed to find out quickly who she was and what negative information
  might exist about her before confronting her and trying to force her into backing off
  the story she had told the Strange Justice authors. I was intent on doing to Savage
  what had been done to Anita Hill and Angela Wright during the Thomas hearings.
  Mark said he would call Clarence Thomas (then a sitting Justice) and see what he
  could find out."
  "Within an hour or so that morning Mark phoned me back. He said he had posed my
  question about how to discredit Savage to Thomas, who knew I was at work on a
  review of the Mayer and Abramson book. (Personal note: I had personally told
  Thomas this when I met him at a Paoletta family event only days prior). Mark told
  me that Thomas had, in fact, some derogatory information on his former friend
  Savage; he passed it along to Mark so that Mark could give it to me. Quoting Thomas
  directly, Mark told me of unverified embarrassing personal information about
  Savage that Thomas claimed had been raised against her in a sealed court record of
  a divorce and child custody battle more than a decade ago. Thomas also told Mark
  where Savage worked after Mark related that I was eager to hunt her down as soon
  as possible. Surely skirting the bounds of judicial propriety to intimidate and smear
  yet another witness against him, Thomas was playing dirty and so was I."
  After an excerpt of Blinded featuring the Savage story was published in TALK
  magazine in 2001, The NYT reported (6-27-01): "Reached at home in Washington
  last night, Ms. Savage said that Mr. Brock had tried to intimidate her but that he had
  not told her the source of the negative information. 'I didn't think to ask,' she said.
  But she said that she had shared the information about her divorce with few people
  and that Justice Thomas and Ms. Hill were 'primarily' those to whom she had
  confided. 'He either got it from Clarence or he got it from Anita, Ms. Savage said. 'and
  Anita's my friend."
  (Personal note: Though I confronted Savage with the information in an effort to get
  her to recant, she never did, although I made it appear otherwise by journalistic
  sleight-of-hand involving a written statement Savage had given me under duress
  about her interviews with Mayer and Abramson in my Spectator review).
  Frank Rich, NYT (12-29-94): "This time Mr. Brock's partisan desperation has led
  him to a tactic that is beyond the pale of even tabloid journalism and that would
  make any citizen think twice before speaking freely to any journalist: He tried to
  bully a source in Strange Justice, a one-time Hill and Thomas associate named Kaye
  Savage, to get her to sign a statement denying her own contribution to the book."
  Jamin Raskin, a law professor and associate dean at American University in
  Washington, received a call seeking advice from Ms. Savage after her encounter with
  5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775408 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775408 Date: 08/31/2015
  Mr. Brock a few weeks ago: "She was distraught and said Brock was threatening to
  reveal damaging information about her from a divorce situation unless she agreed
  to retract everything she had said to the authors of Strange Justice, he said in an
  interview. 'I told her this is a clear violation of journalistic ethics and might be
  blackmail and that she shouldn't give in to it. She was beside herself because she had
  told the truth."
  MORE CONFIRMATION ON PORNOGRAPHY
  Blinded by the Right:
  "I next set out to blow away the Mayer and Abramson story that Thomas had been a
  frequent customer of an X-rated video store near Dupont Circle, called Graffiti,
  where in the early 1980s he was alleged to have rented X-rated videos of the type
  that Hill claimed he had discussed with her in graphic terms. In the hearings Thomas
  had pointedly refused to answer questions about his personal use of pornography,
  other than to categorically deny that he had ever talked about porn with Hill (or
  with anyone in the workplace). The Graffiti story was another theretofore unknown
  piece of evidence for Hill's case..."
  "Now that Mark had opened up a channel directly to Thomas, I asked him to find out
  for me whether Thomas had owned the video equipment needed to view movies at
  home in the early 1980s...Mark came back with a straightforward answer: Thomas
  not only had the video equipment in his apartment, but he also habitually rented
  pornographic movies from Graffiti during the years Anita Hill worked for him. Here
  was the proof that Senate investigators and reporters had been searching for during
  the hearings.
  NYT: (Lillian McEwen) said he kept a stack of pornographic magazines, "frequented
  a store on Dupont Circle that catered to his needs."
  CALLS FOR INVESTIGATION
  Partial Transcript of CNN's Crossfire, 6-28-2001, after TALK published the excerpt
  from Blinded on Kaye Savage:
  Eleanor Smeal, President of Feminist Majority Foundation: "I think there should be a
  hearing. Not only do I think there should be a hearing, I think that we can get to the
  bottom of it. There's other people now involved. There's Kaye Savage, who was, in
  fact, discredited by Brock. There are other authors who have written and were
  discredited by Brock. There is - essentially what Brock is saying they're very serious
  charges, they're not light charges. They are charges that he was fed information, and
  being fed this information, they discredited people wrongfully and knowingly. And
  this is serious.
  6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775408 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775408 Date: 08/31/2015
  "And let's face it, the Supreme Court these are life-time appointments. We are sitting
  here with a Supreme Court that elected this president by a five to four decision, but
  a Supreme Court that could reverse Roe v Wade and many many serious things
  affecting women...
  "Let's get right to - let's just get right to this, the problem with Clarence Thomas.
  There was a book that came out by two reputable reporters, Jill Abramson and Jane
  Mayer. And it collaborated - it confirmed a lot of what Anita Hill said. And we now
  know - of course we don't know this - it's alleged by Brock that he knew when he
  attacked that book and attacked it systematically that he was saying a lie. And so
  basically that is a reputable account that substantiates what she said...
  "Why don't you just bring it before a Senate judiciary committee and have Paoletta
  there, and not only that, why don't you investigate? I mean in fact there were - it's
  not just one person's word against another. He said that he was a regular
  participator in buying videos from a certain store. I mean why can't..."
  Robert Novak: "Who said that? Who said that?"
  Smeal: "Paoletta. Paoletta said it to Brock but what I'm saying is you can check it. I
  mean you don't have to..."
  Novak: "He (Paoletta) denies it."
  Smeal: 'But that's a person's word. Is there no such thing as investigations? Is there
  no such thing as a hearing? I mean and why can't it be bipartisan? If in fact it's true
  that this man is just a liar, then you clear the name. But if it isn't we get at something
  also very serious. So - it's a serious allegation."
  7
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775408 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775413
MetadataSubject: POINT ON TONE W KARL AND PETRAEUS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: jake.sullivan
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-24T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775413/C05775413.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775413
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Jake Sullivan <jake.sullivar
  Sunday, October 24, 2010 2:13 PM
  H
  point on tone w karl and petraeus

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775413 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5,B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Jake Sullivan <jake.sullivar
  Sunday, October 24, 2010 2:13 PM
  H
  point on tone w karl and petraeus
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775413 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775414
MetadataSubject: UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-24T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775414/C05775414.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: Update
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivann@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 2:15 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775414
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: FYI.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775414 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivann@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 2:15 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW: Update
  FYI.
  From: Eikenberry, Karl W
  Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 2:13 PM
  To: Sullivan, Jacob
  Subject: Update
  Karzai has called for an Afghan leaders' meeting at 8:30AM to discuss the Decree. I made the rounds over the past few
  days and discussed the issue with many of the jihadis (including Fahim Khan); they will urge restraint and sobriety.
  PERSONAL
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775414 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775421
MetadataSubject: 4 QDDR DRAFT CHAPTERS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-24T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775421/C05775421.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: 4 QDDR Draft Chapters
ExtractedFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Lew, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D; Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 4:01 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775421
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Aftachments: DiplomacyChapter10 24 10 final 3 pm.doc; Development_Chapter_10_22_10 CLEAN.doc;
  QDDR_Chapter 3_Crisis_Conflictand_Instability_102210_final clean.doc; Working
  smarter 10 24 10 final.doc; DiplomacyChapter10 24 10 final 3 pm.doc;
  Development_Chapter 10_22_10 CLEAN.doc; QDDR_Chapter 3
  _Crisis_Conflictand_Instability_102210_final clean.doc; Working smarter 10 24 10
  final.doc
  With prodigious efforts by your entire team (Jeanne, Dana, and Ed Meier worked very hard with Pat and his people over
  the past week on the last chapter in addition to Bill, Karen, both Jim and Don Steinberg and others at both State and
  USAID), greatly aided by spectacular thinking and all-night editing from Jake, here are a much improved four chapters.
  Among other things, the 4th chapter now showcases much of the great work jack and his team have already done.
  In the final report we will have
  1.An introductory 1-2 page letter from you
  2. An exec summary (10-15 pp that can be read in lieu of entire doc)
  3. An introduction framing the chapters in terms of leading thru civilian power;
  4. A chapter on the global trends and policies driving our assessment of the capabilities we need (written but not yet
  edited):
  5. the attached 4 chapters;
  6. a final chapter on the National Security Budget;
  7. A conclusion.
  With the edits/cuts this week we are on track to come in some 5,000-10,000 words shorter than the QDR.
  We're working this week on roll-out strategies of every kind, as well as further revisions to fill holes and respond to your
  and other comments.
  Happy reading!
  AM

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775421 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 4:01 PM
  To:
  Cc: Lew, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D; Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma
  Subject: 4 QDDR Draft Chapters
  Aftachments: DiplomacyChapter10 24 10 final 3 pm.doc; Development_Chapter_10_22_10 CLEAN.doc;
  QDDR_Chapter 3_Crisis_Conflictand_Instability_102210_final clean.doc; Working
  smarter 10 24 10 final.doc; DiplomacyChapter10 24 10 final 3 pm.doc;
  Development_Chapter 10_22_10 CLEAN.doc; QDDR_Chapter 3
  _Crisis_Conflictand_Instability_102210_final clean.doc; Working smarter 10 24 10
  final.doc
  With prodigious efforts by your entire team (Jeanne, Dana, and Ed Meier worked very hard with Pat and his people over
  the past week on the last chapter in addition to Bill, Karen, both Jim and Don Steinberg and others at both State and
  USAID), greatly aided by spectacular thinking and all-night editing from Jake, here are a much improved four chapters.
  Among other things, the 4th chapter now showcases much of the great work jack and his team have already done.
  In the final report we will have
  1.An introductory 1-2 page letter from you
  2. An exec summary (10-15 pp that can be read in lieu of entire doc)
  3. An introduction framing the chapters in terms of leading thru civilian power;
  4. A chapter on the global trends and policies driving our assessment of the capabilities we need (written but not yet
  edited):
  5. the attached 4 chapters;
  6. a final chapter on the National Security Budget;
  7. A conclusion.
  With the edits/cuts this week we are on track to come in some 5,000-10,000 words shorter than the QDR.
  We're working this week on roll-out strategies of every kind, as well as further revisions to fill holes and respond to your
  and other comments.
  Happy reading!
  AM
  From: Anne-Marie Slaughter
  To: Slaughter, Anne-Marie
  Sent: Sun Oct 24 15:40:03 2010
  Subject: 4 QDDR Draft Chapters
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775421 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775423
MetadataSubject: A POSSIBLE APPROACH....
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Talbott, Strobe
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-24T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775423/C05775423.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: a possible approach....
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Strobe Talbott
ExtractedCc: Phil Goldberg (State); Jake Sullivan (DOS)
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 5:11 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775423
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Attached are some thoughts of an outsider.
  Strobe Talbott
  President, The Brookings Institution
  1775 Massachusetts Avenue NW
  Washington, DC 20036
  202.797.6200
  stalbott

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775423 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Strobe Talbott
  Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 5:11 PM
  To: H
  Cc: Phil Goldberg (State); Jake Sullivan (DOS)
  Subject: a possible approach....
  Attachments: Georgia-Russia scope paper Oct 24-1.doc; Georgia-Russia scope paper Oct 24-1.doc
  Attached are some thoughts of an outsider.
  Strobe Talbott
  President, The Brookings Institution
  1775 Massachusetts Avenue NW
  Washington, DC 20036
  202.797.6200
  stalbott
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775423 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775424
MetadataSubject: A POSSIBLE US DIPLOMATIC INITIATIVE TO UNFREEZE AND DEFUSE GEORGIA-RSSIA RELATIONS
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-24T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775424/C05775424.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775424
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775424 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE
  IN FULL
  A POSSIBLE US DIPLOMATIC INITIATIVE
  TO UNFREEZE AND DEFUSE GEORGIA-RUSSIA RELATIONS
  Sunday, October 24, 2010
  Georgia-Russia relations are not just frozen—they're volatile in ways that could
  exacerbate current and prospective dangers regionally and globally. The deadlock over
  Russia occupation and virtual annexation of Abkhazia and South Ossetia already.
  ....
  — constitutes an on-going violation of international law;
  — highlights the worst, most atavistic, geopolitically assertive trends in Russian
  domestic and foreign policy;
  — complicates Russia's relations with the U.S, EU countries, and Russia's
  neighbors
  — hinders Presidents Obama and Medvedev's joint aspiration for Russia to join the
  WTO, post-NST progress on arms control in general and CFE in particular and
  the prospects for strengthening U.S. and allied security interests in general.
  — undercuts Russia's credibility as a European democracy in good standing and
  worthy of further integration into Euroatlantic and global institutions.
  The aftermath of the Georgia-Russia conflict of August 2008 also has the potential
  to blow up into another conflict between Georgia and Russia and—even short of another
  outright war—spread instability and political violence in the Caucasus (North and South).
  Moreover, the situation, if it remains frozen and dangerous, poses a domestic political
  challenge as well. The Administration's ability to influence Russia's behavior in Georgia
  has become a litmus test of the "reset." For many in Congress and elsewhere,
  the President's efforts to get Russia into the WTO, strengthen the OSCE and European
  security, and move onto next stage of conventional arms control will be judged on
  whether the U.S. is, simultaneously, able to advance the economic and security interests
  of Georgia as democratic NATO aspirant. Conversely, any appearance of U.S. pressure
  on Georgia to accept Moscow's dismemberment of the country will erode support for the
  "reset" in U.S.-Russia relations, including potentially imperiling ratification of the New
  Start Treaty and the 123 agreement.
  In this adversity there is an opportunity for the US to broker improved
  communication between Moscow and Tbilisi, perhaps enabling them to reduce current
  tensions over the territories and make progress on practical economic, humanitarian and
  security concerns, potentially improving the prospects for a longer term process of
  normalization and viable negotiations regarding the restoration of Georgian sovereignty.
  The inter-state conflict is rooted in deep personal animosities at the leadership level in
  Moscow and Tbilisi, a factor that is further complicated by the dynamics within the
  Russian leadership (Putin's close association with the August 2008 invasion). Because
  the two leaderships are not talking to each other—or, when they do, the situation tends to
  get worse—the essence of the US initiative would have to be a shuttle between Tbilisi
  and Moscow.
  1
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775424 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775424 Date: 08/31/2015
  The near-term goal of the initiative would be to persuade the two principal and
  legitimate parties, Georgia and Russia, that they have an interest in the taking the
  following steps in three areas:
  1. Humanitarian: alleviation of the displacement that was a consequence of
  occupation/annexation, opening of borders for family visitation and people to
  people exchanges.
  2. Economic: loosening of economic/commercial relations between and among the
  two countries and the occupied territories (including by establishing a consensual
  customs regime on Georgia's Abkhaz and South Ossetia borders with Russia).
  3. Security: resumption of confidence-building and crisis-management measures
  (including CFE style transparency and CSBMs regarding Russian forces, Open
  Skies flights, international/OSCE monitoring in the territories), reinvigoration of
  negotiating channels on consensual security arrangements for the longer term
  (Geneva talks or another forum) and transparency/CSBMs regarding U.S.-
  Georgian military-military relations.
  Under the rubric of security, it would be crucial that the US (and the international
  community) explicitly reaffirm and adhere to nonrecognition of the two entities and to
  insistence on the principle of Georgia's territorial integrity, recognizing that Russia will
  adhere to its own position.
  Modernizing CFE and getting the Russians back into conventional arms control
  compliance are vital to stability, predictability and confidence in Europe and to fulfilling
  the vision of a post-Cold War Euro-Atlantic Community which includes Russia and its
  neighbors into a sustainable, increasingly integrated and cooperative zone of peace. The
  CFE principle of host-nation consent to the stationing of foreign forces would remain
  nonnegotiable even as the U.S. sets aside for later our disagreement about the ultimate
  legal status of the territories. Our longer term goal in CFE is to reestablish consensual
  security arrangements in the territories, not to settle non-arms control questions like legal
  status.
  Indeed, the measures agreed in all three areas above would be taken without prejudice
  to the final settlement on the territorial and legal issues. "Without prejudice" leaves the
  issue of end state open but maintains the opening and continuing US, Georgian, NATO
  and EU positions intact with regard to what the legal end state should be if Russia is to
  have truly "normal" relations with its neighbors and with the international community.
  If there can be movement in these three areas, it might be possible to unlock other
  issues as well, including WTO for Russia and the beginning of movement on CFE along
  the lines of the NATO proposal.
  Both as a matter of principle and US domestic politics—and as a matter of the logic
  of the situation—it is essential that the security dimension be integral to the strategy and
  execution. Security is at the core of the whole problem: Russian troops have, for the first
  time in the post-Soviet period, invaded, occupied, and brought under the control of
  Moscow the territory of a foreign country. While reversing that situation will probably
  take years, the goal of doing so must be part of whatever diplomacy occurs now. And
  2
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775424 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775424 Date: 08/31/2015
  that diplomacy is simply beyond the capability and attitudes of the Georgian and Russian
  leaderships.
  It will be critical to keep key allies—especially France, Germany, Britain (and
  Turkey?)--closely consulted throughout, as well as the EU/Ashton and NATO. But the
  initiative should be US only, and not get bogged down with all the other interested parties
  appointing their own co-mediators.
  Now that the Administration is on record—via the Summers public statements in
  Moscow last week—advocating and predicting that Russia will be in the WTO "well
  before" the passage of 12 months, the initiative should be planned as soon as possible.
  The President might propose it, first, to Medvedev face-to-face in Yokohama on
  [November 141 and then to Saakashvili on [November 201 in Lisbon. The initiative
  would be have the status and support of a presidential mission, with the special
  representative reporting to the President through Secretary of State, with the diplomacy to
  begin in January with the goal of determining by the summer the prospects for success.
  3
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775424 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775425
MetadataSubject: A POSSIBLE US DIPLOMATIC INITIATIVE TO UNFREEZE AND DEFUSE GEORGIA-RSSIA RELATIONS
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-24T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775425/C05775425.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775425
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775425 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE
  IN FULL
  A POSSIBLE US DIPLOMATIC INITIATIVE
  TO UNFREEZE AND DEFUSE GEORGIA-RUSSIA RELATIONS
  Sunday, October 24, 2010
  Georgia-Russia relations are not just frozen—they're volatile in ways that could
  exacerbate current and prospective dangers regionally and globally. The deadlock over
  Russia occupation and virtual annexation of Abkhazia and South Ossetia already ....
  constitutes an on-going violation of international law;
  highlights the worst, most atavistic, geopolitically assertive trends in Russian
  domestic and foreign policy;
  complicates Russia's relations with the U.S, EU countries, and Russia's
  neighbors
  hinders Presidents Obama and Medvedev's joint aspiration for Russia to join the
  WTO, post-NST progress on arms control in general and CFE in particular and
  the prospects for strengthening U.S. and allied security interests in general.
  undercuts Russia's credibility as a European democracy in good standing and
  worthy of further integration into Euroatlantic and global institutions.
  The aftermath of the Georgia-Russia conflict of August 2008 also has the potential
  to blow up into another conflict between Georgia and Russia and—even short of another
  outright war—spread instability and political violence in the Caucasus (North and South).
  Moreover, the situation, if it remains frozen and dangerous, poses a domestic political
  challenge as well. The Administration's ability to influence Russia's behavior in Georgia
  has become a litmus test of the "reset." For many in Congress and elsewhere,
  the President's efforts to get Russia into the WTO, strengthen the OSCE and European
  security, and move onto next stage of conventional arms control will be judged on
  whether the U.S. is, simultaneously, able to advance the economic and security interests
  of Georgia as democratic NATO aspirant. Conversely, any appearance of U.S. pressure
  on Georgia to accept Moscow's dismemberment of the country will erode support for the
  "reset" in U.S.-Russia relations, including potentially imperiling ratification of the New
  Start Treaty and the 123 agreement.
  In this adversity there is an opportunity for the US to broker improved
  communication between Moscow and Tbilisi, perhaps enabling them to reduce current
  tensions over the territories and make progress on practical economic, humanitarian and
  security concerns, potentially improving the prospects for a longer term process of
  normalization and viable negotiations regarding the restoration of Georgian sovereignty.
  The inter-state conflict is rooted in deep personal animosities at the leadership level in
  Moscow and Tbilisi, a factor that is further complicated by the dynamics within the
  Russian leadership (Putin's close association with the August 2008 invasion). Because
  the two leaderships are not talking to each other—or, when they do, the situation tends to
  get worse—the essence of the US initiative would have to be a shuttle between Tbilisi
  and Moscow.
  1
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775425 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775425 Date: 08/31/2015
  The near-term goal of the initiative would be to persuade the two principal and
  legitimate parties, Georgia and Russia, that they have an interest in the taking the
  following steps in three areas:
  1. Humanitarian: alleviation of the displacement that was a consequence of
  occupation/annexation, opening of borders for family visitation and people to
  people exchanges.
  2. Economic: loosening of economic/commercial relations between and among the
  two countries and the occupied territories (including by establishing a consensual
  customs regime on Georgia's Abkhaz and South Ossetia borders with Russia).
  3. Security: resumption of confidence-building and crisis-management measures
  (including CFE style transparency and CSBMs regarding Russian forces, Open
  Skies flights, international/OSCE monitoring in the territories), reinvigoration of
  negotiating channels on consensual security arrangements for the longer term
  (Geneva talks or another forum) and transparency/CSBMs regarding U.S.-
  Georgian military-military relations.
  Under the rubric of security, it would be crucial that the US (and the international
  community) explicitly reaffirm and adhere to nonrecognition of the two entities and to
  insistence on the principle of Georgia's territorial integrity, recognizing that Russia will
  adhere to its own position.
  Modernizing CFE and getting the Russians back into conventional arms control
  compliance are vital to stability, predictability and confidence in Europe and to fulfilling
  the vision of a post-Cold War Euro-Atlantic Community which includes Russia and its
  neighbors into a sustainable, increasingly integrated and cooperative zone of peace. The
  CFE principle of host-nation consent to the stationing of foreign forces would remain
  nonnegotiable even as the U.S. sets aside for later our disagreement about the ultimate
  legal status of the territories. Our longer term goal in CFE is to reestablish consensual
  security arrangements in the territories, not to settle non-arms control questions like legal
  status.
  Indeed, the measures agreed in all three areas above would be taken without prejudice
  to the final settlement on the territorial and legal issues. "Without prejudice" leaves the
  issue of end state open but maintains the opening and continuing US, Georgian, NATO
  and EU positions intact with regard to what the legal end state should be if Russia is to
  have truly "normal" relations with its neighbors and with the international community.
  If there can be movement in these three areas, it might be possible to unlock other
  issues as well, including WTO for Russia and the beginning of movement on CFE along
  the lines of the NATO proposal.
  Both as a matter of principle and US domestic politics—and as a matter of the logic
  of the situation—it is essential that the security dimension be integral to the strategy and
  execution. Security is at the core of the whole problem: Russian troops have, for the first
  time in the post-Soviet period, invaded, occupied, and brought under the control of
  Moscow the territory of a foreign country. While reversing that situation will probably
  take years, the goal of doing so must be part of whatever diplomacy occurs now. And
  2
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775425 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775425 Date: 08/31/2015
  that diplomacy is simply beyond the capability and attitudes of the Georgian and Russian
  leaderships.
  It will be critical to keep key allies—especially France, Germany, Britain (and
  Turkey?)—closely consulted throughout, as well as the EU/Ashton and NATO. But the
  initiative should be US only, and not get bogged down with all the other interested parties
  appointing their own co-mediators.
  Now that the Administration is on record—via the Summers public statements in
  Moscow last week—advocating and predicting that Russia will be in the WTO "well
  before" the passage of 12 months, the initiative should be planned as soon as possible.
  The President might propose it, first, to Medvedev face-to-face in Yokohama on
  [November 141 and then to Saakashvili on [November 201 in Lisbon. The initiative
  would be have the status and support of a presidential mission, with the special
  representative reporting to the President through Secretary of State, with the diplomacy to
  begin in January with the goal of determining by the summer the prospects for success.
  3
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775425 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775428
MetadataSubject: A POSSIBLE APPROACH...
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-24T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775428/C05775428.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: a possible approach....
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Phil Goldberg (State) <GoldbergPS@State.Gov>; Jake Sullivan (DOS) <Sullivann@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 8:13 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775428
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Ok
RawText:
  B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775428 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 8:13 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: a possible approach....
  Ok
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C; ilaurenjiloty
  Sent: Sun Oct 24 19:59:38 2010
  Subject: Fw: a possible approach....
  <Laurenjiloty B6
  Pls print for me.
  Original Message
  From: Strobe Talbott <STALBOTT
  To: H
  Cc: Phil Goldberg (State) <GoldbergPS@State.Gov>; Jake Sullivan (DOS) <Sullivann@state.gov>
  Sent: Sun Oct 24 17:11:04 2010
  Subject: a possible approach....
  Attached are some thoughts of an outsider.
  Strobe Talbott
  President, The Brookings Institution
  1775 Massachusetts Avenue NW
  Washington, DC 20036
  202.797.6200
  B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775428 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775429
MetadataSubject: CAN YOU TALK TONIGHT?
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-24T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775429/C05775429.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Can you talk tonight?
ExtractedTo: H; cheryl.mills
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 8:45 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775429
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Calling you at 9pm
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775429 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  PART B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 8:45 PM
  To: H; cheryl.mills
  Subject: Re: Can you talk tonight?
  Calling you at 9pm
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; 'cheryl.milH ....., I <cheryl.mills
  Sent: Sun Oct 24 20:00:28 2010
  Subject: Can you talk tonight?
  Pls let me know. Thx.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775429 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775430
MetadataSubject: CHECKING IN
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Muscatine, Lissa
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-25T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775430/C05775430.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775430
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Lissa Muscatine <Imuscatine■
  Monday, October 25, 2010 12:18 AM
  checking in
  Just wanted to see if everything is going okay from your vantage point with the speech team. I hear from each of them
  now and then but want to make sure things are working out the way you want them to.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775430 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Lissa Muscatine <Imuscatine■
  Monday, October 25, 2010 12:18 AM
  checking in
  Just wanted to see if everything is going okay from your vantage point with the speech team. I hear from each of them
  now and then but want to make sure things are working out the way you want them to.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775430 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775431
MetadataSubject: NEED TO DISCUSS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-25T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775431/C05775431.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: need to discuss
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, October 25, 2010 7:21 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775431
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  1. Israel
  2. strobe

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775431 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 7:21 AM
  To: H
  Subject: need to discuss
  1. Israel
  2. strobe
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775431 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775434
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-25T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775434/C05775434.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: Thanks to Secretary Clinton for Participating in the Conference on the American
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, October 25, 2010 10:32 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775434
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Experience in Southeast Asia [John Carland]
  below

MetadataSubject:
  THANKS TO SECRETARY CLINTON FOR PARTICIPATING IN THE CONFERENCE ON THE AMERICAN EXPERIENCE IN SOUTHEAST ASIA (JOHN CARLAND)

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775434 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 10:32 AM
  To:
  Subject: FW: Thanks to Secretary Clinton for Participating in the Conference on the American
  Experience in Southeast Asia [John Carland]
  below
  From: Carland, John M (mailto:Carland)M@state.gov]
  Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 10:27 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Thanks to Secretary Clinton for Participating in the Conference on the American Experience in Southeast Asia
  Dear Ms. Mills—
  Since the chain of events that led to the Secretary's speaking at the Vietnam conference started with my 15
  March 2010 email to you about Brownie Ledbetter's illness, I thought I would close the circle with another
  email to you asking if you would pass this letter of appreciation to the Secretary. I wanted to go on record
  saying how much we in the Historian's Office, and how very much I personally, appreciated both her presence
  and her remarks at the conference.
  Best,
  John
  Dear Secretary Clinton:
  Thanks so much for delivering the opening speech at the Historian's Office's Conference on the American
  Experience in Southeast Asia. It was eloquent and affecting. Your speech welcoming the audience struck the
  perfect note for (1) celebrating the achievement of the Historian's Office documentary histories on
  Indochina/Vietnam and (2) using that event to explore the history of United States policy in Southeast Asia,
  1946-1975. It also placed in context what we were about to do at the conference. We couldn't have found a
  better way to kick off our two days of historical exploration than your speech. You gave us marching orders to
  study the conflict in Vietnam and the American role in it but not to let that past blind us to the common ground
  our two countries now occupy. And that's what we tried to do.
  The conference itself was very successful. We have had good feedback from attendees and from participants.
  The speeches of Dr. Kissinger, Deputy Secretary Negroponte, and Ambassador Holbrooke, sent out ripples of
  stimulating and provocative discussion, while the scholarly papers presented by American and international
  scholars not only placed their comments in historical context but also, and more generally, increased our
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775434 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775434 Date: 08/31/2015
  knowledge and understanding of conflict in Indochina. The official historians from Vietnam fulfilled one of my
  first requirements—that we provide our former enemy's perspective during the conference. And the media
  panel—with old Vietnam hands such as William Beecher, Edith Lederer, Marvin Kalb, Morley Safer, and Barry
  Zorthian on it—added zip to the proceedings as well as substance to our understanding of the media role in this
  conflict. (We put the media panel video on our website Friday, accompanied by a transcript.)
  In addition to the preceding I also wanted to tell you how pleased I was to have had the opportunity to briefly
  chat with you immediately before your speech, and last March, too, after I gave you the sad news about
  Brownie Ledbetter. Throughout that March conversation I was also having an intense debate with myself over
  whether I should or should not ask you about opening the conference. I glad I did and glad that you said yes.
  I also wish to tell you (no surprise here, I'm sure) how well you are served by the likes of Lona Valmoro and
  Lauren Jiloty. Over the spring and summer Lona gave advice and reassurance in a number of emails when I was
  structuring what I hoped you would do for and at the conference. She went out of her way to be helpful and
  positive. And Lauren, as the conference drew near, gave me the sort of precise guidance, and in an always
  friendly and efficient manner, about your speech and the surrounding scenario that lowered my anxiety level
  considerably. I am grateful to both of them.
  Finally, as I head toward retirement in February, I wanted to tell you that we in the Historian's Office—and none
  more than I--see you as a first-rate Secretary of State doing an outstanding job in, to say the least, challenging
  circumstances. I am personally proud to have been in the Department and served while you were Secretary.
  Again, the speech was great. Thanks for doing it.
  Sincerely,
  John M. Carland
  Senior Historian
  Conference Coordinator and Program Committee Chair
  Conference on the American Experience in Southeast Asia, 1946-1975
  Office of the Historian
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775434 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775435
MetadataSubject: TRIP READING - - BANGLADESH IS FOLLOWING THE LEAD OF THE QDDR
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-25T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775435/C05775435.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Trip reading -- Bangladesh is following the lead of the QDDR
ExtractedFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma; Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, October 25, 2010 10:57 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775435
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Eco.docx- 25Nov2010.doc
  This is a very thoughtful piece that identifies many of the same factors we are in our diplomatic chapter (and that is not
  just because the author – the former Bangladesh ambassador to the US—cites me). What is most striking is that it
  affirms that our analysis in the QDDR offers a set of questions that foreign ministries all over the world are grappling
  with. I had hoped to have time to do some traveling to broadcast the QDDR to key allies and partners around the world
  after the QDDR is in, but even if that can't happen, we will devise an outreach strategy re sending the report out to
  foreign ministers around the world and to our ambassadors that will greatly amplify its impact. AM

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775435 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE
  IN PART B6
  From: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 10:57 AM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma; Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Trip reading -- Bangladesh is following the lead of the QDDR
  Attachments: Daily Sun-Evolving Diplomatic Eco.docx- 25Nov2010.doc; Daily Sun-Evolving Diplomatic
  Eco.docx- 25Nov2010.doc
  This is a very thoughtful piece that identifies many of the same factors we are in our diplomatic chapter (and that is not
  just because the author – the former Bangladesh ambassador to the US—cites me). What is most striking is that it
  affirms that our analysis in the QDDR offers a set of questions that foreign ministries all over the world are grappling
  with. I had hoped to have time to do some traveling to broadcast the QDDR to key allies and partners around the world
  after the QDDR is in, but even if that can't happen, we will devise an outreach strategy re sending the report out to
  foreign ministers around the world and to our ambassadors that will greatly amplify its impact. AM
  From: humayun Kabir
  Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 8:21 AM
  Subject: Article in the Daily Sun
  Dear Colleague,
  Here is a piece which has been published in the Daily Sun of today. It is entitled "Evolving Diplomatic Eco
  system and Bangladesh Foreign Policy: An Agenda for Action." Please enjoy!
  Regards,
  M.Humayun Kabir
  Dhaka
  If you want to respond to this e-mail, DO NOT press REPLY button. Please TYPE my address:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775435 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775436
MetadataSubject: EVOLVING DIPLOMATIC ECO-SYSTEM AND BANGLADESH FOREIGN POLICY: AN AGENDA FOR ACTION
MetadataFrom: Daily Sun
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775436/C05775436.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775436
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  dmI
  TRUE & WPM:0'1AL
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775436 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  Evolving Diplomatic Eco-system and Bangladesh Foreign Policy: An Agenda for Action Mr. numayun Kabir
  The foreign policy of a nation is conducted through the institution of diplomacy. Obviously, any evolution in the diplomatic concepts, norms and practices affect the conduct of
  foreign policy of nations. Bangladesh is no exception to this process. Rather, as a nation which is increasingly coming into global interface, understanding and appreciation of the
  dynamic§ of diplomacy is all the more relevant and urgent. Let us have a look at how the changing global environment is impacting on the evolution of diplomacy in general, and
  how the formulation and implementation of our foreign policy is affected by this process.
  New diplomatic topography
  During the last few decades, the topography of the institution of diplomacy has experienced significant transformation. Several factors contributed to this process. Recent intensity
  of thick globalism has pushed deeper the flow of information, capital, manpower, data, images, goods and services. Such a process has produced a kind of paradigm shift in
  international relations with corresponding change not only in content but also in the context of international politics and perception. With the emergence of +competition state,0
  as articulated by Philip J. Cerny, where transnational powers are achieving salience through the exercise of power by many non-state actors, such a process has gained further
  momentum. Intense competition has grown to sell oneOs story to the international community. Those who can successfully tell their stories in a credible fashion win the hearts
  and minds of people, who in turn can become their friends, consumers, investors, tourists and promoters. In the same vein, the concept of national interest is being redefined in the
  larger context of collaborative framework, as against the traditional setting of conflict and war alone. Continuous process of empowerment of people around the world has added
  another new complexity to such a process of transformation.
  Some scholars argue that as a consequence sovereign States+ monolithic identity has given way to multiple identities of sovereign people. A nation is now evaluated constantly;
  government policies are being instantly and constantly reviewed and scrutinized by national and global society with clear impact on its ability to influence the perception. Indeed,
  the network-based world is not only changing topography of sovereignty but also flattened the capacity of hierarchy based bureaucracy practically in all states.
  Proliferation of many new actors in international politics and diplomatic arena has reshaped the global list of •Who is Who,0 and now the list includes NG0s, academics,
  business leaders, international journalists, social entrepreneurs, foundations, philanthropists, and even celebrities, among others. Internet is extensively used to disseminate
  messages, initiate dialogue, recruit new allies and friends, build network, and advocate a particular cause or issue. The development of complex international actors and network
  has affected the international hierarchy of power in a significant way with the spread of huge horizontal contacts all over the world. In a globalised world, public opinion matters
  more than ever. Being skeptical of the government, people are now demanding greater transparency and are ready to participate in policymaking process, which makes it difficult
  for the governments to put 'spin' to overcome communication challenges. In January 2007, Klaus Schwab, Executive Chairman and founder President of the World Economic
  Forum observed, +We are witnessing everywhere a changing power equation. Power is moving from center to the periphery. Vertical command and control structures are eroding
  and are being replaced by horizontal networks of social communities and collaborative platforms.,
  New issues and challenges are also crowding the international agenda. They include issues, such as terrorism, climate change, nuclear proliferation, food security, disaster
  management, peace- making and peace building, public health, and migration, among others. These emerging challenges have practically dwarfed the capacity of any single state
  to handle them. Cooperation among nations has thus become necessary.
  Several consequences flow from this process of transformation. First, as the global system is becoming more fluid and flexible in nature, and moving from multi-polarity to multi
  partnership, as articulated recently by the US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the urgency to reach out to all components of wider global society, including the traditional state
  centric power structure in a foreign nation, is being acutely felt. Thus, diplomacy has become a multi layered and multi partner exercise, characterized by the active involvement of
  multiple actors, namely government, civil society organizations, think tanks, business associations, media, advocacy groups, church and mosques, celebrities, and even private
  persons with global outreach. Second, with multiplicity of actors participating in the policy process, including various Ministries and Departments of a nation alone, the relations
  between nations have thus willy nilly evolved from the phase of formal foreign policy interactions to a deeper phase of domestic interconnectedness, as evidenced in the European
  Union in recent years. Third, everyday concerns of citizens have moved way up the ladder and become priority issues for the foreign policy makers. The role of diplomacy has thus
  significantly transformed from a distant actor to an active social player and catalyst. The growing role of Diaspora communities has accelerated this trend. Fourth, the process of
  diplomacy has also become more inclusive, hi terms of focus, economic diplomacy or management of resources has occupied the centre stage in diplomatic interactions among
  practically all nations, including the most developed and powerful ones. Advocacy and activism has given way to diplomatic protocol and formalism. With the threat of extremism
  and terrorism growing and the possibility of failure of state institutions intensifying in some states, diplomacy has moved from a role of passive observer to an active partner in
  promoting basic values of justice, democracy, human rights and inclusive development, among others.
  The New Hubs
  As for Bangladesh, several regional and global developments are noteworthy. The rise of China and India, which is often called OChindia,0 offers both opportunities and
  challenges for us. Already, they are our top import sources and could be major export destinations a few years down the line. ASEAN nations are yet another growth hub almost
  matching Indian growth rate. They could be a good source of future energy, employment and technology for Bangladesh. East Asian nations, including Japan and South Korea are
  already valuable partners in our economic growth; they could be potential sources of investment, technology and knowledge transfer to Bangladesh. Likewise, the Middle Eastern
  countries have become the new center of Sovereign Funds and Bangladesh could capitalize on it. Of course, for the foreseeable future they are likely to remain as destinations for
  our export of manpower. The United States and EU member states are major destinations for our ready-made garment and shrimp products; they could be markets for our potential
  high value items in the future as well. Russia and other CIS nations could be source of technology and energy, and new export destinations for Bangladeshi products. Latin
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775436 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775436 Date: 08/31/2015
  America and Africa are still not high on our agenda, but both of these continents offer immense opportunities for Bangladesh; we urgently need to build our diplomatic bridges
  with them without any further delay. It is important to understand that in a globalized world physical distance matters less than psychological distance. Clearly, in the coming years
  economic diplomacy will occupy the centre stage in exploring new opportunities around the globe. Now the big question is how do these openings fit into our national priorities?
  Bangladesh Priorities and Challenges
  As Bangladesh strives to elevate itself to a middle income country, she will have to address several developmental challenges, which are closely interlinked. Let us now have a
  look at some of the important issues, which will demand constant attention from the policy makers in Bangladesh in the coming years.
  Strengthen Democracy- One of major priorities of Bangladesh in the coming years would be to strengthen democratic norms and practices. Being a socially driven nation, a
  careful nurturing of democracy would be required in Bangladesh to meet the ever growing expectations of the people for good governance, justice, fairness, decency and
  accountability in public life on a sustained manner. Indeed, the people of Bangladesh overwhelmingly conveyed several messages during the 2008 elections, including their
  forceful rejection of any kind of extremism, in addition to restoring democracy and returning the AMaliajot• to power. Reading those messages in right context and responding to
  them with appropriate care, creativity and dignity would perhaps determine the future course of democracy in Bangladesh. In addition, Bangladesh could also project the verdict of
  2008 elections and subsequent forceful stand of the present government against religious extremism as a test case of how a Muslim majority nation could embrace democracy and
  build up a society based on moderation. In any case, a sustained and creative effort would be required to deal with this insidious phenomenon.
  - Alleviation of Poverty and Creation oflobs- Currently about 40% of people in Bangladesh live under the poverty line and lifting this huge group out of poverty will pose the
  largest development challenges in the coming years. The present government has also repeatedly expressed their commitment to fight this menace through variety of programmes.
  Another related issue involves the creation of jobs for the people. In Bangladesh, about 2.5 million job seekers are joining the work force every year and roughly 1 million jobs are
  created both domestically and externally. A big gap always exists between the demand and supply of jobs. Needless to say, accelerated creation of jobs could also serve to sanitize
  the society from all extremist ideas, which often threaten the basic fabric of our society.
  - Infrastructure- This is a daunting area for Bangladesh to address. Several components could be put in this mix. First, the issue of physical infrastructure, which includes the
  building of network of physical connectivity, such as road, railways, waterways, airports, seaports, and telecommunications, and IT, among others, deserves attention. In order to
  accelerate economic growth Bangladesh has not only to significantly upgrade such infrastructure within the country but she must also align them suitably to connect with the larger
  regional network. Second, Bangladesh will have to build up an energy infrastructure with a view to meeting the growing demand for energy as her economy grows. Government
  anticipates that Bangladesh economy will grow by 8% by 2013 and by 10% by 2017. We must also not ignore the fact that the demand for energy in both China and India is also
  growing at an annual rate of 10%, and Bangladesh has to be creative in exploring its domestic sources as well as taping into the regional matrix, which could perhaps meet the
  regional demand for energy for many years to come. Third, building up a good managerial infrastructure through upgrading the quality of her human resources infrastructure is
  also a top priority for Bangladesh. According to many experts Bangladesh cannot aspire to be on a higher growth trajectory without the quality human resources, both at the
  government and private sector level to back it up. In order to achieve this objective, there is an urgent need to align the education system, particularly the higher education, with
  global standard, including enabling students to leans several foreign languages and building an IT enabled generation as well as reorienting bureaucracy to serve private sector
  driven economic growth with adequate knowledge and expertise. Ambassador Farooq Sobhan has rightly called them Aprivate sector minded bureaucracy.• Perhaps what we
  also need is a globally minded bureaucracy, which would be able to effectively facilitate mobilization of private capital, technology, knowledge and knowhow from global sources.
  Needless to say that Bangladesh cannot overcome the existing challenge on infrastructure without huge infusion of foreign capital, technology and expertise, among other things.
  - Managing shared Resources and Environment- Like many other countries, Bangladesh shares vital resources with other neighbouring countries. Take the case of our river
  systems. Out of 200 plus rivers in Bangladesh, 54 rivers flow from India and at least one of them from China. Nepal is also linked in this riverine network. While adequate quantity
  of water is critical for sustenance and economic growth in Bangladesh, keeping a watch on the quality of water that flows into Bangladesh is also important. Flora and fauna of
  • Bangladesh, and indeed the larger ecosystem in Bangladesh is dependent of maintaining the quantity and quality of water system in Bangladesh. As the demand for water increases
  with economic progress. Bangladesh has to ensure its due share over this critical source of live and livelihood. Creative options have also to be explored to share this vital resource
  keeping in view the growing needs of all riparian nations, including Bangladesh. Again, all South Asian nationsare more of less affected by the issue of climate change. Their
  leaders have agreed during the last Thimphu Summit to forge a common position for dealing with this common challenge. Yet, the contribution of each country to carbon emission
  and the impact which they suffer are different, and as such each nation will have to pursue a nuanced strategy to protect her interests within the larger context of ongoing global
  negotiations on this issue. Likewise, Bangladesh shares energy resources with both Myanmar and India in the Bay of Bengal. Already Bangladesh in engaged in arbitration with
  them through the multilateral process. It is most likely that more serious negotiations will ensue soon, and a great deal of creativity will have to brought to bear in resolving the
  maritime boundary issue to the satisfaction of all parties, and to share the energy resources available in that region.
  Raising Competitiveness- At the same time, Bangladesh badly needs to raise its economic competitiveness. Bangladesh has consistently performed poorly on Global
  Competitiveness Index, and unfortunately changes in government in recent years have not had any significant impact on improving our economic competitiveness. Perhaps, a fresh
  and professional look has to be taken by the policy makers on an urgent basis to complement the heroic efforts of private sector in raising our competitiveness. Otherwise, our
  policy incentives will produce only modest results. On the other hand, an economically competitive Bangladesh will derive multiple benefits. It will open up more space for
  Bangladesh in global trade; it will also attract foreign investment, which could play a vital role in transferring resources, technology, expertise and management skills.
  Agenda for Action
  A number of policy options could be explored to energize our foreign policy with a view to supporting our transition to a middle income country and creating space for advancing
  our vital interests in the region and beyond. Our diplomacy produced good results when the global system was perhaps predictable; we need a new approach now to reach out to
  new constituency of global actors in the fast changing global context Some of the elements for the new framework are noted below:
  a. Redesign our Foreign Policy- Our foreign policy outlook and framework is at best traditional in nature, so are our diplomatic instruments. Dramatic changes, which have
  occurred in concepts and practices in diplomacy during the last 20 years, are not appropriately absorbed and reflected in our foreign policy. This lag costs Bangladesh in terms of
  effectiveness of her foreign policy. One example will perhaps suffice. The Embassy of Bangladesh carried out a survey among 1000 Nepalese citizens in four different cities in
  2006 to understand their awareness about Bangladesh and her foreign policy achievements. Among other questions, we asked them if they would recall any foreign policy
  initiative Bangladesh had taken in recent years on a regional scale. A large number of respondents only recalled the role of Bangladesh in the creation of SAARC in 1985.
  Surprisingly it was 20 years ago by then! Such a response alerted us to the fact that we had fallen far behind in terms of drawing attention of common people with our foreign
  policy, even within the region and more so in a friendly neighbouring nation like Nepal. Now, with a view to redesigning our foreign policy five areas could be looked at. They
  include:
  i.Adopting a look around policy, instead of looting in one direction. This would include exploring all options in building relationship with all neighbours on the basis of mutual
  benefit;
  ii.Articulating a Bilateral plus policy, which is essentially a process of working with multiple partners to achieve major policy objectives, even within the region; Such a policy
  would essentially complement bilateral relations, not replace it.
  iii.Supporting robust regionalism and sub- regionalism, which could create space for capitalizing on larger opportunities; This could allow Bangladesh to capitalize on its
  geographical location;
  iv. Pursuing a creative and flexible multilateralism, which demands nimble diplomacy on issues of common concerns;
  v. Engaging in continuous innovations in our diplomacy, including building coalitions with civil society actors to advance shared objectives. After all, as Princeton University
  scholar Anne- Marie Slaughter has rightly observed, the emerging networked world of the twenty first century exists above the state, below the state, and through the state. In
  this world, the state with most connections will be the central player, able to set the global agenda and unlock innovation and sustainable growth.. Incidentally, the most
  networked nations are not the powerful and big states. Singapore, Norway and Costa Rica are the ones, which are most nimble and active in this regard. Is not the message clear for
  Bangladesh?
  b. Expanding Outreach and Reputation Management through Public Diplomacy- As policy process attracts new actors, the need for expanding the outreach with a view to
  incorporating the new actors into policy process and to seek their help to put into effect such policies has grown enormously. This could be done both at home and abroad. Many
  countries, such as Canada and Norway pursue such a strategy with great effectiveness. This is particularly relevant also for nations, which suffer from reputation deficit, such as
  Bangladesh. Reputation or image deficit affects Bangladesh at least on three counts: it deprives Bangladesh of the opportunity of getting a suitable context to conduct its diplomacy
  abroad in an effective manner. British scholar Mark Leonard observed, "Image and reputation of a country are public goods which can create either an enabling or a disenabling
  environment for individual transactions. Work on particular issue will feed off the general image of the country and reflect back Onto it-in both positive and negative directions..
  Second, in the absence of right kind of collective image we tend to either sink into invisibility or portrayed negatively; consequently we do not figure out in the global
  conversations. Third, a distorted image, which often is the function of others defining us instead of we defining ourselves, affects our business potential as well. For example, in the
  Middle Eastern countries Bangladesh is a major supplier of workers for the last 25 years; we contributed to their economic growth as well. Yet Bangladesh is regularly associated
  with supplying only unskilled and low end workers. When the issue of importing semi skilled and skilled workers comes, they tend to prefer other countries in the region, for
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775436 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775436 Date: 08/31/2015
  example Sri Lanka and India. While emerging nations, such as China and India, which are carefully creating their brand image as a nation, it looks like we are frozen in Our old and
  outdated perception about our inflated self image. Bangladesh needs to wake up from this slumber sooner than later. Experts have suggested a useful tool, namely Public
  Diplomacy, for articulating a realistic and credible strategy to present the stories of a nation to outside audience. Indeed, many nations, including some developing countries have
  already integrated public diplomacy in their foreign policy toolkit. Given the growing capacity and potential influence of Bangladeshi Diaspora in many countries around the
  world, perhaps it is time to articulate a Public Diplomacy programme, which will facilitate their participation in the policy process, among other things. A word of caution would
  perhaps be in order at this point. Contrary to traditional perception, Public Diplomacy is not about manipulating information to present official version of developments to the
  foreign audience, nor is it an episodal shot to serve short term political gains either. It is rather a process of engagement with the target audience with a view to building up a
  relationship of trust. Again, Public Diplomacy it is not a straight jacket affair, one size would not fit all. It has to be calibrated depending on the priorities and sensitivities of local
  audience. For Bangladesh leveraging Bangladeshi culture and social creativity could form a credible plank of public diplomacy. It is important to note that Public Diplomacy is not
  an end in itself; it is a support to advance the overall interests of a nation through reaching out to all segments of host societies. These days, some experts also talk about domestic
  part of Public Diplomacy.
  c. The Whole Government Approach- Our current foreign policy approach is highly bureaucratic, vertical and as such fragmented. Foreign Ministry is considered like any other
  Ministry, while functionally its scope is global in the sense that the Ministry and the Diplomatic Missions protect and promote our vital national interests, spanning over wide
  range of issues, around the globe, As the process of domestic interconnected has increased resulting in growing interactions among nations on a variety of issues of common
  concerns, it has become necessary to articulate a whole government approach to deal with issues that have national relevance. Considering the value of horizontal cooperation in
  dealing with complex problems President Obama had recently advocated such an approach in his National Security Strategy document of 2010. One could argue that the inter-
  Ministerial consultations, which exist now, could somehow compensate for such a need.
  Yet, the value of high level contact cannot be underestimated. One model for consideration for such high level contact could include a Ministerial Coordination Committee
  comprising a cluster of Ministers, whose Ministries are directly related to issues involving foreign nations. This body could be represented by the Minister for Foreign Affairs,
  Minister for Finance, Minister for Commerce, Minister for Expatriate Welfare, Minister for Civil Aviation and Tourism and Executive Chairman, BOI, among others. A suitable
  Representative from the Ministry of Defense could also be included on issues relating to peacekeeping and disaster management issues. Needless to say, all these initiatives would
  bear fruit only when they receive strong commitment from the highest political level. The coordination role should however always remain with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
  like the role of a conductor in a symphony.
  d. Strengthening MOFA and Missions- Although the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Diplomatic Missions abroad have been given the responsibility to conduct Bangladesh
  Foreign Policy in the most effective manner, several impediments have diminished their ability to perform at the optimum level. One is the shortage of officers in the Ministry of
  Foreign Affairs and the existing organorgam is outdated by thirty years. It is important to upgrade the same so that the strength of the Ministry could be doubled, as had been
  suggested by Ambassador Farooq Sobhan. This suggestion is very much in line with what our neighbours are doing in the light of new global reality. India is expanding her
  Foreign Service cadre, so is being done by China. Nepal is also expanding its Foreign Service cadre with a new law, which would give them the coordinating role on all issues
  related to foreign affairs. In recent years, United States has added more than 1100 officers to her State Department cadre. Expansion of cadre is dictated by the fact that emerging
  global issues have to be followed, understood, examined, discussed and negotiated with multiple actors on the global scale, which can only be done by the well groomed diplomats.
  For Bangladesh, which has to leverage on soft power, it is the diplomats who also constitute the first line of defense! On the other hand, budgetary limitation has also stymied the
  initiative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Likewise, Diplomatic Missions have lobe re-tooled with new mission to dramatically expand their outreach to all stakeholders and
  actors, who can have an impact on Bangladesh. Accordingly, it is necessary to support them with research and financial resources. Enhancement in resources must be matched with
  improvement in the efficiency and effectiveness of Bangladesh diplomats. Consideration could be given to holding a kind of Quadrennial Review on Diplomacy to assess the
  changing global scenario and to evaluate the effectiveness of our diplomacy via a vis such transformations. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has launched such a Review for US
  State Department in 2009. A rigorous performance evaluation mechanism should be developed to assess the performance of the Heads of Mission and other diplomats posted in the
  Missions. Experiences of some of our neighbouring countries in this regard could be helpful. In order to ensure smooth and professional functioning of the diplomatic Missions,
  the authority of the Heads of Missions should be further strengthened and the entire team should be responsible to him for performance of their duties. For some time, the issue of
  the appointment of an Inspector General of Missions was on the card; it would be better to implement this suggestion sooner than later. Consideration could be given to form a
  Foreign Policy Advisory Body with retired and experienced diplomats, who could advise the Ministry on various issues suitably. Many countries maintain such a system of
  consultations.
  Conclusion
  Diplomacy has moved from traditional format of Club Model to Crisis Management model, from vertical bureaucratic model to horizontal network model. Now foreign policy has
  to address two fundamental phenomena, which have characterized the contemporary global scenario: managing change and dealing with regional and global crises arising out of
  multiple interactions of myriad actors. We therefore need a new orientation in our foreign policy, need more flexible and creative outlook, need new institutional mechanism and
  need new set of skills to build coalitions with all actors with a view to managing the evolving reality on the ground. Above all, what we need is the attention and understanding of
  the political leadership to lead this process of change. Reorganizing the diplomatic set up along with aligning other domestic setup to support the creative diplomatic endeavour is
  no less important. Bangladesh has lot many friends all over the world; it is us how to tap on that goodwill to widen our space for building lasting relationship with the members of
  international community. Let us not forget the hard reality that our effort to build a democratic, dynamic, decent Bangladesh in the coming years would be as robust and as vibrant
  as our diplomacy is!
  M. Humayun Kabir is a former Secretary, and former Ambassador of Bangladesh
  to the United States.
  • TRUE & IMPARTIAL
  daulysun
  Acting Editor: Prof. Dr. Syed Anwar Husain.
  Published by Mustafa Kamal Mohiuddin on behalf of East West Media Group Limited from
  Bashundhara City, 13/ka/1 Panthapath, Dhaka-1215; Printed from Plot No: C/52, Block-K,
  Bashundhara, Khilkhet, Badda, Dhaka.
  PABX: 02-8119006, 8158856 Fax: 88-02-8158021
  E-mail: Reporting: reporting@daily-sun.com, National: national@daily-sun.com, News:
  news@daily-sun.com
  Home culturetninment ' academia SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775436 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775437
MetadataTo: AbedinH@state.gov
MetadataFrom: Ebeling, Voda
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-25T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775437/C05775437.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: HI
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775437
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  You both are in my prayers. Please email me your current home
  address. I think I still have the one prior to your move. B
  Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775437 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Voda ebeling
  Monday, October 25, 2010 11:37 AM
  abedinh@state.gov; H
  >
  Hillary: I received this email today from Thought you
  should know. So sad
  Original Message
  From: betsyebelingr
  To:
  Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 5:21 AM
  Subject: Re: HI
  You both are in my prayers. Please email me your current home
  address. I think I still have the one prior to your move. B
  Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
  From:
  Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:21:09 -0700
  To: <betsyebelind
  Subject: Re: HI
  Thank you, wonderful lady.
  Love,
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775437 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775438
MetadataSubject: TRIP READING - - BANGLADESH IS FOLLOWING THE LEAD OF THE QDDR
MetadataTo: Slaughter, Anne-Marie
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-25T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775438/C05775438.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: Trip reading -- Bangladesh is following the lead of the QDDR
ExtractedTo: Slaughter, Anne-Marie; H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, October 25, 2010 11:39 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775438
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Thanks ams.
  We are printing for her

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775438 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 11:39 AM
  To: Slaughter, Anne-Marie; H
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: RE: Trip reading -- Bangladesh is following the lead of the QDDR
  Thanks ams.
  We are printing for her
  From: Slaughter, Anne-Marie
  Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 10:57 AM
  To: 'H'
  Cc: Abedin, Hume; Sullivan, Jacob 3; Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Trip reading -- Bangladesh is following the lead of the QDDR
  This is a very thoughtful piece that identifies many of the same factors we are in our diplomatic chapter (and that is not
  just because the author – the former Bangladesh ambassador to the US—cites me). What is most striking is that it
  affirms that our analysis in the QDDR offers a set of questions that foreign ministries all over the world are grappling
  with. I had hoped to have time to do some traveling to broadcast the QDDR to key allies and partners around the world
  after the QDDR is in, but even if that can't happen, we will devise an outreach strategy re sending the report out to
  foreign ministers around the world and to our ambassadors that will greatly amplify its impact. AM
  From: humayun Kabir
  Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 8:21 AM
  Subject: Article in the Daily Sun
  Dear Colleague,
  Here is a piece which has been published in the Daily Sun of today. It is entitled "Evolving Diplomatic Eco
  system and Bangladesh Foreign Policy: An Agenda for Action." Please enjoy!
  Regards,
  M.Humayun Kabir
  Dhaka
  If you want to respond to this e-mail, DO NOT press REPLY button. Please TYPE my address:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775438 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775439
MetadataSubject: JUDEH
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-25T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775439/C05775439.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: Judeh
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Igeorge Walles, Jacob; Feltman, Jeffrey D B6
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, October 25, 2010 11:44 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775439
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: FYI.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775439 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B1,1.4(B),1.4(D),B6
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 11:44 AM
  To:
  Subject: FW: Judeh
  FYI.
  Original Message
  From: Hale, David M
  Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 9:56 AM
  To: Sullivan, Jacob
  Cc: Igeorge Walles, Jacob; Feltman, Jeffrey D B6
  Subject: Judeh
  Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 08/27/2015 — Class: CONFIDENTIAL — Reason: 1.4(B), 1.4(D) — Declassify on:
  10/25/2025
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775439 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775440
MetadataSubject: RE:
MetadataTo: Ebeling, Voda
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-25T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775440/C05775440.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE:
ExtractedTo: Voda ebeling; H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, October 25, 2010 12:51 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775440
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Thanks for forwarding betsy.
  Rob russo is working on a note now

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775440 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 12:51 PM
  To: Voda ebeling; H
  Subject: RE:
  Thanks for forwarding betsy.
  Rob russo is working on a note now
  From: Voda ebeling
  Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 11:37 AM
  To: AbedIn, Huma; hdr22@clintonemall.com
  Subject:
  Hillary: I received this email today from Thought you
  should know. So sad
  Original Message
  From: betsvebeling
  To:
  Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 5:21 AM
  Subject: Re: HI
  You both are in my prayers. Please email me your current home
  address. I think I still have the one prior to your move. B
  Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
  From:
  Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:21:09 -0700
  To: <betsvebelinq
  Subject: Re: HI
  Thank you, wonderful lady.
  Love,
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775440 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775441
MetadataSubject: EMAILING: IMG00265-20101016-2233[1][1] 2.JPG
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Ebeling, Betsy
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-25T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775441/C05775441.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Emailing: IMG00265-20101016-2233[1][1] (2)jpg
ExtractedFrom: Ebeling, Betsy
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, October 25, 2010 5:45 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775441
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  «IMG00265-20101016-2233[1][1] (2).jpg>> One of my favorite photos
  from the Magical Marigold Weekend. Happy Birthday, Genie, a day
  early. Thank you for two magical weekends.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775441 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Ebeling, Betsy
  Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 5:45 PM
  To:
  Subject: Emailing: IMG00265-20101016-2233[1][1] (2)jpg
  Attachments: IMG00265-20101016-2233[1][1] (2)jpg
  «IMG00265-20101016-2233[1][1] (2).jpg>> One of my favorite photos
  from the Magical Marigold Weekend. Happy Birthday, Genie, a day
  early. Thank you for two magical weekends.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775441 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775442
MetadataSubject: TIGER SUMMIT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-25T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775442/C05775442.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Tiger summit
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, October 25, 2010 6:40 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775442
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Bill consulted further today and now feels comfortable on the Putin-Medvedev angle. So I was premature in raising it.
  Hu might go. Can't leave the tiger playing field to the Chinese.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775442 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 6:40 PM
  To:
  Subject: Tiger summit
  Bill consulted further today and now feels comfortable on the Putin-Medvedev angle. So I was premature in raising it.
  Hu might go. Can't leave the tiger playing field to the Chinese.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775442 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775445
MetadataSubject: HAPPY BIRTHDAY MY DEAR
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775445/C05775445.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Happy Birthday my dear
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 6:36 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775445
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  So glad you were born!
  Kiss your mom for me - she did us right bringing you into the world.
  XO
  Cdm

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775445 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 6:36 AM
  To:
  Subject: Happy Birthday my dear
  So glad you were born!
  Kiss your mom for me - she did us right bringing you into the world.
  XO
  Cdm
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775445 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775446
MetadataSubject: HAPPY, HAPPY!
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Valmoro, Lona J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775446/C05775446.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Happy, happy!
ExtractedFrom: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 7:10 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775446
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  MS --
  Happy Birthday -- hope you have a chance to relax tonight and celebrate!
  Here's to a great year ahead --
  All the best,
  Lana (and the whole Speed/Valmoro family)

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775446 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 7:10 AM
  To:
  Subject: Happy, happy!
  MS --
  Happy Birthday -- hope you have a chance to relax tonight and celebrate!
  Here's to a great year ahead --
  All the best,
  Lana (and the whole Speed/Valmoro family)
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775446 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775447
MetadataSubject: MINI SCHEDULE 10/26/10 TUESDAY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775447/C05775447.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Mini Schedule 10/26/10 Tuesday
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 7:35 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775447
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  ***Happy BIrthday!!!***
  7:30 am DEPART Private Residence
  En route Andrews Air Force Base
  7:55 am ARRIVE Andrews Air Force Base (AAB)
  8:05 am WHEELS UP Andrews Air Force Base via Mil Air Tail#60206
  En route LaGuardia Airport
  8:55 am ARRIVE LaGuardia Airport (LGA)
  9:05 am DEPART LaGuardia Airport *En route United Nations Headquarters
  9:55 am ARRIVE United Nations Headquarters
  10:00 am UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL MEETING ON THE 10"
  10:30 am ANNIVERSARY OF RESOLUTION 1325 ON WOMEN, PEACE AND SECURITY
  Security Council Chamber, United Nations Headquarters
  10:30 am MEETING w/UN SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE ON SEXUAL
  11:00 am VIOLENCE IN CONFLICT MARGOT WALLSTROM
  Security Council Meeting Room, United Nations Headquarters
  11:00 am PULL-ASIDE w/AUSTRIAN FOREIGN MINISTER MICHAEL SPINDELEGGER
  11:20 am Security Council Meeting Room, United Nations Headquarters
  11:30 am DEPART United Nations Headquarters
  En route LaGuardia Airport
  12:15 pm ARRIVE LaGuardia Airport (LGA)
  12:25 pm WHEELS UP LaGuardia Airport *En route Andrews Air Force Base
  1:15 pm ARRIVE Andrews Air Force Base
  1:25 pm DEPART Andrews Air Force Base *En route State Department
  1:50 pm ARRIVE State Department
  2:00 pm OFFICE TIME
  2:30 pm Secretary's Office
  2:30 pm MEETING w/SENATOR JOHN KERRY
  3:30 pm Secretary's Office
  3:30 pm ASIA TRIP MEETING*
  4:00 pm Secretary's Outer Office
  4:15 pm YITZHAK MOLCOH PRE-BRIEF*
  4:45 pm Secretary's Outer Office
  4:45 pm MEETING w/ISRAELI CHIEF NEGOTIATOR YITZHAK MOLCHO*
  5:30 pm Secretary's Outer Office
  Tbd pm DEPART State Department *En route Private Residence
  Tbd pm ARRIVE Private Residence
  ###

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775447 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 7:35 AM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Mini Schedule 10/26/10 Tuesday
  ***Happy BIrthday!!!***
  7:30 am DEPART Private Residence
  En route Andrews Air Force Base
  7:55 am ARRIVE Andrews Air Force Base (AAB)
  8:05 am WHEELS UP Andrews Air Force Base via Mil Air Tail#60206
  En route LaGuardia Airport
  8:55 am ARRIVE LaGuardia Airport (LGA)
  9:05 am DEPART LaGuardia Airport *En route United Nations Headquarters
  9:55 am ARRIVE United Nations Headquarters
  10:00 am UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL MEETING ON THE 10"
  10:30 am ANNIVERSARY OF RESOLUTION 1325 ON WOMEN, PEACE AND SECURITY
  Security Council Chamber, United Nations Headquarters
  10:30 am MEETING w/UN SPECIAL REPRESENTATIVE ON SEXUAL
  11:00 am VIOLENCE IN CONFLICT MARGOT WALLSTROM
  Security Council Meeting Room, United Nations Headquarters
  11:00 am PULL-ASIDE w/AUSTRIAN FOREIGN MINISTER MICHAEL SPINDELEGGER
  11:20 am Security Council Meeting Room, United Nations Headquarters
  11:30 am DEPART United Nations Headquarters
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775447 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775447 Date: 08/31/2015
  En route LaGuardia Airport
  12:15 pm ARRIVE LaGuardia Airport (LGA)
  12:25 pm WHEELS UP LaGuardia Airport *En route Andrews Air Force Base
  1:15 pm ARRIVE Andrews Air Force Base
  1:25 pm DEPART Andrews Air Force Base *En route State Department
  1:50 pm ARRIVE State Department
  2:00 pm OFFICE TIME
  2:30 pm Secretary's Office
  2:30 pm MEETING w/SENATOR JOHN KERRY
  3:30 pm Secretary's Office
  3:30 pm ASIA TRIP MEETING*
  4:00 pm Secretary's Outer Office
  4:15 pm YITZHAK MOLCOH PRE-BRIEF*
  4:45 pm Secretary's Outer Office
  4:45 pm MEETING w/ISRAELI CHIEF NEGOTIATOR YITZHAK MOLCHO*
  5:30 pm Secretary's Outer Office
  Tbd pm DEPART State Department *En route Private Residence
  Tbd pm ARRIVE Private Residence
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775447 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775449
MetadataSubject: PNG
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Reines, Philippe I
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775449/C05775449.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: PNG
ExtractedFrom: Reines, Philippe I <reinesp@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 8:02 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775449
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Fascinating read
  http://mobile.nytimes.com/articlejsessionid=5BC84EF426D7B4AD6F8FF526C7C4E890.w5?a=686322&f=19

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775449 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Reines, Philippe I <reinesp@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 8:02 AM
  To:
  Subject: PNG
  Fascinating read
  http://mobile.nytimes.com/articlejsessionid=5BC84EF426D7B4AD6F8FF526C7C4E890.w5?a=686322&f=19
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775449 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775452
MetadataSubject: NOTE ON SUDAN FOR YOUR MEETING W/SENATOR KERRY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Fuchs, Michael H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775452/C05775452.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Note on Sudan for your meeting w/Senator Kerry
ExtractedFrom: Fuchs, Michael H <FuchsMH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, JacobJ
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 11:41 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775452
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Madam Secretary,
  In advance of your meeting with Senator Kerry this afternoon, below is a short note on the current state of play of Sudan
  policy discussions.
  Mike
  B5
  B5
  B5
  B5
  Michael H. Fuchs
  U.S. Department of State
  (202) 647-1709
  (cell) B6

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775452 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5,B6
  From: Fuchs, Michael H <FuchsMH@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 11:41 AM
  To:
  Cc: Sullivan, JacobJ
  Subject: Note on Sudan for your meeting w/Senator Kerry
  Madam Secretary,
  In advance of your meeting with Senator Kerry this afternoon, below is a short note on the current state of play of Sudan
  policy discussions.
  Mike
  B5
  B5
  B5
  B5
  Michael H. Fuchs
  U.S. Department of State
  (202) 647-1709
  (cell) B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775452 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775456
MetadataSubject: ON ANOTHER SUBJECT...
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Talbott, Strobe
MetadataDateSent: 2012-10-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775456/C05775456.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: On another subject
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Strobe Talbott <STALBOTT
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 2:15 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775456
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Happy birthday - and safe travels.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775456 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE
  IN PART B6
  From: Strobe Talbott <STALBOTT
  Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 2:15 PM
  To: H
  Subject: On another subject
  Happy birthday - and safe travels.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775456 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775457
MetadataSubject: HAPPY BDAY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Otero, Maria
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775457/C05775457.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Happy Bday
ExtractedFrom: Otero, Maria <OteroM2@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 2:31 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775457
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Just now returning from Bogota - v good trip. Toasted you from the Miami airport!
  The totally very best to you,
  Maria

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775457 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Otero, Maria <OteroM2@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 2:31 PM
  To:
  Subject: Happy Bday
  Just now returning from Bogota - v good trip. Toasted you from the Miami airport!
  The totally very best to you,
  Maria
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775457 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775458
MetadataSubject: HAPPY BIRTHDAY...
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Steinberg, James B
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775458/C05775458.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Happy birthday....
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Steinberg, James B <SteinbergJB@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 3:07 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775458
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  From Colombia
  Sorry to miss the festivities!
  Jim

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775458 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Steinberg, James B <SteinbergJB@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 3:07 PM
  To: H
  Subject: Happy birthday....
  From Colombia
  Sorry to miss the festivities!
  Jim
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775458 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775459
MetadataTo: ntanden
MetadataFrom: Tanden, Neera
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775459/C05775459.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Neera Tanden
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 3:09 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775459
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Hillary,
  Happy Birthday.
  I hope you're getting some rest, though, I'm not placing any bets on it.
  Thank you for all you are doing for all of us.
  Neera

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775459 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE
  IN PART B6
  From: Neera Tanden
  Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 3:09 PM
  To: H
  Hillary,
  Happy Birthday.
  I hope you're getting some rest, though, I'm not placing any bets on it.
  Thank you for all you are doing for all of us.
  Neera
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775459 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775460
MetadataSubject: MADELIENE ALBRIGHT
MetadataTo: Abedin, Huma
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775460/C05775460.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Madeliene Albright
ExtractedTo: Abedin, Huma; H
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 4:47 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775460
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Her assistant left a voice mail (on her behalf) at the office wishing you a happy birthday. I'll add to our birthday
  greetings list here.
  Lauren

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775460 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 4:47 PM
  To: Abedin, Huma; H
  Subject: Madeliene Albright
  Her assistant left a voice mail (on her behalf) at the office wishing you a happy birthday. I'll add to our birthday
  greetings list here.
  Lauren
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775460 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775461
MetadataSubject: FW:
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Marshall, Capricia P
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775461/C05775461.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW:
ExtractedFrom: Marshall, Capricia P <MarshalICP@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 5:03 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775461
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  FYI —
  Hope you had a nice day and have a great trip.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775461 Date: 08/31/2015
  From: Marshall, Capricia P <MarshalICP@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 5:03 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW:
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  FYI —
  Hope you had a nice day and have a great trip.
  From: Spahn, Andy
  Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 1:44 PM
  To: Marshall, Caprida P
  Subject:
  Happy birthday to our favorite Sec. of State !!!! (ever!)
  Andy Spahn
  President I Andy Spahn & Associates, Inc. 1100 Universal Plaza Building 5121 I Universal City, California 91608 I tele: +1-818-733-7336 I fax:
  +1-818-733-7329
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775461 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775462
MetadataSubject: START CALLS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0104/DOC_0C05775462/C05775462.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: Start calls
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 6:30 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775462
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: This is a follow up note from Rich but he'll settle for McConnell.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775462 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE
  IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 6:30 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW: Start calls
  This is a follow up note from Rich but he'll settle for McConnell.
  Original Message
  From: Verma, Richard R
  Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 4:58 PM
  To: Sullivan, Jacobi
  Subject: Start calls
  Been thinking that these are important, even before the election...goal is to have members accepting that this is a lame
  duck matter and also the members we identified are important in the event our kyl strategy falls apart - at least they
  know we tried with kyl and made tangible offers.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775462 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775463
MetadataSubject: MORE BDAY WISHES
MetadataTo: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0105/DOC_0C05775463/C05775463.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: More bday wishes
ExtractedTo: Jiloty, Lauren C
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 6:38 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775463
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Haim saban
  Duke kinney
  Binta brown
  Vali nasr
  Fred hochberg
  Lisa perry
  Diane von furstenberg
  Leecia eve
  Michael kives
  Bill and ophelia rudin

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775463 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 6:38 PM
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Cc:
  Subject: More bday wishes
  Haim saban
  Duke kinney
  Binta brown
  Vali nasr
  Fred hochberg
  Lisa perry
  Diane von furstenberg
  Leecia eve
  Michael kives
  Bill and ophelia rudin
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775463 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775464
MetadataSubject: NOTE FOR HRC FROM BONO AND ALI
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0105/DOC_0C05775464/C05775464.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775464
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Tuesday, October 26, 2010 8:00 PM
  Fw: Note for HRC from Bono and All
  Fyi

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775464 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  PART B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Tuesday, October 26, 2010 8:00 PM
  Fw: Note for HRC from Bono and All
  Fyi
  Original Message
  B6
  From: Catriona Garde
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Tue Oct 26 19:31:02 2010
  Subject: Note for HRC from Bono and All
  Hi there,
  Would you mind passing the below note onto HRC from Bono and Ali?
  Many thanks
  Catriona
  Dearest Hillary,
  Happy Birthday - we're sad to have missed the other night, but arrived late from the west coast.
  We are in NY for a month... if you and Bill are upstate and have time for a catch up, let us know.
  Love Bono & Ali
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775464 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05775465
MetadataSubject: NOTE FOR HRC FROM BONO AND ALI
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-10-26T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0105/DOC_0C05775465/C05775465.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Note for HRC from Bono and All
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 8:36 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05775465
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  I have a letter
  III leave at house for you when u r out to dinner.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775465 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 8:36 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: Note for HRC from Bono and All
  I have a letter
  III leave at house for you when u r out to dinner.
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Tue Oct 26 20:35:06 2010
  Subject: Re: Note for HRC from Bono and All
  Do you have something for me from Elizabeth Bagley?
  Original Message
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Tue Oct 26 20:00:19 2010
  Subject: Fw: Note for HRC from Bono and All
  Fyi
  Original Message
  From: Catriona GardE
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Tue Oct 26 19:31:02 2010
  Subject: Note for HRC from Bono and All
  Hi there,
  Would you mind passing the below note onto HRC from Bono and Ali?
  Many thanks
  Catriona
  Dearest Hillary,
  Happy Birthday - we're sad to have missed the other night, but arrived late from the west coast.
  We are in NY for a month... if you and Bill are upstate and have time for a catch up, let us know.
  Love Bono & Ali
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05775465 Date: 08/31/2015



