# Emails

DocNumber: C05769392
MetadataSubject: LESSONS FROM THE ACEH AND NIAS MULTI-DONOR TRUST FUND
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769392/C05769392.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769392
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769392 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  Lessons from the Aceh and Nias Multi-Donor Trust Fund
  1. The Government of Indonesia (G01) responded to the Tsunami by issuing a series of
  government decrees, and immediately organized both overview and relief efforts to
  ensure a rational and coordinated response. The first task was to produce a Damage and
  Loss Assessment (DLA). The DLA was followed by a more detailed Master Plan for
  Rehabilitation and Reconstruction (MPRR). The MPRR provided in-depth sector plans,
  spatial planning, the governance and supervision arrangements of finances with
  considerable attention to how to avoid or minimize corruption. The process behind the
  MPRR was consultative, with a wide range of local stakeholders and public offices being
  heard. The MPRR was presented on 26 March, only 3 months after the Tsunami.
  2. The MPRR was to form the basis for a general three-stage strategy. The Relief phase was
  originally set to six months, but was then reduced to three: January- March 2005. The
  Rehabilitation phase is to run for about 21 months, through December 2006, and the
  Reconstruction phase from July 2006 through December 2009. The MPRR provides a
  well defined phasing of interventions.
  3. The objectives for the Relief efforts were humanitarian relief: rescue; food and
  medicine; emergency infrastructure and temporary shelter; and burying the dead. The
  Rehabilitation phase is to restore services to minimum level: public services; economic
  facilities; banking and financial institutions; trauma treatments; secure land rights; law
  and order; and temporary shelter. Finally, Reconstruction is to rebuild the region:
  rebuilding the economy (production, trade and banking); the transportation,
  telecommunications, and social and cultural systems; improving institutional capacity;
  and housing.
  4. The Government set up a ministerial-level agency to manage the MPRR program from
  Aceh itself, the Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Agency for Aceh and Nias. The BRR
  was formally established end April 2005 and became operational early May. The World
  Bank Board on 30 March 2005 formally established the Multi-Donor Trust Fund (MDF)
  with a Steering Committee comprised of BRR, GOI, donors and civil society. Having a
  credible local coordinators was key to success.
  5. The EC channels nearly 93% of its funds through the MDF, while only 2.5% of USD 400
  million from the US goes to the MDF. While payments into the fund were slow,
  disbursements out of it were to begin with even slower. By October 2005, project
  agreements for about USD 200 million had been signed, but only USD 3 million had
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769392 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769392 Date: 08/31/2015
  actually been disbursed. Disbursements picked up the pace thereafter. The delay was
  caused by two principal impediments: first, donors were quick to pledge funds, but
  getting all the exact written agreements in place took time. This points to the need for
  donors to be flexible regarding formal agreements, and accept simple, generic
  paragraphs that can contribute to speedy resolution of slightly differing phrasings and
  concerns. Second, the processing time for project approval and implementation was a
  concern. Since the MDF was to have funded projects on-budget, they had to be
  implemented by government institutions. This crated bottlenecks.
  6. Smaller donors joined because they wished to support the reconstruction efforts in
  Aceh but do not have own capacity and often not strong views on how best to pursue
  this. They want the Bank to assume fiduciary responsibilities for the funds in a high-risk
  environment, and also to take a lead in ensuring that the funds go to prioritized
  activities. The MDF is thus seen a well-managed bank account with some paid-for
  administrative services. However, the all-inclusive Steering Committee made
  membership large and to some extent unwieldy, and forced it to discuss both policy and
  operational issues.
  7. The Multi Donor Fund Secretariat has developed an Outreach Strategy that includes
  regular radio talk shows, field visits to meet and discuss with beneficiaries and
  communication through advertisements as well as a telephone hotline.
  8. MDF received praise for engaging the Government of Indonesia (G01) in policy dialogue.
  The MDF is thus an entry point for engaging on conditions for sustainability, relevance
  and impact.
  9. Because the MDF does not accept strict ear marking of donor contributions — though it
  does allow for preference indications — it means that the funds are freely available for
  programming according to the criteria and priorities that the MDF agrees to. Given
  strong GOI participation, the MDF is seen as the most successful instrument for
  harmonization and coordination in an environment that has been criticized for a lack of
  coordination. The MDF's Mid Term Review conducted in 2008-2009 found that the MDF
  had made a positive contribution to harmonizing donor efforts and to increasing the
  effectiveness and efficiency of the reconstruction effort.
  10. The MDF did not sufficiently engage the private sector and did not have a coherent job
  creation strategy. The MDF lacked executive rights, but GOI and BRR are credited with
  leveraging a decisive response.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769392 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769393
MetadataSubject: H: FYI: ANY FOREIGN NATION OR LEADER WITH A FRONT COMPANY BECOMES A PERSON UNDER US LAW. S
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-23T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769393/C05769393.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front company becomes a "person" under
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 4:06 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769393
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  US law. S
  This is from Justice Stevens' dissent in the Citizens United case:
  If taken seriously, our colleagues' assumption that the identity of a speaker has no relevance to the Government's ability
  to regulate political speech would lead to some remarkable conclusions. Such an assumption would have accorded the
  propaganda broadcasts to our troops by "Tokyo Rose" during World War II the same protection as speech by Allied
  commanders. More pertinently, it would appear to afford the same protection to multinational corporations controlled by
  foreigners as to individual Americans: To do otherwise, after all, could " 'enhance the relative voice' "of some ( i.e. ,
  humans) over others ( i.e. , nonhurnans). Ante, at 33 (quoting Buckley, 424 U. S., at 49). aUnder the majority's view, I
  suppose it may be a First Arnendrnpnt problem that corporations are not permitted to vote, given that voting is, among
  other things, a form of speech.
  http://wvvw.law.cornell.edu/supct/htm1/08-205.ZX.htmi

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769393 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  Ames: A,raesneestlar
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 4:06 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front company becomes a "person" under
  US law. S
  This is from Justice Stevens' dissent in the Citizens United case:
  If taken seriously, our colleagues' assumption that the identity of a speaker has no relevance to the Government's ability
  to regulate political speech would lead to some remarkable conclusions. Such an assumption would have accorded the
  propaganda broadcasts to our troops by "Tokyo Rose" during World War II the same protection as speech by Allied
  commanders. More pertinently, it would appear to afford the same protection to multinational corporations controlled by
  foreigners as to individual Americans: To do otherwise, after all, could " 'enhance the relative voice' "of some ( i.e. ,
  humans) over others ( i.e. , nonhurnans). Ante, at 33 (quoting Buckley, 424 U. S., at 49). aUnder the majority's view, I
  suppose it may be a First Arnendrnpnt problem that corporations are not permitted to vote, given that voting is, among
  other things, a form of speech.
  http://wvvw.law.cornell.edu/supct/htm1/08-205.ZX.htmi
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22©clintonemail.com>
  To: 'sbwhoeo <sbwhoeop
  •
  Sent: Sat, Jan , 3:51 pm
  Subject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front company becomes a "person" under US law. S
  This is unbelievable. Or maybe totally so given the forces at work.
  Original Message
  From:slowhoeoi <sbw[laeop(
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Jan 23 09:26:25 2010
  Subject: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front company becomes a
  "person" under US law. S
  htt
  : Th/coloradoirdependent.com/46462/hugc-chavezs- --owned:petroleos-cor-set-
  Hugo Chavez's state-owned Petroleos Corp set to spend on your U.S. election
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769393 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769393 Date: 08/31/2015
  <hz-cp://coloradoinderendet.com/46462/huap-chavezs-stat cJined-petroLeos-corpTset-to-
  s_pend-on-your-u-s-F,lectior.>
  Digg <htt;D://diug.com/submit?url=htto://col radoindependent.con146462/hugo-chavezs-state-
  owned-jpetrolecs-corp-set-to-spend-cn-your-u-5-
  election&title=Huoo20Chavez%E2%80%99s2Ostate-
  owned?,
  ,,20Petroleos%2UCor2Oset9
  L2Oto%20s.c)end%20on%20you:r%20U.SA20election&hodvtext=Kogi
  nc2±on+theiCitizens+UnitedSureme-i-Court+ruling-i-is+more-i-of+what+we+love+about+the+wet.+Tt%
  26%239217.%33sthe+kintvpical+collective+dissectionfwe-rhave+now+come+to+ex-o
  .ecttbut+th
  at-i-never+reallyi.existedftefore%3A+serious2C+s_Reculative%2C+arcane2C1-funny%2C+brilliant%
  2C-i-baked%2C4-etc.+The+Sunil-Mt+Fon^da'inr4
  -boinredictablv+000d.+Paul±Blumenthal+W:.
  ps+into+the+9
  65B...%5D&media=news&dic-politcs>
  Tweet <http://tw2t
  .ter_,comihome?status=2T20@COindependent9
  520-
  %20Huuc%20ChavezE2%80%29s%20state-
  dwned%20Petrclec,s%20Cor020set2Oto%20spend%20on%20your%2OU.S.%20election%C29
  6A0%
  - 20http://
  bit.lv/7duhoX>
  By John Tomasic <httip://colorac'loindependent.com/author/johnLomasic/> 1/22/10
  3:58 PM
  Blogging on the Citizens United Supreme Court ruling is more of what we love
  about the web. It's the kind of typical collective dissection we have now come
  to expect but that never really existed before: serious, speculative, arcane,
  funny, brilliant, baked, etc. The Sunlight Foundation blogging
  <nt.M://idicq,s_aniihtfoundazion.com/ 010/01/22/wai-ca-forigniranies:n9
  . 1N_:slne-
  4-01
  -
  .1-
  us--ooLitical--lectLons/>
  is predictably good. Paul Blumenthal dips into the multinational dimension of
  the new "corporation as full citizen-person" framework, drawing on blogging
  going on at Newsweek <http://blo:,T.nesweek.com/blogs/thegaggle/aLchive/2010/01/22 d-
  foreian-corporations-spend-mone-on-u-s-political-candidates.ap:K>
  and the Center for Public Integrity <http://www.public tegrity.or/articiesientry.:1213/>
  "Looks like [the Court] might support allowing foreign companies to spend freely
  in elections in the United States. I guess this would be the corporate
  globalization of the U.S. electoral system." So you gotta ask yourself: Who does
  Hugo Chavez want for President?
  Blumenthal excerpting the Center for Public Integrity:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769393 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769393 Date: 08/31/2015
  <http.://colca
  , :(7., m/w2Tecntent/up
  .loac: /20.10/01/Pict:are-1.4
  .2,:mq>
  The Center for Public Integrity looks at this closer and shows what kind of
  foreign influence we are looking at:
  One prominent examples is CITGO Petroleum Company — once the
  American-born Cities Services Company, but purchased in 1990 by the Venezuelan
  government-owned Petraleos de Venezuela S.A. The Citizens United ruling could
  conceivably allow Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, who has sharply criticized
  both of the past two U.S. presidents, to spend government funds to defeat an
  American political candidate, just by having CITGO buy TV ads bashing his
  target.
  And it's not just Chavez. The Saudi government owns Houston's Saudi
  Refining Company and half of Motiva Enterprises. Lenovo, which bought IBM's PC
  assets in 2004, is partially owned by the Chinese government's Chinese Academy
  of Sciences. And Singapore's APL Limited operates several U.S. port operations.
  A weakening of the limit on corporate giving could mean China, Saudi Arabia,
  Singapore, and any other country that owns companies that operate in the U.S.
  could also have significant sway in American electioneering.
  I really can't see Americans being too happy about this.
  Dahlia Lithwick reported for Slate <htto:y y W com/j.d/2 _208/> from the
  Supreme Court as the opinions were being read. She offered this aside:
  While Stevens is reading the portion of his concurrence about the "cautious
  view of corporate power" held by the framers, I see Justice Thomas chuckle
  softly.
  Was it a disdainful chuckle at the impotence of his colleague? Was it merely a
  chuckle of disagreement, of good-natured exasperation? Was it a chuckle at an
  anachronistic vision of the framers set beside today's modern corporate silicon
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769393 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769393 Date: 08/31/2015
  and steel behemoths? I doubt he was thinking- about Hugo Chavez.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769393 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769394
MetadataSubject: H: FYI: ANY FOREIGN NATION OR LEADER WITH A FRONT COMPANY BECOMES A PERSON UNDER US LAW. S
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-23T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769394/C05769394.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769394
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  sbwhoeop B6
  Saturday, January 23, 2010 4:09 PM
  Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front company becomes a "person" under
  US law. S
  Getting a legislative fix might be a gcod initiative for SOTU. Let the Republicans try to oppose it. S

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769394 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  sbwhoeop B6
  Saturday, January 23, 2010 4:09 PM
  Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front company becomes a "person" under
  US law. S
  Getting a legislative fix might be a gcod initiative for SOTU. Let the Republicans try to oppose it. S
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR nemail.com>
  To: 'sbwhoeo <sbwhoeop
  Sent: Sat, Jan 23, 2010 3:51 pm
  Subject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front company becomes a "person" under US law. S
  This is unbelievable. Or maybe totally so given the forces at work.
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeoi <bwhoeon
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Jan 23 09:26:25 2010
  Subject: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front company becomes a
  "person" under US law. S
  htt,p"cc)lo _doindependent.com/46462/ u(70-chavezs- ate-owned-ketfoleos-coi:p-s
  ..ipend-on-vour:u-s-electiop
  Hugo Chavez's state-owned Petroleos Corp set to spend on your U.S. election
  <http://coloradoindependent.com/46462/nuac-chavezs-state-owned7
  pet Jecs-coro-set
  send-on-vour-u-s-election>
  Digg <http_ Tg.coraisbmuri=H_ p://coloradoi deEenden cm/46462,
  owned-p
  .ej=rol,eos:,7.crp-set-to-spend-on-your:u-sT
  election&titl
  .e=Huslc%20ChavezE280%99s2(3state
  :
  .:}ynedC -r cDrp20se LUO u-73c r Gv.r LOL 23 tion&bodytext-Siog
  nad-
  Dnthe+Cti7.ensi
  - United+SuQreme4-Court+rLlinv-is+morei-oE-4-what- love+abot+theiweb.+Tt
  2
  .
  62
  .2
  .738217!:1 33stkind+of+typicalicollectived-dissection÷weavei-now-comel-toexp,
  ,
  c11+buti-th
  a r-funny%2Ci-bri lIiant
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769394 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769394 Date: 08/31/2015
  +The-Suriot+5oundatior biccign
  undatior
  psi.ntotthe+V33...%5D&media=ne- ,&toEic=pc cs>
  s+predictab fQood.
  Tweet <
  .1-Itto://twitter.com/home?status- 20@COindee d
  %2_0_,Hualchvez0E2'030%99s%20state-
  owned%20Pecroieos%23C3r020set%20to%23spend .on%2Ovour%200.3 elect
  bi_t,_12/7d,_IhoY>
  LI
  By John Tomasic <http://color-idoindependen'
  -- comiauthor/)ohntomasic/> 1/22/10
  3:58 PM
  Blogging on the Citizens United Supreme Court ruling is more of what we love
  about the web. It's the kind of typical collective dissection we have now come
  to expect but that never really existed before: serious, speculative, arcane,
  funny, brilliant, baked, etc. The Sunlight Foundation blogging
  <http://bio9.sunlicfhtfoundation.com/2010/01/22/wait-can- n-comoanies nnw-soend--
  us-Dolitical-elections/>
  is predictably good. Paul Blumenthal dips into the multinational dimension of
  the new "corporation as full citizen-person" framework, drawing on blogging
  going on at Newsweek <httc://blog.newsweek.comfol2q ==c-ao
  . c
  ,
  '
  ,
  =
  ,/ar-kv=/2010/01/22/shouid-
  forean-corrations-spend-m3nev-on-u-s-political-candidates.apx>
  and the Center for Public Integrity <http://w- _Lcinte9
  .rity.orafarticies pt17y,
  "Looks like [the Court] might support allowing foreign companies to spend freely
  in elections in the United States. I guess this would be the corporate
  globalization of the U.S. electoral system." So you gotta ask yourself: Who does
  Hugo Chavez want for President?
  Blumenthal excerpting the Center for Public Integrity:
  <http: !/ocloradoi.ndependeot.com/wp-content/uploaas/2010/01/Picture-142.-ong>
  The Center for Public Integrity looks at this closer and shows what kind of
  foreign influence we are looking at:
  One prominent examples is CITGO Petroleum Company — once the
  American-born Cities Services Company, but Purchased in 1990 by the Venezuelan
  government-owned Petroleos de Venezuela S.A. The Citizens United ruling could
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769394 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769394 Date: 08/31/2015
  conceivably allow Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, who has sharply criticized
  both of the past two U.S. presidents, to spend government funds to defeat an
  American political candidate, just by having CITGO buy TV ads bashing his
  target.
  And it's not just Chavez. The Saudi government owns Houston's Saudi
  Refining Company and half of Motiva Enterprises. Lenovo, which bought IBM's PC
  assets in 2004, is partially owned by the Chinese government's Chinese Academy
  of Sciences. And Singapore's APL Limited operates several U.S. port operations.
  A weakening of the liMit on corporate giving could mean China, Saudi Arabia,
  Singapore, and any other country that owns companies that operate in the U.S.
  could also have significant sway in American electioneering.
  I really can't see Americans being too happy about this.
  Dahlia Lithwick reported for Slate <http:/ywww J.dte.comlid/2?
  .. 4
  :?298/> from the
  Supreme Court as the opinions were being read. She offered this aside:
  While Stevens is reading the portion of his concurrence about the "cautious
  view of corporate power" held by the framers, I see Justice Thomas chuckle
  softly.
  Was it a disdainful chuckle at the impotence of his colleague? Was it merely a
  chuckle of disagreement, of good-natured exasperation? Was it a chuckle at an
  anachronistic vision of the framers set beside today's modern corporate silicon
  and steel behemoths? I doubt he was thinking about Hugo Chavez.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769394 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769395
MetadataSubject: H: FYI: ANY FOREIGN NATION OR LEADER WITH A FRONT COMPANY BECOMES A PERSON UNDER US LAW. S
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-23T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769395/C05769395.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front companybecornes a "person.' under
ExtractedFrom: H <HDR22@ciintonemail.com>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 4:23 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769395
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  US law. S
  Me, too. He shouldn't retire
  Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Slackberri
  --

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769395 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  202427.1:01WATRAMaildraktkrOMAZMA1,002,7AlratIC:.. "
  I•ULM:diFiGN
  " ItIZOWSZAW71/110311.41SMY,
  M474 N92.011,7:1XWSCOUV•5.7.;:.
  '1".12',47Z-
  ZMIX..
  ,
  Z11.2:S1.7.f.S.7=VP.1717151/.7=n1110.40=11COMOV:;.`rlarta,
  ..T./MIRt!az,4:-
  .:',7x.7.„"tini.
  ,
  :re..,:anrar.:9.g:rx
  sbwhoeop
  Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 4:23 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front companybecornes a "person.' under
  US law. S
  Me, too. He shouldn't retire
  Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Slackberri
  --Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@ciintonemail.com>
  Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:08:57
  To: 'sbwhoeoc <sbwhoeop
  Subject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front company becomes a "person" under US
  Good for him. I wish he were 50 instead 901
  -- Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop <sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Jan 23 16:06:22 2010
  Subject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front con-mane becomes a "person" under US law. 5
  This is from Justice Stevens' dissent in the Citi2:ens United case:
  If taken seriously, our colleagues' assumption that the identity of a speaker has no relevance to the i.Tjoi..narnments ability
  to regulate political speech would lead to some remarkable conclusions. Such an assumption would have accorded the
  propaganda broadcasts to our troops by "Tokyo Rose' during World Ver Il the same protection as speech by Allied
  commanders. More pertinently, it would appear to afford the same protection to multinational corporations controlled
  by foreigners as to individual Americans: To do otherwise, after all, could 'enhance the relative voice"' of some i.e. ,
  humans) over others ( i.e. , nonhumans). Ante at 33 (quoting Buckley , 424 U. S., at 49). 51
  <http://www.iaw,corneli.edu/supct/htm1/08-205.2X.html#51> Under the majority's view, I suppose ii: may be a First
  Amendment <http:www.la.i.v.cornell.edu/suoct-cgliget-const?amendmenti> problem that corporations are not
  permitted to vote, given that voting is, among other things, a form of speech.
  http://www.law.cornell.edu/suoct/htm1/08-2052X.html
  Original Message--
  From: H <H0822@clintonemail.com>
  To: isbwhaeop <sbwhoeop
  Cent: Sat, Jan 23, 2010 3:51 pm
  Subject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front company becomes a "person" under US law. S
  B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769395 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769395 Date: 08/31/2015
  This is unbelievable. Cr maybe totaily so given the forces at work.
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop <sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Jan 23 09:23:25 2010
  Subject: H: FY: Any foreign nation or leader with a front company becomes a
  "person" under US law, S
  http://coioradoinde.penderit.corn/46462/hugo-ci-iavezs-state-owned-betroiEos-corp-set-to-spend-on-your-u-s-electio ,
  Hugo Chave2's state-ovined Petroieos Corp set to spend on your U.S. ei-ection
  <hztp://coloradoincier.)enderit.ccoTVJ-6462/htigo-chavezs-sta.te-,
  ..)vm:-2,:i-petrcjec:.:,-corp-set-to-spErpi-on-you --u-s-
  e;ection>
  Dif7,17, <http://digg.comIsubmit?uri=http://coioradoindepenc;eriLcorn/46.462/hugo-chavezs-state-owned-oetroleos-corp-
  set-to-spend-on-your-;.:-s-eiection&titie=1-iugo%20Chavez%E2%80%9Ys920state-
  owned%20Petroieos%2Noi'p5.'.-.20set91:20to9,:)20spenc.1%20on%20your.%20U.S.r.:.4.;20eiection&bodytext=Biogging+on+the4-
  Citizens+UnitPd÷Suoreme-i-Coui-t-1-ruling+is+more+of+wiat+,,Jve+Iove-i-about-i-tb:?+web.-1-itc/026c/023821.7%3 ,
  ,i-th,,,i-kinci+0
  f+typ i ea i+co lective+d issec tio n-i-we+have÷now-'-co rrie-i-to+expect+bu'i:-:-that+ neve r-f-rea i-e%3A.+se ro us9.:2
  C-i-specuiative%2C+arcane%2C±finny%2C+briiiiant%2C-i-bake,Y7a1Z+i•,tc.+Thei-Sunlight-i-Foundation+biogrjrig4sis+predicta
  bk,f+good.+Paui+Biurnanthal+dips+into-i-the-i-9,S573...951
  .)&media=riews&topic-polirks>
  Tweet <http://twitter.comlhome.?statos.RT%20@COi depencient%20,-%20Flugo%20Chavez%E7%R0%9":1s9,"0203tatg-
  ownecOPetroleos%20Corp%2.,
  ..Jset%20to5
  , 20spend5:20on'Xi20your%20U.S.'320election%C.2%/1
  .0%2Ohttp://bitiv,17duh
  oy>
  By John Tomasic <http:ficoloradoindependent.corniaithor/johntomasici> 1 /22/10
  3:58 PM
  F.:logging on the CitizenS United Supreme Court ruiing is mor,7, of wha,
  ,: we love
  about the web. it's the kind of typical coiLective c.liss.ectiovi we have now come
  B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769395 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769395 Date: 08/31/2015
  to expect but that never really existed before: serious, speculative, arcane,
  funny, brilliant, baked, etc. The Sunlight Foundation blogging
  <http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/01/22/wait-can-foreign-companies-now-spend-on-us-political-electionsh
  is predictably good. Paul Blumenthal dips into the multinational dimension of
  the new "corporation as full citizen-person" framework, drawing on blogging
  going on at Newsweek <http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/thegaggle/archive/2010/01/22/should-foreign-corporations-
  spend-money-on-u-s-political-candidates.aspx>
  and the Center for Public Integrity <http://www.publicintegrity.orearticlegentry/1913/>
  "Looks like [the Court] might support allowing foreign companies to spend freely
  in elections in the United States. I guess this would be the corporate
  globalization of the U.S. electoral system." So you gotta ask yourself: Who does
  Hugo Chavez want for President?
  Blumenthal excerpting the Center for Public Integrity:
  <http://coloradoindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Picture-142.png>
  The Center for Public Integrity looks at this closer and shows what kind of
  foreign influence we are looking at:
  One prominent examples is CITGO Petroleum Company — once the
  American-born Cities Services Company, but purchased in 1990 by the Venezuelan
  government-owned Petroleos de Venezuela S.A. The Citizens United ruling could
  conceivably allow Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, who has sharply criticized
  both of the past two U.S. presidents, to spend government funds to defeat an
  American political candidate, just by having CITGO buy TV ads bashing his
  target.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769395 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769395 Date: 08/31/2015
  And it's not just Chavez. The Saudi government owns Houston's Saudi
  Refining Company and half of Motiva Enterprises. Lenovo, which bought IBM's PC
  assets in 2004, is partially owned by the Chinese government's Chinese Academy
  of Sciences. And Singapore's APL Limited operates several U.S. port operations.
  A weakening of the limit on corporate giving could mean China, Saudi Arabia,
  Singapore, and any other country that owns companies that operate in the U.S.
  could also have significant sway in American electioneering.
  I really can't see Americans being too happy about this.
  Dahlia Lithwick reported for Slate <http://www.slate.com/id/2242208/> from the
  Supreme Court as the opinions were being read. She offered this aside:
  While Stevens is reading the portion of his concurrence about the "cautious
  view of corporate power" held by the framers, I see Justice Thomas chuckle
  softly.
  Was it a disdainful chuckle at the impotence of his colleague? Was it merely a
  chuckle of disagreement, of good-natured exasperation? Was it a chuckle at an
  anachronistic vision of the framers set beside today's modern corporate silicon
  and steel behemoths? I doubt he was thinking about Hugo Chavez.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769395 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769396
MetadataSubject: H: FYI: ANY FOREIGN NATION OR LEADER WITH A FRONT COMPANY BECOMES A PERSON UNDER US LAW. S
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-23T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769396/C05769396.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front companybecomes a "person" under
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 4:23 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769396
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  US law. S
  Some groups going for amendment but foreign corps may be low hanging fruit. Don't know, an idea to investigate Sent
  via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769396 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 4:23 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front companybecomes a "person" under
  US law. S
  Some groups going for amendment but foreign corps may be low hanging fruit. Don't know, an idea to investigate Sent
  via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:15:21
  To: isbwhoeold _ l'<sbwhoeop
  Subject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front company becomes a "person" under US law. S
  Not sure there is a legislative fix. Haven't read the opinion yet. May require constitutional amendment.
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop <sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Jan 23 16:08:34 2010
  Subject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front company becomes a "person" under US law. S
  Getting a legislative fix might be a good initiative for SOTU. Let the Republicans try to oppose it. S
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: 'sbwhoeor <sbwhoeop
  Sent: Sat, Jan 23, 2010 3:51 pm
  Subject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front company becomes a "person" under US law. S
  This is unbelievable. Or maybe totally so given the forces at work.
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Jan 23 09:26:25 2010
  Subject: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front company becomes a
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769396 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769396 Date: 08/31/2015
  "person" under US law. S
  http://coloradoindependent.com/46462/hugo-chavezs-state-owned-petroleos-corp-set-to-spend-on-your-u-s-election
  Hugo Chavez's state-owned Petroleos Corp set to spend on your U.S. election
  <http://coloradoindependent.com/46462/hugo-chavezs-state-owned-petroleos-corp-set-to-spend-on-your-u-s-
  election>
  Digg <http://digg.com/submit?url=http://coloradoindependent.com/46462/hugo-chavezs-state-owned-petroleos-corp-
  set-to-spend-on-your-u-s-election&title=H ugo%20Chavez%E2%80%99s%20state-
  owned%20Petroleos%20Corp%20set%20to%20spend%20on%20you r%2OU .S.%20e lection&bodytext=Blogging+on+the+
  Citizens+United+Supreme+Court+ruling+is+more+of+what+we+love+about+the+web.+It%26%238217%3Bs+the+kind+o
  f+typica l+collective+d issection+we+have+now+come+to+expect+but+that+never+rea I ly+existed+before%3A+serio us%2
  C+speculative%2C+a rcane%2C+funny%2C+brilliant%2C+baked%2C+etc.+The+Sunlight+Foundation+blogging+is+predicta
  bly+good.+Paul+Blumenthal+dips+into+the+%5B...%5D&media=news&topic=politics>
  Tweet <http://twitter.com/home?status=RT%2O@COindependent%20-%20Hugo%20Chavez%E2%80%99s%20state-
  owned%20Petroleos%20Corp%20set%20to%20spend%20on%20your%2OU.S.%20election%C2%A0%2Ohttp://bit.ly/7d uh
  oY>
  By John Tomasic <http://coloradoindependent.com/author/johntomasich 1/22/10
  3:58 PM
  Blogging on the Citizens United Supreme Court ruling is more of what we love
  about the web. It's the kind of typical collective dissection we have now come
  to expect but that never really existed before: serious, speculative, arcane,
  funny, brilliant, baked, etc. The Sunlight Foundation blogging
  <http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/01/22/wait-can-foreign-companies-now-spend-on-us-political-electionsh
  is predictably good. Paul Blumenthal dips into the multinational dimension of
  the new "corporation as full citizen-person" framework, drawing on blogging
  going on at Newsweek <http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/thegaggle/archive/2010/01/22/should-foreign-corporations-
  spend-money-on-u-s-political-candidates.aspx>
  and the Center for Public Integrity <http://www.publicintegrity.org/articles/entry/1913/>
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769396 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769396 Date: 08/31/2015
  "Looks like [the Court] might support allowing foreign companies to spend freely
  in elections in the United States. I guess this would be the corporate
  globalization of the U.S. electoral system." So you gotta ask yourself: Who does
  Hugo Chavez want for President?
  Blumenthal excerpting the Center for Public Integrity:
  <http://coloradoindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Picture-142.png>
  The Center for Public Integrity looks at this closer and shows what kind of
  foreign influence we are looking at:
  One prominent examples is CITGO Petroleum Company — once the
  American-born Cities Services Company, but purchased in 1990 by the Venezuelan
  government-owned Petroleos de Venezuela S.A. The Citizens United ruling could
  conceivably allow Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, who has sharply criticized
  both of the past two U.S. presidents, to spend government funds to defeat an
  American political candidate, just by having CITGO buy TV ads bashing his
  target.
  And it's not just Chavez. The Saudi government owns Houston's Saudi
  Refining Company and half of Motiva Enterprises. Lenovo, which bought IBM's PC
  assets in 2004, is partially owned by the Chinese government's Chinese Academy
  of Sciences. And Singapore's APL Limited operates several U.S. port operations.
  A weakening of the limit on corporate giving could mean China, Saudi Arabia,
  Singapore, and any other country that owns companies that operate in the U.S.
  could also have significant sway in American electioneering.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769396 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769396 Date: 08/31/2015
  I really can't see Americans being too happy about this.
  Dahlia Lithwick reported for Slate <http://www.slate.com/id/2242208/> from the
  Supreme Court as the opinions were being read. She offered this aside:
  While Stevens is reading the portion of his concurrence about the "cautious
  view of corporate power" held by the framers, I see Justice Thomas chuckle
  softly.
  Was it a disdainful chuckle at the impotence of his colleague? Was it merely a
  chuckle of disagreement, of good-natured exasperation? Was it a chuckle at an
  anachronistic vision of the framers set beside today's modern corporate silicon
  and steel behemoths? I doubt he was thinking about Hugo Chavez.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769396 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769397
MetadataSubject: H: FYI: ANY FOREIGN NATION OR LEADER WITH A FRONT COMPANY BECOMES A PERSON UNDER US LAW. S
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-23T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769397/C05769397.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a frontcompanybecomes a "person" under
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 4:39 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769397
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  US law. S
  You have people somewhere who can explore this Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769397 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 4:39 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a frontcompanybecomes a "person" under
  US law. S
  You have people somewhere who can explore this Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:26:47
  To: 'sbwhoeop <sbwhoeop
  Subject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front companybecomes a "person" under US law. S
  Agreed.
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop <sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Jan 23 16:23:28 2010
  Subject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front companybecomes a "person" under US law. S
  Some groups going for amendment but foreign corps may be low hanging fruit. Don't know, an idea to investigate Sent
  via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:15:21
  To: 'sbwhoeop <sbwhoeopf
  Subject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front company becomes a "person" under US law. S
  Not sure there is a legislative fix. Haven't read the opinion yet. May require constitutional amendment.
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop <sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Jan 23 16:08:34 2010
  Subject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front company becomes a "person" under US law. S
  Getting a legislative fix might be a good initiative for SOTU. Let the Republicans try to oppose it. S
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: 'sbwhoeop
  Sent: Sat, Jan 23, 2010 3:51 pm
  Subject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front company becomes a "person" under US law. S
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769397 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769397 Date: 08/31/2015
  This is unbelievable. Or maybe totally so given the forces at work.
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Jan 23 09:26:25 2010
  Subject: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front company becomes a
  "person" under US law. S
  http://coloradoindependent.com/46462/hugo-chavezs-state-owned-petroleos-corp-set-to-spend-on-your-u-s-election
  Hugo Chavez's state-owned Petroleos Corp set to spend on your U.S. election
  <http://coloradoindependent.com/46462/hugo-chavezs-state-owned-petroleos-corp-set-to-spend-on-your-u-s-
  election>
  Digg <http://digg.com/submit?url=http://coloradoindependent.com/46462/hugo-chavezs-state-owned-petroleos-corp-
  set-to-spend-on-your-u-s-election&title=Hugo%20Chavez%E2%80%99s%20state-
  owned%2OPetroleos%20Corp%20set%20to%20spend%20on%20your%2OU.S.%20election&bodytext=Blogging+on+the+
  Citizens+United+Supreme+Court+ruling+is+more+of+what+we+love+about+the+web.+It%26%238217%3Bs+the+kind+o
  f+typica l+col lective+dissection+we+have+now+come+to+expect+but+that+never+rea I ly+existed+before%3A+serious%2
  C+speculative%2C+arcane%2C+funny%2C+brilliant%2C+ba ked%2C+etc.+The+Sunlight+Foundation+blogging+is+predicta
  bly+good.+Pa ul+Blumenthal+dips+into+the+%5B...%5D&media=news&topic=politics>
  Tweet <http://twitter.com/home?status=RT%2O@COindependent%20-%20Hugo%20Chavez%E2%80%99s%20state-
  owned%20Petroleos%20Corp%20set%20to%20spend%20on%20your%2OU.S.%20election%C2%A0%2Ohttp://bit.ly/7duh
  oY>
  By John Tomasic <http://coloradoindependent.com/author/johntomasic/> 1/22/10
  3:58 PM
  Blogging on the Citizens United Supreme Court ruling is more of what we love
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769397 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769397 Date: 08/31/2015
  about the web. It's the kind of typical collective dissection we have now come
  to expect but that never really existed before: serious, speculative, arcane,
  funny, brilliant, baked, etc. The Sunlight Foundation blogging
  <http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/01/22/wait-can-foreign-companies-now-spend-on-us-political-electionsh
  is predictably good. Paul Blumenthal dips into the multinational dimension of
  the new "corporation as full citizen-person" framework, drawing on blogging
  going on at Newsweek <http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/thegaggle/archive/2010/01/22/should-foreign-corporations-
  spend-money-on-u-s-political-candidates.aspx>
  and the Center for Public Integrity <http://www.publicintegrity.org/articles/entry/1913/>
  "Looks like [the Court] might support allowing foreign companies to spend freely
  in elections in the United States. I guess this would be the corporate
  globalization of the U.S. electoral system." So you gotta ask yourself: Who does
  Hugo Chavez want for President?
  Blumenthal excerpting the Center for Public Integrity:
  <http://coloradoindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Picture-142.png>
  The Center for Public Integrity looks at this closer and shows what kind of
  foreign influence we are looking at:
  One prominent examples is CITGO Petroleum Company — once the
  American-born Cities Services Company, but purchased in 1990 by the Venezuelan
  government-owned Petroleos de Venezuela S.A. The Citizens United ruling could
  conceivably allow Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, who has sharply criticized
  both of the past two U.S. presidents, to spend government funds to defeat an
  American political candidate, just by having CITGO buy TV ads bashing his
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769397 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769397 Date: 08/31/2015
  target.
  And it's not just Chavez. The Saudi government owns Houston's Saudi
  Refining Company and half of Motiva Enterprises. Lenovo, which bought IBM's PC
  assets in 2004, is partially owned by the Chinese government's Chinese Academy
  of Sciences. And Singapore's APL Limited operates several U.S. port operations.
  A weakening of the limit on corporate giving could mean China, Saudi Arabia,
  Singapore, and any other country that owns companies that operate in the U.S.
  could also have significant sway in American electioneering.
  I really can't see Americans being too happy about this.
  Dahlia Lithwick reported for Slate <http://www.slate.com/id/2242208/> from the
  Supreme Court as the opinions were being read. She offered this aside:
  While Stevens is reading the portion of his concurrence about the "cautious
  view of corporate power" held by the framers, I see Justice Thomas chuckle
  softly.
  Was it a disdainful chuckle at the impotence of his colleague? Was it merely a
  chuckle of disagreement, of good-natured exasperation? Was it a chuckle at an
  anachronistic vision of the framers set beside today's modern corporate silicon
  and steel behemoths? I doubt he was thinking about Hugo Chavez.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769397 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769398
MetadataSubject: H: FYI: ANY FOREIGN NATION OR LEADER WITH A FRONT COMPANY BECOMES A PERSON UNDER US LAW. S
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-23T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769398/C05769398.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a frontcompanybecomes a "person" under
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 5:14 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769398
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  US law. S
  See what harold koh says, just the foreign corp piece Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769398 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 5:14 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a frontcompanybecomes a "person" under
  US law. S
  See what harold koh says, just the foreign corp piece Sent via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:26:47
  To: 'sbwhoeop '<sbwhoeopi
  Subject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front companybecomes a "person" under US law. S
  Agreed.
  Original Messa e
  From: sbwhoeo <sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Jan 23 16:23:28 2010
  Subject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front companybecomes a "person" under US law. S
  Some groups going for amendment but foreign corps may be low hanging fruit. Don't know, an idea to investigate Sent
  via Cingular Xpress Mail with Blackberry
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:15:21
  To: 'sbwhoeop <sbwhoeoP
  Subject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front company becomes a "person" under US law. S
  Not sure there is a legislative fix. Haven't read the opinion yet. May require constitutional amendment.
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop <sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Jan 23 16:08:34 2010
  Subject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front company becomes a "person" under US law. S
  Getting a legislative fix might be a good initiative for SOTU. Let the Republicans try to oppose it. S
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: 'sbwhoeop
  Sent: Sat, Jan 23, 2010 3:51 pm
  Subject: Re: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front company becomes a "person" under US law. S
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769398 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769398 Date: 08/31/2015
  This is unbelievable. Or maybe totally so given the forces at work.
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop <sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Sat Jan 23 09:26:25 2010
  Subject: H: FYI: Any foreign nation or leader with a front company becomes a
  "person" under US law. S
  http://coloradoindependent.com/46462/hugo-chavezs-state-owned-petroleos-corp-set-to-spend-on-your-u-s-election
  Hugo Chavez's state-owned Petroleos Corp set to spend on your U.S. election
  <http://coloradoindependent.com/46462/hugo-chavezs-state-owned-petroleos-corp-set-to-spend-on-your-u-s-
  election>
  Digg <http://digg.com/submit?url=http://coloradoindependent.com/46462/hugo-chavezs-state-owned-petroleos-corp-
  set-to-spend-on-your-u-s-election&title=Hugo%20Chavez%E2%80%99s%20state-
  owned%20Petroleos%20Corp%20set%20to%20spend%20on%20your%20U.S.%20election&bodytext=Blogging+on+the+
  Citizens+United+Supreme+Court+ruling+is+more+of+what+we+love+about+the+web.+It%26%238217%3Bs+the+kind+o
  f+typica l+collectiv,e+dissection+we+have+now+come+to+expect+but+that+never+rea Ily+existed+before%3A+serious%2
  C+speculative%2C+arcane%2C+funny%2C+brilliant%2C+baked%2C+etc.+The+Sunlight+Foundation+blogging+is+predicta
  bly+good.+Paul+Blumenthal+dips+into+the+%5B...%5D&media=news&topic=politics>
  Tweet <http://twitter.com/home?status=RT%2O@COindependent%20-%20Hugo%20Chavez%E2%80%99s%20state-
  owned%20Petroleos%20Corp%20set%20to%20spend%20on%20your%2OU.S.%20election%C2%A0%2Ohttp://bit.ly/7duh
  oY>
  By John Tomasic <http://coloradoindependent.com/author/johntomasich 1/22/10
  3:58 PM
  Blogging on the Citizens United Supreme Court ruling is more of what we love
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769398 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769398 Date: 08/31/2015
  about the web. It's the kind of typical collective dissection we have now come
  to expect but that never really existed before: serious, speculative, arcane,
  funny, brilliant, baked, etc. The Sunlight Foundation blogging
  <http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2010/01/22/wait-can-foreign-companies-now-spend-on-us-political-electionsh
  is predictably good. Paul Blumenthal dips into the multinational dimension of
  the new "corporation as full citizen-person" framework, drawing on blogging
  going on at Newsweek <http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/thegaggle/archive/2010/01/22/should-foreign-corporations-
  spend-money-on-u-s-political-candidates.aspx>
  and the Center for Public Integrity <http://www.publicintegrity.org/articles/entry/1913/>
  "Looks like [the Court] might support allowing foreign companies to spend freely
  in elections in the United States. I guess this would be the corporate
  globalization of the U.S. electoral system." So you gotta ask yourself: Who does
  Hugo Chavez want for President?
  Blumenthal excerpting the Center for Public Integrity:
  <http://coloradoindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Picture-142.png>
  The Center for Public Integrity looks at this closer and shows what kind of
  foreign influence we are looking at:
  One prominent examples is CITGO Petroleum Company — once the
  American-born Cities Services Company, but purchased in 1990 by the Venezuelan
  government-owned Petroleos de Venezuela S.A. The Citizens United ruling could
  conceivably allow Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, who has sharply criticized
  both of the past two U.S. presidents, to spend government funds to defeat an
  American political candidate, just by having CITGO buy TV ads bashing his
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769398 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769398 Date: 08/31/2015
  target.
  And it's not just Chavez. The Saudi government owns Houston's Saudi
  Refining Company and half of Motiva Enterprises. Lenovo, which bought IBM's PC
  assets in 2004, is partially owned by the Chinese government's Chinese Academy
  of Sciences. And Singapore's APL Limited operates several U.S. port operations.
  A weakening of the limit on corporate giving could mean China, Saudi Arabia,
  Singapore, and any other country that owns companies that operate in the U.S.
  could also have significant sway in American electioneering.
  I really can't see Americans being too happy about this.
  Dahlia Lithwick reported for Slate <http://www.slate.com/id/2242208/> from the
  Supreme Court as the opinions were being read. She offered this aside:
  While Stevens is reading the portion of his concurrence about the "cautious
  view of corporate power" held by the framers, I see Justice Thomas chuckle
  softly.
  Was it a disdainful chuckle at the impotence of his colleague? Was it merely a
  chuckle of disagreement, of good-natured exasperation? Was it a chuckle at an
  anachronistic vision of the framers set beside today's modern corporate silicon
  and steel behemoths? I doubt he was thinking about Hugo Chavez.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769398 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769400
MetadataSubject: UN HAITI OPERATION
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-23T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769400/C05769400.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: UN Haiti Operation
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 8:34 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769400
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: FYI
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769400 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 8:34 PM
  To:
  Subject FW: UN Haiti Operation
  FYI
  From: Schwartz, Eric P
  Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 6:15 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: UN Haiti Operation
  Cheryl:
  FYI. I understand that Susan Rice and the Secretary discussed UN Haiti operation. Susan subsequently asked me for my
  views on the organization of the UN tsunami operation, with a view toward enhancing the effectiveness of the current
  effort on Haiti. I have lots of thoughts — as the operation needs to be much, much stronger institutionally — which I will
  share with her on Monday.
  Eric
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769400 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769401
MetadataSubject: UPDATE ON MONTANA HOTEL VISIT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-23T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769401/C05769401.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: update on Montana Hotel visit
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 10:46 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769401
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: FYI
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769401 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 10:46 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW: update on Montana Hotel visit
  FYI
  From: Callaghan, Tim [mailto:
  Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 9:30 PM
  To: Harris, Elizabeth 3; Lindwall, David E; Cantrell, Paul M; Callaghan, Tim (DCHA/OFDA/LAC); Rex, Gary L; Mayer, Paul
  0
  Subject: Re: update on Montana Hotel visit
  The family visit was Respectful and alowed the families to have some closure.
  Very shortly after arriving at the site I believe the families understood the magnitude of the devastation at the Hote
  Montana and the reality of surviving such devastaion.
  They thanked the Ambassador and Rescue teams, Consulate, etc who were Searching for their loved ones.
  Given the sad situation - the families were greatful to speak with people who were searching for their children.
  I am around tomorrow if you have any questions.
  Tim
  *Irkintirk***
  Tim Callaghan
  DART Team Leader
  From: Harris, Elizabeth 3 <HarrisE3@state.gov>
  To: Lindwall, David E <LindwalIDE@state.gov>; Cantrell, Paul M <CantrellP@state.gov>; Callaghan, Tim
  (DCHA/OFDA/LAC) [USAID]; Rex, Gary L <RexGL@state.gov>; Mayer, Paul 0 <MayerP0@state.gov>
  Sent: Sat Jan 23 21:09:38 2010
  Subject: update on Montana Hotel visit
  State Ops is calling for an update on how the Lynn University/McGovern visit to the Hotel Montana went. Gary Rex is
  still at the airport with the group and my cell phone call is not going through. Can one of you please provide an urgent
  update to Ops at 202-647-1512?
  Thank you,
  Liz
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769401 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769402
MetadataSubject: LYNN UNIVERSITY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-23T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769402/C05769402.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: Lynn University
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 10:48 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769402
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: FYI
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769402 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 10:48 PM
  To: H
  Subject FW: Lynn University
  FYI
  Original Message ----
  From: Lindwall, David E
  To: Kennedy, Patrick F
  Sent: Sat Jan 23 21:30:45 2010
  Subject: RE: Lynn University
  Pat,
  I heard it went well. They got to the Montana when there was still about a half hour of light.
  American SAR personnel discussed each specific site within the Montana with the
  families and they could see the immense challenge of doing more than had already been done.
  Recovery operations had already begun and seven bodies (if I
  remember the number correctly) were extracted this afternoon, including a number of Amcits.
  Cheers, David
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED
  Original Message--
  From: Kennedy, Patrick F
  Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 8:53 PM
  To: Lindwall, David E
  Subject: Lynn University
  David
  Any feedback on atmospherics?
  Regards
  Pat
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769402 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769408
MetadataSubject: TRUST FUND
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769408/C05769408.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: Trust Fund
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 9:12 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769408
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: The trust fund
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769408 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B5
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 9:12 AM
  To:
  Subject FW: Trust Fund
  The trust fund
  From: Schwartz, Eric P
  Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 7:26 PM
  To: Curtis, Meghann A; Mills, Cheryl D; Slaughter, Anne-Marie
  Subject: RE: Trust Fund
  To all:
  In response to the query to me from Meghann, below, here are some key issues that the
  Administration should consider regarding a trust fund:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769408 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769408 Date: 08/31/2015
  Best,
  Eric
  From: Curtis, Meghann A
  Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 5:37 PM
  To: Drew, Elizabeth I; Schwartz, Eric P
  Subject: Trust Fund
  Eric, Elizabeth,
  Attached is what I drafted for the Secretary. It is pretty straightforward; lifted more or less from their website. To the
  extent that you have editorial commentary, please send it our way. I'll be traveling with S on Monday for the Montreal
  conference and we expect the trust fund concept to be a big topic of conversation. S is very interested in using Aceh
  Fund as a model.
  Meghann
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769408 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769409
MetadataSubject: FROM PAUL COLLIER
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769409/C05769409.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: From Paul Collier
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 9:26 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769409
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Services in Post-1[1].doc
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769409 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 9:26 AM
  To: H
  Subject FW: From Paul Collier
  Attachments: Final version of Dubai Report Fragile States[1].doc; Rethinking the Provision of Public
  Services in Post-1[1].doc
  From: Curtis, Meghann A
  Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 2:31 PM
  To: Brigety, Reuben; Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: From Paul Collier
  Have not had a chance to read yet but wanted to share asap. Paul and Jean-Louis are still working on scrubbing our
  strategy for adds and drops.
  -
  From: Paul Collier [mailto:
  Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:57 AM
  To: Curtis, Meghann A
  Subject: modalities for Haiti
  Meghann,
  A couple of ideas.
  1.To avoid a coordination nightmare, try to get a structure in which there is a single authority with some temporary
  power - e.g. a senior Haiti figure (ex-PM would be ideal) + Bill Clinton, as co-CEOs, supported by a council where you can
  put the key parties on so they dont feel excluded (e.g. EU which will otherwise sulk). It could start from the April Plan and
  the US Plan.
  2. To scale up basic service provision without doing a total bypass of the state, I suggest the Public Service Agencies
  model that I have been working up for the OECD. Essentially, centralized funding of decentralized provision. Fortuitously,
  this has just been endorsed by the Davos Global Agenda Council for Fragile States and will be pitched as one of the key
  ideas at Davos. I attach the brief Davos write-up of the idea, and a fuller paper that I did recently for the OECD. Please
  circulate as you think fit.
  If you need anything from me I will be happy to help. I will be in Davos late next week.
  Paul
  CSAE Department of Economics, Manor Rd Oxford OX13UQ
  phone (44)1865-271084 gen;
  hnp://users.ox.ac.uld—econpco
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769409 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769410
MetadataSubject: COUNCIL REPORT - ISSUE OVERVIEW
MetadataDateSent: 2009-11-20T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769410/C05769410.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769410
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769410 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  Global Agenda Council Report Template, 20-22 November 2009
  Council Report — Issue Overview (page 1)
  Council Name: GAC on Fragile States
  States suffering fragility are those states where the national public authority is not providing the basic public
  goods that allow their societies to live in peace and improve their prospects for the future. These are states
  that do not provide (1) accountable and effective security and social protection; (2) predictable and enforced
  laws that are generally accepted as legitimate; (3) revenue collection and management of external aid to
  ensure the delivery of basic social and economic services to society; (4) mechanisms of accountability of
  state authorities to society.
  These states are vulnerable to both internal and external shocks and thus their populations are likely to
  suffer the most from the vagaries of climate change and the impact of droughts and flooding, regional
  insecurity, and regional and international economic crises. They are marked by low food security, high crime
  rates and high youth unemployment and are susceptible to the mobilisation efforts of entrepreneurs of
  violence of all sorts. In all these respects they represent the weakest links in the global community.
  The causes of state fragility are varied and historically and context specific, so action by the international
  community needs to be based on an understanding of the particularities of each fragile situation. While not
  all states marked by poverty and underdevelopment are fragile, almost all fragile states are poor and
  underdeveloped, so international action needs to be concerned with the reduction of poverty and the creation
  of wealth in these societies.
  The past half century of experience underscores that reforming the institutions and organisations of the state
  in fragile states is a decadal, possibly even generational challenge. The international community must
  consider what needs to be done today or tomorrow to create the stability and breathing space that will allow
  these longer term efforts to take root and flourish
  In recent years the international community has increasingly recognised that to ensure a prosperous and
  secure global community there is a need to increase foreign assistance to fragile states and to support
  processes of state-building. We follow the OECD in recognizing that state-building is "an endogenous
  process to enhance capacity, institutions and legitimacy of the state driven by state-society relations".
  Important analytical work on understanding the conditions of fragility and the requirements of external
  assistance to state-building has been undertaken by the OECD, the World Bank and the International
  Monetary Fund and by individual bilateral development agencies. The Council wishes to build on these
  initiatives, avoid duplication and draw attention to areas that have not received enough attention.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769410 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769410 Date: 08/31/2015
  Council Report — Summarized Proposal(s) (page 2)
  Council Name: GAC on Fragile States
  Innovating in Governance in fragile states: A New System of Mutual Responsibility in Delivering
  Basic Economic and Social Services
  In fragile states, there is a challenge to meet the urgent needs of the population through the delivery of
  essential social and economic services, while building sustainable and accountable systems of public
  authority. Often states are heavily dependent on external resources to finance such services and the
  challenge is to put these to good use without undermining incentives to raise domestic revenue that can
  eventually replace external assistance. Donors in a hurry to see that funds are spent effectively often
  channel them outside state systems, which can undermine or pre-empt the consolidation of viable and
  accountable state organisations. At the same time, for understandable reasons, donors are cautious about
  budget support, where blank cheques are written to governments without assurances that accountability
  standards will be met.
  The existing tools of development assistance, however appropriate for delivering aid to poor but stable and
  relatively well functioning states, are not adequate for confronting the conditions of state fragility:
  • where people have a deep distrust of states
  • where states are often weak and repressive
  • where societies nonetheless have considerable resilience
  The costs of donor mistakes in delivering aid are high everywhere, but in fragile states the costs can be
  catastrophic, leading to state collapse, violence and in the worst cases regional instability and war.
  The existence of fragile states compels us to look for imaginative solutions.
  An innovative approach will ensure:
  • Mutual responsibility between donors and states in spending public resources
  • Accountability to local communities in how public resources are spent
  • Building upon existing local capacities and drawing on capacities at the regional and national levels
  • Delivering resources in ways perceived as equitable and iust
  • Long term commitment by donors that matches the long term task of overcoming fragility
  Objectives:
  A New Aid Delivery Mechanism would:
  1. Allow for domestic resources to be collected and donor moneys channelled according to a set of
  accountability mechanisms that would be transparently measured and reported upon; and
  2. Key policies and services to be implemented through "National Programs" that would implement
  specific functions at the appropriate level of governance, through a system of implementation within
  state systems, thereby avoiding the creation of parallel organisations outside the state and instead
  contributing to developing state systems that can eventually replace external aid with domestic
  revenue;
  3. Ensure that representative organisations in society have the opportunity and means to participate in,
  monitor and supervise the exercise of power and dispensation of public resources.
  Means:
  1. A set of Accountability Standards across the key state functions should be agreed, and the state
  required to report on and make transparent all revenues, procurement and licensing decisions, asset
  disposal and acquisition, budgets, expenditures, accounts and audits.
  2. The integrity of spending would be guaranteed through a dual-oversight agency where responsibility
  is shared between state authorities and external funders. A range of instruments could be deployed,
  including IMF/ World Bank monitoring, trust funds that pool donor resources against these
  standards, and linking of use of the sovereign guarantee to a government's meeting those
  standards. GEMAP in Liberia provides one example.
  3. A set of National Programs should be designed and launched through a partnership of government,
  civil society and international oversight, whereby the ministry provides the policy framework; the trust
  fund and / or domestic revenue provides the funding flow; monitoring and oversight by the civil
  service in partnership with international representatives; and implementation by the combination of
  communities, private sector, NGOs and civil service appropriate to the context and the available
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769410 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769410 Date: 08/31/2015
  capacities. The National Solidarity Program and other national programs in Afghanistan provide
  examples of such mechanisms.
  4. Establish regular reporting on activities to representative organisations however constituted through
  domestic political processes (inclusive of all regions and social groups).
  5. A consortium of Private businesses could be established to link investment to meeting of
  Accountability standards.
  6. As a country develops capacity to raise revenues to replace external aid the shared responsibility
  with donors can pass to shared responsibility between the state and its citizens (through
  parliamentary committees and the like), while states developed also shared responsibility in their
  regions.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769410 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769411
MetadataSubject: RETHINKING THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES IN POST-CONFLICT STATES
MetadataFrom: Collier, Paul
MetadataDateSent: 2009-09-01T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769411/C05769411.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769411
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769411 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  Rethinking the Provision of Public Services in Post-Conflict States
  Paul Collier
  Centre for the Study of African Economies,
  Department of Economics,
  University of Oxford
  September 2009
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769411 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769411 Date: 08/31/2015
  Introduction
  The provision of basic social services is inherently difficult. Considerations of equity demand
  that a minimum provision be available to all citizens regardless of ability to pay. But if provision
  is through non-market mechanisms how are resources to be allocated and what are the incentives
  for effort? There is no universally ideal organizational solution to these problems and approaches
  differ considerably between countries.
  African governments inherited a common model of public service provision from colonial times.
  That model was rooted in how British and French governments were themselves providing
  public services during the 1950s. For the following half-century African governments struggled
  to make this model work. In many of them, and most particularly in those with the social stresses
  associated with being post-conflict, that model has proved to be inappropriate. It is high time to
  try delivery systems which are better suited to the local context.
  The Inherited Model
  The 1950s European model was for a government ministry to take responsibility for an entire
  service, such as health or education. Such ministries combined the potentially distinct functions
  of planning, resource allocation, on-the-ground service delivery, and evaluation. Further, they
  held a national monopoly over the provision of the service.
  African governments tended to assume that this was the appropriate way for a developed society
  to deliver public services, so that it was the system to which they should aspire. In fact, in many
  respects this organizational approach was not an encompassing model for a developed society,
  but was rooted in its highly unusual time, namely the aftermath of the Second World War. One
  legacy of the war was a belief in planning. In wartime Britain national planning had been
  successful and it was now applied to the problem of service delivery. Delivering social services
  through centralized planning requires information: the war had taught the civil service how to
  gather and marshal it for military objectives and initially this worked well for service provision.
  Another legacy of the war was a strong sense of nationhood and public-spiritedness. This spirit
  resolved the problem of motivating public sector workers: they had internalized the norms of
  serving the society and so did not need either close monitoring or large financial incentives. The
  combination of information-guided central planning and a motivated workforce was highly cost-
  effective.
  In ideal conditions the European model of the 1950s is by far the most cost-effective system.
  Both post-war Britain and modern Scandinavia met these conditions. Scandinavia combines a
  self-motivated public sector workforce with a comprehensive system of centralized social
  information. But these advantages are underpinned by an unusually homogenous population with
  a strong sense of national identity and a belief in social equity. In Britain, neither aspect of the
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769411 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769411 Date: 08/31/2015
  system proved to be sustainable. Gradually, the helpful norms of public sector workers eroded.
  For example, after three decades British nurses abandoned their policy of not threatening to
  strike. As service delivery became more complex, it became more information-intensive and so
  less much more demanding for the command-and-control approach that had worked well for
  military objectives. As conditions became less suited to the 1950s model it became unwieldy.
  Ministries grew far beyond the size originally envisaged: for example, the National Health
  Service became the largest employer in Europe. In response, reliance upon self-motivation
  through internalized norms has gradually been replaced through ad hoc reforms by increasingly
  detailed targets combined with high levels of pay. The system of central planning has been
  partially replaced by resource allocation that is guided by simulated 'internal' markets.
  Why the Inherited Model is often unsuited to Fragile States
  Fragile states are far removed from the conditions in which the 1950s European model works
  well. Public sector employees have long ceased to internalize the norms of public-spiritedness.
  Further, social information is neither detailed nor up-to-date. Unfortunately, in the absence of
  these conditions the model works extremely badly. Most workers are not self-motivated to serve
  the public interest but the system lacks the means either to rebuild the norms of public service, or
  to motivate workers with financial incentives.
  Prevailing norms of public service
  In the fragile states the prevailing norms of public sector workers are radically different from
  those in Scandinavia. People are more heterogeneous and conflicted and so have a weaker sense
  of the national public interest. Shirking, as instanced by high rates of absenteeism, is common, as
  is minor corruption. Often the collapse in the norm of public service was due to the erosion in
  salaries. If public sector workers are not paid enough to live then they have no choice but to
  abuse their positions for personal gain. However, once the new norms of self-interest become
  established they become very difficult to change: the new pattern of behaviour is an equilibrium
  in which the conduct of each worker is rational given the expected conduct of other workers.
  Prevailing dysfunctional norms are thereby collectively self-reinforcing. For example, many
  public service jobs depend upon teams so that the return to individual effort depends upon that of
  others. Individually each worker is locked into prevailing norms unless there is a credible reason
  to believe that the norms of other workers have changed. Large and coordinated changes in
  norms of work among staff are very difficult for management to achieve. Simply reversing the
  salary decline is unlikely to restore the norms of public service. The more likely outcome is that
  what was a badly performing but low-cost delivery system is replaced by a badly performing but
  more expensive delivery system.
  Dysfunctional norms are passed on between generations of public sector workers. By its nature
  public service tends to attract young people with a degree of idealism. For example, survey
  evidence from Ethiopia shows that newly trained nurses enter the profession with a strong sense
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769411 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769411 Date: 08/31/2015
  of public spiritedness. However, once placed into clinics where the prevailing norm is self-
  interest over the next three years their initial public-spiritedness is replaced by the dysfunctional
  norms of their elders. Hence, the current model of service delivery is repeatedly destroying the
  asset of self-motivation in the young workforce.
  Limited Alternatives to Self-Motivation
  Even if workers have not internalized the norms of the organization, it may nevertheless be
  possible to motivate them to good performance by means of financial incentives. However, the
  1950s European model is ill-suited to this approach. Being within the civil service, the range of
  financial rewards and penalties that can be deployed is extremely limited. Virtually everywhere
  civil servants have very strong job security so that the threat of dismissal is not credible.
  Demotion is very rare and constrained by cumbersome systems of appeal. Hence, the only scope
  for incentives is through rewards. Even here the civil service is heavily constrained by the need
  for perceived equity among staff and pay scales that are tied to seniority, age, and rank. In post-
  conflict conditions these generic problems of discretionary rewards and penalties for civil
  servants are further complicated by the history of conflict. In the contest for control of the state,
  public sector employment comes to be regarded not merely as an input into service delivery, but
  as a valued prize in itself. This leaves a legacy of pervasive suspicions that discretionary rewards
  reflect patronage and favour rather than performance. The post-conflict imperative of achieving
  perceived equity in public employment between rival political factions may make performance-
  related incentives infeasible.
  Even where incentives are politically feasible, they can only be effective to the extent that they
  can be linked to observable aspects of performance. Yet in post-conflict conditions the
  information needed to assess performance on public service delivery is simply not being
  generated. This is partly due to the larger problems endemic to post-conflict situations such as
  broken local administrations. But it is also itself an instance of the incentive problem: if
  prevailing performance is generally poor, civil servants have an incentive not to collect timely
  evidence by which it could be measured. Yet the same information that would be needed to
  measure performance would also be needed for overall resource allocation through central
  planning to be effective. Starved of information, central planning is blind and an easy prey to
  crude political pressures.
  The consequence for service delivery
  The result is that the same system which in Scandinavia produces the best and most cost-
  effective social services on earth, in African post-conflict conditions produces the worst.
  Workers are motivated neither by internalized norms of public service, nor by financial
  incentives. Central planning without information inevitably grossly misallocates resources. As a
  result services are inevitably very bad.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769411 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769411 Date: 08/31/2015
  Faced with a delivery system that is manifestly dysfunctional, donors starve it of finance. This
  produces the very bad, but very inexpensive systems that prevail in the public sector in fragile
  states. Without question, adequate social provision will require substantially more international
  funding than has been provided to date. However, the root of the problem is not the lack of
  funding, but the lack of a delivery system that could productively use enhanced funding.
  Donor bypass of the state
  Faced with the overwhelming case for responding to social needs, donors have usually resorted
  to bypassing the state, channelling finance through NGOs and the UN agencies. This has
  advantages and disadvantages.
  Advantages of non-government provision
  Unlike government provision, non-government provision is not a uniform model and there is
  considerable variation. Two different approaches can both achieve good organizational
  performance. One approach, typified by mission-run hospitals and schools, achieves good
  performance by maintaining a high level of organizational commitment on the part of its
  workers. Given the high intrinsic satisfaction from activities such as healing the sick and
  teaching children, and the highly visible needs in post-conflict societies, it is possible to create
  islands of self-motivation even where in the public sector norms of service have collapsed. The
  other approach, typified by some for-profit organizations, achieves good performance by solving
  the difficult problem of linking financial incentives to observable performance. In many aspects
  of service delivery individual performance is not readily observable and so effective monitoring
  is difficult. The two approaches are not easily combined and so tend to be alternatives. Norms of
  self-motivation, or working for the common good, thrive on trust and equity among staff. In
  contrast, the essence of addressing motivation by means of financial incentives is that trust is
  replaced by monitoring, and equity is replaced by income differences based on differential
  performance. Field evidence suggests that where strong financial incentives are introduced into
  service delivery organizations norms of service and worker cohesion are undermined.
  According to the type of service, the local context, and the personal characteristics of managers,
  either approach can be more effective. However, while some non-government organizations
  solve the service delivery problem by one or other of the above approaches, others fail. Some
  rely upon trust but have unmotivated staff; others rely on financial incentives but monitor aspects
  of behaviour which are not sufficiently related to performance. Hence, donors cannot tell simply
  by observing the type of organization whether it is efficient. The implication is that by bypassing
  the state donors will sometimes be financing organizations that are considerably more efficient,
  but that there will be considerable variation.
  Disadvantages of bypassing the state
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769411 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769411 Date: 08/31/2015
  The most obvious drawback of donors bypassing the state is that, while unsustainable, it does not
  lead to an exit strategy. The bypass of the state does not build state capacity and may further
  undermine it. Yet it is acknowledged that the complete bypass cannot itself be the long-term
  solution to service delivery. If the state is not involved in providing basic services to citizens it
  will be very difficult for it to establish a claim to legitimacy in the eyes of its citizens.
  The total bypass has a further serious drawback which donors are less willing to recognize: the
  lack of coordination and continuity. The services funded by donors are usually localized and
  often specific to a particular aspect of service delivery. Given this approach there is no
  systematic scope for a nation-wide and sector-wide approach to resource allocation. Donor
  financing of any particular service provider is likely to be temporary. Field staff are typically
  rotated every three years and the priorities of individual donors change as ministers change.
  Given the natural human inclination to make a difference, this is a recipe for continuous turmoil.
  However, the most serious drawback is the lack of accountability to the ordinary people who are
  the users of services. Generically, there are two mechanisms for such accountability: political
  and commercial. By definition, as a result of the donor bypass of the state, political
  accountability to users is not possible. The alternative of commercial accountability is dependent
  upon donor financing of service providing agencies being conditional upon their observed
  performance. However, other than for the most rudimentary aspects of performance, donors lack
  the monitoring capacity with which to hold agencies to. account.
  Public Service Authorities
  An alternative to the 1950s model of the monopoly government ministry and the total bypass of
  the state is to unbundle the functions that in the 1950s model are all performed by a single
  ministry. Some of these functions are intrinsic to the responsibilities that a state should
  undertake. For other functions the state can achieve its objectives better by purchasing the
  function from other providers. Even in the most centralized and efficient of European states this
  approach is now standard: for example, in France both blood-testing and ambulance services are
  financed publicly but provided privately.
  A Public Service Authority (PSA) is a design of public service delivery which may be
  particularly appropriate for post-conflict conditions. It need not be merely a temporary measure:
  it may evolve into a permanent organization much as Independent Revenue Authorities have
  become permanent in many fragile states. Although all PSAs have some core features in
  common, they can take many different forms. For example, at one extreme a single PSA could
  have a national mandate for many different types of service, while at the other, each district
  might have several PSAs, one for each type of service. Such choices should vary country-by-
  country, according to local capacity. Here I focus on the core principles of a PSA rather than on
  such choices.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769411 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769411 Date: 08/31/2015
  A PSA is a public agency: it is an implementing agency of government but is independent of the
  civil service, analogous to central banks and revenue authorities. While it is an agency of
  government, its board of directors can include a minority of non-government appointees. In post-
  conflict conditions these should include the main donor agencies and key components of civil
  society. The primary purpose of such representation is to provide equal and unrestricted access to
  information on the decisions and performance of the PSA for government, donors and civil
  society. As a result, a PSA is structurally transparent.
  The government ministries responsible for service provision have representation on the board of
  the PSA and set policy guidelines by which the PSA must operate. For example, they may set
  minimum standards of provision, and require the PSA to allocate resources so as to ensure
  geographic equity. Ministries will also continue to provide state services directly. Since in post-
  conflict conditions service provision is invariably inadequate, the PSA should constitute an
  expansion in provision not a change in the management of existing services. Over time, if the
  PSA-provided services proved to be better value that those directly provided by the ministries
  then it would be a matter for the government to decide whether to reorganize the directly
  provided services.
  A PSA receives funds from donors and government for the purchase of services from primary
  providers. Since the PSA is an implementing agency of government, the money allocated to the
  PSA, including that from donors, appears in the government budget as an expenditure. Hence,
  donor funding of services through the PSA is somewhat analogous to ring-fenced budget
  support.
  The PSA enters into contracts with primary service providing agencies but does not provide
  services directly. This avoids a conflict of interest and focuses the PSA exclusively on
  negotiating and monitoring the performance of the primary providers. These providers can be
  NG0s, local communities, local governments, or private for-profit organizations. Ideally, the
  PSA will experiment with multiple channels of provision for the same service to maximize the
  scope for variation in performance.
  The PSA devotes most of its resources to monitoring performance and comparing it. The
  evidence on comparative performance is provided to the board of the PSA on a regular basis.
  The board uses this information to reallocate resources from less-efficient providers to more-
  efficient providers.
  The PSA can also experiment with distributing vouchers to households rather than money to
  service providers. This reduces the need for monitoring of performance but introduces other
  problems. To take a trivial example, in health care the prescription of glucose will produce a
  short-term improvement in the patient without addressing the causes of the illness. Users can
  easily misinterpret this effect as indicating that they need repeated treatment rather than different
  treatment. Hence, in the absence of good ethical standards among practitioners in this instance
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769411 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769411 Date: 08/31/2015
  vouchers could be dysfunctional. More generally, the balance of whether service providers are
  more effectively monitored by professions or by users will vary according to type of service and
  local context and is best determined by experiment.
  Why a PSA should improve service delivery
  A PSA is a design that is based on modern economic principles and the evidence from fieldwork
  (see Bold, Collier and Zeitlin (2009) for a discussion of how a PSA fits with theory and
  evidence). This does not guarantee that it is appropriate, but there are clear reasons to expect it to
  work considerably better than either the 1950s model or the donor bypass.
  Variation, competition and selection
  A PSA builds in variation in approaches to service delivery: different providers will be
  attempting to solve the problem worker motivation in different ways. Since the core function of
  the PSA is to evaluate these different approaches it enables gradual improvement in overall
  efficiency. The increase in efficiency comes about through two different mechanisms.
  The most obvious is through the awareness of competition acting as a disciplining device on
  providers. Through this mechanism, the performance of the typical service provider might be
  expected to improve. However, this is probably not the most important.
  The more important mechanism is that resources can gradually be reallocated from inefficient
  providers to efficient providers. Since the variation in efficiency between different providers is
  likely to be considerable, simply by reallocating money between them the PSA can raise the
  efficiency of the average dollar spent on service provision. Note that this does not depend upon
  any improvement in efficiency in each organization.
  Branding
  Unlike the donor bypass of the state, with a PSA donor money is routed through a state
  organization. A condition of for a non-government service provider receiving money from the
  PSA should be that the services delivered are co-branded by government. While the visibility of
  donor operations is reduced, that of government is increased. Ordinary citizens are able to see
  that the government is doing something that is beneficial.
  Scaling up because of donor confidence
  By design, the PSA generates information on the performance of the organizations that it funds,
  and hence on its own performance. Since donors are represented on the management board of the
  PSA they have full access to this information. Transparency of information for donors is crucial
  in post-conflict conditions to enable donors to scale up financing beyond the immediate post-
  conflict period. During the first few years donors give governments are the benefit of the doubt,
  but this rapidly erodes. In its place governments need rapidly to build donor confidence. This
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769411 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769411 Date: 08/31/2015
  cannot be done either by declarations or by comprehensive improvements in governance.
  Declarations of good practice can be made equally well by those governments that have no
  intention of adhering to them and so, despite a deceptively courteous reception, cut no ice with
  donors. Comprehensive improvements in governance simply take too long to achieve to stave of
  reductions in donor funding. A PSA provides a quick institutional solution to the problem of
  building credibility with donors: transparency and design substitute for the lack of trust. As
  quantitative evidence of performance builds up, the local offices of donor agencies are in a much
  stronger position to press their headquarters for a larger share of the budget.
  Centralized resource allocation
  The PSA retains the key benefit of central planning: resource allocation can be coordinated
  rather than being simply the aggregation of individual donor decisions. Further, since the PSA is
  designed to generate information, the precondition for central planning to be effective is met.
  However, while overall resource allocation is centrally determined, the incentive problem is not
  micro-managed. The PSA does not attempt to motivate or monitor the workers who deliver
  services. That task is decentralized to individual service providers to solve as best they can. The
  PSA faces the less daunting task of monitoring the overall performance of each delivery
  organization.
  Motivating the PSA
  The Board of the PSA faces the task of motivating the staff of the PSA. Why might this be any
  easier than the task of motivating civil servants in the service delivery ministries? In part it is
  easier because, being a new organization outside the civil service the PSA can start with higher
  pay structures that are credibly linked to rewards and penalties. Recruits have some reason to
  expect that the behaviour of their colleagues will not be the same as civil service behaviour.
  Perhaps more importantly, the remit of the PSA is more narrowly defined than the remit of a
  ministry. It is not trying to do everything from policy design to on-the-ground delivery of
  services. It is allocating money between providers and evaluating their performance. Finally, it is
  subject to day-to-day scrutiny by donors and civil society who as members of the management
  board receive a continuous flow of information about the performance of managers.
  How can a PSA be established?
  A PSA does not need to start with a 'big bang'. It can start small, with one or two donors
  cooperating with a particular government ministry to finance an expansion in the delivery of a
  particular service. It should be viewed as an experiment in the architecture of public service
  delivery. As an experiment it should be evaluated, but, by design, such evaluation is automatic. If
  it succeeds it can be scaled up virtually without limit. Ultimately, the government might decide
  that the PSA, or a series of PSAs, is the most cost-effective and politically effective way of
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769411 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769411 Date: 08/31/2015
  delivering services for the society. If it fails then it can readily be closed: donors are used to
  running projects which terminate. Nor is failure likely to have high costs. Unfortunately, in there
  is currently no successful model of large scale service delivery in post-conflict conditions, so that
  the opportunity cost of failure is likely to be modest.
  Conclusion
  Post-conflict societies have been attempting to deliver basic services using an inherited colonial
  model that has little prospect of success in the context of their own societies. Given the acute
  needs of their citizens, it is high time for governments to experiment with other designs. The key
  desiderata are that a new system should be capable of being rapidly scaled up, while leading to
  something that is politically sustainable. A PSA is not as good as the 1950s model when that
  model is deployed in ideal conditions. However, based on theory and evidence, it is likely to be
  more successful than the centralized ministerial approach in the conditions that actually prevail
  in post-conflict societies. Given the enormous attention that post-conflict societies and other
  fragile states are now rightly receiving, there is a strong case for experimenting with the PSA
  design on a pilot basis.
  Reference:
  Tessa Bold, Paul Collier, and Andrew Zeitlin, 2009, Public Service Authorities, Centre for the
  Study of African Economies, Oxford.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769411 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769412
MetadataSubject: FROM GOH - MONTREAL MEETING TALKING POINTS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769412/C05769412.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769412
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
  Sunday, January 24, 2010 9:41 AM
  Sullivan, Jacob J
  FW: from GOH - Montreal meeting talking points
  See traffic at bottom which Bob Maguire (Haiti expert) sent to Leslie Voltaire (Haiti's rep to WJC Envoy office and UN)
  who also forwarded to PM Bellerive.
  cdm

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769412 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B5,B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Cc:
  Subject:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
  Sunday, January 24, 2010 9:41 AM
  Sullivan, Jacob J
  FW: from GOH - Montreal meeting talking points
  See traffic at bottom which Bob Maguire (Haiti expert) sent to Leslie Voltaire (Haiti's rep to WJC Envoy office and UN)
  who also forwarded to PM Bellerive.
  cdm
  From: remaguire
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 9:23 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: from GOH - Montreal meeting talking points
  Cheryl - See below the response of Leslie Voltaire and PM Jean Max Bellerive to talking points for tomorrow's
  Montreal meeting I proposed yesterday. Talking points at the end. Response positive. I have also shared these
  with Paul Fanner. Same response. Sources at the UN fear, however, that the donors will focus on PAP and miss
  this historic opportunity. - Bob
  , (email sent also to Patrick G.)
  Message transfere ---
  De: Jean Max Bellerive <
  A: Leslie Voltaire _ ,
  Envoye le : Sam 23 Janvier 2010, 19 h 33 min 51 s
  Objet : Re: Montreal - talking points - urgent
  Thanks ! En ligne avec ce que je pense dire [TRANLATION — IN LINE WITH WHAT I AM THINKING
  OF SAYING]
  JMB
  From: Leslie Voltaire <
  To: Jean-Max Bellerive <
  Sent: Sat, January 23, 2010 10:23:24 PM
  Subject: Montreal - talking points - urgent
  >
  PM
  Reflexions de Bob Maguire
  Leslie
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769412 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769412 Date: 08/31/2015
  Message transfere
  De: "remaouire
  A: Ivoltaire
  Envoye le : Sam 23 Janvier 2010, 13 h 22 min 27 s
  Objet : Montreal - talking points - urgent
  Leslie - First, thank god you were in NYC on Jan 12th. I hope your personal losses were minimal. Surely,
  Haiti has lost much. We all have...
  Thoughts for Montreal:
  1.This offers an opportunity to 'rebalance' Haiti.
  2.Pay attention to the exodus from PAP and catch up with it. (The migration to PAP over the past 30 years was
  an unnatural development, spurred by rural neglect and urban concentration.)
  3.A decentralized system of 'welcome centers' in town and villages can assist returnees re-integrate. Medical
  and continuing education services should be a part of them. NEED TO ACT NOW.
  4. More important, the centers must be equipped to provide work - make them the basis for organizing the civic
  service corps. Higly decentralized: work for cash; public works/environmental restoration/food production;
  restoration of human dignity; rural-urban partnerships through work;e in Haiti's real future. Also a chance to
  begin repairing the social fabric. Will need a 'tough love' approach; disciplined management. Not the work for
  NG0s.
  5.No investment in rural areas and no response to this opportunity will = back to the future re. crowded
  PAP. People will trickle back to the city to replicate past problems.
  6. The damage was done before the earthquake by development/investment policies that ignored the rural areas;
  saw Haitians simply as sources of cheap labor; denigrated human dignity; failed to strengthen local institutions.
  7. This must stop; can't happen again.
  8.This is the time to move forward with the Civic Service Corps - quickly.
  kenbe. F'a lage. - Bob
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769412 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769414
MetadataSubject: NAPOLITANO
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Valmoro, Lona J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769414/C05769414.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Napolitano
ExtractedTo: H; Huma Abedin
ExtractedFrom: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 10:26 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769414
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  I don't believe so but Huma would have a better update than I would.
  Lona Valmoro
  Special Assistant to the Secretary of State
  (202) 647-9071 (direct)

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769414 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 10:26 AM
  To: H; Huma Abedin
  Subject: Re: Napolitano
  I don't believe so but Huma would have a better update than I would.
  Lona Valmoro
  Special Assistant to the Secretary of State
  (202) 647-9071 (direct)
  Original Message ---
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Huma Abedin
  Sent: Sun Jan 24 09:56:19 2010
  Subject: Napolitano
  Am I scheduled to talk w her this morning?
  Valmoro, Lona _I B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769414 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769417
MetadataSubject: YANG
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769417/C05769417.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Yang
ExtractedTo: H; Huma Abedin
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 11:21 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769417
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769417 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B5,B6
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 11:21 AM
  To: H; Huma Abedin
  Subject: Re: Yang
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Huma Abedin <
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob
  Sent: Sun Jan 24 10:49:17 2010
  Subject: Re: Yang
  Original Message ----
  From: Huma Abedin
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jan 24 10:46:07 2010
  Subject: Yang
  Jake said he spoke to you about making yang call. U willing to do tonite? Tomorrow morning?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769417 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769418
MetadataSubject: ON THE GROUND INTELLIGENCE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769418/C05769418.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769418
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Ruh-roh
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sunday, January 24, 2010 11:25 AM
  On the Ground Intelligence

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769418 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Ruh-roh
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sunday, January 24, 2010 11:25 AM
  On the Ground Intelligence
  From: remag u ire
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 10:42 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Re: RE: RE: from GOH - Montreal meeting talking points
  General and specific concerns: Specifically heard from Haiti is that Preval has acceded too much authority to
  the Vorbe family.
  Second, more general, is that the BAMBAM families (the term, I understand, created from the initials of the 6
  leading elite families) are gearing up to inflate costs of doing things and to try to monopolize to the extent they
  can. Will forward in a separate email one or two articles I've seen on this.
  I'm off to Trinity to prepare my classes for this week. (A reality of my full-time teaching load). While check
  email later. Thanks for this opportunity to share thoughts. Am very anxious to do this.
  Can't miss the NFC game, even though the Eagles (I'm from Philly) already collapsed. I also lived in S.W.
  Louisiana during the N.O. "Aints" years.
  Best - Bob
  On Jn 24, 2010, Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov> wrote:
  You and our secretary share similar concerns about making sure Haiti's future is decided by Haiti.
  When we met with PM and P, they both indicated they wanted US to play a large coordination role on their behalf to
  ensure their voice, plans and goals were accomplished. We are committed to doing that as they requested.
  I do think fast will mean some will make money they shouldn't — but goal is to have balance so we move with enough
  alacrity to build confidence that things are getting done.
  Who are the Haiti "operator" types of which this concern is being spoken?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769418 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769418 Date: 08/31/2015
  From: remaguire
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 9:44 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Re: RE: from GOH - Montreal meeting talking points
  I hope the GOH has back-up to hold firm to its positions. Some will want to push it around. Also, while
  urgent need for tent cities clear PAP is clear, definitely not part of solution. Fearful of potential permanance
  of them unless alternates for rural resettlement along lines of talking points exist.
  Am hearing that lots of concern that Haiti's "operators" are licking their chops to make lots of money off
  this. Fact of life or need to expand circle of actors?
  Hang in there. - Bob
  On Jan 24, 2010, Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov> wrote:
  Great — right in line with our thinking so this is great.
  Thanks for forwarding — anything else of note?
  cdm
  From: remaguire
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 9:23 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: from GOH - Montreal meeting talking points
  Cheryl - See below the response of Leslie Voltaire and PM Jean Max Bellerive to talking points for
  tomorrow's Montreal meeting I proposed yesterday. Talking points at the end. Response positive. I have
  also shared these with Paul Farmer. Same response. Sources at the UN fear, however, that the donors will
  focus on PAP and miss this historic opportunity. - Bob
  (email sent also to Patrick G.)
  Forwarded message
  From: Leslie Voltaire I
  Date: Jan 23, 2010
  Subject: Tr: Montreal - talking points - urgent
  To: remaguirc
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769418 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769418 Date: 08/31/2015
  Komisyon pa chaj
  Leslie
  Message transfere
  : Jean Max Bellerive
  A: Leslie Voltaire
  Envoye le : Sam 23 Janvier 2010, 19 h 33 min 51 s
  Objet : Re: Montreal - talking points - urgent
  Thanks ! En ligne avec ce que je pense dire
  JMB
  From: Leslie Voltaire
  To: Jean-Max Bellerive
  Sent: Sat, January 23, 2010 10:23:24 PM
  Subject: Montreal - talking points - urgent
  PM
  Reflexions de Bob Maguire
  Leslie
  Message transfere ----
  De : "remaguire
  A: Ivoltair0
  Envoye le : Sam 23 Janvier 2010, 13 h 22 min 27 s
  Objet Montreal - talking points - urgent
  Leslie - First, thank god you were in NYC on Jan 12th. I hope your personal losses were
  minimal. Surely, Haiti has lost much. We all have...
  Thoughts for Montreal:
  1.This offers an opportunity to 'rebalance' Haiti.
  2.Pay attention to the exodus from PAP and catch up with it. (The migration to PAP over the past 30 years
  was an unnatural development, spurred by rural neglect and urban concentration.)
  3.A decentralized system of 'welcome centers' in town and villages can assist returnees re-
  integrate. Medical and continuing education services should be a part of them. NEED TO ACT NOW.
  4.More important, the centers must be equipped to provide work - make them the basis for organizing the
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769418 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769418 Date: 08/31/2015
  civic service corps. Higly decentralized: work for cash; public works/environmental restoration/food
  production; restoration of human dignity; rural-urban partnerships through work;e in Haiti's real
  future. Also a chance to begin repairing the social fabric. Will need a 'tough love' approach; disciplined
  management. Not the work for NG0s.
  5.No investment in rural areas and no response to this opportunity will = back to the future re. crowded
  PAP. People will trickle back to the city to replicate past problems.
  6.The damage was done before the earthquake by development/investment policies that ignored the rural
  areas; saw Haitians simply as sources of cheap labor; denigrated human dignity; failed to strengthen local
  institutions.
  7.This must stop; can't happen again.
  8.This is the time to move forward with the Civic Service Corps - quickly.
  kenbe. Pa lage. - Bob
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769418 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769419
MetadataSubject: MULTI-DONOR TRUST FUND BACKGROUND MEMO
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769419/C05769419.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Multi-Donor Trust Fund Background Memo
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Curtis, Meghann A; Reynoso, Julissa
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 11:39 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769419
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  This document in text below is coming up the line to you as material for your trip. This is separate (but related) to what
  we discussed earlier today. This focuses on the MDTF, using the tsunami model as a guide.
  I also have tasked Jean-Louis to put together a think piece for this evening that we can look at re: the larger issue of
  ensuring efficient, effective coordination of: bi-lateral donors investment, MDTF, and private fund/NGO efforts that all
  must come together in a coherent fashion. Of not in this memo is fact that in tsunami, there was a GOI reconstruction
  plan
  See below on the Mu It-Donor Trust Fund
  SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED January 24,2010
  INFORMATION MEMO FOR THE SECRETARY

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769419 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B5,B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 11:39 AM
  To:
  Subject: Multi-Donor Trust Fund Background Memo
  Attachments: FINAL MDF IM for the Secretary.docx
  This document in text below is coming up the line to you as material for your trip. This is separate (but related) to what
  we discussed earlier today. This focuses on the MDTF, using the tsunami model as a guide.
  I also have tasked Jean-Louis to put together a think piece for this evening that we can look at re: the larger issue of
  ensuring efficient, effective coordination of: bi-lateral donors investment, MDTF, and private fund/NGO efforts that all
  must come together in a coherent fashion. Of not in this memo is fact that in tsunami, there was a GOI reconstruction
  plan
  See below on the Mu It-Donor Trust Fund
  SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED January 24,2010
  INFORMATION MEMO FOR THE SECRETARY
  From: C — Cheryl Mills
  Re: Creation of a Multidonor Reconstruction Fund (MDF) for Haiti
  This memo provides a summary of key issues related to the creation of a multidonor
  reconstruction fund for Haiti (MDF), incorporating lessons learned from reconstruction efforts
  following the 2004 tsunami.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769419 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769419 Date: 08/31/2015
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769419 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769419 Date: 08/31/2015
  Lessons from Aceh:
  • MDFs encourage greater donor participation: Smaller donors joined the Aceh fund
  because they wished to support reconstruction efforts but lacked independent capacity and
  often did not have strong views on how to pursue reconstruction. They wanted the Bank to
  assume fiduciary responsibilities for the funds in a high-risk environment, and also to take a
  lead in ensuring that the funds go to prioritized activities.
  • Develop an outreach strategy: The Aceh MDF Secretariat developed an Outreach Strategy
  that includes regular radio talk shows, field visits to meet and discuss with beneficiaries, and
  communication through advertisements as well as a telephone hotline.
  • Engage the government in dialogue: The Aceh MDF received praise for engaging the GoI
  in policy dialogue. The MDF was an entry point for engaging on conditions for
  sustainability, relevance and impact.
  • Appointment on Envoy: The appointment of a high-profile UN Special Envoy (former
  President Clinton) increased the availability of funding and willingness of international
  agencies to try new approaches. It also could provide one forum for coordination among
  donors, if the Envoy's office is adequately supported.
  • Disaster prevention: The tsunami underscored the critical role of disaster prevention in
  "building back better." It is difficult to overemphasize the importance of embedding risk
  reduction into recovery, especially in Haiti, where natural disasters have caused enormous
  human suffering.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769419 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769419 Date: 08/31/2015
  • Coordinate proliferating aid agencies: Large numbers of both public and private aid
  agencies are likely be active in Haiti for some time. It is important to develop effective
  coordinating mechanisms and work to ensure that agencies bring actual expertise to the
  country, reduce turnover of international staff, and seek staff with appropriate language
  skills.
  • Authoritative Assessment: Authoritative joint assessments involving the UN, the Red
  Cross, and national governments could have a beneficial impact on the decision making
  process and ensure broad buy-in.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769419 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769419 Date: 08/31/2015
  Drafted:
  Peter Harrell, SIP — x. 7-0724; cell)
  Ted Andrews, SIP
  Cleared:
  WHA — Julissa Reynoso (ok)
  PRM — Eric Schwartz (ok)
  L — Harold Koh (ok)
  From: Harrell, Peter E
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 10:53 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Cc: Curtis, Meghann A; Reynoso, Julissa
  Subject: RE: Urgent: Revised IM on MDFs
  Cheryl,
  Do you want to take a last look at this final version before I send it on for inclusion in S's book?
  Peter
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 10:40 AM
  To: Harrell, Peter E
  Cc: Curbs, Meghann A; Schwartz, Eric P
  Subject: RE: Urgent: Revised IM on MDFs
  Great - thanks
  From: Harrell, Peter E
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 10:30 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Cc: Curtis, Meghann A; Schwartz, Eric P
  Subject: RE: Urgent: Revised IM on MDFs
  I am proofreading now and hope to have final w/in about 20 minutes.
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 10:21 AM
  To: Schwartz, Eric P; Harrell, Peter E
  Cc: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: RE: Urgent: Revised IM on MDFs
  This is looking good.
  Can you also catch the typos in it.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769419 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769419 Date: 08/31/2015
  What is timeline for a final draft?
  cdm
  From: Schwartz, Eric P
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 10:06 AM
  To: Harrell, Peter E; Reynoso, Julissa; Brigety, Reuben; Curtis, Meghann A; Slaughter, Anne-Marie; Mills, Cheryl D;
  Andrews, Theodore H; Valenzuela, Arturo A; Koh, Harold Hongju; Eichensehr, Kristen E; Townley, Stephen G
  Cc: Nagy, Eleanor
  Subject: RE: Urgent: Revised IM on MDFs
  Peter:
  With edits in track changes. Most are self-explanatory, but call if you have questions — I'm in
  the office.
  I've also made two marginal comments that you should consider.
  Best,
  Eric
  From: Harrell, Peter E
  Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 8:33 PM
  To: Reynoso, Julissa; Brigety, Reuben; Schwartz, Eric P; Curtis, Meghann A; Slaughter, Anne-Marie; Mills, Cheryl D;
  Andrews, Theodore H; Valenzuela, Arturo A; Koh, Harold Hongju; Eichensehr, Kristen E; Townley, Stephen G
  Subject: Urgent: Revised IM on MDFs
  Eric,
  I have revised the IM per your extremely helpful comments--I am hardly the expert on these issues, but I am the body
  available to draft today... Please take a look at these revisions.
  Peter Harrell
  S/P
  From: Peter Harrell <
  To: Harrell, Peter E
  Sent: Sat Jan 23 20:25:15 2010
  Subject: Revised IM on MDFs
  Peter E. Harrell
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769419 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769420
MetadataSubject: CREATION OF A MULTIDONOR RECONSTRUCTION FUND (MDF) FOR HAITI
MetadataTo: Secretary
MetadataFrom: C:Mills, Cheryl
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769420/C05769420.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedFrom: C — Cheryl Mills
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769420
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769420 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5, B6
  SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED January 24, 2010
  INFORMATION MEMO FOR THE SECRETARY
  From: C — Cheryl Mills
  Re: Creation of a Multidonor Reconstruction Fund (MDF) for Haiti
  This memo provides a summary of key issues related to the creation of a
  multidonor reconstruction fund for Haiti (MDF), incorporating lessons
  learned from reconstruction efforts following the 2004 tsunami.
  SENSUTIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
  -1
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769420 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769420 Date: 08/31/2015
  SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
  SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
  -2
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769420 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769420 Date: 08/31/2015
  SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
  B5
  Lessons from Aceh:
  • MDFs encourage greater donor participation: Smaller donors joined
  the Aceh fund because they wished to support reconstruction efforts but
  lacked independent capacity and often did not have strong views on how
  to pursue reconstruction. They wanted the Bank to assume fiduciary
  responsibilities for the funds in a high-risk environment, and also to take
  a lead in ensuring that the funds go to prioritized activities.
  • Develop an outreach strategy: The Aceh MDF Secretariat developed an
  Outreach Strategy that includes regular radio talk shows, field visits to
  meet and discuss with beneficiaries, and communication through
  advertisements as well as a telephone hotline.
  • Engage the government in dialogue: The Aceh MDF received praise
  for engaging the GoI in policy dialogue. The MDF was an entry point for
  engaging on conditions for sustainability, relevance and impact.
  • Appointment on Envoy: The appointment of a high-profile UN Special
  Envoy (former President Clinton) increased the availability of funding
  SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
  -3
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769420 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769420 Date: 08/31/2015
  SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
  and willingness of international agencies to try new approaches. It also
  could provide one forum for coordination among donors, if the Envoy's
  office is adequately supported.
  • Disaster prevention: The tsunami underscored the critical role of
  disaster prevention in "building back better." It is difficult to
  overemphasize the importance of embedding risk reduction into
  recovery, especially in Haiti, where natural disasters have caused
  enormous human suffering.
  • Coordinate proliferating aid agencies: Large numbers of both public
  and private aid agencies are likely be active in Haiti for some time. It is
  important to develop effective coordinating mechanisms and work to
  ensure that agencies bring actual expertise to the country, reduce turnover
  of international staff, and seek staff with appropriate language skills.
  • Authoritative Assessment: Authoritative joint assessments involving the
  UN, the Red Cross, and national governments could have a beneficial
  impact on the decision making process and ensure broad buy-in.
  SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
  -4
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769420 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769420 Date: 08/31/2015
  SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
  Drafted:
  Peter Harrell, S/P — x. 7-0724; (cell)
  Ted Andrews, S/P
  Cleared:
  WHA — Julissa Reynoso (ok)
  PRM — Eric Schwartz (ok)
  L — Harold Koh (ok)
  SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
  5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769420 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769421
MetadataSubject: SETTING UP HOLBROOKE FIRST, AND THEN EUGENIE.
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769421/C05769421.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH©state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 11:43 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769421
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769421 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH©state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 11:43 AM
  To:
  Subject Setting up holbrooke first, and then Eugenie.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769421 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769423
MetadataSubject: PUBLIC AFGHANISTAN STRATEGY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769423/C05769423.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: Public Afghanistan Strategy
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Slaughter, Anne-Marie; Jones, Paul W
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 11:46 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769423
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: fyi
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769423 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B5
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 11:46 AM
  To:
  Subject: FW: Public Afghanistan Strategy
  fyi
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 11:27 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Cc: Slaughter, Anne-Marie; Jones, Paul W
  Subject: Re: Public Afghanistan Strategy
  A separate section on women was never B5
  created.I
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Cc: Slaughter, Anne-Marie; Jones, Paul W
  Sent: Sun Jan 24 08:58:55 2010
  Subject: Public Afghanistan Strategy
  Barbara Boxer apparently sent a letter to saying there is nothing about women in the Afghan strategy. There
  is nothing in the table of contents.
  Is this accurate? Seems odd given that I know that AMS had flagged this and I b/lJake you had.
  Can you advise.
  cd m
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769423 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769424
MetadataSubject: SETTING UP HOLBROOKE FIRST, AND THEN EUGENIE.
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769424/C05769424.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Setting up holbrooke first, and then Eugenie.
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 11:47 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769424
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Yes it is eikenberry, my automatic spell check make it eugenie!
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769424 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 11:47 AM
  To:
  Subject Re: Setting up holbrooke first, and then Eugenie.
  Yes it is eikenberry, my automatic spell check make it eugenie!
  Original Message ---
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Sun Jan 24 11:43:24 2010
  Subject: Re: Setting up holbrooke first, and then Eugenie.
  Who? I thought Eikenberry.
  Original Message ----
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jan 24 11:42:34 2010
  Subject: Setting up holbrooke first, and then Eugenie.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769424 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769425
MetadataSubject: THOUGHTS ON HAITI
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769425/C05769425.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Thoughts on Haiti
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Doug Band; Justin Cooper
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 11:56 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769425
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: HRC/WJC: Read below - worth the read
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769425 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 11:56 AM
  To:
  Cc: Doug Band; Justin Cooper
  Subject FW: Thoughts on Haiti
  Attachments: Beyond the Earthquake.doc
  HRC/WJC: Read below - worth the read
  Original Message
  From: Robert Maguire [mailto:
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 203.0 10:57 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Thoughts on Haiti
  Cheryl - This essay from Haitian-American scholar (and friend) Alex Dupuy has been publiished on Alterpresse today. It
  is a good summation of concerns and prospects. - Bob
  Beyond the Earthquake:
  A Wake-Up Call for Haiti
  Alex Dupuy
  Department of Sociology
  Wesleyan University
  Middletown, CT 06457
  Long before the powerful 7.0 magnitude earthquake (and several aftershocks) struck Haiti on January 12 and leveled the
  metropolitan capital city of Port-au-Prince and surrounding areas, that city was already a disaster waiting to happen.
  With a population of more than 2 million in a city whose infrastructure could at best sustain a population of 100,000, the
  local and national public administrations simply abandoned the city to itself. Neither provided meaningful services of
  any kind-schools, healthcare, electricity, potable water, sanitation, zoning and construction regulations-and what they
  did provide was poorly administered, or primarily served the needs of the wealthier or better off sectors of the
  population who could afford to pay for them. Consider, for example, that only about 28 percent of Haitians have access
  to health care, 50 percent have access to potable water, and 10 percent have electrical services. In short, the Haitian
  state-i.e., the government-long ago abdicated its responsibilities to the majority of Haitian citizens, and at least since the
  Duvalier era, deferred to bilateral and multilateral aid donors, non-governmental agencies (NG0s) to provide services to
  the population. More NGOs per capita operate in Haiti than in any other country in the world, and they provide 70
  percent of healthcare in rural areas and 80 percent of public services. This, in turn, has led to an extreme laissez alter
  and the near total privatization of all basic services. Except for a brief seven month attempt in 1991 that ended in a
  bloody coup d'etat against the democratically elected government of Jean-Bertrand Aristide, the turn to democratic
  governance has not changed that basic reality. It is therefore no accident that while the earthquake caused death and
  destruction among all social classes, the high death toll-estimates run from as low as 10,000 to a high of 200,000 so far,
  which means no one really knows-is also a direct consequence of the poor infrastructure, inferior housing construction,
  and the long-standing disregard for the basic needs and rights of the population.
  What's more, geologists had warned the government of the probability of a seismic eruption for years, but as with
  previous massive destructions and loss of lives caused by hurricanes and tropical storms, the government took no
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769425 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769425 Date: 08/31/2015
  measures to prepare for that possibility. It comes as no surprise, then, that the Haitian people have to rely entirely on
  the international community to come to its rescue. This would have been the case even if the symbols of government
  authority-the National Palace, the Parliament, the headquarters of the National Police, and other ministries-had not
  been destroyed for the simple reason that the capacity of the Haitian state to respond to a crisis of this magnitude-or
  even to less severe ones-is non existent due primarily to shortsighted practices and policies-political, economic, and
  social-that prioritized the interests of the few-the 4 percent of the population who hold 66 percent of total assets and
  the 1 percent who appropriate 55 percent of the national income-at the expense of the 75 percent of the population
  who live on less than $2/day and the more than half who live on less than $1/clay.
  There is no doubt that the dominant economic and political classes of Haiti bear great responsibility for the abysmal
  conditions in the country that exacerbated the impact of the earthquake (or of hurricanes or tropical storms). However,
  these local actors did not create these conditions alone but did so in close partnership with foreign governments and
  economic actors with long-standing interests in Haiti, principally those of the advanced countries-the United States,
  Canada, and France-and their international financial institutions (IF1s)-the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund,
  the Inter-American Development Bank. Since the 1970s and under various free market mantras, these international
  actors and institutions sought to and succeeded in transforming Haiti into a supplier of the cheapest labor in this
  hemisphere for foreign and domestic investors in the export assembly industry; in dismantling all obstacles to free trade;
  in privatizing public enterprises; and in weakening further the institutions of the state through policies that reinforced
  Haiti's dependence on foreign aid organizations-governmental and non-governmental.
  These policies had drastic consequences for the Haitian economy. Locating the assembly industries primarily in Port-au-
  Prince encouraged migration from the rural areas to the capital city, contributed to its bloated population and sprawling
  squalor, and provided a never ending supply of cheap labor for those industries. At the same time, removing tariffs on
  food imports were detrimental to Haitian agriculture. Whereas in the 1970s Haiti produced most of the rice it
  consumed and imported only 10 percent of its food needs, by the end of the 1990s it was importing more than 42
  percent of its food needs, had become the highest per capita consumer of subsidized US imported rice in the Western
  Hemisphere, and the largest importer of foodstuffs from the US in the Caribbean. Thus, US farmers benefitted at the
  expense of Haitian producers. These policies, too, propelled rural-to-urban migration, with Port-au-Prince as the primary
  destination, as well as emigration to the neighboring Dominican Republic, the Caribbean, and North America. Haiti is
  becoming increasingly dependent on remittances from its immigrants, which now represent 35 percent of Haiti's GDP.
  What, then, is to be done? The response of the international community-from governments, the UN, and NGOs around
  the world-for medical treatment, food, water, temporary shelter, and road and communication repairs-has been
  immediate and massive, but will need to be sustained for a longer time span if it is to help Haiti recover economically in
  the short and medium term. Pressure is also mounting on bilateral and multilateral aid donors to cancel Haiti's debt of
  some $1.15 billion.
  But to be effective and long lasting, future aid must be unconditional and be given more in the form of grants than
  loans. To that end, the Haitian people need to rethink how the country relates to the international community, in
  particular the major powers and the IFIs. Basically, I would argue, Haiti needs to break with the policies advocated by
  the major powers and IFIs that have proved disastrous for the Haitian economy. These policies are predicated on the
  belief that Haiti can develop only if it remains open to the world market, relies on its comparative advantage of low-cost
  labor to attract foreign investments in the export assembly industry, and prioritizes the production of selected
  agricultural goods, such as mangoes, for export. Despite the failure of these policies to generate sustainable
  development, reduce unemployment and improve the standard of living of the majority of Haitians, the major powers
  and IFIs continue to advocate them as the solution to Haiti's chronic underdevelopment and poverty. This is shown, for
  example, by the report written by former World Bank economist Paul Collier for UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon in
  2008, and the latter's appointment of former US President Bill Clinton to spearhead that strategy in Haiti. Ignoring the
  evidence of the last 38 years, Collier's report calls for establishing a cluster of free trade zones for garment production
  beyond the two that currently exist in Port-au-Prince and Ouanaminthe, and creating such zones for the production and
  export of mangoes.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769425 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769425 Date: 08/31/2015
  It is time for the Haitian people to mobilize as they did in 1990 to change the status quo, but this time by learning from
  the mistakes of the past and avoiding placing their faith in false prophets. As it did in 1990, an agenda for change would
  need to include the following:
  1. Reject all the different versions of the structural adjustment policies of the IFIs that require that Haiti remove tariffs
  on food and other imports, privatize public enterprises, exempt foreign investors from taxes on their profits in the
  assembly industries, and curb social spending. Haiti could instead negotiate bilateral or multilateral agreements with
  those countries that are willing to provide aid without tying them to the implementation of specific economic or social
  policies.
  2. Launch an immediate large-scale and national public works project to rebuild or expand Haiti's infrastructure,
  communication, transportation, public schools, public health facilities, and public housing. Here, too, Haiti could rely on
  bilateral or multilateral agreements to sustain this effort beyond the immediate post-crisis reconstruction now
  underway with foreign assistance that will focus primarily on the quake-ravaged areas.
  3. Prioritize Haiti's food security and sovereignty by launching an agrarian reform, and subsidizing production for the
  local market as well as for export.
  4. Promote the development of local and national agro-industries that use domestic inputs to produce consumer and
  durable goods; and support the national handicraft industry and promote its expansion on the international market.
  5. Protect workers' rights, such as the right to form trade unions and the right to strike, and provide a living wage to all
  workers, especially in the export assembly industries.
  It is obvious that these goals cannot be implemented all at once or immediately. But they must serve as the basis for a
  large scale popular mobilization to hold the elected representatives of the people to account and to renegotiate Haiti's
  relations with the international community.
  Alex Dupuy is the Class of 1958 Distinguished Professor of Sociology at Wesleyan University. His most recent book is The
  Prophet and Power: Jean-Berttrand Aristide, the International Community, and Haiti (2007).
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769425 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769426
MetadataSubject: BEYOND THE EARTHQUAKE: A WAKE-UP CALL FOR HAITI
MetadataFrom: Dupuy, Alex
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769426/C05769426.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769426
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769426 Date: 08/31/2015
  Beyond the Earthquake:
  A Wake-Up Call for Haiti
  Alex Dupuy
  Department of Sociology
  Wesleyan University
  Middletown, CT 06457
  RELEASE IN FULL
  Long before the powerful 7.0 magnitude earthquake (and several aftershocks)
  struck Haiti on January 12 and leveled the metropolitan capital city of Port-au-Prince and
  surrounding areas, that city was already a disaster waiting to happen. With a population
  of more than 2 million in a city whose infrastructure could at best sustain a population of
  100,000, the local and national public administrations simply abandoned the city to itself.
  Neither provided meaningful services of any kind—schools, healthcare, electricity,
  potable water, sanitation, zoning and construction regulations—and what they did
  provide was poorly administered, or primarily served the needs of the wealthier or better
  off sectors of the population who could afford to pay for them. Consider, for example,
  that only about 28 percent of Haitians have access to health care, 50 percent have access
  to potable water, and 10 percent have electrical services. In short, the Haitian state—i.e.,
  the government—long ago abdicated its responsibilities to the majority of Haitian
  citizens, and at least since the Duvalier era, deferred to bilateral and multilateral aid
  donors, non-governmental agencies (NG0s) to provide services to the population. More
  NGOs per capita operate in Haiti than in any other country in the world, and they provide
  70 percent of healthcare in rural areas and 80 percent of public services. This, in turn,
  has led to an extreme laissez aller and the near total privatization of all basic services.
  Except for a brief seven month attempt in 1991 that ended in a bloody coup d'etat against
  the democratically elected government of Jean-Bertrand Aristide, the turn to democratic
  governance has not changed that basic reality. It is therefore no accident that while the
  earthquake caused death and destruction among all social classes, the high death toll—
  estimates run from as low as 10,000 to a high of 200,000 so far, which means no one
  really knows—is also a direct consequence of the poor infrastructure, inferior housing
  construction, and the long-standing disregard for the basic needs and rights of the
  population.
  What's more, geologists had warned the government of the probability of a
  seismic eruption for years, but as with previous massive destructions and loss of lives
  caused by hurricanes and tropical storms, the government took no measures to prepare for
  that possibility. It comes as no surprise, then, that the Haitian people have to rely entirely
  on the international community to come to its rescue. This would have been the case
  even if the symbols of government authority—the National Palace, the Parliament, the
  headquarters of the National Police, and other ministries—had not been destroyed for the
  simple reason that the capacity of the Haitian state to respond to a crisis of this
  magnitude—or even to less severe ones—is non existent due primarily to shortsighted
  practices and policies—political, economic, and social—that prioritized the interests of
  the few—the 4 percent of the population who hold 66 percent of total assets and the 1
  percent who appropriate 55 percent of the national income—at the expense of the 75
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769426 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769426 Date: 08/31/2015
  percent of the population who live on less than $2/day and the more than half who live on
  less than $1/day.
  There is no doubt that the dominant economic and political classes of Haiti bear
  great responsibility for the abysmal conditions in the country that exacerbated the impact
  of the earthquake (or of hurricanes or tropical storms). However, these local actors did
  not create these conditions alone but did so in close partnership with foreign governments
  and economic actors with long-standing interests in Haiti, principally those of the
  advanced countries—the United States, Canada, and France—and their international
  financial institutions (IFIs)—the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the Inter-
  American Development Bank. Since the 1970s and under various free market mantras,
  these international actors and institutions sought to and succeeded in transforming Haiti
  into a supplier of the cheapest labor in this hemisphere for foreign and domestic investors
  in the export assembly industry; in dismantling all obstacles to free trade; in privatizing
  public enterprises; and in weakening further the institutions of the state through policies
  that reinforced Haiti's dependence on foreign aid organizations—governmental and non-
  governmental.
  These policies had drastic consequences for the Haitian economy. Locating the
  assembly industries primarily in Port-au-Prince encouraged migration from the rural
  areas to the capital city, contributed to its bloated population and sprawling squalor, and
  provided a never ending supply of cheap labor for those industries. At the same time,
  removing tariffs on food imports were detrimental to Haitian agriculture. Whereas in the
  1970s Haiti produced most of the rice it consumed and imported only 10 percent of its
  food needs, by the end of the 1990s it was importing more than 42 percent of its food
  needs, had become the highest per capita consumer of subsidized US imported rice in the
  Western Hemisphere, and the largest importer of foodstuffs from the US in the
  Caribbean. Thus, US farmers benefitted at the expense of Haitian producers. These
  policies, too, propelled rural-to-urban migration, with Port-au-Prince as the primary
  destination, as well as emigration to the neighboring Dominican Republic, the Caribbean,
  and North America. Haiti is becoming increasingly dependent on remittances from its
  immigrants, which now represent 35 percent of Haiti's GDP.
  What, then, is to be done? The response of the international community—from
  governments, the UN, and NGOs around the world—for medical treatment, food, water,
  temporary shelter, and road and communication repairs—has been immediate and
  massive, but will need to be sustained for a longer time span if it is to help Haiti recover
  economically in the short and medium term. Pressure is also mounting on bilateral and
  multilateral aid donors to cancel Haiti's debt of some $1.15 billion.
  But to be effective and long lasting, future aid must be unconditional and be given
  more in the form of grants than loans. To that end, the Haitian people need to rethink
  how the country relates to the international community, in particular the major powers
  and the IFIs. Basically, I would argue, Haiti needs to break with the policies advocated
  by the major powers and IFIs that have proved disastrous for the Haitian economy.
  These policies are predicated on the belief that Haiti can develop only if it remains open
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769426 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769426 Date: 08/31/2015
  to the world market, relies on its comparative advantage of low-cost labor to attract
  foreign investments in the export assembly industry, and prioritizes the production of
  selected agricultural goods, such as mangoes, for export. Despite the failure of these
  policies to generate sustainable development, reduce unemployment and improve the
  standard of living of the majority of Haitians, the major powers and IFIs continue to
  advocate them as the solution to Haiti's chronic underdevelopment and poverty. This is
  shown, for example, by the report written by former World Bank economist Paul Collier
  for UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon in 2008, and the latter's appointment of former
  US President Bill Clinton to spearhead that strategy in Haiti. Ignoring the evidence of the
  last 38 years, Collier's report calls for establishing a cluster of free trade zones for
  garment production beyond the two that currently exist in Port-au-Prince and
  Ouanaminthe, and creating such zones for the production and export of mangoes.
  It is time for the Haitian people to mobilize as they did in 1990 to change the
  status quo, but this time by learning from the mistakes of the past and avoiding placing
  their faith in false prophets. As it did in 1990, an agenda for change would need to
  include the following:
  1. Reject all the different versions of the structural adjustment policies of the IFIs
  that require that Haiti remove tariffs on food and other imports, privatize public
  enterprises, exempt foreign investors from taxes on their profits in the assembly
  industries, and curb social spending. Haiti could instead negotiate bilateral or multilateral
  agreements with those countries that are willing to provide aid without tying them to the
  implementation of specific economic or social policies.
  2. Launch an immediate large-scale and national public works project to rebuild
  or expand Haiti's infrastructure, communication, transportation, public schools, public
  health facilities, and public housing. Here, too, Haiti could rely on bilateral or
  multilateral agreements to sustain this effort beyond the immediate post-crisis
  reconstruction now underway with foreign assistance that will focus primarily on the
  quake-ravaged areas.
  3. Prioritize Haiti's food security and sovereignty by launching an agrarian
  reform, and subsidizing production for the local market as well as for export.
  4. Promote the development of local and national agro-industries that use
  domestic inputs to produce consumer and durable goods; and support the national
  handicraft industry and promote its expansion on the international market.
  5. Protect workers' rights, such as the right to form trade unions and the right to
  strike, and provide a living wage to all workers, especially in the export assembly
  industries.
  It is obvious that these goals cannot be implemented all at once or immediately.
  But they must serve as the basis for a large scale popular mobilization to hold the elected
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769426 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769426 Date: 08/31/2015
  -
  representatives of the people to account and to renegotiate Haiti's relations with the
  international community.
  Alex Dupuy is the Class of 1958 Distinguished Professor of Sociology at Wesleyan
  University. His most recent book is The Prophet and Power: Jean-Berttrand Aristide,
  the International Community, and Haiti (2007).
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769426 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769427
MetadataSubject: THE BROADER DONOR COORDINATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769427/C05769427.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: RE: RE: RE: from GOH - Montreal meeting talking points
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769427
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sunday, January 24, 2010 12:05 PM
  The Broader Donor Coordination and Accountability
  His reference to our ppt was to the donor coordination mechanism

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769427 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B5,B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sunday, January 24, 2010 12:05 PM
  The Broader Donor Coordination and Accountability
  His reference to our ppt was to the donor coordination mechanism
  From: remaguire
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 11:43 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Re: RE: RE: RE: from GOH - Montreal meeting talking points
  Enforced transparency will countermand it.
  I thought Collier's earlier idea of an Independent Service Authority was interesting as long as it was transitional
  (toward a strengthened GOH) and had GOH authority from the get go.
  I like your idea. At this point a reconstruction authority with Bellefive at its head makes sense. I like your idea
  of a donor's coordination mechanism that I saw in your policy review powerpoint, with coordination on 'our'
  side under the UN Special Envoy mechanism.
  Maybe within the authority, there can be a private sector sub-group coordinated and monitored by the larger
  authority? This sub-group might also include non-Haitians, including Dominicans.
  Haiti's private sector will be less interested in decentralized investment, I think, especially if it focuses on
  intensive labor and providing dignity and liveable wages to Haiti's people. This is a public works/public sector
  initiative, in conjunction with international public sector organizations.
  Sachs idea of the decentralized growth poles is also interesting - perhaps a way to mobilize decentralized
  investment.
  On Jan 24, 2010, Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov> wrote:
  So I have many Vikings fans I'm supposed to be supporting today — won't tell them that I've now got divided loyalties.
  This is helpful but raises the question, what can we do to countermand this.
  B5
  B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769427 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769427 Date: 08/31/2015
  I'm going to look to see what businesses these folks are in but this speaks more than ever to the need for a Haitian
  reconstruction authority with Bellerive at the head with outside key donor or two like in the tsunami that has the
  plenary authority to make decisions ideally free from this type of influence. What are thoughts you have heard in that
  regard?
  cdm
  From: remaguire [mailto
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 10:42 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Re: RE: RE: from GOH - Montreal meeting talking points
  General and specific concerns: Specifically heard from Haiti is that Preval has acceded too much authority to
  the Vorbe family.
  Second, more general, is that the BAMBAM families (the term, I understand, created from the initials of the 6
  leading elite families) are gearing up to inflate costs of doing things and to try to monopolize to the extent
  they can. Will forward in a separate email one or two articles I've seen on this.
  I'm off to Trinity to prepare my classes for this week. (A reality of my full-time teaching load). While check
  email later. Thanks for this opportunity to share thoughts. Am very anxious to do this.
  Can't miss the NFC game, even though the Eagles (I'm from Philly) already collapsed. I also lived in S.W.
  Louisiana during the N.O. "Aints" years.
  Best - Bob
  On Jn 24, 2010, Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov> wrote:
  You and our secretary share similar concerns about making sure Haiti's future is decided by Haiti.
  When we met with PM and P, they both indicated they wanted US to play a large coordination role on their behalf
  to ensure their voice, plans and goals were accomplished. We are committed to doing that as they requested.
  I do think fast will mean some will make money they shouldn't — but goal is to have balance so we move with
  enough alacrity to build confidence that things are getting done.
  Who are the Haiti "operator" types of which this concern is being spoken?
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769427 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769427 Date: 08/31/2015
  From: remaguire [mailto:
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 9:44 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Re: RE: from GOH - Montreal meeting talking points
  I hope the GOH has back-up to hold firm to its positions. Some will want to push it around. Also, while
  urgent need for tent cities clear PAP is clear, definitely not part of solution. Fearful of potential
  permanance of them unless alternates for rural resettlement along lines of talking points exist.
  Am hearing that lots of concern that Haiti's "operators" are licking their chops to make lots of money off
  this. Fact of life or need to expand circle of actors?
  Hang in there. - Bob
  On Jan 24, 2010, Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov> wrote:
  Great — right in line with our thinking so this is great.
  Thanks for forwarding — anything else of note?
  cdm
  From: remaguire [mailto:
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 9:23 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: from GOH - Montreal meeting talking points
  Cheryl - See below the response of Leslie Voltaire and PM Jean Max Bellerive to talking points for
  tomorrow's Montreal meeting I proposed yesterday. Talking points at the end. Response positive. I have
  also shared these with Paul Farmer. Same response. Sources at the UN fear, however, that the donors
  will focus on PAP and miss this historic opportunity. - Bob
  (email sent also to Patrick G.)
  Forwarded message
  From: Leslie Voltaire
  Date: Jan 23, 2010
  Subject: Tr: Montreal - talking points urgent
  To: remaguire
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769427 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769427 Date: 08/31/2015
  Komisyon pa chaj
  Leslie
  Message transfere
  De: Jean Max Bellerive
  A: Leslie Voltaire
  Envoye le : Sam 23 Janvier 2010, 19 h 33 min 51 s
  Objet : Re: Montreal - talking points - urgent
  Thanks ! En ligne avec ce que je pense dire
  ,TMB
  From: Leslie Voltaire
  To: Jean-Max Bellerive
  Sent: Sat, January 23, 2010 10:23:24 PM
  Subject: Montreal - talking points - urgent
  PM
  Reflexions de Bob Maguire
  Leslie
  Message transfere
  De: "rennaguire
  A: Ivoltaire
  Envoye le : Sam 23 Janvier 2010, 13 h 22 min 27 s
  Objet : Montreal - talking points - urgent
  Leslie - First, thank god you were in NYC on Jan 12th. I hope your personal losses were
  minimal. Surely, Haiti has lost much. We all have...
  Thoughts for Montreal:
  1.This offers an opportunity to 'rebalance' Haiti.
  2.Pay attention to the exodus from PAP and catch up with it. (The migration to PAP over the past 30
  years was an unnatural development, spurred by rural neglect and urban concentration.)
  3.A decentralized system of 'welcome centers' in town and villages can assist returnees re-
  integrate. Medical and continuing education services should be a part of them. NEED TO ACT NOW.
  4.More important, the centers must be equipped to provide work - make them the basis for organizing
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769427 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769427 Date: 08/31/2015
  the civic service corps. Higly decentralized: work for cash; public works/environmental restoration/food
  production; restoration of human dignity; rural-urban partnerships through work;e in Haiti's real
  future. Also a chance to begin repairing the social fabric. Will need a 'tough love' approach; disciplined
  management. Not the work for NG0s.
  5.No investment in rural areas and no response to this opportunity will = back to the future re. crowded
  PAP. People will trickle back to the city to replicate past problems.
  6.The damage was done before the earthquake by development/investment policies that ignored the rural
  areas; saw Haitians simply as sources of cheap labor; denigrated human dignity; failed to strengthen local
  institutions.
  7.This must stop; can't happen again.
  8.This is the time to move forward with the Civic Service Corps - quickly.
  kenbe. Pa lage. - Bob
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769427 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769428
MetadataSubject: TAVIS SMILEY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: PIR
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769428/C05769428.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Tavis Smiley
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: PIR <preines
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 12:07 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769428
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  He asked you about this when you sat down. The press hangs in the Andrews DV lounge and gets on the plane well
  before you, the Air Force must have had Fox on when he was with us.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769428 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: PIR <preines
  Sent: Sunday, January 12:07 PM
  To: H
  Subject: Re: Tavis Smiley
  He asked you about this when you sat down. The press hangs in the Andrews DV lounge and gets on the plane well
  before you, the Air Force must have had Fox on when he was with us.
  Original Message
  From: Evergreen
  To: PIR
  Subject: Tavis Smiley
  Sent: Jan 24, 2010 12:04 PM
  I just saw an article he wrote in USA Weekend claiming we had FOX on our airplane screens. What is he talking about?
  He makes a big deal out of it.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769428 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769429
MetadataSubject: TAVIS SMILEY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: PIR
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769429/C05769429.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Tavis Smiley
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: PIR <preines >
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 12:09 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769429
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  I don't know, people make big deals out of nothing, rather than subscribe to Occam's Razor
  I have to look it up but I think you said you never noticed, probably because it's when you're not on the plane
  I'll double check

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769429 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: PIR <preines >
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 12:09 PM
  To: H
  Subject: Re: Tavis Smiley
  I don't know, people make big deals out of nothing, rather than subscribe to Occam's Razor
  I have to look it up but I think you said you never noticed, probably because it's when you're not on the plane
  I'll double check
  Original Message
  From: Evergreen
  To: PIR
  Subject: Re: Tavis Smiley
  Sent: Jan 24, 2010 12:07 PM
  But why did he make such a big deal out of it? And what did I say when he asked?
  Original Message
  From: PIR <preines
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jan 24 12:06:34 2010
  Subject: Re: Tavis Smiley
  He asked you about this when you sat down. The press hangs in the Andrews DV lounge and gets on the plane well
  before you, the Air Force must have had Fox on when he was with us.
  Original Message
  From: Evergreen
  To: PIR
  Subject: Tavis Smiley
  Sent: Jan 24, 2010 12:04 PM
  I just saw an article he wrote in USA Weekend claiming we had FOX on our airplane screens. What is he talking about?
  He makes a big deal out of it.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769429 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769430
MetadataSubject: PUBLIC AFGHANISTAN STRATEGY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769430/C05769430.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: Public Afghanistan Strategy
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Rodriguez, Miguel E; Feldman, Daniel F; Misko, Sean A
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 12:15 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769430
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: FYI
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769430 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 12:15 PM
  To:
  Subject FW: Public Afghanistan Strategy
  FYI
  From: Jones, Paul W
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 12:07 PM
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J; Mills, Cheryl D; Verma, Richard R; Slaughter, Anne-Marie
  Cc: Rodriguez, Miguel E; Feldman, Daniel F; Misko, Sean A
  Subject: RE: Public Afghanistan Strategy
  The approach we took was to integrate our emphasis on women throughout the strategy, vice indicating that it was a
  separate effort. All of our programs benefit women, usually be specific design. Below are a few places under education,
  health and judicial access where women's issues are highlighted in the strategy. We are completely open to how best to
  address this.
  Page ii - "improving ed opps for all Afghansn regardless of gender, is a top priority"
  Page 11 - protecting women's rights in Af cited in context of judicial reform
  Page 12- "emphase on legal aid, gender, and juv justice issues" in enhancing access to justice
  Page 18 - "significant gains in...ensuring ed opportunities for all Afghans, regardless of gender"
  Page 21 - protecting women in Pak cited as priority
  From: Sullivan, Jacob
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 11:44 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Verma, Richard R; Slaughter, Anne-Marie
  Cc: Rodriguez, Miguel E; Jones, Paul W
  Subject: Re: Public Afghanistan Strategy
  Yes, it is accurate. Unless I am badly mistaken, the report does not have a separate section on women.
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  To: Verma, Richard R; Slaughter, Anne-Marie
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J; Rodriguez, Miguel E; Jones, Paul W
  Sent: Sun Jan 24 11:41:50 2010
  Subject: RE: Public Afghanistan Strategy
  The real issue is — is it accurate that the strategy does not have a section regarding women, which would seem almost
  impossible.
  cdm
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769430 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769431
MetadataSubject: READ BELOW RE: DONOR COORDINATION AND A HRA
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769431/C05769431.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: READ BELOW RE: DONOR COORDINATION AND A HRA
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 1:05 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769431
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: FYI
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769431 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 1:05 PM
  To:
  Subject FW: READ BELOW RE: DONOR COORDINATION AND A HRA
  FYI
  From: Jean-Louis Warnholz [mailto
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 12:55 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Curtis, Meghann A
  Subject: RE: READ BELOW RE: DONOR COORDINATION AND A HRA
  Thanks Cheryl
  I am now at my desk. I agree with concerns below. The cementing of the monopoly by Preval for the public container
  port is a prime example how elite capture runs directly counter to job creation and social welfare.
  Assets (land, heavy equipment, cement, petroleum) that are in high demand during a construction boom are in the
  hands of a few. The risk is that price spikes will severely drive out the potential gains from aid dollars. Dual signatures
  and injecting foreign experts into a HRA task force to review projects for eligibility will counteract obvious forms of
  corruption.
  The much harder task is to determine realistic benchmarks for project costs, given transfer pricing and de facto
  cartels. Injecting competition and open bidding is needed to counteract this. The problem is that any Haitian firm will
  loose business to US or Chinese contractors with much more favorable pricing structures (but limited spillovers to local
  economy). A middle ground may be to invite joint ventures between Haitian and international companies to build up the
  local workforce and overall skill base.
  Best, JL
  From: remag u ire
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 11:43 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Re: RE: RE: RE: from GOH - Montreal meeting talking points
  Enforced transparency will countermand it.
  I thought Collier's earlier idea of an Independent Service Authority was interesting as long as it was
  transitional (toward a strengthened GOH) and had GOH authority from the get go.
  I like your idea. At this point a reconstruction authority with Bellerive at its head makes sense. I like
  your idea of a donor's coordination mechanism that I saw in your policy review powerpoint, with
  coordination on 'our' side under the UN Special Envoy mechanism.
  Maybe within the authority, there can be a private sector sub-group coordinated and monitored by the
  larger authority? This sub-group might also include non-Haitians, including Dominicans.
  Haiti's private sector will be less interested in decentralized investment, I think, especially if it focuses on
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769431 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769431 Date: 08/31/2015
  intensive labor and providing dignity and liveable wages to Haiti's people. This is a public works/public
  sector initiative, in conjunction with international public sector organizations.
  Sachs idea of the decentralized growth poles is also interesting - perhaps a way to mobilize decentralized
  investment.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769431 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769432
MetadataSubject: SITUATION REPORT NO. 34 - HAITI EARTHQUAKE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769432/C05769432.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Situation Report No. 34 - Haiti Earthquake (SBU)
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 1:15 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769432
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Fyi
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769432 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 1:15 PM
  To:
  Subject Fw: Situation Report No. 34 - Haiti Earthquake (SBU)
  Fyi
  From: OpsAlert
  Sent: Sat Jan 23 19:13:19 2010
  Subject: Situation Report No. 34 - Haiti Earthquake (SBU)
  SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
  SITUATION REPORT No. .34
  Haiti Earthquake Task Force TFHAO1
  Saturday, January 23,2010
  1900 EST
  VIP TRAVEL
  • (SBU) Representative James McGovern (D-MA) and a group from Lynn University visited the Hotel
  Montana January 23. Contrary to earlier indications, Senator John Kerry (D-MA), did not travel with the
  Lynn University group. (TF1/DHS e-mail, TF1/0FDA e-mail)
  • (SBU) Senator Bill Nelson (D-FL) was scheduled to arrive January 23 with the non-profit Help Bring
  Hope for Haiti, Inc. However, difficulties in arranging return transportation precluded the Senator from
  accompanying the non-profit.
  (TF1/DHS e-mail, Tampa Bay Tribune)
  SEARCH AND RESCUE (SAR)
  • (SBU) The Government of Haiti informed Ambassador Merten at 0054 EST January 23 that it has not
  ceased search and rescue operations. At approximately 1630 EST, media reported a new live rescue in the
  capital. (TF1/Embassy Port-au-Prince e-mail, CNN)
  • (SBU) Six SAR teams are in country, two at the Hotel Montana. (TF1/Interagency Conference
  Call)
  COMMODITY FLOW
  • (SBU) U.S. forces facilitated delivery of $2 million in cash to 12 banks around the capital January
  23. (TF1/Interagency Conference Call)
  • (SBU) The UN estimates current fuel supplies will last until the port is rehabilitated to the point where it
  can receive fuel shipments. (USA ID SitRep#20)
  • (SBU) JTF-H made adjustments to the aircraft arrival schedule allowing flights from Brazil, China, and
  Argentina to land January 23 even though they had not arranged landing slots. (TF1/Interagency
  Conference Call)
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769432 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769432 Date: 08/31/2015
  • (SBU) JTF-H will revise the scheduling of aircraft to make the process more transparent. An Air Force
  Brigadier General has assumed responsibility for coordinating all air activities supported by JTF-
  H. (TF1/Interagency Conference Call)
  EVACUATIONS/AMERICAN CITIZEN AND LE STAFF WHEREABOUTS
  • (SBU) Post reports 489 evacuees departed January 23. (TF1/Interagency Conference Call)
  • (SBU) Post expects to process 100 orphan cases January 23 and another 100 January
  24. (TF1/Interagency Conference Call)
  • (SBU) Post expects the remains of four private American citizens and three USG family members to be
  repatriated to Dover AFB January 23. (TF1/Interagency Conference Call)
  • (SBU) HES agreed to keep its assessment team in Port-au-Prince until
  relieved. (TF1/Interagency Conference Call)
  MEDICAL RESPONSE
  (SBU) As of 1700 EST January 23, USNS Comfort has 243 patients on board and capacity to accommodate
  another 757. (TF1/Interagency Conference Call, SOUTHCOM DCO)
  INTERNATIONAL COORDINATION /REQUESTS
  (U) No updates at this time.
  DEPLOYMENT OF US. GOVERNMENT ASSETS
  (SBU) There are currently 19,063 U.S. military personnel in Haiti or on ships nearby, in addition to personnel
  from OFDA, DHS, HHS, and other agencies.
  (JTF-Haiti SitRep, TF1/0FDA telcon)
  HUMANITARIAN/SECURITY/INFRASTRUCTURE
  • (SBU) The port is still operating at 30 percent capacity (about 150 containers off-loaded in 24 hours) due
  to damage to the pier, but SOUTHCOM estimates the port's capacity will increase to 400 containers in the
  next 96 hours. There are 14 ships waiting to unload. (TF1/Interagency Conference Call, USA ID
  SitRep#20)
  • (SBU) Six television stations are operating between six and 12 hours daily; over 30 FM stations are also
  broadcasting. (TF1/Interagency Conference Call)
  POLITICAL DEVELOPMENTS
  (SBU) Representatives of MINUSTAH, the Government of Haiti, and the Dominican armed forces will meet in
  Santo Domingo to arrange for the deployment of about 150 Dominican troops to MINUSTAH. (TF1/Embassy
  Santo Domingo e-mail)
  Additional updates are available through our unclassified Intellipedia portal at
  http://www.intelink.gov/wiki/Portal :Crisis Haiti Earthquake.
  Dratted:DSChri sten sen Approved: RPSanders
  Dist: State (all bureaus), NSS, OSD, NMCC, JCS, CIA, OSC, NCTC, DHS, DNI
  SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769432 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769433
MetadataSubject: OUT OF OFFICE AUTOREPLY: S'S QUERY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-03T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769433/C05769433.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Out of Office AutoReply: S's query
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, July 3, 2010 1:36 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769433
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  I am currently traveling. If you need immediate assistance, please contact Nora Toiv (ToivNF@state.gov) or Joanne
  Laszczych, (Laszczychl@state.gov) at 202-647-5548.
  If it is an emergency after business hours, please reach out to our Operations Center to have them reach 'me.
  Thank you
  cdm

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769433 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, July 3, 2010 1:36 AM
  To:
  Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: S's query
  I am currently traveling. If you need immediate assistance, please contact Nora Toiv (ToivNF@state.gov) or Joanne
  Laszczych, (Laszczychl@state.gov) at 202-647-5548.
  If it is an emergency after business hours, please reach out to our Operations Center to have them reach 'me.
  Thank you
  cdm
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769433 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769435
MetadataSubject: BLANK
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Valmoro, Lona J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-03T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769435/C05769435.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedFrom: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Verveer, Melanne S
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, July 3, 2010 12:06 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769435
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Cc: Verveer, Melanne S
  MS, we would like to do one photo at the plane with the local police as you are leaving if that's okay.
  Lona Valmoro
  Special Assistant to the Secretary of State
  (202) (direct)

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769435 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, July 3, 2010 12:06 PM
  To:
  Cc: Verveer, Melanne S
  MS, we would like to do one photo at the plane with the local police as you are leaving if that's okay.
  Lona Valmoro
  Special Assistant to the Secretary of State
  (202) (direct)
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769435 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769437
MetadataSubject: CONFIDENTIAL
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Blair, Cherie
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-04T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769437/C05769437.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: confidential
ExtractedFrom: Cherie Blair
ExtractedCc: dband
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, July 4, 2010 2:03 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769437
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Thank you for that I think it was his office rather than the Crown Prince himself who met your staff.
  All is very well and the mobile phone project is really developing in a fantastic way can't wait for you to launch it in the
  autumn
  Cherie Blair

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769437 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Cherie Blair
  Sent: Sunday, July 4, 2010 2:03 PM
  To:
  Subject: RE: confidential
  Thank you for that I think it was his office rather than the Crown Prince himself who met your staff.
  All is very well and the mobile phone project is really developing in a fantastic way can't wait for you to launch it in the
  autumn
  Cherie Blair
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: 03 July 2010 06:54
  To: Cherie Blair
  Subject: Re: confidential
  We're setting up a call for next week. He's visited and talked already w the folks leading out food/hunger efforts but I'm
  happy to discuss w him as well.
  Love your work on women and mobile phones. Hope all is well--H
  Original Message
  From: Cherie Blair
  To: H
  Cc: dband
  Sent: Wed Jun 30 09:00:41 2010
  Subject: RE: confidential
  Hilary can you give me a telephone number the Qatar Crown Prince can ring you on and he will get in touch.
  Alternatively I can get his personal phone number for you. What is the best for you?
  Cherie Blair
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: 15 June 2010 02:35
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769437 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769437 Date: 08/31/2015
  To: Cherie Blair
  Subject: Re: confidential
  I would be happy to meet w him. How should I follow up to arrange a mutually agreeable time? All the best to you.
  Original Message
  From: Cherie Blair
  To: H
  Sent: Mon Jun 07 09:56:45 2010
  Subject: confidential
  As you know I have good links to the Qataris. Sheikha Mosah's son is the 31/32 year old Crown Prince and she is keen
  that he starts to build a wider international profile. He has been appointed head of the Qatar National Food Security
  Programme which is designed to deal with Qatar's food security issues its a $30 billion programme. He is aware that
  food security is an issue you are majoring on and would love to meet with you in person to discuss this and to explore
  potential partnership areas between US and Qatar including possible participation in the US/World Bank Food Security
  Fund. He is also keen to talk more generally about US/Qatari cooperation and even suggested they could help out with
  the Oil spill problem. There is apparently a Arab Food Security Summit in October 2010 and he would like to discuss Us
  participation in that too.
  IS a meeting possible Or maybe we could set up an initial phone
  call.
  Can you let me know if this appeals to you at all?
  Cherie Blair
  This message has been scanned by MailController - www.MailController.altohiway.com
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769437 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769439
MetadataSubject: STATEMENT ON SYRIAN HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVISTS FOR REVIEW
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Fuchs, Michael H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-05T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769439/C05769439.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Statement on Syrian human rights activists for review
ExtractedFrom: Fuchs, Michael H <FuchsMH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob J
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, July 5, 2010 2:16 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769439
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  NEA is asking for a statement from you on the sentencing of Syrian human rights activists. White House released a
  statement on this. Draft below:
  Statement by Secretary Clinton
  Syrian Convictions of Human Rights Activists
  The sentencing of Syrian lawyer Haitham Maleh to three years in prison is an example of Syria's failure to comply with
  minimum international human rights standards. Convicting Maleh for exercising free speech and defending universal
  human rights sends a clear message to the world that Syria does not tolerate peaceful forms of expression. We call on
  the Syrian government to meet its responsibilities under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. It
  should demonstrate its commitment to international legal norms by releasing Maleh and other Syrian citizens, including
  Muhannad al-Hassani and Ali Abdullah, who have been imprisoned solely for seeking to exercise their most fundamental
  human rights.
  ###

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769439 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Fuchs, Michael H <FuchsMH@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, July 5, 2010 2:16 AM
  To:
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Subject: Statement on Syrian human rights activists for review
  NEA is asking for a statement from you on the sentencing of Syrian human rights activists. White House released a
  statement on this. Draft below:
  Statement by Secretary Clinton
  Syrian Convictions of Human Rights Activists
  The sentencing of Syrian lawyer Haitham Maleh to three years in prison is an example of Syria's failure to comply with
  minimum international human rights standards. Convicting Maleh for exercising free speech and defending universal
  human rights sends a clear message to the world that Syria does not tolerate peaceful forms of expression. We call on
  the Syrian government to meet its responsibilities under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. It
  should demonstrate its commitment to international legal norms by releasing Maleh and other Syrian citizens, including
  Muhannad al-Hassani and Ali Abdullah, who have been imprisoned solely for seeking to exercise their most fundamental
  human rights.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769439 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769440
MetadataSubject: FW:
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-05T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769440/C05769440.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw:
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ©state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, July 5, 2010 3:52 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769440
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Fyi - happy to give more context.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769440 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ©state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, July 5, 2010 3:52 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw:
  Fyi - happy to give more context.
  Original Message
  From: Morningstar, Richard L
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Mon Jul 05 02:06:20 2010
  Subject:
  Per the subject we discussed, we have a diplomatic, "psychological" issue, not a legal issue. Our friend has to be given a
  way out. We should recognize his concerns and frame it in terms of a misunderstanding with no malevolent intent and
  that we will make sure there is no recurrence. Our person won't be able to do anything anyway. If he has to leave so be
  it.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769440 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769448
MetadataSubject: THANK YOU
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Verveer, Melanne S
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-06T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769448/C05769448.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Verveer, Melanne S <VerveerMS@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, July 6, 2010 12:02 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769448
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  for having me join you for the trip. I can now add the Caucuses to the countries we've traveled to together!
  You were magnificent. There is clearly much to be done in the region and I'll be following up from my end.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769448 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Verveer, Melanne S <VerveerMS@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, July 6, 2010 12:02 AM
  To: H
  Subject Thank you
  for having me join you for the trip. I can now add the Caucuses to the countries we've traveled to together!
  You were magnificent. There is clearly much to be done in the region and I'll be following up from my end.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769448 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769449
MetadataSubject: H: FROM PAT LANG ON VMI... SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769449/C05769449.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: H: From Pat Lang on VMI... Sid
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 2:12 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769449
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769449 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 2:12 PM
  To:
  Subject: H: From Pat Lang on VMI... Sid
  Original Message
  From: Pat Lang
  To: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Sun, Jan 24, 2010 2:06 pm
  Subject: RE: the CIA, etc.
  Sidney
  On a rainy, gloomy Sunday I write to you in the hope that we will have agreement from Secretary Clinton to accept the
  "distinguished Diplomat" award at VMI. I am assured by the Superintendent, General JHB Peay, and the department
  head of International Relations/Political Science, Colonel Jim Hentz that the award is hers if she will accept it. This is a
  "done deal."
  All that is needed for her to receive an official letter from General Peay is for me to know that she will accept the
  award. They want to
  give her the award this year on a suitable day before graduation in late May. The letter will ask her to address the corps
  of cadets in a suitable on post (campus) setting. I would like to see it in Jackson Memorial Hall, a beautiful medieval
  revival building. An alternative setting would be the two story atrium in the Marshall Center for Leadership and
  Ethics. The award would be presented at the end of the address. Media coverage would be welcomed and
  assisted. She would be honored by being the reviewing person at a regimental review of the corps. A suitable dinner
  and or luncheon would be arranged.
  If this is going to happen it would be a good idea to set the wheels in motion as soon as possible so that the staffs can
  work out the details.
  Best
  Pat Lang
  VMI '62
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769449 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769454
MetadataSubject: (WASHINGTON POST) OBAMA'S WORST FOREIGH-POLICY MISTAKE
MetadataTo: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-06T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769454/C05769454.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: (Washington Post) Obama's worst foreign-policy mistake
ExtractedTo: Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-III; SES-O_Shift-I; SES-O_Shift-II
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, July 6, 2010 6:44 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769454
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: FYI
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769454 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, July 6, 2010 6:44 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject FW: (Washington Post) Obama's worst foreign-policy mistake
  FYI
  From: Simmons, Krista M
  Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 6:32 AM
  To: NEWS-Mahogany; NEWS-ISN; NEWS-EUR; T_SpecAssts
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-III; SES-O_Shift-I; SES-O_Shift-II
  Subject: (Washington Post) Obama's worst foreign-policy mistake
  By Mitt Romney
  Tuesday, July 6, 2010
  http://www.washingtonpost.comiwp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/05/AR2010070502657.html
  Given President Obama's glaring domestic policy missteps, it is understandable that the public has largely been blinded
  to his foreign policy failings. In fact, these may have been even more damaging to America's future. He fought to
  reinstate Honduras's pro-Chavez president while stalling Colombia's favored-trade status. He castigated Israel at the
  United Nations but was silent about Hamas having launched 7,000 rockets from the Gaza Strip. His policy of
  "engagement" with rogue nations has been met with North Korean nuclear tests, missile launches and the sinking of a
  South Korean naval vessel, while Iran has accelerated its nuclear program, funded terrorists and armed Hezbollah with
  long-range missiles. He acceded to Russia's No. 1 foreign policy objective, the abandonment of our Europe-based missile
  defense program, and obtained nothing whatsoever in return.
  Despite all of this, the president's New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New-START) with Russia could be his worst
  foreign policy mistake yet. The treaty as submitted to the Senate should not be ratified.
  New-START impedes missile defense, our protection from nuclear-proliferating rogue states such as Iran and North
  Korea. Its preamble links strategic defense with strategic arsenal. It explicitly forbids the United States from converting
  intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) silos into missile defense sites. And Russia has expressly reserved the right to
  walk away from the treaty if it believes that the United States has significantly increased its missile defense capability.
  Hence, to preserve the treaty's restrictions on Russia, America must effectively get Russia's permission for any missile
  defense expansion. Moscow's vehemence over our modest plans in Eastern Europe demonstrate that such permission
  would be extremely unlikely.
  The treaty empowers a Bilateral Consultative Commission with broad latitude to amend the treaty with specific
  reference to missile defense. New START does something the American public would never countenance and the Senate
  should never permit: It jeopardizes our missile defense system.
  The treaty also gives far more to the Russians than to the United States. As drafted, it lets Russia escape the limit on its
  number of strategic nuclear warheads. Loopholes and lapses -- presumably carefully crafted by Moscow — provide a
  path to entirely avoid the advertised warhead-reduction targets. For example, rail-based ICBMs and launchers are not
  mentioned. Similarly, multiple nuclear warheads that are mounted on bombers are effectively not counted. Unlike past
  treaty restrictions, ICBMs are not prohibited from bombers. This means that Russia is free to mount a nearly unlimited
  number of ICBMs on bombers -- including MIRVs (multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles) or multiple
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769454 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769454 Date: 08/31/2015
  warheads -- without tripping the treaty's limits. These omissions would be consistent with Russia's plans for a new heavy
  bomber and reports of growing interest in rail-mobile ICBMs.
  Under New START, the United States must drastically reduce our number of launchers but Russia will not -- it already has
  fewer launchers than the treaty limits. Put another way: We give, Russia gets. And more troubling, the treaty fails to
  apply the MIRV limits that were part of the prior START treaty. Again, it may not be coincidental that Russia is
  developing a new heavy-load -- meaning MIRV-capable -- ICBM.
  New-START gives Russia a massive nuclear weapon advantage over the United States. The treaty ignores tactical nuclear
  weapons, where Russia outnumbers us by as much as 10 to 1. Obama heralds a reduction in strategic weapons from
  approximately 2,200 to 1,550 but fails to mention that Russia will retain more than 10,000 nuclear warheads that are
  categorized as tactical because they are mounted on missiles that cannot reach the United States. But surely they can
  reach our allies, nations that depend on us for a nuclear umbrella. And who can know how those tactical nuclear
  warheads might be reconfigured? Astonishingly, while excusing tactical nukes from the treaty, the Obama
  administration bows to Russia's insistence that conventional weapons mounted on ICBMs are counted under the treaty's
  warhead and launcher limits.
  By all indications, the Obama administration has been badly out-negotiated. Perhaps the president's eagerness for
  global disarmament led his team to accede to Russia's demands, or perhaps it led to a document that was less than
  carefully drafted.
  Whatever the reason for the treaty's failings, it must not be ratified: The security of the United States is at stake. The
  only responsible course is for the Senate to demand and scrutinize the full diplomatic record underlying the treaty. Then
  it must insist that any linkage between the treaty and our missile defense system be eliminated. In a world where
  nuclear weapons are proliferating, America's missile defense shield must not be compromised. As currently drafted,
  New START is a non-starter.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769454 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769455
MetadataSubject: BARAK
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-06T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769455/C05769455.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, July 6, 2010 7:19 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769455
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  1.4(B)
  Barak
  1.4(D)
  B1
  Slightly edited Background for Barak call:
  On Gaza and the "controlled items" list, Israeli MFA Director General Yossi Gal and Ministry of Defense COGAT General
  Eitan Dangot briefed Monday in Israel on a release of the new list, and newly announced international projects. (The
  Declassify on: 07/05/2035

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769455 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  1.4(B),B1,1.4(D)
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, July 6, 2010 7:19 AM
  To:
  Subject:
  1.4(B)
  Barak
  1.4(D)
  B1
  Slightly edited Background for Barak call:
  On Gaza and the "controlled items" list, Israeli MFA Director General Yossi Gal and Ministry of Defense COGAT General
  Eitan Dangot briefed Monday in Israel on a release of the new list, and newly announced international projects. (The
  Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 08/27/2015 — Class: CONFIDENTIAL — Reason: 1.4(B), 1.4(D) —
  Declassify on: 07/05/2035
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769455 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769460
MetadataSubject: CONCEPT NOTE: HAITI 2020 PLANNING TEAM
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769460/C05769460.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769460
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769460 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  Concept Note: Haiti 2020 Planning Team
  1
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769460 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769460 Date: 08/31/2015
  2
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769460 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769461
MetadataSubject: THE SETTLEMENT FREEZE THAT NEVER WAS, AND NEVER WILL BE
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-06T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769461/C05769461.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769461
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  sbwhoeop
  Tuesday, July 6, 2010 7:54 AM
  The Settlement Freeze That Never Was, And Never Will Be
  http://maxblumenthal.com/2010/07/the-settlement-freeze-that-never-was-and-never-will-be/
  The Settlement Freeze That Never Was, And Never Will Be
  On 07.05.10, By Max Blumenthal
  0
  Linda Forsell's June 21 photos of ongoing construction in the Israeli settlement of Har Homa expose the illusion of
  Netanyahu's settlement freeze
  With the Israeli settlement moratorium scheduled to expire on September 26, the right-wing parties in Israel's coalition
  government are exerting maximum pressure on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to block the policy's renewal. "Let's
  get rid of the freeze and get back to building," declared Israeli Minister of Public Affairs and the Diaspora Yuli Edelstein on
  Israel National Radio yesterday. "It's our land anyway!" (Edelstein lives in the settlement of Neve Daniel).
  Back in the US, the former Israel lobbyist and ex-Clinton Assistant Secretary of State Martin Indyk took to the Washington
  Post's op-ed page to praise Netanyahu and Barack Obama for ensuring that "there were zero building starts in the West
  Bank settlements."
  During the week of June 21, I traveled through the West Bank with Swedish photojournalist Linda Forsell to document
  new settlement construction and the settlers' theft of water from Palestinian towns. Forsell took a series of photos at Har
  Homa, a massive Israeli settlement towering over the Palestinian town of Beit Sarhour. Her photos show ongoing
  construction of hundreds of new settlement units — documents of the settlement freeze sham.
  0
  Netanyahu authorized the building of new settlement units just days after he
  announced the freeze in November 2009. He attempted to disguise new settlement construction by drawing a false
  distinction between the West Bank and "parts of Jerusalem" like Har Homa that actually lie outside 1967 lines. As Israeli
  government flack Mark Regev remarked in December 2009, "We've made a clear distinction between the West Bank and
  Jerusalem. Jerusalem is our capital and will stay as such." With a few exceptions, Obama allowed this scheme to go
  forward.
  According to the Washington Post, Obama's meeting with Netanyahu this week will have more to do with reassuring
  Jewish Democrats than with halting the wholesale colonization of the West Bank. As the Post's Anne Kornblut reported,
  "The White House meeting will not dwell on some of the most difficult time-sensitive issues, including the expiration of a
  moratorium on Israeli settlement construction in September." This may mean an end to the settlement freeze, but it was
  only an illusion after all.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769461 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From:
  Sent:
  Subject:
  sbwhoeop
  Tuesday, July 6, 2010 7:54 AM
  The Settlement Freeze That Never Was, And Never Will Be
  http://maxblumenthal.com/2010/07/the-settlement-freeze-that-never-was-and-never-will-be/
  The Settlement Freeze That Never Was, And Never Will Be
  On 07.05.10, By Max Blumenthal
  0
  Linda Forsell's June 21 photos of ongoing construction in the Israeli settlement of Har Homa expose the illusion of
  Netanyahu's settlement freeze
  With the Israeli settlement moratorium scheduled to expire on September 26, the right-wing parties in Israel's coalition
  government are exerting maximum pressure on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to block the policy's renewal. "Let's
  get rid of the freeze and get back to building," declared Israeli Minister of Public Affairs and the Diaspora Yuli Edelstein on
  Israel National Radio yesterday. "It's our land anyway!" (Edelstein lives in the settlement of Neve Daniel).
  Back in the US, the former Israel lobbyist and ex-Clinton Assistant Secretary of State Martin Indyk took to the Washington
  Post's op-ed page to praise Netanyahu and Barack Obama for ensuring that "there were zero building starts in the West
  Bank settlements."
  During the week of June 21, I traveled through the West Bank with Swedish photojournalist Linda Forsell to document
  new settlement construction and the settlers' theft of water from Palestinian towns. Forsell took a series of photos at Har
  Homa, a massive Israeli settlement towering over the Palestinian town of Beit Sarhour. Her photos show ongoing
  construction of hundreds of new settlement units — documents of the settlement freeze sham.
  0
  Netanyahu authorized the building of new settlement units just days after he
  announced the freeze in November 2009. He attempted to disguise new settlement construction by drawing a false
  distinction between the West Bank and "parts of Jerusalem" like Har Homa that actually lie outside 1967 lines. As Israeli
  government flack Mark Regev remarked in December 2009, "We've made a clear distinction between the West Bank and
  Jerusalem. Jerusalem is our capital and will stay as such." With a few exceptions, Obama allowed this scheme to go
  forward.
  According to the Washington Post, Obama's meeting with Netanyahu this week will have more to do with reassuring
  Jewish Democrats than with halting the wholesale colonization of the West Bank. As the Post's Anne Kornblut reported,
  "The White House meeting will not dwell on some of the most difficult time-sensitive issues, including the expiration of a
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769461 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769461 Date: 08/31/2015
  moratorium on Israeli settlement construction in September." This may mean an end to the settlement freeze, but it was
  only an illusion after all.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769461 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769462
MetadataSubject: [INSIDERSOUR] BODY OF UGANDAN LGBT VOLUNTEER WAS FOUND BEHEADED
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-06T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769462/C05769462.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: [InsidersOut] Body of Ugandan LGBT volunteer was found beheaded
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Yamamoto, Donald Y; Baer, Daniel B; Sullivan, Jacob J; Posner, Michael H
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, July 6, 2010 10:55 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769462
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: FYI
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769462 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, July 6, 2010 10:55 AM
  To:
  Subject FW: [InsidersOut] Body of Ugandan LGBT volunteer was found beheaded
  FYI
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 10:53 AM
  To: Carson, Johnnie
  Cc: Yamamoto, Donald Y; Baer, Daniel B; Sullivan, Jacob J; Posner, Michael H
  Subject: FW: [InsidersOut] Body of Ugandan LGBT volunteer was found beheaded
  Johnnie:
  Do we know anything more about this?
  Thx
  cdm
  Forwarded message
  From: Jim Burroway
  Date: Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 1.1 / ANI
  Subject: [InsidersOut] Body of Ugandan LGBT volunteer was found beheaded
  To: InsidersOut(
  http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010/07/05/24020
  Ugandan LGBT Advocate Found Beheaded
  Jim Burroway
  July 5th, 2010
  A reader tipped me to this horrible news. The severed head of a volunteer for Integrity Uganda, the pro-LGBT
  organization founded by Bishop Christopher Senyonjo, was found in a pit latrine on a farm in Makindye
  Sabagabo, Wakiso District.
  Judith Nabakooba, a police spokesperson, identified the head as that of Pasikali Kashusbe, one of
  the workers on Kigggundu's farm and a member of Integrity Uganda. Pasikali and his partner
  Abbey are youth workers with Integrity Uganda charged with the responsibility of mobilising
  young LGBT people in activities which build community capacity to face up to the challenge of
  homophobia, especially in the area of attitude change and care through drama and sports
  activities.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769462 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769462 Date: 08/31/2015
  According to the police, a mutilated torso which was earlier in the week discovered in Kabuuma
  Zone, about half a kilometre away from Kiggundu's farm was probably Pasikali's The torso was
  described as belonging to a young man and had no genitals.
  Pasikali went missing over three and half weeks ago when the country was celebrating Uganda
  Martyrs Day. All efforts by his partner Abbey and other family members to find him had been
  fruitless.
  Bishop Christopher Senyonjo, Chairperson of Integrity Uganda lamented the murder of this
  young man as 'absurd' adding that, 'clearly, the values of tolerance and social inclusion are sadly
  being sacrificed on the altar of state ignorance, ineptness and good old colonial stupidity'.
  Uganda's Martyr's Day, a national holiday, is a particularly dangerous time for LGBT people. The holiday
  commemorates the death of several Anglican and Catholic missionaries ordered by the Bugandan King Mwanga
  II, who felt that foreign religious influences posed a threat to his kingdom. In fact, his fears proved correct; the
  executions prompted Britain to invade Uganda and turn it into a British colony. Popular lore has it that King
  Mwanga II, who himself was a teenager, killed the martyrs because they refused his homosexual advances. It is
  unclear how much of that part of the story is true or how much of it is lore that was reinforced by the British
  colonial government to discredit the king.
  The farm where Kashusbe's head was found is reportedly owned by Badru Kiggundu, who is the chairman of
  Uganda's Electoral Commission. Police found the head while searching for a missing priest, Rev Henry Kayizzi
  Nsubuga, who disappeared almost two and half weeks ago after delivering a speech at St. Paul's Church in
  Kanyanya supporting homosexuality in Uganda.
  The independent television network NTV Uganda posted this video three days ago, but doesn't mention the
  circumstances which appear to have led to Pasikali's murder:
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JBj1bN3gtnQ
  Daily Monitor, Uganda's largest newspapers, has a few more sparse details here. In this report, the victim is
  identified as Paschal Kashushu. Amid conflicting reports, it appears that at at least one man has been arrested,
  possibly a relative. I'm trying to get more information directly from Uganda.
  Changing Attitudes has this statement from Rev Erich Kasirye, General Secretary, Integrity Uganda:
  Pasikali and his partner Abbey joined Integrity Uganda in June 2007 and during the last three
  years, Integrity Uganda has seen an increase in coordination and harmonisation of youth
  activities. Pasikali emphasized the promotion of the concept of care across the continuum
  through the formation of voluntary home care groups for young LGBTIs who continue to live in
  fear. He will be greatly missed by the entire LGBTI fraternity.
  As for the missing priest, the only direct news reports that I can find about him appear in the government-owned
  New Vision. There is no mention of Rev. Nsubuga's sermon. Instead, it appears that relatives are painting the
  missing priest as mentally "stressed." A report by a reporter from Kamulali Newspaper and re-published on the
  virulently anti-gay web site Virtue Online provides more hints about the possible link between Rev. Nsubuga's
  disappearance and his pro-gay sermon.
  Reminder: This list is an invitation only lists and all posts are OFF THE RECORD.
  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "InsidersOut" group.
  To post to this group, send email to InsidersOur
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769462 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769462 Date: 08/31/2015
  To unsubscribe from this group, send email to InsidersOut-unsubscrib(
  For more options, visit this group at http://woups.goog1e.com/group/InsidersOut?h1=en
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769462 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769463
MetadataSubject: UNDELIVERABLE: FOLLOW UP W SEC NAPOLITANO
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: postmaster@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769463/C05769463.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Undeliverable: Followup w Sec Napolitano
ExtractedFrom: postmaster@state.gov
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 4:09 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769463
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:
  scwarzericpOstate.gov
  The recipient's e-mail address was not found in the recipient's e-mail system. Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver
  this message for you. Please check the e-mail address and try resending this message, or provide the following diagnostic
  text to your system administrator.
  Diagnostic information for administrators:
  Generating server: MSWASHDCIB01.washdc.state.sbu
  scwarzericp@state.gov
  #< #5.1.1> #SMTP#
  Original message headers:
  Received: from vance2.state.gov ([10.4.16.249]) by
  MSWASHDCIB01.washdc.state.sbu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 24
  Jan 2010 16:09:22 -0500
  Received: from mail.clintonemail.com (ool-18bbeabb.static.optonline.net [24.187.234.187])
  by vance2.state.gov with ESMTP id o00KfLRIA1013222;
  Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:41:21 -0500
  Received: from CLNTINET08.clinton.local ([fe80::dObb:23d3:f75e:4993]) by
  CLNTINET08.clinton.locai ([fe80::dObb:23d3:f75e:4993%10]) with mapi; Sun, 24
  Jan 2010 16:09:21 -0500

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769463 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: postmaster@state.gov
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 4:09 PM
  To:
  Subject: Undeliverable: Followup w Sec Napolitano
  Attachments: details.txt; Followup w Sec Napolitano (2.69 KB)
  Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:
  scwarzericpOstate.gov
  The recipient's e-mail address was not found in the recipient's e-mail system. Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver
  this message for you. Please check the e-mail address and try resending this message, or provide the following diagnostic
  text to your system administrator.
  Diagnostic information for administrators:
  Generating server: MSWASHDCIB01.washdc.state.sbu
  scwarzericp@state.gov
  #< #5.1.1> #SMTP#
  Original message headers:
  Received: from vance2.state.gov ([10.4.16.249]) by
  MSWASHDCIB01.washdc.state.sbu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 24
  Jan 2010 16:09:22 -0500
  Received: from mail.clintonemail.com (ool-18bbeabb.static.optonline.net [24.187.234.187])
  by vance2.state.gov with ESMTP id o00KfLRIA1013222;
  Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:41:21 -0500
  Received: from CLNTINET08.clinton.local ([fe80::dObb:23d3:f75e:4993]) by
  CLNTINET08.clinton.locai ([fe80::dObb:23d3:f75e:4993%10]) with mapi; Sun, 24
  Jan 2010 16:09:21 -0500
  From: H <HDR22@c1intonemail.com>
  To: "'cheryl.mills " <cheryl.mills B6
  "brimmere@state.gov" <brimmere@state.gov>, "'scwarzericp@state.gov'"
  <scwarzericp@state.gov
  ,
  CC: H <HDR22@c1intonemail.com>
  Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:09:21 -0500
  Subject: Followup w Sec Napolitano
  Thread-Topic: Followup w Sec Napolitano
  Thread-Index: Accid0X+x0D6YJ2s7QS+7tLkSF8OrVw==
  Message-ID: <786762D781A7FF4FAC9060892134044880368178E41@CLNTINET08.clinton.local>
  Accept-Language: en-US
  Content-Language: en-US
  X-MS-Has-Attach:
  X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
  acceptlanguage: en-US
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
  Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769463 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769463 Date: 08/31/2015
  MIME-Version: 1.0
  Return-Path: HDR22@clintonemail.com
  X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jan 2010 21:09:22.0667 (UTC) FILETIME=[806AF380:01CA9D39]
  X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.0.0.4125-6.000.1038-17148.000
  X-TM-AS-Result: No--15.161000-5.000000-31
  X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No
  X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769463 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769464
MetadataSubject: THANK YOU
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-06T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769464/C05769464.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: Thank you PAGE(S)
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Laszczych, Joanne
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, July 6,2010 11:05 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769464
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  MISSING
  FYI traffic.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769464 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, July 6,2010 11:05 AM
  To:
  Subject: FW: Thank you PAGE(S)
  MISSING
  FYI traffic.
  From: Mills, Cheryl D
  Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 10:59 AM
  To: Posner, Michael H
  Cc: Laszczych, Joanne
  Subject: RE: Thank you
  You did a great job — I went back and reviewed the outline you provided and this was a very faithful rendition of your
  thoughts.
  I am out this week but let's try for next week.
  Copying joanne to find a time.
  cdm
  From: Posner, Michael H
  Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 10:57 AM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: FW: Thank you
  Cheryl
  The Secretary's speech in Krakow was a home run. I am getting lots of comments like this one from people in my
  world. This speech will give us lots of running room to follow up on these issues.
  When your schedule permits I would like to come see you. It has been a long time since we've talked and it would be
  good to catch up on a few things.
  Best
  Mike
  From: Douglas Rutzen [mailto
  Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 10:45 AM
  To: Posner, Michael H; A/S Posner
  Cc: Duncan, Dara L; Davidson, Lynne A (DRL)
  Subject: Thank you
  Dear Assistant Secretary Posner:
  I am writing to express my deep appreciation to you, Dara, Lynne, and the entire DRL team for your tireless support in
  connection with the recent Community of Democracies meeting. The Secretary's speech was superb. I was sitting with
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769464 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769466
MetadataSubject: BLAIR CALL
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-06T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769466/C05769466.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Blair call
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC©state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, July 6, 2010 11:28 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769466
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Can be done whenever you are back. His office knows you are running just a few minutes late.
  Lauren

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769466 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC©state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, July 6, 2010 11:28 AM
  To:
  Subject: Blair call
  Can be done whenever you are back. His office knows you are running just a few minutes late.
  Lauren
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769466 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769467
MetadataSubject: A UNIQUE REQUEST FOR YOUR HELP FROM HILARY ROSEN
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-06T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769467/C05769467.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: A unique request for your help from Hilary Rosen
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, July 6, 2010 12:54 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769467
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: I will follow up on this today.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769467 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, July 6, 2010 12:54 PM
  To:
  Subject: RE: A unique request for your help from Hilary Rosen
  I will follow up on this today.
  Original Message-----
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 12:53 PM
  To: Sullivan, Jacob
  Subject: Fw: A unique request for your help from Hilary Rosen
  How can we get this done?
  Original Message ----
  From: Rosen And Company <hilary
  To: H; millscd@state.gov <millscd@state.gov>
  Sent: Sun Jul 04 11:09:52 2010
  Subject: A unique request for your help from Hilary Rosen
  HRC:
  You may remember many years ago when olympic champion swimmer diana nyad tried to swim from cuba to florida
  and failed. Diana wants to try again as part of an ongoing commitment she has to promoting fitness among older
  people. As you can see from this email she needs your help to get clearance. I wouldnt ask if i didnt think taking it to
  your level is the only way to get it done.
  Thanks so much in advance for looking into this. I know it is a busy month for you. You are just the best!!!
  Hilary Rosen
  From: Diana Nyad
  In full appreciation of Hilary's always-hectic life....and particularly her
  current high-octane stresses with the oil spill work... .1 thought it easiest for
  her to simply show her below a letter I wrote this week to hopeuflly be
  delivered to Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, dem out
  of FL, in a desperate plea for help to get me and my expedition cleared
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769467 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769467 Date: 08/31/2015
  intto Cuba.
  The basics for Hilary to know are that CNN is covering the entire summer's
  event I'm doing live.
  24-hour training swim off Key West next week-end.
  The Cuba Swim early August, weather dictating.
  It's not that I've been flat turned down by the State Dept. But I have been
  told I won't be approved this summer warm water, my training, all of
  it....there's no other time I can or will do it.
  It's going to be a terribly upbeat story to follow (in CLEAN ocean just
  nearby the oil spill), it's going to be an embraced strong message to
  redefine middle age as strong and relevant, to see a 60-year old
  swim 103 miles and walk up onto the shores of her own country.
  I have been told by lawyers within Treasury that it will take either
  Hilary Clinton or Obama himself to clear my event.
  I know somebody has the power to green light in an hour's time, if
  I can just get to the right person.
  . Please know that I wouldn't
  interrupt either your or Hilary's precious holiday week-end if
  I hadn't committed a year of hardship training to this and now involved
  many good people in the adventure.
  I just can't let this dream slip away because I can't get into Cuba
  with State Dept approval.
  Here is the Schultz doc below. And next I'm going to send you a
  link to a short promo video.
  Thanks so very, very much,
  diana
  DIANA NYAD CUBA SWIM
  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
  At the end of July, 2010, just a month from now, I will attempt to become the first person in history to swim the
  103 miles from Cuba to Florida without the aid of a shark cage.
  In 1978, I swam out of Havana into a raging sea. 41hrs, 49mins later, it was not to be.
  I'm 60 now. This time, when I do walk up onto the Florida shore, I will send a loud message to all the millions my
  age that 60 is not irrelevant, that we are still strong, vital, vibrant individuals, that our best days are not by any means all
  behind us.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769467 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769467 Date: 08/31/2015
  For 30 years, I hadn't swum a stroke. I valued physical fitness to an extreme degree, but just hadn't swum at all
  for 30 years. And now this past year's training is done. It has been intense. Many, many 10, 12, 15 hour swims in the
  Caribbean. Grueling tests of both body and spirit.
  But I was naive to think the training would be the tough part. I am feeling strong and confident. But the
  government permissions for me to walk off the Cuban shore are keeping me from my Dream.
  I first went to the Cuban Interest Section and was told the Cubans would eagerly welcome my event. They
  remember my first attempt and I have been back many times for clinics and such. But they said I would definitely need
  to first have approval from the State Department. I was told there that it is a sensitive time politically, that both Obama
  and Hilary Clinton are very much pro-embargo and it would take perhaps a year to procure State Department clearance.
  On advice from three lawyers from Sonnenschein in D.C., I was told that it would take a direct green light from
  Hilary herself to get this expedition cleared.
  Because I have been stymied by Treasury and the State Dept, I let the Cuban Interest Section permissions go so
  now I don't have permissions from their end, either.
  I am going to make one last attempt to get this done legally by contacting Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman
  Schultz. Perhaps in light of a positive story vis a vis Florida Tourism....there is beautifully clean water, not far from the oil
  disaster and the heroic message of a 60-year-old swimming 100 miles and walking up onto the shores of her own
  country, her own home state, Congresswoman Schultz could champion the project into full legal status, from both the
  Cuban and the State Department sides.
  CNN is the exclusive broadcast coverer of my swim. I am just tonight on the front page of CNN.com.
  There will no doubt be much positive news to come from this story...and to Florida....throughout my endeavor.
  I will do a 24-hour training swim off Key West the week-end of July 10-11. CNN will cover live.
  And then the hope is to go over to Havana on July 23 (or wait at a training camp in Key West starting on July 23)
  and then get the Cuba swim started whenever Mother Nature gives us a forecast of calm seas.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769467 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769468
MetadataSubject: UNDELIVERABLE: FOLLOW W SEC NAPOLITANO
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769468/C05769468.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Undeliverable: Followup w Sec Napolitano
ExtractedTo: H; Huma Abedin
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC©state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 4:18 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769468
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: SchwartzEP@state.gov
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769468 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC©state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 4:18 PM
  To: H; Huma Abedin
  Subject: Re: Undeliverable: Followup w Sec Napolitano
  SchwartzEP@state.gov
  Original Message ---
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C; Huma Abedin
  Sent: Sun Jan 24 16:13:06 2010
  Subject: Re: Undeliverable: Followup w Sec Napolitano
  What is Eric Scwarz's email?
  Original Message
  From: postmaster@state.gov <postmaster@state.gov>
  To: scwarzericp@state.gov <scwarzericp@state.gov>
  Sent: Sun Jan 24 16:09:23 2010
  Subject: Undeliverable: Followup w Sec Napolitano
  Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:
  scwarzericp@state.gov
  The recipient's e-mail address was not found in the recipient's e-mail system. Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver
  this message for you. Please check the e-mail address and try resending this message, or provide the following
  diagnostic text to your system administrator.
  Diagnostic information for administrators:
  Generating server: MSWASHDCIBOtwashdc.state.sbu
  scwarzericp@state.gov
  #< #5.1.1> #SMTP#
  Original message headers:
  Received: from vance2.state.gov ([10.4.16.249]) by
  MSWASHDC1B01.washdc.state.sbu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 24
  Jan 2010 16:09:22 -0500
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769468 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769468 Date: 08/31/2015
  Received: from mail.clintonemail.com (ool-18bbeabb.static.optonline.net [24.187.234.1871)
  by vance2.state.gov with ESMTP id o00KfLRW013222;
  Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:41:21 -0500
  Received: from CLNTINET08.clinton.local ([fe80::d0bb:23d3:f75e:49931) by CLNTINET08.clinton.local
  ([fe80::d0bb:23d3175e:4993%10]) with mapi; Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:09:21 -0500
  From: H <HDR22 clintonemail.com>
  To: "'cheryl.mills " <cheryl.millst
  "brimmere@state.gov"' <brimmere@state.gov>, "scwarzericp@state.gov'"
  <scwarzericp@state.gov>
  CC: H <HDR22@clintonemaiLcom>
  Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 16:09:21 -0500
  Subject: Followup w Sec Napolitano
  Thread-Topic: Followup w Sec Napolitano
  Thread-Index: Acqd0X+x0D6YJ2s7QS+7tLkSF8OrVw==
  Message-ID: <786762D781A7FF4FAC9060892134044880368178E41@CLNTINET08.clinton.local>
  Accept-Language: en-US
  Content-Language: en-US
  X-MS-Has-Attach:
  X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
  acceptlanguage: en-US
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
  Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
  MIME-Version: 1.0
  Return-Path: HDR22@clintonemail.com
  X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jan 2010 21:09:22.0667 (UTC) FILETIME=[806AF3B0:01CA9D39]
  X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.0.0.4125-6.000.1038-17148.000
  X-TM-AS-Result: No--15.161000-5.000000-31
  X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No
  X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769468 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769470
MetadataSubject: JACK LEW ASKING TO TALK TO U
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-06T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769470/C05769470.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Jack few asking to talk to u.
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, July 6, 2010 7:48 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769470
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769470 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, July 6, 2010 7:48 PM
  To: H
  Subject: Jack few asking to talk to u.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769470 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769471
MetadataSubject: H: FROM PAT LANG ON VMI... SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Valmoro, Lona J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769471/C05769471.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: H: From Pat Lang on VMI... Sid
ExtractedTo: H; Huma Abedin
ExtractedFrom: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 4:41 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769471
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  It's actually not too far past Richmond/Lynchburg so a late afternoon/evening trip is realistic. We can discuss tomorrow
  and give you a recommendation.
  Lona Valmoro
  Special Assistant to the Secretary of State
  (direct)

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769471 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 4:41 PM
  To: H; Huma Abedin
  Subject: Re: H: From Pat Lang on VMI... Sid
  It's actually not too far past Richmond/Lynchburg so a late afternoon/evening trip is realistic. We can discuss tomorrow
  and give you a recommendation.
  Lona Valmoro
  Special Assistant to the Secretary of State
  (direct)
  Original Message ---
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Valmoro, Lona J; Huma Abedin
  Sent: Sun Jan 24 15:42:49 2010
  Subject: Fw: H: From Pat Lang on VMI... Sid
  Can we give a date? Should we? Could we do during week?
  Original Message
  From: sbwhoeop
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jan 24 14:11:44 2010
  Subject: H: From Pat Lang on VMI... Sid
  B6
  Original Message
  From: Pat Lan
  To: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Sun, Jan 24, 2010 2:06 pm
  Subject: RE: the CIA, etc.
  Sidney
  On a rainy, gloomy Sunday I write to you in the hope that we will have agreement from Secretary Clinton to accept the
  "distinguished Diplomat" award at VMI. I am assured by the Superintendent, General JHB Peay, and the department
  head of International Relations/Political Science, Colonel Jim Hentz that the award is hers if she will accept it. This is a
  "done deal."
  All that is needed for her to receive an official letter from General Peay is for me to know that she will accept the award.
  They want to give her the award this year on a suitable day before graduation in late May. The letter will ask her to
  address the corps of cadets in a suitable on post (campus) setting. I would like to see it in Jackson Memorial Hall, a
  beautiful medieval revival building. An alternative setting would be the two story atrium in the Marshall Center for
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769471 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769471 Date: 08/31/2015
  Leadership and Ethics. The award would be presented at the end of the address. Media coverage would be welcomed
  and assisted. She would be honored by being the reviewing person at a regimental review of the corps. A suitable
  dinner and or luncheon would be arranged.
  If this is going to happen it would be a good idea to set the wheels in motion as soon as possible so that the staffs can
  work out the details.
  Best
  Pat Lang
  VMI '62
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769471 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769477
MetadataSubject: PREVIOUS CTO PROPOSAL
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Fuchs, Michael H
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-07T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769477/C05769477.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedFrom: Fuchs, Michael H <FuchsMH@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob J
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, July 7, 2010 12:29 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769477
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Madam Secretary,
  Jake mentioned that you asked for more information about a proposal made in 2005 for a global CT organization, and he
  asked me to find out a little about it. Below is some brief information on the proposal, which was made by Saudi Arabia:
  The proposal made by the then crown prince (now king) in Feb. 2005 called for the establishment of an international
  counterterrorism center "under the auspices of the UN." The purpose of the organization would be to, among other
  things, "develop a mechanism for exchanging information and expertise between States" on a wide range of non-
  military counterterrorism issues, encourage the establishment of national and regional centers, and provide assistance
  to developing countries to deal with crises and terrorist acts. The center, as conceived in 2005, would also allow national
  counterterrorism coordinators from different countries and regions to meet and share information and experiences.
  This proposal was endorsed by the OIC (and OIC countries reaffirm their support for the center each year at the UNGA),
  but has never received any serious consideration within the UN by non-OIC members. The Saudis continue to be
  interested in implementing the proposal. Most significantly, recently there have been discussions between the UN and
  Saudis as to how their proposal could be married with efforts to enhance the UN's capacity to support implementation
  of the UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy by allowing the UN Counter-Terrorism Task Force (CTITF) Office and the
  different CTITF member entities to engage more actively and directly with CT experts/practitioners in capitals and have
  multilateral CT consultations wherever necessary.
  But S/CT mentioned that, if we were to move forward
  on S/CT's CFO idea, we would hope to work closely with the Saudis.
  Please let me know if you would like any further info.
  Thanks,
  Mike
  Michael H. Fuchs
  U.S. Department of State
  (202) 647-1709
  (cell)

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769477 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B5,
  B6
  From: Fuchs, Michael H <FuchsMH@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2010 12:29 PM
  To:
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Subject Previous CTO proposal
  Madam Secretary,
  Jake mentioned that you asked for more information about a proposal made in 2005 for a global CT organization, and he
  asked me to find out a little about it. Below is some brief information on the proposal, which was made by Saudi Arabia:
  The proposal made by the then crown prince (now king) in Feb. 2005 called for the establishment of an international
  counterterrorism center "under the auspices of the UN." The purpose of the organization would be to, among other
  things, "develop a mechanism for exchanging information and expertise between States" on a wide range of non-
  military counterterrorism issues, encourage the establishment of national and regional centers, and provide assistance
  to developing countries to deal with crises and terrorist acts. The center, as conceived in 2005, would also allow national
  counterterrorism coordinators from different countries and regions to meet and share information and experiences.
  This proposal was endorsed by the OIC (and OIC countries reaffirm their support for the center each year at the UNGA),
  but has never received any serious consideration within the UN by non-OIC members. The Saudis continue to be
  interested in implementing the proposal. Most significantly, recently there have been discussions between the UN and
  Saudis as to how their proposal could be married with efforts to enhance the UN's capacity to support implementation
  of the UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy by allowing the UN Counter-Terrorism Task Force (CTITF) Office and the
  different CTITF member entities to engage more actively and directly with CT experts/practitioners in capitals and have
  multilateral CT consultations wherever necessary.
  But S/CT mentioned that, if we were to move forward
  on S/CT's CFO idea, we would hope to work closely with the Saudis.
  Please let me know if you would like any further info.
  Thanks,
  Mike
  Michael H. Fuchs
  U.S. Department of State
  (202) 647-1709
  (cell)
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769477 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769482
MetadataSubject: 2 CALLS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-07T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769482/C05769482.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, July 7, 2010 6:06 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769482
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Strobe talbott returned your call through ops. Also, colombian president uribe has put in a request to speak with you.
  He would like to thank you for your public statements on the free trade agreement.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769482 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2010 6:06 PM
  To:
  Subject 2 calls:
  Strobe talbott returned your call through ops. Also, colombian president uribe has put in a request to speak with you.
  He would like to thank you for your public statements on the free trade agreement.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769482 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769484
MetadataSubject: PHONE CALL FROM FM MORATINOS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Valmoro, Lona J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-07T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769484/C05769484.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Phone call from FM Moratinos
ExtractedFrom: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.goy>
ExtractedCc: Jiloty, Lauren C; Sullivan, Jacob J
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, July 7, 2010 9:36 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769484
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  MS, the Spanish FM just called through Ops -- he is boarding a plane from Cuba in about 30-40 minutes and would like to
  speak with you as soon as possible. Would you like Ops to connect the call to the residence or wait until tomorrow?
  Lona Valmoro
  Special Assistant to the Secretary of State
  (direct) B6

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769484 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.goy>
  Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2010 9:36 PM
  To:
  Cc: Jiloty, Lauren C; Sullivan, Jacob J
  Subject: Phone call from FM Moratinos
  MS, the Spanish FM just called through Ops -- he is boarding a plane from Cuba in about 30-40 minutes and would like to
  speak with you as soon as possible. Would you like Ops to connect the call to the residence or wait until tomorrow?
  Lona Valmoro
  Special Assistant to the Secretary of State
  (direct) B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769484 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769487
MetadataSubject: 2 CALLS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-07T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769487/C05769487.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: 2 calls:
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, July 7, 2010 10:13 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769487
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Ok
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769487 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2010 10:13 PM
  To:
  Subject: Re: 2 calls:
  Ok
  Original Message ---
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Sent: Wed Jul 07 22:10:16 2010
  Subject: Re: 2 calls:
  Let's call both tomorrow.
  Original Message
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Wed Jul 07 18:05:56 2010
  Subject: 2 calls:
  Strobe talbott returned your call through ops. Also, colombian president uribe has put in a request to speak with you.
  He would like to thank you for your public statements on the free trade agreement.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769487 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769488
MetadataSubject: CHERYL WANTS TO TALK TO YOU.
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: AbedinH@state.gov
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769488/C05769488.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Cheryl wants to talk to you.
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH©state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 5:54 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769488
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769488 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH©state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 5:54 PM
  To: H
  Subject: Cheryl wants to talk to you.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769488 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769489
MetadataSubject: PHONE CALL FROM FM MORATINOS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Valmoro, Lona J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-07T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769489/C05769489.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Phone call from FM Moratinos
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>; Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivann@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, July 7, 2010 10:13 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769489
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Yes, doing now.
  Lona Valmoro
  S ecial Assistant to the Secretary of State
  (direct)

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769489 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Valmoro, Lona J <ValmoroU@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2010 10:13 PM
  To: H
  Subject Re: Phone call from FM Moratinos
  Yes, doing now.
  Lona Valmoro
  S ecial Assistant to the Secretary of State
  (direct)
  Original Message ---
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Valmoro, Lona 1
  Sent: Wed Jul 07 22:09:24 2010
  Subject: Re: Phone call from FM Moratinos
  Just seeing this. Can you ask Ops to call him and connect him to my house?
  Original Message
  From: Valmoro, Lona 1 <ValmoroU@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>; Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivann@state.gov>
  Sent: Wed Jul 07 21:35:30 2010
  Subject: Phone call from FM Moratinos
  MS, the Spanish FM just called through Ops — he is boarding a plane from Cuba in about 30-40 minutes and would like to
  speak with you as soon as possible. Would you like Ops to connect the call to the residence or wait until tomorrow?
  Lona Valmoro
  Special Assistant to the Secretary of State
  direct)
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769489 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769491
MetadataSubject: FYI, GOING AROUND
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-07T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769491/C05769491.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: fyi, going around...
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, July 7, 2010 11:35 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769491
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Are the Mideast Policy Team!
  by Leslie H. Gelb
  July 7, 2010 I 2:38pm
  I ri==IPresident Barack Obama meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Oval
  Office of the White House, July 6, 2010. (Gary Fabiano / Sipa Press) Obama's bow to Netanyahu was
  just the latest in a series of disastrous missteps in U.S. policy toward Israel. Leslie H. Gelb on who's to
  blame—and how the White House can get back on course.
  Whoever advised President Obama to flay Israel publicly until this week should be fired. Only advisers with no experience
  in dealing with Israel could have believed that Israeli leaders like Prime Minister Netanyahu would bow to public attacks.
  And whoever advised Mr. Obama to kneel rhetorically to Mr. Netanyahu in public on Tuesday should also be fired. The
  only thing accomplished by this embarrassing tactic was to put Israel in a position to call the shots on Mideast policy for
  the rest of Obama's first term.
  The real enemy of a negotiated settlement in the Mideast is not time; it's failure.
  Were the culprits the non-foreign policy White House intimates — chief of staff Rahm Emanuel and political honcho David
  Axelrod? Axelrod knows nothing about this, and worse, Emanuel thinks he does because he lived in Israel. Was George
  Mitchell, the president's Mideast negotiator, the brains behind the foolishness? Surely, he's had enough experience
  working with Israelis to know better. Did General James Jones, the National Security Adviser, remain silent, again? And of
  course, where was Secretary of State Hillary Clinton? Strangely for someone so adept at pleasing Israel's constituents in
  America, she spent a lot of time this past year publicly beating up on Israeli leaders. Has she been led astray by the pro-
  Arab contingent of the State Department?
  •Martin Indyk: New Hope for Mideast Peace
  •Peter Beinart: Netanyahu's Latest Insult Or is the guilty party none other than President Obama himself? The more we
  find out about who makes decisions in the White House on every subject from nuclear weapons to coloring of Easter
  eggs, it turns out to be the man in the Oval Office himself. He's the expert. He's the decider. He invites everyone to state
  his or her piece or peace, then he tells them what to do — and seemingly without question, they do his bidding.
  Mr. Obama started his White House tenure from a near-zero base of foreign policy knowledge and no experience in the
  Middle East. It was easy enough to guess this blissful state from his earliest decisions. He came out of the box demanding
  that Israel agree to suspend construction on the West Bank as a precondition for direct negotiations with the Palestinians.
  Anyone who knew anything about this situation surely would have told the president that the chances of Mr. Netanyahu
  agreeing to this "proposal" were zero, or minus zero. No Israeli leader, even a dovish one, would ever dream of beginning
  negotiations by conceding his major bargaining card. As the teenagers say, what were Obama and his advisers thinking?
  And yes, after the Israelis publicly humiliated Vice President Biden during his trip to the Holy Land by announcing they
  would start new construction in East Jerusalem, Washington had to respond vehemently. The Israelis had been arrogant
  and stupid on this one. They had weakened American power in the region. No U.S. president could let them get away with
  it. Clinton and others made strong public statements of criticism, and those were fine. But Mr. Obama then allowed Mr.
  Netanyahu to come ahead with his planned visit to D.C. — and publicly humiliated him. The U.S. president let the Israeli
  prime minister cool his heels for hours before meeting with him, then wouldn't shake his hand when he departed. There's
  no surer way to unite a nation behind its leader, even a controversial one like Netanyahu, than to have a foreign leader
  humiliate him.
  This brilliant tactic — thought of by Obama's advisers or the president himself — accomplished two things. It stiffened Israeli
  backs even further against being conciliatory about starting talks with the Palestinians. The Israeli government was not
  about to cave to American pressures. It also galvanized Israeli supporters in the United States — in particular within
  conservative parts of the Jewish community and the Republican Party. There went Mr. Obama's support for pressing
  Israel even in private.
  To top this all off with Tuesday's meeting, full of smiles and the adoption of Israeli-desired language on almost every topic,
  only made matters worse. It made the situation look as if the American president had been cowed by Jewish control of
  . .
  American politics. That certainly pleased American and Israeli hawks, but it did not please others who want to see
  genuine progress in Mideast talks.
  There is a time and place for Washington to put pressure on Israel. Mr. Obama and his team picked every wrong time and
  place. The right occasion to squeeze is when the negotiations have reached the point where both sides have given and
  where both must give more to close the deal. Only at that point does pressure make sense. All parties would get a real
  shot at peace in return for their concessions.
  To be sure, many ask at this point — How do you get to that point? The answer is not to browbeat the parties to scurry to
  the negotiating table. That tactic simply never pays off. The answer is to build conditions beyond the negotiating table,
  conditions in the political community in both Israel and Palestine, that would support compromises at the table. The British'
  pushed the Catholics and Protestants to make concessions year after year, only to fail time and again, only to further
  inflame feelings all around and spur greater violence. Finally, London focused on getting Protestant and Catholic women
  to form common groups to support compromise. London did as much with various business communities that evolved into
  backers of mutual concessions as well. Only then did parties know that they had support for compromises, their
  negotiations got somewhere, and they reached agreement. That's what needs to be done between Israel and the
  Palestinians.
  We hear time and again that the enemy of peace in the Middle East is time, and that time is running out. Perhaps that is
  what has caused Mr. Obama and his team to misstep so badly; they think it's a race against the clock. Do something now
  or fail. But the real enemy of a negotiated settlement in the Mideast is not time; it's failure. Neither Israel nor the
  Palestinians nor the United States can afford to fail again. After yet another failure, it could well result in perpetual
  violence.
  To set his Arab-Israeli policy on a sensible course, Mr. Obama needs to search for new advisors who know how to get
  things done in the Middle East, hire them, and listen to them.
  Leslie H. Gelb, a former New York Times columnist and senior government official, is author of Power Rules: How
  Common Sense Can Rescue American Foreign Policy (HarperCollins 2009), a book that shows how to think about and
  use power in the 21st century. He is president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations.
  Get a head start with the Morning Scoop email. It's your Cheat Sheet with must reads from across the Web. Get it.
  For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorialthedailvbeast.com.
  RL: http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-07-07/obama-gets-more-bad-advice-on-israel-leslie-gelb/p/

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769491 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Wednesday, July 7, 2010 11:35 PM
  To:
  Subject: fyi, going around...
  Are the Mideast Policy Team!
  by Leslie H. Gelb
  July 7, 2010 I 2:38pm
  I ri==IPresident Barack Obama meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Oval
  Office of the White House, July 6, 2010. (Gary Fabiano / Sipa Press) Obama's bow to Netanyahu was
  just the latest in a series of disastrous missteps in U.S. policy toward Israel. Leslie H. Gelb on who's to
  blame—and how the White House can get back on course.
  Whoever advised President Obama to flay Israel publicly until this week should be fired. Only advisers with no experience
  in dealing with Israel could have believed that Israeli leaders like Prime Minister Netanyahu would bow to public attacks.
  And whoever advised Mr. Obama to kneel rhetorically to Mr. Netanyahu in public on Tuesday should also be fired. The
  only thing accomplished by this embarrassing tactic was to put Israel in a position to call the shots on Mideast policy for
  the rest of Obama's first term.
  The real enemy of a negotiated settlement in the Mideast is not time; it's failure.
  Were the culprits the non-foreign policy White House intimates — chief of staff Rahm Emanuel and political honcho David
  Axelrod? Axelrod knows nothing about this, and worse, Emanuel thinks he does because he lived in Israel. Was George
  Mitchell, the president's Mideast negotiator, the brains behind the foolishness? Surely, he's had enough experience
  working with Israelis to know better. Did General James Jones, the National Security Adviser, remain silent, again? And of
  course, where was Secretary of State Hillary Clinton? Strangely for someone so adept at pleasing Israel's constituents in
  America, she spent a lot of time this past year publicly beating up on Israeli leaders. Has she been led astray by the pro-
  Arab contingent of the State Department?
  •Martin Indyk: New Hope for Mideast Peace
  •Peter Beinart: Netanyahu's Latest Insult Or is the guilty party none other than President Obama himself? The more we
  find out about who makes decisions in the White House on every subject from nuclear weapons to coloring of Easter
  eggs, it turns out to be the man in the Oval Office himself. He's the expert. He's the decider. He invites everyone to state
  his or her piece or peace, then he tells them what to do — and seemingly without question, they do his bidding.
  Mr. Obama started his White House tenure from a near-zero base of foreign policy knowledge and no experience in the
  Middle East. It was easy enough to guess this blissful state from his earliest decisions. He came out of the box demanding
  that Israel agree to suspend construction on the West Bank as a precondition for direct negotiations with the Palestinians.
  Anyone who knew anything about this situation surely would have told the president that the chances of Mr. Netanyahu
  agreeing to this "proposal" were zero, or minus zero. No Israeli leader, even a dovish one, would ever dream of beginning
  negotiations by conceding his major bargaining card. As the teenagers say, what were Obama and his advisers thinking?
  And yes, after the Israelis publicly humiliated Vice President Biden during his trip to the Holy Land by announcing they
  would start new construction in East Jerusalem, Washington had to respond vehemently. The Israelis had been arrogant
  and stupid on this one. They had weakened American power in the region. No U.S. president could let them get away with
  it. Clinton and others made strong public statements of criticism, and those were fine. But Mr. Obama then allowed Mr.
  Netanyahu to come ahead with his planned visit to D.C. — and publicly humiliated him. The U.S. president let the Israeli
  prime minister cool his heels for hours before meeting with him, then wouldn't shake his hand when he departed. There's
  no surer way to unite a nation behind its leader, even a controversial one like Netanyahu, than to have a foreign leader
  humiliate him.
  This brilliant tactic — thought of by Obama's advisers or the president himself — accomplished two things. It stiffened Israeli
  backs even further against being conciliatory about starting talks with the Palestinians. The Israeli government was not
  about to cave to American pressures. It also galvanized Israeli supporters in the United States — in particular within
  conservative parts of the Jewish community and the Republican Party. There went Mr. Obama's support for pressing
  Israel even in private.
  To top this all off with Tuesday's meeting, full of smiles and the adoption of Israeli-desired language on almost every topic,
  only made matters worse. It made the situation look as if the American president had been cowed by Jewish control of
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769491 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769491 Date: 08/31/2015
  . .
  American politics. That certainly pleased American and Israeli hawks, but it did not please others who want to see
  genuine progress in Mideast talks.
  There is a time and place for Washington to put pressure on Israel. Mr. Obama and his team picked every wrong time and
  place. The right occasion to squeeze is when the negotiations have reached the point where both sides have given and
  where both must give more to close the deal. Only at that point does pressure make sense. All parties would get a real
  shot at peace in return for their concessions.
  To be sure, many ask at this point — How do you get to that point? The answer is not to browbeat the parties to scurry to
  the negotiating table. That tactic simply never pays off. The answer is to build conditions beyond the negotiating table,
  conditions in the political community in both Israel and Palestine, that would support compromises at the table. The British'
  pushed the Catholics and Protestants to make concessions year after year, only to fail time and again, only to further
  inflame feelings all around and spur greater violence. Finally, London focused on getting Protestant and Catholic women
  to form common groups to support compromise. London did as much with various business communities that evolved into
  backers of mutual concessions as well. Only then did parties know that they had support for compromises, their
  negotiations got somewhere, and they reached agreement. That's what needs to be done between Israel and the
  Palestinians.
  We hear time and again that the enemy of peace in the Middle East is time, and that time is running out. Perhaps that is
  what has caused Mr. Obama and his team to misstep so badly; they think it's a race against the clock. Do something now
  or fail. But the real enemy of a negotiated settlement in the Mideast is not time; it's failure. Neither Israel nor the
  Palestinians nor the United States can afford to fail again. After yet another failure, it could well result in perpetual
  violence.
  To set his Arab-Israeli policy on a sensible course, Mr. Obama needs to search for new advisors who know how to get
  things done in the Middle East, hire them, and listen to them.
  Leslie H. Gelb, a former New York Times columnist and senior government official, is author of Power Rules: How
  Common Sense Can Rescue American Foreign Policy (HarperCollins 2009), a book that shows how to think about and
  use power in the 21st century. He is president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations.
  Get a head start with the Morning Scoop email. It's your Cheat Sheet with must reads from across the Web. Get it.
  For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorialthedailvbeast.com.
  RL: http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-07-07/obama-gets-more-bad-advice-on-israel-leslie-gelb/p/
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769491 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769492
MetadataSubject: NEED A FAVOR
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Toiv, Nora F
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769492/C05769492.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Need a favor
ExtractedFrom: Toiv, Nora F <ToivNF@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Jiloty, Lauren C
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 6:53 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769492
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Yes. 111 have them for you before you leave State in the morning.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769492 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Toiv, Nora F <ToivNF@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 6:53 PM
  To:
  Cc: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject RE: Need a favor
  Yes. 111 have them for you before you leave State in the morning.
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 6:33 PM
  To: Toiv, Nora F
  Cc: Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: Need a favor
  Nora--
  Cheryl has emailed dozens of memos about Haiti to me this weekend. Can you please print them and organize them in
  chrono order for me for my trip tomorrow or send to Lauren so she can do? Thx.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769492 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769499
MetadataSubject: CELL. FUNERAL TOMORROW.
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769499/C05769499.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769499
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sunday, January 24, 2010 8:30 PM
  H
  cell. Funeral tomorrow. B6

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769499 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sunday, January 24, 2010 8:30 PM
  H
  cell. Funeral tomorrow. B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769499 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769501
MetadataSubject: CONCEPT NOTE - DONOR COORDINATION
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769501/C05769501.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: CONCEPT NOTE - donor coordination
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Doug Band; Justin Cooper
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 8:56 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769501
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  HRC
  Attached and below is a concept note for how the donor coordination and leadership for Haiti's reconstruction could be
  established, with key being, given Haitian's critical voice. It is modeled after tsunami entity that was created by GOI.
  (Doug/Justin — can you get to WJC this evening?)
  The assumptions underpinning this approach are at the bottom of the email.
  cdm

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769501 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B5,B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 8:56 PM
  To:
  Cc: Doug Band; Justin Cooper
  Subject: CONCEPT NOTE - donor coordination
  HRC
  Attached and below is a concept note for how the donor coordination and leadership for Haiti's reconstruction could be
  established, with key being, given Haitian's critical voice. It is modeled after tsunami entity that was created by GOI.
  (Doug/Justin — can you get to WJC this evening?)
  The assumptions underpinning this approach are at the bottom of the email.
  cdm
  From: Jean-Louis Warn holz [mailto:
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 7:05 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: RE: Concept note - pis confirm receipt - TRYING TO REACH YOU
  Cheryl
  Please see draft attached.
  Best, JL
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769501 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769501 Date: 08/31/2015 B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769501 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769501 Date: 08/31/2015 B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769501 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769503
MetadataSubject: DOCTORS REPORT FROM HAITI
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769503/C05769503.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCc: Helfet<
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769503
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.goy>
  Sunday, January 24, 2010 9:40 PM
  FW: Doctors report from Haiti
  Depressing
  See not only Mike's email — really see the incoming one.
  cdm

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769503 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B5,B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.goy>
  Sunday, January 24, 2010 9:40 PM
  FW: Doctors report from Haiti
  Depressing
  See not only Mike's email — really see the incoming one.
  cdm
  From: Posner, Michael H
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 6:21 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Doctors report from Haiti
  Cheryl
  This came to me through a doctor friend of Harold's and mine. It is a pretty grim snapshot from a group of doctors ( I
  think from Mt Sinai hospital in NY) who returned from Haiti late last week .Our friend, Michael Hausman, is a terrific
  hand surgeon who was trying to get down there to help. I was reluctant to send this to you because I know how hard
  you and many other people have been working to relieve suffering and that you and others are working round the
  clock. Nonetheless I thought you might be interested in their impressions so I am sending it to you as a data point.
  Please feel free to share this with others.
  Best
  Mike
  From: Hausman, Michael [mailto:
  Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 8:1/ Hifi
  To: mrhausman
  Subject: Fw: OR Report - Worth the Read!
  From: "Dean Lorich" <
  Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:11:38
  To: Christopher Born<
  Cc: Helfet<
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769503 Date: 08/31/2015
  >

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769503 Date: 08/31/2015
  Subject: Re: Haiti
  Chris
  Thanks much appreciated.
  I believe we went in with a reasonably comprehensive service we wanted to
  provide acute trauma care in an orthopedic disaster. Our plan was to be at a
  hospital where we could utilize our abilities as trauma surgeons treat the acute
  injuries involved in an orthopaedic disaster. We expected many amputations
  however came with a philosophy that would reasonably start limb salvage in what
  we thought was a salvageable limb.
  David Helfet put a team together which included:
  2 orthopaedic trauma surgeons
  3 orthopaedic trauma fellows
  2 highly skilled anesthiologists
  1 general surgery trauma surgeon
  2 synthes reps who were also scrub techs
  1 trauma nurse practioner to do triage
  2 OR nurses
  Our equipment including a huge amount of anesth medications and equipment,
  ability to construct 150 ex fix both small and large, OR equipment including
  scalpels etc, OR soft goods, splint material, OR prep material.
  We also had a plan of physician and equipment replacemnt that was dynamic
  where w/i 24hrs we could bring in what was necessary on the Synthes private jet.
  We thought the plan was a good one.
  We were incredibly naïve.
  Disaster management on the ground was nonexistent. The difficulties in getting
  in despite the intelligence we had from people on the ground and david helfet's
  high political connections with Partner's in Health as well as the Clintons only
  portended the difficulties we would have once we arrived.
  We started out friday morning, got a slot to get in friday that was eventually
  cancelled when we were on the runway to be rescheduled the next day. We
  diverted to the DR and planned on arriving in P OP saturday.
  Once on the ground the hospital we had intelligence that was up and running with
  2 OR's General Hospital was included severely in the earthquake and not capable
  of running functioning OR's as there was no running water and only a limited
  electrical supply on generator.
  We quickly took our second option
  Community Hospital of Haiti. We found approx 750 pt in the hospital upon our
  initial eval, the hospital had running water, electricity and 2 functional OR's
  Our naivette did not expect that the 2 anesth machines would not work, there
  would be 1 cautery for the hospital, autoclave that fit instruments the size of a
  cigar box, no sterile saline, no functioning fluoro and no local staff only a ragtag
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769503 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769503 Date: 08/31/2015
  group of voluntary health providers who like us had made it there on there own,
  To summarize we had no clue the medical infrastructure of the country was so
  poor.
  As we got up and running in the OR and organized the patients for surgery we
  communicated our new needs back to Synthes and more supplies were loaded for
  a second trip - these included battery operated pulse lavage, a huge supply of
  saline, soft goods in the OR. This plane landed as planned sunday pm, equipment
  was loaded on a truck and subsequent hijacked between the airport and the
  hospital.
  At the hospital we had zero security despite promises form NYPD and NYFD to
  provide that to us.
  Our philosophy was to work like this was a marathon run the OR's around the
  clock with the idea that we would have a defined extraction time of llpm
  tues. The plane that extracted us would come in with a new medical staff
  compliment to replace us. Equipment included urgent things to maximize issues
  that were nonexistent in the hospital that would enable us to provide better and
  more efficient care:
  2 portable anesth machines
  2electrocautery
  2 portable monitors for the pacu
  2autoclaves
  Replacement exfix
  Things that didn't arive with the previous flight
  That planes slot was cancelled by the military at 6am tues.
  We also previously had seen daylight in the remaining patients monday night
  haviving completed approx 100 surgeries. However on tues morning we found a
  huge # of new patients. The hospital was forced to undergo lockdown closing its
  gates to the outside and outside crowd becoming angry.
  We also noted tues morning that many of the patients we were operating on were
  becoming septic.
  We finished operating at noon tues, the last surgery our group assisting an
  obstetrician on a caesarian and resuscitating a baby that was not breathing.
  We decided as a group the situation for us at the hospital was untenable supplies
  were running out, team was exhauted, safety a huge concern, and no extraction
  plan with resupply. We decided to make our way to airport thru the help of a
  hospital benefactor. Jamaican soldiers with M-16 were necessary to escort us out
  with our luggage as the crowd outside saw us abandoning the hospital.
  We made it to airport on back of a pickup track, got onto the tarmac, hailed a
  commercial plane that carried cargo to montreal and had private jet pick us up
  there.
  The issues we were unprepared for and witnessed were
  1. The amount of human devastation
  2. The complete lack of a medical infrastructure in the country
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769503 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769503 Date: 08/31/2015
  3. The lack of support of the haitian medical community
  4. The complete lack of any organization on the ground. Noone was in charge,
  we had the first functional up and running hospital in the P OP area yet noone and
  I me NOONE came to the hospital to assess what we were doing, what we were
  capable of doing and what we would need, to be more efficient. The fact that the
  military could not or would not protect the resupply equipment on sunday or let
  the tues flight come in says it all.
  5. Lack of any security at all at the hospital
  I would take away that disasters like this need organization on a much higher
  level than we had with the clear involvement and approval of the military from
  the beginning.
  Currently there is Noone obviously running the show and care is in chaotic at
  best. MD's are coming in country with no plan of what the are going to
  do. Surgeons that expect to just show up and operate are delusional as to what
  there role would be as without a complement of support staff and supplies they
  would be of limited or no value.
  'I hope this helps. We all felt as though we abandoned these patients and that
  country and feel terrible. Our role now being back in NY is to expose the
  inadequacies of the system to the media in the hopes of effecting a change in this
  system immediatly. We feel that the only way to really help now is an urgent
  programtic change and organization in the support of the medical staff on the
  ground and what is critically needed to expeditiosly bring in.
  Cherrios on the tarmac are not getting it done on these patients which clearly
  would be savable if good care could urgently be provided.
  Please share this email with everyone and anyone you find might help.
  Good luck
  Dean
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769503 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769504
MetadataSubject: HUFFINGTON POST PIECE ON INTERNET SPEECH
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769504/C05769504.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: one more
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Toiv, Nora F
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 9:55 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769504
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: FYI
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769504 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 9:55 PM
  To:
  Subject FW: Huffington Post piece on Internet Speech
  FYI
  Original Message
  From: Alec Ross [mailto
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 6:05 PM
  To: Cheryl Mills; Mills, Cheryl D
  Cc: Toiv, Nora F
  Subject: one more
  http://www.huffingtonpost.comhose-antonio-vargas/internet-freedom-hilla
  ry_b_431830.html
  Internet Freedom, Hillary Clinton and Being the Web's First Global Diplomat (VIDEO)
  When it comes to education and how students learn in the 21st century, when it comes to developing businesses and
  encouraging entrepreneurship in a flattening digital marketplace, when it comes to forming social connections
  regardless of geographic, linguistic and cultural borders -- when it comes to promoting democracy and protecting the
  rights of individuals around the world -- no two words, no other phrase, holds more value. It may sound trite but it's true
  -- just ask students and activists in Iran and China. With the Internet comes freedom. With freedom comes the Internet.
  In countless ways, for many people, the Internet is freedom.
  Hillary Clinton underlined that reality in a bold, impassioned speech at the Newseum in Washington, D.C. this morning.
  Words like "bold" and "impassioned" are not usually found in most of the mainstream media's caricature of Clinton.
  Nevertheless, the Secretary of State gave by far the most important speech about Internet freedom delivered by a top
  U.S. official. What makes it all the more notable is the fact that it was given by arguably the most recognizable female
  political figure in the world. In parts of the Middle East, women are beaten and killed by relatives who find out they are
  using sites like Twitter and Facebook. "Honor" beatings, they're called.
  "Given the magnitude of the challenges we're facing, we need people around the world to pool their knowledge and
  creativity to help rebuild the global economy, protect our environment, defeat violent extremism and build a future in
  which every human being can realize their God-given potential," said Clinton, who announced a new $15 million project
  to help more women, young people and citizen groups to get online. (WATCH: Video of her speech is below.)
  Clinton, speaking in broad strokes and finer details, outlined what she called the "five key freedoms of the Internet age."
  Freedom to connect online anywhere. Freedom of speech. Freedom of worship.
  Freedom from fear of cyber attacks. "In an interconnected world," she said, "an attack on one nation's networks can be
  an attack on all."
  Freedom of "want" -- which means that the here-comes-everybody ethos of the Web, the fact that we can bear witness
  to each other online, can be leveraged in helping relieve suffering worldwide.
  On the Twitterverse, where Internet observers and activists commented on Clinton's remarks and her subsequent Q&A
  in real time, some took note of her "disappointing" answers regarding China's alleged cyber attacks targeted at human
  rights activists. And inevitably, immediate coverage of the speech in our conflict-driven mainstream media, from the
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769504 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769504 Date: 08/31/2015
  New York Times to the Associated Press, focused on the China-Google dispute, which is being closely watched by human
  rights activists, government officials and Internet companies. But the overall meaning and message of her remarks,
  beyond the China-Google stand-off, cannot be overstated. The Internet, after all, was born in America, created by our
  researches and funded by our government. With help and input from other countries, the Web's evolving ethos and
  guiding principles should be shaped by America -- and, naturally, by America's top diplomat.
  "Sec. Clinton once and for all established the fact that free speech and free enterprise can no longer be achieved unless
  we have Internet freedom," Andrew Rasiej, founder of the Personal Democracy Forum, an annual conference on
  technology's impact on politics and policy, told me shortly after Clinton's remarks. He called her speech nothing short of
  a "milestone" in the future of American foreign policy."
  "In a world where billions are connected with each other through technology -- through the Internet and mobile phones
  -- it is imperative that governments recognize that it's easier and faster for people to connect with each other than for
  governments to connect with their citizens. Any government that fails to understand this dynamic will left in the history
  books," Rasiej continued."
  Less than two weeks ago, Clinton hosted a nearly two-hour dinner for some of the tech industry's leading thinkers and
  innovators. It was a small, intimate affair, and guests included Twitter creator Jack Dorsey, Google CEO Eric Schmidt and
  Howcast CEO and co-founder Jason Liebman, who wrote about the event for HuffPostTech in a blog titled "Facebook,
  YouTube and Twitter Are Tools For Diplomacy." Rasiej was one of the guests. Clinton is interested in how technology can
  spur innovation within the State Department and in countries that the U.S.
  has interest in supporting, Rasiej said. Accompanying Clinton in the dinner was her senior staff and her growing new
  media department; most recently, Katie Jacobs Stanton, a former Google exec who joined the White House as its
  director of citizen participation, joined the State Department.
  There's a bit of irony at work here. Early in the long, bruising primary campaign that pitted the establishment-backed
  former first lady turned New York senator against the little-known insurgent junior senator from Illinois, Clinton was
  considered less Web-savvy than Barack Obama. Hers was a top-down, command-and-control operation, online
  observers suggested. In fact, the first online attack ad that spread on YouTube and foreshadowed the narrative of their
  historic fight for the Democratic nomination portrayed Clinton as the old PC and Obama as the shiny new Mac.
  "After having lost to Obama, especially to Obama's use of the Internet in attracting and mobilizing supporters," Rasiej
  pointed out, "Clinton is now leading the way within the Obama administration in recognizing the transformational
  opportunities that the Internet can provide."
  Using DipNote, the State Department's blog, recording videos from all corners of the world, especially where girls and
  women are considered second-class citizens, leveraging technological tools that, as we're seeing in the response and
  outpouring of support for Haiti, allow us to become "global citizens," Clinton can be the Web's first global diplomat.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769504 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769509
MetadataSubject: MAGGIE WILLIAMS CALLED YOU BACK
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-08T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769509/C05769509.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, July 8, 2010 5:20 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769509
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  She will be around/reachable the rest of the evening.
  Ops also has her phone number on file.
  1###

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769509 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2010 5:20 PM
  To:
  Subject Maggie Williams called you back
  She will be around/reachable the rest of the evening.
  Ops also has her phone number on file.
  1###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769509 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769510
MetadataSubject: JIM'S GOING TO CALL YOU
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769510/C05769510.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Jim's going to call you
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Buhl, Cindy
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 10:33 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769510
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: fyi
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769510 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 10:33 PM
  To:
  Subject FW: Jim's going to call you
  fyi
  From: Buhl, Cindy [mailto:Cindy.Buhl@mail.house.gov]
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 4:32 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Cc: Buhl, Cindy
  Subject: Jim's going to call you
  Dear Cheryl -
  He's going to call your number. We're both hoping, on one had, that you're not there and you're at home. Please feel free to
  call his cell phone -- or he'll call you again on Monday. In the meantime, he asked me to pass along to you this simple
  but heartfelt comment: "Please tell her I've never been prouder of my government. I mean that. Sincerely."
  Cindy
  Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769510 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769511
MetadataSubject: CONVERSATION WITH BOB MAGUIRE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769511/C05769511.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: Conversation with Bob Maguire
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 10:36 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769511
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Think I may have sent this but interesting insights and overlapping ones.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769511 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 10:36 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW: Conversation with Bob Maguire
  Think I may have sent this but interesting insights and overlapping ones.
  From: Peter Harrell <
  To: Harrell, Peter E
  Sent: Sun Jan 24 14:56:20 2010
  Subject: Conversation with Bob Maguire
  Cheryl,
  I had a good conversation with Bob this afternoon. The major points he wanted to emphasize were the ones he
  had included in his emails to you, including:
  • "Rebalancing" Haitian development: Redevelopment should occur nationwide and encourage a more
  even distribution of the Haitian population. The international community should not rebuild Port-au-
  Prince at the expense of the rest of the country. Bob thinks that nationwide rebuilding will also reduce
  the chances of elite capture of the rebuilding effort, since elites are strongly concentrated in Port-au-
  Prince.
  • Transparency: Bob is cautious about just throwing money at the problem. He thinks the international
  community should establish a new norm of transparency in Haiti, for example, to ensure that there isn't
  widespread corruption, price gauging, grants of monopolies, etc.
  • Link the Haitian business community to other business communities: Bob thinks that if all the
  rebuilding is done by the usual suspects in the Haitian business community, they'll simply build back the
  country they had before. He recommends working to bring in foreign investors, and then linking foreign
  investors and leading Haitian businessmen (e.g., in a business roundtable) to socialize better business
  practices in Haiti.
  • On the issue of legal authorities for reconstruction: Bob recommends exploring whether presidential
  commission-like structures could be empowered to resolve the legal problems likely to arise as barriers
  to reconstruction.
  • Duration of US presence: Bob cautioned that most Haitians would be happy to see a long-term US
  military presence in the country, though this would likely have adverse reputational consequences in the
  hemisphere for the United States. Given that hurricane season will begin in the fall, Bob recommends
  that when we do draw down, we make clear that we will return if needed.
  • Getting people to work: Bob argued that NGOs may not be the best vehicles for getting Haitians to
  work (e.g., through job training, etc.). In short, they're too nice. Many Haitians have never held a regular
  job, are unfamiliar with showing up on time, etc. They'll need a bit of tough love and discipline. Bob
  though ex-military might set the right kind of example.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769511 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769511 Date: 08/31/2015
  • Diaspora: Engaging the diaspora is clearly important, but we do not want to support widespread
  repatriation of the diaspora as NGO employees, reconstruction experts, etc., at the expense of Haitians
  who never left. This reinforces wage differentials and social discontent about returnees.
  • Conditional cash transfers: Bob thinks that conditional cash transfer programs have a lot of potential
  to improve education and the delivery of health services in Haiti.
  Peter E. Harrell
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769511 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769513
MetadataSubject: YOU WERE A COMPLETE STAR WITH THE JEFFERSON FELLOWS
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-08T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769513/C05769513.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, July 8, 2010 6:33 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769513
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  They were very grateful. Thanks.
  Anne-Marie Slaughter
  Director of Policy Planning
  U.S. Department of State
  (202) 647-2972

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769513 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2010 6:33 PM
  To:
  Subject you were a complete star with the Jefferson Fellows
  They were very grateful. Thanks.
  Anne-Marie Slaughter
  Director of Policy Planning
  U.S. Department of State
  (202) 647-2972
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769513 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769515
MetadataSubject: JIM'S GOING TO CALL YOU - MCGOVERN
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-24T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769515/C05769515.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Jim's going to call you
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Buhl, Cindy
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 11:06 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769515
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: mcgovern
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769515 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 11:06 PM
  To:
  Subject RE: Jim's going to call you - MCGOVERN
  mcgovern
  Original Message
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Sunday, January 24,2010 10:56 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Re: Jim's going to call you
  Who's Jim?
  Original Message ---
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jan 24 22:32:31 2010
  Subject: FW: Jim's going to call you
  fyi
  From: Buhl, Cindy [mailto:Cindy.Buhl@mail.house.gov]
  Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 4:32 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D
  Cc: Buhl, Cindy
  Subject: Jim's going to call you
  Dear Cheryl -
  He's going to call your number. We're both hoping, on one had, that you're not there and you're at home.
  Please feel free to call his cell phone — or he'll call you again on Monday. In the meantime, he asked me
  to pass along to you this simple but heartfelt comment: "Please tell her I've never been prouder of my government. I
  mean that. Sincerely."
  Cindy
  Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769515 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769518
MetadataSubject: URGENCE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: cheryl.mills
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-25T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769518/C05769518.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: URGENCE
ExtractedFrom: cheryl.mills
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, January 25, 2010 7:27 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769518
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Agree - it we also have folks who need hosp care for a period; there are several things like this we should consider Sent
  via BlackBerry by AT&T

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769518 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B6
  From: cheryl.mills
  Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 7:27 AM
  To:
  Subject: Re: URGENCE
  Agree - it we also have folks who need hosp care for a period; there are several things like this we should consider Sent
  via BlackBerry by AT&T
  Original Message
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:15:13
  To: 'cheryl.mills
  Subject: Fw: URGENCE
  We should help students whose education has been interrupted finish here or in French speaking countries. See story
  below.
  Original Message
  From: Dr. Mark Hyman <
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jan 24 20:13:09 2010
  Subject: FW: URGENCE
  Dear Hillary,
  I just arrived back but my heart and mind are back in Haiti I am thankful that you helped me get there and supported
  the resurrection of the hospital in just one week. General Keen was key in reestablishing the hospital (and I got to
  appreciate MRE's). When we got there there were 1500 patients and 400 corpses in a deserted hospital — our team of 7
  was the only group there.... And slowly over the week we have built a functioning hospital again.
  Meeting and working with Paul has been good for the soul---- although when I felt I wanted to meet him –this was not
  the way...But I think I am in this for the long haul...
  Below is an email for President Clinton (it was good to see him and Chelsea and Mark there) I promised to forward this
  email by a medical student he spoke to in the operating room .... Desperate to find a way to continue his education.
  Attached is picture of him and I in front of the surgery area. And there were 3 more I met a few nights later who had
  volunteered since the first days but had not eaten in a week (I managed to gather bag of biscuits from the world food
  program from behind 3 padlocks after 1 hours of searching–They slept on the hospital grounds because their homes
  were destroyed.
  I am not sure what we can do... But I promised to pass this on!
  Thank you for who you are in the world.. God bless you!
  Your friend in gratitude,
  Mark
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769518 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769518 Date: 08/31/2015
  Forwarded Message
  From:
  Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:22:03 -0600
  To: Mark Hyman <
  Subject: URGENCE
  Dear M. President
  My name is the young man who took to you on the Hospital in Haiti.
  With all my Heart i want to thank you so much for helping Haiti in this terrible situation,... Thank you so much for your
  visit in the country, we really appreciate that, so thank you so much...
  As you know, all the universities are broken, so now we get no way to continue our education... And we are with our
  family in the streets, so life is become more difficult as we never imagine.... I know that the USA used to help Haiti with
  Scholarship, but is really sad to tell you that the kind of young man as me, never get chance to benefice a scholarship,
  just because we are in the last categories in the society (the poor persons)....So, In that Situation we need your help
  more than ever, Please, please, please M. President we are "3" friends are helping in the hospital since after the
  catastrophe, and now we are thinking about how to continue to sturdy, So Please, please, please help us have a
  scholarship in USA... And we promiss to come back after to teach, and help the orders... God will Bless you for that M.
  President because we are really, really, really in need...
  Thank you so much to gave me a chance to talk to you, when you was in the country, and thank you for reading this
  mail, God bless you...
  End of Forwarded Message
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769518 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769519
MetadataSubject: READ-OUT: AMBASSADOR ELKENBERRY'S PHONE CALL WITH HAC-FO CHAIRWOMAN NITA LOWEY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-08T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769519/C05769519.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: Read-out Ambassador Eikenberry's phone call with HAC-FO Chairwoman Nita
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, July 8, 2010 7:04 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769519
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Lowey
  FYI.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769519 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2010 7:04 PM
  To:
  Subject: FW: Read-out Ambassador Eikenberry's phone call with HAC-FO Chairwoman Nita
  Lowey
  FYI.
  From: Holbrooke, Richard
  Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 7:01 PM
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Subject: Fw: Read-out: Ambassador Eikenberry's phone call with HAC-FO Chairwoman Nita Lowey
  FYI for you and HRC
  Ambassador Eikenberry and Chairwoman Lowey had a positive conversation that lasted more than an hour. He thanked
  the Chairwoman for her leadership and support and for her willingness and commitment to work with her colleagues to
  secure the significant amounts of funding that is so essential to the success of our Mission's programs and efforts. They
  had a very candid and detailed conversation about the elements, causes, and contributors to corruption in Afghanistan
  and the various interagency programs that are partnering with Afghan institutions to promote transparency and
  investigate corrupt practices and prosecute corrupt actors.
  Chairwoman Lowey appreciated Ambassador Eikenberry's detailed analysis and thorough review of the conditions in
  Afghanistan. She stated that there is an absolute need to ensure meaningful and effective accountability of US taxpayer
  funds appropriated by Congress. She conceded that we are not going to create an utopian society free of corruption,
  but stressed the need for accountability and transparency. She was particularly concerned with various reports that
  officials within the GIRoA are impeding the Embassy's efforts to assist the Afghans in investigating and prosecuting
  corrupt actors. The Chair asked if there are enough credible partners in the Afghan government who are committed to
  good governance and transparency. Ambassador Eikenberry provided an assessment of where he thought the
  challenges are, the next steps to be taken, and how progress can be made going forward.
  The Chair reiterated her longstanding support for assistance programs, especially education and health, and she asked
  Ambassador Eikenberry if he felt we are making progress in the areas of health, education, and agriculture. He provided
  a review of the various health, education, and agriculture programs and the multitude of changes that have been
  implemented to ensure greater transparency, accountability, and flexibility of funds and how these changes have better
  equipped the embassy to hold contractors accountable.
  The Ambassador raised the certification of Ministries program; how we are seeking to certify additional ministries once
  the Ministries achieve the appropriate level of financial accountability standards; and how these efforts will help
  develop Afghan capacity and ultimately allow us to increase the amount of assistance that goes through the Afghan
  government. They discussed the NSP program, and the Chair reiterated her support for the program and how she had
  consistently increased funding for NSP.
  Ambassador Eikenberry explained the Afghan public's reaction to reports that the assistance money had been removed
  and he respectfully encouraged her to reinstate the funding as quickly as possible so as to send a clear message to
  Afghans that we intend to have an enduring civilian assistance presence. He invited her to visit Afghanistan for several
  days and travel the country to see first-hand the progress that has been made and the challenges and opportunities that
  remain. She thanked him for his invitation and suggested that any visit might have to be deferred until November.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769519 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769519 Date: 08/31/2015
  -
  Several times she asked how the hearings could be helpful or if the hearings could be useful to shine a spotlight on
  particular areas, and she welcomed Ambassador Eikenberry's thoughts on that issue. Ambassador Eikenberry agreed to
  give that idea some additional consideration and to speak with the Chair on Tuesday morning.
  SBU
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  SBU
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769519 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769520
MetadataSubject: MINI SCHEDULE 9/25/10 MONDAY
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-01-25T05:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0060/DOC_0C05769520/C05769520.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Mini Schedule 9/25/10 Monday
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Abedin, Huma
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, January 25, 2010 7:43 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769520
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  8:10 am ARRIVE State Department
  8:15 am BILATERAL w/ITALIAN FOREIGN MINISTER FRANCO FRATTINI
  8:45 am Secretary's Conference Room *Official photo in East Hall preceding.
  8:45 am PRESS PRE-BRIEF
  8:50 am Secretary's Office
  8:50 am JOINT PRESS AVAILABILITY w/ITALIAN FM FRANCO FRATTINI
  9:00 am Treaty Room
  9:00 am DEPART State Department *En route Andrews AFB
  9:25 am ARRIVE Andrews AFB
  9:30 am DEPART Andrews Air Force Base via Air Force Aircraft Tail #
  9:45 am SECURE PHONE CALL WI GEORGE MITCHELL
  10:55 am ARRIVE Montreal-Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport
  11:00am DEPART Montreal-Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport
  En route International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)
  11:35 am ARRIVE ICAO
  11:45 am WORKING SESSION PART II: "TRANSITION FROM HUMANITARIAN 12:05 pm NEEDS TO LONGER TERM STRATEGIC
  VISION" ICAO Council Chamber
  12:15 pm MEETING w/CANADIAN PRIME MINISTER HARPER
  12:45 pm Meeting Room, 3r1 Floor *Camera Spray at top
  12:50 pm FAMILY PHOTO w/CONFERENCE PARTICIPANTS
  12:55 pm Delegates' Lounge
  1:00 pm SESSION: "RECONSTRUCTION AND BEYOND: A VISION FOR THE
  3:15 pm NEW HAITI" ICAO Council Chamber *Camera Spray at top.
  3:30 pm JOINT PRESS AVAILABILITY w/FM CANNON, PM BELLERIVE,
  4:00 pm AND OTHERS TBD
  4:15 pm MEDIA INTERVIEW TBD
  4:40 pm Media Room Tbd
  4:50 pm DEPART ICAO *En route Montreal-Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport
  5:25 pm ARRIVE Montreal-Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport
  5:30 pm DEPART Montreal-Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport via Air Force Aircraft Tail
  7:00pm ARRIVE Andrews Air Force Base
  7:10 pm DEPART Andrews Air Force Base *En route Private Residence
  7:30 pm ARRIVE Private Residence
  ###

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769520 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 7:43 AM
  To:
  Cc: Abedin, Huma
  Subject: Mini Schedule 9/25/10 Monday
  8:10 am ARRIVE State Department
  8:15 am BILATERAL w/ITALIAN FOREIGN MINISTER FRANCO FRATTINI
  8:45 am Secretary's Conference Room *Official photo in East Hall preceding.
  8:45 am PRESS PRE-BRIEF
  8:50 am Secretary's Office
  8:50 am JOINT PRESS AVAILABILITY w/ITALIAN FM FRANCO FRATTINI
  9:00 am Treaty Room
  9:00 am DEPART State Department *En route Andrews AFB
  9:25 am ARRIVE Andrews AFB
  9:30 am DEPART Andrews Air Force Base via Air Force Aircraft Tail #
  9:45 am SECURE PHONE CALL WI GEORGE MITCHELL
  10:55 am ARRIVE Montreal-Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport
  11:00am DEPART Montreal-Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport
  En route International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)
  11:35 am ARRIVE ICAO
  11:45 am WORKING SESSION PART II: "TRANSITION FROM HUMANITARIAN 12:05 pm NEEDS TO LONGER TERM STRATEGIC
  VISION" ICAO Council Chamber
  12:15 pm MEETING w/CANADIAN PRIME MINISTER HARPER
  12:45 pm Meeting Room, 3r1 Floor *Camera Spray at top
  12:50 pm FAMILY PHOTO w/CONFERENCE PARTICIPANTS
  12:55 pm Delegates' Lounge
  1:00 pm SESSION: "RECONSTRUCTION AND BEYOND: A VISION FOR THE
  3:15 pm NEW HAITI" ICAO Council Chamber *Camera Spray at top.
  3:30 pm JOINT PRESS AVAILABILITY w/FM CANNON, PM BELLERIVE,
  4:00 pm AND OTHERS TBD
  4:15 pm MEDIA INTERVIEW TBD
  4:40 pm Media Room Tbd
  4:50 pm DEPART ICAO *En route Montreal-Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport
  5:25 pm ARRIVE Montreal-Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport
  5:30 pm DEPART Montreal-Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport via Air Force Aircraft Tail
  7:00pm ARRIVE Andrews Air Force Base
  7:10 pm DEPART Andrews Air Force Base *En route Private Residence
  7:30 pm ARRIVE Private Residence
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769520 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769521
MetadataSubject: NEED TO TALK TONIGHT, IF AT ALL POSSIBLE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Rice, Susan E
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-08T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769521/C05769521.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedTo: H; Abedin, Huma
ExtractedFrom: Rice, Susan E (USUN) <RiceSE@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, July 8, 2010 7:47 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769521
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Hillary,
  I would like to share the outcome of the meeting I had with Netanyahu today. I need some guidance from you urgently
  and before I talk to SG (at Netanyahu's short fuse request).
  I am reachable through Ops.
  Many thanks,
  Susan

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769521 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Rice, Susan E (USUN) <RiceSE@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2010 7:47 PM
  To: H; Abedin, Huma
  Subject Need to talk tonight, if at all possible
  Hillary,
  I would like to share the outcome of the meeting I had with Netanyahu today. I need some guidance from you urgently
  and before I talk to SG (at Netanyahu's short fuse request).
  I am reachable through Ops.
  Many thanks,
  Susan
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769521 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769523
MetadataSubject: ARE YOU BACK FROM CHINA YET?
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Marshall, Capricia
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-08T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769523/C05769523.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Are you back from China yet?
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Capricia Marshall
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, July 8, 2010 9:17 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769523
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Yes! A great trip.
  On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 9:02 PM, H <HDR22@clintonemail.com> wrote:

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769523 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Capricia Marshall
  Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2010 9:17 PM
  To: H
  Subject: Re: Are you back from China yet?
  Yes! A great trip.
  On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 9:02 PM, H <HDR22@clintonemail.com> wrote:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769523 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769529
MetadataSubject: REVISED: CFR 2.0 DRAFT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769529/C05769529.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: REVISED: CFR 2.0 draft
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, July 9, 2010 10:40 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769529
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Below and attached is a proposed draft for a speech next Thursday at CFR. You'll recall that we discussed this with you
  at the last speech meeting. The idea is to give a speech one year after your last CFR address that updates and amplifies
  the frame you outlined, and fills it in with the work of the past year. The speech will also underscore the continuity
  between your speech and the National Security Strategy.
  The below draft still needs a good bit of work, but we have between now and next Thursday to get it into shape. AMS
  was initially skeptical, but I think she believes the speech is heading in the right direction (she'll write you with specific
  comments ... I have my own suggestions for further improvement) and that on balance it should be given. Derek is a
  strong proponent of the speech, and Jim, who has not read a draft, embraced the concept.
  ***DRAFT***
  SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON REMARKS AT COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS WASHINGTON, DC
  JULY 15, 2010
  B5
  B5
  B5
  B5
  B
  -
  Thank you.
  ###

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769529 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, July 9, 2010 10:40 AM
  To:
  Subject: FW: REVISED: CFR 2.0 draft
  Attachments: CFR 2.0 draft -v5.doc
  Below and attached is a proposed draft for a speech next Thursday at CFR. You'll recall that we discussed this with you
  at the last speech meeting. The idea is to give a speech one year after your last CFR address that updates and amplifies
  the frame you outlined, and fills it in with the work of the past year. The speech will also underscore the continuity
  between your speech and the National Security Strategy.
  The below draft still needs a good bit of work, but we have between now and next Thursday to get it into shape. AMS
  was initially skeptical, but I think she believes the speech is heading in the right direction (she'll write you with specific
  comments ... I have my own suggestions for further improvement) and that on balance it should be given. Derek is a
  strong proponent of the speech, and Jim, who has not read a draft, embraced the concept.
  ***DRAFT***
  SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON REMARKS AT COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS WASHINGTON, DC
  JULY 15, 2010
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769529 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769529 Date: 08/31/2015
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769529 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769529 Date: 08/31/2015
  B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769529 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769529 Date: 08/31/2015
  B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769529 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769529 Date: 08/31/2015
  B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769529 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769529 Date: 08/31/2015
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769529 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769529 Date: 08/31/2015
  B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769529 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769529 Date: 08/31/2015
  B
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769529 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769529 Date: 08/31/2015
  -
  Thank you.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769529 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769530
MetadataSubject: REVISED: CFR 2.0 DRAFT
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769530/C05769530.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: RE: REVISED: CFR 2.0 draft
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, July 9, 2010 11:32 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769530
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: Are you up for that given your other demands?
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769530 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, July 9, 2010 11:32 AM
  To:
  Subject: RE: REVISED: CFR 2.0 draft
  Are you up for that given your other demands?
  Original Message----
  From: H [mailto:HDR22@clintonemail.com]
  Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 11:30 AM
  To: Sullivan, Jacob
  Subject: Re: REVISED: CFR 2.0 draft
  What about delivering it in NY July 27?
  Original Message ---
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <Sullivan.1.1@state.gov>
  To: H
  Sent: Fri Jul 09 10:40:09 2010
  Subject: FW: REVISED: CFR 2.0 draft
  Below and attached is a proposed draft for a speech next Thursday at CFR. You'll recall that we discussed this with you
  at the last speech meeting. The idea is to give a speech one year after your last CFR address that updates and amplifies
  the frame you outlined, and fills it in with the work of the past year. The speech will also underscore the continuity
  between your speech and the National Security Strategy.
  The below draft still needs a good bit of work, but we have between now and next Thursday to get it into shape. AMS
  was initially skeptical, but I think she believes the speech is heading in the right direction (she'll write you with specific
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769530 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769530 Date: 08/31/2015
  comments ... I have my own suggestions for further improvement) and that on balance it should be given. Derek is a
  strong proponent of the speech, and Jim, who has not read a draft, embraced the concept.
  ***DRAFT***
  SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON REMARKS AT COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS WASHINGTON, DC
  JULY 15 2010
  B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769530 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769530 Date: 08/31/2015
  B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769530 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769530 Date: 08/31/2015
  B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769530 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769530 Date: 08/31/2015
  B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769530 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769530 Date: 08/31/2015
  B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769530 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769530 Date: 08/31/2015
  B5
  Ia. ,.IIII.,••••Il 41,,I,..••
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769530 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769530 Date: 08/31/2015
  B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769530 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769530 Date: 08/31/2015
  B5
  e
  I
  !I'
  is
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769530 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769530 Date: 08/31/2015
  Thank you.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769530 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769531
MetadataSubject: SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON REMARKS AT COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS
MetadataFrom: Clinton, Hillary Rodham
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-15T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769531/C05769531.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769531
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART B5
  DRAFT
  Schwerin — v5
  SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON
  REMARKS AT COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS
  WASHINGTON, DC
  JULY 15, 2010
  1
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015
  DRAFT
  2
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015
  DRAFT
  3
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015
  DRAFT
  4
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015
  DRAFT
  5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015
  DRAFT
  LP
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015
  DRAFT
  7
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015
  DRAFT
  B
  8
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015
  DRAFT
  9
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015
  DRAFT
  10
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015
  DRAFT
  B5
  11
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015
  DRAFT
  B5
  12
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015
  DRAFT
  B5
  13
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015
  DRAFT
  Thank you.
  ###
  14
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769531 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769532
MetadataSubject: DELAYED
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769532/C05769532.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: Delayed
ExtractedFrom: Huma Abedin <Huma@clintonemail.com>
ExtractedCc: Diane Reynolds; Oscar Flores; 'hanleymr@state.gov'
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, July 9, 2010 1:13 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769532
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Ok
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769532 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Huma Abedin <Huma@clintonemail.com>
  Sent: Friday, July 9, 2010 1:13 PM
  To:
  Cc: Diane Reynolds; Oscar Flores; 'hanleymr@state.gov'
  Subject: Re: Delayed
  Ok
  Original Message
  From: H
  To: Huma Abedin
  Cc: Diane Reynolds; Oscar Flores; thanleymr@state.govi <hanleymr@state.gov>
  Sent: Fri Jul 09 13:12:04 2010
  Subject: Delayed
  We've just been told we have a ground stop until 2 because of thunderstorms. Pls tell Liz we're running late. I'll give you
  updates.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769532 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769535
MetadataSubject: FY 2011
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Verma, Richard R
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769535/C05769535.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedTo: H; Lew, Jacob i
ExtractedFrom: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, July 9, 2010 4:54 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769535
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Tim Rieser said today our allocation in the Senate for FY11 is $2.6 billion below our request. Haven't seen a
  break out of the numbers yet, but that is far better than how the House treated us. We are expecting the
  Senate to mark-up State/Foreign ops on July 22nd.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769535 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Verma, Richard R <VermaRR@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, July 9, 2010 4:54 PM
  To: H; Lew, Jacob i
  Subject FY 2011
  Tim Rieser said today our allocation in the Senate for FY11 is $2.6 billion below our request. Haven't seen a
  break out of the numbers yet, but that is far better than how the House treated us. We are expecting the
  Senate to mark-up State/Foreign ops on July 22nd.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769535 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769539
MetadataSubject: CFR SPEECH
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-09T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769539/C05769539.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: CFR speech
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Sullivan, Jacob J
ExtractedDateSent: Friday, July 9, 2010 7:43 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769539
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  You have many better things to think about this Friday night, and I hope
  my 2 cents on the speech.
  But let me add
  Best,
  AM

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769539 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5,B6
  From: Slaughter, Anne-Marie <SlaughterA@state.gov>
  Sent: Friday, July 9, 2010 7:43 PM
  To: H
  Cc: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Subject: CFR speech
  You have many better things to think about this Friday night, and I hope
  my 2 cents on the speech.
  But let me add
  Best,
  AM
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769539 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769540
MetadataSubject: YOUR PHONE CALL TO PRESIDENT KARZAI
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-10T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769540/C05769540.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Your Phone Call to President Karzai
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Mills, Cheryl D
ExtractedDateSent: Saturday, July 10, 2010 3:06 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769540
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: FYI. We are revising call sheet for call to Karzai - potentially Sunday.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769540 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B5, B6
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2010 3:06 PM
  To:
  Cc: Mills, Cheryl D
  Subject: Fw: Your Phone Call to President Karzai
  FYI. We are revising call sheet for call to Karzai - potentially Sunday.
  From: Eikenberry, Karl W
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma; Mills, Cheryl D; Holbrooke, Richard; Wayne, E Anthony; Petraeus, David H GEN MIL
  USA USCENTCOM CCCC/CCCC
  Sent: Sat Jul 10 12:36:22 2010
  Subject: FW: Your Phone Call to President Karzai
  Madam Secretary:
  There are two recommended topics for your upcoming phone call with President Karzai:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769540 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769540 Date: 08/31/2015
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769540 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769540 Date: 08/31/2015
  Respectfully,
  Karl
  SBU
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769540 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769541
MetadataSubject: YOUR PHONE CALL TO PRESIDENT KARZAI
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-10T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769541/C05769541.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCc: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769541
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Saturday, July 10, 2010 3:24 PM
  Re: Your Phone Call to President Karzai
  1.4(D)
  B1
  Pakistanis will go to Kabul just before the conference to try to bring it home. Checking with Holbrooke to see what is
  necessary on Pakistani side.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769541 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B1,B5,1.4(D),B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Saturday, July 10, 2010 3:24 PM
  Re: Your Phone Call to President Karzai
  1.4(D)
  B1
  Pakistanis will go to Kabul just before the conference to try to bring it home. Checking with Holbrooke to see what is
  necessary on Pakistani side.
  Original Message ---
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J
  Sent: Sat Jul 10 15:10:40 2010
  Subject: Re: Your Phone Call to President Karzai
  What's status of Agreement?
  Original Message ----
  From: Sullivan, JacobJ <Sullivaral@state.gov>
  To: H
  Cc: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Sat Jul 10 15:05:47 2010
  Subject: Fw: Your Phone Call to President Karzai
  Classified by DAS, A/GIS, DoS on 08/27/2015 — Class:
  CONFIDENTIAL — Reason: 1.4(D) — Declassify on:
  07/09/2035
  FYI. We are revising call sheet for call to Karzai - potentially Sunday.
  From: Eikenberry, Karl W
  To: Sullivan, Jacob J; Abedin, Huma; Mills, Cheryl D; Holbrooke, Richard; Wayne, E Anthony; Petraeus, David H GEN MIL
  USA USCENTCOM CCCC/CCCC
  Sent: Sat Jul 10 12:36:22 2010
  Subject: FW: Your Phone Call to President Karzai
  Madam Secretary:
  There are two recommended topics for your upcoming phone call with President Karzai:
  B5
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769541 Date: 08/31/2015
  B6

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769541 Date: 08/31/2015
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769541 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769541 Date: 08/31/2015
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769541 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769541 Date: 08/31/2015
  Respectfully,
  Karl
  SBU
  This email is UNCLASSIFIED.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769541 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769542
MetadataSubject: H: FYI, LEAKED LUNTZ POLL ON BIBI POLICIES; AND MANY CONGRATS TO HUMA! SID
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769542/C05769542.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769542
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  sbwhoeop
  Sunday, July 11, 2010 10:06 AM
  H: fyi, leaked Luntz poll on Bibi policies; and many congrats to Huma! Sid
  Below is a transcript from Israeli TV News Channel Ten on a leaked poll taken last week by Frank Luntz. Here's a
  summary:
  1. 56% of Americans agree with the claim that there is a humanitarian crisis in Gaza;
  2. 43% of Americans agree with the claim that people in Gaza are starving;
  3. 34% of Americans support the Israeli operation against the Flotilla;
  4. 20% of Americans "felt support" for Israel following announcement of easing of Gaza closure.
  Frank Luntz analyses Netanyahu's media performance in the flotilla affair
  The figures are troubling and worrisome. If that is the situation with our great friend the US, it is easy to imagine the
  situation in other, somewhat less sympathetic countries.
  Channel Ten TV News, July 1 2010 20:38
  Yaacov Eilon (host): Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is considered to make an extremely persuasive presentation in
  the world press. But a professional analysis by a US expert presented yesterday to his senior aides strongly criticizes him.
  Netanyahu's messages on the flotilla caused more harm than good. Our political correspondent Chico Menashe has
  obtained the report.
  Chico Menashe: Criticism of Prime Minister Netanyahu's current PR messages and Israeli PR in general comes from the
  international elite of media consultants and pollsters and from the mouth of Frank Luntz, considered one of the leading
  American political consultants, a Republican pollster, a consultant to many governments throughout the world and to
  dozens of the biggest corporations in the US. He was asked by the Jewish organization The Israel Project to check the
  opinions of the American public on the messages Israel issued to the world during and after the flotilla events. The result
  is a harsh document that primarily criticizes the media strategy of the person considered Israel's number one
  propagandist in the world, Prime Minister Netanyahu.
  Netanyahu: Once again Israel faces hypocrisy and a biased rush to judgment.
  Chico Menashe: Every time Israeli speakers begin with accusing the international community, writes Luntz, they
  lose their audience. For example, Netanyahu's comments after the flotilla about the world hypocrisy were rejected by
  most of the American participants who listened to them. The findings were presented last night to senior members of
  Netanyahu's Bureau. Luntz checked the opinions with focus groups, not a poll. He warns of a dangerous slide in the
  public opinion of the only country considered pro-Israeli, the U.S. Israel misses simple opportunities to change world
  public opinion, he writes, and the consequences are significant. The American public increasingly hesitates to accept
  arguments that support Israeli positions.
  Ehud Barak: There is no hunger in Gaza and no humanitarian crisis.
  Netanyahu: There's no shortage of food, there's no shortage of medicine, there's no shortage of other goods.
  Chico Menashe: Luntz says Israel must immediately stop using the argument that there is no hunger and no
  humanitarian crisis in Gaza. He says this fatally destroys Israel's credibility in light of the images on the
  television screens. Israel must admit that there is a problem, he says, to gain the listeners' sympathy [emphasis
  mine]. Luntz finds the troubling figure that 56% of participants agree with the claim that there is a humanitarian crisis in
  Gaza, and no less astonishing is that 43% of participants from the American public agree with the claim that people in
  Gaza are starving. But even lifting the closure that was supposed to improve Israel's image missed the opportunity,
  according to Luntz.
  Netanyahu: Yesterday an important decision was made by the security cabinet. Its meaning is clear. On the one hand,
  allowing civilian goods into Gaza, and on the other hand maintaining the military blockade of Hamas.
  Chico Menashe: The statement by Netanyahu's bureau of lifting the closure missed the opportunity to gain
  support in international public opinion [emphasis mine]. Only 20% of the Americans polled felt support of Israel
  following the statement. According to Lunt, this is the summary of the flotilla damage in American public opinion: Only
  34% of the American public support the Israeli operation against the flotilla, and he says that is a dangerously low
  percentage.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769542 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  PART B6
  From:
  Sent:
  To:
  Subject:
  sbwhoeop
  Sunday, July 11, 2010 10:06 AM
  H: fyi, leaked Luntz poll on Bibi policies; and many congrats to Huma! Sid
  Below is a transcript from Israeli TV News Channel Ten on a leaked poll taken last week by Frank Luntz. Here's a
  summary:
  1. 56% of Americans agree with the claim that there is a humanitarian crisis in Gaza;
  2. 43% of Americans agree with the claim that people in Gaza are starving;
  3. 34% of Americans support the Israeli operation against the Flotilla;
  4. 20% of Americans "felt support" for Israel following announcement of easing of Gaza closure.
  Frank Luntz analyses Netanyahu's media performance in the flotilla affair
  The figures are troubling and worrisome. If that is the situation with our great friend the US, it is easy to imagine the
  situation in other, somewhat less sympathetic countries.
  Channel Ten TV News, July 1 2010 20:38
  Yaacov Eilon (host): Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is considered to make an extremely persuasive presentation in
  the world press. But a professional analysis by a US expert presented yesterday to his senior aides strongly criticizes him.
  Netanyahu's messages on the flotilla caused more harm than good. Our political correspondent Chico Menashe has
  obtained the report.
  Chico Menashe: Criticism of Prime Minister Netanyahu's current PR messages and Israeli PR in general comes from the
  international elite of media consultants and pollsters and from the mouth of Frank Luntz, considered one of the leading
  American political consultants, a Republican pollster, a consultant to many governments throughout the world and to
  dozens of the biggest corporations in the US. He was asked by the Jewish organization The Israel Project to check the
  opinions of the American public on the messages Israel issued to the world during and after the flotilla events. The result
  is a harsh document that primarily criticizes the media strategy of the person considered Israel's number one
  propagandist in the world, Prime Minister Netanyahu.
  Netanyahu: Once again Israel faces hypocrisy and a biased rush to judgment.
  Chico Menashe: Every time Israeli speakers begin with accusing the international community, writes Luntz, they
  lose their audience. For example, Netanyahu's comments after the flotilla about the world hypocrisy were rejected by
  most of the American participants who listened to them. The findings were presented last night to senior members of
  Netanyahu's Bureau. Luntz checked the opinions with focus groups, not a poll. He warns of a dangerous slide in the
  public opinion of the only country considered pro-Israeli, the U.S. Israel misses simple opportunities to change world
  public opinion, he writes, and the consequences are significant. The American public increasingly hesitates to accept
  arguments that support Israeli positions.
  Ehud Barak: There is no hunger in Gaza and no humanitarian crisis.
  Netanyahu: There's no shortage of food, there's no shortage of medicine, there's no shortage of other goods.
  Chico Menashe: Luntz says Israel must immediately stop using the argument that there is no hunger and no
  humanitarian crisis in Gaza. He says this fatally destroys Israel's credibility in light of the images on the
  television screens. Israel must admit that there is a problem, he says, to gain the listeners' sympathy [emphasis
  mine]. Luntz finds the troubling figure that 56% of participants agree with the claim that there is a humanitarian crisis in
  Gaza, and no less astonishing is that 43% of participants from the American public agree with the claim that people in
  Gaza are starving. But even lifting the closure that was supposed to improve Israel's image missed the opportunity,
  according to Luntz.
  Netanyahu: Yesterday an important decision was made by the security cabinet. Its meaning is clear. On the one hand,
  allowing civilian goods into Gaza, and on the other hand maintaining the military blockade of Hamas.
  Chico Menashe: The statement by Netanyahu's bureau of lifting the closure missed the opportunity to gain
  support in international public opinion [emphasis mine]. Only 20% of the Americans polled felt support of Israel
  following the statement. According to Lunt, this is the summary of the flotilla damage in American public opinion: Only
  34% of the American public support the Israeli operation against the flotilla, and he says that is a dangerously low
  percentage.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769542 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769546
MetadataSubject: STEINBERG
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769546/C05769546.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Steinberg
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC©state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, July 11,2010 10:51 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769546
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Ms: dep. steinberg has put in a request through ops to speak with you. He says it can be unsecure.
  ###

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769546 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC©state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, July 11,2010 10:51 AM
  To: H
  Subject: Steinberg
  Ms: dep. steinberg has put in a request through ops to speak with you. He says it can be unsecure.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769546 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769547
MetadataSubject: PLS CLEAR: 15TH ANNIVERSARY OF SREBRENCIA GENOCIDE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769547/C05769547.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Pls clear: 15th Anniversary of Srebrenica Genocide
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 11:05 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769547
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText: Fyi - we are putting out the following today.
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769547 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2010 11:05 AM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Pls clear: 15th Anniversary of Srebrenica Genocide
  Fyi - we are putting out the following today.
  Original Message
  From: Schwerin, Daniel B
  To: Reines, Philippe I; Fuchs, Michael H; Sullivan, Jacob
  Sent: Sun Jul 11 09:35:52 2010
  Subject: Pls clear: 15th Anniversary of Srebrenica Genocide
  STATEMENT BY SECRETARY CLINTON
  15th Anniversary of Srebrenica Genocide
  Today we remember the tragic events in Srebrenica fifteen years ago. I join President Obama and the people of the
  United States in offering our deepest condolences on this most solemn occasion. We honor the memories of the victims
  and mourn with their families.
  The United States stands with Bosnia and Herzegovina, and all countries in the region who wish to foster peace and
  reconciliation. We remain committed to ensuring that those responsible for these crimes face justice. We recognize that
  there can be no lasting peace without justice. It is only by bringing all responsible parties to account for their crimes that
  we will truly honor Srebrenica's victims.
  We are duty-bound — to the victims, to their surviving family members, and to future generations — to prevent such
  atrocities from happening again. Our common faith in the value of freedom and peace unifies us and drives us to act.
  That is why we are committed to working with all the communities that make up Bosnia and Herzegovina to move
  forward and build a pluralistic, democratic state that can take its rightful place in the Euro-Atlantic community. A
  prosperous, free, and unified Bosnia and Herzegovina is the most worthy monument to those who lost their lives at
  Srebrenica and the best guarantee against such a tragedy ever repeating itself.
  ###
  Drafted: EUR/PPD: TWeik
  Cleared:
  EUR/FO: NMcEldowney (ok)
  EUR/SCE: JBuzbee (ok)
  EUR/Press: MCavey (ok)
  DRL/EUR: SCorke (ok)
  P: TWaser (ok)
  D: AScanlon
  S/P: EGaudiosi (info)
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769547 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769547 Date: 08/31/2015
  PA:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769547 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769549
MetadataSubject: KARZAI
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-11T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769549/C05769549.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Sunday, July 11,2010 12:08 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769549
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  Ms:
  I apologize if this email is duplicating anyone else's efforts (we are trying to leave huma alone today!) Jake has put forth
  a recommendation for you to call karzai today, and also for you to speak with holbrooke in advance of that call. There is
  an updated call sheet which has been faxed to your residence in chappaqua, and should be there now.
  Let me know if I can help in any other way.
  ###

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769549 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Jiloty, Lauren C <JilotyLC@state.gov>
  Sent: Sunday, July 11,2010 12:08 PM
  To: H
  Subject Karzai
  Ms:
  I apologize if this email is duplicating anyone else's efforts (we are trying to leave huma alone today!) Jake has put forth
  a recommendation for you to call karzai today, and also for you to speak with holbrooke in advance of that call. There is
  an updated call sheet which has been faxed to your residence in chappaqua, and should be there now.
  Let me know if I can help in any other way.
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769549 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769553
MetadataSubject: KRACOW SPEECH
MetadataTo: Posner, Michael H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769553/C05769553.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: FW: Kracow Speech
ExtractedTo: Posner, Michael H; Sullivan, Jacob J; Tillemann, Tomicah S
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, July 12, 2010 2:00 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769553
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: FYI
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769553 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD©state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 2:00 PM
  To: Posner, Michael H; Sullivan, Jacob J; Tillemann, Tomicah S
  Subject FW: Kracow Speech
  FYI
  From: Suzy George [mailto
  Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 12:30 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Valmoro, Lona J; Sullivan, Jacob J; Jiloty, Lauren C
  Subject: FW: Kracow Speech
  All:
  Below is a note from Ken Wollack for Secretary Clinton regarding the Kracow speech. Sorry for emailing so many of you,
  wasn't sure where best to send it.
  Thanks.
  Suzy
  From: Ken Wollack [mailt
  Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 11:02 AM
  To: Suzy George
  Subject: Kracow Speech
  Suzy,
  Thank you for passing this on to the appropriate people.
  Ken
  Dear Madam Secretary:
  I was in Krakow, along with our chairman, Madeleine Albright, for the 10th anniversary
  celebration of the Community of Democracies. I just wanted to express our appreciation for
  your inspirational speech in defense of civil society. Your remarks were warmly received by
  the group assembled in Poland and sent an important signal to both friends and adversaries
  worldwide about America's commitment to fundamental human and political rights. From
  ND l's perspective, your words were also a message of solidarity to democratic activists who,
  in their peaceful struggle, can often feel isolated and neglected.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769553 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769553 Date: 08/31/2015
  Thank you for your continuing interest and concern.
  Sincerely,
  Ken
  Kenneth Wollack
  President
  National Democratic Institute
  2030 M Street, NW, Fifth Floor
  Washington, DC, 20036
  202-728-5500 (Tel)
  202-7
  email
  websi e: www.nsi.org
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769553 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769554
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-12T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0086/DOC_0C05769554/C05769554.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedTo: H
ExtractedFrom: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Monday, July 12, 2010 8:06 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769554
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedBodyText:
  The gentleman you have talked to Bill Burns about has apparently gone to his country's interests section because he is
  unhappy with how much time it has taken to facilitate his departure. This could lead to problematic news stories in the
  next 24 hours. Will keep you posted.

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769554 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Sullivan, Jacob J <SullivanJJ@state.gov>
  Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 8:06 PM
  To: H
  The gentleman you have talked to Bill Burns about has apparently gone to his country's interests section because he is
  unhappy with how much time it has taken to facilitate his departure. This could lead to problematic news stories in the
  next 24 hours. Will keep you posted.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769554 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769565
MetadataSubject: (REUTERS) OBAMA NAMES FORMER CLINTON CHIEF LEW TO HEAD CMB
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-13T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0087/DOC_0C05769565/C05769565.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: (Reuters) Obama names former Clinton budget chief Lew to head OMB
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: SES-O_Shift-II
ExtractedDateSent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 11:08 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769565
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769565 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 11:08 AM
  To:
  Subject FW: (Reuters) Obama names former Clinton budget chief Lew to head OMB
  From: Morgan, Jack A
  Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 11:08 AM
  To: NEWS-Mahogany
  Cc: SES-O_Shift-II
  Subject: (Reuters) Obama names former Clinton budget chief Lew to head OMB
  WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama will nominate Jacob Lew as the new director of the White House
  Office of Management and Budget, the White House said.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769565 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769578
MetadataSubject: IROQUOIS UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-14T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0087/DOC_0C05769578/C05769578.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Iroquois Update
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedCc: Toner, Mark C; Macray, Rosemary R; Echard, John E Jr; Reines, Philippe I
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 5:50 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769578
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769578 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 5:50 PM
  To:
  Subject Fw: Iroquois Update
  From: Crowley, Philip J
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Kirby, Michael D; Sullivan, Jacob J.
  , Kennedy, Patrick F
  Cc: Toner, Mark C; Macray, Rosemary R; Echard, John E Jr; Reines, Philippe I
  Sent: Wed Jul 14 17:48:54 2010
  Subject: Iroquois Update
  A media update, CNN just called for a comment after the British rejected the letter. I told CNN that we
  provided the team/delegation the waiver letter earlier this afternoon. I quoted from it that the waiver, which
  applied to 28 individuals, was a limited authorization for departure from and re-entry in the United States. I
  made clear during the briefing that even though we granted the waiver they needed to gain visas from the UK.
  So, there is a sad ending to the story, but I also made clear during the briefing that the unique situation that
  they found themselves in stemmed from their decision not to apply for a U.S. passport. I'll keep you updated
  on the media play.
  PJ
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769578 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769579
MetadataSubject: IROQUOIS UPDATE
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Mills, Cheryl D
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-14T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0087/DOC_0C05769579/C05769579.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Fw: Iroquois Update
ExtractedFrom: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 6:06 PM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769579
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN FULL
ExtractedCc:
  Toner, Mark C; Macray, Rosemary R; Echard, John E Jr; Reines, Philippe I; Sprague, Brenda S; Brennan, John B

RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769579 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN
  FULL
  From: Mills, Cheryl D <MillsCD@state.gov>
  Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 6:06 PM
  To:
  Subject: Fw: Iroquois Update
  From: Kirby, Michael D
  To: Kirby, Michael D; Crowley, Philip 3; Mills, Cheryl D; Sullivan, Jacob 3; Kennedy, Patrick F
  Cc: Toner, Mark C; Macray, Rosemary R; Echard, John E Jr; Reines, Philippe I; Sprague, Brenda S; Brennan, John B
  Sent: Wed Jul 14 17:56:20 2010
  Subject: RE: Iroquois Update
  Make that Delta 003.
  Michael D. Kirby
  Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary
  Bureau of Consular Affairs
  U.S. Department of State
  From: Kirby, Michael D
  Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 5:52 PM
  To: Crowley, Philip 3; Mills, Cheryl D; Sullivan, Jacob 3; Kennedy, Patrick F
  Cc: Toner, Mark C; Macray, Rosemary R; Echard, John E Jr; Reines, Philippe I
  Subject: RE: Iroquois Update
  PJ,
  It is not the ending. We understand that the British have now agreed to
  allow those who benefited from our letter (in which we listed those
  whom we believe to be American citizens) to go to the UK. (To the best
  of my knowledge, the Canadians have not provided a similar letter to
  those whom they believe are Canadians.) We believe the group will be
  on Delta 0036 directly to Heathrow later today.
  Michael
  Michael D. Kirby
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769579 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769579 Date: 08/31/2015
  Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary
  Bureau of Consular Affairs
  U.S. Department of State
  From: Crowley, Philip J
  Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 5:49 PM
  To: Mills, Cheryl D; Kirby, Michael D; Sullivan, Jacob J; Kennedy, Patrick F
  Cc: Toner, Mark C; Macray, Rosemary R; Echard, John E Jr; Reines, Philippe I
  Subject: Iroquois Update
  A media update, CNN just called for a comment after the British rejected the letter. I told CNN that we
  provided the team/delegation the waiver letter earlier this afternoon. I quoted from it that the waiver, which
  applied to 28 individuals, was a limited authorization for departure from and re-entry in the United States. I
  made clear during the briefing that even though we granted the waiver they needed to gain visas from the UK.
  So, there is a sad ending to the story, but I also made clear during the briefing that the unique situation that
  they found themselves in stemmed from their decision not to apply for a U.S. passport. I'll keep you updated
  on the media play.
  Pi
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769579 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769583
MetadataSubject: A FEW THINGS..
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: Abedin, Huma
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-15T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0087/DOC_0C05769583/C05769583.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: Re: A few things..
ExtractedFrom: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 8:22 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769583
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText: B6
RawText:
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769583 Date: 08/31/2015_
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: Abedin, Huma <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 8:22 AM
  To:
  Subject: Re: A few things..
  B6
  Original Message ----
  From: H <HDR22@clintonemail.com>
  To: Abedin, Huma
  Sent: Thu Jul 15 06:57:15 2010
  Subject: Fw: A few things..
  Original Message ---
  From: Mark Hyman
  To: H
  Sent: Sun Jul 11 16:06:03 2010
  Subject: A few things..
  Hi Hillary,
  B6
  Just wanted to let you know that the ARC did give a $10 million grant (reduced to $3.8 because of political reasons) - but
  it almost didn't get accepted by the Haitians because they didn't want oversight. But with Paul Farmer's help we
  created a joint oversight process with PIH, KPMG and the Ministry of Health. Sadly its slow going. But my cousin at the
  ARC is working to do the right things.... Any good words you can say about the ARC would be appreciated!
  And we are trying to move things forward still...
  As always, fondly,
  Mark
  Forwarded Message
  From: Mark Hyman
  Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 15:54:28 -0400
  To: Huma Abedin <AbedinH@state.gov>
  Subject: A few things..
  ###
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769583 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769583 Date: 08/31/2015
  Dear Huma,
  Just wanted to check in with you about a few things..
  Thanks for letting me know.
  Be well,
  Mark
  Mark Hyman, MD
  Chairman, Institute for Functional Medicine Volunteer, Partners in Health Founder and Medical Director The
  Ultra Wellness Center
  45 Walker Street
  Lenox, MA 01240
  End of Forwarded Message
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769583 Date: 08/31/2015



DocNumber: C05769584
MetadataSubject: FYI
MetadataTo: H
MetadataFrom: sbwhoeop
MetadataDateSent: 2010-07-15T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataDateReleased: 2015-08-31T04:00:00+00:00
MetadataPdfLink: DOCUMENTS/HRCEmail_August_Web/IPS-0087/DOC_0C05769584/C05769584.pdf
MetadataCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
MetadataDocumentClass: Clinton_Email_August_Release
ExtractedSubject: fyi
ExtractedFrom: sbwhoeop
ExtractedDateSent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 8:56 AM
ExtractedCaseNumber: F-2014-20439
ExtractedDocNumber: C05769584
ExtractedDateReleased: 08/31/2015
ExtractedReleaseInPartOrFull: RELEASE IN PART
ExtractedBodyText:
  http://www.bloomberq.com/news/2010-07-14/americans-disappoving-of-obama-policies-poised-to-enable-republican-
  dains.html
  Americans Disapproving Obama Poised to Enable
  Republican Gains
  By John McCormick and Catherine Dodge - Jul 14, 2010
  •
  • Email
  • Share
  • Print
  Chart: Poll Results
  Attachment: Poll results and methodology
  Americans disapprove of U.S. President Barack Obama's handling of almost every major issue and are
  deeply pessimistic about the nation's direction, offering a bullish environment for Republicans in the
  November congressional elections.
  A majority or plurality disapproves of Obama's management of the economy, health care, the budget
  deficit, the overhaul of financial market regulations and the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, according to a
  Bloomberg National Poll conducted July 9- 12. In addition, almost 6 in 10 respondents say the war in
  Afghanistan is a lost cause.
  Almost two-thirds say they feel the nation is headed in the wrong direction, an even more sour
  assessment than in March when 58 percent felt that way. Two-thirds of independent voters are
  pessimistic, while just 56 percent of Democrats offer a vote of confidence.
  "They don't see any solutions in sight," said J. Ann Selzer, president of Selzer & Co., a Des Moines, Iowa-
  based firm that conducted the nationwide survey. "They have been hammered by the economy and there
  is a disconnect between the lives Americans are living and Washington. They seem to have lost hope."
  Poll respondents are divided on their congressional preference between Democrats and Republicans,
  with both sides getting 43 percent support. Among those who say they are most likely to vote,
  Republicans are favored, 48 percent to 40 percent. The Republican advantage is even greater among
  likely voters who view the election as exceptionally important, with Republicans beating Democrats 56
  percent to 34 percent.
  Control of Congress
  For the Democrats, whd control Congress and the White House, the survey shows the potential 'for losses
  in November, when voters will fill all 435 House seats, 36 Senate seats and 37 governorships. The
  outcome could affect °Pam's ability to move his agenda through Congress for the two years leading up
  to his own 2012 re-election bid.
  The fate of incumbents will depend to some extent on what happens to the economy in the next four
  months and whether unemployment drops much from its current 9.5 percent. A rising stock market could
  help as well. So far this year, the S&P 500 stock index has declined 1.8 percent.
  The public's disenchantment with the president's Policies doesn't extend to voter feelings about Obama
  himself, as he gets a job approval rating of 52 percent and personally is viewed favorably by 55 percent.
  Obama, 48, remains more popular than any of the Republican figures tested in the poll and is topped only
  by Secretary of State :-- ;:!aity ant.cn and General Da,,,td Petraeos, the new commander of U.S. forces in
  Afghanistan, among a list of 15 people and political parties reviewed.
  Republican Leaders
  The only bright spot for Republican candidates is for Louisiana Governor Eiob%) 1i:tele!, who gets a 32
  percent favorable rating and an 18 percent unfavorable grade. Better-known party leaders such as former
  vice presidential candidate :a-et..n and former House Speaker Netf,ri: CirigPait both have negative
  ratings that outweigh the positive views.
  Although turnout in midterm elections is historically lower than in presidential races, the electorate is
  interested. Four- fifths of Americans who plan to vote say November's election is very or exceptionally
  important.
  The likelihood to vote is strongest among older voters, Republicans and those with the highest incomes.
  Among those 55 and older. three-quarters say they will definitely vote, compared with 48 percent of those
  younger than 35. Four-fifths of Republicans say they will definitely vote, compared with 65 percent of
  Democrats and 62 percent of independents.
  Referendum on °barna
  Seeking to capitalize on the intensity expressed by voters, Republicans want to make the election a
  national referendum on Obama and the party in power, while the White House and Democrats argue it is
  about going forward, rather than backward to failed policies.
  The challenge for Democrats will be to translate their vision of a better future into more positive feelings
  about the economy among voters. In the poll, Republicans have the advantage among the independents
  often critical to winning elections. Among independents likely to vote, Republican congressional
  candidates are preferred to Democrats, 50 percent to 29 percent.
  "Anything that has been tried hasn't resulted in making anything better in the world where ordinary people
  live," Selzer said. "That's a bad scenario for incumbents of the majority party."
  Incumbent Disadvantage
  A third of poll participants say they would be less likely to vote for a candidate who has served in
  Congress for many years. About one-fifth of likely voters say the election is more about sending a
  message, while three-quarters say it is about picking the party that has the best ideas.
  "I don't know what these people are thinking in Washington," says poll respondent Jeff Lockman, 41, a
  professional golfer and Republican from Malvern, Pennsylvania. "They are going in 10 different directions
  and they really don't know what to focus on."
  The proportion who feel the nation is headed in the wrong direction is about the same as at this poin't in
  1994, when Republicans took control of Congress, and 2006, when Democrats took over.
  The public also has soured on Obama's foreign-policy priority, the war in Afghanistan. While the president
  has ordered an expansion of forces to turn the tide in a conflict where he says the U.S. has a critical stake,
  58 percent say it is a lost cause, compared with 36 percent who say it can still be won. A slim majority of
  Republicans -- 52 percent -- say the U.S. can still win in Afghanistan, while 71 percent of Democrats say
  the conflict is lost.
  Afghanistan Withdrawal
  Six in 10 Americans say it would be best to stick with Obarna's plan to start withdrawing forces in July
  2011, while one-third say they remain open to keeping the same number of troops there, or even adding
  additional forces.
  Reflecting the belief among many that the war cannot be won, a third of Americans say they have become
  less supportive of the effort there in recent months.
  The Bloomberg National Poll is based on interviews with 1,004 U.S. adults ages 18 or older. Percentages
  based on the full sample may have a maximum margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points.
  :4:?,r;yr• '.
  3cwrra:1, who studies public opinion at the ,A;-necicar Entarpr:F.:e institute, a public-policy research
  group in Washington, cails the poll "very, very grim news for the Democrats."
  At the same time, she says, one silver lining for Democrats is that Republicans have yet to convince
  voters that they have a plan.
  Obarna Visit
  One signpost for Democrats in the poll is the finding that just 26 percent of Americans say it would help a
  Democratic candidate in their area to get a visit from Obama, while 20 percent say it would hurt the
  candidate and 54 percent say it wouldn't matter or they don't know.
  Obama's worst ratings are for his handling of the budget deficit, where 59 percent disapprove and 37
  percent approve. It's his worst grade for that subject in any of four Bloomberg polls taken since
  September 2009. The Obama administration expects a record budget deficit this year of more than $1.5
  trillion, or 10.6 percent of GDP, according to projections the White House released in February. It was
  $1.4 trillion for the 2008-2009 fiscal year, which covers the end ofGecrge W. Bush's presidency, and
  Obama has said that the current fiscal shortfall as well as theunemployment rate are inheritances from his
  Republican predecessor's administration.
  "My biggest fear is we have people in government who don't have a clue about what is going on in the
  economy," says poll respondent Jim Heeter, 66, from Glendale, Arizona. "They have never run a business
  or had to make a payroll."
  Economy, Health Care
  Slim majorities disapprove of Obama's handling of the economy and health care. When it comes to
  creating jobs, he gets 46 percent approval, addressing problems on Wall Street, 42 percent support,
  running the war in Afghanistan, 46 percent approve, and managing the BP Plc oil spill, 46 percent
  support.
  Forty-five percent say they have become more supportive in recent months of tougher regulations for Wall
  Street. The momentum is heading in the opposite direction from the White House and Democrats on most
  other issues.
  Almost half say they have become less supportive in recent months of federal money being loaned to
  automotive companies to help them stay in business, while 37 percent have become less supportive of
  the health-care overhaul passed by Congress earlier this year. A majority, 61 percent, say the nation
  should wait and see how the health-care legislation works or leave it alone, while 37 percent want to see it
  repealed.
  Arizona Immigration Law
  Almost half of Americans say they have also grown more supportive of allowing local law enforcement to
  detain anyone who can't produce proof of citizenship when stopped for an offense, as is contemplated in
  an Arizona law. Cbama has criticized the measure and the Justice Department has announced it plans to
  sue Arizona.
  At least half of respondents also say they would be less likely to support candidates who voted to give
  financial assistance to the banking or automobile industries.
  Americans are roughly divided on whether they would be more or less likely to support a candidate who
  voted against extending unemployment benefits because of concern over the cost. A measure providing
  such support worth $34 billion is stalled in Congress.
  Clinton Popularity
  The disaffection with Obarna and Democrats doesn't carry over to all Democrats. Hillary Clinton, 62, is
  viewed favorably by 61 percent of respondents and a quarter of Americans, including 30 percent of
  Republicans and 21 percent of Democrats, say the nation would be in a better place if she had been
  elected president.
  The Tea Party movement, which has been mainly associated with Republicans, has lukewarm support in
  the poll. A majority of 58 percent of all respondents says it would make no difference to them if a
  candidate was backed by Tea Party activists, while a third of Republicans say that kind of backing would
  make a candidate more appealing to them.
  Those who are more likely to think the Tea Party is a simplistic and misguided movement -- 44 percent of
  all respondents -- include Democrats, 65 percent, and those with the highest incomes, 52 percent.
  Independent voters are divided on whether it is misguided or has rightly identified that the nation would be
  better served by reduced federal government, compared with 39 percent overall.

RawText:
  B6
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769584 Date: 08/31/2015
  RELEASE IN PART
  B6
  From: sbwhoeop
  Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 8:56 AM
  To:
  Subject: fyi
  http://www.bloomberq.com/news/2010-07-14/americans-disappoving-of-obama-policies-poised-to-enable-republican-
  dains.html
  Americans Disapproving Obama Poised to Enable
  Republican Gains
  By John McCormick and Catherine Dodge - Jul 14, 2010
  •
  • Email
  • Share
  • Print
  Chart: Poll Results
  Attachment: Poll results and methodology
  Americans disapprove of U.S. President Barack Obama's handling of almost every major issue and are
  deeply pessimistic about the nation's direction, offering a bullish environment for Republicans in the
  November congressional elections.
  A majority or plurality disapproves of Obama's management of the economy, health care, the budget
  deficit, the overhaul of financial market regulations and the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, according to a
  Bloomberg National Poll conducted July 9- 12. In addition, almost 6 in 10 respondents say the war in
  Afghanistan is a lost cause.
  Almost two-thirds say they feel the nation is headed in the wrong direction, an even more sour
  assessment than in March when 58 percent felt that way. Two-thirds of independent voters are
  pessimistic, while just 56 percent of Democrats offer a vote of confidence.
  "They don't see any solutions in sight," said J. Ann Selzer, president of Selzer & Co., a Des Moines, Iowa-
  based firm that conducted the nationwide survey. "They have been hammered by the economy and there
  is a disconnect between the lives Americans are living and Washington. They seem to have lost hope."
  Poll respondents are divided on their congressional preference between Democrats and Republicans,
  with both sides getting 43 percent support. Among those who say they are most likely to vote,
  Republicans are favored, 48 percent to 40 percent. The Republican advantage is even greater among
  likely voters who view the election as exceptionally important, with Republicans beating Democrats 56
  percent to 34 percent.
  Control of Congress
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769584 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. CO5769584 Date: 08/31/2015
  For the Democrats, whd control Congress and the White House, the survey shows the potential 'for losses
  in November, when voters will fill all 435 House seats, 36 Senate seats and 37 governorships. The
  outcome could affect °Pam's ability to move his agenda through Congress for the two years leading up
  to his own 2012 re-election bid.
  The fate of incumbents will depend to some extent on what happens to the economy in the next four
  months and whether unemployment drops much from its current 9.5 percent. A rising stock market could
  help as well. So far this year, the S&P 500 stock index has declined 1.8 percent.
  The public's disenchantment with the president's Policies doesn't extend to voter feelings about Obama
  himself, as he gets a job approval rating of 52 percent and personally is viewed favorably by 55 percent.
  Obama, 48, remains more popular than any of the Republican figures tested in the poll and is topped only
  by Secretary of State :-- ;:!aity ant.cn and General Da,,,td Petraeos, the new commander of U.S. forces in
  Afghanistan, among a list of 15 people and political parties reviewed.
  Republican Leaders
  The only bright spot for Republican candidates is for Louisiana Governor Eiob%) 1i:tele!, who gets a 32
  percent favorable rating and an 18 percent unfavorable grade. Better-known party leaders such as former
  vice presidential candidate :a-et..n and former House Speaker Netf,ri: CirigPait both have negative
  ratings that outweigh the positive views.
  Although turnout in midterm elections is historically lower than in presidential races, the electorate is
  interested. Four- fifths of Americans who plan to vote say November's election is very or exceptionally
  important.
  The likelihood to vote is strongest among older voters, Republicans and those with the highest incomes.
  Among those 55 and older. three-quarters say they will definitely vote, compared with 48 percent of those
  younger than 35. Four-fifths of Republicans say they will definitely vote, compared with 65 percent of
  Democrats and 62 percent of independents.
  Referendum on °barna
  Seeking to capitalize on the intensity expressed by voters, Republicans want to make the election a
  national referendum on Obama and the party in power, while the White House and Democrats argue it is
  about going forward, rather than backward to failed policies.
  The challenge for Democrats will be to translate their vision of a better future into more positive feelings
  about the economy among voters. In the poll, Republicans have the advantage among the independents
  often critical to winning elections. Among independents likely to vote, Republican congressional
  candidates are preferred to Democrats, 50 percent to 29 percent.
  "Anything that has been tried hasn't resulted in making anything better in the world where ordinary people
  live," Selzer said. "That's a bad scenario for incumbents of the majority party."
  Incumbent Disadvantage
  A third of poll participants say they would be less likely to vote for a candidate who has served in
  Congress for many years. About one-fifth of likely voters say the election is more about sending a
  message, while three-quarters say it is about picking the party that has the best ideas.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769584 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769584 Date: 08/31/2015
  "I don't know what these people are thinking in Washington," says poll respondent Jeff Lockman, 41, a
  professional golfer and Republican from Malvern, Pennsylvania. "They are going in 10 different directions
  and they really don't know what to focus on."
  The proportion who feel the nation is headed in the wrong direction is about the same as at this poin't in
  1994, when Republicans took control of Congress, and 2006, when Democrats took over.
  The public also has soured on Obama's foreign-policy priority, the war in Afghanistan. While the president
  has ordered an expansion of forces to turn the tide in a conflict where he says the U.S. has a critical stake,
  58 percent say it is a lost cause, compared with 36 percent who say it can still be won. A slim majority of
  Republicans -- 52 percent -- say the U.S. can still win in Afghanistan, while 71 percent of Democrats say
  the conflict is lost.
  Afghanistan Withdrawal
  Six in 10 Americans say it would be best to stick with Obarna's plan to start withdrawing forces in July
  2011, while one-third say they remain open to keeping the same number of troops there, or even adding
  additional forces.
  Reflecting the belief among many that the war cannot be won, a third of Americans say they have become
  less supportive of the effort there in recent months.
  The Bloomberg National Poll is based on interviews with 1,004 U.S. adults ages 18 or older. Percentages
  based on the full sample may have a maximum margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points.
  :4:?,r;yr• '.
  3cwrra:1, who studies public opinion at the ,A;-necicar Entarpr:F.:e institute, a public-policy research
  group in Washington, cails the poll "very, very grim news for the Democrats."
  At the same time, she says, one silver lining for Democrats is that Republicans have yet to convince
  voters that they have a plan.
  Obarna Visit
  One signpost for Democrats in the poll is the finding that just 26 percent of Americans say it would help a
  Democratic candidate in their area to get a visit from Obama, while 20 percent say it would hurt the
  candidate and 54 percent say it wouldn't matter or they don't know.
  Obama's worst ratings are for his handling of the budget deficit, where 59 percent disapprove and 37
  percent approve. It's his worst grade for that subject in any of four Bloomberg polls taken since
  September 2009. The Obama administration expects a record budget deficit this year of more than $1.5
  trillion, or 10.6 percent of GDP, according to projections the White House released in February. It was
  $1.4 trillion for the 2008-2009 fiscal year, which covers the end ofGecrge W. Bush's presidency, and
  Obama has said that the current fiscal shortfall as well as theunemployment rate are inheritances from his
  Republican predecessor's administration.
  "My biggest fear is we have people in government who don't have a clue about what is going on in the
  economy," says poll respondent Jim Heeter, 66, from Glendale, Arizona. "They have never run a business
  or had to make a payroll."
  Economy, Health Care
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769584 Date: 08/31/2015

  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769584 Date: 08/31/2015
  Slim majorities disapprove of Obama's handling of the economy and health care. When it comes to
  creating jobs, he gets 46 percent approval, addressing problems on Wall Street, 42 percent support,
  running the war in Afghanistan, 46 percent approve, and managing the BP Plc oil spill, 46 percent
  support.
  Forty-five percent say they have become more supportive in recent months of tougher regulations for Wall
  Street. The momentum is heading in the opposite direction from the White House and Democrats on most
  other issues.
  Almost half say they have become less supportive in recent months of federal money being loaned to
  automotive companies to help them stay in business, while 37 percent have become less supportive of
  the health-care overhaul passed by Congress earlier this year. A majority, 61 percent, say the nation
  should wait and see how the health-care legislation works or leave it alone, while 37 percent want to see it
  repealed.
  Arizona Immigration Law
  Almost half of Americans say they have also grown more supportive of allowing local law enforcement to
  detain anyone who can't produce proof of citizenship when stopped for an offense, as is contemplated in
  an Arizona law. Cbama has criticized the measure and the Justice Department has announced it plans to
  sue Arizona.
  At least half of respondents also say they would be less likely to support candidates who voted to give
  financial assistance to the banking or automobile industries.
  Americans are roughly divided on whether they would be more or less likely to support a candidate who
  voted against extending unemployment benefits because of concern over the cost. A measure providing
  such support worth $34 billion is stalled in Congress.
  Clinton Popularity
  The disaffection with Obarna and Democrats doesn't carry over to all Democrats. Hillary Clinton, 62, is
  viewed favorably by 61 percent of respondents and a quarter of Americans, including 30 percent of
  Republicans and 21 percent of Democrats, say the nation would be in a better place if she had been
  elected president.
  The Tea Party movement, which has been mainly associated with Republicans, has lukewarm support in
  the poll. A majority of 58 percent of all respondents says it would make no difference to them if a
  candidate was backed by Tea Party activists, while a third of Republicans say that kind of backing would
  make a candidate more appealing to them.
  Those who are more likely to think the Tea Party is a simplistic and misguided movement -- 44 percent of
  all respondents -- include Democrats, 65 percent, and those with the highest incomes, 52 percent.
  Independent voters are divided on whether it is misguided or has rightly identified that the nation would be
  better served by reduced federal government, compared with 39 percent overall.
  UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05769584 Date: 08/31/2015



